Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20230686 Ver 1_USACE More Info Requested_20230710Baker, Caroline D From: Fuemmeler, Amanda J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <Amanda.Jones@usace.army.mil> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2023 1:25 PM To: Eric Romaniszyn; Clement Riddle Cc: Jones, M Scott (Scott) CIV USARMY CESAW (USA); Homewood, Sue; Moore, Andrew W Subject: [External] Corps Comments in Response to Asheville Airport PN/Application AID: 2023-00994 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Report suspicious emails with the Report Message button located on your Outlook menu bar on the Home tab. Thanks for the call today to discuss the comments received in response to the Public Notice for this project. Comments received were previously sent via email. Below is the Corps comments/concerns which are similar to those expressed by the N.C. Division of Water Resources as they relate to the alternatives analysis and avoidance/minimization measures. A response to our comments should be received by August 10, 2023 and please copy us on your response to NCDWR's as well. Feel free to contact me with any questions. 1. Please provide a summary of parking facilities to date that the Airport utilizes (both on and off Airport Property) to include when those facilities were constructed, # of spaces provided, what/if any impacts to waters of the US were incurred and anticipated plans for changes to these areas. 2. Your Alternatives Analysis should include off -site locations to include sites currently adjacent/near the Airport and not necessarily owned by the Airport at the time of this analysis. 3. Site 1 Alternatives Discussion: Please clarify if this site could be used for future parking expansion and a discussion on if this site would meet the project's purpose/need for parking regardless of the commercial/multi- use designation. Your response should note the extent of wetland/water impacts if any for development of this site. This discussion should also address/include the potential alternative of relocating the existing Marathon Gas Station/Dunkin Donuts commercial facility to Site 1. This facility was sited on property shown as potential parking alternatives in the 2013 Airport Master Plan and is on property still owned by the Airport. The construction of this commercial development eliminates the opportunity to align the primary entrance off Terminal Drive in a way that could have avoided/minimized impacts to approximately 745 linear feet of stream channel. 4. Site 5 Alternative — Please clarify why expansion of this parking area/conversion into a garage would not be considered practicable and why it's proximity to adjacent garages would preclude this alternative from being further considered. 5. Site 6 Alternative: Please provide further clarification as to why moving the primary entrance to the lot further south is not practicable. It appears that there is room to have two access points without much impact/loss to the rental car facility. It is also not clear why access can't be changed/allowed to make the primary route of shuttles along Rental Car Drive versus Terminal Drive or why one access would be sufficient with proper access control points. Amanda Jones Project Manager USACE-Asheville Regulatory Field Office 828-271-7980 ext. 4225