Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20190800 Ver 1_Comment Summary_Boseman_MY3_2022Summary of Comments on 20190800 Ver 1 _Bosema n_100119_MY3_2022_20221225 Page: 5 — Number: 1 Author: bhartshorn Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/12/2023 2:21:09 PM Why is Maple Swamped referenced? Page: 8 Number: 1 Author: bhartshorn Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/12/2023 2:31:00 PM No visual assessment summary was included Number: 2 Author: bhartshorn Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/12/2023 2:32:06 PM What were the site observations? Page: 15 = Number: 1 Author: bhartshorn Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/12/2023 2:52:15 PM Several 2021 photos are duplicates from 2020. Therefore some of the photos do not accurately depict site conditions for 2021 Page: 16 Number: 1 Author: bhartshorn Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/12/2023 2:58:02 PM No site photos for Pp5-Pp12 were provided for 2022 Page: 19 Number: 1 Author: bhartshorn Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/12/2023 3:00:47 PM No site photos for Monitoring Plot 5-12 were provided for 2022 Number: 2 Author: bhartshorn Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/12/2023 3:01:19 PM Several 2021 photos are duplicates from 2020. Therefore some of the photos do not accurately depict plot conditions for 2021 Page: 22 Number: 1 Author: bhartshorn Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/12/2023 3:11:00 PM Please indicate what the scale is to measure vigor data. ;Number: 2 Author: bhartshorn Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/12/2023 3:19:34 PM While including average height per plot is beneficial, it is not as representative or beneficial as compared to including individual tree height per plot. Therefore, DWR cannot confirm whether the tree height data included in the report is a healthy assessment of what stems/species should be at year 3.