20071827 Ver 1_401 Application_20071007

~S&ME
October 26, 2007
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Attention: Mr. James Shern
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attention: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Reference: Nationwide Permit No. 39
Joyner Park
Approximately 118-Acre Tract
Wake Forest, NC
S&ME Project No. 1054-06-078
Dear Mr. Shern and Ms. Karoly:
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) is submitting an application for a Nationwide Permit No. 39 and Neuse River
Riparian Buffer Rule approval associated with proposed impacts to waters of the U.S. and riparian
buffers on the above referenced property. S&ME is working on behalf of the Town of Wake
Forest who will be considered the applicant for this permit. Please find enclosed the following:
• A completed Pre-Construction Notification (PCN)
• Agent Authorization Form
• Site Vicinity Map (Figure 1)
• USGS Topographic Map (Figure 2)
• NRCS Soils Map (Figure 3)
• Property Boundary Survey (Figure 4)
• Waters of the U.S. Map (Figure 5)
• Site Plan Overview
• Pond Dam Reconstruction Drawing (Figure 6)
• Buffer Impact Area A (Figure 7)
• Buffer Impact Area E (Figure 8)
• Sanitary Sewer Crossing Map
• DWQ Riparian Buffer Determination Letter
S&ME, irvC. / 3201 Spring Forest Road /Raleigh, NC 27616 / p 919.872.2660 f 919.876.3958 / www.smeinc.com

Nationwide Permit No. 39 S&ME Project No. 1054-06-078
Joyner Park October 26. 2007
Natural Heritage Program Letter ~ p A I D
Diehl and Phillips Letter regarding level spreaders
Site Photographs
07-1827
PROJECT BACKGROUND
For purposes of this PCN, the subject property is referred to as Joyner Park. The site is an
approximately 118-acre farm located on Harris Road on the east side of U.S. Highway 1 in Wake
Forest, N.C. See Figure 1.
Provided below is a list of pertinent information relating to the site and permit applicant:
Applicant:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Address of Project:
Size of Property:
Closest Waterway:
River Basin:
County:
Coordinate Location of Site:
USGS Quadrangle
SITE CONDITIONS
Town of Wake Forest (Ms. Susan Simpson)
401 Elm Avenue
Wake Forest, NC 27587
919-554-6182
701 Harris Road
Approximately 118 Acres
Richland Creek
Neuse
Wake
35.9946N 78.5176 W
Wake Forest, N.C. (1999)
The site is composed of fallow agricultural fields and forest. It contains a RPW (perennial
tributary) that flows through the embankment of a pond in the central part of the property.
Richland Creek is near the project and the proposed sewer will cross this tributary to reach the
project. See attached Figures 2 and 3 and Site Photographs.
ON-SITE JURISDICTIONAL AREAS
S&ME wetlands professionals conducted a jurisdictional delineation of the subject site in May
2006. This delineation identified a RPW (perennial tributary [Tributary 1]) that flows through
the property from west to east. The total length of Tributary 1 is approximately 2,500 linear feet
(lf). Tributary 1 flows into an approximately 2.2-acre pond in the central portion of the property.
Approximately 0.5 acre of adjacent and abutting wetlands were identified along Tributary 1 at the
head of the pond. This delineation was approved by Mr. Monte Matthews with the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USAGE). See Figure 5. A jurisdictional determination was not issued on
this site. Richland Creek is located about 200 feet east of this project and a sewer easement runs
from the existing sewer up to and across the subject site. To provide sewer service to this site,
2

Nationwide Permit No. 39 S&ME Project No. 1054-06-078
Jovner Park October 26, 2007
the sewer pipe will have to cross Richland Creek. S&ME walked this sewer easement from the
existing manhole to the subject site and did not observe any jurisdictional areas except for the
creek channel. The USACE has not reviewed this offsite sewer easement area.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed park and associated features such as parking lots, playgrounds, athletic fields,
amphitheater, buildings, etc. are planned for the subject property. These amenities will be sited
on high ground away from jurisdictional waters of the U.S. Additionally, repair of the on-site
dam will be completed and a sanitary sewer will extend from the park and tie into an existing
sewer located just off-site.
PROPOSED JURISDICTIONAL IMPACTS
As a result of dam repair and installation of a sanitary sewer, Tributary 1 will be impacted in two
locations, the section below the pond spillway and at the sanitary sewer crossing (Figure 6). The
total area of jurisdictional impacts on this site includes area C 1, a man-made spillway channel;
area C2, a natural stream channel below the dam; and area F, the sanitary sewer crossing (Figure
6 and Site Photographs). Area C1, consists of 801inear feet of Tributary 1 (spillway channel)
that flows across high ground. This area will be filled. Area C2 consists of 135 feet of Tributary
1 (natural channel) at the base of the dam. This area will be filled and the outflow from the
overflow pipes will flow into a stilling basin before waters join the remaining downstream
portion of Tributary 1. Area F, consists of 20 linear feet of RPW of natural channel known as
Richland Creek. The sanitary sewer crossing will have temporary impacts to approximately 20
feet of Richland Creek for installation of the sewer pipe.
PROTECTED SPECIES AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
S&ME sent scoping letters to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) asking for a review of known occurrences of
federally threatened or endangered species on or near the subject site. Also, a scoping letter was
sent to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) for a records review of historic sites on or
near the subject site. S&ME received responses from the NCNHP on September 17, 2007 (see
attached letter). To date we have not received responses from the USFWS or the SHPO.
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
The proposed pond dam repair is needed to protect public safety in the proposed park. None of
the approximately 0.5 acre of wetlands at the head of the pond will be disturbed by the project.
No waters in the pond will be permanently impacted. Only temporary dewatering of the pond
will be done to repair the dam. Of the approximately 2,500 if feet of Tributary 1, approximately
2,285 if will not be impacted.
3

Nationwide Permit No. 39 S&ME Project No. 1054-06-078
Jovner Park October 26. 2007
PROPOSED NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACTS
One section of Tributary 1 located below the pond spillway will be impacted by activities
associated with the dam repair (Figure 6). The North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
made a site visit on May 1, 2006 and determined that Tributary 1 located within the subject
property is subject to the Neuse River riparian buffer rules. DWQ determined that two other
stream features mapped on the NRCS soil maps are not subject to the buffer rules because they
do not have enough stream quality indicators to qualify as an intermittent stream. See attached
letter dated May 1, 2006 for more details.
The project involves construction of walking trails that extend across and along the stream and
pond. Except for three crossings, the trails are located outside of the 50-foot riparian buffer.
According to the Table of Uses found in Section 6 of the Neuse and Tar-Pamlico River Basin
Riparian Buffer Rules, greenway and hiking trails are allowable provided that there are no
practical alternatives to the requested use. One crossing is located on an old breached pond dam
on the west side of the property (Figure 7). This is the most practical area to cross the stream
since there is already an existing pond dam that has been breached. Another crossing is located
in the central portion of the property at the existing pond dam which is the most practical area to
cross to the other side in the central area of the park. The last trail crossing is at the east end of
the property at a narrow section of the stream (Figure 8 and Site Photographs).
The most practical area to access sewer to the site is through a perpendicular 20-foot sewer
access easement proposed along the east side of the property. This will impact less than 40 feet
of buffer and have a 20-foot maintenance easement. According to the table of uses this activity is
allowable if there are no practical alternatives (Figures 6).
The repair of the existing pond dam will require disturbance of the vegetation in both Zones 1
and 2 of the riparian buffers around the pond dam. See the colored impacts in area C of Figure 6.
According to the Table of Uses, Dam maintenance activities are exempt as long as the activities
minimize soil disturbance and provide maximum water quality protection as practical. Figure 6
indicates some of the practices that will be implemented to accomplish this such as silt fencing,
tree protection fencing etc.
To protect the water quality in these waters, stormwater BMP's such as level spreaders have been
implemented to catch and treat the first inch of stormwater runoff on the impervious surfaces of
this site. See the attached plans. stormwater flows in excess of the first inch will be bypassed to
the pond. See Area G on Figure 6. The proposed impervious surface for this site is 8.1 acres or
6.8 percent. The attached Table 1 shows the proposed impacts to the buffers in each of these
areas. They are labeled A through G, but the trail areas B and D no longer impact the riparian
buffers, so they were taken off the plans.
4

Nationwide Permit No. 39 S&ME Project No. 1054-06-078
Joyner Park October 26, 2007
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
Appropriate sediment and .erosion control practices equaling those outlined in the most recent
version of the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual" will
be implemented. Specifications governing the proper design, installation, operation and
maintenance of such Best Management Practices will be met to comply with the appropriate
turbidity water quality standard. Sediment and erosion control measures placed in waters will be
removed and the original grade restored within two months after the Division of Land Resources
has released the project. Impacts have been avoided and minimized, and appropriate measures
will be taken during construction to allow flow and circulation patterns of waters of the U.S. to
remain unaffected.
MITIGATION
Compensatory mitigation may not be required for this project since the impacts are minimal and
avoidance and minimization efforts have been undertaken in the planning process. The spillway
channel appears to be man-made and is cut through high ground; therefore, mitigation is not
expected for this section of Tributary 1. Also, we do not expect any mitigation for the sewer
crossing.
By copy of this correspondence and completed PCN, we are requesting your written concurrence
with this NWP No. 39 permit application. If we can provide additional information or answer
questions you may have, please feel free to contact us at [phone].
Sincerely,
S&ME, Inc.
~~
/~~
ohn R. Davis, Jr. L.S.S.
Natural Resources Project Manager
~~~
Lisa J. Beckstrom, C.E., C.W.B.~~
Senior Reviewer
Attachments
cc: Mr. Mark Robinson, R.L.A., Mark Robinson and Associates
Mr. Alan Keith, P.E., Diehl and Phillips Engineers, PA

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. ~ 7 - 1 8 2 7
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing p A, I D
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39 (WQC 3631L_
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), c c e~ ~~
D ~ _ ,.. ~,
~J
II. Applicant Information
OCT 2 `~ ZQOI
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Town of Wake Forest Parks & Recreation Director Attn: - ' "K c~iJAl~7Y
Mailing Address: 401 Elm Avenue
Wake Forest. NC 27587
Telephone Number: 919-554-6182 Fax Number: NA
E-mail Address: NA
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Mr. John Davis, Jr.
Company Affiliation: S&ME Inc
Mailing Address: 3201 Spring Forest Road
Raleigh, NC 27616
Telephone Number: 919-218-3352 Fax Number: 919-876-3958
E-mail Address: idavis(a~smeinc.com
Page 5 of 13

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Joyner Park
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 184.06-38-1114
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Wake Forest
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NA
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Raleigh, travel U.S
Highway 1 North to Wake Forest. Cross over NC 98 and travel approx. one mile. Turn right
on Harris Rd. Travel approximately `/2 mile site is on the right.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.9946 °N 78.5176 °W
6. Property size (acres): 118.841 Acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Richland Creek flows approx. five miles to Neuse
River
8. River Basin: Neuse River
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Site is an existing farm with fallow fields. A residential
subdivision borders the property on the south.
Page 6 of l3

Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The site
will be converted to a town park with hiking_trails, amphitheater, parking lot etc. Equipment
used to construct the park will include: bulldoziers, road graders, pans, backhoes, and
excavators.
10. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The parks and recreation department with the
town of Wake Forest has determined that a park is desired by the taxpayers. They have
determined that the park should include reg enway trails, an ampitheater, and sports fields.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.LP. project, along with
construction schedules
A field visit was made by Mr. Monte Mattews with the USACE in May 2006. No jurisdictional
determination document was issued.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permits are anticipated for this site
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 13

1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The existing_pond dam needs
repair and in doing so the water level will be temporarily lowered. Overflow from the existing
pond is through the spillway. Water flowing through the spillway has created a jurisdictional
channel across high ground to a point where it connects with Tributary 1 which is a RPW or
perennial stream. The proposed pond construction will impact this spillway channel (80 lfl.
Also, a section of Tributary 1 that the spillway flows into will be permanentl~pacted with the
installation of overflow pipes (135 lfl.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
( es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
NONE

Total Wetland Impact (acres) None
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.5 Acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must he included. To calculate acreage. multiply leneth X width. then divide by 43.560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Im act Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
C1 Trib 1 (Spillway) Fill (Perm) Perennial* 12 80 0.022
C2 Tributary 1 Fill (Perm) Perennial 15 135 0.046
F Richland Creek Excavation (Temp) Perennial 20 20 0.009

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 235 0.077

* The 80-foot spillway section of the stream is unimportant channel since it is flow over high ground
and may not require mitigation.
Page 8 of 13

5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.077
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.077
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 235
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USAGE.
8. Pond Creation (EXISTING POND)
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
Page 9 of 13

techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The proposed pond dam repair
is needed to protect public safety in the proposed park. None of the approximately 0.5 acre of
wetlands at the head of the pond will be disturbed by the protect. No waters in the pond will be
permanently impacted Only temporary dewaterin~ of the pond will be done to repair the dam.
Of the approximately 2 500 if feet of Tributary 1 approximatel~2 285 if will not be impacted
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc. us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No plans are provided because the permanent impacts to high quality portions of
Tributary 1 are limited to 135 lf. The spillway channel is manmade and has lower quality
characteristics that are not expected to require mitigation. Approximately 80 if of impact is
anticipated to this section of Trib 1. The 20 if section of sewer crossing impacts (Richland
Creek) are temporary are not expected to require mitigation.
Page 10 of 13

2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify Meuse ? Yes ® No ^
SEE ATTACHED TABLE 1 FOR SUMMARY OF BUFFER IMPACTS
Page 11 of 13

Table 1
Joyner Park Buffer Impacts
Project No.: 1054-06-078
Area A Area E .Area G Area F Area G Combin®d
Zone 1 Impervious 620 SF 812 SF 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF 1,432 SF
Zone 1 Pervious 1,404 SF 1,500 SF 23,204 SF 1,803 SF 896 SF 28,807 SF
Zone 1 Total 2,024 SF 2,312 SF 23,204 SF 1,803 SF 896 SF 30,239 SF
Zone 2 Impervious 500 SF 740 SF 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF 1,240 SF
Zone 2 Pervious 1,480 SF 1,512 SF 4,947 SF 833 SF 480 SF 9,252 SF
Zone 2 Total 1,980 SF 2,252 SF 4,947 SF 833 SF 480 SF 10,492 SF
Zones 1 & 2 Impervious 1,120 SF 1, 552 SF 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF 2, 672 SF
Zones 1 8~ 2 Pervious 2,884 SF 3,012 SF 28,151 SF 2,636 SF 1,376 SF 38,059 SF
Zones 1 & 2 Total 4,004 SF 4,564 SF 28,151 SF 2,635 SF 1,376 SF 40,731 SF
Width Along Stream 35 FT 35 FT 20 FT 30 FT
Area A -Trail Crossing West
Area E -Trail Crossing East
Area C -Pond Dam
Area F -Sanitary Sewer Crossing
Area G -Bypass Outlet
Areas B S~ D intentionally omittetl.

2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* ( Impact Multi Tier I Required
i..,.,.....o F a.~ P r,r:«:,,.,«:,,,,
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Total site area = 118.841 acres. One
acre existing impervious. Proposed disturbed acres = 25.6 = 21.7% of site.
Proposed impervious surface 8.1 acres =6.8%
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The proposed sewer will tie into the Town of Wake Forest's existing sewer off-site.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this anafter-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
Page 12 of 13

If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
The development of this public park is unlikely to result in cumulative impacts since it serves
existing residents.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
t~ ~~_.~~
,applicant/Agent's Signae Date
signature is valid only i an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13

i
.•
~~+
(a zs)
~~~ ;a~gQ :~autip ,i~radoJ~
•~ssaaac~ pamaap~i `BUOike$l~sanui a;isao F~(~ zap ~xadoxd atp
ssaoa~ o~ ~~b ~~~ ,~o uocsu~Q •~•~ Yo~pue saaau?$t~~o sci~o~ ~m.~ -S.n aq~~o sati~~tzasaxda.~
nso~le o1 lt~a~~ btu sf; ~oB o; '~~ `3N1~$S a'zuo~~ osp3 ~ asp ~Sa~camcaorYnoa ~urraq~E~
.3a asoc~rnd aq~ ao~ tC~.t:'-doxd anogr aq3 ss~aa8 0; uossszuu~d `•~trj `~~g ~.~e~ptsuoa act ~u~.zS I
Jib ~ 1_ :ssa.aPP~
~-+
~'~a L ~~
:a~ei~ a~IS
~co3 xozx~z~xo~.r~n.~ ~u~~~
___,~ an~r `A1~~S LZ86 OBL 8t6 'YV,~ TO~~'C 900Z~8Z/Zo
7fa 7r1H.J n i c~~n~ 7~JHAh Jn F.IAhn I ~Of]7000G TC h7 'QT Qfa fa7 i TG1 i!= fl"

07- 1 827
WAKE SOREST' C~IJ~DRANGL~
NORTH CARC}LINk a WAKE CO. ~M`i~a~
~~.
7.5 MiN~tTE SERIES (TCii~CiGRAPi•~IO) t~~~~'~`~
1'dar,~ '2A._F:ICK !5 ~ll.tgr?PAh1GLE `~~S
~- Fr.T ~ '~.3 _ - '24 X25 ~S e 3Ci,
.v ., r• ... Y ... _.. .. ....
d _ _ 1 n ~~1 _1
~~ _ '~-~
` s i {
i - f
t ~
'a:-. d "' 1` tt~ 189 ,i. ~. ~.
A ~ -- ~ ~ - -~ - ~ 1
;~Y ~ ~
_ = r ~_ ~ ~_
~~ ~ ~i ~~ r y ~ ; ,
b '
? , ,._. ~ _ ~~~ ! ,~;~ ~:'~• ` e~ ° t *. ~ • y. to
• !a ...~
5
!£~ t O ~.
r.
'~•• • Y...tl , ..: '~ tai
• 1v
;~
... ' •
~ i
~ r~~6v 7H?~'Ca3 riP. tY]Ui.t14~ •~:,:~ ~.~ !'~ 'ir ~ t 1, t^' t _.;
_ _ • ''".!,•+ t ,~ ' ,/ a! • rr ± °^ tit!:
i.. "-
• ~
t
__ ~arr i> ~' ° '
a
Source: USGS Wake Forest Quad, 1999
Scale: NTS
U.S. Topographic Map
cneckea ay: ~~B Joyner Park
Wake Forest, NC
-- ~-
Date: 10-16-2007
Project No.: 1054-06-078 I Figure 2

Q7- 1 ~?~' 7
-,
•,~ o
:~
5=°~
~~~
a , Y'
~m~~o
Source: Williams-Pearce & Associates, P.A.
,,,,,~r~-„ ,«,
~- ,`fMtl 9n :Ctrl
.aY
"'"c~
v F~
w. f
~ ;~
,~ ~
w (~ ~ ~ 5
~ ~~«„ .m
~I
}1;

.,t
-~ "~I
~~Y .3,i',r
1~`{'
4 i
1 ,i'

Y ` Clf
R
Q
~i '~ ~
~
~ P
0
`
~
a 5
~~~~ ~
~ ~`5 C
.~a &ff~BtF. 4Y# 6.
.. .~ '..}
_~
'e
:1
$
`"N~
1II
tf r. O

y .tA
~
t
~
d
r
~
;T
R
I
~~, ~
+~ GI
~' l l.:
~'(i
~.
`'
I'; .~
~±~': w

'.
„
y.
o
~
~~ ~~ ~
w~
F,
ti~,u

~~g
~4
. t1,

~
:
.,
,lti
q~ ;~
;/2
~~; .~'
a'~ ,~
dea re
rvsx
5 ~'~~
4s'
Y ~ {~qf
t I}!
+
t
~ ~ ~ y7p~

i}.=~ 4 ~IRZS~
a };I S
Scale: As Shown
Property Boundary Survey
checked by: ~~B Joyner Park
Wake Forest, NC
_~r
Date: 10-1-2007
Project No.: 1054-06-078 Figure 4

~7_ ~ g27
tiraPOU~3X~ ~ '~~"'
,~
~ ~ ~
7
f ~
~'~~,
~uhvcrrtf~ .Q~ ano m
,~: -:~ izoo ft
4,, -.~~~
~~ ~
~~ TrQr a t*iarbank St
r1 ! -•
i i
i„..,
Cslub Vitlas Dr .
Wake fore:e
6o~f Crse~r~~c
_ ~ , ~...
rv_
. ~.~`
~ ~~~~~~
4~
D~
5+~'utt- ~~~
:'~.~~
o~,
~~ a
~~ 24(17 h4ap4uesl Inc.
~ iVt~tst~~~ ~~
Sri rs
N ~ a
j 5
~~~ye~ ~'~ 4~ ~
~@ ru
b ~
~~~ ~
~{s
~~~~:
~ ~.
~~~~
S~rr~~ ~
c
4
T~
~~
tia

11 /x _ iV~\
\~ ~
~ ,
~~~~~ ~ ~~~ef~ ue ~ ~~
` ~ _ ~ ~~
__
ri. _~.J'
~~ ~ ~SC*~~ ,ti
Map L~ata~~!'2C47~N1lYi~Q tie Te1~Atlas
From Raleigh, travel U.S. Highway 1 North to Wake Forest. Cross over NC 98 and
travel approx. one mile. Turn right on Harris Rd. Travel approximately %2 mile site is
on the right.
Scale: As Shown
Site Vicinity Map
checked by: t_~e Joyner Park
t~' Wake Forest, NC
Date: 10-16-2007 ,
Project No.: 1054-06078 ~ Figure 1

0 7- 1 8 2 7
Scale: NTS
Checked by: LJB
3~iR.
Date: 10-16-2007
NRCS Soils Map
Joyner Park
Wake Forest, NC
Project No.: 1054-06-078 ~ Figure 3
Source: NRCS Wake County Soil Survey Map,
1970 Sheet 11

'r .. ~9
.~F~
Tributary 1
(RPW Perennial)
0.5 acre of wetland
x .
~~
~L
._°
~~~
wx w93
W7A y~
W'AZ .2 acre pond
w46
w7f w73
w~8
wT2 N'45
wlOwlt
W6f ~'G9 ~
Wfs7 w5
w66 v,57

x.
VJ65
~ m r
WG4 ^
~~~
Aerial Source: Wake County (MAPS
ributary 1
2PW Perennial)
~;E
Note: S&ME delineated waters of the U.S. on-site in May 2006. The jurisdictional
boundaries were verified by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and surveyed.
Scale: NTS
Waters of the U.S. Map
cneckea by: ~~B Joyner Park
- ~ ~ ~ Wake Forest, NC
Date: 10-162007 ~~;,r::-.
Project No.: 1054-06-078 I Figure 5

_,~
~~ ZONE ;
-- -- - f
\4~r_
Source: Mark Robinson and Associates
Scale: NTS
Checked by: LJD
~~ .~~~
Date: 10-16-2007
IMPACT` AREA A
JC?~`N ER FA RK
TO~i','V OF WAKE FOREST
Impact Area A
Joyner Park
Wake Forest, NC
Project No.: °1054-06-078 I Figure 7
--- Zfll
~_t__.
_~._.._
~..-
~_ _~ ..~
~~
y
~•-.,
NG `. ~
'` , t `'
d .~~~
`~
~~
~ ,~~~
`; ? ZONE 1 I?1~IPERVIOiJS 62U SF
~'~,, ~ f ~ ZONE 1 PERVIOUS 3404 Sf
~ 70NE 1
} `~ ~ '. 1 TC)TAL 2024 SF
J s ~ ! ~ ZONE 2
.
e
1 I.NIPERVIOXJS 500 SF
~
!
ZONE 2
~
, PERVIOUv 1480 SF
/
`1 ZONE
) I '~~. ~~
I I °. 'TOTAL 1980 SF

+ '~
__

+ g

- . _
-
~ j ~,
~
RNs{
\ ., \
ti.``,,
`` `~
i ~'~
X ZO1`IE 2 ~_~
~ ~,'
/r
~;. ,
,: ~
j ~~ ~! f!
~!!/ ? ~
.1 l_ow Point J
~e ~o Drain Water Utf Q1! 1°rai!
s
1 ~ ~ TRAIL
_~-.•-- ~~n BRIDCGE
~ ~e~ONE 1
~ . ,`
~ ~ ~
-
y
7 ~`L `~int
` ~
C~ra1~ Water t)tf~f T \
,"
~ ~
'
r
r
~
~
~
`, l

`~
~ I
I
~~ '- %
~ ~ ~ ZC3NE 1 IMPERVIC)US 9i2 SF

i ZONE 1 PERVIOUS
~~_ 1500 SF
~ \ j;~ Zf~NE 1 TOT~AI_ 2
912 SF

/ ~~i ,
{ ~OYdL; 2 IM1IPF,R VIOUS 7~O 5F
J ~
~ ~, i ZONE 2 PERVIOUS 1512 5k'
I
'i I e
~~ t I
'~ I .i ZONF 2 TOTAL 22.52 SF
1
' i ~
IMPACT" AREA
~~
E
J©YNER R~RIC

' '
~ ~ i y TO4Y~N OF WAKE`~'URE51
~.
~I ^
Source: Mark Robinson and Associates
Scale: NTS
Checked by: LJB
Date: 10-16-2007 ~ry
Impact Area E
Joyner Park
Wake Forest, NC
Project No.: 1054-06-078 Figure 8

O~O~ W A T ~9pG
>_ ~
~ ~
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
May 1, 2006
Mr. John Davis
S&ME
P.O. Box 58069
Raleigh, NC 27658-8069
NBRRO 06-101
County: Wake
BASIN:
Neuse X
(1SA NCAC 2B .0233)
Tar-Pamlico
(1SA NCAC 2B .0259)
Complaint NOV Buffer Determination X
Incident # Appeal Call
Project Name: Joyner Park -Wake Forest
Location/Directions: Site is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Harris Road and West Oak
Avenue in Wake Forest.
Subject Stream:
UT to Richland Creek
Date of Determination: 4/25/06
Feature Start Buffer
GPS Points (if provided) End Buffer Stream
Form Appeal
Call Located
on Soil
Survey Located on
USGS
Topographic
A Subject Throughout X X
B Not Subject X
C Not Subject X
This on-site determination shall expire five (S) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties
that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that a surface water exists and that
it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination by the Director. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c% Cyndi Karoly ,DWQ Wetands/40l Unit, 2321 Crabtree
Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260. Individuals that dispute a determination by the DWQ or Delegated Local
Authority that "exempts" a surface water from the buffer rule may ask for an ad judicatory hearing. You must
act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60-day statutory
appeal time does not start until the affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of
this decision. DWQ recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third
party appeals are made in a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to
Noe Carolina
~QtlltYl~~lf
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Phone [phone] Customer Service
FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

5/1 /2006
Page 2 of 2
Chapter 1 SOB of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, N. C. 27699-6714. This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing
within 60 days.
The (owner/future owners) should notify the Division of Water Quality (including any other Local, State, and
Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property (stated
above). This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the Division of Water Quality (Central Office) at (919)-733-1786, and the US Army Corp of Engineers
(Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-876-8441.
CC: File Copy
Central Files
DWQ Wetlands and Stormwater Branch
Bill Summers -Town of Wake Forest
Noe Carolina
~tura!!r~
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nC.us 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Phone [phone] Customer Service
FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

~ ii
\
r
~
~

w ~i ~
„
~ ,
~ ~~ Y: ~ _ ~
of 1 ~
L9 5 g
~ • t ~ 1
{ y 1. ~
~ } ~y ( e ~ ww
?yam
~ ba?
WO"YY>~ W.s®R~p~ 7 7 0 1

,,~ ~~
~~
~.AI~E ~"®1REST QUADRANGLE
IvoRTx BAR®LI1~A-wAxE c®. y6,~~~~~R~~~
Z.~ MIIVLdTE SERIES (TOPOGRAP~IIC) ~~~~'~
6 N SE NE/4 RALEIGH 15' QUADRANGLE `F~
ssolw; ; ~2G X21 32'3G" i r Cem~ oa
2 140 GOv FEET i 23 ~2Q ~2 78i° 30'
- - - --- ------~--- - - --r-- --5
Beacon.il _ _
1 ~
~ t
~ ~ ~ - . ,d. t, __., r COF Ali. '
~,
~~ ~ ~ ~ - ,
~.
~. _ ~ - ~ ~° - n~ ~~ ! ~ ,i~ (; ~~ ~~ High
~~ ... ,[, ~ ~1 CGU.rse,
r ~ 1 ~ ~- ~' ~ ~ ~~ I~~~o~ ~
i ~\
~r,
;-
.. ~-
,,
~~'° "39~ ~\ , - SoutheaAten
/- 1r~ -~ ~ Thrningical ~mman
J
1~\
~~.~/r .fir ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~'~ /\- ~ ~,• \ ~~~ '"" ~. i~~%
'^-~. ~!~\ .. ~. ~ .. N ~ r rte,. (~'. ~ .~ ~E ape. ~ \
~~ i -- 1 i ~~''~ ~ ~\~~ ( „'
i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~; ~i~~ ~ ,- _
r~ ~ ( ~
l ~ _' J' +~/ ~ _ 4 ~:c ~-y ! 1;11- ~ ~ °
\ !~( ~ ! _ _ ~~e
i
i~
- ....
~- mu_ ..~
~ ,, I _
.,~ r~li (.nurse !~;` ~ ~i .~~ ~ - >
- _ ,~ ~
`r/ _ ~ _.~ -. 1~ - -
f _ i i ~I; II _ ~~II ©q _ °
G~
/ i, ` ~
~ \
a~)~ \ c .: - ~+~
.- ,
° ~ i,
i8 / j
fP~ 3951 F ~i f ,~ ~/
~ ~~/ j~a
~ • ~ B•M ~
- i. ~: „ .~~ 7 ~ 3s85
~O/ / ~~/ ~~~ f / 41 /~ 6 %/> ~ O
/// iT ~ ~ ~ ~- °'~~/ ~
`~.'~~ ~~~~° vy~ •~*~~ ~ ° 3984
1
:+: '
'~..~ ~' ~_ ~ ~`~ 810 000
~° ~ ~ FEET
jc
// ~ ~ ®~ /4
~- - Hospital

w ~~
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor
September 17, 2007
Ms. Melanie McKinney
S&ME, Inc.
3718 Old Battleground Road
Greensboro, NC 27410
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Subject: Joyner Park -Proposed Development into a Recreational Park; Wake Forest, Wake County
S&ME Project No. 1054-07-068
Dear Ms. McKinney:
The Natural Heritage Program -has no record of rare species, significant natural communities, or
significant natural heritage areas at the site nor within a mile of the project area. However, immediately
bordering the Joyner Park tract on the east are two stnall tracts owned by the Town of Wake Forest that
are protected by conservation easements to the State's Clean Water Management Trust Fund (see
enclosed map). You should contact that agency for details about the easements and restrictions/
requirements for development on adjacent properties.
You may wish to check the Natural Heritage Program database website at www.ncnhp.org for a listing of
rare plants and animals and significant natural communities in the county and on the quad map.
NC OneMap uow provides digital Natural Heritage data online for free. This service provides site
specific information on GIS layers with Natural Heritage Program rare species occurrences and
Significant Natural Heritage Areas. The NC OneMap website provides Element Occurrence (EO) ID
numbers (instead of species name), and the data user is then encouraged to contact the Natural Heritage
Program"for detailed information. This service allows the user to quickly and efficiently get site specific
NHP data without visiting the NHP•workroom or waiting for the Information Request to be answered by
i~-lP staff. Eor more infot„ration about data formats-and~eeess; ~isi~-Fw : en~ata:ht~~nl~;
or email NC OneMap at <dataq@ncmaiLnet>.. .
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 919-715-8697 if you have questions or need further information.
Sincerely,
Harry" . LeGrand, Jr:',Loologist -
Natural Heritage Program
Enclosure
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] FAX:- 919-715-3060 t Internet: www.enr.state:nc,us/ENRI
An Equal Opportunity I Affirmative Action Employer- 50 °I° Recycled 110 % post Consumer Paper
~ne Cai'olilla
iaturia!!r~

A W
W
"Ala
MIA
NMI
gis
A ma
i IN-F—
'r
4w
1,
lu.
,96
aft -
b
4
Oleo,
40
7X
ip
4w.
vr
% wfr
V"ff!
44
VAO.O
W4M
A, V4 A
WO
Ig
M. MMM
m7img
IVA
1f:Nl!iV 1W
4F
� %Yg
w4y
Me
All
air
Pam
4ft�
P 46
qCv�m

DIEHL & PHILLIPS, P.A.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
219 East Chatham Street
Cary, North Carolina 27511
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone]
September 19, 2007
Mr. John Davis
S & ME, Inc.
3109 Spring Forest Road
Raleigh, NC 27616
Re: Level Spreader Documents for Joyner Park Phase 1
Wake Forest, NC
Dear John:
Enclosed are the following for the referenced project:
1. DWQ Level Spreader Worksheet
2. Color Photo of proposed Level Spreader Site
3. Level Spreader System Operations and Maintenance Agreement
4. Calculations for the 1" storm and flow sputter device
5. Level Spreader Detail
6. Two (2) sets of plans showing the level spreader
WILLIAM C. DIEHL, P.E.
JOHN F. PHILLIPS, P.E.
ALAN R. KEITH, P.E.
We propose to split the flow for the heavier developed areas such as the parking lot,
performance garden, and amphitheater in one of the proposed catch basins. The flow
from the 1"storm will be directed to the level spreader downstream of the pond dam.
Larger storms will bypass the level spreader via the storm drainage piping and will be
directed to the pond in pipe P-28. The remainder of the park facilities discharge well up
slope from any Neuse buffers. Therefore, no other level spreaders are proposed.
Contact our office if you have questions, or if you require anything further.
Sincerely,
Diehl & Phillips, P.A.
l~ ~~
Alan R. Keith, P.E.
enclosures
Cc: Mark Robinson

l~e. //i~ell-e510\neal°!°20c°1°20drive\Work%2~Fic~res\Vt~ynbrool~e,°f®29Jc~yner%20Part~°,~°2®&°/®~O~r~Ar°~/°~0::: 9/1 ~JO
Page 1 of
~- ~„~„- -
,~.
~. ;fin 9~ ~~
;., ~; ,.
~..
,,.
' .. ~~ ~.
~, ~ _ ;
,ern s~ ~ ~~ ~ m
z.
~, .F f ~'
_ ~ 3 - ~v*4 ~y . , A~ „fig.
.~ ~,
a _° w
a'
M.~
~ '` " .~ ~~
E ,
., d Sf1
b ,, a.
3 ~ ,
a ~- ~
~ _ ~' °
j ~ A.# t 7 s

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY -LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET (112007)
I. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following. information):
Project Name : Joyner Park Phase 1 Town of wake Forest
Contact Person: Alan Keith, PE Phone Number: [phone]
Level Spreader ID: ~ 1
Level Spreader Length 40 ft.
Drainage Area 6.84 ac.
Impervious Area 2.76 ac.
Forebay Area 240 cu
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope 6.2

Max. Discharge from 1"/Hr Storm 2.8 cfs
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader 3.0 cfs
Filter Strip/ Zone 1 Buffer Vegetation Forest
Filter Stripl Zone 1 Buffer Width 30 ft,
Filter StriptZone 2 BufferVegetation Meadow
Filter Strip/ Zone 2 Buffer Width 40 ft.
.(perpendicular toflow)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
ft. (0.2% of the contributing impervious surface area)
(6% for forested/leaf littler cover, 8% for grass/thick cover)
(Discharge rate from extended detention wetland or pond)
(Grass/Thick ground cover or Forested)
Bypass Method Used Flow splitter w/ bypass Please include a worksheet for this,
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is
attached. If a requirement has not been met, please explain why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan
submittal includes a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs .and outlet
structure details, a detailed drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete
submittal package will result in a request for additional information and will substantially delay finaf review and approval of
the project.
Applicants Initials
~,.1~ Project Site was visited prior to designing level spreader system.
d.1lG"7 Date of the Site visit. Please attach time-dated digital photos of existing buffer conditions.
yq p Level spreader length is at least: 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover /grass; OR 65 ft per cfs for 50-
footcanopied forest with leaf litter; 50 ft per cfs for 100-foot forested buffer; 40 ft. per cfs for 150-foot
forested buffer; OR a weighted average of the two vegetation types within the buffer/filter strip).
,~r~ All ground cover types and their widths have been labeled on the construction plans.
,q~..~, All contours have been depicted on the construction plans.
~A,,~ No structures are located in protected buffers (must meet no practical alternatives criteria).
,qr,..~_ No draws are located in the buffer or filter strip in the vicinity of the proposed level spreader.
yr.~;~. Construction details for the level spreader have been provided.
~Z,, The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
~s/,~ No practical alternatives explanation + Variance request. (Level Spreaders in Series only).
Bypass method used:
~.~,~~, Bypass conveyance method is specified and construction details and calculations are provided.
N~rr Alternative design option is specified and plan details and calculations are provided.
~., Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the
bypass discharge.
i4'u~~ Construction details for the bypass and outlets are provided.

LEVEL SPREADER SYSTEM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT (1/2007}
A level spreader system includes: a forebay, diverter box, level spreader, riparian buffer/vegetated filter strip,
and flow bypass channel.
Name of Project: Joyner Park-Town of Wake Forest
Address: Wa11 Road at Harris Road
Maintenance activities shall be performed as follows:
MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY FREQUENCY
Post-construction monitoring-inspect for vegetation, Check after every heavy rainfall for first 6 months
settling, erosion, or concentrated flow. followin construction.
Inspect Diverter Box and clean and/or make repairs. Once a month and after heavy rainfalls/storms.
Look for:
• Clogged inlet or outlet pipes.
• Trash/debris in the box.
Inspect Forebay + Level Spreader. Clean and/or Once a month and after heavy rainfalls/storms.
make repairs. Look for:
• Sediment in forebay and along level spreader
lip;
• Trash and/or leaf buildup.
• Scour, undercutting of level spreader.
• Settlement of level spreader structure (no
longer level; you see silt downhill below level
spreader).
• Fallen trees on level spreader.
• #57 stone washin downhill.
Inspect the Riparian Buffer and the Bypass Swale Once a month and after heavy rainfalls/storms.
and make repairs as needed'. Look for:
• Damaged turf reinforcement or riprap rolling
downhill.
• Erosion within the buffer or swale.
• Concentrated flows downhill of level
spreader-look for gullies or sediment flows.
Mow grass to a 6" height. As needed during growing season.
Remove any weeds/shrubs growing on level spreader Once a year.
or in swale.
1 NOTE: Contact NC Division of Water Quality, 401/Wetlands Unit at 919-733-1786 BEFORE any work
in Protected Riparian Buffers.
Page 1 of 2

LEVEL
SPREADER NO. LOCATION ON SITE (DESCRIBE) HOW WILL IT BE ACCESSED?
1
just south and east of pond spillway
paved trail
2
3
4
5
6
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the performance of the maintenance
procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ of any problems with the system or prior to any changes to
the system or responsible party.
Print
Title
Address: ~{D ( ~ (~ flV~Ma[e Idea ('S e t~y'2S~ NL rT5g7
Phone: 1`7(`1 1 9.9 ~t
Signature: ~~'(K4c[M
Date: 9 " ~ ~ ' 07
Note: The legally responsible party should not be a homeowners association unless more than 50% of the
lots have been sold and a resident of the subdivision has been named the president.
I, , a Notary Public for the State of t` r~ (rl~+.,
County of Y1Ui ((r°,~ , do he~re'by certify t at ~ n
personally appeared before me this _ day of (~ ,and acknowledge the due
execution of the forgoing wet [wetland] detention basin maintenance requirements. Witness my hand and
official seal,
.............
,,~~..~'~Y "'~.
't~~ '0G ~°~ ss
B` 4y~ s
Q s c~
C~ i 1'
~p ~`~ couN~,,.~('~'1
A~MN~2OV
~' F ~" N
SEAL
My commission expires ~'07'~
Page 2 of 2

l~J2,o,,vrV ~ a~ ~l~-,~ ~ _ ~ . g ~ ~v ~,
~< <~ - a ~ ~(• G, g~-- 1, b ~~ _ ~. ~ Ct;f
/i~.!?~.~z.~.ltoc.~r__._ 14.3 v~ rOrL~ _ ~.~~1 ~ q ~ ~~p, ~.s Sr
v s~ 8 ~ ~ 30 ` L Fd ~-,~.a,~y
Lt~ucL SP~~a~h~
tJGf,~n~3r/L..l;'xM ~ILc-/~ i~ vet l~A/JDc-J Gl~c'SS ~~ Cx>cx~ ~G~--
.sC.. ~Pr c d ~, U~j> ~t ~~ x ~ 3'
Lc~~-r ~t = ~. 8 x l ~ = 3G ~ ~- vs~ ~t-o ~

~ `' rv ~ _ ~ , ~ Grs
l
SPL[ [ ~ . ~ ~f= ~ T~ L~UtL S/p!~-~~G/J~ti-
i
SLa~~ ~sc.~`~ ~~ " ~ 061 Yo Use l~.-`' ~' 6,~tt ~Q
r~ p
3(0,6
~r1 ~.J, _ ~ ^ ~ 5~
~'
~v`~ ~~
~ ~
,tea

P-~,s
'~o
Q `1 Pass
'~x

w c--c:- Z. - ~"~~.,~ SPLI ~~~

LEVEL SPREADER NOTES:
1. VERIFY CONTOUR OF PROPOSED LEVEL SPREADER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED SUCH THAT TOP OF WEIR IS LEVEL.
2. CONSTRUCT LEVEL SPREADER FOLLOWING SITE STABILIZATION AND/OR EROSION
MEASURE REMOVAL,
3. SECURELY ATTACH LEVEL SPREADER WEIR MATERIAL TO FOOTING.
4. STABILIZE APPROACH CHANNEL (CHANNEL BEHIND WEIR) PRIOR TO ALLOWING
LEVEL SPREADER.
LEVEL SPf~11DER WEIR 1~ Q4
Cpl WfM ~OpC GbRE FltLED WITH
OQN~IE
JUTE M4TUVG OR WL~'IH
~~~ ~
~ ~:
z "i %~
AM'~KaR WEIR TO FOOTER
VNTI-I #4 REQ4R
CdI~TE Ft)OTER
4' MIN. 3' MIN.
No. 57 Nf4ShE~
57Lr1E
3 3 f3" 3" 4",
~I I~~
~~
I ,_o.,
SECTION A A
30' ~
Ft7REB4Y PASS 'B'
RIP-1?fW (22" 1H(~C)
W(TH FlL1ER FA~C
Z
Z
W
J
W
w
w
J
JUTE I~arnn>~ oR n,~
AMER'CAN GREDV SC
250
A
A
X xx .~~
~~ x LEVEL SF'I?F~QER WEIR -
,~'' LEVfZ ENTIRE LFJJGIH
v ;~~
4, ~ ~ ~--Na 57 Nf~IS~FfD
I-- ~ ---I STC,~E
LEVEL SPREADER
CONTROL
FLOW ONTO
LEVEL SPREADER DETAIL
NO SCALE

1 View of pond from spillway.
~~ . - °",
J:~.
. ..
,~ a~,
.~ ~ ..
~..~ ,
ME
Joyner Park
Site Photographs
S&ME Project No.: 1054-06-078
Taken on 10/17/07
3 C1 View of spillway channel
2 View of path across top of dam.
4 C2 View of natural channel at base of dam.

SITE DATA TABLE
Project Name: Joyner Park
Ownen Town of Wake Forest
Address: 701 Hams Road
PIN Number. 1841381114
Deed Reference: #9964, page 2748
Date Property Acquired: March 11, 2003
Zorsng: RD
Site Acreage: 118.841 acres
Disturbed Aaes: 25.6 acres 121.7%of site
Impervious Surface Area: 8.1 acres 16.8°k of s8e
Land Use: Putt Park
Number of Buildings: 4 Exsting Fann SWCWres
1 Metal Farm Building -Relocated
1 LogCabin -Reassembled
3 New Build'ngs
BuBd'mg Usage and Square Footage: Area A
- Fxlsting Farm SWcture 168 SF; Preservation
• Fisting Farm SUudure 289 SF; Preservation
• Existing Farm SUuclure 289 SF; Preservation
• Fxisdrlg farm SWcture 1080 SF; Preservation
• Lag Cabin • Reassembled 320 SF; Preservation
• Mahal Farm Building - Relogted 3000 SF; Maintenance I Storage Undeveloped • Zoned Co a is
-RestroomBuiWing 1,333 SF;Resiroom
-Chair Storageeuild'mg 192 SF; Chair Storage ~
• Shelter I Overlook 400 SF; Shaded Overlook /
Parking Required -1 space per 4 occupants 126 spaces
Parking Provided: 172 spaces
Handicap Parking Required: 6 spaces /f
Handicap Parking Provided: 11 spaces I
Bicyde Rada Required: 5 racks
B'wyde Racks Provided: 6 racks
Site Elements:
•Amplitheater ,
- Pedormance Garden
• Waken Garden (Perennial Garden) /
-Farm Building Preservation
-Pecan Grove Restoration
-Maintenance FacBity
-TraBs (17,975 LF 13.4 miles)
Setbacks: / Acce
s To H
ntlicap Ps
- Neuse River Buffer s
/
P
Dro Loo -
(tromWetiandBourtdary): 5pft MirapPaddng
• front Yard -Minimum 30 (L ~
oelns
• Back Yard -Minimum: 30 ft
-Side Yard -Minimum: 10 ft ~
r _
- Stmchlre from R.O.W.: 30 ft \

Amphitheater Capadty: ~
5D0 People \
~~
ortowAreaen
~ Future Sports F' b
I~ ~
J Amphti atr -
\~ Sealw s (ypial) -
\ Stage
Land Usr%
~~•, !
~~\
~~
~~
l \~ ~
~ ~~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
) ~ ~
\~
~~
~.
r ~,
`\
1
~ ,
Area C
/~ ~ \ Dam d pillway Remnstmctien - Area CZ
\ \ Rte it - -__-- -.
`e~ential Land Use ( Natural Stream
~~ ~
V~ ~ /
~ rdyor~, l
\,\\~~\ ~\ \r ~ 1
~ u ~ J( ~ ~
a ~~ ~ 1
Marc Robinson
~~ Paved Trail Sys(em (Typical
~• Mowed Tmils Fy Associates
Main Parking u,,,.• a.>wm~~
aw.+e++e arbnnwwa.,wm
."x„ k H ,wrvgh .
~~'~ , i
J \ 6
r
)'off
~ . eaw~
.'c~ -New Errhy Ddve ~ y~
\ ~~~ ~ -Old farm Road (Limited Use For Service Access)
Residential Land Use
l:~-j
~~
~- ~ ~ Residential Land Use
t
Exstng Fann Office (Preservation Dnly)
~ t ' Existing Mule Bam (Proservaton Only)
t ;. Existng Chicken Coop (Preservation Only)
t „ Log Cabin (To Be ReconsWctetl On Sitefor
_ ~ Preservaton Purposes Only)
,. N '" ~ t-x~ting Totracm Bam (Peservaton Ony)
~~,
I~L

\ ~~ ~~ .. /
~- ~ ~~
Area G
~'~~ \ _
)~ ~~~' `I ~~~~~/\ \
Area C1 Spillway Channel
a
' v/ / ~~ \.
u ~ ~
o
,,_..
~. ~ r
\.~
~.~~ ~~
--,-~ i V
~ \ ~ \
~ \
"'.~ \ \
11~\'\
^~~~ : 4 ,°
-- e"~
~s;
. v~-
Richld Creek Corridor
ShelterlOvedook
Existing Peen G~ve
Walker Garden ndosed Perennial Garden)
Storge Bulldi For Performance Gartlen
Performan ,~rden (Small Venue Performance Fadlity)
1. 'the hdormaem contained In th agree andaealed
docunenls should be deemed to be caned aM
eupMor to eleNonic hdamedon.
~alGLitenlC alreml81p11 R e Cgllpgllenf arena h$manama
of sake and Is aMy for me dmYe henefif m dre
epeafle pmfed and faa speddc uae.
'theta Is na reDresemation of dla wilehliry time
ekdmnk hMnnalian mromer purposes, oflha
dunellly oflhe Inbmlalgn tithe medium mmugh
which Ua hrormetbn Ismmahed.
'My use tore pspoae omertlren Ihat forwtich me
Yllamaaan a erteMed shall 6e at me remhda Ask,
end thenfom me n:thNer shell protect and Indemnity
the senderaorn arty tleims, msts, losses a damages.
'Tranafxof me vrtameeon does nm aalreMany limes
to use me undedydng eonwara oredlrguish ma tights
al ma serderro reuse the Infarmatian N Uw geneal
mores Napmressional prad'ne,
o~~ 1 8 2 1
~¢ n.dns u>? am enaovsa aaw cahsraacnou ar 1~
rowroew.ucssosrar.
~tMr~YD4/eN 0•.tl
iJU1n aS~wa,n['wM nwr
rwrna.rwwa ax,
aw,aax nr
andaadpr.uk[nneaeaa.w net
~~~ ~~ ~INAL_ DESIGPJ
\~ ~~ Area E ~JQT{g:t.E4SEDFDRCONSTRUG17oN
p~I~lTpiiJ
~~ SEP lb PWI gp7E o~s~RVTlog
j REVISIONS
1 C'N
Richland C k Comdor ~scuP xm ro scale
~"
~ Area F ~o~~ ~~~
I ~ Parks and Recreation Department
~~.
See Sanitary Sewer Town of Wake Forest
MaintenanceBuBding Crossing Map 707HardaRoad Wakeforest,xorMCarollna
^~, ~ Maintenance Yard PROJECTIOW1tER
Maintenance Yard Access i
Y, 1. Refer to F~sling Condigrms Plans for roes detailed mleMew of existing mnditions ~i'~e ~~~ ~~~~
> 2. RefartoDemgplbnPlensforslteelemenfatoSeremovedorrekcaled.
/ 3. RefertaSileWarrefamaetletailedouervkwotproposedskedevebpmenl~aWres. $NEETTIitE
a a~rermrl~aaM.sraglaar,~anlaanr~~aa.,o„~m~~M~wa~~s,~nw9a~d~~em~~1•~eM

1` `,.
k e~
~ ~. t
`5 ~.
~ i4
F ~ ~~
~'
:I
~ i
"~
~ ~ ~
4 ~` ~
i
' M1 :, .+
+t
°
~ ~.
tt y ~`p
F sp `
9
°t 4 ,.. ,~ \\~tl
. ``. \
e,,
FES INV, OUT3D3,5D ~ ~'~ ~\
20k8'x22'DCLASSB ~~~r~~4 ~\`
RIP•RAPWITHFILTER .. a' ,~ ~M,~
FABRIC t Zv~7 ,"~ ~\~DIVEF
°.\
SEE CONSTRUCTION \ ~
SEQUENCESHi.EC•t \e ~'` '\ *\
'4
Area G ` l
t. ~,'~ ~ `' ` . ...
SILTFENCE . ''~ .-.
.. ~
't ~
Area C
~ ~ ,
~.
~
~
~,
~
~ ~•
'~
~
#,
,.~
~' ~, II.

s ~ 1
` • +
,
~.
E
-' ~- xi f
~
~ Y1• .
~. >f .fi.:: 2,
~~~
7j(.1,1~F, J
~~ ti z~w~~
~° \.
°
..
,`
' E
. '.
nl!^
~~.3

B° "
~ d`~
;~~_
_
• ~~
Area C2
° '~~ .~
'° \ ` }
~`
•
A

~
Natural Stream * ~
~~ `~ ~~
~

~ y R
1351 If of impact -.~ ; `;~1A
(Trib.1) ~~, . .
~s ,~ ,,
,r
}` ~ ~ ;i,
~ ,~1`
°,z • :.
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACTS
23,204 SQ. FT.
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTS
4,947SQ. FT.
,, ~ `"~;
e
:i
,r. ° .,..
f M~
~~ ~=
ff .
r-

I ~ (~'
I ! y\
f ~ 4° 4
'^a ~
\~~ i
l,,. ~ ~
\\
~ i
~ i
\ i
' ~ ~h \.
1 ' \ .,~\
~\ ~ ! ~~ o\
~ \ \
I j
~~\ ~ I` ~ \~~ ~~` 20' CITY OF RALEIGH
I ~\ .. ~\ SAN. SEWER EASMENT
~ ~ \\ i
~ :''"
,. ~
J.~1 `~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~:
,F ~~
Area C1 ` ~~~ ~°
~' Spillway (man-made) zo~2 ~~
~; Channel 80 If of impact
I (Trib. 1)
.. ,
1~,
~, ',
~+.

~ ~ ' .,
ON(. ~ /
LS-140' LEVEL SPREADEF; . ~+
SEE DETAIL 9 ~-
~~
°
c .-- rMi
~~
ZQ1VG 1.... ,

f
Area ~
20 If of impact
''~ (Trib. 1) ~
° ~/
Richland ~`
- Creek i
z®iv~1
ZONE2
1
~.
i
i~
~ ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACTS
,~ _ ~ 1,803 SQ. FT.
~~~~ ~ ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPAC'i5
~,~,~~ 833 SQ. FT.
rr
/~
~ ~
/ /
/ /
1 % %
.r ~
`1/ /
~~
r
,~` ~.
r ,

SCU.E 1"=20'
Joyt~e~ perk
Parks and Recreation Department
Town of Wake Forest
lOlNarrioRoad Wale Frrea~Nwtl~Cardina
>SroR co~or
Plan
Figure ~

See Figure ~
for more details
Sanitary Sewer
Crossing Map