HomeMy WebLinkAboutFSM Worksheet 2023 HB-0040 Bridge 24
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FIELD SCOPING MEETING WORKSHEET
Return with Comments to Division by:
PROJECT NO.: HB-0040
FIELD SCOPING MEETING DATE: August 3, 2023 LET DATE:
DIVISION/COUNTY: 3/New Hanover
LOCATION: On-Site
LAT/LONG: 34.216667, -77.794078
ROUTE (US / NC / SR): US74
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replace bridge 24 over Banks Channel
BRIDGE NO.: 24
TIER: Regional
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION: Urban Minor Collector
MPO / RPO AREA: Wilmington
MUNICIPALITY: Wrightsville Beach
ATTENDEES
NAME (PRINT)
PHONE No
E-MAIL
DIVISION CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER
Anthony Law
910-341-2000
awlaw@ncdot.gov
ASSISTANT DIVISION CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER
Dan Cumbo
910-341-2000
drcumbo@ncdot.gov
DIVISION MAINTENANCE ENGINEER
Trevor Carroll
910-341-2000
tkcarroll@ncdot.gov
ASSISTANT DIVISION MAINTENCE ENGINEER
Jessi Leonard
910-341-2000
jleonard6@ncdot.gov
DIVISION BRIDGE MAINTENANCE ENGINEER
Daniel Perry
910-467-0520
dlperry5@ncdot.gov
AREA CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER
David Candela
910-524-4931
dacandela@ncdot.gov
RESIDENT ENGINEER
Joshua Pratt
910-398-9130
jtpratt@ncdot.gov
DIVISION PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
Katie Hite
910-341-2000
kehite@ncdot.gov
DIVISION DESIGN CONSTRUCT REPRESENTATIVE
David Leonard
910-341-2000
dbleonard@ncdot.gov
DIVISION UTILITY ENGINEER
Bo Hemphill
910-707-6981
bohemphill@ncdot.gov
DIVISION UTILITY COORDINATOR
Eric Matuszewski
910-341-2000
ecmatuszewski@ncdot.gov
DIVISION PDEA ENGINEER
Mason Herndon
910-341-2000
tmherndon@ncdot.gov
DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICER
Jon Giles
910-341-2000
jwgiles1@ncdot.gov
HYDRAULICS UNIT REPRESENTATIVE
Craig Lee
919-707-6708
cjlee@ncdot.gov
HYDRAULICS UNIT REPRESENTATIVE
Galen Cail
919-707-6711
gcail@ncdot.gov
GEOTECHNICAL UNIT REPRESENTATIVE
Dean Argenbright
252-439-2870
dargenbright@ncdot.gov
GEOTECHNICAL UNIT REPRESENTATIVE
STRUCTURES MANAGEMENT UNIT REPRESENTATIVE
David Stutts
919-707-6442
dstutts@ncdot.gov
STRUCTURES MANAGEMENT UNIT REPRESENTATIVE
Kristy Alford
919-707-6531
kalford@ncdot.gov
DIVISION RIGHT OF WAY AGENT
Ben Sox
910-341-2000
bmsox@ncdot.gov
LOCATION AND SURVEYS REPRESENTATIVE
CJ Sawyer
910-341-2280
cjsawyer@ncdot.gov
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Tom Steffens
910-251-4615
Thomas.A.Steffens@usace.army.mil
DIVISION OF MARINE FISHERIES
Kim Harding
252-264-3901
Kimberlee.harding@ncdenr.gov
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
Stephen Lane
252-208-2808
Stephen.Lane@ncdenr.gov
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
Hannah Sprinkle
910-796-7306
hannah.sprinkle@ncdenr.gov
DIVISION OF WILDLIFE RESOURCES
Travis Wilson
919-707-0370
travis.wilson@ncwildlife.org
US FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICES
Gary Jordan
919-856-4520 ext. 32
gary_jordan@fws.gov
US COAST GUARD
Hall Pitts
757-398-6222
CGDFiveBridges@uscg.mil
Local MPO/RPO
Mike Kozlosky
910-341-3258
mike.kozlosky@wilmingtonnc.gov
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT
DESIGN CONSULTANT
DESIGN CONSULTANT
DESIGN CONSULTANT
DESIGN CONSULTANT
DESIGN CONSULTANT
DESIGN CONSULTANT
UTILITY CONSULTANT
UTILITY CONSULTANT
UTILITY CONSULTANT
DIVISION (COMPLETED BY DIVISION STAFF AND SENT WITH THE FSM LETTER)
EXISTING FEATURES:
FEATURE BRIDGED: New Hanover 24
(BRIDGE / CULVERT) LENGTH 616’
DECK WIDTH (OUT TO OUT): 40.3’
WATER DEPTH: 20’
HEIGHT BED-TO-CROWN: 30’
PRIOR SURVEY DATE: 1/24/23
POSTED: SV NO
TTST: NO
STRUCTURE TYPE: Reinforced Concrete Deck Girders (T-Beams), Reinforced Concrete Caps and PPC piles
SPAN TYPE: Tangent –16 spans @37’
HISTORIC HIGH WATER (ELEV. TO THE TOP OF RAIL):
-L- BASE YEAR: 2021
-L- BASE YEAR: 2040
ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 10,000 ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 20,000
% TRUCKS/DUALS: 6
SUFFICIENCY RATING: 45.2
POSTED SPEED LIMIT IN PROJECT VICINITY: MPH w/i City Limits / STATUTORY 25/35
DETOUR: OFF-SITE: XX
ON-SITE:
STAGE CONSTRUCTION:
IF DETOUR IS OFF-SITE, PROVIDE DESCRIPTION OF DETOUR ROUTE: US 76
APPROXIMATE LENGTH OF DETOUR? 2 MILES
IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED TO ROAD ON DETOUR? COMMENTS: Yes, open discussion
IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED TO BRIDGES ON DETOUR? Yes, open discussion
ARE BRIDGES ON DETOUR CURRENTLY PROGRAMMED ON TIP? N COMMENTS: They are programmed to be replaced with State Funds
ARE THERE EMS, SCHOOL, OR BUSINESS ACCESS ISSUES? Y COMMENTS: Yes, open discussion
ARE THERE ANY RAILROAD CROSSINGS ON DETOUR? N COMMENTS:
WILL RAILROAD INVOLVEMENT BE REQUIRED? N
SHOULD WORK ZONE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS BE MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION?
REASONS: Not likely
EXISTING R/W WIDTH: 130’ ?
IMPACT RATING TO UTILITIES: ----------
POWER TRANSMISSION LINES: AERIAL/UG/BOTH: IN CONFLICT:
TELEPHONE: AERIAL/UG/BOTH: IN CONFLICT:
CABLE TV: AERIAL/UG/BOTH: IN CONFLICT:
FIBER OPTIC: AERIAL/UG/BOTH: IN CONFLICT:
WATER: IN CONFLICT:
SEWER: IN CONFLICT:
NATURAL GAS: IN CONFLICT:
OTHER: IN CONFLICT:
BASED ON THE PAST HISTORY NEAR THIS PROJECT SITE, WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TIME REQUIRED TO COMPLETE UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS MONTHS
WHICH UTILITIES WILL REQUIRE PERMITS FOR RELOCATION?
WHAT TYPE PERMIT?
WHO WILL BE OBTAINING PERMITS FOR UTILITY RELOCATION?
IS THERE ANY FUTURE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION ANTICIPATED IN THE PROJECT AREA?
IS A FEMA BUY-OUT PROPERTY BEING IMPACTED?
EXISTING UTILITY DRAWING ATTACHED?
WILL TEST HOLES BE REQUIRED?
HYDRAULICS (COMPLETED BY HYDRAULICS ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE FSM)
WILL THIS PROJECT REQUIRE A FEMA PERMIT?
IS THERE UNUSUAL SCOUR POTENTIAL? IS PROTECTION NEEDED?
ARE BANKS STABLE? IS PROTECTION NEEDED?
DOES STREAM CARRY APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF LARGE DEBRIS?
WILL THE PLACEMENT OF BENTS IN THE WATER BE ALLOWED? COMMENTS:
BRIDGE TO PIPE CANDIDATE? COMMENTS:
WILL THIS PROJECT REQUIRE A STATE STORMWATER PERMIT?
HOW WILL ROADSIDE DRAINAGE AND / OR TREATMENT OF STORMWATER VIA THE BRIDGE DECK BE ADDRESSED FOR EACH QUADRANT?
NE QUADRANT:
SE QUADRANT:
SW QUADRANT:
NW QUADRANT:
GEOTECHNICAL UNIT (COMPLETED BY GEOTECHNICAL UNIT PRIOR TO THE FSM)
EXISTING FOUNDATION REPORTS? IF SO, ATTACH.
KNOWN GEOLOGICAL FEATURES IN AREA WHICH MAY AFFECT DESIGN:
ARE PERMITS NEEDED FOR INVESTIGATIVE WORK AT SITE? COMMENTS:
ARE THERE ANY HISTORICAL AND / OR VIBRATION SENSITIVE STRUCTURES NEAR BY? COMMENTS:
ARE THERE ANY KNOWN LANDFILLS AND / OR GEOENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD SITES AT OR WITHIN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE PROJECT SITE? COMMENTS:
DEPTH OF WEATHERED ROCK OR ROCK BELOW STREAMBED? (FT.)
ARE ANY IMPACTS ANTCIPATED TO NATURAL SPRINGS OR ARTESIAN WELLS: COMMENTS:
POSSIBLE FOUNDATION TYPE:
ENVIRONMENTAL (COMPLETED BY DEO STAFF PRIOR TO THE FSM)
WETLANDS AT SITE? COMMENTS:
WETLAND MITIGATION? RATIO? STREAM MITIGATION? RATIO?
KNOWN ENDANGERED SPECIES POPULATIONS IN AREA? COMMENTS:
BUFFER REQUIREMENTS?
CAMA COUNTY: PRIMARY NURSERY AREA: DCM CLAIMING:
MORATORIA: IF YES-DURATION
COMMENTS
IS WATER FEATURE CLASSIFIED AS A WILD AND SCENIC RIVER? COMMENTS:
WHAT IS THE WATER QUALITY CLASSIFICATION FOR THIS PROJECT: STREAM ID#
WILL A COAST GUARD PERMIT BE REQUIRED? COMMENTS:
IS THE PROJECT SITE IN OR NEAR ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
NATIONAL FOREST:
WILDLIFE REFUGE:
STATE, COUNTY, OR LOCAL PARK:
AIRPORT:
A LAKE FOR RECREATION OR POWER GENERATION:
WATER SUPPLY RESERVOIR:
NUTRIENT SENSITIVE WATERS:
PUBLIC USE BOAT RAMP:
CEMETARIES:
WILL A FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION (FERC) PERMIT BE REQUIRED?
IS THIS BRIDGE IN A FEDERAL PROJECT AREA THAT IS SUBJECT TO SECTION 408 PERMISSIONS?
IS THE PROJECT AREA KNOWN FOR POTENTIAL INDIAN, COLONIAL, OR OTHER ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES?
KNOWN OR POTENTIAL HISTORIC PROPERTIES IN THE AREA?
IS THE BRIDGE STRUCTURE ITSELF, OR ANY PART THEREOF, CONSIDERED HISTORIC?
WILL THE PROJECT IMPACT A CHURCH, COMMUNITY CENTER, OR OTHER PUBLIC FACILITY?
IS THIS PROJECT ON A STATEWIDE BICYCLE ROUTE OR A LOCAL NON-MARKED BICYCLE ROUTE?
ANY CLARIFICATION OR COMMENTS ON ITEMS ABOVE:
CONSTRUCTABILITY AND ACCESS (DISCUSSED AT THE FSM BY DIVISION BRIDGE MANAGER)
METHOD OF ACCESS:
TOP-DOWN:
MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT ACCESS TO SITE:
TRACTOR-TRAILER ACCESS:
BARGE ACCESS:
HEAVY EQUIPMENT ACCESS:
POSTED ROADS AND POSTED BRIDGES IN VICINITY THAT MAY AFFECT ACCESS?
ARE CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREAS AVAILABLE NEAR SITE?
ANY ANTICIPATED AREAS OF TEMPORARY SHORING REQUIRED?
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
ROADWAY (COMPLETED BY ROADWAY ENGINEER PRIOR TO FSM)
ALIGNMENT: EXISTING HORIZONTAL:
EXISTING VERTICAL:
POSSIBLE DESIGN STANDARDS:
POSSIBLE DESIGN SPEED:
POSSIBLE DESIGN EXCEPTIONS: COMMENTS:
APPROXIMATE PROJECT LENGTH:
NUMBER AND WIDTH OF LANES:
SHOULD THIS PROJECT HAVE CURB AND GUTTER OR SHOULDER APPROACHES?
COMMENTS:
TOTAL SHOULDER WIDTH:
PAVED SHOULDER WIDTH:
CLEAR ROADWAY ON STRUCTURE:
WILL EXISTING DRIVEWAYS, BUSINESS ACCESS, -Y- LINES OR RAMPS NEED TO BE RELOCATED?
COMMENTS:
ARE THERE ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY / PERMANENT EASEMENTS / TEMPORARY EASEMENTS ANTICIPATED FOR CONSTRUCTION? COMMENTS:
ARE ANY RETAINING WALLS ANTICIPATED?
ARE THERE ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY / PERMANENT EASEMENTS / TEMPORARY EASEMENTS ANTICIPATED FOR CONSTRUCTION? COMMENTS:
ARE ANY RETAINING WALLS ANTICIPATED?
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED / RESOLVED AT FSM BY ATTENDEES
ALTERNATIVES TO BE STUDIED BY ROADWAY DESIGN (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
OFF-SITE DETOUR
ON-SITE DETOUR
NEW LOCATION
CHECK ONE
TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT (CHECK ONE)
LIBR ATT G
PROGRAMMATIC CATIGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE)
MINIMUM CRITERIA RULE COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST
THE OPTIMUM LET DATE FOR THIS PROJECT IS:
SURVEY LIMITS:
POSSIBLE SUPERSTRUCTURE:
TYPE:
NUMBER OF SPANS:
LENGTH OF SPANS: (FT)
TOTAL PROPOSED LENGTH: (FT)
TOTAL PROPOSED WIDTH: (FT)
BRIDGE SKEW:
ROW BY:
PERMITS:
METHOD OF CLEARING:
SALVAGEABLE MATERIALS:
REMOVAL OF REMENANT ABUTMENTS / PIERS:
DECK OVERLAY TYPE
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
APPROACH SLAB ON SKEW OR PERPENDICULAR:
SHOULD PILES BE NON-CORROSIVE MATERIAL:
WILL TEST HOLES BE REQUIRED?