20201990 Ver 1_White Hat SAW-2018-0207 Final As-Built Report

3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612

Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South, Suite 300
Bellaire, TX 77401
Main: 713.520.5400

res.us
May 31, 2023

Todd Tugwell
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587

Subject: RES Pasquotank 05 UMBI White Hat (SAW- 2018-0207) As-Built Baseline Report Submittal

Mr. Tugwell:

On behalf of Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Resource Environmental Solutions (RES), I
am pleased to submit the RES Pasquotank 05 UMBI White Hat As-Built Baseline Report. Construction and planting for this
project were completed in March 2023.
The site was built to design and guidelines with some adjustments, which are noted and described in the baseline monitoring
report and record drawings.
RES setup cross sections and installed vegetation plots, wetland gauges, and stream monitoring devices in April 2023.
Monitoring data of the vegetation indicates that all plots are exceeding the interim success criteria of 320 planted stems per
acre. Additionally, cross section data closely matches design parameters.
Upon approval of this as-built report, RES is requesting a 15% stream credit release (1,100.970 SMUs) and a 15% wetland
credit release (1.203 SMUs). Due to a change in easement boundary during As-built, total credit amounts have decreased
from 7,363.663 to 7,351.733 SMUs and from 8.470 to 8.434 WMUs. This change resulted in 1.79 extra SMUs and 0.011 extra
WMUs being released in Task 1 due to the higher credit totals in the approved Mitigation Plan. The requested credit
amounts for As-Built reflect this change in total credit, and account for the extra credits released in Task 1. A credit
breakdown is shown on the following page. Please see the enclosed credit release schedule, updated credit ledger, and as-
built baseline report.
Thank you for all of your time and consideration and we look forward to continuing to work with you all as this Project
progresses. Please contact me at 336-514-0927 or [e-mail] if you have any questions or require any additional
information.

Thank you,

Ben Carroll, Engineer
[e-mail] | 336-514-0927

Project Name:
Sponsor Name:
USACE Action ID:
NCDWQ Action ID:
Non-Forested
Wetland Credits
Warm Water Cool Water
Cold
Water
Riparian
Preservation
Riparian
Non-
Preservation
Non-Riparian Coastal
7363.663 0.349 8.121
7351.733 0.343 8.091
Scheduled
Releases Warm Water Cool Water
Cold
Water
Scheduled
Releases
Riparian
Riverine
Riparian
Non-Riverine Non-Riparian Scheduled
Releases Coastal
1 (Bank/Site Establishment)1, 2 15% 1104.550 100%, 15% 1.567 15% 12/31/2021 12/31/2021
2 (Year 0/As-Built)4 15% 1100.970 15% 1.203 15% 8/31/2023
3 (Year 1 Monitoring)10% 735.173 10% 0.809 10%
4 (Year 2 Monitoring)10% 735.173 10% 0.809 15%
5 (Year 3 Monitoring)10% 735.173 15% 1.214 20%
6 (Year 4 Monitoring)5% 367.587 5% 0.405 10%
7 (Year 5 Monitoring)10% 735.173 15% 1.214 15%
8 (Year 6 Monitoring)5% 367.587 5% 0.405 NA NA
9 (Year 7 Monitoring)10% 735.173 10% 0.808 NA NA
Stream Bankfull Standard 3 10% 735.174 NA NA NA NA NA NA Varies3
Total Credits Release to Date 7351.733 8.434
Date
4 - Credit amounts changed during as-built. As-built credit amounts reflect 15% of the new credit total (1,102.760 SMU & 1.214 WMU), minus the extra amount release in Task 1 from the higher Mitigation Plan numbers
(1.790 SMU & 0.011 WMU).
Perquimans
3010205
2023
6/1/2023
County:
8-Digit HUC:
Year Project Instituted:
Date Prepared:
Potential Credits from As-Built Survey
Stream Credits
Credit Classification
Non-Forested Wetland
CreditsForested Wetland Credits
3 - A 10% reserve of credits to be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met.
1 - The first credit release milestone is based on the potential credits stated in the approved mitigation plan.
2 - The first credit release shall occur upon establishment of the mitigation bank, which includes the following criteria:
1) Execution of the MBI or UMBI by the Sponsor and the USACE;
2) Approval of the final Mitigation Plan;
3) Mitigation bank site must be secured;
4) Delivery of the financial assurances described in the Mitigation Plan;
5) Recordation of the long-term protection mechanism and title opinion acceptable to the USACE;
6) 404 permit verification for construction of the site, if required.
Contingencies (if any):
Signature of Wilmington District Official Approving Credit Release
Total Potential Credits
Stream Credits
Actual Release
DateCredit Release Milestone
Wilmington District Mitigation Bank Credit Release Schedule
White Hat Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project
EBX
SAW-2018-0207
DWR # 20201993 V1
Potential Credits from Mitigation Plan
Forested Wetland Credits
Current and Future Credit Releases
Projected
Release Date
Transaction Credits Released Credits Debited Current Credits
Number To Bank From Bank Credit Balance Reserved Purchaser Project Permit Number Date HUC
1 1.567 1.567 1/5/22
Total 1.57 0.00 1.567 0.0
RES PASQUOTANK 05 UMBRELLA MITIGATION BANKING INSTRUMENT
WHITE HAT WETLAND CREDIT LEDGER (HUC 03010205)
Monday, January 10, 2022
Credits Released: Task 1
Transaction Credits Released Credits Debited Current Credits
Number To Bank From Bank Credit Balance Reserved Purchaser Project Permit Number Date HUC
1 1,104.55 1,104.55 1/5/22
2 1,104.55 NCDOT Contract # 7700002253 TBD 1/24/22
Total 1,104.55 1,104.55 0.00 0.0
RES PASQUOTANK 05 UMBRELLA MITIGATION BANKING INSTRUMENT
WHITE HAT STREAM CREDIT LEDGER (HUC 03010205)
Friday, January 21, 2022
Credits Released: Task 1

As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report

WHITE HAT STREAM AND WETLAND
MITIGATION PROJECT

PERQUIMANS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
USACE Action ID: SAW-2018-0207 | DWR Project # 20201990 V.1
Pasquotank River Basin, HUC 03010205
RES Pasquotank Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument

Provided by:

Bank Sponsor: Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
919-770-5573

June 2023
White Hat Stream and 1 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site June 2023
Table of Contents
1 PROJECT SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................... 3
1.1 Project Location and Description .................................................................................................... 3
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................................ 3
1.3 Project Success Criteria ....................................................................................................................... 4
1.3.1 Stream Restoration Success Criteria ..................................................................................... 5
1.3.2 Wetland Success Criteria ........................................................................................................... 5
1.3.3 Vegetation Success Criteria ...................................................................................................... 6
1.4 Project Components ............................................................................................................................ 6
1.5 Stream and Wetland Design/Approach ........................................................................................ 7
1.5.1 Streams ............................................................................................................................................ 7
1.5.2 Wetlands .......................................................................................................................................... 8
1.6 Construction and As-Built Conditions ........................................................................................... 9
1.7 Baseline Monitoring Performance (MY0) ................................................................................... 10
1.7.1 Vegetation ................................................................................................................................... 10
1.7.2 Stream Geomorphology ......................................................................................................... 10
1.7.3 Wetland Hydrology .................................................................................................................. 11
2 METHODS ........................................................................................................................................................ 11
3 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................................... 13

White Hat Stream and 2 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site June 2023
Appendix A: Background Information
Table 1: Mitigation Assets and Components
Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3: Project Contacts Table
Table 4: Project Background Information
Figure 1: Site Location Map

Appendix B: Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2: Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3: Buffer Overview
Vegetation Plot Photos
Monitoring Device Photos
General Photos

Appendix C: Vegetation Plot Data
Table 5: Planted Species Summary
Table 6: Main Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 7: Main Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species

Appendix D: Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data
Table 8: Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 9: Cross Section Morphology Data Table
Cross Section Overlay Plots

Appendix E: Hydrology Data
Groundwater Well Soil Profile Characterization Data Forms

Appendix F: As-Built & Record Drawings
White Hat As-Built Survey
White Hat Sealed Record Drawings

White Hat Stream and 3 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site June 2023
1 PROJECT SUMMARY
1.1 Project Location and Description
The White Hat Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project (“Project”) is located within Perquimans
County, approximately nine miles east of Hertford, NC. The Project lies within the Pasquotank
River Basin, North Carolina Department of Water Resources (“NCDWR”) sub-basin 03-01-52
and United States Geological Survey (“USGS”) 14-digit hydrologic unit code (“HUC”)
03010205060020 (Figure 1). The Project is designed to help meet compensatory mitigation
requirements for stream and wetland impacts in the HUC 03010205.

The Project is comprised of a 75.99-acre conservation easement contained within six parcels
and a 23.60-acre draft perpetual flowage easement extending west toward Godfreys Lane. The
Project involves the restoration and enhancement of Deep Creek, a named stream forming to
the west of the easement boundary flowing east through the Project to the Little River,
eventually draining to the Albemarle Sound. Within the conservation easement, the stream
channel is divided into three reaches, DC1-A, DC1-B, and DC1-C and is surrounded by a system
of interconnected jurisdictional wetlands. The Project restored 5,254 linear feet (LF) and
enhanced 1,541 LF of stream as well as restored 3.461 acres, enhanced 13.891 acres, and
preserved 3.429 acres of wetlands that will ultimately provide water quality benefits and
ecosystem uplift for the Project’s 1,859-acre drainage area.

The aquatic resources associated with the Project had been highly manipulated and degraded
over time due to agricultural practices. Project stream reaches, specifically DC1-A, DC1-B, and
DC1-C of Deep Creek, had historically been dredged and straightened, leading to channels
with limited habitat and poor hydraulic function. Dredging and straightening had also
adversely impacted the hydrology of the surrounding wetlands and caused some areas to lose
jurisdiction. Also, networks of surface ditches draining toward the main channel further altered
the natural hydrology of the stream-wetland complex. Much of the forested area surrounding
the conservation easement had been cleared for row crop production resulting in narrow to
absent riparian areas. Current and historical pine planting and harvesting operations have led
to a monoculture in upstream areas along the channel and limited the natural vegetative
diversity within the riparian areas. Therefore, the Project presented a great opportunity to
address stressors identified within the watershed while also providing tremendous additional
uplift to a degraded stream-wetland floodplain system.
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
Through the comprehensive analysis of the Project’s maximum functional uplift using the
Stream Functions Pyramid Framework, specific, attainable goals and objectives are realized by
the Project. These goals clearly address the stream and landscape manipulations that have
altered natural pattern, hydrology, habitat, and riparian buffers, as well as address agricultural
impacts such as nonpoint source runoff and hydrologic modification that have degraded water
quality in the watershed. Ultimately, these goals promote long-term resilience to the inevitable
White Hat Stream and 4 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site June 2023
issues that were identified as major watershed stressors in the 2009 Pasquotank River RBRP.
The Project addresses these stressors and supports RBRP goals.

The Project goals were:

· Re-establish the natural position, pattern, and function of the stream-wetland complex;
· Improve water transport from watershed to the channel in a non-erosive manner;
· Improve water quality within the restored channel reaches and downstream
watercourses by reducing sediment and nutrient loads;
· Improve flood flow attenuation on site and downstream by allowing for overbank flows
and connection to the active floodplain;
· Improve instream habitat;
· Restore and enhance native floodplain vegetation;
· Improve ecological processes by reducing water temperature, improving terrestrial
and aquatic habitat, and restoring a native plant community; and
· Restore and enhance riparian wetlands.

The Project objectives that addressed these goals were:

· Design and reconstruct stream channels to be relocated within the historic low
position, sized to convey design flows that will maintain a stable dimension, profile,
and planform;
· Add in-stream structures and bank stabilization measures to protect restored and
enhanced streams;
· Install habitat features such as brush toes, brush bed sills, riffles, wood material, and
pools of varying depths to restored and enhanced streams;
· Reduce bank height ratios and increase entrenchment ratios;
· Increase forested riparian buffers to approximately 100 feet on both sides of the
channel along the project reaches with a hardwood riparian plant community;
· Treat exotic invasive species;
· Re-establish and enhance riparian wetlands by raising stream bed elevations, plugging
surface
· ditches, and planting native wetland plant species;
· Establish a permanent conservation easement on the Project; and
· Establish a permanent perpetual flowage easement upstream of the Project.

1.3 Project Success Criteria
The success criteria for the Project follows the 2016 USACE Wilmington District Stream and
Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update and subsequent agency guidance. Specific success
criteria components are presented below.
White Hat Stream and 5 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site June 2023
1.3.1 Stream Restoration Success Criteria
Four bankfull flow events must be documented within the seven-year monitoring period. The
bankfull events must occur in separate years. Otherwise, the stream monitoring will continue
until four bankfull events have been documented in separate years.

There should be little change in as-built cross sections. If changes do take place, they should
be evaluated to determine if they represent a movement toward a less stable condition (for
example down-cutting or erosion) or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability
(for example settling, vegetative changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in
width/depth ratio). Cross sections shall be classified using the Rosgen stream classification
method, and all monitored cross sections should fall within the quantitative parameters
defined for channels of the design stream type. Bank height ratio shall not exceed 1.2, and the
entrenchment ratio shall be no less than 2.2 within restored riffle cross sections.

Digital images will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank
erosion, success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures.
Longitudinal images should not indicate the development of bars within the channel or an
excessive increase in channel depth. Lateral images should not indicate excessive erosion or
continuing degradation of the banks over time. A series of images over time should indicate
successional maturation of riparian vegetation.
1.3.2 Wetland Success Criteria
The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has a current WETs table (1911-2020) for
Pasquotank County upon which to base a normal rainfall amount and average growing season.
Data for Perquimans County was not available; therefore, the closest comparable data station
was determined to be the WETS station in Elizabeth City, NC. This station determines the
growing season to be 258 days long, extending from March 14 to November 27, and is based
on a daily minimum temperature greater than 28 degrees Fahrenheit occurring in five of ten
years.

Based upon field observation across the site, the NRCS mapping units show a good correlation
to actual site conditions in areas of the site. Mitigation guidance for soils in the Coastal Plain
suggests a hydroperiod for Roanoke, Perquimans, and Pasquotank soil series of 9 to 12
percent of the growing season; and 12-16 percent for Chowan soil series. Soil in the
surrounding upland soil map units and immediately adjacent to the floodplain are anticipated
to have shorter hydroperiods. Small depressional areas underlain by a clayey subsoil may
exhibit longer hydroperiods exceeding 16 percent. Therefore, hydrology success criterion for
the Project is to restore the water table so that it will remain continuously within 12 inches of
the soil surface for at least 12 percent of the growing season (approximately 31 days) at each
groundwater gauge location. Due to the current drainage and permeable soils, it may take at
least a year for the site to become completely saturated and reach the target hydroperiod.

White Hat Stream and 6 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site June 2023
1.3.3 Vegetation Success Criteria
Specific and measurable success criteria for plant density within the riparian buffers on the
Project will follow IRT Guidance. The interim measures of vegetative success for the Project
will be the survival of at least 320 planted three-year old trees per acre at the end of Year 3,
260 five-year old trees at 7 feet in height at the end of Year 5, and the final vegetative success
criteria will be 210 trees per acre with an average height of 10 feet at the end of Year 7.
Volunteer trees will be counted, identified to species, and included in the yearly monitoring
reports. In order for a volunteer tree to count towards success criteria, it must be a species on
the approved planting list and be present for at least two growing seasons. Moreover, any
single species can only account for up to 50 percent of the required number of stems within
any vegetation plot. Any stems in excess of 50 percent will be shown in the monitoring table
but will not be used to demonstrate success.
1.4 Project Components
Through stream restoration and enhancement, the Project presents 6,795 LF of stream, that
generated 6,281.333 base Warm Stream Mitigation Units (“SMU”) (Table 1). By incorporating
wider buffers, the total adjusted SMUs for the Project amount to 7,351.733. Additionally, the
Project presents 20.781 acres of wetland re-establishment, enhancement, and preservation,
that generated 8.434 Riparian Wetland Mitigation Units (“WMU”) (Table 1).

Both SMUs and WMUs totals have changed from those proposed in the Mitigation Plan due
to an easement change detailed in section 1.6. Total SMUs decreased from 7,363.663 to
7,351.733, and WMUs decreased from 8.470 to 8.434. These changes are detailed in Table 1.
Additionally, the changes have been accounted for in the Credit Release Schedule included
with this report.

Table 1: As-Built Stream Credits
Stream Mitigation
Mitigation Approach Linear Feet Ratio Warm SMUs
Restoration 5,254 1:1 5,254.000
Enhancement I 1,541 1.5:1 1,027.333
Total 6,795 6,281.333
Credit Loss in Required Buffer -102.590
Credit Gain for Additional Buffer 1,172.990
Total Adjusted SMUs* 7,351.733
*SMUs are adjusted in accordance with Section XI(C)- “Wilmington District Stream Buffer Credit Calculator”,
supplied to Providers in January 2021, from the USACE.

White Hat Stream and 7 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site June 2023
Wetland Mitigation
Mitigation Approach Area (acres) Ratio Riparian WMU
Re-establishment 3.461 1:1 3.461
Enhancement 13.891 3:1 4.630
Preservation 3.429 10:1 0.343
Total** 20.781 8.434
** Areas generating wetland credit are within the proposed 50-foot stream buffer area or are wholly outside of the
Non-standard buffer width areas generating additional stream credit (>150 ft.); therefore, additional stream credit
areas and wetland credit areas do not overlap.
1.5 Stream and Wetland Design/Approach
The detailed treatment plan and design approach are as follows:
1.5.1 Streams

Reach DC1-A & B
An offline restoration approach was used for this reach to address channelization and loss of
habitat. Priority Level I Restoration was conducted on Reach DC1-A, which entailed raising the
channel bed and restoring a stable single thread channel through the existing floodplain. The
existing channels were backfilled with material excavated from onsite to the elevation of the
floodplain in areas adjacent to the new channel. Woody debris was installed throughout the
reach to improve aquatic habitat. Woody debris was added in the channel in the form of typical
riffles (all riffles will be a mix of 75% woody material / 25% native substrate), brush bed sills,
and brush toes. Channel banks were live-staked, and a minimum 100-foot buffer was
established and planted with native riparian vegetation, but buffers exceed 100 feet in many
areas. Invasive species will be treated.

Multiple drainage ditches ran through the easement and tied directly to the existing channel.
The ditches that use to confluence with DC1-A flowed through existing wetlands with
dimensions and slopes indicative of stormwater treatment swales and were therefore tied
directly into DC1-A. The ditches that used to confluence with DC1-B did not exhibit these
treatment characteristics and were therefore directed into treatment swales before they outlet
into DC1-B or existing jurisdictional wetlands. The existing hunting impoundment, south of
DC1-A, was graded during construction.

Reach DC1-C
An Enhancement I approach was conducted on this reach to address lack of appropriate
channel pattern, channel dimension, limited habitat, and limited connection to the left
overbank area. Enhancement activities promoted appropriate channel pattern, channel
dimension, habitat, and encouraged the formation of a natural stream and wetland complex
in the low gradient floodplain of Deep Creek. Reference section 6.1.2.1.2 for a detailed analysis
of the hydraulic changes provided by this enhancement. Enhancement activities included:

White Hat Stream and 8 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site June 2023
- Installation of 12 single wing deflectors to promote channel pattern, flow diversity,
appropriate channel dimension and overbank flows.
- Removal of the existing road on the left bank. Removal included the excavation of 50
percent of road material to provide connection from the channel to the low areas of
the left bank wetland. Excavated material was deposited on the remaining areas of the
existing road to form hummocks and promote floodplain flow and habitat diversity.
- Riparian planting along the top of the single wing defectors and the created
hummocks.

1.5.2 Wetlands
The White Hat Project offers a total ecosystem restoration that revitalizes a highly manipulated
floodplain forest community. As such, the wetland restoration and enhancement are closely
tied to the stream restoration. Wetland restoration re-established hydrology and hydrophytic
vegetation to previously non-wetland areas that exhibit hydric soil indicators and drained
hydrology, while enhancement areas improve hydrology or vegetation in already jurisdictional
wetland areas. The Project provides 8.434 Riparian WMUs through a combination of wetland
re-establishment, enhancement, and preservation. Notably, areas generating wetland credit
are either within the 50-foot stream buffer area of stream channels or are wholly outside of
the non-standard buffer width areas generating additional stream credit (greater than 150
feet). Therefore, wide buffer areas utilized for additional stream credit and wetland credit areas
do not overlap (Figure 9 & Figure 11).

Re-establishment
Wetland re-establishment with a credit ratio of 1:1 occurred for areas 50 feet out from the
stream channel top of bank where jurisdictional wetlands do not exist and includes areas of
existing stream channel footprint, spoil, farm path, and drained areas. These re-establishment
areas connect the existing jurisdictional wetlands (WJ, WH, WK, WE, and WD), resulting in a
contiguous riparian wetland corridor. The system of interconnected re-established wetlands
on the western side of the easement break, is collectively referred to as “WR-1” (Wetland Re-
establishment 1) (Figure 2). Most of these areas incorporate the footprint of the existing,
excavated Deep Creek channel that was backfilled and graded to match the existing floodplain
elevations in association with the stream restoration. However, there are other small areas
within WR-1 that contain hydric soils but lack sufficient wetland hydrology and a lowered
water table due to the altered landscape and drainage modifications, including the relocated
and incised Deep Creek, presence of highly permeable soils, and the location of drainage
ditches intercepting groundwater discharges onto the floodplain. Moving east across the
easement break, “WR-2” (Wetland Re-establishment 2) was restored 50 feet out from the
proposed channel. This system of wetlands borders jurisdictional wetlands WF and WG. As
mentioned above, the hydrologic restoration of this area was directly related to the stream
restoration and re-vegetation activities. Reconstructing Deep Creek (specifically reach DC1-A
and DC1-B), with an appropriately sized channel back within the low of the existing floodplain
and filling the incised, abandoned channel, will raise the local groundwater elevation that will
White Hat Stream and 9 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site June 2023
allow frequent flooding. Also, the re-established wetland area were planted with bare root
hardwood trees representative of a Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp community. Due to the
high organic matter of existing soil and existing natural surface topography, ripping was not
required; however, where construction equipment was utilized, limited surface roughening
was necessary due to the structure of high organic soil that was destroyed by equipment.

In order to document hydrology and establish baseline conditions for wetland re-
establishment area WR-1 and WR-2, one groundwater hydrology well was installed within the
area, near the easement break. In addition, one well was installed within existing, jurisdictional
wetland, just outside of the western-most Project boundary, within the perpetual flowage
easement to serve as a reference and document less disturbed hydrologic conditions.
Unfortunately, this well was damaged sometime between its installation in May 2019 and
present day and therefore can no longer be used as a reference. Limited data was collected
from it to establish a baseline reference. The other well was installed in May 2019 with an
automatic pressure transducer within the well, which recorded data twice per day. Data from
these wells was presented in the Final Mitigation Plan.

Enhancement (Medium)
Wetland enhancement with a credit ratio of 3:1 occurred for the jurisdictional wetlands WJ,
WH, WK, WG (labeled WG-1 on Figure 9), WF (labeled WF-1 on Figure 9), WE and WD in areas
50 feet and >150 feet out from the stream channel top of bank (Figure 9). These wetlands are
naturally fed by groundwater; however, anthropogenic disturbance from agricultural
production (clearing), ditching, and planted pine monocultures created unfavorable
conditions for regeneration of woody wetland vegetation. Therefore, the primary approach
to enhance these wetlands was to plant native bare root trees, characteristic of a Coastal Plain
Small Stream Swamp in order to establish a wetland hardwood forest community. By
reconstructing and enhancing Deep Creek, with an appropriately sized channel back within
the low of the existing floodplain, and plugging and filling the incised, abandoned channel,
the local groundwater elevation will rise and more frequent flooding will occur, ultimately
improving hydrology to the entire system.

Preservation
Wetland preservation with a credit ratio of 10:1 occurred for the remaining jurisdictional
wetland areas within WG and WF that was not directly enhanced by stream restoration efforts
(labeled as WG-2 and WF-2 on Figure 9). These areas lie outside of the non-standard buffer
width areas (greater than 150 feet) as well as directly south of DC1-C, and will remain forested
and protected in perpetuity.

1.6 Construction and As-Built Conditions

An easement revision was required for this project to provide adequate space for farm
equipment to utilize the existing farm crossing. This was discussed with USACE Todd Tugwell
White Hat Stream and 10 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site June 2023
via email on 1/20/2023. The easement revision resulted in minor changes to the stream and
wetland crediting which are accounted for in this report. An overview of the easement revision
can be found in Figure 3.

Stream construction and planting were completed in March 2023. The White Hat Site was built
to design plans and guidelines with one major change; Swale D was redesigned to keep several
mature trees. The record drawings are included in Appendix E.

There were no major changes in the planting plan from the Final Mitigation Plan. The 14
proposed tree species were planted on March 13 and 14, 2023. Due to wet conditions and
high water levels during planting, Swales A and B were only planted around the edges to
prevent stem mortality.

Minor monitoring device location changes were made during as-built installation; however,
the quantities remained as proposed in the Final Mitigation Plan.

1.7 Baseline Monitoring Performance (MY0)
The White Hat baseline monitoring activities were performed on April, 4, 5, and 12, 2023. All
baseline monitoring data is present below and in the appendices. The Project is on track to
meeting vegetation, stream, and wetland interim success criteria.
1.7.1 Vegetation
Setup and monitoring of 18 fixed vegetation plots and 12 random vegetation plots was
completed after planting and stream construction on April 5th, 2023. Vegetation data is in
Appendix C, associated photos are in Appendix B, and plot locations are in Appendix B.
MY0 monitoring data indicates that all plots are exceeding the interim success criteria of 320
planted stems per acre. Planted stem densities ranged from 566 to 1,133 planted stems per
acre with a mean of 743 planted stems per acre across all plots. A total of 12 planted species
were documented within the plots. Volunteer species were not noted at baseline monitoring
but are expected to establish in upcoming years. The average stem height in the plots was
1.55 feet.

Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous
vegetation has not yet become established throughout the project. Seeding has occurred, but
weather has been unfavorable for sprouting conditions. RES will continue to monitor the
herbaceous layer and re-seed any areas that are not well established by the time Year 1
Monitoring Activities begin.
1.7.2 Stream Geomorphology
A total of 14 cross sections were installed and geomorphology data collection for MY0 was
conducted on April 4 and 12, 2023. Summary tables and cross section plots are in Appendix
D. Overall, the baseline cross sections and profile relatively match the proposed design. The
as-built conditions show that shear stress and velocities have been reduced for the restoration
White Hat Stream and 11 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site June 2023
reach. The reach was designed as a brush/sand and silt bed channel with cobble stone added
to the brush to reduce buoyancy post construction. This cobble is already beginning to silt
over post-construction and the channel bed is expected to continue to move toward and sand
and silt bottom as monitoring continues.

Visual assessment of the stream channel was performed to document signs of instability, such
as eroding banks, structural instability, or excessive sedimentation. The channel is transporting
sediment as designed and will continue to be monitored for aggradation and degradation.
1.7.3 Wetland Hydrology
A total of 10 groundwater wells with automatic recording pressure transducers were installed
throughout the wetland areas on April 4 and 5, 2023. Five groundwater wells (GW1, GW4,
GW6, GW7, and GW8) were installed in wetland re-establishment areas. Two groundwater
wells (GW3 and GW5) were installed in wetland enhancement areas, and one groundwater
well (GW 2) was installed in an upland area. Two groundwater wells (GW9 and GW10) were
installed in wetland preservation areas to serve as references. Soil profiles were taken during
installation and can be found in Appendix E. The groundwater wells record water table levels
at a frequency of twice per day. The purpose of these groundwater wells is to demonstrate
maintenance of jurisdictional wetland hydrology. Wetland hydrology data will be included in
the Monitoring Year 1 Report in this section and in the appendices.
2 METHODS
Stream cross section monitoring was conducted using a Topcon GTS-312 Total Station. Three-
dimensional coordinates associated with cross-section data were collected in the field (NAD83
State Plane feet FIPS 3200). Morphological data were collected at 14 cross-sections. Survey
data were imported into CAD, ArcGIS®, and Microsoft Excel® for data processing and
analysis.

The stage recorders documenting stream hydrology include an automatic pressure transducer
placed in PVC casing in a pool. The elevation of the bed and top of bank at each stage recorder
are used to detect bankfull events.

Vegetation success is being monitored at 18 fixed monitoring plots and 12 random monitoring
plots. Vegetation plot monitoring follows the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes analysis of species composition and
density of planted species. Data are processed using the CVS data entry tool. In the field, the
four corners of each plot were permanently marked with PVC at the origin and metal conduit
at the other corners. Photos of each plot are taken from the origin each monitoring year. The
random plot data are collected in locations where there are no permanent vegetation plots.
Random plots are typically collected in the form of 100 square meter belt transects with
variable dimensions. Tree species and height are recorded for each planted stem and the
transects are mapped, and new locations will be monitored in subsequent years.

White Hat Stream and 12 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site June 2023
Wetland hydrology is being monitored to document success of wetland restoration areas as
well as conditions of wetland enhancement and preservation areas. This is accomplished with
10 automatic pressure transducer gauges (located in groundwater wells) that record daily
groundwater levels. Five groundwater wells were installed in wetland re-establishment areas;
two were installed in wetland enhancement areas; two were installed in wetland preservation
areas to serve as references; and one was installed in an upland area. One automatic pressure
transducer was installed above ground to record ambient air pressure and is used to correct
all other pressure transducers onsite. Gauges are downloaded quarterly and wetland
hydroperiods are calculated during the growing season. Gauge installation followed current
regulatory guidance. Visual observations of primary and secondary wetland hydrology
indicators are also recorded during quarterly site visits. As mentioned earlier, soil was
characterized at each groundwater well. Soil borings were taken at each groundwater well and
characterized in accordance with the Soil Characterization Data Forms provided in the USACE’s
Technical Standard for Water-Table Monitoring of Potential Wetland Sites, and includes
parameters of soil horizon depths, texture, colors, redoximorphic features, induration, and
roots, as well as a photo of each soil profile (Appendix E).

White Hat Stream and 13 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site June 2023
3 REFERENCES
Griffith, G.E., J.M.Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H.McNab, D.R.Lenat,
T.F.MacPherson, J.B. Glover, and V.B. Shelburne. (2002). Ecoregions of North Carolina and
South Carolina, (color Poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs):
Reston, Virginia, U.S. Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,500,000).

Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP
Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2

Peet, R.K., Wentworth, T.S., and White, P.S. (1998), A flexible, multipurpose method for recording
vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63:262-274

Resource Environmental Solutions (2021). White Hat Final Mitigation Plan.

Schafale, M.P. 2012. Guide to the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.

USACE. (2016). Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update.
NC: Interagency Review Team (IRT).

Appendix A
Background Tables

Table 1. White Hat - Mitigation Assets and Components
Existing Mitigation
Footage Plan Mitigation As-Built As-Built
or Footage or Mitigation Restoration Priority Mitigation Plan Footage or Plan
Project Segment Acreage Acreage Category Level Level Ratio (X:1) Credits Acreage Credits Comments
DC1-A 1799 2,907 Warm R PI 1.00000 2907.000 2903 2903.000 Channel restoration, riparian planting
DC1-B 2019 2,351 Warm R PI 1.00000 2351.000 2,351 2351.000 Channel restoration, riparian planting
DC1-C 1,541 1,541 Warm EI - 1.50000 1027.333 1,541 1027.333 Channel restoration, riparian planting
WR-1 1.084 1.084 Rip R 1.00000 1.084 1.067 1.067
Floodplain reconnection, wetland planting, permanent
conservation easement
WR-2 2.405 2.405 Rip R 1.00000 2.405 2.394 2.394
Floodplain reconnection, wetland planting, permanent
conservation easement
WJ, WH, WG-1, WF-1,
WE, WD, WK 13.893 13.893 Rip E 3.00000 4.631 13.891 4.630
Floodplain reconnection, wetland planting, permanent
conservation easement
WG-2, WF-2 3.487 3.487 Rip P 10.00000 0.349 3.429 0.343 Permanent conservation easement
Project Credits
Non-Rip Coastal
Warm Cool Cold Wetland Marsh
Restoration 5254.000
Re-establishment 3.461
Rehabilitation
Enhancement 4.630
Enhancement I 1027.333
Enhancement II
Creation
Preservation 0.343
NSBW 1070.400
Total 7351.733 8.434
Restoration Level
Stream Riparian
Wetland
Elapsed Time Since grading complete: 2 months
Elapsed Time Since planting complete: 2 months
Number of reporting Years1:0
Data Collection Completion or
Activity or Deliverable Complete Delivery
Restoration Plan NA Nov-21
Final Design – Construction Plans NA May-22
Stream Construction NA Mar-23
Initial bare root and live stake plantings NA Mar-23
As-built (Year 0 Monitoring – baseline)Cross sections April-23
Veg plots April-23 Jun-23
Year 1 Monitoring
Year 2 Monitoring
Year 3 Monitoring
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
Year 6 Monitoring
Year 7 Monitoring
1 = The number of reports or data points produced excluding the baseline
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
White Hat Mitigation Project
Designer RES, LLC / 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100,
Raleigh, NC 27612
Primary project design POC Ben Carroll, PE
Construction Contractor KBS Earthworks Inc, 5616 Coble Church Road,
Julian, NC 27283
Construction contractor POC Kory Strader
Survey Contractor Pilot Surveying and Engineering, PC / P.O. Box: 879,
Pilot Mountain, NC 27041
Survey contractor POC Jonathan Cory George, PLS
Planting Contractor Shenandoah Habitats, 1983 Jefferson Hwy.
Fishersville, Va 22939
Planting contractor POC David Coleman
Seeding Contractor KBS Earthworks Inc, 5616 Coble Church Road,
Julian, NC 27283
Contractor point of contact Kory Strader
Seed Mix Sources Green Resource, LLC P.O. Box: 429, Colfax, NC 27235
Seeding point of contact
Nursery Stock Suppliers Shenandoah Habitats
Monitoring Performers RES, LLC / 3600 Glenwood Drive, Suite 100,
Raleigh, NC 27612
Monitoring POC Katie Obenauf [phone]
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
White Hat Mitigation Project
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 3010205
Reach DC1-C
1541
Unconfined
1859
Perennial
SC
F - C
F - C
AEFEMA classification AE AE
Stream Classification (existing)F - C F - C
Stream Classification (proposed)C C
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral Perennial Perennial
NCDWR Water Quality Classification SC SC
Valley confinement (Confined, moderately confined, unconfined)Unconfined Unconfined
Drainage area (Acres and Square Miles)1535 1711
Length of reach (linear feet)2903 2351
Parameters Reach DC1-A Reach DC1-B
Project Drainage Area (Acres and Square Miles)1,859 ac (2.9 sqmi)
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area 0%
Reach Summary Information
River Basin Pasquotank
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit 3010205060020
DWR Sub-basin 03 - 01 - 52
Level IV Ecoregion Chesapeake-Pamlico Lowlands and Tidal Marshes
Table 4. Project Background Information
Project Name White Hat Mitigation Bank
County Perquimans
Project Area (acres) 76.32
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)36.175378, -76.329986
Planted Acreage (Acres of Woody Stems Planted)51.90
Project Watershed Summary Information
MEADSTOWN AIRSTRIP
0 2,0001,000
Feet
Figure 1 - Project Vicinity
White HatMitigation Project
Perquimans County, North Carolina
Legend
Conservation Easement
Perpetual Flowage Easement
14- Digit HUC - 03010205060020
Pasquotank River Basin - 03010205
5 Mile Aviation Zone
©Date: 7/12/2021
Drawn by: EJU
Checked by: MGB
Do
c
u
m
e
n
t

P
a
t
h
:

R
:
\
R
e
s
g
i
s
\
e
n
t
g
i
s
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
0
0
1
5
8
_
W
h
i
t
e
_
H
a
t
\
M
X
D
\
3
_
P
e
r
m
i
t
t
i
n
g
\
3
_
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n

P
l
a
n
\
F
I
N
A
L

M
I
T

P
L
A
N
\
F
i
g
u
r
e

1
a

-

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

V
i
c
i
n
i
t
y

-

W
h
i
t
e

H
a
t
.
m
x
d
1 inch = 2,000 feet
White Hat Project
36.177, -76.333

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

:'
:(
:+
:-
:.
:5
:)
:5
:5
˘
ˇ
ˆ
˙˝
5
5
5
5ˇ
5˘
5
5˙
5˝
5ˆ
;6
˘
;
6
ˆ
;6
ˇ
;6
;6
;6
;6˝
;
6
˙
;6
'&%
'&$
65'&$
$PELHQW
*:
*:
*:ˇ
*:˘
*:
*:
)LJXUH&&390<
:KLWH+DW
0LWLJDWLRQ3URMHFW
3HUTXLPDQV&RXQW\
1RUWK&DUROLQD
'DWH˛ˇ'UDZQE\˛.%72
'R
F
X
P
H
Q
W
3
D
W
K
˛
5
˛
?
5
H
V
J
L
V
?
H
Q
W
J
L
V
?
3
U
R
M
H
F
W
V
?
˘
˙
B
:
K
L
W
H
B
+
D
W
?
3
5
2
?
ˇ
B
0
R
Q
L
W
R
U
L
Q
J
0
D
L
Q
W
H
Q
D
Q
F
H
?
0
<
?
:
K
L
W
H
+
D
W
D
S
U
[
5HVWRULQJDUHVLOLHQWHDUWKIRUDPRGHUQZRUOG
)HHW
/HJHQG
˝’˚u˚vı
d}›}(vl
^ı„µıµ„˚
^ı„˚u››„}Z
˝vZv˚u˚vı/
Z˚’ı}„}v
„}’’^˚}v
s˚P˚ı}vWo}ı’
&]Æ˚ˆs˚PWo}ıEïîì’ı˚u’l„˚
Zvˆ}us˚PWo}ıEïîì’ı˚u’l„˚
'µP˚’
u]˚vı
^ıP˚Z˚}„ˆ˚„
'„}µvˆÁı˚„t˚oo
t˚ıovˆ››„}Z
˝vZv˚u˚vı
W„˚’˚„À}v
Z˚’ı}„}v
hv„˚ˆ]ı˚ˆ
^Áo˚
&KHFNHGE\˛%&LQFK IHHW
^Áo˚
^Áo˚
:*
:)
:*:5
:)
:*
:5
ˇ
˘
ˆ
˙
5
5
5
;6
;6
;
6
;6
'&%
'&&
65'&%*:ˆ
*:˙
*:
*:˝
)LJXUH&&390<
:KLWH+DW
0LWLJDWLRQ3URMHFW
3HUTXLPDQV&RXQW\
1RUWK&DUROLQD
'DWH˛ˇ'UDZQE\˛.%72
'R
F
X
P
H
Q
W
3
D
W
K
˛
5
˛
?
5
H
V
J
L
V
?
H
Q
W
J
L
V
?
3
U
R
M
H
F
W
V
?
˘
˙
B
:
K
L
W
H
B
+
D
W
?
3
5
2
?
ˇ
B
0
R
Q
L
W
R
U
L
Q
J
0
D
L
Q
W
H
Q
D
Q
F
H
?
0
<
?
:
K
L
W
H
+
D
W
D
S
U
[
5HVWRULQJDUHVLOLHQWHDUWKIRUDPRGHUQZRUOG
)HHW
/HJHQG
˝’˚u˚vı
d}›}(vl
^ı„µıµ„˚
^ı„˚u››„}Z
˝vZv˚u˚vı/
Z˚’ı}„}v
„}’’^˚}v
s˚P˚ı}vWo}ı’
&]Æ˚ˆs˚PWo}ıEïîì’ı˚u’l„˚
Zvˆ}us˚PWo}ıEïîì’ı˚u’l„˚
'µP˚’
u]˚vı
^ıP˚Z˚}„ˆ˚„
'„}µvˆÁı˚„t˚oo
t˚ıovˆ››„}Z
˝vZv˚u˚vı
W„˚’˚„À}v
Z˚’ı}„}v
hv„˚ˆ]ı˚ˆ
^Áo˚
&KHFNHGE\˛%&LQFK IHHW
^Áo˚
Figure 3
White Hat MY0 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Vegetation Plot 1 (4/4/2023)

Vegetation Plot 2 (4/4/2023)

Vegetation Plot 3 (4/4/2023)

Vegetation Plot 4 (4/4/2023)

Vegetation Plot 5 (4/4/2023)

Vegetation Plot 6 (4/4/2023)

Vegetation Plot 7 (4/4/2023)

Vegetation Plot 8 (4/4/2023)

Vegetation Plot 9 (4/4/2023)

Vegetation Plot 10 (4/4/2023)

Vegetation Plot 11 (4/4/2023)

Vegetation Plot 12 (4/4/2023)

Vegetation Plot 13 (4/5/2023)

Vegetation Plot 14 (5/5/2023)

Vegetation Plot 15 (4/5/2023)

Vegetation Plot 16 (4/5/2023)

Vegetation Plot 17 (4/5/2023)

Vegetation Plot 18 (4/5/2023)

White Hat MY0 Random Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Random Vegetation Plot 1 (4/12/2023)

Random Vegetation Plot 2 (4/12/2023)

Random Vegetation Plot 3 (4/12/2023)

Random Vegetation Plot 4 (4/12/2023)

Random Vegetation Plot 5 (4/12/2023)

Random Vegetation Plot 6 (4/12/2023)

Random Vegetation Plot 7 (4/12/2023)

Random Vegetation Plot 8 (4/12/2023)

Random Vegetation Plot 9 (4/12/2023)

Random Vegetation Plot 10 (4/12/2023)

Random Vegetation Plot 11 (4/12/2023)

Random Vegetation Plot 12 (4/12/2023)

White Hat Monitoring Device Photos

Stage Recorder DC1-A

Stage Recorder DC1-B

Groundwater Well 1

Groundwater Well 2

Groundwater Well 3

Groundwater Well 4

Groundwater Well 5

Groundwater Well 6

Groundwater Well 7

Groundwater Well 8

Groundwater Well 9

Groundwater Well 10

Ambient

White Hat General Photos

Single Wing Deflector

DC1-B

Swale A ESP

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data

Table 5. Planted Species Summary
Bare Roots in Main Zone 1 (Spacing: 9X6)
Common Name Scientific Name
Percent
Composition
Zone 1
Percent
Composition
Zone 2
QTY
Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum 10% 30% 4200
Swamp tupelo Nyssa biflora 10% 0% 4100
Buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis 10% 20% 4200
American sycamore Platanus occidentalis 10% 0% 4100
Willow oak Quercus phellos 10% 0% 4100
Overcup oak Quercus lyrata 10% 10% 4200
Swamp white oak Quercus bicolor 10% 0% 4100
Pin oak Quercus palustris 10% 5% 4100
Water oak Quercus nigra 5% 0% 2100
River birch Betula nigra 5% 0% 2100
Wax myrtle Morella cerifera 5% 5% 2100
Water tupelo Nyssa aquatica 5% 10% 2100

Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data

Table 6. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Plot # Planted
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
Average
Planted Stem
Height
1 566 0 566 Yes 1.97
2 809 0 809 Yes 1.46
3 688 0 688 Yes 1.19
4 768 0 768 Yes 1.53
5 728 0 728 Yes 1.61
6 768 0 768 Yes 1.32
7 809 0 809 Yes 1.33
8 890 0 890 Yes 1.53
9 566 0 566 Yes 1.78
10 566 0 566 Yes 2.07
11 647 0 647 Yes 1.70
12 688 0 688 Yes 1.86
13 688 0 688 Yes 1.55
14 688 0 688 Yes 1.52
15 890 0 890 Yes 1.39
16 1012 0 1012 Yes 1.23
17 890 0 890 Yes 1.35
18 1012 0 1012 Yes 1.56
R1 688 0 688 Yes 1.76
R2 850 0 850 Yes 1.72
R3 728 0 728 Yes 1.83
R4 567 0 567 Yes 1.35
R5 607 0 607 Yes 1.47
R6 769 0 769 Yes 1.38
R7 567 0 567 Yes 1.31
R8 647 0 647 Yes 1.54
R9 607 0 607 Yes 1.48
R10 688 0 688 Yes 1.44
R11 1133 0 1133 Yes 1.53
R12 769 0 769 Yes 1.69
Project
Avg 743 0 743 Yes 1.55

Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data

Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species

EEP Project Code 100158. Project Name: White Hat
PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Betula nigra river birch Tree 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1
Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2
Morella cerifera wax myrtle shrub 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Nyssa aquatica water tupelo Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Nyssa biflora swamp tupelo Tree 3 3 3 2 2 2 7 7 7 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 4 4 4
Quercus bicolor swamp white oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 3 3 3 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercus palustris pin oak Tree 1 1 1 4 4 4 2 2 2 3 3 3 6 6 6 4 4 4 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 4 4 4 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 4 4 4
Taxodium distichum bald cypress Tree 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 5 5 5
14 14 14 20 20 20 17 17 17 19 19 19 18 18 18 19 19 19 20 20 20 22 22 22 14 14 14 14 14 14
7 7 7 6 6 6 8 8 8 9 9 9 7 7 7 9 9 9 11 11 11 10 10 10 7 7 7 7 7 7
567 567 567 809 809 809 688 688 688 769 769 769 728 728 728 769 769 769 809 809 809 890 890 890 567 567 567 567 567 567
100158-01-0008 100158-01-0009 100158-01-0010100158-01-0003 100158-01-0004 100158-01-0005 100158-01-0006 100158-01-0007
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
100158-01-0001 100158-01-0002
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
1
0.02
1
0.02
Stems per ACRE
1
0.02
1
0.02
Species count
1
0.02
Current Plot Data (MY0 2023)
PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Betula nigra river birch Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 4 4 4 2 2 2
Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub 1 1 1 2 2 2 4 4 4 2 2 2
Morella cerifera wax myrtle shrub 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 5 4 4 4 2 2 2
Nyssa aquatica water tupelo Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1
Nyssa biflora swamp tupelo Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 4 4 4
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 6 6 6 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercus bicolor swamp white oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 1
Quercus palustris pin oak Tree 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 6 6 6 2 2 2
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 10 10 10 5 5 5 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1
Taxodium distichum bald cypress Tree 2 2 2 7 7 7 3 3 3 9 9 9 3 3 3 2 2 2 4 4 4 1 1 1 6 6 6 6 6 6
16 16 16 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 22 22 22 25 25 25 22 22 22 25 25 25 17 17 17 21 21 21
8 8 8 9 9 9 10 10 10 5 5 5 8 8 8 7 7 7 9 9 9 8 8 8 7 7 7 9 9 9
647 647 647 688 688 688 688 688 688 688 688 688 890 890 890 1012 1012 1012 890 890 890 1012 1012 1012 688 688 688 850 850 850
100158-01-R1 100158-01-R2
1 1
0.02 0.02
Current Plot Data (MY0 2023)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
100158-01-0011 100158-01-0012
0.02 0.02
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
Stem count
size (ares)1 1 1
100158-01-0013 100158-01-0014 100158-01-0015 100158-01-0016 100158-01-0017
0.020.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
100158-01-0018
1 1 1 1 1
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data

Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species Continued

PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Betula nigra river birch Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 5 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 5 5 5 43 43 43
Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub 2 2 2 1 1 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 5 2 2 2 38 38 38
Morella cerifera wax myrtle shrub 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 35 35 35
Nyssa aquatica water tupelo Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 22 22 22
Nyssa biflora swamp tupelo Tree 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 8 8 8 65 65 65
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 5 5 5 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 45 45 45
Quercus bicolor swamp white oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 22 22 22
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1 45 45 45
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 29 29 29
Quercus palustris pin oak Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 4 4 4 2 2 2 3 3 3 61 61 61
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 61 61 61
Taxodium distichum bald cypress Tree 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 85 85 85
18 18 18 14 14 14 15 15 15 19 19 19 14 14 14 16 16 16 15 15 15 17 17 17 28 28 28 19 19 19 551 551 551
8 8 8 9 9 9 8 8 8 9 9 9 8 8 8 7 7 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 11 11 6 6 6 12 12 12
728 728 728 567 567 567 607 607 607 769 769 769 567 567 567 647 647 647 607 607 607 688 688 688 1133 1133 1133 769 769 769 743 743 743
Species count
Stems per ACRE
30
0.74
1 1
size (ACRES)0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
1 1 1 1 1
Stem count
size (ares)1 1 1
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
100158-01-R3 100158-01-R4 MY0 (2023)
Current Plot Data (MY0 2023)
100158-01-R5 100158-01-R6 100158-01-R7 100158-01-R8 100158-01-R9 100158-01-R10 100158-01-R11 100158-01-R12
Annual Means

Appendix D
Stream Measurement and
Geomorphology Data

Parameter
Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n
Bankfull Width (ft)15.8 38.1 17.6 101.3 4 24.0
24.0 26.3 6
Floodprone Width (ft)22.1 60.2 50.9 116.7 4 70.0
>48.9 >81.8 6
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)1.4 2.2 2.2 3.0 4 1.8
1.4 1.9 6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2.24 4.1 3.94 6.4 4 2.4
2.3 3.4 6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)22.03 76.6 48.6 187.2 4 42.0
34.6 48.8 6
Width/Depth Ratio 6.2 19.8 9 54.8 4 13.7
13.1 17.6 6
Entrenchment Ratio 1.15 2.2 1.35 4.8 4 2.9
>2.2 >3.1 6
Bank Height Ratio 1 1.3 1 2.3 4 2.4
1.0 1.0 6
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
Other
F-C C
Table 8: Baseline Stream Data Summary
White Hat DC1-A & B
Pre-Existing Condition (applicable)Monitoring Baseline (MY0)Design
C
Parameter
Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n
Bankfull Width (ft)23.5 1 ------ -- --
--
Floodprone Width (ft)46.0 1 ------ -- --
--
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)2.1 1 ------ -- -- --
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)3.4 1 ------ -- --
--
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)49.1 1 ------ -- --
--
Width/Depth Ratio 11.2 1 ------ -- -- --
Entrenchment Ratio 2.0 1 ------ -- --
--
Bank Height Ratio 1.4 1 ------ -- --
--
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
Other
--- ---
F-C --- ---
Table 8: Baseline Stream Data Summary
White Hat DC1-C
Pre-Existing Condition (applicable)Design Monitoring Baseline (MY0)
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 4.72 4.31 4.34 4.13 4.05
Bankfull Width (ft)1 25.2 27.3 24.4 30.6 25.0
Floodprone Width (ft)1 >67.5 -->59.1 -->48.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 3.4 3.7 2.8 4.1 2.8
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 4.72 4.31 4.34 4.13 4.05
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 48.8 58.9 39.9 77.2 43.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 >2.7 -->2.4 -->2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0 --1.0 --1.0
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 3.61 3.67 3.11 2.99 2.57
Bankfull Width (ft)1 26.6 24.5 29.1 24.0 28.5
Floodprone Width (ft)1 -->50.5 -->64.4 --
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 3.2 2.7 3.7 2.3 3.3
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 3.61 3.67 3.11 2.99 2.57
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 51.6 41.7 65.3 34.6 56.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -->2.2 -->2.7 --
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 --1.0 --1.0 --
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 2.78 3.52 3.92 3.61
Bankfull Width (ft)1 26.3 23.2 23.3 25.2
Floodprone Width (ft)1 >81.8 ------
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.4 3.9 4.2 4.7
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 2.78 3.52 3.92 3.61
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 39.3 52.4 62.1 69.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 >3.1 ------
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0 ------
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Cross Section 9 (Riffle) Cross Section 10 (Pool)
Table 9. - Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters – Cross Sections)
Project Name/Number: White Hat - SAW-2018-0207
Cross Section 1 (Riffle) Cross Section 2 (Pool) Cross Section 3 (Riffle) Cross Section 4 (Pool) Cross Section 5 (Riffle)
Cross Section 6 (Pool) Cross Section 7 (Riffle) Cross Section 8 (Pool)
Cross Section 14 (Pool)Cross Section 11 (Riffle) Cross Section 12 (Pool) Cross Section 13 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
White Hat - Reach DC1-A - Cross Section 1 - Riffle - (Restoration)
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 4.72
Bankfull Width (ft)1 25.2
Floodprone Width (ft)1 >67.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 3.4
Low Bank Elevation (ft)4.72
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 48.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 >2.7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0
Cross Section 1 (Riffle)
3X Vertical Exaggeration
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1
4.31
Bankfull Width (ft)1 27.3
Floodprone Width (ft)1 --
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 3.7
Low Bank Elevation (ft)4.31
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 58.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 --
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 --
Cross Section 2 (Pool)
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
White Hat - Reach DC1-A - Cross Section 2 - Pool - (Restoration)
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull 3X Vertical Exaggeration
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
White Hat - Reach DC1-A - Cross Section 3 - Riffle - (Restoration)
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 4.34
Bankfull Width (ft)1 24.4
Floodprone Width (ft)1 >59.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.8
Low Bank Elevation (ft)4.34
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 39.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 >2.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0
Cross Section 3 (Riffle)
3X Vertical Exaggeration
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
White Hat - Reach DC1-A - Cross Section 4 - Pool - (Restoration)
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1
4.13
Bankfull Width (ft)1 30.6
Floodprone Width (ft)1 --
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 4.1
Low Bank Elevation (ft)4.13
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 77.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 --
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 --
Cross Section 4 (Pool)
3X Vertical Exaggeration
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1
4.05
Bankfull Width (ft)1 25.0
Floodprone Width (ft)1 >48.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.8
Low Bank Elevation (ft)4.05
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 43.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 >2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0
Cross Section 5 (Riffle)
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
White Hat - Reach DC1-A - Cross Section 5 - Riffle - (Restoration)
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
White Hat - Reach DC1-A - Cross Section 6 - Pool - (Restoration)
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1
3.61
Bankfull Width (ft)1 26.6
Floodprone Width (ft)1 --
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 3.2
Low Bank Elevation (ft)3.61
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 51.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 --
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 --
Cross Section 6 (Pool)
3X Vertical Exaggeration
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
White Hat - Reach DC1-A - Cross Section 7 - Riffle - (Restoration)
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 3.67
Bankfull Width (ft)1 24.5
Floodprone Width (ft)1 >50.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.7
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 3.67
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 41.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 >2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0
Cross Section 7 (Riffle)
3X Vertical Exaggeration
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
White Hat - Reach DC1-B - Cross Section 8 - Pool - (Restoration)
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 3.11
Bankfull Width (ft)1 29.1
Floodprone Width (ft)1 --
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 3.7
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 3.11
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 65.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 --
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 --
Cross Section 8 (Pool)
3X Vertical Exaggeration
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
White Hat - Reach DC1-B - Cross Section 9 - Riffle - (Restoration)
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 2.99
Bankfull Width (ft)1 24.0
Floodprone Width (ft)1 >64.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.3
Low Bank Elevation (ft)2.99
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 34.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 >2.7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0
Cross Section 9 (Riffle)
3X Vertical Exaggeration
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
White Hat - Reach DC1-B - Cross Section 10 - Pool - (Restoration)
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 2.57
Bankfull Width (ft)1 28.5
Floodprone Width (ft)1 --
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 3.3
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 2.57
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 56.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 --
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 --
Cross Section 10 (Pool)
3X Vertical Exaggeration
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
White Hat - Reach DC1-B - Cross Section 11 - Riffle - (Restoration)
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 2.78
Bankfull Width (ft)1 26.3
Floodprone Width (ft)1 >81.8
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.4
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 2.78
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 39.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 >3.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0
Cross Section 11 (Riffle)
3X Vertical Exaggeration
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
White Hat - Reach DC1-C - Cross Section 12 - Pool - (Enhancement)
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1
3.52
Bankfull Width (ft)1 23.2
Floodprone Width (ft)1 --
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 3.9
Low Bank Elevation (ft)3.52
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 52.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 --
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 --
Cross Section 12 (Pool)
3X Vertical Exaggeration
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
White Hat - Reach DC1-C - Cross Section 13 - Pool - (Enhancement)
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 3.92
Bankfull Width (ft)1 23.3
Floodprone Width (ft)1 --
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 4.2
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 3.92
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 62.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 --
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 --
Cross Section 13 (Pool)
3X Vertical Exaggeration
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
White Hat - Reach DC1-C - Cross Section 14 - Pool - (Enhancement)
MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1
3.61
Bankfull Width (ft)1 25.2
Floodprone Width (ft)1 --
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 4.7
Low Bank Elevation (ft)3.61
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 69.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 --
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 --
Cross Section 14 (Pool)
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Appendix E
Hydrology Data
Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 White Hat

Soil Characterization Data Form
Project Name: White Hat Date: April 5, 2023
Personnel: Emily Ulman and Heath Hidlay Soil Pit ID: GW1
Latitude, Longitude 36.1772910204787, -76.3351073016303
Horizon Depths
(inches)
Texture Matrix Color (Munsell
moist)
Redoximorphic Features Induration (none,
weak, strong)
Roots
Color Abundance
0-10 Sandy Clay
Texture Modifier: NA
10YR 5/2 10YR 8/8 5% None None
10-16 Sandy Clay Loam
Texture Modifier: NA
10YR 5/1 10YR 6/8 15% None None
16-27 Sandy Clay Loam
Texture Modifier: NA
10YR 5/1 10YR 5/8 15% None None
Comments: Soil Profile:

NA

Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 White Hat

Soil Characterization Data Form
Project Name: White Hat Date: April 5, 2023
Personnel: Emily Ulman and Heath Hidlay Soil Pit ID: GW2
Latitude, Longitude 36.1780985609849, -76.334792386475
Horizon Depths
(inches)
Texture Matrix Color (Munsell
moist)
Redoximorphic Features Induration (none,
weak, strong)
Roots
Color Abundance
0-4 Sandy Loam
Texture Modifier: NA
10YR 3/4 None None
4-10 Sandy Loam
Texture Modifier: NA
10YR 8/2 10YR 8/8 15% None None
10-22 Sandy Clay Loam
Texture Modifier: NA
10YR 7/1 10YR 5/8 10% None None
10YR 6/8 10%
22-26 Sand
Texture Modifier: NA
10YR 7/1 10YR 5/8 15% None None
Comments: Soil Profile:

NA
Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 White Hat

Soil Characterization Data Form
Project Name: White Hat Date: April 6, 2023
Personnel: Emily Ulman and Heath Hidlay Soil Pit ID: GW3
Latitude, Longitude 36.1753955064679, -76.333652548563
Horizon Depths
(inches)
Texture Matrix Color (Munsell
moist)
Redoximorphic Features Induration (none,
weak, strong)
Roots
Color Abundance
0-6 Sandy Clay Loam
Texture Modifier: NA
2.5YR 3/1 None Few
6-18 Sandy Clay Loam
Texture Modifier: NA
10YR 4/2 10YR 6/8 5% None None
18-30 Sandy Clay Loam
Texture Modifier: NA
10YR 6/1 10YR 7/8 15% None None
Comments: Soil Profile:
NA

Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 White Hat

Soil Characterization Data Form
Project Name: White Hat Date: April 5, 2023
Personnel: Emily Ulman and Heath Hidlay Soil Pit ID: GW4
Latitude, Longitude 36.1766640909714, -76.3327230350263
Horizon Depths
(inches)
Texture Matrix Color (Munsell
moist)
Redoximorphic Features Induration (none,
weak, strong)
Roots
Color Abundance
0-4 Sandy Clay
Texture Modifier: NA
10YR 4/2 None None
4-12 Sandy Clay Loam
Texture Modifier: NA
10YR 4/1 10YR 5/8 5% None None
12-27 Sandy Clay
Texture Modifier: NA
10YR 5/1 Gley 1 4/5G_/2 10% None None
10YR 7/4 5%
Comments: Soil Profile:
NA

Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 White Hat

Soil Characterization Data Form
Project Name: White Hat Date: April 4, 2023
Personnel: Emily Ulman and Heath Hidlay Soil Pit ID: GW5
Latitude, Longitude 36.1756833658103, -76.3316450352185
Horizon Depths
(inches)
Texture Matrix Color (Munsell
moist)
Redoximorphic Features Induration (none,
weak, strong)
Roots
Color Abundance
0-16 Sandy Clay Loam
Texture Modifier: NA
10YR 5/1 10YR 4/6 10% None None
16-28 Sandy Clay Loam
Texture Modifier: NA
10YR 5/1 10YR 4/6 10% None None
Comments: Soil Profile:

Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 White Hat

Soil Characterization Data Form
Project Name: White Hat Date: April 4, 2023
Personnel: Emily Ulman and Heath Hidlay Soil Pit ID: GW6
Latitude, Longitude 36.175117017735, -76.3299434725906
Horizon Depths
(inches)
Texture Matrix Color (Munsell
moist)
Redoximorphic Features Induration (none,
weak, strong)
Roots
Color Abundance
0-14 Sandy Clay
Texture Modifier: NA
10YR 4/2 7.5YR 4/6 15% None None
14-27 Sandy Clay Loam
Texture Modifier: NA
10YR 5/1 5YR 4/6 20% None None
Comments: Soil Profile:
NA

Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 White Hat

Soil Characterization Data Form
Project Name: White Hat Date: April 5, 2023
Personnel: Emily Ulman and Heath Hidlay Soil Pit ID: GW7
Latitude, Longitude 36.1754703047935, -76.3260811818315
Horizon Depths
(inches)
Texture Matrix Color (Munsell
moist)
Redoximorphic Features Induration (none,
weak, strong)
Roots
Color Abundance
0-12 Sandy Clay
Texture Modifier: NA
10YR 4/1
10YR 6/6
10YR 5/8 10% None None
12-26 Sandy Clay Loam
Texture Modifier: NA
10YR 4/1 5YR 5/8 20% None None
Comments: Soil Profile:
NA

Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 White Hat

Soil Characterization Data Form
Project Name: White Hat Date: April 5, 2023
Personnel: Emily Ulman and Heath Hidlay Soil Pit ID: GW8
Latitude, Longitude 36.1755850378235, -76.3243872053695
Horizon Depths
(inches)
Texture Matrix Color (Munsell
moist)
Redoximorphic Features Induration (none,
weak, strong)
Roots
Color Abundance
0-29 Clay
Texture Modifier: NA
10YR 5/1 10YR 5/8 20% None None
Comments: Soil Profile:
NA

Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 White Hat

Soil Characterization Data Form
Project Name: White Hat Date: April 5, 2023
Personnel: Emily Ulman and Heath Hidlay Soil Pit ID: GW9
Latitude, Longitude 36.1764645242193, -76.3229382335263
Horizon Depths
(inches)
Texture Matrix Color (Munsell
moist)
Redoximorphic Features Induration (none,
weak, strong)
Roots
Color Abundance
0-10 Sandy Clay Loam
Texture Modifier: NA
10YR 4/1 10YR 5/8 15% None None
10-22 Sandy Clay Loam
Texture Modifier; NA
10YR 5/1 5YR 5/8 20% None None
Comments: Soil Profile:
NA

Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 White Hat

Soil Characterization Data Form
Project Name: White Hat Date: April 5, 2023
Personnel: Emily Ulman and Heath Hidlay Soil Pit ID: GW10
Latitude, Longitude 36.1756774501716, -76.3195801273106
Horizon Depths
(inches)
Texture Matrix Color (Munsell
moist)
Redoximorphic Features Induration (none,
weak, strong)
Roots
Color Abundance
0-5 Sandy Clay Loam
Texture Modifier: NA
10YR 3/1 None Few
5/28 Sandy Clay Loam
Texture Modifier: NA
10YR 5/1 5YR 5/8 15% None None
Comments: Soil Profile:
NA

Appendix F
As-Built & Record Drawings
1 23456 7 8
123 456 7
A
F
B
C
D
E
VICINITY MAP
NCBELS FIRM NO. C-4724
PO BOX: 879, PILOT MOUNTAIN, NC 27041
www.pilotse.com | 336-422-6741
Contact: [e-mail]
WHITEHAT STREAM & WETLAND MITIGATION SITE
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
3600 GLENWOOD AVE, SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27612
PILOTSE PROJECT
NO. 22-283
AS-BUILT TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
for
8
SHE
E
T

1
SHEE
T

2
SHEET 3
SHEET 4
LIMITS OF CONS
E
R
V
A
T
I
O
N

E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
PROJECT LOCATION
I, JONATHAN CORY GEORGE, CERTIFY THAT THIS PROJECT WAS COMPLETED UNDER
MY DIRECT AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY
SUPERVISION; THAT THIS TOPOGRAPHIC (GROUND) SURVEY WAS PERFORMED TO
MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A TOPOGRAPHIC / PLANIMETRIC SURVEY TO THE
ACCURACY OF CLASS A AND VERTICAL ACCURACY WHEN APPLICABLE TO THE
CLASS A STANDARD, AND THAT THE ORIGINAL DATA WAS OBTAINED ON 03/13-03/17
& 04/03-04/05, 05/08/2023; THAT THE SURVEY WAS COMPLETED ON 05/11/2023; THAT
CONTOURS SHOWN AS BROKEN LINES MAY NOT MEET THE STATED STANDARD; AND
ALL COORDINATES ARE BASED ON NC - NAD'83, (NSRS 2011), AND ALL ELEVATIONS
ARE BASED ON NC - NAVD '88.
THIS PLAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR LAND
SURVEYING IN NORTH CAROLINA (21 NCAC 56.1600). WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL,
THIS 11TH DAY OF MAY , 2023.
NOTES:
1. EXISTING CONTROL POINT 10725 AS PROVIDED BY RES WAS USED AS SURVEY CONTROL
FOR THIS SURVEY. AS ESTABLISHED BY MATRIX EAST, PLLC.
2. BEARINGS ARE GRID NORTH. NCSPCS NAD '83, US SURVEY FOOT.
3. TIE TO GRID COMPLETED BY RTK GPS (VRS)
4. AREAS COMPUTED BY COORDINATE GEOMETRY.
5. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GROUND DISTANCES.
6. ADJOINING LAND OWNERS WERE IDENTIFIED USING THE CURRENT ONLINE COUNTY GIS
TAX MAPS.
7. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT, WHICH MAY
REVEAL ADDITIONAL CONVEYANCES, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY, OR RESTRICTIONS
NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAT.
8. NOT ALL UTILITIES OR IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN.
9. PARCEL IS PARTIALLY LOCATED IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA, ZONE AE. SEE MAP
NUMBER 3720788800K, EFFECTIVE 12/21/2018.
10. ALL VEGETATION PLOTS, STREAM GAUGE AND WETLAND GAUGE LOCATIONS PROVIDED
BY RES TO PILOTSE IN SHAPEFILE FORMAT. NOT SURVEYED.
11. AREAS SOME AREAS NOT INCLUDED IN TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY WERE NOT DISTURBED
AREAS AT TIME OF SURVEY.
TOP OF BANK
TOP OF BANK
EXTENTS OF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
DEEP CREEK
INDEX NO. 30-5-4
CLASS: SC
Jonathan
Cory
George
Digitally signed
by Jonathan
Cory George
Date: 2023.05.11
11:23:59 -04'00'
8
8
8
7
8
9
9
8
8
7
6
6
5
5
6
5
7
7
7 6
7
6
6 5
5
6 8
8
9
7
5 8
6
10
10
12
10
9
6
5
6
8
5
4
4
4
4
5
4
5
4
4
5
4
1
4
4
5
7
6
5
6
7
7
5
6
7
8
8
9
12
13
14
1
5
14
10
13
9
9
75
6
5
5
6
67
6
1
2
2
4
3
2
3
4
2
1
3
3
1
3
1
4
1
3
3
0
3
3
1
4
4
1
3
3
1
2
3
1
1
3
1
4
7
5
35+07
36
+
0
0
3
7
+
0
0
38
+
0
0
39
+
0
0
40+00
41+00
42
+
0
0
43
+
0
0
44+00
4
5
+
0
0
46
+
0
0
47+00
48+
0
0
4
9
+
0
0
50+00
51
+
0
0
5
2
+
0
0
5
3
+
0
0
5
4
+
0
0
5
5
+
0
0
56+0
0
57+
0
0
58+00
59+
0
0
60+00
61+00
62+0
0
N2
0
°

5
1
'

2
8
"
E

-

5
0
8
.
7
9
'
S76° 28' 28"E - 723
.
3
6
'
S
2
8
°

4
0
'

4
8
"
E

-

2
1
9
.
6
9
'
S3
2
°

0
2
'

1
5
"
E

-

4
6
7
.
9
4
'
S80° 01' 06"E

-

2
1
7
.
1
4
'
S52° 1
0
'

0
8
"
E

-

2
3
N2
9
°

1
5
'

4
9
"
E

-

1
1
3
.
1
1
'
N
3
0
°

5
4
'

2
8
"
W

-

1
3
1
.
1
6
'
S78°
4
6
'

5
7
"
W

-

1
4
8
.
5
9
'
S4
3
°

1
3
'

0
0
"
W

-

1
0
9
.
2
3
'
S78°
5
9
'

5
6
"
W

-

1
8
6
.
2
7
'
0'

2
6
"
E

-

1
6
0
.
6
6
'
N71° 09' 31"W - 479.86'
N47°

3
7
'

1
6
"
W

-

3
5
7
.
2
5
'
N2
0
°

5
1
'

2
8
"
E

-

2
9
2
.
6
3
'
N70° 44' 28"W
18.18'50 0 25 50 100
SCALE: 1" = 50'
NCBELS FIRM NO. C-4724
PO BOX: 879, PILOT MOUNTAIN, NC 27041
www.pilotse.com | 336-422-6741
AS BUILT SURVEY
for
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS
3600 GLENWOOD AVE., SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27612
P:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
2
0
2
3
\
2
3
-
3
4
5

-

R
E
S

-

W
h
i
t
e
h
a
t

M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
\
C
A
D
\
2
3
-
3
4
5
-
X
C
1
.
d
w
g
NEW HOPE TOWNSHIP
PERQUIMANS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DATES SURVEYED: 03/13-03/17 & 04/03-04/05, 05/08/2023
DRAWN BY: A. HUTCHINS
FIELD CREW: AH, JT, CG, JC
PROJECT NO: 23-345
LEGEND
SEWER MANHOLE
FIRE HYDRANT
TRAVERSE STATION
CONCRETE MONUMENT
PK NAIL
STORM MANHOLE
R/W MONUMENT
WATER METER
SEWER CLEANOUT
BOUNDARY LINE
OVERHEAD ELEC
UNDERGRD ELEC
WATER LINE
SEWER LINE
GAS LINE
STORM LINE
RIGHT OF WAY
EASEMENT
SET 5/8" REBAR
EXISTING IRON MON.
CALCULATED POINT
SINGLE POLE SIGN
DITCH CNTRLINE
CHAIN LNK FNCEUTILITY POLE
LINE NOT SURVEYED
WATER VALVE
WELL
R.R. SPIKE
GUY WIRE
STONE
N
A
D

'
8
3

(
2
0
1
1
)
XS1LP
XS2LP XS3LP
XS4LP
XS5LP
XS1RP
XS2RP XS3RP
XS4RP
XS5RP
TOP OF BANK (TYP.)
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP.)
THALWEG (TYP.)
PROPERTY LINE NOT SURVEYED (TYP.)
EDGE OF
TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY
(TYP.)
EDGE OF
TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY
(TYP.)
EDGE OF DITCH (TYP.)
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E

-

S
E
E

S
H
E
E
T

2
MI
C
H
A
E
L

T
W
I
D
D
Y
PI
N
:

7
8
8
9
-
6
5
-
1
6
2
8
DE
E
D

B
K
:

3
9
6

P
G
:

2
5
3
PL
A
T

C
A
B
:

2

S
L
I
D
E
:

3
3

M
A
P
:

4
JA
M
E
S

B
U
T
T
PI
N
:

7
8
8
9
-
4
3
-
9
6
4
3
DE
E
D

B
K
:

1
2
9

P
G
:

3
7
1
PL
A
T

C
A
B
:

2

S
L
I
D
E
:

3
6

M
A
P
:

2
ROBERTA HEATH
PIN: 7889-62-5550
DEED BK: 287 PG: 562
ROBERTA HEATH
PIN: 7889-74-6923
DEED BK: 287 PG: 562
ROBERTA HEATH
PIN: 7889-84-1950
DEED BK: 287 PG: 562
ROBERTA HEATH
PIN: 7889-62-5550
DEED BK: 287 PG: 562
ROBERTA HEATH
PIN: 7889-82-4911
DEED BK: 287 PG: 562
LIMI
T
S

O
F

C
O
N
S
E
R
V
A
T
I
O
N

E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T

(
T
Y
P
.
)
PLA
T

C
A
B
:

4

S
L
I
D
E

1
6
6
SET 5/8" REBAR
SET 5/8"
REBAR
RES CONTROL POINT # 10722
RES CONTROL POINT # 10721
RES CONTROL
POINT # 10727
FOUND 5/8"
REBAR
FOUND 5/8" REBAR
FOUND 5/8"
REBAR
FOUND 5/8"
REBAR
FOUND 5/8"
REBAR
FOUND 5/8" REBAR
FOUND 5/8" REBAR
FOUND 5/8" REBAR
FOUND 5/8" REBAR
FOUND 5/8"
REBAR
EDGE OF 100-YR
FLOODPLAIN
(ZONE AE) (TYP.)
EDGE OF 100-YR
FLOODPLAIN
(ZONE AE) (TYP.)
TOE WOOD (TYP.)
WETLAND GAUGE
STREAM GAUGE
BRUSH TOE
WG#2
WG#1
VP#2
WG#4
SR DC1-A
VP#5
VP#3
VP#1
VP#4
VP#6
WG#5
VP#7
WG#3
AREA OUTSIDE OF
TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY
AREA OUTSIDE OF
TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY
SHEET 1
LOG VANE (TYP.)
LOG VANE (TYP.)
Jonathan
Cory
George
Digitally signed by
Jonathan Cory
George
Date: 2023.05.11
11:24:54 -04'00'
5
8
9
7
5 8
6
10
1
0
12
10
9
6
5
6
8
5
4
4
4
4
5
4
5
4
4
5
4
1
4
4
5
7
6
5
6
7
7
7
8
7
5
6
3
3
0
3
3
1
4
4
1
3
3
1
2
3
1
1
3
1
0
2
4
6
5
4
4
5
5
6
7
8
4
4
5
8
9
7
5
0
2 0
2
2
2
0
2
1
1
2
2
7
6
5
5
4
6
7
8
9
9
87
6
5
4
4
5
6 7
8
7
76
5
4
4
5
6
8
7
7
6
5
3
4
5
4
5
4
5
6
7
7
6 5 3
4
9
+
0
0
50+00
51
+
0
0
5
2
+
0
0
53
+
0
0
5
4
+
0
0
5
5
+
0
0
56+0
0
57+0
0
58+00
59+
0
0
60+00
61+00
62+0
0
63+
0
0
64+00
65
+
0
0
66+
0
0
67+00
68+
0
0
69+0
0
70
+
0
0
71+00
72
+
0
0
73+0
0
S3
2
°

0
2
'

1
5
"
E

-

4
6
7
.
9
4
'
S80° 01' 06"E - 2
1
7
.
1
4
'
S52°
1
0
'

0
8
"
E

-

2
3
8
.
3
4
'
S64° 32' 23"E
53.63'
S1
6
°

0
5
'

2
1
"
W

-

9
8
.
2
0
'
S3
0
°

4
1
'

0
7
"
W

-

1
2
1
.
4
8
'
S2
3
°

0
0
'

2
0
"
W

-

1
0
5
.
7
1
'
S
9
°

5
4
'

3
9
"
E

-

1
5
1
.
0
0
'
S
2
°

4
2
'

2
3
"
E

-

7
8
.
8
2
'
N64° 17' 35"W -
3
1
7
.
9
3
'
N2
9
°

1
5
'

4
9
"
E

-

1
1
3
.
1
1
'
N
3
0
°

5
4
'

2
8
"
W

-

1
3
1
.
1
6
'
S78°
4
6
'

5
7
"
W

-

1
4
8
.
5
9
'
S4
3
°

1
3
'

0
0
"
W

-

1
0
9
.
2
3
'
S78° 5
9
'

5
6
"
W

-

1
8
6
.
2
7
'
N85° 53' 1
5
"
W

-

2
9
7
.
6
8
'
N1
8
°

5
0
'

2
6
"
E

-

1
6
0
.
6
6
'
S13° 47' 28"W
41.26'
S76°
1
0
'

4
6
"
W

-

1
1
5
4
.
2
1
'
N
3
°

0
2
'

3
3
"
W

-

8
6
.
8
9
'
N
9
°

5
4
'

5
5
"
W

-

1
3
6
.
4
9
'
N2
0
°

2
5
'

2
0
"
E

-

1
2
6
.
4
1
'
N2
8
°

2
6
'

1
8
"
E

-

9
1
.
0
1
'
N1
6
°

0
5
'

2
1
"
E

-

1
0
7
.
1
5
'
N71°

0
9
'

3
4
"
E

-

2
5
3
.
0
8
'
N74°

0
6
'

3
6
N13° 28' 00"W
50.54'
N35° 30' 08"E
35.48'
8
9
1
0
1
1
12
10
9
1
1
12 10
8
50 0 25 50 100
SCALE: 1" = 50'
NCBELS FIRM NO. C-4724
PO BOX: 879, PILOT MOUNTAIN, NC 27041
www.pilotse.com | 336-422-6741
AS BUILT SURVEY
for
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS
3600 GLENWOOD AVE., SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27612
P:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
2
0
2
3
\
2
3
-
3
4
5

-

R
E
S

-

W
h
i
t
e
h
a
t

M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
\
C
A
D
\
2
3
-
3
4
5
-
X
C
1
.
d
w
g
NEW HOPE TOWNSHIP
PERQUIMANS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DATES SURVEYED: 03/13-03/17 & 04/03-04/05, 05/08/2023
DRAWN BY: A. HUTCHINS
FIELD CREW: AH, JT, CG, JC
PROJECT NO: 23-345
LEGEND
SEWER MANHOLE
FIRE HYDRANT
TRAVERSE STATION
CONCRETE MONUMENT
PK NAIL
STORM MANHOLE
R/W MONUMENT
WATER METER
SEWER CLEANOUT
BOUNDARY LINE
OVERHEAD ELEC
UNDERGRD ELEC
WATER LINE
SEWER LINE
GAS LINE
STORM LINE
RIGHT OF WAY
EASEMENT
SET 5/8" REBAR
EXISTING IRON MON.
CALCULATED POINT
SINGLE POLE SIGN
DITCH CNTRLINE
CHAIN LNK FNCEUTILITY POLE
LINE NOT SURVEYED
WATER VALVE
WELL
R.R. SPIKE
GUY WIRE
STONE
N
A
D

'
8
3

(
2
0
1
1
)
TOP OF
BANK
(TYP.)
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP.)
THALWEG (TYP.)
PROPERTY LINE NOT SURVEYED (TYP.)
EDGE OF
TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY
(TYP.)
EDGE OF DITCH (TYP.)
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E

-

S
E
E

S
H
E
E
T

1
LIMIT
S

O
F

C
O
N
S
E
R
V
A
T
I
O
N

E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T

(
T
Y
P
.
)
PLAT

C
A
B
:

4

S
L
I
D
E

1
6
6
EDGE OF
TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY
(TYP.)
M
A
T
C
H
L
I
N
E

-
S
E
E

S
H
E
E
T

3
EDGE OF
GRAVEL
ROAD
(TYP.)
XS4LP
XS5LP
XS4RP
XS5RP
SET 5/8"
REBAR
(TYP.)
XS6LP
XS7LP
XS8LP
XS9LP
XS6RP
XS7RP
XS8RP
XS9RP
ROBERTA HEATH
PIN: 7889-74-6923
DEED BK: 287 PG: 562
ROBERTA HEATH
PIN: 7889-84-1950
DEED BK: 287 PG: 562
ROBERTA HEATH
PIN: 7889-62-5550
DEED BK: 287 PG: 562
ROBERTA HEATH
PIN: 7889-82-4911
DEED BK: 287 PG: 562
ROBERTA HEATH
PIN: 7889-82-4911
DEED BK: 287 PG: 562
ROBERTA HEATH
PIN: 7889-72-3895
DEED BK: 67 PG: 522
EDGE OF
DITCH/POND
(TYP.)
SET 5/8"
REBAR
(TYP.)
SET 5/8" REBAR
(TYP.)
FOUND 5/8" REBAR
RES CONTROL POINT # 10722
FOUND 5/8" REBAR
RES CONTROL POINT # 10723
RES CONTROL
POINT # 10725
RES CONTROL POINT # 10726
FOUND
5/8"
REBAR
FOUND 5/8"
REBAR
FOUND 5/8" REBAR
FOUND 5/8" REBAR
FOUND 5/8" REBAR
FOUND 5/8"
REBAR
EDGE OF
GRAVEL
ROAD
(TYP.)
24" PLASTER PIPE
INV: 4.60'
24" PLASTER PIPE
INV: 4.65'
24" HDPE
INV: 4.86'
24" HDPE
INV: 4.25'
EDGE OF 100-YR
FLOODPLAIN
(ZONE AE) (TYP.)
EDGE OF 100-YR
FLOODPLAIN
(ZONE AE) (TYP.)
DAM
TOE WOOD (TYP.)
AREA OUTSIDE OF
TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY
AREA OUTSIDE OF
TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY
AREA OUTSIDE OF
TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY
WETLAND GAUGE
STREAM GAUGE
BRUSH TOE
WG#3
VP#6
WG#5 AMBIENT
WG#6
VP#8
VP#7
VP#10
VP#9
VP#11
VP#12
60" CMP
60" CM
P
SHEET 2
LOG VANE (TYP.)
LOG VANE (TYP.)
Jonathan
Cory
George
Digitally signed
by Jonathan
Cory George
Date: 2023.05.11
11:27:59 -04'00'
1 1 2
2
2
0
1
3
3
0
1
0
3
0
1 2
3
0 2
2
2 2
2
4
3
3
34
3
4
3
3
4
5
6
8 9
7
6
5
4
9
9
8
9
8
7
6
5
4
5
4
6
7
8
4
5
6
7
7
6
5
3
6
7
8
9
8
6
5
4
4
4
4
4
5
7
8
8
9
4
5
6
5
6
7
6
6
7
8
6
5
4
3
3
44
3
3
5
6
0+0
0
71+00
72+
0
0
73+00
7
4
+
0
0
75+00
76
+
0
0
77+
0
0
78+
0
0
79+
0
0
80+0
0
81+
0
0
82+0
0
83+00
84+
0
0
85+00
86+
0
0
87+0
0
88+00
88+75
S8
S79° 57' 48"W -

1
0
6
.
1
5
'
S60° 5
0
'

4
5
"
W

-

3
1
0
.
6
8
'
S77° 12' 08"
W

-

3
7
7
.
1
5
'
S83° 27' 17"W - 198.14'
S76° 10' 46
"
W

-

1
1
5
4
.
2
1
'
N74° 06' 3
6
"
E

-

4
9
5
.
5
7
'
N82° 10' 24"E - 1605
.
9
8
'
S71° 38' 56"W
49.86'
S83° 27' 17"W
10.00'
S15° 57' 07"W
37.40'
S76° 10' 46"W
15.00'
1
2
10
9
1
1
12
10
8
8
9
9
10
15
15
1
4
13 12
9
910
12
139
14
1
3
8
9
8
10
1
0
12
50 0 25 50 100
SCALE: 1" = 50'
NCBELS FIRM NO. C-4724
PO BOX: 879, PILOT MOUNTAIN, NC 27041
www.pilotse.com | 336-422-6741
AS BUILT SURVEY
for
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS
3600 GLENWOOD AVE., SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27612
P:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
2
0
2
3
\
2
3
-
3
4
5

-

R
E
S

-

W
h
i
t
e
h
a
t

M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
\
C
A
D
\
2
3
-
3
4
5
-
X
C
1
.
d
w
g
NEW HOPE TOWNSHIP
PERQUIMANS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DATES SURVEYED: 03/13-03/17 & 04/03-04/05, 05/08/2023
DRAWN BY: A. HUTCHINS
FIELD CREW: AH, JT, CG, JC
PROJECT NO: 23-345
LEGEND
SEWER MANHOLE
FIRE HYDRANT
TRAVERSE STATION
CONCRETE MONUMENT
PK NAIL
STORM MANHOLE
R/W MONUMENT
WATER METER
SEWER CLEANOUT
BOUNDARY LINE
OVERHEAD ELEC
UNDERGRD ELEC
WATER LINE
SEWER LINE
GAS LINE
STORM LINE
RIGHT OF WAY
EASEMENT
SET 5/8" REBAR
EXISTING IRON MON.
CALCULATED POINT
SINGLE POLE SIGN
DITCH CNTRLINE
CHAIN LNK FNCEUTILITY POLE
LINE NOT SURVEYED
WATER VALVE
WELL
R.R. SPIKE
GUY WIRE
STONE
NA
D

'
8
3

(
2
0
1
1
)
TOP OF
BANK (TYP.)
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP.)
THALWEG (TYP.)
PROPERTY LINE NOT SURVEYED (TYP.)
LIMITS OF C
O
N
S
E
R
V
A
T
I
O
N

E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T

(
T
Y
P
.
)
PLAT CAB:
4

S
L
I
D
E

1
6
6
EDGE OF
TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY
(TYP.)
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E

-
SE
E

S
H
E
E
T

2
XS8LP XS9LP
XS8RP XS9RP
ROBERTA HEATH
PIN: 7889-82-4911
DEED BK: 287 PG: 562
EDGE OF
DITCH/POND
(TYP.)
RES CONTROL POINT # 10724
EDGE OF TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY (TYP.)
ROBERTA HEATH
PIN: 7889-82-4911
DEED BK: 287 PG: 562
ROBERTA HEATH
PIN: 7899-03-1867
DEED BK: 287 PG: 562
JAMES BUTT
PIN: 7899-02-5606
DEED BK: 122 PG: 391
PLAT CAB: 2 SLIDE: 36 MAP: 1
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E

-

S
E
E

S
H
E
E
T

4
FOUND 5/8"
REBAR
CALCULATED POINT IN DITCH
CALCULATED
POINT IN DITCH
FOUND 5/8" REBAR
FOUND 5/8" REBAR
FOUND 5/8" REBAR
FOUND 5/8" REBAR
FOUND 5/8" REBAR
FOUND
5/8"
REBAR
FOUND 5/8" REBAR
XS10/11LP
XS10RP
XS11RP
24" HDPE
5.60'
24" HDPE
INV: 5.41'
24" HDPE
INV: 5.66'
24" HDPE
INV: 5.40'
15" HDPE
INV: 5.75'
15" HDPE
INV: 5.68'
RES CONTROL
POINT # 10728
EDGE OF 100-YR
FLOODPLAIN
(ZONE AE) (TYP.)
EDGE OF 100-YR
FLOODPLAIN
(ZONE AE) (TYP.)
TOE WOOD (TYP.)
STREAM
DEFLECTOR
STREAM
DEFLECTOR
WETLAND GAUGE
STREAM GAUGE
BRUSH TOE
WG#7
VP#11
SR DC1-B
WG#8
VP#12
VP#14
VP#16
VP#15
SHEET 3
LOG VANE (TYP.)
LOG VANE (TYP.)
VP#13
Jonathan
Cory
George
Digitally signed
by Jonathan
Cory George
Date: 2023.05.11
11:28:40 -04'00'
2
2
2
2 2
2
2
1
2 2 2
2 2
3
3
3
43
3
33
3
3
333
44
3
4
4
3
5
6
4
4
5
5 4
4
4
4
4
3 4 3
4 4
3
88+75
S
1
6
°

0
1
'

3
3
"
E

-

1
1
0
.
1
9
'
S1
9
°

1
3
'

1
7
"
W

-

3
2
6
.
3
7
'
N65
°

1
9
'

4
0
"
W

-

1
8
5
.
1
1
'
N78° 4
5
'

2
6
"
W

-

1
1
4
.
4
7
'
S87° 57' 38"W - 111.00'
S81° 29' 43"W - 131.24'
N80° 05'

1
9
"
W

-

1
0
1
.
7
2
'
N66
°

2
6
'

4
6
"
W

-

2
3
1
.
4
4
'
S88° 51' 12"W - 192.30'
N82° 42' 2
1
"
W

-

1
1
5
.
7
9
'
S89° 40' 10"W - 89.86'
S79° 57' 48"W - 106.1
5
'
N85° 23' 21"E - 449.50'
N81° 30' 39"E - 278.15'
N86° 20' 43"E - 320.67'
N86° 20' 43"E
10.00'
S10° 59' 43"E
41.03'
S11° 27' 50"E
37.66'
S13° 27' 56"E
44.34'
S25° 24' 59"E
28.01'
S18° 26' 48"E
51.62'
S2° 12' 33"E
47.66'
S6° 12' 33"W
32.94'
S30° 33' 50"W
49.20'
N44° 23' 28"W
16.33'
N54° 03' 36"W
21.41'
S19° 13' 17"W
17.36'
50 0 25 50 100
SCALE: 1" = 50'
NCBELS FIRM NO. C-4724
PO BOX: 879, PILOT MOUNTAIN, NC 27041
www.pilotse.com | 336-422-6741
AS BUILT SURVEY
for
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS
3600 GLENWOOD AVE., SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27612
P:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
2
0
2
3
\
2
3
-
3
4
5

-

R
E
S

-

W
h
i
t
e
h
a
t

M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
\
C
A
D
\
2
3
-
3
4
5
-
X
C
1
.
d
w
g
NEW HOPE TOWNSHIP
PERQUIMANS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DATES SURVEYED: 03/13-03/17 & 04/03-04/05, 05/08/2023
DRAWN BY: A. HUTCHINS
FIELD CREW: AH, JT, CG, JC
PROJECT NO: 23-345
LEGEND
SEWER MANHOLE
FIRE HYDRANT
TRAVERSE STATION
CONCRETE MONUMENT
PK NAIL
STORM MANHOLE
R/W MONUMENT
WATER METER
SEWER CLEANOUT
BOUNDARY LINE
OVERHEAD ELEC
UNDERGRD ELEC
WATER LINE
SEWER LINE
GAS LINE
STORM LINE
RIGHT OF WAY
EASEMENT
SET 5/8" REBAR
EXISTING IRON MON.
CALCULATED POINT
SINGLE POLE SIGN
DITCH CNTRLINE
CHAIN LNK FNCEUTILITY POLE
LINE NOT SURVEYED
WATER VALVE
WELL
R.R. SPIKE
GUY WIRE
STONE
NA
D

'
8
3

(
2
0
1
1
)
TOP OF
BANK (TYP.)
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP.)
PROPERTY LINE NOT SURVEYED (TYP.)
EDGE OF TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY (TYP.)
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E

-

S
E
E

S
H
E
E
T

3
XS12LP
XS12RP
EDGE OF TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY (TYP.)
FOUND
5/8"
REBAR
FOUND 5/8" REBAR
FOUND 1" PIPE (BENT)
FOUND 5/8" REBAR
FOUND 1/2" REBAR
FOUND 3/8" REBAR
FOUND 3/8" REBAR
FOUND 3/8" REBAR
FOUND 5/8" REBAR
FOUND 5/8" REBAR
FOUND 5/8" REBAR
FOUND 32" CYPRUS TREE
FOUND 5/8" REBAR
FOUND 5/8" REBAR
FOUND 22" SYCAMORE TREE
FOUND 1" PIPE (BENT)
XS13LP
XS14LP
XS13RP
XS14RP
ROBERTA HEATH
PIN: 7899-03-1867
DEED BK: 287 PG: 562
ROBERTA HEATH
PIN: 7899-03-1867
DEED BK: 287 PG: 562
KAREN MAZIK & ANNETTE BUTT
DEED BK: 433 PG: 302
PLAT CAB: 3 SLIDE: 192
LIZZIE GODFREY
PIN: 7899-14-9056
DEED BK: 498 PG: 611
WILLIAM & BILLIE DIVERS
PIN: 7899-13-6211
PLAT CAB: 2 SLIDE: 63
LAURA WEAVER
PIN: 7899-11-8264
DEED BK: 34 PG: 227
JAMES BUTT
PIN: 7899-02-5606
DEED BK: 122 PG: 391
PLAT CAB: 2 SLIDE: 36 MAP: 1
EDGE OF 100-YR
FLOODPLAIN
(ZONE AE) (TYP.)
EDGE OF 100-YR
FLOODPLAIN
(ZONE AE) (TYP.)
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT (TYP.)
PLAT CAB: 4 SLIDE 166
STREAM
DEFLECTOR
STREAM
DEFLECTOR
STREAM
DEFLECTOR
STREAM
DEFLECTOR
STREAM
DEFLECTOR
STREAM
DEFLECTOR
STREAM
DEFLECTOR
STREAM
DEFLECTOR
STREAM
DEFLECTOR
STREAM
DEFLECTOR
STREAM
DEFLECTOR
WETLAND GAUGE
STREAM GAUGE
BRUSH TOE
WG#10
VP#17
WG#9
VP#18
SHEET 4
CALCULATED POINT
IN CENTER OF DITCH
(TYP.)
CALCULATED POINT
IN CENTER OF DITCH
(TYP.)
CALCULATED POINT IN
CENTER OF STREAM (TYP.)
Jonathan
Cory
George
Digitally signed
by Jonathan
Cory George
Date: 2023.05.11
11:29:26 -04'00'
Design Centerline PROFILE
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
35+00
35
+
2
5
35
+
5
0
35
+
7
5
36+00
36
+
2
5
36
+
5
0
36
+
7
5
37+00
37
+
2
5
37
+
5
0
37
+
7
5
38+00
38
+
2
5
38
+
5
0
38
+
7
5
39+00
39
+
2
5
39
+
5
0
39
+
7
5
40+00
40
+
2
5
40
+
5
0
40
+
7
5
41+00
41
+
2
5
41
+
5
0
41
+
7
5
42+00
42
+
2
5
42
+
5
0
42
+
7
5
43+00
43
+
2
5
43+50
Design Centerline PROFILE
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
43+50
43
+
7
5
44+00
44
+
2
5
44
+
5
0
44
+
7
5
45+00
45
+
2
5
45
+
5
0
45
+
7
5
46+00
46
+
2
5
46
+
5
0
46
+
7
5
47+00
47
+
2
5
47
+
5
0
47
+
7
5
48+00
48
+
2
5
48
+
5
0
48
+
7
5
49+00
49
+
2
5
49
+
5
0
49
+
7
5
50+00
50
+
2
5
50
+
5
0
50
+
7
5
51+00
51
+
2
5
51
+
5
0
51
+
7
5
52+00
Design Centerline PROFILE
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
52+00
52
+
2
5
52
+
5
0
52
+
7
5
53+00
53
+
2
5
53
+
5
0
53
+
7
5
54+00
54
+
2
5
54
+
5
0
54
+
7
5
55+00
55
+
2
5
55
+
5
0
55
+
7
5
56+00
56
+
2
5
56
+
5
0
56
+
7
5
57+00
57
+
2
5
57
+
5
0
57
+
7
5
58+00
58
+
2
5
58
+
5
0
58
+
7
5
59+00
59
+
2
5
59
+
5
0
59
+
7
5
60+00
60
+
2
5
60+50
Design Centerline PROFILE
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
60+50
60
+
7
5
61+00
61
+
2
5
61
+
5
0
61
+
7
5
62+00
62
+
2
5
62
+
5
0
62
+
7
5
63+00
63
+
2
5
63
+
5
0
63
+
7
5
64+00
64
+
2
5
64
+
5
0
64
+
7
5
65+00
65
+
2
5
65
+
5
0
65
+
7
5
66+00
66
+
2
5
66
+
5
0
66
+
7
5
67+00
67
+
2
5
67
+
5
0
67
+
7
5
68+00
68
+
2
5
68
+
5
0
68
+
7
5
69+00
50 0 25 50 100
SCALE: 1" = 50'
NCBELS FIRM NO. C-4724
PO BOX: 879, PILOT MOUNTAIN, NC 27041
www.pilotse.com | 336-422-6741
AS BUILT SURVEY
for
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS
3600 GLENWOOD AVE., SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27612
P:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
2
0
2
3
\
2
3
-
3
4
5

-

R
E
S

-

W
h
i
t
e
h
a
t

M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
\
C
A
D
\
2
3
-
3
4
5
-
X
C
1
.
d
w
g
NEW HOPE TOWNSHIP
PERQUIMANS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DATES SURVEYED: 03/13-03/17 & 04/03-04/05, 05/08/2023
DRAWN BY: A. HUTCHINS
FIELD CREW: AH, JT, CG, JC
PROJECT NO: 23-345
LEGEND
SEWER MANHOLE
FIRE HYDRANT
TRAVERSE STATION
CONCRETE MONUMENT
PK NAIL
STORM MANHOLE
R/W MONUMENT
WATER METER
SEWER CLEANOUT
BOUNDARY LINE
OVERHEAD ELEC
UNDERGRD ELEC
WATER LINE
SEWER LINE
GAS LINE
STORM LINE
RIGHT OF WAY
EASEMENT
SET 5/8" REBAR
EXISTING IRON MON.
CALCULATED POINT
SINGLE POLE SIGN
DITCH CNTRLINE
CHAIN LNK FNCEUTILITY POLE
LINE NOT SURVEYED
WATER VALVE
WELL
R.R. SPIKE
GUY WIRE
STONE
SHEET 5
Jonathan
Cory
George
Digitally signed by
Jonathan Cory
George
Date: 2023.05.11
11:30:06 -04'00'
Design Centerline PROFILE
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
69+00
69
+
2
5
69
+
5
0
69
+
7
5
70+00
70
+
2
5
70
+
5
0
70
+
7
5
71+00
71
+
2
5
71
+
5
0
71
+
7
5
72+00
72
+
2
5
72
+
5
0
72
+
7
5
73+00
73
+
2
5
73
+
5
0
73
+
7
5
74+00
74
+
2
5
74
+
5
0
74
+
7
5
75+00
75
+
2
5
75
+
5
0
75
+
7
5
76+00
76
+
2
5
76
+
5
0
76
+
7
5
77+00
77
+
2
5
77+50
Design Centerline PROFILE
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
77+50
77
+
7
5
78+00
78
+
2
5
78
+
5
0
78
+
7
5
79+00
79
+
2
5
79
+
5
0
79
+
7
5
80+00
80
+
2
5
80
+
5
0
80
+
7
5
81+00
81
+
2
5
81
+
5
0
81
+
7
5
82+00
82
+
2
5
82
+
5
0
82
+
7
5
83+00
83
+
2
5
83
+
5
0
83
+
7
5
84+00
84
+
2
5
84
+
5
0
84
+
7
5
85+00
85
+
2
5
85
+
5
0
85
+
7
5
86+00
Design Centerline PROFILE
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
86+00
86
+
2
5
86
+
5
0
86
+
7
5
87+00
87
+
2
5
87
+
5
0
87
+
7
5
88+00
88
+
2
5
88
+
5
0
88
+
7
5
88+75
50 0 25 50 100
SCALE: 1" = 50'
NCBELS FIRM NO. C-4724
PO BOX: 879, PILOT MOUNTAIN, NC 27041
www.pilotse.com | 336-422-6741
AS BUILT SURVEY
for
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS
3600 GLENWOOD AVE., SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27612
P:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
2
0
2
3
\
2
3
-
3
4
5

-

R
E
S

-

W
h
i
t
e
h
a
t

M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
\
C
A
D
\
2
3
-
3
4
5
-
X
C
1
.
d
w
g
NEW HOPE TOWNSHIP
PERQUIMANS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DATES SURVEYED: 03/13-03/17 & 04/03-04/05, 05/08/2023
DRAWN BY: A. HUTCHINS
FIELD CREW: AH, JT, CG, JC
PROJECT NO: 23-345
LEGEND
SEWER MANHOLE
FIRE HYDRANT
TRAVERSE STATION
CONCRETE MONUMENT
PK NAIL
STORM MANHOLE
R/W MONUMENT
WATER METER
SEWER CLEANOUT
BOUNDARY LINE
OVERHEAD ELEC
UNDERGRD ELEC
WATER LINE
SEWER LINE
GAS LINE
STORM LINE
RIGHT OF WAY
EASEMENT
SET 5/8" REBAR
EXISTING IRON MON.
CALCULATED POINT
SINGLE POLE SIGN
DITCH CNTRLINE
CHAIN LNK FNCEUTILITY POLE
LINE NOT SURVEYED
WATER VALVE
WELL
R.R. SPIKE
GUY WIRE
STONE
AS-BUILT SURFACE (TYP.)
SHEET 6
Jonathan
Cory
George
Digitally signed
by Jonathan
Cory George
Date: 2023.05.11
11:30:52 -04'00'