Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
20201990 Ver 1_White Hat SAW-2018-0207 Final As-Built Report
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100 Raleigh, NC 27612 Corporate Headquarters 6575 West Loop South, Suite 300 Bellaire, TX 77401 Main: 713.520.5400 res.us May 31, 2023 Todd Tugwell U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587 Subject: RES Pasquotank 05 UMBI White Hat (SAW- 2018-0207) As-Built Baseline Report Submittal Mr. Tugwell: On behalf of Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Resource Environmental Solutions (RES), I am pleased to submit the RES Pasquotank 05 UMBI White Hat As-Built Baseline Report. Construction and planting for this project were completed in March 2023. The site was built to design and guidelines with some adjustments, which are noted and described in the baseline monitoring report and record drawings. RES setup cross sections and installed vegetation plots, wetland gauges, and stream monitoring devices in April 2023. Monitoring data of the vegetation indicates that all plots are exceeding the interim success criteria of 320 planted stems per acre. Additionally, cross section data closely matches design parameters. Upon approval of this as-built report, RES is requesting a 15% stream credit release (1,100.970 SMUs) and a 15% wetland credit release (1.203 SMUs). Due to a change in easement boundary during As-built, total credit amounts have decreased from 7,363.663 to 7,351.733 SMUs and from 8.470 to 8.434 WMUs. This change resulted in 1.79 extra SMUs and 0.011 extra WMUs being released in Task 1 due to the higher credit totals in the approved Mitigation Plan. The requested credit amounts for As-Built reflect this change in total credit, and account for the extra credits released in Task 1. A credit breakdown is shown on the following page. Please see the enclosed credit release schedule, updated credit ledger, and as- built baseline report. Thank you for all of your time and consideration and we look forward to continuing to work with you all as this Project progresses. Please contact me at 336-514-0927 or bcarroll@res.us if you have any questions or require any additional information. Thank you, Ben Carroll, Engineer bcarroll@res.us | 336-514-0927 Project Name: Sponsor Name: USACE Action ID: NCDWQ Action ID: Non-Forested Wetland Credits Warm Water Cool Water Cold Water Riparian Preservation Riparian Non- Preservation Non-Riparian Coastal 7363.663 0.349 8.121 7351.733 0.343 8.091 Scheduled Releases Warm Water Cool Water Cold Water Scheduled Releases Riparian Riverine Riparian Non-Riverine Non-Riparian Scheduled Releases Coastal 1 (Bank/Site Establishment)1, 2 15% 1104.550 100%, 15% 1.567 15% 12/31/2021 12/31/2021 2 (Year 0/As-Built)4 15% 1100.970 15% 1.203 15% 8/31/2023 3 (Year 1 Monitoring)10% 735.173 10% 0.809 10% 4 (Year 2 Monitoring)10% 735.173 10% 0.809 15% 5 (Year 3 Monitoring)10% 735.173 15% 1.214 20% 6 (Year 4 Monitoring)5% 367.587 5% 0.405 10% 7 (Year 5 Monitoring)10% 735.173 15% 1.214 15% 8 (Year 6 Monitoring)5% 367.587 5% 0.405 NA NA 9 (Year 7 Monitoring)10% 735.173 10% 0.808 NA NA Stream Bankfull Standard 3 10% 735.174 NA NA NA NA NA NA Varies3 Total Credits Release to Date 7351.733 8.434 Date 4 - Credit amounts changed during as-built. As-built credit amounts reflect 15% of the new credit total (1,102.760 SMU & 1.214 WMU), minus the extra amount release in Task 1 from the higher Mitigation Plan numbers (1.790 SMU & 0.011 WMU). Perquimans 3010205 2023 6/1/2023 County: 8-Digit HUC: Year Project Instituted: Date Prepared: Potential Credits from As-Built Survey Stream Credits Credit Classification Non-Forested Wetland CreditsForested Wetland Credits 3 - A 10% reserve of credits to be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met. 1 - The first credit release milestone is based on the potential credits stated in the approved mitigation plan. 2 - The first credit release shall occur upon establishment of the mitigation bank, which includes the following criteria: 1) Execution of the MBI or UMBI by the Sponsor and the USACE; 2) Approval of the final Mitigation Plan; 3) Mitigation bank site must be secured; 4) Delivery of the financial assurances described in the Mitigation Plan; 5) Recordation of the long-term protection mechanism and title opinion acceptable to the USACE; 6) 404 permit verification for construction of the site, if required. Contingencies (if any): Signature of Wilmington District Official Approving Credit Release Total Potential Credits Stream Credits Actual Release DateCredit Release Milestone Wilmington District Mitigation Bank Credit Release Schedule White Hat Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project EBX SAW-2018-0207 DWR # 20201993 V1 Potential Credits from Mitigation Plan Forested Wetland Credits Current and Future Credit Releases Projected Release Date Transaction Credits Released Credits Debited Current Credits Number To Bank From Bank Credit Balance Reserved Purchaser Project Permit Number Date HUC 1 1.567 1.567 1/5/22 Total 1.57 0.00 1.567 0.0 RES PASQUOTANK 05 UMBRELLA MITIGATION BANKING INSTRUMENT WHITE HAT WETLAND CREDIT LEDGER (HUC 03010205) Monday, January 10, 2022 Credits Released: Task 1 Transaction Credits Released Credits Debited Current Credits Number To Bank From Bank Credit Balance Reserved Purchaser Project Permit Number Date HUC 1 1,104.55 1,104.55 1/5/22 2 1,104.55 NCDOT Contract # 7700002253 TBD 1/24/22 Total 1,104.55 1,104.55 0.00 0.0 RES PASQUOTANK 05 UMBRELLA MITIGATION BANKING INSTRUMENT WHITE HAT STREAM CREDIT LEDGER (HUC 03010205) Friday, January 21, 2022 Credits Released: Task 1 As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report WHITE HAT STREAM AND WETLAND MITIGATION PROJECT PERQUIMANS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA USACE Action ID: SAW-2018-0207 | DWR Project # 20201990 V.1 Pasquotank River Basin, HUC 03010205 RES Pasquotank Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument Provided by: Bank Sponsor: Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC 3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100 Raleigh, NC 27612 919-770-5573 June 2023 White Hat Stream and 1 Baseline Monitoring Report Wetland Mitigation Site June 2023 Table of Contents 1 PROJECT SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Project Location and Description .................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Project Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................................ 3 1.3 Project Success Criteria ....................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.1 Stream Restoration Success Criteria ..................................................................................... 5 1.3.2 Wetland Success Criteria ........................................................................................................... 5 1.3.3 Vegetation Success Criteria ...................................................................................................... 6 1.4 Project Components ............................................................................................................................ 6 1.5 Stream and Wetland Design/Approach ........................................................................................ 7 1.5.1 Streams ............................................................................................................................................ 7 1.5.2 Wetlands .......................................................................................................................................... 8 1.6 Construction and As-Built Conditions ........................................................................................... 9 1.7 Baseline Monitoring Performance (MY0) ................................................................................... 10 1.7.1 Vegetation ................................................................................................................................... 10 1.7.2 Stream Geomorphology ......................................................................................................... 10 1.7.3 Wetland Hydrology .................................................................................................................. 11 2 METHODS ........................................................................................................................................................ 11 3 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................................... 13 White Hat Stream and 2 Baseline Monitoring Report Wetland Mitigation Site June 2023 Appendix A: Background Information Table 1: Mitigation Assets and Components Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History Table 3: Project Contacts Table Table 4: Project Background Information Figure 1: Site Location Map Appendix B: Visual Assessment Data Figure 2: Current Conditions Plan View Figure 3: Buffer Overview Vegetation Plot Photos Monitoring Device Photos General Photos Appendix C: Vegetation Plot Data Table 5: Planted Species Summary Table 6: Main Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table 7: Main Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species Appendix D: Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data Table 8: Baseline Stream Data Summary Table 9: Cross Section Morphology Data Table Cross Section Overlay Plots Appendix E: Hydrology Data Groundwater Well Soil Profile Characterization Data Forms Appendix F: As-Built & Record Drawings White Hat As-Built Survey White Hat Sealed Record Drawings White Hat Stream and 3 Baseline Monitoring Report Wetland Mitigation Site June 2023 1 PROJECT SUMMARY 1.1 Project Location and Description The White Hat Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project (“Project”) is located within Perquimans County, approximately nine miles east of Hertford, NC. The Project lies within the Pasquotank River Basin, North Carolina Department of Water Resources (“NCDWR”) sub-basin 03-01-52 and United States Geological Survey (“USGS”) 14-digit hydrologic unit code (“HUC”) 03010205060020 (Figure 1). The Project is designed to help meet compensatory mitigation requirements for stream and wetland impacts in the HUC 03010205. The Project is comprised of a 75.99-acre conservation easement contained within six parcels and a 23.60-acre draft perpetual flowage easement extending west toward Godfreys Lane. The Project involves the restoration and enhancement of Deep Creek, a named stream forming to the west of the easement boundary flowing east through the Project to the Little River, eventually draining to the Albemarle Sound. Within the conservation easement, the stream channel is divided into three reaches, DC1-A, DC1-B, and DC1-C and is surrounded by a system of interconnected jurisdictional wetlands. The Project restored 5,254 linear feet (LF) and enhanced 1,541 LF of stream as well as restored 3.461 acres, enhanced 13.891 acres, and preserved 3.429 acres of wetlands that will ultimately provide water quality benefits and ecosystem uplift for the Project’s 1,859-acre drainage area. The aquatic resources associated with the Project had been highly manipulated and degraded over time due to agricultural practices. Project stream reaches, specifically DC1-A, DC1-B, and DC1-C of Deep Creek, had historically been dredged and straightened, leading to channels with limited habitat and poor hydraulic function. Dredging and straightening had also adversely impacted the hydrology of the surrounding wetlands and caused some areas to lose jurisdiction. Also, networks of surface ditches draining toward the main channel further altered the natural hydrology of the stream-wetland complex. Much of the forested area surrounding the conservation easement had been cleared for row crop production resulting in narrow to absent riparian areas. Current and historical pine planting and harvesting operations have led to a monoculture in upstream areas along the channel and limited the natural vegetative diversity within the riparian areas. Therefore, the Project presented a great opportunity to address stressors identified within the watershed while also providing tremendous additional uplift to a degraded stream-wetland floodplain system. 1.2 Project Goals and Objectives Through the comprehensive analysis of the Project’s maximum functional uplift using the Stream Functions Pyramid Framework, specific, attainable goals and objectives are realized by the Project. These goals clearly address the stream and landscape manipulations that have altered natural pattern, hydrology, habitat, and riparian buffers, as well as address agricultural impacts such as nonpoint source runoff and hydrologic modification that have degraded water quality in the watershed. Ultimately, these goals promote long-term resilience to the inevitable White Hat Stream and 4 Baseline Monitoring Report Wetland Mitigation Site June 2023 issues that were identified as major watershed stressors in the 2009 Pasquotank River RBRP. The Project addresses these stressors and supports RBRP goals. The Project goals were: · Re-establish the natural position, pattern, and function of the stream-wetland complex; · Improve water transport from watershed to the channel in a non-erosive manner; · Improve water quality within the restored channel reaches and downstream watercourses by reducing sediment and nutrient loads; · Improve flood flow attenuation on site and downstream by allowing for overbank flows and connection to the active floodplain; · Improve instream habitat; · Restore and enhance native floodplain vegetation; · Improve ecological processes by reducing water temperature, improving terrestrial and aquatic habitat, and restoring a native plant community; and · Restore and enhance riparian wetlands. The Project objectives that addressed these goals were: · Design and reconstruct stream channels to be relocated within the historic low position, sized to convey design flows that will maintain a stable dimension, profile, and planform; · Add in-stream structures and bank stabilization measures to protect restored and enhanced streams; · Install habitat features such as brush toes, brush bed sills, riffles, wood material, and pools of varying depths to restored and enhanced streams; · Reduce bank height ratios and increase entrenchment ratios; · Increase forested riparian buffers to approximately 100 feet on both sides of the channel along the project reaches with a hardwood riparian plant community; · Treat exotic invasive species; · Re-establish and enhance riparian wetlands by raising stream bed elevations, plugging surface · ditches, and planting native wetland plant species; · Establish a permanent conservation easement on the Project; and · Establish a permanent perpetual flowage easement upstream of the Project. 1.3 Project Success Criteria The success criteria for the Project follows the 2016 USACE Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update and subsequent agency guidance. Specific success criteria components are presented below. White Hat Stream and 5 Baseline Monitoring Report Wetland Mitigation Site June 2023 1.3.1 Stream Restoration Success Criteria Four bankfull flow events must be documented within the seven-year monitoring period. The bankfull events must occur in separate years. Otherwise, the stream monitoring will continue until four bankfull events have been documented in separate years. There should be little change in as-built cross sections. If changes do take place, they should be evaluated to determine if they represent a movement toward a less stable condition (for example down-cutting or erosion) or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (for example settling, vegetative changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio). Cross sections shall be classified using the Rosgen stream classification method, and all monitored cross sections should fall within the quantitative parameters defined for channels of the design stream type. Bank height ratio shall not exceed 1.2, and the entrenchment ratio shall be no less than 2.2 within restored riffle cross sections. Digital images will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank erosion, success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Longitudinal images should not indicate the development of bars within the channel or an excessive increase in channel depth. Lateral images should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the banks over time. A series of images over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian vegetation. 1.3.2 Wetland Success Criteria The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has a current WETs table (1911-2020) for Pasquotank County upon which to base a normal rainfall amount and average growing season. Data for Perquimans County was not available; therefore, the closest comparable data station was determined to be the WETS station in Elizabeth City, NC. This station determines the growing season to be 258 days long, extending from March 14 to November 27, and is based on a daily minimum temperature greater than 28 degrees Fahrenheit occurring in five of ten years. Based upon field observation across the site, the NRCS mapping units show a good correlation to actual site conditions in areas of the site. Mitigation guidance for soils in the Coastal Plain suggests a hydroperiod for Roanoke, Perquimans, and Pasquotank soil series of 9 to 12 percent of the growing season; and 12-16 percent for Chowan soil series. Soil in the surrounding upland soil map units and immediately adjacent to the floodplain are anticipated to have shorter hydroperiods. Small depressional areas underlain by a clayey subsoil may exhibit longer hydroperiods exceeding 16 percent. Therefore, hydrology success criterion for the Project is to restore the water table so that it will remain continuously within 12 inches of the soil surface for at least 12 percent of the growing season (approximately 31 days) at each groundwater gauge location. Due to the current drainage and permeable soils, it may take at least a year for the site to become completely saturated and reach the target hydroperiod. White Hat Stream and 6 Baseline Monitoring Report Wetland Mitigation Site June 2023 1.3.3 Vegetation Success Criteria Specific and measurable success criteria for plant density within the riparian buffers on the Project will follow IRT Guidance. The interim measures of vegetative success for the Project will be the survival of at least 320 planted three-year old trees per acre at the end of Year 3, 260 five-year old trees at 7 feet in height at the end of Year 5, and the final vegetative success criteria will be 210 trees per acre with an average height of 10 feet at the end of Year 7. Volunteer trees will be counted, identified to species, and included in the yearly monitoring reports. In order for a volunteer tree to count towards success criteria, it must be a species on the approved planting list and be present for at least two growing seasons. Moreover, any single species can only account for up to 50 percent of the required number of stems within any vegetation plot. Any stems in excess of 50 percent will be shown in the monitoring table but will not be used to demonstrate success. 1.4 Project Components Through stream restoration and enhancement, the Project presents 6,795 LF of stream, that generated 6,281.333 base Warm Stream Mitigation Units (“SMU”) (Table 1). By incorporating wider buffers, the total adjusted SMUs for the Project amount to 7,351.733. Additionally, the Project presents 20.781 acres of wetland re-establishment, enhancement, and preservation, that generated 8.434 Riparian Wetland Mitigation Units (“WMU”) (Table 1). Both SMUs and WMUs totals have changed from those proposed in the Mitigation Plan due to an easement change detailed in section 1.6. Total SMUs decreased from 7,363.663 to 7,351.733, and WMUs decreased from 8.470 to 8.434. These changes are detailed in Table 1. Additionally, the changes have been accounted for in the Credit Release Schedule included with this report. Table 1: As-Built Stream Credits Stream Mitigation Mitigation Approach Linear Feet Ratio Warm SMUs Restoration 5,254 1:1 5,254.000 Enhancement I 1,541 1.5:1 1,027.333 Total 6,795 6,281.333 Credit Loss in Required Buffer -102.590 Credit Gain for Additional Buffer 1,172.990 Total Adjusted SMUs* 7,351.733 *SMUs are adjusted in accordance with Section XI(C)- “Wilmington District Stream Buffer Credit Calculator”, supplied to Providers in January 2021, from the USACE. White Hat Stream and 7 Baseline Monitoring Report Wetland Mitigation Site June 2023 Wetland Mitigation Mitigation Approach Area (acres) Ratio Riparian WMU Re-establishment 3.461 1:1 3.461 Enhancement 13.891 3:1 4.630 Preservation 3.429 10:1 0.343 Total** 20.781 8.434 ** Areas generating wetland credit are within the proposed 50-foot stream buffer area or are wholly outside of the Non-standard buffer width areas generating additional stream credit (>150 ft.); therefore, additional stream credit areas and wetland credit areas do not overlap. 1.5 Stream and Wetland Design/Approach The detailed treatment plan and design approach are as follows: 1.5.1 Streams Reach DC1-A & B An offline restoration approach was used for this reach to address channelization and loss of habitat. Priority Level I Restoration was conducted on Reach DC1-A, which entailed raising the channel bed and restoring a stable single thread channel through the existing floodplain. The existing channels were backfilled with material excavated from onsite to the elevation of the floodplain in areas adjacent to the new channel. Woody debris was installed throughout the reach to improve aquatic habitat. Woody debris was added in the channel in the form of typical riffles (all riffles will be a mix of 75% woody material / 25% native substrate), brush bed sills, and brush toes. Channel banks were live-staked, and a minimum 100-foot buffer was established and planted with native riparian vegetation, but buffers exceed 100 feet in many areas. Invasive species will be treated. Multiple drainage ditches ran through the easement and tied directly to the existing channel. The ditches that use to confluence with DC1-A flowed through existing wetlands with dimensions and slopes indicative of stormwater treatment swales and were therefore tied directly into DC1-A. The ditches that used to confluence with DC1-B did not exhibit these treatment characteristics and were therefore directed into treatment swales before they outlet into DC1-B or existing jurisdictional wetlands. The existing hunting impoundment, south of DC1-A, was graded during construction. Reach DC1-C An Enhancement I approach was conducted on this reach to address lack of appropriate channel pattern, channel dimension, limited habitat, and limited connection to the left overbank area. Enhancement activities promoted appropriate channel pattern, channel dimension, habitat, and encouraged the formation of a natural stream and wetland complex in the low gradient floodplain of Deep Creek. Reference section 6.1.2.1.2 for a detailed analysis of the hydraulic changes provided by this enhancement. Enhancement activities included: White Hat Stream and 8 Baseline Monitoring Report Wetland Mitigation Site June 2023 - Installation of 12 single wing deflectors to promote channel pattern, flow diversity, appropriate channel dimension and overbank flows. - Removal of the existing road on the left bank. Removal included the excavation of 50 percent of road material to provide connection from the channel to the low areas of the left bank wetland. Excavated material was deposited on the remaining areas of the existing road to form hummocks and promote floodplain flow and habitat diversity. - Riparian planting along the top of the single wing defectors and the created hummocks. 1.5.2 Wetlands The White Hat Project offers a total ecosystem restoration that revitalizes a highly manipulated floodplain forest community. As such, the wetland restoration and enhancement are closely tied to the stream restoration. Wetland restoration re-established hydrology and hydrophytic vegetation to previously non-wetland areas that exhibit hydric soil indicators and drained hydrology, while enhancement areas improve hydrology or vegetation in already jurisdictional wetland areas. The Project provides 8.434 Riparian WMUs through a combination of wetland re-establishment, enhancement, and preservation. Notably, areas generating wetland credit are either within the 50-foot stream buffer area of stream channels or are wholly outside of the non-standard buffer width areas generating additional stream credit (greater than 150 feet). Therefore, wide buffer areas utilized for additional stream credit and wetland credit areas do not overlap (Figure 9 & Figure 11). Re-establishment Wetland re-establishment with a credit ratio of 1:1 occurred for areas 50 feet out from the stream channel top of bank where jurisdictional wetlands do not exist and includes areas of existing stream channel footprint, spoil, farm path, and drained areas. These re-establishment areas connect the existing jurisdictional wetlands (WJ, WH, WK, WE, and WD), resulting in a contiguous riparian wetland corridor. The system of interconnected re-established wetlands on the western side of the easement break, is collectively referred to as “WR-1” (Wetland Re- establishment 1) (Figure 2). Most of these areas incorporate the footprint of the existing, excavated Deep Creek channel that was backfilled and graded to match the existing floodplain elevations in association with the stream restoration. However, there are other small areas within WR-1 that contain hydric soils but lack sufficient wetland hydrology and a lowered water table due to the altered landscape and drainage modifications, including the relocated and incised Deep Creek, presence of highly permeable soils, and the location of drainage ditches intercepting groundwater discharges onto the floodplain. Moving east across the easement break, “WR-2” (Wetland Re-establishment 2) was restored 50 feet out from the proposed channel. This system of wetlands borders jurisdictional wetlands WF and WG. As mentioned above, the hydrologic restoration of this area was directly related to the stream restoration and re-vegetation activities. Reconstructing Deep Creek (specifically reach DC1-A and DC1-B), with an appropriately sized channel back within the low of the existing floodplain and filling the incised, abandoned channel, will raise the local groundwater elevation that will White Hat Stream and 9 Baseline Monitoring Report Wetland Mitigation Site June 2023 allow frequent flooding. Also, the re-established wetland area were planted with bare root hardwood trees representative of a Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp community. Due to the high organic matter of existing soil and existing natural surface topography, ripping was not required; however, where construction equipment was utilized, limited surface roughening was necessary due to the structure of high organic soil that was destroyed by equipment. In order to document hydrology and establish baseline conditions for wetland re- establishment area WR-1 and WR-2, one groundwater hydrology well was installed within the area, near the easement break. In addition, one well was installed within existing, jurisdictional wetland, just outside of the western-most Project boundary, within the perpetual flowage easement to serve as a reference and document less disturbed hydrologic conditions. Unfortunately, this well was damaged sometime between its installation in May 2019 and present day and therefore can no longer be used as a reference. Limited data was collected from it to establish a baseline reference. The other well was installed in May 2019 with an automatic pressure transducer within the well, which recorded data twice per day. Data from these wells was presented in the Final Mitigation Plan. Enhancement (Medium) Wetland enhancement with a credit ratio of 3:1 occurred for the jurisdictional wetlands WJ, WH, WK, WG (labeled WG-1 on Figure 9), WF (labeled WF-1 on Figure 9), WE and WD in areas 50 feet and >150 feet out from the stream channel top of bank (Figure 9). These wetlands are naturally fed by groundwater; however, anthropogenic disturbance from agricultural production (clearing), ditching, and planted pine monocultures created unfavorable conditions for regeneration of woody wetland vegetation. Therefore, the primary approach to enhance these wetlands was to plant native bare root trees, characteristic of a Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp in order to establish a wetland hardwood forest community. By reconstructing and enhancing Deep Creek, with an appropriately sized channel back within the low of the existing floodplain, and plugging and filling the incised, abandoned channel, the local groundwater elevation will rise and more frequent flooding will occur, ultimately improving hydrology to the entire system. Preservation Wetland preservation with a credit ratio of 10:1 occurred for the remaining jurisdictional wetland areas within WG and WF that was not directly enhanced by stream restoration efforts (labeled as WG-2 and WF-2 on Figure 9). These areas lie outside of the non-standard buffer width areas (greater than 150 feet) as well as directly south of DC1-C, and will remain forested and protected in perpetuity. 1.6 Construction and As-Built Conditions An easement revision was required for this project to provide adequate space for farm equipment to utilize the existing farm crossing. This was discussed with USACE Todd Tugwell White Hat Stream and 10 Baseline Monitoring Report Wetland Mitigation Site June 2023 via email on 1/20/2023. The easement revision resulted in minor changes to the stream and wetland crediting which are accounted for in this report. An overview of the easement revision can be found in Figure 3. Stream construction and planting were completed in March 2023. The White Hat Site was built to design plans and guidelines with one major change; Swale D was redesigned to keep several mature trees. The record drawings are included in Appendix E. There were no major changes in the planting plan from the Final Mitigation Plan. The 14 proposed tree species were planted on March 13 and 14, 2023. Due to wet conditions and high water levels during planting, Swales A and B were only planted around the edges to prevent stem mortality. Minor monitoring device location changes were made during as-built installation; however, the quantities remained as proposed in the Final Mitigation Plan. 1.7 Baseline Monitoring Performance (MY0) The White Hat baseline monitoring activities were performed on April, 4, 5, and 12, 2023. All baseline monitoring data is present below and in the appendices. The Project is on track to meeting vegetation, stream, and wetland interim success criteria. 1.7.1 Vegetation Setup and monitoring of 18 fixed vegetation plots and 12 random vegetation plots was completed after planting and stream construction on April 5th, 2023. Vegetation data is in Appendix C, associated photos are in Appendix B, and plot locations are in Appendix B. MY0 monitoring data indicates that all plots are exceeding the interim success criteria of 320 planted stems per acre. Planted stem densities ranged from 566 to 1,133 planted stems per acre with a mean of 743 planted stems per acre across all plots. A total of 12 planted species were documented within the plots. Volunteer species were not noted at baseline monitoring but are expected to establish in upcoming years. The average stem height in the plots was 1.55 feet. Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous vegetation has not yet become established throughout the project. Seeding has occurred, but weather has been unfavorable for sprouting conditions. RES will continue to monitor the herbaceous layer and re-seed any areas that are not well established by the time Year 1 Monitoring Activities begin. 1.7.2 Stream Geomorphology A total of 14 cross sections were installed and geomorphology data collection for MY0 was conducted on April 4 and 12, 2023. Summary tables and cross section plots are in Appendix D. Overall, the baseline cross sections and profile relatively match the proposed design. The as-built conditions show that shear stress and velocities have been reduced for the restoration White Hat Stream and 11 Baseline Monitoring Report Wetland Mitigation Site June 2023 reach. The reach was designed as a brush/sand and silt bed channel with cobble stone added to the brush to reduce buoyancy post construction. This cobble is already beginning to silt over post-construction and the channel bed is expected to continue to move toward and sand and silt bottom as monitoring continues. Visual assessment of the stream channel was performed to document signs of instability, such as eroding banks, structural instability, or excessive sedimentation. The channel is transporting sediment as designed and will continue to be monitored for aggradation and degradation. 1.7.3 Wetland Hydrology A total of 10 groundwater wells with automatic recording pressure transducers were installed throughout the wetland areas on April 4 and 5, 2023. Five groundwater wells (GW1, GW4, GW6, GW7, and GW8) were installed in wetland re-establishment areas. Two groundwater wells (GW3 and GW5) were installed in wetland enhancement areas, and one groundwater well (GW 2) was installed in an upland area. Two groundwater wells (GW9 and GW10) were installed in wetland preservation areas to serve as references. Soil profiles were taken during installation and can be found in Appendix E. The groundwater wells record water table levels at a frequency of twice per day. The purpose of these groundwater wells is to demonstrate maintenance of jurisdictional wetland hydrology. Wetland hydrology data will be included in the Monitoring Year 1 Report in this section and in the appendices. 2 METHODS Stream cross section monitoring was conducted using a Topcon GTS-312 Total Station. Three- dimensional coordinates associated with cross-section data were collected in the field (NAD83 State Plane feet FIPS 3200). Morphological data were collected at 14 cross-sections. Survey data were imported into CAD, ArcGIS®, and Microsoft Excel® for data processing and analysis. The stage recorders documenting stream hydrology include an automatic pressure transducer placed in PVC casing in a pool. The elevation of the bed and top of bank at each stage recorder are used to detect bankfull events. Vegetation success is being monitored at 18 fixed monitoring plots and 12 random monitoring plots. Vegetation plot monitoring follows the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes analysis of species composition and density of planted species. Data are processed using the CVS data entry tool. In the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked with PVC at the origin and metal conduit at the other corners. Photos of each plot are taken from the origin each monitoring year. The random plot data are collected in locations where there are no permanent vegetation plots. Random plots are typically collected in the form of 100 square meter belt transects with variable dimensions. Tree species and height are recorded for each planted stem and the transects are mapped, and new locations will be monitored in subsequent years. White Hat Stream and 12 Baseline Monitoring Report Wetland Mitigation Site June 2023 Wetland hydrology is being monitored to document success of wetland restoration areas as well as conditions of wetland enhancement and preservation areas. This is accomplished with 10 automatic pressure transducer gauges (located in groundwater wells) that record daily groundwater levels. Five groundwater wells were installed in wetland re-establishment areas; two were installed in wetland enhancement areas; two were installed in wetland preservation areas to serve as references; and one was installed in an upland area. One automatic pressure transducer was installed above ground to record ambient air pressure and is used to correct all other pressure transducers onsite. Gauges are downloaded quarterly and wetland hydroperiods are calculated during the growing season. Gauge installation followed current regulatory guidance. Visual observations of primary and secondary wetland hydrology indicators are also recorded during quarterly site visits. As mentioned earlier, soil was characterized at each groundwater well. Soil borings were taken at each groundwater well and characterized in accordance with the Soil Characterization Data Forms provided in the USACE’s Technical Standard for Water-Table Monitoring of Potential Wetland Sites, and includes parameters of soil horizon depths, texture, colors, redoximorphic features, induration, and roots, as well as a photo of each soil profile (Appendix E). White Hat Stream and 13 Baseline Monitoring Report Wetland Mitigation Site June 2023 3 REFERENCES Griffith, G.E., J.M.Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H.McNab, D.R.Lenat, T.F.MacPherson, J.B. Glover, and V.B. Shelburne. (2002). Ecoregions of North Carolina and South Carolina, (color Poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs): Reston, Virginia, U.S. Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,500,000). Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2 Peet, R.K., Wentworth, T.S., and White, P.S. (1998), A flexible, multipurpose method for recording vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63:262-274 Resource Environmental Solutions (2021). White Hat Final Mitigation Plan. Schafale, M.P. 2012. Guide to the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, NCDENR, Raleigh, NC. USACE. (2016). Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update. NC: Interagency Review Team (IRT). Appendix A Background Tables Table 1. White Hat - Mitigation Assets and Components Existing Mitigation Footage Plan Mitigation As-Built As-Built or Footage or Mitigation Restoration Priority Mitigation Plan Footage or Plan Project Segment Acreage Acreage Category Level Level Ratio (X:1) Credits Acreage Credits Comments DC1-A 1799 2,907 Warm R PI 1.00000 2907.000 2903 2903.000 Channel restoration, riparian planting DC1-B 2019 2,351 Warm R PI 1.00000 2351.000 2,351 2351.000 Channel restoration, riparian planting DC1-C 1,541 1,541 Warm EI - 1.50000 1027.333 1,541 1027.333 Channel restoration, riparian planting WR-1 1.084 1.084 Rip R 1.00000 1.084 1.067 1.067 Floodplain reconnection, wetland planting, permanent conservation easement WR-2 2.405 2.405 Rip R 1.00000 2.405 2.394 2.394 Floodplain reconnection, wetland planting, permanent conservation easement WJ, WH, WG-1, WF-1, WE, WD, WK 13.893 13.893 Rip E 3.00000 4.631 13.891 4.630 Floodplain reconnection, wetland planting, permanent conservation easement WG-2, WF-2 3.487 3.487 Rip P 10.00000 0.349 3.429 0.343 Permanent conservation easement Project Credits Non-Rip Coastal Warm Cool Cold Wetland Marsh Restoration 5254.000 Re-establishment 3.461 Rehabilitation Enhancement 4.630 Enhancement I 1027.333 Enhancement II Creation Preservation 0.343 NSBW 1070.400 Total 7351.733 8.434 Restoration Level Stream Riparian Wetland Elapsed Time Since grading complete: 2 months Elapsed Time Since planting complete: 2 months Number of reporting Years1:0 Data Collection Completion or Activity or Deliverable Complete Delivery Restoration Plan NA Nov-21 Final Design – Construction Plans NA May-22 Stream Construction NA Mar-23 Initial bare root and live stake plantings NA Mar-23 As-built (Year 0 Monitoring – baseline)Cross sections April-23 Veg plots April-23 Jun-23 Year 1 Monitoring Year 2 Monitoring Year 3 Monitoring Year 4 Monitoring Year 5 Monitoring Year 6 Monitoring Year 7 Monitoring 1 = The number of reports or data points produced excluding the baseline Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History White Hat Mitigation Project Designer RES, LLC / 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100, Raleigh, NC 27612 Primary project design POC Ben Carroll, PE Construction Contractor KBS Earthworks Inc, 5616 Coble Church Road, Julian, NC 27283 Construction contractor POC Kory Strader Survey Contractor Pilot Surveying and Engineering, PC / P.O. Box: 879, Pilot Mountain, NC 27041 Survey contractor POC Jonathan Cory George, PLS Planting Contractor Shenandoah Habitats, 1983 Jefferson Hwy. Fishersville, Va 22939 Planting contractor POC David Coleman Seeding Contractor KBS Earthworks Inc, 5616 Coble Church Road, Julian, NC 27283 Contractor point of contact Kory Strader Seed Mix Sources Green Resource, LLC P.O. Box: 429, Colfax, NC 27235 Seeding point of contact Nursery Stock Suppliers Shenandoah Habitats Monitoring Performers RES, LLC / 3600 Glenwood Drive, Suite 100, Raleigh, NC 27612 Monitoring POC Katie Obenauf (336) 705-3041 Table 3. Project Contacts Table White Hat Mitigation Project USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 3010205 Reach DC1-C 1541 Unconfined 1859 Perennial SC F - C F - C AEFEMA classification AE AE Stream Classification (existing)F - C F - C Stream Classification (proposed)C C Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral Perennial Perennial NCDWR Water Quality Classification SC SC Valley confinement (Confined, moderately confined, unconfined)Unconfined Unconfined Drainage area (Acres and Square Miles)1535 1711 Length of reach (linear feet)2903 2351 Parameters Reach DC1-A Reach DC1-B Project Drainage Area (Acres and Square Miles)1,859 ac (2.9 sqmi) Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area 0% Reach Summary Information River Basin Pasquotank USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit 3010205060020 DWR Sub-basin 03 - 01 - 52 Level IV Ecoregion Chesapeake-Pamlico Lowlands and Tidal Marshes Table 4. Project Background Information Project Name White Hat Mitigation Bank County Perquimans Project Area (acres) 76.32 Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)36.175378, -76.329986 Planted Acreage (Acres of Woody Stems Planted)51.90 Project Watershed Summary Information MEADSTOWN AIRSTRIP 0 2,0001,000 Feet Figure 1 - Project Vicinity White HatMitigation Project Perquimans County, North Carolina Legend Conservation Easement Perpetual Flowage Easement 14- Digit HUC - 03010205060020 Pasquotank River Basin - 03010205 5 Mile Aviation Zone ©Date: 7/12/2021 Drawn by: EJU Checked by: MGB Do c u m e n t P a t h : R : \ R e s g i s \ e n t g i s \ P r o j e c t s \ 1 0 0 1 5 8 _ W h i t e _ H a t \ M X D \ 3 _ P e r m i t t i n g \ 3 _ M i t i g a t i o n P l a n \ F I N A L M I T P L A N \ F i g u r e 1 a - P r o j e c t V i c i n i t y - W h i t e H a t . m x d 1 inch = 2,000 feet White Hat Project 36.177, -76.333 Appendix B Visual Assessment Data :' :( :+ :- :. :5 :) :5 :5 ˘ ˇ ˆ ˙˝ 5 5 5 5ˇ 5˘ 5 5˙ 5˝ 5ˆ ;6 ˘ ; 6 ˆ ;6 ˇ ;6 ;6 ;6 ;6˝ ; 6 ˙ ;6 '&% '&$ 65'&$ $PELHQW *: *: *:ˇ *:˘ *: *: )LJXUH&&390< :KLWH+DW 0LWLJDWLRQ3URMHFW 3HUTXLPDQV&RXQW\ 1RUWK&DUROLQD 'DWH˛ˇ'UDZQE\˛.%72 'R F X P H Q W 3 D W K ˛ 5 ˛ ? 5 H V J L V ? H Q W J L V ? 3 U R M H F W V ? ˘ ˙ B : K L W H B + D W ? 3 5 2 ? ˇ B 0 R Q L W R U L Q J 0 D L Q W H Q D Q F H ? 0 < ? : K L W H + D W D S U [ 5HVWRULQJDUHVLOLHQWHDUWKIRUDPRGHUQZRUOG )HHW /HJHQG ˝’˚u˚vı d}›}(vl ^ı„µıµ„˚ ^ı„˚u››„}Z ˝vZv˚u˚vı/ Z˚’ı}„}v „}’’^˚}v s˚P˚ı}vWo}ı’ &]Æ˚ˆs˚PWo}ıEïîì’ı˚u’l„˚ Zvˆ}us˚PWo}ıEïîì’ı˚u’l„˚ 'µP˚’ u]˚vı ^ıP˚Z˚}„ˆ˚„ '„}µvˆÁı˚„t˚oo t˚ıovˆ››„}Z ˝vZv˚u˚vı W„˚’˚„À}v Z˚’ı}„}v hv„˚ˆ]ı˚ˆ ^Áo˚ &KHFNHGE\˛%&LQFK IHHW ^Áo˚ ^Áo˚ :* :) :*:5 :) :* :5 ˇ ˘ ˆ ˙ 5 5 5 ;6 ;6 ; 6 ;6 '&% '&& 65'&%*:ˆ *:˙ *: *:˝ )LJXUH&&390< :KLWH+DW 0LWLJDWLRQ3URMHFW 3HUTXLPDQV&RXQW\ 1RUWK&DUROLQD 'DWH˛ˇ'UDZQE\˛.%72 'R F X P H Q W 3 D W K ˛ 5 ˛ ? 5 H V J L V ? H Q W J L V ? 3 U R M H F W V ? ˘ ˙ B : K L W H B + D W ? 3 5 2 ? ˇ B 0 R Q L W R U L Q J 0 D L Q W H Q D Q F H ? 0 < ? : K L W H + D W D S U [ 5HVWRULQJDUHVLOLHQWHDUWKIRUDPRGHUQZRUOG )HHW /HJHQG ˝’˚u˚vı d}›}(vl ^ı„µıµ„˚ ^ı„˚u››„}Z ˝vZv˚u˚vı/ Z˚’ı}„}v „}’’^˚}v s˚P˚ı}vWo}ı’ &]Æ˚ˆs˚PWo}ıEïîì’ı˚u’l„˚ Zvˆ}us˚PWo}ıEïîì’ı˚u’l„˚ 'µP˚’ u]˚vı ^ıP˚Z˚}„ˆ˚„ '„}µvˆÁı˚„t˚oo t˚ıovˆ››„}Z ˝vZv˚u˚vı W„˚’˚„À}v Z˚’ı}„}v hv„˚ˆ]ı˚ˆ ^Áo˚ &KHFNHGE\˛%&LQFK IHHW ^Áo˚ Figure 3 White Hat MY0 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos Vegetation Plot 1 (4/4/2023) Vegetation Plot 2 (4/4/2023) Vegetation Plot 3 (4/4/2023) Vegetation Plot 4 (4/4/2023) Vegetation Plot 5 (4/4/2023) Vegetation Plot 6 (4/4/2023) Vegetation Plot 7 (4/4/2023) Vegetation Plot 8 (4/4/2023) Vegetation Plot 9 (4/4/2023) Vegetation Plot 10 (4/4/2023) Vegetation Plot 11 (4/4/2023) Vegetation Plot 12 (4/4/2023) Vegetation Plot 13 (4/5/2023) Vegetation Plot 14 (5/5/2023) Vegetation Plot 15 (4/5/2023) Vegetation Plot 16 (4/5/2023) Vegetation Plot 17 (4/5/2023) Vegetation Plot 18 (4/5/2023) White Hat MY0 Random Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos Random Vegetation Plot 1 (4/12/2023) Random Vegetation Plot 2 (4/12/2023) Random Vegetation Plot 3 (4/12/2023) Random Vegetation Plot 4 (4/12/2023) Random Vegetation Plot 5 (4/12/2023) Random Vegetation Plot 6 (4/12/2023) Random Vegetation Plot 7 (4/12/2023) Random Vegetation Plot 8 (4/12/2023) Random Vegetation Plot 9 (4/12/2023) Random Vegetation Plot 10 (4/12/2023) Random Vegetation Plot 11 (4/12/2023) Random Vegetation Plot 12 (4/12/2023) White Hat Monitoring Device Photos Stage Recorder DC1-A Stage Recorder DC1-B Groundwater Well 1 Groundwater Well 2 Groundwater Well 3 Groundwater Well 4 Groundwater Well 5 Groundwater Well 6 Groundwater Well 7 Groundwater Well 8 Groundwater Well 9 Groundwater Well 10 Ambient White Hat General Photos Single Wing Deflector DC1-B Swale A ESP Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data Table 5. Planted Species Summary Bare Roots in Main Zone 1 (Spacing: 9X6) Common Name Scientific Name Percent Composition Zone 1 Percent Composition Zone 2 QTY Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum 10% 30% 4200 Swamp tupelo Nyssa biflora 10% 0% 4100 Buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis 10% 20% 4200 American sycamore Platanus occidentalis 10% 0% 4100 Willow oak Quercus phellos 10% 0% 4100 Overcup oak Quercus lyrata 10% 10% 4200 Swamp white oak Quercus bicolor 10% 0% 4100 Pin oak Quercus palustris 10% 5% 4100 Water oak Quercus nigra 5% 0% 2100 River birch Betula nigra 5% 0% 2100 Wax myrtle Morella cerifera 5% 5% 2100 Water tupelo Nyssa aquatica 5% 10% 2100 Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data Table 6. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Plot # Planted Stems/Acre Volunteer Stems/Acre Total Stems/Acre Success Criteria Met? Average Planted Stem Height 1 566 0 566 Yes 1.97 2 809 0 809 Yes 1.46 3 688 0 688 Yes 1.19 4 768 0 768 Yes 1.53 5 728 0 728 Yes 1.61 6 768 0 768 Yes 1.32 7 809 0 809 Yes 1.33 8 890 0 890 Yes 1.53 9 566 0 566 Yes 1.78 10 566 0 566 Yes 2.07 11 647 0 647 Yes 1.70 12 688 0 688 Yes 1.86 13 688 0 688 Yes 1.55 14 688 0 688 Yes 1.52 15 890 0 890 Yes 1.39 16 1012 0 1012 Yes 1.23 17 890 0 890 Yes 1.35 18 1012 0 1012 Yes 1.56 R1 688 0 688 Yes 1.76 R2 850 0 850 Yes 1.72 R3 728 0 728 Yes 1.83 R4 567 0 567 Yes 1.35 R5 607 0 607 Yes 1.47 R6 769 0 769 Yes 1.38 R7 567 0 567 Yes 1.31 R8 647 0 647 Yes 1.54 R9 607 0 607 Yes 1.48 R10 688 0 688 Yes 1.44 R11 1133 0 1133 Yes 1.53 R12 769 0 769 Yes 1.69 Project Avg 743 0 743 Yes 1.55 Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species EEP Project Code 100158. Project Name: White Hat PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T Betula nigra river birch Tree 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 Morella cerifera wax myrtle shrub 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Nyssa aquatica water tupelo Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Nyssa biflora swamp tupelo Tree 3 3 3 2 2 2 7 7 7 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 4 4 4 Quercus bicolor swamp white oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 3 3 3 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 Quercus nigra water oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Quercus palustris pin oak Tree 1 1 1 4 4 4 2 2 2 3 3 3 6 6 6 4 4 4 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 4 4 4 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 4 4 4 Taxodium distichum bald cypress Tree 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 5 5 5 14 14 14 20 20 20 17 17 17 19 19 19 18 18 18 19 19 19 20 20 20 22 22 22 14 14 14 14 14 14 7 7 7 6 6 6 8 8 8 9 9 9 7 7 7 9 9 9 11 11 11 10 10 10 7 7 7 7 7 7 567 567 567 809 809 809 688 688 688 769 769 769 728 728 728 769 769 769 809 809 809 890 890 890 567 567 567 567 567 567 100158-01-0008 100158-01-0009 100158-01-0010100158-01-0003 100158-01-0004 100158-01-0005 100158-01-0006 100158-01-0007 Scientific Name Common Name Species Type 100158-01-0001 100158-01-0002 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 Stem count size (ares) size (ACRES) 1 0.02 1 0.02 Stems per ACRE 1 0.02 1 0.02 Species count 1 0.02 Current Plot Data (MY0 2023) PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T Betula nigra river birch Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 4 4 4 2 2 2 Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub 1 1 1 2 2 2 4 4 4 2 2 2 Morella cerifera wax myrtle shrub 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 5 4 4 4 2 2 2 Nyssa aquatica water tupelo Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 Nyssa biflora swamp tupelo Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 4 4 4 Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 6 6 6 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 Quercus bicolor swamp white oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 Quercus nigra water oak Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 Quercus palustris pin oak Tree 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 6 6 6 2 2 2 Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 10 10 10 5 5 5 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 Taxodium distichum bald cypress Tree 2 2 2 7 7 7 3 3 3 9 9 9 3 3 3 2 2 2 4 4 4 1 1 1 6 6 6 6 6 6 16 16 16 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 22 22 22 25 25 25 22 22 22 25 25 25 17 17 17 21 21 21 8 8 8 9 9 9 10 10 10 5 5 5 8 8 8 7 7 7 9 9 9 8 8 8 7 7 7 9 9 9 647 647 647 688 688 688 688 688 688 688 688 688 890 890 890 1012 1012 1012 890 890 890 1012 1012 1012 688 688 688 850 850 850 100158-01-R1 100158-01-R2 1 1 0.02 0.02 Current Plot Data (MY0 2023) size (ACRES) Species count Stems per ACRE 100158-01-0011 100158-01-0012 0.02 0.02 Scientific Name Common Name Species Type Stem count size (ares)1 1 1 100158-01-0013 100158-01-0014 100158-01-0015 100158-01-0016 100158-01-0017 0.020.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 100158-01-0018 1 1 1 1 1 Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species Continued PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T Betula nigra river birch Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 5 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 5 5 5 43 43 43 Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub 2 2 2 1 1 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 5 2 2 2 38 38 38 Morella cerifera wax myrtle shrub 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 35 35 35 Nyssa aquatica water tupelo Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 22 22 22 Nyssa biflora swamp tupelo Tree 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 8 8 8 65 65 65 Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 5 5 5 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 45 45 45 Quercus bicolor swamp white oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 22 22 22 Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1 45 45 45 Quercus nigra water oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 29 29 29 Quercus palustris pin oak Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 4 4 4 2 2 2 3 3 3 61 61 61 Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 61 61 61 Taxodium distichum bald cypress Tree 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 85 85 85 18 18 18 14 14 14 15 15 15 19 19 19 14 14 14 16 16 16 15 15 15 17 17 17 28 28 28 19 19 19 551 551 551 8 8 8 9 9 9 8 8 8 9 9 9 8 8 8 7 7 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 11 11 6 6 6 12 12 12 728 728 728 567 567 567 607 607 607 769 769 769 567 567 567 647 647 647 607 607 607 688 688 688 1133 1133 1133 769 769 769 743 743 743 Species count Stems per ACRE 30 0.74 1 1 size (ACRES)0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 1 1 1 1 1 Stem count size (ares)1 1 1 Scientific Name Common Name Species Type 100158-01-R3 100158-01-R4 MY0 (2023) Current Plot Data (MY0 2023) 100158-01-R5 100158-01-R6 100158-01-R7 100158-01-R8 100158-01-R9 100158-01-R10 100158-01-R11 100158-01-R12 Annual Means Appendix D Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data Parameter Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n Bankfull Width (ft)15.8 38.1 17.6 101.3 4 24.0 24.0 26.3 6 Floodprone Width (ft)22.1 60.2 50.9 116.7 4 70.0 >48.9 >81.8 6 Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)1.4 2.2 2.2 3.0 4 1.8 1.4 1.9 6 Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2.24 4.1 3.94 6.4 4 2.4 2.3 3.4 6 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)22.03 76.6 48.6 187.2 4 42.0 34.6 48.8 6 Width/Depth Ratio 6.2 19.8 9 54.8 4 13.7 13.1 17.6 6 Entrenchment Ratio 1.15 2.2 1.35 4.8 4 2.9 >2.2 >3.1 6 Bank Height Ratio 1 1.3 1 2.3 4 2.4 1.0 1.0 6 Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull Rosgen Classification Bankfull Discharge (cfs) Sinuosity (ft) Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) Other F-C C Table 8: Baseline Stream Data Summary White Hat DC1-A & B Pre-Existing Condition (applicable)Monitoring Baseline (MY0)Design C Parameter Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n Bankfull Width (ft)23.5 1 ------ -- -- -- Floodprone Width (ft)46.0 1 ------ -- -- -- Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)2.1 1 ------ -- -- -- Bankfull Max Depth (ft)3.4 1 ------ -- -- -- Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)49.1 1 ------ -- -- -- Width/Depth Ratio 11.2 1 ------ -- -- -- Entrenchment Ratio 2.0 1 ------ -- -- -- Bank Height Ratio 1.4 1 ------ -- -- -- Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull Rosgen Classification Bankfull Discharge (cfs) Sinuosity (ft) Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) Other --- --- F-C --- --- Table 8: Baseline Stream Data Summary White Hat DC1-C Pre-Existing Condition (applicable)Design Monitoring Baseline (MY0) Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 4.72 4.31 4.34 4.13 4.05 Bankfull Width (ft)1 25.2 27.3 24.4 30.6 25.0 Floodprone Width (ft)1 >67.5 -->59.1 -->48.9 Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 3.4 3.7 2.8 4.1 2.8 Low Bank Elevation (ft) 4.72 4.31 4.34 4.13 4.05 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 48.8 58.9 39.9 77.2 43.6 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 >2.7 -->2.4 -->2.2 Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0 --1.0 --1.0 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 3.61 3.67 3.11 2.99 2.57 Bankfull Width (ft)1 26.6 24.5 29.1 24.0 28.5 Floodprone Width (ft)1 -->50.5 -->64.4 -- Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 3.2 2.7 3.7 2.3 3.3 Low Bank Elevation (ft) 3.61 3.67 3.11 2.99 2.57 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 51.6 41.7 65.3 34.6 56.0 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -->2.2 -->2.7 -- Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 --1.0 --1.0 -- Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 2.78 3.52 3.92 3.61 Bankfull Width (ft)1 26.3 23.2 23.3 25.2 Floodprone Width (ft)1 >81.8 ------ Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.4 3.9 4.2 4.7 Low Bank Elevation (ft) 2.78 3.52 3.92 3.61 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 39.3 52.4 62.1 69.3 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 >3.1 ------ Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0 ------ 1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Cross Section 9 (Riffle) Cross Section 10 (Pool) Table 9. - Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters – Cross Sections) Project Name/Number: White Hat - SAW-2018-0207 Cross Section 1 (Riffle) Cross Section 2 (Pool) Cross Section 3 (Riffle) Cross Section 4 (Pool) Cross Section 5 (Riffle) Cross Section 6 (Pool) Cross Section 7 (Riffle) Cross Section 8 (Pool) Cross Section 14 (Pool)Cross Section 11 (Riffle) Cross Section 12 (Pool) Cross Section 13 (Riffle) 1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Upstream Downstream -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Distance (ft) White Hat - Reach DC1-A - Cross Section 1 - Riffle - (Restoration) MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 4.72 Bankfull Width (ft)1 25.2 Floodprone Width (ft)1 >67.5 Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 3.4 Low Bank Elevation (ft)4.72 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 48.8 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 >2.7 Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0 Cross Section 1 (Riffle) 3X Vertical Exaggeration 1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Upstream Downstream MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 4.31 Bankfull Width (ft)1 27.3 Floodprone Width (ft)1 -- Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 3.7 Low Bank Elevation (ft)4.31 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 58.9 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -- Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 -- Cross Section 2 (Pool) -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Distance (ft) White Hat - Reach DC1-A - Cross Section 2 - Pool - (Restoration) MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull 3X Vertical Exaggeration 1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Upstream Downstream -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Distance (ft) White Hat - Reach DC1-A - Cross Section 3 - Riffle - (Restoration) MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 4.34 Bankfull Width (ft)1 24.4 Floodprone Width (ft)1 >59.1 Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.8 Low Bank Elevation (ft)4.34 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 39.9 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 >2.4 Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0 Cross Section 3 (Riffle) 3X Vertical Exaggeration 1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Upstream Downstream -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Distance (ft) White Hat - Reach DC1-A - Cross Section 4 - Pool - (Restoration) MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 4.13 Bankfull Width (ft)1 30.6 Floodprone Width (ft)1 -- Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 4.1 Low Bank Elevation (ft)4.13 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 77.2 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -- Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 -- Cross Section 4 (Pool) 3X Vertical Exaggeration 1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Upstream Downstream MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 4.05 Bankfull Width (ft)1 25.0 Floodprone Width (ft)1 >48.9 Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.8 Low Bank Elevation (ft)4.05 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 43.6 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 >2.2 Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0 Cross Section 5 (Riffle) -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Distance (ft) White Hat - Reach DC1-A - Cross Section 5 - Riffle - (Restoration) MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area 3X Vertical Exaggeration 1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Upstream Downstream -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Distance (ft) White Hat - Reach DC1-A - Cross Section 6 - Pool - (Restoration) MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 3.61 Bankfull Width (ft)1 26.6 Floodprone Width (ft)1 -- Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 3.2 Low Bank Elevation (ft)3.61 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 51.6 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -- Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 -- Cross Section 6 (Pool) 3X Vertical Exaggeration 1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Upstream Downstream -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Distance (ft) White Hat - Reach DC1-A - Cross Section 7 - Riffle - (Restoration) MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 3.67 Bankfull Width (ft)1 24.5 Floodprone Width (ft)1 >50.5 Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.7 Low Bank Elevation (ft) 3.67 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 41.7 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 >2.2 Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0 Cross Section 7 (Riffle) 3X Vertical Exaggeration 1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Upstream Downstream -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Distance (ft) White Hat - Reach DC1-B - Cross Section 8 - Pool - (Restoration) MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 3.11 Bankfull Width (ft)1 29.1 Floodprone Width (ft)1 -- Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 3.7 Low Bank Elevation (ft) 3.11 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 65.3 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -- Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 -- Cross Section 8 (Pool) 3X Vertical Exaggeration 1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Upstream Downstream -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Distance (ft) White Hat - Reach DC1-B - Cross Section 9 - Riffle - (Restoration) MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 2.99 Bankfull Width (ft)1 24.0 Floodprone Width (ft)1 >64.4 Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.3 Low Bank Elevation (ft)2.99 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 34.6 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 >2.7 Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0 Cross Section 9 (Riffle) 3X Vertical Exaggeration 1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Upstream Downstream -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Distance (ft) White Hat - Reach DC1-B - Cross Section 10 - Pool - (Restoration) MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 2.57 Bankfull Width (ft)1 28.5 Floodprone Width (ft)1 -- Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 3.3 Low Bank Elevation (ft) 2.57 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 56.0 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -- Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 -- Cross Section 10 (Pool) 3X Vertical Exaggeration 1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Upstream Downstream -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Distance (ft) White Hat - Reach DC1-B - Cross Section 11 - Riffle - (Restoration) MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 2.78 Bankfull Width (ft)1 26.3 Floodprone Width (ft)1 >81.8 Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.4 Low Bank Elevation (ft) 2.78 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 39.3 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 >3.1 Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0 Cross Section 11 (Riffle) 3X Vertical Exaggeration 1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Upstream Downstream -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Distance (ft) White Hat - Reach DC1-C - Cross Section 12 - Pool - (Enhancement) MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 3.52 Bankfull Width (ft)1 23.2 Floodprone Width (ft)1 -- Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 3.9 Low Bank Elevation (ft)3.52 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 52.4 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -- Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 -- Cross Section 12 (Pool) 3X Vertical Exaggeration 1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Upstream Downstream -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Distance (ft) White Hat - Reach DC1-C - Cross Section 13 - Pool - (Enhancement) MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 3.92 Bankfull Width (ft)1 23.3 Floodprone Width (ft)1 -- Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 4.2 Low Bank Elevation (ft) 3.92 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 62.1 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -- Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 -- Cross Section 13 (Pool) 3X Vertical Exaggeration 1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Upstream Downstream -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) Distance (ft) White Hat - Reach DC1-C - Cross Section 14 - Pool - (Enhancement) MY0 2023 Approx. Bankfull MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 3.61 Bankfull Width (ft)1 25.2 Floodprone Width (ft)1 -- Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 4.7 Low Bank Elevation (ft)3.61 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 69.3 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 -- Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 -- Cross Section 14 (Pool) 3X Vertical Exaggeration Appendix E Hydrology Data Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 White Hat Soil Characterization Data Form Project Name: White Hat Date: April 5, 2023 Personnel: Emily Ulman and Heath Hidlay Soil Pit ID: GW1 Latitude, Longitude 36.1772910204787, -76.3351073016303 Horizon Depths (inches) Texture Matrix Color (Munsell moist) Redoximorphic Features Induration (none, weak, strong) Roots Color Abundance 0-10 Sandy Clay Texture Modifier: NA 10YR 5/2 10YR 8/8 5% None None 10-16 Sandy Clay Loam Texture Modifier: NA 10YR 5/1 10YR 6/8 15% None None 16-27 Sandy Clay Loam Texture Modifier: NA 10YR 5/1 10YR 5/8 15% None None Comments: Soil Profile: NA Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 White Hat Soil Characterization Data Form Project Name: White Hat Date: April 5, 2023 Personnel: Emily Ulman and Heath Hidlay Soil Pit ID: GW2 Latitude, Longitude 36.1780985609849, -76.334792386475 Horizon Depths (inches) Texture Matrix Color (Munsell moist) Redoximorphic Features Induration (none, weak, strong) Roots Color Abundance 0-4 Sandy Loam Texture Modifier: NA 10YR 3/4 None None 4-10 Sandy Loam Texture Modifier: NA 10YR 8/2 10YR 8/8 15% None None 10-22 Sandy Clay Loam Texture Modifier: NA 10YR 7/1 10YR 5/8 10% None None 10YR 6/8 10% 22-26 Sand Texture Modifier: NA 10YR 7/1 10YR 5/8 15% None None Comments: Soil Profile: NA Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 White Hat Soil Characterization Data Form Project Name: White Hat Date: April 6, 2023 Personnel: Emily Ulman and Heath Hidlay Soil Pit ID: GW3 Latitude, Longitude 36.1753955064679, -76.333652548563 Horizon Depths (inches) Texture Matrix Color (Munsell moist) Redoximorphic Features Induration (none, weak, strong) Roots Color Abundance 0-6 Sandy Clay Loam Texture Modifier: NA 2.5YR 3/1 None Few 6-18 Sandy Clay Loam Texture Modifier: NA 10YR 4/2 10YR 6/8 5% None None 18-30 Sandy Clay Loam Texture Modifier: NA 10YR 6/1 10YR 7/8 15% None None Comments: Soil Profile: NA Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 White Hat Soil Characterization Data Form Project Name: White Hat Date: April 5, 2023 Personnel: Emily Ulman and Heath Hidlay Soil Pit ID: GW4 Latitude, Longitude 36.1766640909714, -76.3327230350263 Horizon Depths (inches) Texture Matrix Color (Munsell moist) Redoximorphic Features Induration (none, weak, strong) Roots Color Abundance 0-4 Sandy Clay Texture Modifier: NA 10YR 4/2 None None 4-12 Sandy Clay Loam Texture Modifier: NA 10YR 4/1 10YR 5/8 5% None None 12-27 Sandy Clay Texture Modifier: NA 10YR 5/1 Gley 1 4/5G_/2 10% None None 10YR 7/4 5% Comments: Soil Profile: NA Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 White Hat Soil Characterization Data Form Project Name: White Hat Date: April 4, 2023 Personnel: Emily Ulman and Heath Hidlay Soil Pit ID: GW5 Latitude, Longitude 36.1756833658103, -76.3316450352185 Horizon Depths (inches) Texture Matrix Color (Munsell moist) Redoximorphic Features Induration (none, weak, strong) Roots Color Abundance 0-16 Sandy Clay Loam Texture Modifier: NA 10YR 5/1 10YR 4/6 10% None None 16-28 Sandy Clay Loam Texture Modifier: NA 10YR 5/1 10YR 4/6 10% None None Comments: Soil Profile: Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 White Hat Soil Characterization Data Form Project Name: White Hat Date: April 4, 2023 Personnel: Emily Ulman and Heath Hidlay Soil Pit ID: GW6 Latitude, Longitude 36.175117017735, -76.3299434725906 Horizon Depths (inches) Texture Matrix Color (Munsell moist) Redoximorphic Features Induration (none, weak, strong) Roots Color Abundance 0-14 Sandy Clay Texture Modifier: NA 10YR 4/2 7.5YR 4/6 15% None None 14-27 Sandy Clay Loam Texture Modifier: NA 10YR 5/1 5YR 4/6 20% None None Comments: Soil Profile: NA Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 White Hat Soil Characterization Data Form Project Name: White Hat Date: April 5, 2023 Personnel: Emily Ulman and Heath Hidlay Soil Pit ID: GW7 Latitude, Longitude 36.1754703047935, -76.3260811818315 Horizon Depths (inches) Texture Matrix Color (Munsell moist) Redoximorphic Features Induration (none, weak, strong) Roots Color Abundance 0-12 Sandy Clay Texture Modifier: NA 10YR 4/1 10YR 6/6 10YR 5/8 10% None None 12-26 Sandy Clay Loam Texture Modifier: NA 10YR 4/1 5YR 5/8 20% None None Comments: Soil Profile: NA Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 White Hat Soil Characterization Data Form Project Name: White Hat Date: April 5, 2023 Personnel: Emily Ulman and Heath Hidlay Soil Pit ID: GW8 Latitude, Longitude 36.1755850378235, -76.3243872053695 Horizon Depths (inches) Texture Matrix Color (Munsell moist) Redoximorphic Features Induration (none, weak, strong) Roots Color Abundance 0-29 Clay Texture Modifier: NA 10YR 5/1 10YR 5/8 20% None None Comments: Soil Profile: NA Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 White Hat Soil Characterization Data Form Project Name: White Hat Date: April 5, 2023 Personnel: Emily Ulman and Heath Hidlay Soil Pit ID: GW9 Latitude, Longitude 36.1764645242193, -76.3229382335263 Horizon Depths (inches) Texture Matrix Color (Munsell moist) Redoximorphic Features Induration (none, weak, strong) Roots Color Abundance 0-10 Sandy Clay Loam Texture Modifier: NA 10YR 4/1 10YR 5/8 15% None None 10-22 Sandy Clay Loam Texture Modifier; NA 10YR 5/1 5YR 5/8 20% None None Comments: Soil Profile: NA Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 White Hat Soil Characterization Data Form Project Name: White Hat Date: April 5, 2023 Personnel: Emily Ulman and Heath Hidlay Soil Pit ID: GW10 Latitude, Longitude 36.1756774501716, -76.3195801273106 Horizon Depths (inches) Texture Matrix Color (Munsell moist) Redoximorphic Features Induration (none, weak, strong) Roots Color Abundance 0-5 Sandy Clay Loam Texture Modifier: NA 10YR 3/1 None Few 5/28 Sandy Clay Loam Texture Modifier: NA 10YR 5/1 5YR 5/8 15% None None Comments: Soil Profile: NA Appendix F As-Built & Record Drawings 1 23456 7 8 123 456 7 A F B C D E VICINITY MAP NCBELS FIRM NO. C-4724 PO BOX: 879, PILOT MOUNTAIN, NC 27041 www.pilotse.com | 336-422-6741 Contact: cory@pilotse.com WHITEHAT STREAM & WETLAND MITIGATION SITE RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC 3600 GLENWOOD AVE, SUITE 100 RALEIGH, NC 27612 PILOTSE PROJECT NO. 22-283 AS-BUILT TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY for 8 SHE E T 1 SHEE T 2 SHEET 3 SHEET 4 LIMITS OF CONS E R V A T I O N E A S E M E N T PROJECT LOCATION I, JONATHAN CORY GEORGE, CERTIFY THAT THIS PROJECT WAS COMPLETED UNDER MY DIRECT AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION; THAT THIS TOPOGRAPHIC (GROUND) SURVEY WAS PERFORMED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A TOPOGRAPHIC / PLANIMETRIC SURVEY TO THE ACCURACY OF CLASS A AND VERTICAL ACCURACY WHEN APPLICABLE TO THE CLASS A STANDARD, AND THAT THE ORIGINAL DATA WAS OBTAINED ON 03/13-03/17 & 04/03-04/05, 05/08/2023; THAT THE SURVEY WAS COMPLETED ON 05/11/2023; THAT CONTOURS SHOWN AS BROKEN LINES MAY NOT MEET THE STATED STANDARD; AND ALL COORDINATES ARE BASED ON NC - NAD'83, (NSRS 2011), AND ALL ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NC - NAVD '88. THIS PLAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYING IN NORTH CAROLINA (21 NCAC 56.1600). WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL, THIS 11TH DAY OF MAY , 2023. NOTES: 1. EXISTING CONTROL POINT 10725 AS PROVIDED BY RES WAS USED AS SURVEY CONTROL FOR THIS SURVEY. AS ESTABLISHED BY MATRIX EAST, PLLC. 2. BEARINGS ARE GRID NORTH. NCSPCS NAD '83, US SURVEY FOOT. 3. TIE TO GRID COMPLETED BY RTK GPS (VRS) 4. AREAS COMPUTED BY COORDINATE GEOMETRY. 5. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GROUND DISTANCES. 6. ADJOINING LAND OWNERS WERE IDENTIFIED USING THE CURRENT ONLINE COUNTY GIS TAX MAPS. 7. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT, WHICH MAY REVEAL ADDITIONAL CONVEYANCES, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY, OR RESTRICTIONS NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. 8. NOT ALL UTILITIES OR IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN. 9. PARCEL IS PARTIALLY LOCATED IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA, ZONE AE. SEE MAP NUMBER 3720788800K, EFFECTIVE 12/21/2018. 10. ALL VEGETATION PLOTS, STREAM GAUGE AND WETLAND GAUGE LOCATIONS PROVIDED BY RES TO PILOTSE IN SHAPEFILE FORMAT. NOT SURVEYED. 11. AREAS SOME AREAS NOT INCLUDED IN TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY WERE NOT DISTURBED AREAS AT TIME OF SURVEY. TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK EXTENTS OF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY DEEP CREEK INDEX NO. 30-5-4 CLASS: SC Jonathan Cory George Digitally signed by Jonathan Cory George Date: 2023.05.11 11:23:59 -04'00' 8 8 8 7 8 9 9 8 8 7 6 6 5 5 6 5 7 7 7 6 7 6 6 5 5 6 8 8 9 7 5 8 6 10 10 12 10 9 6 5 6 8 5 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 5 4 1 4 4 5 7 6 5 6 7 7 5 6 7 8 8 9 12 13 14 1 5 14 10 13 9 9 75 6 5 5 6 67 6 1 2 2 4 3 2 3 4 2 1 3 3 1 3 1 4 1 3 3 0 3 3 1 4 4 1 3 3 1 2 3 1 1 3 1 4 7 5 35+07 36 + 0 0 3 7 + 0 0 38 + 0 0 39 + 0 0 40+00 41+00 42 + 0 0 43 + 0 0 44+00 4 5 + 0 0 46 + 0 0 47+00 48+ 0 0 4 9 + 0 0 50+00 51 + 0 0 5 2 + 0 0 5 3 + 0 0 5 4 + 0 0 5 5 + 0 0 56+0 0 57+ 0 0 58+00 59+ 0 0 60+00 61+00 62+0 0 N2 0 ° 5 1 ' 2 8 " E - 5 0 8 . 7 9 ' S76° 28' 28"E - 723 . 3 6 ' S 2 8 ° 4 0 ' 4 8 " E - 2 1 9 . 6 9 ' S3 2 ° 0 2 ' 1 5 " E - 4 6 7 . 9 4 ' S80° 01' 06"E - 2 1 7 . 1 4 ' S52° 1 0 ' 0 8 " E - 2 3 N2 9 ° 1 5 ' 4 9 " E - 1 1 3 . 1 1 ' N 3 0 ° 5 4 ' 2 8 " W - 1 3 1 . 1 6 ' S78° 4 6 ' 5 7 " W - 1 4 8 . 5 9 ' S4 3 ° 1 3 ' 0 0 " W - 1 0 9 . 2 3 ' S78° 5 9 ' 5 6 " W - 1 8 6 . 2 7 ' 0' 2 6 " E - 1 6 0 . 6 6 ' N71° 09' 31"W - 479.86' N47° 3 7 ' 1 6 " W - 3 5 7 . 2 5 ' N2 0 ° 5 1 ' 2 8 " E - 2 9 2 . 6 3 ' N70° 44' 28"W 18.18'50 0 25 50 100 SCALE: 1" = 50' NCBELS FIRM NO. C-4724 PO BOX: 879, PILOT MOUNTAIN, NC 27041 www.pilotse.com | 336-422-6741 AS BUILT SURVEY for RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS 3600 GLENWOOD AVE., SUITE 100 RALEIGH, NC 27612 P: \ P r o j e c t s \ 2 0 2 3 \ 2 3 - 3 4 5 - R E S - W h i t e h a t M i t i g a t i o n \ C A D \ 2 3 - 3 4 5 - X C 1 . d w g NEW HOPE TOWNSHIP PERQUIMANS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA DATES SURVEYED: 03/13-03/17 & 04/03-04/05, 05/08/2023 DRAWN BY: A. HUTCHINS FIELD CREW: AH, JT, CG, JC PROJECT NO: 23-345 LEGEND SEWER MANHOLE FIRE HYDRANT TRAVERSE STATION CONCRETE MONUMENT PK NAIL STORM MANHOLE R/W MONUMENT WATER METER SEWER CLEANOUT BOUNDARY LINE OVERHEAD ELEC UNDERGRD ELEC WATER LINE SEWER LINE GAS LINE STORM LINE RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT SET 5/8" REBAR EXISTING IRON MON. CALCULATED POINT SINGLE POLE SIGN DITCH CNTRLINE CHAIN LNK FNCEUTILITY POLE LINE NOT SURVEYED WATER VALVE WELL R.R. SPIKE GUY WIRE STONE N A D ' 8 3 ( 2 0 1 1 ) XS1LP XS2LP XS3LP XS4LP XS5LP XS1RP XS2RP XS3RP XS4RP XS5RP TOP OF BANK (TYP.) TOE OF SLOPE (TYP.) THALWEG (TYP.) PROPERTY LINE NOT SURVEYED (TYP.) EDGE OF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY (TYP.) EDGE OF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY (TYP.) EDGE OF DITCH (TYP.) MA T C H L I N E - S E E S H E E T 2 MI C H A E L T W I D D Y PI N : 7 8 8 9 - 6 5 - 1 6 2 8 DE E D B K : 3 9 6 P G : 2 5 3 PL A T C A B : 2 S L I D E : 3 3 M A P : 4 JA M E S B U T T PI N : 7 8 8 9 - 4 3 - 9 6 4 3 DE E D B K : 1 2 9 P G : 3 7 1 PL A T C A B : 2 S L I D E : 3 6 M A P : 2 ROBERTA HEATH PIN: 7889-62-5550 DEED BK: 287 PG: 562 ROBERTA HEATH PIN: 7889-74-6923 DEED BK: 287 PG: 562 ROBERTA HEATH PIN: 7889-84-1950 DEED BK: 287 PG: 562 ROBERTA HEATH PIN: 7889-62-5550 DEED BK: 287 PG: 562 ROBERTA HEATH PIN: 7889-82-4911 DEED BK: 287 PG: 562 LIMI T S O F C O N S E R V A T I O N E A S E M E N T ( T Y P . ) PLA T C A B : 4 S L I D E 1 6 6 SET 5/8" REBAR SET 5/8" REBAR RES CONTROL POINT # 10722 RES CONTROL POINT # 10721 RES CONTROL POINT # 10727 FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 5/8" REBAR EDGE OF 100-YR FLOODPLAIN (ZONE AE) (TYP.) EDGE OF 100-YR FLOODPLAIN (ZONE AE) (TYP.) TOE WOOD (TYP.) WETLAND GAUGE STREAM GAUGE BRUSH TOE WG#2 WG#1 VP#2 WG#4 SR DC1-A VP#5 VP#3 VP#1 VP#4 VP#6 WG#5 VP#7 WG#3 AREA OUTSIDE OF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AREA OUTSIDE OF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SHEET 1 LOG VANE (TYP.) LOG VANE (TYP.) Jonathan Cory George Digitally signed by Jonathan Cory George Date: 2023.05.11 11:24:54 -04'00' 5 8 9 7 5 8 6 10 1 0 12 10 9 6 5 6 8 5 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 5 4 1 4 4 5 7 6 5 6 7 7 7 8 7 5 6 3 3 0 3 3 1 4 4 1 3 3 1 2 3 1 1 3 1 0 2 4 6 5 4 4 5 5 6 7 8 4 4 5 8 9 7 5 0 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 1 1 2 2 7 6 5 5 4 6 7 8 9 9 87 6 5 4 4 5 6 7 8 7 76 5 4 4 5 6 8 7 7 6 5 3 4 5 4 5 4 5 6 7 7 6 5 3 4 9 + 0 0 50+00 51 + 0 0 5 2 + 0 0 53 + 0 0 5 4 + 0 0 5 5 + 0 0 56+0 0 57+0 0 58+00 59+ 0 0 60+00 61+00 62+0 0 63+ 0 0 64+00 65 + 0 0 66+ 0 0 67+00 68+ 0 0 69+0 0 70 + 0 0 71+00 72 + 0 0 73+0 0 S3 2 ° 0 2 ' 1 5 " E - 4 6 7 . 9 4 ' S80° 01' 06"E - 2 1 7 . 1 4 ' S52° 1 0 ' 0 8 " E - 2 3 8 . 3 4 ' S64° 32' 23"E 53.63' S1 6 ° 0 5 ' 2 1 " W - 9 8 . 2 0 ' S3 0 ° 4 1 ' 0 7 " W - 1 2 1 . 4 8 ' S2 3 ° 0 0 ' 2 0 " W - 1 0 5 . 7 1 ' S 9 ° 5 4 ' 3 9 " E - 1 5 1 . 0 0 ' S 2 ° 4 2 ' 2 3 " E - 7 8 . 8 2 ' N64° 17' 35"W - 3 1 7 . 9 3 ' N2 9 ° 1 5 ' 4 9 " E - 1 1 3 . 1 1 ' N 3 0 ° 5 4 ' 2 8 " W - 1 3 1 . 1 6 ' S78° 4 6 ' 5 7 " W - 1 4 8 . 5 9 ' S4 3 ° 1 3 ' 0 0 " W - 1 0 9 . 2 3 ' S78° 5 9 ' 5 6 " W - 1 8 6 . 2 7 ' N85° 53' 1 5 " W - 2 9 7 . 6 8 ' N1 8 ° 5 0 ' 2 6 " E - 1 6 0 . 6 6 ' S13° 47' 28"W 41.26' S76° 1 0 ' 4 6 " W - 1 1 5 4 . 2 1 ' N 3 ° 0 2 ' 3 3 " W - 8 6 . 8 9 ' N 9 ° 5 4 ' 5 5 " W - 1 3 6 . 4 9 ' N2 0 ° 2 5 ' 2 0 " E - 1 2 6 . 4 1 ' N2 8 ° 2 6 ' 1 8 " E - 9 1 . 0 1 ' N1 6 ° 0 5 ' 2 1 " E - 1 0 7 . 1 5 ' N71° 0 9 ' 3 4 " E - 2 5 3 . 0 8 ' N74° 0 6 ' 3 6 N13° 28' 00"W 50.54' N35° 30' 08"E 35.48' 8 9 1 0 1 1 12 10 9 1 1 12 10 8 50 0 25 50 100 SCALE: 1" = 50' NCBELS FIRM NO. C-4724 PO BOX: 879, PILOT MOUNTAIN, NC 27041 www.pilotse.com | 336-422-6741 AS BUILT SURVEY for RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS 3600 GLENWOOD AVE., SUITE 100 RALEIGH, NC 27612 P: \ P r o j e c t s \ 2 0 2 3 \ 2 3 - 3 4 5 - R E S - W h i t e h a t M i t i g a t i o n \ C A D \ 2 3 - 3 4 5 - X C 1 . d w g NEW HOPE TOWNSHIP PERQUIMANS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA DATES SURVEYED: 03/13-03/17 & 04/03-04/05, 05/08/2023 DRAWN BY: A. HUTCHINS FIELD CREW: AH, JT, CG, JC PROJECT NO: 23-345 LEGEND SEWER MANHOLE FIRE HYDRANT TRAVERSE STATION CONCRETE MONUMENT PK NAIL STORM MANHOLE R/W MONUMENT WATER METER SEWER CLEANOUT BOUNDARY LINE OVERHEAD ELEC UNDERGRD ELEC WATER LINE SEWER LINE GAS LINE STORM LINE RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT SET 5/8" REBAR EXISTING IRON MON. CALCULATED POINT SINGLE POLE SIGN DITCH CNTRLINE CHAIN LNK FNCEUTILITY POLE LINE NOT SURVEYED WATER VALVE WELL R.R. SPIKE GUY WIRE STONE N A D ' 8 3 ( 2 0 1 1 ) TOP OF BANK (TYP.) TOE OF SLOPE (TYP.) THALWEG (TYP.) PROPERTY LINE NOT SURVEYED (TYP.) EDGE OF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY (TYP.) EDGE OF DITCH (TYP.) MA T C H L I N E - S E E S H E E T 1 LIMIT S O F C O N S E R V A T I O N E A S E M E N T ( T Y P . ) PLAT C A B : 4 S L I D E 1 6 6 EDGE OF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY (TYP.) M A T C H L I N E - S E E S H E E T 3 EDGE OF GRAVEL ROAD (TYP.) XS4LP XS5LP XS4RP XS5RP SET 5/8" REBAR (TYP.) XS6LP XS7LP XS8LP XS9LP XS6RP XS7RP XS8RP XS9RP ROBERTA HEATH PIN: 7889-74-6923 DEED BK: 287 PG: 562 ROBERTA HEATH PIN: 7889-84-1950 DEED BK: 287 PG: 562 ROBERTA HEATH PIN: 7889-62-5550 DEED BK: 287 PG: 562 ROBERTA HEATH PIN: 7889-82-4911 DEED BK: 287 PG: 562 ROBERTA HEATH PIN: 7889-82-4911 DEED BK: 287 PG: 562 ROBERTA HEATH PIN: 7889-72-3895 DEED BK: 67 PG: 522 EDGE OF DITCH/POND (TYP.) SET 5/8" REBAR (TYP.) SET 5/8" REBAR (TYP.) FOUND 5/8" REBAR RES CONTROL POINT # 10722 FOUND 5/8" REBAR RES CONTROL POINT # 10723 RES CONTROL POINT # 10725 RES CONTROL POINT # 10726 FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 5/8" REBAR EDGE OF GRAVEL ROAD (TYP.) 24" PLASTER PIPE INV: 4.60' 24" PLASTER PIPE INV: 4.65' 24" HDPE INV: 4.86' 24" HDPE INV: 4.25' EDGE OF 100-YR FLOODPLAIN (ZONE AE) (TYP.) EDGE OF 100-YR FLOODPLAIN (ZONE AE) (TYP.) DAM TOE WOOD (TYP.) AREA OUTSIDE OF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AREA OUTSIDE OF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AREA OUTSIDE OF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY WETLAND GAUGE STREAM GAUGE BRUSH TOE WG#3 VP#6 WG#5 AMBIENT WG#6 VP#8 VP#7 VP#10 VP#9 VP#11 VP#12 60" CMP 60" CM P SHEET 2 LOG VANE (TYP.) LOG VANE (TYP.) Jonathan Cory George Digitally signed by Jonathan Cory George Date: 2023.05.11 11:27:59 -04'00' 1 1 2 2 2 0 1 3 3 0 1 0 3 0 1 2 3 0 2 2 2 2 2 4 3 3 34 3 4 3 3 4 5 6 8 9 7 6 5 4 9 9 8 9 8 7 6 5 4 5 4 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 7 6 5 3 6 7 8 9 8 6 5 4 4 4 4 4 5 7 8 8 9 4 5 6 5 6 7 6 6 7 8 6 5 4 3 3 44 3 3 5 6 0+0 0 71+00 72+ 0 0 73+00 7 4 + 0 0 75+00 76 + 0 0 77+ 0 0 78+ 0 0 79+ 0 0 80+0 0 81+ 0 0 82+0 0 83+00 84+ 0 0 85+00 86+ 0 0 87+0 0 88+00 88+75 S8 S79° 57' 48"W - 1 0 6 . 1 5 ' S60° 5 0 ' 4 5 " W - 3 1 0 . 6 8 ' S77° 12' 08" W - 3 7 7 . 1 5 ' S83° 27' 17"W - 198.14' S76° 10' 46 " W - 1 1 5 4 . 2 1 ' N74° 06' 3 6 " E - 4 9 5 . 5 7 ' N82° 10' 24"E - 1605 . 9 8 ' S71° 38' 56"W 49.86' S83° 27' 17"W 10.00' S15° 57' 07"W 37.40' S76° 10' 46"W 15.00' 1 2 10 9 1 1 12 10 8 8 9 9 10 15 15 1 4 13 12 9 910 12 139 14 1 3 8 9 8 10 1 0 12 50 0 25 50 100 SCALE: 1" = 50' NCBELS FIRM NO. C-4724 PO BOX: 879, PILOT MOUNTAIN, NC 27041 www.pilotse.com | 336-422-6741 AS BUILT SURVEY for RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS 3600 GLENWOOD AVE., SUITE 100 RALEIGH, NC 27612 P: \ P r o j e c t s \ 2 0 2 3 \ 2 3 - 3 4 5 - R E S - W h i t e h a t M i t i g a t i o n \ C A D \ 2 3 - 3 4 5 - X C 1 . d w g NEW HOPE TOWNSHIP PERQUIMANS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA DATES SURVEYED: 03/13-03/17 & 04/03-04/05, 05/08/2023 DRAWN BY: A. HUTCHINS FIELD CREW: AH, JT, CG, JC PROJECT NO: 23-345 LEGEND SEWER MANHOLE FIRE HYDRANT TRAVERSE STATION CONCRETE MONUMENT PK NAIL STORM MANHOLE R/W MONUMENT WATER METER SEWER CLEANOUT BOUNDARY LINE OVERHEAD ELEC UNDERGRD ELEC WATER LINE SEWER LINE GAS LINE STORM LINE RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT SET 5/8" REBAR EXISTING IRON MON. CALCULATED POINT SINGLE POLE SIGN DITCH CNTRLINE CHAIN LNK FNCEUTILITY POLE LINE NOT SURVEYED WATER VALVE WELL R.R. SPIKE GUY WIRE STONE NA D ' 8 3 ( 2 0 1 1 ) TOP OF BANK (TYP.) TOE OF SLOPE (TYP.) THALWEG (TYP.) PROPERTY LINE NOT SURVEYED (TYP.) LIMITS OF C O N S E R V A T I O N E A S E M E N T ( T Y P . ) PLAT CAB: 4 S L I D E 1 6 6 EDGE OF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY (TYP.) MA T C H L I N E - SE E S H E E T 2 XS8LP XS9LP XS8RP XS9RP ROBERTA HEATH PIN: 7889-82-4911 DEED BK: 287 PG: 562 EDGE OF DITCH/POND (TYP.) RES CONTROL POINT # 10724 EDGE OF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY (TYP.) ROBERTA HEATH PIN: 7889-82-4911 DEED BK: 287 PG: 562 ROBERTA HEATH PIN: 7899-03-1867 DEED BK: 287 PG: 562 JAMES BUTT PIN: 7899-02-5606 DEED BK: 122 PG: 391 PLAT CAB: 2 SLIDE: 36 MAP: 1 MA T C H L I N E - S E E S H E E T 4 FOUND 5/8" REBAR CALCULATED POINT IN DITCH CALCULATED POINT IN DITCH FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 5/8" REBAR XS10/11LP XS10RP XS11RP 24" HDPE 5.60' 24" HDPE INV: 5.41' 24" HDPE INV: 5.66' 24" HDPE INV: 5.40' 15" HDPE INV: 5.75' 15" HDPE INV: 5.68' RES CONTROL POINT # 10728 EDGE OF 100-YR FLOODPLAIN (ZONE AE) (TYP.) EDGE OF 100-YR FLOODPLAIN (ZONE AE) (TYP.) TOE WOOD (TYP.) STREAM DEFLECTOR STREAM DEFLECTOR WETLAND GAUGE STREAM GAUGE BRUSH TOE WG#7 VP#11 SR DC1-B WG#8 VP#12 VP#14 VP#16 VP#15 SHEET 3 LOG VANE (TYP.) LOG VANE (TYP.) VP#13 Jonathan Cory George Digitally signed by Jonathan Cory George Date: 2023.05.11 11:28:40 -04'00' 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 43 3 33 3 3 333 44 3 4 4 3 5 6 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 3 88+75 S 1 6 ° 0 1 ' 3 3 " E - 1 1 0 . 1 9 ' S1 9 ° 1 3 ' 1 7 " W - 3 2 6 . 3 7 ' N65 ° 1 9 ' 4 0 " W - 1 8 5 . 1 1 ' N78° 4 5 ' 2 6 " W - 1 1 4 . 4 7 ' S87° 57' 38"W - 111.00' S81° 29' 43"W - 131.24' N80° 05' 1 9 " W - 1 0 1 . 7 2 ' N66 ° 2 6 ' 4 6 " W - 2 3 1 . 4 4 ' S88° 51' 12"W - 192.30' N82° 42' 2 1 " W - 1 1 5 . 7 9 ' S89° 40' 10"W - 89.86' S79° 57' 48"W - 106.1 5 ' N85° 23' 21"E - 449.50' N81° 30' 39"E - 278.15' N86° 20' 43"E - 320.67' N86° 20' 43"E 10.00' S10° 59' 43"E 41.03' S11° 27' 50"E 37.66' S13° 27' 56"E 44.34' S25° 24' 59"E 28.01' S18° 26' 48"E 51.62' S2° 12' 33"E 47.66' S6° 12' 33"W 32.94' S30° 33' 50"W 49.20' N44° 23' 28"W 16.33' N54° 03' 36"W 21.41' S19° 13' 17"W 17.36' 50 0 25 50 100 SCALE: 1" = 50' NCBELS FIRM NO. C-4724 PO BOX: 879, PILOT MOUNTAIN, NC 27041 www.pilotse.com | 336-422-6741 AS BUILT SURVEY for RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS 3600 GLENWOOD AVE., SUITE 100 RALEIGH, NC 27612 P: \ P r o j e c t s \ 2 0 2 3 \ 2 3 - 3 4 5 - R E S - W h i t e h a t M i t i g a t i o n \ C A D \ 2 3 - 3 4 5 - X C 1 . d w g NEW HOPE TOWNSHIP PERQUIMANS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA DATES SURVEYED: 03/13-03/17 & 04/03-04/05, 05/08/2023 DRAWN BY: A. HUTCHINS FIELD CREW: AH, JT, CG, JC PROJECT NO: 23-345 LEGEND SEWER MANHOLE FIRE HYDRANT TRAVERSE STATION CONCRETE MONUMENT PK NAIL STORM MANHOLE R/W MONUMENT WATER METER SEWER CLEANOUT BOUNDARY LINE OVERHEAD ELEC UNDERGRD ELEC WATER LINE SEWER LINE GAS LINE STORM LINE RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT SET 5/8" REBAR EXISTING IRON MON. CALCULATED POINT SINGLE POLE SIGN DITCH CNTRLINE CHAIN LNK FNCEUTILITY POLE LINE NOT SURVEYED WATER VALVE WELL R.R. SPIKE GUY WIRE STONE NA D ' 8 3 ( 2 0 1 1 ) TOP OF BANK (TYP.) TOE OF SLOPE (TYP.) PROPERTY LINE NOT SURVEYED (TYP.) EDGE OF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY (TYP.) MA T C H L I N E - S E E S H E E T 3 XS12LP XS12RP EDGE OF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY (TYP.) FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 1" PIPE (BENT) FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 1/2" REBAR FOUND 3/8" REBAR FOUND 3/8" REBAR FOUND 3/8" REBAR FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 32" CYPRUS TREE FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 5/8" REBAR FOUND 22" SYCAMORE TREE FOUND 1" PIPE (BENT) XS13LP XS14LP XS13RP XS14RP ROBERTA HEATH PIN: 7899-03-1867 DEED BK: 287 PG: 562 ROBERTA HEATH PIN: 7899-03-1867 DEED BK: 287 PG: 562 KAREN MAZIK & ANNETTE BUTT DEED BK: 433 PG: 302 PLAT CAB: 3 SLIDE: 192 LIZZIE GODFREY PIN: 7899-14-9056 DEED BK: 498 PG: 611 WILLIAM & BILLIE DIVERS PIN: 7899-13-6211 PLAT CAB: 2 SLIDE: 63 LAURA WEAVER PIN: 7899-11-8264 DEED BK: 34 PG: 227 JAMES BUTT PIN: 7899-02-5606 DEED BK: 122 PG: 391 PLAT CAB: 2 SLIDE: 36 MAP: 1 EDGE OF 100-YR FLOODPLAIN (ZONE AE) (TYP.) EDGE OF 100-YR FLOODPLAIN (ZONE AE) (TYP.) LIMITS OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT (TYP.) PLAT CAB: 4 SLIDE 166 STREAM DEFLECTOR STREAM DEFLECTOR STREAM DEFLECTOR STREAM DEFLECTOR STREAM DEFLECTOR STREAM DEFLECTOR STREAM DEFLECTOR STREAM DEFLECTOR STREAM DEFLECTOR STREAM DEFLECTOR STREAM DEFLECTOR WETLAND GAUGE STREAM GAUGE BRUSH TOE WG#10 VP#17 WG#9 VP#18 SHEET 4 CALCULATED POINT IN CENTER OF DITCH (TYP.) CALCULATED POINT IN CENTER OF DITCH (TYP.) CALCULATED POINT IN CENTER OF STREAM (TYP.) Jonathan Cory George Digitally signed by Jonathan Cory George Date: 2023.05.11 11:29:26 -04'00' Design Centerline PROFILE -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 35+00 35 + 2 5 35 + 5 0 35 + 7 5 36+00 36 + 2 5 36 + 5 0 36 + 7 5 37+00 37 + 2 5 37 + 5 0 37 + 7 5 38+00 38 + 2 5 38 + 5 0 38 + 7 5 39+00 39 + 2 5 39 + 5 0 39 + 7 5 40+00 40 + 2 5 40 + 5 0 40 + 7 5 41+00 41 + 2 5 41 + 5 0 41 + 7 5 42+00 42 + 2 5 42 + 5 0 42 + 7 5 43+00 43 + 2 5 43+50 Design Centerline PROFILE -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 43+50 43 + 7 5 44+00 44 + 2 5 44 + 5 0 44 + 7 5 45+00 45 + 2 5 45 + 5 0 45 + 7 5 46+00 46 + 2 5 46 + 5 0 46 + 7 5 47+00 47 + 2 5 47 + 5 0 47 + 7 5 48+00 48 + 2 5 48 + 5 0 48 + 7 5 49+00 49 + 2 5 49 + 5 0 49 + 7 5 50+00 50 + 2 5 50 + 5 0 50 + 7 5 51+00 51 + 2 5 51 + 5 0 51 + 7 5 52+00 Design Centerline PROFILE -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 52+00 52 + 2 5 52 + 5 0 52 + 7 5 53+00 53 + 2 5 53 + 5 0 53 + 7 5 54+00 54 + 2 5 54 + 5 0 54 + 7 5 55+00 55 + 2 5 55 + 5 0 55 + 7 5 56+00 56 + 2 5 56 + 5 0 56 + 7 5 57+00 57 + 2 5 57 + 5 0 57 + 7 5 58+00 58 + 2 5 58 + 5 0 58 + 7 5 59+00 59 + 2 5 59 + 5 0 59 + 7 5 60+00 60 + 2 5 60+50 Design Centerline PROFILE -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 60+50 60 + 7 5 61+00 61 + 2 5 61 + 5 0 61 + 7 5 62+00 62 + 2 5 62 + 5 0 62 + 7 5 63+00 63 + 2 5 63 + 5 0 63 + 7 5 64+00 64 + 2 5 64 + 5 0 64 + 7 5 65+00 65 + 2 5 65 + 5 0 65 + 7 5 66+00 66 + 2 5 66 + 5 0 66 + 7 5 67+00 67 + 2 5 67 + 5 0 67 + 7 5 68+00 68 + 2 5 68 + 5 0 68 + 7 5 69+00 50 0 25 50 100 SCALE: 1" = 50' NCBELS FIRM NO. C-4724 PO BOX: 879, PILOT MOUNTAIN, NC 27041 www.pilotse.com | 336-422-6741 AS BUILT SURVEY for RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS 3600 GLENWOOD AVE., SUITE 100 RALEIGH, NC 27612 P: \ P r o j e c t s \ 2 0 2 3 \ 2 3 - 3 4 5 - R E S - W h i t e h a t M i t i g a t i o n \ C A D \ 2 3 - 3 4 5 - X C 1 . d w g NEW HOPE TOWNSHIP PERQUIMANS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA DATES SURVEYED: 03/13-03/17 & 04/03-04/05, 05/08/2023 DRAWN BY: A. HUTCHINS FIELD CREW: AH, JT, CG, JC PROJECT NO: 23-345 LEGEND SEWER MANHOLE FIRE HYDRANT TRAVERSE STATION CONCRETE MONUMENT PK NAIL STORM MANHOLE R/W MONUMENT WATER METER SEWER CLEANOUT BOUNDARY LINE OVERHEAD ELEC UNDERGRD ELEC WATER LINE SEWER LINE GAS LINE STORM LINE RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT SET 5/8" REBAR EXISTING IRON MON. CALCULATED POINT SINGLE POLE SIGN DITCH CNTRLINE CHAIN LNK FNCEUTILITY POLE LINE NOT SURVEYED WATER VALVE WELL R.R. SPIKE GUY WIRE STONE SHEET 5 Jonathan Cory George Digitally signed by Jonathan Cory George Date: 2023.05.11 11:30:06 -04'00' Design Centerline PROFILE -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 69+00 69 + 2 5 69 + 5 0 69 + 7 5 70+00 70 + 2 5 70 + 5 0 70 + 7 5 71+00 71 + 2 5 71 + 5 0 71 + 7 5 72+00 72 + 2 5 72 + 5 0 72 + 7 5 73+00 73 + 2 5 73 + 5 0 73 + 7 5 74+00 74 + 2 5 74 + 5 0 74 + 7 5 75+00 75 + 2 5 75 + 5 0 75 + 7 5 76+00 76 + 2 5 76 + 5 0 76 + 7 5 77+00 77 + 2 5 77+50 Design Centerline PROFILE -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 77+50 77 + 7 5 78+00 78 + 2 5 78 + 5 0 78 + 7 5 79+00 79 + 2 5 79 + 5 0 79 + 7 5 80+00 80 + 2 5 80 + 5 0 80 + 7 5 81+00 81 + 2 5 81 + 5 0 81 + 7 5 82+00 82 + 2 5 82 + 5 0 82 + 7 5 83+00 83 + 2 5 83 + 5 0 83 + 7 5 84+00 84 + 2 5 84 + 5 0 84 + 7 5 85+00 85 + 2 5 85 + 5 0 85 + 7 5 86+00 Design Centerline PROFILE -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 86+00 86 + 2 5 86 + 5 0 86 + 7 5 87+00 87 + 2 5 87 + 5 0 87 + 7 5 88+00 88 + 2 5 88 + 5 0 88 + 7 5 88+75 50 0 25 50 100 SCALE: 1" = 50' NCBELS FIRM NO. C-4724 PO BOX: 879, PILOT MOUNTAIN, NC 27041 www.pilotse.com | 336-422-6741 AS BUILT SURVEY for RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS 3600 GLENWOOD AVE., SUITE 100 RALEIGH, NC 27612 P: \ P r o j e c t s \ 2 0 2 3 \ 2 3 - 3 4 5 - R E S - W h i t e h a t M i t i g a t i o n \ C A D \ 2 3 - 3 4 5 - X C 1 . d w g NEW HOPE TOWNSHIP PERQUIMANS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA DATES SURVEYED: 03/13-03/17 & 04/03-04/05, 05/08/2023 DRAWN BY: A. HUTCHINS FIELD CREW: AH, JT, CG, JC PROJECT NO: 23-345 LEGEND SEWER MANHOLE FIRE HYDRANT TRAVERSE STATION CONCRETE MONUMENT PK NAIL STORM MANHOLE R/W MONUMENT WATER METER SEWER CLEANOUT BOUNDARY LINE OVERHEAD ELEC UNDERGRD ELEC WATER LINE SEWER LINE GAS LINE STORM LINE RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT SET 5/8" REBAR EXISTING IRON MON. CALCULATED POINT SINGLE POLE SIGN DITCH CNTRLINE CHAIN LNK FNCEUTILITY POLE LINE NOT SURVEYED WATER VALVE WELL R.R. SPIKE GUY WIRE STONE AS-BUILT SURFACE (TYP.) SHEET 6 Jonathan Cory George Digitally signed by Jonathan Cory George Date: 2023.05.11 11:30:52 -04'00'