20230791 Ver 1_2023.06.02_Deep River East Phase 2_Attachments Package (reduced)_20230602

5410 Trinity Road P 919.866.4951
T I M M Q N S GROUP Raleigh,, NC 27607 Fw mfimmons.com
June 2, 2023
Lyle Phillips
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers — Wilmington District
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Zachary Thomas
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
NCDEQ — Division of Water Resources
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Re: Electronic Pre -Construction Notification Attachments
Deep River East Phase 2
Sanford, Lee North Carolina
Project No.: 48020
Dear Mr. Phillips and Mrs. Homewood,
On behalf of LGI Homes, we are providing additional attachments and information to aid in the
review of the electronic Pre -Construction Notification of the Deep River East Phase 2 an
approximately 50.24-acre site located approximately 0.14-mile southeast of the intersection of
Cumnock Road and Cotten Road in Sanford, North Carolina, within Lee County (the Site).
Please review the below attachments and contact Morgan Gilbert at [phone] or
morgan. giIberta-timmons.com if additional information is required.
Sincerely,
Timmons Group
--
Morgan Gilbert, WPIT
Environmental Scientist I
ENGINEERING I DESIGN I TECHNOLOGY

Enclosures
ATTACHMENTS
Appendix A Figures 1 a& 1 b— Vicinity Map
Figure 2a & 2b — NRCS Soil Survey Map
Figure 3 — Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. Delineation Map
Appendix B Agent Authorization Form
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Addendum to SAW-2021-00985
DWR Pre -Filing Requests (10/18/2021 & 04/20/2023)
Appendix C Environmental Impacts Set
Appendix D Preliminary Stormwater Management Plan
Appendix E IPaC Official Species Report
NCNHP Database Report
Appendix F SHPO Map and List

Appendix A

Path: Y:\805\48020 - Village at Deep River\GIS\48020-JD-VIC.mxd
�t. 1
��
4
I�
i
I•„
w f n
S
u C L'✓5il f?NS p' � �
r
r
✓F -�;
`:r
µ ....y .,....�...... ter- . v.—.+ _,.._..
' Gulf n Site Limits
�f1
-
G Sku View Lake
r a
«
.,A
a
,vp4y •�k�
ell
p i
9� (�`� !'rat [F'.r:r� �. ... G•�� ,i�
t
z4C%WL
1
4
4 � — n �•, F 91 '
.. • .. �.. - ",.........,--tip.. .. i i
Site limits are approximate.
�
Topographic imagery from USGS.
'7 \
'"1. �• (n-1N45rt7�JCl Vl_S T.b
0 3,000 6,000 9,000 12,000 iry flniidae! La&r•
Feet
DEEP RIVER EAST PHASE 2 T i A M Q N S GROUP 004 C IL
LEE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE la: VICINITY MAP YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. �
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER: 48020 U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S): COLON
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS: 413A ACRES DATE(S): 2019
LATITUDE: 35.548043 WATERSHED(S): DEEP (CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN)
LONGITUDE:-79.238796 HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S): 03030003
These clans and associated documents are the exclusive Droeertv of TIM MONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in Dart and shall not be used for anv Dureose whatsoever. inclusive. but not
to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

Path: Y:\805\48020 - Village at Deep River\GIS\GIS_AdditionalArea\48020-JD-VIC.mxd
N\e
.. S
t
�11
S
1
Site Limits
rM
y �uS
9 i
')
p
as
G^
4
\
Site limits are approximate.
1
\'�
'
Topographic imagery from USGS.
'
0 1,000 2,000
3,000
4,000
119 Feet
DEEP RIVER EAST PHASE 2 - ADDITIONAL AREA
T I M M O N S GROUP
•
LEE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
�
FIGURE 1b: VICINITY MAP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER:48020
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE (S):COL ON
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS: 11.6 ACRES
DATE(S):2022
LATITUDE: 35.544047
WATERSHED(S):DEEP (CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN)
LONGITUDE:-79.234097
HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S):03030003
These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not
limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIM MONS GROUP.

Path: Y:\805\48020 - Village at Deep River\GIS\48020-JD-NRCS.mxr'
t, T
"Alm ialla
aCurnnock
Pff
NO
V. AfB
$ M+B
_PfD Pis
f t Mfg14
�r
ti PfC
Co
W 9
frj--
�6
PfB �_ a
`fF pis r'
E
W.
P
Site Limits t
limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

Path: Y:\805\48020 - Village at Deep River\GIS\GIS_AdditionalArea\48020-JD-NRCS.mxd
1 F
Site limits are approximate.
"r e
-2,800 y�
f3,
0 700 1,400
2,100
Feet
-
DEEP RIVER EAST PHASE 2 - ADDITIONAL AREA
T l M M O N S
GROUP
LEE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 2b: NRCS SOIL SURVEY MAP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED
THROUGH OURS.
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER: 48020
SOURCE NRCS WEB SOIL SURVEY
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS: 11.6 ACRES
SOIL SURVEY DATE: 1989
LATITUDE: 35.544047
WATERSHED(S): DEEP (CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN)
LONGITUDE:-79.234097
HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S):03030003
These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIM MONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not
limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIM MONS GROUP.

d no No SNOW Nli Jo 1 ups um a 111 ssldxp I gj110plm 6ugess a oil —Is— o/p,, 6wppiq'uoln—Is—ofpF)iwp
J m J fZ
OIlV3NI130 S831VM ONV SONV113M:£ 321nou
N011dRlOS30 NOISIA321 Alva 3SVHd 1SV3 N3AIN d334
Rluawuo�inu3 I ABolouyoal � asny�nsyseyuil leyuapisabl luawtlolanap a�ig
•� �` szzzz vn p w e1oo�
ll�ronauoww�vxoeuaia, ,�
3ed 63ada3aa �y�Mdae ��� dnoug SNOWWll •r + +
C7

Appendix B

• aif6
TIMMONS GROUP
Yt:riIf; V151ON A c t I I F "TD T "'.x:t' 4UR5.
AGENT AUTHORIZATION and
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION FORM
All Blanks to be Filled in by Current Landowner
The Department of the Army
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
To Whom It May Concern:
NCDEQ — Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
I, the undersigned, current property owner designate, authorize representatives of Timmons
Group to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon
request supplemental information in support of applications, etc., from this day forward.
This the 3rd day of February , 20 23
(number) (Month) (Year)
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
and NCDEQ Division of Water Resources (DWR) to enter upon the property herein described
for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with
Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 401 and 404 of the Clean Water
Act, and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
Project Name: Village at Deep River —Additional Area
Parcel ID: 9635-02-2884-00
Site Address: 0 Cotten Road
Sanford, NC 27330
Property Owner's Name (Print): LGI Homes -NC LLC
Property Owner's Signature:
Property Owner's Mailing
Address: 1450 Lake Robbins Dr; Suite 430
Property Owner's Fax
Telephone: [phone] No.
Property Owner's
Email Address: josh.spiegelPlgihomes.com
0
Ln
E
0
U
Ln
C
0
E
E

TIMMONS GROUP
,OUR V11;1) d AZHI 'l='I) FHi; 7Ui;H {J�Jz4
AGENT AUTHORIZATION and
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION FORM
All Blanks to be Filled in bV Current Landowner
The Department of the Army
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
To Whom It May Concern
NCDEQ — Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
I, the undersigned, current property owner designate, authorize representatives of Timmons
Group to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon
request supplemental information in support of applications, etc., from this day forward.
This the day of 20 Z t
(number) (Month) (Year)
1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
and NCDEQ Division of Water Resources (DWR) to enter upon the property herein described
for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with
Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 401 and 404 of the Clean Water
Act, and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
Project Name: Village at Deep River
Parcel ID: 9625-75-1532-00, 9625-63-6695-00, 9625-93-8206-00, & 9635-04-5989-00
Site Address: 0 Cumnock Road and 0 Cotten Road
Sanford, North Carolina 27330
Property Owner's Name (Print): LCaT Okwu a 5 tic t-Lc- a C:>re_,J
Property Owner's Signature:
Property Owner's Mailing
Address:
1e,i5k , Qr— 27Q 3
Property Owner's q�jG} t� r7Fax
Telephoner / (S06- ` ! ! S_ No.
Property Owner's
Email Address: [�►-Y�
a
0
v
L,
n
Ln
v
rn

TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
March 15, 2023
Lyle Phillips
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers- Wilmington District
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Re: Revised Delineation and Expanded Review Area Addendum
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
SAW-2021-00985
Village at Deep River
(Revised delineation area approx. 35.8 acres;
Additional delineation area approx. 11.6 acres)
Lee County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Phillips,
We are sending this addendum letter to request a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
(PJD) for the project known as Village at Deep River (the Site) to include an additional
delineation area and a revised delineation adjacent to the additional area. The Site, including
the previously approved area and expanded review area, totals 424.7 acres.
The original PJD was submitted to your office on May 7, 2021 and the informal PJD approval
(SAW-2021-00985) was received on February 16, 2022 after the on -Site review on June 17,
2021 for 413.1 acres.
Since the on -Site review and informal PJD approval, the review area was expanded by 11.6
acres along the southeastern portion of the Site to include the total anticipated limits of
disturbance associated with the project. Timmons Group conducted a field delineation on
February 14, 2023 to identify potential jurisdictional waters of the U.S. (WOTUS) within the
additional area that is now included in the Site. During the delineation of the additional area, it
was determined that there were uplands present within areas that were previously delineated
and confirmed as wetland. On February 27, 2023, a portion of the Site totaling 35.8 acres
immediately west of the additional area that was previously confirmed was re -delineated. The
results from the revised delineation are included in this addendum letter.
The previously confirmed intermittent stream segment of feature D4 was extended into the
additional area, now totaling 587 linear feet. The perennial stream segment of feature D4 was
also extended into the additional area, now totaling 122 linear feet. An intermittent stream
(feature R4) was delineated in the additional area and extended into the revised delineation

TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
area, totaling 448 linear feet. Feature C4, also known as Big Buffalo Creek, was extended along
the southern portion of the additional area, now totaling 1,152 linear feet. Three ephemeral
stream features were delineated within additional area: 04 (125 linear feet), P4 (217 linear feet),
and Q4 (467 linear feet). The previously confirmed potential palustrine forested (PFO) wetland
feature U2 was extended into the additional area through a drainageway along the toe a slope
that connects to perennial stream feature D4 (Figure 6: Wetlands and Waters of the U.S.
Delineation Map [WTDM]).
Feature U2 originally totaled approximately 493,579 square feet (11.33 acres). On February 27,
2023, the boundaries of feature U2 were re -delineated based on the presence/absence of a
hydric soil indicator. Occasionally, hydrologic indicators such as Saturation (Al), High Water
Table (A2), Water -Stained Leaves (139), and/or Drainage Patterns (1310) were observed in areas
that lacked a hydric soil indicator due to soil chromas higher than 2, therefore, these areas were
not delineated as wetland. Because of the distance from Big Buffalo Creek and no evidence of
sediment deposits, the Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) indicator was determined to be
inapplicable. Additionally, a stormwater basin was removed from the area that was previously
confirmed as PFO wetland. Overall, feature U2 was reduced to approximately 218,627 square
feet (5.02 acres). As noted in the preceding paragraph, an intermittent stream (feature R4) was
extended into the revised delineation area.
The following items are included in this addendum to reflect the additional delineated area,
revised delineated area, and areas previously reviewed in the informal JD confirmation from
May 2021:
• Updated JD Request Form
• Updated PJD Request Form and Agent Authorization Forms
• Updated maps including:
o Figure 1 — Vicinity Map (additional area only)
o Figure 2 — HUC Map (additional area only)
o Figure 3 — Environmental Inventory Map (EIM) (additional area only)
o Figure 4 — Parcel Map (additional area only)
o Figure 5 — NRCS Map (additional area only)
o Figure 6 — WTDM depicting the full Site totaling 424.7 acres that includes 35.8
acres of the revised delineation area and 11.6 acres of the additional area
• Informal PJD Concurrence email dated February 16, 2022
• Data forms (revised delineation area and additional area only)
• Photographic Log (revised delineation area and additional area only)
Please review this enclosure and contact Amanda Johnson at [phone] or
amanda.iohnson(a)timmons.com if you need any additional information or have any questions.

TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
Sincerely,
Timmons Group
Morgan Gilbert, WPIT
Environmental Scientist I
Amanda Johnson, PWS
Senior Environmental Scientist
CC Zachary Thomas, DWR

Jurisdictional Determination Request
U5 Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington Distrid
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http: //www. saw. usace. army. mil/M ssions/Re._ ul�atoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator. aspx
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
FaxNumber: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 0 Cotten Road
City, State:
County:
Sanford, NC
Lee
9625-93-8205-00; 9625-75-1532-00; 9625-63-6695-00;
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 9625-93-8206-00; 9635-04-5989-00
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Amanda Johnson
Mailing Address: 5410 Trinity Road, Suite 102
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: arnandaJoh [e-mail]
Select one:
✓❑
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultanti
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION'
Name: LGI Homes NC, LLC
Mailing Address: 5511 Capital Center Drive, Suite 560
Raleigh, NC 27606
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Amanda Johnson
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner Z Authorized Agents
March 15, 2023
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
s For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/iJSACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 424.7 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
35.544047
Longitude:-79.234097
❑✓ A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.niil/Missions/Re"latory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F4Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
W1 Vicinity Map
zAerial Photograph
z USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
zOther Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
zLandscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑✓ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatorv/regdocs/JD/RGL_08-02_App A Prelim _JD_Form fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re atory-Permit-Program/Juiisdictior/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdictionunder the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

TIMMONS GROUP
,OUR V11;1) d AZHI 'l='I) FHi; 7Ui;H {J�Jz4
AGENT AUTHORIZATION and
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION FORM
All Blanks to be Filled in bV Current Landowner
The Department of the Army
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
To Whom It May Concern
NCDEQ — Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
I, the undersigned, current property owner designate, authorize representatives of Timmons
Group to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon
request supplemental information in support of applications, etc., from this day forward.
This the day of 20 Z t
(number) (Month) (Year)
1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
and NCDEQ Division of Water Resources (DWR) to enter upon the property herein described
for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with
Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 401 and 404 of the Clean Water
Act, and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
Project Name: Village at Deep River
Parcel ID: 9625-75-1532-00, 9625-63-6695-00, 9625-93-8206-00, & 9635-04-5989-00
Site Address: 0 Cumnock Road and 0 Cotten Road
Sanford, North Carolina 27330
Property Owner's Name (Print): Lla2 H6v%c,5 tic L L L a C:>re_,J
Property Owner's Signature:
Property Owner's Mailing
Address:
1e,i5k , Qr— 27Q 3
Property Owner's q fir G} t� r7Fax
Telephone: / UOl9� / ! ! S_ No.
Property Owner's
Email Address: [�►-Y�
a
0
v
L,
n
Ln
v
rn

• aif6
TIMMONS GROUP
Yt:riIf; V151ON A c t I I F "TD T "'.x:t' 4UR5.
AGENT AUTHORIZATION and
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION FORM
All Blanks to be Filled in by Current Landowner
The Department of the Army
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
To Whom It May Concern:
NCDEQ — Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
I, the undersigned, current property owner designate, authorize representatives of Timmons
Group to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon
request supplemental information in support of applications, etc., from this day forward.
This the 3rd day of February , 20 23
(number) (Month) (Year)
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
and NCDEQ Division of Water Resources (DWR) to enter upon the property herein described
for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with
Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 401 and 404 of the Clean Water
Act, and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
Project Name: Village at Deep River —Additional Area
Parcel ID: 9635-02-2884-00
Site Address: 0 Cotten Road
Sanford, NC 27330
Property Owner's Name (Print): LGI Homes -NC LLC
Property Owner's Signature:
Property Owner's Mailing
Address: 1450 Lake Robbins Dr; Suite 430
Property Owner's Fax
Telephone: [phone] No.
Property Owner's
Email Address: josh.spiegelPlgihomes.com
0
Ln
E
0
U
Ln
C
0
E
E

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Amanda Johnson, Timmons Group
5410 Trinity Rd, Ste 102, Raleigh, NC 27607
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Lee City: Sanford
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.544047 Long.:-79.234097
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17S 660076.02E, 3934812.83N
Name of nearest waterbody: Big Buffalo Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
■❑ Field Determination. Date(s): 02/14/2023 & 02/27/2023
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
See the attached Table of Aquatic Resources that only includes revisions/additions to previous confirmation

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
■❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:Vicinity, HUC, environmental inventory, parcel, NRCS soils, delineation map
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
■❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: 030300030606
❑ USGS NHD data.
0 USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
■❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Colon, 2019
■❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Lee County, 1989
■❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS NWI North Carolina 2018
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
■FEMA/FIRM maps: 3710962500K (eff. 02/02/2007) & 3710963500K (eff. 02/02/2007)
■❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: 229-231 .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
■❑ Photographs: ■❑ Aerial (Name & Date): NC OneMap Orthoimagery 2017
or ■❑ Other (Name & Date): Landscape
■❑ Previous determination (s). File no. and date of response letter: sAw-2021-00985,'nf°ma'`°n`U en`eemail dated °2"6'22
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
03/15/2023
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

@
.CHIT
/3k
c
2 � 2
g
g
g
$
m
)
t
t
: L-
0
0
o
o
0
t
t
§ �IT
IT
: 2 c
\
\
\
a)2
2
2
CD
o §
0 E'
�
U�2
�
.
cr.
■ 7 L-
O
g
Q
Q
Q
0 § m
ƒ
±
±
±
±
±
CL § »
�
� d
§
�
@
2 ■
oJJ
2> %
@
A
q
o
co
m
o¥¥
c
o c
o
®
Q
"T
E ; .
a
N
N
'IT
'IT
«@204
u ©
2 b
�2�
/ �
■
w
2
2
q
m
q
LO
q
2
co
coNT
CD
04
N
N
N
N
@
7
7
CO
kLO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
k
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
�
�
�
3
J
2
q
3
3
ƒ
3
2
m

Path: Y:\805\48020 - Village at Deep River\GIS\GIS_AdditionalArea\48020-JD-VIC.mxd
N\e
.. S
t
�11
S
1
Site Limits
' �.`,4t3ia ty�ri.atn Creel-
t
_ anclt
9 i
as ') p ,
G^ 4
1
Site limits are approximate.
Topographic imagery from USGS. '
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000
119 Feet
VILLAGE AT DEEP RIVER - ADDITIONAL AREA T I M M O N S GROUP •
LEE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. �
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER:48020 U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE (S):COL ON
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS: 11.6 ACRES DATE(S):2022
LATITUDE: 35.544047 WATERSHED(S):DEEP (CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN)
LONGITUDE:-79.234097 HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S):03030003
These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not
limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

Sou S,q'e snPul. 'Seneope gm e dl,d Rue SOS peso eq Sou llegs p,ey dul.Soelogmulpe1npoSd., eq Sou A—pue dN021`JSNOZ:JO RSIedoSd enisnpxe eSp eSesSuewroop pe�ei�osse puesueld esayl
> m> v dVW 3003IlNn OIJ0�021OAH Z 321f1J1d
�z;�
a= �_ _ _ tlN11 O21tl0 H121ON 'AlNf1OO 33l 00
NOLLd RlOS30N01SIA321 J. om om �r a b'321b' Ib'N011lddb'- N3AIN d334 iV 3E)VIIIA
Ie�uawuoS!nu3 I ABolouyoal I aSn»nSyseyul I leyuaplsaa luawtlolanap al!S d n a J SNOW W I l
Y
1-1 tlAV Po 64004 WY19XM9MNl L3A31X3tl110NNLt9A � •
fr��
n e S
..�.
- � a
awv
a
0
17
_
R
t
V
r,
n8
a=
-
o
v
I
LL
I
a
I
...
— I
e
•r
y
fe�P
at
ID
_
a
s
a
r
�
LS
w
`
yexw
�
m fv
o
ti
7
bH�
h
° O
W
> B)
`
a
d
'
LL
O
pxw'o NH-OfUZ08b\eaiMeuoylppy SI`J\SI`J\I.AIH daa4 W-B-IIV\- OZ08b\908\:A:47ed

pxwd--Qle-Bell%\- OZ08A908\FA:47ed

Path: Y:\805\48020 - Village at Deep River\GIS\GIS_AdditionalArea\48020-JD-PARCEL.mxd
limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

Path: Y:\805\48020 - Village at Deep River\GIS\GIS_AdditionalArea\48020-JD-NRCS.mxd
1 F
Site limits are approximate.
"r e
f3,
0 700 1,400
2,100
2,800
Feet
-
VILLAGE AT DEEP RIVER - ADDITIONAL AREA
T 1 M M O N S
GROUP
• . • 0*
LEE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
�
FIGURE 5: NRCS SOIL SURVEY MAP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED
THROUGH OURS.
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER: 48020
SOURCE NRCS WEB SOIL SURVEY
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS: 11.6 ACRES
SOIL SURVEY DATE: 1989
LATITUDE: 35.544047
WATERSHED(S): DEEP (CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN)
LONGITUDE:-79.234097
HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S):03030003
These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIM MONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not
limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIM MONS GROUP.

Amanda Johnson
Subject: Village at Deep River / Sanford / Lee County / SAW-2021-00985 / Jurisdictional
Determination
Attachments: Figure 6- WTDM (revised 2021.12.02 reduced).pdf
From: Phillips, George L CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 1:12 PM
To: Sydni Law <[e-mail]>
Cc: Lauren Norris -Heflin <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Village at Deep River / Sanford / Lee County / SAW-2021-00985 / Jurisdictional Determination
Sydni,
Based on my site visit on 06/17/2021 the Corps concurs with the delineation within the pink outlined "Project Study
Limits" on the attached "FIGURE 6: WETLANDS AND WATERS DELINEATION MAP". It may take 90-120 days for the
issuance of a written jurisdictional determination. The delineation may be used for planning and permitting purposes,
should a permit be required the JD can be issued at the time of permit verification. The AID for the project is SAW-2021-
00985. I have attached the delineation for reference.
Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Lyle Phillips
Regulatory Specialist
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW-RG-R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone], Ext. 25.
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is
located at https://regulatory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-survey/ . Thank you for taking the time to visit this
site and complete the survey.
From: Sydni Law
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2021 9:17 AM
To: 'Phillips, George L CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)' <[e-mail]>
Cc: 'Hopper, Christopher D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)' <[e-mail]>; Lauren Norris -Heflin
<[e-mail]>; Matt Michel <Matt.Michel @timmons.com>
Subject: RE: Village at Deep River / Sanford / Lee County / SAW-2021-00985 / Jurisdictional Determination
Lyle,
Based on our conversation in the field on 12/2, the delineation map for Village at Deep River has been revised and is
attached, along with the updated ORM resources spreadsheet. As discussed, the client would like to pursue a PJD and
not a combined AJD and PJD as originally requested.
Can the attached be used for planning and permitting purposes?

Best,
Sydni Law, WIT
Environmental Scientist
TIMMONS GROUP I www.timmons.com
5410 Trinity Rd, Suite 102 1 Raleigh, NC 27607
Office: [phone] 1 Fax: [phone]
Mobile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Your Vision Achieved Through Ours
From: Phillips, George L CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, July 2, 2021 12:57 PM
To: Sydni Law <[e-mail]>
Subject: Village at Deep River / Sanford / Lee County / SAW-2021-00985 / Jurisdictional Determination
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
Sydni,
Based on my site visit on 06/17/2021 the Corps concurs with the delineation within the pink outlined "Project Study
Limits" on the attached "FIGURE 6: WETLANDS AND WATERS DELINEATION MAP". It may take 90-120 days for the
issuance of a written jurisdictional determination. The delineation may be used for planning and permitting purposes,
should a permit be required the JD can be issued at the time of permit verification. The AID for the project is SAW-2021-
00985. I have attached the delineation for reference.
Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Lyle Phillips
Regulatory Specialist
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW-RG-R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone], Ext. 25.
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is
located at https://repulatory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-survey/ . Thank you for taking the time to visit this
site and complete the survey.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Village at Deep River City/County: Sanford/Lee Sampling Date: 02/14/2023
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-33D5-1
Investigator(s): M. Gilbert, E. Quillian Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1-3%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.543514 Long:-79.234649 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: PfD - Pinkston silt loam, 8-15% slopes NWI classification: Not mapped
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool, the site is within "Wetter than Normal" and is within the wet season during a "Mild drought'. Point
taken at toe of slope within a floodplain, near the lowest point a wetland feature.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (B14)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_High Water Table (A2) _Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
—Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Saturation potentially affected by recent rain; no water table was observed.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-33D5-1
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Betula nigra
15
Yes
FACW
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acerrubrum
10
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
3.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 60.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
35
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
18
20% of total cover:
7
OBL species x 1 =
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Betula nigra
20
Yes
FACW
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Liriodendron tulipifera
10
Yes
FACU
FACU species x 4 =
3.
Ulmus rubra
8
No
FAC
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Carpinus caroliniana
5
No
FAC
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.01
43
=Total Cover
_
- Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
22
20%
of total cover:
9
-4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Lonicera japonica
5
Yes
FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Ligustrum sinense
3
Yes
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3.
Carex blanda
3
Yes
FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
6
20% of total cover:
3
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft
)
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
18
Yes
FAC
2.
Lonicera japonica
5
Yes
FACU
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
23
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
12
20% of total cover:
5
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: FDS-33D5-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-3
10YR 4/2
100
Loamy/Clayey
3-10
10YR 4/2
85
7.5YR 5/6 15 C PL/M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
10-18
10YR 5/2
90
10YR 5/8 10 C M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Point not located within a depressional feature.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Village at Deep River City/County: Sanford/Lee Sampling Date: 02/14/2023
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-33D5-2
Investigator(s): M. Gilbert, E. Quillian Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1-3%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.543439 Long:-79.234733 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: PfD - Pinkston silt loam, 8-15% slopes NWI classification: Not mapped
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool, the site is within "Wetter than Normal" and is within the wet season during a "Mild drought'. Point
taken at the toe of slope juse down stream of a wetland seep, within a floodplain.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (B14)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_High Water Table (A2) _Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
—Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 10
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Saturation potentailly affected by recent rain; no water table was observed.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-33D5-2
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Acerrubrum
20
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Betula nigra
15
Yes
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Fagus grandifolia
10
Yes
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 62.5% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
45
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
23 20% of total cover:
9
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Carpinus caroliniana
25
Yes
FAC
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Fagus grandifolia
8
Yes
FACU
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.01
33
=Total Cover
_
- Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
17 20%
of total cover:
7
-4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Lonicera japonica
10
Yes
FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Microstegium vimineum
5
Yes
FAC
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
15
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft )
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
10
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
10
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: FDS-33D5-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-6
7.5YR 3/3 80
7.5YR 4/6 20 C PL/M
Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
6-18
7.5YR 4/4 80
7.5YR 5/8 20 C PL/M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Point not located within a depressional feature.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Village at Deep River City/County: Sanford/Lee Sampling Date: 02/14/2023
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-33z5-1
Investigator(s): M. Gilbert, E. Quillian Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Drainageway Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 5-10%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.544551 Long:-79.233557 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: MfB - Mayodan fine sandy loam, 2-8% slopes NWI classification: Not mapped
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool, the site is within "Wetter than Normal" and is within the wet season during a "Mild drought'. Point
taken within a draw covered in kudzu.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (B14)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) _Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
—Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 6
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Saturation and water table potentially affected by recent rain.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-33Z5-1
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Acerrubrum
15 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liriodendron tulipifera
10 Yes
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 16.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
25 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
13 20% of total cover:
5
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
N/a
FAC species 20 x 3 = 60
2.
FACU species 35 x 4 = 140
3.
UPL species 105 x 5 = 525
4.
Column Totals: 160 (A) 725 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.53
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.01
=Total Cover
_
- Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
-4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Pueraria montana
30 Yes
UPL
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Allium vineale
25 Yes
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Stellaria media 20 Yes UPL
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
75 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
38 20% of total cover:
15
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft )
1.
Pueraria montana
55 Yes
UPL
2.
Toxicodendron radicans
5 No
FAC
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
60 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: FDS-33Z5-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-2
10YR 3/3
100
Loamy/Clayey
2-10
10YR 3/3
85
7.5YR 4/6 15 C M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
10-18
10YR 5/4
90
10YR 5/8 10 C M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Point not located within a depressional feature.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Village at Deep River City/County: Sanford/Lee Sampling Date: 02/14/2023
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-33z5-3
Investigator(s): M. Gilbert, E. Quillian Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-1 %
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.543848 Long:-79.234749 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: PfD - Pinkston silt loam, 8-15% slopes NWI classification: Not mapped
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool, the site is within "Wetter than Normal" and is within the wet season during a "Mild drought'. Point take
within floodplain near a perennial stream feature.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (B14)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_High Water Table (A2) _Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
—Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 15
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Saturation and water table potentially affected by recent rain.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-33Z5-3
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
25
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acerrubrum
15
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
3.
Betula nigra
10
Yes
FACW
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 85.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
25
20% of total cover:
10
OBL species x 1 =
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Carpinus caroliniana
25
Yes
FAC
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Ilex opaca
10
Yes
FACU
FACU species x 4 =
3.
Fagus grandifolia
5
No
FACU
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.01
40
=Total Cover
_
- Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20
20%
of total cover:
8
-4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Lonicera japonica
3
No
FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
3
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
2
20% of total cover:
1
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft )
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
10
Yes
FAC
2.
Gelsemium sempervirens
5
Yes
FAC
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
15
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
8
20% of total cover:
3
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: FDS-33Z5-3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-8 7.5YR 4/4 80 2.5YR 3/6 20 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
8-18 7.5YR 4/4 80 5YR 4/6 20 C M Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Point not located within a depressional feature.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Village at Deep River City/County: Sanford/Lee Sampling Date: 02/14/2023
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-33z5-4
Investigator(s): M. Gilbert, E. Quillian Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1-5%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.542455 Long:-79.235483 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Ch - Chewacla silt loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: Not mapped
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool, the site is within "Wetter than Normal" and is within the wet season during a "Mild drought'. Point
taken in a floodplain within a potential historic oxbow.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (B14)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
—Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-33Z5-4
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Platanus occidentalis
10
Yes
FACW
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Pinus taeda
10
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Liriodendron tulipifera
8
Yes
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
28
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
14
20% of total cover:
6
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft
)
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
1.
Ligustrum sinense
30
Yes
FACU
FAC species 33 x 3 = 99
2.
Carpinus caroliniana
15
Yes
FAC
FACU species 94 x 4 = 376
3.
Ilex opaca
15
Yes
FACU
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 137 (A) 495 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.61
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.01
60
=Total Cover
_
- Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
30
20%
of total cover:
12
-4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Lonicera japonica
10
Yes
FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Ligustrum sinense
8
Yes
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Ilex opaca 5 No FACU
4.
Allium vineale
3
No
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
26
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
13
20% of total cover:
6
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft )
1.
Lonicera japonica
15
Yes
FACU
2.
Smilax rotundifolia
8
Yes
FAC
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
23
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
12
20% of total cover:
5
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: FDS-33Z5-4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-18 7.5YR 3/4 80 7.5YR 4/6 20 C M Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Point not located within a depressional feature.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Village at Deep River City/County: Sanford/Lee Sampling Date: 02/14/2023
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-33z5-5
Investigator(s): M. Gilbert, E. Quillian Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Top of draw Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 3-5%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.545467 Long:-79.233429 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: MfB - Mayodan fine sandy loam, 2-8% slopes NWI classification: Not mapped
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool, the site is within "Wetter than Normal" and is within the wet season during a "Mild drought'. Point was
taken near the top of a draw above an ephemeral feature.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (B14)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
—Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 6
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Recent rain during the following week may have affected the saturation; no water was observed.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-33Z5-5
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Pinus taeda
25
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liriodendron tulipifera
10
Yes
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
8
No
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Acer rubrum
5
No
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 57.1 % (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
48
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
24
20% of total cover:
10
OBL species x 1 =
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Ilex opaca
8
Yes
FACU
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.01
18
=Total Cover
_
- Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
9
20%
of total cover:
4
-4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Gelsemium sempervirens
5
Yes
FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Quercus nigra
2
Yes
FAC
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
7
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
4
20% of total cover:
2
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft )
1.
Pueraria montana
35
Yes
UPL
2.
Smilax rotundifolia
8
No
FAC
3.
Gelsemium sempervirens
5
No
FAC
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
48
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
24
20% of total cover:
10
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: FDS-33Z5-5
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-6 7.5YR 3/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
6-18 7.5YR 4/4 60 7.5YR 4/6 40 C M Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Soil layer 6-18 inches of the surface consists of a mixed matrix
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Village at Deep River City/County: Sanford/Lee Sampling Date: 02/27/2023
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-33D6-1
Investigator(s): M. Gilbert, A. Johnson Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1-3%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.542894 Long:-79.236267 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Ch - Chewacla silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool on 2/14/23, the site is within "Wetter than Normal' and is within the wet season during a "Mild drought'
As of 3/14/23, the APT was down, therefore, more recent climatic data from the APT was not available. According to the U.S. Drought Monitor, the
Site was not experiencing drought conditions at the time of the delineation conducted on 2/27/23. Point taken within wetland in a large relict floodplain
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (B14)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) _Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
X Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
—Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-33D6-1
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Quercus phellos
20
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Betula nigra
10
Yes
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Platanus occidentalis
8
No
FACW
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Liquidambar styraciflua
8
No
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 57.1 % (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
46
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
23
20% of total cover:
10
OBL species x 1 =
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Ilex opaca
15
Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Ligustrum sinense
10
Yes
FACU
FACU species x 4 =
3.
Pinus taeda
10
Yes
FAC
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
8
No
FAC
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Liriodendron tulipifera
3
No
FACU
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.01
46
=Total Cover
_
- Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
23
20%
of total cover:
10
-4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Ligustrum sinense
5
Yes
FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
5
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
3
20% of total cover:
1
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft
)
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
15
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
15
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
8
20% of total cover:
3
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: FDS-33D6-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Types
Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-8
10YR 4/2
88
7.5YR 4/6 12 C
PL
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
8-11
10YR 5/3
85
7.5YR 5/8 15 C
PL/M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
11-18
7.5YR 5/8
80
7.5YR 5/4 20 C
M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Point not located within a depreassional feature
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Village at Deep River City/County: Sanford/Lee Sampling Date: 02/27/2023
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-33E6-2
Investigator(s): A. Johnson, M. Gilbert Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 1-3%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.54283923 Long:-79.23625506 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Ch - Chewacla silt loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool on 2/14/23, the site is within "Wetter than Normal' and is within the wet season during a "Mild drought'
As of 3/14/23, the APT was down, therefore, more recent climatic data from the APT was not available. According to the U.S. Drought Monitor, the
Site was not experiencing drought conditions at the time of the delineation conducted on 2/27/23. Point taken within the floodplain and adjacent to a
wetland feature.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 8
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No water table was observed, however, a layer of saturation from 8 to 13 inches of the soil surface was observed. Soil layers below were not
saturated.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-33E6-2
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Quercus phellos
10
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
5
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Acerrubrum
2
No
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
17
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
9
20% of total cover:
4
OBL species x 1 =
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Rubus pensilvanicus
50
Yes
FAC
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
6
No
FAC
FACU species x 4 =
3.
Ligustrum sinense
4
No
FACU
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Pinus taeda
2
No
FAC
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Ilex opaca
1
No
FACU
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.01
63
=Total Cover
_
- Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
32
20%
of total cover:
13
-4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Gelsemium sempervirens
2
No
FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Lonicera japonica
1
No
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3.
Allium vineale
1
No
FACU
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
4
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
2
20% of total cover:
1
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft
)
1.
Gelsemium sempervirens
10
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
10
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
5
20% of total cover:
2
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: FDS-33E6-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-4
7.5YR 3/2
100
Loamy/Clayey
4-12
7.5YR 5/4
100
Loamy/Clayey
12-20
7.5YR 5/6
55
7.5YR 6/3 40 D M
Loamy/Clayey
7.5YR 6/8 5 C M
Distinct redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Village at Deep River City/County: Sanford/Lee Sampling Date: 02/27/2023
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-54A1-1
Investigator(s): M. Gilbert, A. Johnson Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1-3%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.543646 Long:-79.235248 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Ch - Chewacla silt loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool on 2/14/23, the site is within "Wetter than Normal' and is within the wet season during a "Mild drought'
As of 3/14/23, the APT was down, therefore, more recent climatic data from the APT was not available. According to the U.S. Drought Monitor, the
Site was not experiencing drought conditions at the time of the delineation conducted on 2/27/23. Point taken within relict floodplain near the toe of
slope.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
—Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 2
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-54A1-1
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Betula nigra
12
Yes
FACW
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acerrubrum
10
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
3.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
8
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Liriodendron tulipifera
8
Yes
FACU
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
38
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
19
20% of total cover:
8
OBL species x 1 =
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Carpinus caroliniana
20
Yes
FAC
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Fagus grandifolia
10
Yes
FACU
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.01
30
=Total Cover
_
- Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
15
20%
of total cover:
6
-4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Carex blanda
3
Yes
FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Lonicera japonica
2
Yes
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
5
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
3
20% of total cover:
1
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft )
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
10
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
10
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
5
20% of total cover:
2
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: FDS-54A1-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Types
Loc2
Texture
Remarks
0-2
10YR 5/3
80
7.5YR 4/4 20 C
M
Loamy/Clayey
Faint redox concentrations
2-10
10YR 3/1
75
7.5YR 4/6 25 C
PL/M
Loamy/Clayey
Prominent redox concentrations
10-18
10YR 4/1
65
10YR 6/4 20 C
M
Loamy/Clayey
Distinct redox concentrations
7.5YR 4/6 15 C
PL/M
Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
X Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Village at Deep River City/County: Sanford/Lee Sampling Date: 02/27/2023
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-54A1-2
Investigator(s): M. Gilbert, A. Johnson Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1-3%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.543587 Long:-79.235064 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Ch - Chewacla silt loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool on 2/14/23, the site is within "Wetter than Normal' and is within the wet season during a "Mild drought'
As of 3/14/23, the APT was down, therefore, more recent climatic data from the APT was not available. According to the U.S. Drought Monitor, the
Site was not experiencing drought conditions at the time of the delineation conducted on 2/27/23. Point taken within the relict floodplain adjacent to a
wetland feature.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
—Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Saturation is present from 0 to 8 inches of the soil
surface, potentially due to recent rainfall and slight
compaction of the soil layers. No water table
was observed.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-54A1-2
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Pinus taeda
15
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Quercus rubra
10
Yes
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Ulmus rubra
8
No
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Fagus grandifolia
8
No
FACU
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
51
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
26
20% of total cover:
11
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
Fagus grandifolia
25
Yes
FACU
FAC species 51 x 3 = 153
2.
Ilex opaca
10
Yes
FACU
FACU species 56 x 4 = 224
3.
Carpinus caroliniana
8
No
FAC
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Ulmus rubra
5
No
FAC
Column Totals: 107 (A) 377 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.52
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
- Dominance Test is >50%
9.
-2
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.01
48
=Total Cover
_
- Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
24
20%
of total cover:
10
-4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Lonicera japonica
3
No
FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
3
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
2
20% of total cover:
1
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft )
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
5
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3
20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: FDS-54A1-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Types
Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-5
7.5YR 5/3
95
5YR 4/6 5 C
PL
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
5-9
10YR 5/4
75
7.5YR 6/8 25 C
PL
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
9-18
10YR 7/8
65
10YR 5/4 35 D
PL
Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Point not located within a depressional feature.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Village at Deep River City/County: Sanford/Lee Sampling Date: 02/27/2023
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-54C1-1
Investigator(s): A. Johnson, M. Gilbert Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Drainageway Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0-2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.54303544 Long:-79.23606485 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Ch - Chewacla silt loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool on 2/14/23, the site is within "Wetter than Normal' and is within the wet season during a "Mild drought'
As of 3/14/23, the APT was down, therefore, more recent climatic data from the APT was not available. According to the U.S. Drought Monitor, the
Site was not experiencing drought conditions at the time of the delineation conducted on 2/27/23. Point taken within wetland feature located within a
large floodplain.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (B14)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) _Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
—Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 6
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 6
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-54C1-1
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
40
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Betula nigra
30
Yes
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Pinus taeda
5
No
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Acer rubrum
5
No
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
80
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
40 20% of total cover:
16
OBL species 1 x 1 = 1
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft
)
FACW species 34 x 2 = 68
1.
Ligustrum sinense
5
Yes
FACU
FAC species 55 x 3 = 165
2.
Carpinus caroliniana
3
Yes
FAC
FACU species 7 x 4 = 28
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 97 (A) 262 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.70
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.01
8
=Total Cover
- Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
4 20%
of total cover:
2
-4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Carex intumescens
4
Yes
FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Lonicera japonica
2
Yes
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Galium tinctorium 1 No OBL
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
7
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
4 20% of total cover:
2
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft )
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
2
No
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
2
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
1 20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: FDS-54C1-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox
Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist)
% Types
Loc2
Texture
Remarks
0-1
10YR 5/3
100
Loamy/Clayey
1-8
10YR 6/2
80
7.5YR 5/6
20 C
PL/M
Loamy/Clayey
Prominent redox concentrations
8-18
7.5YR 6/3
75
7.5YR 4/4
25 C
PL/M
Loamy/Clayey
Faint redox concentrations
18-24
7.5YR 6/2
75
7.5YR 4/4
10 C
M
Loamy/Clayey
Distinct redox concentrations
7.5YR 6/6
15 C
PL/M
Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Point not located within a depressional feature
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Village at Deep River City/County: Sanford/Lee Sampling Date: 02/27/2023
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: NC Sampling Point: FDs-54C1-2
Investigator(s): A. Johnson, M. Gilbert Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Flat Slope (%): 0-2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.543220 Long:-79.235973 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Ch - Chewacla silt loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: Not mapped
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool on 2/14/23, the site is within "Wetter than Normal' and is within the wet season during a "Mild drought'
As of 3/14/23, the APT was down, therefore, more recent climatic data from the APT was not available. According to the U.S. Drought Monitor, the
Site was not experiencing drought conditions at the time of the delineation conducted on 2/27/23. Point taken within the floodplain adjacent to a
wetland feature.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
—Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-54C1-2
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Platanus occidentalis
40
Yes
FACW
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Betula nigra
30
Yes
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Quercus phellos
20
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
No
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71.4% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
100
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
50 20% of total cover:
20
OBL species x 1 =
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
Ilex opaca
4
Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.
Acer rubrum
2
Yes
FAC
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.01
6
=Total Cover
_
- Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
3 20%
of total cover:
2
-4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Rubus pensilvanicus
10
Yes
FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Ligustrum sinense
5
Yes
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Viola sorona 3 No FAC
4.
Carex intumescens
2
No
FACW
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Lonicera japonica
2
No
FACU
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
22
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
11 20% of total cover:
5
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft )
1.
Toxicodendron radicans
2
No
FAC
2.
Gelsemium sempervirens
1
No
FAC
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
3
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
2 20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: FDS-54C1-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist)
% Types
Loc2
Texture
Remarks
0-2
7.5YR 5/4
90
7.5YR 5/6
10 C
PL
Loamy/Clayey
Distinct redox concentrations
2-14
7.5YR 6/4
95
7.5YR 4/6
5 C
PL/M
Loamy/Clayey
Distinct redox concentrations
14-22
10YR 6/3
85
7.5YR 4/4
10 C
M
Loamy/Clayey
Distinct redox concentrations
7.5YR 6/6
5 C
M
Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Point not located within a depressional feature.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Village at Deep River City/County: Sanford/Lee Sampling Date: 02/27/2023
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-54z1-1
Investigator(s): A. Johnson, M. Gilbert Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1-3%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.541926 Long: 79.237269 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Ch - Chewacla silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: R2UBH
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool on 2/14/23, the site is within "Wetter than Normal' and is within the wet season during a "Mild drought'
As of 3/14/23, the APT was down, therefore, more recent climatic data from the APT was not available. According to the U.S. Drought Monitor, the
Site was not experiencing drought conditions at the time of the delineation conducted on 2/27/23. Point taken adjacent to Big Buffalo Creek within the
floodplain.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
—Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-54Z1-1
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Ilex opaca
20
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Betula nigra
15
Yes
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Fagus grandifolia
10
No
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Acer rubrum
8
No
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
53
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
27
20% of total cover:
11
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft
)
FACW species 15 x 2 = 30
1.
Ilex opaca
15
Yes
FACU
FAC species 13 x 3 = 39
2.
Fagus grandifolia
8
Yes
FACU
FACU species 56 x 4 = 224
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 84 (A) 293 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.49
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
- Dominance Test is >50%
9.
-2
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.01
23
=Total Cover
_
- Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
12
20%
of total cover:
5
-4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Ilex opaca
3
No
FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
3
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
2
20% of total cover:
1
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft )
1.
Vitis rotundifolia
5
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3
20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: FDS-54Z1-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3
7.5YR 4/4
100
Loamy/Clayey
3-15
7.5YR 5/4
100
Loamy/Clayey
15-22
5YR 5/6
90
7.5YR 5/4 10 C M Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Feature P4
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 PSA-33A5-1
Date: 02/14/2023
Project/Site: Village at Deep River
Latitude: 35.545422
Evaluator: M. Gilbert, E. QUllllan
county: Lee
Longitude: _79.233670
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent 14
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: Colon, 2022 USGS
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30"
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 7 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2T
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel *
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 3
* NRCS, USGS, & Field -Verified
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
�1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
11 No = 0 1
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 4 7.5YR 4/3 w/ 8% 5YR 4/6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 1 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool, the site is within "Wetter than Normal' and is within the wet season. Recent rain may affect
hydrology.
Sketch:

Feature 04
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 PSA-33B5-1
Date: 02/14/2023
Project/Site: Village at Deep River
Latitude: 35.544622
Evaluator: M. Gilbert, E. QUllllan
county: Lee
Longitude: _79.234038
Total Points: F
Stream is at least intermittent 17. 5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name: Colon, 2022 USGS
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30"
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 10 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
F _2T
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0 1
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
INo = 0 1
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 3.5
* NRCS, USGS, & Field -Verified
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
�1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? **
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 4 10YR 4/4
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 1 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool, the site is within "Wetter than Normal' and is within the wet season. Recent rain may affect
hydrology.
Sketch:

Feature Q4
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 PSA-33E5-1
Date: 02/14/2023
Project/Site: Village at Deep River
Latitude: 35.543736
Evaluator: M. Gilbert, E. QUllllan
county: Lee
Longitude: _79.234778
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent 11
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: Colon, 2022 USGS
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30"
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 5.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
I No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 1.5
* NRCS, USGS, & Field -Verified
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? **
No = 0 1
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 4 7.5YR 4/4
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 1 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool, the site is within "Wetter than Normal' and is within the wet season. Recent rain may affect
hydrology. Standing water present within pools.
Sketch:

Feature Q4
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 PSA-33E5-2
Date: 02/14/2023
Project/Site: Village at Deep River
Latitude: 35.543642
Evaluator: M. Gilbert, E. QUllllan
county: Lee
Longitude: _79.234897
Total Points: F
Stream is at least intermittent 14. 5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name: Colon, 2022 USGS
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30"
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 5.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
F _2T
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
11
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel *
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 4
* NRCS, USGS, & Field -Verified
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
�1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1 0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? **
No = 0 1
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 5 7.5YR 5/3 w/ 10% 7.5YR 4/6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1 2
1
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 1 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool, the site is within "Wetter than Normal' within the wet season.
Standing water present but minimal flow.
Sketch:

Feature R4
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 PSA-33F5-1
Date: 02/14/2023
Project/Site: Village at Deep River
Latitude: 35.542967
Evaluator: M. Gilbert, E. QUllllan
county: Lee
Longitude: _79.235303
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 21
Stream Determination circle one)
Other
Colon, 2022 USGS
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30"
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 10.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
F _2T
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
©2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1 2
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
[21
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel *
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 4.5
* NRCS, USGS, & Field -Verified
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
�2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
11.5
1
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1 0.5
1
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? **
No = 0 1
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 6 7.5YR 4/4
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3 T
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 1 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool, the site is within "Wetter than Normal' and is within the wet season. Multiple water beetles
noted within the stream. Recent rain may affect hydrology.
Sketch:

Feature D4
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 PSA-33Z5-2
Date: 02/14/2023
Project/Site: Village at Deep River
Latitude: 35.544573
Evaluator: M. Gilbert, E. QUllllan
county: Lee
Longitude: _79.234223
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 21.5
Stream Determination circle one)
Other
Colon, 2022 USGS
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30"
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 13 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
1 2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0 1
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
JNo=0 I
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
Field -Verified
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 3.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
�2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? **
No = 0 1
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 5 7.5YR 4/4
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 1 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool, the site is within "Wetter than Normal' and is within the wet season. Recent rain may affect
hydrology. Small red worm noted within stream.
Sketch:

Village at Deep River —Additional Area (Wetlands and Uplands)
East -facing view of Feature U2, a Palustrine
Forested (PFO) wetland located in the central
portion of the additional area.
West -facing view at upland data point FDS-33D5-2
located in the central portion of the additional area.
South -facing view at upland data point FDS-33Z5-3
located in the central portion of the additional area.
Representative photo of the wetland soils located at
Feature U2, in the central portion of the additional
area, with a 10YR 4/2 matrix and 7.5YR 5/6 redox
concentrations from 3 to 10 inches.
m
♦ hw r '
_4
f-
if": S 4
M �
Representative photo of the upland soils located at
FDS-33D5-2, in the central portion of the additional
area, with a 7.5YR 4/4 matrix and 7.5YR 5/8 redox
concentrations from 6 to 18 inches.
Representative photo of the upland soils located at
FDS-33Z5-3, in the central portion of the additional
area, with a 7.5YR 4/4 matrix and 7.5YR 5/8 redox
concentrations from 8 to 18 inches. .4004
0 %
TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR Y151QN ACHIL�LV THROUGH OURS,

Village at Deep River —Additional Area (Streams)
Representative photo of the downstream view of
Feature P4, an ephemeral stream located in the
northern portion of the additional area.
Representative photo of the downstream view of
intermittent stream segment of Feature D4 located
in the northern portion of the additional area.
Representative photo of the upstream view of
Feature Q4, an ephemeral stream located in the
central portion of the additional area.
Representative photo of the upstream view of
Feature 04, an ephemeral stream located in the
northern portion of the additional area.
Representative photo of the upstream view of
perennial stream segment of Feature D4 located in
the central portion of the additional area.
Representative photo of the downstream view of
Feature R4, an intermittent stream located in the
southern portion of the additional area.
TIMMONS GROUP
YQUR Y151QN ACHILvLD THRQUGH PVR5,

Village at Deep River — Revised Delineation Area
South -facing view at FDS-54A1-1 for the PFO
wetland located along the eastern boundary of the
revised delineation area.
West -facing view at FDS-54A1-2 for upland located
along of eastern boundary of the revised
delineation area.
West -facing view at FDS-54C1-1 for the PFO
wetland located in the central portion of the revised
delineation area.
9 .;
F
pa,
Representative photo of the wetland soils located at
FDS-54A1-1, along the eastern boundary of the
revised delineation area.
s
o-
Representative photo of the upland soils located at
FDS-54A1-2, along the eastern boundary of the
revised delineation area.
it
4}
Representative photo of the wetland soils locatedat
FDS-54C1-1, in the central portion of the revised
delineation area.
TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR Y151QN ACHIL�LV THROUGH OURS,

Village at Deep River — Revised Delineation Area
West -facing view at FDS-54C1-2 for upland located
in the central portion of the revised delineation
area.
North -facing view at FDS-33D6-1 for the PFO
wetland located in the central portion of the revised
delineation area.
East -facing view at FDS-33E6-2 for upland located
in the central portion of the revised delineation
area.
wry
N
r s
. V
a
'1
1�;
Representative photo of the upland soils located at
FDS-54C1-2, in the
central portion of the revised
delineation area.
x
Representative photo of the wetland soils located at
FDS-33D6-1, along the in the central portion of the
revised delineation area.
�V ��ar � ,ram "�•.dA' i M . '*.W _.. �L�s�. �" �Md�
Representative photo of the upland soils located at
FDS-33E6-2, in the central portion of the revised
delineation area.
TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR Y151QN ACHIL�LV THROUGH OURS,

Village at Deep River — Revised Delineation Area
East -facing view at FDS-54Z1-1 for upland located
in the central portion of the revised delineation
area.
a�z
14
'r+
'}4�� � �.e•r�.
'f4
+�rvT'Y'iYf.
•• .VY.
f i4 -� JL7Y h1lFi..''1� '`�NY
West -facing view of the utility
easement located in
the southwestern portion of the revised delineation
area.
Representative photo of the upstream view of
intermittent stream Feature R4 in the southeastern
portion of the revised delineation area.
Representative photo of the upland soils located at
FDS-54A1-2, in the central portion of the revised
delineation area.
°,r h
�`I iow .•i!u� i � 1 TIN.
West -facing view of stormwater basin located in the
southwestern portion of the revised delineation
area.
.`de**
TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR Y151QN ACHIL�LV THROUGH OURS,

DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form
Contact Name*
Sydni Law
Contact Email Address*
[e-mail]
Project Owner*
LGI Homes
Project Name*
Village at Deep River
Project County*
Lee
Owner Address: *
Street Address
7201 Creedmoor Road
Address Line 2
Suite 147
city
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27613
Is this a transportation project?*
Yes No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Individual Permit
Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#? *
Yes No
NORiH 1AR.U11A
EnWranm W Quality
NC
-1 _.
USA
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Modification
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Please give a brief project description below and include location information. *
The proposed project consists of a mixed multi- and single-family residential development with community cohesion in
Sanford, North Carolina within western Lee County. The proposed project will include necessary amenities, including
walking trails and stormwater control measures, as well as roadway and utility improvements. The proposed project is
located to the east and west of Cumnock Road, east of the Deep River and Lee/Chatham County lines.
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:

This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401
Certification Rule.
I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
I also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting
location and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you
can submit an application.
Signature*
Submittal Date 10/18/2021

From: lase rficheCcbncdenr.gov
To: Svdni Law
Subject: Pre -Filing Time Clock has been reached for Village at Deep River - Ver
Date: Thursday, November 18, 2021 12:02:02 AM
Attachments: DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form.odf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
The North Carolina Division of Water Resources has received the Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form for
Village at Deep River that you submitted on 10/18/2021.
Your Pre -Filing Meeting Request has now reached the 30 calendar days' requirement and your
application can now be accepted.
When you submit your application please upload a copy of the attached document in this email.
This email was automatically generated by Laserfiche workflow. Please do not respond to this email
address, as responses are not monitored
Internal Use only. Non Transportation

Amanda Johnson
From: 401 PreFile <401 [e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2023 9:51 AM
To: Morgan Gilbert
Subject: Automatic reply: [External] Pre -Filing Request - Deep River Phase 2
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
This email confirms receipt of your pre -filing meeting request. Please retain this email for your records and
submit this documentation as part of your 401 application (PCN Application) as required by federal law. DWR
will not be able to accept your application without this federally required documentation. 401 applications
received without documentation that a pre -filing meeting request was submitted at least 30 days prior will be
returned as incomplete.
Responses to this email are not monitored.
If you need to contact 401/Buffer Permitting Staff, please use the following link(s) to access of staff contact
list(s).
For Non -Transportation Central Staff:
https://deg.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-quality-permitting/401-buffer-permitting/401-
buffer-permitting-contacts
For Non -Transportation Regional
Staff: https://edocs.deg.nc.gov/WaterResources/DocView.aspx?dbid=0&id=2162034&cr=1
For all Transportation Projects Including NCDOT Projects:
httos://deg.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-resources-permits/transportation-
pe rm itti ng/staff-contacts

Amanda Johnson
From: Morgan Gilbert
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2023 9:51 AM
To: 401 PreFile
Subject: Pre -Filing Request - Deep River Phase 2
Good morning,
I would like to submit a Pre -filing notice for the following project:
Project name: Deep River Phase 2
Project county: Lee
Applicant name: LGI Homes
Applicant address: 5511 Capital Center, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27606
Type of project/Approval sought: NWP 29
Thanks in advance,
Morgan Gilbert, WIT (she,her)
Environmental Scientist i
TIMMONS GROUP I www.timmons.com
5410 Trinity Rd, Suite 102 1 Raleigh, NC 27607
Office: 919.866.4951 1 Fax: [phone]
Mobile: [phone] [e-mail]
Your Vision Achieved Through Ours
To send me files greater than 20MB click here.

Appendix C

133 H S� 2i
3AOD o
o =o
_ M g dNnoado H—N'—noo Nds
Z Hd 1SV/ ] 'd3]AI i d334 m
wwi)'rnrarr, bd I IN ,,n XVj 156b'999'fii6131 •• • d n O v J S N O W W 11
L09LZ JN'4fiialeN� ZOl aain5'Peoy A�wH10ID5 San0 --I —II— NOrSInanOx
3H1I03 .Idd 9SN %AtldO 11H. •��o co N
H
N
N
d
d
W
r n
Q
Z
Vj
Q U
�
o
z /� w ~ a
wr Q
�I �o
W~ �s �� 0 w r �0
Zz Q �; z Ell
W D �� ,
ry 2C) o
W o J
>�
w�
w�
o
� o w
Z LL
z F-w
W z i �>
Q W
n�
W
W
U
Q
d
QU MQo 'v
w o a Q j m
Q O o 0 a
zti wLL n
w¢�Q�� �o
3lC
QwmUm 3L�
�z
0 ���oo
Z���u)
w z¢¢OO
� OO ••
OOmm
U
W
Q
J
d
Q
H
H
H
H
H
��
z
J
in
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
J
F�
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
�
D��
Cie
O
z
w
a
O
Q
w
w
w
w
Q
z
N�
00
z�
z
z
z
z
z
w
�
w
�
�
�
�
�
�
O
Z
W
�
�
W
W
O
W
a
O
O
O
Ln
O
�
O
�
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
v
y
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U

SNOIlICINOD JNIlSIX3
g f � � dNnoavouiaoN';.iNnooa�'aaosNds mo
Z Hd 1SV/ l 'd3]AI i d334 m
N a Eab� 1 �ssea9a66,3 .- d n Ob J S N O W W l l
—z'' 'u0�Wl I zol aa�s .Pena nn�yi olas �•
33nrasna �nr�nwn sano uonoaui aana�un. uo�s�,�anot •
su ra aswi ��••
0
v
0
0
�g OdN N b
W O
U
O
�Q
Wo
az
m0
am
z Il ,
W 1 /o
al==�%;.:. /1Alw�lll�
lv}t)�I �`VAA,vv�� ��"'�.�- o _ /fzwllll.
o
zOf J i
�/ tW� !/ /////•°„ ` �' ,\ / as �r )\ ae
W
O
Z
Z
❑ Z O
W uj Q
Q Oz w O
❑ >0 z
D (7 L Q
11 Z ?
12 pz 9 zU O
0
wo a M g� Q w
Z J LU L O\ O Z ❑
y laf o U)'o W J
O m X O �' W ❑ Q
H w Z W❑❑ Q O
Z y Z N Z Y W Z H
> YQ OOMtZQW �dp W
W QZ Z NZZU S(n0
� z0 w�QO0�ae 00U
(7 OQNJ❑N�
ozro
12 DLwaUC06 O�zw
W Z J m O W N ae Q >
Q Oacje 0��m�0
Zw�Ych z�oz rza
> N a W a w 00 o❑- Q o Q❑ m S
Q O Q z W 0I M� N Z N M� M 0
❑ L(7 (J O ❑ ll�m (D ON J LU ON ON ON J LU ON
z�O� W OOLnacow vaLn W
D S LuLu N����\��❑
O Q O Z Q S M M D N W a N 0 M❑
w❑�* 0 0 0❑— O o<
N co V Lo CO r co
Am
W =
--�—
FJi
� t
f
c,
U) n
! /�/�/ I v� i�ro0���• � �< wo' rI-" � y�){ 1\\\�U o�
-'W w'l O ^z \�\\\\)\\I\ 3,
7 ! t �� /��✓ rm - �,� 4rg- --,,zm \ \ \\\\ 1i \ a�
/ �.> /,Iv �/ U) !t i '1�U) ,�ti 1i111\\\�0\\gyp\\ a;W ��3 a• a �r� a�r��j�
Omi _� a °\ }\O\1�\ N\K" \ a> aka a,z aa�
1 is 1 ! 0 f z a
tt/ �r��-e� S/fN 7"}I}A�11A AVM a''a
"(P lir/f 1/t \11�\., a� a Oa
a3U)
I�^O\,�\r of as ��FQ. as Q
WfII(}1l\1\�l1 a"�ai>`"xW
wa
! t <''bb�s i,F >wl a,sa QS7-a
r�s \t N I tY•/; o} / f rr r i �a'a as a mQ�S�
w
\
14
_
;
a
I s 10-' ( W o N
' LLQ... Vli / _tV\ �IJ-r�`� g� N i�/'//1( la.\^:.o a� o Ikl a \\
c7 mp lti \\\.�11 �_W ug1 f'i/ rL \ -`.z O 'fa o x'�y! OI
z r OJ l l , \ J t6tJ z \ \ t 1 vJ \ } w , ? o a1
N\ / \: \� }°/ 1 1 r u� o
9)ct)
U11�i RO t r I !if/�A 0\.6Q i // % --zJ i! /-
,J
Sl !'/� Jai o �� IIVApill
f0
38 76 4 t
1�0' 1
0,
U
,J rTr fl,,
60
260
6t
3° l
oa

SIDVdWI -nV'd]AO 0 -
a \ N
dNnoado u1aoN ';.1Nnoo aa�'aaodNds m o
Z Hd 1SV3 'd3]AI i d334
a " U
w a l s slb , Isbe s9 d16,31 •. • . - • d n o m J SNOW W 11
n�eo9a �N�'I' a1z1 I MT inns roeon Annul ocns
3JI330 H9131tlL
3H11tl 4311tld3Nd �NIIAtln0 SIH1 a H nHl a3iaiH aN Dina a •.••
0
N
dN ='
O o
�B w oN
Q
U
to
0
0
Z
W
(`)
W
J
> a
Q w
~ W
0z
W Z ~ W to
W w Z Q
Z
= J Q LU, W Z Q p
O >� om ywQLU
� W
ot
UwQWQ)�(D Q OW w O O Z> z a w U) z w
a aa��w? to z
aaa��wx
D�a w
o
mD(70 Z O
,� O
I c
� o
ill 0
P� W
O � m
a < <
> W W
Z a a
O U) U)
w w a
< < a
a a LU
w w w
IltJl � �c • � VA V�V A\V\cll I I �� I �V��A
It Ii(\�
J J j
11
1d
aJ i 5 a
' � // �;•;`� \I r <�aaa aaa f �`��hsr l^\`�' �7
10�-1��'�
C) _ �
��v ���V ��av�°aJia��� � �
•,,. 1
aaa aaa3al��raaaaa �1�� ����V.
C J r aa'aa a a as �i v
,a as aaa aaa a as `1 1r
r F L— a.aa a �'aaa�Ta \ aaa��d1 1
�Iit �Ilt
v, w.
/.. \ IIYIPIklocc r� —`—? aJcoccffi °���
P IZ ��i IIII`II{�111 g ®� ®® r � J�1i\� t �
L'/r \ �• Ut\I�<� �f�l/��I°��� 1//� �rJ� ,J JJJ/�//�\�� ,IIII�`�\, �\r
rr L� J �• � � / `� /, 1 �
r� i�iS lJ rJ�/f �Ji i(J J/ l y 'r 1tt `
I�`I a
L,'af/�����`'

7,*0080=
1-10VI SIDVdWI -WIN3W02JIAN3 0 0 0
_ g d
dw noadoH—N a-A-
NOI-11— NOIS-1 dld
Z Hd 1SV3 2i3AI2i d334 m
bZiB'n3IHJ u
£N
EH'6ifi XY3 i£66'998'6i6131 ,I"Z JN OI•• d n O b J S N O W W l l
L09LZ '46,a�ey � ZOI alin5 'PeoL yiuuIT`SanO 9noa ul a3OISII 1101 • •
3H11H 43NHd3Nd 9NA—G SIH1 •••• •
d
v
o
a o
�a
3 lC
3 C7
V
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
• LL
VI
�
�
N
0
to
U
Q
J
Ln
M
N
�
a
Q
M
M
w
F-
U
O
O
vi
O
O
H
z
w
a
�
N
N
N
~
v
Ol
lD
lf1
a¢
Q
g
o
0
CD0
0
J
U1
S
�
v
w
a
z
a
O
-
�
z
�
z
o
of
00
M
z
g
� N
w
w

T IDVdWI -WIN3WNO2JIAN3 0
a i %NI�Ob %o H—N —noo — O-A— z _ m O I
Z Hd 1SV/ l 'd3]AI i d334 m
w Z1B"B616xy,156b998.616131 •. • d n o v J S N O W W I 1
0 09 z N Ubaeal I'V s 1 T'l' ales _.
3JIJ19 H9131tlL
3 Hi o Vd3Nd—N A—SIHl •�� •
r ry
Q
w
W Z~
z Y w
n Q
oLu
w
o
m
J Z
W n W
SW
o a
Q p
f
m
o
O mQ
Q
W Wa
O
Lu LU
W�
WnWW
> Q
wQ �ng0Wc7
Q
(7 ll�
cj�
u
aHN
z rza
�wZ n
z Qaao
w£8
Z
W
O O O WQ Z
WU) >
H
Y
U
Zll� Ile w
aaamD(D0 z
a X o
O w
w
Q
�
o
o
a
I
o
z
�
4
°
w
aLU
Q
O
0
o
o
C)
Z
LLl
o
z �LL
2 Y
J
WM 2 N
1 � -
QU)
z�v vv
0 OU

C I"'MN, o
MM M f _� dN noado H—N'—noo aav 'a-ANds om
Z Hd 1SV3 'd3]AI i d334
ezta�ld9 xn,L=be99abt6,3
Zos• d o om J SNOW W 11
Wn�a JN'I'! lea I Zoc sans 'veoa nnn!u oLns
e� Dx""- sun. HEn.uHi.3n3�H�n Nmsn un.t
3ui iv a3avd3aa �wrnHaa s�ui �o o .
0
£8 aHN
W
Q
U
�Z
a0
� U U
� Q
O
0
�Zo
z
w
}go
0
z
W
,w
`co
w
\ J_
H
\\O I
6) —
S �
co
O
M
V co M
N ~
pNz OLLc
=0i>
�PZ Z
c
Lr
n
> a
Q W
W Z ~ W
O Z1'HL LZLI m W Q
Lzu =JQ W(n W Z Q 0
O m W W Q� W W O
>oo�nQQwa Q
�U)U)(DLu (DE a cD
W OOZ>z a W Un Z Q
a a- a- F--W? to z F: y
�� 0- D��� w a d o
a a- amD(70 Z O w o
O
lo
LD
Q
U
W
LL
O
o a
Ln O
Ln
O
Ln
a o O
Ln
N
N
N
1
LL D M N
J
N
tea' O
N o �1
6b S£Z
W
W <
L "S£Z
o
Q a
o=
(D
p Z
r
_�
W �
U)
LL LL
OOQ
Ln
a w
W W
(7 Q z e
9'bSZ
.o
O
z
�
I� N
d N
a
U U)
a O Lu Z
O N z O
W
gFo Z
—
LL �o
J o
N o
QO�
a
LU
L 6SZ
Lo
V
N
o
V
N
Lo
M
N
o
M
N
Lo
N
N
O W
O J
LL
oLo
Ln 11
aww
J J
Q
N U)U)
N
U O> _
O I —
O
O
W
D
m
w
a
U)
>
a
a
0
Z W
W
Lu
U
a

E IJVdWI IVINzJWNUdl/\NzJ '^
O o N
dwnoavo ulaow ';.lwnoo —'aao3wds o
Z Hd 1SV/ l 'd3]AI i d334 "u
wwN'r�w,rn tZiH'EEB'6l6 Xtlj 5566'99H6i6131 •• • �• ial 11 H—HI -.113NII— d f l O J S N O W W I 1
'46ZOI aiinS'Peoy Nwul OibE 5yn015111101
03 _ d1 31tlN
1tl 3H1`.]NIIY\WO 5[Hl •�� �
V
£817VN
LU
J ON
U
O
Z
F N O
1 U d
_ _
°
+ ° W
\ -- — OFz
— — — — — — — — — — \ O U _LU
a _
\ > U) ` � ° -
W \ O�m — — —_i_
_ U) i —
\ z ° d — z o
—' �wON i o
_— (D aLL
0 _ --
— — — — —0' -
9rs U) - - O
�L \
U
--- cao----
\ 09xi _ i "co _ ° 0� -
\ ° o ° 0 07
0
r r
r ` O = �
r
6 6 O
W
O O �
M N N :::)
o NZZU
=a0>>>
��ZZZ
F
w
0
(D
(J Q CO o n
z (D O O
_� _
U)
WO O D)
0 r V
0)
N N
N N
Z
z O
>
Z
d
O
V
N
Ln
M
N
O
M
N
Ln
N
N
N
o
co
_3 (J)
\
co
o
Q O
C
0
,;Tbo N
N N
�o
c, O
=O»
��z z
o
V
N
n
M
N
o
M
N
Ln
N
N
S EEZ
w
J_
LL
0
cl
p JL CC)
J
M U)U J
N
U o> _
0
Lq
U
0-
r
Q W
Lw z
H
0
Z_ Y H L W T W
Lu :I-J Q W (n W Q W
m W W Q
�lLu
O
��WW
�Ow(a (7 tr
z>- a U)z a
aaao,wz_U) z F: >
O O O J w Q z w U)
aaamD((70Lu z O w
°
0
o
fill 0
d
0 J 9
e
U
o w
O W tc
O 3 is
3L�
oa �
n O
0 MAL
Ln
O

7_LJVdWI IVINzJWNUdl/\N� o v
a N
a %N C10bKJ H1bON 'A1Nf10D 331 'ObP�N%S
Y Z Hd 1SV/ l 2i3/�I2i d334
v U
NOISI/,
I
3H� tZiH'££B'6I6 Xtl3 56t'99B'6I6131
• O O �' u, .11 �N uaWl I zoc anas'o— -111-1 �• •
3J11�0 H9I3ltlH ­0 H9f10NH143A3MJtl b00A
�
11tl a3a —d 9NIM1\Wa -1 •�� •
d
r
LO
M
N
O
M
N
LO
N
N
O
N
N
9'isZ
W 1
I p I
5
0
0 ►
co
z
N
to
co
9 ICU,
X 1
W
n co
o `` 1
o =
�o)
VLO
I
O) LO
N
M N �
M
�
c) 0
=»
FO0z z
co
M
N
o
co
N
n
N
N
o
N
N
w
J
Oo Lo
L� 11 z
w w
o LL J w
t C)C J
HNC
U O>
Q=
C�
G
r
Q W
LL z � , z
O z 6 F,� W m p Q
= J Q W (o W z Q p
m w y w Q U W O
ypploQ W d IJi
�U)U)�W�cU� a cD
z > a cn z a
aa_a��w? U) z F-: y
O O O J w Q z W U)
aaamD((0z O w 7o
I °
1 °
O
j O
o
d
LO J 9
O U
O U) 67
+ W L
O � jn
0 3 {Q
LL
O a
n O
O
Ln
O

S IDVdWI -WIN3WNO2JIAN3 0
Z Hd 1SV3 2i3AI2i d334
w bZLB-6I6xA SIH3936[6131 •. • .•• d o Ou J S N O W W I1
oo L09¢�N �461,1,L ZOI o4,ls 'P, A4-1OI HS
3�IJ10 H9131tlL SN�0 H91ONH I—I—NOI--k
3H1 1tl a3NHd3L'd 9NIIAtlLO SIHl •�� �
O
V
W
J
0]
O
�
w
£8 aHN N
O
J
v
n
r
U)
<
Q
0
a
o
�
O z
w
w
s�
/
� JOz
C
r
C
r
~
C�
-qqwA, Q
I a
I�
z _
W
L / 0
w
U z
w W
J \ J
0
r
O
r a
Q w
W z
LL
0 W W z j - Q
z U~ L W m O a
LU = J Q W (n W z Q
mw w LQ Q W W> O
> w w� w> W a U> W
w 00z>z Q w U)z Q
a a_ a_ L:w? to z F: y
O O O J w Q z w U)
a aamD(a7 a0 z O w o
o
0
0
j 0
��II �o
O Lys
LO
U
U)
W
J_
LL
0
ry
o a
LO O
0
Ln
O
N
Ln
N
o
N
n
N
o
N
LL
(D0
z>u)
Lu
w
u) 0
Q
a
0
aw~
0 a U
(7
Z
J (n LL
Q L
H
x
LU W Lou)
W d a
o
Q W In
X
H
N
U) a 0
U N
a U LL
J O
0,0Q
�io�
_
a0 n 0
z
Q
_
1
a
0
N
o
L LZZ
�
M =
0
U)
>L-I
N
M O
o J
O V
coo N
l OZZ
N N
N N Z
N W L Lg
'0 Q
W LU
Oa
Lu H
a z z
a z W
L'ZZZ
Qw�
0
�
LU
W
O
M
N
LO
N
N
O
N
N
N
N
N
0
N
w
J_
LL
pow
Ljj L
�LOU)U)
N
U o>
<
I.CL
G
� a o
0
+ � a
0
3 to
3 Lo
OMAL
+
O te

m
S-lIVI]CI aNV S]ION
o
o
g
_
dN noavo ulaoN ';.1Nnoo —'aaodNds
Z Hd 1SV3 2i3AI2i d334
I I N11+tZi9'££B'6I6 Xtl3 56t'99B'66131
w 169a 'ua�aiea zoc anes'oeoa q�uu acts
Stlf10 H9f10a Hl J3A3IHJ NOISI 10 >!0A
�•
3J11�0 HOI3ltlL
3H tl Jab -d 9NI M1\WJ -Io
•��
••�
d o O
v o S N O
W W' 1
z �a
Oa��
o ;o
�p pa
'o
z>
zp OUP
pp.�.z wwp O�.z.
m¢='I~it FF� w wow
wp plJ J
¢K mz
�� oQ
p
wJz� �oz ��mm a�
Z.. Q
oaz NOp
wQ oo
�Qou aomo �oJo a�
o�G o�z
I
M o¢ oao
o��� as
sae
o w
au� Joy
~wo
��o�i�w
is cn z
�\n mtJ �avl p \n¢ a
�pu InF VI
W
o
N¢
m
f
1
111
I
zLL�w
po�o�z
o w
zo_pp QY
y� wN
w o
wgaow ow<z
z
oz
oow
amF J0�
u x w
zo
aNw;� o.. w�
w o
u
>z Jm� aN3 wwa�ucwi\�
Ins ¢�
U F a¢ z
ti w n z_ w p w F w w
o
O O Q
p
of
-
U U p
�5^� z
N J u O
J p w > p E Y E V~] w F
F z W o< >ww?�oLL
i�
J r ~�
¢ F p z
`
a
a O
w ¢f6m¢uo¢
O
=Doan LLrvG oa
G:¢�
6\
mad
u)
ry
I
_
w
O O
m
'Q3
az��
pg w zo
~¢ O O
a
�LLOU
O Q W Oz
J
OD
O F N N O F
d z ? w (9 U z
u
o W
O
Q w
Q
W
U~
O .�.30Y
¢�
J¢� Oz zS �w H.
plow w _> p z
O y ¢
a z
1
-
Z
z m
Z w
LL�
N O B p U z z z a
z °Y w p
a P
r
W
m
OU w�?o�wa
..�o LL¢
¢��m Ij�w�Q ua
p o•
a Dui
-
Q
Lu
' H yp�ow
Lou z
W ..w�uw�
ww "� oo uw..
m LL Q w a m LL
uO�ww >�a�^i ��
zu
¢
/
/
a>cY,pmawa
Z
O
� w'O
w��✓Id ti� z��
a
ww zp
'0
U
LL 1 w
w
z
S I u� H ~ Z p 6 U N z F
Y F
OU z
o <z
�UI¢O�
(�9 �
���w� ¢w>�w �z ���
O
¢� �¢
z
�ulwpo�
o�aro
�pzo oLL �o o' �� Oo zJ
wa�In
zi Ooa
a
w
.. uoaum uuu
r ua
u .,
Fm
r _
6 -
_- pE
&t'a
wrwy�
Et
M

Appendix D

O
W
in
Z
O
H
Q U
£8 aHN i b z OJ
w D
J
U co In
w Z < 0 LU
Q Q Q .-� N Q rl
Zo W
O W
� O
W a� U) In a d
J I�nn
\\\\alp
vvvx �n
. ,1 \ \\ ,\�
�\°
\ U U
O d \c b. '�• 1 1 i _s Ali > 4l , �.\\\\� �\ O ° ' I
\ P M5 r
11t1i\ �\ 12 r� \� \�\� \ \\\ 511}fl h'°+ .�.,� •\ � ` � s � = � o /!h/�/i'r . _
i \ \1 �\\ \I !I r� \\\ \ \\\\\�01t,� ,',°� 9a,yitir ^dip r/!�/i U lllll ° o
\\\\\ \xtt' 1 r ,�aa \�5 s\ ®a I r /r/ °
\�,\,\�l{,t,�__h,>o''•:.'�.; 7,r�Ulr,�J1;,,, ,/, r<. � ° °
\\\\�\\\il 7 �.? = y f1V lDpi �("�/1/• ° O O
\\,\l t r �� = /ii�l 1 �:�•/9 •iI, �ktf t[7`f''\-rrL� C //fl+ _ ° r
41t1\•+"���`- It\\^/-vo ro�r ,r>.til1r t°z\Il Jr tl{t`l h/' •-111 t \ oo .4
°t
/l
L � /i.r � ? �, } •' )'i :� '���, � � �'•t�rsr•liy,4lrJt ' •� �� / ! I o
��l�r/rr"`t\1�tiJllit,ll/J°>f/r//}11`�'~•'1ti ''t r�•.'�\ _{ °\off`\�� y f// \\ °o
/
r"\l!ls ir\s 1�l/fl1 i'rrt 1 ertrV \l„,1irljt^?l)ri3\', (i,l%L!,S`ti1ti••�;~`xw \\ \\ '\��-'S,`f,. b. \r\\c>J 't�e l rf)i!rS,,/�Il•,ll(s'f.1', r_,�-I+I °v1rr'.,�\ .�/ /, rI /'/��/ // '//// / /////////�/// /°\°\ °
>so o
I °) o
O
0, 11 „oI
° I //
ifI
W,l`t rt�l !• .� ll -o �1 ti /s' �\ I / 1 0
!' V1SI�lt"1'// 15�51.. `� f\L \\ .. °.•._ + .w\\�\ / �% 7� �,//) il�°r r/
°
O
7 e �/ir �'r..11t�- °r'•"I'a 1 j�1 •r r J �� �� \\ t4 �r �'". 1 +� .'�y4 t "� e J t
//fir/-iif / f r!/i%. ` t\ i 3.' �3':' •-1'
r' /(p� I)I l' 1 "" � \ � /! //f Jr /r c..\ t r!'� •J •/ 1 � � " •�e,.''4..�.'✓t n . "
r
r/1 tl ll0'7: It, rI/r�r.A ;tin`a;%,; •; `I .•' ,�o' r
�.o „.;,', �,..-'',p'+• <::� Q
IS>1-��, .J✓i;/(r,\J(j>J '//r_ `3j o 0, oLu
o 4P oo \
„Zti l / :� J ! ram. 1 _ O l \ \ CO2 ' `e r �E 's, f r o `\o �/�+ a
_. t,�.. /.-�� t�lfl i \y'. ^�\JS�\\il''� `•J4 /I �rrc� ®� r LU
f t
cna
_ � 1
Q
I -
r 0
y ~s7 t / > W Z
i� �/ J/J•:• t,,Sr 1, r{ _ N r �'�i rt �- t A /ru Jy /I r I.V wW
LU G
�y�tjtlf,r,J�°>;,� rctt _—� �1.\.�i �. ,� �—t\\�\,•\��; �( I}7,=k���:�i I,`, �__ ��.. > O
J
LU
J is L U
'0, ,\ fo M; f l., t � � \\ !• L \ �• dam'. a 0 LU
vrr/�r°v�n vtll ro• — �� y'�h�I r
\` . �_�\ /r `• I r ;•` J ^!" . -„ > °�; i, / ' �, s \ rr1 , 6S' •.� -^. �,� r3 r II I'_„a• rr -
c
Lti-.b1 ll• \\\" rr1i•\ JaI t \``\ 3 �:� r �rrl r it , 11;
/ 11\l � / f rrJ � / 1y, t t S � l• jr> !, %` " � '� % �- III 1�5 r�'� �'r
:t'1`ri„� t r,�',r%4r '` r,'/riilti !•"•i�lt' \r5., _ w/ O
�' ht°•.+ rr>>? 1•"li 'r ;

INVIlil Id1D'INVJ dud dD'I 11VN VU - D'JNI/V\Odu D'D'dd`JVdd
0
N m m p S-IIt/134'3 S310N WJS aNOd,l2i4 0
dNnoado uiaoN ;.iNnoo — aaoANds m o
Z LSe]'d]nrd dl]a Q m
Z59T-J ON 3SN3JI-1 VNIlO'dVJ Hi'dON
•. • .•• d n Ob J S N O W W 11
o it - s p oeo n m a-J o
w' W,
o�op
a
og p s=
_ as _
wea loll)
��
Wol =_
;
— - w Boa
_ _ awe
—� � I
lE
- -
- — —
"Nm -
�000
-
0 0 0
a IIHIIi
HR
= amo
— w w o�
w IIIIII-
�iim
IIIIIII �Im�
d
w IIIIIII �� � a m
m o=`
goo= o =11f IIII a 4
-o�� o III III III_o aw e
w II -III III-1� Qawa § a�.
oa4 .o
� IIIIIIIa ono= w .l
,so w<w
Ya Wds o§Qo o a§ sz g o
a fee sas
o
o
aSa o�2
Lao LL a m
� a
o��o- �, 4�am
ad
a i,o �g`M' �gaom -
o
����w
<�o amaan�po' 090"
= wo ��o
l
wa
a
ao
�
—
g , a
�o
o
ago
o —
o
m =HE
s ° n
=o oa fl
�����
§z§� a0°
�IN
�
zo 04 ga ono 0 0a w �:w
d� �§
ogdo a§ a o$o a S o w g> _°

oa =oww.,o.Naao.a ... .... w..op.... ..... s
3�I�02id'3 Ntf�d T WAS o
a r w o %N 0-3 H—N ALNf10S 331 O-AN%S
O
fa
ol�dl 3allolsl�� z LSVI'd]nrd dDIG
1111-1 ON 3SNDDIl VNIl0'dVJ Hi'dON
os ,N usa�l o olos o oa a3 31 y o=I •. • •' d n O b J S N O W W I 1
3���da�da�d9�IM�a=I�. ..,..
-o<
om
�m
2�
a�
a
e
o'oo
o'"`-'
�w
se
boa
oo
o �m
Q eN
.p
c
g`
WB oV-J
e�
I I
oN�p
leer
g �
'1 al i al
III II III 1
—
s oYz
e
d
I I
�
�
I
Ijl
III II
III I
nl -I
�Iv1 I 1
-
uk i
4�1
o1
11 1
1
I
I
i
i
I 1
>o
a
o
I
0
I
I
I

m
0 0 3�I�02id'3 NV -Id Z WAS .I
�o
MVNI I-- H-UN I.L 5 — OtloAN%S �
Z LSVI 'd d��a
ZS9T-J ON 3SNDDIl VNIl0'dVJ Hi'dON
.,a� M,.. os ,Nusa� o oos o oa a3x3, y o=, •. • .•• d o Ob J S N O W W I 1
�--
6
=sax s`s` ssssa:sx::^ Hs 99
boa
e
s xa�eb� m�
e Qa
0
• eases€ 8. ._._._.._..........z.__. a =�,w
`a 881 £m` �fltl :n28: sfr-_-•.-.i a :'l o _oo
e �w " afi 3ws88= �" €a 6aass: os so = a"
o
ofl
ryI'
wa
o gz' see
- ---------
LL ;
� I
r�
oil
� o
II
�/d
3� gm
�o
s,er
/A
Y ��I
as>=
�3
d3 m
i
9�� I I
� a
mi i � ix
i
s
.zz
I
-
__
za
saw
w
LL
0
a
o,
z
0�
a
Qo

Appendix E

IPaC
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is a There is an ongoing issue with accessing projects that have large or complex _. (collectively
referred to as t geometry. We are working on a solution. If you are unable to access an � known or
expected to be existing project, please submit a helpdesk ticket by clicking "contact us" at the --es that occur
outside of the I bottom of the page and we will assist you with access. Thank you for your i the project area.
However, deter patience. )ically requires
gathering addit ide and timing of
proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s) with
jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species,
Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources
addressed in that section.
Location
Lee County, North Carolina
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]
JJJ [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
.A \%-e
vl�
C;U�

Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of
influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could
be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does
not occur at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream).
Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on
or near the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and project -
specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any
project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a
species list which fulfills this requirement caronly be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the
Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an
official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
�Itq
1 11 \ Ir _W
Listed species and their critical habitats are managed by thd=cological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact
forspecies under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under theEndangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are
candidates, or proposed, for listing. See thdisting status page for more information. IPaC only shows species that
are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals
NAME STATUS
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus Proposed Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws. ov/ecp//species/10515
Fishes
NAME STATUS

Cape Fear Shiner Notropis mekistocholas Endangered
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species.Your location does not overlap the
critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws. ov/ecp//species/6063
Insects
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws. ov/ecp//species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME
Harperella Ptilimnium nodosum
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws. ov/ecp//species/3739
Critical habitats
STATUS
Candidate
STATUS
Endangered \0 1
CN \000
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species
themselves.
There are no critical habitats at this location.
You are still required to determine if your project(s) may have effects on all above listed
species.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Actand the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and
their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures,
as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concernhttps://www.fws.gov/pro rg am/mi rator -bv irds/sspecies
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to bird!https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding and-
minimizing-incidental-take-mi ratory birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birdEhttps://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nationwide-
standard-conservation-measures.pdf

The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on thIdSFWS Birds of
Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the
levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FA elow. This is not a list of every bird
you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see
exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit dire
bird data mapp�intool(Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur
off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on
your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information
about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found
below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts
to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when
these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 25
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the
continental USA and Alaska.
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus vociferus Breeds May 1 to Aug 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the
continental USA and Alaska.
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus Breeds Apr 20 to Aug 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range Ahe
continental USA and Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the
continental USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the
continental USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the
continental USA and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the
continental USA and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your
project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts
to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird

Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence( )
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps
during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher
probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the
presence score. One can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the
species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there
were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted
Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This
is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example,
imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of
presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week
12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all
possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season i, )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If
there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort(I)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that
species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for
example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The
exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data
in these areas is currently much more sparse.
SPECIES ]AN
Chimney Swift . • . —
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Eastern Whip -poor -will . . . —
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Kentucky Warbler ----
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Prairie Warbler _
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Prothonotary Warbler . . . —
BCC Rangewide (CON)
FEB MAR APR
probability of presence
MAY JUN JUL
,i.I ,II, „-.
--+— — •'I Ill
I
breeding season I survey effort — no data
AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

Red-headed ---- —,
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Rusty Blackbird ____
BCC -BCR
Wood Thrush --
BCC Rangewide (CON)
1++- -4--+ 1 , , ,
— A ---- ---- ----
---- ---- ---- ---I
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year
round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds
may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact
minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of
Presence Summary.Additional measures orpermits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the
type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFW!E3irds of Conservation Concern LC) and other species t it ay wa a
special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by thAvian Knowled �tworAK . The AKN data
is based on a growing collection ofsurvey, banding, and citizen science datasetsand is queried and filtered to return a list of those
birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special
vulnerability to offshore activities or development. g grequirements matey apply), or a species that has a particular
attention because the are a BCC species in that area, an ea eFa e Act
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all
birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit tNepid Avian
Information Locator CRAIL) Tool. N.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified
location?
The probability of presence graphs gssociated Wi your migratory bird list are based on data provided by th�vian Knowledge
Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection ofurvey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
N
Probability of prese9A data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how
the probability o p ence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on
the "Telln
th e graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may
query your location using theRAIL Tool and look at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles
provided for each bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird
does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is
indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds areBirds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the
USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of tlEegle Act
requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or
activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).

Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize
impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation
measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for
these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within
your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit thENortheast Ocean Data Portal The Portal also offers data and information about
other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files
underlying the portal maps through theNOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird
Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration.
Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see tCD�ving
Bird Study and thenanotag studies or contactCaleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need tobtain a ep rmitto avoid violating the Eagle Act should such
impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
J. •
r
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more
about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ
"What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report
provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your pr*ct; not your exact project footprint.
On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the
"no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of
presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and,
therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds
of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests
might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn
more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by thENational Wildlife Refugee system must undergo a 'Compatibility
Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
There are no refuge lands at this location.
Fish hatcheries
There are no fish hatcheries at this location.

Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the IoceU.S. Army Cor sp of Engineers District
Wetland information is not available at this time
This can happen when the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map service is unavailable, or for very large projects
that intersect many wetland areas. Try again, or visit thENWI map to view wetlands at this location.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location,
type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on
vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground
inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and
quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine
the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences
in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
0*1
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary
data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the
intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm
reefs) have also been excluded from the inve ory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner
than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of
proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of
government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek
the advice of appropriate Federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary
jurisdictions that may affect such activities.

Roy Cooper, Governor
■■■10 INC DEPARTMENT OF
■■ ■■ NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ONE
May 30, 2023
Amanda Johnson
Timmons Group
5410 Trinity Rd., Suite 102
Raleigh, NC 27607
RE: Village at Deep River East - Phase 2
Dear Amanda Johnson:
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy DirectDr, Natural Heritage Program
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httr)s://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler�ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DE PA,PTmENT OF NATvPAi. AND Cui,TuPAi. KSOUaCES
FAX }r 7 r �'

/
2 \
\
y
\ / ®
\
3
n
E /
s
/ / /\
z
z
_
3 d
\
CC3%
/
<
u
0
\
\
\/
\\
2
\\
/
~ \
_ _
.k
\
\
\\
>}§
gg
%
/ } _
\
CC3
%
*
o
\\
~
.�
u
U}u
� \
° J
\ ( ®
6 mo
E\
/(\
.
--
/\
3/
0
\ � \ \
0`
e ® o a
=
ƒ /
.\e a
g /
0
\//�
®\2/
�\
/\\/
\%/6
\\
2 e x e
=o Z
/ 3
g a
\
CC3\%
\
e
/
.. OE
u
2 a):
\>
E
\\
\�
e
ez
u
�>
0
0
t
$)
�©
/
\ ^
E
z%
/
\ \
0
e
/
�
c�/ \
\
®
©
k ? t
%
?e; co
u
e
/±
®
» ® E
®
» /
co
e:
\
y
\ \
/
= v( x z
e
/
-0z:
\D
\\
.�
u s x c s
-0\\
/
2
E
::
( {
© \
%-
E
\
\
E0
\
(/
\
\
\
\\
©
»
<
=Ln
\
\
g >
C"
\
\ « \
4
\ \
/
\ \
t o - z
° E
-
/
f
_
CID
.0
/ D /
\
\ \ \ \\ \
\
\ /
/
\ /
s
§
\
/

CO
CO
M
M
n
N N
�
n
n
n
n
n
n
M
n
n
n n
o e
M
-0 c
M
0
0
0
�
0
0
�
Ln Ln
O f0
�7
M
M
0
3
0 0
(3
0
0
(3
(3
(3
CO
aJ
N
a s
U
U
U
a
+COCO
(n (J-)
E CO
E CO
E
CO
CO n3
a a
(n
(n
W
(n
W
O
_
o
aJ
a
CO
CO
E
W �
CO
�
aJ
C
W
>
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E E
c
O
D
D D
_
CO r r
a
> o
a
a
a
a
a
I
a
I
a a
ro ro
N N
CO
U
O
N
N
C C
a
Q
}
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M M
O o (3
a
N
Q!, Ln Ln
U
U) Ln
a
E co
W
=
W
W
Q
CD
CD
m
Q
Q
I I
Q
a U FY
W O
0) CONO
O
C
CO N O N
O
N
a
N
N
N
O
N
N
N
O W
CO + CC3 a)
a
CO
CO
Ln
CO
LnLn
Ln
O O
"0 T
N COiCO
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
un
E C
�> Z
o a o
J aJ Q
Q in
N
O
O
O
N
N
M
M
M
M
M
Ln LnO
U O
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
C)z
aJ +
N
co
co
Q co
O
0)
�
a
c
a
Q
CO
o
a
N
N
r
0
—
CO
IIIIIIllIlIl
m,1111111111�CO
uu
a
N
r
— o
Z
o E
E
c
0
co , CO
_
E
n
v v
a
�
zIIII
C�
Ln Ln
a)
O
}
E II�11111�
to
CO
�
(�
C
CO
CO
>,
J
E
E
a)
3:
W
O
a). M
u
n
O
an
COo CO0
U
E
E O
�
O
N
CC3
ro
_ _
E
O
O°
O
o
CO
O
c
c
a
E
E
CO
�
co
W
a
c+
CO
O c+
v
CO
W
O
0
>
Q 0O
E
cn
CO
n= E
>
Q O
a)
a)+CO
CO
CO
n
O
cJ
O a a
Q
J
�\
COCOQ
Ems\
ELn
Q
CO
�z
a O
i:E
CC3
O C
a
u X a
r C
C
7 C
7 C
Ln�
C
a
c
o
.0
U)
Q
Q O+
O
U O
O
Q o o
ClCO
=
Q
.�
ro �
Q
CO
in
O
.cn O in
> E
cn E—
E
Q
._
O E
Q
O
.� c
E.�
E
EOE
0
°�02
0
D-cC3�ED--0
�Q
O
O
O aJ
ro
—
O
O
E
D ._
O ._
a
E
a E==
a o
O (n
1
(3
(n O�
J
i
Z
W
n
W
n—
(n —
(n
co
O
o
z
N
CO
M
M
N
M
CO
O
O
CO
E
O Z
O O
M
M
CO
CO
N
M
0)
0)
N O
U
i aa)
W
M
CO
N
M
N
M
M
M
O
a CO
u
cn
C Ccn
CO
a
u
CO CO
LL
Q
o
E
74-- 74--
74-- 74--
ro
CO
CO
c
c
c
c
c
CO C
E'`: >
°a
ocno�
>-L>-L
f6E
-E-E-E
-E
CO CO
z�
EOD
O)EU)Ecncocncocn
DE
DEDEDE
�E
ucn �
��o
� OCO
o m
N>
N>
ro O
ro
O ro
O ro
O
ro
O
CO CO
ro
a
—, N c
W 0
� �
� C)
LL
CD LL
CD LL
Z U
Z
U Z
U Z
U
Z
U
i i
Z
(n :'; C) W

/
\
k
3
2
\
z
z
ƒ
/
/
/
6{
\j
/§
2
t
t
G}
«^
E
E
3/
c
E
z
+ _
\
w
\/
\
y
e o
o
&y
/
U >
7��
\
/ \ \
\ CO CO
\ \
/
o%
\
}0
\
\/
\./
\
LL
ƒ/
/
� \
) )
°
\CO \
�\
\
CO
E
\
CO
2
CO
/
E
CO
\
\
\ co\
\
Ln
/ co
\
\ \
/ >
Ln
{ e %
_
/2/
»
=o?>ZZ
m 3\
t y y
\\
e=»
e
® 9
o= e e
:z
e$/
3 ± ®
y
\ ®6
0 ® ®
0 0
o t
_ l
c
0
>
se
:
3\
/
co \ / /
/ Z
/
�
COz
CO®
\ \
»
E m
: -
7 CO{y
s3
/ u
}
\\
<ƒ
z O
»
= c
\
O =
COe
.2 /
® _
CO
4
§
®
7
CO _
.\ /
/ n
9
/ O
a
/
\
}
±
/ g
\ E
\
2
//
-
0)
/
_
CO m
CO
su
0!
/ \
\
/
( ( \
$ /
E o
=
e= s
n® o
/ �\
0
\ n /
® /
\ \
cn \
\
\ \ /
\ \ (
\ \
% 2
±
± / /
»
± m c
4
4==
y/_
s z
< E ƒ
\
\cc' 0-/
s 5
) \
\
/
/ 2 \
CO \
\ \
% / ƒ
/
M
E
} e E
\/
Z 7 e
x
x 0 o
a Z o
s
§
\
c

w
W
V)
[6
r
z
Lu c
o
fu
fu
o�
a
a
m 0) m
NCD d N
N z m a
O
r
I
N
a

Appendix F

W O
Of
W N
S E
a)
W
5�
a)
LL
0—
VJ
N
n�
n
\L
'Ar
/
ryo
0—
a)
a)
0
O
LPL
h-
4
LU
J
to
E
G
L L-
W.S2
0
E
• Ir
� �
�
d"V
}}
J
-L j
f }
W W
J
IL
0
4F4
C'
CD
c
ru
A+=4
fL p
LSt=
t1
a
v
O�•f
'_ay
i m
L=)} 4LJ
tu'_'
f
�
C7
•
'o
W
J
E _O
N
N LuU
-
O �
0 �
0
o
m
Q
o W
`m o fn
U
m -
0 N
N z ° E
0 oZ0
0
(O m
VO any
o
Z�U
Z U
M o [L Z
p O U F Q
Z
0
:EU
W U
To Z
UZ�
O O o
3 E o
m
F O m
�
6
N
C
o
m
N
O
Q
(U
�
J
U
0
d
to
-O
U
C
C
3 cu
m
7
o
(U
U
no
W
cu
0
=
o
O
0
tl) co
U)
o�
o
0
0
N
LD
r
(U
Q
O
O
N
�
pL
to
Q
tD
(� Q
_0O
O
Z
T 3
(6
O �
Q
U
T w
T
i U
o
i
�
to m
�
to
0
d
U
od
(U
i
7
O
N
N
0
z
0')
o
t
a
Z
CN
> T
N
>
N
T
(�
Q O
N
(U
N
0 T
to
to
�
00
to
V
to