310159_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230608

OoDivision of Water Resources
Facility Number 15 O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ('Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: b Sf Arrival Timed 'f� Departure Time: �,Qr71}M^ County: Region:
Region:
Farm Name: `) ,jrook 01 1/z Owner Email:
Owner Name: 57,--11y A, Tamey Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: LL Integrator:
Certified Operator: (uA l e.-y jG r► 3 Certification Number: 1 t7d77
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish La er Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 7,3qq 3 756 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-La ers Beef Feeder
Boars 1pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey POURS
Other
Discharees and Stream_Imt)acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [?fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes Rf No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge'?
Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - j J01 Date of Inspection: -T5123
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? [] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? [] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 2
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 3 ---z.
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DNN'R
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [3-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to rooted pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land applications? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [3'1lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Z'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ff No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ®'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [�'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Otlier:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections [:]Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes H70 [] NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: 3 ( - 151 1 jDate of Inspection: 6 /_Z3
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑`No ❑ NA D NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ][ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [a-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes D No �&A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge, freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ff No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-tip visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes []N ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
�u(/b rufravt I OL �23
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Abc '&d peh-fU0 Phone: 7/0- �797" tF655
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: C/?/ Z3
Page 3 of 3 511212020