20150611 Ver 1_401 Application_20150615

AXOMAECOM 919 461 1100 ' tel
1600 Perimeter Park Drive 919 461 1415 fax
Suite 400
Morrisville, NC 27560
www.aecom com
June 18, 2015
Ms. Karen Higgins, Supervisor 2 0 1 5
401 & Buffer Permit Unit Q
Division of Water Resources
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
Re: Clark's Creek Greenway — Hampton Connection
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina JUN 2
DENR . W,4. R
Deaf MS. Higgins: 401 & BUFFER PERA ITTIN S
AECOM (formerly URS), on behalf of Mecklenburg County, is submitting a Pre - Construction
Notification application for your record only. The project consists of the construction of a paved
greenway path in uplands with one single span pedestrian bridge crossing of a perennial stream
(Clark's Creek). The amount of permanent fill proposed for the bridge abutments that would be
located below the ordinary high water mark of the stream is less than nine cubic yards, well under the
25 cubic yards criteria to meet a Nationwide Permit # 18 (Minor Discharges), and under the 10 cubic
yard notification critera.
The property is located near Lookout Point Drive in Charlotte, North Carolina (Figure 1 and Figure 2
in Attachment A). The purpose of the project is to connect the communities near Lookout Point Drive,
located on the west side of Clark's Creek, to the existing Clark's Creek Greenway located on the east
side of Clark's Creek. The subject property is owned by Mecklenburg County. The property was field
delineated by URS wetland scientists on October 7, 2014 according to the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, as amended by the Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
supplement. Please find attached a Preliminary JD request form and supporting documentation
(Attachment B).
Project Description:
During the field investigation, one perennial stream, Clark's Creek (Stream SA), was identified within
the project area. In addition, one ephemeral drainage channel was identified within the project area.
No wetlands were identified. Clark's Creek (Stream SA) is a second -order USGS blue -line perennial
stream that flows in a southerly direction through the project area. Clark's Creek is located with the
Rocky River watershed (HUC 03040105), and flows to Mallard Creek approximately 2 miles
southeast of the project area. A 340 -foot reach of Clark's Creek was evaluated within the project
area. The stream is characterized as an incised channel with severe bank erosion along both the left
and right bank. The bank width is 15 feet to 20 feet, and the bank height is six feet to seven feet.
The stream contained moderate flow with a good riffle -pool complex, and fish were observed in the
channel. A single span bridge is proposed to cross Clark's Creek using a crane from the top of the
stream bank. No construction equipment is anticipated within the stream bed.
The project requires clearing /grading and the placement of rip -rap (120 square feet - 9 cubic yards)
for the bridge abutment on the steep stream banks. No rip -rap or other fill material would be installed
within the stream bed, but some rip -rap may be placed below the stream's ordinary high water mark
along the stream bank. An additional 40 square feet of clearing /grading would occur adjacent to the

A=COM
Ms. Karen Higgins, NC DWR
June 18, 2015
Page 2
k bridge. S;eeith enclosed Stream Bank Impacts figure and the Bridge Abutment Details figure
} _l(httachment A).
In addition, an ephemeral ditch (Ephemeral EA) was identified within the project area. This
ephemeral channel originates from stormwater runoff and flows in a westerly direction to its
confluence with Clark's Creek (left bank). The 2 -foot wide ditch starts outside the project area from a
stormwater culvert under a residential property. The feature is a straight channelized ditch, lined with
rip -rap stone. A portion of the ditch within the project area flows under the existing greenway trail via
a double 3 -foot diameter PVC culvert. The proposed greenway connection would cross the
ephemeral stream in the same location as the existing culvert.
If you would like to arrange a site visit or if you should have any questions regarding the information
submitted, please contact me at (919) 461 -1435 or by email at charles.benton @aecom.com. We
appreciate your review of this project and concurrence that the proposed project meets the criteria for
the Water Quality Certification #3890 that is associated with a NWP #18, and that the impacts are
below the criteria required for written approval.
Sincerely,
AECOM
1
.r
Charles Benton, PWS
Project Manager /Senior Environmental Scientist
Enclosures
cc: Alicia Rocco, Mecklenburg County
Mr. Chris Petterson, AECOM (URS)
Mr. William A. Elliott, USACE
File copy

�Nsun
r �
f Al� �
oqT o" •
h CAR
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
ASSET AND FACILITY MANAGMENT
June 17, 2015
RE: Authorization for AECOM to act as agent on behalf of Owner
To whom it may concern:
This letter is to confirm that AECOM, 1600 Perimeter Park Drive, Ste. 400, Morrisville, North Carolina is acting as
agent on behalf of Mecklenburg County for the Little Sugar Creek Greenway — Parkwood Ave. & Cordelia Park
Underpass project and the Clark's Creek Greenway - Hampton Connector project located in the City of Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. This authorization is for the delineation of jurisdictional water resources,
and processing of subsequent permit applications, including:
• U.S. Corps of Engineers (USACE) Section 404 Clean Water Act- Nationwide Permit; and
• N.C. Department of the Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Resources (NCDENR -DWR)
Section 401 Clean Water Act- Water Quality Certification
Any required written correspondence concerning the application process or other aspects of this project should be
jointly copied to AECOM Corporation - North Carolina and Mecklenburg County at the address shown below:
Ms. Alicia Rocco, RLA, ASLA
Mecklenburg County Asset and Facility Management Title,
3205 Freedom Drive, Suite 101
Charlotte, NC 28208
Please contact me with any questions at (980) 314 -2501.
Sincerely,
Aet'__ie°�; I ee,, —
Alicia Rocco, RLA, ASLA
Project Manager

A_COM AECOM 919 461 1100 tel
1600 Perimeter Park Drive 919 461 1415 fax
Suite 400
Morrisville, NC 27560
www.aecom.com
June 18, 2015
Mr. William A. Elliott, Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 -5006
Re: Clark's Creek Greenway — Hampton Connection
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Elliott:
JUN 2 9 , �D
AECOM (formerly URS), on behalf of Mecklenburg County, is submitting a Pre- Construc, ER "SRC
Notification application for your record only. The project consists of the construction of a paved , &G
greenway path in uplands with one single span pedestrian bridge crossing of a perennial stream
(Clark's Creek). The amount of permanent fill proposed for the bridge abutments that would be
located below the ordinary high water mark of the stream is less than nine cubic yards, well under the
25 cubic yards criteria to meet a Nationwide Permit # 18 (Minor Discharges), and under the 10 cubic
yard notification critera.
The property is located near Lookout Point Drive in Charlotte, North Carolina (Figure 1 and Figure 2
in Attachment A). The purpose of the project is to connect the communities near Lookout Point Drive,
located on the west side of Clark's Creek, to the existing Clark's Creek Greenway located on the east
side of Clark's Creek. The subject property is owned by Mecklenburg County. The property was field
delineated by URS wetland scientists on October 7, 2014 according to the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, as amended by the Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
supplement. Please find attached a Preliminary JD request form and supporting documentation
(Attachment B).
Project Description:
During the field investigation, one perennial stream, Clark's Creek (Stream SA), was identified within
the project area. In addition, one ephemeral drainage channel was identified within the project area.
No wetlands were identified. Clark's Creek (Stream SA) is a second -order USGS blue -line perennial
stream that flows in a southerly direction through the project area. Clark's Creek is located with the
Rocky River watershed (HUC 03040105), and flows to Mallard Creek approximately 2 miles
southeast of the project area. A 340 -foot reach of Clark's Creek was evaluated within the project
area. The stream is characterized as an incised channel with severe bank erosion along both the left
and right bank. The bank width is 15 feet to 20 feet, and the bank height is six feet to seven feet.
The stream contained moderate flow with a good riffle -pool complex, and fish were observed in the
channel. A single span bridge is proposed to cross Clark's Creek using a crane from the top of the
stream bank. No construction equipment is anticipated within the stream bed.
The project requires clearing /grading and the placement of rip -rap (120 square feet - 9 cubic yards)
for the bridge abutment on the steep stream banks. No rip -rap or other fill material would be installed

A=COM
Mr. William A. Elliott, USACE
June 18, 2015
Page 2
within the stream bed, but some rip -rap may be placed below the stream's ordinary high water mark
along the stream bank. An additional 40 square feet of clearing /grading would occur adjacent to the
bridge. See the enclosed Stream Bank Impacts figure and the Bridge Abutment Details figure
(Attachment A).
In addition, an ephemeral ditch (Ephemeral EA) was identified within the project area. This
ephemeral channel originates from stormwater runoff and flows in a westerly direction to its
confluence with Clark's Creek (left bank). The 2 -foot wide ditch starts outside the project area from a
stormwater culvert under a residential property. The feature is a straight channelized ditch, lined with
rip -rap stone. A portion of the ditch within the project area flows under the existing greenway trail via
a double 3 -foot diameter PVC culvert. The proposed greenway connection would cross the
ephemeral stream in the same location as the existing culvert.
We would appreciate you issuing a preliminary JD for the subject property at your earliest
convenience. If you would like to arrange a site visit or if you should have any questions regarding
the information submitted, please contact me at (919) 461 -1435 or by email at
charles.benton @aecom.com. We appreciate your review of this project and concurrence that the
proposed project meets the criteria for a NWP #18, and that the impacts are below the criteria
required for written approval.
Sincerely,
1
Charles E. Benton, PWS
Senior Environmental Scientist
Enclosures
cc: Alicia Rocco, Mecklenburg County
Mr. Chris Petterson, AECOM (URS)
Ms —Karen Higgin "s— NCDWRj
File copy _ - -1

o� va a r��,
J N& p Office Use Only.
L
r Corps action ID no.
I., 1 0 DWQ project no.
ZI
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: I ❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 18 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes ❑X No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ For the record only for Corps Permit:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
because written approval is not required? 401 Certification:
❑X Yes ❑ No
❑X Yes ❑ No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
❑ Yes ❑X No
or in -lieu fee program.
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
❑ Yes ❑X No
below.
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project: Clark's Creek Greenway Hampton Connector Project
2b.
County: Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town: Charlotte
2d.
Subdivision name: Amber Leigh
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed: See attached property owners list
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent X❑ Other, specify: Mecklenburg County
4b. Name: Alicia Rocco, RLA, ASLA
4c. Business name Mecklenburg County Asset and Facility Management Title
(if applicable):
4d. Street address: 3205 Freedom Drive, Suite 101
4e. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28208
4f. Telephone no.: 980.314.2501
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Charles Benton
5b.
Business name
AECOM /URS
(if applicable):
5c.
Street address:
1600 Perimeter Park Drive
5d.
City, state, zip:
Morrisville, NC 27560
5e.
Telephone no.:
919.461.1435
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
charles.benton @aecom.com
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): I Latitude: 35.350258
1c. Property size:
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
2c. River basin:
3. Project Description
02743199, 02743197
Longitude: - 80.787236
3 acres
Clarks Creek
C
Rocky - 03040105
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project site is a wooded buffer along a perennial stream - Clark's Creek The surrounding area is developed with single - family residential homes
within large subdivision communities. The western side of Clark's Creek has been cleared for an existing sanitary sewer easement, and the east side
has been cleared for an existing greenway trail
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 340
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The proposed project would connect the Amber Leigh subdivision (Hampton Place Phase 7) to the existing Clark's Creek Greenway trail
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project would install a 10 -foot wide paved path from Lookout Point Drive to the existing greenway on the east side of Clark's Creek The project
would use standard construction equipment, such as graders to construct the new path. The pedestrian bridge would be installed from the top of bank
usina a crane. The construction start date is September 15. 2015. and is anticipated to last thee months.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the ❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments: preliminary JD Request enclosed
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ❑X Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Charlie Benton, PWS Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
6b. If yes, explain.
❑ Yes ❑X No
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that
apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams - tributaries
❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters
❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then
complete this question for each wetland
area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary (T)
W1 Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W2 Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W3 Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
N/4 Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W5 Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W6 Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
2g. Total
Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average Impact
number intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream length
Permanent (P) or width (linear
Temporary (T) (feet) feet)
S1 P Stabilization Clark's Creek PER Corps I 20 45
S2 Choose one
S3 I Choose one
S4 I Choose one
S5 I Choose one
S6 I Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 45
3i. Comments:
The project involves a pedestrian foot bridge over Clark's Creek as part of the Greenway improvement project The project requires clearing /grading
and the placement of rip -rap (120 square feet - 9 cubic yards) for the bridge abutment on the steep stream banks. No rip -rap or other fill material would
be installed within the stream bed, but some rip -rap may be placed below the stream's ordinary high water mark. An additional 40 square feet of
clearing /grading would occur adjacent to the bridge. See the enclosed Stream Bank Impacts figure and the Bridge Abutment Details figure.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b.
4c.
4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer,
then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer
impact number (if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
type
Temporary (T)
6b. 6c.
01
Choose one
Choose
O2
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
purpose of pond (acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose one
P2 Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer,
then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer
impacts
below. If any impacts require mitiqation, ti-en you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
❑ Other:
6b. 6c.
6d. 6e. 6f.
6g.
Buffer Impact Reason for impact
Stream name Buffer
Zone 1
Zone 2
number —
mitigation
impact
impact
Permanent (P) or
required?
(square
(square
Temporary (T)
feet)
feet)
B1
Yes /No
B2
Yes /No
B3
Yes /No
B4
Yes /No
B5
Yes /No
B6
Yes /No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
A single span pedestrian bridge was designed for the stream crossing, instead of a culvert. Clearing /grading and rip -rap placement has been
minimized to the greatest extent practicable.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction of the pedestrian bridge will be conducted from the top of bank.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
3c. Comments:
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Type: Choose one Quantity:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
4h. Comments:
❑ Yes
0 linear feet
Choose one
0 square feet
acres
acres
acres
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires I ❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
The project is not located in one of the watersheds where the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules are in
place ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Manaqement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Manaqement Plan? ❑ Yes ❑x No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
The proposed project would minimally increase the area of impervious land surface by 7,080 square feet for the construction of the 10 -foot wide paved
greenway path.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local qovernment's jurisdiction is this project?
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Proqram Review
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
DWR
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
❑ORW
❑Session Law 2006 -246
❑Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the 0 Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes O No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes Z No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑Yes 0 No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application? ❑Yes M No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in I El Yes O No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative Impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project Involves the installation of a greenway path and pedestrian bridge to connect two subdivisions that are already fully built -out. No
cumulative Impacts are anticipated
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
N/A the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Element Occurrences and field surveys.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office GIS Web Service & field surveys.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplam? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The project will receive approval of an Individual Floodplain Development Permit (IFDP) application from with Mecklenburg County.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA Flood Map Service Center
Charles Benton - AECOM /URS 6 -12 -2015
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

Attachment A
Figures

Clark's Creek
�,. ... ,. Greenway
-7
—1k F��e
� t N
;'� ` _ r,.•''w Project location �' I
�y��+r,° 35.350256, - 80.787221 `'► I
�ff���fff��dJ"'ddd- --AMiYYCCCCCC. ♦ �� L, ��
�- 'i14.1�.IrArP
Hampton Connection
✓f
ti `� «,,,,,,•,,,. '+� ~mot' URS Project No. 38941593
Vol
�►`� r , `pct 4 � 4 ��.'
is+.. fI� K�}-�+ ti + , '�► t ✓tea•
y. ti 3 ,
J� }tsf, 11r•w♦
f' M. 1, yam. - �' ~• i
via
fr 4_ a� -R s.wra t s ewo
vy-
Ch Otte CM ••1MN WII'
! COUNTY
F
-Mecklenburg
I
L ! Rocky Watershed
N ♦ HUC - 03040105
WE + ♦w� ., l •�•M+ # ,o.w ♦a a° Figure 1
p �1�1
5'''�� ,/ �-. ,�►'' Project Location
- `Sources: Esn, HE�RE�DeL'orme, USGS;�In rma , increme Corp.. NF9C-#N, Esri
0 5 10 ile� Japan, METI, Esri China.(Hong Kongj`Esri (Thailan !To�Tom, Mapmyl'n'c�ia, © NAD 3oUTM 17N
f zhs_�� _ _ - OpenStreetMap conit,,ributors, and the' GIS Us�er Com riity This map rs for reference only.

� "rte � �.� • - v. t � � r r � ,
1� ♦ rk
r f
IL
� T .
Yrs
Project . -
itt _
�• ., t , '` •���
• ?r • .1 OF
-oo .oMg.(• oU Do
' �v -'y o',�So .?ol�a• •. 00 0 �p o00 �(�CS
1 500 1,000
i

1 �
1 2/'
I IN `'a 1
a
Project location r
35.350256, -80.787221 ,
+
_r
Clark's Creek
Greenway
J.
Hampton Connection
URS Project No. 38941593
Disturbance limits
f .� yr".5•:' ' ,t;; .�: � �•.: ..:! •: ,. ; _ :.,. ry� •:.�- .� �!y. � ' {r °•'r•:c - 'c -cy,,. .- :1•,,•��, p,,•• ti•,.: _
s :� .}'• r
":� :;: ..i• t� +.:�: :• . ,c _ .. �., . - ' %s:;, ^ . ti7'
111 },' �' f �' '_.. •�•-4 r �-ti_' •'�'•r•' � IS•• ,�•5'C,.: -r ,•
• 1 �. � '� :f. ;r'; J; •l:'a" �t +�!'' 'vet - ,:.Ji a�`k' jr :,.yam :Y.�:F� 1 "r ' f�e' F:• °:r' ^. T..•, .: 4' _;. .r,. - i... :r;'.5:i'; ;::J '.':" � :Y.. ..
r`r a ,5� �i"1 ! x !_.};:.� y,. �.�, ' - ::,y. � .:k .' 6. -:p .t. ' ?' • •( �-8f'-:i..i' "�
}::, -'. 1::x;7:.. �.•
r '..4 k.;'. tiy, lrer.':'�F : �:'r': :-_ }�. �'..�x•:r �eyr•:: -.y'•':F ,M; ti:�: �:�^'`: �r -.
iJ� '•. Y _ i•r •c .y :: c�g '' is .i:" .; �' ._i?;.,1. a: Y.K; ;1: '•�t �:�• .,ti. '::i! -c' J,r. ,., " 1';4• r ,�.r. i.:
-r': J�`- ..3;.'• . k, ;n''- 'if':� .'!4. ti r.. '.V :rr:- 'yk -' - '•• }r.'Y# ''r �:
l••��: ..3 ?;. �k�,S�� :.rl' -' :.' ?.1F'�C ?: •�d`:.:R- t :F"�'•m. r- ,1 %Tlf ._��' tea; :`�., ,4 y:
r -. },. ..r�" .:'� i� �- �..el'`•: � �•.'':"';i`. �-* : -:S�i:::' •c �y�- ;,,P'' a.� �k :r .� �� .:r � ' s�,:: .- .i- a[ �;`•i`�k;
COUNTY
�.' � ...l... '. '. � .fir; ':. -., ..H•; '� '..'r1aiY'.:; �R :JI l'',T..F•' �+, �
,� ,F �;::.. �: ��.�.. a:; -r+r - '1•.. r• � `� -y. y�.,. �.� . r ::'.i5 i.,;' ;tom. ' t r. .
:1i �l��t �yr.4� '4� ih c•� { u'� i:k T.•:-• fi;3� lr �..' .�.{:r�,.� •:i... , i' its'_ � _ '.4=r• �''Y-'i'
�+'r _ r.: ". "?;i' }; r; r,:r.i.:: `-'•J+Y�':Y.:i �'- i., .A;,�,.... ? '�; -r;, } '•. ;r,• "•!_�4 :. s.: •; .4 k.,. ���..� ... Y }..
`' }:d-Fi :�;I t:... k _ " ?' • i'�,yc,r:`. .���. .1..:�� � -Y � y.. ': �. ,. ). ...� - .r, �: �r�ia.• c r%';ir•. -
r: : +.:r Mecklenburg
9
.: ;.l' (...': �:' :� ..,:':.•:r. s::�rr - } •:[.utt k�;�. •� - � . "�i?`.-.rY:' ":�.. �. .1 ., n-..::; .. -�. h '� :k•.. R..•
..f ��.. L` } a't r, l.• +.Y 4'. .� ...r .�:,; .$. ';Y)•. •-. if•:: "' 1': •.:. LL °•y' 'r •• .ti :. 1l.. 1; .ti'.; - •_t.
': +,..4.,,:�;'�. .�:- �i :�.' „41{ : • k: .t:. 'ti,; : �:r ,,., x,_ =,y • 4a.: } . l'• Rocky Watershed
\ .t. , 4'F.��i'} a.:r•.: •r" 'r.r.::c a tMJ.'�.. r k:- w; �.,• HUC - 03040105
' / .;a• -. •,fir: .� ..3.1"+.k - k�i4:.' .' `'f' .•,y': } °:4:�.: r''':.., r.:. ,Y, -,r: t.yy�. , t •`- �'r:...�ra. c,: .,, -.: :�•.. -•d, X ''i r,-:-:•
4 \\' I'. - '4•� �:n.. K t •i}t•`�.. ��:; ':R!' *. .�.�p•.:;o.'.0 ! *•..Tt t �:.: 9. `9i;�' :T.,r' .r
4 „tip •�h.. 1' - -'_� � r' - ::r..
•, -�: ,- :'.rf+�: :,,..tip; �,.:' `;�' .;` � ;:. �_7.�;:: ,..; Figure 3
,.,. 3.. •y: T.c ?r�•h-:r }'' -,, .:,}- .F:�'r• [w�- $:'•': .al' -._•,4 }ti; l.. .r. k...' :.: *... ,• Ka, ti.k ,. .�•��_•
raT:i: :,:y'i;.4'�4ry:'.9': -. 7- h...,r. fi'.r - -' c'. h - �`I. a..`: :•`ti USGS To o Ma
Feet
..r:!,. • -� ?' 'r •' •r. 1. }:�.ix- `F!��.:.; � i' -,: ''�Ji w�'` � ;'k�� 4'� .IR {':..' � .. r.' t�� .:,1. 2ois
'+• y .... tii ". •i•': :� ,1:,'r, '' ��'-' :y'y.• } ry-,� NA,,e
D83 UTM N
500 1,0 Tn s in is 17 for reference only
i.rn:n'-�e.�� -..�_� �..�.. :4 (�. ^�'.: ': ��: L: #Y} !� :lVC �}.'�'.'•a� "fir-. - �L�•: F,�: •.. :r.'G." -r. [- ''�f'!'.i .laf� .. -
}..: �.�:_ -ten: :�.:�:: •�rr- c•, s -•,. ... ._ •... ..,, .� •.::

Clark's Creek
Greenway
Hampton Connection
URS Project No. 38941593
Legend
Disturbance limits
O Flagpoints
Culvert
Perennial stream
Ephemeral stream
i
COUNTY
Mecklenburg
Rocky Watershed
HUC - 03040105
Figure 4
Delineated WOUS
TI,

vatic'
Ji
7
f t r' i •Y i�D �i, 4..
4 rew
IL
r � � •
r
d tr+ ± ±LL t •
1 •1 • / 1

1Wn
\i
I
Scale: V = 5'
June 3, 2015
Y
W
STREAM
CENTERLINE U
CLEAR AND GRUB IMPACT A EA Cn
10 SO T (
RIP RAP IMPACT AREA Q
30 SO FT U
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
PROPOSED
TRAIL
— F
tin
Cn
F
PROPOSED
ABUTMENT
1
C
PROPOSED BRIDGE l
1
TOP OF BANK RIP JAP IMPACT REA 1
/I 90 SO FT
CLEAR AI�(D GRUB IMPACT AREA
1 15 SO FT
Clark's Creek Greenway Hampton Connector
Stream Bank Impacts
1
cI) \ \
v
v
v
RUB I PACT AR A v
I
�n O
cn �
PROPOS
ABUTMEN
F v
r� r
r O
rte,
}
1
F �
PR06SED
TRAIL
- LIMIT OF U
DIST ANCE U
U7
6000 Fairview Road. Suite 200
Charlotte, North Carolina 28210
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
\
TO OF
BA K
CLEAR AND
15 SC
C�
t
I
C
1
C
PROPOSED BRIDGE l
1
TOP OF BANK RIP JAP IMPACT REA 1
/I 90 SO FT
CLEAR AI�(D GRUB IMPACT AREA
1 15 SO FT
Clark's Creek Greenway Hampton Connector
Stream Bank Impacts
1
cI) \ \
v
v
v
RUB I PACT AR A v
I
�n O
cn �
PROPOS
ABUTMEN
F v
r� r
r O
rte,
}
1
F �
PR06SED
TRAIL
- LIMIT OF U
DIST ANCE U
U7
6000 Fairview Road. Suite 200
Charlotte, North Carolina 28210
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

xEC lo+ 98 E' vrI
9av H veGE -
/,]]09 L°09oUi vpMiloxn�E B9r48'�[ , ��9. S � 9ieMW- ,5.198,
/ 4 / i lam"° '� \� �� /I \•`.P°4�� ``� \ � � \�� \'-� � � / ° s
°EEO 2 M. ve°E 191 \ \ 9
4 BW9 5. veGE „8 , R
` /19b9 OdtWi vOxi M84 1 \ � r% � IB�a1 \�
PROFILE VIEW: Lt I
SCALE: 1" = 20' HORIZ. 1" = 4' VERT. 2
STA. 10+00 TO STA. 15 +19.61 g
Y e -pr �Y Y.IMIKR/9. 19AMMr I Q
a ZI �R
rn J °
o;
zza 6.
pzs-90 a� _
nz A.
J p
1118 1 1 >AI�
Ism 9NQ1 os pan w -la
m rzs -1r 9xc pn°rac _� - _
ml
M. i aL
L; 1 1 - �N..}Y I o
90a tv
d
V0 .I
89'1 .. - _.. - - — -- I I I "9i n•
i «b aM 119Y aMe v�b �lrm I«Y ,NY rNY IBM �\

Iiewnl/ ■ / �I4eWTYl m — —
� ki 1LL
nTl rYnCtMI
ABUTMENT 1 I _ ABUTMENT 2
SECTION ALONG GREENWAY T c
rJ f
- - A�m ..MC,
.ia • • �_— � Mrs
v[
ti l
c IIV \ PLAN ' c
c
�� � I �rf M •bd1 ear urW, •ionr Wr i•eu[ ,mLSilfrri,
iI II mono a� .ea � .cn.or nssc,m me M
� nwcmrs naoeaun m
R M nw xria •nr uren a M sw
are�".c' M oiv �r �•san t ms.no Ia
;p w.usneni s ear rauMn
� sw rAa
•s�"ar
••rn
T , re
PLM
ANCHOR BOLT LAYOUT PLAN
GENERAL NOTES
wia¢n •nrden� Irel se,u � nom n.
a,u. r saern .ua ro rare•c mienunori er M rronc r"mtisn
rnN rmna as. M aom •,u.n ec mmaim .m runMxi oI M Iron �'sa
m
3�4
k
er awn
y. rr rn�
eu r.rA� Ie •,r rn
y rnw �sMr -A•iYrn
_ _� p•r cn
rr C-1 r�
ABUTMENT DETAIL
�arr nor lusal
euv.
sra.
ae oT
ELEVATION
WING WALL DETAILS
Y 0 �
Y a z F
m r•zi� aF
3�c vc
0
u `g �
a m
S
L 00 f

Attachment B
JD Package

Jurisdictional Determination Request
0
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
wliriutwon Diarkt
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
to the appropriate Corps Field Office (or project manager, if known) via mail, electronic mail, or
facsimile. A current list of county assignments by Field Office and project manager can be
found on -line at: htti): / /www.saw.usace.armv. mil / Missions /Rel;ulatoryPermitProaram.aspx , by
telephoning: 910 -251 -4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below:
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 -5006
General Number: (828) 271 -7980
Fax Number: (828) 281 -8120
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: (919) 554 -4884
Fax Number: (919) 562 -0421
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: (910) 251 -4610
Fax Number: (252) 975 -1399
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910 -251 -4633
Fax Number: (910) 251 -4025
Version: December 2013 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E and F.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part G.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that all JD
requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the
determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be
signed by the current property owner to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REOUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for JD
requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be
conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not
be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or
your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you
should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural
Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: December 2013 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Lookout Point Drive
City, State: Charlotte, North Carolina
County: Mecklenburg County
Directions: From 1 -85 take exit 45B and head west on NC 24 for 3 mi Turn right onto W Sugar Creek Rd and continue
for 1 mi Turn right onto Amber Leigh Way and right onto Lookout Point Drive Project is past cul -de -sac
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): See attached property owners list
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Charles Benton, URS
Mailing Address: 1600 Perimeter Park Drive, STE 400, Morrisville, NC 27560
Telephone Number: 919.461.1435
Electronic Mail Address t: charles.benton @urscom
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
✓❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: See attached property owners list
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address 3:
❑ Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS /Parcel /Tax Record data)
1 If available
2 Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property /properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and /or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
Property Owner (please print) Date
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property /project area for the presence or
absence of WoUS5 and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property /project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
❑ I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property /project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT /USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
Size of Property or Project Area 4.4 acres
FY—/1 I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form6.
❑ Project Coordinates: 35.350256 Latitude - 80.787221 Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑✓ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑✓ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑� USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08 -02, dated June 26, 2008
Version: December 2013 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets8
Tributaries:
❑✓ USACE Assessment Forms
❑ Upland Data Sheets ❑✓ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑✓ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
■ All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
■ Locations of wetland data points and /or tributary assessment reaches
■ Locations of photo stations
■ Approximate acreage /linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
❑ Project Coordinates:
Latitude
Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
httr): / /www.usace.armv.mil/ Missions/ CivilWorks/ ReaulatorvProaramandPermits /rea suDD.asDx
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
httD. / /Dortal.ncdenr.ora /c /document library /aet file ?uuid= 76f3c58b -dab8- 4960- ba43- 45b7faf06f4c &arouDld= 38364 and,
httD: / /www.saw.usace.armv.mil/ Portals /59 /docs /reaulatory /Dublicnotices /2013 /NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318.Ddf
8 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland /community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
❑ Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage /linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
❑ Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos
Form(s)")
❑ Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters.
s Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland /community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 7

Jurisdictional Determination Request
REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard -
copy submittals include at least one original Plat (to scale) that is no larger than 11 "x17"
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than 11 "x 17 ", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDF) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
plats and return them via e -mail to the requestor.
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
Must be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
❑ Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
❑ Must be legible
❑ Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings /metes
and bounds /GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
❑ Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property
corner, USGS monument)
❑ When wetlands are depicted:
• Must include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Must identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Version: December 2013 Page 8

Jurisdictional Determination Request
When tributaries are depicted:
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM) of tributary
• Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate
widths or surveyed OHWM)
• Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary"
all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie -to
surveyed project /property boundaries
❑ Must include the location of wetland data points and /or tributary assessment
reaches
❑ Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands ", "non -
jurisdictional waters "). NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
❑ Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that
transport WoUS
Version: December 2013 Page 9

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
❑ When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the la w or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from
this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. "
Regulatory Official.,
Title:
Date:
USACEAction ID No.:
When uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404_ jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual. "
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACEAction lD No.:
Version: December 2013 Page 10

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(3) GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as:
be at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
❑ include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross - referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
❑ include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: December 2013 Page 11

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Charles Benton, URS (Applicant Agent for Mecklenburg Co ) 1600 Perimeter Park Dr, STE 400, Morrisville, NC 27560
Alicia Rocco, Mecklenburg County (Applicant) 3205 Freedom Drive, STE 101, Charlotte NC 28208
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Clark's Creek Greenway - Hampton Connection, Mecklenburg County, NC
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC County /parish /borough: Mecklenburg City. Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 35.350256 °N; Long. - 80.787221 OW.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Clark's Creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non - wetland waters:
350 linear feet: 10 width (ft) and /or acres.
Cowardin Class: R2UB
Stream Flow: Perennial
Wetlands: acres.
Cowardin Class:
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:
Non - Tidal:
1

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant:
❑✓ Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the
applicanUconsultant.
Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑✓ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Dernita, 7.5 min. quad.
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA /FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑✓ Photographs: ❑✓ Aerial (Name & Date): or
7 Other (Name & Date): Field photographs from 10 -07 -2014
❑ Previous determination (s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre- construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
3

This preliminary JD finds that there "may be "waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarilv been verified by the Corps and should not be relied uaon for
later iurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
4
'�- 06/18/15
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

Forms

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Mecklenburg County
3. Date of evaluation: 10 -7 -2014
5. Name of stream: SA - Clark's Creek
7. Approximate drainage area: 1000 ac.
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 ft.
2. Evaluator's name: Charlie Benton/ Paul Gerlach - URS
4. Time of evaluation: 14:00
6. River basin: Rocky River 03040105
8. Stream order: 2nd
10. County: Mecklenburg
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35.350075 Longitude (ex - 77.556611): - 80.787187
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet rtho (Aerial) Photo /GIS ther GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and Ian mar cs and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
West of current Clark's Creek Greenway near Lookout Point Dr
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Construction of pedestrian bridge over creek
15. Recent weather conditions: 0 inches of rain in previous 48 hours
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Cloudy - 80 deg. F.
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? t'E NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 3 ac.
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? 0 NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ( NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 60 % Residential 5 % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
35 % Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other (
22. Bankfull width: 10 ft. 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 6 ft.
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2 %) X Gentle (2 to 4 %) _Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 53 Comments:
Clark's Creek is a second order USGS blue -line perennial stream. The stream contains moderate flow with a good riffle -
pool complex. The channel is incised with severe bank erosion along both the left and right bank.
Evaluator's Signature Date 10 -07 -2014
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

Stream SA
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# CHARACTERISTICS Coastal Piedmont Mountain SCORE
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0-5 0 - 4 0-5
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points) 4
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points) _ 4
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points) 2
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0 - 4 0-4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points) 4
5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4
(no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points) 4
Presence of adjacent floodplain
6 0- 4 0- 4 0- 2
y, (no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain =max points) 4
Entrenchment / floodplain access
pr 7 (deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points) 0-5 0 - 4 0-2 0
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0-6 0-4 0-2 0
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3
(extensive_ channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 2
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0 - 5
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points) 2
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0 - 4 0-5 0
>4 (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
0-0 -4 Presence of major bank failures
a 13 0 -5 0 -5 0 -5 0
i,4 (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14 Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0 - 4 0-5 2
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points) 0-5 0 - 4 0-5 4
Presence of riffle- pool/ripple -pool complexes
16 0 -3 0 -5 0 -6 4
F
(no-riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well - developed = max points)
1 0-6 0 - 6 0-6
Habitat complexity 4
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats max points)
18 Canopy coverage over streambed
,x (no shading vegetation =_0; canopy =max points)
0; continuous cano 0-5 0 - 5 0-5 5
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 2
(deeply embedded _= 0; loose structure = max)
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
20 0 -4 0 -5 0 -5 p
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)_
G7 I 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points) 0
Presence of fish
OI 22 0 -4 0 -4 0 -4 2
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 3
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 53
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2

Stream ID# SA (flags 1 to 11 and 1A to 11A)
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 10/7/14 Project/Site: Clark's Creek Latitude: 35.350075
Evaluator: Charlie Benton/ Paul Gerlach - URS County: Mecklenburg Longitude: - 80.787187
Total Points: Stream Determination (circ a Other Derita
Stream is at least intermittent 36.5 Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial ) e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if ? 30
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 20.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
(J)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1�
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
1
0
3
ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
U
5 Active /relict floodplain
0
1
2
O
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
©
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1Q
2
3
8. Headcuts
(
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1 I
(1. o
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
I No
= 0
Yes (3)
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
(1)
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
(0)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
(9
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
0
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No
= 0
Yes
C. Biology (Subtotal = 7 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
(1)
1.5
23. Crayfish
(0o
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
00)
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
(0)
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other "
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods
See p 35 of manual
Notes: Clark's Creek is a second order USGS blue -line
perennial stream. The stream contains moderate flow with a
good riffle -pool complex. The channel is incised with severe bank erosion along both the left and right bank.
Sketch:

Stream ID# EA (flags 1 to 6)
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 10/7/14 Project/Site: Clark's Creek Latitude: 35.350256
Evaluator: Charlie Benton/ Paul Gerlach - URS County: Mecklenburg Longitude: - 80.787221
Total Points: SyAamj2etermi nation (circle one) Other Derita
Stream is at least intermittent 8.5 hemera Intermittent Perennial a g. Quad Name:
if ? 19 or perennial if ? 30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 5.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
U)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1�
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
O
1
2
3
ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
U
1
2
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
QO
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
OQ
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
OQ
1
2
3
1 8. Headcuts
D
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
U
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
Cl)
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No (0)
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 2 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
OO
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
(0)
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
(0.5)
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
00
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
(1)
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No =(0)
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 1 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
co
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
(0)
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
no
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
no
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
(0 )
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5 Other €(
'Perennial streams may also be identified using other methods
See p. 35 of manual
Notes: This ephemeral ditch originates from stormwater runoff and
flows in a westerly direction
to its confluence
with
Clark's Creek (left bank). The 2 -foot wide ditch
starts outside the project area from a stormwater culvert
under
a residential project. The feature is a straight
channelized
ditch lined with rip -rap stone. A portion
of the ditch
Sketch:within the project area flows under the existing
greenway
trail via a double 3 -foot
diameter PVC culvert.

Maps

Y
-�- f Clark's Creek
Greenway
0 a•IYIi
rar M► 1.+iMr , ► —�_ yam/` ��
JA j �•
,ty
!s
i � - .,•u i
Niw�esalte �wp..r � � <on.
+ � im •�
Project location
� v%
35.350256, - 80.787221 '+
PM
.ti a PM
- iwrw.r.
e Hampton Connection
URS Project No. 38941593
`� t �• ems+
,
.. � • Baal!•
1
Y
y A
'1r J
o a
f
f a y M
M
!tw ' �' M e Yom► .�* ,
r Ch fns. If 1 ,
.Mi
I
♦` t •p
COUNTY
Mecklenburg
•� t L l Rocky Watershed
• ' HUC - 03040105
w E r 1 'f t S ..•••" ..
S t . �•-w- »., 4 r' Figure 1
1 y
! �.�. ,, .`' Project Location
Miles +Sources: Esri. HERE, DeL'omle, USGS.; In ermap, +ncrem t Corp., N13.04N, Esri
0 5 10 Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong)*, Esri (Thailan' ,!TomTom, Mapmylndia, © June 2015
p NAD83 UTM 17N
�- QpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS ulpe om Wnity This map is for referenceonk

. s
.fir �' � � ••f
••��
47 .. i.
It
I Project location
ti ,f: 4
r ti
t
s a i , f
At
f
ILI
y l
• R
�� •' o ` .41
�► A,� /�!
- � • ` Feet'
� ✓ '„ L.1 � � p��p[°[pp7��I��J���• D //��o��'-{,v((' o c ' of o � o - o • o o . o �y / �ya1',\'' � n °ry1I�.�o
�1 • r �� l:Jl.l!:(/� 04i`LSCvp . 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 �j�IIU�l:.�}��l
500 1.000 ,

rte.
4
lip a ? M�
�r
Protect location
0 �' * 35.350256, - 80.787221 ;
r
f•�ff�
f,1
rf f
-�1 a
f�1
Clark's Creek
Greenway
Hampton Connection
URS Project No. 38941593
Disturbance limits
�r
COUNTY
= Mecklenburg
Rocky Watershed
HUC - 03040105
Figure 3
USGS Topo Map
June 2015
NAD83 UTM 17N
This map is for reference only.
Feet
0
500
1,000
-�1 a
f�1
Clark's Creek
Greenway
Hampton Connection
URS Project No. 38941593
Disturbance limits
�r
COUNTY
= Mecklenburg
Rocky Watershed
HUC - 03040105
Figure 3
USGS Topo Map
June 2015
NAD83 UTM 17N
This map is for reference only.

. . 4r t , i-
SA-11A
•
SA-11
SA-10A
•
SA-10
•
SA-9A
SA-9 •
•
low
SA-8
SA-8A
• SA-7A-EA-6 EA-5 E
SA-7 SA-6A % - EA -4 E
SA-6
SA-5 SA-5A
SA-4 SA-4A
SA-3
SA-73,A
•
SA-2
SA-2A
•
SA -1
•
SA-IA
ft D;Dl&bA. ft@%rA Eat" fteowg mm ommm m
= Q & ma, A E r, Q m wp. I a A a o D W. 0 Q P% Mb 000 WA ft Q R Lf I P w

Photos

Clark's Creek Greenway - Hampton Connection
Stream SA: View looking south at Clark's Creek.
Channel EA: View looking east at ephemeral rip -rap
lined drainage channel.
Photographs of WOOS Delineation
Stream SA: View looking north at Clark's Creek.
Channel EA: View looking east showing culverts
under existing greenway that drain the ephemeral
channel.
Mecklenburg County Parks and Recreation Mecklenburg County, North Carolina

Property Owners

Property Owners List
PIN
Name 1
Name 2
Mailing Address
Deed Book
Deed Page
02760117
McMahan, Kevin
12305 Lookout Point Dr Charlotte NC 27269
28773
391
02760116
Taylor, Necolia
McBride, Mackie
12304 Lookout Point Dr Charlotte NC 28269
27811
282
02710389
Mecklenburg County
600 East 4th St 11th Floor Charlotte NC 28202
29372
90
02743197
Mecklenburg County
C/O Real Estate /Finance Dept
600 East 4th St 11th Floor Charlotte NC 28202
06755
222
Clark's Creek Greenway Hampton Connector Page 1 of 1