Barrow East Lagoon Closure Plan Pt3

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON A SITE
FROM APPLYING LAGOON SLUDGE
As part of either a lagoon closure operation or on -going lagoon maintenance, the attached plan
has been developed to apply sludge to the following areas:
Tracts & Field Numbers:
Feld '7, ITrdc74-dd5 F��l�f 1e�# `� ��Id ��e '� �F� '►t (�.
While using animal waste as a source of nutrients for crops in lieu of inorganic fertilizers is an
ecologically sound practice, producers should be aware that sludge that accumulates in a lagoon
may have high concentrations of nutrients and/or heavy metals. Accordingly, the quantity of
phosphorus and micronutrients in the material to be applied may exceed the fertility
requirements of planned crops.
Metals. High concentrations of metals in the soil can impact crop growth or yields. The
application of lagoon sludge has the potential to significantly increase the concentration
of metals (particularly copper and zinc) in the soil. NCSU and NCDA&CS recommend
that alternative sites for waste application be sought when soil concentrations of zinc (Zn)
exceed 142 lbs/ac (Zn-I of 2000) or copper (Cu) exceed 721bs/ac (Cu-I of 2000). A Cu-I
or Zn-I of 3000 is recognized as a critical toxic level for some crops. For peanuts,
alternative sites are recommended when the Zn-I is 300, and a Zn-I of 500 is recognized
as a critical toxic level. Producers should be aware of the post -application Cu and Zn
concentrations predicted on the sites planned for sludge application. Additionally, soil
PH should be maintained at 6.0 or above to minimize risk of toxicity.
Phosphorus. Phosphorus (P) concentration in lagoon sludge may be high. Because P
adsorbs onto iron, aluminum, and calcium, the soil can bind and store excess P. When P
concentrations reach higher concentrations, there is an increasing potential for P to be
transported offsite and become a pollutant of surface waters. This transport may occur
through soil erosion, or as a soluble form in surface runoff or leaching. An assessment of
the risk for P loss to surface water is required as part of a nutrient management plan for
permitted operations or those receiving federal or state cost -share assistance. If the
potential for P transport offsite is high, then future application of animal waste may not
be allowed in a nutrient management plan. Producers should be aware that applying
lagoon sludge may limit the ability to use the site for future animal waste application.
Accordingly, applying lagoon sludge to fields that are planned for future waste
application as part of a nutrient management plan is not advised.
1 understand that applying macronutrients or micronutrients at rates that significantly exceed the
expected crop removal could limit the future use of the field as a waste application site, and in
some cases, negatively impact future plant growth. 1 voluntarily agree to apply sludge to the
fields identified above that 1 own or operate according to the attached nutrient management plan
or lagoon closure plan. (*Both landowner and farmer/operator must sign.)
Owner* 6� aka
TK drnl, Date
LLC
Farmer/Operator, * I v� a�
&4,81,4 G • -ToWW St-, Date
NPPH, NC Supplement 2007-01, June 2007
p. 6

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON A SITE
FROM APPLYING LAGOON SLUDGE
As part of either a lagoon closure operation or on -going lagoon maintenance, the attached plan
has been developed to apply sludge to the following areas:
Tracts & Field Numbers: T rac,+* 1 q. 3 ty (=; e.1 A,'1- l -t.1 t 3 # 4 45 # (o #- a it b *-q # I ® W ta.. 4 13
11y,�is) .�-Ile,i19 �— ' 1 �
While using animal waste as a source of nutrients for crops in lieu of inorganic fertilizers is an
ecologically sound prqctice, producers should be aware that sludge that accumulates in a lagoon
may have high concentrations of nutrients and/or heavy metals. Accordingly, the quantity of
phosphorus and micronutrients in the material to be applied may exceed the fertility
requirements of planned crops.
Metals. High concentrations of metals in the soil can impact crop growth or yields. The
application of lagoon sludge has the potential to significantly increase the concentration
of metals (particularly copper and zinc) in the soil. NCSU and NCDA&CS recommend
that alternative sites for waste application be sought when soil concentrations of zinc (Zn)
exceed 1421bs/ac (Zn-I of 2000) or copper (Cu) exceed 72 lbs/ac (Cu-I of 2000). A Cu-I
or Zn-I of 3000 is recognized as a critical toxic level for some crops. For peanuts,
alternative sites are recommended when the Zn-I is 300, and a Zn-I of 500 is recognized
as a critical toxic level. Producers should be aware of the post -application Cu and Zn
concentrations predicted on the sites planned for sludge application. Additionally, soil
pH should be maintained at 6.0 or above to minimize risk of toxicity.
Phosphorus. Phosphorus (P) concentration in lagoon sludge may be high. Because P
adsorbs onto iron, aluminum, and calcium, the soil can bind and store excess P. When P
concentrations reach higher concentrations, there is an increasing potential for P to be
transported offsite and become a pollutant of surface waters. This transport may occur
through soil erosion, or as a soluble form in surface runoff or leaching. An assessment of
the risk for P loss to surface water is required as part of a nutrient management plan for
permitted operations or those receiving federal or state cost -share assistance. If the
potential for P transport offsite is high, then future application of animal waste may not
be allowed in a nutrient management plan. Producers should be aware that applying
lagoon sludge may limit the ability to use the site for future animal waste application.
Accordingly, applying lagoon sludge to fields that are planned for future waste
application as part of a nutrient management plan is not advised.
1 understand that applying macronutrients or micronutrients at rates that significantly exceed the
expected crop removal could limit the future use of the field as a waste application site, and in
some cases, negatively impact future plant growth. 1 voluntarily agree to apply sludge to the
fields identified above that I own or operate according to the attached nutrient management plan
or lag0000n closure plan. (*Both landowner and farmer/operator must sign.)
Owner*
}1 �(
Farmer/Operator* R66,4
Date
' �Oa3
3 _ 16- a3
Date
NPPH, NC Supplement 2007-01, June 2007 P. 6

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON A SITE
FROM APPLYING LAGOON SLUDGE
As part of either a lagoon closure operation or on -going lagoon maintenance, the attached plan
has been developed to apply sludge to the following areas:
Tracts &Field Numbers: Trd_c;i- L4 11 j
While using animal waste as a source of nutrients for crops in lieu of inorganic fertilizers is an
ecologically sound practice, producers should be aware that sludge that accumulates in a lagoon
may have high concentrations of nutrients and/or heavy metals. Accordingly, the quantity of
phosphorus and micronutrients in the material to be applied may exceed the fertility
requirements of planned crops.
Metals. High concentrations of metals in the soil can impact crop growth or yields. The
application of lagoon sludge has the potential to significantly increase the concentration
of metals (particularly copper and zinc) in the soil. NCSU and NCDA&CS recommend
that alternative sites for waste application be sought when soil concentrations of zinc (Zn)
exceed 1421bs/ac (Zn-I of 2000) or copper (Cu) exceed 72 lbs/ac (Cu-1 of 2000). A Cu-1
or Zn-I of 3000 is recognized as a critical toxic level for some crops. For peanuts,
alternative sites are recommended when the Zn-I is 300, and a Zn-I of 500 is recognized
as a critical toxic level. Producers should be aware of the post -application Cu and Zn
concentrations predicted on the sites planned for sludge application. Additionally, soil
pH should be maintained at 6.0 or above to minimize risk of toxicity.
Phosphorus. Phosphorus (P) concentration in lagoon sludge may be high. Because P
adsorbs onto iron, aluminum, and calcium, the soil can bind and store excess P. When P
concentrations reach higher concentrations, there is an increasing potential for P to be
transported offsite and become a pollutant of surface waters. This transport may occur
through soil erosion, or as a soluble form in surface runoff or leaching. An assessment of
the risk for P loss to surface water is required as part of a nutrient management plan for
permitted operations or those receiving federal or state cost -share assistance. If the
potential for P transport offsite is high, then future application of animal waste may not
be allowed in a nutrient management plan. Producers should be aware that applying
lagoon sludge may limit the ability to use the site for future animal waste application.
Accordingly, applying lagoon sludge to fields that are planned for future waste
application as part of a nutrient management plan is not advised.
1 understand that applying macronutrients or micronutrients at rates that significantly exceed the
expected crop removal could limit the future use of the field as a waste application site, and in
some cases, negatively impact future plant growth. I voluntarily agree to apply sludge to the
fields identified above that 1 own or operate according to the attached nutrient management plan
or lagoon closure plan. (*Both landowner and farmer/operator must sign.)
IV ( Cry j
Own r & S' ro peer- ; e5 s ►)C , Date
Farm a�
erlOperator Date
1�obe�
NPPH, NC Supplement 2007-01, June 2007
p. 6

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON A SITE
FROM APPLYING LAGOON SLUDGE
As part of either a lagoon closure operation or on -going lagoon maintenance, the attached plan
has been developed to apply sludge to the following areas:
Tracts & Fie Nu hers: Tr G-j--1k Cl3 1 �► e, (c� F; el a * d F►ekd A 3 V ik y P mid U_ la�
Frey!'_ r'el rT, F�eIcL �, rel re & Its
While using animal waste as a source of nutrients for crops in lieu of inorganic fertilizers is an
ecologically sound practice, producers should be aware that sludge that accumulates in a lagoon
may have high concentrations of nutrients and/or heavy metals. Accordingly, the quantity of
phosphorus and micronutrients in the material to be applied may exceed the fertility
requirements of planned crops.
Metals. High concentrations of metals in the soil can impact crop growth or yields. The
application of lagoon sludge has the potential to significantly increase the concentration
of metals (particularly copper and zinc) in the soil. NCSU and NCDA&CS recommend
that alternative sites for waste application be sought when soil concentrations of zinc (Zn)
exceed 142 lbs/ac (Zn-I of 2000) or copper (Cu) exceed 72 lbs/ac (Cu-I of 2000). A Cu-I
or Zn-I of 3000 is recognized as a critical toxic level for some crops. For peanuts,
alternative sites are recommended when the Zn-I is 300, and a Zn-I of 500 is recognized
as a critical toxic level. Producers should be aware of the post -application Cu and Zn
concentrations predicted on the sites planned for sludge application. Additionally, soil
pH should be maintained at 6.0 or above to minimize risk of toxicity.
Phos horus. Phosphorus (P) concentration in lagoon sludge may be high. Because P
adsorbs onto iron, aluminum, and calcium, the soil can bind and store excess P. When P
concentrations reach higher concentrations, there is an increasing potential for P to be
transported offsite and become a pollutant of surface waters. This transport may occur
through soil erosion, or as a soluble form in surface runoff or leaching. An assessment of
the risk for P loss to surface water is required as part of a nutrient management plan for
permitted operations or those receiving federal or state cost -share assistance. If the
potential for P transport offsite is high, then future application of animal waste may not
be allowed in a nutrient management plan. Producers should be aware that applying
lagoon sludge may limit the ability to use the site for future animal waste application.
Accordingly, applying lagoon sludge to fields that are planned for future waste
application as part of a nutrient management plan is not advised.
1 understand that applying macronutrients or micronutrients at rates that significantly exceed the
expected crop removal could limit the future use of the field as a waste application site, and in
some cases, negatively impact future plant growth. 1 voluntarily agree to apply sludge to the
fields identified above that 1 own or operate according to the attached nutrient management plan
or lagoon closure plan. (*Both landowner and farmer/operator must sign.)
✓��� � 7 anal
[hlner ��l�tTear�S,FdrmS LLC Date
Farmer/Operator* c�Gs
�d6a G J
Date
NPPH, NC Supplement 2007-01, June 2007
p. 6

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON A SITE
FROM APPLYING LAGOON SLUDGE
As part of either a lagoon closure operation or on -going lagoon maintenance, the attached plan
has been developed to apply sludge to the following areas:
Tracts & Field Numbers: TTrA n+ W
4 U F; P_ Iri * i::� P o LA -Ek
Field #10 Rdd *_l 1, Fie &4 Q_
While using animal waste as a source otnutrients for crops in lieu of inorganic fertilizers is an
ecologically sound practice, producers should be aware that sludge that accumulates in a lagoon
may have high concentrations of nutrients and/or heavy metals. Accordingly, the quantity of
phosphorus and micronutrients in the material to be applied may exceed the fertility
requirements of planned crops.
Metals. High concentrations of metals in the soil can impact crop growth or yields. The
application of lagoon sludge has the potential to significantly increase the concentration
of metals (particularly copper and zinc) in the soil. NCSU and NCDA&CS recommend
that alternative sites for waste application be sought when soil concentrations of zinc (Zn)
exceed 1421bs/ac (Zn-I of 2000) or copper (Cu) exceed 721bs/ac (Cu-I of 2000). A Cu-I
or Zn-I of 3000 is recognized as a critical toxic level for some crops. For peanuts,
alternative sites are recommended when the Zn-I is 300, and a Zn-I of 500 is recognized
as a critical toxic level. Producers should be aware of the post -application Cu and Zn
concentrations predicted on the sites planned for sludge application. Additionally, soil
pH should be maintained at 6.0 or above to minimize risk of toxicity.
Phosphorus. Phosphorus (P) concentration in lagoon sludge may be high. Because P
adsorbs onto iron, aluminum, and calcium, the soil can bind and store excess P. When P
concentrations reach higher concentrations, there is an increasing potential for P to be
transported offsite and become a pollutant of surface waters. This transport may occur
through soil erosion, or as a soluble form in surface runoff or leaching. An assessment of
the risk for P loss to surface water is required as part of a nutrient management plan for
permitted operations or those receiving federal or state cost -share assistance. If the
potential for P transport offsite is high, then future application of animal waste may not
be allowed in a nutrient management plan. Producers should be aware that applying
lagoon sludge may limit the ability to use the site for future animal waste application.
Accordingly, applying lagoon sludge to fields that are planned for future waste
application as part of a nutrient management plan is not advised.
1 understand that applying macronutrients or micronutrients at rates that significantly exceed the
expected crop removal could limit the future use of the field as a waste application site, and in
some cases, negatively impact future plant growth. 1 voluntarily agree to apply sludge to the
fields identified above that 1 own or operate according to the attached nutrient management plan
or lagoon closure plan. (*Both landowner and farmenoperator must sign.)
t,4vner * vbi!� U5 Date
es- & � a �a1- a3
Farmer/Operator* G� Ja�Gs S`, Date
NPPH, NC Supplement 2007-01, June 2007 p 6
-4-01)

Steve Troxier North Carolina Department of Agriculture
Commissioner and Consumer Services
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
March 1, 2023
SUBJECT: Jimmy Barrow East Swine and Dairy Assistance Program Closure Plan Approval
TO: Paul Boone
Northampton SWCD
Vernon Cox
Director
Thank you for submitting Jimmy Barrow East Farm's closure waste management plan for review as part of the
Swine and Dairy Assistance Program (SDAP). After reviewing the closure waste management plan, I feel the
plan meets SDAP policies, NRCS 590 and 360 Standards and DWR permit requirements. With this approval of
the closure waste management plan, please submit the two bids for conducting the closure for approval and
funds allocation through the SDAP website. Additional information on the Swine and Dairy Assistance
Program policies can be found at httys://www.ncagr.gov/SWC/tech/SwineDaiLyAssistance.html
If you have any further questions or concerns do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Michael Shepherd
Technical Specialist WUP/NM, WA
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
MAILING ADDRESS
Division of Soil and Water Conservation Telephone: [phone]
1614 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1614
An Equal Opportunity Employer
LOCATION
Old Health Building
216 W. Jones St. 3'' Floor
Raleigh, NC 27603

��ULTUq�µ
a''t^oyN
Jy ^ g
Steve Troxler North Carolina Department of Agriculture
Commissioner and Consumer Services
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
March 8, 2023
William P. Boone
District Conservationist
Northampton Soil & Water Conservation District
9495 NC Hwy 305, Suite 104
Jackson, NC 27845
Mr. Boone,
Vernon Cox
Director
The Jimmy Barry East Lagoon Conversion design meets the requirements of Commission policy
in accordance with Swine and Dairy Assistance Program Closure — Waste Impoundments policy
item 6. The design submitted February 28, 2023 meets Agriculture Cost Share Program
requirements and the contract is recommended for approval.
Please contact me if you have questions or need additional information regarding this project.
Sincerely,
Et DocuSigned by:
D. /Aetv;A
1 A2769EMNAC
Scott Melvin, PE
Engineering Services Section Chief
MAILING ADDRESS
Division of Soil and Water Conservation Telephone: [phone]
1614 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1614
An Equal Opportunity Employer
LOCATION
Old Health Building
216 West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27604

A- N RCS
United States Department of Agriculture
Natural Resources Conservation Sesv ce
Prepared for:
By: L '
Farm:
WHAT IS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT?
Nutrient Management is applying nutrients
from all sources with the right placement, in
the right amount, at the right time, and from
the right source to minimize nutrient losses to
surface and groundwater. This practice is
accomplished through development and
implementation of a Nutrient Management
Plan, which can be part of a broader
Conservation Plan or CNMP that addresses
multiple resource concerns.
PURPOSE OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT
A nutrient management plan is intended to
accomplish one or more of the following
objectives:
• To budget, supply, and conserve nutrients for
plant production.
• To minimize agricultural nonpoint source
pollution of surface and groundwater
resources.
• To properly utilize manure or organic by-
products as a plant nutrient source.
• To protect air quality by reducing odors,
nitrogen emissions (ammonia, oxides of
nitrogen), and the formation of atmospheric
particulates.
• To maintain or improve the physical, chemical,
and biological condition of soil.
CONTENTS OF THE NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT PLAN
The following components are included in
nutrient management plan specifications
typical of more 'traditional'
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
N.C. Practice Job Sheet: NC-590
VIMM1/ 94,4ZQ
E7V46/Li4D4C
Tract(s):_ 1� - Date: 6 2-
fertilizer and rr anure application methods.
When precisict i ag/variable rate application
technology is utilized, see the next section of
this Job Sheet for additional guidance on plan
requirements.
• aerial site p otograph(s)Amagery or site
map(s), and a soil survey map of the site,
• Sufficient s ils information —such as dominant
soil map until for each planned field —needed
to apply nuti ients at RYE and Soil Test Report
determined ates as appropriate; and to not
exceed rates determined by nutrient risk
assessment planning criteria.
• location of d signated sensitive areas and the
associated nutrient application restrictions and
setbacks,
• results of approved risk assessment tools for
any necessc ry evaluations for nitrogen,
phosphorus and erosion losses.
• current and/ r planned plant production
sequence oi rotation,
• soil, water, compost, manure, organic by-
product, and plant tissue sample analyses
applicable t the plan. Where non-NCDA soil
testing labs re used, nutrient
recommend tions must be made using NCDA-
similar guid lines and methodologies. Note:
high levels soil copper and zinc may be toxic
to productio crops. Land application of these
nutrients must be accordance with
NCSU/NCDA crop toxicity guidelines.
• Realistic yield goals for the crops planned for
nutrient aool cation.
page 1

• Planned nitrogen application rates based on
NC Realistic Yield Expectations (RYEs) or
sufficiently documented yield records,
• The Nitrogen Leaching Index for planned
fields,
• Planned P & K application rates based on soil
test results (see next section where P & K
applied through variable rate technology).
• listing and quantification of all nutrient sources
and form, including starter fertilizer
applications and legume -based cover crop
mixes.
• in accordance with the nitrogen and
phosphorus risk assessment tool(s), specify
the recommended nutrient application source,
timing, amount (except for precision/variable
rate applications specify method used to
determine rate), and placement of plant
nutrients for each field or management unit,
and
• guidance for implementation, operation and
maintenance, and recordkeeping as specified
by the CNMP or applicable NC DWQ or
NDPES permit.
Where precision/variable rate nutrient
application applications are planned and
made, some required planning components of
the preceding section may be provided by the
overall conservation plan. In addition, the
following components are required in nutrient
management planning.
• The geo-referenced field boundary and data
collected that was processed and analyzed as
a GIS layer or layers to generate nutrient or
soil amendment recommendations.
• Planned nitrogen application rates based on
NC RYEs or sufficiently documented yield
records
• The Nitrogen Leaching Index for planned
fields.
• The nutrient recommendation guidance and
recommendation equations used to convert the
GIS base data layer or layers to a nutrient
source material recommendation GIS layer or
layers.
• Soil testing documentation that crop
Phosphorus (P205) and Potassium (K20)
nutrient or soil amendment application will be
made per soil test results similar to NCDA
guidelines. Where P & K will not be applied
via variable rate application technology, but by
basic GPS guidance, recommended P & K
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015
rates must be provided as specifications prior
to application.
Note —where Diammonium phosphate (1846-
0) is the primary variable rate P fertilizer
source applied on legume crops, additional N
will likely be needed to achieve RYEs.
The plan was developed based on the current
NRCS 590 standard and Federal, state, or
local regulations or policies. Changes in laws
or regulations may require a plan modification.
This Job Sheet is a required supplement to
the Nutrient Management Plan.
NC Permitted Animal Operations: For NC
DENR-DWR or NPDES permitted animal
operations, the waste utilization portion of the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP) must meet requirements specified by
the Permit. The NC 1217 Interagency Group
provides guidance on the required minimum
elements of a CAWMP. This guidance is found in
Sec 1.1 of the latest 1217 Guidance Document,
located at:
httr)://www.ncagr.gov/SWC/tech/�guidancedocumen
ts.html.
Nitrogen Leaching Index Values
Nitrogen Leaching Index values, obtained through
use of current Soil Hydrologic Group ISHGI-based
LI index maps in Sec II of the NC FOTG or RUSLE
2 field -specific soil loss calculations, are included
in the Nutrient Management Plan. SHGs per soil
map unit are available through selection of the Soil
Data Explorer and Soil Properties and Qualities
(then select "Soil Qualities and Features") tabs
once an Area of Interest has peen defined in
NRCS Web Soil Survey.
If the Nitrogen Leaching Index > 10 for planned
fields, appropriate conservation practices must be
included in a conservation plan to prevent nitrogen
from leaving the field via surface or subsurface
runoff.
Below are conservation crop management
techniques and practices recommended for
mitigation of nitrate losses (practices also
docu}ented in conservation plan):
I�Ias-� ,,�►1 l
h
111ed 0
eta. Of
�
clrai4
D rz u S d P �'�C 4.7 `17
page 2

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
DEVELOPMENT
The nutrient management plan has been
developed to meet nutrient application rate criteria
for all sources of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium
as specified by NRCS 590 Nutrient Management
standard criteria.
In addition to NCDA Agronomic Division soil test
recommendations, or soil test recommendations
made through similar guidelines, the plan is based
on NC INMC approved values for realistic yield
goals, nitrogen factors, phosphorus removal rates,
default nutrient values for animal waste, plant
availability coefficients for N, P, and K, and animal
waste generation volumes where applicable.
Approved values are found at:
htto://nutrients.soil.ncsu.edulndex htm
Where manure is applied, farm records may also
be used through a procedure provided in SIB 1217
Interagency Group guidance, available at:
httQ://www.ncaar.aov/SWCAech/1217committee ht
ml
For NC permitted animal operations, planning
requirements for Plan "Amendments" (minor
modifications) and "Revisions" (Major
Modifications) are clarified by SIB 1217 Interagency
Group Guidance.
ADDITIONAL PHOSPHORUS -RELATED
PLAN INFORMATION (Applicable when
increases in Soil Test P are expected on
the planned areal
In NC, a field -speck Phosphorus Loss
Assessment Tool (PLAT) evaluation is completed
in accordance with 590 Nutrient Management
standard General Criteria requirements, and
phosphorus must be applied in accordance with
590 standard Manure Phosphorus Application
Rates.
In addition to the basic plan components, plan
information on PLAT categorical ratings, P
drawdown strategies, and conservation practices
to reduce P loss risk is required when increases in
Soil Test P are expected on the Planned area.
Typically, this could occur when manure is
consistently applied at Nitrogen -based rates. High
levels of phosphorus in the surface soil layer have
been linked to increasing risk of P loss through
surface runoff and leaching.
❑ Increases in Soil Test P are expected
on the planned area (not typical if P
application made per soil test results).
When soil test F
hosphor s continues to increase
on a long term I
asis, p` �T may produce results
that require P-b
3sed manure application planning
and planning foi
no additional manure P.
Conditions that
Afill requirg P-based or no-P
planning will be
ased on site specific resource
conditions, whic
i will facilitate
data input into
PLAT. PLAT c4
itegoricallratings
that will require
enhanced P apr
lication p
anninq are:
HIGH: P-based manure application is required
(limited to P upt ke in harvested crop biomass)
VERY HIGH: Oo additinal manure P or starter P
application to b specifieI in nutrient management
plan.
Information:
Implementation f a phosphorus 'drawdown'
strategy may be a consequence of PLAT results,
or may be requested in order to lower soil test
phosphorus levE Is.
Should a reduct on in soil best P be desired or
necessary, the my currently proven method of
substantial P 'di wdown' Is to not apply manure -
based P and to )lant and harvest crops that utilize
P currently pres nt in the soil surface.
Crop specific estimated annual P removal amounts
are available on he NCSY Nutrient Management
in NC website:
conservation pr ctices, especially those that
prevent soil part le detachment and trap sediment
at field edges ar effective in preventing
phosphorus mo ement from the planned site.
Manure applicat n techniques can also be applied
to reduce P loss risk. Theese practices must be
included in the c nservati6n plan where
determined PLA risk = H�GH for planned fields.
Consult the coniribed
rvation plan developed in
conjunction withhe nutrient management plan for
information on pctices recommended to reduce
hos horns ANnitro en loss risks. Application
management toniques to reduce nutrient loss
risk may be pre bejow:
A1d 1��1 d s k j tV
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 I page 3

Long Term Strategy for Reduction of Soil P
Levels:
As noted in the P drawdown strategy section, the
only currently proven method for reducing high
levels of soil P is not applying P, paired with
producing crops on the planned site that use
existing soil P. Where soil P and PLAT
evaluations indicate an increasing risk to water
quality, substantially reducing soil P levels through
crop uptake can take many years of
implementation. When P is not applied, and
existing soil P is used by crops, eventually, soil will
become P deficient. Consult CES or NCDA
Regional Agronomy specialists for additional
information soil test P reduction timelines.
Manure P produced in excess of crop
requirements:
Consult the nutrient management plan for a
quantification of manure generated by the animal
feeding operation that may exceed crop P
requirements.
"Manure Hauler" Information
All manure waste applied on land owned by or
controlled by the Animal Feeding Operation (AFO)
owner or operator must be included in the nutrient
management plan. The volume difference in total
manure waste generated by the AFO and waste
applied to land not owned or controlled by the
producer must be accounted for in a nutrient
management plan.
General information on manure waste generated
by an AFO to be applied to land not owned or
controlled by the AFO owner or operator may be
recorded as specked in the NC CLAMP
Certification Sheet and Documentation Checklist or
other supplemental documentation to the nutrient
management plan. NRCS CNMP technical criteria
require documentation of manure exports off the
farm (this can be done below). The AFO
owner/operator should provide the third party
applicator with a current waste analysis in order to
facilitate agronomic crop application of the facility's
generated waste. Should land not owned or
controlled by the AFO owner or operator be
included in a nutrient management plan, the
complete plan must meet 590 criteria.
Type and Quantity of Animal Feeding Operation
(AFO) manure generated by the facility:
1400 F7eedcf -4 4?w iS h
RECORDKEEPING
Waste reports from the NCDA & CS Agronomic
Division, or equivalent, are acceptable sources of
information for determining applied manure nutrient
amounts for recordkeeping or crop budgeting
purposes.
Records must be maintained for at least 5 years, or
for time and manner required by Permit for animal
operations to document plan implementation and
maintenance. As applicable, records include:
• soil, plant tissue, water, manure, and
organic by-product analyses resulting in
recommendations for nutrient application,
• quantities, analyses and sources of
nutrients applied,
• dates, and method(s) of nutrient
applications, source of nutrients, and rates
of application,
• weather conditions and soil moisture at the
time of application; lapsed time to manure
incorporation; rainfall or irrigation event,
• crops planted, planting and harvest dates,
yields, nutrient analyses of harvested
biomass, and crop residues removed,
• dates of plan review, name of reviewer,
and recommended changes resulting from
the review, and
• all enhanced efficiency fertilizer products
used.
Additional records for precision/variable rate
sites must include:
• maps identifying the variable application
source, timing, amount, and placement of
all plant nutrients applied, and
• GPS-based yield maps for crops where
yields can be digitally collected.
• Documentation per field nitrogen
application rates do not exceed RYE -
based recommended rates
• Documentation that applied phosphorus
and potassium recommendations do not
exceed recommended rates specked by
soil tests.
• For non -variable rate application of P & K.
provide applied map with field boundaries
indicating source, timing, method, and rate
of all applications.
Quantity of AFO manure generated to be exported Where 'chlorophyll reader technology is
off the farm for third party application: utilized, application records that nitrogen
1,2 14, 7itrr � rates match RYE -based N rates as closely
J as possible.
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 4

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
The producer is responsible for safe operation and
maintenance of this practice, including all
equipment. Review the plan periodically to
determine if adjustments or modifications to the
plan are needed. In NC, animal operations
permitting provisions may specify more frequent
review periods. Adhere to the following operation
and maintenance provisions:
• Protect fertilizer and organic by-product
storage facilities from weather and accidental
leakage or spillage.
• Properly calibrate application equipment to
ensure uniform distribution of material at
planned rates.
• Workers should be protected from and avoid
unnecessary contact with inorganic fertilizers
and organic by-products. Extra caution must
be taken when handling ammonia sources of
nutrients, or when dealing with organic wastes
stored in unventilated enclosures.
• The disposal of material generated by the
cleaning of nutrient application equipment
should be accomplished properly. Excess
material should be collected and stored or field
applied in an appropriate manner. Excess
material should not be applied on areas of high
potential risk for runoff or leaching.
• Disposal or recycling of nutrient containers
should be done according to state and local
guidelines or regulations.
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 1 1 page 5

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWR
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
S WCD
NRCS
71 GZ.3-G7ft8
2S2 -S�J - /�-G8�/
ZS 2
Z�2 -S3S/-533/-3
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at the
facility. The following are some action items you should take.
l . Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
C. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
December 18, 1996

D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to flowing
leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put in a
submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes and
compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon
as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DW R (Division of Water Resources) regional office;
Phone 1I_UZ3-e7Xf er hours, Emergency Management number: 800-858-0368 or
919-733-3300. Your phone call should include: your name, facility, telephone number,
the details of the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the facility, the
location or direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The
corrective measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number.?�S.3f� G8�/
C. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number -
and
local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - - ..%t-
2 December 18, 1996

4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your problem to
them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site damage.
a. Contractors Name:_Z-+A 41"Wie Z1G /✓eg/1l,/�
b. Contractors Address: Alil Gv4,;t.
c. Contractors Phone: 9/ 9- 7 7 R- p 9 70
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (MRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: eV///,*A,., '�O- saaoNC
b. Phone: Zx r2 - S-3 jr - S-23 / - 3
7: Implement procedures as advised by DW R and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with
release of wastes from happening again.
December 18, 1996

Wrl---
APPENDIX 3.1
Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
General Information:
Name of Farm: 'M,. C_Af"&,dcJ ,gL.a&J of A r f _ Facility No:
Owner(s) Name:
q.C.A.0 c,.J
w 1 G�600
Mailing Address: ZJA 2gL,,Owj-/Vl V/ ��. Phone Nov?-5.2-� $—'J D/
TA ekSOA) N_C' ..2 7e VX-- 9.s,34 County: 41,0 t" ii40.- o •✓
Operation Description (remaining animals only):
o Please check this box if there will be no animals on this farm after lagoon closure. If there will still be animals on the site
after lagoon closure, please provide the following information on the animals that will remain.
Operation Description:
Type ofSivine No. of Animals
o Wean to Feeder
o Feeder to Finish / YO o
o Farrow to Wean
o Farrow to Feeder
o Farrow to Finish
o Gilts
o Boars
Type of Poultry No. of Animals
o Layer
o Non -Layer
Type of Beef No. of Animals
o Brood
o Feeders
o Stockers
Other Type of Livestock:
Type ofDaity
o Milking
oDry
o Heifers
o Calves
No. of Animals
Number of Animals:
Will the farm maintain a number of animals greater than the 2H .0217 threshold? Yes OE
0
Will other lagoons be in operation at this farm after this one closes? Yes o No 0
How many lagoons are left in use on this farm?: A)wOo- 044c, C, (asu-,Q—
(Name) of the Water Quality Section's staff in the Division of
Water Quality's g,*Je g Regional Office (see map on back) was contacted on (date)
for notification of the pending closure of this pond or lagoon. This notification was at least 24 hours prior to the
start of closure, which began on (date).
I verify that the above information is correct and complete. I have followed a closure plan, which meets all NRCS
specifications and criteria. I realize that I will be subject to enforcement action per Article 21 of the North
Carolina General Statutes if I fail to properly close out the lagoon.
Name of Land Owner (Please Print):
Signature:
Date:
The facility has followed a closure plan which meets all requirements set forth in the NRCS Technical Guide
Standard 360. The following items were completed by the owner and verified by me: all waste liquids and
sludges have been removed and land applied at agronomic rate, all input pipes have been removed, all slopes have
been stabilized as necessary, and vegetation established on all disturbed areas.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address (Agency):
Signature:
Phone No.:
Return within 15 days followinmp g —co of animal water storage pond or lagoon closure to:
N. C. Division Of Water Quality
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
PLC - 1 March 18, 2002

SMING SPECEICATIONS JrOR CONMRVATIOR WORK
Natural Resources conservation Service /_ 4,foa,%) ajo-sawe-
9495 NC Highway 305 STE 107 14ceA Seed
Jackson, NC 27845
[phone]
Diversions Dams
- s --- EFlite
Dams
Filter Strips Grass Waterways
_Critical Ai:q tin im 1�v
Planting_ SedlmenEtBla sins Field Borders
Please observe Planting dates for all cost share work
............ ..........
Lime
10- 1 )- 10 Fertilizer or Chicken Litter can be used tons fertilizer or 3-5 tons
of clicken 9— ZeQJ11'1'V M L"P.+/ 0 "') A', Er=j
seeal 1,ii
C,=!
r
'd ..... ..... I g­_
N'
7
W04 AA
4 -S
16 (Wh e
Z., Ixmoatof t 6 fOjj.t*Qf
n.
?
........... R 2 1
Y .....
e p
-Oats• era
e. PtT gacree
2..
........ ................ 'hel per, icli....
,bifs
!�z
Leaped'­10�Abi-ph� ­_-� . ­j r'.
Korean- - . `72-01b, � - i ;-
Sereia ei T per" 'Wn,
�
)nscanfied.:2
'Scarmw
.......................
no p.9r_aN_qq0W
0 In U116h
n '1�-
o t,
or
Ove laptWg6joW.qrqW -ki
!�q"or $eedja Ya
0 in
T_w
B,
�A .
,
..............
Y
Mer DWW1V, 2 T empo
• earl 111 filet high)
.-MY Over,(h
2-516, per gore J.
7
All
`50 MAYS y
-pe", rr ...... _7
ensici bihi'
♦ Aensitsola l
Bahia .......... ibsper4,M-0 March is
mv
• Ann
"dal LLr;speci
1141-6
. . ..... 26 Jbifer gei, e.. wo W
• 0
Mar&
. .......... 20.1bs per acre 7A
. . ... .....
May
-bon- �spedeza?Mqorm WOZa
............
♦
.20 i per -aer . e M
Bermuda Gress ...........
Hulleii
$Prinuda NP to June) 6
.............. i..
. ...... . 10 Is per r pp.re
; , �Pfil
........................ I ............. I i-I k 11'. , � ", - _ . i. .. . - -
er acre. j-.t anuary, jqarch
NOTE: All ingredients average set up for acreage of practice applied on ground. To figure acreage to be seeded
multiply the length times the width of the area to be seeded and divide by 43560 to get an average figure.
EXAMPLE: Grass Waterway -- 30 ft wide / 600 ft long
30 X 600 = 18000; 18000/43560 =.41 acres (rounded off to 0.4 acres)
***All temoorary nlagdl­ should be followed by permanent at the next appropriate season