Buffer Plan for PN

NUTRIENT OFFSET &
BUFFER MITIGATION
PLAN
June 2023
TWIN BURROS MITIGATION BANK PARCEL
Caswell County, NC
DWR Project Number 2021-1425v1
Cape Fear River Basin
HUC 03030002
PREPARED BY:
WILDLANDS
ENCINEERIN C>
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 W Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27603
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

ktr4
WILDLANDS
E N G I N E E R I N G
June 8, 2023
Katie Merritt
Nutrient Offset & Buffer Banking Coordinator
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27620
RE: DWR Draft Twin Burros Buffer Plan Comments
Twin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel (DWR # 2021-1425v1)
Caswell County, NC
Dear Ms. Merritt:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) has reviewed the Division of Water Resources (DWR) comments
dated April 4, 2023, for the draft Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Plan (Buffer Plan) for the Twin
Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel. Please note that the tree line data used in the draft Buffer Plan was based
on aerial imagery. The final Buffer Plan has been updated using a GPS tree line survey. Credit totals have
been adjusted accordingly.
The DWR comments are listed below in bold, while Wildlands responses are noted in italics lettering.
1. Cover Page
a. Change to Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
The correction has been made.
b. Add the DWR ID# (2021-1425v1)
The correction has been made.
2. Table of Contents- Change to Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
The correction has been made.
3. Section 1.0
a. This is not a BPDP since it is part of the 404/401 combo plan. Change BPDP here to
Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan (or to Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset
Plan) whichever you prefer, but make the change consistent throughout the cover
page and text.
The correction has been made.
b. It references the UMBI but only an MBI was proposed and the name of the MBI is
called "Twin Burros" MBI, not Wildlands Cape Fear 02. That must be the name for the
stream UMBI with the USACE?
The correction has been made. Yes, the text in reference is the name for the stream
UMBI with the USACE.
c. Reference "Buffer Plan" here on out.
"Buffer Plan" is now referenced throughout the text.
d. There are many typos for "Burrows" instead of "Burros" throughout the document.
Edit accordingly.
The correction has been made.
4. Table 2
a. Check to confirm this 14digit HUC is correct because it is different on the Project Credit
Table
The 14 digit HUC used within table 2 is the correct one. The Project Credit Table has been
corrected to reflect this.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. • phone [phone] • fax [phone] • 312 W Millbrook Rd St 225 • Raleigh, NC 27609

WILDLANDS
E N G I N E E R I N G
b. Add "Credit Service Area" to this table and insert Haw River Subwatershed
The addition has been made.
5. Section 2.4
a. General Comment —when using the term "Buffer", this only refers to the Zone land
Zone 2 riparian zones adjacent to a subject stream. Since this site includes more than
just the Jordan riparian "buffer", need to use "Riparian areas" to be all-inclusive. Edit
accordingly throughout the text.
Thank you, the correction has been made throughout the text.
b. Add "Preservation" and reference (o)(4) & (5)
The addition has been made.
6. Section 4.1- Add a specific reference to where the grading plan is located within the stream
wetland plan.
The following text has been added: "The specifics of the stream restoration project are in the
Twin Burros Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plan. Section 6.7 of the Twin Burros Stream and
Wetland Mitigation Plan contains information on grading."
7. Table 8- Add a column for "tree/shrub" and fill in fields accordingly.
The addition has been made.
8. Table 9- Tag Alder is not an acceptable species for planting in areas generating RBC or NOC. If
only being planted in wetland mitigation credit areas, then that is fine. Otherwise, remove
from planting plan where RBC or NOC is being generated.
Tag Alder has been removed from the planting plan.
9. Section 4.2- If at least 8 species will be planted, then Wildlands needs to identify which 8 of
the 12 are their primary species and then select the remaining 4 that will be used as
"substitutions" if any of the 8 primary species are not available. Additionally, Wildlands needs
to include the % of those remaining 4 substitutions that may need to be utilized.
Wildlands anticipates that planting less than 12 species will be unlikely. If a species is not
available at the time of planting, the percentage composition of one or more of the available
species will be increased to ensure the some number of trees required to meet the proposed
density are planted. Wildlands proposes that any of the 12 species be viable for an increase in
percent composition so long as there are at least 8 species planted. Wildlands will ensure that no
one species is planted at a composition higher than 15%. Text has been added to section 4.2.
10. Section 7.0
a. The MBI refers to "Riparian Buffer Credit" and "Nutrient Offset Credit" or "RBC" and
"NOC". Throughout this section, the credits are referred to inconsistently and as
"buffer mitigation credit", "buffer credits" or "riparian buffer credit". Edit accordingly
using the terms Riparian Buffer Credit" and "Nutrient Offset Credit as noted in the
MBI template.
The correction has been made throughout the text.
b. Add a statement within this section that credits are determined based on existing
riparian conditions (forested vs non -forested) adjacent to existing streams.
The following text has been added to section 7.0: "Credits will be determined based on
existing riparian conditions on the Parcel".
c. Add a statement regarding how the credits will be finalized in an AsBuilt Survey
submitted with the AsBuilt Report.
The following text has been added to section 7.0: "All credit areas will be finalized in an
As -Built Survey and will submitted in the As -Built report."
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. • phone [phone] • fax [phone] • 312 W Millbrook Rd St 225 • Raleigh, NC 27609

WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
d. Correct UMBI to MBI throughout
The correction has been made.
e. Buffer Preservation and Enhancement credits will be documented on the same ledger.
The relevant sentence within section 7.0 has been updated to say, "There will be four (4)
credit ledgers for the project: Buffer Restoration, Buffer Enhancement (Cattle Exclusion)
with Buffer Preservation, Nitrogen Nutrient Offset Credits (46.10836 Delivery Factor) and
Phosphorus Nutrient Offset Credits (1, 009. 66554 Delivery Factor)."
f. Include what Delivery Factors are for N & P based on the 14 digit HUC this site is
located in.
The additions have been made.
11. Table 10
a. This 14 digit HUC doesn't match what is shown in the text/tables. Confirm and update
accordingly.
The 14-digit HUC has been updated within Table 10.
b. This column does not accurately depict Subject vs Non -subject features. Split out all
I/P streams that are "Not Subject" vs "Subject" accordingly to the viability letter. For
this site particularly, DWR will not require that the supporting credit figures also
differentiate between subject & non -subject. However, on some projects, that would
be necessary. Non subject streams should be Gallo, Polio, Perro, Caballo, Burro,
Panchito, Martinez, Vaca & JR
The table has been corrected so that the column in reference properly displays subject
versus non -subject streams. Associated information within the table has been updated to
correspond correctly to this change.
12. Figure 2 — Denote this area as "Haw River Subwatershed"
The change has been made.
13. Figure 7
a. See comments on Figure 9 and correct this Figure accordingly.
The figure has been corrected to reflect changes in Figure 9.
b. Thank you for calling these areas out.
You're welcome.
14. Figure 9
a. Need to add the widths that are represented by each color using the following 0-100
and 101-200 widths as shown in the table. 20-29' is already called out appropriately. It
is NOT necessary to differentiate between subject & non -subject streams on this
figure, but it IS required that the Ephemeral channels be differentiated from the
streams
Widths have been added to the legend of Figure 9. The figure has been updated so that
credit areas corresponding to ephemeral channels use a different symbology from
Intermittent/perennial features.
b. Add width for blue. Need to also separate restoration on Ephemeral channels from
the I/P channels. Show as different color/symbology.
The addition has been made. Restoration on ephemeral channels has been separated
from 1/P channels with different symbology.
c. Add width
The addition has been made.
d. Add width and put "Ephemeral"
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. • phone [phone] • fax [phone] • 312 W Millbrook Rd St 225 • Raleigh, NC 27609

kt�
WILDLANDS
E N G I N E E R I N G
The additions have been made.
e. Add width and put Ephemeral as well
The additions have been made.
f. Add width
The addition has been made.
g. Why is fencing not continuous to this boundary?
There is existing fencing along the portion of the boundary in reference that is to remain
after construction is complete. The existing fence has been added to Figure 7 and Figure
9 for clarity.
h. It says that this plot and others are combined for both "Stream & Buffer". Why is this?
My main question here surrounds whether or not Wildlands intends to request non-
standard buffer widths for better ratios for stream credits. Is Wildlands proposing to
apply the non-standard buffer width towards their stream credits? If yes, explain.
In areas where riparian restoration for purposes of the Buffer Plan overlaps planting for
the Twin Burros Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site, the some vegetation plot will be
used for both monitoring reports. References to vegetation plots related to the Twin
Burros Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site have been removed from Figure 9 for clarity.
No, Wildlands is not proposing to apply the non-standard buffer width towards stream
credits.
i. Why is fencing not continuous to this boundary?
There is existing fencing along the portion of the boundary in reference that is to remain
after construction is complete. The existing fence has been added to Figure 7 and Figure
9 for clarity.
j. Why is fencing not continuous to this boundary?
There is existing fencing along the portion of the boundary in reference that is to remain
after construction is complete. The existing fence has been added to Figure 7 and Figure
9 for clarity.
k. Why is fencing not continuous to this boundary?
There is existing fencing along the portion of the boundary in reference that is to remain
after construction is complete. The existing fence has been added to Figure 7 and Figure
9 for clarity.
I. Why is fencing not continuous to this boundary?
There is existing fencing along the portion of the boundary in reference that is to remain
after construction is complete. The existing fence has been added to Figure 7 and Figure
9 for clarity.
The final Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Plan has been uploaded to the Laserfiche system. Please
contact me at 540-907-9432 if you have any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Kaitlyn Hogarth
Environmental Scientist
[e-mail]
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. • phone [phone] • fax [phone] • 312 W Millbrook Rd St 225 • Raleigh, NC 27609

Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
Twin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel
Cape Fear River Basin
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
Project Introduction.......................................................................................................................... 1
1.1
Parcel Description......................................................................................................................... 1
2.0
Mitigation Project Summary............................................................................................................. 1
2.1
Project Goals.................................................................................................................................1
2.2
Existing Parcel Conditions.............................................................................................................2
2.3
Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Mitigation..............................................3
2.4
Alternative Mitigation...................................................................................................................4
2.5
Watershed Characterization.........................................................................................................5
2.6
Soils...............................................................................................................................................6
2.7
Existing Vegetative Communities.................................................................................................6
2.8
Threatened and Endangered Species...........................................................................................7
2.9
Cultural Resources........................................................................................................................
7
2.10
FEMA Floodplain Compliance.......................................................................................................7
2.11
Parcel Location, Parcel Constraints, and Access...........................................................................7
2.12
Other Environmental Conditions..................................................................................................7
3.0
Site Protection Instrument................................................................................................................7
4.0
Mitigation Work Plan........................................................................................................................
8
4.1
Parcel Preparation........................................................................................................................
8
4.2
Riparian Area Restoration Activities.............................................................................................
8
4.3
Riparian Area Enhancement Via Cattle Exclusion Activities.......................................................10
4.4
Riparian Area Preservation Activities..........................................................................................
10
4.5
NCDWR As -Built Evaluation........................................................................................................
10
5.0
Monitoring and Maintenance Plan.................................................................................................10
5.1
Monitoring Protocol....................................................................................................................
10
5.2
Parcel Maintenance....................................................................................................................
11
5.3
Easement Boundaries.................................................................................................................
11
6.0
Financial Assurance and Long -Term Management.........................................................................
12
6.1
Financial Assurances...................................................................................................................
12
6.2
Long-term Management.............................................................................................................
12
7.0
Potential Credit Generation............................................................................................................
12
8.0
References......................................................................................................................................16
W Twin Burros Litigation Bank Parcel Nutrient Offset & Buffer Litigation Plan
HUC 03030002 Page i June 2023

TABLES
Table 1 Ecological and Water Quality Goals
Table 2 Buffer Project Attributes
Table 3 Project Features
Table 4 Drainage Areas and Associated Land Use
Table 5 Project Soil Types and Descriptions
Table 6 Existing Vegetation
Table 7 Site Protection Instrument
Table 8 Selected Tree Species
Table 9 Selected Wetland Tree Species
Table 10 Twin Burros Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Bank — Project Credit Table
Table 11 Twin Burros Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Bank — Total Area of Nutrient Offset and
Buffer Mitigation
FIGURES
Figure 1
Vicinity Map
Figure 2
Credit Service Area Map
Figure 3
Site Map
Figure 4
USGS Topographic Map
Figure 5
Watershed Map
Figure 6
NRCS 1908 NRCS Soil Survey Map
Figure 7
Buffer Credits Map
Figure 8
Riparian Buffer Zones Map
Figure 9
Monitoring Components Map
APPENDICES
Appendix A Current Land Use Photographs —September 7, 2022
Appendix B Historical Aerials
Appendix C On Site Determination of Applicability to Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules —July 27, 2022
Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Letter— October 26, 2022
Appendix D USFWS Correspondence
SHPO Request for Review and Response
EDR Radius Map Report, Executive Summary
Appendix E Twin Burros Mitigation Site Planting Plans
WTwin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
HUC 03030002 Page ii June 2023

Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
Twin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel
Cape Fear River Basin
Wildlands Holdings VI
1.0 Project Introduction
The Twin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel (Parcel) is proposed under the terms and conditions of the Twin
Burros Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI), proposed to be made and entered into by Wildlands
Holdings VI, LLC acting as Bank Sponsor (Sponsor) and the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ) Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). The Parcel shall be planned and designed
according to the MBI, 15A NCAC 0213.0703, and the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B
.0295. The Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Plan (Buffer Plan) has also been designed in
concurrence with the Wildlands Cape Fear 02 Umbrella Mitigation Bank, Twin Burros Mitigation Site
(SAW 2021-01308, DWR ID 2021-1425 V.1)
The project is in Caswell County approximately four miles north of Pleasant Grove, North Carolina
(Figure 1). Directions are included on Figure 1. The Parcel creates a protected riparian area from top of
bank out to 200 feet along twelve unnamed tributaries (Maria Creek, Caballo Creek, Gallo Creek, Pollo
Creek, Jesus Creek, Perro Creek, Burro Creek, Pinto Creek, JR Creek, Panchito Creek, Vaca Creek, and
Martinez Creek). The primary purpose of the project is to provide riparian buffer mitigation credits and
nutrient offset credits to compensate for unavoidable impacts in the Cape Fear River Basin 03030002
Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC), within the Haw River sub -watershed of the Jordan Lake Watershed (Figure
2). The Parcel is located within the Cape Fear River Basin HUC 03030002030040 and NCDWR Subbasin
03-06-02 in Caswell County.
1.1 Parcel Description
The project features flow to Hughes Mill Creek, which is a tributary to Jordan Creek. Jordan Creek drains
to Stoney Creek and eventually to the Haw River and Jordan Lake. Hughes Mill Creek is classified as
Water Supply II (WS-II), High Quality Waters (HQW), and Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW).
This riparian mitigation project will reduce sediment and nutrient loading, provide and improve
terrestrial and instream habitats, and improve stream and bank stability. The Parcel is located on an
active cattle farm and is currently occupied by areas of pasture grass and existing forest. See Appendix A
for September 2022 current land use photographs. Restoring and enhancing the riparian area up to 200
feet from the streams will reduce nutrient and sediment inputs in the tributaries to Hughes Mill Creek,
and subsequently to the Haw River and Jordan Lake. The restored floodplain areas will filter sediment
during high rainfall events and provide cover and food for wildlife throughout the Parcel. Fencing out
cattle will protect the riparian buffers from their impact and aid in the development of a functioning
multi stratum forest. Preventing cattle access to streams will also further reduce sediment and nutrient
inputs by improving stream bank stability.
2.0 Mitigation Project Summary
2.1 Project Goals
The major goals of the proposed nutrient offset and buffer mitigation project are to provide ecological
and water quality enhancements to the Cape Fear River Basin by restoring, enhancing, and preserving,
WTwin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
HUC 03030002 Page 1 June 2023

the riparian area to create a functional riparian corridor. Specific enhancements to water quality and
ecological processes are outlined below in Table 1.
Table 1: Ecological and Water Quality Goals
Goals
Objectives
Nutrient input will be decreased by filtering runoff from surrounding
Decrease nutrient levels.
agricultural fields through restored native vegetation. The off -site nutrient
input will also be absorbed on -site by filtering flood flows through restored
floodplain areas, where flood flows can disperse through native vegetation.
Decrease sediment input.
Sediment from off -site sources will be captured by deposition on restored
floodplain areas where native vegetation will slow overland flow velocities.
Decrease water
temperature and increase
Planted riparian trees will shade the project features as they mature, reducing
dissolved oxygen
thermal pollution.
concentrations.
Fecal coliform input will be reduced by preventing livestock waste deposition
Reduce fecal coliform
in project riparian areas and streams through the installation of fencing
around the conservation easement. Furthermore, livestock waste from
inputs.
surrounding agricultural fields will be filtered through restored and enhanced
floodplain areas.
Create appropriate
Riparian areas will be restored by treating invasive vegetation and planting
terrestrial habitat.
native vegetation.
Permanently protect the
project Parcel from
A conservation easement will be recorded on the Parcel.
harmful uses.
2.2 Existing Parcel Conditions
The proposed buffer mitigation and nutrient offset project includes approximately 33.9 acres of
livestock pasture and forest along twelve unnamed tributaries to Hughes Mill Creek. Livestock have
access to all forested areas and project streams. The Parcel easement boundary will extend from top of
bank to at least 30 feet along nearly all project streams and out to 200 feet where possible (Figure 3).
There is a small area along Burro Creek, Jesus Creek, Maria Creek, and Vaca Creek where the easement
boundary does not extend to 30 feet, no credit will be proposed in these areas (Figure 7).
In general, project streams have a forested buffer that vary in width and are then surrounded by pasture
grass. Maria Creek flows west; it originates from a pond off -site and is bordered by existing forest that
varies in width from approximately 15 feet to 150 feet for its project length. Caballo Creek is an
ephemeral channel that originates from a wetland and flows north then turns into an intermittent
channel for 33 feet before joining Maria Creek. At its origin, Caballo Creek lacks a riparian buffer and is
surrounded by pasture grass. It then possesses a narrow -forested buffer for most of its length that
ranges from 10 feet to roughly 40 feet. Gallo Creek flows north and is surrounded by a narrow existing
forest that varies between 10-50 feet wide. Pollo Creek is a short channel that flows west for 100 feet
with mostly pasture grass surrounding the origin before entering a forested buffer. Jesus Creek begins
off -site and flows west across the Parcel. It is surrounded by a forested buffer for most of its project
extent, which ranges from 10 feet to over 200 feet. Perro Creek flows south until its confluence with
Jesus Creek and is surrounded in its entirety by existing forest that extends out to approximately 100
WTwin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
HUC 03030002 Page 2 June 2023

feet in some areas. Burro Creek, Pinto Creek, and Panchito Creek flow north and are surrounded by
forest all the way to their confluence with Jesus Creek. JR Creek flows south and begins as an ephemeral
channel originating from a wetland. About halfway down its project extent it becomes intermittent and
is surrounded by forest. Vaca Creek also originates from a wetland and is an ephemeral channel that
flows south until its confluence with Jesus Creek. The right floodplain has a narrow line of trees around
it with pasture grass dominating the remainder of that floodplain within the project extent. The left
floodplain is a forested buffer that reaches up to 100 feet. Martinez Creek begins within the project and
flows north out of the easement boundary before it eventually reaches its confluence with Jesus Creek
off -site. The Parcel is characterized by moderately sloped valleys of agriculture fields.
In general, this area has maintained its rural, farming character over the last 60 years with only minor
changes in land cover (see historical aerials in Appendix B). The consistency in land use within the
project watershed indicates that processes affecting hydrology, sediment supply, and nutrient and
pollutant delivery have not varied widely over this period. With a lack of developmental pressure,
watershed processes and stressors from outside the project limits are likely to remain consistent
throughout the implementation, monitoring, and closeout of this project.
Table 2: Buffer Project Attributes
Project Name
Twin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel
Hydrologic Unit Code
03030002030040
River Basin
Cape Fear
Credit Service Area
Haw River Sub watershed
Geographic Location (Lat, Long)
79.322039°W, 36.249011°N
Site Protection Instrument (DB, PG)
To be recorded
Total Credits
681,678.769 ftz riparian buffer, 1,265.280 Ibs N offset
and 57.781 Ibs P offset
Types of Credits
Riparian Buffer Credits and Nutrient Offset Credits
Buffer Plan Date
April 2023
Initial Planting Date
January 2024
Baseline Report Date
April 2024
MY1 Report Date
December 2024
MY2 Report Date
December 2025
MY3 Report Date
December 2026
MY4 Report Date
December 2027
MY5 Report Date
December 2028
2.3 Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Mitigation
On July 12, 2022, NCDWR assessed the project streams and issued the official Stream Determination
Letter on July 27, 2022. NCDWR also performed an onsite visit of the project area to determine viability
for buffer mitigation and nutrient offset on September 7, 2022 and issued a site viability letter on
October 26, 2022. Twelve features were assessed by NCDWR during the September 71h site visit and all
twelve were deemed viable for buffer credits. Gallo Creek, Pollo Creek, Maria Creek, Caballo Creek,
Jesus Creek, Vaca Creek, and JR Creek were deemed viable for nutrient offset credits. There have been
no changes to land use in the project area since NCDWR's 2022 site visits. A copy of both the "On -Site
(Stream Origin) Determination for Applicability to Jordan Lake Buffer Rules" and the "Site Viability for
WTwin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
HUC 03030002 Page 3 June 2023

Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset" letters from NCDWR are included in Appendix C and summarized in
Table 3.
Table 3: Project Features
Feature Name
Classification
Buffer Credit Viable
Nutrient Offset Viable
Gallo Creek
Yes
Pollo Creek
Stream
Yes
(non -forested areas only)
Maria Creek
Stream
Yes
Yes
(non -forested areas only)
Caballo Creek (Upper) starts at
Yes
Ephemeral
Yes
36.2524935,-79.3169567
(non -forested areas only)
Caballo Creek (lower) starts at
Yes
36.2537573,-79.3177004
Stream
Yes
(non -forested areas only)
Jesus Creek
Stream
Yes
Yes
(non -forested areas only)
Pinto Creek
Stream
Yes
No
Perro Creek, Burro Creek, Panchito
Stream
Creek, Martinez Creek
Yes
No
Vaca Creek starts at
Ephemeral
Yes
36.2516236,-79.3224631
Channel
Yes
(non -forested areas only)
JR Creek (upper) starts at
Ephemeral
Yes
36.2500610,-79.3195050
Channel
Yes
(non -forested areas only)
JR Creek (lower) starts at
Yes
36.2499057,-79.3194909
Stream
Yes
(non -forested areas only)
2.4 Alternative Mitigation
In addition to riparian restoration on subject streams, per the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rules (15A
NCAC 02B 0.0295 (o)), alternative mitigation is proposed on the Parcel in the form of riparian restoration
and enhancement on non -Subject streams, cattle exclusion enhancement of grazing areas adjacent to
streams, riparian restoration on ephemeral channels, and riparian preservation on subject and non -
subject streams. The proposed project complies in the following ways:
Riparian Restoration and Enhancement on Non -Subject Streams (15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(3):
• The non -subject streams were confirmed as intermittent or perennial streams by Division staff
certified per G.S. 143-214.25A using the Division publication, "Methodology for Identification of
Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins (v.4.11, 2010)" (See Appendix C for the
On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Jordan Lake Buffer Rules letter).
Cattle exclusion enhancement of grazing areas adjacent to streams (15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6):
• Grazing has been the predominant land use since the effective date of the applicable buffer rule
(See Appendix B for historical aerials).
• Mitigation work will include the permanent exclusion of grazing livestock and credit will be at a
2:1 ratio (See Table 10 for credit calculations and Figure 7 for proposed fencing).
Riparian Restoration on ephemeral channels (15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7):
• The entire area proposed for mitigation credit is within the contributing drainage area to the
ephemeral channel (See Figure 5 for watershed areas and Figure 7 for credit areas).
WTwin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
HUC 03030002 Page 4 June 2023

The ephemeral channel is directly connected to an intermittent or perennial stream and
contiguous with the rest of the mitigation site protected under the perpetual conservation
easement
• The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels will not comprise more than 25% of the
total area of buffer mitigation (See Table 10 for mitigation areas).
• The riparian buffer preservation area on ephemeral channels meets all the requirements of 15A
NCAC 02B .0295(o)(4)
Riparian Preservation on subject and non -subject streams (15A NCAC 02B. 0295 (o)(4) & (o)(5)):
• Both subject and non -subject streams were confirmed as intermittent or perennial streams by
Division staff certified per G.S. 143-214.25A using the Division publication, "Methodology for
Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins (v.4.11, 2010)" (See
Appendix C for the On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Jordan Lake Buffer Rules letter)
• The area of preservation credit will not comprise more than 25% of the total area of buffer
mitigation
2.5 Watershed Characterization
The Parcel is located within the HUC 03030002030040. All project features flow to Hughes Mill Creek,
which is a tributary to Jordan Creek. Jordan Creek drains to Stoney Creek and eventually to the Haw
River and Jordan Lake. Hughes Mill Creek is classified as Water Supply II (WS-II), High Quality Waters
(HQW), and Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW).
Topography, as indicated on the Burlington and Anderson USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
shows moderately sloped areas throughout the Parcel (Figure 4). Maria Creek, Jesus Creek, and Pinto
Creek are depicted as streams on the USGS Topographic Map. Drainage areas were delineated using the
USGS Stream Stats website and the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program's 2014-2015 Light
Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data. Land uses draining to the project streams are primarily a
combination of agricultural and forested land. The watershed areas and current land use around project
streams are depicted in Figure 5, the current land use photographs in Appendix A, and are summarized
in Table 4 below.
Table 4: Drainage Areas and Associated Land Use
Reach Name
Watershed Area
Land Use
(acres)
Maria Creek
84
87% cultivated crops and hay; 11% forest; 2%
shrub/herbaceous; <1% developed
Jesus Creek
173
49% cultivated crops and hay; 41% forested; 6%
developed; 3% herbaceous; 1% impervious surfaces
Gallo Creek
13
90% cultivated crops and hay; 10% forested
Pollo Creek
3
95% cultivated crops and hay; 5% forested
Martinez Creek
8
60%forested; 40% cultivated crops and hay
JR Creek
7
90% cultivated crops and hay; 10% forested
Panchito Creek
43
50% cultivated crops and hay; 40% forested; 8%
developed; 2% impervious
WTwin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
HUC 03030002 Page 5 June 2023

Watershed Area
Reach Name
(acres)
Land Use
60% forested; 30% cultivated crops and hay; 8%
Pinto Creek
24
developed; 2% impervious
Burro Creek
8
85% forested; 10% cultivated crops and hay; 5% developed
Perro Creek
12
40% forested; 55% cultivated crops and hay; 5% developed
Caballo Creek
13
90% cultivated crops and hay; 10% forested
Vaca Creek
8
90% cultivated crops and hay; 10% forested
2.6 Soils
The proposed Parcel is mapped by the Caswell County Soil Survey. The project area soils are described
below in Table 5. None of the project features are depicted as streams on the 1908 NRCS Soil Survey
provided in Figure 6.
Table 5: Project Soil Types and Descriptions
Soil Name
Description
Rowan -Poindexter complex is made up of approximately 85% Rowan and up to 15%
Rowan -Poindexter Complex
Poindexter components. This complex is found in upland interfluves and was formed
from weathered diorite, gabbro, diabase, and/or gneiss. This non-hydric complex is
well -drained and has a surface -horizon organic content of 1-2%.
Helena sandy loam is found in upland interfluves and was formed from weathered
Helena Sandy Loam
igneous rock and/or high-grade metamorphic rock. This non-hydric soil is well -
drained and has a surface -horizon organic content of approximately 1%.
Chewacla loam is found in river valley floodplains and was formed from igneous and
Chewacla Loam
metamorphic rock alluvium. This non-hydric soil is well -drained and has a surface -
horizon organic content of approximately 3%.
Source: Web Soil Survey https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/AppIWebSoilSurvey.aspx
2.7 Existing Vegetative Communities
Existing vegetation within the Parcel is primarily comprised of pasture grass and existing forest. Existing
vegetation species across the project area are listed in Table 6. This is not an exhaustive list but gives an
indication of types of species growing in the area.
Table 6: Existing Vegetation
Species
Common Name
Species
Common Name
Acerrubrum
Red Maple
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
Ailanthus altissima
Tree of Heaven
Quercus alba
White Oak
Alnus incana
Tag Alder
Quercus rubra
Northern Red Oak
Carpinus caroliniana
Ironwood
Salix nigra
Black Willow
Carya glabra
Pignut Hickory
Ulmus rubra
Slippery Elm
Celtis occidentalis
Hackberry
Fraxinus americana
White Ash
Cercis canadensis
Eastern Redbud
Juglans nigra
Black Walnut
Twin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
HUC 03030002 Page 6 June 2023

Cornus amomum
Silky Dogwood
Juniperus virginiana
Eastern Red Cedar
Fagus grandifolia
American Beech
Ligustrum sinense
Privet
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip Poplar
Liquidambarstyraciflua
Sweetgum
2.8 Threatened and Endangered Species
According to the Official Species List provided by the Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office of the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), there are no threatened or endangered species or final designated
critical habitat that occurs within the project boundary. Additionally, the USFWS responded to the
prospectus for the Twin Burros Mitigation Site on November 29, 2021, stating "it appears the action
[this project] is not likely to adversely affect federally listed species or their critical habitat as defined by
the ESA". All correspondence with USFWS and a list of Threatened and Endangered Species in Caswell
County, NC is included in Appendix D.
2.9 Cultural Resources
There are no existing structures in the project area. The Parcel is not located near any sites listed on the
National Register with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). SHPO was contacted with request
for review and comment on June 9, 2022. SHPO responded on August 2, 2022 that they "are aware of no
historic resources which would be affected by the project" and have no comment on the project as it is
currently proposed. The SHPO request and response are included in Appendix D.
2.10 FEMA Floodplain Compliance
The Parcel is represented on the Caswell County Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panels 9900 and
9901. There are no FEMA-mapped streams within the Parcel. However, 200 LF of Maria Creek falls
within the mapped 100-year floodplain of Hughes Mill Creek. Wildlands will coordinate with the local
floodplain administrator to make sure that all regulatory requirements are met. The Parcel will be
designed to avoid adverse floodplain impacts or hydrologic trespass on adjacent properties or local
roadways.
2.11 Parcel Location, Parcel Constraints, and Access
The project area is split into two sections which are both easily accessible, one via Shaniqua Drive and
the other via Ross Acres Road 2. Within each section, there are no easement breaks. There are no
internal crossings on the northern project section, however, there are four proposed internal culvert
crossings on the southern project section. The internal crossings will have gates and cattle will be
permitted to cross only in these areas, per the conservation easement language. There are multiple
existing private access easements, all located outside of the proposed conservation easement.
2.12 Other Environmental Conditions
An EDR Radius Map Report with Geocheck was ordered for the Parcel through Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. on May 11, 2021. Neither the target property nor the adjacent properties were listed in
any of the Federal, State, or Tribal environmental databases searched by EDR. There were no known or
potentially hazardous waste sites identified within or immediately adjacent to the project area. The
Executive Summary of the EDR report is included in Appendix D.
3.0 Site Protection Instrument
The land required for planting, management, and stewardship of the mitigation project includes
portions of the parcels listed in Table 7. The Parcel will remain in private ownership, protected in its
WTwin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
HUC 03030002 Page 7 June 2023

entirety by an approved NCDWR long term steward, and will be managed under the terms detailed in an
approved NCDWR conservation easement.
Table7: Site Protection Instrument
Site
Deed Book
Acreage
Landowner
PIN
County
Protection
and Page
to be
Instrument
Number
Protected
Jesus Bosquez Martinez and
990100600460
Conservation
To Be
Caswell
19.8
Maria T Martinez
990000597769
Easement
Recorded
Israel Villalpando and Francisco
Conservation
To Be
990100610825
Caswell
14.1
Villalpando
Easement
Recorded
4.0 Mitigation Work Plan
The project will restore and enhance agriculturally impacted land along twelve tributaries on the Parcel
to a protected riparian corridor, improving the ecological function of the area. Figure 7 illustrates the
nutrient offset credit areas and riparian buffer credit areas and conceptual design; Figure 8 depicts the
riparian zones and designated widths for the Parcel.
4.1 Parcel Preparation
In general, riparian areas will either be restored, enhanced by installing fencing to exclude cattle, or
preserved with minimum widths of 20 feet from tops of banks and maximum widths of 200 feet from
tops of banks. Much of the land within 200 feet from top of bank of the project features has either been
cleared and maintained for active cattle pastures or has remained forested. Areas slated for riparian
restoration that are not impacted by the construction of the stream and wetland mitigation project will
require little site preparation including select herbicide treatments or limited mechanical clearing to
removed undesirable underbrush, invasive species, and fescue (Festuca spp.). Other areas of the
easement will be graded in accordance with the IRT approved stream mitigation plan. Any haul roads or
other areas of compacted soil including areas compacted by cattle within the easement boundary will be
ripped prior to planting. The specifics of the stream restoration project are in the Twin Burros Stream
and Wetland Mitigation Plan. Section 6.7 of the Twin Burros Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plan
contains information on grading. A 401 & 404 permit will be required for all stream restoration work and
will be obtained before any work in the waters begins.
4.2 Riparian Area Restoration Activities
Riparian area restoration will involve planting appropriate native tree species along the riparian corridor.
Vegetation management and herbicide applications may be needed over the first few years of tree
establishment in the riparian restoration areas to prevent encroachment of undesirable species that
may out -compete the planted native vegetation. Tree and shrub species planted across the riparian
areas of the Parcel will include a mixture of the species listed in the Twin Burros Mitigation Site Planting
Tables, located in Appendix E. The primary species will include the species listed in Table 8. All activities
associated with generating riparian buffer and nutrient offset credits will occur at the same time as the
stream and wetland mitigation activities and not before.
Table 8: Selected Tree Species
Species
Common Name
Composition
Forest Strata
Tree/Shrub
Quercus alba
White Oak
10%
Canopy
Tree
WTwin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
HUC 03030002 Page 8 June 2023

Species
Common Name
Composition
Forest Strata
Tree/Shrub
Quercus rubra
Northern Red Oak
10%
Canopy
Tree
Quercus shumardii
Shumard Oak
5%
Canopy
Tree
Ulmus americana
American Elm
10%
Canopy
Tree
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
5%
Canopy
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
10%
Canopy
Tree
Betula nigra
River Birch
10%
Canopy
Tree
Nyssa sylvatica
Black Gum
10%
Canopy
Tree
Diospyros virginiana
Persimmon
10%
Canopy
Tree
Fagus grandifolia
American Beech
3%
Canopy
Tree
Hamamelis virginiana
Witch Hazel
5%
Subcanopy
Shrub
Cercis canadensis
Eastern Redbud
5%
Subcanopy
Shrub
Carpinus caroliniana
Ironwood
3%
Subcanopy
Shrub
Asimina triloba
Pawpaw
4%
Subcanopy
Shrub
Table 9: Selected Wetland Tree Species
Wetland Planting Zone
Species
Common Name
Composition
Forest Strata
Tree/Shrub
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
10%
Canopy
Tree
Betula nigra
River Birch
10%
Canopy
Tree
Ulmus americana
American Elm
15%
Canopy
Tree
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
10%
Canopy
Tree
Quercus shumardii
Shumard Oak
5%
Canopy
Tree
Salix nigra
Black Willow
10%
Canopy
Tree
Salixsericea
Silky Willow
5%
Subcanopy
Shrub
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
10%
Canopy
Tree
Celtis laevigata
Sugarberry
10%
Canopy
Tree
Cephalanthus
occidentalis
Buttonbush
5%
Subcanopy
Shrub
Carpinus caroliniana
Ironwood
5%
Subcanopy
Shrub
Cornus amomum
Silky Dogwood
5%
Subcanopy
Shrub
Trees and shrubs will be spaced at 6 feet by 12 feet during planting, which is equivalent to a stem
density of 521 stems per acre and is sufficient to meet the performance standards outlined in the Rule
15A NCAC 02B .0295 of 260 planted trees and shrubs per acre at the end of five years. At least 8 species
listed in Table 8 will be planted. If a species is not available at the time of planting, the percentage
composition of one or more of the available species will be increased to ensure the same number of
trees required to meet the proposed density are planted. No one species will be planted at a
composition higher than 15%. Stems will be well mixed prior to planting to ensure diversity of bare root
WTwin Burros Litigation Bank Parcel Nutrient Offset & Buffer Litigation Plan
HUC 03030002 Page 9 June 2023

species across the Parcel. Due to the nature of random mixing, some stems of the same species might
be planted together in some areas. No one tree or shrub species will be greater than 50% of the
established stems. The final performance standard shall include a minimum of four native hardwood
tree and native shrub species. A regionally appropriate seed mix of warm season grasses and
wildflowers will also be applied to provide temporary and permanent ground cover for soil stabilization
and reduction of sediment loss during rain events in areas without existing herbaceous cover. The
proposed planting area includes the areas identified as Riparian Restoration for Buffer Credits and
Riparian Restoration for Nutrient Offset Credits on Figure 7. Additionally, areas that are generating
wetland credits in the associated Twin Burros Mitigation Site will be planted with species listed in Table
9. These areas will not generate riparian buffer or nutrient offset credit and are therefore not tied to
success criteria stated in Section 5.0. Planting is scheduled for January 2024.
4.3 Riparian Area Enhancement Via Cattle Exclusion Activities
For enhancement areas under NCAC 02B .0295(o)(6), cattle exclusion, planting isn't anticipated to be
needed except where required in the stream mitigation plan. Fencing will be installed throughout the
entirety of the easement to discontinue cattle access. A seed mix as identified in Appendix E will be
applied where livestock have created bare soils and sufficient sunlight is available to support the species
in the seed mix.
4.4 Riparian Area Preservation Activities
There will be no parcel preparation work done in the riparian preservation areas under 15NCAC 02B
.0295(o)(4) except as required in the stream mitigation plan. The area of preservation credit within the
buffer mitigation site is less than 25% of the total area of buffer mitigation, as shown in Table 10. The
preservation area will be protected in perpetuity under a conservation easement and fencing will be
installed throughout the entire easement boundary.
4.5 NCDWR As -Built Evaluation
Within 30 calendar days after completing the establishment of the buffer mitigation and nutrient offset
areas, the Sponsor will submit written notification to NCDWR documenting that all buffer mitigation and
nutrient offset activities have been completed, including the installation of fencing and adequate
marking of easement boundaries. In addition, all stream and wetland mitigation activities for the Twin
Burros Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site must be completed prior to the NCDWR as -built evaluation.
Failure to submit written notification within 30 days may result in a modified credit release schedule or
a delay in the issuance of credit releases.
5.0 Monitoring and Maintenance Plan
5.1 Monitoring Protocol
Vegetation monitoring plots will be installed and evaluated within the riparian restoration areas to
measure the survival of the planted trees and shrubs. The plots will be randomly placed throughout the
planted riparian areas and will be representative of areas generating riparian buffer credits and nutrient
offset credits. A total of 5 plots will be established within restoration areas and will be randomly placed
such that the plots are representative of the buffer mitigation credit areas (Figure 9). The size of
individual quadrants will be 100 square meters. All 5 vegetation plots will be shared with the stream and
wetland mitigation bank.
Vegetation assessments will be conducted and follow the Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) Level 2
Protocol for Recording Vegetation (Lee et al., 2008). A reference photo will be taken from the
WTwin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
HUC 03030002 Page 10 June 2023

southwestern corner of each of the 5 plots. Overview photos will be taken each monitoring year and
provided in the annual reports. All planted stems will be marked with flagging tape and recorded.
The first annual monitoring activities will commence at the end of the first growing season, at least five
months after planting has been completed and no earlier than the fall season. Species composition,
height, vigor, and survival rates will be evaluated on an annual basis by plot. The total number of
volunteer woody stems will also be documented and reported. The measure of vegetative success for
the Parcel will be the survival of at least four native hardwood tree and shrub species, where no one
species is greater than 50% of the established planted stems, and an established density of at least 260
planted trees and shrubs per acre at the end of the fifth year of monitoring. Appropriate and desirable
native volunteer species may be included in the Parcel's density to meet the performance standards
with written NCDWR approval.
A visual assessment of the cattle exclusion areas within the conservation easement will also be
performed each year to confirm:
• Existing fencing is in good condition throughout the site;
• No cattle access within the conservation easement area;
• No encroachment has occurred;
• Diffuse flow is being maintained in the conservation easement area; and
• There has not been any cutting, clearing, filling, grading, or similar activities that would
negatively affect the functioning of the buffer.
The Sponsor shall submit the annual monitoring report to NCDWR by December 315T of each year for five
consecutive years and will follow the terms and conditions of the MBI.
5.2 Parcel Maintenance
If the Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve the success criteria outlined in Section
5.1, adaptive measures will be developed and/or appropriate remedial actions will be implemented.
Maintenance will be performed to correct any identified problems on the Parcel that have a high
likelihood of affecting project success. Such items include, but are not limited to, fire, flooding, drought,
or insects that cause excess tree mortality. Any actions implemented will be designed to achieve the
success criteria and will include a work schedule and updated monitoring criteria. A rigorous herbicide
schedule may need to be implemented in the first few years of tree establishment in the restoration
areas to prevent establishment of invasive species that may out -compete the planted native vegetation.
The only herbicides used on the Parcel will be aquatic approved herbicides that will be applied in
accordance with North Carolina Department of Agriculture rules and regulations.
The easement boundary will be checked annually as part of monitoring activities. The condition of
fencing will be assessed to ensure livestock do not have access to the easement. Easement boundary
conditions as well as any maintenance performed will be reported in the annual monitoring reports to
NCDWR.
5.3 Easement Boundaries
Easement boundaries will be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the Parcel and
adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by marker, post, tree -blazing, or other means as
allowed by site conditions and/or conservation easement prior to the NCDWR onsite As -Built evaluation
for Task 2 credit release. Boundary markers that have been disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be
repaired and/or replaced on an as needed basis. Contact information for the conservation easement
holder will be included on easement markers.
WTwin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
HUC 03030002 Page 11 June 2023

credits in riparian restoration areas from 101-200 feet from top of bank along streams and ephemeral
channels. These areas will not be convertible to riparian buffer credits per the MBI. The total credit
potential of riparian buffer credit convertible to nutrient offset credit is represented in Table 9 below
and will be documented in the As -Built Report and will be supported by the As -Built survey. There will
be four(4) credit ledgers for the project: Buffer Restoration, Buffer Enhancement (Cattle Exclusion) with
Buffer Preservation, Nitrogen Nutrient Offset Credits (46.10836 Delivery Factor) and Phosphorus
Nutrient Offset Credits (1,009.66554 Delivery Factor).
WTwin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
HUC 03030002 Page 13 June 2023

Table 10: Twin Burros Buffer Mitigation Bank — Project Credit Table
Cape Fear - Jordan Haw 03030002030040
Project Area
N Credit Conversion Ratio (ftz/pound)
P Credit Conversion Ratio (ftz/pound)
46.10836
1009.66554
Subject?
Min -Max
Total
Initial
Final
Convertible
Delivered
Delivered
Credit Type
Location
(enter NO if
Feature Type
Mitigation Activity
Buffer
Feature Name
Total Area
(Creditable)
Credit
%Full Credit
Credit
Convertible to
Riparian
to Nutrient
Nutrient
Nutrient
ephemeral
Width (ft)
z
(ft)
Area of Buffer
Ratio
Ratio
Riparian Buffer?
Buffer Credits
Offset?
Offset: N (Ibs)
Offset: P
or ditch 1)
Mitigation (ft2)
(x:1)
(x:1)
(Ibs)
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
20-29
Maria Creek
6
6
1
75%
1.33333
Yes
4.500
No
—
—
Maria Creek, Jesus
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
0-100
228,883
228,883
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
228,883.000
Yes
4,964.024
226.692
Creek
Buffer
Rural
No
I / P
Restoration
0-100
Gallo Creek, Pollo
37,036
37,036
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
37,036.000
Yes
803.238
36.681
Creek
Buffer
Rural
No
Ephemeral
Restoration
20-29
Vaca Creek
594
594
1
75%
1.33333
Yes
445.501
No
—
—
Vaca Creek, JR
Buffer
Rural
No
Ephemeral
Restoration
0-100
46,542
46,542
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
46,542.000
Yes
1,009.405
46.096
Creek, Caballo Creek
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I / P
Enhancement via
20-29
Maria Creek
200
200
2
75%
2.66667
Yes
75.000
No
—
—
Cattle Exclusion
Enhancement via
Buffer
Rural
No
I / P
20-29
Burro Creek
250
250
2
75%
2.66667
Yes
93.750
No
—
—
Cattle Exclusion
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I / P
Enhancement via
0-100
Maria Creek, Jesus
494,924
494,924
2
100%
2.00000
Yes
247,462.000
No
—
—
Cattle Exclusion
Creek, Pinto Creek
Gallo Creek, Pollo
Creek, Martinez
Buffer
Rural
No
I / P
Enhancement via
0-100
Creek, JR Creek,
195,483
195,483
2
100%
2.00000
Yes
97,741.500
No
—
—
Cattle Exclusion
Panchito Creek,
Burro Creek, Perro
Creek
Enhancement via
Maria Creek, Jesus
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I / P
101-200
114,893
114,893
2
33%
6.06061
Yes
18,957.333
No
—
—
Cattle Exclusion
Creek
Buffer
Rural
No
I / P
Enhancement via
101-200
Martinez Creek,
409
409
2
33%
6.06061
Yes
67.485
No
—
—
Cattle Exclusion
Panchito Creek
Nutrient
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
101-200
Maria Creek, Jesus
51,293
51,293
1
33%
3.03030
No
—
Yes
1,112.445
50.802
Offset
Creek
Nutrient
Vaca Creek, Caballo
Rural
No
Ephemeral
Restoration
101-200
7,047
7,047
1
33%
3.03030
No
—
Yes
152.836
6.979
Offset
Creek
Totals (ft2):
1,177,560
1,177,560
677,308.069 8,041.947 367.250
Total Buffer (ft2):
,119,220
1,119,220
r58,340
N/A
Total Nutrient Offset (ft2):
WTwin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
HUC 03030002 Page 14 June 2023

Total Ephemeral Area (ft') for Credit: 69,004 69,004
Total Eligible Ephemeral Area (ft'): 285,272 6.0% Ephemeral Reaches as %TABM
Total Eligible for Preservation (ftz): 373,073 1.5% Preservation as % TABM
Total
Credit Type
Location
Subject?
Feature
Mitigation Activity
Min -Max Buffer Width (ft)
Feature Name
Total
(Creditable)
Initial Credit
% Full
Final Credit
Riparian Buffer
Type
Area (sf)
Area for Buffer
Ratio (x:1)
Credit
Ratio (x:1)
Credits
Mitigation (ft')
Rural
No
Ephemeral
20-29
Vaca Creek
58
58
5
75%
6.66667
8.700
Vaca Creek, Caballo
Rural
No
Ephemeral
0-100
21,810
21,810
5
100%
5.00000
4,362.000
Creek, JR Creek
Preservation Area Subtotals
(ft2): 21,868 21,868
Table 11: Twin Burros Buffer Mitigation Bank - Total Area of Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION (TABM)
Mitigation Totals
Square Feet
Credits
Restoration:
313,061
312,911.001
Enhancement:
806,160
364,397.067
Preservation:
21,868
4,370.700
Total Riparian Buffer:
1,141,089
681,678.769
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals
Square Feet
Credits
Nutrient
Offset:
Nitrogen:
58,340
1,265.280
Phosphorus:
57.781
Upon submittal of the appropriate documentation by the Sponsor and subsequent approval by NCDWR, the mitigation credits associated with the Twin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel will be released as described in the MBI.
WTwin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
HUC 03030002 Page 15 June 2023

8.0 References
Lee, M.T., Peet, R.K., Roberts, S.D., & Wentworth, T.R. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation
Version 4.2. http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-eep-protocol-v4.2-lev1-2.pdf
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 2011. Web Soil Survey of Caswell County.
http://websoiIsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), 2015. 15A NCAC 02B .0259 Mitigation
Program Requirements for Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers.
http://reports.oa h.state. nc. us/ncac/title% 2015a / 20-
%20envi ron menta l%20g ua l ity/cha Ater%2002%20-
%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20b/15a%20ncac%2002b%20.0295.pdf
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), 2020. 15 NCAC 02B .0703 Nutrient Offset
Credit Trading.
http://reports.oa h.state. nc. us/ncac/title% 2015a / 20-
%20envi ron menta l%20qua l ity/cha pter%2002%20-
%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20b/15a%20ncac%2002b%20.0703. pdf
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2011. Surface Water Classifications.
http://porta1.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/csu/classifications
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP), 2021. Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Database,
Wayne County, NC. https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/
North Carolina Geological Survey (NCGS), 2009. Mineral Resources.
http://www.geology.enr.state.nc.us/Mineral%20resources/mineralresources.html
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 2021. Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal
Species of Concern and Candidate Species, Caswell County, NC. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/
WTwin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
HUC 03030002 Page 16 June 2023

Figures

Directions: From the City of Raleigh, travel on 1-40 W for 40
miles. Take exit 153 to merge onto NC-119 N/S 5th St/S
North Carolina Hwy 119 and continue to follow signs for
NC-119 N. Continue on NC-119 N for 14 miles, then turn
left onto Huffines Road. Travel on Huffines Road for 0.5
miles before turning left onto E Hughes Mill Road. Continue
for 0.6 miles, then turn right onto Ross Acres Rd 2. The
Parcel is accessible where the road dead -ends.
Bank Parcel Conservation Easement
Twin Burros Bank Parcel Location
aA
_ U
cn =
a co
a
�a
�u es Mill Gt°Wr ct
Q
41
CASWELL
-- ALAMANCE -- --------------———————
-------
Hughes
- N
WWILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
Jorge crQ
r -
U
z
z
W ,ttre Pace Rd
ens Creek �0\?Q6 4,11.
09
770 ft Corbett Rd
O-
CL
a
�o
Oar\y S
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Twin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel
0 0.5 1 Miles Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
I I I I I Cape Fear River Basin (03030002)
Caswell County, NC

P.irrr illy
County Boundaries
_.._..—;,................................................ �...............
HUC 03030002
Jordan Lake Sub -Watersheds
Service Area for Riparian Buffer Credits and
j
Nutrient Offset Credits - Haw River
Subwatershed
• PAayodan
j
j Ll rll.on
j
Twin Burros Bank Parcel Location
ieidsville
1
j
I
I n
u_.._..
_.•
i �a
j'.-.I
IIIIIIII IIII
Oak Ridge
j
� 1
j 1
j
Haw River Subwatershed
�
I. -; ille
j
Burlington
•
Hillsborough j
40
Durham
j High Point
I
e
I -New F
Upper. Ho e
1----•-----•—•--•--•:�.I
°_'.._.
1p
Chap-' Hill
1.
.i
1
L )wer
s r
I
9w Hope
A;Ir l ,,ro
Ap
c
-�_
j�
•
Or �.7 y.rc
H
S pr
1
1
'"w `'hea,oc
J , 7
•
-
;
Raven
T. Rock
Sate Park
Figure 2. Credit Service Area Map
0-1 W I L D L A N D S Twin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel
ENGINEERING 0 6 12 Miles Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
I I I I I Cape Fear River Basin (03030002)
Caswell County, NC

Project Location
Bank Parcel Conservation Easement
/ Existing Wetlands
Perennial Project Stream
/ Intermittent Project Stream
�+ Ephemeral Project Stream
Non -Project Stream
Existing Fence
Existing Culverts
Reach Break
-'X
o-
k
I k ► � I
k I
_ 1
k r
ra Q�13Ar
� + X
4- 1
x
`i + X
h$
r +x
+ Y, o
k =�
WILDLANDS
�0 E N G I N E E R I N G
Figure 3. Site Map
Twin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel
0 200 400 Feet Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
Cape Fear River Basin (03030002)
Caswell County, NC

}dp
■
' # ►
►
Project Location
`-- Bank Parcel Conservation Easement
o.s.,S.ACID
r
7
Burlington and Anderson USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangles
Figure 4. USGS Topographic Map
W I L D L A N D S 0 250 500 Feet Twin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel
E N G I N E E R I N G I i I i I Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
Cape Fear River Basin (03030002)
Caswell County, NC

Bank Parcel Conservation Easement
k*
Perennial Project Stream
`
Intermittent Project Stream
Ephemeral Project Stream
. Maria Creek Watershed
`_ i Jesus Creek Watershed
EM Subwatershed
— Non -Project Stream
y E.
Topographic Contour (4')
4
.�• a
�� �� ��� � �:d� � ��� '`� � �,.
i
•
`, 3
i i
_ L Y
(IIIIIII lj
• `•P _ y '�}Si "i
FF
i R
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING 0 350 700Feet
I I I I I
Figure 5. Watershed Map
Twin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel
Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
Cape Fear River Basin (03030002)
Caswell County, NC

0 I = Project Location
1908 NRCS Soil Survey of Caswell County
Bank Parcel Conservation Easement
a
1
Figure 6. 1908 NRCS Soil Survey Map
Twin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel
W I L D L A N D S 0 250 500 Feet Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Plan
E N G I N E E R I N G I i I i I Cape Fear River Basin (03030002)
Caswell County, NC

Project Location
FinalTOB_BuffersCETOBcrossWetland_
Riparian Enhancement Via
Riparian Restoration for
Bank Parcel Conservation
Mitigation Approach
Cattle Exclusion for Buffer
Nutrient Offset Credit
Easement
Riparian Restoration for Buffer
Credit (0'-100')
(101'-200')
Stream Mitigation
Credit - Ephemeral (20'-29')
Riparian Enhancement Via
Riparian Restoration for
Riparian Restoration for Buffer
LLa Cattle Exclusion for Buffer
Nutrient Offset Credit -
Ephemeral Channel
Credit - Ephemeral (0'-100')
Credit (101'-200')
Ephemeral (20'-29')
30' from Top of Bank
Riparian Restoration for Buffer
Riparian Preservation for
Not for Credit - Pocket Wetland
C 50' from Top of Bank
Credit (20'-29')
Bufffer Credit - Ephemeral "
"' BMP
100' from Top of Bank
■ Riparian Restoration for Buffer
(20'-29')
Riparian Preservation for Buffer
Not for Credit - Wetland
Mitigation
Credit
30' from Top of Bank
Credit - Ephemeral (0'-100')
Not for Credit
Riparian Enhancement
n Enhancement Via
® Cattle Exclusion for Buffer
Non -Project Stream
Credit (20'-29')
AWILDLANDS
E N G I N E E R I N G
Figure 8. Riparian Buffer Zones Map
Twin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel
Buffer Mitigation Plan
0 300 600 Feet Cape Fear River Basin (03030002)
I i I i I
Caswell County, NC

Appendix A:
Current land Use Photographs

q
IWN
r
A-�
rt

AN
Ar
z`d
Aw
Ali
r:

+eta v ,c �` r>441
71
}"
"
6
.y

6 •O
fp
ri
3 a?Y
3 .
At

-
� ...
7,
a+
e
r f
apW-m
f r
4R 'I
na
Alp,
t�40" W-.
1w
x
i ;'t

MIT
., q.
6
� � � �
gyp• � a IP
i
f
�
F
_
a
�".wl
Mr•
s.N'� Ak. �
Y
�s
4you!
�
to
i;iiy !
Oki
a
:r ,ram

N
"
1 3.
Rz J yy
i eFsE�4
(AI
3
7
M
1
A
�
46,
1
i
ryJo
►:

Reach 3 — Upstream (0910712022) 1 Reach 3 — Upstream (0910712022) 1
Reach 3 — Downstream (0910712022) 1 Reach 3 — Downstream (0910712022) 1
Caballo Creek
Downstream (0910712022) 1 Downstream (0910712022) 1
Twin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel
HUC 03030002

Y
.
s a,
�kWON,` C
❑■
�,., �p jjj
3r
'fie.
f
1
t
t
% +8
I �
X
a
}� r
QL
• 3 PI c" l �Ei�
9 d
k $ 1

Gallo Creek
Downstream (0910712022) 1 Downstream (0910712022) 1
Upstream (0910712022) I Upstream (0910712022)
Twin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel
HUC 03030002

Appendix B:
Historical Aerials

Tom'N t..
v�tr ..
ter':
Y
� 4
".. +C• s sib. !•Y-"?}F.��f�'AS' ,�� -,. y-f:-.Y,S�_;
may'
Ivi
S

NZ-1 * , R.
a F
4*4
47
low
r 7;
lie

Appendix C:
On Site Determination of Applicability to Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules
Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset letter

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR.
Director
Kaitlyn Hogarth
Wildlands Engineering
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
July 27, 2022
Delivered via email to: [e-mail]
Subject: On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Jordan Lake Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0267)
Subject Property: Twin Burros Mitigation Site, Caswell County
Dear Mr. Yates:
On July 12, 2022, at your request, I conducted an on -site determination to review features located on the
subject project for stream determinations with regards to the above noted state regulations.
The attached Figure 3 Site Map accurately depicts the channels that were reviewed during the site visit
as well as origin locations located within the property limits and were documented by Wildlands
Engineering during the site visit. The channels that were reviewed and their subjectivity to the above
cited rules are described in the table below. Please note that these regulations may be subject to
change in the future.
Feature Identifier
Type of Feature
Randleman Buffer Rules
Subjectivity
Martinez Creek
Intermittent Stream
Not Subject
Vaca Creek
Ephemeral Stream
Not Subject
Panchito Creek
Perennial Stream
Not Subject
JR Creek
Ephemeral Stream / Intermittent Stream
Not Subject
Pinto Creek
Intermittent Stream
Subject
Burro Creek
Intermittent Stream
Not Subject
Perro Creek
Intermittent Stream
Not Subject
Jesus Creek
Perennial Stream
Subject
Maria Creek
Perennial Stream
Subject
Caballo Creek
Ephemeral Stream / Intermittent Stream
Not Subject
Pollo Creek
Intermittent Stream
Not Subject
Gallo Creek
Perennial Stream
Not Subject
D E Q�J/ North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
!� Winston-Salem Regional Office 1 450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300 1 Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
NoarH CAROLINA 336.776.9800
oeparrmem or eartruomemai aaaZ�

Page 2 of 2
The owner (or future owners) should notify the Division (and other relevant agencies) of this decision in
any future correspondences concerning this property. This on -site determination shall expire five (5)
years from the date of this letter.
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the Division or Delegated Local
Authority that a surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination
by the Director. A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing
c/o 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650. Individuals that
dispute a determination by the Division or Delegated Local Authority that "exempts" surface water from
the buffer rule may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you
receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60-day statutory appeal time does not start
until the affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. The
Division recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third party
appeals are made in a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing within 60 days.
This letter only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity within
Waters of the United States or Waters of the State or their associated buffers. If you have any additional
questions or require additional information, please contact me at 336-776-9693 or
[e-mail].
Sin erell
5igried by::
"t Ho pwood
4 ED631098F411
Sue omewood
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Enclosures: USGS Topo Map
Wildlands Engineering- Figure 3. Site Map — DWR initialed/dated
Cc: Jesus Bosquez Martinez & Maria T. Martinez, 708 Oakgrove Dr, Graham NC 27253-3175
Israel Villalpando and Francisco and Tabatha Villalpando, 1125 Annie Jane Ct, Graham NC 27252
Katie Merritt, DWR (via email)
DWR, Winston-Salem Regional Office
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
D E Q�� Winston-Salem Regional Office 1 450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300 1 Raleigh, North Carolina 27105
NORTH CAROLINA -
oeparrmemorea.noomemaiaaar� 336.776.9800

= Project Location
_ i Proposed Conservation Easement +
,A
D��
_� I
1 1 �
1
N.
Burlington and Anderson USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangles
ktwWILDLANDS
v ENGINEERING
Figure 1. USGS Topographic Map
0 300 600 Feet Twin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel
I I I t Cape Fear River Basin (03030002)
Caswell County, NC

�WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
ISH
DS
7/27/2022
Figure 3. Site Map
0 200 400 Feet Twin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel
, , , , , L Cape Fear River Basin (03030002)
Caswell County, NC

DocuSign Envelope ID: 13616880-7564-4EB4-ABA9-D79DOBA77E44
ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RICHAM E. ROGERS, JR.
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
October 26, 2022
Kaitlyn Hogarth
Wildlands Engineering
(via electronic mail: khogarthgwildlandseng com
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset — Twin Burros Site
Near 36.2517563,-79.3169865 located at 192 Shaniqua Lane in Burlington, NC
Cape Fear River Basin — Haw River Subwatershed
Caswell County
Dear Ms. Hogarth,
On July 28, 2022, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), received a request
from you on behalf of Wildlands Engineering (Wildlands) for a site visit near the above -referenced
site in the Cape Fear River Basin within the Haw River Subwatershed of Jordan Lake. The site visit
was to determine the potential for nutrient offset and buffer mitigation within a proposed
conservation easement boundary, which is more accurately depicted in the attached maps labeled
"Concept Map A" and "Concept Map B", both prepared by Wildlands. The proposed easement
boundaries on the maps include all riparian areas intended to be proposed as part of the buffer
mitigation and nutrient offset site. Additionally, Figure 3 shows the stream origins performed by
DWR and is attached to this correspondence. This site is also being proposed as a stream mitigation
site and therefore stream bank instability or presence of erosional rills within riparian areas were not
addressed. On September 5, 2022, Ms. Merritt performed a site assessment of the subject site. Staff
with RS were also present.
Ms. Merritt's evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank (TOB)
and landward 200' from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295 and for
nutrient offset pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703 and using 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to define the
mitigation type determinations.
D E Q �J North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1 1611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611
NORTH C of Envi A a 919.707.9000
Deparlmem of Envlronmenml Duali�

DocuSign Envelope ID: 13616880-7564-4EB4-ABA9-D79DOBA77E44
Twin Burros Site
Wildlands
October 26, 2022
Feature
Classification
1Subiect
Riparian Land uses
Buffer
3Nutrient
4'Mitigation Tyne Determination Win
onsite
to
adiacent to Feature
Credit
Offset Viable
riparian areas
Buffer
0( 200,)
Viable
Rule
Gallo Creek,
Stream
No
Combination of forested
'Yes
Yes (non-
Non -forested Pasture - Restoration site
Pollo Creek
and non -forested pasture
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(3)
grazed by cattle.
pasture only)
Forested Pasture - Enhancement Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6)
Maria Creek
Stream
Yes
Combination of forested
'Yes
Yes (non-
Non -forested Pasture - Restoration site
and non -forested pasture
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
grazed by cattle.
pasture only)
Forested Pasture - Enhancement Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6)
Caballo
Ephemeral
No
Combination of forested
2•6Yes
Yes (non-
Non -Forested Pasture - Restoration Site
Creek
and non -forested pasture
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7)
(upper)_
grazed by cattle
pasture only)
starts at
Forested Pasture — Preservation Site per
36.2524935,
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4)
-79.3169567
Caballo
Stream
No
Combination of forested
7Yes
Yes (non-
Non -forested Pasture - Restoration site
Creek
and non -forested pasture
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(3)
(lower)
grazed by cattle.
pasture only)
starts at
Forested Pasture - Enhancement Site per
36.2537573,
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6)
-79.3177004
Jesus Creek
Stream
Yes
Combination of forested
7YeS
Yes (non-
Non -forested Pasture - Restoration site
and non -forested pasture
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
grazed by cattle.
pasture only)
Forested Pasture - Enhancement Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6)
Pinto Creek
Stream
Yes
forested pasture grazed by
7Yes
No
Forested Pasture - Enhancement Site per
cattle
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6)
Perro Creek,
Stream
No
forested pasture grazed by
7Yes
No
Forested Pasture - Enhancement Site per
Burro Creek,
cattle
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6)
Panchito
Creek,
Martinez
Creek
Vaca
Ephemeral
No
Combination of forested
2•6Yes
Yes (non-
Non -Forested Pasture - Restoration Site
starts at
and non -forested pasture
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7)
36.2516236,
grazed by cattle
pasture only)
-79.3224631
Forested Pasture — Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4)
Page 2 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 13616880-7564-4EB4-ABA9-D79DOBA77E44
Twin Burros Site
Wildlands
October 26, 2022
Feature
Classification
1Sublect
Riparian Land uses
Buffer
3Nutrient
4,SMitigation Type Determination w/in
onsite
to
adiacent to Feature
Credit
Offset Viable
riparian areas
Buffer
0( 200')
Viable
Rule
JR Creek
Ephemeral
No
Combination of forested
2.6Yes
Yes (non-
Non -Forested Pasture - Restoration Site
(upper)
and non -forested pasture
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7)
starts at
grazed by cattle
pasture only)
36.2500610,
Forested Pasture — Preservation Site per
-79.3195050
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4)
JR Creek
Stream
No
Combination of forested
7Yes
Yes (non-
Non -forested Pasture - Restoration site
(lower)
and non -forested pasture
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(3)
starts at
grazed by cattle.
pasture only)
36.2499057,
Forested Pasture - Enhancement Site per
-79.3194909
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6)
'Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondences dated January 20, 2022 (DWR# 2021-00200) and
April 1, 2022 (DWR# 2021-0020v4) using the 1:24,000 scale quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent
printed version of the soil survey map prepared by the NRCS .
2The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
3NC Division of Water Resources - Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment
'Determinations made for this Site are determined based on the proposal provided in maps and figures submitted with the request.
s All features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset, must have a planted conservation easement established that includes the
tops of channel banks when being measured perpendicular and landward from the banks, even if no credit is viable within that riparian
area.
6The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7).
7The area described as an Enhancement Site was assessed and determined to comply with all of 15A NCAC 02B .0295(o)(6). Cattle
exclusion fencing is required to be installed around the mitigation area to get buffer credit under this part of the rule.
Determinations provided in the table above were made using a proposed easement boundary showing
proposed mitigation areas and features shown in Concept Map A, Concept Map B and Figure 3. The
maps representing the proposal for the site are attached to this letter and initialed by Ms. Merritt on
October 26, 2022. Substantial changes to the proposed easement boundary as well as any site
constraints identified in this letter, could affect the Site's potential to generate buffer mitigation and
nutrient offset credits.
This letter does not constitute an approval of this Site to generate buffer mitigation and nutrient offset
credits. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be
submitted to DWR for written approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas
and/or surface waters for buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703, a proposal
regarding a proposed nutrient load -reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to
DWR for approval prior to any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.
All vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being
viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
Page 3 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 13616880-7564-4EB4-ABA9-D79DOBA77E44
Twin Burros Site
Wildlands
October 26, 2022
This viability assessment will expire on October 26, 2024 or upon approval of a mitigation plan
by the DWR, whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in any nutrient offset,
buffer, stream or wetland mitigation plan for this Site.
Please contact Katie Merritt at [phone] if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,
E/P-
DocuSigned by:
a we W10 I r-
94,cDuMA53EF4E0...
Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
PW/kym
Attachments: Concept Map A, Concept Map B, Figure 3
cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)
Page 4 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 13616880-7564-4EB4-ABA9-D79DOBA77E44
Project Location
Conservation Easement
Internal Crossing
Proposed Stream Approach
+
/ k
+ +
/ \ Proposed Buffer Approach
+ x Restoration
� / \ Enhancement
Preservation
_• �,_ / k Not for Credit
'x•_• / �., . k + Non -Project Stream
R"� R
�+ I Access Easement
\k +
x / _ �k \ / I X _ Existing Fence - To Be Removed
�+ Within Easement Area
®�_�•—• _ �' k �k.� X I o Reach Break
Pocket Wetland BMP
V.
Ma—chillB
•�
O
•`
i
X
Concept Map A
L Twin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel
r� WILD LANDS Cape Fear River Basin (03030002)
ENGINEERING 0 200 400Feet
I a i a l i i i J
Caswell County, NC

DocuSign Envelope ID: 13616880-7564-4EB4-ABA9-D79DOBA77E44
45' Internal
Crossing
X —XX
I I
>R — XX
50' Internal
Crossing
1 ai:
Project Location
h f
Conservation Easement
Internal Crossing
Proposed Stream Approach
k � �
x_
k x—x��`'\x �1
5 k
/
r i1, A x
W- 1
�r �/ x
x
h
t
x
45' Internal
Goa 3 Crossing
• x
,._ X
I
X
I�
WILD LAND S
ENGINEERING
x �
3 i44
.:;
X
I � � X
k � I •
X 9 � —
k
i
40' Internal
Crossing
KrI olab/aa
Proposed Buffer Approach
Restoration
Enhancement
Preservation
Not for Credit
Non -Project Stream
Access Easement
X — Existing Fence - To Be Removed
Within Easement Area
O Reach Break
Pocket Wetland BMP
41
Concept Map B
Twin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel
Cape Fear River Basin (03030002)
0 200 400 Feet
Caswell County, NC

DocuSign Envelope ID: 13616880-7564-4EB4-ABA9-D79DOBA77E44
E Origin:
36.2516236 IN,
r `
3224631 W
I/P Origin:
36.2529131 IN,
-79.3196286 W
i
E Origin:
36.2500610 IN,
-79.3195050 W
'
I/P Origin:
36.2510237 IN,
79.3233365 W
I/P Origin:
36.2484122 IN,
r, s.-79.3186698 W
Project Location
Proposed Conservation Easement
Internal Crossing
Perennial Project Stream
Intermittent Project Stream
Ephemeral Project Stream
® Non -Project Stream
-- Access Easement
I/P Origin: Ir
36.2537573 N,
I/P Origin:-79.3177004 W s
36.2533401 IN, a
79.3191653 W
4. ♦ �� E Origin:
36.2524935 IN,
79.3169567 W
I/P Origin:
36.2499057 IN, I/P Origin:
-79.3194909 W 36.2494943 IN,
-79.3157087 W
L
0 W I L D L A N D S 0 200 400 Feet
E N G I N E E R I N G I I I I I I I I
DS
SH 7/27/2022
Figure 3. Site Map
Twin Burros Mitigation Bank Parcel
Cape Fear River Basin (03030002)
Caswell County, NC

Appendix D:
USFWS Correspondence
SHPO Request for Review and Response
EDR Radius Map Report, Executive Summary

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh ES Field Office
551-F Pylon Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
November 29, 2021
Todd Tugwell
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Wildlands Engineering Cape Fear 02 UMB Twin Burros Mitigation Site/ SAW-2021-01308/ Caswell
Co.
Dear Mr. Tugwell:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the information concerning the above
referenced project. The project, based on the description in your letter to our office, and other
information, is expected to have minimal adverse impacts to fish and wildlife resources.
In accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, (ESA) and based on the
information provided, and other available information, it appears the action is not likely to adversely
affect federally listed species or their critical habitat as defined by the ESA. We believe that the
requirements of section 7 (a)(2) of the ESA have been satisfied for this project. Please remember that
obligations under the ESA must be reconsidered if: (1) new information identifies impacts of this action
that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species is listed or critical
habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
For your convenience a list of all federally protected endangered and threatened species in North
Carolina is now available on our website at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Our web page contains a
complete and frequently updated list of all endangered and threatened species protected by the
provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), and a list of
federal species of concern' that are known to occur in each county in North Carolina.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal representative), in
consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized, funded, or carried out by such
agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any federally -listed endangered or
threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be prepared to fulfill that requirement
and in determining whether additional consultation with the Service is necessary. In addition to the
1 The term "federal species of concern" refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of concern receive no legal protection and their designation
does not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or
threatened species. However, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse
impacts to federal species of concern.

federally -protected species list, information on the species' life histories and habitats and information
on completing a biological assessment or evaluation and can be found on our web page at
http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the web site often for updated information or changes.
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be present
within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to adversely affect
those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine the species' presence
or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not
be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely to
adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your determination, the
results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects of the action on listed
species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects, before conducting any
activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed action will have no effect
(i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally listed species, then you are not
required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an Environmental Impact Statement is prepared).
However, you should maintain a complete record of the assessment, including steps leading to your
determination of effect, the qualified personnel conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site
photographs, and any other related articles.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to review and provide comments on the proposed action.
Should you have any questions regarding the project, please contact Kathy Matthews at [phone],
extension 27.
Sincerely,
kV.
for Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
cc: NMFS, Beaufort, NC
EPA, Atlanta, GA
WRC, Raleigh

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary D. Reid Wilson
June 30, 2022
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.
Tasha King tkin e,wildlandseng.com
Wildland Engineering, Inc.
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Re: Twin Burros Mitigation Site, 36.239494,-79.68927, Pleasant Grove, Caswell County, ER 21-3075
Dear Tasha King:
Thank you for your email of June 9, 2022, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have reviewed
the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental.reviewgncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
(1� LLL
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
(� State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

Twin Burros
Ross Acres Road
Burlington, NC 27217
Inquiry Number: 6489115.2s
May 11, 2021
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
(rEDW Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
FORM-LBD-MGA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
Executive Summary-------------------------------------------------------
ES1
Overview Map
2
Detail Map
3
Map Findings Summary----------------------------------------------------
4
Map Findings
8
OrphanSummary---------------------------------------------------------
9
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking
GRA
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum------------------------------------------
A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary-------------------------------------------.
A-2
Physical Setting Source Map
A-7
Physical Setting Source Map Findings----------------------------------------
A-8
Physical Setting Source Records Searched------------------------------------.
PSGRA
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC6489115.2s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
ROSS ACRES ROAD
BURLINGTON, NC 27217
COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
36.2542990 - 36' 15' 15.47"
79.3189220 - 79' 19' 8.11"
Zone 17
651033.8
4013263.8
669 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map
Version Date:
South Map:
Version Date:
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
5947436 ANDERSON, NC
2013
5947951 BURLINGTON NE, NC
2013
Portions of Photo from: 20140619
Source: USDA
TC6489115.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

F- MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
ROSS ACRES ROAD
BURLINGTON, NC 27217
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP
ID SITE NAME ADDRESS
NO MAPPED SITES FOUND
DATABASE ACRONYMS
RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ELEVATION DIRECTION
6489115.2s Page 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL___________________________ National Priority List
Proposed NPL________________ Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS -------------------- Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL__________________ National Priority List Deletions
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY__________ Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS_________________________ Superfund Enterprise Management System
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE-------------- Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS------------------ Corrective Action Report
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF------------------ RCRA- Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG------------------- RCRA- Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG------------------- RCRA- Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG----------------- RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity
Generators)
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS_________________________ Land Use Control Information System
TC6489115.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US ENG CONTROLS_________ Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROLS --------- Institutional Controls Sites List
Federal ERNS list
ERNS_________________________ Emergency Response Notification System
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
NC HSDS_____________________ Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS------------------------- Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF_______________________ List of Solid Waste Facilities
DEBRIS_______________________ Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
OLI____________________________ Old Landfill Inventory
LCID__________________________ Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LUST -------------------------- Regional UST Database
LAST__________________________ Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
INDIAN LUST_________________ Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUST_________________ State Trust Fund Database
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST____________________ Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST___________________________ Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST___________________________ AST Database
INDIAN UST__________________ Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP___________________________ Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
INDIAN VCP__________________ Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS______________ Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS----------- A Listing of Brownfields Sites
TC6489115.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF_______________________
Solid Waste Facility Listing
SWRCY_______________________
Recycling Center Listing
INDIAN ODI___________________
Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
ODI___________________________
Open Dump Inventory
DEBRIS REGION 9___________
Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
IHS OPEN DUMPS___________
Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL_________________ Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL_______________________ National Clandestine Laboratory Register
Local Land Records
LIENS 2_______________________ CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS________________________
Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS________________________
Spills Incident Listing
IMD___________________________
Incident Management Database
SPILLS 90____________________
SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80____________________
SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
FUDS_________________________
Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD__________________________
Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS_______
State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR_______________
Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST____________
EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA_________________________
Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS__________________________
Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS--------------------------
Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD__________________________
Records Of Decision
RMP__________________________
Risk Management Plans
RAATS________________________
RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP___________________________
Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS_________________________
PCB Activity Database System
ICIS___________________________
Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS__________________________
FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS_________________________
Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE______________
Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA______________
Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER _ _ _ _
_ _ _ PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO ---------------------
Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS____________________
FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS_____________________
Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT____________________
Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
TC6489115.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INDIAN RESERV_____________
Indian Reservations
FUSRAP______________________
Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA_______________________
Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS____________
Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS______________________
Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES____________________
Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES ---------
Abandoned Mines
FINDS -------------------------
Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
UXO ---------------------------
Unexploded Ordnance Sites
ECHO -------------------------
Enforcement & Compliance History Information
DOCKET HWC----------------
Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
FUELS PROGRAM___________
EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
AIRS__________________________
Air Quality Permit Listing
ASBESTOS___________________
ASBESTOS
COAL ASH____________________
Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS______________
Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance -----------
Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES------------------------
NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC----------------------------
Underground Injection Wells Listing
AOP---------------------------
Animal Operation Permits Listing
CCB___________________________
Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
MINES MRDS-----------------
Mineral Resources Data System
SEPT HAULERS______________
Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
PCSRP------------------------
Petroleum -Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP_____________________ EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto ----------------- EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner_____________ EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS____________________ Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF_______________________ Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST____________________ Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
1.1117lollP1QRg1CWIII 11*11I9W_1IQ:1&9
Surrounding sites were not identified.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
TC6489115.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
There were no unmapped sites in this report.
TC6489115.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7

OVERVIEW MAP - 6489115.2S
I
*
Target Property
A
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
♦
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
A
Manufactured Gas Plants
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
I
l
I
0 1/4 1/2 1 Mlles
Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
County Boundary Disposal Sites
Special Flood Hazard Area (1%)
0.211/. Annual Chance Flood Hazard
National Wetland Inventory
State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Twin Burros CLIENT: Wildlands Eng, Inc.
ADDRESS: Ross Acres Road CONTACT: Andrea Eckardt
Burlington NC 27217 INQUIRY #: 6489115.2s
LAT/LONG: 36.254299 / 79.318922 DATE: May 11, 2021 6:09 pm
Copyright �o 2021 EDR, Inc.(,) 2015 Tom Tom Rel. 2015.

DETAIL MAP - 6489115.2S
*
Target Property
A
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
♦
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
A
Manufactured Gas Plants
t
Sensitive Receptors
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
0 1 /16 1 /B 1 /4 Mlles
Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
Special Flood Hazard Area (1%) Disposal Sites
0.211/. Annual Chance Flood Hazard
National Wetland Inventory
State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Twin Burros CLIENT: Wildlands Eng, Inc.
ADDRESS: Ross Acres Road CONTACT: Andrea Eckardt
Burlington NC 27217 INQUIRY #: 6489115.2s
LAT/LONG: 36.254299 / 79.318922 DATE: May 11, 2021 6:12 pm
Copyright �o 2021 EDR, Inc.(,) 2015 Tom Tom Rel. 2015.

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database (Miles) Property
< 1/8
1/8-1/4
1/4-1/2
1/2 - 1
> 1
Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Proposed NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
NPL LIENS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
SEMS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
RCRA-SQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
RCRA-VSQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
LUCIS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US ENG CONTROLS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US INST CONTROLS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal ERNS list
ERNS TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
NC HSDS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
State and tribal landfill and/or
solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
DEBRIS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
OLI 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LCID 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
TC6489115.2s Page 4

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database (Miles) Property
< 1/8
1/8-1/4
1/4-1/2
1/2 - 1
> 1
Plotted
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LAST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
INDIAN LUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LUST TRUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
AST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
INDIAN UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
State and tribal institutional
control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
INDIAN VCP 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS
0.500
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF
0.500
SWRCY
0.500
INDIAN ODI
0.500
ODI
0.500
DEBRIS REGION 9
0.500
IHS OPEN DUMPS
0.500
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL
TP
US CDL
TP
Local Land Records
LIENS 2
TP
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS
TP
SPILLS
TP
I M D
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
TC6489115.2s Page 5

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database
(Miles) Property
< 1/8
1/8 - 1/4
1/4 - 1/2
1/2 - 1
> 1
Plotted
SPILLS 90
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
SPILLS 80
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
FUDS
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
DOD
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
SCRD DRYCLEANERS
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US FIN ASSUR
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
EPA WATCH LIST
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
2020 COR ACTION
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
TSCA
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
TRIS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
SSTS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ROD
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
RMP
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
RAATS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
PRP
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
PADS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ICIS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
FTTS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
MLTS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH DOE
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH EPA
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
PCB TRANSFORMER
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
RADINFO
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
HIST FTTS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
DOT OPS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
CONSENT
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
INDIAN RESERV
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
FUSRAP
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
UMTRA
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LEAD SMELTERS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
US AIRS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
US MINES
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
ABANDONED MINES
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
FINDS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
UXO
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
ECHO
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
DOCKET HWC
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
FUELS PROGRAM
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
AIRS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ASBESTOS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
DRYCLEANERS
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
Financial Assurance
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
NPDES
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
UIC
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
AOP
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
CCB
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
MINES MRDS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
TC6489115.2s Page 6

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Database (Miles) Property
SEPT HAULERS TP
PCSRP 0.500
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP 1.000
EDR Hist Auto 0.125
EDR Hist Cleaner 0.125
:I Q 7 *019IT14 :11XCT91V/:I 7kqI Mtl:1,11/_1YN:IW**
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS TP
RGA LF TP
RGA LUST TP
- Totals -- 0
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
< 1/8
1/8-1/4
1/4-1/2
1/2 - 1
> 1
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
NR
NR
Total
Plotted
0
0
0 0 0 0 NR 0
0 NR NR NR NR 0
0 NR NR NR NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
0
0 0
TC6489115.2s Page 7

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation Site
NO SITES FOUND
MAP FINDINGS
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
TC6489115.2s Page 8

Count: 0 records.
ORPHAN SUMMARY
City EDR ID Site Name Site Address Zip Database(s)
NO SITES FOUND
TC6489115.2s Page 9

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.
Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days
from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC) and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2021
Number of Days to Update: 26
NPL Site Boundaries
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Sources:
EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 1
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 3
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 4
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 5
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 10
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 6
Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 7
Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 8
Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule
in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on
the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2021
Number of Days to Update: 26
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority
to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner
received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
TC6489115.2s Page GR-1

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994
Number of Days to Update: 56
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2021
Number of Days to Update: 26
Federal CERCLIS list
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing
A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAG) sites found in the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities
Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.
Date of Government Version: 04/03/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/14/2019
Number of Days to Update: 39
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/30/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System
SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites,
and remedial activities performed in support of EPA's Superfund Program across the United States. The list was
formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous
waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons,
pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the
sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021
Number of Days to Update: 35
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/26/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
TC6489115.2s Page GR-2

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under
the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP,
renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while
it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed
and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge,
assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the
site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or
other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean
that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the
location is not judged to be potential NPL site.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021
Number of Days to Update: 35
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/26/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2021
Number of Days to Update: 5 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that
move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the
waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 5
Federal RCRA generators list
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate
over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 5
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6489115.2s Page GR-3

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate
between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 5
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-VSQG: RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators)
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Very small quantity generators (VSQGs) generate
less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 5
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System
LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure
properties.
Date of Government Version: 02/09/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 39
Source: Department of the Navy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/05/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/23/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building
foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental
media or effect human health.
Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/18/2020
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US INST CONTROLS: Institutional Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,
such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation
care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally
required as part of the institutional controls.
Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/18/2020
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6489115.2s Page GR-4

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal ERNS list
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/15/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/15/2020
Number of Days to Update: 7 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
HSDS: Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Locations of uncontrolled and unregulated hazardous waste sites. The file includes sites on the National Priority
List as well as those on the state priority list.
Date of Government Version: 08/09/2011 Source: North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2011 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/05/2011 Last EDR Contact: 04/16/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially
responsible parties. Available information varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 11/02/2020 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2021 Last EDR Contact: 03/10/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/21/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities
or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal
sites.
Date of Government Version: 09/10/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/23/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2020 Last EDR Contact: 03/26/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DEBRIS: Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
NCDEQ Division of Waste Management Solid Waste Section Temporary Disaster Debris Staging Site (TDDSS) Locations
which are available to be activated in a disaster or emergency.. Disaster Debris Sites can only be used for temporary
disaster debris storage if the site's responsible party activates the site for use by notifying the NCDEQ DWM
Solid Waste Section staff during an emergency
Date of Government Version: 09/16/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/14/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/04/2021 Last EDR Contact: 03/16/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/28/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6489115.2s Page GR-5

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
OLI: Old Landfill Inventory
Old landfill inventory location information.
sites).
Date of Government Version: 09/11/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/09/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
(Does not include no further action sites and other agency lead
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LCID: Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
A list all of the Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notification facilities (under 2 acres in
size) in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 04/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/09/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2020
Number of Days to Update: 76
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST: Regional UST Database
This database contains information obtained from the Regional Offices. It provides a more detailed explanation
of current and historic activity for individual sites, as well as what was previously found in the Incident Management
Database. Sites in this database with Incident Numbers are considered LUSTs.
Date of Government Version: 01/22/2021 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/29/2021 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LAST: Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations.
Date of Government Version: 01/22/2021 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/29/2021 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.
Date of Government Version: 04/08/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 10/07/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: EPA, Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6489115.2s Page GR-6

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington.
Date of Government Version: 11/12/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada
Date of Government Version: 10/01/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming.
Date of Government Version: 10/09/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/22/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.
Date of Government Version: 10/01/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: EPA Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/18/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST TRUST: State Trust Fund Database
This database contains information about claims against the State Trust Funds for reimbursements for expenses
incurred while remediating Leaking USTs.
Date of Government Version: 01/04/2021 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2021 Last EDR Contact: 04/06/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6489115.2s Page GR-7

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing
A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.
Date of Government Version: 01/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/17/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 33
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UST: Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST's are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available
information varies by state program.
Date of Government Version: 01/22/2021 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/28/2021 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AST: AST Database
Facilities with aboveground storage tanks that have a capacity greater than 21,000 gallons.
Date of Government Version: 10/29/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/26/2021 Last EDR Contact: 03/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/28/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
and Tribal Nations)
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/18/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 11/12/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal
Nations).
Date of Government Version: 10/01/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6489115.2s Page GR-8

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 10/01/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/22/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 10/07/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: EPA Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes).
Date of Government Version: 04/08/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 10/09/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL: No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
A land use restricted site is a property where there are limits or requirements on future use of the property
due to varying levels of cleanup possible, practical, or necessary at the site.
Date of Government Version: 09/04/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/12/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/21/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6489115.2s Page GR-9

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP: Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Responsible Party Voluntary Action site locations.
Date of Government Version: 11/02/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2021 Last EDR Contact: 03/10/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/21/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.
Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 142
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.
Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008
Number of Days to Update: 27
State and tribal Brownfields sites
Source: EPA, Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Projects Inventory
A brownfield site is an abandoned, idled, or underused property where the threat of environmental contamination
has hindered its redevelopment. All of the sites in the inventory are working toward a brownfield agreement for
cleanup and liabitliy control.
Date of Government Version: 12/01/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/09/2020 Last EDR Contact: 03/30/2021
Number of Days to Update: 1 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence
or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these
properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment.
Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields
grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on
Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from
Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information
is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.
Date of Government Version: 12/11/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/11/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2021
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/28/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
TC6489115.2s Page GR-10

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY: Recycling Center Listing
A listing of recycling center locations.
Date of Government Version: 01/28/2021 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/29/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/23/2021 Last EDR Contact: 04/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/09/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
HIST LF: Solid Waste Facility Listing
A listing of solid waste facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/06/2006 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2007 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2007 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2009
Number of Days to Update: 17 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
Location of open dumps on Indian land.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/22/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/09/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258
Subtitle D Criteria.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004
Number of Days to Update: 39 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside
County and northern Imperial County, California.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Source: EPA, Region 9
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Last EDR Contact: 04/14/2021
Number of Days to Update: 137 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land
A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Source: Department of Health & Human Serivices, Indian Health Service
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/09/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
TC6489115.2s Page GR-11

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory
Register.
Date of Government Version: 12/07/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/09/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/22/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this
web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Date of Government Version: 12/07/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/09/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83
Local Land Records
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/22/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information
A Federal CERCLA ('Superfund') lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent
Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.
CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021
Number of Days to Update: 35
Records of Emergency Release Reports
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version: 12/16/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/24/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SPILLS: Spills Incident Listing
A listing spills, hazardous material releases, sanitary sewer overflows, wastewater treatment plant bypasses and
upsets, citizen complaints, and any other environmental emergency calls reported to the agency.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/09/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2021 Last EDR Contact: 01/11/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/21/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
IMD: Incident Management Database
Groundwater and/or soil contamination incidents
TC6489115.2s Page GR-12

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 01/22/2021 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/29/2021 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch
Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are
already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.
Date of Government Version: 09/27/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 80: SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch
Spills 80 includes those spill and release records available from FirstSearch databases prior to 1990. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded before 1990. Duplicate records that
are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 80.
Date of Government Version: 06/14/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Other Ascertainable Records
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous
waste.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 5
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
Date of Government Version: 02/11/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/17/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2021
Number of Days to Update: 47
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/26/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
TC6489115.2s Page GR-13

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands
Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps
of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land,
Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management,
Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.
Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2019
Number of Days to Update: 574
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: N/A
SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office
of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established
drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas,
Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/10/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/23/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information
All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide
proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post -closure care of their facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST
EPA maintains a "Watch List' to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement
matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being
on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by
EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation
has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged
violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and
local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/30/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List
The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action
Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe
contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but
have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation.
Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6489115.2s Page GR-14

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/19/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/28/2021
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/14/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/04/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/02/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all
registered pesticide -producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices
being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
Date of Government Version: 01/20/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/21/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 60
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021
Number of Days to Update: 35
RMP: Risk Management Plans
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/14/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC6489115.2s Page GR-15

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance
for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program
Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing
industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances
to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects
of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst -case and alternative
accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee
training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures
and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur.
Date of Government Version: 11/02/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/12/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2021
Number of Days to Update: 74
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration
actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties
A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/05/2021
Number of Days to Update: 50
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Date of Government Version: 11/19/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement
and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
program.
Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6489115.2s Page GR-16

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Number of Days to Update: 25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MILTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 08/05/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/10/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/08/2020
Number of Days to Update: 59
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/16/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
COAL ASH DOE: Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2021
Number of Days to Update: 70
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/05/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/14/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2019
Number of Days to Update: 251
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/14/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database
The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 96
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RADINFO: Radiation Information Database
The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity.
TC6489115.2s Page GR-17

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 07/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2019
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/25/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The
information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA
(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions
are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters
with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included
in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing
A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA
regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation
of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some
EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing
EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that
may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data
Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.
Date of Government Version: 01/02/2020 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/28/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2020 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/09/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/13/2021 Telephone: Varies
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2021 Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Number of Days to Update: 68 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG)
and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/20/2020
Number of Days to Update: 151
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
TC6489115.2s Page GR-18

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
than 640 acres.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 546
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/06/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where
radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations.
Date of Government Version: 08/08/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2018
Number of Days to Update: 3
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/28/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills
shut down, large piles of the sand -like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2020
Number of Days to Update: 74
LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites
A listing of former lead smelter site locations.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2021
Number of Days to Update: 26
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/18/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites
A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites
may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust
Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: American Journal of Public Health
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS)
The database is a sub -system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data
on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This
information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants,
steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action,
air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance
data from industrial plants.
TC6489115.2s Page GR-19

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data
A listing of minor source facilities.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
US MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes
violation information.
Date of Government Version: 11/03/2020 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2021 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 63 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
MINES VIOLATIONS: MSHA Violation Assessment Data
Mines violation and assessment information. Department of Labor, Mine Safety & Health Administration.
Date of Government Version: 11/24/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2021
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: DOL, Mine Safety & Health Admi
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/01/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/14/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing
This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron
ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such
as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/27/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/26/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing
Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team
of the USGS.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011
Number of Days to Update: 97
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/26/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines
An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide
information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory
contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated
with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE
program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing
problems are reclaimed.
TC6489115.2s Page GR-20

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/11/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/11/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2021
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: Department of Interior
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/10/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/21/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric
Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities
Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).
Date of Government Version: 02/03/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2021
Number of Days to Update: 33
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/03/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/14/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/03/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/26/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information
ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide.
Date of Government Version: 01/02/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 73
UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites
A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2020
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/06/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Source: Department of Defense
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/13/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/26/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels
Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations.
Date of Government Version: 02/17/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/17/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 33
AIRS: Air Quality Permit Listing
A listing of facilities with air quality permits.
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6489115.2s Page GR-21

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/07/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2021 Last EDR Contact: 03/10/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/21/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ASBESTOS: ASBESTOS
Asbestos notification sites
Date of Government Version: 02/05/2021 Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/09/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2021 Last EDR Contact: 05/06/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites
A listing of coal combustion products distribution permits issued by the Division for the treatment, storage,
transportation, use and disposal of coal combustion products.
Date of Government Version: 09/10/2020 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/23/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2020 Last EDR Contact: 03/26/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Sites
Potential and known drycleaning sites, active and abandoned, that the Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program has
knowledge of and entered into this database.
Date of Government Version: 09/08/2020 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/16/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2020 Last EDR Contact: 03/16/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/28/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing
A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended
to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures
if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 01/22/2021 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/28/2021 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing
Information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available
to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated
facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2012 Source: Department of Environmental & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2012 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2012 Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Number of Days to Update: 23 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information
Hazardous waste financial assurance information.
TC6489115.2s Page GR-22

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/02/2020 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/21/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NPDES: NPDES Facility Location Listing
General information regarding NPDES(National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) permits.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2021 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/27/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/19/2021 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing
A listing of uncerground injection wells locations.
Date of Government Version: 10/26/2020 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/2020 Last EDR Contact: 03/05/2021
Number of Days to Update: 7 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/14/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AOP: Animal Operation Permits Listing
This listing includes animal operations that are required to be permitted by the state.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2020 Last EDR Contact: 03/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 1 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/21/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCS: Permit Compliance System
PCS is a computerized management information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permit holding facilities. PCS tracks the permit, compliance, and enforcement status of NPDES
facilities.
Date of Government Version: 07/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011
Number of Days to Update: 55
Source: EPA, Office of Water
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
SEPT HAULERS: Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
This list of all active and permitted Septage Land Application Site (SLAS) and Septage Detention and Treatment
Facility (SDTF) sites in North Carolina. The purpose of this map is to provide the public and government entities
a visual overview of the businesses that manage septage and septage facilities throughout the state.
Date of Government Version: 05/13/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2020 Last EDR Contact: 04/06/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCSRP: Petroleum -Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
To treat petroleum -contaminated soil in order to protect North Carolinaa??s environment and the health of the
citizens of North Carolina.
TC6489115.2s Page GR-23

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/30/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
MINES MRDS: Mineral Resources Data System
Mineral Resources Data System
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/24/2019
Number of Days to Update: 3
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/06/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/26/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CCB: Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
These are not permitted Coal Ash landfills A list all of the now closed Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) in North
Carolina, in point data form. The purpose is to provide the public and other government entities a visual overview
of coal ash structural fills throughout the state and increase public awareness of their current locations.
Date of Government Version: 02/27/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCS INACTIVE: Listing of Inactive PCS Permits
An inactive permit is a facility that has shut down or is no longer discharging.
Date of Government Version: 11/05/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 120
PCS ENF: Enforcement data
No description is available for this data
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 29
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants)
compiled by EDR's researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's
to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture
of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,
such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds
are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently
disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil
and groundwater contamination.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC6489115.2s Page GR-24

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited
to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station
establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station,
filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within
a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents
unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns,
but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources
that might, in EDR's opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were
not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls
within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort
presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental
concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt Archives
RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived
from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled
from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2013 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases
and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available
from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 196 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents
derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.
Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North
Carolina.
TC6489115.2s Page GR-25

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2013 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 172 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through
transporters to a tsd facility.
Date of Government Version: 10/05/2020 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/17/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2021 Last EDR Contact: 02/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/24/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2019 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/16/2019 Last EDR Contact: 04/09/2021
Number of Days to Update: 36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD
facility.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2019 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2020 Last EDR Contact: 04/30/2021
Number of Days to Update: 72 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/09/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2019 Last EDR Contact: 04/09/2021
Number of Days to Update: 53 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/26/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019 Source: Department of Environmental Management
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2021 Last EDR Contact: 02/09/2021
Number of Days to Update: 13 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC6489115.2s Page GR-26

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/03/2019
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/21/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Oil/Gas Pipelines
Source: Endeavor Business Media
Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty
Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases
(Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information
is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its
fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business
Media.
Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: Endeavor Business Media
This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best
effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any
particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media.
Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers,
and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.
AHA Hospitals:
Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.
Telephone: [phone]
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual surrey of hospitals.
Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone: [phone]
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services,
a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: [phone]
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.
Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary
and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical
database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are
comparable across all states.
Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on private school locations in the United States.
Daycare Centers: Child Care Facility List
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
TC6489115.2s Page GR-27

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC6489115.2s Page GR-28

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
TWIN BURROS
ROSS ACRES ROAD
BURLINGTON, NC 27217
11r_1 Z0:11i:j Z91» irlci•Z•]U•71�r_�r9
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator:
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Target Property Map:
Version Date:
South Map:
Version Date:
36.254299 - 36' 15' 15.48"
79.318922 - 79' 19' 8.12"
Zone 17
651033.8
4013263.8
669 ft. above sea level
5947436 ANDERSON, NC
2013
5947951 BURLINGTON NE, NC
2013
EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
geologic strata.
TC6489115.2s Page A-1

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site -specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
General Topographic Gradient: General NW
SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES
� A
C
V
W W 00 A
N N N O V OOi N O�
W. - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - .�
North
M T
a) AM
O O N N
W ` �.A- IC' . -
West
South
TIP
V
V
N V
�
O
O
N
V
O
W
W
TIP
0
Target Property Elevation: 669 ft.
East
1/2 1 Miles
Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified.
TC6489115.2s Page A-2

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
and bodies of water).
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property
3710990100J
Additional Panels in search area:
3710991100J
3710991000J
3710990000K
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Quad at Target Property
ANDERSON
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
FEMA Source Type
FEMA FIRM Flood data
FEMA Source Type
FEMA FIRM Flood data
FEMA FIRM Flood data
FEMA FIRM Flood data
NWI Electronic
Data Coverage
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION
MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW
Not Reported
TC6489115.2s Page A-3

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
move more quickly through sandy -gravelly types of soils than silty -clayey types of soils.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT
GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Era: Paleozoic Category: Plutonic and Intrusive Rocks
System: Ordovian
Series: Lower Paleozoic granitic rocks
Code: Pzg1 (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps.
The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data.
Soil Component Name: CECIL
Soil Surface Texture: sandy clay loam
Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained. Soils have intermediate water holding capacity. Depth to
water table is more than 6 feet.
Hydric Status: Soil does not meet the requirements for a hydric soil.
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: HIGH
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 60 inches
Depth to Bedrock Max: > 60 inches
TC6489115.2s Page A-4

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
Permeability
Soil Reaction
Rate (in/hr)
(pH)
1
0 inches
7 inches
sandy clay loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 2.00
Max: 6.50
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 0.60
Min: 4.50
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
2
7 inches
11 inches
sandy clay loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 2.00
Max: 5.50
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 0.60
Min: 4.50
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
3
11 inches
50 inches
clay
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 2.00
Max: 5.50
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 0.60
Min: 4.50
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit 50% or
200), Clayey
more), Elastic
Soils.
silt.
4
50 inches
75 inches
variable
Not reported
Not reported
Max: 0.00
Max: 0.00
Min: 0.00
Min: 0.00
OTHER SOIL TYPES IN AREA
Based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data, the following additional subordinant soil types may
appear within the general area of target property.
Soil Surface Textures: sandy loam
loam
clay loam
silt loam
very channery - silt loam
gravelly - sandy loam
Surficial Soil Types: sandy loam
loam
clay loam
silt loam
very channery - silt loam
gravelly - sandy loam
Shallow Soil Types: sandy clay
silt loam
silty clay loam
clay
very channery - silt loam
loam
Deeper Soil Types: silty clay loam
weathered bedrock
fine sandy loam
unweathered bedrock
sandy clay loam
TC6489115.2s Page A-5

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
DATABASE
SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)
Federal USGS
1.000
Federal FRDS PWS
Nearest PWS within 1 mile
State Database
1.000
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No Wells Found
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No PWS System Found
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No Wells Found
TC6489115.2s Page A-6

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP - 6489115.2s
CD
0 O a
0
� ° o
0 0 0 o 0 0
O
a
a o G
0
0 CD o 0 0
� o 0
°
0 0
0 O
O D o
0 o 0 00
0
70 0
0
° 640
6°0 10�
0 �
6
d o
0 0
0
e
o fi % 0
6 60
1 ^'
6"
0
6°° 680
� 0
60
County Boundary
N Major Roads
N Contour Lines
OO Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater
® Water Wells
© Public Water Supply Wells
® Cluster of Multiple Icons
0 1/4 1/2 1 Miles
Groundwater Flow Direction Wildlife Areas
c I Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location Natural Areas
c v Groundwater Flow Varies at Location o Rare & Endangered Species
SITE NAME: Twin Burros CLIENT: Wildlands Eng, Inc.
ADDRESS: Ross Acres Road CONTACT: Andrea Eckardt
Burlington NC 27217 INQUIRY #: 6489115.2s
LAT/LONG: 36.254299 / 79.318922 DATE: May 11, 2021 6:13 pm
Copyright �o 2021 EDR, Inc. v 2015 TonnTom Rel. 2015.

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
AREA RADON INFORMATION
State Database: NC Radon
Radon Test Results
Num Results Avg pCi/L Min pCi/L Max pCi/L
1 0.60 0.6 0.6
Federal EPA Radon Zone for CASWELL County: 2
Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.
Zone 2 indoor average level — 2 pCi/L and — 4 pCi/L.
Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.
Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 27217
Number of sites tested: 4
Area Average Activity % <4 pCi/L
% 4-20 pCi/L
% >90 nCi/I
Living Area - 1 st Floor 0.225 pCi/L 100% 0% 0%
Living Area - 2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported
Basement Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported
TC6489115.2s Page A-8

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOWR Information System
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)
soil survey maps.
SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
Telephone: [phone]
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county
natural resource planning and management.
TC6489115.2s Page PSGR-1

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).
USGS Water WeIIs: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface
water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
North Carolina Public Water Supply Wells
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: [phone]
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
North Carolina Wildlife Resources/Game Lands
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
All publicly owned game lands managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and as listed in Hunting
and Fishing Maps.
NC Natural Heritage Sites: Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites
Source: Natural Heritage Occurrence Sites Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A point coverage identifying locations of rare and endangered species, occurrences of exemplary or unique natural
ecosystems (terrestrial or aquatic), and special animal habitats (e.g., colonial waterbird nesting sites).
NC Natural Areas: Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A polygon converage identifying sites (terrestrial or aquatic) that have particular biodiversity significance.
A site's significance may be due to the presenceof rare species, rare or high quality natural communities, or
other important ecological features.
RADON
State Database: NC Radon
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
TC6489115.2s Page PSGR-2

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR's Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared
in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC6489115.2s Page PSGR-3

Appendix E:
Twin Burros Mitigation Site Planting Plans

�/�
E A
_ — —
EXISTING
50' ROW EASEMENT
�n
�
M.B. 16, PG. 481
r
c
\
o°
°'
Al
SHEET 5.1.2 FOR THIS AREA 71pX
`
\SEE
o0
E CD
/ L
/Z
ROSS qCRES
EXISTING
50' ROW EASEMENT
3
RD NO Z
\
M.B. 16, PG. 481
4P�
30
900x °p
/
I
I I
✓�.\ EXISTING
J'G 0.45' ROW EASEMENT
M.B. 16, PG. 4 1 I
V =- `Q \ -
0 0
0o I
\
\ x�
x
\ J
\ CELL TOWER INSIDE
\ WOOD PRIVACY FENCE
\
Streambank Planting Zone 1
(See Detail 2, Sheet 7.12)
Streambank Planting Zone 2
(See Detail 3, Sheet 7.12)
Buffer Planting Zone 3
(See Detail 1, Sheet 7.12)
Wetland Planting Zone 4
(See Detail 1, Sheet 7.12)
O O O O O BMP Obligate Species Planting Zone 5
(See Detail 1, Sheet 7.12)
Permanent Seeding Outside Easement
Note: Non -hatched areas within easement are currently vegetated
and will be planted as needed to achieve target density.
Buffer planting will occur within the Limits of Disturbance.
EXISTING
BUILDING J
J
3
x \
444
+ 444
JE
114+00 SUS CREEx K W
O / I
v I
/ CE
O
O
0
WU 111+OOY
W
cc
U
�J
_z \
�j
— CE-IX
�3J—,fin J V
1
1 /
CE - CE
0
I \ \
I \ \ 0' \ \0' 200' 300'
I � �
`IZO MAL)
Q
z�
�o
��91
�9�W
Q)
�
v
m
z
0
U
i

FP-- FEMA'
/ Mla