20141224 Ver 1_More Info Received_20150630

Homewood, Sue
From: Gerald Pottern <gpottern @rjgacarolina.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 12:21 PM
To: Wainwright, David
Cc: Homewood, Sue; David Bailey ACE
Subject: Dan River Intake EA Update, Caswell +Person Co
Attachments: Dan River Intake EA Update 2015. Files A to D.combined.pdf
Hi David -- Attached is the Draft Update to the 2006 EA for the Dan River Intake serving Roxboro and Yanceyville in
Caswell and Person counties. The 404 -401 permit review by David Bailey (USACE) and Sue Homewood (DWR-
WSRO) and is complete, with approvals pending upon completion of this SEPA review.
For review, you'll need the 2006 Final EA and FONSI with appendices. I can send you those files using DropBox
or WeTransfer for now, then burn everything onto CDs when we're ready to distribute them to the various
agencies. Please let me know what's the best way for you to receive those files for this initial review.
Sincerely,
Gerald Pottern
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc.RJG &A Environmental Consultants
1221 Corporation Parkway, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27610 Tel: 919 - 872 -1174
apottem(d).RJGAcarolina.com
<°/, } } }}} }) = <{ <°/, } } } } } }) = <{
- - - -- Original Message - - - --
From: Wainwriaht, David
To: Gerald Pottern (apottern(d).riaacarolina.com)
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 10:41 AM
Subject: Brunswick County 1-12GO EA Review
Gerald,
I have received comments from the DENR agencies as well as SHPO (please see attached). I have not received a
response from USFWS — have you?
To keep the project moving forward, for each comment please do the following:
1. Where necessary, secure a written agreement from the commenting agency that the response or mitigation you
propose is sufficient for that agency to support a FONSI for this project.
2. Where necessary, update any text in the document based on comments received.
3. Add the written agreements from the commenting agency and copies of the comments in a new appendix to the
revised draft EA. Please also include a cover letter listing each commenting agency's item(s) and the agreed final
response or mitigation.
4. After all comments have been sufficiently addressed and necessary edits made, please send one copy of the
revised draft EA with the new appendix and cover letter to my attention for review.

Please copy me on all communication between you and the commenting agency so that I may track progress and
provide feedback to help expedite comment resolution. Once it is agreed that all agency comments have been
addressed, I will ask you to send us ten copies of the cover letter and Final EA. The cover letter and Final EA will be
transmitted, along with the FONSI, to the State Clearinghouse for review.
If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.
David Wainwright
NCDENR, Division of Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1617
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation.

UPDATE TO 2006 SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
DAN RIVER REGIONAL RAW WATER INTAKE AND TRANSMISSION LINES:
CITY OF ROXBORO and TOWN OF YANCEYVILLE
PERSON AND CASWELL COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA
JUNE 2015
Original State Clearinghouse Review Number: 02E- 4300 -0005
New State Clearinghouse Review Number:
Background:
In June 2006, NC -DENR issued a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for a SEPA Environmental
Assessment (EA, dated April 2006) documenting a proposed raw water intake on the Dan River near
Milton in northeastern Caswell County and water lines to serve Caswell County, Person County, and
their municipalities (Town of Yanceyville, Town of Milton, and City of Roxboro). The two counties and
three municipalities established an inter -local partnership agreement in 2003 to develop and share this
intake as a long -term regional water source, with City of Roxboro taking the lead role for designing and
permitting the project. The project as approved in 2006 included the proposed intake and pumping
facilities, a settling basin, raw water lines from the intake site to the existing water treatment plants in
Yanceyville (about 10 miles) and Roxboro (about 13 miles), plus a small package WTP on the intake
property with a potable water line to serve Milton.
Yanceyville purchased the 22 -acre intake site, including 2,300 feet of river frontage and an access road
corridor from NC -62, about 3,000 feet upstream from the NC -57 bridge at Milton. DENR approved the
water supply watershed reclassification (from Class C to Class WS -IV and WS- IV -CA) in 2008. Due to
changing economic conditions soon after the EA -FONSI was completed, the project was put on hold for
several years, and is now proceeding in phases on a longer time scale. For budgeting purposes, the
partners are currently designing and planning to build the river intake channel, pump station building
pad, and access road off NC -62 (Phase 1 project components) during the summer and fall of 2015.
Subsequent components including the pump station building, pumping facilities, intake trash rack and
screens, raw water lines connecting to Yanceyville's and Roxboro's existing WTPs, and the on -site
Milton WTP will be designed and built at least 5 to 10 years later as the Towns' water demand grows.
NC Division of Water Resources (DWR) is the lead agency for SEPA review and permitting of the
project, and has requested an update to the 2006 EA describing proposed changes in the project and a
re- evaluation of potential environmental impacts. The EA update request was made in response to a
Section 404 -401 permitting meeting with the Army Corps of Engineers and DWR during September
2014. Predicted impacts may change in response to project design changes, recent land use changes,
new information about natural and cultural resources or environmental issues pertinent to the project,
new technology in water infrastructure design and construction methods, and /or regulatory changes at
the federal, state, and local levels.
Dan River Regional Water Intake Robert J Goldstein & Associates
SEPA EA Update — June 2015 Environmental Consultants

This SEPA EA Update follows the format of the 2006 EA, describing changes in the proposed project
and its potential impacts section by section, as recommended by DWR. It will be circulated along with
a digital copy of the 2006 EA for reference.
1.0. PROJECT DESCRIPTION.
The currently proposed version of the Dan River Regional Water Supply project is mostly the same as
the project approved in 2006, with two main differences: 1) The location and design of the intake
structure presented in the 2006 EA were based on preliminary concept plans, and have now been
further developed; and 2) the project schedule and predicted water demand thresholds have shifted
several years later, due to the interruption in economic growth since 2008. The proposed initial intake
capacity remains at 10 MGD, and the potential expansion capacity at build -out remains at 22 MGD.
The proposed raw water line routes to Yanceyville (12.7 miles) and Roxboro (13.3 miles) and the
proposed package WTP and potable water line to Milton remain the same, but are still preliminary
concept plans. Final plans for water transmission lines will be designed during future phases of the
project, based on growth in water demand and the adequacy of existing supplies. Because road
improvements, utility projects and other development may occur along the proposed water line
corridors prior to the need for these facilities, it is not prudent to design and permit them too far ahead
of their anticipated construction.
The revised plan for the raw water intake is about 600 ft northeast of the intake location depicted in the
2006 EA. This new location was selected to take advantage of an existing ravine that will greatly
reduce the volume of excavation needed to construct the intake channel. The river bank is lower and
less steep than the previously mapped site at the northeast edge of the powerline right -of -way, posing
less risk of erosion and slumping. The intake pump station (40 x 40 ft) will be built in this ravine, 230 ft
southeast of the river bank, at the edge of the floodplain. The intake well floor will be at the river bed
elevation (341 ft) and the upper floor supporting the pumps will be at 382 ft, which is 3 ft above the
FEMA 100 -yr flood elevation (379 ft). A 230 -ft long trapezoidal intake channel will extend from the
pump station to the river, with a 24 ft bottom width (341 ft elevation), 60 ft top width at ordinary high
water (350 ft elevation), and 145 ft wide at the floodplain (370 ft elevation). The flared opening of the
intake channel will be 136 ft wide at the river bank, for stability during high flow events. The intake
channel side - slopes and adjacent river bank will be stabilized with articulated block from the bed
elevation (341 ft) up to normal water elevation (350 ft), and Curlex or similar geotextile matting will be
installed on the upper slopes (350 to 370 ft) to allow vegetation growth.
The volume of soil to be excavated for the river intake channel and pump station is approximately 2252
cubic yards (below normal water elevation ). Approximately 6258 square feet of Armorflex Block will
be placed below normal water elevation to stabilize the bank. The temporary cofferdam used to
dewater the intake construction area will use approximately 250 cubic yards of surge stone (5' tall, 10'
wide, 136' long) topped with concrete Jersey barriers.
Traveling screens will be installed at the mouth of the intake along the river bank to exclude debris and
protect fish from intake mortality. The intake screens will use 1.0 mm mesh, and flow velocity entering
the screen will be less than 0.5 ft /sec, in accordance with NC -WRC recommendations for rivers
supporting anadromous fish spawning (including shad and striped bass).
A gravel access road 1,680 ft long will be built from NC -62 northwest to the pump station, and is
located on the intake property purchased by Yanceyville. This road will cross 1,180 ft of pasture, 500 ft
of mesic hardwood forest, and a 6 -ft wide small perennial stream
Dan River Regional Water Intake Robert J Goldstein & Associates
SEPA EA Update — June 2015 Environmental Consultants

The intake channel, pump station well and building pad, and access road off NC -62 are being designed
and scheduled to be built during the latter half of 2015. The upper portion of the pump house, pumping
facilities, controls, and raw water lines will be designed and built at least 5 to 10 years later as water
demand grows. For budgeting purposes the municipalities plan to build just the Phase 1 facilities at this
time (intake channel, building pad, and access road).
No changes to the proposed Yanceyville raw water line, Roxboro raw water line, or Milton WTP and
potable water line are known at this time. However, streams and wetlands on the intake site and along
the Yanceyville water line corridor were re- delineated in 2014 and a Section 404 -401 permit application
(PCN) was submitted to US -ACE and NC -DWR. The updated stream and wetland impacts are
included in Section 4.12. The proposed operation of the project remains the same as described in the
2006 EA, except that flow thresholds will be reached much later than predicted in 2006. Yanceyville's
and Roxboro's existing wastewater treatment plants and the majority of the proposed water service
areas are located in the source water basin (Roanoke River basin). Portions of southern Caswell
County and southern and eastern Person County are in the Cape Fear, Neuse and Tar River basins,
but it will be several decades before flow loss into those basins exceeds the 2.0 MGD threshold that
requires an Interbasin Transfer (IBT) Certificate.
2.0. NEED FOR THE PROJECT.
The Town of Yanceyville, Caswell County, City of Roxboro, and Person County established an inter -
local agreement in 2003 to develop the Dan River intake as a long -term regional water source to serve
the two counties and their municipalities. The 2006 EA discusses existing water supply sources,
current water demand, and projected water demand for these communities. Roxboro and Yanceyville
currently rely on impoundments constructed on smaller streams ( Roxboro's City Lake and Yanceyville's
Farmer Lake) which have adequate safe yield for now, but will eventually need to be supplemented as
water demand increases. Milton relies on a public groundwater well system with limited yield. The Dan
River intake will provide a much greater safe yield and is expected to meet the region's water needs for
50 years and beyond.
Since 2008 the economic recession has resulted in slower growth in the project area. Need for
expanded water supplies will thus be delayed by a decade or more, but the long -term projected water
demand volumes based on developable land area remain the same as presented in the 2006 EA.
3.0. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS.
The 2006 EA evaluated the following water supply alternatives: 1) No- action alternative; 2) Increase
water storage for existing sources; 3) New intake on Hyco Lake or Mayo Reservoir; 4) New intake on
Flat River or Tar River; 5) Connection to Kerr Lake Regional Water System; 6) Dan River intake
(preferred); and 7) Water conservation & wastewater reuse. The alternatives discussion and analysis
presented in the 2006 EA remains valid, except that water demand thresholds will be reached much
later than the dates predicted in 2006.
The new intake location was selected over the previously identified site (600 ft southwest) because the
ravine at the new site will facilitate construction of the intake channel will much less soil excavation and
river bank disturbance than at the previous site (beside the powerline) shown in the 2006 EA.
Alignment alternatives and proposed construction methods for the Yanceyville and Roxboro raw water
lines and Milton potable water line will be re- assessed and revised if necessary during final design of
Dan River Regional Water Intake Robert J Goldstein & Associates
SEPA EA Update — June 2015 Environmental Consultants

those facilities, probably in 5 to 10 years. Stream and wetland crossings will be installed using jack and
bore methods wherever practicable.
4.0. EXISTING ENVIRONMENT AND PROJECT IMPACTS.
4.1. Topography and Land Use.
The 22 -acre intake property (new location) is bounded by the Dan River to the northwest, a Duke
Energy powerline to the south, and an unnamed tributary to the east and north. Elevations on the site
range from 350 feet at the edge of the river (OHWM) to 480 feet on the highest ridge. The property is
roughly two - thirds forested (mesic hardwood and alluvial forest) and one -third cattle pasture. An
abandoned railroad embankment (tracks have been removed) parallels the river about 140 ft from the
edge of water (OHWM). A steep forested ravine is located in the west - central portion of the site, and a
small riparian wetland is located where the ravine drainage is impeded by the railroad embankment.
This wetland drains through a culvert under the railroad embankment onto the levee, where surface
flow disappears into the soil. The river bank at the intake site is steep, with no fringe wetland. Land
uses adjacent to the intake property land uses are rural - residential and agricultural.
The proposed access road corridor from NC -62 westward to the intake site lies 400 to 550 ft north of
the powerline right -of -way edge depicted as the access road corridor in the 2006 EA. The new corridor
traverses 1,180 feet of pasture, 500 feet of mesic hardwood forest, and crosses the small perennial
stream that forms the eastern edge of the intake site.
The proposed raw water line corridors to Yanceyville and Roxboro are, at this time, unchanged from the
mapping provided in the 2006 EA. These corridors are predominantly rural residential, agricultural and
forest, with higher density residential, commercial, and institutional development limited to the southern
end of the Yanceyville corridor and eastern end of the Roxboro corridor. In 2014 we noted new
residential development and solar cell "farms" along NC -62 near Yanceyville; new since our previous
field surveys in 2002 -2005. A portion of the off -road corridor between Moorefield Rd and the
Yanceyville WTP (south of Yanceyville) has been acquired by NC -WRC for use as Gamelands. The
water line corridors to Roxboro and Milton have not been re- examined in recent years, but they appear
to have changed little during the past decade based on aerial images. The water line corridors will be
re- evaluated at the appropriate time during the design phase, as these facilities will not be needed for 5
to 10 years or more.
Land clearing for the intake and access road construction will disturb approximately 10.8 acres on the
22 -acre intake property, including 6.1 acres of mesic hardwood forest and 4.7 acres of pasture. This
area includes the intake channel, pump station building, access road, two upland storage areas for
excavated soil, and the future settling basin and Milton package WTP. The impervious surface area will
be 0.92 acre, including the gravel access road from US -82, the pump station, and gravel maintenance
roads along each side of the intake channel. The Town of Yanceyville currently owns the intake
property and access road corridor. The future settling basin and Milton WTP will add less than 0.5 acre
of additional impervious area.
The volume of soil to be excavated for the intake channel and pump station is approximately 85,000
cubic yards, including approximately 2,250 cubic yards excavated from below the normal river
elevation. Much of the excavated material will be used as fill for grading the access roads, and the
remainder (about 17,000 cubic yards) will be stored in two piles on either side of the access road.
Dan River Regional Water Intake Robert J Goldstein & Associates
SEPA EA Update — June 2015 Environmental Consultants

Impacts of the proposed raw water line corridors to Yanceyville and Roxboro are, at this time,
unchanged from the mapping and tables provided in the 2006 EA. The Yanceyville line is mostly along
roadsides except for the last mile between Moorefield Rd and the Yanceyville WTP which traverses
forest, cut -over scrub, and the Yanceyville WWTP property. The proposed Roxboro line is mostly
alongside a Duke Power powerline right -of -way, with some segments along roadsides near Roxboro's
City Lake. The three segments crossing arms of Hyco Lake will be directionally bored. The water lines
will not add any new impervious surface area.
NC -DWR determined that the water supply watershed reclassification approved for the previously
proposed intake site remains valid for the new site and does not need to be reclassified again (emails
from Elizabeth Kountis, Nov -Dec 2014, Appendix 1). NC -DWR provided shape files of the new critical
area to Caswell County for use in their Water Supply Watershed Protection Ordinance and GIS
database. There is no existing or proposed development (other than the proposed intake) within the 28
acres of "new" critical area.
4.2. Soils and Important Farmlands.
Soils on the Caswell County portion of the project area, including the intake site and Yanceyville raw
water line corridor, have not yet been mapped by USDA. Potential impacts to prime farmlands are thus
unknown, However, much of the intake site has steep slopes that would not qualify as prime farmland.
Soils and prime farmland impacts for the Person County portion of the project are unchanged from the
2006 EA.
4.3. Floodplains
The FEMA 100 -yr flood hazard elevation at the new intake site is 379.5 ft (NAVD -88). The river intake
and channel leading to the pump station are below this elevation, by necessity. The proposed pump
house will be built at the edge of the floodplain, with the main floor at or above 382 ft, and the bottom of
the intake well excavated down to the river bed elevation of 341 ft. The large volume of soil material
removed during excavation and grading of the intake channel will greatly offset the small volume of
permanent concrete block, erosion control stone, and intake screen structures placed below the flood
hazard elevation. The net gain in flood storage capacity (net cut volume below 379.5 ft) will be several
thousand cubic yards.
Construction impacts in FEMA 100 -yr flood hazard areas along the water line corridors are unchanged
from the 2006 EA. There is no FEMA- mapped flood hazard area along the Yanceyville water line
corridor, which crosses only small headwater streams.
4.4. Public, Scenic, and Recreational Lands.
The state -owned parcel west of Moorefield Rd along the off -road segment of the Yanceyville water line
corridor (PIN # 0083 - 0000 -0038) is now part of the NC -WRC Gamelands (Figure 11 -G). Approximately
1,450 feet of the proposed water line crosses the northern edge of this parcel. Other public, scenic and
recreational lands in the project vicinity remain the same as described in the 2006 EA.
Dan River Regional Water Intake Robert J Goldstein & Associates
SEPA EA Update — June 2015 Environmental Consultants

4.5. Archaeological and Historical Resources.
RJG &A submitted a new scoping letter and project mapping for the intake and Yanceyville raw water
line to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) in October 2014. SHPO has no records of
significant historic resources on or near the intake site, and did not request a field survey for cultural
resources at this site. SHPO identified three listed historic structures along the NC -62 portion of the
water line corridor north of Yanceyville; Lea's Tavern, Melrose/Williamson House, and William Poteat
House (Figure 15). All are within the designated NC -62 Rural Historic District which extends from
Blanch Rd (beside Lea's Tavern) southward 6.5 miles to the north edge of Yanceyville, and could be
affected by water line construction along the edge of the highway. Since final plans for this line will not
be designed for 5 to 10 years, detailed impacts cannot be assessed at this time, and SHPO agreed to
review the water line plans at the appropriate time during a future phase of project review and
permitting. Other archaeological and historic resources in the project vicinity remain the same as
described in the 2006 EA.
4.6. Air Quality.
There is no known change in ambient air quality in the project area, and no anticipated change in air
quality impacts of the project. Minor impacts of dust and construction vehicle emissions at the intake
site and along water line construction corridors will be short -term and insignificant to health and safety.
Back -up generators for the intake and Milton WTP will be permitted as required by NC -DAQ at the
appropriate time, probably in 5 to 10 years. The intake pump station site is 1,000 feet from the nearest
residence.
4.7. Noise Levels.
There is no known change in ambient noise levels in the project area, and no anticipated change in
noise impacts of the project. Minor noise impacts during construction at the intake site and along water
line construction corridors will be short -term and insignificant to health and safety. Expected noise from
pumps and back -up generators at the intake and Milton WTP will be negligible at the distance of the
nearest residence, located 1,000 feet east from the pump station site.
4.8. Water Resources.
The North Carolina portion of the Dan River and tributaries within ten miles upstream of the intake site
was reclassified from Class C to WS -IV water supply watershed in 2012, including a 0.5 mile WS -IV -CA
critical area just above the intake site. NC -DWR provided shape files of the new critical area to Caswell
County for use in their Water Supply Watershed Protection Ordinance and GIS database. There is no
existing or proposed development (other than the proposed intake) within the 28 acres of "new" critical
area (Appendix 1). The NC /VA state line is 8.7 river miles upstream of the intake, and the Danville VA
wastewater treatment plant is another 2.1 river miles upstream from the state line. The Duke Power
coal ash spill site (Feb 2014) is another 29 river miles upstream of the Danville WWTP, or 40 river miles
upstream of the proposed intake site.
Project construction impacts to water resources at the intake site include excavation of the river bank
and placement of bank stabilization materials (articulated block and rock), and installation of a road
crossing culvert on a small stream at the eastern edge of the intake site. For the intake channel, a
Dan River Regional Water Intake Robert J Goldstein & Associates
SEPA EA Update — June 2015 Environmental Consultants

temporary cofferdam 200 feet long will be constructed in the river parallel to the bank using surge stone
and concrete Jersey barriers. The isolated area will be dewatered with pumps, and this section of river
bank will be excavated, graded, and stabilized to create a 230 ft long trapezoidal intake channel
perpendicular to the river bank. The main portion of the intake channel will be 24 ft wide at the bottom
(river bed elevation = 341 ft) and 60 ft wide at ordinary high water (350 ft elevation). The flared opening
where the channel joins the river will be 136 ft wide at the bottom, and 170 ft wide at ordinary high
water. The flared end is necessary for hydraulic stability during high flows.
The flared channel connection to the river will be constructed last, after all other intake site grading
work including access roads and the pump station well and building pad are installed. This strategy will
allow the straight portion of the intake channel to be used as a temporary sediment / skimmer basin
during grading and construction of the other site features.
The stream along the eastern edge of the intake site is 4 to 8 ft wide (average 6 ft at the proposed
access road crossing), flowing northward into the Dan River near the northern edge of the property.
The stream bed is predominantly bedrock steps and pools with sand and silt deposits, and the banks
are relatively steep, with no fringe wetland in the vicinity of the road crossing. The upper reach of this
stream (south of the proposed road crossing) is impounded by a farm pond located between the
powerline and the proposed access road. A permanent 54" diam RCP culvert with concrete headwalls
and riprap stabilization at the inlet and outlet will be installed in this stream to accommodate the intake
access road crossing. The total length of stream impact at this crossing is 146 ft, of which 136 ft is
permanent impact and 10 ft is temporary impact.
Other water resource impacts along the raw water line corridors are essentially the same as those
described in the 2006 EA. Stream and wetland crossings along the Yanceyville corridor were revisited
and impacts updated in 2014 during preparation of the Section 404 -401 permit. These impacts are
discussed further in Section 412.
Proposed operational impacts of the project on flow in the Dan River are unchanged from those
discussed in the 2006 EA. Mean annual flows from 2005 to 2014 at the Paces VA USGS gage
downstream of the proposed intake ranged from 1,623 cfs (in 2008) to 3,170 cfs (in 2010). The lowest
mean annual flow of record remains 1,335 cfs (in 2002) as reported in the 2006 EA, based on calendar
year, rather than water -year (Oct to Sep).
4.9. Fish and Aquatic Habitats.
Habitat in the Dan River at the intake site is essentially the same as at the previously identified site
upstream beside the powerline. It is a low- gradient sand - dominated river segment, about 200 ft wide,
with scattered bedrock outcrops and submerged logs. The flared intake channel opening at the river
bank will be 136 ft wide at the bottom and 170 ft wide at ordinary high water elevation. The intake will
use traveling screens with 1 mm mesh and velocity through the screen face less than 0.5 ft /sec as
recommended by NC -WRC to protect larval fishes in rivers that support anadromous species including
striped bass and shad.
NCSU fishery scientists working with NC -WRC and Dominion Power have been studying the potential
for restoring American shad to the Dan River and Staunton River basins upstream of the hydroelectric
reservoirs. During 2007 to 2009, 110 shad were captured in the lower Roanoke River, radio - tagged
and released in Kerr Lake. Most of the tagged fish remained in the lake, with 7% to 34% (per year)
traveling upstream into free - flowing segments of the Dan or Staunton Rivers. 2009 was the most
Dan River Regional Water Intake Robert J Goldstein & Associates
SEPA EA Update — June 2015 Environmental Consultants

successful year, when seven tagged shad were recorded in the Dan River near South Boston VA.
However, plankton samples collected between Danville and South Boston revealed no evidence of
shad spawning in Dan River over the three -year period. Stocked striped bass, white bass, white perch,
blue catfish, flathead catfish, largemouth bass, and sunfishes are the major sport fish species in this
river segment.
The Roanoke logperch (federally endangered) was discovered in the Smith River near Eden, NC in
2007, and subsequently found in additional reaches of the Dan and Mayo Rivers in Rockingham
County NC. Surveys to date indicate that it does not occur in the Dan River or tributaries downstream
of Danville VA. Similarly, the federally endangered James spinymussel also appears to be limited to
the upper reaches of Dan River in Stokes and Rockingham Counties, with no records downstream of
Danville. US -FWS concluded that the project will not affect these aquatic endangered species.
4.10. Wildlife and Terrestrial Habitats.
The current intake site plan requires clearing approximately 10.8 acres on the 22 -acre intake property,
including 6.1 acres of mesic and alluvial hardwood forest and 4.7 acres of upland pasture. This area
includes the intake channel, pump station building, access road, two upland storage areas for
excavated soil, and the future settling basin and Milton package WTP. The forested areas support a
mix of trees including Sweetgum, Red maple, Tulip poplar, Musclewood, Box elder, Sugarberry, Willow
oak, Red oak, Beech, Loblolly pine, Eastern redcedar, Sycamore, and Paulownia.
Impacts of the raw waterline corridors on wildlife and terrestrial habitats are unchanged from the 2006
EA. The one mile off -road segment from Moorefield Rd west to the Yanceyville WTP traverses mostly
upland hardwood and mixed pine- hardwood forest. The western one - fourth of this area was clearcut in
recent years, after the 2006 EA. Five south - flowing streams cross this segment.
4.11. Forestry Resources.
The current intake site plan requires clearing approximately 6.1 acres of mesic and alluvial hardwood
forest on the 22 -acre intake property. Predominant tree species are listed in the preceding section.
Impacts of the raw waterline corridors on forest lands are mostly unchanged from the 2006 EA, except
that some off -road portions of these corridors have been clearcut in recent years, after the 2006 EA.
4.12. Jurisdictional Waters and Wetlands.
RJG &A biologist Gerald Pottern delineated wetlands and waters on the new intake site and Yanceyville
raw water line corridor during Oct 2014, and re- visited these sites with ACE agent David Bailey and
DWR agent Sue Homewood on 11 Feb 2015. The currently proposed intake site is about 600 ft
northeast of the intake location depicted in the 2006 SEPA -EA wetland maps. The ravine in the middle
of the intake site contains a small riparian wetland mostly on the east (upslope) side of the old railroad
embankment. The downstream portion of this wetland west of the RR culvert outlet is a linear seep,
flowing about 65 feet toward the river before disappearing into the soil on the levee, about 60 feet from
the edge of the river. The eastern portion is 0.073 acre and the western portion is 0.011 acre; total =
0.084 acre. Its connection with the river is underground, and its elevation (approx 365 ft) is about 15
feet above normal river stage elevation. Wetland vegetation (on both sides of the railroad
embankment) is predominantly shrub and herb vegetation with few trees, but the wetland is well
Dan River Regional Water Intake Robert J Goldstein & Associates
SEPA EA Update — June 2015 Environmental Consultants

shaded by large trees rooted in the adjacent non - wetland forest
The raw water line corridor along NC -62 between the intake site and Moorefield Rd (worst -case
preliminary alignment, extending 10 -ft beyond highway R -O -W) passes adjacent to several headwater
seep wetlands, but the jurisdictional portions are all are 30 ft or more beyond the road right -of -way and
thus beyond the impact area. Some of these drainage ways are depicted as wetlands or "wet ditch"
impacts in the 2006 EA, but the upper portions within the proposed impact corridor were found to be
non - jurisdictional during the Feb 2015 field verification meeting (PCN figures revised accordingly).
From Moorefield Rd west to the Yanceyville WTP, the off -road preliminary corridor (20 -ft wide) crosses
five small streams and two alluvial wetlands (total 0.0405 acre in construction corridor) that are
contiguous with streams.
A 404 -401 permit application (PCN) for the intake and Yanceyville raw water line was completed in
April 2015. This PCN includes 0.084 acre of permanent wetland impact (in the ravine at the intake
site), 0.046 acre of temporary wetland impact, 136 feet of permanent stream impact (access road
culvert), 145 feet of temporary stream impact, 0.051 acre of permanent open water impact (river intake
grading and stabilization), and 0.045 acre of temporary open water impact.
Permit approvals will be issued by US -ACE and NC -DWR after completion of this SEPA EA update
review. Wetlands and waters along the Roxboro raw water line and Milton potable water line corridors
are presumably similar to those mapped in the 2006 EA. They will be re- delineated at the appropriate
time during future design and permitting of these components.
4.13. Protected Species.
The NC Natural Heritage program (NHP) has records of 25 protected animal or plant species known
from Caswell and /or Person Counties (April 2015 database search). One species, the Roanoke
Logperch, is federally listed as endangered. The other 24 species are state listed as endangered,
threatened, or special concern. Potential impacts to protected species and their habitats are discussed
below, updated from the 2006 EA.
4.13.1. Roanoke Logperch (Percina rex).
The federally endangered Roanoke Logperch (Percina rex) is reported from the Dan River in the
northwest corner of Caswell County between Eden NC and Danville VA, and at sites upstream of Eden
in the Dan, Smith, and Mayo rivers in Rockingham County. The NC and VA Natural Heritage Programs
have no record of this fish downstream of Danville VA. Multiple dams in Danville isolate the
Rockingham County population from the Caswell County river segment. Logperch occur principally in
rocky and gravelly stream habitats; the low- gradient sand -bed reach in north - central Caswell County is
unlikely to provide suitable habitat for this fish.
Another federally endangered species known from western Rockingham County and Stokes County is
the James Spinymussel (Pleurobema collina), listed as "Potential" in Caswell County by US -FWS. Like
the Roanoke Logperch it could potentially occur in the Dan River between Eden and Danville VA,
including the northwest corner of Caswell County, but is unlikely to occur in the low- gradient sand -
dominated reach in north- central Caswell County. Neither the NC nor VA Natural Heritage Programs
have any record of this mussel in the Dan River or tributaries east of Wentworth, NC.
Dan River Regional Water Intake Robert J Goldstein & Associates
SEPA EA Update — June 2015 Environmental Consultants

RJG &A submitted a letter to LIS -FWS in October 2014 discussing potential project impacts to federally
listed species. In April 2015 John Ellis of FWS provided an email response stating their concurrence
with RJG &A's opinion that the project is not likely to adversely affect federally listed species.
4.13.2. State - Listed Aquatic Animals.
Nine additional species of stream - dwelling aquatic animals reported from Caswell or Person counties
are state - listed as endangered, threatened, or special concern. These include seven river mussels
(Triangle Floater, Atlantic Pigtoe, Yellow Lampmussel, Eastern Lampmussel, Green Floater, Creeper,
and Notched Rainbow); one fish (Riverweed Darter); and one salamander ( Neuse Waterdog). The
Neuse Waterdog is endemic to the Neuse and Tar River basins (south and east of Roxboro) and does
not occur in the Roanoke River basin where the project is located. The Riverweed Darter and four river
mussel species are known to occur in Country Line Creek and other major tributaries of the Dan River
within a few miles of the project construction areas.
None of these species is reported to occur in the Dan River near the proposed intake, which has a low -
gradient river bed dominated by sand and silt. No aquatic surveys for mussels or fish in the Dan River
was conducted for this project. NC -DENR and Duke Power are monitoring physical and biological
conditions in the river following the coal ash spill in Feb 2014.
4.13.3. State - Listed Terrestrial Animals.
Two species of state - listed terrestrial animals are reported from Caswell or Person counties; both are
salamanders and are listed as special concern. The Four -toed Salamander and Mole Salamander
occur in mesic to wet forested areas with suitable breeding sites nearby (seeps and floodplain pools
with a winter /spring hydroperiod of several months). These two species are reported in southern and
eastern Person County, several miles from the project area. Neither is reported in Caswell County. As
no suitable breeding habitat occurs on the intake site or along the Yanceyville raw water line, it is
unlikely that these species occur in the project area. Potential impacts are unchanged from those
discussed in the 2006 EA.
4.13.4. State - Listed Plant Species.
Thirteen species of state - listed terrestrial plants are reported from Caswell or Person counties. These
include the Carolina Birdfoot - trefoil, Prairie Blue Wild Indigo, American Barberry, American Bittersweet,
Tall Larkspur, Eastern Isopyrum, Cliff Spurge, Indian Physic, Sweet Pinesap, Pursh's Wild- petunia,
Narrow -leaf Aster, Virginia Spiderwort, and Buffalo Clover. Most of these species were given state -
protection status as endangered, threatened, or special concern during the years after the 2006 EA.
Common Name
Carolina Birdfoot - trefoil
Prairie Blue Wild Indigo
American Barberry
American Bittersweet
Tall Larkspur
Eastern Isopyrum
Cliff Spurge
Dan River Regional Water Intake
SEPA EA Update — June 2015
Habitat in Caswell or Person Counties
open woods over clay soils, roadsides **
glades and open forests on basic soils
glades and open forests on basic soils
cove forests and rich woods
grassy balds, glades, woodlands, mostly over mafic rock
rich bottomlands, levees, and lower slopes **
thin soil around mafic or calcareous outcrops
Robert J Goldstein & Associates
Environmental Consultants

Indian Physic
open woodlands, mainly over mafic rocks
Sweet Pinesap
dry forests and bluffs
Pursh's Wild- petunia
glades and woodlands, mostly over mafic or calcareous rocks **
Narrow -leaf Aster
open woodlands & edges mainly over mafic rocks **
Virginia Spiderwort
rich woods on circumneutral soils
Buffalo Clover
open woods and clearings **
Five of these plants (indicated by * *) are reported from one or more of the four USGS topographic
quadrangles that comprise the project area (Leasburg, Milton, Olive Hill, and Yanceyville quadrangles).
Land cover and habitat types on the new intake site include mowed pasture, dry -mesic oak /hickory
forest, mesic hardwood forest, and alluvial forest with a small depression wetland. No soil mapping
exists in this area, but the soils might be basic or mafic, as suggested by the presence of Basswood
and Redbud on the intake site slopes. The forested areas have a dense canopy that is too shaded for
"open woodland" and "glade" species, and there is no rock outcrop habitat on the site. Protected plant
species that could possibly live on the intake site or the off -road segment of water line west of
Moorefield Road include the four "rich woods" and "dry forest/ bluff' species: American Bittersweet,
Eastern Isopyrum, Sweet Pinesap, and Virginia Spiderwort. None of these species was seen during
the Oct 2014 or Feb 2015 field visits by RJG &A, but the season was not optimal for finding them. The
previously reported site for Eastern Isopyrum on the Leasburg quadrangle is more than two miles from
the project area. The other three species have not been reported on the four USGS topographic
quadrangles that comprise the project area.
The Roxboro and Milton water line corridors will be re- examined for wetlands, streams, and protected
species at the appropriate time during future design and permitting of those components. Potential
secondary and cumulative impacts on protected species in the water service area are discussed in the
2006 EA. As noted above, several additional species gained state - protection status since 2006.
Caswell County and Person County planners will coordinate with local land conservancies (Piedmont
Land Conservancy and Tar River Land Conservancy, respectively) and NHP to identify and encourage
protection of biologically and culturally significant areas, including rare species habitats.
4.14. Introduction of Toxic Substances.
No contamination of soil or groundwater is known on the intake site or along the proposed water line
corridors. The potential for release of toxic substances during project construction and operation are
essentially unchanged from the discussion provided in the 2006 EA. Chemical storage facilities and
safety precautions at municipal water treatment plants are revised periodically, and the facilities will be
designed and built in accordance with industry standards applicable at that time.
5.0. MITIGATIVE MEASURES.
5.1. Mitigation for Direct Impacts
The new intake site reduces the area and volume of soil disturbance required for intake construction,
due to the presence of an existing ravine at the site of the intake channel and pump station. The river
bank is less steep in this area, and will require less concrete black and riprap stabilization. Stream and
wetland crossings along the water line corridors will be installed using jack and bore methods wherever
practicable . Other impact avoidance and mitigation strategies are the same as those discussed in the
2006 EA.
Dan River Regional Water Intake Robert J Goldstein & Associates
SEPA EA Update — June 2015 Environmental Consultants
11

5.2. Mitigation for Secondary & Cumulative Impacts
Local government programs and ordinances to manage growth, control stormwater runoff, conserve
and reuse water resources, encourage low- impact development, and encourage preservation of natural
areas and working agricultural lands are discussed in the 2006 EA. Some of these programs and
strategies may have changed since 2006. We have not re- evaluated them.
FIGURES for 2015 EA UPDATE (also used in Section 404 -401 PCN Application):
Figure 1. Project vicinity, USGS topographic map, Milton NC quad.
Figure 2. Dan River intake site property survey plat, 2003.
Figure 3. Caswell County GIS tax map, adjacent properties.
Figure 4. Google Earth aerial photo of Dan River intake site property.
Figure 5. Dan River intake site grading plan, overview map.
Figure 6. Impact W1: Wetland YG in footprint of proposed intake channel.
Figure 7. Impact S1: Stream 1, proposed intake access road crossing.
Figure 8. Impact 01: Dan River cofferdam, bank excavation, and armoring.
Figure 9. Cofferdam and dewatering process, cross - section.
Figure 10 A -D. Dan River intake site erosion control & grading plan, close -ups.
Figure 11 A -D. USGS topo maps of raw water line, stream and wetland crossings.
Figure 11 E -F. Google Earth aerials of intake site and off -road waterline segment.
Figure 12. Temporary cofferdam and pumping plan for culvert installation.
Figure 13. Typical bore - and -jack plan for wetland crossings along the raw water line.
Figure 14. Typical bore - and -jack plan for stream crossings along the raw water line.
ATTACHMENTS from 2006 EA: (PDF files provided on compact disk)
SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, Dan River Regional Water Intake (Final EA) 25 April 2006
TABLES 1 to 7 from Final EA, April 2006
FIGURES 1 to 10 from Final EA, April 2006
APPENDIX A 2002 Scoping Document, Agency Comments & Applicant Responses.
APPENDIX B. March 14, 2002 Public Meeting Transcript.
APPENDIX C. Roxboro & Person County Drought Management Plan.
APPENDIX D. DRAFT Ordinance To Amend The Caswell County Watershed Protection Ordinance.
APPENDIX E. Reports and correspondence identifying potential sources of surface water
contamination in the Virginia portion of Dan River watershed.
APPENDIX F. 2004 Agency Comments & Applicant Responses
APPENDIX G. 2005 -06 Agency Comments & Applicant Responses
Dan River Regional Water Intake
SEPA EA Update — June 2015
WA
Robert J Goldstein & Associates
Environmental Consultants

Caswell County NC
.\ 00,
- Dan River
�. intake
site `-
y %f+
yIle /
I �
USGS National Map \, _ 4J,
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map: USGS National Map, Milton NC Quad, Dan River intake site.
Figures for PCN Application: Dan River Intake, Caswell County NC
RJG &A Environmental Consultants — November 2014
b
•,r i �.5,
OAV1O L BAIIXER
6X%.
N
�.
i IlA� Vw Fa
�` Fv
- -- _-- v
25.996
� t N
OANO L BApltFii
` - - -
%�'���� 16.2{4 ACRES
\ /I
Raw Water
Intake Site
9 J d 2.323 ACRES,
LOT 3C IS AN
UNBUILOABLE TRACT
Figure 2. Dan River intake site property survey plat, 2003, Caswell County NC.
Figures for PCN Application: Dan River Intake, Caswell County NC
RJG &A Environmental Consultants — November 2014

Figure 3. Caswell County GIS Tax Map, adjacent properties.
Figure 4. Dan River Intake site, Google Earth Aerial Image, Apr 2014, Caswell

1 2 3 4
r • �. -- ago
C -301 C -302
A
Intake Channel with
�g< Articulated Block
O '
Borrow & i s
- Fill Area
Did Y+Y,;•,? \, ti
C -304
C -303 - / /��%
//
c A�opQ _ Borrow & Intermittent Trib
Fill Area
; - ,►mom..
// wnRw
_
PSUPSW
A711RM ,�`'
--- .� .a~QW»„
w*xl) U
,.•,K*., r!: - -� .� �/ ',� \ _ ' . Pond
DAN RIVER INTAKE ' l• ,� `�
Grading 8 Erosion Control
Caswell County NC�� _
Figure 5. Dan River intake site, grading plan overview, LaBella Associates (JN Pease), 2014.
Figures For PCN Application: Dan River Intake, Caswell County NC
RJG &A Environmental Consultants — November 2014 3

Wetland YG :._..:
0.073 ac S of culvert
-' =% v 0.011 ac N of culvert
r
1
�#
O .•
s``toad MP1o9Kf
;i
M
I
Figure 6. Wetland impact W -1 = 0.084 acre: Wetland YG (in footprint of proposed intake channel).
�\ e�'�' � •�� \� \ \� \��� ����\ \1\ \ \�� , I I�I� Illlljl'f jll! 'll /� /
�\ \\ \� \�\ \\ \\\ \��\� \�\\�� \'�•\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ ��` � IIII� 1111 1 /1' 1/1 /f 1 I
100 FEET,.��
� �\ ,. \\\ \ \ 1 ► I 1111 ! !! I
i-� � `•• "` \ �' ���\ \��\ \� \ \ \�\ \\\\ \\ \ \ \\ \ \� \ \ \1\ \� \\11111 IIII !I1'!1'rlJrlll!/lllll�
�=T` � � `,. �\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \` \� \ \` \ \\ \ \\ \ 1 � 1► ► ����� �� / / ! � 1 �� I rr 11 r! � r � 1l 1 � rl / 1
8.5 ft wide concrete headwall, ,
% /i // outlet invert = 403.0 ft; and /
30 ft long riprap apron.
�•
% ft 54" diam RCP r / r
I\ at 4.0% slope
J / l / i /• I
Perennial Stream Impact S -1: 105 ft culvert pipe /headwalls
+ 31 ft riprap outlet = 136 ft permanent stream impact length.
Riprap at inlet = 10 ft temporary stream impact length.
(Stream is 4 ft longer than total length of installed structures)
. .. , , i
i
/
/h l /
8.5 ft wide concrete headwall, / !
inlet invert = 407.0 ft; and 10 ft long r
riprap placed at stream be grade.
I
Figure 7. Stream Impact S -1: Intake access road crossing culvert and riprap. Temporary fill for
dewatering will be within the permanent impact footprint shown — see Fig 12.

CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL A TFlyPi'A.1
COFFEROAM MA /OR A .ATLSEY BARRIER
SYSTEM YAM PUMPS WHILE THE LAST PHASE
Or EXAVATION OF THE TRAPEZOIDAL
Impact Area O -1 DCµ NyCLS PERFORMED 70 TIE-INTO THE
Dan River Intake G
♦ c�
�.yT •ooyA,
s
SttMEE OURET(rnJ ,, arts ,, ♦ +`a�a�oC RLT RAP
articulated block 0.009 acre ' pa5�•' or`° .� 2wxPLx24-
(left+ right sides total) THICK
, .aF�e�Q ,���o� _ / :0 PVC .. • ,
♦
♦,( STOKE OJTLET(M.I
AR VOr_EX ARTICLLATEO CONCRETE
BOCK (PROM ELEVATION 04' TO
ELEVATION 350)
;IF`8`?A`I ` TRAPEZOIDAL
SEDIMENr:EKCE CHANNEL
STONE OURET Ow.) —
E OURS
\\ \ \ \SE dNrFENIN�
rn R seDIMEn�FENCE
"N _::,1. „.3r e(N�
AREA - 2'Oi -[ -?:
10'1410EK
as i
AAMOFLEXARTICUUIFO CONCRETE
BLOCK )FROM ELES'AlI”" .I T'
ELLVAT04050)
I 50 feet WWTAU
S9)MENT ucE . �� °
Figure 8. River bank open water impacts, Dan River intake.
CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL A TEMPORARY
COFFERDAM AND /OR A JERSEY BARRIER DETAIL OF COFFERDAM BARRIER AT DAN RIVER
SYSTEM WITH PUMPS WHILE THE LAST PHASE
OF EXCAVATION OF THE TRAPEZOIDAL
CHANNEL IS PERFORMED TO TIE —INTO THE PUMP ANY SEDIMENT LADEN WATER
DAN RIVER TO SILT SACKS OR OTHER
POLYETHELHIE PLASTIC APPROPRIATE FILTERING DEVICES
f BARRIER
SILT SACK
CONCRETE JERSEY BARRV POSTING
Cj CREEK BANK
DAN RIVER NORMAL DEPTH
y
DISCHARGE OF FILTERED
SURGE STONE LEVELING CLEAN RUNOFF
COURSE CLASS I RIP RAP AS
NECESSARY
SURGE STONE
DOSTING RIVER BOTTOM
SUMP PUMPS AS
NECESSARY
STON
1. ENSURE CONCRETE JERSEY BARRIERS ARE ADEQUATELY ANCHORED
TOGETHER (END TO END) FOR STABILITY.
2. CONTRACTOR TO FREQUENTLY CHECK THE BARRIERS TO ENSURE
THE STRUCTURES ARE PLUMB. ADD RIP RAP AND RESET BARRIERS
AS NECESSARY. /
3. ADD POLYETHYLENE PLASTIC BARRIER AND ADDITIONAL SUMP
PUMP(S) AS NECESSARY TO KEEP THE TRAPEZOIDAL OPEN CHANNEL /
TIE -IN TO THE DAN RIVER AS DRY AS POSSIBLE DURING GRADING
AND PLACING OF THE ARMORFLEX ARTICULATED CONCRETE BLOCK
UNITS.
4. PUMP ANY SEDIMENT LADEN WATER THAT IS IN THE EXCAVATION
AREA TO SILT SACKS OR OTHER APPROPRIATE FILTERING DEVICES.
Figure 9. Cofferdam and dewatering process, cross - section at river bank.
5
t STONE WE

DETAL OF OD/Y91OW VJW0 AT DAN RMM
/
CONTRACTOR TO NSTALL A TEMPORARY / /'l
Fur Alp mow:. .ER
ow"m COWUMAN AND/OR A SEY eARPJER / !i // — / Q1MQpCiRZ111t)rN1aIQSiMKTiR W OIIfN@! A
IOLloOARf{ACC roirewonwZratewcceaa
CF EKCAV TA CNN F TW TRAPEZOIDAL PHASE � %��
UNOI CNAN%EL O F0F0RWED TO TIE -NTO THE
DAN F VEa STOLE OUTLET (IYP.}
A
WSW r wm1o+� Es J-w
wae a +R ro oaewe >p 11✓
am a . / /� / / / / / s �wns
/ / / / / r.I RRUaA weer
am OWL=
MMQMIIWpjrm
Oa<71CIF`O A6R=
CEDRiExT FENCE / EtOQ "W EEiVA1 pN 1♦11 TD
-TONE OUTLET fn?.) EEFVAiIDII
L E'MSUIIE COIICAETE AEASEY W WEAS ARE ADEQUATELY ANCf1011E0 / / // r RIRt1
L x.s
TOGETIEA (END TO END) FOR STA�ILMC
2 CONTRACTOR TO FREQUENTLY C Fa THE GARNERS TO ENSURE // r T"m
THE STRUCTURES ARE PLUSM ADD TRIP RAP AND RESET SAIIRIERS // / , / . / /
AS NECESSARY.
1. ADD PWI TIM81f PLAST C GAFMA AND ADOMONAL SUMP / / / , Iti51Al t A AkLEVTpk ' / \ \ / / / / / tM OF
P UMPWASWCfSSAAYTOKE1 P THE TMPQOWLOPENCMANNEU ii /�� p SLmENl10a i / / 11fTUMIrE // /
T1E•N lO TIE DAN mu AS DRY As POSsw DUNNG c OING
AND PLACING OF THE AWCOAXX AATTCUEATFO CONCIRETE NLa X
Uwm
l PUN► ANY SIDMAENT LADEN WATER THAT 5 I THE E"VATION l` • ♦ 1 STOLE OURET qW.}
AREA TO SILT SAW OR OTHER APPIIOPRIATE FILTE104 DEVICES
%_ r / 4 (/ � r /// • r /
5A..ET TT.I / / / />/ ! )/ COILTRACTpI TD RACE CURET
// SKMME4 / OCT /' / OR A"WdW ECdJAiALI
EXCEtZMWAITAN6AILOW
mm LOGN t WCTM OF.
2DPE351:TY AID STEM (r
4VOnEwBt ///
SI!]AAIAEIR LI N •1 • CONSTOX711OM S�IfICE }} / •/ / / / /�/ ��%
/
L PL/LCf THE SEDIMENT FENCE AND TREE lEAW DUTY STONE
CUTLETS WOW THE AASN AREA LIEF W ANY CLEARING FOR
THE 6ALN BEGNL
2. EXCAVATT A TEMPORARY SEDBMENT SIORILGE AREA OF LINT fRAfi . ' ,' - TST# 16
APPIIOIKWAWtV r MP X IC VNDE X 100' LONG &U(W
CIEAALNG AND EXCAVAT04 FOIR THE BASAL . SFpYEM siCiiALf
A. ENSURE THE MENTIONED TENW ORAAY SEDWENE STORAGE / AKA - 1-
AREA lS CLEANED OUT AND MAINTMIED DUI NG 111E
OCCAVATION PROCESS FOR THE BASK
♦. SEE SHEETC -M FOR DETAILED SP OFKATIONST000MSTRUCT
THE S13WER BASK
S. SEED AND MULCH THE SLOPES OF THE S10AAMEA EALSO AS SOON J ^ / , , �' 'Q / • \t.� I r ..r N/
AS TIE CRADING OPCIATION IS COMPLETED. AWIICFLUX ARII .LATED CO%:%tE
OLOCX 114W 1LCiA113%34N TO b
FIEVA71" awl
"WALL i MLMAN
'� �' ♦ ♦ /� / /' �' / / ( i SEDUiBFENCE
/ // �Ir ///
of
/j /.� / / - AT'1WAY M181T =2t AT 1L V.=ON ;;7.
TOP LEW61W AT SPLLAAY Wo1ERT =1 SF AT ELEV. =1W / / / �\� 10
WTTOY VAM =11' AT M. =361 / / UNIT DT , / /
60TTOYL8i6T1latATELEl.=3Et /
TOP OF BAtA*00ff M.=R.SO / / / / 57; •L" • R i }
STONE OIRtET MV.) / / / / ! } i /
e000l
ZIONE 1 C`
ol C
AO.LWAY1W9R =.f ATffM.ri77
_ TOP LER67h AT 7LLR'AY FMM =W AT LEV.=M / / / / / / / f J 'A mz
/ i = GO1T0M WOTM =1_ AT ELEV. =M / / / / / / rl
BOTTOM LEN67M =St AT EL W =170 / / / P
NER LEk6TM =F i / / / g Zt BM131 � \ 1
r J f — — — — SKl1A1t9U SCi =r J / �' TWA
r OAIFCE SCIE =OSO' = J ` / / / i [ _ — "'f
�'' �• TOPOfO!l/NLME3YfELE'l. =TISC 1 __ �`-•�� � �SN
Figure 10A. Intake site erosion control plan, NorthWest quadrant.
6

/
// /
r►a .
AE wER
X"
i
/�/
/ �/ — _� r /// / / // /// LN
/01
/.iii / / '� �� i 1 / /
7 = \l ,. -- — NY's l-,6 s Y �Z'kL• ' ' 11 NXU `-,-S,
Figure 10B. Intake site erosion control plan, NorthEast quadrant.
N
FIR:
S I UR \t l)1N 11. V IS B 1-71 [M UN-11U1 R IOR TIML Ot (DM 77YIX1010% -it WM 7)\
DITBFD.)
SUE
Mt..
pwM.l
tVFlVB%%n)0 -.%4m %lKxlt
MAIMLU.
OATS
16.20
14
BC/
10 11
11111
Y
Brr
STORNIWATER SENVER CAIJCHATIONS AND
DFSIG\ TABLE
1s
09011M lIML1t10MMM51wimm1004=4=
"D
ILM
Is
w
1011
1201
Is
Brr
"U
.lN
14
STT)RN 8111 w% rimon. 25 \R
• i
IrIBtOBat
-
il'r►.
aVll7
LVII.I
IuI.U.
DRUG
tlq \I
TO
AFFTDX
CAA F.
AREA
O
U1TA
I
C
Q
mw
9W.
INV.
MC M
SIDFE
RDA
no,
to
(ALI
CPS
1• W
11000
CPS
TIMAT
Uh
IM
(to
�►
imo>res
V:.\
Fl% 1 I n% 2
1A3
&II 1 ?S2
7.7
am
ILM
VA
OJI.M
421.40
710
IAO
•
'Oor
1U0
I v.(
INN 1 I BM 1
47.92
7117 I 4.92
7.7
am
$=*I
V:.\
407A0
40J.M
IQAO
122
• Y-40100 MMIGM
I %,A
FllJt 1 I DUM 1
110
201 I 1.-9
7.7
$AS
177
\r.\
179AS
17810
ALM
709
yI
r
•
I VIA
M4 I DHB 1
am
U" I it %
7.7
Km
7212
VA
179,40
37810
41.00
L76
... �-; l� . • f
'.: * ' _ .
111104
Of01 I 1 M 1
OAS
OM 1 ::7
7.7
am
GM
2210
17110
MIS
AN
121
/ /
0(111
DI I 1 ms
0.11
0.71 1 uAi
7.2
GAO
IAN
a"
JAL"
341M
11.M
M07
IUMW2R('ID (COMIMIT Mr. TO B[(IASS M O-I(M: JOINI\ (%V.1TT2ttKJln
ETF
cvwtu,�»v.utatt�r[tv�nu rrrrvBtllPt� \ \1n1IR1s�txu,��ust�atSTneun'
IN q) rINIri% Ml) FOBEMWFSTDS40.t4N1711iN.16ill.M w(R111S
lO BF:WDE)"! STDI3011
DRUV.1(A: \L\NIM.F. TO Bt: V( "W F STD S1SS2 %7F110M.Q RNt: i COMM
/
// /
r►a .
AE wER
X"
i
/�/
/ �/ — _� r /// / / // /// LN
/01
/.iii / / '� �� i 1 / /
7 = \l ,. -- — NY's l-,6 s Y �Z'kL• ' ' 11 NXU `-,-S,
Figure 10B. Intake site erosion control plan, NorthEast quadrant.
N
CMkI?1EL DETfJL f =RPi TQ R`CTAIIGULAR
P=AU CUOL x I VATrA*
ADS WNE L906T►. A
TIDTN AAWE PROPOM
PAVATC1-160
CHANNEL DETAIL CHANNEL ACCESS ROADS
MOM OR AMMMW
eau\ltM. cam MAT
PMU SNJIFO' TO TOr OF
FROMM) AOCLSS
CHANNEL DETAIL fROY EASTERN EDGE Of PAR" TO DROP INLET s1
DAM MU TIP SECTION
effmcma
UXPC 1
�J
'44A*�*
Pease
Engineers - Architects
'-'I Wess Ines S=eeL Sure B
Salisbury, N(: 28144 [phone]
Prelitnmry -do not use The wnstrumon
.I"
r ;
con NO
s)i1t y
M�tn-t •
C 2011 PEA
FIR:
N
DITBFD.)
SUE
Mt..
pwM.l
(LAw.►
MAIMLU.
OATS
16.20
14
BC/
10 11
11111
Y
Brr
6.011
Mtn
1s
Of r
"D
ILM
Is
w
1011
1201
Is
Brr
"U
.lN
14
rASP
CMkI?1EL DETfJL f =RPi TQ R`CTAIIGULAR
P=AU CUOL x I VATrA*
ADS WNE L906T►. A
TIDTN AAWE PROPOM
PAVATC1-160
CHANNEL DETAIL CHANNEL ACCESS ROADS
MOM OR AMMMW
eau\ltM. cam MAT
PMU SNJIFO' TO TOr OF
FROMM) AOCLSS
CHANNEL DETAIL fROY EASTERN EDGE Of PAR" TO DROP INLET s1
DAM MU TIP SECTION
effmcma
UXPC 1
�J
'44A*�*
Pease
Engineers - Architects
'-'I Wess Ines S=eeL Sure B
Salisbury, N(: 28144 [phone]
Prelitnmry -do not use The wnstrumon
.I"
r ;
con NO
s)i1t y
M�tn-t •
C 2011 PEA

CD
0
m
v
CD
T_
CD
CD
0
U)
n
O
0
70
v
O
CD
CO
Q
v
� z
G7
90
m
O
CO
Z
O
� r
z
-i
Q
a i to
NO V �',l1 \1
L1,,,1 ,111
1 1 \1\11,1 +1,,1,11
11L1 \L111\11, \, L ,,1111,,;,1 \L;L
\W\ ,\ t 1 \1 1\1
1`
`\ \11` 11`11111` \1�,1L11
1L \ \1` 1L 1 `1\ , L 1\ ,11L\
1\\1\ 1L \\ `tL \11 \` 11`1\ \ \ \,
i l l l 1 1 1 ,1 1L1 1 1\ 1,1 t 11\ 1L 1 1 1
1 \ \,11111L1,1,11,1,1 1;; \1` 1 L 1 \` 1`, 1 1L 11, 1 1► I 1
\,,1;`IL11111,11
1 \\ �1 1 �
,1
\\N\\
\1,1111 11 ` i \
\ \L 1111 �
�e
11,111` 1,1111 , \1,11 1 \1,11 +L1,1 115,i'11 ` 11L�
1, \ 1L,111\ \1 L \\ L 1 \1111+ LI 1\ 1 L \1{,11 \ o 1 ;�
t l MATCHUNE (C-M) 1 lam' 1 1 l 1 j I ! J 1111,L1`1`1 \\`1`IL1 \1` \L1 \'11` \11'1 \`111,1L 111` \1LL 11' L 1 11 1LtL1` + 1 1� y ;Z
`\
1 \\ 1111
1
1\ \1 1111E , ,,1111,11 O
1 1 1 1 1 V t t 1 1 1 I 1 I l II I 1 1 t>♦ 1 1 t� 1' I',1 1L ,1 \1\, \1L,L ,L11\ ,1, 1� ,1 1 1 IL 1 �� � ~ �a
\111+ 1 , +11 \,1 11\ \1 11; lL 1,1 11111 1N\�\X 1111,1,1 .. t� ` �- _
1,111L1',L ,111,'1� kI \I'Lli
1,\ \ ,1 , ,, , ,,1 1 , U 1 \,11 \1 \
,'11111,11 \1111, L\ ;�,1L 1L1,,1LL 1 Lt LL
`L \IIL11'1'1L1LLIv
t 1 L +' "� �' � � � ��' , 1 11 , � 11 ti ' 1 ► 5i,�11�'� 5 '1 ,1' L'S ', 1� 1111 , L�1j t
1 , L 1 .• . 1 1 1 1 , L 11 L\ ,, , 51 ` 5 L 11L` 11
1'L `L1,�i�i I^ S$ 11, t t l � l 5 iS1115,551
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 11'1a 5 °��5 ti I t , ,5 LL, 1,511 1111 1 1
1, t, l' l l t L t i 15 151111
i
=1 t►
1, ,I l t, , 1 1 r5�Yt5' 115 1 11 +555 1
rn 111 tlt 1511511 5 51
t 1151 1
l t
w ,
111 m�l 1 II
f-
I r I I I �� � I :•I I -I j I
�i cn ili,t ,1 1
I
1
dI
5 �
5, t l 1 I III 1 1
I 1 1 1 IIt I l � �II
�, jl1jl� I 1 I o
i I I I �tll,�l 1 II'1
J � 9
\\

Rb
CD
cic
�21 -,t
66
IIIE
U,
Ili,
nit
C)
e
LO
WHO LL.
LU CD
06 C:)
F
r) cc:
LL.J
F— LLJ
CM)
C, b C/D
L)
21
E
LU
0
Cl)
0-
O
0
L)
O
0
O
O
Cf)
CD
(1)
.27)
LL
TVs
2
c�
0
-0
co
CL
X
0
"
.2 0
2 co
2
0
0 co
2
z
x
0 co
x
0
co
C2
Z
Ln
Rb
CD
cic
�21 -,t
66
IIIE
U,
Ili,
nit
C)
e
LO
WHO LL.
LU CD
06 C:)
F
r) cc:
LL.J
F— LLJ
CM)
C, b C/D
L)
21
E
LU
0
Cl)
0-
O
0
L)
O
0
O
O
Cf)
CD
(1)
.27)
LL
(01�
TVs
CL
—i
z
2
co
(01�

r -- Dan
take site Impacts
see Figs 6, T. 8
S
oo +oo
it C`/
r mow' _- 1.• i
wetiand`YB
ri' o im act
, it1
11 .` - �� `� 1 -- �' � — `� —r � I l �,j`�"'�� � • -
OIL
C Ile.
f ! 'Ccmctcrri Ot, i.ZV�
W2: ditch wetland -
tir temp = 0.0081 ac
Station
4%
98 +00 -' 4
jot owl
Figure 11A. USGS National Map, Yanceyville raw water line, Intake site Sta 0 +00 to Sta, 198 +00.
Milton and Leasburg USGS topographic quadrangles.
10 - -
Station
r •, ' 198 +00
1r•j�-
I . �- -� � .. J ' , /j� �, , I rt F •` •~ . � sir
n � c •, L J'
W3: ditch wetland
temp = 0.003 ac
f ._ a
� -
Lk
t-1
i ade r -4..
Rd I amct ? -
�:•� � _,ter '��- � _ . .
RoCAr 1
_ Schoo ��
iRr
a
s t- _ 0
E ,
Stream S7: Temp
impact - 20 ft ; �r •�f
Station
412 +00 '
Figure 11 B. USGS National Map, Yanceyville raw water line, Sta 198 +00 to Sta, 412 +00.
Leasburg and Yanceyville USGS topographic quadrangles.

i
s.
�I
Station �
412 +00
. -A-0
wetland YC
no impact
� Zimmerman
U. Co ! �1 Road
Figure 11 C. USGS National Map, Yanceyville raw water line, Intake site Sta 412 +00 to Sta 647 +50.
Yanceyville USGS topographic quadrangle.
J r
w�
fy
It
1
.: 7v
E
IV C% E '�, \
N,M )
cn to (\
7Mt 1•Yp
N N
LL �m
LL _ a a
EE
- �oo'ITo
N ) to cD
E II cn fn
EE U
caE E t Mw Ww
co
- -- - - --------
g
-
Figure 11 D. USGS National Map, Yanceyville raw water line, Sta 647 +50 to Sta 705 +00.
Yanceyville USGS topographic quadrangle.

,, �� It '! 1. ►. ' . r: ► '' r I�, 1
''�,�J�7:, yAY•- ,�� %t11f ■) /Yl:,f• _i '�• ' `..ft4 �_ ' 't ,• r
..,L- !., _ . ,• a as � •.,
aim" .•t'. � �`. • L � L 5i. .
- _ _ �. -- •. � 1. • � � clearing li
N
, 1► h ► v (0
ff
- �/., . • L. "� ` �, • /• " i ► ; ' ' .. 1, N
1 Ji` h' 1 1 / rIl •' co
W
of
Im
oil ol t 04
jr
• 1 i '
f �1 -Tt • e, . ;i ,+ ,. ,. t �; ? •7r�` h }•_,; C�
Mu
Af
f M •.-._tJL:♦.4�. ••• Y II . �` S r, lid O
AV cn
As
� . 7�O, .fir ?4• l� a' T_ I � �/l �'�� .f„���.r� ''• _ ` � 1 •� �.i� �� �
r ' +ice•✓ / 1w +)t�l { �• I '+ X, � •'t • n , • , •� � •� is ! %w�� � . , � , N
rr. S�KhI f �s� \�.' . l? �! b•..i' �.� .+ • •1•sFl^. / /�i 1 e r . LL

`"_ -
WWI-
ivcl'
-A'• •� 4k
7
_ g
1;
V4
'1• o • � ., �� 1��.` fin► �`.�.
I•► S t ► 1
rq
•It�'
t ILI ► • �►';i
16% �.
IL
?4_0!
AL
Alt
1308 ft
t' s' ate• - � •-.
`-�• Country Line Creek •, .•� "�, '�
Figure 11 F. Moorefield Rd to Yanceyville WTP segment of raw water line showing proposed Stream S2 -S6 and Wetland W5 -W6 impacts, Google Earth April 2014 aerial image
N�
I
k
Figure 11 F. Moorefield Rd to Yanceyville WTP segment of raw water line showing proposed Stream S2 -S6 and Wetland W5 -W6 impacts, Google Earth April 2014 aerial image
N�
I

< T
v GO
� C:
rD �
Z
rD G)
n
O
Q V)
O
Z rD
cri n
r+ O
v C:
rD
O_ <
z �
n N
;-o
-a v
O n
_0 (D
rD U-)
Di
'< O
M Uq
O ::7
rD
z o
o
� v
r)
Gl (DD
m �
3 3
rD rD
v :3
Q O
r+
v
rD
rD
v

TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION AREA SEDIMENT TRAP
MINIMUM SURFACE AREA = 50 S.F.
MINIMUM VOLUME = 50 C.F.
MINIMUM DEPTH = 1 FT.
AFTER COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION WITHIN CREEK BANKS,
REMOVE STONE FILTER, CLEAN TEMP. TRAP OF ALL SEDIMENT, AND
BACKFILL TOEXISTING GRADE WITH COMPACTED EARTH. RESTORE
ALL DISTURBED AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROJECT
REQUIREMENTS.
PERMANENT RIP -RAP AS
INDICATED ON PLAN
SUMP AS REQ'D. TO DRAIN
CONSTRUCTION AREA
LOCATION OF CULVERT
L
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
AREA PUMPING UNIT- \
50 GPM MAX. CAP.
10'LG.x5'W-
SEDIMENT TRAP
I- __
TEMPORARY NCDOT
No. 57 STONE FILTER
TO BOTTOM OF
SEDIMENT TRAP
J
TOP OF
CREEK BANK
ODO
O
Pease
Engineers -Architects
CULVERT INSTALLATION SHALL BE PERFORMED WHEN
CREEK FLOW IS AT A MINIMUM AND NO INCLEMENT
WEATHER IS ANTICIPATED WITHIN THE CREEK
L CROSSING CONSTRUCTION PERIOD.
PUMP DISCHARGE
PROVIDE TEMPORARY UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM
COFFERDAMS CONSTRUCTED WITH SAND BAGS, STEEL
TRENCH BOXES, PRECAST CONCRETE BARRIERS OR
OTHER NON -EROSIONABLE MATERIALS. TOP OF
COFFERDAMS ARE TO BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF
ONE FOOT ABOVE ANTICIPATED STREAM WATER LEVEL,
PUMPS AND COFFERDAMS ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE
UNTIL CULVERT INSTALLATION ACROSS CREEK IS
COMPLETE AND ALL PERMANENT RIP -RAP IS IN PLACE.
WHERE STEEP DOWNSTREAM CREEK GRADIENT
ELIMINATES ANY POTENTIAL FOR EXCAVATION
FLOODING FROM THE DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION,
THE DOWNSTREAM COFFERDAM MAY BE OMITTED.
Creek Crossing Detail
for Culvert Installation
Figure
No. 3
Date: March 2015
THE TEMPORARY COFFERDAMS WILL BE PLACED
WITHIN THE FOOTPRINT OF THE PROPOSED RIP RAP
O
ENERGY DISSIPATERS. THE TEMPORARY COFFERDAMS
\
WILL BE ONE FOOT TALL, WITH ONE FOOT TOP WIDTH
WITH 2H:1 V SIDE SLOPES. THE INSTREAM LENGTHS WILL
BE 5 LINEAR FEET FOR EACH COFFERDAM.
l \
TOP OF \
CREEK BANK
PUMP SUCTION
\ \
PROVIDE TEMPORARY ENGINE DRIVEN
\
PUMPING UNITS AS REQUIRED - PUMP
CAPACITY TO BE SUFFICIENT TO
/
TRANSPORT ENTIRE FLOW OF CREEK
/
AROUND CULVERT CROSSING POINT
/
QP
N
TEMPORARY NCDOT
No. 57 STONE FILTER
TO BOTTOM OF
SEDIMENT TRAP
J
TOP OF
CREEK BANK
ODO
O
Pease
Engineers -Architects
CULVERT INSTALLATION SHALL BE PERFORMED WHEN
CREEK FLOW IS AT A MINIMUM AND NO INCLEMENT
WEATHER IS ANTICIPATED WITHIN THE CREEK
L CROSSING CONSTRUCTION PERIOD.
PUMP DISCHARGE
PROVIDE TEMPORARY UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM
COFFERDAMS CONSTRUCTED WITH SAND BAGS, STEEL
TRENCH BOXES, PRECAST CONCRETE BARRIERS OR
OTHER NON -EROSIONABLE MATERIALS. TOP OF
COFFERDAMS ARE TO BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF
ONE FOOT ABOVE ANTICIPATED STREAM WATER LEVEL,
PUMPS AND COFFERDAMS ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE
UNTIL CULVERT INSTALLATION ACROSS CREEK IS
COMPLETE AND ALL PERMANENT RIP -RAP IS IN PLACE.
WHERE STEEP DOWNSTREAM CREEK GRADIENT
ELIMINATES ANY POTENTIAL FOR EXCAVATION
FLOODING FROM THE DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION,
THE DOWNSTREAM COFFERDAM MAY BE OMITTED.
Creek Crossing Detail
for Culvert Installation
Figure
No. 3
Date: March 2015

40'x 30'
BORE PIT
PLACE ANTI -SEEP C
THE DOWNSTREAN
BOUNDARY AND E
UP THE GRADIENT I
WATERLINE IS OUT
WETLAND
0 50
SCALE: L' - 50'
I' x 30'
ARE PIT
.TERLINE
PIPE ONLY)
J �-H ti ii ,N ii ffi ii I ,U I I
pO'x 30'
40'x E1,
4 41 ::R :FF FH �:F :4 FHT
WETLAND ` PROPOSED WATER _INE
4 FR :FF 44 C = � r!R� OrF�:F
CE L
_+ � _+� ++ ++ +
0.00
4*w
Pease
Engineers - Architects
1.00 2.00
Wetland Crossing Detail
Bore and Jacking
3.00
Figure
No. 2
Date: March 2015

Siol iiazew :a}pQ
•oN
azn�?t3
�iuiypel pue ajog
J!UjaQ �iuisso .TD uupa�ls
oo•z 00•L
LH4HH4
+L
L
(ilN
(J 34Id t�1O?JI
+��� +
3l1 Std t L
LLB
777 L L
- --
Tn777
LLB-
L
LH4—
�
L
LH
H -t fit�
-01
LLLLLLLL
El J
LHHHHH
-HHHH
,OS = „l :3lvoS
09 0
SjOajiuOay — Saaaui6u3
aspa
4 40
00.0
�4�-H4�-H 4
le I Sv 3H8M, 1S E
TFF7TF1
`�� rt�Lrtfih'_
ILL-
-- LLLLLLLLL
HHHHHHHHHH
_-
-----------
ild INOO J lld Ddou
,0£ X ,Oi7 .0£ X .04
(LINO 3dld NON 3mona)
3NIl?13iVM 43SOdONd

_T
C
CD
F"
lJl
D
w
Id Rd a�
d
I-
nty HoR
L
ls�
9
�3
4
c�
T
T.
C
C
CS0185 Potears School
CS0186 Frank James Place (Gone?)
•
°3+rso� Rd
Camen
Pine s
Go If C lu b
o`
v
Oak Try s
Melrose/ Williamson o
House CS -0070
Files Rd o`
50 � Sr),,'76
Kinch Williams House
/ CS0074 NC 62 Rural Historic District 1996
qa
c
CS0075 John Johnstone ouse(OcBilelsite; moved) 11997
o`
elrose (W illiemson House) 1985
148 Pearson - Williamson -Howe House(Apprmcimate site) (Gone ?)
ELL
William Poteat House
CS -0013
R
,r`
%CS0013'Pot at H 1479
NC -62 Rural
G
�11 so n House
v <
CS0338 D.L. Edmonds Place
n.mry A
�' CS0337 Robertson House Sde-3 Ce A pp.."te J C
�
site) p
"`CS03S0 5 Johnston House � ,15.158 NC -86
V y"CEYV LJX 1^ 1
a S r.1fr•, d r
CSO77-9 Prehgvterien Mans eCS0004 Craves House 1974 6
C50474 R. an- JohnsIr- House 197'J 000, iG
■ P SOOO1�Gaswell GOUnty'Gbuwh,0use 1973 S
CiM0057A.� ., oiaJc i,ws2 i.:....ie1 Ro 7
JCS4J 'Y71\kni wILCE HISTOR:ICDIST.RIGTc19731994 4
J
h oo! I ?
CS0087'Caswc1Aa?bunty Training School 2003
Labtude:36.420980 Longitude:- 79.295479 Sca
VP
r
3"
g
Pli
C

Nonn "r011na Jraie ruSronc t reset
HPOWEB GIS Service (GeneralAudier
CS0171 Tobacco Barn (Wood Flue)
I on Rd
r-r CS0170 MseCabin
n• Z • CS0385 House(Mise)(Gone ?) Q
i >�
] c�
0 rNF ,r
or
74f%w
rD CS0177 MooreF arm
0
ti�i►
o° ? Lea's Tavern
r*. " CS 0077 r
O c .r -•r
N K
M
l 6�,r
v fD i RalLl a
o
� v
rr O e
ro O 0>
CS0151 Bggus Powell House (Gore?
M n AG �5 - • o.
N
Cr• v apron
-s O
O M
N
� rt
n M
Ln
>v
N O-
n Z
O �
>` 01
� N
r-r
I I
� fl1 I I
1 mi
CS0077 Lee's Taver
n 2000
1 hlehaftey House
C
CA SW6s,�l CSO428 New Hope Methodist Church
a
3l� SO413 Leahurs t
CSO425 Moore House
Js,.
U HrAh ROOk
2 OO, R -
d
BOP Sm /rh
� CSO 50 Kinch W illiens House
' >r
CS0074 NC 82 Rural Historic District 1998
*/ Latitude:36.470759 Longitude:- 79.241636 Scale 136,111.9
'000 r
r
Rd
CSO411 Lea - Rodgers HamkplsoE (Gon
e`
c`
I2a
lon
Longs 4,,,, Ca
Rq 0`\\ CSO419 William Long st
Mill (Gone'
•
rD 0
r
N
a
rD
v Q
h
M
�
n
N
O
O
r0 �•
)
CS0184Tom Jones Ho e y .)
O
• S)agr Ra Y
m
-s O
O M
N
� rt
n M
Ln
>v
N O-
n Z
O �
>` 01
� N
r-r
I I
� fl1 I I
1 mi
CS0077 Lee's Taver
n 2000
1 hlehaftey House
C
CA SW6s,�l CSO428 New Hope Methodist Church
a
3l� SO413 Leahurs t
CSO425 Moore House
Js,.
U HrAh ROOk
2 OO, R -
d
BOP Sm /rh
� CSO 50 Kinch W illiens House
' >r
CS0074 NC 82 Rural Historic District 1998
*/ Latitude:36.470759 Longitude:- 79.241636 Scale 136,111.9
'000 r
r
Rd
CSO411 Lea - Rodgers HamkplsoE (Gon
e`
c`
I2a
lon
Longs 4,,,, Ca
Rq 0`\\ CSO419 William Long st
Mill (Gone'
•

.MS. STAB 4,
C�
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Pat McCrory
Secretary Susan Kluttz
November 4, 2014
Gerald Pottern
RJG &A Goldstein & Associates, Inc.
1221 Corporation Parkway, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27610
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
V_9ottern(&,,RJ GAcarolina. com
Re: Dan River Water Intake & Raw Water Transmission Lines, Caswell County, ER 14 -2481
Dear Mr. Pottern:
We are in receipt of your letter of October 21, 2014, concerning the above - referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the materials submitted and offer the following comments.
There are no known archaeological sites within the proposed project area. Based on our knowledge of the
area, it is unlikely that any archaeological resources that may be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of
Historic Places will be affected by the project. We, therefore, recommend that no archaeological investigation
be conducted in connection with this project.
We reviewed the project description and maps of the project area. According to the HPOGIS website
http: / /Os.ncdcr.Lov /hpoweb/ the proposed undertaking may affect the following National Register -listed
properties:
• Poteat House (CS0013)
• Melrose (Williamson) House (CS0070)
The following Study -listed properties are considered eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic
Places and also may be affected by the installation of a raw water line along NC 62.
• Lea's Tavern (CS0077)
• NC 62 Rural Historic District (CS0074)
We understand the raw water line will be buried along NC 62. However, it is unclear if the proposed work will
be performed within existing DOT Right -of -Ways and where the work will occur in relation to the
aforementioned properties.
To assist us with making a determination regarding the potential effects of the project, we request you provide
maps that clearly illustrate the proposed location for the raw water line in reference to historic resources using
the HPOGIS website.
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax: (919) 807 - 6570/807 -6599

To obtain shapefiles of our HPO GIS data, please visit the Data Download webpage at:
http: / /www.hpo. ncdcr. gov/ gis/ CountvDisclaimers .html #DataDownload. There you will find a zipped file
that contains shapefiles for everything you see in HPOWEB and a thorough description regarding the colors
and shapes in our symbology. Please feel free to contact us with any questions you may have regarding the
HPOGIS website and the HPO GIS data.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919- 807 -6579 or
environmental .review(&ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
�OvRamona M. Bartos

rl
f ,
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Pat McCrory
Secretary Susan Kluttz
April 13, 2015
Gerald Pottern
RJG &A Goldstein & Associates, Inc.
1221 Corporation Parkway, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27610
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
gyottern(a,RJGAcarolina.com
Re: Yanceyville Dan River Intake and Raw Water Line to Yanceyville, Caswell County, ER 14 -2481
Dear Mr. Pottern:
Thank you for your email of March 6, 2015, concerning the above - referenced undertaking. We have reviewed
the materials submitted and offer the following comments.
The aerial images you provided showing historic properties in relation to the proposed project area, which runs
along NC Highway 62, were very helpful. Reviewing these images it appears the raw water line, which may be
placed inside the DOT right -Of -way or behind it, may adversely affect the historic properties located along the
project corridor.
As stated in your email, "final plans for this line may not be designed for at least five to ten years and changes
to the road, roadside utilities or adjacent development may occur during the intervening years." Thus, we
cannot offer a final determination of effect at this time as the current environmental record may not accurately
reflect what elements may be present or absent when the project is initiated. We will, therefore, look forward to
reviewing the plans for the raw water line when they are prepared and recommend that due consideration be
given to the historic properties and their setting in developing any such plans.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919- 807 -6579 or
environmental .review(a,ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
60VRamona M. Bartos
David E. Bailey
Tommy Warren
david. e.bailev2(&,usace. army.mil
twarren(a,cityofroxboro. corn
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax: (919) 807 - 6570/807 -6599

I nylneclinrl
Arc hill ( lull
I nvhonmcnlal
Plannlno
*Pease
A c u ir+•110 V1111"I"
Ian•, !'i lu i�:'�����n�llhli l�.�l�,ii� li
15)0 South hlw.l, Suite )Io, t harlutte, NC 78203
OX$ORO
140 I CA.ROLlNA
June 9, 2014
Engineering Report
I`hone 104,316b423
I nw 104.332 41 17
V~ pease )V (on)
City of Roxboro Raw Water Intake Site Improvements
IlA
S
1 Q L
028;347
+r111r
9 Bey
It+.IaI Iesnshlp !�, IZc",0Uf( e,ti. IZrcults

Roxboro Raw Water Intake
Table of Contents
CoverSheet .......................................................................................................... ............................... 1
Tableof Contents .................................................................................................. ............................... 2
1.0 Project Applicants ........................................................................................... ............................... 3
2.0 Existing Water System ..................................................................................... ............................... 3
Tablei .................................................................................................................. ............................... 4
3.0 Growth and Water Demand Projections .......................................................... ............................... 5
4.0 Dan River Intake Evaluation ............................................................................ ............................... 6
5.0 Project Description .......................................................................................... ............................... 6
Table2 .................................................................................................................. ............................... 7
Roxboro Raw Water Intake, Page 2

1.0 Project Applicants
City of Roxboro
Mr. Tommy Warren
Assistant City Manager
PO Box 128
Roxboro, NC 27573
(336) 599 -3116
2.0 Existing Water System
The City of Roxboro, NC currently uses two existing raw water sources. These are Lake Isaac
Walton (Roxboro City Lake), an impoundment on Story Creek and South Hyco Creek, The South
Hyco Creek intake is located near the US -158 bridge and pumps raw water to Satterfield Creek,
upstream of Lake Isaac Walton. From Lake Isaac Walton, the raw water is pumped to Roxboro's
Water Treatment Plant located south east of Lake Isaac Walton on Cave] Chub Lake Rd in
Roxboro, NC. The WTP is permitted for 8 MGD. No modifications to the existing intakes and
pumping faculties are included in this project. The City of Roxboro does not have a connection
with other water distribution systems.
In 1997, the Roxboro water system served approximately 10,800 people, and included 3,489
residential connections, 586 commercial connections, 19 industrial connections, and 20
institutional connections. The Average annual daily water production in 1997 was 3.46 MGD.
The system's peak monthly average flow was 3.84 MGD, and the peak daily flow was 5.24 MGD.
All of the water treated was used by the Roxboro Water System. The Lake Isaac Walton intake
was operated everyday of the year, and pumped an annual average of 3.48 MGD. The South Hyco
Creek Intake was used 79 days out of the year, and added an average daily flow of 6 MGD into
Lake Isaac Walton.
During 2001, the annual average use was 2.90 MGD, the peak monthly average was 3.5 MGD,
and the peak daily use was 4.41 MDG. The decrease was due to decreases in industrial uses.
Table 1 (Final EA 12/14/05) indicates that the existing raw water sources should be adequate for
the service area's water needs to approximately 2020. The projections are based on growth and
water demand projections for the service area.
The 20 -year safe yield calculated in the December 2005 Environmental Assessment at the existing
raw water sources were 3.20 MGD for Lake Isaac Walton and 7.80 MDG for South Hyco Creek.
This provides a safe yield of 11 MGD and represents 29% of the mean annual flow of these
streams. This yield is anticipated to decrease as storage capacity is lost due to sediment
accumulation.
The Town of Yanceyville has one primary raw water supply at Farmer Lake. This impoundment
on Country Line Creek has a storage capacity of approximately 3,070 acre -feet. An additional
water reservoir is available at Fullers Creek; however it is only available for emergency use due to
Roxboro Raw Water Intake, Page 3

Table 1. Annual average, peak month, and peak day raw water demand data and projections for the Roxboro-Person and Yanceyville-
Milton- Caswell regional water supply system.
Year ServicePopulation Annual Ave Peak Month Peak Day
Connections Served Use. MGD Use, MGD Use, MGD data source
1997
4,114
10,850
3.46
3.84
5.24
1997 Local Water Supply Plan
2001
4,560
12,300
2.90
3.50
4.14
Roxboro WTP records
2005
5,600
15,100
3.50
4.50
5.90
JNPease Assoc. projections
2010
6,800
18,400
4.20
5.45
7.15
JNPease Assoc. projections
2020
11,700
31,600
5.90
7.65
10.0
JNPease Assoc. projections
2030
19,500
52,600
8.00
10.4
13.6
JNPease Assoc. projections
2050
41,700
112,600
13.0
16.9
22.0
JNPease Assoc. projections
1997 850
2,600
0.25
0.29
-
1997 Local Water Supply Plan
2002 975
2,690
0.37
0.48
0.53
2003 Local Water Supply Plan
2010 -
3,120
0.44
0.57
0.75
2003 Local Water Supply Plan
2020 -
3,760
0.60
0.78
1.02
2003 Local Water Supply Plan
2030 -
4,540
0.83
1.08
1.41
2003 Local Water Supply Plan
Yancewille-Milto Caswell Co u* (with major expansion into Caswell County)
2050 - - - - 7.0 JNPease Assoc. estimate
Projected peak month demand is approximately 1.3 x annual average demand
Projected peak day demand is approximately 1.7 x annual average demand
This Table from the NEPA /SEPA Environmental Assessment, dated 12/14/05
Roxboro Raw Water Intake, Page 4

its limited yield and poor water duality. The Town of Yanceyville utilizes at Water Treatment
Plant that is permitted at 1 MGD. In 2002, Yanceyville had 851 service connections and served
2,490 people. Its Annual average flow was 0,76 MGD, and the peak daily flow was 0.5 MGD,
The Town of Yanceyville does not have a connection with other water distribution systems. in
addition, Caswell County has no public water system.
The Town of Milton utilizes a deep well to provide for its distribution system. The estimated
yield of the well is 150 GPM. Two shallow wells are reserved for emergency use. The only water
treatment of the groundwater prior to use is chlorination. In 1997 Milton's water system served
179 residents with approximately 124 connections. The annual average use was 0.017 MGD, and
the peak daily use was 0,029 MGD.
3.0 Growth and Water Demand Projections
Roxboro's water demand is expected to increase due to residential, industrial, and commercial
growth, In addition, Roxboro plans a gradual expansion of the water system throughout Person
County. The population of Person County grew from 30,200 in 1990 to 35,600 in 2000,
According to the US Census Bureau, the population in 2012 was 39,268. Its growth rate is
expected to increase due to the proximity of two expanding metropolitan areas with rapid growth
rates. The Research Triangle Park located to the south, and the Piedmont Triad area located to the
southwest. For water supply purposes, the growth rate used to predict the water service
population was 1.8% annual growth through year 2020. A water consumption rate of 300 gpd per
household was assumed, plus additional flow for industrial use where industrial development is
planned. The resulting potable water use projections at build -out are 12.9 MGD annual average
demand, 16.9 MGD peak month demand, and 22.0 peak day demand as shown in Table 1.
Yanceyville intends to expand its water distribution system into the surrounding portions of
Caswell County to serve the existing development that currently utilizes wells. Between 1990 and
2012 the population grew between 20,600 to 23,200, but only approximately 2,500 are served by
the public distribution system. The 2003 Local Water Supply Plan for the Town of Yanceyville
estimates that the distribution system will serve 4,300 by 2030 with an average day demand of
0.81 MGD. Assuming ratios similar to that in Roxboro's projections, the estimated peak day
demand in 2030 is 1.4 MGD. Assuming that Yanceyville serves as the potable water supplier for
Caswell County, the combined raw water need is estimated at 7.0 MGD by 2050.
The Town of Milton's population and subsequent demand is not expected to change significantly
from current conditions. The expected peak day demand is about 30 percent of the estimated well
yield. However, the effective well yield will likely decrease over time. In addition, the only water
treatment currently is chlorination. Increase in water quality criteria would require treatment that
the town is not capable of providing. Currently the town of Milton has no emergency water
source.
4.0 Dan River Intake Evaluation
The Dan River is the only large river in close proximity to Person County. Based on data fi-om the
USGS gage at Paces VA located 13 miles downstream of the intake site, the estimated mean
annual flow at the proposed intake site is 2,530 cfs (1,635 MGD). This value is based on the long
term annual mean at the gage of 2,780 cfs and adjusts for the reduction in drainage area (2328
square miles /2550 square miles). The lowest monthly mean flow recorded (1950 to present) was
Roxboro Raw Water Intake, Page 5

242,8 cfs (157 MGD) in August of 2002 (Table 2), The proposed 22 MGD maximum withdrawal
at full build -out is 14 percent of the lowest monthly mean flow.
The Dan River supports striped bass spawning; therefore, the intake structure will be required to
meet NC Wildlife Resources Commission guidelines to minimize entrainment and impingement of
fish eggs, larvae, and juveniles. The intact screen will be designed at 0.5 ft /s maximum intake
velocity. The intake will be designed to meet these criteria at the maximum withdrawal at full
build -out of 22 MGD.
5.0 Project Description
The City of Roxboro is proposing a phased development of the Dan River Raw Water intake. The
first phase would include the access road to the site, the intake channel, and a portion of the intake
structure. The proposed improvements are included in the Plans and Specifications titled
"Roxboro Raw Water intake Access Road" by Pease Engineering and Architecture and arc
included with this report. The remaining structures, pumps, raw water pumps, and appurtenances
would be constructed in the fixture to meet the projected needs. A proposed schedule of phases is
not determined at the writing of this report.
The project at full build out will include a regional raw water intake, sediment settling basin, raw
water pumping station, and raw water force mains. The total capacity of raw water pumping
station will be 22.0 MDG, based on the projected 50 year demand (Table 1). This is the basis for
the design of the channel and screening structures. However, the initial capacity that includes
adding pumping capacities will be 10.0 MGD. The current phase that is being proposed will not
include removal of any raw water from the Dan River.
The planned raw water force main for Roxboro will be 36 inches in diameter and will discharge
directly into the current reservoir at Lake Isaac Walton. This will include approximately 70,200
linear feet of force main that will be installed predominantly in an existing CP &L power line
right -of -way. The existing raw water intake at Lake Isaac Walton will pump the raw water to the
existing water treatment plant. This work is included in a later phase and not part of this
submittal,
Yanceyville will install a 24 inch raw water force main from the Dan River intake directly to the
Yanceyville water treatment plant. This pipeline will be approximately 67,000 feet long, and will
predominately be installed alongside NC -62, with a portion in Caswell County installed off-road.
This work is included in a later phase and not part of this submittal.
Milton will install a small package water treatment plant on the Dan River intake property, and
approximately 5,000 feet of potable water line to the existing distribution system. The potable
water lines will be installed along NC -62. This work is included in a later phase and not part of
this submittal.
Roxboro Raw Water Intake, Page 6

Table 2. USGS Surface-Water Monthlv Statlitics O is cubic 4
Per fys n
Monthly mean nft3Zs(calculation Period: 1458-10 01 -> 2013 -09 -301
]an Feb Mar gpr Mav 3jLo_ 3ul Aug Sec I Oct Nov M'9
1,685 �-
1,644 3,149 2,985 4,871 2,071 2,705 1,579 1,109 690.5 647.8 1,239 3,307
2,973 1,411 7,402 3,409 2,928 1,474 1,355 2,124 2J 741 998.9 1,702 1,965
3,489 ,270 4,897 2,560 1,583 1,7762 1,100 727.5 678.4 616.3 778.2 1,576 9 2,220 1,967 1
11487 3,345 3,672 4,743 2,009 1,829 1,790 3,070 1187 1,371 1,1139 1,091
1,036 2,968 2,721 4,132 1,27641 1,0443 994.2 944 1,527 1,972 1,694 2,433
4,159 3,808 3,653 7,38 5,51' 2,8'1 1,693 2,032 1,108 1,411 1,318 3, -66
3,369 9,141 179 6,410 3,625 2 3
154 1,69 1,2Z1�34 1,938 1,515 1,318 1,345
2,021 4,657 5,373 5,135 2,665 2,9141 1,776 2,213 1,196 979.2 1,283 4,087
4,740 5,009 4,155 4,748 2,174 3,9001 19 1 1,774 1,407 1,194 4,424 3,563
32421 2,9641 P,024 2,0771 1,819 1,5341 1:1 '7 827.41 1,064 1,095 1,737 1734
4,0881 4,1871 x,785 2,7231 1,3291 986.81 2,1551 1,3771 2,452 4,311 2,0 0 2,924
2,9391 4,9081 5,7701 3,1931 2,1511 1,7151 2,7681 1,6851 1,144 1,651 1,1 38 1,186
1`5731 5,3681 4,671 1,561 2,4911 1,271 898.41 1,1¢61 1,221 1,612 1,140 1,499
2,2741 2,6441 1,7 61 1,31 1 1,89 1 965.6 793.51 1, 41 819.6 791.7 823.8 3,442
3,5851 1,7691 3,3 91 1,9651 1,8681 1,6851 1,1071 949.31 775.7 1,636 2,078 1436
1,8241 2,6051 , 21 2,195 1,5701 2,7591 1,7531 2,201 1,3121 1,1931 1,162 2,7b9
2,5941 3,8691 2, 351 7.,781 2,426 1,3941 1,4491 4,6251 975.31 985.31 3,5391 1,830
2 7241 5,3431 3,6161 2 871 5,3131 2,1491 1,6861 1,752 1,4861 44131 3,4841 2,663
2141 4 �5871 2,9011 41-331 g 2621 8, 8Z� 3,3921 1,945 116841 2, 3841 4,7811 5,166
4,0821 5,9131 5,9611 5 848 3191 3,065► 2,3121 2,6181 1,4581 1,6071 1,5181 4,827
5,4431 4,09 I 3,3151 5,191 3,176 2,38 ?1 2,0401 2,¢231 4,2861 1,3371 1,3911 3,144
5,0481 4,1d 11,190 5,254' 3,023 3``1921 5,0911 1,9 81 3,6361 3,0471 2,0901 2,203
4,1591 2,7301 2,445' 2,1481 1,6841 2,z�31 1,2991 884.21 768.11 3,6451 118421 3,667
1,8151 1,7561 2,5681 3,1181 1,3701 1,1091 787.61 647.11 1,1181 2,2591 2,2401 2979
8,4071 2,6571 5,7211 6,2581 j, 5051 2, 911 2,8601 2,7051 1,8921 1,077 1,2881 3,094
7,0681 7,2531 6,3311 4,8151 3:411 2,1311 1,9911 1,4911 8,2691 5,347' 1,5501 2,459
4,07 2 4791 5,27 6,2371 3,3091 2,6451 2,1891 1,1731 875.6 1,1211 3251 1,083
1,01 '1 2, 731 1,5 0 1,8321 1,2341 1,0271 1,1381 57.71 1,543 1,1761 950.21 2,104
3,6411 4,3391 3,4 31 2,213 2,3001 4,8181 1,6521 1 6431 870.5 1,2871 1,589 3,017
1, 311 4, 96 5,5471 8,52P 3,082 2,1791 1,41241 934.21 761.2 1,351 2,625 3,671
3,501 5, �71� 7,1771 4,9631 3,8001 2,2361 3,4161 2,5091 1,1801 1,257' 1,324 1,505
2,091 ,8211 1,6 ? §1 1,3181 1,6081 110421 1,3211 4,8 1 1,3691 1,2171 5,3441 3,055
1,1031 2 1 2,4961 1,3461 1,1841 89.71 803.91 1,4 1 1,1791 78.81 1,4191 3,Q 2
2,6461 4,5 81 7,666 11,500 3,6711 2,0531 2,5271 1,1 61 4,9311 1,1841 1,6441 2,8 4
3,1361 2,2421 1,794 2,54 1 :7931 1,1401 1,5391 905.21 1,1481 1,0001 1,8041 1,296
1,5031 2,7671 5,342 2, 07j1 2 1 5,1641 4,6171 2,9391 3,4171 6,1201 2,7151 3,167
5,6001 7,0921 4,87j11 4,352221 ,4691 2,6751 2,298 1,513Q51 1,1031 6,4781 181.4f 2,4 991 3,957
X38 2, 1 2,l0 1 4,6101 4381 3, j 1 1,403 1,640) 1,4311 1,3931 5481 2,920
5,9631 3,568 11,1801 6,9561 3,0871 1,9531 2,013 1,3051 1,4321 1,0481 1,5961 2,493
3,4841 4,408 9,1¢91 3,¢481 1,9001 1;4$11 2,5681 2,4521 1,42¢1 1,1831 1,4791 1,4¢4
3,7911 2,9121 3,1 1,1961 1,8451 4 1 3 :651 1,4751 1,0491 2,7531 2,6541 1,443
5,5061 4,2871 3,6701 2,84¢1 3,4971 3,5881 1,7541 3,796110,2001 ,3021 2,7731 5,734
3,7851 4,7371 6,1951 5, 5831 3,8411 2,7791 1,7651 1,4721 1,3991 1, 3351 1,6211 1,892
6,7341 7,7681 5,6311 6,2711 5,1541 2,3111 1,5561 1,437 946.61 846,31 954.8 1,657
3,4101 2,1061 2`20 I'l 2,0891 2,781 948.91 1,2681 934.4 3,0021 1,9821 1(263 1,714
2,2051 2,6661 2,37 3031 1, 991 1,9691 1,0521 1,1431 2,0901 8.71 914.71 1,p 14
1,5151 1,4341 297 1 1,4161 2,3131 1,3541 835.41 1,1221 683.91 1.8 601.81 925
1,4201 1,1041 1,8251 1,0601 1,379 464.71 418.41 242.81 499 1,221 2,81501 3,540
2,0601 4,5461 8,3341 7,3511 4,717 8,0591 3,9821 5,2451 4,9601 2447 2,6381 4,117
2,3571 4,3711 2,2891 3,2461 2,1481 2,943 2,040 2,5391 4,5141 3,0601 3,4131 3,852
3,4331 2,7941 4,3131 3,2751 2,731 2,052 2,795 1,9351 973.41 1,9221 1,6241 3,486
3,286 2,0771 1,5101 1,509 1,256 1,961 2,155 1,0271 2,6041 1,9831 4,Ei231 2,203
6,165 2,8181 4,5201 3,559 1,60$ 1,419 1,248 804.4 1,0961 1,6781 939.1 1,164
1,439 1682 1,8221 3,2771 2,916 897.91 793.61 1,244 1,4531 686.91 913.1 2,351
2,695 1,261 3,1541 2,5651 2,417 4,3641 1,0971 947.1 873.41 900.71 6,081 6,487
6,6831 6,139 5,5931 3,5631 2,7701 1,7611 1,2471 1,767 1,2171 3,$151 },527 1,964
1,6191 1,584 4,0111 3,2631 2,4351 1,3131 1,13 1 7151 1,171 1,0471 2,282 2906
2,3821 1,8081 3,4591 2,0391 2,7461 1,5761 1,1351 954.81 1,176 1,0011 8271 1, 227
5,1211 3,0941 2,8021 2,8801 3,6581 3,3511 4,315 2,4281 1,390 1 1
YEAR
1950
1951
I 1952
I 1953
1954
1955
1956
I 1957
I 1958
I 1959
1 1960
1961
I 1962
1963
1964
I 1965
I 1966
I 1967
1968
I 1969
1970
I 1971
1972
I 1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
I 1979
I 1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
I 1985
I 1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
I 1997
I 1998
I 1999
I 2000
I 2001
2002
2003
I 2004
I 2005
2006
2007
2008
I 2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Mean of
monthly
ve
Roxboro Raw Water Intake, Page 7

47iA_
N G ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Land Quality Section
Tracy E. Davis, PE, CPM Pat McCrory, Governor
Director John E. Skvarla, III, Secretary
June 06, 2014
LETTER OF APPROVAL
City of Roxboro
ATTN: Tommy Warren
PO Box 128
Roxboro, NC 27573
RE: Project Name: Roxboro Raw Water Intake
Project ID: CASWE- 2014 -005 Acres Approved: 11.00
County: Caswell, Highway 62, Milton
River Basin: Roanoke Stream Classification: Other
Submitted By: Paul Stimpson, Pease Engineering and Architecture. PC
Date Received by LQS: May 30, 2014
Plan Type: Revised
Dear Mr. Warren:
This office has reviewed the subject erosion and sedimentation control plan. We find the plan to be
acceptable and hereby issue this Letter of Approval. The enclosed Certificate of Approval must be
posted at the job site. This plan approval shall expire three (3) years following the date of approval.
if no land- disturbing activity has been undertaken, as is required by Title 15A NCAC 4B .0129.
Please be aware that your project will be covered by the enclosed NPDES Construction Stormwater
General Permit NCG010000. Please become familiar with all the requirements and conditions of
this permit in order to achieve compliance.
Title 15A NCAC 4B .0118(a) requires that a copy of the approved erosion control plan be on file at
the job site. Also, this letter gives the notice required by G.S. 113A- 61.1(a) of our right of periodic
inspection to insure compliance with the approved plan.
Winston -Salem Regional Office
585 Waughtown Street, Winston - Salem, North Carolina 2 7107 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

Letter of Approval
Project: Roxboro Raw Water Intake
June 06, 2014
Page 2 of 2
North Carolina's Sedimentation Pollution Control Act is performance- oriented, requiring protection
of existing natural resources and adjoining properties. If, following the commencement of this
project, it is determined that the erosion and sedimentation control plan is inadequate to meet the
requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 (North Carolina General Statute
113A -51 through 66), this office may require revisions to the plan and implementation of the
revisions to insure compliance with the Act.
Acceptance and approval of this plan is conditioned upon your compliance with Federal and State
water quality laws, regulations, and rules. In addition, local city or county ordinances or rules may
also apply to this land - disturbing activity. This approval does not supersede any other permit or
approval.
Please note that this approval is based in part on the accuracy of the information provided in the
Financial Responsibility Form, which you provided. You are requested to file an amended form if
there is any change in the information included on the form. In addition, it would be helpful if you
notify this office of the proposed starting date for this project. Please notify us if you plan to have a
preconstruction conference.
Your cooperation is appreciated.
Sincerely,
Sue White
Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section
Enclosures: Certificate of Approval
NPDES Permit
cc: Paul Stimpson, Pease Engineering and Architecture. PC
121 West times Street, Suite B, Salisbury, NC 28144

CERTIFICATE OF PLAN APPROVAL
;TATP
QunM Vol,:
1
D
a
J
The posting of this certificate certifies that an erosion and sedimentation control plan has been
approved for this project by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 113A — 57 (4) and 113A — 54 (d) (4) and
North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15A, Chapter 4B.0107 (c). This certificate must be
posted at the primary entrance of the job site before construction begins and until establishment of
permanent groundcover as required by North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15A, Chapter
4B.0127 (b).
gc> R�Uj QhTE(Z'* I NotNtzan:
2k=44 . is Project Name and Location QkZ "
r.
/., N1 • Now
(as t 4 ,�
Date of PlairApproval ��� klmks- Regional Engineer
NCDENR

SWEPT Project Detail For Project: 14 -00509
Project Status: REVIEW COMPLETE System Status: OPEN
8/5/2014
Project Type: WATER TREATMENT Permit ID: 14 Account
No:
TC - PHONED /E- MAILED COMMENTS
FACILITY
WF - WSMP ON FILE - COMPLETE
7/18/2014
PWS Number: NCO273010 PWS Name: ROXBORO,CITYOF Customer No:
7/18/2014
City 1: ROXBORO
6/27/2014
CHANGED PROJECT
District: County: PERSON
OPENED PROJECT
Fed Type: C
Project Description: ROXBORO RAW WATER INTAKE STRUCTURE & GRADING
6/23/2014
Permit Required: ❑ Issued: Inspection Required: ❑
Completed:
Cap Part 1 Rcvd: ❑ Cap Part 2 Rcvd: ❑ Cap Construction: ❑
Cap Operation: ❑
Remarks: 8/5/2014 - RJD - "NO OBJECTION" LETTER ISSUED FOR THIS STAGE OF THE PROJECT.
Reviewers
Name Title
Phone
DICKIE, RICHARD REVIEW ENGINEER NC PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SECTION
919 - 707 -9074
CHOHAN, SIRAJ REVIEW ENGINEER NC PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SECTION
919 - 707 -9070
Consulting Firms and Contacts
Office EO
Phone
Fax
Address City
ST Zip
Name Contact
PEASE ENGINEERING & ARCHITECTURE - SALISBU EO -01260
704 - 560 -8514
121 WEST INNES STREET SUITE B SALISBURY
NC 28144
PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SECTION -PLAN REVIEW EO -00002
919 - 707 -9100
1634 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH
NC 27699 -1634
Project Events
Event Date
RE - REVIEW COMPLETE
8/5/2014
CR - REPLY TO COMMENTS RECVD
8/4/2014
TC - PHONED /E- MAILED COMMENTS
7/18/2014
WF - WSMP ON FILE - COMPLETE
7/18/2014
DP - PULLED FOR REVIEW
7/18/2014
CHANGED PROJECT
6/27/2014
CHANGED PROJECT
6/25/2014
OPENED PROJECT
6/23/2014
APPLICATION RECEIVED
6/23/2014
Project Checks
Number Amount Date
85462 $75.00 6/23/2014
Project Applicant
Name: THOMAS WARREN, ASSISTANT CITY MGR
Address Line One: CITY OF ROXBORO
Address Line Two: PO BOX 128
City: ROXBORO
Comments
"NO OBJECTION" LETTER ISSUED FOR THIS STAGE OF THE PROJECT.
FROM WATER SUPPLY PLANNING BRANCH
TO WATER SUPPLY PLANNING BRANCH
WSMP 00 -01849
RJD
REVIEWER 'SCH OHAN' TO 'RD ICKIE' BYSCHOHAN
CONSULTING FIRM'EO- 00002' TO'EO- 01260' BY TKAUFMAN
CREATED ON 6/23/2014 3:53:10 PM BY PJOHNSON
PROJECT OPENED
Name Status
CITY OF ROXBORO PENDING
State: NC Zip: 27573
© GEC 2005
Page 1 of 1

' f
V i 0
1
4�
'a
4N
mul
jr( " Existing CA �
TT
•
Proposed CA
e �-
11 O 32 "N �� r
PF
Od
r
too
1 r�
011
� 'l \C�p4yighr�,�2(
,,
,a