310348_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230608

G�Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 3 r� - 3 $� 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation _
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: 90'Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Y 23 Arrival Time:1 01 i M—pq Departure Time:f County: QV—W-,A- Region: =r�0
Farm Name: t t`f-f e 13vedG- No t,✓m Owner Email:
Owner Name: An trey K . jC.xYYt-8S Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: S ''r,n IC y S Certification Number: 1 8 077
L
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer I Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I jNon-Layer I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 72sv Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pultets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes E�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at; ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
I
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes [] No NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [XNo ❑ NA E] NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: 31 - 3 q jDate of Inspection: 6 23
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage phis heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes P�-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? [:] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [:�-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Q o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 2/`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes E�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E2<s10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes []'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Z-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes © No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes E�rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements [7]Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [�,-Qo ❑ NA [] NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: 31 - 3 y T Date of Inspection: 8- 2 3
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes []"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑Tlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [D]No [] NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑--dA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 4?fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ✓❑rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.;discharge, freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [;3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes VN o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
5(Vdyate- ?M�z 3
_o 2 3
dil-
Reviewer/Inspector Name: /�rL�/ ��i�IZ7i2{� Phone: !/U. 7417•
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: G/a✓Z 3
Page 3 of 3 511212020