20021700 Ver 1_Complete File_20021002

?OF W AT ?R
P
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
December 19, 2002
DWQ Project No. 02-1700
County: Franklin
Page 1 of 2
Nemo Associates, Inc.
Attn: James T. Moss, Jr.
P.O. Box 276
Youngsville, North Carolina 27596
Subject Property: Youngsville Industrial Park, Bert Winston Road, Youngsville, NC
S&EC, Inc. Project No. 02-7091
Unnamed tributary to Brandy Creek [03-03-01, 28-29-3-(2), C NSW]
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE per the Tar-Pamlico River
Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0259) with ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Dear Mr. Moss:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill within or
otherwise impact.0.04 acres of wetlands, 144 feet of perennial streams and 148 feet of intermittent streams, and 22,390
square feet (h) of protected riparian buffers for the purpose of constructing the two (2) road crossings at the subject
property, as described within your application dated October 21, 2002. After reviewing your application, we have
decided that the impacts are covered by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) General Water Quality Certification
Number(s) 3375. The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit 14 when issued by the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USAGE). This letter shall also act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected
riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 2B. 0259. In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required
federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment
Control, Non-discharge. Also, this approval will expire when the accompanying 404. permit expires unless otherwise
specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your project,
you must notify us and you may be required to send us anew application. If the property is sold, the new owner must
be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If
total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory
mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
Conditions:
Deed Notifications
Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands, waters and
protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer impact. These mechanisms
shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or buffers approved for impact under this
Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
A final, written stormwater management plan shall be approved in writing by this Office before the impacts specified
in this Authorization Certificate shall occur if the proposed built out of the individual lots exceed 30% built upon area.
The stormwater management plan must include plans and specifications for stormwater management facilities
designed to remove 85% TSS according to the most recent version of the NC DENR Stormwater Best Management
North Carolina Division of Water Quality WETLANDS / 401 UNIT
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nG.us/ncwetiands
Page 2 of 2
Practices Manual. These facilities must be designed to treat the runoff from the entire project, unless otherwise
explicitly approved by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ). Also, before any permanent building is occupied at the
subject site, the facilities (as approved by this Office) shall be constructed and operational, and the stormwater
management plan (as approved by this Office) shall be implemented. The structural stormwater practices as
approved by this Office as well as drainage patterns must be maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural
stormwater practices shall be made without written authorization from the Division of Water Quality.
3. Diffuse Flow (No Review)
An additional condition is that all stormwater shall be directed as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the
protected stream buffers and will not re-concentrate before discharging into the stream as identified within 15A
NCAC 2B.0259(5).
4. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any
subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of completion to the
401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or stream impacts),
you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for
a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office
of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved buffer impacts)
shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is subject to review as provided in
Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act and the Tar-
Pamlico riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 2B.0259. If you have any questions, please
telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646 or Bob Zarzecki at 919-733-9726.
Attachments: Certificate of Completion
GC 3375
Cc: Brad Suther, S&EC, Inc., 11010 Raven Ridge Road, NC 27614
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
DWQ # 021700
Date: December 19, 2002
bz
Sincerely,.
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney
Non-Discharge Branch
Regional Contact: Steve Mitchell
WQ Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Youngsville Industrial Park County Franklin
Project Number 02 1700 County2
Recvd From APP Region Raleigh
Received Date 10/22/02 Recvd By Region
Project Type commercial
Certificates
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream
Type Type Impact Score Index
Stream
Class Acres Feet
Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
Stream Impacts (ft.)
min
F14 Stream PT O N F_ 28-29-3-(2) I NSW 30,301. 0.04 292.00 F_-
FTPBR .Buffers F7_0 N???? 30,301. 0:51 F_ ?
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? O Y ON Did you request more info? O Y ON
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y O N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/Cond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 360318 Longitude (ddmmss) 782801
Comments:
Are we sure that the impacts at crossing _1 are under 150 feet of perrenial stream. Although I do not
like the location of that crossing, moving it upstream causes more buffer impact and ds causes a lot
more wetland impact. I have to agree that the client minimized these impacts with the imposed
location. Can we issue w/out stormwater for the site?
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Triage Check List
Date: 0 ' 6& Project Name: en&60116
DWQ#:
County:
To: ? ARO Mike Parker ? WaRO Deborah Sawyer
? FRO Ken Averitte ? WiRO Joanne Steenhuis
? MRO Mike Parker ? WSRO Jennifer Frye
d RRO Steve Mitchell
From: .(V3.? ?mWI\ Telephone : (919) 2 JU
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
(®-Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
i?uffer Rules (Meuse Tar-Pamlico atawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Litigation Ratios ?y, P*t,-q
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
-EHs the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
'?- Cumulative impact concern
67
Comments:
riIi?/i[? ! pH I n l I ?/?
reZ-? A.. rtyl k r.?;
S vy,Ot?,
ajj?X?
,`r
m^ `fa ? ?i v?oc?3?
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
r
a 2 2
2 2002
NCDENR-DWQ US Army Corps of 7inersOC
I
Attn: Mr. John Dorney Attn: Mr. John Tho 2321 Crabtree Blvd 6508 Falls of the N SEC h
Parkview Building Raleigh, NC 27615
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Nationwide Permit 14/401 Water Quality Certification/Buffer Compliance Request
Youngsville Industrial Park
Youngsville, Franklin County, North Carolina
S&EC Project #: 02-7091
Dear Mr. Dorney and Mr. Thomas:
On behalf of Nemo Associates (property owner), we hereby request authorization from
the US Army Corps of Engineers to use Nationwide Permit 14 to cover impacts to two
stream channels and adjacent wetland areas. We also request written concurrence from
the NC Division of Water Quality (NC-DWQ) that the project complies with the 401
Water Quality Certification associated with Nationwide Permit 14 and the Tar-Pamlico
River Basin buffer rules. A Pre-construction Notification Application (PCN) is attached,
as well as an agent authorization form.
The site is located north of the town of Youngsville and is approximately 126 acres in
size. Specifically, the site is located 100 feet east on Bert Winston Road (SR 1133) from
the intersection of Highway 1 and Bert Winston Road. The site extends approximately
2000 feet south of Bert Winston Road and is bound to the west by the Seaboard Coast
Line Railway. Please refer to the USGS topographic map attached for the location of the
project.
The proposed project consists of an industrial park. S&EC conducted a detailed wetland
delineation of the proposed impact areas in May 2002. Data forms from our delineation
of the wetland areas in the vicinity of impact area 1 are attached. Mr. Steve Mitchell, of
the NC-DWQ, determined that the two features entering the property from the western
property line (CSX Railroad tracks), as well as two north - south oriented tributaries, are
subject to the Tar-Pamlico River Basin Buffers. The small tributary shown on the
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive 710 Boston Road
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
October 21, 2002
S&EC Project #: 7091
Page 2 of 4
Franklin County Soil Survey on the southern portion of the property was determined to
be "not subject". S&EC believes the feature at impact area 1 to be perennial, while the
feature at impact area 2 is believed to be intermittent. S&EC has a site meeting with Mr.
Mitchell scheduled for 10/23/02 to confirm our determination. No jurisdictional
determinations or permits have been previously issued for this project.
Because no clients have committed to occupy the site at this time, no plans exist for the
individual lots. Current construction plans consist only of a spine road that will be used to
provide access to the entire property. The applicant plans to construct two road crossings
(see impacts 1 & 2 on attached plans). Impact area 1 includes impacts to 144 linear feet
of a 4-foot-wide perennial channel, 0.28 acre of riparian buffer, and 0.04 acre of adjacent
wetland. Impact area 2 includes impact to 148 linear feet of a 3-foot-wide intermittent
channel, 0.234 acre of riparian buffer, and no wetland impacts. Cumulative impacts to
waters of the U.S. and wetlands for the proposed spine road total 144 linear feet of
perennial channel, 148 linear feet of unimportant / insignificant channel, and 0.04
acre of wetland.
The USACE's current policy requires applicants to avoid and minimize wetland and
stream channel impacts to the maximum extent practicable and may require
compensatory mitigation to offset unavoidable losses of waters of the US when impacts
exceed the requirements for notification (0.10 acre) or if a discharge to a special aquatic
site such as wetlands is proposed. The applicant requested a detailed delineation in the
vicinity of the proposed spine road corridor in order to minimize impact to stream
channels and wetlands to the maximum extent practicable. However, a perennial stream
channel and intermittent stream channel separate the northern portion of the property
from high ground on the central and southern portions of the property, making it
necessary to construct road crossings over these features in order to access the property.
The applicant considered two alternative locations to the proposed road crossing: 1)
crossing downstream of the proposed impacts, below the confluence of the perennial and
intermittent channels, and 2) crossing upstream of the proposed impacts. Due to NCDOT
standards, constructing a road crossing downstream of the proposed impacts has been
determined to be infeasible. Because the project is an industrial park, the roadway must
by necessity be designed to carry tractor-trailers and other large trucks. Due to the
configuration of the property, crossing below the confluence point of the two features
would require a roadway that turned at an approximately 90 degree angle in the vicinity
of the crossing. According to Mr. Graham Cawthorne, of Cawthorne, Moss, and
Panciera, the curve radius required to construct such a road would be in violation of
NCDOT standards. A further constraint to crossing downstream of the proposed road
crossing is the presence of a large beaver impoundment that extends from the easternmost
limit of impact 1 downstream. Crossing below the confluence of the perennial and
intermittent features would result in far greater impacts to wetlands than the proposed
crossing location.
October 21, 2002
S&EC Project #: 7091
Page 3 of 4
Crossing upstream of the proposed location has also been ruled out due to the fact that an
upstream crossing would result in more stream channel and wetland impacts. Upstream
of the proposed crossing, the perennial channel shown at impact 1 splits into two smaller
perennial channels that are surrounded by wetland areas. After examining the
jurisdictional features along the main perennial channel on-site, the applicant located the
proposed crossing in the area that will result in the least impact to wetland areas and
stream channel. Because the proposed impacts are necessary to access high ground on
the central and southern portions of the site, and because the client placed the crossing in
a manner to avoid substantially larger wetland impacts both upstream and downstream of
the proposed crossing, S&EC believes the client minimized and avoided impacts to the
maximum extent practical and that mitigation should not be required by the USACE for
this project.
NC-DWQ's current policy requires stream mitigation for perennial stream channel
impacts greater than 150 linear feet per project and wetland mitigation for wetland
impacts greater than 1 acre per project. Because the total cumulative permanent impact
to perennial stream channels on-site is 144 linear feet and the total impact to wetlands is
0.04 acre, S&EC believes neither stream nor wetland mitigation should be required. As
stated above, S&EC believes the stream channel at crossing 2 is an intermittent /
insignificant feature and should therefore not count toward the 150 linear foot threshold
that triggers stream channel mitigation. If the 10/23/02 site meeting scheduled with Mr.
Steve Mitchell determines this feature to be perennial, the applicant will offer mitigation
at that time. Should mitigation be required, the applicant plans to request acceptance of
payment from the NC Wetlands Restoration Program.
Crossing 1 will impact 144 linear feet of stream and 0.280 acre of buffer, and crossing 2
will impact 148 linear feet of stream and 0.234 acre of riparian buffer. Current NC-DWQ
policy allows road crossings without mitigation if the impacts are less than or equal to
150 linear feet of stream channel or 1/3 acre of riparian buffer per tributary. Because the
project impacts are within these thresholds, S&EC believes that riparian buffer mitigation
should not be required by the NC-DWQ.
Sincerely,
l
Brad uther
Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
Pre-construction (PCN) notification form
Site Location Map (Figure 1)
Soil Survey Map (Figure 2)
October 21, 2002
S&EC Project #: 7091
Page 4 of 4
Over-all Impact Map
Impact Map Insets ( 2 sheets)
Wetland and Upland Data Forms
Agent Authorization
NC DWQ Buffer Letter
$475 Check for 401 Water Quality Certification Fee
Office Use Only' Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Nemo Associates Inc.
Mailing Address: PO Box 276
Youngsville, North Carolina 27596
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Brad Suther
Company Affiliation: Soil and Environmental Consultants
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh North Carolina 27614
Telephone Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
Page I of 9
E-mail Address: bsutherAsandec.com
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Youngsville Industrial Park
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 1853-27-4737
4. Location
County: Franklin Nearest Town: Youngsville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Youngsville Industrial Park
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The site is located north of the
town of Youngsville. Specifically, the site is located 100 feet east on Bert Winston Road (SR
1133) from the intersection of Highway 1 and Bert Winston Road. The site extends
gpproximately 2000 feet south of Bert Winston Road and is bound to the west bathe
Seaboard Coast Line Railway.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lab/Long): Impact 1, 36° 03' 18.3"N. 78° 28'
1.1 "W. Impact 2, 36° 03' 14.2"N, 78° 29' 1.7"W.
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): - 126 acres.
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): The nearest body of water is an
unnamed tributary of Brandy Creek.
8. River Basin: Tar-Pamlico River Basin.
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mVs/.)
Page 2 of 9
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: At present the site is forested and undeveloped.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
proposed use of the property is an industrial park. Because no clients have committed to
occupy the site at this time, no plans exist for the individual lots. Current construction plans
consist only a spine road that will be used to provide access to the entire property. The
equipment to be used for this proposed project would include heavy equipment typically used
for road construction.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of this project is to construct 2 road
crossings to allow access to high ground in the central and southern portions of the site.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
No permits or jurisdictional determinations have been obtained for this site. A site meeting with
Steve Mitchell from the NCDENR-DWQ determined that the streams channels that cut through
the property from west to east are subject to the Tar-Pamlico 50 foot buffers as well as the north
south oriented features located west of the proposed spine road The smaller tributary in the
southern portion of the tributary south from Brandy Creek is not subject to the buffers. The ID#
for this project is NBR 01-228
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Because no clients have committed to occupy the site no plans exist for the individual lots at this
time Whether or not future site development will require permits is not known at this time.
Page 3 of 9
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed impacts consist of a
road crossing of a perennial channel (see crossing 1) and an intermittent channel (see
crossing 2) to provide access to the central and southern portions of the property from Bert
Winston Road.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact Area of Located within Distance to
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact 100-year Floodplain** Nearest Stream Type of Wetland***
(indicate on ma) (acres) (yes/no) (linear feet)
Impact 1 Roadway fill 0.04 Yes 0 LF Bottomland Hardwood
acre

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: unknown
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.04 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
1 Crossing 144 LF UT of Brandy Creek 4' Perrenial
2 Crossing 148 LF UT of Brandy Creek 3' Intermittent

Page 4 of 9
A ;,to„t;f, ta,n,v,r impacts imnactc include- but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap..
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.lMzone.com,
www.manguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 292 linear feet (144
perennial)
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds; estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)
NA NA NA NA NA

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. impacts include, but are not umireu to. nu, nacavauvu, ??as,s,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
Page 5 of 9
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The applicant requested a detailed delineation in the vicinity of the proposed spine road
corridor in order to minimize impact to stream channels and wetlands to the maximum extent
practicable. However, a perennial stream channel and intermittent stream channel separate the
northern portion of the property from high ground on the central and southern portions of the
property, making it necessary to construct road crossings over these features in order to access
the property. The gapplicant considered two alternative locations to the proposed road crossing:
1) crossing downstream of the proposed impacts, below the confluence of the perennial and
intermittent channels, and 2) crossing upstream of the proposed impacts.
Due to NCDOT standards, constructing a road crossing downstream of the proposed impacts has
been determined to be infeasible. Because the project is an industrial park, the roadway must by
necessity be designed to carry tractor-trailers and other large trucks. Due to the configuration of
the property, crossing below the confluence point of the two features would require a roadway
that turned at an approximate) 990 degree angle in the vicinity of the crossing. According to Mr.
Graham Cawthorne, of Cawthorne, Moss, and Panciera, the curve radius required to construct
such a road would be in violation of NCDOT standards. A further constraint to crossing
downstream of the proposed road crossing is the presence of a large beaver impoundment that
extends from the easternmost limit of impact 1 downstream. Crossing below the confluence of
the perennial and intermittent features would result in far greater impacts to wetlands than the
proposed crossing location.
Crossing upstream of the proposed location has also been ruled out due to the fact that an
upstream crossing would result in more stream channel and wetland impacts. Upstream of the
proposed crossing, the perennial channel shown at impact 1 splits into two smaller perennial
channels that are surrounded by wetland areas. After examining the jurisdictional features along
the main perennial channel on-site, the applicant located the proposed crossing in the area that
will result in the least impact to wetland areas and stream channel.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
Page 6 of 9
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strm.gide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, .if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Because total cumulative impacts to perennial stream channels on-site is 144 linear feet
and because this impact is necessary to access high ground on the central and southern
portions of the site, S&EC believes stream channel mitigation should not be required for this
project Because total cumulative impact to wetlands on-site is 0.04 acre and because the
client placed the crossing in a manner to avoid substantially larger wetland impacts both
upstream and downstream of the proposed crossing S&EC believes wetland mitigation
should not be required for this project
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NC)VRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http_//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
Page 7 of 9
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify. )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact 1
(square feet) Impact 2
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 7,623 SF 6,795 SF 3 N/A
2 4,574 SF 3,398 SF 1.5 N/A
Total 12,197 SF 10,193 SF N/A
Gone l extends out SU feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Gone 1 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or.0260.
N/A - Current NC-DWO tnolicv does not require riparian buffer mitigation for road crossing
impacts to riparian buffers that are less than 150 linear feet and 1/3 acre of buffer per tributary.
Page 8 of 9
Because the project is below these thresholds the applicant does not proposed mitigation for
these impacts -
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Because no clients have committed to occupy the site at this time, the final impervious surface
coverage for the site is not yet known Temporary sediment basins and silt fences will be used to
control stormwater during construction Basins will be installed outside of the 50-ft. Tar-Pam
Buffers in the vicinity of the proposed crossings in order to provide diffuse flow into the riparian
buffers Further questions regarding stormwater management on-site should be directed to Mr.
Graham Cawthorn of Cawthorn Moss and Panciera.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sanitary sewer will be used to dispose of wastewater generated on-site. However, locations of
the proposed sanitary sewer lines have not been planned at this time.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

21102-
(Agent's signature is
lure - Ddte
if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Current Landowner
r
Name: 4V,-1-^40
Address: 'op
Phone: 5??-60

VAW(f
Project Name/ Description: 1©u<? 4S Vi /!G _
Date: -? / Zdd
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn: Jpu#J 1 Ffi?ms
Field Office: RA w'lr.W
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the current propgft owner, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA to
act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon 70-day sup lement/aaJl information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The . of
MGG/ 121106:2-
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC
to arrange a site meeting nor to visiting the site.
Ale Aio IqSSOG'a4T / 1c-•
tJG?iMef ?? ?of?'. cl r',
Print Property Owner's Name roperty Owner' igna e
cc: Mr. John Dorney cc: Mr. Kevin Martin
NCDENR - DWQ Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604 blank agent auth form doc
Greensboro Office: Hicko- n' Office
Charlotte Office: 910 Boston Road
PMB 291, 3020-I Prosperity Church Road Greensboro, N, NC le Dr 27455 Drive Taylorsville, NC 28681
Charlotte, NC 28269-7197 Greens
n?,,,....• rzz?t Sdn_R2?a Phone [phone]
1;NTON N.
?'?i FRANKLI
; .
N3600-W7822.5/7.5
1978
j '
ran°? %' ho
w ,l?
41 - 1 AMS 5356 III SW--SERIES V
p
jjA
.e ';. /?{• r r r / / ? 1`•)? !I ? „r ?_ 1 it ' ? ."
\Jv
O , I uel, i I
I
'ij 4/6
l?
'3M H
fL
( ri II, t
77
I ?' I f Z`. i c58. \
It -0
Union Gr W (i m
Ch t -
¢n •1• I 456
'A 1,
ZUNI
n Ville
' J %% I '?M•n 662. '472
. Armory H? h? •?. , I ? ? ? ? -j `
B I-
H AP 3`f7113
Bj
Z w
`" ?
J i .
Ow . °
H L K
0!V

32E%
x

116 A
W ?x o
W =V • w
_ F o •
H
O
Z
W = „
J
'ao u
W r>
W Z 3 r

~
O
Z
N J<
]C>
ZO
D! >
U- ¦
O
O
O
N
If
.? I
W
< ri
U
0 o
N
x
O
Q
a
a
<
z
0
w
a <
D
F- w H
JU_ z
V> W
m z?
0Z;W
IL
ILO Zx
Of Fw
> K <
z
WIX W(c
fWLL)
vl O
M Z O J
<O u]
au u
w_J
O O l7
Ul <
j W
F-
<
H
IMPACT 1 INSET
\ \ ` ` EASEMENT \ 77 CLEARING LIMITS
WETLANDS AREA- 0.04 AC.. ?-? 81 9
ZONE 1?BUFFER AREA x.175 AC.
ZONE 2 BUFFER AREA 0.1'M AC.
-?. ----
LEN?T.H` OF STREAM` CHANNEL - 14.00
SCALE: 1 11:1009
IMPACT 2 INSET

i
I
' WETLANDS AH/t - 0.020 AC.
oooo?
ZONE 1 BU-FrER AREA - 0.156 AC.
ZONE 2 BUFFER AREA 0.0-78- /4C-
\<ENGTH.,6F STREAM Cl I *N N EL - 148.00
i

(I A
SCALE: 1 " : 64'
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources 00 IVA
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor NCDENR
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
September 10, 2001
W. Graham Cawthorne
Cawthorne, Moss, & Panciera
239 East Owens St.
Post Office Box 1253
Wake Forest, N.C. 27588
Subject: Tar Pamlico River Basin
Riparian Buffer Rules
NEMO Associates
NBR 01-228
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Cawthorne:
The information that you provided to this Office has been reviewed and an evaluation of the stream
features represented on the USGS Youngsville Quad and the Franklin County Soils maps has been
made. This was accomplished to determine if the site would require compliance with the Tar
Pamlico Buffer Rule. This specific project is referenced by the Raleigh Regional Office as NBRRO Ol -
228.
It was determined that the there are several features depicted on this property that are subject to
the Tar Pamlico River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy; Protection and
Maintenance of Existing Riparian Areas, Administrative Code T15A:02B.0259 (NCAC 0259). Two main
features enter the property from the CSX right of way and two smaller tributaries are depicted on
the two maps. The small tributary in the souther portion of the property is not subject to protection.
The required 50 foot buffer is delineated on the map received by this Office August 16, 2001.
Thank you for your attention to this matter and if this Office can be of any assistance or if you have
additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. This letter only addresses the applicability
of the Neuse Riparian Buffer. For information relevant to Wetlands and additional impacts, please
contact the Central Office at 733-1786.
Sincerely,
Steve Mitchell
Environmental Scientist
cc: RRO/John Dorney
Land Quality
H:\nbrlet.for\Ol nbr\nemoass.228
uc 97899-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Youngsville Industrial Park Date: 5/15/02
Applicant/Owner: Nemo Associates County: Franklin
Investigator: Brad Suther State: NC
Piedmont Levee
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: community
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: Flag #207, Wetland
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VCf1-CTATIf11J
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Impatiens capensis Herb FACW 9.
Eulalia viminea Herb FAC+ 10.
3. Carex sp. Herb FACW+ 11.
12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7, 15.
8, 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): . , ... , 100%
'.j t
i i 4.
'9.:3 ,
Remarks:
uvnn?? v
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
_
Aerial Photographs _ Inundated
_
Other X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_
X No Recorded Data Available _ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water. 0 (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >14 (in.) _ FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 2 (in.)
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Project/Site: Youngsville Industrial Park, S&EC #7091 Plot ID: Flag #207, Wetland
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Poorl y drained
(Series and Phase): Bibb Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquents Confirm W" - Type? X Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-2 A 7.5 YR 416 ---- - Coarse sand
2-
14+ C 2.5 Y 311
- -
Fine sand
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
X Aquic Moisture Regime X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions X Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes _ No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes _ No X Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? X Yes _ No
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Youngsville Industrial Park Date: 5/15/02
Applicant/Owner: Nemo Associates County: Franklin
Investigator: Brad Suther State: NC
Piedmont Levee
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: community
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
15' upslope of Flag
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: #207, Upland
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
1/C!!CT A TIl1 W
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Boehmaria cylindrica Herb FACW+ 9.
2. Eulalia viminea Herb FAC+ 10.
3. AUU*tm felix-femina Herb FAC 11.
Phytolacca americana Herb FACU+ 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7, 15.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 75%
Remarks:

Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
_
Aerial Photographs _ Inundated
_
Other _ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_
X No Recorded Data Available _ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water. 0 (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >16 (in.) X FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: >16 (in.) _
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Project/Site: Youngsville Industrial Park, S&EC #7091 Plot ID: Flag #207, Upland
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Somewhat poor) drained
(Series and Phase): Chewacla* Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic Dystrudepts Confirm Mopped Type? X Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) ( Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-6 A 5 YR 4/6 - Silty cla loam
6-13 Bw 7.5 Y 4/3 5 YR 4/6 Common / distinct Sand clay loam
13-
16+ C 7.5 YR 4/4 - - Coarse sand
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
*Soil mapped as Pacolet but actually is most like a depositional phase of Chewcla.
IL-
I
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
11 11
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL'

CONSULTANTS, PA FIRST-CITIZENS BANK 15809
11010 RAVEN RIDGE ROAD AND TRUST COMPANY
RALEIGH, NC 27614 RALEIGH, NC 27609
[phone] FAX: [phone]'30/531
10/21/2002
c
PAY TO k
ORDER THE NC Division of Water Quality ' $ **475.00 j
Four Hundred Seventy-Five and 00/100***************t*****k***********************************************************?
DOLLARS 8
NC Division of Water Quality
MEMO Job #7091 Permit App. fee
r
1180 L 580911' 1:0 53 L00 3001:086 L 24864911'
NCGS MONUMENT "MESSIAH" / / ~ , i
A T N =8418 , A 82.82 ~ , " ~~1 11 / • 1
E X =215,294.83 ' ~ NAD 83 ' 'w~ ~R. 5~ ' / ~
TOTAL ARE _ - • ~ A 126.082 AC. , ~ N 1 ~ ~ ~ ~g3
~ RI i G TO BE SUBDIVIDED ~ , i ~ I CURVE TABLE BRANDY
~ oei ~ r / 6 ~ ~ ~ CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD SITE BEARING
r ~ , " • R~ t ' ~ ; ' ~ • C- 1 57.99' 4126.92' 57. ~ ~ I 99 S 11'09'49" E
LESS R W = ~ ~ ~oN ~ ; 4.274 AC. S N/F ~ f C- 2 ~ N , ~ • • 380.95; 4126.92 380.82' S 08'07'00" E
. ~IN~ r TABRON STET ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ C- 3 185.82 ~ gABRpN SIELLA ~ 2814.85 185.78' S 02'37'11" E ~ ' I C- 4 Z C N ~ ~ HEIRS ~ I _ 743.06' 2814.85' 740.90' S 06'50'02" W to U1
` ER 3 rn ~ HEIRS NET AREA = ~ ~ , 6' ~ 5~ " ; D.B. 357 P• ~ ; D,B. 357 PG. 136 ; r C- 5 272.99' 2814.85' 272.89' S 17'10'28" W J ~
121.807 AC. . 60 69. 87116 s .ft N / ~ ~ 2 ~ q o , 1854-30- r \ ~ ~ , ' ~ . I C- 6 ~I ~ 1854-30-1808 I ~ ~ 534.24' 2814.85' 533.44' S 25 23'24" W D
r ~ N 6 ~ ~ , _ 2.000 AC. I I ~ , . C- 7 190.37' 430.00' I , , ~ 188.82' S 84'54'52" E
= 2 w , TOTAL LOTS 1 i ~ 2 N , C- 8 i ~ ~ I 104.21' 430.00' 103.96' N 75'27'35" E ~ ~p y
' 87120 0 - ~ ' ' ~ ' ' ~ C- 9 6.87' 430.00' 6.87' N 68'03'33" E
, ~ ~ EAOEIIDlT ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ AVERAGE LOT SIZE _ ~ X2.000 AC. ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ W s ~ ~ ~ ~
10.151 AC. ~ , ~ , o o. i J ~ ~ r,` ~ N I i i ~ ~ i t p
, ~i r 2,1801 ~ , , i ~ < _ , - ~ I Z - -
TOTAL ROAD LENGTH ~ ~ ~ ~ 2997 ' v / i ~ ~ I ~ c 47 I
~ v~ N ~ 64~~ ao ` ~ 147 965.s .ft. ~ 2 q w 4, • ~ , I gR 11 ~ ~
PROPOSED USE - my N ' INDUSTRIAL 3.397 A~, - , , ~ ~ I ~i
~ o. „ 87,120 s .ft. , , ~ ~ , i ~P LYOUNGSVILLE 'y
COMERCIAL ~ ~ • ~ 2, ado A C. , ' ~ 6' , , , I
0 41.95 , , N 5 ~ ~ 6a ~ / , , ,
_ ' ~ ~ TAR-PAMtJCO ~ ~OJ 1 TOTAL DISTURBED AREA ~ ~ ~ ' 5.5 AC. ~ i RhER PIT ~ ~ Al I N ~ - 400 v c NI T Y MAP ~ AL~.EEN, MAUDE MRS Ha~S ~ ,
~ r ~ ~ r ( , ~ 1854-+`51-2510 ~ '
~ Z , , 1 , l \ \ i i ~ ~ I i i I 1
~ ~ 5 ~ ~ i ~ 1
` ' ' 1 , ~ ( ~ ~ ~ '
. r ~ , ~ I ~ ~.J J ~ ~.J i ~ i ~
i I ~ , i i
, i I -
' / ~ pl 1 ~ ~r ~ ~ ~r- _ ~ N. ~ Ca ' ~ LEG ~ END:
~ _ , r ~ ~ ' ' ~ , ~ EIP -EXISTING IRON PIPE
r , I ~ ti~ 00.0' ' ~ I i T~ap'~ EPK -EXISTING PK NAIL r RI~R ~ , , ~ " ~ ' ~ NIP -NEW IRON PIPE SET
8 ~ ~ 1'~ • I Y , 9s• EASE~HTs ~ ' i ~ ~ R/W -RIGHT OF WAY
~ ~ m,• - ~ o ~ ~ ~ _ CATV -CABLE TV BOX
' ~ / ' / EB -ELECTRIC BOX ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ TEL -TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
SO , , ~ \ ~ ~ X4.72'-.I ~ .21 , PP -POWER POLE . 151 ~ , - ~r / ~ ~ -
` ' - load. 1 65 652 _ . ~ ~ / _ OHL OVERHEAD LINE / / cJ , i-~'~ LP -LIGHT POLE
~ 1Rlt-PAIAJ00 / , IIGIP A( y l` _ r v AC ~,r EIB EXISTIN T 1 G IRON BAR .r-
„ , ~S RCP -REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
, , ,
V - " ~ 1 V ~ • ' ` ~ \ TAR-PA - - . ~ ~ I 1 I A , , ~ 1 a L _ , , . , ,RME TAR-PAIrIE~ ~ / / i ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ , 3 _ F
~ ~ ~ 46 s Zoo. 6,287,s . - BUFFER , t_ - - _ _ _ 0
, q ~ , L , I ~ ~y` ~ r r^, MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS 1 ~1. • ? G
S --1 ~ '0 704 RC. ' ~ I~ ~ ~ 1, ~ ~ WETLANDS AREA- 0.04 AC{.~ ~ •'f~`•~~ I S 9.59 o , ( FRONT 50
~ I V J ' ` ` ZONE FF ` \ V` ~~~1. \ ~2 m , , t\BU E~ AREA -0,175 AC. ~ 19 ~ J ~ , t ~ ZONE 2 BUFFER A1iEA - 0.~5 AC. 11.19 J 21 ~ 1 1 • J ~ „ ~ v~~• ~ ~ ~ REAR 50'
/ LEN OF STREAb1 CHAANEU - 144.00' ~ +t J , . , , ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ SIDE ~ 1 I 1 50 ~ ~
~ i ~
. _
Uff, TOMMY, L { ' 60' RIGHT OF WAY B 1108 P / ' ~ , ' ` ~ ' ~ G / ) 1 ~ , , ~
~ 1853-18-593 / t 1 , WETLANDS aF e n fAR~A~K~ ' r 1 ' ZONE 1 UPPER Af WETLANDS ARER ' 0.020 AC. - ~ J ~ , ZONE 1~UFFER AREA - 0.156 AC. , i' • ~ . / ,
~ ~ ' I ' / , ~ / ZONE 2 BUFFER AF ~ , , . , , ZONE 2 BUFFER AREA ~ a07B. AG . - , , ~ ~ ~ VGTFI. QF STREAM CykNl'!EL - 148.00' ~ " ~ ' , ` , , ~ , ,
8' 24' PA ~ ~ / , ENCrw6F STREAM cy, SFIOULD~ DITCH J , NSF • r / , ~ ~
r WOODIJff, BRYAN ~ - - ~ ~ , ~ , • / . ' / 1 N~
t 4• Fr. ~ 153-19-5110 ; / ; ~~52g / 1 PER 1 PER FT. ~ ~ ~ ' , ~ ~ 14 NEMO ASSOCIATES INC
'L 9-35,0 5 ,ft,,~ ~ ~ r DB 920 PG 909 ~ " ^ ~ 40p, 486,064 s .ft. 1es3-49-0242 '
I-~ ~ 9.987 Q ti ~ - ' ' NEWL1 C • o, 1 " / I OHT INC. , / q ~
•,r. ` , DB 110' PG 858 • • ~ • rl`~ / ~ ~ - I ~ ~
1853-18-5933 i ~ _ / , . r . ~ r ~ / ~ r ~ I
N . / i . i I r . ~ / / i 1
' NEWLIGHT INC. ' ~ - . ~ • / / ' r ' ~ ~
~ I DB 108 PG 858 L- ~ ~ - ~ /
' 1 18-5749 1 ~ ~ ~ , ~ 692 , u rice 6 _ _ IMP
ACT ~ 2 SE E IN ~ , , ~ ~ ,
N/F ~ / ~ r NEWIJGHT INC. 5 ~ • , `
i I 9 ~ • DB 11Q8 PG 1N5 ODR>rEe . ~ ` ~ _ _ - ~ / 1 ~ ~ ' ~ 13 , ~ ~ i
' 1853-yp_ 33 , eod • . _ ~ ~ , , . r / 1 _ _ EASEYEH ~ ~ ~ , ~ . ~ ~ r t ' I
N~ ~ , 2, 297,381 s .ft. ~ ~ q
LOS CAI~POS INC. ~ ~ • - ~ ' DB 1182 ~ 1 / , 778 r 7 AC. ~ ~ ' ~ ,
~ - 1853-18- 1 ~ \ ; ~ r ,
~ DELEON PARKS . ^ - ~ ~ i r' r t ~ ,
1 DB 1085 PG 131 \ ~ ~ / ~ , , ,a~18_5~ao 1,160,69 ,gq.ft. ~ i r ~ , ~ ~ / N/F ~ ~ NEM~ ASSOCIATES INC
~ ~ ` , ~ r ' , ,'DB 1197 PG 385
~ 26.63c~ AC. r 1 I i ~ 1853-46-0351 r ? L ,
1 N~' X , , r / , ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ i , ~ l ~
ROBERT E & LINDA FU , , ~ ~ ~ ; r ~ C DB 712 P 898 ' r / ~ , • d' , ~
,a ~ 1 ~ , . oa ~ 1853-18- 0 ~ ~ , 1 , • / ,
' I / ~ ~ z ~ 12 12
1 ~ Y I ,
~ ~ _ , _ ~o ~ .434,238 s~ N('~GS MONUMENT "DUEL" ~ - - 34 238 s _ ' ~ ~ q. f t.
N =838083.89 ~ \ 9.969 A( E X =2 ~ ~ 150793.35 ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ OWNER DEVEL 9.969 A OPER. C. o
NAD 83 N/F pp m N~ / NEMO ASSOCIATES, INC. RONALD WADE do
PARK AVENUE OCIATES / DB 1175 PG 1 B ~ P.O. BOX 276 BONNIE B GIBBON
1853-17-8933 Z ' C~ ~ _ ~ DB 1014 PG 91&'~, YOUNGSVILLE, N.C. 27596 ~ r\ 1853-47-099 [phone]
~ ~ 217. ' i' ' • ' , N
~ - - - - ~ 32 STOIE ~ ' T r
C , ~~21~ ~ 2 ~ ~
2 ~ ~ N ~
i r- N/F ' 6g1' o ~ F'EaERAL SIGNAL CORP. ~ - - ~ ~ ~ / N rn N~ ~ i N ~ RONALD WADE do ANNIE B ~
~ D 1090 PG I ~ ~ o ' 438 , ~ ~ / 74 4 ~ GIBBON ,
; ~ I 1853-17-8889 , r v, ' N~ DB 1014 PG~918
` ~ 1 ~ CLYDE ORE CLYDE OREN Ji. do BETTY °P ~ 1853-47-0824 CROWELL ~ I
~ ~ ~o ~ DB 888 PG 804 . , , ~ ~ J
~ 1853 ~ N~ 1 1853-37-2597 ~ ~ ~
ARBOR RECYCLING EQUIPMENT 3 3, 5 7 7 s. f t. CO. q , N~ ~ STEPHEN V p dAI~E• C, \ ~
DB 921 PG 281 Z 8.806 AC. I 1853-17_7404 ~ ~ 289, 9~2 s . ft., ~ I ~ VIQK
q w I ~ ~ ~ DB 954 PG 978 , • • ' ~ ~ 1853-47'-0318 ~ ~ ~ • .
- _ _ w ~ ~ 6.657 AC. - - - ~ ~ \ ~ ~ t t-'~.
w ~ ` N. i \ N 1 ~ i \ ~ ~ , ~
~ , - - - ` CIRCUIT BOARD ASSEMBLERS ~ 1~ o \ ~ ~ PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION P , ~ ~ LAN FOR ~ .._~.rc ~ ,
DB 1180 PG 790 ' , ~ ~ YOUI~GSVI ~ ~~E INDU
1853-17-7226 I ~ N \ N ~ ~ , , ~ ~ GREGGbRY P N STRIAE PA ~ ~ ~ RK GREGGbRY P r!c M Y W ~ ~ ~ ~ '
~ - - - - - ' ~ l 1DUF ~ou~Y ~ ~ OWNER: NEMO ASSOCIATES INC. ~ ,
{ ~ I ~ \ DB 925 , ; N 185-3, DB 925 PG 2~2 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 37-2139 ~ ~ ' ~ REF; DB 810 PG 230
N , N ~ ~ ~ /
gI~CUIT BOARD ASSEMBLERS ' ~ ; 1 \ DB 1160 PG 792 ( 1 1 ' YOUNGSVILLE TOWNSHIP ~ t ' ~ ~
\ 1853-17-7088 1 ~ ' { ~ ~ 412.64' \ 5f0lE 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ FRANKLIN COUNTY, NORTH CARD I
~ ` .2s ~ L NA ~ ` ~
~ ' ~ 1 ~ ~ . , , ` 200 100 0 200 400
1 ,
N/F
~ ~ 1 1853-28-9016 SCALE 1 "=200'
NOVEMBER 16, 2000
CAWTHORNE, MOSS 8C PANCERA, P. C. PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS, 2,39 EAST OWENIAVE.P.0. BOX 12.. ' ' ZONED MI
3, WAKE FOREST, OREST N. C. 27587) [phone] 1853_27_4737