20230807 Ver 1_401 Application_20230609

Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?*
Yes No
ID#* Version* 1
20230807
Is this project a public transportation project?* Yes
No
Reviewer List: * Joseph Myers:[e-mail]
Select Reviewing Office: * Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Submittal Type: * 401 Application
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?
Yes
No
How much is owed?* $240.00
$570.00

Project Submittal Form
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type: * For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy)
New Project
Modification/New Project with Existing ID
More Information Response
Other Agency Comments
Pre -Application Submittal
Re-Issuance\Renewal Request
Stream or Buffer Appeal
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
4/18/2023
Project Contact Information
Name: Heather LaGamba
Who is submitting the information?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
Project Name: Falcons Way
Is this a public transportation project?
Yes
No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
Yes No Unknown
Is this project connected with ARPA funding?
Yes No
County (ies)
Chatham
Please upload all files that need to be submited.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
8900_Falcons Way_PCN_06.02.23.pdf 5.2MB
Only pdf or kmz files are accepted.
Describe the attachments or
comments:
PCN for 401 WQC
Sign and Submit
By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:

• I, the project proponent, hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the
best of my knowledge and belief.
• I, the project proponent, hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401
certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I agree that submission of this online form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a
written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form.
Signature:
��nrii�t ,✓�..���iairrAii
Submittal Date: 6/5/2023
Is filled in automatically.

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- 2023 Begin Date (Date Received): 06.02.23
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Falcons Way
2. Work Type: ✓❑Private ❑Institutional ❑Government ❑Commercial
3. Project Description/Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
4. Property Owner/Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A41: Alicia Parr & Gary Crumpler
5. Agent/Consultant [PNC Form A5 —or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Bradley Luckey, Pilot Environmental, Inc.
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location—Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form B1b]:
35.63386, -79.22589
8. Project Location—Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B 1 a]: 95551
9. Project Location—County [PCN Form A2b]: Chatham
10. Project Location—Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Pittsboro
11. Project Information—Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Rocky River
12. Watershed/ 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Cape Fear 03030003
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ✓❑ Section 10 and 404 ❑
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit ❑Pre-Application Request
❑ Nationwide Permit# ❑Unauthorized Activity
FRRegional General Permit# ✓❑Compliance
urisdictional Determination Request ❑No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

OF W A TF9
moo`' pG Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
o < DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s)of approval sought from the
Corps: ® Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit(NWP) number: NWP 29 or General Permit(GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes ® No
1d. Type(s)of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification—Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification—Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation ❑ Yes ® No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes ® No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Falcons Way
2b. County: Chatham
2c. Nearest municipality/town: Pittsboro
2d. Subdivision name: NA
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s)on Recorded Deed: Alicia Parr& Gary Crumpler
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 2296/0355
3c. Responsible Party(for LLC if NA
applicable):
3d. Street address: 2 Drakesway Ct
3e. City, state, zip: Durham, NC 27713
3f. Telephone no.: 919-730-6165
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address: [e-mail] & [e-mail]
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form—Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Bradley Luckey
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Pilot Environmental, Inc.
5c. Street address: PO Box 128
5d. City, state, zip: Kernersville, NC 27285
5e. Telephone no.: 336.708.4997
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form—Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 95551
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.63386 Longitude: -79.72759
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 10.08 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water(stream, river, etc.)to Rocky River
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Class C
2c. River basin: Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site contains a gravel driveway, stream crossing (culvert only)and undeveloped wooded land. Structures are not
located on the site. The site is located in a rural and residential area of Pittsboro, Chatham County, North Carolina.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Wetland=0.077 ac
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial)on the property:
Streams=946 LF.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to provide access to develop the site with one single family residence.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project includes the construction of one single family residence. In order to facilitate the proposed
development and access the site, it is necessary to have a stream crossing. To facilitate the development of the site,
clearing and grading the site is necessary. Graders, haulers, excavators and other heavy equipment will be used during
grading and construction of the single family residence.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property/
project(including all prior phases) in the past? Yes No Unknown
Comments: 4.6.23 Self Reporting Field Visit with Lyle Phillips
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? El Preliminary El Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Pilot Enviromental, Inc.
Name (if known): Bradley Luckey Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
4.6.23 Self Reporting Field Visit with Lyle Phillips
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project(including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to"help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form—Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Impacts to streams/wetlands, outside of those proposed in this application, are not anticipated as a result of the proposed
project.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form—Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project(check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams-tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number— Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps-404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent(P)or (if known) DWQ—non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
2g.Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: Wetland impacts are not proposed.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number- (PER)or (Corps-404, 10 stream length
Permanent(P)or intermittent DWQ—non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ® P ❑ T Driveway Unnamed ® PER ® Corps 7.94 67
Crossing Fill ❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 67
3i. Comments: Stream Impact 1 will permanently impact 67 linear feet(532 square feet)of stream channel with driveway
crossing fill. Temporary impacts are not proposed. Mitigation is not proposed.
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form—Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number- (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact(acres)
Permanent(P)or
Temporary T
01 ❑ P ❑ T
02 ❑ P ❑ T
03 ❑ P ❑ T
04 ❑ P ❑ T
4f.Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: Open water impacts are not proposed.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f.Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar-Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number- Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent(P)or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary (T) impact re uired?
B1 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: Buffer impacts are not proposed.
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form-Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The applicant has selected the crossing location in a relative straight portion of the stream and near the most up-gradient
portion of the stream located on the site. There are no other options to access the property without a stream crossing. The
applicant selected the crossing location in an area that does not contain wetlands. The applicant is utilizing a proposed head
wall to avoid additional net loss impact to the stream from sideslope fill.
The approximate 0.077 acres of wetlands and the remaining 879 linear feet of stream channel are being avoided.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Sediment and erosion control devices will be utilized at the most down-gradient portion of the proposed stream impact. If
water is present during rip-rap or wall installation, then a temporary coffer dam will be installed upgradient of the proposed
culvert crossing. During headwall and rip-rap installation,water will be pumped around the construction footprint. The
applicant has designed the use of precast concrete headwalls thus avoiding the potential for live concrete use in the stream
Upon completion of the culvert installation, the temporary sand bag coffer dam will be removed and flow will be diverted
through the culvert.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes,mitigation is required by(check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments: The applicant does not propose mitigation for impacts to streams.
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal)wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form—Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules)—required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form—Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? low density%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: The project is low density. This estimate
accounts for anticipated impervious from lot development. Vegetative swales have been constructed adjacent to the
existing driveway crossing.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Chatham County
® Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): El USMP❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form—Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public(federal/state/local)funds or the ❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes"to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act(NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes"to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ® No
Comments: A NEPA or SEPA is not required as part of this project.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ® Yes ❑ No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ® Yes ❑ No
2c. If you answered "yes"to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): The applicants are
private individuals who purchased the property with the intention to construct their primary residence sometime prior to
November 2022. The applicants were not aware of environmental protection regulations for streams or wetlands until
informed by Chatham County as part of their local site plan review sometime near the end of 2022. Prior to this review, the
applicants installed a 20'48"corrugated plastic pipe culvert into an estimated 21 linear feet of stream channel sometime in
November 2022. Pilot estimated the linear feet of stream channel impacted from the installed culvert based on field
measurements and interpretation of digital elevation modeling.At the time of culvert installation, water was not present within
the stream feature. Upon discovery of potential compliance concerns, the applicants immediately engaged Pilot
Environmental, Inc. (Pilot)to complete a forensic delineation of the culvert and to delineate remaining areas of the site in
December 2022. Pilot completed the stream/wetland delineation on January 20, 2023. Pilot self-reported the compliance
concern to Mr. Lyle Phillips, regulatory project specialist with the USACE, sometime in March 2023 with intentions to provide
an after the fact permit application to return the site to compliance. Mr. Phillips of the USACE completed a field visit on April
6, 2023.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project(based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts)result in ❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes"to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We are not aware of additional development that will result which will impact nearby downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge)of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Impacts from wastewater generation are not proposed.
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form—Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat(Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. E] Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The IPaC report for the site identifies the following federally protected species: red cockaded woodpecker(RCW) (E),
Cape Fear shiner(E),Atlantic Pigtoe (T)and Harpella (E)as protected species that could be proximate to the site.
The project area contains a weakly defined perennial stream located in a mature hardwood forest. The perennial stream
has a sand/silt/gravel substrate and low base flow that would not be capable of supporting aquatic species. Based on our
observations, proposed culvert installation and installation of the gravel driveway has not resulted in an adverse affect to
federally protected species based on the absence of suitable habitat
6. Essential Fish Habitat(Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Based on our knowledge of the site, the site is not located in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat. Best
management practices and the construction of stormwater ponds will prevent sediment from entering down-gradient
waterbodies which may contain fish.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
We reviewed the SHPO Map (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/)to identify cultural resources of the site. The map does not
identify listed or eligible for listing properties on or proximate to the project area. A copy of the map is included as an
attachment.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s)did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA NHFL (Drawing 4, attached)
Digity Bradley
Bradley DN Ico YBradledy b ckey,—Pilotey,
Enviromental,Inc,ou, 6.2.23
Bradley S. Luckey, PWS Luckey Date:2023.0602Plotenvi 210:00:22r04'00'c US
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form—Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

DocuSign Envelope ID:7A989391-EFE1-4872-BD59-099483BF84F5
Proposal for Environmental Services
Pilot Proposal 8900.1
May 2,2023
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
This form authorizes Pilot to act as our agent in stream/wetland matters including U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Resources field verification and
permitting.
590 Falcons way
Property Address:
Pittsboro, NC 27312
Applicant Information:
Alicia Parr Gary Crumpler
Name:
2 Drakesway Court
Address:
Durham, NC 27713
919-730-9165 9199437219
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
aliciajparr@gmail .com pinkapnka@gmail .com
E-mail Address:
DocuSigned by: DocuSigned by:
El9F5CAD74796431
l;a. �.rrE 5/2/2023 5/2/2023
Signature: _. soDiiASA4ess44a.. Date:
4

Chatham County Tax Map
b
d o Alston Chape�Ra
'Pobeso�G�
=° Pitt~ s�b�or
902 vke �
ate
u
U
n
F
of�a
br o°
ho
a
G�s`
Legend
Parcel Pop-Up
Address Points
❑ Parcels
mi
0 0.0425 0.085
N
Service Layer Credits: NC
CG IA, NC DOT
Photogrammetry Unit, NC
Geodetic Survey, NC911 Date: 2
Time:2:50:1:50:12 PM

Chatham County • Records • Use&Planning Viewer •• Ward Viewer
s�5s1 X q e�sss
�^CA'592rCn fE5lFI51'O!95551
' TIC
61a98 !A!t
•
Parcel:95551
Deed Neme: PARR ALCIA�ETUX GARY
IYkN GRUMP!ER
2021 Taxpayer of Record: PARR.AU CtA J
E DUX GARY LYNX CRUMPLER
Land Value: S
Improvement Value:
Total Value. i,
45551 DeededAcneage:10.80`.
Current Deed:2296Jtl355
Currant Plat:2622/OC82
Legal Description TRACT 2
Fire Tax D�stncY.CIRCLE CITY FIRE DISTRICT
Physical Address: 590 FALCONS WAY
,�. Current Owners: PARR ALICIA�&
`.F^!f�!F!EF uaRY LYNN
Billing Address: 2 DRAKESWAY CT
A2 r61 B�Uing City: DIJRiiAM
Bdhng State: NC
Billing Zip: 2 7 7 t 3-2042
865!J' Z�rm.2sz
94910 .
• «t
84192_
')090]

„,�op,�HfEG S Rp�'•.
0EAL
26447-31
l
�-
EXISTING DRIVE ENTRY FROM ••,�0�� SUN`�P``�',
FALCON WAY .nn.
EX.48”HOPE STORM
7�7��� 1 I / / // r/ /J 1 1 \ I \ \ J I / -
\ � \ STONE DRIVE TO BE INSTALLED
TOP OF DRIVE TO BE INSTALLED
BOT. OF GRAVEL DRIVE 404.50 -
1 TOP OF PIPE 402.50
, III 1 11 y
r.
EXISTING STREAM LOCATION
STREAM BED 398
INV 398.00
In I c
U)
qN �IL
SEE BELOW FOR STREAM I) 1 \ \ 1 .
CROSSING ENLARGEMENT I ^ I \I \\ I \I �" E\�T O N A—A
\ `I��\1
\ \ \ \\ \\ \\ 1 \\\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\ \\ I \ I \ NOT TO SCALE
PROPOSED HOUSE LOCATONri
v - vim/ v v v vvv vv I v vvvvv>T wv`r\vv vI ) /' vvvv v v
vv v vv vv vvvv vvvv vv��� ��v vvv 1v v i I v v/ 416 W
412 t�
EX.48'HOPE STORM
—
\ \ \ \ I \\\\ \\ \ I \ \` PROPOSED CONCRETE HE
\ ) I \ \ I I I \\\\\\\1 I Q ° ) / \ \\ \ 408 PER DETAIL ON SHEET C-5.1
\ I �
PROPOSED CLASS B RIP RAP PAD
W1DTH 12'AND LENGTH 20'BURY 18"THICK
OVERALL SITE PLAN 404 AWITH GEO-TEND STREAM BED FABRIC BETWEEN RIP RAP
1" = 40'
INV.398.00
400 1 �Ec �
0
/ — 396
r /
INV.397.64
—\ — 392
/ z
/ \ � STREAM
388
— ' /' --- _
PROPOSED CLASS B RIP RAP PAD —0+40 0+00 0+40 0+80 1+20
, /�' \ � m
I \ \ WIDTH 12'AND LENGTH 20'BURY 18'THICK \
/ \\ WITH GEO-TEXTILE FABRIC BETWEEN RIP RAP
\ AND STREAM BED
\ ' W
v SECTION B-B I- a
PROPOSED CONCRETE HEADWALL /� /i/ NOT TO SCALE a- U-1
\ v U Z
PER DETAIL ON SHEET C 5.1
3 K
/
PROPOSED CLASS 8 RIP RAP PAD
WIDTH 12'AND BURY THICK
WITH GEO-TEXTI ENGTH F BR CC BETWEENBRIP RAP
—
N O
-- _ / / AND STREAM BED Z
INV.397.64
vv vv ---- STREAM IMPACTS v o
00
DRAWING LEGEND � Z
PROPERTY LINE H
' 532 SF OF STREAM
ADJOINING PROPERTY LINE W U
(` EXISTING TREELINE N J
67 LF OF STREAM PROPOSED TREELINE 7
\
MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING F�
7.94 AVG WIDTH -------------- MINOR CONTOUR EXISTING
\ I
v v V vim/
EX.48'HOPE STORM --- SL' N n
EXISTING CROSSING NOTES o S
1. FIELD ELEVATIONS, PIPE INVERTS, SIZE, AND ROAD LOCATION ARE SHOWN j
PER FIELD SURVEY RECEIVED FROM SURVEY CAROLINA, PLLC. O
2. WETLAND AND STREAM DELINEATION ARE SHOWN FROM DATA RECEIVED FROM
PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL.
3. NO ADDITIONAL STREAM DISTURBANCE OR IMPACT IS PROPOSED AS PART OF
THIS PLAN. ►►►���III -
�i N
STREAM CROSSING ENLARGEMENT � Sheet o.
1" = 10' C—/ II

,,,,�op,�HfECs ROB'•.
MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS' Er\ EAL
t ..--,,CC26447
INSPECT RIPRAP OUTLET STRUCTURES WEEKLY AND AFTER SIGNIFICANT(1/2 INCH OR GREATER) C5 31-23
ORINF FLL EVENTS STONES TO SEE IF BEEN ANY
EROSION DISLODGED.AROUNDIMMEDIATELY
TH ALL HAS KEN REPAIRS PLACE.
ETO .y eroGINEEP
PREVENT FURTHER DAMAGE. IMM MAKEA •,•.�qC Ey,',
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS: •• ..........
1. ENSURE THAT THE SUBGRADE FOR THE FILTER AND RIPRAP FOLLOWS THE REQUIRED LINES
AND GRADES SHOWN IN THE PLAN. COMPACT ANY FILL REQUIRED IN THE SUBGRADE TO THE
��pp DENSITY OF THE SURROUNDING UNDISTURBED MATERIAL. LOW AREAS IN THE SUBGRADE ON
.ys UNOISTURBED SOIL MAY ALSO BE FILLED BY INCREASING THE RIPRAP THICKNESS. Q
PROJECT E-8117 Gary Crumpler -� 2. THE RIPRAP AND GRAVEL FILTER MUST CONFORM TO THE SPECIFIED GRADING LIMITS
3'Do=12 FT "_'_ _, �, f SHOWN
oN THE PLANS.
TLET:48'HDPE J. FILTER CLOTH WHEN USED, MUST MEET DESIGN REQUIREMENTS AND BE PROPERLY
GU - -- -,,La=20 FT .. = PROTECTED FROM PUNCHING OR TEARING DURING INSTALLATION. REPAIR ANY DAMAGE BY
"'MAX VELOCITY=120 CFS 'J°W=12 FT II - REMOVING THE RIPRAP AND PLACING ANOTHER PIECE OF FILTER CLOTH OVER THE DAMAGED AREA
ALL CONNECTING JOINTS SHOULD OVERLAP SO THE TOP LAYER IS ABOVE THE •;�_
Z Ly, a d50=0.5 FT DOWNSTREAM LAYER A MINIMUM OF 1 FOOT. IF THE DAMAGE IS EXTENSIVE, REPLACE
u - _ THE ENTIRE FILTER CLOTH,
II RIPRAP MAY BE PLACED BY EQUIPMENT, BUT TAKE CARE TO AVOID DAMAGING THE
4.
dMAX=1.0 FT -III FILTER.
THICKNESS=1.5 FT 5. THE MINIMUM THICKNESS OF THE RIPRAP SHOULD BE 1.5 TIMES THE MAXIMUM
S TONE DIAMETER
6. RIPRAP MAY BE FIELD STONE OR ROUGH QUARRY STONE, IT SHOULD BE HARD,
!G ANGULAR, HIGHLY WEATHER-RESISTANT AND WELL GRADED.
f� ]. CONSTRUCT THE APRON ON ZERO GRADE WITH NO OVERFILL AT THE END. MANE THE
TOP OF THE RIPRAP AT THE DOWNSTREAM END LEVEL WITH THE RECEIVING AREA OR SLIGHTLY
BELOW IT.
u 8. ENSURE THAT THE APRON IS PROPERLY ALIGNED WITH THE RECEIVING STREAM
I' AND PREFERABLY STRAIGHT THROUGHOUT ITS LENGTH. IF A CURVE IS NEEDED TO FIT SITE
CONDITIONS, PLACE IT IN THE UPPER SECTON OF THE APRON.
9. IMMEDIATELY AFTER CONSTRUCTION, STABILIZE ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITH VEGETATION
_ (PRACTICES 6.10, TEMPORARY SEEDING, AND 6,11, PERMANENT SEEDING). O
Omle1 w-DW+D.4L, 120 ' Pipe Outlet to Flat Area- ^I
alpb llo H No Well-defined Channel 4 o Z
dlamel r(g11
;5Da Y 4,s �V l � ) � .In t c c
3do A A .0
Ek
,n
L � 04 c
Plan V Y m M o Il
e
at
4O y ,n 3
i IJ?; I �.: a Section AA blanket Notes
30, a a Q�
1.La is the length of the riprap
apron.
z Y = Pipe Outletto Well-defined
rI N ory( 2.d=1.5 times the maximum'. Channel
t g 1 -�' • in stone diameter but not less ((\
la a . C. than 6". " ,f
i, ¢ 3.In a well-defined channel ex-
tendtheapronupthechannel
banks to an elevation of 6"
A A above the maximum tailwater
Im '• ` r depth or to the top of the bank,
R whichever is less.
3 a'....5.;, -.. IU�= 20-f 's ff too-. 200 Sao into --H
Discharge(ft3lseC) 4.A filter blanket or filter fabric
should be installed between
' Plan the riprap and soil foundation. i
Curves may not be extrapolated. b
La
FIMMre 81065 Design of nutlet pmteclwn km a round pipe(k win9 lull.maximum ilailwaler condition(Tw 2 0.5 tliame[erl. C)
ua I id �I1=
II lil�l Sectio4A1 _I H�.I"Iui1Gt
Filter
blanket
Figure 6.41,Riprap outlet pr 1d,,n(mo6flad from VI SWCC). O
RIP-RAP OUTLET PROTECTION Z
N.T.S.
r✓�
o � Z
NOTES: Q Q g
W. 1 FT, O fill • THI6 PRECAST 8.01,ENMALL MAY 6E 38.2 FOR THE FOLLOWING HZy Ot=ryV Q a v
I- STANDARDS:3. 838.01, .57, ,838.21,838.69.B3B.33, 0J�
838.39,838.51 838.5],838.63 AND 838.69. 0 GO
• INSTALL PRECAST ENDWALLS WITH WINGS AND PAY W Q Q LL Z 0
FOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATION SECTION 838.
1-O" 1'-0" • USE 4000 PSI CONCRETE. F 2~Z W t✓) O m
• PROVIDE ALL REINFORCING STEEL WHICH MEETS ASTM A615 WIFU_0J
FOR GRADE 60 AND WELDED WIRE FABRIC CONFORMING 0 GE O �I j
O TO ASTIR A186 WITH 2"MIN.CLEARANCE. Z
H2 H2 • PLACE LIFT HOLES OR PINS IN ACCORDANCE WITH hH t
CS/RCP OSHA STANDAND 1926.704. W v D a
Hl H1 • PIPE TO BE GROUTED INTO HEADWALL AT JOB SITE BY S 7
CONTRACTOR C
• ALL ELEMENTS PRECAST TO MEET ASTM C913.
1'0" • WELDED WIRE FABRIC MAY BE 8UBSTITUTED FOR REBAR
AS LONG AS THE SAME AREA OF STEEL IS PROVIDED. �+ z '•1
• CHAMFER ALL CORNERS 1"OR HAVE A RADIUS OF 1
B"D.C.(TYP.) S"O.C.(TYP.)
REFER TO CHART REFER TO CHART W
FOR BAR SIZE FOR BAR SIZE NOTE:THE MINIMUM BAR SIZE SHALL BE WS BAHS ¢ _j y V (n
AT 8"CTS.THE CONTRACTOR WILL HAVE THE OPTION O J W U
ELEVATION SIDE TO INCREASE THIS BAR SIZE AS NEEDED. LL Q O �I
3
Z cn W
ENDWALL DIMENSIONS LU
¢ X
W2(FT.) FT. MINIMUM MIN./MAX. MIN./MAX. MIN./MAX. MIN./MAX. MIN./MAX. C] W o-
�u
H=
PIPE DIA. BAH SIZE H1(FT.) 12(FT.) D (FT.) W1 W2 Q W
1.0 W5 @ B" 1.25/2.00 2.00/3.75 1.25/1.75 3.0013.75 5.50/6.00 0 V s
"F 1.25 A5 @ B" 1.25/2.00 3.00/3.75 1.25/2.00 3.50/3.75 6.50/6.75 Q Z F
1.50 M5 @ 8" 1.25/2.00 3.00/4.25 1.50/2.50 3.50/3.75 6.50/6.75 N V c
2.0 W5 @ 8" 1.50/2.50 4.0014.75 1.75/2.50 4.00/4.25 7.50/8.25 SL' N b
0 2.5 WS 9 8" 2.50/3.50 4.00/8.00 2.00/3.00 4.50/5.50 10.00/11.50
CO)J (::) fl :�R
3.0 N5 @ 8" 3.00/3.50 5.00/6.00 2.75/3.50 5.25/5.75 11.50/11.75 p Q Z Z N S
6Sy¢ 3.5 W5 @ 8" 3.25/4.50 6.00/6.75 3.25/3.50 6.00/6.75 12.00/13.25 ¢ W O
4.0 W5 @ B" 3.50/4.50 6.50/7.00 3.25/3.50 6.50/6.75 13.00/13.25 2 Z
PLAN 4.5 M5 @ 8" 4.00/5.00 6.50/8.50 3.25/4.00 7.00/9.25 13.50/15.75 0
5.0 W5 @ 8" 4.50/5.00 1 7.00/8.50 3.25/4.00 1 7.2519.25 1 13.75/15.75
5.5 WS @ 8" 4.50/5.00 7.50/8.50 3.25/4.00 7.25/9.25 14.00/15.75 _ -jf Z
6.0 W5 @ 8" 4.50/5.00 7.50/8.50 3.25/4.00 7.75/9.25 14.75/16.75 p' p
SHEET 1 OF 1 Sheet No.
838.80
C,� 12

taEH�CF Ty 17
Q PP F.yT riwAV4M ru'i r•
a United States Department of the Interior 4' ',
!, FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
=RCH 3 �s Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh,NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: June 02, 2023
Project Code: 2023-0089230
Project Name: Falcons Way
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species'presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information.An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

06/02/2023 2
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts)that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act(42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act(ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act(MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act(BGEPA)to
protect native birds from project-related impacts.Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project-related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project-related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.govibirds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186.php.

06/02/2023 3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
■ Official Species List
• Migratory Birds

06/02/2023 1
OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

06/02/2023 2
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2023-0089230
Project Name: Falcons Way
Project Type: Residential Construction
Project Description: Driveway Crossing for Single family Residence
Project Location:
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/(a)35.68423535,-79.22281754997124,14z
Counties: Chatham County, North Carolina

06/02/2023 3
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 6 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries1, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
MAMMALS
NAME STATUS
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis sub flavus Proposed
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Endangered
Species profile:httpss://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
BIRDS
NAME STATUS
Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
FISHES
NAME STATUS
Cape Fear Shiner Notropis mekistocholas Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species.Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile:https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6063
CLAMS
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species.Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164

06/02/2023 4
INSECTS
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
FLOWERING PLANTS
NAME STATUS
Harperella Ptilimnium nodosum Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3739
CRITICAL HABITATS
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S)MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL
ABOVE LISTED SPECIES.

06/02/2023
MIGRATORY BIRDS
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act!and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location.To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)in this area,but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 25
and Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)throughout its range in the continental USA to Jul 31
and Alaska.

06/02/2023 2
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)throughout its range in the continental USA Jul 31
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)throughout its range in the continental USA to Sep 10
and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)only in particular Bird Conservation Regions elsewhere
(SCRs)in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 31
and Alaska.
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.)A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated?The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.

06/02/2023 3
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort —no data
SPECIES JJAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle
Non-BCC iliaii INkh Aii i■}ii J11 IIII ++++ 1+Ma lid all IIII
Vulnerable
Chimney Swift ++++ ++++ +I�t +,+1 NO gill Ilia i++� 1+1+ 1+++ +
BCC Rangewf +—+ —+�+
(CON)
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide ++++ ++++ ++++ +111 Jill !1+1 1+4.1 '+++ ++++ ++++ ++-+ —+­+
(CON) ■ ■ ■r
Prothonotary PI--- ---- -- IIII
Warbler ++++ ++++ ++++ +++, IT +, ++++ ++++ ++++ ++�+ �+�+
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed ,+++ ++++ „ 2++' +III IIII ■■F +� +
Woodpecker '+++ ++ ++++ ++++ ++++ + + �'—
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Rusty Blackbird ,+++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC-BCR

06/02/2023 4
Wood Thrush ++++ ++++ ++++ „" Jill "'' ','„+11 ++1+ ++++ ++-+ —+—+
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
■ Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
■ Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/librar3r�/
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory
■ Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
MIGRATORY BIRDS FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s)which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information
Locator(RAIL)Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?

06/02/2023 5
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding,wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look
at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each
bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated
with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not
breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC)that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA(including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non-BCC -Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or(for non-eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.

06/02/2023 6
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Lorin.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s)that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar).A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

06/02/2023 7
IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency: Pilot Enviromental, Inc
Name: Bradley Luckey
Address: 743 Park Lawn Court
City: Kernersville
State: NC
Zip: 27285
Email [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]

NC HUCsSSoil Surveys by
HPOWEB 2.0 General Audience •• • • ,;� _ • _
N.
Show search results for fallc...
vgor
:•
mow. �• � ` � ,. _1:• '�- - � � ' .�
awl
41
w , • i I * v 1 r 4'
� Y 1At
_
~ t :, 1
• -79.248321 35.704385 Degrees
• _ �1� O e W P , ' 20
• 1

,Top
a _ I j � •,ts6 I� � _
so
Iota
.>s
I ;
LEGEND
Site Boundary
{��"�'r - _ ���`-�:�;:.--..�I �:�`��( ►lam
USGS Topographic Map
Drawing 1
Falcons Way
USGS Topographic Map
Pittsboro, NC Quadrangle - - Approximate 10.8-Acre Tract
^�
PILO Pittsboro, Chatham County, NC
Scale: 1" = 2,000, PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL.INC Pilot Project8900

. ,� 1._ � �•.
Ply; � �•,•.M •T ' 'a. •. x 44{
t Arf'.
�t�` i� 'mac '.•• i r . 1 . .�
•y N�„
• • • • i•1

3f
NL1G 1� a
NIB
9 Id NC
N10
N — C
T
00 N�
LEGEND
Off'.+ Site Boundary
u.FO El ML
Drawing 2A Published Soil Map
USDA Soil Survey ,,.f,. -.�;,' Yy Falcons Way
of Chatham County, NC Approximate 10.8-Acre Tract
Published 2006 �'. , Pittsboro, Chatham County, NC
Not To Scale u PILOT Pilot Project 8900
f PI L 0 1 lk a kV'„411,1A1. C

0
4 :,r
• G.
� - �f 'L+ �Fr'�•i+' � •fir. �• •
Y
� r
rk
;oi.�Freshwater Forested/Shrub
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
�►► l j. R5 Bbl `t.
LEGEND
-Site Boundary
-1 Freshwater Emergent
( _
r—N Estuarine and Marine
• ,. �' _.
L in Freshwater Pond
. ;• A . 1
Lake
Riverine
Other
t
� 11

1 'N,F, •'ll' �. f •tea, '
• -� �' it ..�y,•� Il , , .T�
♦ J.^•. .'` •I�• J�• ' _ - ' ,'+ - fir.
TTT � ' �. �, 1 •• � ''t rP
y1 ZipAt
�� • ■
'� 1' MfYlr�l ti
of
mom
It
o mom
I �• � TT 7 F ,�f y
+r> •u 11 .�
- •� 1 _ _■ •4■ _ _ __
1

N
DP-1
21 Liner Feet of Culvert Impact Based on %0
Field Measurements and Digital
Elevation Modeling
SA
(582 LF)
WBA 1-5
(0.028 ac) SB
(364 LF) WB 1 9
(0.049 ac)
- r
' - 4
LEGEND
Site Boundary
Perennial Stream `4
Wetland
■ Culvert
DP-1 • Data Point
SA 1-5 Flag Number/Feature ID
THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP HAVE BEEN CONFIRMED IN THE FIELD BY MR. LYLE PHILLIPS WITH THE USACE ON
4.6.23. THIS EXHIBIT INCLUDES GPS LOCATIONS OF DELINEATED FEATURES. DELINEATION CONDUCTED BY PILOT PERSONNEL ON
01.20.2023.
Drawing 5 Wetland Map
2019 Satellite Imagery from ESRI Falcons Way
and Pilot GPS Data A ' `` _ Approximate 10.8-Acre Tract
Scale: 1" = 150' ����®1� Pittsboro, Chatham County, NC
Date: 6.2.23 PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL,INC Pilot Project8900

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirement Control Symbol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region EXEMPT
(Authority:AR 335-15,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Falcons Way City/County: Pittsboro/Chatham Sampling Date: 1.20.23
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: DP-1
Investigator(s): Pilot Environmental, Inc Section,Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside,terrace,etc.): side slope Local relief(concave,convex, none): Slope(%): 3
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.63386 Long:-79.722589 Datum: WGS-84
Soil Map Unit Name: CmB, Cid-Ligum Complex NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) —Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
_Surface Water(A1) _True Aquatic Plants(1314) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
_High Water Table(A2) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) X Drainage Patterns(1310)
_Saturation(A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
—Water Marks(B1) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(B2) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(133) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(135) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(B13) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP-1
Absolute Dominant indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Platanus occidentalis 20 Yes FACW Number of Dominant Species
2. Acer rubrum 15 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 5 (A)
3. Ulmus alata 15 Yes FACU Total Number of Dominant
4. Carya tomentosa 10 No UPL Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5• Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 71.4% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
60 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 30 20%of total cover: 12 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FACW species 25 x 2= 50
1. Acer rubrum 5 Yes FAC FAC species 35 x 3= 105
2. Ilex opaca 5 Yes FACU FACU species 20 x 4= 80
3. UPL species 10 x 5= 50
4. Column Totals: 90 (A) 285 (B)
5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 3.17
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. 3-Prevalence Index is:53.0'
10 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover: 2 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) _Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Microstegium vimineum 15 Yes FAC Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Carex intumescens 5 Yes FACW be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4• Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH), regardless of
6 height.
7• Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines, less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9 (1 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 10 20%of total cover: 4 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. None
2.
3.
4.
5' Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-18 10YR 4/3 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(All) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147, 148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
_Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) —Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
—Black Histic(A3) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) —Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
—Stratified Layers(A5) _Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Red Parent Material(F21)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, _Other(Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix(S6) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0