HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCG070227_Inspection Report_20230523 Compliance Inspection Report
Permit:NCG070227 Effective: 04/28/22 Expiration: 05/31/23 Owner: Metro Stone&Granite Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Metro Stone&Granite Inc.
County: Union 1720 Tower Industrial Dr
Region: Mooresville
Monroe NC 28110
Contact Person:Michael Webb Title: Phone: 704-791-5882
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications: SWNC,
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On-Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 05/23/2023 Entry Time 01:30PM Exit Time: 02:OOPM
Primary Inspector:Rebecca A Edwards Phone: 704-235-2137
Secondary Inspector(s):
Matthew J Gigante
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Stone, Clay, Glass, and Concrete Products Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page 1 of 3
Permit: NCG070227 Owner-Facility:Metro Stone&Granite Inc
Inspection Date: 05/23/2023 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
The following was observed during the inspection:
1. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)was not avliable during the inspection.SWPPP was signed after the
inspection date and was provided by email.Training records were not provided. Training must be conducted and the SWPPP
must be implemented.
2. Qualitative monitoring documents were not available for review. Conduct qualitative monitoring as required by permit
NCG070000.
3. Illicit(non-stormwater)discharge evauation has not been documented. Illicit(non-stormwater) discharge evaluations are
required on an annual basis.
4. All outfalls were observed during the inspection. An excess of dust from site fabrication noted on the southern portion of
facility. Additional control procedures may be necessary in this area.
5. The facility's application for coverage under NCG070000 indicated three outfalls. However, it has since been determined
that outfall 2 and 3 flow to outfall 1 and that the facility actually only has one outfall. Based on this, outfalls 2 and 3 do not
need to be subject to monitoring requirements.
Page 2 of 3
Permit: NCG070227 Owner-Facility:Metro Stone&Granite Inc
Inspection Date: 05/23/2023 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a"Narrative Description of Practices"? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a BMP summary? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Comment: SWPPP was not signed by facility personnel until after this inspection. Training records were
not provided.
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Comment: Conduct qualitative monitoring as required by NCG070000.
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Comment: Not applicable at the time of the inspection.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Has the facility evaluated all illicit(non stormwater)discharges? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Comment: All outfalls were observed during the inspection. An excess of dust from site fabrication noted
on the southern portion of facility. Additional control procedures may be necessary in this area.
lllict (non-stormwater) discharge evaluation has not been documented.
Page 3 of 3