WQ0036561_Staff Report - WSRO_20230314

State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Staff Report
March 14, 2023
To: DWR Central Office — WQ, Non -Discharged Application No.: W00036561
Attn: Erick Saunders Facility name: Danville RLAP
From: Caitlin Caudle
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Note: This form has been adapted from the non -discharge facility staff report to document the review of both non -discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals. Please complete all sections m they are applicable.
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or ❑ No
a. Date of site visit: 2/24/2023. 3/7/2023. 3/8/2023
b. Site visit conducted by: C. Caudle and C. Smith from RRO
c. Inspection report attached? ® Yes or ❑ No
d. Person contacted: Brent Collins and their contact information: brent.collinsgemaresourcesinc.com
II. EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
ORC: Roy Whitaker Certificate #: 13283 Backup ORC: Brent Collins Certificate #: 27651
2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? ® Yes or ❑ No
3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ® Yes or ❑ No
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e.g., drainage added, new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? ❑ Yes or ® No
5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? ® Yes or ❑ No
6. Are the existing application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) still acceptable? ® Yes or ❑ No
7. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or ® No
8. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ® Yes or ❑ No
9. Has a review of all self -monitoring data been conducted (e.g., AR, NDMR, NDAR, GW)? ® Yes or ❑ No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review: An NOD was issued in 2021 for ponding and runoff
from the application area (in U).
Provide input to help the permit writer evaluate any requests for reduced monitoring, if applicable.
10. Has a review of source facilities compliance history been completed (e.g., CEIs and DMRs)? ® Yes or ❑ No
11. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑ Yes or ® No
12. Check all that apply:
® No compliance issues ❑ Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under JOC
❑ Notice(s) of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 1 of 2

13. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit`?
❑ Yes ®No❑N/A
III. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or ® No
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non -Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an
additional information request:
Item
Reason
Soil borings for CS-09-03?
There were not soil borings provided to add these areas to the application area.
Soil boring needed?
Soil scientist comments for
updated soil series in Att.
Most soil series are listed as Fairview without any LSS comments.
B?
3. Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
® Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
❑ Issue
❑ Deny (Please state reasons: )
4. Signature of report preparer:
Signature of regional supervisor: I "I T. i5.1
Date: 3/14/202 3 145ME225CMEA...
IV. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
See site summary.
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 2

On March 6, 2023, Division of Water Resources staff Caitlin Caudle and Chris Smith conducted a
permitting site visit to review newly permitted fields. Brent Collins, EMA Resources, was present during
the entire site visit. On March 7, 2023, Ms. Caudle continued reviewing the permitted fields. Ms. Caudle
also reviewed fields on February 24, 2023. Below is a table of the suggested predominant soil series for
each new field, or field with new areas:
Field
Soil Series
Map Unit
CS-06-03/04
Fairview
FbB2
CS-06-05
Fairview
FbB2
CS-09-02A
Fairview
FbB2
CS-09-02B
Rhodhiss
RnB, can be found in
Rockingham Co in RYE
CS-09-02C
Fairview
FbB2
CS-12-02
Toast
ToB, can be found in
Rockingham Co in RYE
CS-15-01
Fairview
FbB2
CS-06-03/04
CLC2 (36.738344,-79.443545)
0-2"
7.5YR 4/6, clay loam
2-6"
7.5YR 4/6, clay loam, structure changes
6-16"
7.5YR 5/6, sandy clay loam
>16"
5YR 5/8, sandy clay loam
The above description is within the range of characteristics of eroded Fairview, which is consistent with
field conditions. The provided soil descriptions are within the range of characteristics of Fairview. CS-06-
04 was originally permitted as Clifford and CS-06-03 permitted as Fairview. Fairview may be a more
appropriate soil series for the combined 03 and 04 field. Fairview has a more conservative RYE rate
than Clifford for fescue. Based on field conditions, buffers were removed or added, a rock outcropping is
present in the field, and stream lines were added.

CS-n6-n5
CLC1 (36.385140,-79.447618)
0-3"
10YR 2/2, granular structure
3-10"
10YR 5/6, granular structure
10-15"
10YR 6/8, subangular blocky structure, clay content
increases
15-17"+
10YR 5/8, 7.5YR 5/8 common concentrations,
subangular blocky structure
The above soil description, and the provided soil descriptions, are within the range of characteristics of
Fairview. Fairview is the predominant soil series for this field. Based on site conditions, buffers were
added for stream lines, ditches, and restrictive slopes.
CS-09-02C
CLC3 (36.392840,-79.469224)
0-2"
10YR 2/2, sandy loam
2-14"
10YR 5/6, sandy loam
14-18"
10YR 6/8, sandy clay loam, wet
>18"
10YR 5/8, sandy clay loam, wet
CLC4 (36.394236,-74.468295)
0-2"
Brown, granular, loam
2-4"
7.5YR 4/6, sandy clay
4-15"+
2.5YR 4/8, some mica, increase clay content
The above soil descriptions are within the range of characteristics of Fairview. Fairview is the
predominant soil series for this field. Based on site conditions, buffers were removed.

CS-12-02
CLC5 (36.424327,-79.447605)
0-6"
2.5YR 4/6, sandy clay loam, —40% gravel
6-13"+
2.5YR 4/8, clay content increases, manganese
concentrations, mica
The newly cleared areas were removed as they were not completely cleared and unsuitable for land
application at the time of inspection. This boring was completed in the original application area.
Additional borings in the outlying areas were not completed to confirm that Fairview is the predominant
soil series. Toast should remain the permitted soil series.
CS-15-01
CLC6
0-6"
10YR 4/6, sandy clay loam
6-13"
2.5YR 4/8, few 7.5YR 4/4 mottles, mica, clay content
increases
13-17"+
2.5YR 4/8, few 10YR 5/6 mottles, maybe lithochromic colors
The above soil description is within the range of characteristics for Fairview. Fairview is the
predominant soil series. Based on site conditions stream lines and buffers were added.

Other Observations:
• According to Mr. Gould, the lime stabilization equipment is still installed but abandoned and no
longer used.
• The flow path of the plant stops at the sludge treatment basin, but there is a weir that allows
supernatant to go back to the headworks of the Northside WWTP.
• Robert Clifton and Alan Gould were both listed in the O&M Plan as Project Manager. Mr. Collins
stated that Mr. Gould is the new Project Manager. Mr. Collins will update the O&M Plan to
reflect that.
• CS-6-1 was last applied on in 2014. The FSF is attached.
• CS-9-10 has never been applied on. It is in a crop rotation and timing has not worked out to
apply on the field. The operator has stated that the field will eventually be turned into a hay
field.
• Land was transferred from CS-07-01 to CS-07-02. This reflects current management practices, no
concerns with the adjusted acreage. The predominant soil series for CS-07-02 would still be
Fairview.
• CS-09-02A is the original CS-09-02. A barn is being built on the back part of the field. 2A may
change as field conditions change.
• CS-09-02B and 02C were originally CS-06-02. 06-02 was permitted as Rhodhiss. 09-02B does not
have a soil evaluation to confirm that Fairview is a more appropriate soil series.
• CS-09-03 has areas that have been added to the field without new soil evaluations (marked on
map). Will a soil evaluation be needed to add these formerly buffered areas to the application
area?
• The majority of the fields have a different soil series in the permit application than in
Attachment B, but soil scientist comments were not provided to support changing the soil
series. Caswell County is not in the RYE database and PAN values must be pulled from
neighboring counties, e.g. Rockingham. The fields without new areas were not reviewed with a
change in soil series in mind. Please advise on how to approach this.
• The storage facility was not reviewed as it was visited during the 2022 CEI.

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: City of Danville WQ Permit #: WQ0036561 Field #: 1 Acres Utilized: 24.9
Land Owner: James Blackwell Annual Dry Tons Applied: 39.54 Site #: CS06 Acres Permitted: 24.9
Operator: James Blackwell Predominant Soil Series: CfB Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503): 0
Crop 1 Name: Fescue Crop 1 Max. PAN: 216 Crop 2 Name: Crop 2 Max. PAN:
CZ
Q
Volume applied
(enter one) Solids/
Liquid
Cu. Yds Gallons
%
Solids
Volume
Applied per
Acre
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Residual Sources
(NPDES #, WQ#,
Fert., Animal
Waste, etc)
Soil
Cond.
(Dry, Wet,
Moist)
Precip.
Past 24
Hrs.
inches
c
°ate
*
o
*
°�
�_
N•
g
o'
TKN
mg/kg
z >
o
o0 0
CD
mg/kg
Nitrate
and
Nitrite
mg/kg
PAN Applied
( lbs/acre)
Name of Crop Type
Receiving Residual
Application
Crop 1
Crop 2
Crop I
Crop 2
6/10
143000
6.63
1.588
Northside WWTP
Dry
<.5"
S
0.5
0.3
36875
10352.5
14.73
41.751
NA
Fescue
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Residuals Applications
totals on FORM
FSF supp ( attach FORM
FSF supp
to this form):
TOTALS:
01
143000
As
Cd
Cu
Cr
Pb
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn P
41.751
0.00o
Lime A lied
Annuallbs/acre
0.055
0.010
1.446
0.385
0.264
0.006
0.073
0.218
0.016
5.367 66.696
Date
lbs/ac
Prior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Current Cumulative lbs/ac
0.055
0.010
1.446
0.385
0.264
0.006
0.073
0.218
0.016
5.367
Permitted C. P. L. R.****
36
34
1338
267
15
374
89
2498
Permit PAN Limit 1st/2nd Crop
216
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Zyz G�j� *Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
9/4/2014 **Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation - 1.0
Signature of Land Applier Date *** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 ft within the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established midway between
the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area.
M
Field Total Acres Applicable Acres
1 29.11 20.33
SCALE: 1 ^ = 440 ' =
DATE: 03-10-23 �jMA
DRAWN BY: BC-.Resour�c%s, Inc.
• Rock Outcrop
On Site Dwelling
■ Off Site Dwelling
Church
areas
Ditch
Stream
® Buffer s
Pond
Field Boundary
ouree. Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthst'ar Property Boundary `
USDA, U� G= , AeroGRdD, IGN, and the � � tl
City of Danville, VA FIGURE NO.
Land Application Program
2
N C-CS-06
Nettie Blackwell

The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 ft within the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary for field CS06-03 has been
modified to allow for application up to 100 feet from on -site water supply well
dded buffer
r
w
3
♦.
M.
ew nouse butter
Field Total Acres Applicable Acres
3 55.73 45.87
5 30.52 26.89
SCALE: 1 " = 660 ' =
DATE: 03-13-23 �jMA
DRAWN BY: BC -.Resources, Inc.
• Rock Outcrop
• Well
♦ Structure
On Site Dwelling
Formed buffered
■ Off Site Dwelling i
Church
Stream
Drain
Silage Pit
w
�
®
Buffer t
Pond `
Field Boundary
ource: Esri, Max«ar, GeoEye, Earths4ar
Property Boundary
USDA, USGS, AeroGRdD, IGN, and the
m
FIGURE NO.
City of Danville, VA
Land Application Program
2
N C-CS-06
Nettie Blackwell

The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 ft within the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary for field CS07-01 has been
modified to allow for application up to 100 feet from on -site water supply well
f
Field Total Acres Applicable Acres
1 9.72 7.29
SCALE: 1 = 440, *P"
DATE: 03-10-23DRAWN BY: BC
�'� ■ AA A
A
A
• Well
A Structure
■ Off Site Dwelling
On Site Dwelling
® Buffer
Field Boundary
ource: Esri, Maxlar, GeoEye, Earbhsdar ! � � � �,
U DA, U G� , AeroGRID, IGN, and Uhe Property Boundary
Garmin,(e Open�treetMapcontributors, L����
City of Danville, VA FIGURE NO.
Land Application Program 2
N C-CS-07
James R Blackwell

The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 ft within the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary for field CS07-02 has been
modified to allow for application up to 100 feet from on -site water supply well
1
ewly buffered
�. ... _ tq- -r
Field Total Acres Applicable Acres
2 43.4 36.85
SCALE: = 440 ' *—Resources,
DATE: 03-10-23DRAWN BY: BCInc.
lication area
me frees remove
d added this area
appncauon area
i
• Well
-;
On Site Dwelling
■ Off Site Dwelling
Stream
® Buffer
Field Boundary `
Pond
�: Esri, Ma ar, GeoEye, Earthsdar � � � �,
U G_ , eroGR+ID, IGN, and the Property Boundary
(c)IrpentreetMap contributors, L ... M
City of Danville, VA
FIGURE NO.
Land Application Program
2
N C-CS-07
Locust Hill Land & Cattle

The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 ft within the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary for field CS09-2B has been modified to allow for application up to 100 feet from on -site water supply
well
New area - These areas added with
N Eno soil boring. Okay?
Property line buffer ■ w �`' ! SEX ' ��
removed ■ i 3 Xt
—x �+
■ —x —x —x —x
■ / �� \+ Removed this area, no
/ X soil borin
2C /
V. /
dded buffer around
rees and excluded wet
area x _ X ! t Legend
A Structure
Well
1 p• - 2B On Site Dwelling
•• Church
_ � y r+
Vew house buffer
2A
Public Contact Site
N
Rock Outcrop "
�� // _ ■ Off Site Dwelling Co
_ N
Drain m
x x — x Fenceline
Field Total Acres Applicable Acres - - Stream o
1 40.56 36.71
® Buffer o
2A 23.37 11.87 ■ Field Boundary U�
213 29.39 11.85 CD
0 Pond
Q
2C 21.15 17.69r'
Source: EsriIffira'1111111170:771 r; G➢eoEe Earthstar GeographicsCNES/Arbus C r Property Boundary3 79.74 52.46 IGN, and thUser Community
0
SCALE: 1 = 623 DATE: 03-10-23 "1 City of Danville FIGURE NO. o
PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: EMA Land Application Program y
WQ0001793 BC Z
Resources, Inc. NC-CS-09
Glenn Hodges

The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 ft within the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary for field CS09-09 has been
modified to allow for application up to 100 feet from on -site water supply well
WRIM. • ►- ,i.
3
Ire
0
Field Total AcrtApplicable Acres
9 29.2938
SCALE: 1 " = 440 ' = �
DATE: 03-13-23 EMA
DRAWN BY: BC -.Resources, Inc.
�' a... • Well
On Site Dwelling
■ Off Site Dwelling
t Drain
Stream
Pond
® Buffer
Field Boundary
Pond
rce. sri, Mancar, GeoEye, EarbhsUar Property Boundary
SDA, U G , AeroGRdD, IGN, and the
City of Danville, VA FIGURE NO.
Land Application Program 2
N C-CS-09
Glenn Hodges

The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 ft within the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established midway between
the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area. The review boundary for this site has been modified to allow for application up to 100 feet from on -site water supply well
Field Total Acres Applicable Acres
10 15.44 11.5
SCALE: 1 " = 440 ' *—Resources,
DATE: 03-13-23DRAWN BY: BC Inc.
• Well
■ Off Site Dwelling
Stream
® Buffer
Field Boundary
Pond
ource. Esri, Max«ar, GeoEye, EarGhsfiar Property Boundary
USDA, U ' G� , AeroGRdD, IGN, and the
City of Danville, VA FIGURE NO.
Land Application Program 2
N C-CS-09
Glenn Hodges

The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 ft within the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established midway between
the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area. The review boundary for field CS10-02, CS10-03 & CS10-04 has been modified to allow for application up to 100 feet from on -site water supply well
N
All part of F`
6
r
eo.
3
\+
r ..
4 :-
�eAd Rd 5
ab
od Satter.
x
■ Well E
N
O
On Site Dwelling co
■ Off Site Dwelling 2
Field Total Acres Applicable Acres �x — x Fenceline o
1 11.91 10.37 r ,_' •,� StreamN co
o
2 49.48 46.46 Buffer
3 14.04 12.74
Pond g
4 15.69 10.91
Field Boundary E
5 45.7 45.35
ource. Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Ear6hstar Geo
00
6 17.22 10.23 USDA, U'G�,AeroGRdD, IGN, and the GIS �.�.� Property Boundary
SCALE: 1 �� = 660 = City of Danville FIGURE NO. y
DATE: 03-13-23 EM Land Application Program
DRAWN BY: BC -.Resources, Inc. 2
PROJECT NO: N C-CS-10
1AInnn'29991 Marc Thomas/Walter Thomas

The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 ft within the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established midway between
the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area. The review boundary for field CS12-02 & CS12-03 has been modified to allow for application up to 100 feet from on -site water supply well
1
rdue
moved some areas
to land clearing
16
eW nouse DUTTer
Field Total Acres Applicable Acres
1 25.45 24.85
2 40.25 34.65
3 34.19 25.78
SCALE: 1 " = 660 '
DATE: 03-13-23 �jMA
DRAWN BY: BC -.Resources, Inc.
Mow
Buffered these areas
ra
I
i t
r
removed this area
i1
© V_1C:z:J _
a Well
Off Site Dwelling
On Site Dwelling
' — — Drain j
— — Stream
i
® Buffer `
i
Pond
e. Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthsfiar Geograp Field Boundary !
IU' G� , AeroGR+ID, IGN, and tihe GIS Use r' �' Property Boundary
n' (c Open�treetMap contributors, and th
City of Danville, VA
FIGURE NO.
Land Application Program
2
NC-CS-12
Margaret Hatchett

The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 ft within the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established midway between
the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area.
-- — — — < ■
N
5 ■
�v
,._
f -
f -
i •x
r
■ Off Site Dwelling
ri- — %Lt Drain
Field Total Acres Applicable Acres
5 25.43 17.47
SCALE: 1 ^ = 440,
DATE: 01-20-23
DRAWN BY: BC ,—Resources, Inc.
Stream
® Buffer
Pond
Field Boundary
rce. sri, iaXar, GeoEye, Ea
rt star
1 , U G�S,AeroGRID, IGN,analthe Property Boundary
nin, (c OO penStreetMap contributors,
City of Danville, VA FIGURE NO.
Land Application Program
2
NC-CS-12
Margaret Hatchett

The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 ft within the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary for field CS14-01 and CS14-02 has been modified to allow for application up to 100 feet from on -site
water supply well

The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 ft within the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established midway between
the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area.
i-.
Field Total Acres Applicable Acres
1 34.27 21.33
SCALE: 1 " = 440 ' *—Resources,
DATE: 03-13-23DRAWN BY: BC Inc.
0 Off Site Dwelling - Waiver
■ Off Site Dwelling
On Site Dwelling
Stream
Drain
® Buffer
Field Boundary
Pond
�. Esri, Max+air, GeoEye, E �■�■�,
U'G eroGR+I©, IGN, Property Boundary
(c Open-treetMaO con ■�■�
City of Danville, VA FIGURE NO.
Land Application Program 2
NC-CS-15
Larry Whitt

LAND APPLICATION SITE CERTIFICATION
Applicant's name: City of Danville
Land application sites currently certified: 814.16 net acres and Total to be certified: 658.07 net acres.
I. LAND APPLICATION SITE INFORMATION (See Instruction B):
Status
Codes
Site/Field
ID
Landowner�s �
Lessee�s� or O s p ��
Operator(s)
Net Acres
County
Con �'
Crop(s)
Predominant Soil
a
Series Name
Mapping Unit
or Rep. Slope
R/M
NC-CS06-01
Nettie Blackwell
20.33
Caswell
Fescue
Fairview
FbB2
R/M
NC-CS06-02
See NC-CS09-2B & 2C
R/M
NC-CS06-03
Nettie Blackwell
45.87
Caswell
Fescue
Fairview
FbB2
D
NC-CS06-04
Combining NC-CS06-03 & 04
N
NC-CS06-05
Nettie Blackwell
26.89
Caswell
Fescue
Fairview
FbB2
R/M
NC-CS07-01
James R. Blackwell
7.29
Caswell
Fescue
Fairview
FbB2
R/M
NC-CS07-02
Locust Hill Land & Cattle
36.85
Caswell
Fescue
Rasalo-Enott Complex
ReB
R/M
NC-CS09-01
Glenn Hodges
36.71
Caswell
Fescue
Fairview
FbB2
R/M
NC-CS09-2A
Glenn Hodges
11.87
Caswell
Fescue
Fairview
FbB2
R/M
NC-CS09-2B
Glenn Hodges
11.85
Caswell
Fescue
Fairview
FbB 1
N
NC-CS09-2C
Glenn Hodges
17.69
Caswell
Fescue
Fairview
FbB2
R/M
NC-CS09-03
Glenn Hodges
52.46
Caswell
Fescue
Fairview
FbB2
D
NC-CS09-04
Glenn Hodges
9.8
Caswell
R/M
NC-CS09-09
Glenn Hodges
24.38
Caswell
Fescue
Fairview
FbB2
R/M
NC-CS09-10
Glenn Hodges
11.5
Caswell
Fescue
Fairview
FbB2
R/M
NC-CS10-01
Marc Thomas
10.37
Caswell
Fescue
Fairview
FbB2
R/M
NC-CS10-02
Marc Thomas
46.46
Caswell
Fescue
Fairview
FbB2
R/M
NC-CS10-03
Marc Thomas
12.74
Caswell
Fescue
Fairview
FbB2
R/M
NC-CS10-04
Walter Thomas
10.91
Caswell
Fescue
Casville
CaB
R/M
NC-CS10-05
Walter Thomas
45.35
Caswell
Fescue
Casville
CaB
R/M
NC-CS10-06
Walter Thomas
10.23
Caswell
Fescue
Fairview
FbB2
R/M
NC-CS12-01
Margaret Hatchett
24.85
Caswell
Fescue
Fairview
FbB2
FORM: LASC 06-16 Page 1

LAND APPLICATION SITE CERTIFICATION
R/M
NC-CS12-02
Margaret Hatchett
34.65
Caswell
Fescue
Fairview
FbB2
R/M
NC-CS12-03
Margaret Hatchett
25.78
Caswell
Fescue
Fairview
FbB2
R/M
NC-CS12-05
Margaret Hatchett
17.47
Caswell
Fescue
Fairview
FbB2
R/M
NC-CS14-01
Sledge Sartin/David Sartin
75.78
Caswell
Fescue
Toast
ToB
R/M
NC-CS14-02
Sledge Sartin
11.93
Caswell
Fescue
Toast
ToB
R/M
NC-CS14-03
Sledge Sartin
6.38
Caswell
Fescue
Fairview
FaB
N
NC-CS15-01
Larry Whitt
Sledge Sartin
21.48
Caswell
Fescue
Fairview
FbB2
D
NC-PSO1-01
Circle P Farms
James Poindexter
12
Person
D
NC-PS02-01
James F. Poindexter
22
Person
D
NC-PS02-02
James F. Poindexter
17
Person
D
NC-PS02-03
James F. Poindexter
21.5
Person
D
NC-PS02-04
James F. Poindexter
26
Person
D
NC-PS02-05
James F. Poindexter
14
Person
D
NC-PS02-06
James F. Poindexter
34
Person
D
NC-PS03-01
Etree LLC
James Poindexter
58
Person
a Status Code for land application sites are: ♦ N (New) ♦ R (Renewed) ♦ M (Modified) ♦ T (Transferred) ♦ D (Deleted)
b Soil Series Name (i.e. Appling, Cecil, etc.)
Mapping Unit must be consistent with those used in the County Soil Survey (i.e. for a 2-8% slope Cecil in Anson County the mapping unit is CeB2)
II. WATERBODY AND CLASSIFICATIONS INFORMATION (See Instruction C):
Site/Field ID
Latitude
Longitude
Location
Location Method Code
Location Accuracy
Waterbody Subbasin and
Current and Proposed
P
Datum
Stream Index No.
Class
NC-CS06-05
360 23' 00"
790 26' 46"
NAD83
GPS
Nearest Second
East Prong Moon Creek 22-51-1
C
NC-CS-15-01
360 26' 44"
790 18' 52"
NAD83
GPS
Nearest Second
South Fork Rattlesnake Creek 22-52-2-(2)
WS-IV
Note: Please keep the site information (I.) and waterbody information (IL) of the same field on the same page.
FORM: LASC 06-16 Page 2