The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFSM Worksheet 2023 HB-0040 Bridge 21 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FIELD SCOPING MEETING WORKSHEET Return with Comments to Division by: PROJECT NO.: HB-0040 FIELD SCOPING MEETING DATE: August 3, 2023 LET DATE: DIVISION/COUNTY: 3/New Hanover LOCATION: On-Site LAT/LONG: 34.209094, -77.797556 ROUTE (US / NC / SR): US76 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replace bridge 21 over Banks Channel BRIDGE NO.: 21 TIER: Regional FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION: Urban Minor Collector MPO / RPO AREA: Wilmington MUNICIPALITY: Wrightsville Beach ATTENDEES NAME (PRINT) PHONE No E-MAIL DIVISION CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER Anthony Law 910-341-2000 awlaw@ncdot.gov ASSISTANT DIVISION CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER Dan Cumbo 910-341-2000 drcumbo@ncdot.gov DIVISION MAINTENANCE ENGINEER Trevor Carroll 910-341-2000 tkcarroll@ncdot.gov ASSISTANT DIVISION MAINTENCE ENGINEER Jessi Leonard 910-341-2000 jleonard6@ncdot.gov DIVISION BRIDGE MAINTENANCE ENGINEER Daniel Perry 910-467-0520 dlperry5@ncdot.gov AREA CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER David Candela 910-524-4931 dacandela@ncdot.gov RESIDENT ENGINEER Joshua Pratt 910-398-9130 jtpratt@ncdot.gov DIVISION PROJECT DEVELOPMENT Katie Hite 910-341-2000 kehite@ncdot.gov DIVISION DESIGN CONSTRUCT REPRESENTATIVE David Leonard 910-341-2000 dbleonard@ncdot.gov DIVISION UTILITY ENGINEER Bo Hemphill 910-707-6981 bohemphill@ncdot.gov DIVISION UTILITY COORDINATOR Eric Matuszewski 910-341-2000 ecmatuszewski@ncdot.gov DIVISION PDEA ENGINEER Mason Herndon 910-341-2000 tmherndon@ncdot.gov DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICER Jon Giles 910-341-2000 jwgiles1@ncdot.gov HYDRAULICS UNIT REPRESENTATIVE Craig Lee 919-707-6708 cjlee@ncdot.gov HYDRAULICS UNIT REPRESENTATIVE Galen Cail 919-707-6711 gcail@ncdot.gov GEOTECHNICAL UNIT REPRESENTATIVE Dean Argenbright 252-439-2870 dargenbright@ncdot.gov GEOTECHNICAL UNIT REPRESENTATIVE STRUCTURES MANAGEMENT UNIT REPRESENTATIVE David Stutts 919-707-6442 dstutts@ncdot.gov STRUCTURES MANAGEMENT UNIT REPRESENTATIVE Kristy Alford 919-707-6531 kalford@ncdot.gov DIVISION RIGHT OF WAY AGENT Ben Sox 910-341-2000 bmsox@ncdot.gov LOCATION AND SURVEYS REPRESENTATIVE CJ Sawyer 910-341-2280 cjsawyer@ncdot.gov US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Tom Steffens 910-251-4615 Thomas.A.Steffens@usace.army.mil DIVISION OF MARINE FISHERIES Kim Harding 252-264-3901 Kimberlee.harding@ncdenr.gov DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT Stephen Lane 252-208-2808 Stephen.Lane@ncdenr.gov DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Hannah Sprinkle 910-796-7306 hannah.sprinkle@ncdenr.gov DIVISION OF WILDLIFE RESOURCES Travis Wilson 919-707-0370 travis.wilson@ncwildlife.org US FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICES Gary Jordan 919-856-4520 ext. 32 gary_jordan@fws.gov US COAST GUARD Hall Pitts 757-398-6222 CGDFiveBridges@uscg.mil Local MPO/RPO Mike Kozlosky 910-341-3258 mike.kozlosky@wilmingtonnc.gov ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT DESIGN CONSULTANT DESIGN CONSULTANT DESIGN CONSULTANT DESIGN CONSULTANT DESIGN CONSULTANT DESIGN CONSULTANT UTILITY CONSULTANT UTILITY CONSULTANT UTILITY CONSULTANT DIVISION (COMPLETED BY DIVISION STAFF AND SENT WITH THE FSM LETTER) EXISTING FEATURES: FEATURE BRIDGED: New Hanover 21 (BRIDGE / CULVERT) LENGTH 870’ DECK WIDTH (OUT TO OUT): 58’ WATER DEPTH: 18’ HEIGHT BED-TO-CROWN: 27’ PRIOR SURVEY DATE: 2/8/23 POSTED: SV 32 TTST: 35 STRUCTURE TYPE: Reinforced Concrete Slab on Continuous Prestressed Concrete Girders SPAN TYPE: Tangent – 14 spans. Max span 61’ HISTORIC HIGH WATER (ELEV. TO THE TOP OF RAIL): -L- BASE YEAR: 2021 -L- BASE YEAR: 2040 ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 13500 ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 27000 % TRUCKS/DUALS: 6 SUFFICIENCY RATING: 8.66 POSTED SPEED LIMIT IN PROJECT VICINITY: MPH w/i City Limits / STATUTORY 25/35 DETOUR: OFF-SITE: XX ON-SITE: STAGE CONSTRUCTION: IF DETOUR IS OFF-SITE, PROVIDE DESCRIPTION OF DETOUR ROUTE: US 74 APPROXIMATE LENGTH OF DETOUR? 2 MILES IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED TO ROAD ON DETOUR? COMMENTS: Yes, open discussion IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED TO BRIDGES ON DETOUR? Yes, open discussion ARE BRIDGES ON DETOUR CURRENTLY PROGRAMMED ON TIP? N COMMENTS: They are programmed to be replaced with State Funds ARE THERE EMS, SCHOOL, OR BUSINESS ACCESS ISSUES? Y COMMENTS: Yes, open discussion ARE THERE ANY RAILROAD CROSSINGS ON DETOUR? N COMMENTS: WILL RAILROAD INVOLVEMENT BE REQUIRED? N SHOULD WORK ZONE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS BE MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION? REASONS: Not likely EXISTING R/W WIDTH: 100’ ? IMPACT RATING TO UTILITIES: ---------- POWER TRANSMISSION LINES: AERIAL/UG/BOTH: IN CONFLICT: TELEPHONE: AERIAL/UG/BOTH: IN CONFLICT: CABLE TV: AERIAL/UG/BOTH: IN CONFLICT: FIBER OPTIC: AERIAL/UG/BOTH: IN CONFLICT: WATER: IN CONFLICT: SEWER: IN CONFLICT: NATURAL GAS: IN CONFLICT: OTHER: IN CONFLICT: BASED ON THE PAST HISTORY NEAR THIS PROJECT SITE, WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TIME REQUIRED TO COMPLETE UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS MONTHS WHICH UTILITIES WILL REQUIRE PERMITS FOR RELOCATION? WHAT TYPE PERMIT? WHO WILL BE OBTAINING PERMITS FOR UTILITY RELOCATION? IS THERE ANY FUTURE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION ANTICIPATED IN THE PROJECT AREA? IS A FEMA BUY-OUT PROPERTY BEING IMPACTED? EXISTING UTILITY DRAWING ATTACHED? WILL TEST HOLES BE REQUIRED? HYDRAULICS (COMPLETED BY HYDRAULICS ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE FSM) WILL THIS PROJECT REQUIRE A FEMA PERMIT? IS THERE UNUSUAL SCOUR POTENTIAL? IS PROTECTION NEEDED? ARE BANKS STABLE? IS PROTECTION NEEDED? DOES STREAM CARRY APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF LARGE DEBRIS? WILL THE PLACEMENT OF BENTS IN THE WATER BE ALLOWED? COMMENTS: BRIDGE TO PIPE CANDIDATE? COMMENTS: WILL THIS PROJECT REQUIRE A STATE STORMWATER PERMIT? HOW WILL ROADSIDE DRAINAGE AND / OR TREATMENT OF STORMWATER VIA THE BRIDGE DECK BE ADDRESSED FOR EACH QUADRANT? NE QUADRANT: SE QUADRANT: SW QUADRANT: NW QUADRANT: GEOTECHNICAL UNIT (COMPLETED BY GEOTECHNICAL UNIT PRIOR TO THE FSM) EXISTING FOUNDATION REPORTS? IF SO, ATTACH. KNOWN GEOLOGICAL FEATURES IN AREA WHICH MAY AFFECT DESIGN: ARE PERMITS NEEDED FOR INVESTIGATIVE WORK AT SITE? COMMENTS: ARE THERE ANY HISTORICAL AND / OR VIBRATION SENSITIVE STRUCTURES NEAR BY? COMMENTS: ARE THERE ANY KNOWN LANDFILLS AND / OR GEOENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD SITES AT OR WITHIN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE PROJECT SITE? COMMENTS: DEPTH OF WEATHERED ROCK OR ROCK BELOW STREAMBED? (FT.) ARE ANY IMPACTS ANTCIPATED TO NATURAL SPRINGS OR ARTESIAN WELLS: COMMENTS: POSSIBLE FOUNDATION TYPE: ENVIRONMENTAL (COMPLETED BY DEO STAFF PRIOR TO THE FSM) WETLANDS AT SITE? COMMENTS: WETLAND MITIGATION? RATIO? STREAM MITIGATION? RATIO? KNOWN ENDANGERED SPECIES POPULATIONS IN AREA? COMMENTS: BUFFER REQUIREMENTS? CAMA COUNTY: PRIMARY NURSERY AREA: DCM CLAIMING: MORATORIA: IF YES-DURATION COMMENTS IS WATER FEATURE CLASSIFIED AS A WILD AND SCENIC RIVER? COMMENTS: WHAT IS THE WATER QUALITY CLASSIFICATION FOR THIS PROJECT: STREAM ID# WILL A COAST GUARD PERMIT BE REQUIRED? COMMENTS: IS THE PROJECT SITE IN OR NEAR ANY OF THE FOLLOWING: NATIONAL FOREST: WILDLIFE REFUGE: STATE, COUNTY, OR LOCAL PARK: AIRPORT: A LAKE FOR RECREATION OR POWER GENERATION: WATER SUPPLY RESERVOIR: NUTRIENT SENSITIVE WATERS: PUBLIC USE BOAT RAMP: CEMETARIES: WILL A FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION (FERC) PERMIT BE REQUIRED? IS THIS BRIDGE IN A FEDERAL PROJECT AREA THAT IS SUBJECT TO SECTION 408 PERMISSIONS? IS THE PROJECT AREA KNOWN FOR POTENTIAL INDIAN, COLONIAL, OR OTHER ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES? KNOWN OR POTENTIAL HISTORIC PROPERTIES IN THE AREA? IS THE BRIDGE STRUCTURE ITSELF, OR ANY PART THEREOF, CONSIDERED HISTORIC? WILL THE PROJECT IMPACT A CHURCH, COMMUNITY CENTER, OR OTHER PUBLIC FACILITY? IS THIS PROJECT ON A STATEWIDE BICYCLE ROUTE OR A LOCAL NON-MARKED BICYCLE ROUTE? ANY CLARIFICATION OR COMMENTS ON ITEMS ABOVE: CONSTRUCTABILITY AND ACCESS (DISCUSSED AT THE FSM BY DIVISION BRIDGE MANAGER) METHOD OF ACCESS: TOP-DOWN: MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT ACCESS TO SITE: TRACTOR-TRAILER ACCESS: BARGE ACCESS: HEAVY EQUIPMENT ACCESS: POSTED ROADS AND POSTED BRIDGES IN VICINITY THAT MAY AFFECT ACCESS? ARE CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREAS AVAILABLE NEAR SITE? ANY ANTICIPATED AREAS OF TEMPORARY SHORING REQUIRED? ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: ROADWAY (COMPLETED BY ROADWAY ENGINEER PRIOR TO FSM) ALIGNMENT: EXISTING HORIZONTAL: EXISTING VERTICAL: POSSIBLE DESIGN STANDARDS: POSSIBLE DESIGN SPEED: POSSIBLE DESIGN EXCEPTIONS: COMMENTS: APPROXIMATE PROJECT LENGTH: NUMBER AND WIDTH OF LANES: SHOULD THIS PROJECT HAVE CURB AND GUTTER OR SHOULDER APPROACHES? COMMENTS: TOTAL SHOULDER WIDTH: PAVED SHOULDER WIDTH: CLEAR ROADWAY ON STRUCTURE: WILL EXISTING DRIVEWAYS, BUSINESS ACCESS, -Y- LINES OR RAMPS NEED TO BE RELOCATED? COMMENTS: ARE THERE ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY / PERMANENT EASEMENTS / TEMPORARY EASEMENTS ANTICIPATED FOR CONSTRUCTION? COMMENTS: ARE ANY RETAINING WALLS ANTICIPATED? ARE THERE ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY / PERMANENT EASEMENTS / TEMPORARY EASEMENTS ANTICIPATED FOR CONSTRUCTION? COMMENTS: ARE ANY RETAINING WALLS ANTICIPATED? ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED / RESOLVED AT FSM BY ATTENDEES ALTERNATIVES TO BE STUDIED BY ROADWAY DESIGN (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) OFF-SITE DETOUR ON-SITE DETOUR NEW LOCATION CHECK ONE TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT (CHECK ONE) LIBR ATT G PROGRAMMATIC CATIGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE) MINIMUM CRITERIA RULE COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST THE OPTIMUM LET DATE FOR THIS PROJECT IS: SURVEY LIMITS: POSSIBLE SUPERSTRUCTURE: TYPE: NUMBER OF SPANS: LENGTH OF SPANS: (FT) TOTAL PROPOSED LENGTH: (FT) TOTAL PROPOSED WIDTH: (FT) BRIDGE SKEW: ROW BY: PERMITS: METHOD OF CLEARING: SALVAGEABLE MATERIALS: REMOVAL OF REMENANT ABUTMENTS / PIERS: DECK OVERLAY TYPE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: APPROACH SLAB ON SKEW OR PERPENDICULAR: SHOULD PILES BE NON-CORROSIVE MATERIAL: WILL TEST HOLES BE REQUIRED?