20230773 Ver 1_2023.05.30_ePCN Cover Page_w. attachments_20230530

. `too*
5410 Trinity Road P 919.866.4951
T I M M O N S GROUP Suite F 919.859.5663
Raleigh,
NC 27607 www.timmons.com
May 30, 2023
Meagan Jolly
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers—Wilmington District
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28262
Andrew Pitner
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
NCDEQ — Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Re: Electronic Pre-Construction Notification Attachments
Fairhaven Glen
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Project No.: 47655
Dear Ms. Jolly and Mr. Pitner,
On behalf of Commonwealth Development Corporation, we are providing additional attachments
and information to aid in the review of the electronic Pre-Construction Notification of the Fairhaven
Glen project, an approximately 16.75-acre proposed residential site located at 8301 and 8329
Nations Ford Road in Charlotte, North Carolina, within Mecklenburg County (the Site).
Please review the below attachments and contact Kate Hefner at [phone] or
kate.hefner�timmons.com if additional information is required.
Sincerely,
Timmons Group
Kate Hefner, WPIT
Environmental Scientist II
_19f'.
G
Nick Tudor, PWS
Senior Environmental Scientist
ENGINEERING I DESIGN I TECHNOLOGY

Enclosures
ATTACHMENTS
Appendix A Figure 1 —Vicinity Map
Figure 2 — NRCS Soil Survey Map
Figure 3 —Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. Delineation Map
Appendix B Agent Authorization Form
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Buffer Determination
DWR Pre-Filing Request
Appendix C Environmental Impacts Set
Appendix D Mitigation Acceptance Letter
NCSAM Analysis Forms
Appendix E IPaC Official Species Report
NCNHP Database Report
Appendix F SHPO Map and List

Appendix A

Path:Y:\805\47655-Fairhaven Glen\GIS\47655-JD-VIC.mxd
V
ti
"'A
I ADY I
DUPONI OR
POIN
PIVE Ir
c (�
Site Limits
`FpSf IN
.1000
■
NElcmSf Ors-1 ■■�■■
Ekm Sch
11yv4 �
�r b
`r
ti
i
Site limits are approximate.
Topographic imagery from USGS.
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000
Miiiiiia Feet
FAIRHAVEN GLEN TIMMONS GROUP
MECKLENBURG COUNTY,NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 1:VICINITY MAP YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. •
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER: 47655 U.S.G.S.QUADRANGLE(S): CHARLOTTE WEST,NC
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS: 16.75 ACRES DATE(S): 2022
LATITUDE: 35.141647 WATERSHED(S): LOWER CATAWBA(SANTEE RIVER BASIN)
LONGITUDE: -80.891158 HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S): 03050103
These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,inclusive,but not
limited to construction,bidding,and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

Path:Y:\805\47655-Fairhaven G1en\GIS\47655-JD-NRCS.n-xd
q7
� w�,��r.
1 Ilk S
WIN
z
r
■
UL4 � -
Site Limits ••' •
00000 _
00
1
�■o,00•• 1 ��
a ■.��
0 WON
•0.0.0 1
_
WOO—
EL
■
�� .
■'116L
- A _
Er Li
Site limits are approximate. ^■ ■
NRCS Mecklenburg County Soil Survey(1980) '
0 400 800 1,200 1,600
Feet •
FAIRHAVENGLEN TIMMONS GROUP � � � ��
MECKLENBURG COUNTY,NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 2: NRCS MAP YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. •
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER: 47655 U.S.G.S.QUADRANGLE(S): CHARLOTTE WEST,NC
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS: 16.75 ACRES DATE(S): 2022
LATITUDE: 35.141647 WATERSHED(S): LOWER CATAWBA(SANTEE RIVER BASIN)
LONGITUDE: -80.891158 HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S): 03050103
These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,inclusive,but not
limited to construction,bidding,and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

J.. \.- - --Vj - ro .ri ,r_ Jri -r•rfrr - ....: `• - - - r�.� 11 >\,11' J'/ ♦ 4,`�` ril!!IrIB/I'/r Ir •'i'!
,r,r�A,rlrllr/ r•�1: rlryr • •a` >' _ � 11�� • ley i °\ f \ rt�/ I l�r
/ -. ,' - r . J,-'J r•r��'�r 1'+iii iris r �� �_•l� .ry a' - - r •,f 1 1 ♦ Jl l r L y}/,►r�/ \
r --��r� Ja , `/Jf�ni, / } '•�• err �r -��;°f, �.' _ •Lr�', ••r�r`II !l\ 1. _ +' \1l +, \H , • ,//� lrr( /+ rII VI
, ' 'fvi1.?7ygi•��o/��' r�ii%��r 1ri// +/%' 1 / li'1 • •:� :/� 43% `% _ -.•\_� a<• 1, 111 ,ll \, •1 r - I.1 ' 1 rJl� 14 rJ r/V�,+,II%/!/�,/\ ,' , VVV ,J
S 7.��n..' '�--� r5 i�r�S .;'., r'/,,,,u,r ,`,r� . %�"s; :`���•�'�_ -,. _ r • >Ir rl +�+ 1 C q \ \11 r 1 rrr : r�/f,.i / N+rl + ./
', "i= �Yr�i�i'/'+!i/ji/, r� �lr�• . �� • rye' `; ♦, r ,� ,\ _ '• 9• r/.�y3� /+/�/7 l 1 1 III( rr r rlrs u�,.� rrr �rJrfl r/ 1 1 +
CG S __ �4i Ji +rr r /i • iJ! ' - 1 0\ f `♦ Jr 'a ` /rr �4//q 5d•0•1G`�..-\ �.-I' I ' f -, /+ I • I r I
i •\` �I \ , +` >I r i r \�$ IIII / r ,i III,\1 /N,' • 'i/'1% +/+1/Il1
rlh� r • -./"i 'i/ r. /
\\ 111'�`1 - / r r - � ��i - \ _'j/�>r/ l ' ''Ells ''r IVI � f. 1 , , \ , ttl5. ,III\\-I IIIIAI', i , L, UIII I r IA • �'rrltfl ' '�+ir/+fl
1\\\1 -�) f 1 " / Ji<' • N Sy 4r� �tv- il_ I +� ♦,
\ -. ^'i''i= 1 S-, • r / ` I� , ,1- I , 1 I + „\\ / //qf�, C , , Irl p(, a+/rr ,++l + ' +'/r l 1
1l\ ,\?�\` '.,,.. `•`� \\ \a\.`•- �:,. -!• 'i •^�1'' 'f\--ice
+ . r r .' <_ '• 1+` 1:'> /' ,_ �.rhi`x�)Jl `'t1I���i'4�y r 111/', 'r 1r l , -`IIII,^ I •I( ,,BJJ ur 1, ri/„��,r���777/,' 'i' ,; III \
ChrCation
r F • ir`'�!X ':y.3! '/11\\`� ,' I 1 SArI/ , 1 Ii ; •r
r „♦ ♦ �a ,.\\J\ \\.�u`�� ` .. --'• i r. • .! }yj�: Il 1 \I lr
`�'�� r- / 5r, �r ,l,l \\ \ [ I +Flf I 1 J J
'r"^?`!\}^. _ s'J/ 1 I 1- I I 1 1 I '1 \ I /1�1 + I A 111\III y Jr
`1 1 1 , \, \ \ 11\ 1 1, 1 1 +111 i /r �+I f + \
\ r ` .>U _ - .A•i 1 ,�`-\ y _^J�_ s,; 1 -„ + \Ill�la` `�\1\� 11 Iw. I Ir /l 1\ I•I 1 1 1 I r P
„� 1 f r ?,,. A`t •. r _ _ ____` , ` \ \ , ! i /I 1 1 11 J i e r-
- \\. \ ,7`:�,", 1 r .:t ! • \ ,\ \ i' UI+•,i. + rrr / r r •I /I I I IIII I A l i
\\ ♦ )\ y',♦ -\ 1 _ t ` \__-,`, �'' -_" 1\\ 1 I` ,\ ,\ ,.. \`\ �,_., / \ Tf • , , \
l \ ,\,..�_ -�1r t)Y , \,`_j �=4 ',1 � � - - \r••...( .:� ,, ti \ 1-.-=n411' 1\ 1 ' \ Ip \ff\ , Ir- J ♦ r J• IJ 7P .,( ('tfl \ C _
\ -�i ' � !.\ - /� rii^� _ r - 1 \ ti \ 1\ 1 I I� ' ✓rr 4, t JI.1.?I. uI \ .. I
`\\ \ \ L \ _ / , JI I /.] \\ -/, ,. 1 • \h\ I \+ rM' rJ r ♦ • 111\I� \, I
\ "n♦ � ,\ ' `,. _ 11, , , •I I ,1 1i'.` (, \,\ ' ' III r `rr�Il / ,`• , l' r • \ 5'
\ , Y `, i•`....\ 11 :r' \ s- � ` „ + ,Yi1'= • . \r•'�, \� . r ,.L--\
[,94 1.' •; `I 1 '1 t l•W er.J<' , . rr, , , . 11 1 \ 'LI+,+ \"
J'`. -C`�' -. -�Y \ r I\ I II 1 le l' 1_ •
- 1 1 :(./, \\�, r \ •• `_ 1 I r 1 1 I; \ 1`l\r. r \III\I • 1 I+11 r
\, - --- � \�l I ^` ' ' J/ J � �--==.�_� �71 ,t `• I )\ fl . , , ,) 11111 III lt1A \\ \J \1�c,.,,� r+,M -),r, � _
Pd
l , , • \(; r r v' _ \ ❑=it , . \\ + A' \1 l, \ \ �) 1 I 4 \ p\ , r ( 5•' -eg
at
-- _j .,�`:.IINII' \ ��.` r`�, ..I \ v- \ 11 \ ,\ '\\ ,fl l���,�( J • `) 11 11\\1.7 1 .. 1 ,Syr- r • r ; � _
^- ` , • , INyI 1_�`��._ \ 11 ,V \.,`� l •: '••Rjl 1, 11 , ..)= + `r.\ \ / 1 1
•1 I"\•J`I,',� , ,_ t It .\I` _, '.'• _ b / , \^\\ l\ •L . 11 1 \ �
®®® / •\ -� r+h'I 1` �\ \ I - r, �'. ).:N\ ,. 11. , rr / v r" 1 111 1 'III n� l /'r `, r_., / , \I�\\ ."1""` \7eVN ,
• lO W ®® _ I '. [Q " ' l ` " `_ t : _ ` � ij ` ` ' I ' 1-,l_ 141 r 1r l l\1 \ _> "
0���������® 'y° .1 a i1N11 .'•: `:` = IL
�:•- R - `�`fy \1 \ " C, .O r,tl\!
.\.- • dl,r, . , _ - �> •1 - f - \ 1 I - I ! / 11 , \1 - 1
I+ ``� \ `'' \_�_ `- .\+, . \ r . \11\\h r t,t \. 1 l l 1 / I/ 0Il
1
p \ _\,\\.r' 1 �'\\ �V" ,X r \ �� �. , \ `r \1 ^ , PIiI �+/r/r 11jJ11 ,1\ 1,\1\1/
\ +`\\ _ , ,` 1 \ r \` �' I r�/ rI , nIl\ ,.' \
I ,\,\ _.•�.-.,\ \` , : _� s-\ -1 /• \ \.`,\ +Il \u \\l ` C -, t51\V / J! / r _ ul1 1 ° ' r�l,lJ) I l '+ J , Y' I �: l�1 1. 1 \` �\ f a y rI +'l
„\\\`•r ,/r , r` {{{•.]]]��� � \, ` 11, \ Ill\ < _rrr + Ir I ! a\
J ) \`'\I I, ,\ v. I 4 1 I 1 l , \`/ \1, z•-• 1�, • 1 >�I. + +I III/1 1 / , , , 1 � , `\��i
��000��oo�� •'> 1 r>t 1 l ,al r \, I a \
, i\\ \`_� 1 I + \.,• 1 \\\ � \ �," !i 1 � � JJ Ir% / �r�y a `,
_ l Q4 1i r _ J� �r
--., \L r .. � + r ,_I JI \C:`\\\:.\ ,`,\\ l- I , . +r/+ ,rj / [•�/, \ , _ %�:
_- I1l\ I I , \•, \ ;r\\ \ ./,i��ey y'/r ../ _ i
\\ l�, \ 'q� `J l+l/ .. ' .l , \ - \�\\\, • 1 k i\r�� S/.',�• 11 ' r " r' /, T' / r-.' ,!
- '1; r / >,.r :Gr'f r. •+t\ • ), / : lllnl �.`\,`\.,, I )\\\ rl ,. 1 rr, / /� •,/r' 1 J J
r� r I \ r . \ \\I \ 111�\\ \\ n'�A i •'( l l� / r,r J /' + 11 1 ' Jr r - '/r ��111�•
- - -- > `, .. / ``I,r ' i/ a\ 1 1t,� ,\,\,`\\\\\�''l 1,\�\\\ ' �1_1 ~
-\ - tl1 , _ y I r r ^l C_ 1 \ 1 \ 1 r l l
\ r 1 1 r Jr )I ` ' + '+,r•!j 91 r /+ 'Z ♦ \I ,,, 1 , \\ 1 I +
1 , II,\1\ _--,- .� + •I �. l \ \II•, I\ ,\;1\1\N\l•\\Jr.. • ,Ill f , l ll - r.. ,r
;.r•- ♦♦�� J ) 1 1 'rl� \\ Y \1 \ „\ \\\\ \u' ,\•�1 .. .d I ( II Ill 1\ I ,+' 1 _//l _ . .'/ ,� . .•
r •''r'-` `` t,1111,p, rLl �- \ ,1,r+ 'r - ,1\ ld 1 l \\1 \ • �'^f r
�+� =, '\r\� . , ,l ,\1,, I , I II • 1 If 11 ( \ / ,,,
•Y' �) { 1\1 � I / i 1j /, +1 r'`.t.-` <--_ \ \ N.
�'\\\ \\\•'11111 \\11'\ �lU l+tl Il,tll I +t �I I rllll/Ir, 1 1!\r 1, I I • ..Y I \ '• ,�� /qn
• , - ♦ gyn,ll! ti._+ -! r r.V / --_L- + `" \d \ 1 "\1 I1111 Ill • l ' '< Ir,,• r 1 1 I _ - - - y
! , J \\\\11 - 1 I 1 1/ 1/CIl i., p• I II r - `- - •a'
• - • _ . �i: `L v�r 1 r' r 1 . r r rl l\\\.•.Irl t+l+illy lhl r+Ji/!iJ/ I 1 r,`,11 t'ullLe
-4�6] _ r JhI'+,NIr`r�_.. \__/ �111 rr t� `."i\\. r r^ I a 1,11 r1}l,rr 111 VI 1/ rrr 1, � r\ Il+ Y , Ilf(I - • Qr � -• '` 'I ,
r'• y! JIYI `{ + 4' r- N' �Si,, ,`,- r I J i'i�" /. r/ ,Ir / p /, , \\ A ,. IIII\ Ill 111 \11 • • r/ .. ' r
r ,•a, I/./ - !r iJr. _-:_- ' • ''r',l)rl 1 r +�\r:,ne�.�, \.1,)rl l�,r 11 �-' �,\� + / +i 1 ! ••
• - •y Limits - 16.75 Acres1 ''� )'• $YSr- I r r, i I , / - _ _../ I f I+/ l+l 1 +1 ll+ +q , I I r1 L\I U t -''` /I r \
-fn ,�.;_. I r C - - 1 �;��rfr' „' - rr + rl al ,n/Ji r, \ 1• �"=�• �' '� , rL
1 �/_ _'�,r'+ 1 lfll/ll rllr/JI 1-1 -/. +,-,`,7•`-- �ttl �r
r 1 � 1• - --- Irl/IIr
X - Identifier - I I Q! ^'• 'r l r/ t 1 i i a �''~. • ' I ___i' ' /r l 'I I I I • lot - -\ 1 ``1
r 7 t,i /��-�qc r _ //11 I Ill Il \
I _5�r • •. I/. ,< 1/ ,.\. ri_ rl'M• t'`= �• r ' _ '�+I! 1 'I+l l'r 1, Iy� I• \[\. \
'I O' • � I ___ • II ` I S C'y, / • , +',J„ 'r� -:.,;; •r -_�. , //fI 1111 q a\\\ r \ `� '
r' r_=r_-_- r r ' ' Ill - •\ ` •"XWetland `•1. I r + r/ - lull + ' 'J / ff'' +
Identifier \_ \ / / / �' 111 ' / < 1 r / - �''., 3 S r S - ri�^ J 'S- a='r// 111+l+'I'+ IIII IIIIIN,` • I I 'r r''•' I i, r i�I 11
�`�1 `, r �� II I 1-�:'.�S-4r.�' !/.1, ,i"� / /f-�r`•S t': r.�r riIr
,rr7r r,.• ` I /�l { +' reel _•..,,< _
r\\ ��a�_C_--�=:._�' rri ll,1I 11/11 Illyy+/1i 1r7•.1 1 • ,- li\I\ . ,r/' _ '.•!''4 -,1+,. `1 '�/y+�,�' rr 11�. +l ` 1• ,t ,' i 1I:4
ill ^`I Ill 'J ` ■' f Nrl/i l ) ++l�i� _J ��:'_,'� -�r� J+"�/r-_�- `` • +B _"" A ,r 111r % 1>•, S �\ 1 II 1'.1 rlI/`
- • Data StationPSA IU .`\_`'+ i\lr'1r�,u,1�,.�Y '^ \ //'/ it y�iii r�J •• 111� - -rS =__s�i%.�z�J •� - J. . J4 _,+, 'a qrb+ . "!: �\ ' +r+ l )I, l _ G 1/+ • ,rig
- \ !.I t- .r'-�\ '�_/r ,'„ /+ll'/ / r" - --__-___ ��„j�:i��� __ ��/////r^• _ ' _�rri� -- 'aa)�a \ \\11t -' � '+i o i
Location
f++r�ri /r vj'd' -is-�' +('ri'' �✓ rA'!~rim =_S _ter_ r' S�� ^```� - - 9/i �'`!►' - _ _ �r \ \1• - •� - 'JI q r
I > ! Irr J,/r I r r 1 g \ r r,rl,rr •1 rrJ 1 �r _ �,�a_ , �__ _ L'• \ 1 t r,
I i I �(;'_+,/�Zy/jl = I l //,/rj r N .- �,rho+�IIII' - ,+ '%r t� �- v ��•/.'' -. �.rl�r, /•y'(r�,,�,� a, \ ` '\._,` `l I''t�' �`\:. � r J • r/,
Feature Assessment ■• r• 1 r) II �l! 'i�''+ -ri,y �,_�„ ,pri _ rJ„!I/,Il, lfr• _L_=j • r_!, `-�. �,r�iiirii \ ,,- -"• v11P11 -:� l 1 �\ \\\
\+S l 1 / ray ^, i /ram /'' ^`\= / •. _ `
IIl. 1 I 1 1�\ 1•,,1f/�\\a,D`„�r '^$°�� .�./+��I'•','=�y_"f��'-niJs% JrJr 4 '� / ` ' -:+.'-/it rr1 a r/< `'`,'.���/. - x_ _s���'�``\``_`` sE'—-�' '-••''• -` \1 C t\\ 44J.
Feature AssessmentReach �`rP \1`5
_
r•%r,
Stream `a p'll ii uVl Q�•,
—Perennial St - ■ \ate\\ r r, -Z . =a`���� v %yt � l+iz'==a��� `;� - \'�� �� L Z J (� �Y , •.,' aC�.! (�Jj � •
,iq _r,\\�;\\\,tip '! \ r�•J 1 - \\ �I r�..� • 5I�% �'i�,' f������j,�`�\'``.\` ),/ �•<' `Z. a\ " j; , y �\II�.S•/`"M, J •
•Y +' \ Jr'1/r\llf 1l\" •P '�. \ �J..., -a� t + ' -_�s�'-=�-`'%J"== `\t\ r \ i' 11\. \ r.,)\�\1 ` 0
1 hr'l1 I\\•.\ G'1r}^.l-f,.-\ rr l I1,I\1`1 t1f\\1\\�\\.}`�\�``�l\\\\\\\`\I,I I 1, Iillt fIntermittent Stream (R4) It
ill
r CC.. • � ,`' ,1\h'I1 Jr 1 . ro:,.`,II`,,.\n-.\"\ o. �y_ r• \ ,1 -Ile
Culvert
.-.\.•\\+/J '�,1, //1 V
•
', 1' tI r I• � t1,t\t_ '/f'.A.. 2
■ - Forested ■ • • 1'l 4t lyre -\ `I?`h ,+IIII III „\l, II/ ___ __- ,`tM ,\`` p'f` -- 1 •. ``t=: • 1\. ` :.- -' ^ \` / \\, . -'!I'
�Ib > ', I , 11 +l ,11 f,ll l� / r_ - _ 1,,r1 \��. �'_- . \ _- �\1 1 1 �'
,/CIirr 1 Jr//JII/11/lIi// rllllll+ll /'r iS ll\ l<7, -"\ `��_� IJ'�, 1 )1 .".. r - „ • ,1,`
• • • • • • • 9I \� ` •• I \,\\1\IIII ,;Irr///+, /r�f� �r/'1/J /+ +Il�'/I" _ \\\ ) r/lI U/� • ' ^^,• •r ..♦ ` •IB \ { n'1
r It\\Z\ C'•J 111, 11 +,I1 1,1 /1 //r �I +ir � r � +l'11 + ` '_.^ \• l .:,- \Y• \ 1 - It I ,\ _-- 1 '.'•_.-'\ ` :�.."1\\ \,\ • �,� ,^/ ' //u J r r 1 7 rr+11�,�'.�`� -P,�+ �)_ 1 I 1 __ _ % 1.� ` \ •t•,; , � •
Major1 •• \ iu'�C 78:,,� r u t \1 1 1 f \ I 1 \ - - _� i 1�^ • \ ,. \ , .,.
_ L L ,1 , I 1 1 I r/r ♦. / ,1 •`/ �I.1 ' `' \�o iv
I • - _- ,) `;�\ \ \,
\ 1 1, 1 I I l f 1 \\ ((�7�/♦ \ r ri /.r•/ 1 \ 71 I ♦ �1 , \
\ \\\\C\\• 111111\1 III\l l) Illrtr il'`'�l\� � \�'... 'i rr// +I Jir- • 1,. 4J\
rl
Minor- •• a•� \�, \ \\\\;\i r \II,Illl,t \11 , ,I\\\\1`\\�: - • ' ,:rrr i/ r J rr„S`l_` \- •. \ �\L _ Ir \'1 '�ir4141 •I 'r' f-' \% - rrr', \\ `�\`\ '`'\\
1•S 4 • \ 1 t l / �� 1y1'7�.L1� r.1' J I"\ r r r t<l I ' \ \ ,\\ ■
\ \\ \ 1 1 1 I •y // r r . ?may C� \ , r . `\\U\\
`t. '. 11 \A1'15'rJL 1'I"tt\\Il lr'.� •`_ \\'�,�\.♦ ` _ ��1 : ',' �r raE //. \ fif"` \ - ��,1:�` `t�\. , �_ 1�\�rr ) .�i�Jr J)/ri: 1 •`" .(�}a .r -;�,`\,�\
• q\ , \,111,\,.1;.,•\, ` „` ,� } - , ,�_yTLyr\�;``• ��.�.-- r. f l/, .;�� �_�\� C\\,,` ram ,\Jr�t � ` '`V •, „ ♦` 1
-\ ♦ 1 + _ , - � rye I 1 \- 1 / " r r'' y rrr I r 5 _ \ \ \ \'
•\ -r'/; } ,\ \ 1 r l l ,.r. •' \ ,� / ) , ,.-� - ,. (. 1 __-- - \,`'_ _ _ / yf//�f,rr�i/'may�i j' --_r^ - �� \J+/ \ ( f:� \ , \\\ \\
,-
C` Y `1- - Y__ - �t ,, r,it ��\ �•�C•� ` l \ , ■
__ - -� '.r'\C\. 1\ ) tlll,,-• •• . \.. .� r �.. / � • �r-,, �r�i I'r I-�- +:'� r /!! /i // rr ,��!�,i ,i
1.Waters of the U.S.within the project study limits have been �J ,' 1 { �_�.- rr r/ri J, r,r r,r/,rir r r'� ��r�r
') f-, I ,- 1"V • \ '1 ,C• , r_r r r -���� r /41r //r f,J /r�r r ,.r r+. •1 /, _ I > ` \,\\�
\ t` _ 1•-. � ' '^ � , ♦ IN,
Group.2. �J. 1> +/ 1 ✓r 1 : �• _ '• `�� _ -- •, r' /r 1 rJ r i ri /r, /I b r l 1"�7�•.7>/�7 , r' J \` , \ \
- - - __ ``L,,C \l�f'I'."If Tifr�� 1 i J �t\.` r/�ic.�C`' r r � \ -_ _---,irr _��•.�/7``1
Corps of Engineers until stamped. 1 ,, I1�N tl !\\11 lnyN , fir ., `;\. u + � >: \ ' a _ =i`I /r/ //�J�i ''''� �!�rrl+ 1/f�i it J :5 ifs§�=r'• " \ 1 r la r. l Z
rrr r /r I • \ Ir ! \
\ •, rl/ ...,�'..� i _ _ \•. _i>-r ti .; /./ rJ+/ r/ r / // ,rile. rf // 1 l , \ \I J l I r 'r r
.3 Project limits are approximate.
4 Topography Irl, VV
1\` J +R• it /�' i <:- \ 1 rt 1j1 1 ' rrr�y .~`�*�^ r r__ \ ! ,� ,
based
.•- . l \\\ • , +\ , / d + _ ' . -�,•� l I I 1 / ) �l , __,..� P\\ r^I I + �y�• r a , 1 \ I f Y
' \
• • �♦ /,\, 1•\ 4' \\ \I l,tl•\ , ,\ �\�` rid/I r r i+r i1,i
stream5.Cowardin Stream Classifications are based on NC- - t1//'I,l,r./r,f r1,r `\\,L\+ I r-��'•v--� _.-+\„,\` Y•+JJ 1,k1 a/'/+/I .1\ r. �\ l 1 l
,erI r) r
• W
• i\.. , J I / 1 �, r rr♦ II 1 l/ 1 , I r r �I
rf \{Ir 1\ \� `,\ \/ 11 '�` , ' ^, , r olll\+ r� /1�/Jrr 4r + ( Ip + l/1/ r + �lt,. "-+ f•\ .�I 1
J,• I,ll I I \ < `�`\ r / I l 1 ) 111 Ir . l 1 11 r , 5 1 I + , / /G�p' \ r • I +\ `kl \ 1 •l •I h
\J 1 / r I •' r -�.A` =, ///r/ ry• /�' \ 1'`S• 11 llt , , • +r \\/ \ rural/I � If ^`\ �=�r,r ^y�a.\ s `( `., 1t ` l 1
���,rf_I,Y;, , 1\•'111111 , \ `I` , _�{ :,� -'l+il+� ;; \t •_•1/•' • :; Y� ,1 J 11 r +1t,IIII r' t1 ; "\`D : l'••77tt__ 1 1 11 r r /. •�` J •,1 / I
,y 1 I , I • 11_ „ti_ f. 1 /, -,+} < 1 ,r - 1 1 r .. ^ ` \\
\, \i,,: ,,1 \ .; \ • .\{ \�\ 1\; rrr/ / /fJ/,'ice- ✓�-y v'; � •\_ !f `e \ 1, r 11 r p..- dr`\d`;;� ��r�Ili , l \ �• \
t ,rrJ 1 I 11 1\ , / / / _ ,'�� 1 Il\r( n+l I) - •^. `l ,' •v l\ \t
• I ), I { ',_� \ , \. r/ I rrL_\ 1 !' / ',l I l i 11\I\tt J r[•r� 1 r JI J
ir++i r�/ r, \i\\- v` `_�_—t \- ,II II +Ill! �. /,l , 1 \\1\ 1= ^\T:y r:' 1 �'l �refl,/h/+I `�,\C 1 tea, ,
\ I1\1 I /r r / / I Iq , \ �\+ �'� +' i 1\/1 1 \l \` J1•r `; YJ
�/ \ ] 4 \ • 1 \\/r r ,ll I ,1;111" `J.S'� "r { r I \ + l,[I rr irr r/I f /( ♦ r • �+ 11'rr r 1 r=` ' t" K )• 1
\`-/// •• I >l/r yr r 4+ 1 _ ! 1, 1 1 r r' r)• _, Il`
• , wN. \\ \ t\ rr / rEl1{1111eI' 1 \ l „ rr v„_ _
I / 411f "_` - 1 ! t. a\ , „r +JrJ ,/,r rJJ\_,.;�.+ `I -a, r[ rl rll Cu.lrl " t1 , \+ // r_ l • .. 1\ 1
\ \.-. _ y\ h ..,,I+ _-ti ) � I,ilr. j ! 11 J� lr r< ••`\`\ !�� `� ,x.' > ) T.y ,1 \ , \ ,Ir 11
�1 t(`�" \' •�^ 'I \ r+�. M--- I I r' �' ,f4t /, +'r' u [c - a r 1 t I I
`- \ " ,,I + I$/G r �'E' ,r r 1I 'irl l l .\T^. ��"�=-�'.Z�'\`=.� J :n1'r tf�r „Il r It,t l \\� 1`f��\1\I I r r r J•. r
\-- \ ` Ij �„ `�� / rig b , 1 � ,_r ri ;\�,. � YHI• Y7\ 1,1 1 �
-,IIII 4r rr !.• \ J,^�_a-`` `\ \ l , j",� :r ra l�t,t Il ll I l\\t `\I
y/ �< '1`'' •� \ -- _ ,\1 - _ / / r -I< _ ,``_ \ - \ ., \
�-�lSr -s� , P ., \ afri/ l•'4 r�)ri� ., /IJ++/ rile 1\s�. Sr,- -,-.,',\;� 1 , r � ,/1tt, a1
-\ r \ 1• ♦ \. Z \ r f�
I - • ' �_ I J -- _ ,► 1 J ♦ t 1, rVi \ ♦�/ \\ „ .
\- 7,�� II „'%rt. /II tl1 \`.'-'i `�,�� `�T�� 1� \ ,\♦ ♦\ �JII� rl\! \ll \ �,. I\N�` ♦\ `\N�11 // r _
' '11 ~,n\ \ •��. _ \ ' " II �� II + i •�`�• \ \ \ \\^..l rl\\l�jjli \.\r,=•'\,\ \\\\ Il r' \ •-
_ •••_'••' T f• lC 1 �� 1 _ - w/� \ 9y.__'> >�! r• -r ' I I l� _ � _ ` j1 (\ ,1\..`,. , �vi ,\ 1/ _y\\ \IJ - 1 1 I ' 11 I l `�`e'T', ` `
+. O` \ '< ! \ �J ��i ' .r,,....r r/ �J, r `\^�`,�:.` ♦`n \Z 1� �t\ \\[•.1 r 1 \ \ ` r \ I l // t J l •.
_•••. , 1 + \\� _.a'I 1�_" . r \ ` . \\1,I1 ' "�.". . \`�`,```' �\y.Ill , NL iIlr �;if++\/l\ \\\1 r/+=
\ , I \8 r„ ', 1 \ - JA\`Q` \ Intl ;♦ `�, \\` -r'>•,\ 1 " ) „ r ° >>� \" l {•^ >.
"'a 1� •1s. \•� a"` -=�' `' a , `,._Jil ,,,, J / \,\�a .,�-:� ' f +4 ` , ` ,l+ 1 rr: U 1 \\\a"_ , 1 1. -\ 1 \ \\.1..1 .Ia\ • .\, s.` ,rr•� f_lr , I„ -,l ,\,\t--s•- .' l ..^ la\\.:0... 1 r.

Appendix B

0 •
TIMMONS GROUP
YUUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
All Blanks to be Filled in by Applicant
The Department of the Army NCDEQ— Division of Water Resources
US Army Corps of Engineers 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Wilmington District 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
PO Box 1890 Mooresville, NC 28115 rN
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 U
z
L M
LT �
N kD
L!'1
To Whom It May Concern: cl� a)
I, the undersigned, current applicant designate, authorize representatives of Timmons Group to o
act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request Q
supplemental information in support of applications, etc., from this day forward.
This the 5th day of May , 20 23
(number) (Month) (Year)
Cr
T
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project. ID
Project Name: Fairhaven Glen
Ln E
Applicant Name(Print): Fairhaven Glen LLC
Applicant Signature: E
7 University Avenue, Suite 210 2 °
o U
Applicant Mailing Addre iddleton, WI 53562 L N
c
0
E
Applicant Fax
Y
Telephone: [phone] No. 920-922-8171 3
Applicant Email 3
Address: [e-mail]
a
a_
W
W
C
71
E
a
0
m
v
G
m
V,

SAW-2021-01424
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2021-01424 County:Mecklenburg U.S.G.S.Quad:NC-Charlotte West
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor: Commonwealth Development Corporation
Sean Bradt/
Address: 7447 University Avenue,Suite 210
Middleton,WI 53562
Telephone Number: 404-406-6697
E-mail: s.brady(&commonwealthco.net
Size(acres) 15.5 Nearest Town Charlotte
Nearest Waterway Kings Branch River Basin Santee
USGS HUC 03050103 Coordinates Latitude: 35.141647
Longitude:-80.891158
Location description: The review area is located on the north side of Deanna Lane; approximately 0.1 miles east of the
intersection of Deanna Lane and Nations Ford Road.PIN: 16921223.Reference review area description shown in the
Jurisdictional Determination Request package entitled"Figure 1,Vicinity Mad'.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters,including wetlands on the above described project area/property,that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act(CWA)(33 USC§ 1344)and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC§403).The
waters,including wetlands have been delineated,and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable.The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 5/17/2021. Therefore
this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process,including determining compensatory
mitigation.For purposes of computation of impacts,compensatory mitigation requirements,and other resource protection
measures,a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any
way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S.This preliminary determination is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process(Reference 33 CFR Part 331).However,you may
request an approved JD,which is an appealable action,by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters,including wetlands on the above described project area/property,that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act(CWA)(33 USC § 1344)and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC §403).
However,since the waters,including wetlands have not been properly delineated,this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation,this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters,including wetlands at the project area,which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision.We recommend that you have the waters,
including wetlands on your project area/property delineated.As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner,you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC §403)and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations,this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waters,including wetlandson the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act(CWA)(33 USC§ 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑We recommend you have the waters,including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner,you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.

SAW-2021-01424
❑The waters,including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE.We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion,this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once
verified,this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which,provided
there is no change in the law or our published regulations,may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑The waters,including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below onDATE.Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S.,to include wetlands,present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations,this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act(CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City,NC,at(252)808-2808 to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US,including wetlands,without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act(33 USC§ 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,construction or
placement of structures,or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(33 USC§401 and/or 403).If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program,please contact Bryan Roden-Reynolds at 704-510-1440 or
bryan.roden-reynolds(&usace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the preliminary jurisdictional determination
form dated 09/20/2021.
D. Remarks: None
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants,or anticipate participation in USDA programs,you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service,prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
If you object to this determination,you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed
you will find a Notification of Appeal Process(NAP)fact sheet and Request for Appeal(RFA)form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr.Philip A. Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW,Floor M9
Atlanta,Georgia 30303-8803
AND
PHILIP.A.SHANNIN(a,USACE.ARMY.MIL
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps,the Corps must determine that it is complete,that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5,and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form,it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Bryan Roden-Reynolds
Corps Regulatory Official: W2 1 na 20 1 a.2ti.a6-"00'

SAW-2021-01424
Date of JD:09/20/2021 Expiration Date of JD:Not applicable
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so,please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
htt2s://reizulatoly.ops.usace.anny.mil/customer-service-survey
Copy Furnished:
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so,please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.artny.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136*0
Copy furnished:
Agent: Timmons Group
Matt Michel
Address: 428 Eastwood Road
Wilmington,NC 28403
Telephone Number: 574-514-3115
E-mail: matt.michelAtimmons.com
Property Owner: Yorkmont Land LES,LLC
Donald Harlan
Address: 7960 Old Georgetown Road
Bethesda,MD 20814
Telephone Number: 301-652-8662
E-mail: dharlanAharlan-enterprises.com

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Commonwealth Development Corporation, File Number: SAW-2021-01424 Date: 09/20/2021
Sean Brad
Attached is: See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT(Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A
PROFFERED PERMIT(Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
❑ PERMIT DENIAL C
❑ APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
❑X PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I-The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or http://www.usace.gM.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/Re ugulatoryProgramandPennits.aspx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit,you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission(LOP),you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety,and waive all
rights to appeal the permit,including its terms and conditions,and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit(Standard or LOP)because of certain terms and conditions therein,you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly.You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice,or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter,the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a)modify the permit to address all of your concerns,(b)modify the permit to address some of your
objections,or(c)not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections,the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration,as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT:You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit,you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission(LOP),you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety,and waive all
rights to appeal the permit,including its terms and conditions,and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit(Standard or LOP)because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice,means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety,and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD,you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish,you may request an approved JD(which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II-REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record,the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting,and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However,you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact: also contact:
District Engineer,Wilmington Regulatory Division MR.PHILIP A. SHANNIN
Attn: Bryan Roden-Reynolds ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL REVIEW OFFICER
Charlotte Regulatory Office CESAD-PDS-O
U.S Army Corps of Engineers 60 FORSYTH STREET SOUTHWEST,FLOOR M9
8430 University Executive Park Drive,Suite 615 ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30303-8803
Charlotte,North Carolina 28262
PHONE: [phone];FAX[phone]
EMAIL:PHILIP.A.SHANNINgUSACE.ARMY.MIL
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants,to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15-day
notice of any site investigation,and will have the opportuni to participate in all site investi ations.
Date: Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer,Wilmington Regulatory Division,Attn: Bryan Roden-Reynolds,69 Darlington Avenue,Wilmington,North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials,Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer,Commander,U.S.Army Engineer Division,South Atlantic,Attn:Mr.Philip Shannin,Administrative
Appeal Officer,CESAD-PDO,60 Forsyth Street,Room 10M15,Atlanta,Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 09/20/2021
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Commonwealth Development Corporation,
Sean Brady, 7447 University Avenue, Suite 210,Middleton,WI 53562
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District,Fairhaven Glen, SAW-2021-
01424
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The review area is located on the
north side of Deanna Lane; approximately 0.1 miles east of the intersection of Deanna Lane and Nations Ford
Road. PIN: 16921223. Reference review area description shown in the Jurisdictional Determination Request
package entitled"Figure 1,Vicinity Map".
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES
AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State:NC County: Mecklenburg City: Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):Latitude: 35.141647 Longitude: -80.891158
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody:Kings Branch
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
®Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 07/13/21
❑X Field Determination. Date(s): 09/13/21
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH"MAY BE"SUBJECT TO
REGULATORY JURISDICTION
Feature Latitude Longitude Estimated amount Type of aquatic Geographic authority to
(decimal (decimal of aquatic resources resources(i.e., which the aquatic
degrees) degrees) in review area wetland vs.non- resource"may be"
(acreage and linear wetland waters) subject(i.e.,Section 404
feet,if applicable or Section 10/404
Wetland A 35.14188081 -80.88999609 0.02 acre Wetland 404
Wetland B 35.14173123 -80.89045057 0.02 acre Wetland 404
Stream C 35.14287272 -80.88853274 228 linear feet Non-wetland 404
Stream D 35.14172683 -80.89067829 1,150 linear feet Non-wetland 404
Stream E 35.14127815 -80.89218527 435 linear feet Non-wetland 404
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general
permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit
applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit
authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of

jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before
accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being
required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an
individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other
general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and
thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including
whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6)
accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking
any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD
constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by
that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction
in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative
appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or
a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit
denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an
administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether
geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an
official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that
there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"navigable waters of the U.S.
on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could
be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD(check all that apply)Checked items are included in the administrative
record and are appropriately cited:
0 Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Figure 1-6
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor. Datasheets:
0 Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑Corps navigable waters'study:
❑U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑USGS NHD data:
❑USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps:
❑U.S.Geological Survey map(s).Cite scale&quad name:
ONatural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Figure 3,Environmental Inventory Map(Web
Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County) and Figure 5,NRCS Map(Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County Dated
1980)
O National wetlands inventorymap(s). Cite name: Figure 3,Environmental Inventory Map (USFWS NWI
Mapper)
❑State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
0 Photographs: 0 Aerial(Name & Date):Figure 1,Vicinity Map and Figure 4,Parcel Map
or ❑ Other(Name&Date):
❑Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
®Other information(please specify): Figure 2,Hydrologic Unit Code Map and Figure 6,Wetlands and
Waters Delineation Map (Dated 05/17/21)
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps
and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Bryan Roden-Reynolds
2021.09.20 14:26:06
-04'00'
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD Signature and date of person requesting PJD
09/20/2021 (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is

impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established
time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.

'dnO0 OSNOWWIJ lo!ues..ueppm sswdxp.11 Ip p.6uI1e!s uogaw!suoa 1.1-6u1ppiq'uol!aegsuoa o!Pe!Iwll
lou Inq'eusnPu!'eneos!eg.esodrnd Aue ion peso eq 1ouIlegspue pedu!io alaym u!paepwder eq!ou Aew pue dnOND SNOWW1110 Apedwd enl p..ey!eie s1.,.m.p pele!aosse pue sueld esegl
>w 1w dVW NOIltl3Nn30 SM3ivm ONV SONVI13M:932lnsw
o 121 <° � _ ,� vmrmw ILLvom AllYIOO OlM1Yl9'DY.�1 w$
NOI1dl-S3U NOISIA3L 31tlO og o� VY N319 N3AVHNIV=l
1e1uewuoi1nu3 .lBolouyael einlarulseyul le!IueP!sey IuawdoleneO el!S d f 10 J S N O W W I l
szzzz vn Pua maalooc mrroaA mw�s:.wwoeslPw • • •e♦
aulloxenoaumnararxonlnana �000
alu as�g6151aq <'t9 f'Zg 6251 62A bZ9 O 6.�'h^'h yg5
90y !�9 ZZ9 610 ! 02
!
9£9 G£g `fl qQ 909 608 � 09 O'L
6 5R2 �`yN � � 6 6 g89 591
S� 62 SZ8 �` S09 ",hrn`O o6sb6 � b6S
o !9 622 - OZy r S BS..
9
b19
60A £09 610 LL9 Z 8L9 5S9r593
gOg 609 h0 h
b09 a h� 609 �, 600 606
6g,. b6S m hg ! 619
N 625
809 Z09 602 � 009 hg CC8 �� 636
b09 a £L9
J. 1Sany� hp15t L09 015 620 c Y l[9 6�a
1 Oi Fa1m 0f 616 w 9l£9 8Z8 a Dry �ry� ti Y £fie
L•Z9 622
630
�
f
t Q a
6a5 e o hh^� ggs ��i
r
N
a _ 667 •�O
co ZS9 d 66^
OJ O 6 rn � ro p
O2 G
E i9
•c 6 S w
665
M rIQ
169
�� Ln
LL ppverdale Ln 8Ls c i I �
0 a
'9 0
3 6�h 6g3
,,y 6g0
CarrolWpod�r � � } TOSS• 676 �� B89
6g'I F69 Nat10n5 Fpfd 09
6a9 669
F6, 91 a/
A � b69 O
690 .c 696 �00 l p` oo h°j�o
691 692 Nations Ford Rd Nations F°rd Rd
869 �= 869 L69
'.c�A• gg` ���� fE 41
d c
E
p6 Q
F I°
& =dF ifsa.
`� Wo" as N LL E cc a
�o E_ w
w 4
'� yfppEfr J mw N N E ccl6 N O nr mo .o84 Z �fGC -
1".-_ T '— C .0. C N N N Cn O C O
0 O M N fn LL O
O C
° ° :° LL Nm Ewan W€
�q II.■. a � A in '0'
aam m ° ` ° fir- s
7 _ '99aw3 -Oc ° i EC s �E "�i�"- E9
E r e K 3 N f6 'O J .0. .0. (0 C N fA O. 0 0 0 9 a 8 3
Q (0 N d > 7 I`6 O c oW Enc_
_ C ID N N N a 9
LL US LL LL LL 11 LL V) 0_ C U LLo� o
w@ � N r: I I I I 0

Lauren Norris-Heflin
From: Miller,Jordan <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, July 1, 2021 04:06 PM
To: Kate Hefner
Cc: Lauren Norris-Heflin; Matt Michel; [e-mail];Johnson, Alan; Smith,
Brendan
Subject: RE: [EXT]RE: [EXT]RE: [EXT]RE: Preliminary Jurisdictional Request Package - Fairhaven Glen - Charlotte,
NC
No worries. The map should show buffers on the intermittent and perennial streams as determined by the agreed upon
field assessment. The GIS buffers are only based on desktop data and are estimates. Thanks.
From: Kate Hefner<[e-mail]>
Sent:Thursday,July 1, 2021 2:15 PM
To: Miller,Jordan <[e-mail]>
Cc: Lauren Norris-Heflin <[e-mail]>; Matt Michel <Matt.Michel @timmons.com>;
[e-mail];Johnson, Alan <[e-mail]>; Smith, Brendan
<[e-mail]>
Subject: [EXT]RE: [EXT]RE: [EXT]RE: Preliminary Jurisdictional Request Package- Fairhaven Glen - Charlotte, NC
EXTERNAL EMAIL:This email originated from the Internet.Do not click any images,links or open any attachments unless you recognize and trust the sender and
know the content is safe.Please click the Phish Alert button to forward the email to Bad.Mail.
HiJordan,
My apologies for not being more clear on this. Please see the attached map from Mecklenburg County's GIS. It only
shows the main perennial stream and one intermittent stream buffered.
Should our map go off of these depicted buffers or should our map buffer both intermittent streams since they show up
on the USGS/NRCS map?
Thanks!
Kate Hefner, WIT
Environmental Technician
0000000
•
TH ONS GROUP
ENGINEERING I DESIGN I TECHNOLOGY
Celebrating LGBTQ+Pride Month
TIMMONS GROUP I www.timmons.com
5410 Trinity Rd, Suite 102 1 Raleigh, NC 27607
Office: 919.866.4953 1 Cell: 828.455.4636
[e-mail]
Your Vision Achieved Through Ours
i

From: Miller,Jordan <[e-mail]>
Sent:Thursday,July 1, 2021 1:42 PM
To: Kate Hefner<[e-mail]>
Cc: Lauren Norris-Heflin <[e-mail]>; Matt Michel <Matt.Michel @timmons.com>;
[e-mail];Johnson, Alan <[e-mail]>; Smith, Brendan
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [EXT]RE: [EXT]RE: Preliminary Jurisdictional Request Package- Fairhaven Glen -Charlotte, NC
Hey Kate,
How you show the buffers appear correct to me (page 13 of the PDF copied below). The buffers should be measured
from field located top of bank and would need to "join" when overlapping. I did not measure the widths to confirm but
assuming they are scaled appropriately this should be fine. Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Jordan
z

From: Kate Hefner
To: 401PreFile
Cc: Lauren Norris-Heflin
Subject: DWR Pre-Filing Request-Fairhaven Glen-Charlotte,NC
Date: Wednesday,October 5,2022 3:41:00 PM
Good afternoon,
I wanted to submit a 401 Pre-Filing Request for a project in Charlotte, NC. The project information
can be found below:
• Project Name: Fairhaven Glen
• Project Applicant: Commonwealth Development Corporation
• Applicant Contact Information: Sean Brady at s.brady(@commonwealthco.net
• Applicant Mailing Address: 7447 University Avenue, Suite 210
Middleton, WI 53562
• Parcel IDs: 16921223 and 16921224
• Project Location: Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
• The proposed project is a an approximately 16.75-acre residential development located in
Charlotte, NC in Mecklenburg County. The project is located at 8301 Nations Ford Road.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks!
Kate Hefner, WIT(she/her)
Environmental Scientist
TIMMONS GROUP I www.timmons.com
5410 Trinity Rd, Suite 102 1 Raleigh, NC 27607
Office: 919.866.4953 1 Cell: 828.455.4636
Kate.Hefner(@timmons.com
Your Vision Achieved Through Ours
To send me files greater than 20MB click here.

Appendix C

NE
z E
FAIRHAVEN GLEN APARTMENTS
v E
ti 3 e
o LLU^oz
w�N
z Oin^m
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS x� 0
Q Z v Q� Z
�� a
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINAo=
u
z
o
0
0
SHEET LIST
a
CW10.0 COVER o
CWI 1.0 OVERALL EXISTING CONDITIONS BASE
0 12ZO512022
CWI 2.0 OVERALL IMPACT MAP
CWI 2.01 IMPACT MAP - DETAIL VIEW DRAWN BY
^ CWI 2.1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT PROFILES IN
DESIS'G NNEED By
`- CWI 2.2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT PROFILES • J.DOLAN
CWI 2.3 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT PROFILES �� CHECKED BY
0 %r CWI 2.4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT PROFILES • J.DOLAN
O CWI 2.5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT PROFILES • • SCALE
y ASS"owN
CWI 2.6 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT PROFILES :
�4 CWI 3.0 NOTES & DETAILS •
4 •
�;&2
NOTES: w
1. BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION TAKEN FROM TIMMONS GROUP.
SITE BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY, DATED OCTOBER 24, 2022 . LLJ
z -
-c�Z 2. SOIL INFORMATION TAKEN FROM SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION & GEOTECHNICAL0
EVALUATION REPORT BY MR RICHARDS ENGINEERING, PLLC DATED MARCH 25, z
2023. a
Z 3. ENVIRONMENTAL DELINEATION BY TIMMONS GROUP, DATED APRIL 28, 2021 AND a _
�O N J U LY 19, 2022. Q 0 _
o LANE DRIVE 4. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS PRIMARILY LOCATED IN ZONE X WITH A PORTION
DEANNA z
VICINITY MAP LOCATED IN ZONE AE. REFER TO SHEET CWI 1.0 FOR ZONE LOCATION ON SUBJECT w Z
1" - 4OO' PROPERTY. THIS WAS DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FIRM MAP NUMBERS J o 3
3710453100K WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF SEPTEMBER 2, 2015. L7 >
O
zz Ua
SITE DATA TABLE: LU Y
E
TOTAL TRACT AREA: 17.95 ACRES Q =
TOTAL TRACT WETLANDS: 0.04 ACRES O
TOTAL TRACT STREAMS: 0.27 ACRES
PROPOSED TRACT IMPERVIOUS AREA: 4.07 ACRES (22.7%) (177,289 SF) �
TOTAL NUMBER OF APARTMENTS: 140
-
E
I , A

�o
z E
_Y
F o 3 e
0 0 0 p o
a�N
� M
O�`a-'vim
z Di'no m
� c
✓O7yNNY07B>>s �=w LL� z
�qM ?4B O Vyou O
Gz F o V
N
FQ 0
S or
1228
LPN&7 F C ALCE FR4YLON P/D 16925106
DB 13147PG 890 VICTORYCHRISTIAN w 2
''/O / �'s FA/RGREEN OR CENTER INCORPORATED >y
DA7j<✓B1'7`9�01 O O a a L7 50'PUBLICRIW 0825917 PG
47g laPGy'gRO / PROPERTYBOUNDARY N m? m
z
q
C'
O
C
PO1JOSITYP THOMAS DEBRA EILEEN WILSONB in2P/D 16921522 P1D 16921501 PlD
I OT 1,MB 11 PG 263 SAMUEL STEPHEN WILSON O CD BOYD 8 NISSA VONGPHAKDYB O m +y n O a a C p n a is D So ❑
16921401
/ O ROBERTAMBOYD
/ / L0T22,MB if PG 263 d S/SOUPHAH YANVANHXAY a3 a No y N
C LOT 70,MB 11 PG 263 LOT II,MB 11 PG263 `_ �O m a Ox�r yam NAxu� Ngq2a OyyG. ♦� \ /
vV y v�'2� uoimmyZ2 `o m 11 1�•
1,7
l,) I IIII/I/Ill .J 1111 I(I 11b� Ai %/icei o 0
1 I I\ I \ \\\ \�� - s// /� —_ — — '!� __ _ > \I / /I/. /•,/ //f ///IIII I �l / 100-YRFEMA
_ :i/ — _ — /
� g� \� ��1 �� //�°/�/ — 1 \� `` •�/ //// / ,))//�EXIST/NG PERENNIAL STREAM CHANNEL \\\I FLOODPLAIN LINE DATE
IEX�E6� LyyyyFFF s\\\\ _ — —_ O 12 05 2022
EDMf >00-YR FEMA FLOODPLAIN LINE
�73 R7 \ i _ \\\\ �� — .i _ �� ��\\\ / �'•7 / /F7, .. / /// // /I / / // / / DRAWN BY
`— �— EXISTING INTERMITTENT STREAM CHANNEL \\ ` _ / // / •/ / //// / J.DOLAN
_ DESIGNED BY
Pg1ss21 /i W. ZONE // I 1 I l / s; / • J.DOLAN
� .; _ — — \\\ — ' EXISTING WETLAND `` — / / llll/l 1 I III I I l/ // �/ 1►I\ ( I //////r� I l / l l l 1 I \ \\� \ �\ / �2s Rle.. I f
• •® /I I I ' I \ \ \ / / // %/ / // CHECKED BY
zooLAN
i I I / SCALE
I I IrilEXISTING WETLAND ASSHOWN
EXISTING INTERMITTENT STREAM I I / 1 •• �i='
I ( I 1// /lllll 111 s/ //B�//� r / //////// //��,�//���\``_�_�_'�� \\�\\\\\`\\\\ \ ��,,,.� \ � —�r.�. .6y'� I II \ \ �\� •
/ l) I I I (I IIII I I 1 111��/ f � ( /� ///�/�//ii�������_=—�'�"'%\���� \ \ ���\� � � \ � \ �� �'� — .•�;,�'"\ ��_ _�'�AAF
Zr _1���� _��\\\\ \lj�\ \\\\\` g \I I 1 1\ z I =
\ I ( DEANNA
I I PRivarE"E \\
\))J// // / \l\ _ _ U) 0 z
~
_Z L u
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LEGEND Q
/'�� E
PID 16921225 ` 11 I (�/// EXISTING CONTOUR QL z
O
GKBROOKLLC 0
DB 18682 PG 824 Q 0 p
PROJECT BOUNDARY
ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE
RIGHT OF WAY < O Q c
WETLANDS Z z
Z 0
EXISTING STREAM (� W Z U
J o z a
m ~
ZZ � ¢
Z WJX
\ LU WLU
>
O Lu
v
s
1--1 0
LL
F
o
2�
a
E
SCALE 1"=150'
' , JOB NO.
47655
� SHEEP NO.
0 150' 300' cwr i.o

0E
z E
v E
F o 3 e
°UU�o
d0�
zIm
✓ONNA'Y 7BT79 g_f LL o` z
AMo 246 'U/.ul O
Mg q'I'NiF�RFsq �^ ti a
pG2.9.9F H p U
F v �
S on
SpRTN/ PID
16921228 O
POB(/ F e ALICEFRAYLON PID 16925106
DB 13147 PG 890 VICTORYCHRISTIAN w
CENTERINCORPORATED
FAIRGREENDR
CqR16,
`910> N O O D w 50'PUBL/C R/W DB 25917 PG 5
Mg lgP/4'
cgR0 PROPERTYBOUNDARY m° m 235 IROGE
21, CWI-2.6o0oTEMP.IMPACT40
p c m0 op� ci vm - o" o�u, aa mam ='am <� 2'�P1D7692f522 P1O16921501 4lr ca aro �Na� ono- m�'o H oo cm'o 'vmZ `°mmo_ ��o \ �a y,FF,Q� MH1A SHEET 2.6
oPIDi P/01692f401 � m2amv0� �npn �2� �Or' � y-. �Z<-• 33m - Y
JOSITYPTHOMAS DEBRA E/LEEN WILSON& n O \Nn, v ti o' W 7 L w c/.OT 1,MB if PG263 CD BOYD& NISSA VONGPHAKOY& n m D SAMUEL STEPHEN W/LSON ar �tiOti �� m�� nZ ,.mm� -+ vAtq� Ny�-, �ZyNRTA M BOYD SISOUPHAH YANVANHXAY a LOT22,M811PG263 On Do A �cm m�n� a9��N my4)N mmmro N A- • /LOT 10,MB 11 PG 263 2 L1 D • //
LOT77,MB 11 PG 263 �O m nm � � yrn �a�<n �pZa 4)Ay'w ZC" ••
� ///
—= — — — — — _ — 2G7/ —am aZ� m Ill 11 �// u w
/s `C`W'I-2.o��� SHEET 2.01 _
�, _ 1 �1 l 1 f I I I I /// //// o
—PERM.NO-LOSS IMPACT 1a - - —_ J /� — - \ — __= - — // — �� \ \ l l 1 I l l I
iRJILi PERL;VvIM OIMPACT 1c CWI-2.01 — — — / — \ // / �// cJ // I \ ! //" / FLOODPLAINL/NE o DnTE
— �� / (REFER TO SHEETS CWI 2.02&2.03 PERM.NO-LOSS IMPACT 1d �_� — — j i= \\\\ �� 7• / / — / / / /
y 1210512022
/ — _ _ : �4 — ��,`_�—i' \ \ �=100-YR FEMA FLOODPLAIN LINE �/E/ // e, '/ DRAWN BY
• \\\ — — �\PROPOSED SCM PROPOSED SCM / /// //// //// /j // / 1DOLAN
PID 16921224 / \ _ _ ��_ _ OUTLET DIRECT TO /`•'
a I I �/ _ \ — _ �..� — / WETLANDS J / // / / / / d/� / DESIGNED BY
ERNESTSLYTES& \ .•� -- \\\\\\ _ \�� D / /
EDW/NAMLYTES ) // I / ON AE L II / / / �' ° • J.DOLAN
1 = —� •EXISTING WETLANDS `_ \��— — / I l I / " I l/ 0814684PG479 /h/,..,I ,/1.
I 67,731SFOR1.555AD. NO IMPACT \ \ I E JC f
I CWI-2.01 CWI-2.01 ) /i-
® � /Ill TEMP.IMPACT 1b \PERM.IMPACT 3b // CWI-2.01 \ \\ / •/// \\\ \ // ///// IIII I I I I I r • CHDOLA Y
J PERM.NO-LOSS IMPACT 3c / /� \ \— /// /// // 1 I I I/ / / I I I I I • J.00LAN
I I. � • SCALECWI-2.01
TEMP.IMPACT 3a ASSHOW N
%l //�'%// I
—
-- — a j � YORKMONTLANOL ESLLC \ \ � — /�• I 1 ( `� �` — —
t DB 21ss4 M H 4 -� //y/ + / Z.� �� •
,WI-2.01 714.109 SF
%PERM.NO-LOSS IMPACT 2b \ \� \ ( I / �•;: ••. ®� � gAL •
CWI-2.01' / / — _ — — 1111H5 v =PERM.IMPACT 2a \\\\ `s s �i z I
III 2.6 I PR�VANTEADANE � 1 \\\\ �° SHEET
I I R/VE
DIRECT TO ° U) a
PROPOSED SCM OUTLET( U)
WETLANDS) (D Z 9
LU
I / ^ LEGEND a
EXISTING CONTOUR
0 J i
,l
PROPERTYBOUNDARY Q Da p
A PROJECT BOUNDARY
— ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE RI < a n
GHT OF WAV � Q s
O � z
WETLANDS z
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS
EXISTING STREAM W z Q a
7
STREAM IMPACT 1 0 a 3
MAP IMPACT IMPACT L7
SHEET NUMBER SPECIFICATION PERMANENT TEMPORARY PERMANENT-NO LOSS ~
m J
(LF) (SF) (AC) (LF) (SF) (AC) (LF) (SF) (AC) z w J 2
CWI-2.01 1a Rip Rap Aporn Install - - - 12 24 0.001 STREAM IMPACT LEGEND: ; wLUE
CWI-2.01 1b 10'Wal I Const.Buffer 53 106 0.002 - - - "�'� PERMANENT STREAM-ORANGE Q � R
7� PERMANENT STREAM-NO LOSS-BROWN
CWI-2.01 1c Site Fill&Road Const. 286 589 0.014 O
TEMPORARY STREAM-PINK
CWI-2.01 1d Rip Rap Apron Install - - - 80 54 0.001 I--I c
CWI-2.01 2a Site Fill&Road Const. 46 183 0.004 Q
CWI-2.01 2b Rip Rap Apron Install - - - - - - 53 82 0.002 L.L f
CWI 2.01 3a 10'Wall Const.Buffer 10 36 0.001 M
CWI-2.01 3b Site Fill&Road Const. 81 320 0.007 - - - 2°
CWI-2.01 3c Rip Rap Apron Install 55 78 0.002
SewerAerail Crossing E
CWI-2.6 4a 24 349 0.008 - - -
SewerAera•ItCrossing SCALE 1"=150'
]OB NO.
CWI-2.6 4b 15 180 0.004 47655
Bank Stabilzation.
TOTAL 413 1,092 0.025 87 491 0.011 215 418 0.010 0 150' 300'
CWI 2.0

r I .� o
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
—665— yIN
_ _ _ z
— // / / PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT 1c
— — — _ FOR ROAD FILL
+ _ — 286 LF 589 SF
— aWv�v
0 PROPOSED BYPASS STORM LINE (REFER TO SHEETS CWI 2.1 &2.2
STORM SEWER TO OUTFACE AT HEAD OF FOR STREAM ALIGNMENT AND / �/ _ \ o o
/ EXISTING INTERMITTENT STREAM CHANNEL SECTIONS)
IN ORDER TO AVOID INDIRECT STREAM LOSSESCULWT
/ — _ / _ - _ / \ 54"RCP \ \ \ \ — — --_— -
/ PERMANENT NO-LOSS STREAM IMPACT 1a `\—
\ \ \\ \ \ FOR RIP
ui
o \ —
v 2
STREAM REALIGNMENT + \ ,PERMANENT NO-LOSS STREAM IMPACT 1d ° °
FOR RIP RAP APRON _ DATE
\ •69 0
— — — \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ - \ 80 LF 54 SF — —¢ r iz/os/zozz
BY
CAST-IN-PLACE, / / / — _ — -— _ — — _ DRAWN N
\ \ \ \ / RETAINING WALL '�- PROP.RIP J.DOLAN
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT 1b \ \� \ \ � � � � / --__,,`` y� DESIGNED BY
10'WALL CONSTRUCTION BUFFER \ / / / —RAP APRON' — — _ •
/ 53 LF 106 SF \ — \ �'� / i ,\ / / y / — _ 62� �\\\\ - — • J.DOLAN
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT 3a- _ — — -
-d/ 1CHECKED BY
0'WALL CONSTRUCTION BUFFER / v _ _ _ ���J_ _ _ • J.DOLAN
10 LF 36 SF:-� - i62o — — — —
620— SCALE
/ / / / QA 1 I I / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / ' ' / ' •,i _ — — �, \ �. / AS SHO WN
PERMANENT NO-LOSS STREAM IMPACT 2b FOR RIP RAP APRON /// _ _ d _ _ PERMANENT NO LOSS STREAM IMPACT 3c/ / / / / / / / / __ _ _ _ _ _ _
53 LF 82 SF -FOR RIP RAP APRON —
55 LF 78 SF
PROP. RIP /r/�� i/j/j//// _ — — —
RAP APRON//i/ //// %/� / \ _ — — — — — — /, — (I)Lu
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT 3b
STREAM IMPACT 2a r / / / / / / \�\I \ —
+ FOR ROAD FILL / / // // ////� / // / \ \ !, = FOR ROAD FILL / o
46 LF 183 SF / / //ice/ / /ri/ / i%/ii \ 81vF 320 SF SCALE 1"=50' Q u P
Lu
�/ / / i / \ ___ — — Qo > _
CULVERT 2 = _ — _ 0 50' 100, z g
_ Lu
J o w
LEGEND
EXISTING CONTOUR
PROJECT BOUNDARY z co d 5
ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE Lu
j Q P
RIGHT OF WAY V
WETLANDS
/ CULVERT 3 r — -- _— , � W E
I p \ \\ \ �� \� =J� ri / / 48"RCP / / // b — — _ \/ ® Q Q o
EXISTING STREAM = a
STREAM IMPACT LEGEND: a
1 Q I \ \ \\\ \\ �_ �� `�/ / / / / `s O \ PERMANENT STREAM-ORANGE
PERMANENT STREAM-NO LOSS-BROWN
TEMPORARY STREAM-PINK E
PROPERTY BOUNDARY / / / / � - m \ \ \ S ' � JOB NO.
I
� EETN�47655
wl Z.n1

660 660 665 665 665 665
-o
_E
v€
PROPOSED =wt3"o
GRADE
�LL o
655 PROPOSED GRADE 655 660 660 660 660
a� M
PROPOSED
,<
`GRADE "`�
o u�"u o
�r a
f p o
z
650 650 655 655 655 655
0
PROPOSED RETAINING
WALL,TYP.
645 645 650 650 650 650
a Q
DATE
PROPOSED RETAININ o
1210512022
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL,TYP. DRAWN BY
WALL,TYP. J.DOLAN
640 640 645 645 645 645 • DESIGNED BY
• J.DOLAN
/ •IMPACT #1 c Y
• CHECKED HECKED B
/ • • SCALE
HORIZ SCALE:1"=50' • ASSHOWN
VERT SCALE 1"=5' •
635 635 640 640 640 640 0 0
-
I
630 630 635 635 635 N 635 z
I I I
I I
I I PROPO ED Z Lu
V
EXISTIN CHANN L Q aGRAD I ADJUS ENTa. 0(2'FLAT BOTTOM)625 625 630EXISTING 630 630 630EXIS ING STREAM LIN GRADE /�V/
W Q
PROPOSED J o � 3
BOTTOM CHANNEL BOTTO 14 OF
EXISTING STR' ADJUSTMENT EXISTING ST EAM
(2'FLAT BOTTO ) Z Z Q
W Y z
620 620 625 625 625 625 Q w "' E
� a
2 Op
�o � � NN �r � N � �oN � � N r � � o OQE
�0 �0 �O �O M r DO CO I--I
N N � N `n NN N � N � d rr M M � M >
co co co cfl co cfl co cfl co co co w
-0+50 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 0+0c 1+00 0+00 1+00
STA 0+00.00 STA 0+50.00
E
SCALE 1"=50' IMPACT #1c CROSS-SECTIONS JOB NO.
HORIZ SCALE:1"=50' 47655
ISHEET NO. _
0 50' 160, VERT SCALE 1"=5'
CWI 2.1

660 660
�o
v�
PROPOSED GRADE =wt3o
a0
655 655 655 655 655 655 6�LmV
PROPOSED GRADE
� vLLo
PROPOSED o�� U o
�e a
GRADE
v u,
z
o
650 1650 650 650 650 650
0
0
PROPOSED RETAIN NG o
ALL,TYP. w
645 645 645 645 645 645 a
� DATE
o
1210512022
DRAWN BY
].DOLAN
BY
640 640 640 640 640 640 •� J.DES I IGNED
GNED
OLAN
• CHECKED BY
J.DOLAN
• • SCALE
AS SHOWN
635 635 635 635 635 635 0
I EXISTING \
GRADE \
D
630 630 630 \ EXISTING 630 630 630 W 3
I \ W I GRADE / O
PROPOSE BOTTOM C IF ~ Z w
CHANNEL \ / EXISTING STRE 0 J
BOTTOM OF ADJUSTME T BOTTOM 013 EXISTING Q u 0
EXISTING STREAM (2'FLAT B TOM) GRADE a L
LL
EXISTING STREA Q �
o a rt
625 625 625 625 625 625 z Z �
PROPOSED Z U
W � Q a
N N M N CHANNEL% L
M PROPOSED J o 3
Cp �
ADJUSTMENT °4 CHANNEL C7 L7
MCO O M (2'FLAT BOTTO L� COLO Cfl Co ADJUSTMENT
(.0
Q
( ) e
W J
Y z
> w w
Q a
0+00 1+00 0+00 1+00 0+00 1+00 O 2 O p
STA 1 +00.00 STA 1 +50.00 STA 1 +90.43 SCALE 1°=50' QLL. w
0 50' 100,
IMPACT #1c CROSS-SECTIONS _
E
HORIZ SCALE:1"=50'
VERT SCALE 1"=5' I OB ND.
c
47655
SHEET
CWI 2.2

655 655 655 655
660 660 ^E
PROPOSE D GRADE
PRO OSED GRADE PROPOSED RADE w v€N
P OPOSED f 3"
PROPOSED 6 PVC
15" RC STORM LL o
WATER LINE
650 650
650 650
=�
655 655
vas
PR POSE 6" PVT �u�LLU�r a
WATER LIN
PROPOSED 8" PVC
z
PROPOS D SEWER LINE
645 15" RCP STORM 645 645 645
650 650
0
PROPOSED PROPOSE CAST-IN-PLACE 10
1 RCP STORM RETAINING WALL
640 640 640 640 a
645 645 o
KATE
PROPOSED 16. ' 1210512022
C ST-IN-PLACE
14DRAWN BY
RETAINING WALL '9 21.2' / ].DOLAN
1 5.2' DESIGNED BY
635 635 635 635 3.2' •� ].DOLAN
640 640 CHECKED BY
—/l::
PR POSE 20.3' 16.8' :•
7.DOLAN
CAST-I -PLAC SCALE
RETAINING WAL • ASSHOWN
•
14.27' F �
630 630 630 630 48" RCP @ 4.9 % •
635 635
EXISTING GRADE
z
625 625 625 625 O W 3
630 630 �
ROP. RIP I ~ Z w
R P APRON PROP. RIP < ° J
-� I Q a u r
RAP APRON p O
PROP. RIP Q
620 89.16' F 620 620 620 RAP APRON z Z
54" RCP @ 5.7 % 51.12' OF 625 625 W Q
1' E BED. J 54" R P@ 28% J o
EXISTING GRA E 60.9 ' OF
C�
1' EMBED. EXISTIN GRA E U J
V E BED. 48" RCP @ 4 55% w Z a
89.16 LF OF 54 RCP 51.12 LF OF 54" RCP u Lu
z 'E
615 615 615 615 60.97 LF OF 48" RCP Q
620 620 0 O = z
M � 00 ON a/ V
O Cpoq � � Q) Oa � M O O00 0p
CNp � CNp � Cp � � � � rl Cps O W
cfl cfl
-0+50 0+00 1+00 1+50 -0+25 0+00 1+00 1+20
-0+50 0+00 1+00 1+20 E
CULVERT 1 PROFILE SCALE 1"=50' CULVERT 2 PROFILE CULVERT 3 PROFILE • JOB NO.
HORIZ SCALE:1"=50' HORIZ SCALE:1"=50' HORIZ SCALE:1"=50' 47655
VERT SCALE 1"=5' 0 VERT SCALE 1"=5' VERT SCALE 1"=5' ' ' c SHEET NO.
R
i
50' 100' 12.3

655 655 655 655 655 655 655 655
PRO OSED 13RADE -E
(FOP OF WALL) PROPOSED GRADE PROPOSED GRADE PROPOSE GRA E
z E
( OP OF ALL) (T P OF WALL) (TOP F WAL ) w o �
o u 2�o
650 :. '. 650 650 650 650 ti.:.s`:;,ti: ' x, 650 650 650
k'•1.:��'y�`. {.'�' S.: :�.�����5•'*''�.: �,�,..{`: �,'.�SA::5'.'�_,;ti S;'y �•Y't•SScS'•.i';:.5'S{i N �ti a
,.5s.,45' :5:�. 4:'ti.."1. y:yti i.•ti�. `.Y�, ,4„ 45•;,... .5:...•y.'r F a,co
645 645 645 : ;.. ;, 645 645 h: • : 645 'y s ,
' '. ,..: ,� , sh�''•�?:,'• ,';:' . .. �;. 645 ,.. . :•: :� 645
ui
•'� ,•�.4 .h�t'•.�•i :4: +';•5:"{,'..'.'�� .:1•.YS. <.-i5"*{K:�.{.. .:,....V.:S,S4•:. .'G.,�� �
5 .�,:�5::;,,`".Y,•�� .�, ... ..� :,,��?..�5 :; �.',.��.,.,'SS'',•1••..S%. .h'S ti':.�1..1�.S'..4:, .• �
•�:Si� ..':: 15'.••.". 5�,'L'.,'•,.k'!'' �1:.«5• '.',.:�. i�:S .,` " :.,Yi.':5;.'1..•' O�
640 ''s. ' .¢'.ti. 640 640 " ' .. 640 640 .: :: .:,:.:.. 640 640 k'. 640
;:. PROPOSED :. . ',-y'•,M1 s...: • :ti•;; 4,'':K.:. .5. 1 ,,.:.5,•
.... h .•Af4,i'f� .. .'.4:.�4a1 5:.•..1'..A�.�S
PROPOSED
' is ;�s•�K . . . .'. .. ..,•�,•�`• `' "`.�:,•,,, .,.s >
x. . . .; CAST-IN-PLACE 5:s'�: ;'''+: i:.',.•.
'• •,,'. y, DATE
� .: :u'"{' ;',• ^;. ?5'::i':,;,..':.:::r �: AST-IN-PLACE o
..s S•.?: y ,... sy-. , 1210512022
RETAINING WALL Y i: :s'",:.. ,:.,,..',«', ',. • s.. �5:.:(`5.; ..�;�4.:'.�:.
RETAINING WALL 4. 5!� , 'ti,�,•{."K'' K b .'y lv
.K •,...S DRAWN BY
4.).{•'.hJy.:.y.y':y1,,:.y' _ h:.+,,:..,xiYS'.• ',{":,h .:2YY ti:' ..7•�4 J.DOLAN
5.,2'•5',•1. •5.';5: :"• � 5� ..4'�..{. 1 ..'•4Y:,`'',.•Y:•.:L• .:,K�4 t.:;
635 635 635 " :. `` 635 635 ' `"' 635 :y '::.,s ti 'Y S y DESIGNED BY
�, ,. 5 ., ,�:.:
., •t •.5,. ��. .,. . :.,� 635 �. :s�''*: ,.::,•.: 635 • J.DOLAN
'•.i5 :'.1;SY..ifi , '.: �, fi•:,.K ,.,{5. .•J"Si` •�:yl,''.S , +i..'S.s •
. ., •• `!5•' '. r ��•. .. 'ylb.,� • CHECKED BY
IDOLAN
SS'.:,��'•,(•:•y.,.,+:.ti y<. •• `!ti's::,�3::�_,{%�Y 5� •{5:2' S;.%,. .3. •s,: ,.�5, •.a. •ti:•R:.
,.� ..h.. Y�. 'S` .. :5 �• •. i.. 1 Y`5,. .1��}.,... • • SCALE
_)S•i y ;••S.r. 1.: X, � AS SHOWN
630 �:,: ' :ti, 630 630 X:.':;.,.; '' ., 630 630 = :' ' 630 630 ':'" 630 •
-Y.S
625 625 625 : '',.::''° 625 625 5 625 625 �'' 625
Lu
PROP. 54' RCP 4.`°.:.;: ,:�.g:' , {..+.4: E
CULVER P OP. 54 'x:•,,:'K.; p� � w
r °
PROP. 54' EXIS ING GRADE J g
XISTIP G GRADE RCP C LVERT 5' + � Q a LL
EXISTING C5h RCP C LVER ,..•.,"K` ' °
a
0 .
620 620 620 620 620 620 620 620 Q o a
Z
z � u �
w � a
coo � � cow MI N � � � EXISTING RA DE J o
00 � �i d �i o 0) PROP. 5 " (7
cNoQ � D cNo � c`yo � z Q0 N RCP CU VERT J f
zm � a
wYz
615 615 > � u' E
� R
-0+25 0+00 0+75 -0+25 0+00 0+75 660 = zz
CULVERT 1 W PROFILE O >
HORIZ SCALE:1"=50' CULVERT 1 E PROFILE CULVERT 2 W PROFILELL. W
VERT SCALE 1"=5' HORIZ SCALE:1"=50' f
HORIZ SCALE:1"=50'
VERT SCALE 1"=5' VERT SCALE 1"=5'
CULVERT 2 E PROFILE r
SCALE 1"=50' HORIZ SCALE:1"=50' IDB NO. -
NOR VERT SCALE 1"=5' 47655
0 50' 100' I SHEET NO. _
CW12.4

660 660
�o
PROPOSED GRADE E
(TOP OF WALL)
Ur 3 c5
a
1 S•.
655
,...q,-+'' S..:.; . , 655 moo� � ��
o
OR zo
' '•:••1; 3a�aE z
��K�S•S,t; 5] o CC
t z
650 ,.:... . s: 650
{: 0
x
U
645 <. • ���°-s.';�s.��¢:.;. 645 z a
PROPOSED
..n.,:•M1 ^4,� ,.. DATE
5.K o 1210512022
'+�,$;.y4S•l.ti Ky''�ti•,'• CAST-IN-PLACE
RETAINING WALL
DRAWN BY
J.DOLAN
DESIGNED BY
,..tt •5•'�'y..fi.:.,;MKS': • CHECKED BY
;5.•.5: .•.5,...�. .'� :' • SCALE
q y .'1•,h 5,S M1..
..t:•.ti t.y't)`'.�,'� � AS SHOWN
635 A. a:'; `:,`.` 635 �
S
630 .,:f. ..�: 630 O W 3
W
O J
aaur
EXISTING GRADE d = O
o a -
625 625 z Z
w Z <
J o �
PROP. 48" RCP CULVERT Z Z Q
z > L)
le
w E
620 620 Q z
cow nL0 O
cy ,—,
� � � � LaL w
z
-0+25 0+00 0+75
E
CULVERT 3 N PROFILE
SCALE 1"=50' / JOB NO.
HORIZ SCALE:1"=50' r 47655
now
VERT SCALE 1"=5' SHEET NO.
0 50' 100' ' R
CWI 2.5 s

\ I I MH4 K- \F k 1 / ' I I I / r I I ' TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT 4a
EF I I I ► / I I 1 I I I EXISTING AERIAL CROSSING PIER CONSTRUCTION E
PERENNIAL 24 LF 349 SF m
zo
\\\ \ \ \ I I I I I I 1 I I I I I STREAM I lI M H 1 E
I I I I ► ..( , W�U�U
1+S 68
I STORMWATER \ I IIII
Q.Q
h 3avx-
EXISTINV\ \ \\\ \ I R ESMT 11 I ,I I i I ► I i I MP PROP. CONC. IER ok5o
INTERMITTENT\ \\ I I I I I I I I I
STREAM ► �,° I o Sa. I I I I I I I I i o S \\ / / v
�o w
1 1 C I I I 1 I1 \ I ' \ R sit
11 lilt/TEMP. I : / 11 lli Oil l ill ��
w
H-1A J ' 4 I I I PERMANENT(NO-LOSS)STREAM IMPACT 4b
II I I I I
RECEIVING 1 1 I I \11 IIII III 1= R• / — — — I II1 i I BANK STABILZATION ul
PIT \ I I 1 11 T `` \ - - I I —Ll:j 15 LF 180 SF o
MH5 I 1111/ 11/ 1 1 � :111 \ \\ \ \ / III �2 � �I I � IeI I �I I o
I I 1111 1111�\t —
Z
625 625
Z
0
MH1A
DATE
MH5
TOP 599.95 0 1210512022
TOP 614.54 605 INV IN 596.43 (SW) 605 DRAWN BY
INV IN 604.75 (SW)
DIP TO STEEL INV OUT 596.23 (NE) 1.DOLAN
INV OUT 604.55 (N) PIPE OUPLING DEPTH 3.72' •� �IGNED
By
620 OLAI
DEPTH 10.01' MH4 (5' DIA ETER) EXIISTING TOB MH1 (DOGHOUSE CHECKED BY
TOP 621.00 MANHOLE • J.DOLAN
INV IN 603.4 (S) 600 600 W/OUTSIDE DROP) SCALE
j • AS SHOWN
INV OUT 603 26 (E) -� / TOP 601.03 •
DEPTH 17.7 ' INV IN 595.45 (SW)
615 615 DIP PIPE INV IN 591.55
INV OUT 591.55
DEPTH 10.31' _
595 - — 595
EXISTING G z
' I-FtPROP. RIP P R
Lu
610 610 FOR BANK STABILIZATION
/ (; 8" HIGHS RENGTH O
STEEL PRE PER CW STD.
I l TEMPORAR BORE PIT az cn E
Lu
O J a
590 590 Q U L
2' MI
4' PROP. CONC. PIER r1 = p
. Qo a =
605 605 Z U rt
z ;
W F z Q
16" STE L CASING PIPE f 5 ' a `
J o 3
J 585 5, 585 z Z Q
TEMPORARY RECEIVI G PIT z
I-I-I Y z
> W w E
600 600 582 582 Q rt
2 o
c
Lo 0O Qo M
oo � w
-0+50 0+00 1+00 1+50 -0+50 0+00 1+00 2+00
E
SEWER BORING PROFILE SCALE 1°=50' AERIAL CREEK CROSSING PROFILEkk
-
HORIZ SCALE:1"=50' HORIZ SCALE:1"=50' 47655
VERT SCALE 1"=5' 0 50' 100' VERT SCALE 1"=5' ' r 1111T ND. R
CWr 2.6

a- f7pk.
NON-MVASIVE PERMANENT SEEDING z E
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FALL °'E
NON-INVASIVE PERMANENT SEEDING RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR LATE WINTER AND EARLY SPRING NON-INVASIVE PERMANENT SEEDING SEEDING MIXTURE
SEEDING MIXTURE a w t 3
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SUMMER Species Rate `-';°o
LL
TABLE 6.10a TABLE 6.10b TABLE 6.10c Species Rate SEEDING MIXTURE Hard lslbsra re
oN��
i Switchgrass 2.5-3.5 IbsJauu' p F v M v
Centipede 5lbs/acm Species Rate Indian Grass 5-7 Ituilacre' z c ^c
WINTER AND EARLY SPRING SUMMER FALL Indian wddddats ,s-2 s IbsJacre radian Woodoats 1.5-2.5 It s acts' Big 9luestam 5-7 lbs/acro'
Virginia Wild Rye 4-6 Ibs/aae" Virginia Wild Rye 4-6 Itis/sire' Indian Woodoats 1 5-2.5 Ibslaere• <°"`
Table 6.t0a Table 6.10a Temporary Seeding Specifications for Summer Table B.IOa Temporary Seeding Specifications for Fall x v LL o z
Virginia Wild Rye 4-61bWacre' o v+o" O
Temporary Seeding Specifications Seeding Mixture Spades Rate(Iblacre) 'Depending upon mix with other species.See table 6.11 d 'Depending upon mix with other species. 1. r a
for Winter and Early Spring Seeding Mixture Spades Rate(Iblacre) Grain from Chapter 6 of the NC Erosion and Sediment Control See table 6.11.d Rom Chapter 6 of the NC v N s
Rya 30 'Depending upon mix with other apaches.See table 6.11.0 from u
German Millet 15 Planning and Design Manual Erosion and Sediment Control Planning Chapter 6 of the NC Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and o z w
Seeding Mixture Spades Rate(Iblacre) In the Piedmont and Mountains,asmall-stemmed sundangrass may and Desl n Manual. o
In the Piedmont and Mountains,a small-stemmed sundangrass may 9 Design Manual
Rye Grain 3U be substituted at a rate of 501blacre. be substituted et a rate of 501b/sire. Seeding Dates g z
Seeding Dates Coastal or Eastern Piedmont for Centipede-Sept.1•May 1 Seeding Dates Seeding Dates ° o
Seeding Dates Seeding Dates Coastal and Piedmont for Indian Woodoats and Virginia Mountains-July 15-Aug 15 w Mountains 15-Atg o 15-Dec Mountains-Hard Fescue-Aug t-June 1
Mountains>2500 fL 15-Feb to 15-May Mountains 15-May to 15-Aug Coastal Plain and 15-A to 30-Dee Will Rye-Feb 15•April 1 Piedmont-Aug 15.Oct 15
<2500 ft. t-Feb to 1-Ma Piedmont 1-May to 15-Au � I Mountains-and
Coastal-
Indian Grass.Big Bluestein-Dec t-April 15
Y g Piedmont Mountains for Indian Woodoats and Virginia WIKI Rye- Piedmad and Cdastat-Switchgrass.Indian Grass,8g Bluaslem-
Piedmtmt 1Jan to 1-May Coastal Plain 15-Apr to 15-Aug March 1-May 15 Maintenance:
Coastal Plain 1-Dec to 15-Apr Soil Amendments Indian Woodoets and Virginia Wild Rye Dec 1-April 1
Follow recommendations of soil tests or apply 2 tonfacre ground Maintenance: are both sun and shade tolerant. Coastal.Indian Wrxxtdats and Virginia Wild Rye-Sept 1-Nov 1 c
Soil Amendments Soil Amendments o
agricultural limestone and 7501blaere 10-10-10 fenilizee Significant maintenance may be required to obtain desired
Follow recommendations of soil fasts or apply 2 onlacre ground Follow recommendabons of soil teals or apply 2 tonlacre ground g Y eq Maintenance: i,
agricultural limestone and 7501b/acre 10-10-10 fertiliser Mulch cover once centiplede,is planted.Acceptable for sodding. Hard Fescue is not recommended for slopes>5% Prefers shade. o
agricultural limestone and 750 Iblacre 10.10.10 fertilizer agricultural
4,000 Ib/acre straw.Anchor straw by tacking with asphalt SEED BED PREPARATION: _
Mulch netting or a mulch anchoring tool.Use 400 gallons of tack per acre LIMING-A lime oknaMln to sou toll remmmendnimhs.if
tne
4,000 Ib/acre straw.Anchor straw by tacking with asphalt, or straw covered with oiled netlin Apply 9 I H(stdlty)of the ail is not known,an apMbelan of ground aryKuiwrat limestone at me rate W 1 to 1 I onuacro on rnerae-mifurad o
Apply 4,000 Iblacre straw.Anchor straw by tacking with asphalt, nefting or a mulch anchoring tool.Use 400 gallons of tack per acre Pi g seas and 2.3 tonsraae an fine-leatured so is is uavaliy sum vent Apply install"Jose"end Incorporate late the top 4-0 I 1105 of sal SW.s y lh a pH air e a tNgller nebd not be Mond. w
netting or a mulch anchoring tool.Use 40D gallons of tack per acre or straw covered with pinned netting. Maintenance FERTILIZER-ease appleratbn rates on eon wsta vAedn mew pie nlyt possmle.apply a 10.10-10 grader lemlaer at roil-1.000 Itunce Br.T tenMca and lime should be nrnrporated Iola tree top 4-6
or straw covered with pinned netting. Repair and refertilize damaged areas immediately.Topdress with mrhas of sea.it a oyareubc sooder a used,do net mu sews and to Main,more then 30 mmule.enfold application Q
Maintenance 5911b/acre of nitrogen in March.If ft is necessary t0 extent SURFACE ROUGHENING If rircrim litlaten oucial-ons hove lesuaed e a:,I a fmsd surface lotig gwmd,llonmg may nor on m excepl to basal,w brae clods It ranfsg causes MI wassail to 0
Maintenance Referiilize If growth is not fully adequate.Reseed,refertilize and become reeked a udsred,loosen It rue+pno,to waiting by raking,he—Ing.a finer suitable methods for fine grading The his aMd grade shall as a smooth a nRn sM surf—WiIn a loosen o
Refedflize if growth is not fully adequate.Reseed,refertilize and mulch immediately toilovilin erosion or damage. temporary rover beyond June 15,tyvarseed with 501b/acre Kobe g y grades are commod era `^
g ly eq 9 a9 seedbed
one texture All c ridges and depresseons shell be removM one flYcd b prowM Me approved strlaca drainage Planting Is to the done,mmedlaal after hnleMld
mulch immediately following erosion or damage. (Piedmont and Coastal Plain) >
late February or early March sak<lbad preparation Is completed �. DATE
NOTES oo 12/OS/2022
1. Pennanont seedmg.seodding or am mo the,moans of to bo—h e.me mguved when 0construtban work Is[dmpisI accorong eke m to NPDE S befrene'e faolti
2 A North Carolina Department er Agrkcuaom MIS IMt for egUell Ik Nosy rem m Wndod to to eb43umd for all areas In be saodM songged,mown or picot k
PERMANENT SEED MIX ERNST CONSERVATION SEEDS NC PIEDMONT FACW MIX OR APPROVED EQUAL BY DESIGNER 3 the a sewing mix that Will woduce fast grewmg nurse croos and includes nor Invasive species that will evenlually provide a permenenn wowelcdsw Sol bamliels(my be used in law of niaae DBA W N BY
APPLICATION RATE 20 LBS/AC.TO BE PLANTED IN ALL DISTURBED WETLAND AND RIPARIAN AREAS. crops.Mel.rack or enmp mulch,as neaided to sweilze seeded areas Imhu rant establishment MUlrh must be Rallied umfomay Over me sag with a ca"r denary of at least 80% J.DOLAN
4. Ground tslwv slag be mslMained until Pemtlanenl vegetalinn is 6$WWWW and statue against accelerated erosion.
•
PLASTIC NETTING SHOULD NOT BE USED WITHIN WETLANDS R STREAMS DESIGNED BY
�e�y •�'�Fwr..rv�ah PERMANENT SEEDING RECOMMENDATIONS ].DOLAN
• CHECKED BY
J.DOLAN
• • SCALE
-
TEMPORARY SEEDING SCHEDULES NTS PERMANENT SEEDING SCHEDULES NTS -
-
AS SHOW
APPROVED SEDIMENT FILTERING DEVICE
(SEDIMENT FILTER BAG). PROVIDE Contractor will follow the following construction sequence:
POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM SEDIMENT STREAM DIVERSION PUMP uwORonoraaE
FILTER BAG TO STREAM. DISCHARGE HOSES a`saw`N aNO NPgNar -
P Contractor shall notify the Mecklenburg County Department of Public 4'
INTAKE HOSE z '
DISCHARGE ONTO DEWATERING PUMP - f tart f ark during period f time
-
STABLE RIPRAP P
PAD TO PREVENT ..•....•..
Utilities 48 hours in advance o s o w n cu e o t- 1 y /*`;o L1J
O SCOUR HOLE ..,�''�'..- jti~:[e(a,.`�.S•�j'1�,;'.,,.�,.51ftEIMBANK with no rain in the forecast. �- �' a' � �'�o �aeReEam,.LelrR,r�,e.a�a�. �
F- — • Prior to start of work,contractor shall have all materials and
1 ,$ _ �
`N Q
a �° equ►pment on-site. For utility crossings with casings,the carrier pipe o
HOSES SUMP-HOLE FOR POOL shall be installed within the casing pipe prior to any open cut activities. RE EnaRa�HEp ,.eEReeNr 4�'
y � mr
INTAK
E
(D FLO�- SEDIMENT CLEAN WATER sracrfr+sranxa " Pu'"n"O sc"saute O
DIKE DIKE arOc rare sPEaEs to 9E sl�nslxaaaE ' moaexie "
(n � �..._ _ (12'TO 18•DEEP,2-FT DIAMETER) Contractor shall install a temporary coffer dam on the upstream side of .TMR� ��
� ,;k�:;..•v:.;..c:-.-.';::.' Kerr-i .-', �,;.i'-d :>�„,,..:a:•,i-' .. -' �
a n pump water around the open cut area to w„ m
r.<
the proposed crossing and um o e ��, Q �
'Ea Z �
the downstream side. n Rai apu� -
N'ORK AREA LENGTH NOT TO IXCEED THAT^ IH
uyE uasn'acy 7
r WHICH CAN BE COMPLETED IN ONE DAY T
a Contractor shall place the culvert or utility casing with carrier pipe at a maw LU D L
CY elevations shown on the approved plans and backfill in accordance ( ,w.—ORks— °` e J o w 3
IELIPORARV PUMP ARIX1N0 SEUIIEN(a• -
a with Mecklenburg County Department of Public Utilities specifications.
• •eoeoe••o
.a�x
1.SET UP PUMP MTH SUCTION AND DISCHARGE HOSE. "�.,.,•,e
2 INSTALL UP-STREAM SANDBAG DAM. • Contractor shall restore channel and seed and stabilize any disturbance 1Q1°"��" m
3.INSTALL DOWN-STREAM SANDBAG DAM. aras.r�� ' c�vxmlp� w w v o
j 4.THE PUMP MUST RUN CONTINUOUSLY WHILE WORKING IN THE STREAM. with native species within 24-hours of start of work. "m"ef -- � o
ll 5.STREAMBANKS MUST BE STABILIZED AT THE END OF EACH DAY. IurraoRlaw.l.•. W y -g
NOTES: > W O E
1.SANDBAG DIKES SHALL BE SITUATED AT THE UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM ENDS OF THE WORK AREA,AND STREAM FLOW z o"
U LIVE STAKING(MULTIPLE ROW)
to SHALL BE PUMPED AROUND THE WORK AREA.THE PUMP SHOULD DISCHARGE ONTO A STABLE VELOCITY DISSIPATER SPACING DETAIL FOR MAJOR REINFORCED SOIL LIFT DETAIL FOR Q u 8
to CONSTRUCTED OF RIPRAP OR SANDBAGS. STREAM BANK RESTORATIONS MAJOR STREAM BANK RESTORATIONS O `m
Q0 2.WATER FROM THE WORK AREA SHALL BE PUMPED TO A SEDIMENT FILTERING MEASURE SUCH AS A SEDIMENT BAG OR OTHER _ "air ro Norro....,.
APPROVED DEVICE THE MEASURE SHALL BE LOCATED SUCH THAT THE WATER DRAINS BACK INTO THE CHANNEL BELOW THE
Ur DOWNSTREAM SANDBAG DIKE MTHOUT CAUSING FURTHER EROSION BETWEEN THE SEDIMENT FILTER BAG AND THE STREAMBANK. _ __ Pi-
F1
Q _ Q net
TEMPORARY PUMP AROUND =ti R"r'K"m•^°aef a°
0 - = - akaWww o
0
�
�/r Blackberry
V — Elderberry j.N
JI WUMl aSpONNE ' PBLTEIHYIFaE nW o
Hcs pvPj uamka lremnmaaeef -
2OffS: nark trva•araewadwl Birk Willow v
(d OR N PIPING RPE - STRF/ae 8 ud8o Silky aogwootl
HOR PNIerS PNp POLYETrvaleE FlW 1 Wool Grass `o
(D P SLgy p 'RM
kwelwcerl ?y
LL eve.P.`�Ei— m
LO e.assTPRINT OF sacra FOR aapmONu ENEROr PLANTING SCHEDULE FOR MAJOR _
L17 aoET PRIOR TO RERHR raw Ter STREAM BANK RESTORATIONS
' sRraa. ' LOB NO.
crF TEMPORARY STREAM BYPASS PUMP) 2 L. �47655 a

Appendix D

WILDLANDS IS
HOLDINGS
Catawba Stream Credits Statement of Availability
May 25, 2023
Fairhaven Glen LLC
Attn:Jonathan Nesburg
7447 University Avenue, Suite 210
Middleton, WI 53562
RE: Availability of Stream Credits for the "Fairhaven Glen Apartments" project
Bank Name: Wildlands Catawba 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank: Firestone Mitigation Site and Double
Rock Mitigation Site
Bank Sites: Firestone Mitigation Site/ Double Rock Mitigation Site
Bank Sponsor: Wildlands Holdings VI, LLC
USACE Action ID No.: SAW-2020-01534/SAW-2020-01532
Permittee: Fairhaven Glen LLC
Stream Credits Needed: 387 LF
Stream Credits Available:856 LF
Catawba 03050101 River Basin
Dear Mr. Nesburg,
Wildlands Holdings VI, LLC, owned and operated by Wildlands Engineering, Inc., currently has sufficient stream
credits from the Wildlands Catawba 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank: Firestone Mitigation Site and Double Rock
Mitigation Site to satisfy the stream mitigation requirements related to the above-mentioned project. The
project is located within the Catawba River Basin of the service area (HUC 03050101) of the Bank.
This letter is simply a statement of availability of credits as of the date written. It is neither a guarantee of
future credit availability, nor a guarantee of credit pricing. Credits are sold on a first come, first serve basis at
the Bank's price at the time an invoice is requested. Invoices reserve both the credits and the price for a period
of 30 days. Credits and associated pricing may be reserved for up to 6 months with a signed reservation
agreement and a 10%deposit.
Final transfer of the credits will be made upon receipt of a copy of the US Army Corps of Engineers
Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form approving the Stream and/or wetland mitigation
purchase from the Bank and upon receipt of your payment to Wildlands Holdings VI, LLC.
We appreciate the opportunity to assist you with your mitigation requirements. Please contact me at (704) 332-
7754 x114 or [e-mail] if you have any questions or need any additional information.
Wildlands Holdings VI,LLC • Wildlands Engineering,Inc • 1430 South Mint Street,Suite 104,Charlotte,NC 28203

WILDLANDS
HOLDINGS
Sincerely,
Camden M. Brunick
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Mitigation Credit Sales
[e-mail]
O: (704) 332-77S4 ext. 114
M: [phone]
Cc: Ms. Meagan Jolly, Regulatory Agent I USACE
Wildlands Holdings VI,LLC • Wildlands Engineering,Inc • 1430 South Mint Street,Suite 104,Charlotte,NC 28203

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM Stream B
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map,and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the"Notes/Sketch"section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name(if any): Fairhaven Glen 2. Date of evaluation: 07-13-2021
3.Applicant/owner name: Commonwealth Development Group 4.Assessor name/organization: Sydni Law-Timmons Group
5.County: Mecklenburg 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Catawba on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Kings Branch
8.Site coordinates(decimal degrees,at lower end of assessment reach): 35.141725,-80.890566
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9.Site number(show on attached map): SAM-40D1-1 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 360
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present)to top of bank(feet): 3 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank(feet): 5 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains(M) ® Piedmont(P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain(I) ❑Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A\ , ❑B
valley shape(skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (<0.1 mil) ❑Size 2(0.1 to<0.5 mil) ❑Size 3(0.5 to<5 mil) ❑Size 4(>_5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes,check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d)List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat(list species)
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? ®Yes ❑No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow,water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach(examples: undersized or perched culverts,causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates,debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples:straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B Not
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
❑A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples: channel down-cutting,existing damming,over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
®B Not
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure,active channel down-cutting(head-cut),active widening,and artificial hardening(such as concrete,gabion, rip-rap).
❑A < 10%of channel unstable
®B 10 to 25%of channel unstable
❑C >25%of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction—streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
®A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging)that adversely affect
reference interaction(examples: limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
❑C ®C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,disruption
of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:impoundments,intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
®B Excessive sedimentation(burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal, burning, regular mowing,destruction,etc)
❑1 Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams,D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
®A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes ❑No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach)(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses 0 ❑F 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) CO ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o Y ❑H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation Y LC ❑l Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) t ❑J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
❑D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
1la. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle-run section(evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool-glide section(evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=absent, Rare
(R)= present but< 10%, Common (C)_ > 10-40%, Abundant(A) _ >40-70%, Predominant(P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder(256—4096 mm)
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble(64—256 mm)
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2—64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Sand(.062—2 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial(rip-rap,concrete,etc.)
11d. ❑Yes ❑No Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life-assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ❑Yes ®No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for Size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts, lichens,and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae(T)
❑ ❑Asian clam(Corbicula)
❑ ❑Crustacean(isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae(E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera(alderfly,fishfly,dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish(Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tad poles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae(P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
®A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ®C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples: ditches,fill,soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees,drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage-streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>-6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
®Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
❑N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds(include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area(beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam,weir)
®D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors-assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach(includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex:watertight dam, sediment deposit)
®C Urban stream(>_24%impervious surface for watershed)
®D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading-assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded(example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and "wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ®A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to< 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to<50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ®D From 10 to<30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ❑A Mature forest
❑B ®B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees< 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts),does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet),or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22: ❑
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ®B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ❑A Medium to high stem density
❑B ®B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation> 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first)as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
®A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ®C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity—assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ®Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A <46 ❑B 46 to<67 ❑C 67 to<79 ❑D 79 to<230 ❑E >_230
Notes/Sketch:
Drought conditions on the day of our site visit(July 13,2021)were identified to be in the DO intensity(Abnormally Dry)category.According to the
Antecedent Precipitation Tool,data was collected during the Dry Season and conditions were within their normal range.
The right bank streamside area was heavily affected by runoff resulting from 1) an adjacent SCM drainageway flowing to the stream from the
adjoining multi-family housing development, 2) increased runoff from the adjoining development due to paved roads and parking lots, and 3)a
wooded buffer that was largely replaced by maintained lawn,which typically results in increased sheet flow rates due to soil compaction. What
remained of the vegetated buffer on along the right bank was largely composed of invasive species(e.g. Chinese privet,glossy privet,Japanese
honeysuckle, pokeweed),which comprised over 50%of the vegetative structure.

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1 Stream B
Stream Site Name Fairhaven Glen Date of Assessment 07-13-2021
SAM-40Dl-1
Stream Category Pal Assessor Name/Organization Sydni Law-Timmons Group
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type(perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1)Hydrology MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2)Baseflow MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2)Flood Flow MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4)Floodplain Access MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4)Microtopography MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4)Channel Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4)Sediment Transport LOW LOW
(4)Stream Geomorphology HIGH HIGH
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA NA
(2)Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(1)Water Quality HIGH HIGH
(2)Baseflow MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation HIGH HIGH
(3)Upland Pollutant Filtration HIGH HIGH
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors NO NO
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance OMITTED NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA NA
(1)Habitat LOW HIGH
(2) In-stream Habitat LOW MEDIUM
(3)Baseflow MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Substrate LOW LOW
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3) In-stream Habitat LOW HIGH
(2)Stream-side Habitat HIGH HIGH
(3)Stream-side Habitat MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH HIGH
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(3)Flow Restriction NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA NA
Overall MEDIUM HIGH

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM Stream D
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map,and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the"Notes/Sketch"section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name(if any): Fairhaven Glen 2. Date of evaluation: 07-13-2021
3.Applicant/owner name: Commonwealth Development Group 4.Assessor name/organization: Sydni Law-Timmons Group
5.County: Mecklenburg 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Catawba on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Kings Branch
8.Site coordinates(decimal degrees,at lower end of assessment reach): 35.141673,-80.891571
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9.Site number(show on attached map): SAM-40D1-2 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 650
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present)to top of bank(feet): 1 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank(feet): 5 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains(M) ® Piedmont(P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain(I) ❑Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A\ , ❑B
valley shape(skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (<0.1 mil) ❑Size 2(0.1 to<0.5 mil) ❑Size 3(0.5 to<5 mil) ❑Size 4(>_5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes,check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d)List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat(list species)
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? ❑Yes ®No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow,water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
®A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach(examples: undersized or perched culverts,causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates,debris jams,
beaver dams).
❑B Not
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples:straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B Not
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
❑A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples: channel down-cutting,existing damming,over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
®B Not
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure,active channel down-cutting(head-cut),active widening,and artificial hardening(such as concrete,gabion, rip-rap).
®A < 10%of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25%of channel unstable
❑C >25%of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction—streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging)that adversely affect
reference interaction(examples: limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,disruption
of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:impoundments,intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
®B Excessive sedimentation(burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal, burning, regular mowing,destruction,etc)
❑1 Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams,D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
®A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes ❑No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach)(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses 0 ❑F 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) CO ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o Y ❑H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation Y LC ❑l Sand bottom
®C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) t ❑J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
®D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
1la. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle-run section(evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool-glide section(evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=absent, Rare
(R)= present but< 10%, Common (C)_ > 10-40%, Abundant(A) _ >40-70%, Predominant(P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder(256—4096 mm)
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble(64—256 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2—64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Sand(.062—2 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial(rip-rap,concrete,etc.)
11d. ❑Yes ❑No Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life-assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ❑Yes ®No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for Size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts, lichens,and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae(T)
❑ ❑Asian clam(Corbicula)
❑ ❑Crustacean(isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae(E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera(alderfly,fishfly,dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish(Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tad poles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae(P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples: ditches,fill,soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees,drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage-streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>-6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds(include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area(beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam,weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors-assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach(includes areas excavated for pump installation)
®B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex:watertight dam, sediment deposit)
®C Urban stream(>_24%impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading-assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded(example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and "wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ®A ®A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to< 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to<50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to<30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees< 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts),does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet),or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation> 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first)as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
®A ®A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity—assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A <46 ❑B 46 to<67 ❑C 67 to<79 ❑D 79 to<230 ❑E >_230
Notes/Sketch:
Drought conditions on the day of our site visit(July 13,2021)were identified to be in the DO intensity(Abnormally Dry)category.According to the
Antecedent Precipitation Tool,data was collected during the Dry Season and conditions were within their normal range.
Excessive sedimentation was observed throughout the stream, filling pools so that pool-glide or riffle-run sequences were largely masked
throughout the assessment reach. Sedimentation likely causes impediment to water flow during low flow periods.

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1 Stream D
Stream Site Name Fairhaven Glen Date of Assessment 07-13-2021
SAM-40D 1-2
Stream Category Pal Assessor Name/Organization Sydni Law-Timmons Group
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type(perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1)Hydrology HIGH HIGH
(2)Baseflow MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2)Flood Flow HIGH HIGH
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation HIGH HIGH
(4)Floodplain Access HIGH HIGH
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer HIGH HIGH
(4)Microtopography HIGH HIGH
(3)Stream Stability HIGH HIGH
(4)Channel Stability HIGH HIGH
(4)Sediment Transport LOW LOW
(4)Stream Geomorphology HIGH HIGH
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA NA
(2)Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(1)Water Quality HIGH HIGH
(2)Baseflow MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation HIGH HIGH
(3)Upland Pollutant Filtration HIGH HIGH
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors NO NO
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance OMITTED NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA NA
(1)Habitat LOW LOW
(2) In-stream Habitat LOW LOW
(3)Baseflow MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Substrate LOW LOW
(3)Stream Stability HIGH HIGH
(3) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2)Stream-side Habitat HIGH HIGH
(3)Stream-side Habitat HIGH HIGH
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH HIGH
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(3)Flow Restriction NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA NA
Overall HIGH HIGH

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM Stream E
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map,and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the"Notes/Sketch"section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name(if any): Fairhaven Glen 2. Date of evaluation: 07-13-2021
3.Applicant/owner name: Commonwealth Development Group 4.Assessor name/organization: Sydni Law-Timmons Group
5.County: Mecklenburg 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Catawba on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Kings Branch
8.Site coordinates(decimal degrees,at lower end of assessment reach): 35.141489,-80.891744
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9.Site number(show on attached map): SAM-40E1-1 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 435
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present)to top of bank(feet): 2 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank(feet): 6 .75 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains(M) ® Piedmont(P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain(I) ❑Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A\ , ❑B
valley shape(skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (<0.1 mil) ❑Size 2(0.1 to<0.5 mil) ❑Size 3(0.5 to<5 mil) ❑Size 4(>_5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes,check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d)List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat(list species)
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? ❑Yes ®No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow,water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
®A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach(examples: undersized or perched culverts,causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates,debris jams,
beaver dams).
❑B Not
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples:straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B Not
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples: channel down-cutting,existing damming,over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure,active channel down-cutting(head-cut),active widening,and artificial hardening(such as concrete,gabion, rip-rap).
❑A < 10%of channel unstable
®B 10 to 25%of channel unstable
❑C >25%of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction—streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
®A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ®B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging)that adversely affect
reference interaction(examples: limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,disruption
of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:impoundments,intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
®B Excessive sedimentation(burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal, burning, regular mowing,destruction,etc)
❑1 Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams,D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
®A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes ❑No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach)(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses 0 ❑F 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) CO ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o Y ❑H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation Y LC ❑l Sand bottom
®C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) t ❑J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
®D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
1la. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle-run section(evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool-glide section(evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=absent, Rare
(R)= present but< 10%, Common (C)_ > 10-40%, Abundant(A) _ >40-70%, Predominant(P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder(256—4096 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble(64—256 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Gravel (2—64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Sand(.062—2 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial(rip-rap,concrete,etc.)
11d. ❑Yes ❑No Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life-assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ❑Yes ®No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for Size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts, lichens,and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae(T)
❑ ❑Asian clam(Corbicula)
❑ ❑Crustacean(isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae(E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera(alderfly,fishfly,dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish(Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tad poles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae(P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples: ditches,fill,soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees,drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage-streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>-6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence-streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds(include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area(beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam,weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors-assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach(includes areas excavated for pump installation)
®B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex:watertight dam, sediment deposit)
®C Urban stream(>_24%impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading-assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded(example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and "wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ®A ®A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to< 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to<50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to<30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees< 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts),does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet),or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation> 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first)as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
®B ®B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity—assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ®Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A <46 ❑B 46 to<67 ❑C 67 to<79 ❑D 79 to<230 ❑E >_230
Notes/Sketch:
Drought conditions on the day of our site visit(July 13,2021)were identified to be in the DO intensity(Abnormally Dry)category.According to the
Antecedent Precipitation Tool,data was collected during the Dry Season and conditions were within their normal range.
Excessive sedimentation observed throughout the assessment reach as having buried stream features, likely causing flow impediments during
low flow periods.
A culvert with an approximately 20-ft concrete dissipator pad was observed at the top of the stream.While the culvert itself was not perched,the
concrete pad was approximately 3 ft from the streambed at its outfall.
Vegetative communities along both streambanks were diverse with some exotic plant species(e.g. Chinese privet at 10%cover, Japanese stilt
grass at 30%cover)present, but not overwhelming the natural plant communities.

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1 Stream E
Stream Site Name Fairhaven Glen Date of Assessment 07-13-2021
SAM-40El-1
Stream Category Pal Assessor Name/Organization Sydni Law-Timmons Group
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type(perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1)Hydrology MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2)Baseflow MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2)Flood Flow MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation HIGH HIGH
(4)Floodplain Access HIGH HIGH
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer HIGH HIGH
(4)Microtopography HIGH HIGH
(3)Stream Stability LOW LOW
(4)Channel Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4)Sediment Transport LOW LOW
(4)Stream Geomorphology LOW LOW
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA NA
(2)Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(1)Water Quality HIGH HIGH
(2)Baseflow MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation HIGH HIGH
(3)Upland Pollutant Filtration HIGH HIGH
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors NO NO
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance OMITTED NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA NA
(1)Habitat LOW LOW
(2) In-stream Habitat LOW LOW
(3)Baseflow MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Substrate LOW LOW
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2)Stream-side Habitat HIGH HIGH
(3)Stream-side Habitat HIGH HIGH
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH HIGH
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(3)Flow Restriction NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA NA
Overall MEDIUM MEDIUM

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM Wetland A
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
USACE AID# NCDWR#
Project Name Fairhaven Glen Date of Evaluation 07-13-2021
Applicant/Owner Name Commonwealth Development Wetland Site Name WAM-40A1-1
Corporation
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization S dni Law-Timmons Group
Level III Ecoregion Piedmont Nearest Named Water Body Kings Branch
River Basin Catawba USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit 03050103
County Mecklenburg NCDWR Region Mooresville
❑ Yes ® No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude deci-de rees 35.141851,-80.890053
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area(may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past(for instance,within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications(examples: ditches,dams, beaver dams,dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland(examples:discharges containing obvious pollutants,presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks(USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress(examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage,disease,storm damage,salt intrusion,etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration(examples: mowing,clear-cutting,exotics,etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ❑ Yes ® No
Regulatory Considerations-Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area(PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)(including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HOW, ORW,or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any?(check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
® Brownwater
❑ Tidal(if tidal,check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ® Yes ❑ No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface(GS)in the assessment area and vegetation structure(VS)in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable(see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
®A ❑A Not severely altered
❑B ®B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area(ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides,salt intrusion[where appropriate],exotic species,grazing,less
diversity[if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration(Surf)and sub-surface storage capacity and duration(Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only,while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
❑B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially(typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered(typically,alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples:draining,flooding,soil compaction,filling,excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief—assessment area/wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA)and the wetland type(WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water> 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®D ®D Depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
®C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure-assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
❑B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features(concentrations,depletions,or rhizospheres)
®C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ®A Soil ribbon< 1 inch
❑B Soil ribbon>_ 1 inch
4c. ®A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland-opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges(Surf)and sub-surface pollutants or discharges(Sub). Examples
of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank,underground storage tank(UST), etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges(pathogen, particulate,or soluble)entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland(water discoloration,dead vegetation,excessive
sedimentation,odor)
6. Land Use-opportunity metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply(at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed(WS),within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area(2M).
WS 5M 2M
®A ®A ®A > 10%impervious surfaces
❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations(or other local,concentrated source of pollutants
❑C ❑C ❑C >-20%coverage of pasture
❑D ❑D ❑D >-20%coverage of agricultural land(regularly plowed land)
❑E ❑E ❑E >_20%coverage of maintained grass/herb
❑F ❑F ❑F >_20%coverage of clear-cut land
❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer-assessment area/wetland complex condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
®Yes ❑No If Yes,continue to 7b. If No,skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
❑A >_50 feet
❑B From 30 to<50 feet
❑C From 15 to<30 feet
®D From 5 to< 15 feet
❑E <5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed,combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
®<_ 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water(no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
®Yes ❑No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
®Sheltered-adjacent open water with width <2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
❑Exposed-adjacent open water with width >_2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area-wetland type/wetland complex condition metric(evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area(WT)and
the wetland complex at the assessment area(WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet
❑B ❑B From 80 to< 100 feet
❑C ❑C From 50 to<80 feet
❑D ❑D From 40 to<50 feet
❑E ❑E From 30 to<40 feet
❑F ❑F From 15 to<30 feet
®G ®G From 5 to< 15 feet
❑H ❑H <5 feet

9. Inundation Duration-assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
❑A Evidence of short-duration inundation(<7 consecutive days)
®B Evidence of saturation,without evidence of inundation
❑C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation(7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition-assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only(no plant growth since deposition).
®A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size-wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut,select"K"for the FW column.
WT WC FW(if applicable)
❑A ❑A ❑A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to<50 acres
❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to<25 acres
❑F ❑F ❑F From 5 to< 10 acres
❑G ❑G ❑G From 1 to<5 acres
❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to< 1 acre
❑I ❑I ❑I From 0.1 to<0.5 acre
®J ®J ®J From 0.01 to<0.1 acre
❑K ❑K ❑K <0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness-wetland type condition metric(evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent(>_90%)of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is<90%of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas-landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water(if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water> 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
❑A ❑A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
®C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
❑D ®D From 10 to<50 acres
❑E ❑E < 10 acres
❑F ❑F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect-wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non-forested areas>-40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear-cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option"C."
❑A 0
®B 1 to 4
❑C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition-assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species,with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
❑B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant,over a large portion of the expected strata.
®C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non-
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity-assessment area condition metric(evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species(< 10%cover of exotics).
❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has> 10%to 50%cover of exotics.
®C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species(>50% cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure—assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes ❑No If Yes,continue to 17b. If No,skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands.
❑A >_25%coverage of vegetation
❑B <25%coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA)and the wetland type(WT)separately.
AA WT
o®A ®A Canopy closed,or nearly closed,with natural gaps associated with natural processes
❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U ❑C ❑C Canopy sparse or absent
T
o❑A ❑A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
®B ®B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
❑C ❑C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
❑A ❑A Dense shrub layer
®B ®B Moderate density shrub layer
U) ❑C ❑C Shrub layer sparse or absent
.0 ®A ®A Dense herb layer
_ ❑B ❑B Moderate density herb layer
❑C ❑C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Large snags(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches DBH,or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not
19. Diameter Class Distribution—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems>6 inches in diameter at breast height(DBH); many large trees(> 12 inches DBH)are
present.
®B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH,few are> 12 inch DBH.
❑C Majority of canopy trees are<6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris.
❑A Large logs(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches in diameter,or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion—wetland type/open water condition metric(evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas,while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D
22. Hydrologic Connectivity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching,fill,sedimentation,channelization,diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
®A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
1.VS considered to be severely altered due to high percentage of exotic species dominating the tree,sapling,shrub, and herbaceous strata.
15 & 16. Vegetation largely composed of exotic species, which comprised >50% of total vegetative cover. Invasive pecies observed included:
Chinese privet(Ligustrum sinense) 15%,pokeweed(Phytolacca americana)at 10%cover,Japanese stilt grass(Microstegium vimi neum)at 80%
of the herbacous layer alone, and glossy privet(Ligustrum lucidum)at 20%. Native species observed included: red maple(Acer rubrum)at 8%
cover,American elm(Ulmus americana)at 10%cover,and trumpet creeper(Campsis radicans)at 15%cover.

Wetland A
NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WAM-40A1-1 Date of Assessment 07-13-2021
Sydni Law-Timmons
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Group
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition HIGH
Sub-surface Storage and
Retention Condition HIGH
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Particulate Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Soluble Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Physical Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Pollution Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition HIGH
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition LOW
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Condition HIGH
Water Quality Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Habitat Condition LOW
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM Wetland B
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
USACE AID# NCDWR#
Project Name Fairhaven Glen Date of Evaluation 07-13-2021
Applicant/Owner Name Commonwealth Development Wetland Site Name WAM-40131-1
Group
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization S dni Law-Timmons Group
Level III Ecoregion Piedmont Nearest Named Water Body Kings Branch
River Basin Catawba USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit 03050103
County Mecklenburg NCDWR Region Mooresville
❑ Yes ® No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude deci-de rees 35.141764,-80.890529
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area(may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past(for instance,within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications(examples: ditches,dams, beaver dams,dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland(examples:discharges containing obvious pollutants,presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks(USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress(examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage,disease,storm damage,salt intrusion,etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration(examples: mowing,clear-cutting,exotics,etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ❑ Yes ® No
Regulatory Considerations-Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area(PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)(including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HOW, ORW,or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any?(check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
® Brownwater
❑ Tidal(if tidal,check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ® Yes ❑ No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface(GS)in the assessment area and vegetation structure(VS)in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable(see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
❑A ❑A Not severely altered
®B ®B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area(ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides,salt intrusion[where appropriate],exotic species,grazing,less
diversity[if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration(Surf)and sub-surface storage capacity and duration(Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only,while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
❑A ❑A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
❑B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially(typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
®C ®C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered(typically,alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples:draining,flooding,soil compaction,filling,excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief—assessment area/wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA)and the wetland type(WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water> 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
®C ®C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
®C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure-assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
®B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features(concentrations,depletions,or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ®A Soil ribbon< 1 inch
❑B Soil ribbon>_ 1 inch
4c. ®A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland-opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges(Surf)and sub-surface pollutants or discharges(Sub). Examples
of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank,underground storage tank(UST), etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges(pathogen, particulate,or soluble)entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland(water discoloration,dead vegetation,excessive
sedimentation,odor)
6. Land Use-opportunity metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply(at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed(WS),within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area(2M).
WS 5M 2M
®A ®A ®A > 10%impervious surfaces
❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations(or other local,concentrated source of pollutants
❑C ❑C ❑C >-20%coverage of pasture
❑D ❑D ❑D >-20%coverage of agricultural land(regularly plowed land)
❑E ❑E ❑E >_20%coverage of maintained grass/herb
❑F ❑F ❑F >_20%coverage of clear-cut land
❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer-assessment area/wetland complex condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
®Yes ❑No If Yes,continue to 7b. If No,skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
❑A >_50 feet
❑B From 30 to<50 feet
❑C From 15 to<30 feet
®D From 5 to< 15 feet
❑E <5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed,combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
®<_ 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water(no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
®Yes ❑No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
®Sheltered-adjacent open water with width <2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
❑Exposed-adjacent open water with width >_2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area-wetland type/wetland complex condition metric(evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area(WT)and
the wetland complex at the assessment area(WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet
❑B ❑B From 80 to< 100 feet
❑C ❑C From 50 to<80 feet
❑D ❑D From 40 to<50 feet
❑E ❑E From 30 to<40 feet
❑F ❑F From 15 to<30 feet
®G ®G From 5 to< 15 feet
❑H ❑H <5 feet

9. Inundation Duration-assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
®A Evidence of short-duration inundation(<7 consecutive days)
❑B Evidence of saturation,without evidence of inundation
❑C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation(7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition-assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only(no plant growth since deposition).
❑A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
®C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size-wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut,select"K"for the FW column.
WT WC FW(if applicable)
❑A ❑A ❑A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to<50 acres
❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to<25 acres
❑F ❑F ❑F From 5 to< 10 acres
❑G ❑G ❑G From 1 to<5 acres
❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to< 1 acre
❑I ❑I ❑I From 0.1 to<0.5 acre
®J ®J ®J From 0.01 to<0.1 acre
❑K ❑K ❑K <0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness-wetland type condition metric(evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent(>_90%)of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is<90%of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas-landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water(if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water> 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
❑A ❑A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
®C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
❑D ®D From 10 to<50 acres
❑E ❑E < 10 acres
❑F ❑F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect-wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non-forested areas>-40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear-cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option"C."
❑A 0
®B 1 to 4
❑C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition-assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species,with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
❑B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant,over a large portion of the expected strata.
®C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non-
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity-assessment area condition metric(evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species(< 10%cover of exotics).
❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has> 10%to 50%cover of exotics.
®C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species(>50% cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure—assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes ❑No If Yes,continue to 17b. If No,skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands.
❑A >_25%coverage of vegetation
❑B <25%coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA)and the wetland type(WT)separately.
AA WT
o❑A ❑A Canopy closed,or nearly closed,with natural gaps associated with natural processes
®B ®B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U ❑C ❑C Canopy sparse or absent
T
o❑A ❑A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
®B ®B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
❑C ❑C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
❑A ❑A Dense shrub layer
®B ®B Moderate density shrub layer
U) ❑C ❑C Shrub layer sparse or absent
.0 ❑A ❑A Dense herb layer
_ ❑B ❑B Moderate density herb layer
®C ®C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Large snags(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches DBH,or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not
19. Diameter Class Distribution—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems>6 inches in diameter at breast height(DBH); many large trees(> 12 inches DBH)are
present.
®B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH,few are> 12 inch DBH.
❑C Majority of canopy trees are<6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris.
❑A Large logs(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches in diameter,or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion—wetland type/open water condition metric(evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas,while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D
�., r
22. Hydrologic Connectivity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching,fill,sedimentation,channelization,diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
®A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
1.GS considered severely disturbed due to bank slumping into wetland and excessvie sedimentation received from adjacent stream.Stormwater
conveyance from adjoining multi-family housing development observed flowing into top of wetland.VS considered severely disturbed due to high
percentage of exotic plant species observed within the wetland area.
2.Surface and subsurface storage capacity/duration considered severely disturbed due to excessive sediment loading from adjacent stream and
stormwater runoff inputs from urban area via an SCM.
15 & 16. Exotic species observed included: glossy privet(Ligustrum Iucidum) at 30% cover, Chinese privet(Ligustrum sinense) at 25% cover,
and Japanese honeysuckle(Lonicera japonica)20%cover. Native plant species observed included:trumpet creeper(Campsis radicans)at 5%
cover,sourwood(Oxydendrum arboreum)at 10%cover, muscadine(Vitis rotundifolia)at 8%cover,and sawtooth blackberry(Rubus argutus)at
2%cover.

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet Wetland B
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WAM-40131-1 Date of Assessment 07-13-2021
Sydni Law-Timmons
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Group
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW
Sub-surface Storage and
Retention Condition LOW
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Particulate Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Soluble Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Physical Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Pollution Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition LOW
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Condition LOW
Water Quality Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Habitat Condition LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

Appendix E

IPaC U.S. Fish &Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical
habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's
(USFWS)jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced
below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but
that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area.
However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust
resources typically requires gathering additional site-specific (e.g., vegetation/species
surveys) and project-specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the
USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to
each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI
Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that
section.
Location
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina 0
r N
Cie err:,
CMIc re -
Soll ti'�'• r6ry
.=Pr•plgn
Toro a
Rd
J, `��iA —
Local office
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
%. [phone]
Ja [phone]
160 Zillicoa Street

Asheville, NC 28801-1082

Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of
project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each
species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes
areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in
that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at
the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow
downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this
list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any
potential effects to species, additional site-specific and project-specific information is often
required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the
Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be
present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted,
funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list
which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from
either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field
office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC
website and request an official species list by doing the following:
1 . Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed speciesi and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on
this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1 . Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also
shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for
more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).

2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office
of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals
NAM E STATUS
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus Proposed Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
Insects
NAME STA \0
�S��
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAM E STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3849
Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata Threatened
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3473

Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the
endangered species themselves.
There are no critical habitats at this location.
You are still required to determine if your project(s) may have effects on all
above listed species.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and olden
Eagle Protection Acts.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and
consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1 . The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gQv//program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-
migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-
measures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this
location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see
exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around
your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date
range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional
maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your

list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other
important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization
measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF
PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be
present and breeding in your project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but
warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of
development or activities. \0\
Black-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus erythropthalmus Breeds May 15 to Oct 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9399
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 25
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Eastern Whip-poor-will Antrostomus vociferus Breeds May 1 to Aug 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.

Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to
be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your
project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and
understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before
using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( )
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-
week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey
effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One
can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also
high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1 . The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events
for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted
Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in
week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ( )

Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds
across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your
project area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of
surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The
number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are
based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG */SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle I I I t tt++ 111104 11 1111 IIII
Non-BCC
Vulnerable
Black-billed TTTT ++++ ++ +4 I 4�T ++++ TTTT TTTT TTTT ++++ ++++ ++++
Cuckoo
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Chimney Swift
BCC Rangewide T T�+++ -I 1 1++ 0101 IN*+ ++++ ++++
(CON)
Eastern Whip E TTTT++++ I +t I I I Mt it++ ++++ ++++ +��+ TTTT TTTT TTTT TTTT
poor-will TT T T
BCC Rangewide
(CON) L Prairie Warbler BCC Rangewide I I I-+ ++++ TTTT ++J I I I
(CON)
Prothonotary Warbler ++++ ++++ +++o NON sell III! I +1� ++++ TTTT ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide
(CON) yy yyy yy 1yyi
Red-headed ++�
Woodpecker +T+� T+++ T+TT ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide
(CON)

Rusty Blackbird 0000 0000 T 4++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC- BCR TT T
Wood Thrush ++++ +++ ITT
BCC Rangewide TT T TTTT T
(CON)
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all
birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds
are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the
locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure.
To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of
Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity
you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC)and other
species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge
Network(AKN).The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science
datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid
cell(s)which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because
they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a
particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It
is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially
present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator(RAIL)Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by
the Avian Knowledge Network(AKN)..This data is derived from a growing collection of survey., banding, and
citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes
available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret
them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering,
migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look at the range maps
provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each bird in your results. If a bird

on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If"Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC)that are of concern throughout their
range anywhere within the USA(including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin
Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in
the continental USA; and
3. "Non-BCC-Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either
because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or(for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in
offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or
longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in
particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of
rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and
minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and
groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data
Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to
you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal
maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird
Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the
year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional
information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact
Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating
the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of
priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other
birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of
presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s)that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint.
On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort(indicated by the black vertical bar)
and for the existence of the "no data" indicator(a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key

component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more
dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack
of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying
what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they
might be breeding(which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to
confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or
minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more
about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to
avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands �0\
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must
undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the
individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
There are no refuge lands at this location.
Fish hatcheries
There are no fish hatcheries at this location.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
( NWI)
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Wetland information is not available at this time

This can happen when the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map service is unavailable, or
for very large projects that intersect many wetland areas. Try again, or visit the NWI map to
view wetlands at this location.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of
high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A
margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on-the-ground inspection of any particular
site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image
analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work
conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any
mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There
may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted
on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of
aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or
submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and
nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also
been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe
wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or
products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local
government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies.
Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should
seek the advice of appropriate Federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory
programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.

Roy Cooper,Governor
■`00■
n ■ NC DEPARTMENT OF D.Reid Wilson,Secretary
■■ ■i NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ own Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director,Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-22046
May 24, 2023
Lauren Norris-Heflin
Timmons Group
5410 Trinity Road, Suite 102
Raleigh, NC 27607
RE: Fairhaven Glen - updated letter; 47655
Dear Lauren Norris-Heflin:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one-mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally-listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one-mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.ciov/offices/Di rectory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally-
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod nev.butler(a)ncdcr.aov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
UcOARI MEN i QF NAiURAL ANU LULTURAL kLSiQokLES
Q 121 W JONES STREET,RALEIGH.NC 27603 • 1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER.RALEIGH.NC 27699
® OFC 919 707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Fairhaven Glen - updated letter
Project No. 47655
May 24, 2023
NCNHDE-22046
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID :Scientific Name Common Name Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
IIIIIIIIIIIIIINE Date Rank MMEE ME
Freshwater 13485 Lasmigona decorata Carolina Heelsplitter 1918-Pre X 3-Medium Endangered Endangered G1 S1
Bivalve
Vascular Plant 13743 Delphinium exaltatum Tall Larkspur 1800s Hi? 5-Very --- Threatened G3 S2
Low
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area I Owner Type
City of Charlotte Open Space City of Charlotte Local Government
Mecklenburg County Open Space Mecklenburg County Local Government
Mecklenburg County Open Space - Archdale Park Mecklenburg County Local Government
Mecklenburg County Open Space - Kings Branch Mecklenburg County Local Government
Greenway
Mecklenburg County Open Space - Little Sugar Mecklenburg County Local Government
Creek Greenway
Mecklenburg County Open Space - Ramblewood Mecklenburg County Local Government
Soccer Complex
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/help. Data query generated on May 24,2023;source: NCNHP,Spring (April)2023. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-22046: Fairhaven Glen - updated letter
p 77
718 Jt
�F
2 4a
F
�Py
Archdale Dr h.
00
O
t '
a
a sx
o m a
Rd a £ o
A
Edgewat r O,
0
5�
�o
n \ Starmount
rrowoo
dR
A kv �\ o
a ,��.:�,�� a"
♦3 S A �00
o
a ^_
a
Hebron
N p
a
H+E 4a\\oriSEota� j' 0 0.28 0.55 1.1 Miles
sr �i I I I I I I
May 24, 2023
Managed Area (MAREA)
Buffered Project Boundary
Pro ect BOUndar Sources Esn Airbus DS USGS NGA NASA,CGIAR,N Robinson,NCEAS.
J y NLS OS NMA Geodatastyrelsen. Rykswaterstaal GSA Geoland FERIA.
Inlermap and the GIS user community
Sources. Esrt HERE- Garm n FAO. NOAA, USGS. ® OpenStree%lap
contnbutors and the GIS User Community
Page 3 of 3

Appendix F

NCHPO HPOWEB - Fairhaven Glen
GtC" Gir wo �`tJette��� a o
anbY
°
0
a QL°5e Ln o R
G �
Montelaire �
Cho" South 4ait0re ict,_,r, ap
Ltd Chn-ti<ai s Sta
O�Y a r C.-rarer 0 CAP,
t
C y
Nations Ford fro `aAL v Starmount
EO�es r` eQ. e ElErrtzntary u ¢ c�Q' Larklield _.term unr
G GV5 C/ 7 of Acres Or Nit y�i t South Oaks d,r1eP Pre-K
onY
to C ar4 'enter rook
Post Kd p1n�`� ` Lt, . took Dr
Q v sko^epo rtOWp 06Rd ` Slacb
41) A
Qc °�OT e t Oa 51J tpoodstream Dr
�°°k Ln �°
e<<��° MECKLENBURG
4, r d
�a °►d°°a G Gy 0
Rry : K1n95 /n> @
�a4 a O pe`d/Ct a 0tton S/ v °�.S�O`
PD Cl) a �� T'�►arrn�h LA0.^1ct
G i o
c
co
FOjest9d v 3 Old Hebron, Rd, Rockt
O° ` Hebron v
y�r S Iy//,Rd Mapler.
o
'010 or we
Pic ut S/ ryes Rry �� c Ridg
N `o
Antt`��
IFofd� F h eb�on
a \ate aid �� o
00 4 a a, (P
oar s' 01-
Fbirri and 3 O oh Lakes R
cl
3/8/2023, 9:49:09 AM 1:18,056
0 0.13 0.25 0.5 mi
Find resources within a buffer_Query result 0 Counties (outline) o 0.2 0.4 0.8 km
City of Charlotte,York County Government,SC,State of North Carolina DOT,
Surveyed Only individual resources & centerpoints Esri,HERE,Garmin,INCREMENT P,NGA,USGS
Surveyed Only
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
City of Charlotte,York County Government,SC,State of North Carolina DOT,Esri,HERE,Garmin,INCREMENT P,NGA,USGS

OBIECTID Id Site ID Status Local Statt HD status Site Name Descriptio Notes Internal Year NR Year SL Year DOE Year Lands Year Su—NR nomim DOE Repoi County Quad Narr Township Density Location Photo Link Spatial Au Latitude Longitude Year Surve x y
135089 0 MK1716 50 None None WET Build 19291-story parapet roof brick Art Deco building 1990 Mecklenbi Charlotte I Charlotte H E side Nations Ford Rd(SR1126) 35,13194 -80.891 -9004748 4181827