20201938 Ver 2_Loop Road BPDP - Final_20230626

ID#* 20201938 Version* 2
Select Reviewer:
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 06/27/2023
Mitigation Project Submittal - 6/26/2023
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* Yes No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name: * Email Address:
Kaitlyn Hogarth [e-mail]
Project Information
ID#: * 20201938 Version:* 2
Existing ID# Existing Version
Project Type: DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel
County: Wayne
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload:
Loop Road BPDP - Final.pdf 57.94MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:*
Kaitlyn Hogarth
Signature: *

BANK PARCEL 
DEVELOPMENT 
PACKAGE 

June 2023 
LOOP ROAD MITIGATION BANK PARCEL 
Wayne County, NC 
DWR Project Number 2020‐1938v2 

Neuse River Basin 
HUC 03020201 

PREPARED BY: 

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104 
Charlotte, NC  28203 
Phone: (704) 332‐7754 
Fax: (704) 332‐3306 

Wildlands Engineering, Inc.  phone [phone]  fax [phone]  312 W Millbrook Rd St 225  Raleigh, NC 27609
June 26, 2023 
Katie Merritt 
Nutrient Offset & Buffer Banking Coordinator 
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality  
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27620 
RE:  DWR Draft Loop Road Buffer Plan Comments 
Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel (DWR # 2020‐1938v2) 
Wayne County, NC 
Dear Ms. Merritt: 
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) has reviewed the Division of Water Resources (DWR) comments 
dated May 24th, 2023, for the draft Bank Parcel Development Package (BPDP) for the Loop Road Mitigation 
Bank Parcel.  
The DWR comments are listed below in bold, while Wildlands responses are noted in italics lettering. 
1.Cover Page ‐ Change to 2020‐1938v2
The correction has been made.
2.Section 2.2 ‐ DWR did not call this pond out in the viability letter due to its condition during
the time of the onsite mitigation determination. DWR considered this area an extension of D1.
A portion of the old pond bed is now referred to as an extension of D1.
3.Table 2 ‐ Change to just show the 8‐digit
The correction has been made.
4.Table 3 ‐ It's okay to leave this as is for this bpdp, but in the future, keep the same naming
conventions of features as they are used in the Site viability letter.
Noted.
5.Section 2.4
a.If adding preservation to UT1, speak to that as Alt mitigation as well.
No preservation is being added to UT1.
b.Add a statement here that the site viability letter also indicated that the ditch met
some of these criteria & note which criteria the letter cited
The addition has been made.
c.Thank you for providing the figure and table for resources, but explain how the figure
and table 4 meet this requirement. Your credit table shows how much is being
restored along the ditch… so you need to show how this equation was put together to
meet the rule
The equation has been added.
d.Need more details on how the ditch will be secured in an easement to connect to UT1,
and how is future maintenance of the ditch going to be prohibited? See 0295 (o)(8)
last paragraph of rule for guidance
The additions have been made.
6.Section 4.2 – The old pond footprint above D1 was determined to be an extension of D1.
Rather than call out the area as a “non credit area” and an area not to be planted, Wildlands
needs to propose wetland species (herbaceous mix and wet‐tolerant trees/shrubs) within this

Wildlands Engineering, Inc.  phone [phone]  fax [phone]  312 W Millbrook Rd St 225  Raleigh, NC 27609
wider footprint of the ditch. Live stakes may be successful and worth considering. Speak to 
the efforts Wildlands will take along this reach of D1. 
A portion of the old pond bed is now considered an extension of D1, and therefore the outer 
edges of the depressional area will be planted and included in nutrient offset credits. Wildlands 
proposes a combination of live stakes listed below to be planted within portions of the old pond 
bed included in crediting. Wildlands also proposes a mixture of the following herbaceous species 
within this area: Juncus effusus, Panicum rigidulum, Bidens aristosa, Helianthus angustifolius, 
Elymus virginicus, Carex lupulina, Rhexia mariana, and Carex vulpinoidea. 
Species Common
Name Density Forest Strata
Salix nigra Black Willow 25% Sub-canopy
Cephalanthus occidentalis Button Bush 25% Sub-canopy
Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 25% Sub‐canopy 
Sambucus canadensis Elderberry 25% Sub-canopy
Relevant text has been added to section 4.2.  

7. Table 8 ‐ If 11 species of trees are shown in the table, DWR expects 11 species to be planted.  
If anticipating to plant only 8 from this list, DWR cannot confirm the Density percentages 
column would comply with the performance standard of "no one tree species will be greater 
than 50%" as noted on Rule 0295 (n)(2).  At this time, the column labeled "Density"", which is 
required to include in this plan, is not accurate unless 11 species (all adding up to be 100%) are 
planted.  Adjust the table accordingly. I understand that changes to planting plans can 
happen.  If any changes are needed to the planting list before planting, the Provider will need 
to submit a request to DWR for approval of that modified planting list if not listed as an 
approved tree/shrub in table 8.  DWR will accept a FEW substitutions if Wildlands wants to 
include the extra 3 species in this table as potential substitutions in a Table 8b...but you must 
include the % those subs are intended to be utilized in the case you need those substitutions.   
Wildlands anticipates that planting less than 11 species will be unlikely. If a species is not 
available at the time of planting, the percentage composition of one or more of the available 
species will be increased to ensure the same number of trees required to meet the proposed 
density are planted. Wildlands proposes that any of the 11 species be viable for an increase in 
percent composition so long as there are at least 8 species planted. Wildlands will ensure that no 
one species is planted at a composition higher than 15%. Text has been added to section 4.2.  
8. Section 5.1 
a.  DWR requests at least 2 of the 9 plots proposed be rotating plots and be included in 
the Monitoring plan. Commit to having one within riparian restoration along D1 and 
one along D2. Note that the size and shape will be the same as the permanent plots. 
Two of the 9 plots will be rotating plots. Wildlands proposes that the 2 rotating plots be 
circular in shape, while the 7 fixed plots be square. Due to the process of establishing a 
square versus circular plot, it is more feasible after MY0 to create an accurate 100 m2 
sized plot when it is circular. More specifically, to set up a square shaped plot, three 
measuring tapes need to be pinned to the ground in one location, two tapes will then be 
pulled 10 meters out at a 90‐degree angle away from one another. Each tape will then 
be pinned to the ground at this corner, and then turned again at 90 degrees and pulled 

Wildlands Engineering, Inc.  phone [phone]  fax [phone]  312 W Millbrook Rd St 225  Raleigh, NC 27609
another 10 meters back towards one another. The third tape is then pulled out 14.14 
meters diagonally across the square shape and where the three tapes intersect is where 
the last corner is marked. Often, the locations of the corners of the plot will need to be 
adjusted to achieve the appropriate dimensions and shape. As vegetation becomes 
established across the Parcel, it becomes difficult to string the tape out, pin to the 
ground, then re‐adjust to achieve the proper 10‐meter dimensions and 90‐degree angles. 
This can skew the dimensions and angles of the plot, therefore, affecting its size. Circular 
plots allow for one location to be marked, where one person can hold the tape at the 
center, and another can hold the opposite end of the tape and walk in a circle. The tape 
can then be held above much of the vegetation as the person on the outer edge walks in 
a circle and catalogs stems.  
The following statement has been added to section 5.1.  “Of these 9 plots, 2 will be 
rotating plots. Throughout the monitoring period, one of the rotating plots will be done 
within the riparian restoration area along D1, while the other rotating plot will be done 
within the riparian restoration area along D2. All 9 plots will be 100 square meters, 
however, the 7 fixed plots will be square in shape (10 x 10 meters), while the rotating 
plots will be circular with a radius of 5.64 meters.” 
b. Add vigor 
The addition has been made.  
9. Section 5.3 – Make it clear the width of the easement boundary off D2 left bank. Also 
acknowledge that the supporting figure/s shows the connection of the CE to UT1 
The following text has been added to Section 5.3 “The conservation easement on the left side of 
D2 is at least 15 feet wide measuring from the top of bank (see Figure 3). The confluence of both 
D1 and D2 with UT1 will be secured under a conservation easement (see Figure 3).” 
10. Section 7.0 
a. Label this ditch as DA on corresponding figures and reference it as DA in this 
paragraph. This matches the site viability labeling 
The change has been made.  
b. Add a note here that Wildlands isn’t requesting riparian buffer credits or nutrient 
offset credits off UT1, but that the connection between D1 and D2 with UT1 is secured 
with an easement 
The addition has been made.  
11. Table 9 
a. Be sure to compensate for the extra area on D1 that can be planted for credit. See 
comments on figures 
The additional area that can be planted for credit as been included within totals on Table 
9.  
b. Change to “No”; these aren’t convertible to RBC 
The change has been made. 
c. Add that this is off DA 
The addition has been made.  
d. Change to “no”  
The change has been made. 
12. Table 10 – This table is missing all the other components…replace with correct table online 
Table 10 has been replaced with the correct table obtained from DWR’s website. 
13. Figure 2 – Change to “Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Credit Service Area” 

Wildlands Engineering, Inc.  phone [phone]  fax [phone]  312 W Millbrook Rd St 225  Raleigh, NC 27609
The change has been made. 
14. Figure 3  
a. Add 3 origin points to this map. One for each Feature (D1, D2, and UT1) 
The change has been made. 
b. Add a call‐out to this area and label it “wider section of ditch” 
The change has been made.  
c. Pull this pink line for D1 up to easement boundary and make the same update to all 
other figures 
The change has been made to Figure 3, Figure 5, Figure 7, Figure 8, and Figure 9.  
d. Label this ditch, DA, as it is labeled in the viability letter 
The change has been made.  
15. Figure 5 – Include on this figure what the restored area acreage is along D2. Remember, the 
rule says the watershed drainage area has to be 4x the area being restored… 
The restored area acreage of 0.7 has been added to Figure 5.  
16. Figure 7  
a. Add 3 origin points to this map. One for each Feature (D1, D2, and UT1) 
The additions have been made.  
b. Show the anticipated width of this easement on the left bank of D2. It should be no 
less than 10‐15’ from ditch Top of Bank 
The addition has been made.  
c. This area needs to be planted and is unique to the rest of the proposed planting areas. 
Add a call‐out here to bring attention to this area since it is going to be planted in a 
unique manner. Change this from “No credit” to nutrient offset credits (orange) and 
update the credit table accordingly.  
The change has been made and Table 10 has been updated to reflect this change.  
d. Change title to Project Credits Map 
The change has been made.  
17. Figure 8  
a. Add 3 origin points to this map. One for each feature (D1, D2, and UT1) 
The additions have been made.  
b. Change buffer zone boundaries after moving the D1 line to easement boundary.  
The change has been made.  
c. Change to represent nutrient offset 
The change has been made.  
d. Since DA is not viable for credits per the site viability letter, the top of bank widths are 
measured off D1, not off DA. Remove the buffer zone boundaries off DA and change 
to be measured off D1 instead. Areas within the 100‐200’ when measured off D1 need 
to be calculated and that area added to the Project Credit Table.  
The buffer zone boundaries off DA have been removed and are now measured off D1. 
The areas in reference along D1 have been added to the Loop Road Project Credit Table.  
18. Figure 9 – Make changes to this figure where applicable based on previous comments 
The applicable changes have been made.  
19. Appendix A 
a. Add a picture showing confluence with UT1 since UT1 is referenced throughout this 
BPDP 
A picture of the confluence of UT1 has been added to Appendix A.  

Wildlands Engineering, Inc.  phone [phone]  fax [phone]  312 W Millbrook Rd St 225  Raleigh, NC 27609
b. These photos are outdated. Submit newer photos 
Photographs in reference have been replaced with photographs taken on 6/2/2023.  
c. Loop Branch photos showing riparian areas are not necessary for this BPDP since Loop 
Branch is not part of this project. You may leave them in the BPDP, but need to also 
include photos of UT1 
Photographs showing Loop Branch have been removed from Appendix A.  

The final Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Plan has been uploaded to the Laserfiche system. Please 
contact me at 540‐907‐9432 if you have any questions or concerns. 
Sincerely,  

Kaitlyn Hogarth 
Environmental Scientist 
[e-mail] 

 Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
 HUC 03020201  Page i June 2023 
Bank Parcel Development Package 
Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel  
Neuse River Basin 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 
1.0 Project Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 
1.1  Parcel Description ......................................................................................................................... 1 
2.0 Mitigation Project Summary ............................................................................................................. 1 
2.1  Project Goals ................................................................................................................................. 1 
2.2 Existing Parcel Conditions ............................................................................................................. 2 
2.3  Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Mitigation .............................................. 3 
2.4 Alternative Mitigation for Buffer Mitigation ................................................................................. 3 
2.5 Watershed Characterization ......................................................................................................... 4 
2.6 Soils ............................................................................................................................................... 4 
2.7 Existing Vegetative Communities ................................................................................................. 5 
2.8 Threatened and Endangered Species ........................................................................................... 6 
2.9 Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................................ 6 
2.10 FEMA Floodplain Compliance ....................................................................................................... 6 
2.11 Parcel Location, Parcel Constraints, and Access ........................................................................... 6 
2.12 Other Environmental Conditions .................................................................................................. 6 
3.0  Site Protection Instrument ................................................................................................................ 6 
Mitigation Work Plan .................................................................................................................................... 7 
4.1 Parcel Preparation ........................................................................................................................ 7 
4.2 Riparian Area Restoration Activities ............................................................................................. 7 
4.4 NCDWR As‐Built Evaluation .......................................................................................................... 8 
5.0 Monitoring and Maintenance Plan ................................................................................................... 8 
5.1  Monitoring Protocol ...................................................................................................................... 8 
5.2 Parcel Maintenance ...................................................................................................................... 9 
5.3 Easement Boundaries ................................................................................................................... 9 
6.0 Financial Assurance and Long‐Term Management ......................................................................... 10 
6.1 Financial Assurances ................................................................................................................... 10 
6.2 Long‐term Management ............................................................................................................. 10 
7.0 Project Credit Potential ................................................................................................................... 10 
8.0 References ...................................................................................................................................... 13 

 Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
 HUC 03020201  Page ii June 2023 
TABLES 
Table 1 Ecological and Water Quality Goals 
Table 2 Buffer Project Attributes 
Table 3 Project Features  
Table 4 Drainage Areas and Associated Land Use 
Table 5  Project Soil Types and Descriptions 
Table 6                Existing Vegetation 
Table 7 Site Protection Instrument 
Table 8 Selected Tree Species 
Table 9                Selected Tree Species for Old Pond Footprint 
Table 10 Loop Road Project Credit Table  
Table 11 Loop Road Total Area of Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation 
FIGURES 
Figure 1 Vicinity Map  
Figure 2 Credit Service Area Map 
Figure 3 Site Map 
Figure 4 USGS Topographic Map 
Figure 5  Watershed Map 
Figure 6 NRCS 1974 Soil Survey Map  
Figure 7 Project Credits Map 
Figure 8 Riparian Buffer Zones Map 
Figure 9 Monitoring Components Map 
APPENDICES 
Appendix A Current Land Use Photographs – June 2, 2023 
Appendix B Historical Aerials  
Appendix C On Site Determination of Applicability to Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules – April 21, 2021 
Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Letter – July 27, 2021 
Appendix D USFWS Self‐Certification Letter and Correspondence  
SHPO Request for Review and Response 
EDR Radius Map Report, Executive Summary  

 Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
 HUC 03020201  Page 1 June 2023 
Bank Parcel Development Package 
Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel  
Neuse River Basin 
1.0 Project Introduction 
The Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel (“Parcel”) is proposed under the terms and conditions of the 
proposed Loop Road Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Banking Instrument (“MBI”), made and 
entered into by Wildlands Holdings IX, LLC acting as Bank Sponsor (“Sponsor”) and the North Carolina 
Department of Environmental Quality (“NCDEQ”) Division of Water Resources (“NCDWR”). The Parcel 
shall be planned and designed according to the MBI, 15A NCAC 02B .0703, and the Consolidated Buffer 
Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 which became effective November 1, 2015. 
The project is in Wayne County approximately 11 miles southwest of the City of Goldsboro (Figure 1). 
Directions are included on Figure 1. The Parcel creates a protected riparian area from top of bank out to 
200 feet along one unnamed tributary (UT1) and two project ditches (D1 and D2). The primary purpose 
of the project is to provide riparian buffer mitigation credits and nutrient offset credits to compensate 
for unavoidable impacts in the Neuse River Basin 03020201 Hydrologic Unit Code (“HUC”) outside the 
Falls Lake Watershed (Figure 2). The Parcel is located within the Neuse River Basin HUC 
03020201170010 and NCDWR Subbasin 03‐04‐12 in Wayne County.  
1.1  Parcel Description 
The one unnamed tributary and two ditches flow to another unnamed tributary on the project property.  
That tributary extends for approximately half a mile until it flows into Falling Creek. Falling Creek 
eventually flows into the Neuse River. Falling Creek is classified as Water Supply Water source (“WS‐IV”) 
and Nutrient Sensitive Waters (“NSW”) by NCDWR. The proposed project supports specific goals 
identified in the 2018 Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities Plan (RBRP) by promoting “nutrient and 
sediment reduction in agricultural areas by restoring and preserving wetlands, streams and riparian 
buffers”. 
This riparian mitigation project will reduce sediment and nutrient loading, provide and improve 
terrestrial and instream habitats, and improve stream and bank stability. The area surrounding the 
stream and ditches proposed for mitigation is a mixture of forest and active agricultural fields. See the 
Appendix for January 2022 site photos. Restoring the riparian area up to 200 feet from the streams and 
ditches will reduce nutrient and sediment inputs in the tributaries to Loop Branch and subsequently the 
Neuse River. The restored floodplain areas will filter sediment during high rainfall events and provide 
cover and food for wildlife throughout the Parcel.  
2.0 Mitigation Project Summary 
2.1  Project Goals 
The major goals of the proposed buffer and nutrient offset mitigation project are to provide ecological 
and water quality enhancements to the Neuse River Basin by restoring the riparian area to create a 
functional riparian corridor. Specific enhancements to water quality and ecological processes are 
outlined below in Table 1. 

 Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
 HUC 03020201  Page 2 June 2023 

Table 1: Ecological and Water Quality Goals  
Goals Objectives 
Decrease nutrient levels. 
Nutrient input will be decreased by filtering runoff from the agricultural fields 
through restored native vegetation. The off‐site nutrient input will also be 
absorbed on‐site by filtering flood flows through restored floodplain areas, 
where flood flows can disperse through native vegetation. 
Decrease sediment input. Sediment from off‐site sources will be captured by deposition on restored 
floodplain areas where native vegetation will slow overland flow velocities. 
Decrease water 
temperature and increase 
dissolved oxygen 
concentrations. 
Planted riparian trees will shade the project features as they mature, reducing 
thermal pollution. 
Create appropriate 
terrestrial habitat. 
Riparian areas will be restored by treating invasive vegetation and planting 
native vegetation.  
Permanently protect the 
project Parcel from 
harmful uses. 
A conservation easement will be recorded on the Parcel. 
2.2 Existing Parcel Conditions 
The proposed buffer mitigation and nutrient offset project includes approximately 13.75 acres of 
agricultural fields and mature forest along one unnamed tributary (UT1) and two project ditches (D1 and 
D2). The Parcel easement boundary will extend from top of bank to 200 feet from the two ditches. 
(Figure 3).  
D1 is surrounded by agricultural fields on either floodplain and flows east until its confluence with UT1.  
The top of D1 is surrounded by the footprint of an old pond where portions of the area frequently have 
shallow standing water. D2 flows south to its confluence with UT1.  The right floodplain of D2 is 
agricultural fields and an existing forested buffer occupies the left floodplain of D2.  The agriculture 
fields on the Parcel are used rotationally to graze cattle and produce row crops. UT1 is forested and 
eventually flows into another unnamed tributary beyond the conservation easement. 
In general, this area has maintained its rural, farming character over the last 60 years with only minor 
changes in land cover (see Appendix B). This consistency in land use within the project watershed 
indicates that watershed processes affecting hydrology, sediment supply, and nutrient and pollutant 
delivery have not varied widely over this time period. With a lack of developmental pressure, watershed 
processes and stressors from outside the project limits are likely to remain consistent throughout the 
implementation, monitoring, and closeout of this project. 

 Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
 HUC 03020201  Page 3 June 2023 
Table 2: Buffer Project Attributes  
Project Name Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel 
Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201 
River Basin Neuse, not in the Falls Lake watershed 
Geographic Location (Lat, Long) ‐78.131426 W, 35.283350 N 
Site Protection Instrument (DB, PG) To be recorded 
Total Credits 30,838.000 buffer mitigation credits and 25,627.872 Ibs. N  
Types of Credits Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Credits 
BPDP Date June 2023 
Initial Planting Date December 2024 
Baseline Report Date April 2024 
MY1 Report Date December 2025 
MY2 Report Date December 2026 
MY3 Report Date December 2027 
MY4 Report Date December 2028 
MY5 Report Date December 2029 
2.3  Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Mitigation 
NCDWR assessed the stream origin and issued the official Stream Origin Determination Letter on April 
21, 2021. NCDWR performed an onsite visit of the project area to determine viability for buffer 
mitigation and nutrient offset mitigation on June 7, 2021, and issued a site viability letter on July 27, 
2021. One of the three final project features assessed were deemed viable by NCDWR to generate 
buffer mitigation. There have been no changes to land use in the project area since NCDWR’s 2021 site 
visit.  A copy of both the “On‐Site Stream Origin Determination for Applicability to Neuse Riparian Buffer 
Rules” and the “Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset” letters from NCDWR are included 
in Appendix C and summarized in Table 3. 
Table 3: Project Features  
Feature Name 
(BPDP) 
Feature Name 
(NCDWR 
Evaluation) 
Classification Buffer Credit Viable Nutrient Offset Viable 
UT1 UT3 Stream No Yes  
(non‐forested fields only) 
D1 D1 Ditch No Yes  
D2 D2 Ditch Yes Yes 
(non‐forested fields only) 
Additional features are referenced in the Site Viability letter, but are not included in the project or Table 3. 
2.4 Alternative Mitigation for Buffer Mitigation 
In addition to buffer restoration on subject streams, per the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rules (15A 
NCAC 02B 0.0295 (o)), alternative mitigation is proposed on the Parcel in the form of buffer restoration 
on ditches. As noted in the Site Viability Letter (see Appendix C), the right side of D2 meets 15A NCAC 
02B .0295 (o)(8) (A, B, C, D & E).  The proposed project complies in the following ways: 
Restoration on Ditches (15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(8): 

 Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
 HUC 03020201  Page 4 June 2023 
 D2 is directly connected with and draining towards an intermittent or perennial stream (See 
Figure 3). 
 The point at which the ditch connects to an intermittent or perennial stream is protected under 
a perpetual conservation easement (See Figure 3 for confluence of D2 and UT1). 
 The ditch is contiguous with the rest of the mitigation site protected under a perpetual 
conservation easement, which prohibits any future maintenance of the ditch (See Figure 3 and 7 
for easement boundary). 
 Stormwater runoff from overland flow drains towards the ditch (See Figure 5 for topographic 
and watershed information). 
 The ditch is between one and three (3) feet in depth based on the distance from the thalweg to 
the top of bank (See Site Viability Letter). 
 The entire length of the ditch shall have been in place prior to the effective date of the 
applicable rule (See appendix for historical aerial photographs). 
 The width of buffer restoration on the ditch is no less than 30 feet and no more than 50 feet 
(See Figure 8 for buffer zones and proposed mitigation).  
 The watershed of the ditch is at least four times larger than the restored area along the ditch ‐ 
0.7 ac < 20 ac/4 (See Figure 5 for the drainage and restored area of D2).  
2.5 Watershed Characterization 
The Parcel is located within the HUC 03020201170010. All onsite features drain to Falling Creek. Falling 
Creek flows to the Neuse River. Falling Creek is classified as WS‐IV and NSW by NCDWR. WS‐IV waters 
are sources of water supply for drinking water, culinary, or food processing purposes. The NSW 
designation applies to surface waters that are experiencing excessive growths of microscopic or 
macroscopic vegetation.  
The topography of the Parcel, as indicated on the Grantham USGS 7.5‐minute topographic quadrangle, 
shows low sloped areas throughout the Parcel (Figure 4). Drainage areas for the project reaches (Figure 
5) were delineated using 2‐foot contour intervals derived from the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping 
Program’s 2017 Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data. Land uses draining to the project reaches are 
primarily a mix of active crop fields, woodlands and developed space. The watershed areas and current 
land use are summarized in Table 4, below.  
Table 4: Drainage Areas and Associated Land Use  
Reach Name Watershed Area 
(acres) Land Use 
UT1 80 86% agriculture, 13% forested, 1% developed 
D1 59 90% agriculture, 8% forested, 2% developed 
D2 21 82% agriculture, 17% forested, <1% developed 
2.6 Soils 
The proposed Parcel is mapped by the Wayne County Soil Survey. Project area soils are described below 
in Table 5. Loop Branch and UT1 are depicted as streams on the 1974 NRCS Soil Survey provided in 
Figure 6. 

 Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
 HUC 03020201  Page 5 June 2023 
Table 5: Project Soil Types and Descriptions  
Soil Name Description 
Go – Goldsboro loamy sand, 0‐
2% slopes 
Goldsboro loamy sand consists of a moderately well drained soil on broad, 
smooth divides. Permeability is moderate and surface runoff is slow. Seasonal 
high water table is around two and a half feet.  
We – Weston Loamy Sand 
Weston loamy sand consists of poorly drained soil on smooth flats and in 
depressions on broad interstream divides. Permeability is moderate and 
surface runoff is slow.  
To – Torhunta Loam – 0‐2% 
slopes 
Torhunta loam consists of very poorly drained soils on smooth flat areas 
between streams and in oval depressions. Permeability is moderate, and 
surface runoff is slow. Water ponds in some places.  
Js – Johnston Loam – 0‐2% 
Johnston loam consists of very poorly drained alluvial soil on floodplains. 
Permeability is moderately rapid and the seasonal high water table is at the 
surface.  
Lv ‐ Lumbee Sandy Loam – 0‐
2% slopes 
Lumbee sandy loam consists of poorly drained, nearly level soils in shallow 
drainage ways and broad, smooth, flat areas on terraces. Permeability is 
moderate and surface runoff is very slow. Seasonal high water table is at the 
surface. 
WaB – Wagram Loamy Sand, 0‐
6% slopes 
Wagram loamy sand consists of well‐drained soils on slightly convex, smooth, 
and broad divides. Permeability is rapid, while surface runoff is slow. Seasonal 
high water table remains below a depth of five feet. 
   Source: Wayne County Soil Survey, June 1974, USDA‐NRCS,             
https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_MANUSCRIPTS/north_carolina/wayneNC1974/map19.pdf 
https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_MANUSCRIPTS/north_carolina/wayneNC1974/text.pdf 
2.7 Existing Vegetative Communities 
Existing vegetation within the Parcel is primarily comprised of agricultural fields used to grow row crops 
and graze cattle. Various species of annual herbaceous vegetation exists along the banks of D1, including 
dog fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium) and rush (Juncus spp.). Very occasional woody stems also exist 
along the banks of D1, including sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), Baccharis (Baccharis spp.), black 
willow (Salix nigra), southern wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), blackberry (Rhus occidentalis), and Chinese 
privet (Ligustrum sinense). Existing forest is located along with the left floodplain of D2. Please see Table 
6 for existing woody and herbaceous species noted within the forested area along D2.  
Table 6: Existing Vegetation 
Woody Herbaceous 
Species Common Name Species Common Name 
Acer negundo boxelder smilax spp. greenbriar 
Acer rubra red maple Gelsemiun sempervirens Carolina jessimine 
Betula nigra river birch Arundinaria sp. rivercane 
Ilex opaca American holly Juncus sp. rush 
Ligustrum sinense Chinese privet Lonicera japonica Japanese honeysuckle 
Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum  
Magnolia virginiana sweetbay magnolia  
Myrica cerifera southern wax myrtle  
Pinus taeda loblolly pine  
Quercus alba white oak 

 Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
 HUC 03020201  Page 6 June 2023 
Species Common Name 
Quercus laurifolia laurel oak 
2.8 Threatened and Endangered Species 
The NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database and the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 
Information for Planning and Consultation database (IPaC) were searched for federally listed threatened 
and endangered plant and animal species in Wayne County, NC. Three listed endangered or threatened 
species and one species proposed for listing as endangered or threatened were identified. Respectively, 
these are the Red‐cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis), the Neuse River Waterdog (Necturus 
lewisi), the Carolina Madtom (Notorus furiousus), and the Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus). 
Wildlands performed a pedestrian survey of the project parcel on January 19, 2022. It was determined 
that there is no suitable habitat for any of the listed species; therefore, the project will have “no effect” 
on the federally listed species. USFWS was contacted on July 27, 2022 with request for comment on the 
project. USFWS did not respond within 35 days, therefore it is appropriate to assume USFWS agrees 
with the conclusions made. The USFWS correspondence and Self‐Certification Letter packet is included 
in Appendix D. 
2.9 Cultural Resources 
There are no existing structures in the project area. The Parcel is not located near any sites listed on the 
National Register with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). SHPO was contacted with request 
for review and comment on January 27, 2022. SHPO responded on February 23, 2022 stating they are 
aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project. The SHPO response and request 
are included in Appendix D. 
2.10 FEMA Floodplain Compliance 
No grading activities are proposed in the FEMA floodplain, so a floodplain development permit will not 
be required. No hydraulic modeling is proposed for this project. 
2.11 Parcel Location, Parcel Constraints, and Access 
The Parcel is accessible via a dirt farm path near 297 Loop Road, Goldsboro (See Figure 7). There are no 
crossings within the Parcel.    
2.12 Other Environmental Conditions 
An EDR Radius Map Report with Geocheck was ordered for the Parcel through Environmental Data 
Resources, Inc. on April 11, 2022. Neither the target property nor the adjacent properties were listed in 
any of the Federal, State, or Tribal environmental databases searched by EDR. There were no known or 
potentially hazardous waste sites identified within or immediately adjacent to the project area. The 
Executive Summary of the EDR report is included in the Appendix. 
3.0  Site Protection Instrument 
The land required for planting, management, and stewardship of the mitigation project includes 
portions of the parcels listed in Table 6. The Parcel will remain in private ownership, protected in its 
entirety by an approved NCDWR long term stewardship, and will be managed under the terms detailed 
in an approved NCDWR conservation easement. 

 Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
 HUC 03020201  Page 7 June 2023 
Table 7: Site Protection Instrument 
Landowner PIN County 
Site 
Protection 
Instrument 
Deed Book 
and Page 
Number 
Acreage to 
be Protected 
Mills Family Properties LLC 2566‐10‐3958 Wayne Conservation 
Easement 
To Be 
Recorded 13.75 
Mitigation Work Plan 
The project will restore agriculturally impacted land along D1 and D2 on the Parcel to a protected 
riparian corridor, improving the ecological function of the area. The project design will ensure that no 
adverse impacts to existing riparian buffers occur. Figure 7 illustrates the conceptual design for the 
Parcel. Figure 8 further depicts the riparian buffer zones for the Parcel. 
4.1 Parcel Preparation 
Most areas slated for restoration will require little parcel preparation because the land has been cleared 
and maintained for agriculture; therefore, soil disturbance during planting of the project will be minimal. 
Soil samples will be collected and analyzed prior to planting to determine if soil preparation is necessary 
to support herbaceous and planted stem success. Additionally, during the spring of 2023, the condition 
of herbaceous cover prior to the establishment of row crops will be visually assessed across the Parcel. If 
herbaceous vegetation does not appear to grow naturally, Wildlands will note the areas of deficiency 
and seed them the following spring of 2024. 
4.2 Riparian Area Restoration Activities 
Riparian area restoration will involve planting appropriate native tree species along the riparian corridor. 
Vegetation management and herbicide applications may be needed over the first few years of tree 
establishment in the riparian restoration areas to prevent undesirable species from out‐competing 
planted native vegetation. Except for one small depressional area surrounding the top of D1, tree 
species planted across the riparian areas of the Parcel will include a mixture of at least 8 species listed in 
Table 8 below. Within the old pond footprint surrounding D1, a combination of the species listed in 
Table 9 will be planted as live stakes, along with an herbaceous mix of Juncus effusus, Panicum 
rigidulum, Bidens aristosa, Helianthus angustifolius, Elymus virginicus, Carex lupulina, Rhexia mariana, 
and Carex vulpinoidea.  
    Table 8: Selected Tree Species  
Species Common Name Density Forest Strata 
Platanus occidentalis American Sycamore 15% Canopy 
Betula nigra River Birch 10% Canopy 
Diospryos virginiana Common Persimmon 5% Canopy 
Quercus nigra Water Oak 10% Canopy 
Quercus phellos Willow Oak 5% Canopy 
Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 10% Canopy 
Nyssa biflora Swamp Tupelo 10% Canopy 

 Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
 HUC 03020201  Page 8 June 2023 
Species Common Name Density Forest Strata 
Populus deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 10% Canopy 
Magnolia virginiana Sweetbay Magnolia 10% Sub‐canopy 
Acer negundo Boxelder 10% Canopy 
Prunus serotina Black Cherry 5% Canopy 
Table 9: Selected Tree Species for Old Pond Footprint 
Species Common Name Density Forest Strata 
Salix nigra Black Willow 25% Sub‐canopy 
Cephalanthus occidentalis Button Bush 25% Sub‐canopy 
Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 25% Sub‐canopy 
Sambucus canadensis Elderberry 25% Sub‐canopy 
Trees will be spaced at 7’X12’ upon planting, which is equivalent to a stem density of 521 stems per acre 
and is sufficient to meet the performance standards outlined in the Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 of 260 
planted trees per acre at the end of five years. At least 8 of the 11 species listed in Table 8 will be 
planted. If a species is not available at the time of planting, the percentage composition of one or more 
of the available species will be increased to ensure the same number of trees required to meet the 
proposed density are planted. No one species will be planted at a composition higher than 15%. Stems 
will be well mixed prior to planting to ensure diversity of bare root species across the Parcel. Due to the 
nature of random mixing, some stems of the same species might be planted together in some areas. No 
one tree species will be greater than 50% of the established stems. A regionally appropriate seed mix of 
warm season grasses and wildflowers will also be applied to provide temporary and permanent ground 
cover for soil stabilization and reduction of sediment loss during rain events in areas without existing 
herbaceous cover. The proposed planting area is depicted on Figure 7. Planting is scheduled for 
December 2024. Fencing will be installed along the perimeter of the conservation easement along D1 
and D2, which will connect with existing fencing on the Parcel. 
4.4 NCDWR As‐Built Evaluation 
Within 30 calendar days after completing the establishment of the buffer mitigation and nutrient offset 
areas, the Sponsor will submit written notification to NCDWR documenting that all buffer mitigation and 
nutrient offset activities have been completed. Failure to submit written notification within 30 days may 
result in a modified credit release schedule or a delay in the issuance of credit releases.  
5.0 Monitoring and Maintenance Plan 
5.1  Monitoring Protocol 
Permanent vegetation monitoring plots will be installed and evaluated within the riparian restoration 
areas to measure the survival of the planted trees. A total of 9 plots will be established within the 
riparian restoration areas and will be randomly placed such that the plots are representative of the 
buffer mitigation and nutrient offset credit areas (Figure 9). Of these 9 plots, 2 will be rotating plots. 
Throughout the monitoring period, one of the rotating plots will be done within the riparian restoration 

 Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
 HUC 03020201  Page 9 June 2023 
area along D1, while the other rotating plot will be done within the riparian restoration area along D2. 
Each of the 9 plots will be 100 square meters, however, the 7 fixed plots will be a 10 x 10 meter square 
while the rotating plots will be circular with a radius of 5.64 meters.  
Vegetation assessments will be conducted and follow the Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) Level 2 
Protocol for Recording Vegetation (2008). A reference photo will be taken from the southwestern corner 
of each of the 9 plots. Overview photos will be taken each monitoring year and provided in the annual 
reports. All planted stems will be marked with flagging tape and recorded.  
The first annual monitoring activities will commence at the end of the first growing season, at least five 
months after planting has been completed and no earlier than the fall season. Species composition, 
height, survival rates, and vigor will be evaluated on an annual basis by plot. The total number of 
volunteer woody stems will also be documented and reported. The measure of vegetative success for 
the Parcel will be the survival of at least four native hardwood tree species, where no one species is 
greater than 50% of the established planted stems, and an established density of at least 260 planted 
trees per acre at the end of the fifth year of monitoring. Appropriate and desirable native volunteer 
species may be included in the Parcel’s density to meet the performance standards with written NCDWR 
approval.  
The Sponsor shall submit the annual monitoring report to NCDWR by December 31st of each year for five 
consecutive years and will follow the terms and conditions of the MBI. 
5.2 Parcel Maintenance 
If the Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve the success criteria outlined in Section 
5.1, adaptive measures will be developed and/or appropriate remedial actions will be implemented. 
Maintenance will be performed to correct any identified problems on the Parcel that have a high 
likelihood of affecting project success. Such items include, but are not limited to, fire, flooding, drought, 
or insects that cause excess tree mortality. Any actions implemented will be designed to achieve the 
success criteria and will include a work schedule and updated monitoring criteria. A rigorous herbicide 
schedule may need to be implemented in the first few years of tree establishment in the restoration 
areas to prevent establishment of invasive species that may out‐compete the planted native vegetation. 
The only herbicides used on the Parcel will be aquatic approved herbicides that will be applied in 
accordance with North Carolina Department of Agriculture rules and regulations.  
The easement boundary will be checked annually as part of monitoring activities. Easement boundary 
conditions as well as any maintenance performed will be reported in the annual monitoring reports to 
NCDWR. If mowing is deemed necessary by the Sponsor during the monitoring period, the Sponsor must 
receive approval from NCDWR prior to conducting any mowing activities within Zone 1 and Zone 2 of 
the Neuse buffers to ensure that no buffer violations have occurred.  
5.3 Easement Boundaries  
Easement boundaries will be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the Parcel and 
adjacent properties. The conservation easement on the left side of D2 is at least 15 feet wide measuring 
from the top of bank (see Figure 3). The confluence of both D1 and D2 with UT1 will be secured under a 
conservation easement (see Figure 3). This can be seen in Figure 3. Boundaries may be identified by 
marker, post, tree‐blazing, or other means as allowed by Parcel conditions and/or conservation easement 
prior to the NCDWR on‐site As‐Built evaluation for Task 2 credit release. Boundary markers that have been 
disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on an as needed basis. Contact 
information for the conservation easement holder will be included on easement markers. 

 Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
 HUC 03020201  Page 10 June 2023 
6.0 Financial Assurance and Long‐Term Management 
6.1 Financial Assurances 
Following approval of the Loop Road Bank Parcel Development Package, the Sponsor shall provide a 
Performance Bond from a surety that is rated no less than an “A‐“ as rated by A.M. Best. The 
Performance Bond amount shall be 100% of the estimated cost for implementation of the project as 
described in the Bank Parcel Development Package (BPDP), but not less than $150,000.00. In lieu of 
posting the performance bond, the Sponsor may elect to construct the project prior to the first credit 
release. In that case no performance bond will be necessary. 
After completion of the restoration/construction, a separate Performance/Maintenance Bond will be 
secured for 100% of the estimated cost to implement the monitoring and maintenance plan but not less 
than $100,000.00. The Performance/Maintenance Bond shall apply at the inception of the monitoring 
period for a term of one year and be extended annually for a minimum of five years. Upon NCDWR 
approval, this may be lowered each year based on the adjusted cost to complete the monitoring. 
Performance bonds for monitoring shall be renewed at least annually to cover the next years monitoring 
period, with confirmation of renewal provided to NCDWR with each annual monitoring report when 
applicable. NCDWR reserves the right to alter the credit release schedule if monitoring reports are 
submitted without proof of bond renewals when applicable. 
6.2 Long‐term Management 
The Parcel will remain in private ownership, protected in its entirety by an approved NCDWR long term 
stewardship, and will be managed under the terms detailed in an approved NCDWR conservation 
easement. The long‐term manager will be chosen prior to the submittal of the Year 4 Monitoring report 
and will be responsible for periodic inspection of the Parcel to ensure that the restrictions documented 
in the recorded easement are upheld in perpetuity. No remaining credits will be released for Monitoring 
Year 4 until the conservation easement has been assigned to an approved land trust or stewardship. 
7.0 Project Credit Potential 
Of the 13.75 acres protected under the conservation easement, the mitigation activity for 12.0 acres is 
riparian restoration. Of that 12.0 acres of restoration, 0.7 acres are proposed for buffer mitigation credit 
and 11.3 acres are proposed for nutrient offset credit. The Buffer Interpretation /Clarification Memo 
#2008‐019 applies to DA and D1  where maintenance of diffuse flow onsite is unattainable; therefore, a 
total of 8,712 square feet is removed from the creditable area. The credit calculations were derived 
based on Wildlands’ conceptual design for maximum ecological uplift. The management objectives, 
mitigation type, and proposed amount of buffer mitigation and nutrient offset are presented in Tables 9 
and 10, below. The riparian restoration areas within 50 feet of D2 are viable for either riparian buffer 
credits or nutrient offset credits, however, Wildlands is seeking Riparian Buffer Credit from areas within 
Top of Bank‐50’ along that feature. These credits can be converted and transferred into Nutrient Offset 
Credits only upon receiving written approval by NCDWR. Wildlands is not seeking Riparian Buffer Credit 
or Nutrient Offset Credit from UT1. The connection between both D1 and D2 with UT1 is secured within 
the easement. Wildlands is seeking Nutrient Offset Credits in all the remaining riparian restoration areas 
within the Parcel. These areas of riparian restoration areas will not be convertible to Riparian Buffer 
Credits per the Parcel's MBI. There will be two credit ledgers for the project: A Buffer Restoration Credit 
Ledger and A Nitrogen Nutrient Offset Credit Ledger. 

 Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
 HUC 03020201  Page 11 June 2023 
In accordance with the MBI, any credit conversions must be calculated using the guidance provided in 
the Clarified Procedures for Calculating Buffer Mitigation Credits and Nutrient Offset Credits letter issued 
by the NCDWR.

 Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
 HUC 03020201  Page 12 June 2023 
Table 10: Loop Road Project Credit Table  
Neuse 03020201 ‐ Outside Falls Lake Project Area             
19.16394 N Credit Conversion Ratio (ft2/pound)           
N/A P Credit Conversion Ratio (ft2/pound)           
Credit Type Location 
Subject? 
(enter NO if 
ephemeral 
or ditch 1) 
Feature 
Type 
Mitigation 
Activity 
Min‐Max 
Buffer 
Width (ft) 
Feature Name Total Area (ft2) 
Total 
(Creditable) 
Area of Buffer 
Mitigation (ft2) 
Initial 
Credit 
Ratio 
(x:1) 
% Full 
Credit 
 Final 
Credit 
Ratio 
(x:1)  
 Convertible 
to Riparian 
Buffer?  
 Riparian Buffer 
Credits  
 Convertible to 
Nutrient 
Offset?  
 Delivered Nutrient 
Offset: N (lbs)  
Buffer Rural No Ditch Restoration 0‐50 D2 30,838 30,838 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 30,838.000 Yes 1,609.168 
Nutrient 
Offset Rural No Ditch Restoration 0‐100 D1 and D2 197,768 197,768 1 100% 1.00000 No — Yes 10,319.799 
Nutrient 
Offset Rural No Ditch Restoration 101‐200 D1 and D2 293,363 293,363 1 33% 3.03030 No — Yes 15,308.073 
Buffer Rural No Ditch Restoration 101‐200 
Diffused Flow 
Deductions  DA and 
D1 
8,712 0 1 33%   No — No — 
      Totals (ft2): 530,681 521, 969      30,838.000   27,237.040 
       Total Buffer (ft2): 39,550 30,838            
      Total Nutrient Offset (ft2): 491,131 N/A            

Total Ephemeral Area (ft2) for Credit: 0 0  
Total Eligible Ephemeral Area (ft2): 9,888 0.0% Ephemeral Reaches as % TABM  
Enter Preservation Credits Below   Total Eligible for Preservation (ft2): 13,183 0.0% Preservation as % TABM  
Credit 
Type Location Subject? Feature 
Type 
Mitigation 
Activity 
Min‐Max Buffer Width 
(ft) Feature Name  Total Area 
(sf)  
Total (Creditable) Area for Buffer 
Mitigation (ft2) 
Initial Credit Ratio 
(x:1) 
% Full 
Credit 
 Final Credit 
Ratio (x:1)  
 Riparian Buffer 
Credits  
Buffer                          — 
    Preservation Area Subtotals (ft2): 0 0  
Table 11: Loop Road Total Area of Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation 
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION (TABM) 
Mitigation Totals Square Feet Credits 
Restoration: 30,838 30,838.000 
Enhancement: 0 0.000 
Preservation: 0 0.000 
Total Riparian Buffer: 30,838 30,838.000 
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION 
Mitigation Totals Square Feet Credits 
Nutrient 
Offset: 
Nitrogen: 
491,131 
25,627.872 
Phosphorus: 0.000 

 Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
 HUC 03020201  Page 13 June 2023 
Upon submittal of the appropriate documentation by the Sponsor and subsequent approval by NCDWR, 
the mitigation credits associated with the Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel will be released as 
described in the MBI.  

8.0 References 
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), 2015. 15A NCAC 02B .0259 Mitigation 
Program Requirements for Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers. 
http://reports.oah.state.nc.us/ncac/title%2015a%20‐
%20environmental%20quality/chapter%2002%20‐
%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20b/15a%20ncac%2002b%20.0295.pdf 
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP), 2010. 2010 Neuse River Basin Restoration 
Priorities Plan (RBRP). 
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Mitigation%20Services/Watershed_Planning/Neuse_River_Basin/FINAL
%20RBRP%20Neuse%202010_%2020111207%20CORRECTED.pdf 
North Carolina Geological Survey (NCGS), 2009. Mineral Resources. 
http://www.geology.enr.state.nc.us/Mineral%20resources/mineralresources.html 
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP), 2019. Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Database, 
Wayne County, NC. https://www.ncnhde.natureserve.org 
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), 2006. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Soil 
Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Wayne County, North Carolina. 
https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/ 
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 2018. Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal 
Species of Concern and Candidate Species, Wayne County, NC. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/ 


&ŝŐƵƌĞƐ



4
Bank Parcel Conservation Easement
off` * Loop Road Bank Parcel Location
CU
tq
r
4
us f4ighway - 13S
WILDLANDS
E N G I N E E R I N G
O'B'WTV Rd
Directions: From the City of Raleigh, travel east on I-40
for approximately 42 miles. Take exit 341 for NC-50/
NC-55 towards US13/Newton Grove. Keep left at the
fork, follow signs for Newton Grove. Turn left onto NC-50
S/NC-55 E. At the traffic circle, take the 4th exit onto
US-13 N. Continue onto US HWY 13 S. In 7.8 miles, turn
right onto Loop Rd. The entrance to the dirt road will bE:
on the right in 1.6 miles. Follow the dirt road for 0.3
miles. The Parcel will he located on the left.
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
0 0.5 1 Miles Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel
i 1 1 I Bank Parcel Development Package
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Wayne County, NC

County Boundaries
Khoro i ..�..�.
H U C 03020201
�A
H Riparian Buffer & Nutrient
Offset Credit Serivice Area
y Loop Road Bank Parcel
i ! Location
1 +------ Creadrnoor
Louisburg
Hillsborough �' _ _ �•
f urharn j •�•
Chap Hrll
f::71'y' Fi:]lei.11l F`1wllrf:l,I- Wender/••• _.1 I- _.�• s
i,et. �•
�itlshoro ��• '�, ;serf � tiMl
03020201 .
fr Springs Clayton ,
i
• /
An
:r[
Smith d
•/
San or rl
/
.
�,
Coals
-Lilringfon Bules Creek
!•
B
cn
•+�•.-�
Erwin
�•
��•
❑u
/
/•
Walkertown
f"
'
toll
tr
Spring Lake
- ud Bra ;
Fart Bragg
+•
Ullaw r
- ..•I
Figure 2. Credit Service Area Map
W I L D L A N D S 0 6 12 Miles Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel
ENGINEERING �i ill Bank Parcel Development Package
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Wayne County, NC

s.
n
Wider Section
of Ditch
`WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
EM
L_.. .... _.....
Project Location
Bank Parcel Conservation Easement
Project Stream
i Project Ditch
Non -Project Ditch
Non -project Stream
(D Origin Points
bIL.0'Irom TOB
Figure 3. Site Map
0 150 300 Feet Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel
I 1 I 1 I Bank Parcel Development Package
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Wayne County, NC

! Bank Parcel Conservation Easement
Grantham USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle
Figure 4. USGS Topographic Map
W I L D L A N D 5 0 200 400 Feet Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel
%PAV* ENGINEERING IiIi I t Bank Parcel Development Package
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Wayne County, NC

!
Bank Parcel Conservation Easement
,.
UT1 Watershed
D1 Watershed
D2 Watershed
Project Stream
bw
Project Ditch
' "°*a•
Non -Project Ditch
Riparian Restoration for Buffer Credits
Non -Project Stream
Topographic Contours (Y)
�
❑.7 ac
1-------------
W I L D L A N D 5 0 250 500 Feet
ENGINEERING 1 1 1 l _J t
Figure 5. Watershed Map
Loop Branch Mitigation Bank Parcel
Bank Parcel Development Package
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Wayne County, NC

! Bank Parcel Conservation Easement
h ;,r R.
F �
l i
Ke-
TO .• .�•.
• N uA
e R r .. �
LI
.
—n � I _
a °
" Go
WaO'.
6
1974 NRCS Soil Survey of Wayne County - Sheet 3D{
Figure 5. 1974 NRCS Soil Survey Map
W I L D L A N D S 0 200 400 Feet Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel
kt ENGINEERING 1 I I I I Bank Parcel Development Package
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Wayne County, NC

Figure 7. Project Credits Map
W I L D L A N D 5 0 150 300 Feet Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel
E NO I NEE RING I I Bank Parcel Development Package
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Wayne County, NC

Figure 8. Riparian Buffer Zones Map
kkWILDLANDS 0 150 300 Feet Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel
ENGINEERING 1 i I 1 Bank Parcel Development Package
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Wayne County, NC

Figure 9. Monitoring Map
kkWILDLANDS 0 200 400 Feet Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel
ENGINEERING ! I ! I ! Bank Parcel Development Package
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Wayne County, NC


ƉƉĞŶĚŝces



Appendix A:
Current Land Use Photographs

CURRENT LAND USE PHOTOGRAPHS 
Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel 

Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel
HUC 03020201 

D1 

D1 – Downstream (06/02/2023) D1 – Downstream (06/02/2023) 
D2 

D2 – Upstream – Forested Section Right Bank (06/02/2023) D2 – Upstream (06/02/2023) 
D1 – D2 – UT1 Confluence 

 (06/02/2023) (06/02/2023) 

Appendix B:
Historical Aerials
The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package
Loop Road
297 Loop Road
Goldsboro, NC 27530
Inquiry Number:
April 12, 2022
6935406.5
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
2016 1"=875'Flight Year: 2016 USDA/NAIP
2012 1"=875'Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP
2009 1"=875'Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP
2006 1"=875'Flight Year: 2006 USDA/NAIP
1999 1"=875'Acquisition Date: January 01, 1999 USGS/DOQQ
1993 1"=875'Acquisition Date: March 09, 1993 USGS/DOQQ
1983 1"=875'Flight Date: March 02, 1983 NHAP
1973 1"=875'Flight Date: February 24, 1973 USGS
1964 1"=875'Flight Date: April 01, 1964 USGS
1961 1"=875'Flight Date: October 05, 1961 USGS
1959 1"=875'Flight Date: February 21, 1959 USDA
1950 1"=875'Flight Date: November 21, 1950 USGS
EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 04/12/22
Loop Road
Site Name:Client Name:
Wildlands Eng, Inc.
297 Loop Road 1430 South Mint Street
Goldsboro, NC 27530 Charlotte, NC 28203
EDR Inquiry #6935406.5 Contact:Kaitlyn Hogarth
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist
environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s
professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo
per decade.
Search Results:
Year Scale Details Source
When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE
ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more
information contact your EDR Account Executive.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot
be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE
OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,
WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING,
WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any
analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to
provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.
Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2022 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of
Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are
the property of their respective owners.
6935406 5-page 2
6935406.5
2016
= 875'
6935406.5
2012
= 875'
6935406.5
2009
= 875'
6935406.5
2006
= 875'
6935406.5
1999
= 875'
6935406.5
1993
= 875'
6935406.5
1983
= 875'
6935406.5
1973
= 875'
6935406.5
1964
= 875'
6935406.5
1961
= 875'
6935406.5
1959
= 875'
6935406.5
1950
= 875'

Appendix C:
On Site Determination of Applicability to Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules
Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Letter

April 21, 2021 Project 20201938 Wayne County Andrea Eckardt Wildlands Engineering Inc. [e-mail] Carolyn Lanza Wildlands Engineering Inc. [e-mail]
Subject: Determination for Applicability to the Neuse River Buffer Rules 15A NCAC 02B .0714
Project Name: Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel
Address: 214 Loop Road, Goldsboro, NC 27530, Wayne County, NC
Location: Lat., Long: 35.285198, -78.132003 Dear Ms. Eckardt and Ms. Lanza: On January 29, 2021, Shelton Sullivan of the Division of Water Resources (DWR) conducted an on-site review of features located on the Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel at the request of Wildlands Engineering Inc. to determine the applicability of features on the site to the Neuse River Riparian Area Protection Rules, Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 02B .0714. The enclosed map(s) depict the feature(s) evaluated and this information is also summarized in the table below. Streams were evaluated for being ephemeral, at least intermittent, and for subjectivity to the Neuse River Riparian Area Protection Rules. Streams that are considered “Subject” have been located on the most recently published NRCS Soil Survey of Wayne County and/or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic (at 1:24,000 scale) map(s), have been located on the ground at the site, and possess characteristics that qualify them to be at least intermittent streams. Features that are considered “Not Subject” have been determined to not be at least intermittent, not present on the property, or not depicted on the required maps.
This determination only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules within the proposed
easement and does not approve any activity within buffers or within waters of the state. There
may be other streams or features located on the property that appear or do not appear on the
maps referenced above. Any of the features on the site may be considered jurisdictional
according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and subject to the Clean Water Act.

The following table addresses the features observed and rated during the DWR site visit.
DocuSign Envelope ID: A9406950-D5E2-4373-8CF4-9838E5E4658A
Project 20201938_Loop Road Wayne Co. Page 2 of 2
Feature
ID
Feature Type: stream
(ephemeral,
intermittent, perennial),
ditch, swale, wetland,
other
Subject
to Buffer
Rules
Start @ Stop @
Depicted
on
Soil Survey
Depicted on
USGS Topo
UT1 Ditch No Easement
boundary
Confluence with
Feature UT2 Yes No
UT2
(main
trib)
Stream-at least I Yes
Upstream of
Easement
boundary
Continues beyond
Easement boundary Yes Yes partial
UT3 Stream-at least I Yes
UT3 Start at
confluence
with Ditch 3
and 4
Confluence with
UT2 Yes No
Ditch
3 Ditch No Not
evaluated
Confluence with
Ditch 4 and UT3
Start
Yes No
Ditch
4 Ditch No Not
evaluated
Confluence with
Feature Ditch 3 and
UT3 Start
No No * E: Ephemeral, I: Intermittent, P: Perennial
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners
or affected parties that dispute this determination made by the DWR may request an appeal
determination by the Director of Water Resources. An appeal request must be made within
sixty (60) calendar days of the date of this letter to the Director in writing, as per 15A NCAC
02B .0714 (4).
If sending via U.S. Postal Service: Paul Wojoski - DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch Supervisor 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.) Paul Wojoski - DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch Supervisor 512 N Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 This determination is final and binding as detailed above, unless an appeal is requested within
sixty (60) calendar days of the date of this letter. If you have any additional questions or require additional information, please contact Shelton Sullivan at [e-mail] or 919-239-0238. This determination is subject to review as provided in Articles 3 & 4 of G.S. 150B. Sincerely,
Paul Wojoski Supervisor, DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Attachments: Site Map with labels, Photos, NRCS Soil Survey, USGS Topographical Map cc: Katie Merritt via email [e-mail] 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch files Wayne Mills, Mills Family Properties LLC via email at [e-mail] Filename: 20201938_LoopRoad_WayneCoStreamCalls Letter_4-21-21
DocuSign Envelope ID: A9406950-D5E2-4373-8CF4-9838E5E4658A
DWR Site Visit 1/29/21
UT2
main trib
UT3
UT3 Start
UT2
main trib
DocuSign Envelope ID: A9406950-D5E2-4373-8CF4-9838E5E4658A
DWR Site Visit 1/29/21
UT1 Ditch looking downslope UT2 Main Tributary looking downslope
3 Ditch looking upslope UT3 Start flowing right: Confluence of Ditch 3 and Ditch 4
DocuSign Envelope ID: A9406950-D5E2-4373-8CF4-9838E5E4658A
Figure 3. 1974 NRCS Soil SurveyMapLoopRoadBankParcelNeuseRiverBasin (03020201)
0 700350 Feet
Wayne County, NC
1974 NRCS Soil Survey of Wayne County - Sheet 30
Project Location
DocuSign Envelope ID: A9406950-D5E2-4373-8CF4-9838E5E4658A
Figure 2. USGS TopographicMapLoopRoadBankParcelNeuseRiverBasin (03020201)
0 700350 Feet
Wayne County, NC
Project Location
2019, Grantham & Southwest Goldsboro, NCUSGS7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle
DocuSign Envelope ID: A9406950-D5E2-4373-8CF4-9838E5E4658A
Certificate Of Completion
Envelope Id: A9406950D5E243738CF49838E5E4658A Status: Completed
Subject: Please DocuSign: 20201938_LoopRoad_WayneCoStreamCalls Letter_4-21-21.pdf
Source Envelope:
Document Pages: 6 Signatures: 1 Envelope Originator:
Certificate Pages: 1 Initials: 0 Shelton Sullivan
AutoNav: Enabled
EnvelopeId Stamping: Enabled
Time Zone: (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada)
217 W. Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27699
[e-mail]
IP Address: 149.168.204.10
Record Tracking
Status: Original
4/20/2021 5:25:17 PM
Holder: Shelton Sullivan
[e-mail]
Location: DocuSign
Security Appliance Status: Connected Pool: StateLocal
Storage Appliance Status: Connected Pool: North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality
Location: DocuSign
Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Paul Wojoski
[e-mail]
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 149.168.204.10
Sent: 4/20/2021 5:26:38 PM
Viewed: 4/21/2021 1:43:20 PM
Signed: 4/21/2021 1:43:42 PM
Freeform Signing
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
In Person Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Editor Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Agent Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Intermediary Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Certified Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Carbon Copy Events Status Timestamp
Witness Events Signature Timestamp
Notary Events Signature Timestamp
Envelope Summary Events Status Timestamps
Envelope Sent Hashed/Encrypted 4/20/2021 5:26:38 PM
Certified Delivered Security Checked 4/21/2021 1:43:20 PM
Signing Complete Security Checked 4/21/2021 1:43:42 PM
Completed Security Checked 4/21/2021 1:43:42 PM
Payment Events Status Timestamps

July 27, 2021
Andrea Eckardt
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
(via electronic mail: [e-mail] )

Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset – Loop Road Site
Near 35.283350, -78.131426 in Goldsboro, NC
Neuse 03020201
Wayne County

Dear Ms. Eckardt,

On June 7, 2021, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), received a request
from you on behalf of Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) for a site visit near the above-
referenced site in the Neuse River Basin within the 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201. The site
visit was to determine the potential for riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset within a
proposed conservation easement boundary, which is more accurately depicted in the attached map
labeled “Figure 1-Site Map” (Figure 1) prepared by Wildlands. The proposed easement boundary in
Figure 1, includes all riparian areas intended to be proposed as part of the mitigation site. On July 7,
2021, Ms. Merritt performed a site assessment of the subject site. Staff with Wildlands were also
present.

Ms. Merritt’s evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank (TOB)
and landward 200’ from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(effective November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 5DB659C5-80CC-45C0-8959-1A5274E84C07
Loop Rd Site
Wildlands
July 27, 2021
Page 2 of 3
1Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated April 21, 2021 (DWR# 2020-1938) using the
1:24,000 scale quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared by
the NRCS .
2The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
3NC Division of Water Resources - Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment
4 Determinations made for this Site are determined based on the proposal provided in maps and figures submitted with the request.
5 All features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset, must have a planted conservation easement established that includes the
tops of channel banks when being measured perpendicular and landward from the banks, even if no credit is viable within that riparian
area.
6The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7).
Determinations provided in the table above were made using a proposed easement boundary showing
proposed mitigation areas shown in Figure 1. The map representing the proposal for the site is
attached to this letter and initialed by Ms. Merritt on July 27, 2021. Substantial changes to the
proposed easement boundary as well as any site constraints identified in this letter, could affect the
Site’s potential to generate buffer mitigation and nutrient offset credits.

This letter does not constitute an approval of this Site to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to
DWR for written approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or
surface waters for buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703, a proposal regarding a
proposed nutrient load-reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to DWR for
approval prior to any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.
Feature Classification
onsite
1Subject
to
Buffer
Rule
Riparian Land uses
adjacent to Feature
(0-200’)
Buffer
Credit
Viable
3Nutrient
Offset
Viable
4,5Mitigation Type Determination w/in
riparian areas
D1

Ditch
>3’ depth
No Non-forested agricultural
fields
No Yes Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)

DA Ditch No Non-forested agricultural
fields
No No Directly hydrologically connected to
Ditch D1
D2
Starts @
35.287336,
-78.128809
Ditch
<3’ depth
No Beginning @ point down to
UT3:
Left Side - Mature Forest

Right Side – Non-forested
agricultural fields

*see Note Yes (non-
forested
fields only)
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (o)(8)

*Buffer Mitigation Note – Assessment
concludes the right side of ditch meets
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(8) (A, B, C, D
& E). More information is required to be
provided in a mitigation plan for
complete assessment. See rule.

D3

Ditch/Swale No N/A No No Feature does not meet criteria to be viable
for nutrient offset or buffer mitigation
credits
Loop Branch Stream Yes A combination of mature
forested areas and non-
forested agricultural fields
2Yes Yes (non-
forested
fields only)
Forested Areas - Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)

Non-forested areas = Restoration site
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5DB659C5-80CC-45C0-8959-1A5274E84C07
Loop Rd Site
Wildlands
July 27, 2021
Page 3 of 3

All vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being
viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.

This viability assessment will expire on July 27, 2023 or upon approval of a mitigation plan by
the DWR, whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in any nutrient offset, buffer,
stream or wetland mitigation plan for this Site.

Please contact Katie Merritt at [phone] if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,

Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
PW/kym

Attachments: Figure 1: Site Map

cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)

DocuSign Envelope ID: 5DB659C5-80CC-45C0-8959-1A5274E84C07
Loop Branch
200'
D2
DA
D3
D1
2017 Aerial Photography
Figure 1. Site MapLoop Road Mitigation Bank ParcelNeuse River Basin (03020201)0 500250 Feet
Wayne County, NC
¹
UT3
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5DB659C5-80CC-45C0-8959-1A5274E84C07

Appendix D:
USFWS Self-Certification Letter and Correspondence
SHPO Request for Review and Response
EDR Radius Map Report, Executive Summary

             Wildlands Engineering, Inc.   (P) 704.332.7754  •  1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104  •  Charlotte, NC 28203
January 27, 2022 

US Fish and Wildlife Service 
Raleigh ES Field Office 
551‐F Pylon Drive 
Raleigh, NC 27606 

Subject: Loop Road Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel  
Wayne County, North Carolina     

To whom it may concern, 

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. requests review and comment on any possible issues that might emerge with respect 
to fish and wildlife issues associated with a potential riparian buffer restoration project on the Loop Road 
Mitigation Site located in Wayne County, NC. A Site Map is enclosed. The site is located at latitude 35.283350 
longitude ‐78.131426. 
The Loop Road Mitigation Site is being developed to provide riparian buffer and nutrient offset mitigation in the 
Neuse River basin. The project will include buffer restoration and preservation along Loop Branch and two ditches 
that flow to Falling Creek. Restoration activities will include planting native tree species along the riparian corridor, 
along with the application of a regionally appropriate seed mix of warm season grasses and wildflowers in areas 
without existing herbaceous cover. This buffer mitigation project will reduce sediment and nutrient loading, 
provide and improve terrestrial and in stream habitats, and improve stream and bank stability. The area 
surrounding the channels proposed for buffer restoration is a combination of agricultural fields and forest. 
Restoring the vegetative buffer on the areas up to 200 feet from streams and ditches will remove crops and 
fertilizer inputs within the project area. The restored floodplain areas will filter sediment during high rainfall 
events. The establishment of riparian buffers will create shading to minimize thermal heating. Finally, newly 
planted native vegetation will provide cover and food for wildlife. 
The major goals of the proposed buffer restoration project are to provide ecological and water quality 
enhancements to the Neuse River Basin by creating a functional riparian corridor and restoring the riparian buffer. 
Waters of the United States 404/401 permitting is not required for this buffer mitigation site as construction 
activities will only involve planting riparian vegetation and will not impact project streams or downstream 
resources. 
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact us with any 
questions that you may have concerning the extent of site disturbance associated with this project. 
Sincerely, 
Kaitlyn Hogarth
Kaitlyn Hogarth, Environmental Scientist 
[e-mail] 
540.907.9432 
Attachments: Figure 1 Site Map  

Project Location
—•—� Proposed Conservation
--•+ Easement
Project Stream
Project Ditch
Non -project Stream
I
I j
♦'♦
,♦ j
• I
Figure 1. Site Map
k�t W I L D L A N D S 0 200 400 Feet Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel
E N G I N E E R I N G I I I i I t Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Wayne County, NC

Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726






































Self-Certification Letter
Project Name______________________________
Dear Applicant:
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid.This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
“no effect” determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
“may affect, not likely to adversely affect” determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
“may affect, likely to adversely affect” determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
“no Eagle Act permit required” determinations for eagles.
01/27/2022
Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel
✔

Applicant Page 2

We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the “no effect” or
“not likely to adversely affect” determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the “may affect” determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the “no Eagle Act permit required” determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html.
If you have any questions, you can write to us at [e-mail] or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.

Sincerely,

/s/Pete Benjamin

Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services

Enclosures - project review package
Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel
Date: 01/27/2022
Species / Resource Name Conclusion ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act
Determination
Notes / Documentation
Necturus lewisi
(Neuse River Waterdog)

No suitable habitat present No Effect A Field Survey was conducted on January 19 2022, and no
suitable habitat was found due to siltation, poor water quality,
and small ditch/channel size. The proposed project is not in
the proposed critical habitat area designated by USFWS for
this species. Per NCNHP data explorer, no known element
occurrences exist within the proposed project area.
Noturus furiosus
(Carolina Madtom)

No suitable habitat present No Effect A Field Survey was conducted on January 19, 2022, and no
suitable habitat was found due to lack of appropriate channel
substrate, poor water quality, and small ditch/channel size.
The proposed project is not in the proposed critical habitat
area designated by USFWS for this species. Per NCNHP data
explorer, no known element occurrences exist within the
proposed project area.
Picoides borealis
(Red-cockaded Woodpecker)
No suitable habitat present No Effect A Field survey conducted on January 19, 2022, determined no
suitable habitat was found due to lack of mature forest with
appropriate tree species. No critical habitat has been
designated by USFWS for this species. Per NCNHP data
explorer, no known element occurrences exist within the
proposed project area.
Bald Eagle Unlikely to disturb nesting
bald eagles
No Eagle Act Permit Required Not within 660 feet of large bodies of water.
Critical Habitat No critical habitat present
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all the provided resources to make an informed decision about
impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.

Kaitlyn Hogarth
Environmental Scientist 01/27/2022
_______________________________________________________________ ___________________________
Signature /Title Date

December 27, 2021
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2022-SLI-0484
Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-01073
Project Name: Loop Road

Subject:List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally-listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally-protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
12/27/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-01073   2

evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally-protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/
towers/comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].
12/27/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-01073   3

▪
Attachment(s):
Official Species List
12/27/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-01073   1

Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]
12/27/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-01073   2

Project Summary
Consultation Code:04EN2000-2022-SLI-0484
Event Code:Some(04EN2000-2022-E-01073)
Project Name:Loop Road
Project Type:LAND - RESTORATION / ENHANCEMENT
Project Description:Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Bank
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/@35.2844494,-78.12784931672357,14z
Counties:Wayne County, North Carolina
12/27/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-01073   3

1.
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 4 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME STATUS
Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Endangered
Amphibians
NAME STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Threatened
Fishes
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Endangered
Insects
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Candidate
1
12/27/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-01073   4

Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

             Wildlands Engineering, Inc.   (P) 919.851.9986  •  312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225  •  Raleigh, NC 27609

January 27, 2022 

Renee Gledhill‐Earley 
State Historic Preservation Office 
4617 Mail Service Center 
Raleigh, NC 27699‐4617  

Subject: Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel  
Wayne County, North Carolina    

Dear Ms. Gledhill‐Earley, 

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. requests review and comment on any possible issues that might emerge with respect 
to archaeological or cultural resources associated with a potential riparian buffer restoration project on the Loop 
Road Mitigation Bank Parcel located in Wayne County, NC. An Overview Site Map and a USGS Topographic Map 
showing the approximate project area are enclosed. The topographic figure was prepared from the Grantham 7.5‐
Minute USGS Topographic Quadrangle, and the site is located at latitude 35.283350 longitude ‐78.131426. 
The Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel is being developed to provide riparian buffer and nutrient offset mitigation 
in the Neuse River Basin. The project will include restoration and preservation of riparian buffers along Loop Road 
and two ditches (D1 and D2) that flow to Falling Creek. Loop Branch is surrounded by forest on its left floodplain 
and a narrow, forested corridor on its right, with agricultural fields directly adjacent. D1 is surrounded by 
agricultural fields on either side and D2 is surrounded by agricultural fields on its right floodplain and forest on its 
left.  
The major goals of the riparian buffer and nutrient offset mitigation bank project are to provide ecological and 
water quality enhancements to the Neuse River Basin while creating a functional riparian corridor at the site level. 
This will be accomplished by restoring and or preserving the vegetative buffer on the areas up to 200 feet from 
streams and ditches, along with permanently preserving and protecting the site through establishing a 
conservation easement.  
No surveyed sites listed on the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) are located within one mile 
of the site. In addition, the site is not located near any sites listed on the National Register with the SHPO. No 
architectural structures or archaeological artifacts have been observed or noted during preliminary surveys of the 
site for restoration purposes. We ask that you review the site based on the attached information to determine the 
presence of any historic properties within the conservation easement area proposed as shown on Figures 1 and 2. 
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact us with any 
questions that you may have concerning the extent of site disturbance associated with this project. 
Sincerely, 
Kaitlyn Hogarth
Kaitlyn Hogarth, Environmental Scientist 
[e-mail] 
919.851.9986 x 122 
Attachments: Figure 1 Overview Site Map and Figure 2 USGS Topographic Map  

i---. ----· ----. ---' -·----·---
l�WILDLANDS
�
ENGINEERING 0 200 400 Feet
I
Project Location
Proposed Conservation
Easement
Project Stream
Project Ditch
Non-project Stream
Figure 1. Overview Site Map
Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel
Neuse River Basin {03020201)
Wayne County, NC
Iri
Proposed Conservation Easement
e�
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
. 1 I
• ' 1
dF
y �
4
� 1
Ir
i�
I
� I
100
Grantham USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle
1 ►rf
Figure 2. USGS Topographic Map
W I L D L A N D S 0 250 500 Feet Loop Road Mitigation Bank Parcel
E N G I N E E R I N G I I i i I Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Wayne County, NC

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History
Secretary D. Reid Wilson Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.

Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

February 23, 2022

Kaitlyn Hogarth [e-mail]
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 West Millbrook Street, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609

Re: Loop Road mitigation bank parcle, 35.283350, ‐78.131426, Wayne County, ER 22-0403

Dear Ms. Hogarth:

Thank you for your letter of January 27, 2022, regarding the above-referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submittal and offer the following comments.

We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.

The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.

Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or [e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.

Sincerely,

Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer

FORM-LBD-MGA
®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
Loop Road
297 Loop Road
Goldsboro, NC 27530
Inquiry Number: 6935406.2s
April 11, 2022
SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary ES1
Overview Map 2
Detail Map 3
Map Findings Summary 4
Map Findings 8
Orphan Summary 12
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary A-2
Physical Setting Source Map A-7
Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-8
Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1
TC6935406.2s Page 1
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6935406.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E1527-21), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
297 LOOP ROAD
GOLDSBORO, NC 27530
COORDINATES
35.2846730 - 35ˆ 17’ 4.82’’Latitude (North):
78.1280400 - 78ˆ 7’ 40.94’’Longitude (West):
Zone 17Universal Tranverse Mercator:
761203.0UTM X (Meters):
3908198.0UTM Y (Meters):
102 ft. above sea levelElevation:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
13847225 GRANTHAM, NCTarget Property Map:
2019Version Date:
13846641 SOUTHWEST GOLDSBORO, NCNortheast Map:
2019Version Date:
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
20141018Portions of Photo from:
USDASource:
6935406.2s Page 2
2 PAT & STEVE’S CONV. US 13 N OF GRANTHAM LUST, IMD Lower 1080, 0.205, NE
1 FLOODED HOME - 2223 2223 US HIGHWAY 13 S ASBESTOS Lower 5, 0.001,
MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
297 LOOP ROAD
GOLDSBORO, NC 27530
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6935406.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL National Priority List
Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions
Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action
CORRACTS Corrective Action Report
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity
Generators)
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS Land Use Control Information System
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6935406.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4
US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROLS Institutional Controls Sites List
Federal ERNS list
ERNS Emergency Response Notification System
Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites
NC HSDS Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities
SHWS Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities
SWF/LF List of Solid Waste Facilities
DEBRIS Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
OLI Old Landfill Inventory
LCID Land-Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
LAST Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUST State Trust Fund Database
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST AST Database
INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
VCP Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY Recycling Center Listing
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6935406.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5
HIST LF Solid Waste Facility Listing
INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
ODI Open Dump Inventory
DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register
PFAS PFAS Contamination Site Listing
Local Land Records
LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS Spills Incident Listing
SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80 SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD Records Of Decision
RMP Risk Management Plans
RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS PCB Activity Database System
ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations
FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6935406.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6
US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines
FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information
UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites
FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
AIRS Air Quality Permit Listing
COAL ASH Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC Underground Injection Wells Listing
AOP Animal Operation Permits Listing
PCSRP Petroleum-Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
CCB Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
SEPT HAULERS Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
MINES MRDS Mineral Resources Data System
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases.
Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on
a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been
differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.
Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed
data on individual sites can be reviewed.
Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6935406.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incidents Management Database contains an inventory
of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the Department of Environment, &
Natural Resources’ Incidents by Address.
A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/29/2021 has revealed that there is 1 LUST
site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
PAT & STEVE’S CONV. US 13 N OF GRANTHAM NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.205 mi.) 2 8
Incident Phase: CO
Incident Number: 6861
Current Status: File Located in House
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Records of Emergency Release Reports
IMD: Incident Management Database.
A review of the IMD list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/29/2021 has revealed that there is 1 IMD
site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
PAT & STEVE’S CONV. US 13 N OF GRANTHAM NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.205 mi.) 2 8
Facility Id: 6861
Other Ascertainable Records
ASBESTOS: Asbestos notification sites
A review of the ASBESTOS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/31/2021 has revealed that there is 1
ASBESTOS site within approximately 0.001 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
FLOODED HOME - 2223 2223 US HIGHWAY 13 S 0 - 1/8 (0.001 mi.) 1 8
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6935406.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8
There were no unmapped sites in this report.
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
1 2 0
160
160
1 2 01
20
120120
1 2 0
120
1 2 0
1
2
0
120
120
1 2 0
1 2 0
1 2 0
1 20
12 0 12 0
1
2
01
2
0
120
1 2 0
120
1
2
0
1
2
0
1
2
0 1 20
1 2 0
1 2 0
1
1 2 0
1 2 0
1 2
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
1 2 0120
1 2 0
120
120
12
0
1 2 0
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL LIENS
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL
Lists of Federal sites subject to
CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities
undergoing Corrective Action
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-LQG
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-SQG
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-VSQG
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROLS
Federal ERNS list
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ERNS
Lists of state- and tribal
(Superfund) equivalent sites
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NC HSDS
Lists of state- and tribal
hazardous waste facilities
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000SHWS
Lists of state and tribal landfills
and solid waste disposal facilities
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF
TC6935406.2s Page 4
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500OLI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LCID
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LAST
1 NR NR 0 1 0 0.500LUST
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUST TRUST
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250UST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250AST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST
State and tribal institutional
control / engineering control registries
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INST CONTROL
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500VCP
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWRCY
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500HIST LF
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US HIST CDL
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US CDL
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPFAS
Local Land Records
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LIENS 2
Records of Emergency Release Reports
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HMIRS
TC6935406.2s Page 5
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SPILLS
1 NR NR 0 1 0 0.500IMD
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SPILLS 90
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SPILLS 80
Other Ascertainable Records
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US FIN ASSUR
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001EPA WATCH LIST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TSCA
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TRIS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SSTS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RMP
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RAATS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PRP
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PADS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ICIS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FTTS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MLTS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001COAL ASH DOE
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PCB TRANSFORMER
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RADINFO
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HIST FTTS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOT OPS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000INDIAN RESERV
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LEAD SMELTERS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US AIRS
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250ABANDONED MINES
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FINDS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOCKET HWC
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ECHO
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001AIRS
1 NR NR NR NR 1 0.001ASBESTOS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001Financial Assurance
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001NPDES
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001UIC
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001AOP
TC6935406.2s Page 6
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PCSRP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CCB
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SEPT HAULERS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MINES MRDS
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Auto
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA HWS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA LF
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA LUST
3 0 0 0 2 1 0- Totals --
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC6935406.2s Page 7
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
RType:
0Cubic Feet:
1,600Square Feet:
0Linear Feet:
Not reportedDemo End Date:
Not reportedDemo Start Date:
11-30-20Removal End Date:
10-31-20Removal Start Date:
[phone]Phone:
County of WayneOwner Name:
A/K Grading & Demolition Inc.Contractor:
61791NESHAP Number:
NC31745Permit Number:
GOLDSBORO, NCCity,State,Zip:
2223 US HIGHWAY 13 SAddress:
FLOODED HOME - 2223 US HIGHWAY 13 SName:
ASBESTOS:
5 ft.
0.001 mi.
Relative:
Lower
Actual:
95 ft.

< 1/8 GOLDSBORO, NC
2223 US HIGHWAY 13 S N/A
1 ASBESTOSFLOODED HOME - 2223 US HIGHWAY 13 S S127020803
G1RBCA GW:
CCurrent Status:
1GPS Confirmed:
Not reportedLUR Filed:
0Flag1:
0Flag:
YMTBE1:
0MTBE:
RESLand Use:
CSite Risk Reason:
1Phase Of LSA Req:
60DSite Priority:
08/22/1991NOV Issue Date:
Not reportedCorrective Action Plan Type:
LRisk Class Based On Review:
HRisk Classification:
CCommercial/NonCommercial UST Site:
0# Of Supply Wells:
S1Level Of Soil Cleanup Achieved:
07/15/2011Close Out:
Not reportedClosure Request:
04/16/1991Date Reported:
3Source Type:
6861Incident Number:
WA-309UST Number:
00-0-000Facility ID:
GRANTHAM, NC 28333City,State,Zip:
US 13 N OF GRANTHAMAddress:
PAT & STEVE’S CONV. STOREName:
LUST:
1080 ft.
0.205 mi.
Relative:
Lower
Actual:
96 ft.

1/8-1/4 GRANTHAM, NC 28333
NE IMDUS 13 N OF GRANTHAM N/A
2 LUSTPAT & STEVE’S CONV. STORE S101168198
TC6935406.2s Page 8
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
PAT & STEVE’S CONV. STOREName:
6861Facility ID:
IMD:
Not reportedClose-out Report:
Not reportedClosure Request Date:
Not reportedRS Designation:
Not reportedReclassification Report:
Not reportedSOC Signed:
Not reportedPublic Meeting Held:
Not reported45 Day Report:
Not reportedNORR Issued:
8/22/1991NOV Issued:
COIncident Phase:
7/15/2011Last Modified:
6861Incident Number:
LUST:
Not reportedUST Number:
Not reportedSource:
Not reportedCause:
Not reportedErr Type:
PirfSource Code:
Not reportedRelease Code:
Not reportedPirf/Min Soil:
15 Minute Quad:
37#5 Minute Quad:
0Samples Include:
NWells Affected Y/N:
9/8/1999Priority Update:
1Location:
3Type:
6Operation Type:
4Ownership:
KEITH BONDOwner/Operator:
8/29/1991Date Reported:
4/16/1991Date Occurred:
6861Facility Id:
WA-309UST Number:
Not reportedERR Type:
LUST:
Not reported5 Min Quad:
Not reportedTelephone:
BOND OIL CO. INC.Company:
STFRegional Officer Project Mgr:
Not reportedTestlat:
FalseValid:
NError Code:
0Error Flag:
TrueRPOP:
TrueRPOW:
0Reel Num:
0CD Num:
FalseRPL:
3PETOPT:
PAT & STEVE’S CONV. STORE (Continued) S101168198
TC6935406.2s Page 9
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedDate Land Use Restriction Filed:
Not reportedMTBE in Groundwater Y/N/U Yes, No or Unknown:
Not reportedFacility Phone Number:
Not reportedMTBE in Well Y/N/U Yes, No or Unknown:
Not reportedNumber of Supply Wells Located on Property:
Not reportedExtent of Contamination:
Not reportedDate Case Closed:
Not reportedDate Close Review Requested From RP or Owner:
Not reportedRBCA:
Not reportedCorrective Action Plan Selected - up to 5:
Not reportedUse of Land, Industrial:
-78.11722222Longitude:
35.29194444Latitude:
Not reportedIntermediate Condition Present:
Not reported5 Min Quad:
Not reported7.5 Min Quad:
Not reportedInitial reported risk of incident (never changes):
1Samples Include:
3Sampled By:
Not reportedCurrent Risk Condition:
FacilityLocation:
GASOLINE/DIESELType:
Not reportedSite Priority:
0Num Affected:
Not reportedPhase 1 or Phase 2:
Not reportedNotice of Violation:
NWells Affected:
Not reportedNotice of Regulatory Requirement:
9/8/1999Priority Update:
Not reportedWhether Tank is Regulated:
95HSite Priority:
Not reportedWhether Tank is Commercial or Non Commercial:
Not reportedDate Incident Reported:
Not reportedPetroleum Type:
1Location:
3Type:
3Source:
GASOLINE/DIESEL/KEROSENESource of Contamination:
Not reportedResponsible Party County:
CommercialOperation Type:
PrivateOwnership:
Not reportedResponsible Party City,State,Zip:
Not reportedResponsible Party Mailing Address:
6Operation:
Not reportedResponsible Party Contact Name:
4Ownership:
Not reportedResponsible Party/Company Name:
Not reportedRegional Office:
Not reportedInitials of UST Regional Contact:
Not reportedIncident ID:
Not reportedUST ID:
C/O MS. NANCY ODHAMOperator:
UST REMOVAL, SAMPLING OF SOILS AND PIT WATER SHOWED CONTAMINATION.Incident Desc:
8/29/1991Submit Date:
4/16/1991Date Occurred:
GRANTHAM, NCCity,State,Zip:
US 13 N OF GRANTHAMAddress:
PAT & STEVE’S CONV. STORE (Continued) S101168198
TC6935406.2s Page 10
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedClose-out Report:
Not reportedClosure Request Date:
Not reportedRS Designation:
Not reportedReclassification Report:
Not reportedSOC Sighned:
Not reportedCorrective Action Planned:
Not reportedPublic Meeting Held:
Not reported45 Day Report:
Not reportedNORR Issued:
1991-08-22 00:00:00NOV Issued:
COIncident Phase:
2011-07-15 00:00:00Last Modified:
6861Facility ID:
Status:
Not reportedRP Landowner?:
Not reportedRP Operator?:
Not reportedRP Owner?:
Not reportedReference Number for Media Disk for Archived Record:
Not reportedPollutant Type Present:
Not reportedRBCA GW:
Not reportedRBCA GW Codes:
Not reportedRecord Status:
Not reportedDate Cleanup Initiated:
PAT & STEVE’S CONV. STORE (Continued) S101168198
TC6935406.2s Page 11