20050150 Ver 3_401 Application_20071030

Trle Town of
ray Town of Holly Springs ~, d v~
~5 d 15
i"li'lS Engineering Department
IYORTIi CAROLInA
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date: October 29, 2007
To: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/401 Unit ,'~~''~~i
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250 ~~~~ _,~~~~r_~-
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Green Oaks Parkway -SAW-2006-20193-292
The following items are enclosed:
1. 'Z copies Cover Letter
2. "~ copies of PCN for 401 Modification
3. '2` copies of the Stream Repair and Stabilization Plan
These are transmitted: 0 ~ ~ ~~~
^ as requested ^ for approval
O C T 3 C 2007
^ for review ® for your use taErdR - wAl ER QUALITY
WE7lANA3.AA!D STQI?MlYAT~R 9RAtdCH
Remarks:

Signed:
ephanie L. Sudano, P.E.
Director of Engineering
Copies to:
P. O. Box 8 • Holly Springs • NC 27540. 919-557-3938 (phone) • 919-552-9881 (fax)
Stephanie. Sudano@ncmail. net

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]b7
www.SandEC.com
October 23, 2007
' S&EC Project No. SOOS.D1
Stephanie L. Sudano, PE
' Town of Holly Springs
1'.O. Box 8
Holly Springs, NC 27540

Reference: Green Oaks Parkway
' Stream Repair and Stabilization :Plan
Holly Springs, Wake County, NC

Dear Ms. Sudano:
Q ~~~~~~
:; ~:
h"T~ ~dtiil~rU.;J V1~..'~Miiv.l.1 ~„.5y .~. •`s ~
i1"..
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) has been engaged by Wakefield
Development to prepare a Stream Repair and Stabilization Plan for select locations along
the Green Oaks Parkway which were inadvertently impacted as a result of site
construction activities. These areas are in the vicinity of several existing road crossings
(and their associated culverts) installed on the referenced project site. These actions were
in response to observations made by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) and United
States Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE).
Enclosed is a copy of the Stream Repair and Stabilization Plan, as requested. Please
contact me if you have any questions or comments regarding the plan.
Sincerely,
SOIL & ENV:[RONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
.~
~...-- !~ ~- - 1
Jessica E. Regan
Environmental Scientist
Enclosure: Green Oaks Parkway Stream Repair & Stabilization Plan

' October 22, 2007
S&EC Project No. SOOS.D1
Environmental Consultants, PA
;Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Phone: [phone] Fax: {919) 846-9467
www.SandEC.com
' Mr. Randy Smith
Wakefield Development
' 3209 Gresham Lake Road, Suite 160
Raleigh, NC 27615
~ Reference: Green Oaks Parkway
Stream Repair and Stabilization Plan
' Wake County, NC
' Dear Mr. Smith:
' Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) has been engaged by Wakefield
Development to prepare a Stream Repair and Stabilization Plan for select locations along
the Green Oaks Parkway which were inadvertently impacted as a result of site
t construction activities. These areas are in the vicinity of several existing road crossings
(and their associated culverts) installed on the referenced project site.
' Both the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) and the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR), Division of Water Quality (DWQ) are
aware of and familiar with site conditions based on their observations during a series of
' site visits over the month of August 2007. The repair and stabilization measures
described below are recommended to address unstable channel and wetland conditions
and incidental resource impacts which occurred during the installation of these crossings.
' The purpose of this letter is to summarize our findings regarding these temporary impacts
and describe in detail our plan for the repair and stabilization of the stream channel and
wetland areas in the vicinity of each crossing. Additionally this report also addresses
select other concerns raised by the Agencies during site visits and subsequent telephone
discussions.

' Green Oaks Parkway October 22, 2007
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Project No. SOOS.Dl
It is our recommendation that the repair and stabilization measures described below not
' be performed until the concrete headwall/win~wall construction work and ~radin~
associated with each of the crossings is complete This approach will reduce the potential
for future disturbance of newly restored areas during headwall construction. Based on
our telephone conversation with Ms Jean Manuele of USAGE on August 29, 2007 she is
in agreement with this approach.
' This document does not address specifics of any required 404/401 permitting or
supplemental Agency coordination other than that required to execute this plan.
Additionally we have assumed that any land disturbing activities associated with the
' proposed work (including additions to the previously approved disturbance limits) would
be covered under the existing approved Erosion & Sediment Control Plan and the Land
Disturbance Permit issued by the Town of Holly Springs for the Green Oaks Parkway
' project.

' Site Description
d
The project site, a transportation corridor of approximately 4,500 feet in length, is locate
west of the intersection of the NC Highway 55 Bypass and Ballentine Road in the Town
' of Holly Springs in Wake County, NC. A series of unnamed tributaries onsite drain
generally to the south to another unnamed tributary which eventually drains to Utley
Creek (Cape Fear River Basin HUC 03030004). A vicinity map is provided in Figure 1.
i
6
f
i
f
x (
)
es o
s
a ser
The impact areas are located immediately upstream and downstream o
separate road crossings. Site crossings have been labeled Crossings 1 through 7
' (sequenced from northwest to southeast along the corridor) and are shown on Sheet 1
(attached). With the exception of Crossing 4 (where no incidental impacts have
occurred), all crossings will require that restorative efforts be performed both upstream
' and downstream of each crossing.
Proposed Stream Repairs
As part of our project scope, S&EC visited the project site to observe site conditions
associated with reported impacts (both stream and wetland) and to determine their extent
and severity of the impacts, and to the collect necessary site data to develop this plan.
' While onsite we observed the characteristics of the site (including current grading and
stabilization operations), the surrounding area, verified surface and channel flow
conditions, observed channel and wetland impacts and observed visible property
boundaries, limits of construction, utilities, and water conveyance structures. During this
process we identified and GPS located the approximate boundaries of the impacts and the
approximate limits of disturbance. We also collected a photographic record of select site
conditions and the above described impacts. While on site we also performed alimited-
engineering survey of select portions of the site using alaser-level and measunng tape to
' provide a general baseline against which our repair and stabilization measures could be
compared.

' Page 2 of 6

' Green Oaks Parkway October 22, 2007
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Project No. SOOS.Dl
As noted above before any of the proposed work is performed S&EC recommends that
' all headwall/wingwall construction be completed and the areas immediately adjacent to
those walls backfilled and graded and u~slope areas stabilized. Completing these tasks
before the stream repairs will reduce the potential for any inadvertent damages to the
' stream/wetland areas once they are restored and will allow the final restoration grading to
be tied to the fmal grades of those areas.
' If you will recall, Crossings 1, 5 and 7 consist of a single installed culvert at each
location. Crossings 2, 3 and 6 consist of installed culvert pairs. At each crossing location
the stream channel both upstream and downstream has been disturbed. The proposed
restoration requires that the stream channel be realigned to varying degrees. Based on the
current channel alignment (just outside of the disturbed area both upstream and
downstream of each crossing) a hydraulic connection will be made between the culvert
' and the contributing or receiving channel. This localized restoration will occur on both
the upstream and downstream ends of each crossing. In the case of Crossings 2, 3 and 6
the channel will be aligned to the culvert intended to receive base channel flow (the
' culvert with the lowest invert elevation). This restored channel alignment is shown on
Sheets 2 through 7 attached.
' A limited vertical profile was collected to describe conditions at the upstream and
downstream end of each crossing (see the attached). These profiles describe the
estimated tie-in elevations (for the installed culverts and the undisturbed channel invert)
' as well as the approximate location of each proposed structure. The invert of each pipe
(both upstream and downstream) was utilized as a relative temporary benchmark for each
set of local (upstream or downstream) profile data collected. The attached photos show
' the approximate proposed restored channel alignment marked with pink pin-flags
(generally along the white tape line). Care will be taken to maintain across-sectional
area similar to that of the channel upstream and downstream of the crossing. It should be
' noted that while on site to collect channel profile data the headwalUwingwall concrete
formwork at Crossings 5 and 6 was under construction thereby shieldin tg he upstream
ape inverts Accordin~~y we were required to estimate invert elevations at the upstream
' end of these crossings. We will confirm our assumptions prior to the commencement of
restoration efforts and make any necessary adjustments at that time.
Sheets 2 through 7 also show the approved disturbance limits (defined by others) as well
' as the areas which were disturbed (based on our site observations) during the installation
of the crossings (culverts and headwalls/wingwalls). In almost every case the area
disturbed by construction activities to date (both upstream and downstream of each
' crossing) have exceeded the previously approved disturbance limits. Accordingly our
ability to keep the necessary restorative efforts within the previously approved
disturbance limits (by the Town of Holly Springs) is greatly limited. And based on
observed channel conditions (including select head-cuts which have migrated) some
additional disturbance (beyond those areas already disturbed) will be necessary to repair
and stabilize the streams (and associated wetlands). We understand that the Town of
Holly Springs will perform the necessary review and subsequent approval of these
1
' Page 3 of 6

Green Oaks Parkway October 22, 2007
' Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Project No. SOOS.D1
revised disturbance limits. Every effort will be made during construction to limit the
' extent of disturbance and minimize the removal of established vegetation however, based
on the channel reali~ment necessary some vegetation losses can be expected.
One or more rock cross-vane structures will be installed at each location. The
' approximate location of each structure is similarly shown. The structures will serve to
maintain the channel alignment and provide the necessary grade control (thereby
stabilizing existing head-cuts and reducing the potential for future head-cutting) until
' such time that the channel banks can be stabilized with dense vegetation. These
structures are particularly important on the upstream side of each crossing as field
evidence indicates that head-cutting is already occurring to varying degrees at a number
' of crossings. Wherever possible the sills of cross-vane structures will be tied (and
extended if necessary) to the headwall or wmgwall of the culvert. This will allow for the
' structure to be "anchored" to the crossing and reduce the potential for localized erosion
which might eventually lead to structure failure or the bypass (and eventual head-cutting)
of the structure.
' As is typically the case in restoration projects the exact channel alignment and structure
locations depicted are approximate and maybe field modified by the Designer at the time_
based on conditions encountered during construction select
of construction. Similarly
' ,
structures maybe constructed with a step (to control channel elevation drops),
supplemental structures maybe added, or one or more structures may be dropped from
the plan. Based on our experience on large-scale restoration projects as well as numerous
' similar violation sites across the State this flexibility is warranted and typically
acceptable to both USACE and NCDENR-DWQ.
' The floodplain on either side of the channel will be graded to match (through blending)
the elevation of the existing floodplain or topography. Wetland and buffer areas adjacent
to the impacted areas will be graded to an elevation roughly coincident with their pre-
' disturbance condition. The exact elevation will be determined by the Designer based on
topographic and soil conditions as well as the grading associated with the adjacent culvert
and head/wing walls. At each repair location, the reconstructed stream banks will be
' stabilized with CF-7 coir matting (or similar material), seeded with appropriate erosion
control grasses, and over planted with live stakes (during the appropriate season).
Live stakes should be a minimum of 24-inches in length with a diameter of at least %-
inch. We recommend that a minimum of two of the recommended species (see Sheet 9)
be planted to provide desired diversity. The planting of live stakes is typically
' recommended to occur after mid-October but not later than mid-March, for highest
survivability. Any disturbed areas outside of the channel banks will be replanted with a
combination of tree and shrub species (see Sheet 9) and similarly seeded with appropriate
erosion control grasses. Any disturbed wetland areas should be replanted with trees and
shrubs, and over-seeded with a wetland seed mix. Transplants can be utilized where
appropriate.

' Page 4 of 6

1

Green Oaks Parkway
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Other Considerations
October 22, 2007
Project No. SOOS.D1
During our site meeting on August 15, 2007, there was some discussion regarding
conditions in the vicinity of Crossing 3. If you will recall Crossing 3 consists of two (2)
parallel 8-foot by 8-foot pre-cast reinforced concrete box-culverts. Ms. Manuele of
USACE expressed concern that these culverts might be oversized thereby creating an
undesirable condition as they transitioned to the contributing (upstream) and receiving
(downstream) stream channels. Ms. Manuele requested that consideration be given to the
possible installation of sills on the upstream end of the culverts (to reduce the potential
for head-cutting upstream) and the installation of in-culvert baffles to reduce water
velocities within the culverts.
With regard to the sills, the installation of proposed cross-vane structure and its
associated bank sills (left and right) will serve to reduce the potential for the described
head-cutting. And while we understand the concern over excessive velocities, in our
opinion the installation of in-culvert baffles or other such devices is inappropriate and ill-
advised for the following reasons; 1) only the Designer/Manufacturer of the culverts
would be able to sufficiently determine the structural effect of drilling and doweling steel
connections for cast-in-place concrete baffles. Drilling ofpre-cast concrete structures can
result in damage to installed (and structurally required) reinforcing steel. Such damage
has the potential to compromise the structural integrity of the box-culvert, and in the
worst case result in potentially catastrophic failure of the culvert and road fill. 2) even if
the installation were structurally feasible, the culvert was likely designed to a specific
design storm (recurrence interval, ie. 25-year, 50-year, etc.). The placement of baffles
would reduce the overall capacity of the culvert as it would affect the available cross-
sectional flow area. 3) similarly the placement of baffles within the culvert would serve
to disrupt the flow path and likely serve to collect debris thereby additionally impeding
flow and potentially creating more dynamic hydraulic conditions downstream of the
culvert.
Another area which we understand was of concern to Ms. Manuele is the existing
wetland immediately downstream of Crossing 7. Based on a review of the pre-
construction delineation it appears that a defined stream channel previously extended
(upstream through the existing wetland) to a location approximately 8 feet downstream
from the proposed culvert outfall. Based on site conditions observed during our visits the
existing downstream pipe invert is at an elevation approximately 1.10 feet higher than the
existing footer and approximately 1.40 feet higher than the existing wetland surface
(approximately 30 feet downstream). While there can be no way to confirm the pre-
existing condition of this channel (as this area has been significantly disturbed due to
construction activities to date) the ve~ical separation alone complicates the restoration of
this area. It is our opinion that with the installation of a single cross-vane (as shown,
possibly with an additional step) we can stabilize the outfall (vertically and horizontally),
reconnect the baseflow channel, and still restore the surrounding wetland area to its
approximate pre-disturbance condition.
Page 5 of 6

Green Oaks Parkway October 22, 2007
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Project No. SOOS.DI
It is also our understanding that Ms. Manuele similarly requested that consideration be
given to the construction ofpre-formed scour holes on the downstream end of some or all
of the culvert crossings.. Our plan proposes to construct across-vane structure at the
downstream end of each crossing. These structures are to be located immediately
downstream of each pipe outfall and will serve the similar purpose of dissipating energy
but also serve to provide the desired grade control and bank stabilization until such time
as vegetation can be densely established.
Implementation Schedule
Following the review and approval of this plan by the Town of Holly Springs, it will be
submitted to both the USACE and DWQ for their review and approval. The stream
repair and stabilization activities can be completed (barring any inclement weather)
within 60 days of the approval of this plan by USACE and DWQ (whichever is later).
Notification should be made to USACE and DWQ following the completion of site work.
Please contact us if you have any questions or comments regarding these
recommendations.
Sincerely,
SOIL & ENVIRONMEl~~'e~~°~.~iSULTANTS, PA
~°@ ~ ®sss
~~A
-- ~~ . ~ °~
,~~~
,~ .~
e ,~ _-
v
Patrick K. Smith, ;,P'~ '~ ,°°° essica E. Reg
N.C. License No. 2552, R ~, ~~e~m°0~ Environmental Scientist
Cc: Ms. Stephanie Norris, P.E., Spaulding & Norris, PA
Ms. Stephanie Sudano, P.E., Town of Holly Springs
Ms. Heather Keefer, Town of Holly Springs
Mr. Sean Clark, S&EC
Attachments: Figure 1 -Vicinity Map
Site Maps - (Sheets 1 through 9)
Crossing Profile Data
Site Photos
Page 6 of 6

Green Oaks Parkway
EXISTING
~~~
rJ~' f
~r-= r!

Project Number:
5005.D I
Project Manager:
JER
I " = 1500'
Date:
SEPTEMBER 2007
Map Title:
Flgure I - Vlclnlty Map
Green Oaks Parkway
Wake County, NC
Source:
Apex Quadrangle
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.• Raleigh, NC 27614
(919)8465900 • (919) @469467
Web Page: www.SandEC.com

>~
,n~ ~
J
CROSSING # I
CROSSING #3
CROSSING #2
CROSSING #5
SEE NUMBERED INSET
SHEETS FOR DETAILS ON
PROPOSED REPAIR AND
STABILIZATION EFFORTS
CROSSING #4
(NO REPAIRS PROPOSED)
NOTES:
I . SITE DATA INCLUDING CONTOURS, STREAMS, WETLANDS,
AND HEADWALLS PROVIDED BY SPAULDING ~ NORRIS, PA.
2. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS ARE
APPROXIMATE.
3. GPS DATA COLLECTED ON AUGUST 27, 2007, BY S+I;EC.
ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
4. PROPOSED STRUCTURE AND CHANNEL LOCATION IS
APPROXIMATE AND MAYBE MODIFIED AT
TIME OF CONSTRUCTION BY DESIGNER. FINAL GRADING OF
FLOODPLAIN WILL BE FIELD ADJUSTED BY THE DESIGNER.
5. FULL EXTENT OF PLANTING ZONES WILL BE MODIFIED BY
DESIGNER AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. THE EXACT
EXTENT OF WETLAND AND BUFFER PLANTING WILL BE POST
GRADING PERFORMED BY OTHERS.
DRAWINGS PRINTED
AT f~1ALF- SCALE
X07 Soil d Environmental Consultants, PA
CROSSING #6
OVERALL SITE PLAN ~ INDEX SKEET
CROSSING #7
NORTH
SCALE I " = 200'
zoo i a~~ o
~Zo
g..~l
Z z
z o w
L
} ~ > NNx
3 N 0 W
J ~
Q m IL tl
~N ..~ Z
Q W ~3 5
0 0[ u ~
w
u ~
w ~ '~
~~ z
J
"~ oy ~
o~~ >
~ "< 0
N ~3 u
-i N
e
a
~m
a
~ a
~~
~~
~~
~~
V~
a
~.
~~a
~~~
U
0 ?
.~
w~
t
0~
~~

rn
0
3
;u
D
~~
l J
0
V 1
^z
V ,
+~
APPROXIMATE
FOOTER LOCATION
EXISTING CHECK DAM
(f0 BE REMOVED)
APPROXIMATE TREE
PROTECTION FENCE /
EXISTING LIMITS
OF DISTURBANCE GZ
APPROXIMATE
HEADWALUWINGWALL
LOCATION

EXISTIN
SEDIMENT BASIN
c`
,,
r,
\~
APPROXIMATE
FOOTER LOCATION
\\
APPROXIMATE
HEADWALLNVINGWALL
LOCATION
NORTH
SCALE I " = 10'
10 5 O 10
~`` T ~ 1 V ~ \ \ \
'y~~~
APPROXIMATE TREE
PROTECTION FENCE /
EXISTING LIMITS
~ t ~ OF DISTURBANCE
i~~
EXISTING
_~ SEDIMENT BASIN
i'
,,
I,
,~' ~ ,
1
I
UPSTREAM
DOWNSTREAM
DRAWINGS PRINTED
AT f1ALF- SCALE
Project: Project No.:
~

~ S
il & E
i
l
l GREEN OAKS PARKWAY
STREAM REPAIR 4 STABILIZATION PLAN 5oo5.Di
Prod. Mgr.: Drawn:
R °C1
o
nv
ronmenta
Consu
tants, PA
11010 Raven Ridgn Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Phonc: (919) g46-5900 Fax: [phone] Location: Cheat:
WAKE CO., NC WAKEFIELD DEVELOPMENT Scale
I" = I O'
www.SandEC.oom Sheet Title: heet No.:
CROSSING I 2 OF 9
NOTES:
I . SITE DATA INCLUDING CONTOURS, STREAMS, WETLANDS,
AND HEADWALLS PROVIDED BY SPAULDING ~ NORRIS, PA.
2. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS ARE
APPROXIMATE.
3. GPS DATA COLLECTED ON AUGUST 27, 2007, BY SPEC.
ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
4. PROPOSED STRUCTURE AND CHANNEL LOCATION IS
APPROXIMATE AND MAY BE MODIFIED AT
TIME OF CONSTRUCTION BY DESIGNER. FINAL GRADING OF
FLOODPLAIN WILL BE FIELD ADJUSTED BY THE DESIGNER.
5. FULL EXTENT OF PLANTING ZONES WILL BE MODIFIED BY
DESIGNER AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. THE EXACT
EXTENT OF WETLAND AND BUFFER PLANTING WILL BE POST
GRADING PERFORMED BY OTHERS.

NOTES:
I . SITE DATA INCLUDING CONTOURS, STREAMS, WETLANDS,
AND HEADWALLS PROVIDED BY SPAULDING ~ NORRIS, PA.
2. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS ARE
APPROXIMATE.
3. GPS DATA COLLECTED ON AUGUST 27, 2007, BY SPEC.
ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
4. PROPOSED STRUCTURE AND CHANNEL LOCATION IS
APPROXIMATE AND MAYBE MODIFIED AT
TIME OF CONSTRUCTION BY DESIGNER. FINAL GRADING OF
FLOODPLAIN WILL BE FIELD ADJUSTED BY THE DESIGNER.
5. FULL EXTENT OF PLANTING ZONES WILL BE MODIFIED BY
DESIGNER AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. THE EXACT
~ EXTENT OF WETLAND AND BUFFER PLANTING WILL BE POST
GRADING PERFORMED BY OTHERS.
~ \\ i
\ \ /~
APPROXIMATE
FOOTER LOCATION
~~1 ,~
APPROXIMATE TREE
PROTECTION FENCE
EXISTING LIMITS
OF DISTURBANCE
i
EXISTING CHECK DAM
(TO BE REMOVED)
: .
E.

;e\

,~:
~ ~. '
/~, \\ \ ,
EXISTING
SEDIMENT BASIN
APPROXIMATE
FOOTER LOCATION
~ APPROXIMATE -~
\ HEADWALUWINGWALL
~ LOCATION
\\ /

%'"
~~
EXISTING CHECK DAM _
(TO BE REMOVED)
~ ~ ~~~ ~ +
APPROXIMATE .
hEADWALL/WINGWALL \
LOCATION
\ \ \ \
\\
+ + t -
+ + + + >'
+ ~ ~ ~
~'~ + ~ ~~ EXISTING
DRAWINGS PRINTED
AT f1ALF- SCALE
Soil 6 Environmental Consultants, PA
_ SEDIMENT BASIN
r
CRO551 NG 2
\~
EXISTING _
SEDIMENT BASIN
\\
NORTH
SCALE I " = 10'
i a~
APPROXIMATE TREE
PROTECTION FENCE /
EXISTING LIMITS
OF DISTURBANCE

~~~

G d0 iV £ 9NIGGO*ND
:'ON ;aay :01711 1pogG woa-Dgpueg mrom
1N3WdO13A30 4131JJNVM I ON "OD jYVM L9b6 M (616) :-d • 0069-M (616) :auo4d • 419LZ --!I—D WON `gStaluH . peoa a8pia uanag 0101)
A 1 = . I:aleo :7uai :uope�
„a �o dd s}uv;jnsuo� lv)uamuosieud v dos
:umej :-AN �ro� Mfld NOIIVZ1119VJG # b1Vd321 WVJ2IIG
a soon AVM'A�Vd CAVO N33?J9
.,-,ter
z
Z �
W Z Q
Q O c!1 rt]
�QU>5z
00
o
Lu -i Q� T)
� �: 0
G Q 1L
xzU
IL
QQ
C)
Q
W
IZ
LL
O �- M
UOL/
z w zW�j0
< LU
�Q Z
3ZZ 0 =J z
m,0 QWQ~� -
�C�ct� C:) U (z—L
(1Q�ZZ N O� co ^
_j C) [; co U )
/ SDC) N zLLJZLLJ—D O
Z W_ Z W —
IL Lu Z
0co c��UOoozLLI 00LL ry
z Z <ooW QO �o U
h p z Q > N U m
000 z02Qm��c�pp>
U—I— O W zz CD
000 j pQCV/QO"_F-LLJQp
_zIL/ W W DWz�pW
p w U Q U p~ z
p WZ OZ
a--
O
zQz�Ozc��z�'��
0�oC
�OQUO Qpz�-Q�w
QQ►—u2U W���
F— U7 — W 0 C9
Lij F— Q Q — Q
C) 0-1 COL U 0zZ
W J J W p[ W O _1 — W p
W~ zz J IL W J OL W W
O(nQQQUQWQF—tLLL- p 0
z
O
=
II
= o
0
w
z
Q
U
U) o
z
Z �
W Z Q
Q O c!1 rt]
�QU>5z
00
o
Lu -i Q� T)
� �: 0
G Q 1L
xzU
IL
QQ
C)
Q
W
IZ
LL
O �- M
UOL/
z w zW�j0
< LU
�Q Z
3ZZ 0 =J z
m,0 QWQ~� -
�C�ct� C:) U (z—L
(1Q�ZZ N O� co ^
_j C) [; co U )
/ SDC) N zLLJZLLJ—D O
Z W_ Z W —
IL Lu Z
0co c��UOoozLLI 00LL ry
z Z <ooW QO �o U
h p z Q > N U m
000 z02Qm��c�pp>
U—I— O W zz CD
000 j pQCV/QO"_F-LLJQp
_zIL/ W W DWz�pW
p w U Q U p~ z
p WZ OZ
a--
O
zQz�Ozc��z�'��
0�oC
�OQUO Qpz�-Q�w
QQ►—u2U W���
F— U7 — W 0 C9
Lij F— Q Q — Q
C) 0-1 COL U 0zZ
W J J W p[ W O _1 — W p
W~ zz J IL W J OL W W
O(nQQQUQWQF—tLLL- p 0
z
W LLj
J
z
E2U
WJz
Q Q O
`J
ZQ
��Q
l u z
Q0
uWI1u�U
0Z0
�Q
OCL W �<
D-
z
Z �
W Z Q
Q O c!1 rt]
�QU>5z
00
o
Lu -i Q� T)
� �: 0
G Q 1L
xzU
IL
QQ
C)
Q
W
IZ
LL
O �- M
UOL/
z w zW�j0
< LU
�Q Z
3ZZ 0 =J z
m,0 QWQ~� -
�C�ct� C:) U (z—L
(1Q�ZZ N O� co ^
_j C) [; co U )
/ SDC) N zLLJZLLJ—D O
Z W_ Z W —
IL Lu Z
0co c��UOoozLLI 00LL ry
z Z <ooW QO �o U
h p z Q > N U m
000 z02Qm��c�pp>
U—I— O W zz CD
000 j pQCV/QO"_F-LLJQp
_zIL/ W W DWz�pW
p w U Q U p~ z
p WZ OZ
a--
O
zQz�Ozc��z�'��
0�oC
�OQUO Qpz�-Q�w
QQ►—u2U W���
F— U7 — W 0 C9
Lij F— Q Q — Q
C) 0-1 COL U 0zZ
W J J W p[ W O _1 — W p
W~ zz J IL W J OL W W
O(nQQQUQWQF—tLLL- p 0
z
m m m m m m m m r m m m m m m m m m m
WJz
Q Q O
��Q
l u z
Q0
uWI1u�U
0Z0
�Q
OCL W �<
D-
00LLJ
U
C9
IV
�OZLLJ
�
E
w
oU'o
W 1L
=
OO
i 1L
o
>
n- 0
Q
w
-
OOC
\
W
1\
r
m m m m m m m m r m m m m m m m m m m

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w
~ NOTES:
I . SITE DATA INCLUDING CONTOURS, STREAMS, WETLANDS,
rn AND HEADWALLS PROVIDED BY SPAULDING ~ NORRIS, PA.
2. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS ARE
3 APPROXIMATE.
3. GPS DATA COLLECTED ON AUGUST 27, 2007, BY SPEC.
°' ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
4. PROPOSED STRUCTURE AND CHANNEL LOCATION IS
APPROXIMATE AND MAY BE MODIFIED AT
TIME OF CONSTRUCTION BY DESIGNER. FINAL GRADING OF
FLOODPLAIN WILL BE FIELD ADJUSTED BY THE DESIGNER.
D 5. FULL EXTENT OF PLANTING ZONES WILL BE MODIFIED BY
DESIGNER AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. THE EXACT
EXTENT OF WETLAND AND BUFFER PLANTING WILL BE POST
GRADING PERFORMED BY OTHERS.
~% .
EXISTING ~
SEDIMENT BASIN ~_'
~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ APPROXIMATE
FOOTER LOCATION
i ~ ++.
I '~ ~ + APPROXIMATE
Itl f i + ' ~ HEADWALL/WINGWALL
LOCATION +
+ +,
+ +
l J
(O
(V ,
V,
z

EXISTING /
SEDIMENT BASIN
APPROXIMATE TREE
PROTECTION FENCE / _---
EXISTING LIMITS
OF DISTURBANCE ~/
EXISTING CHECK DAM ~
(TO BE REMOVED)
I i-
r
NORTH
SCALE I " = I O'
to s o to
;+ t
~i- +

°,~ ~
t~, i
1~,
APPROXIMATE TREE
PROTECTION FENCE /
EXISTING LIMITS
OF DISTURBANCE
>;ril
a iii
!I
i
u~ - -

~ EXISTING
APPROXIMATE SEDIMENT BASIN \
FOOTER LOCATION
~.
--
l
~ ', , ~
\ % APPROXIMATE
HEADWALL/WINGWALL --
LOCATION
DIZAWI NGS
AT HALF- PRINTED
SCALE
Project:
GREEN OAKS PARKWAY Project No.:
5DO5.Dl
~
S
il ~ E
i
l C
l STREAM REPAIR 4 STABILIZATION PLAN ProJERgr.: DrDCI
o
nv
ronmenta
onsu
tants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Phone: (919) R46-5900 Fax: (919) R46-9467 Location: Client:
WAKE CO., NC WAKEFIELD
DEVELOPMENT Scale:
I " = I d
www.SandFC.com Sheet Title:
CROSSING 5 heet No.:
5 OF 9
+ + +
+ + + +
i~ + + '
~~ + + + ~
r ~ + +~~
*\~
i ~ r
\ r~~/

NORTh
SCALE I " = I O'
10 5 O 10
NOTES:
I . SITE DATA INCLUDING CONTOURS, STREAMS, WETLANDS,
AND t1EADWALLS PROVIDED BY SPAULDING ~ NORRIS, PA.
2. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS ARE
APPROXIMATE.
3. GPS DATA COLLECTED ON AUGUST 27, 2007, BY SPEC.
ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
4. PROPOSED STRUCTURE AND ChANNEL LOCATION IS
APPROXIMATE AND MAY BE MODIFIED AT
TIME OF CONSTRUCTION BY DESIGNER. FINAL GRADING OF
FLOODPLAIN WILL BE FIELD ADJUSTED BY THE DESIGNER.
5. FULL EXTENT OF PLANTING ZONES WILL BE MODIFIED BY
DESIGNER AT ThE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. Tf1E EXACT
EXTENT OF WETLAND AND BUFFER PLANTING WILL BE POST
GRADING PERFORMED BY OTHERS.
APPROXIMATE TREE
PROTECTION FENCE /
EXISTING LIMITS
~~ OF DISTURBANCE
/ APPROXIMATE
/ 11EADWALL/WINGWALL
LOCATION
APPROXIMATE
FOOTER LOCATION
~~
r~ /
lJ
C>
O
C~
N
z
G~
6>
i`
G
,~
~~

EXISTING
\ SEDIMENT BASIN
/\
~% ~
APPROXIMATE
FOOTER LOCATION
i
i ~
i
~/
EXISTING CHECK DAM
(TO BE REMOVED) ~j
~~ APPROXIMATE TREE
PROTECTION FENCE /
~~ ~ EXISTING LIMITS
OF DISTURBANCE

%;f
%~4`'
~:";,

/j

~~ / /
~..
,'
~~ ~ ~ ~ /
,~ / /
./
~ ~ ;, ,;
~,
~ ~ ~ ~
,,
/ ~
~'
~ ~ %
~ % J ,~
i
EXISTING
~ SEDIMENT BASIN
APPROXIMATE
hEADWALL/WINGWALL
LOCATION
DfZAWINGS PRINTED
AT h ALF- SCALE
Project: Project No.:
GREEN OAKS PARKWAY g
O5
~
~
PA
Soil ~ Environmental Consultants
STREAM RPPAIR ~ STABILIZATION PIAN
Client:
L
t Prod. M
r
Drawn:
JER ocl
Scale:
,
11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] ion:
oca
WAKE CO., NC WAKEFIELD DEVELOPMENT ~ ° _ ~ O~
www.SandEC.com Sheet Title: Sheet No.:
CROSSING 6 6 OF 9

~--;
+ 1
+ + +
- + + + + + + ~
NORTH f / + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
444 + + + + + + + + + +
SCALE I " = I O' - +-_ _- -_____ --~_
I O 5 O I O ~ ;~ ~ ~~
D l I
NOTES:
I . SITE DATA INCLUDING CONTOURS, STREAMS, WETLANDS,
AND HEADWALLS PROVIDED BY SPAULDING ~ NORRIS, PA.
2. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS ARE
APPROXIMATE.
3. GPS DATA COLLECTED ON AUGUST 27, 2007, BY SPEC.
ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
4. PROPOSED STRUCTURE AND CHANNEL LOCATION IS
APPROXIMATE AND MAY BE MODIFIED AT
TIME OF CONSTRUCTION BY DESIGNER. FINAL GRADING OF
FLOODPLAIN WILL BE FIELD ADJUSTED BY THE DESIGNER.
5. FULL EXTENT OF PLANTING ZONES WILL BE MODIFIED BY
DESIGNER AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. THE EXACT
EXTENT OF WETLAND AND BUFFER PLANTING WILL BE POST
GRADING PERFORMED BY OTHERS.
i
~/
APPROXIMATE
FOOTER LOCATION .~
\J
(O
rV ,
V,
z

~~~
APPROXIMATE TREE
PROTECTION FENCE / _
EXISTING LIMITS
OF DISTURBANCE

~ /r/
~;
/~ ' ,----
i
%~
i
~~~ ~ APPROXIMATE
H EADWALUWI NGWALL
LOCATION
r
j ~;
APPROXIMATE
/~~ HEADWALI/WINGWALL
/ LOCATION
1
__ ,
--_ --- APPROXIMATE
__--
FOOTER LOCATION
,- // , ;,
APPROXIMATE TREE ~
PROTECTION FENCE / / ~
EXISTING LIMITS
OF DISTURBANCE
I ~
DfZAWI NGS PRINTED
AT HALF- SCALE
Project: Project No.:
~ GREEN OAKS PARKWAY 50o5.D1
STREAM REPAIR +6 STABILIZATION PLAN Prod. Mgr.: Drawn:
~ Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Location: GLent: ScaleR DCI
11010 Raven Ridge Rood Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Phonc: [phone] Fax: (919) g46-9467 WAKE CO., NC WAKEFIELD DEVELOPMENT I " = 10'
www.SandBC.com Sheet Ttle: heet No.:
CROSSING 7 7 OF 9
} //.~

' _ ~o
` ~ m
.. O
ON p N ., 1L

Zg
vN ..
.
~w
0
v
60
Z
m
NOTE: d ~ N o
r
'

RIGHT BANK CROSS VANE MAY BE CONSTRUCTED WITH OR z
~ z
LEFT BANK WITHOUT STEP DEPENDING ON SITE CONDITIONS.
' z
~ o
w ~
a
3° ~N
~/ J O O
ONE ~

° BANKFULL STAGE ~ ~
~ „~
yQ
V
_ 7
k
FLOW - SLOPE ,;~ r
r>'
0 ~ ~3
~
~

STREAM CHANNEL BED ~~:'"~ y W ~
~ ~ z
o J
v
U
FABRIC GEOTEXTILE FABRIC

STEP ~ ~
„
~ N o~
y<
o3
"
N
FOOTER
Rods
w
' PROFILE scouR Pool ~
«+

~ PooL ~
PLAN ~
0
' CROSS ROCK VANE WITH STEP-POOL DETAIL ~
(NOT TO SCALE)

~
~~
BANKFULL BENCH
COIR MATTING
_° Q
'
_ ~- -~
WATER ELEVOA~ON ~ W

__ -
-~ - 12" ECO-STAKP® O

' I___~ I I__I ' ~
a -CO-STAGE®
24" E-- ...... 24" ECO-STAKE
v FRONT VIEW PROFILE VIEW ~~

~ • MINIMUM 2' CENTERS ALONG BOTTOM • 12" ECO-STAKES® INSTALLED IN BANK • TRENCHED TOP OF MATTING TO A
DEPTH OF AT LEAST 12", STAKF
' MINIMUM I' OVERLAP AT JOINING FLUSH WITH COIR MATTING ABOVE OR STAPLE IN PLACE, # BACKFILL
SECTIONS OF GOIR MATTING BOTTOM ROW OF 24" ECO-STAKES® TO DESIGN GRADE
s ECO-STAKES®SPACED AT MINIMUM 24" ECO-STAKi=S®
N MAXIMUM 3' CENTERS (APPROX.) INSTALLED ALONG TOE OF MATTING
' ~ (Intercept between water surface and bank)

9
0
m
COIR MATTING DETAIL
m
o
(NOT TO SCALE)
e
o
TYPICAL STRUCTURE DETAILS
,~ 2007 Soil 4 Environmental Consultants, PA.

BANKFULL BENCH
-~ ~ ~-
BASE FLOW -III-
WATER ELEVATION --I
I,
ANGLE-CUT END
PROFILE VIEW
• LIVE STAKES INSTALLED IN BANK
WITH DEAD-BLOW HAMMER
• 4/5 OF STAKE IN GROUND
• BUDS ORIENTED UPWARDS
• 3' CENTERS (APPROX.)
• CUT EXPOSED END OF LIVE STAKE
AFTER INSTALLATION IF DAMAGED
DUE TO INSTALLATION
(i.e. damaged bark, split ends, etc.)
LIVE STAKE PLANTING DETAI L
(NOT TO SCALE)
2 3
Open planting Place bare-root Close hole with
hole with seedling mhole - Shovel or Auger-
Shovel or Auger root collar at no air space
surface around roots
BARE-ROOT SEEDLING
PLANTING DETAIL
(NOT TO SCALE)
WETLAND SEED MIX
A minimum of four fo the
following species should be used
•Virginia Wild Rye (E/ymus vrrgm~cus)
•Soft Rush (Juncos effuses)
Sedge (Carex lurida, lu/~ubna, or vu/pmo~dea)
•Woolgrass (Sc~rpus cy~er~nus)
•Cardmal Flower (Lobelra cardmahs)
•Lizard's Tail (Saururus cernuus)
5_a as
PA.
LIVE STAKES - 3 FT. SPACING
SPECIES COMMON NAME TOTAL # SIZE REMARKS
Corms amomum Silky Dogwood 125 Lve Stake Along streambanks
Cephalanthus occidentahs Buttonbush 125 Lwe Stake Along streambanks
Sahx carohniana Carolina Willow 125 Live Stake Along streambanks
Salix nigra Black Willow 65 Live Stake Along streambanks
TOTAL 440

SHRUBS - 6 FT. SPACING
SPECIES COMMON NAME TOTAL # SIZE REMARKS
Stryax amencanus 5nowbell 3 I Bare-root Seedling 6' x 6' spacing
Ilex Glabra Inkberry 3 I Bare-root Seedling 6' x 6' spacing
Aroma arbutifolia Red Chokeberry 3 I Bare-root Seedhng 6' x 6' spacmg
Euonymus amencanus Strawberry bush 3 I Bare-root Seedhng 6' x 6' spacmg
TOTAL 124

TREES - 8 FT. SPACING
SPECIES COMMON NAME TOTAL # SIZE REMARKS
Platanus occidentahs Sycamore I ~ Bare-root Seedhng 8' x 8' spacing
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash I ~ Bare-root Seedhng 8' x 8' spacing
Linodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar I ~ Bare-root Seedling 8' x 8' spacing
Oxydendron arboreum Sourwood I ~ Bare-root Seedling 8' x 8' spacng
TOTAL 68
NOTES:
I . An estimated total of 235 hvestakes will be installed along the repair/stabilization areas. These
livestakes will be a conbination of at least two of the above mentioned species. Species will be
randomly intermixed over planted areas of stabilized channel banks.
2, All disturbed wetland areas to be seeded with a wetland seed mix. All other disturbed areas to be
seeded with Rye Grain and/or Brown Top Millet.
3. All efforts will be made to reduce clearing required. Any disturbed wetland or buffer areas must be
replanted with tree and shrub bare-root seedlings as described above. Approximately Xbare-root
seedlings (trees ~ shrubs) will be installed. Any trees removed during construction must be replaced with
bare-root seedlings from the speics list above.
4. Transplants will be utilized where appropriate.
PLANTING PLAN ~ DETAI LS
-~o ~ m
0o N ..~
z8~ ~Zo
~~~wn yin
z w
z o ~
0
3a o ~
J ~
~m .Q a
Q ~ `v_3 z
o~ ~
ww ww~ U U'
K K z, Z
z
`~~ °y 5
~ o~~
u ya i
o N ~3r
a
~i
++
~i
0
V
~i
0
.~
~i

Crossing # I Upstream Channel Profile
I10
108
106
104
¢~
~? 102
0
~ 100
w
rn 98
a~
oC
96
94
92
90
0+00
0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40
Station (feet)
(Distance Upstream of Culvert)
0+50 0+60

~ ~ ~ ~ ~r ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~^^~ rr r
Crossing # I Downstream Channel Profile
v
0
v
w
.N
m
-0+60 -0+50 -0+40 -0+30 -0+20 -O+ I O 0+00
Station (feet)
(Distance Downstream of Culvert)

Crossing #2 Upstream Channel Profile
0
.~
R
_~
W
c6
N
0+40 0+50 0+60
0+00 0+10 0+20 0+30
Station (feet)
(Distance Upstream of Culvert)

Crossing #3 Upstream Channel Profile
120
t Existing Channel/Ground
f Proposed Channel
115
• CROSS-VANE STRUCTURE
FI n\N
I
a~
.~
0
I
n~
w
a~
m
90
85
0+00 0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50
Station (feet)
(Distance Upstream of Culvert)
0+60 0+70
0+80

Crossing #3 Downstream Channel Profile
v
0
w

-0+80 -0+70 -0+60 -0+50 -0+40 -0+30 -0+20 -0+ I 0 0+00
Station (feet)
(Distance Downstream of Culvert)

i
Crossing #5 Upstream Channel Profile
I10
108
106
IO
,r
V 10
0
.N
10
~
w
a~
~ 98
~ Existing Pipe Invert
96
94
92 ---

90

0+ 00 O+ I O
~-
Tie to Existing
~Existinq ileadcu~ Channel Invert
0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50 0+60 0+70
Station (feet)
(Distance Upstream of Culvert)
~ Existing Channel/Ground
-f-Proposed Channel
FLOW • CROSS-VANE STRUCTURE

Crossing #5 Downstream Channel Profile
~ Existing Channel/Ground
-~ Proposed Channel - - - --- - - - - I~
CROSS-VANE STRUCTURE
-- - Existing Riprap f 06
FLOW Check Dam
y
104
Tie to Existing
Channel Invert
- -- f O2-
v
v
o
w
8
i Existing Pipe Invert
-- -- - - - - - --- o.-
- - -- - 94
-0+60 -0+50 -0+40 -0+30 -0+20 -0+ I 0 0+00
Station (feet)
(Distance Downstream of Culvert)

Crossing #6 Upstream Channel Profile
iin
I
a~
~-
o ~
w
0+00 0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50 0+60 0+70 0+80
Station (feet)
(Distance Upstream of Culvert)

Crossing #6 Downstream Channel Profile
-~ Existing Channel/Ground
f Proposed Channel
• CROSS-VANE STRUCTURE
o°i i
O ~'
ca
> - -
n~
iu
> ~
+~
_._ ~ ~ ~
- -- - - ,~
FLOW Existing Riprap
Check Dam 104
Tie to Existing
Channel Invert
- ___ ~n ~
I
Existing Pipe Invert
96
E
-0+40 -0+30
92
-0+20 -0+ I 0
Station (feet)
(Distance Downstream of Culvert)
0+00

I I O - -~
108
106
10

~
.
I o
0

10
w
a~
~ 98
Existing Pil

96
94

92

90
0+ 00
Crossing #7 Upstream Channel Profile
-~-Existing Channel/6round
-E-Proposed Channel
• CROSS-VANE STRUCTURE
FLOW ~
I
Existin 1leadcut
Tie to Existing
Invert Channel Invert
i
0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50 0+60 0+70
Station (feet)
(Distance Upstream of Culvert)

Crossing #7 Downstream Channel Profile
a~
0
v
w
-0+70 -0+60 -0+50 -0+40 -0+30 -0+20 -0+ I O 0+00
Station (feet)
(Distance Downstream of Culvert)

Green Oaks Parkway
Stream Report & Stabilization Plan

i .y4 ~ i~
11 ez
~ ~ ~ -F~
:~~
~.
_~:
+r ..
free ~! ~ '': r ~ .;~_M~
~. '
~~~ ~~~ ~

S&EC Project No. SOOS.D 1
Site Photos
Photo 1 -Crossing #1, Upstream End (Looking Upstream) Photo 2 -Crossing #1, Downstream End (Looking Upstream)

~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~^ ~ ~ rs ~
Green Oaks Parkway
Stream Report & Stabilization Plan
S&EC Project No. SOOS.DI
Site Photos
Photo 3 -Crossing #2, Upstream End (Looking Downstream) Photo 4 -Crossing #2, Downstream End (Looking Downstream)

r ~ ~ ~ r ~ i r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Green Oaks Parkway S&EC Project No. SOOS.DI
Stream Report & Stabilization Plan Site Photos
Photo 5 -Crossing #3, Upstream End (Looking Downstream) Photo 6 -Crossing #3, Downstream End (Looking Downstream)

~ . ~w ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ r~ ~ ~
Green Oaks Parkway
Strewn Report & Stabilization Plan
S&GC Project No. SOOS.DI
Site Photos
Photo 7 -Crossing #5, Upstream End (Looking Downstream) Photo 8 -Crossing #5, Downstream End (Looking Downstream)

Green Oaks Parkway
Stream Report & Stabilization Plan
Photo 9 -Crossing #6, Upstream End (Looking Downstream)
S&EC Project No. SOO~.UI
Site Photos
Photo 10 -Crossing #6, Downstream End (Looking
Downstream)

Green Oaks Parkway
Stream Report & Stabilization Plan
S&EC Project No. SOOS.DI
Site Photos
Photo 11-Crossing #7, Upstream End (Looking Upstream) Photo 12 -Crossing #7, Downstream End (Looking Upstream)

Y
~~w~ o~ ~~~,.~,. S
~x~c ~.v
0 0
~~o ~~ti
s~^/t~~__ moo;
P:o. sox x
12R S. Main Street
Holly Springs, N.C. 27540
www.hol lyspri ngsnc. us
(9191552-6221
Fax: [phone]
Mayor's Office Fax:
[phone]
Q5-bl5dv3
October 25, 2007
US Army Corps of Engineers NC Division of Water Quality
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Monte Matthews Attn: Cyndi Karoly
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, N.C. 27615 Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
RE: Green Oaks Parkway (formerly Ballentine Street)
Action ID# SAW-2006-20193-292; DWQ project 3 99-0239, Ver. 2
TOHS Project No. OS-017
Dear Mr. Matthews & Ms. Karoly:
I am submitting the attached documentation in response to the October 9,
2007 permit suspension letter from John E. Pulliam, Jr., Colonel, U.S. Army,
District Commander which was sent to the Town of Holly Springs, and in response
to the on-site permitting meeting that was held with the Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) and the US Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) on August 15, 2007.
Since, receipt of the letter and the meeting, we and our consultants Kimley Horn
and Associates have been working closely with Jean Manuele, Monte Matthews
from the USAGE, and DWQ staff to address those items needed to bring this
project back into compliance with the permit. The attached submittal includes the
Green Oaks Parkway Modification PCN and Stream Repair & Stabilization Plan.
Earlier this week, field as-built survey information was sent to you as well to show
the existing field conditions as they relate to both construction already completed
and construction proposed. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or
need for additional information for this project.
Thank you for working with on this project.
Sincerely,
Step nie L. Sudano, P.E.
Director of Engineering
Attachment
SLS/hvk
cc: Carl G. Dean, Town Manager
Chuck Simmons, Assistant Town Manager
John Schifano, Town Attorney
D ~~~ ~~~
C?C.T ~ ~ 'r7Q7
il~f'JCt ~fV l f~k ~+! !~
yV~it~W~~?~J'!0 ~~~~~
Heather V. Keefer, CFM, Environmental Specialist
Harlan Britt, P.E., Kimley-Horn & Associates
Chad Evenhouse, P.E., Kimley-Horn & Associates
13022

z
Sean Clark, S&EC
Jean Manuele, USACE
Danny Smith, DWQ (2 copies)
John E. Pulliam, Jr., Colonel, U.S. Army, District Commander
U.S. Attorney, Eastern District of North Carolina
Mr. Ron Mikulak, Chief, Wetlands Section-Region IV,
Water Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Mr. Justin McCorcle, Assistant District Council,
Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
13022

Q5- o~5d v3
Environmental Consultants, PA
;Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
October 23, 2007
S&EC Project #5005
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Monte Matthews
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, N.C. 27615
From: Sean Clark
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Green Oaks Parkway Modification
Holly Springs, Wake County, NC
NC Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
On behalf of the applicant, The Town of Holly Springs (Attn: Stephanie L. Sudano, PE), please find attached a
complete application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USAGE) and the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NC-DWQ) that the additional activities
proposed below may precede utilizing consecutive Nationwide Permit 14's. Please contact me at [phone] if you
have any questions or require additional information.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name Green Oaks Parkway
Project Tye Linear Trans ortation Project
Owner / A licant Town of Holly S rings
County Wake
Nearest Town Holly S rin s
Waterbody Name UT to Utle Creek
Basin /Sub-basin 03-06-07
Index Number 18-7-5.5
Class C
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0.0078
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.0425**
O en Water Im act (acres): 0
Total Im act to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.0503
Total Stream Im act (linear feet): 128*
* Of the 0.0425 ac or total additionally requested wetland impact only U.UU t:i ac rs permanent.
** Of the 128 linear feet of requested impact 5 LF is permanent "important", 99 LF is temporary important, 23 LF is
temporary "unimportant" and ILF is permanent "unimportant".
Attachments:
Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Agent Authorization
USGS Vicinity Map
Wake County Soil Survey
Impact Maps & Overall Site Plan
Water Quality Certification Fee (or a copy of the check)
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 1
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section -VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further det ' here: ^
t~, ~~~ s
II. Applicant Information '~
ACT 3 G 2007
Owner/Applicant Information ~~~NK waT~R
Name: Town of Holl S rin s -~ll A!~ ~At-TY
Mailing Address: Attn: Stephanie L. Sudano PE ~ ~ ~ ~ H
P.O. Box 8
Holl~pring_s NC 27540
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: Stephanie.Sudano(a~hollyspring_snc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Sean Clark
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh NC 27614
Telephone Number:~919) 846-5900 Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: SClark(a~SandEC.com
Page 1 of 11

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Green Oaks Parkway
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Holly Springs
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The project corridor is
located 3/4 mile west of the intersection of New Hill Road (SR 1152) and Old Holl~Springs-
A~ex Road (SR 1153Liust south of US 1 south. The portion of Green Oaks Pkwy being
addressed within this application will extend from Premier Drive to New Hill Road.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.6561 °N 78.8651 °W
6. Property size (acres): Linear Road Project approximately 1 mile in length
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT's to Utley Creek (03-06-07, 18-7-5.5, C)
8. River Basin: Cape Fear 03-06-07
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The corridor for the Green Oaks Parkway is under
construction as per the 401 and 404 authorizations issued in 2006. Culverts have been
installed in the locations previouslX requested and the roadbed has been graded in most
Page 2 of 11

locations Both upstream and downstream areas immediately adjacent to the existing
culverts at most crossing locations were temporaries impacted during the installation of the
culverts These temporal impacts are identified on the attached maps. This application is
seeking an after-the-fact Qermit for the temporary impacts as well as the permanent impacts
required to complete the project A stream and wetlands restoration plan will be submitted
under separate cover and will implement measures to permanently stabilize the wetlands and
streams after the road construction is completed The surrounding land use is a mix of
residential commercial and forested areas.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
proposed project consists of the construction of the Green Oaks Parkway which will be a
two-lane divided roadw~ connecting the existing_stub of Green Oaks Parkway to New Hill
where the permanent impacts slightly exceeded those previously permitted. Equipment
~ical of linear road projects including backhoes graders etc. will used.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the ~ro~osed Green Oaks
Parkway is to construct a road that will service the ~ronosed and existing, residential and
commercial developments in the area and will provide access from New Hill Road to Irvin
Parkway A road corridor in this general vicinity has been part of the Town of Holly
Spring's Transportation Plan for some time
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. As mentioned previouslythe Qroiect currently called Green Oaks
Parkway was formerly known as Ballentine Street. S&EC delineated the wetlands and streams
for the northern section of the Green Oaks Parkway_in April of 2006. The southern terminus for
the roadway had been previously delineated by Mulkey En ing Bering & Consultants prior to April
2006 The jurisdictional determination was signed by Mr. Monte Matthews of the US Army
Corps of EngLneers on April 26' 2006 (Action ID #200620193). The NC Division of Water
Quality field verified the southern half of this corridor as well as another alignment (further west
of the alignment proposed of the northern portion on September 23 2005 during a meeting, with
Mr Harold Brady of Mulkey Engineers & Consultants. Although permits have been issued for
the road corridor that exists to the east of this portion no prior permits have been issued for this
portion of the Green Oaks Parkway
In October of 2006 the USACE and the DWQ issued authorizations rg anting the use of section
404 Nationwide Permit 14 (SAW-2006-20193-292) and section 401 General Certification 3404
(DW Project #99-0239 ver 2~ respectively The 404 rag nted permanent impacts totaling 0.72
Page 3 of 11

acre of wetland 0141 acre of impact to intermittent/unimportant stream channel, and 5071inear
feet of impact to important stream channel The 401 granted impacts to 0.7287 acre of wetlands,
0 0216 acre of isolated wetlands and 7301inear feet of channel (perennial and intermittent).
During construction of the proposed road in the late summer of 2007 the USACE discovered an
elevated outlet pipe at Crossing, #7 see attached maps) This discovery led to a series of
meetings and discussions questioning if the construction of the road was in compliance with the
401 and 404 authorizations In an effort to gather information and prevent any further impacts
occurring outside the ~reviousl~permitted footprint work was stopped on the road until "as
built" data could be obtained Specific tasks within the project needed to stabilize the site have
resumed within the~ermitted area based on written email approval from the USACE. This
application's purpose is to ~uantif~and request impacts both temporary and permanent in
nature that are needed in order to complete the project and brim it completely back into
compliance
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
At this time the Green Oaks Parkwa~~lanned to be a two-lane divided roadway. The Town
will in the future raise the height of the headwalls and otherwise retrofit two additional lanes
within the requested roadway footprint which will widen Green Oaks Parkway to a four-lane
divided roadway from the NC55 Bypass to New Hill Rd. as shown on the Town of Holly Springs
approved Thoroughfare Plan
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Crossing #1 (NWP 14): 5 322 ft2 (0.122 ac.~previously permitted, requesting additional 20
ft~ (0.0005 acre) of temporary wetland impacts•
Page 4 of 11
Crossing #3 (NWP 14): 294 linear feet (0.0548 ac.) of perennial/important stream channel

(0.0054 acZ of temporary wetland and 16 linear feet of temporary intermittent/unimportant
stream channel impact;
1
stream channel and
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland
Impact Type of wetland Located within Distance to Previously
Requested Additional Area of

Site Number
Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Permitted Area o
Impact (acres)
(indicate on herbaceous, bog, Floodplain Stream Impact (acres)
etc.) (yes/no) (linear feet)
ma
#1 Fill
(Road Crossing) Riparian No 0 0.1222 0.0005 (temporary)
#2 Fill
Road Crossing Riparian No 0 0.1966 0.0008 (temporary)
#3 Fill
Road Crossing Riparian No 0 0.1550 0.0080 (temporary)
#4 Fill Herbaceous / No Isolated 0.0216 0
(Road Crossing) Isolated
#5 Fill
(Road Crossing) Riparian No 0 0.1364 0.0054 (temporary)
#6 Fill
Road Crossin Riparian No 0 0.0210 0.0068 (temporary)
#7 Fill Riparian No 0 0.0975 0.0013 (permanent)
(Road Crossing) 0.0197 (temporary)
Total
Wetland 0.7090 0.0425
Impact
(acres)
*Of the 0.0425 ac of total additionally requested wetland impact only 0.0013 ac is permanent.
Page 5 of 11
previouslypermitted, No additional impacts requested;
Crossing #5 (NWP 14): 125 linear feet (0.0057 ac.) of intermittent/unimportant stream
channel and 5.940 ft2 (0.1364 ac.l of wetland previously permitted. reauestinQ additional 1
wetland impact;
!`«..~~~.... IYT l1~rtJUD 1 Al. 21 l:.,o.,r ~oo+ m nni G ,,,. \ „~ ;,,~o,..,,;++o„~/;,,,,,,,,-*n„+ o+rnnm nhonnal

3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: The acreage of
wetlands delineated within the evaluated potential alignments totals approximately 3 acres.
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Average
Stream previously Previously Requested
Additional
Stream Impact
Number
Stream
Type of
Perennial or
Width permitted

Impact Permitted

Area of
Impact Requested

Additional Area of
(indicate on Name Impact Intemuttent? Before ~ng~ Impact Length Impact (acres)
map) Impact (linear feet) (acres) (linear
feet

#2 UT to
Utley Avert Intermittent /
3
98
0.0084
7 (temp)
0.0005 (temp)
(permanent) Unimportant
Creek
UT to Avert Perennial /
4
294
0548
0 5 (perm) 0.0005 (perm)
#3 Utley
(Permanent)
Important . 33 (tem
P) 0.0030 (tem
P)
Creek
UT to Intermittent /
2
125
0057
0 1 (perm) 0.00004 (perm) II
#5 Utley Culvert Unimportant . 16 (temp) 0.0007 (temp) ~I
Creek

#6 UT to
Utley
Culvert Intermittent /
2
182
0.0084
6 (temp)
0.0003 (temp)
Important
Creek

#7
UT to
Utley

Culvert
Intermittent /

2

31

0.0015

60 (temp) ~~

0.0028 (temp)
Creek Important
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 730 0.0295 128* 0.0078
* Of the 1281inear feet of requested impact 5 LF is permanent "important", v9 Lr is temporary imponam, ~a l.r is reu.parary
"unimportant" and 1LF is permanent "unimportant".
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill excavation dred in floodin drains e, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
indicate on ma if a licable
~ PP ) ocean, etc. acres
Page 6 of 11

N/A N/A N/A N/A 0
Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
6. List the cumulative im act to all Waters of the U.S. resultin from the ro'ect:
Stream Im act acres : 0.0078
Wetland Im act acres : 0.0425
O en Water Im act acres : 0
Total Irri act to Waters of the U.S. acres 0.0503
Total Stream Im act linear feet : 128
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ®Yes ^ No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
No additional impacts to the isolated feature (Crossing #4, are requested.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. As stated in the previously
annroved application, the least environmentally dama~in~ practical alternative (LEDPA) for this
roadway corridor was selected after evaluating, several potential corridors. During the
construction of the road impacts occurred outside of the permitted boundaries. The additional
impacts are primarily temporary in nature and were/are required in order to build the proposed
headwalls The headwalls are being constructed in an effort to reduce the size of pipe at each
crossin tg hereby reducing the~ermanent impact foo~rint The temporary impacts necessary for
the headwall construction have been evaluated numerous times by the project's contractor and
Page 7 of 11

engineers in an effort to decrease the impacts as much as possible. This application in
conjunction with a "restoration flan" (submitted under separate covert seeks to stabilize the
impact areas in both the near and extended future and bring the project back into compliance.
The permanent imnacts~ro~osed were required due to conditions and data gathered at the time
of construction.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
htt~•//h2o enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Payment into the NCEEP is proposed at a 2.1 ratio to offset the permanent impacts to S linear
feet o~erennial/important stream channel
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
Page 8 of 11

additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http•//h2o enr.state.nc.us/wr~index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 10 LF
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
s uare feet Miti ation
1 N/A 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 N/A 1.5 N/A
Page 9 of 11

Total N/A N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. As this project is proposed in the Cape Fear
River Basin there are no~rotected buffers and therefore there is no miti>ation proposed.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss Stormwater
controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. If
percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations demonstrating total proposed
impervious level. Although the impervious surface area for the road will exceed 30%, typically
stormwater devices for linear transportation projects are not required However devices will be
constructed to provide diffuse flow into the Town regulated Cape Fear Riparian Buffer. Additionally, the
Town of Holly Springs is committed to requiring engineered Stormwater mana eg ment plans for any
future development within the areas adjacent to the proposed Green Oaks Parkway (see attached letter).
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
It is not anticipated that this protect will generate andwastewater.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ® No ^
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ® No ^
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: We
have reviewed the "DRAFT Internal Policy Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality
Certification and Isolated Wetland Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water
Quality on April 10 2004 version 21 While the proposed Green Oaks Parkway is a "road on a
new location" which has the potential for growth-stimulating effects the Town of Holly Springs
has entered into a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with NC Department of Environment
and Natural Resources ANC DENR) to develop a Secondary and Cumulative Impacts Master
Page 10 of 11

Mitigation Plan to properly_plan for and accommodate growth related environmental impacts and
to prevent the degradation of downstream water quality..In addition, please refer to the attached
letter, which also outlines discussions that the Town has had with the US Army Corps of
Engineers and the NC Division of Water QualitX staff re a~g_permitting of Town projects in
respect to secondary and cumulative impacts.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
lelaq to
AppGcant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 11 of 11

Project Number:
5005.W I
Project Manager:
NT
Scale:
I" = 2,000'
Date:
09/08/06
Map Title:
FIG. I - USGS
GREEN OAKS
PARKWAY
Wake Co., NC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.• Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www SandEC.com
Source:
New 11111/Apex Quads

Project Number:
5005.W
Project Manager:
NT
Scale:
I " = 13 20'
Date:
09/08/06
Map Title:
FIG. 2- SOIL SURVEY
GREEN OAKS
PARKWAY
Wake Co., NC
Soil & Environmental Consullanls, PA
11010 Raven R dge Rd • Raleigh, NC 27614
~s1sl easssao • Is1s~ aas-sasr
Web Page' www SandEC.can
Source:
Wake Co. Soil Survey

/~" -
/ ~ ~~~~
~ ~~
~~~
?~~ ~
1
~~ . ~,
vi mom ~a
~~ a ~ iw.a~in~. rrrm s~wi rse ~ v
m ~nwua
~ ~~
\~~
A..a~vo ~u*~ sw" s v
--.---- v~co~®.~a
_- - -- - r--._.
~~.~ ~ 3
...
/ ~~„~
It
`- ~ ~~
~1
~ o
/~
~ q
_~
~~~~~
~ n
~~
4
~~o~ ~a~
~~,~~
~~ ,~~
` ,%-`~,.. ~ ~ ~.,.o..K, ~.~ a~,~
,. } ~ ~.
-.. ~
,.
•, -.
r 6 _ - ' - ~_ ~.~ ~.-~
~' 7
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 " = 350'
350 0 350 700

X~
O 20352
C 20351
IMPACT AREA 1
UPSTREAM SIDE Z
0
SCALE: 1 "=10' ~
DATE: 10/18/07
LEGEND:
012345 SURVEYOR'S CONSTRUCTION STAKING
POINTS FOR HEADWALL
-^- CLEARING LIMITS (PER APPROVED PLAN)
-X - SILT FENCE (PER APPROVED PLAN)
+ NOTES:
1. HEADWALL AND FOOTING TO BE CONSTRUCTED
WITHIN THE PERMITTED IMPACT AREA, AS ILLUSTRATED.
+ 2. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY IMPACT FOR CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITY WITHIN THE WETLAND IS NEEDED.
20 SF OF ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY WETLAND
IMPACT FOR FOOTING CONSTRUCTION

+ C 20
20346
~ 0914
i~
20348
PROPOSED HEADWALL
~~~ (PER APPROVED PLAN)
PROPOSED FOOTING
(PER SHEET S-8 OF APPROVED HEADWALL PLAN)
PERMITTED WETLAND IMPACT
FOR STORM DRAINAGE INSTALLATION

PERMITTED WETLAND IMPACT
FOR STORM DRAINAGE INSTALLATION
CONSTRUCTION STAKING POINTS
TO BE REVISED BY SURVEYOR
IMPACT AREA 1
DOWNSTREAM SIDE Z
O
SCALE: 1 "=10'
DATE: 10/18/07
LEGEND:
012345 SURVEYOR'S CONSTRUCTION STAKING
POINTS FOR HEADWALL
-~- CLEARING LIMITS (PER APPROVED PLAN)
-X - SILT FENCE (PER APPROVED PLAN)
NOTES:
1. HEADWALL AND FOOTING TO BE CONSTRUCTED
WITHIN THE PERMITTED IMPACT AREA, AS ILLUSTRATED.
2. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY IMPACT FOR CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITY WITHIN THE WETLAND WILL NOT BE NEEDED.
3. CONSTRUCTION STAKING POINTS FOR WINGWALL
WILL BE REVISED TO ACCOUNT FOR WINGWALL ROTATION.
~ ~ ~ ~
+ + +
R W
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
~' .~' ~"
~ '~
.,
j 0343 20 ~ ~\ ~. +
~ +
+ +,.,
+ +
+ +
~+
7 ~
20340
f
PROPOSED HEADWALL
(PER APPROVED PLAN)
PROPOSED FOOTING
(PER SHEET S-8 OF APPROVED HEADWALL PLAN)
20339
__--_~
20336
20338 O 20335
O 20337
n

+~

- +
- +

31

PERMITTED WETLAND IMPACT
FOR CULVERT INSTALLATION
PERMITTED INTERMITTENT STREAM
IMPACT FOR CULVERT INSTALLAIION

IMPACT AREA 2
UPSTREAM SIDE o
SCALE: 1 "=10' ~
DATE: 10/18/07
LEGEND:
012345 SURVEYOR'S CONSTRUCTION STAKING
POINTS FOR HEADWALL
-~- CLEARING LIMITS (PER APPROVED PLAN)
- X - SILT FENCE (PER APPROVED PLAN)
NOTES:
1. HEADWALL AND FOOTING TO BE CONSTRUCTED
WITHIN THE PERMITTED IMPACT AREA, AS ILLUSTRATED.
2. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY IMPACT FOR CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITY WITHIN THE WETLAND WILL NOT BE NEEDED.
3. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY IMPACT FOR CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITY WITHIN THE STREAM WILL NOT BE NEEDED.
PROPOSED HEADWALL
(PER APPROVED PLAN)
PROPOSED FOOTING
(PER SHEET S-8 OF APPROVED HEADWALL PL )

W
20323
203220

O 20337
IMPACT AREA 2
DOWNSTREAM SIDE
Z
o SCALE: 1 "=10'
~ DATE: 10/18/07
PROPOSED FOOTING ' ~
(PER SHEET S-8 OF APPROVED HEADWALL PLAN)
PERMITTED WETLAND IMPACT
FOR CULVERT INSTALLATION ~
15 SF OF ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY WETLAND
IMPACT FOR FOOTING CONSTRUCTION
7 LF OF ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACT FOR FOOTING CONSTRUCTION
PERMITTED INTERMITTENT STREAM IMPACT
IMPACT FOR CULVERT INSTALLATION
20 SF OF ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY WETLAND
IMPACT FOR FOOTING CONSTRUCTION
PROPOSED HEADWALL
LEGEND: (PER ADJUSTED LOCATION)
012345 SURVEYOR'S CONSTRUCTION STAKING
POINTS FOR HEADWALL
-^- CLEARING LIMITS (PER APPROVED PLAN)
-X - SILT FENCE (PER APPROVED PLAN)
NOTES:
1. HEADWALL AND FOOTING TO BE CONSTRUCTED
WITHIN THE PERMITTED IMPACT AREA, AS ILLUSTRATED.
2. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY IMPACT FOR CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITY WITHIN THE WETLAND IS NEEDED.
3. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY IMPACT FOR CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITY WITHIN THE STREAM IS NEEDED.
4. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING POINTS FOR HEADWALL
WILL BE REVISED TO ACCOUNT FOR 2' SHIFT TOWARD R/W.
R ~W
-+'
~ ~
~-

_~" %
'~
J ~ ~' '~'
.s ~'
20 2
+ + ~-
~' + ~'
~' + + + +
~ + + -~- +
+ + ~' ~' ~'
+ + + + +
0331
~_
~~ + + + ~

AS-~71LT HEADWALL
(P. KCI SURVEY)
PROPOSED HEA
` (PER APPROVE[
1 ~
~- 20310
I
ALL - /
LAN)
/ /
O
20311
1 ~ 203
AS-BUILT CULVERT
(PER KCI SURVEY)
AS-BUILT HEADWALL
(PER KCI SURVEY)
PROPOSED HEADWALL-
(PER APPROVED PLAN)
R
LVJIG
PERMITTED WETLAND IMPACT
FOR CULVERT INSTALLATION
T
-1-

IMPACT AREA 3
o UPSTREAM SIDE
~l
= SCALE: 1"=10'
DATE: 10/19/07
LEGEND:
012345 SURVEYOR'S CONSTRUCTION STAKING
POINTS FOR HEADWALL
-O- CLEARING LIMITS (PER APPROVED PLAN)
-X - SILT FENCE (PER APPROVED PLAN)
NOTES:
1. AS-BUILT HEADWALL AND FOOTING LOCATIONS WERE
PROVIDED BY KCI ON 10/8/07 AND 10/19/07.
2. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY IMPACT FOR CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITY WITHIN THE STREAM IS NEEDED.
3. 2 LF OF ADDITIONAL PERMANENT PERENNIAL STREAM
IMPACT IS NEEDED TO ACCOUNT FOR AS-BUILT FOOTING.
ADDITIONAL AREA OF TEMPORARY WETLAND
(347 SF)
PERMITTED PERENNIAL STREAM
IMPACT FOR CULVERT INSTALLATION \~
~~~
2 LF OF ADDITIONAL PERMANENT STREAM-~'
IMPACT FOR FOOTING CONSTRUCTION
ADDITIONAL LENGTH OF TEMPORARY STRRAEIvY"
(25 LF) ~~
AS-BUILT FOOTING
(PER KCI SURVEY)

020314
~ ~\
~ \
AS-BUILT HEADWALL ~
41 y (PER KCI SURVEY)
~, AS-BUILT FOOTING -
(PER KCI SURVEY)
0315 PROPOSED HEADWALL
(PER APPROVED PLAN)
PERMITTED PERENNIAL STREAM
IMPACT FOR CULVERT INSTALLATION
h.F 0 'ADDITIONAL PERMANENT ST
IM `~T FO ~ OOTING CONSTRUCTION
\~

ADDITIONAL LENGTH OF TEMPORARY STREAM
(8 LF)
LEGEND:-- ---
:(712345 SURVEYOR'S CONSTRUCTION STAKING -
- POINTS FOR HEADWALL- -
-O- CLEARING LIMITS (PER APPROVED PLAN)
-X - SILT FENCE (PER APPROVED PLAN)
NOTES:
1. AS-BUILT HEADWALL AND FOOTING LOCATIONS WERE
PROVIDED BY KCI ON 10/8/07.
2. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY IMPACT FOR CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITY WITHIN THE STREAM IS NEEDED.
3. 3 LF OF ADDITIONAL PERMANENT PERENNIAL STREAM
IMPACT IS NEEDED TO ACCOUNT FOR AS-BUILT FOOTING.
IMPACT AREA 3 20318
DOWNSTREAM SIDE z
0
SCALE: 1 "=10' ~
DATE: 10/18/07 = 020319

20316
--._- ~
19124
19127~~
7 \
AS-BUILT CULVERT
(PER KCI SURVEY)
AS-BUILT HEADWALL
(PER KCI SURVEY)
-PROPOSED HEADWi
(PER APPROVED P

020296
220295
PERMITTED WETLAND IMPACT
FOR CULVERT INSTALLATION
i
~ IMPACT AREA 5
~
`',
UPSTREAM SIDE
,

SCALE: 1"=10'
I DATE: 10/18/07

I LEGEND:
O12J45 SURVEYOR'S CONSTRUCTION STAKING
I POINTS FOR HEADWALL
-~- CLEARING LIMITS (PER APPROVED PLAN)
-X ~ SILT FENCE (PER APPROVED PLAN) '
NOTES: ~`,

~
~ _ 1. AS-BUILT FOOTING LOCATION WAS PROVIDED
/
` BY KCI ON 10~8~07.
'~ I
~ ~ 2. HEADWALL TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE ~'~
~
( \ PERMITTED IMPACT AREA, AS ILLUSTRATED. '~,
// 2. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY IMPACT FOR CONSTRUCTION
'
ACTT VITY
WTHIN THE WETLAND MAY BE NEEDED. '~
3. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY IMPACT FOR CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITY 'M THIN THE STREAM 'YS NEEDED.
4. 1 LF OF ADDITIONAL PERMANENT INTERMITTENT STREAM
IMPACT IS NEEDED TO ACCOUNT FOR AS-BUILT F~OTING.
1

294 ,~
I

ADDITIONAL LENGTH OF TEMPORARY STREAM
(10 LF) i
~1 ~ LF OF ADD9TIONAL PEF~MANENT STREAM --
IMPACT FOR '.FOOTING CONSTRUCTION ~
n ~
/ ADDITIONAL AREA OF TENIPORAR 2
0289
WETLAND (115 SF)
~ 020290
~

20291
y
i
20293 ~ ~~
PROPOSED HEADWALL
19118 I (PER APPROVED PLAN)
02^~ ~
y AS-BUILT FOOTING
(PER KCI SURVEY)
i
~_

~
\
PERN~ITTED INTERMITTENT STREAM
~~
IMPALT FOR CULV
ERT INSTALLATION ~~~~
~~
~ ~ II
z
0

~ PROPOSED FOOTING
(PER SHEET S-8 OF
PROPOSED HEADWALL
(PER ADJUSTED LOCATION)
L 3
020303
OSFOFA
IMPACT FOR
IMPACT
ON
-~ ~ f f -t ~ t ~ f

+ + ~ + + + -f- -F'
+ + + i + + + +
~ ..
+ ~' ~' +

I -f + + +
• 2030 1 11 +
' ~' ~.. .+. +

" ~ ~ ~ PERMIT~TTEED
2030 FOR CfJLVER B~LLAND IMMPACT
'iIVSTALLAC'fION
+
+
/
/" ~~ ~ + +
~+ ~' ~' + +

+ + +
TEMPORARY WETLAND
CONSTRUCTION
O 20304 + +
~'
+
6 LF OF ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY STREAM -~
IMPACT FOR FOOTING CONSTRUCTION
+ +
85 SF OF ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY WETLAND
IMPACT FOR FOOTING CONSTRUCTION +
LEGEND:
01234 SURVEYOR'S CONSTRUCTION STAKING + +
POINTS FOR HEADWALL
- - CLEARING LIMITS (PER APPROVED PLAN) +
X - SILT FENCE (PER APPROVED PLAN)
+ +
NOTES:
1. HEADWALL AND FOOTING TO BE CONSTRUCTED -}- -F'
WITHIN THE PERMITTED IMPACT AREA, AS ILLUSTRATED.
2. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY IMPACT FOR CONSTRUCTION ~'
ACTIVITY WITHIN THE WETLAND IS NEEDED. + +
3. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY IMPACT FOR CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITY WITHIN THE STREAM IS NEEDED. +
4. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING POINTS FOR HEADWALL
WILL BE REVISED TO ACCOUNT FOR 3' SHIFT TOWARD R/W. + +
IMPACT AREA 5 SCALE: 1°=10' +
DOWNSTREAM SIDE DATE: 10/18/07 + +

+
+

020298
z
020297

LEGEND:
012345 SURVEYOR'S CONSTRUCTION STAKING
POINTS FOR HEADWALL
I M P A C T
A R E A 6
~
-0- CLEARING LIMITS (PER APPROVED PLAN)
-K - SILT FENCE (PER APPROVED PLAN) UPSTREAM SIDE
NOTES:
1. AS-BUILT FOOTING LOCATION WAS PROVIDED
BY KCI ON 10/8/07.
ZO
SCALE: 1"=10'
I
2. HEADWALL TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE
AS ILLUSTRATED
T
R
A
t ~
~ DATE: 10/18/07 1
I
.
A
,
PERMITTED IMPAC
E , 1
2. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY IMPACT FOR CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITY WITHIN THE WETLAND MAY BE NEEDED.
I
T
+ ~ J
1 ~
+
+
~
~
+
3. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY IMPACT FOR CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITY WITHIN THE STREAM MAY BE NEEDED.
+
+
+
+
+ +
+ +
+

+ + + + + + + + + +

020279 + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + +
ADDITIONAL AREA FOR TEMPOR ARY WETLAND •- + + + + + + + + +
(295 SF) ~
PERMITTED ~ETLAN~ I
MPAC~ + + + + +
OR CU~VERT II~STALL A.~lON + + ~- ~- +
0278 + + + + + + +
AS-BUILT FOOTING
+
+
+
(PER KCI SURVEY) 202740
+ + + +
+
20275
I
P l
+ +
~ PPROVED PLAN)
(PER 1
~ -{- + +
+ + `~ + +
I
~
+
7
~
+
+
+
202
7 PERMIT TED TERMITTENT STREAM
+ + ~- + -}- IMPACT F CULVERT I NSTALLATION
+ + 191 +
~ +
~+ + +
+
+19 R/W
20276
+ /
+ ~ ~ AS-BUILT FOOTING
(PER KCI SURVEY)

PERMITTED INTERMITTENT STREAM IMPACT
FOR CULVERT INSTALLATION
PROPOSED FOOTING '
(PER SHEET S-8 OF APPROVED HEADWALL PLAN) ~
PROPOSED HEADWALL ` '
(PER APPROVED PLAN) X
r
202880
6 LF OF ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACT FOR FOOTING CONSTRUCTION
LEGEND:
012345 SURVEYOR'S CONSTRUCTION STAKING
POINTS FOR HEADWALL
-^- CLEARING LIMITS (PER APPROVED PLAN)
-X - SILT FENCE (PER APPROVED PLAN)
NOTES:
1. HEADWALL AND FOOTING TO B
WITHIN THE PERMITTED IMP LLUSTRATED.
2. ADDITIONAL TEMP FOR CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITY WITHIN BE NEEDED.

SCALE: 1 "=10'
DATE: 10/18/07
IMPACT AREA 6
i DOWNSTREAM SIDE

fi fi -}- -}- fi -~ ~- fi 1- -fi fi -i- fi fi -t-
~- + + -~ ~- + -~ + + -f- + + -~ ~-- +

-~ ~ --~ ~ ~ I I -~ ~ T ~ T
LEGEND:
012345 SURVEYOR'S CONSTRUCTION STAKING
L
~
POINTS FOR HEADWALL
- ^- CLEARING LIMITS (PER APPROVED PLAN)
-X- SILT FENCE (PER APPROVED PLAN)
+
SCALE~1
"=1
0'~
NOTES:
WALL AND FOOTING TO BE CONSTRUCTED
H
~ DAIITE: 10/1I18 /07 II
1.
EAD
WITHIN THE PERMITTED IMPACT AREA, AS ILLUSTRATED. T T T
2. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY IMPACT FOR CONSTRUCTION I M P A C T ARE A 7 + + + +
ACTIVITY WITHIN THE WETLAND IS NEEDED.
3. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY IMPACT FOR CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITY WITHIN THE STREAM IS NEEDED.
U P S T R E A M SID E
+
+
+
+
4. CONSTRUCTION STAKING POINTS FOR WINGWALL O
WILL BE REVISED TO ACCOUNT FOR WINGWALL ROTATION.
+
+
+
+
20264
+ + + +
+ + +
ADDITIONAL LENGTH OF TEMPORARY S TREAM
n (43 LF) + + + ~-
CONSTRUCTION STAKING POIt`
TO BE REVISED BY SURVEYO
PROPOSED FOOTING
PER SHEET S-8 OF
PPROVED HEADWALL PLAN)
PROPOSED HEADWi
(PER ADJUSTED LC
PERMITTED INTERMITTENT STR
IMPACT FOR CULVERT INSTALI
PERMITTED WETLAND IMPACT
FOR CULVERT INSTALLATION

LEGEND:
012345 SURVEYOR'S CONSTRUCTION STAKING
POINTS FOR HEADWALL
-p- CLEARING LIMITS (PER APPROVED PLAN)
-X - SILT FENCE (PER APPROVED PLAN)
NOTES:
1. AS-BUILT HEADWALL AND FOOTING LOCATIONS WERE
PROVIDED BY KCI ON 10/8/07.
2. ADDITONAL TEMPORARY IMPACT FOR CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITY YATHIN THE STREAM IS NEEDED.
3. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY IMPACT FOR CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITY WITHIN THE WETLAND IS NEEDED.
4. 48 SF OF ADDITIONAL PERMANENT WE1lAND IMPACT
IS NEEDED TO ACCOUNT FOR AS-BUILT FOOTING.
R/W
PROPOSED HEADWALL
(PER APPROVED PLAN)
PERMITTED WETLAND IMPACT
FOR CULVERT INSTALLATION
55 SF OF ADDITIO ERMANENT WETLAND
IMPACT FOR F NG CONSTRUCTION
+ +
+ + +
+ + +
+ + + +
- + + + +
~` + + +
+ + + +
+ + +
20269 + + + +
T~119 + + ~
~, + + ~!
8
20270 AS~BUILT 1{fEADWAt}t-~ + + ~
20271 ~ + +(PER K+CI SUR+Y) + + + + + +
~~.
20272 r + + + + + + + + + +
As-euILT FoorlNC + + + + + + +
(PER KCI SURVEY) AS-BUILT SILT FENCE
(PER KCI SURVEY) + + ~. + ~- ~- +
+ + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + ~
+ + ~- -~ + + ~- + ADDITIONAL LENGTH OF TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACT SHOULD BE FIELD VERIFIED
SCALE: 1"=10' + + + + + + + ~- (17 LF)
DATE: 7 0~18~07
+ + + + + + +
M PAC T A R E A 7 7 + + + + + + + ~ DD ITIO jAL AREA OF TEMPORARY WETLAN7
DOWNSTREAM SIDE ~ + + + + + +
r + + + + + +
+ + + + + +
+ + + + + +
+ + + + + -~ /
020266
020265