20061416 Ver 1_401 Application_20060806

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Todd Tugwell
6508 Falls of Neuse Rd, Suite 120
Raleigh, N.C. 27615
August 31, 2006
S&EC Project # 8126.W2
NC Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
2 0 0 6 1 4 1 6
From: Debbie Edwards
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Booth Mountain
Pittsboro, Chatham County, NC
On behalf of the owners, MacGregor Development Company (Attn: Jerry Radman), please find attached a complete
application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) and the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NC-DWQ) that the activities proposed below may
precede utilizing Nationwide Permits 12 & 39. Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or
require additional information.
PROTFCT CI IMMARY
Project Name Booth Mountain
Project Type Residential Development
Owner / Applicant MacGregor Development Company
Count Chatham
Nearest Town Pittsboro
Waterbod Name Herndon Creek
Basin / Sub-basin 03-06-05
Index Number 16-41-4-1-(0.5)
Class WS-IV; NSW
IMPACT Ct IMMARY
Attachments:
Pre-contraction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Agent Authorization
USGS Vicinity Map
Wake County Soil Survey
Impervious Calculations
Data sheets
Impact Maps & Overall Site Plan
$475.00 Water Quality Certification Fee
0 Y4yY jhIn?IS?H?t,
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
D
*Please Note that only 94 linear feet of important/perennial stream is pro d to be pe agfnl; ,acted
?U.6 ,
Stream Impact (acres): 0.0314
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.249
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres): 0.2804
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Office Use Only: Fonn Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 2 0 0 6 1 4 1 6
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 12 & NWP 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: El M
II. Applicant Information "j LS @
LN
1. Owner/Applicant Information AU6 9 ZA6
N
Mailing Address: Attn: Jerry Radman
201 Shannon Oaks Circle Suite 201
CaU, NC 27511
Telephone Number: 919-465-3312 Fax Number: 919-465-3383
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Debbie Edwards
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number: 919-846-5900 Fax Number: 919-846-9467
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Pagel of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Booth Mountain
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 9785-44-846
n/a
4. Location
County: Chatham Nearest Town: Pittsboro
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Booth Mountain
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The property is located on
the north side of Jack Bennett Road (SR1717) approximately 2000 feet west of its
intersection with Big Woods Road (SRI 716).
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.8287 ON 79.0523 °W
6. Property size (acres): +/-314
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Herndon Creek 16-41-4-1-(0.5), WS-IV; NSW
8. River Basin: Cape Fear (03-06-05)
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is heavily wooded with some existing logging roads
present. The general land use in the vicinity consists of residential development and a school
Page 2 of 9
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project is for a residential subdivision with impacts resulting from the
installation of roads, sanitary sewer force main and an 8'wooden bridge trail, these impacts
are necessary for accessing the entire property. Heavy equipment typically used for road
construction and excavation will be employed for this project.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work is to meet the
demand of additional housing needed in the area. Proposed impacts to jurisdictional areas are
needed in order to gain access to the entire property.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
On July 24, 2004, S&EC conducted a detailed wetland delineation. On September 22, 2004, Mr.
Todd Tugwell of the USACE conducted a site visit to verify jurisdictional wetlands (Action ID
200421535).
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Although the western portion of the project area indicates "Future Development", the extent
of all impacts have been shown and requested within this application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 3 of 9
I . Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed permanent impacts
include 94 linear feet of important/perennial stream, 232 linear feet of
unimportant/intermittent stream and 0.025 acre of jurisdictional wetlands for road crossings
The proposed temporary impacts include 33 linear feet of important/perennial stream for the
construction of the Sanitary Sewer Force Main and a road crossing, 10 linear feet of
unimportant/intermittent stream for a construction corridor of a road crossing and 0.224 acres
of jurisdictional wetlands for the Sanitary Sewer Force Main crossing.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
es/no linear feet
Crossing 1B Permanent-Road Emergent No 0' 0.025
(NWP 39) crossing/culvert
Crossing 1 B Temporary-Road
(NWP 39) Crossing/construction Emergent No 0' 0.014
easement
Crossing 2 Temporary-Utility Beaver Impoundment-
(NWP 12) Crossing & Walking mixed herbaceous & No 0' 0.210*
Trail* forested
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.249
* Please note: the 20' maintenance corridor for Sanitary Sewer Force Main is included in the amount of proposed
temporary impacts. The 20' maintenance corridor will not generate a permanent "loss of waters".
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 9.132 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Intermittent? t? Before Impact linear feet acres
Crossing IA UT to Herndon Permanent-Road Unimportant '

(NWP 39)
Creek
crossing/culvert
/Intermittent -2' 104 0.005
CrossinglB UT to Herndon Permanent-Road Important/
'
(NWP 39) Creek crossing/culvert Perennial 2' - 6' 94 0.011

Crossing 1 B
UT to Herndon Temporary-Road
Important/

'
(NWP 39) Creek crossing/construction perennial -2 10 0.0005
easement
Page 4 of 9
o ?"

Crossing 2 Temporary-Utility
Important)

'
'
(NWP 12) I1cmdon Creek Crossing & Walking Perennial 4
- 5 23' 0.002
Trail
Crossing 3 UT to Herndon Permanent-Road Unimportant -4' 128' 0
012
(NWP 39) Creek crossing/culvert /Intermittent .
3 UT to Herndon Temporary-Road Unimportant
'
(NWP 39) Creek crossi
struction /Intermittent 10 0.0009
easem
easement
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 369 0.0314
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number
(if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
indicate on ma ocean, etc. acres
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Open Water Impact (acres) N/A
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the ro'ect:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.0314
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.249
Open Water Impact acres : 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.2804
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 369
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
There are no isolated wetlands that exist onsite: therefore there are no nronosed impacts to
isolated wetlands for this project.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
Page 5 of 9
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The site is a 314 acre site with Hemdon Creek bisecting the property; however permanent
stream impacts have been avoided to Herndon Creek. The only proposed permanent impact to
an important/perennial stream is impact 1 B, this road crossing is proposed on an existing
culverted log iging road therefore minimizing the potential impacts to this perennial stream. This
proposed impact is also unavoidable due to the fact that this perennial stream runs parallel to
Lystra Church Road and is the only access point from a state road on the north side of Herndon
_Creek. Impact 1 A is to an unimportant/intermittent stream that is also unavoidable due to its
existing location under Lystra Church Road, to move the spine Road to the east or the west
would only increase the perennial stream impacts for Impact 1 B. Impact 3 is also to an
unimportant/intermittent stream. This proposed road crossing is necessary to connect the east
and west side of the development on the north side of Herndon Creek, this location has been
designed because of the topography associated with "Booth Mountain". Booth Mountain is
located to the north-northwest of this proposed road crossing. The only additional impacts
associated with this proposed project are temporary, Impact 2 is a Sanitary Sewer Force Main
that is proposed to cross Herndon Creek and the beaver impoundment. A wood bridge has been
proposed in this same location, eliminating the need for additional impacts to this wetland
system and creek. The wood bridge will utilize post holes similar to that of a pier, which will
allow the wetland to remain functional. All additional streams and wetlands have been avoided:
deed restrictions will be put in place for these remaining streams and wetlands as well. This
includes the unimportant/intermittent stream within lot 85, a building footprint has been
provided for this lot (see sheet Booth Mountain location map 5) and no impacts to this stream
are planned.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
Page 6 of 9
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strtngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Because permanent impacts to important/perennial streams are only 94 linear feet and
permanent impacts to jurisdictional wetlands are to be 0.025 acres we do not believe
mitigation should be required. There was also additional clarification requested from Todd
Tugwell with the USACE on 08/30/06 about the maintenance corridor associated with the
Sanitary Sewer Force Main. It was his interpretation that because the majority of the beaver
impoundment was herbaceous and a minimal amount forested (the out perimeter of
impoundment) that because there was not to be a permanent "loss of waters" only some loss
of function (removal of trees within maintenance corridor), mitigation should not be required.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
Page 7 of 9
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Rnnd Crnacinv #1
Zone*
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 N/A 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 N/A 1.5 N/A
Total N/A N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
Page 8 of 9
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
The percent impervious for the entire project is expected to be approximately 23.8 % (see
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
A wastewater treatment plant and spray irrigation ystem is to be constructed for this
development. The treatment area is located on the east and west sides of the spine Road just
south of Road A and Road B.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
We have reviewed the "DRAFT Internal Policy Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality
Certification and Isolated Wetland Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water
Quality on October 3, 2002, version 1.6. The draft states that most residential subdivisions are
unlikely to cause cumulative impacts. Booth Mountain does not meet any of the three criteria of
private projects that can clearly result in cumulative impacts We anticipate that you will advise
us if a qualitative or quantitative impact analysis is required.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
V
Page 9 of 9
1/15/2004 08:46 FAX 4 CORPS RALEIGH 0 008
89/14/2004 05:64 919-465-3383 MACGREGOR DEV PAGE 02
uuiluieuw us;Z4 FAb Z002/002
Address
Phone 1
L4 ' s.2.?
Project Nan*/Dpsmron-* TI
Date;
l/U/ U5? '
The Deparl?tettt of ft Army
US. Army Cops of Engkweft, Wiluingtm Mb ict
P.O. Box ism
WguVng oN NC 284M
Attn:
field Office:
Re.- WedAn& Relsted Consulting and Peraiimng
To Whom it imy Coca ;
L the current owner, hereby deAgmte and authorize Soil & EnVironmenUl Consultants, PA to
fret i11 sty bdmV as any agent in the prooessing of pftudt applications, to furnish upon request
Supplemental information m support of appamtlans, ow. fr m t1-ds day forw& rd. The ---_ day of
Thu notidcadon superaedaa any previous correspondence cmuenihg the aimt for this project,
Nt)'><iCE, This authorization, for Xebft OW pcvfessignA courtesy,teasomq, is valid ally for
You should call S&BC
gv"remtent offidals to eAter the property when a:Zgnature
to arrange a We meeting prior to vieitlrtg t1w site. Ptint Property Owner's NavW Cc: Mr. John Domey c.01 Mr. Todd Preuninger
NCDENR - DWQ soil & Envlrorrotiental Consultants, PA
2321 Crabtt+ee 130aievvxd
Rawgh, NC 27604
Suile C

Environmental Consultants, PA
Rod * UGO, Nocds Cam io 27614 - Phaw; (919)146-59M - Fix: (919) 64&9467
WWW.S*AdEC-wm
AGENT AU'ITi1Q MATiON FORM
ZTV /
CoWW' NC 266 4617-e t.ew mWe pdW '
rr wx; (704) 7m.M Ogahatvv' Ne. 27453
Rpu [phone] )'hone:. (W) 440-02,44
Sam; 0362 UO-92U

O 11 d, it INV?
?( /
0? J450 l?. ?_? ? l o.
•
? IL/1 ?/ ? %F
lL
?
o , - o • I
n
? 1 ? c? ?• 11 0
500 I ,? ? r

o O r = '+
r o -
o ?
` , o
a cs _
7
5 300 ? o -',* E? ? o

7 N
M
eBf
- . 771
u• - 7 -
_

? = 0 4
r Z5
30 'S

\? E
? w'J

Project
8126
w1 Scale:
1":2000 Figure 1- USGS Map
.
Project Date: Boothe Mountain Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mgr.: SC 71512004
Ma
G
D
l
t
11010 Raven Ridge Rd. - Raleigh NC 27614
c
regor
eve
opmen
Chatham County, NC [phone] • [phone]
F
i SandEC.com
Web Page: www
arr
ngton Quadrangle .
1993

Project Scale: Figure 2 - Soil Survey
e126.wt :2000
Project Date: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mgr.: SC 71512004 Boothe Mountain
MacGregor Development 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
Chatham County, NC [phone] • [phone]
Chatham County Soil Survey Web Page: www.SandEC.com
Sheets H1, H2,11,12
f
Maximum Potential Impervious Calculation (Booth Mountain)
Residential Lots Impervious Area Total
Total 739 10,000 s.f. 7,390,000 s.f
Item Impervious Area
1. Homesites
Sub-total 7,390,000 s.f.
2. Roadways
Sub-total 1,818,946 s.f.
3. Water Booster Pump Station
Sub-total 4,000 s.f.
4. Amenity
Sub-total 161,172 s.f.
5. Sidewalks & Trails
Sub-total 451,912 s.f.
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 9,826,030 s.f.
TOTAL TRACT AREA 948.46 Ac.
41,314,918 s.f.
IMPERVIOUS PERCENTAGE 23.8 %
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Boothe Mountain/S&EC#8126.W1 (Wetland) Date: 8/16/04
Applicant/Owner: County: Chatham
Investigator: DG State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Emergent
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: 10'W of flag 634
If needed, explain on reverse.) 1 11
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acer rubrum Tree FAC 9.
2. Smilax rotundifolia Vine FAC 10.
3. Quercus phellos Sapling FACW- 11.
4. Quercus albs Sapling FACU 12.
5. Microstegium vimineum Grass FAC+ 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 80%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
_ Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
x Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) x Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 6 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 6 (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Project/Site: Boothe Mountain/S&EC#8126.W1 (Wetland) Plot ID: 10' W of flag 634
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Well-drained
(Series and Phase): Wedowee Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Kanhapludult Confirm Mapped Type? _ Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-4 10YR 6/1 Clay loam
4-12+ 10YR 6/1 10YR 6/6 Common / distinct Clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
IL-
11
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? x Yes No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? x Yes No x Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? x Yes No
Remarks:
IL
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Boothe Mountain/S&EC#8126.W1 (Upland) Date: 8/16/04
Applicant/Owner: County: Chatham
Investigator: DG State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Hardwood
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: 20' E of flag 634
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Carya glabra Tree FACU 9.
2. Polystichum acrostichoides Herb FAC 10.
3. Liriodendron tulipifera Tree FAC 11.
4. Acer rubrum Tree FAC 12.
5. Cornus florida Tree FACU 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 60%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
_ Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
_ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: n/a (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: n/a (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: n/a (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Project/Site: Boothe Mountain/S&EC#8126.W1 (Upland) Plot ID: 20' E of flag 634
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Well-drained
(Series and Phase): Wedowee Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Kanhapludult Confirm Mapped Type? _ Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-4 10YR 4/3 Clay loam
4-12+ 10YR 5/4 Clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
IL
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? x Yes No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No Yes x No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
IL
fil,
CHAPEL
o Booth Mountain
FILL
Location Map
,
cue -:T 71
,I
_ Wetland/Channel Impacts
s E AugUSt 29, 2006
:= V
_ to o, {
ROW k
? - i
?-r 1
VICINITY MAP
--
_ _? - - v A v v ` , A fMPORTANT
1 \ \
_ vv \
v v v II ??, l? _ /'
- Pt NIA
_ I
\ \ Orb \ CHANNEL / j /,-
1
5 PI N E ROAD
--
1 I
? I
1
I I
1 ,
^p
0 ^
-
?L
-
EXITING
?--- pi ? P
30 LF 8" CM
^
- \ ?.-
PROPOSED I I I I I v `;. I, ;?
R?-USE I1 c? I 1 1 1 I ??':'``_ UN RANi% I I/;
I t
IRRfGATtON - ?? I f \\ 1 1 I \ JF(TERMI'Fi?NT I 1 1
POND -- I I \ 1 1 I \
C ?? ---- ?A? I V 1 1, V CHANNEL l 1 1
L9CaE n \ I ?
N D
D n
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND
Irs.
,?yy
Soil t Environmental Conwltan"V&T e111Q AW IVna.'I?
1010 Raven Ridge Road ?""
Raleigh, NC 27614
Phone [phone]
JURISDICTIONAL STREAM
100' 0 100' 200'
SCALE: I `= 100' (Hartz.)
? E- Group, mc.
OWN=
LAND PLANNING
CIVIL ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
11000 Regency Parkway, Suite 410, Cary, N.C. 2751 1
NORTH voice [phone]- fax [phone]
CHAPEL
Booth Mountain
ILL
UNlk;, ; -= Location Mai 2 3
iN TE ? -
Ipacts
. ' ' etlandI hannel m
-
SITE-
•? , , '; ?% /? . August 29, 2006
.
QJi
.
.
.
? .paDNa_ «- . '
VICINITY MAP ----
i 1 ! ! / ....
PROPOSED AKY SEWEa/ -
PUMPSTA/fl
/! I 0 /
I ,
14
0
A C4.)
OPINE/ ROAD
I I °
1
5
CA)
Q) 1
I I iv i 5 2 , 5 I, // i' I
it 11
82 I
\? \1 11 \\ II 150 ! ; !! I coo
00, v I I W ??! o
00 ?po
40
LEGEND
L WETLAND CEGro U p inc.
?JURI5DICTIONA
LAND PLANNING
Al,r zaps - - JURISDICTIONAL5TREAM 100' 0 100' 200' CIVIL ENGINEERING
Soil 4 Emronmen wl?r CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
010 Raven ! 11000 Regency Parkway, Suite 410, Cary, N.C. 2751 1
Raleigh, NC 27614 'fin "+'y`.JCn
Phone [phone] SCALE: I"= 1 00' (hoPIZ.) NORTH voice [phone]- fax [phone]
?a
CHAPEL I ----
Boot Mountain
4 HL - /
138
Location Map
otz- ,; -- Wetland/Channel Impacts "OIL
1139 - 140 I August 29, 2006
/ 41 0
174
172 ,-?.. /-,09z- V42 -
LWE 175 VICINITY MAP
•
171-
-17-(; 0 ,,-
.
.
I \ \ ?? -
V 1 7
J ' R1 DtCtIaNA L
- -
.
.
.
.
V,
170
v , 43 N? 1. 1. 1. ITT
.
\ 144 p
Q ?
45 .
\\ \\ o _ - / 0 3 2006
"ON X
ATERUWAUTY
s.
I ?,0 ,?jo?TS1R?T
0 I A\ 179 `ti; ; ; ; , EDGE OF WATER I
a , IMPOUNDMENT (TYP.)
a
i 67 \ ,r QUO; . . . . . . . . . .
.
%\\ \
.
.
x, V
.
.
.
< Q
61165 PROPOSED BUILDING
c ,' t PROPOSED N 41ly SMR: '
q; ?uMsrg,?N FOOTPRINT t.
LEGEND Q::?0-
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND
----------------- -
Sod d Environmental Consultants
11010 Raven Podge Road
Ralegh, NC 27614
Phone[phone]
JURISDICTIONAL STREAM
100' 0 100' 200
SCALE: I "= 100' (Hor1z.)
\[L \ r o u p 9 inc.
Now=
LAND PLANNING
CIVIL ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
11000 Regency Parkway, 5mte 410, Cary, N.C. 2751 1
NORTH voice [phone]- fax [phone]
CRAPE
/Jt , /
- Booth Mountain
Location Map 5
OWED,/BUILD,INCB
PRO
-- - -- v l I I I I etlan lChannel Impacts
SITE '? OAP L#T/ I W d -
r? ?? I 1 I
r?
- I /? I I I i I August 29, 2006
I
\ \ \ IMf ORTANT'J f 1 I 11 \ . 1 ?_,
XE I 1 I INTE ITTENT I I 1 \• \ 1 1 \ \
`? ??? \V I II CHANMEL 11 \\ 11 1? \v ?? ?\ ?? 1\ ,?' \ ,? ?\ \V A
VICINITY MAP ?/ 1\ 1 \ \ ?\ ?? A 1 \'? ?? A 1 V It i V A A
v v
o N,
.
PROPOSED 5A ARY SEWEa, - - - - , , \ \ \ \
OW ouMP sTA/fI ?00
?
o v
1pb
1 o ?` v v?
/ / / i --_ - -- RIsulctloWaL wt, 85,
NDS
_i
I \ ?
CA)
---
40
,A W ti
?' i I v\
1
/ , -- 66,
W
/ X2/
?.
50 g?
r
CA) I I o v ?-
C)
I
w o I I\ v
LEGEND
51 t Envirow rental Comultant5
010 Raven Ridge Road
Ralegh, NC 27614
Phone [phone]
JURI5DICTIONAL WETLAND r O LI p' inc.
LAND A?NPLANNING
JURI5DICTIONAL5TREAM ioo' o loo' 200' CIVIL ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
11000 Regency Parkway, 5mte 410, Cary, N.C. 27511
SCALE: I "= 100' (Horiz) NORTH voice [phone]- fax [phone]

LEGEND CROSSING - I A

...................

..................
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND IMPACTED CHANNEL
...................
LENGTH:
415

z

?
®PERMANENT IMPACT PERMANENT: 103.72 LF.
00 L
F
0
RARY
T n
-
•
:1 Z w a
.
.
.
:
EMPO
-----
} -
- + o

0 Z w
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA:
PERMANENT: 205.71 S.F. 0.005 AC GO' P4W 5od4EnwonmentalCon5ultants

Road
a
I 1 0 1 0 Raven Wd QZ ?g
\ n
NEW 24 LF 24 RCP 4
TEMPORARY: 0.00 S.F. 0.000 AC EXI TING 14
Raleigh, NC 276
(919) 84G-5900
Ph Z 3
INV IN=393. 10
? \ 410 G DE 2 one p
1
\
I NV OUT=392.62 IMPACTED WETLAND 6 B -
Z
PERMANENT: 0.00 S.F. 0.000 AC
\
+ Q Z H
J 0
TEMPORARY: 0.00 S.F. 0.000 AC
\
\ I - +
\ \ OPOSE
UNIMPORTANT /
\
\ ?
1
`
INTERMITTENT 405 P OPOSED
;
Z
CHANNEL l _ - - a

0P05E
--
F-? -
W
I
AILKI
" \
\ \ I 1
EXIST. 90.5 LF 18
RC 400 1
1 INV IN=396.92 -
1 INV OUT=393.73
69 L.F. 60" RCP I I??fF? 1
U
INV IN=393.10 1 NEW 80 F
INV IN=392.62
JURISDICTIONAL ?F\ RcP 80 LF
@ 2. 24" RCP
a% U
INV OUT=391.50
80
INV OUT=390 C
.
WETLANDS (fYP.) 1 395 ? z

l 1 g
a IMPACT 1 A
IN
=393. 101

`
-- INb` - 2:62
?
1

1
PROPOSED
24 LF 2
RCP

44\4.

=390.

01
O
1
• CONCRETE
?
•
, ,
! 390

1 HEADWALL
1 a° U

Z
. 9'L x 5'W x 23" D
"
" I- -EXI
ST TING
AM U
RIP RAP
B
. . . . . . . . S 5?' x 5'W
L 23" D o S
IMPORTANT . . . . . . . .
1 c s e PRAP PA D 4-?
PERENNIAL
! . 385
CHANNEL , , , , I ?? ?/ D
D U
o
b~ S
/? G 3 ? 2006
PROPOSED
R06AUTY
IE
-
1 CONCRETE g 50 L.F, RIP-RAP APRON 0+ 00 U, -
OtA
-
1 HEADWALL ro CLASS "2" @ 30" THICK KTWOS
ROADWAY CR OSS SECTION
IMPACT 115 ! I
ACT 18
HORIZONTAL SCALE 1 "=50' 08/29/OG
T
! 1 VERTICAL SCALE I" =5'

1 50' 25' 0 50' 100'
EXISTING 30 LF
81, C
IN
1 1
1 NV. IN = 393.58

?

0
1
INV. OUT = 393.09 SCALE: 1 " = 50' l) z
AP
I "l

LEGEND CROSSING - I B

IMPACTED CHANNEL

JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND LENGTH:
................... 41 5

J

0

AN `-

Z Z
Q
PERMANENT: 93.99 L.F.
?
® PERMANENT IMPACT TEMPORARY: 10.03 LF. - - - Z w

EMPORARY IMPACT AREA:
PERMANENT: 485.02 S.F.
--
- ?- -

B 2

B
---?-- -
-
----

ail EnwonmentalCOn5AWt5
Road
R z<

' e
Z ?g
? Z z
Z
NEW 24 LF 24" RCP
TEMPORARY: 20.06 S.F. Rzc
h NC zi6 144
9 ?
ne [phone]
Ph G <$
E
Z
G
INV IN=393. 10

\ \ 410

OPOSE
o
? w

L
Lj
`
INV OUT=392.62 IMPACTED WETLAND
\ \ ` BADE Z? z
-
\ PERMANENT: 1,082.72 S.F. 0.025 AC
014 AC
0
627
F
` TEMPORARY
26 S CONC + } \ U uu
.
.
.
:
.
` .
H -ADWALL
I
- -
-}
-
- -

\ UNIMPORTANT / oPOSE
` INTERMITTENT 405
W ATERLINE
CHANNEL
` CON .
HEA W L
"
RC
EXIST. 90.5 LF 18 400

INV IN=396.92 ?

-- i

-

-
-- -
-
?
I INV OUT=393.73 EXIS ING 1
-

60" RCP I
F
69 L GFZA

- 711f

}
U
.
.
INV IN=393
10 I
V
0 _ I - - U
?
.
392.62
N
N
JURISDICTIONAL INV OUT=391
50 -- s - ?
.
80
INV OUT
390
=
.
WETLANDS OYP.) 395 _ _ @ 2 p E Z
I - _ _ I CD
IMPACT I A IN /. IN - ?.?
l '
3 93. 10
r 1;57) 0
PROPOSED - - --
• CONCRETE

. I HEADWALL 390
U
- - N
- } } - 0
. 9'Lx5'Wx23"D
_

. S "B" RIP RAP - 1- -
5
L.F. C
S "2.. U s

IMPORTANT
PERENNIAL

1
A
E 385

0
m
??? v

S
NN
L
CH
a` g p'? G ? 1.2p06
7
PROPOSED -jQAL;
CONCRETE -g 50 L.F. RIP-RAP APRON
0+
00
1 HEADWALL °° CLA55 "2" @ 30" THICK
I ROADWAY CR 055 SECTION
IMPACT 1 B i
I ACT I B HORIZONTAL SCALE 1 "=50' 08/29/0@
1 1 VERTICAL 5CALE I" =5'

50' 25' 0 50' 100'
EXISTING 30 LF
18" CMP
t INV. IN = 393.58

O
INV. OUT = 393.09 SCALE: 1 " = 50' z
1

CROSSING - 2

' - IMPACTED CHANNEL
LENGTH z
:
PERMANENT: 0.00 L.F.
Q Z w?

27
?- --- -?? ?/ TEMPORARY: 23.1 G L.F.
AREA: Z W < o
W<r"
O Z
0 PERMANENT: 0.00 S.F.
Soil 4 Enmronmental Consukants
1010 Raven Pwd
e Road _
? Z
(?

- - / g
TEMPORARY: 107.07 S.F.
Raleigh, NC 27G 14 $
L Z - ;
4
-
' Phone (919) 84G-5900
IMPACTED WETLAND 5
W 2
F
SAN. SEWER ,
- PRO. 4
--
FORCE MAIN

PERMANENT: 0.00 S.F. 0.000 AC
0.1 12 AC
F
888
08 S
TEMPORARY: 4 _j

Z? z -
g
-
0
. . . . . . .
- .
.
.
, z§
?
.............
- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
20' MAINTENANCE CORRIDOR -
-
j, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PERMANENT: 4,275.13 S.F. 0.098 AC
-- /CO ..................

. SAN. SSE NER- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. -FORCE MAIN . . . . . . . . . ' . . . '
. - ' CROSSING
. . . . . . . . . .
- - -
F
_ 8' WIDE
- - - - - - - - - - - .
......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * . _
_ - -
. . . . . . . . .-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.

TIMBERS
TREATED
" RAILING
4-0
1,
1
Y

?
.

. . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . _
(TYP) 8
O
-0
.C (T
P)

f 43
•
• / / WOODEN BRIDGE SECTION
.•..•....... .....•.•.... .. ...

•
•
•
•
•
•
@ WETLAND CROSSING
O
o
.
.
. .
.
.
.
. . . . . .
. • -
. . .•.•.? •./• NTS
?%V9
D N r
O LJ
•
. .
/ p L4--?
.. •
................. . 3 1 X006 U
s
•
/ / /
• A? r 0

. /
. .
FORCE
- ' / CROSSI
N R gl?Aurf

` Fit NK
0

-N
C

S
/
• Wwo #
....
.
• • •
/
LEGEND
\ ?\ -•?-.,.•! JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND

JUP,15DICT(ONAL STREAM
PERMANENT IMPACT

TEMPORARY IMPACT 0812906

/ GO' 30' 0 GO' 120'
WD ""SAN. SEWER
/ / ? I n
(
FORCE MAIN O
- - - /
0 SCALE: I " = GO' z

LEGEND
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND
® PERMANENT IMPACT
® TEMPORARY IMPACT
CR055ING - 3
IMPACTED CHANNEL
LENGTH:
PERMANENT: 127.79 L.F.
TEMPORARY: 10.00 LF.
AREA:
PERMANENT: 51 1.18 5.F.
TEMPORARY: 40.01 5.F.
IMPACTED WETLAND
PERMANENT: 0.00 5.F. 0.000 AC
TEMPORARY: 0.00 5.F. 0.000 AC
I_
300
295
290
285
28C
27!
27C
5otl 6 Eroronmental C0n5"Itant5
1010 Raven PJdge Road
Ralayh, NC 27614
Phone [phone]
0+00
ROADWAY CR055 SECTION
APPROX. STA. 12+93 ROAD "G"
PROFILE HORIZONTAL SCALE 1 "=50'
PROFILE VERTICAL SCALE I" =5'
50' 25' 0 50' 100'
SCALE: 1 50'
Q ??w
ZWQ
o zZ_R
gzo
U
? a?
W j
?z
U z z
? U

m

U O
?
m s

4
? s
U
1 08/29/OG
poi
- - - - W
R~ ' Q
I
I ~ I - T- i I _ I / ~ I L E D _ E N ;103; I
' I ~ ~ ~ ~ I
~ ~ , ! 104 ti ~ i JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND i I I
' ~ ~ ; 63 I ! 62 ~ I
. 0.1 ' - - ~ - JURISDICTIONAL STREAM "a I
;102; ~ I
~ X105' I I i
% I I N
1 Z 0 I
I ~ I Future Lots T _ I -
YP _ 64 ; I I - W
- I~---___ I I - i i f _ I ~
;1011 ~ ~ • ~ I I I
I l (106;,
I ~ 65 I . I / I / ;107; I
i i i i I
i / i I - ~ ,l I ,~1 I I
i ;100, / I I / I I
/ I I i 66 ;
I / _ / ~ I I I
/ i 61 ~ I - I / --i --i I I ~ Future Lots T
/ I I / r•., I I ~ ~ , ~ 67 , I ' YP I
~ I o
I I / r-~ i z 1
-------------I ; bo ~ , _---^T ~
I , I / / ~ ~ _ - _Y----- i ~ i
/ / ' I I I ~ ' I / / y I 1 i I ,
,i U I ~ C 't
~1 i ~1 ~ z -
I 94 / 1 95 % 97 / ~ I I 98; \ '7 Z
~ x'71``' I / / ~ ; 71 ! ; 72 ! i 11 ~ Z ~ ~ m U~
j % _ •1 I ~ 170 ; / ~ 10,E ~ Z ~ v
/ R d \ _ lc ' I , ' i Z "m i73? Z um
~ ~ - Z 'm i ~ Q _o
~ a/ / ~
j toa ~ .J, ~ ~ N~
i' 126 125 124 ~ ; 57 Q \ ~ / I
I m / \ • at j m
i i ! a • . , _ Q
l ~ a- N _ 110 ~ 56 ~ ©a'' , 75 12 ! r ~ a i ~ ~ i- ~
r 79 ; R _ . • Z o -
n , / / / iu r ,7a'
111 ' / \ J U u ~ - \ bI
119 - / i 111 ~ ~ _ , \ ~
120 ' % - ~ 13 ' \ / 1 ~ ~ \
121 ~ ~ _ ~ / - \ i %
4 118 _ 86 r,~ i ~ 14' i \ 5
113 'C, - i ~ I
~ 1; ; i I ~ 55 I \ ~ 5 87 i j - / / ~
~ d ~ - / 1n ~ 114 I e / ~ a K a1
- ~ I (16'~ t 4
< 116 bl it
~ u C 115 ~ I ~ - •
~ ~ ,1 , , -
'U ~ ~ ~ ~f
~ ~ ` ' S2 51 \ i e~
1 a / / 13a 50 ~ .ya ~ 89 I
/ / Q 41 135 ~ ! /Q 41 ^
~ / 133 49 136 V ~ ~ j i ~ i
/ / 132 _ ~ 92
137 • / / / ~ \ 131 ~ ~ 1 ~ I I - I I Junsdict~onal o
138 \ ` ` ~ ~ ~ a I I I
/ 130 / • 48 ~ t1 \ 3 Re-Use / Wetlands T YP
% 173 ~ ~ / ~ 42 / ~ 1 139 129 ~ , ~ ' I Irn anon - g
/ / 140 141 174 ~ I' I S ra Area ~
/ 128 172 142 ~ \ I= a. ~ ~ 4 / 175 47 I = - 3 PY
0 \ ~ 5' ) 1 i ~ k I ~ ~ ~
/ ~ 171 ' 1 y 176 _ ~ ~ , r
/ 45 I ~ c~ -
/ 177 ~ \ / / ; 170 ~ ~ r ~ 143 , - ~ ~ -u Q. - ~ m _ ~ r -N
/ / ~ 178 14/{ Ovate ; o i , ~ U ~ - - ~ - ~ i ~ ~
. ~ 169 ~ • ~ / 145 Q ~ - ~
37 \ / / , 4o a - ~ _ ~ 0 - . ~ _ _ i ~ p ~ ~ N ,
e ~ o,-; . ~ . . o ~ ~ a l~
1601 / 168 'f . 1 • V
~ d ,p ~ ~ 241 ~ / ~ _
167 ~ % ~ ~ ;159 I {/IO , , ~ r ' ~ i ~ L i ~ 1 ~ y~
• ~ • • • • uns ut~ona Wetlands T 166 ~ r•' ---j i ~ ~ Q
i' i Z I ~ I ' I 0~>
l ~ ;1581 ~ ;161 ~ ~ 1 ( ~ 38 I I e-Use ~ ; ~ ~ ,8 I ~ ti ,
r i . - I ~1~ 2~; ~ Edtltle of Water / ~ ~ s i ~ ~L_.----- I rri ate ~ I i
'1571 6 5 i ~
Ed a of Im oundment 39 ~ g P ~ ~ n ~ \ ;163; 1 nd p o l zb 1 poi 1
;1561 © ~ 1 / ~ ~ ! 1471 ~ ~-..i d ;164; ~ ~ / 0 o WWTP ~ ,9 P ~
7 ` 1 i q i 1 I i 20061416
~ / C (155; / ; 36 1 - 1 6 ,148; 36 ! ~ ~ ~1, I ~
I ~ ;154) - ~J ~ \ ~
~ \ , ~ ~ I ~ -
~ i ~ 1531 ' a~ ~ ~ !L 't, i t \ ~
~ I ~ i 152 1150; ~ ~ , ~+c••~ ; 28 r J~, ~ Date:
~ ! 151; V / ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r i35 I U 35 0 ~ ~ I August 29, 2006 ~ ~ I _ \ ~ ~ ~ I Scale:
~ ~ ~ i - 1 1--a /,p 0 20 ~
I 't Future Lots T ~ YP ~ 5-Da \ ~ ~ 200 I Y I
I ~ " Junsdutional Wetlands T YP ~ ,9 ~ 1 i 29' ~ ~ - 1 U set Pond ~ ~ N RT Drawn:
~ i ~ " ~ i 34 ; Ih` r34, 7 P I O H f---• _ \ ~ R5R
1 'I / ._._.I
~ ~ I Checked: ~ ~ I 100' 0 200' 400'
/ ~ r - Road A Extension l Mvz • ~ r~•~ ~ ~ _ - _ ~ I
~ 33 ,a 33 , , ' ~ 30 ' ' + ~ SCALE: 1"=200' (Horiz.) rode
,..._.l e 275-05 ~ .
• ` i ~ i I i 21 ; Computer Dwg. Name
~ J i I 1 I 275-05 WetlandSu Imnt 20060829
i23~ q2; % p
Future Lots T YP r ~ i ~
t e ~ ! 32 , , I Sheet No: - ~ ~ FOR REVIEW Ofd Y
,
j, 1 r
~ \1- ~ i i OF WATER & SE E R - - - NOT RELEASE OL=

FOR CONSTRUCTIO Of_
Future Lots (Typ.)