20150603 Ver 1_401 Application_20150615

JUN 18 201
5 '
401 R.UFfiER PERM U CEa
June 11, 2015 JUN 7._ D
Karen Higgins a BOFFER OURCES
NCDENR-DWR RF�E TTlNG
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Dear Ms. Higgins:
Please find the attached Pre-construction Notification (PCN)and supporting documentation to apply
for a Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 27 for the Grassy Creek Stream Enhancement in Spruce Pine,
NC.
The project is a non-compensatory stream habitat improvement project on approximately 3,150
linear feet of Grassy Creek. Grassy Creek is a hatchery supported trout stream and also contains
eastern hellbender (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis). The goal of the project is to improve in-stream
habitat, improve water quality, lower water temperatures, establish native riparian vegetation, and
improve recreational opportunities and access. Natural channel design and related stream
stabilization practices will be utilized. Stormwater from adjacent areas will be treated within three
constructed stormwater wetlands (CSW) along the project. Please see the attached plan set for
additional information.
In addition to the temporary impacts to Grassy Creek due to stabilization, structure placement and
downstream realignment, permanent impacts will occur to two unnamed tributaries and one
wetland. The realigned portion of Grassy Creek will encroach upon Stream 3 and Wetland B
accounting for 153.5 linear feet and 0.036 acres of respective permanent impacts. To improve
stability of Stream 4, the culvert at the upstream end is being extended 34.5 feet.
The PCN packet contains the PCN form, agent authorization, JD request form, preliminary JD form,
photos, vicinity map, soils mapping, jurisdictional features maps, GIS property records, stream and
wetland data forms, impact drawings and site plan, as well as the NHP project report. Please
contact me if you have any questions.
Qom#
Sincerely, �
Tel: [phone]
[e-mail] cs
Attachment: 5 copies - PCN packet (including 11x17 plan sheets)
Check for$570.00

i
20150603
OF W A TF9
o� pG Office Use Only
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no
Form Version 1 4 January 2069
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s)of approval sought from the Corps: Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit(NWP) number: 27 or General Permit(GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? Q Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s)of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification—Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification—Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? 401 Certification:
❑Yes 0 No ❑Yes ❑X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so,attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank ❑ Yes ❑X No
or in-lieu fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes ❑X No
below.
1h Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑Yes 0 No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Grassy Creek Stream Enhancement
2b. County: Mitchell
2c. Nearest municipality/town: Spruce Pine
2d Subdivision name: n/a
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: n/a s� n�V M
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s)on Recorded Deed: See attached JUN
3b. Deed Book and Page No. *WATER 3c Responsible Party(for LLC if 401 8 BUFFER P Rf0UR-ING
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state,zip:
3f. Telephone no
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑X Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name: Starli McDowell
4c. Business name Toe River Valley Watch
(if applicable):
4d. Street address: P.O. Box 252
4e. City, state,zip: Penland, NC 28765
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address: starsledge @aol.com
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Jason Zink
5b. Business name Zink Environmental, PLLC
(if applicable):
5c. Street address: 129 Norwood Ave.
5d. City, state,zip: Asheville, NC 28804
5e. Telephone no.: 828-273-8322
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address: jmzink @gmail.com
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): See attached
1b. Site coordinates(in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.891666 Longitude: -82.065174
1 c. Property size: 10 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Grassy Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C, Tr
2c. River basin: French Broad
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Project site consists of the riparian corridor of Grassy Creek from a bridged private driveway north of Grassy Creek Clothing following the stream
approximately 3,2001f to the bridge under Carter's Ridge Road.The left bank of Grassy Creek is densely developed with shopping areas and parking
while the right bank consists of an industrial area,old landfill and forest The stream has been channelized and banks are actively eroding in areas
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.13
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial)on the property: 3,903
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
See attached.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
See attached
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the ❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property/
project(including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination,what type Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes,who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:Stantec
Name(If known):A.Coleman Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Preliminary JD is requested as part of this permit application Tasha Alexander,USACE visited the site with Jason Zink,PE,on March 24,2015 to
review the protect and jurisdictional features.Ms Alexander's comments are incorporated into the attached JD maps and forms.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ❑Yes ❑X No
this project(including all prior phases) in the past? El Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to"help file"instructions.
N/A
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
N/A
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

� 4
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project(check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams—tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site,then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of
number Corps(404,10)or impact
Permanent(P)or DWQ (401, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 P Fill Bottomland Hardwood Forest Yes Corps 0.036
W2 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
W3 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
W4 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
W5 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
W6 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts: 0.036
2h. Comments:
The realignment of Grassy Creek to the east will encroach upon Wetland B impacting 0 036 acres This wetland is fed by a spring outside the project
area and transitions to a depressional floodplain wetland with early successional vegetation within the zone of impact
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts(including temporary impacts) proposed on the site,then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial (PER)or Type of Average Impact
number intermittent (I NT)? jurisdiction stream length
Permanent(P)or width (linear
Temporary(T) (feet) feet)
S1 T Stream Enhancement Grassy Creek-Reach1 PER Corps 35 288.5
S2 T Stream Enhancement Grassy Creek-Reach2 PER Corps 35 743.6
S3 T Stream Restoration Grassy Creek-Reach3 PER Corps 35 2,1181
S4 P Fill Stream 3 PER Corps 3 1535
S5 T Stabilization Stream 3 PER Corps 3 34.5
S6 P Culvert Stream 4 INT Corps 3 34.5
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 3,3727
3i. Comments:
Grassy Creek will be enhanced by habitat improvement structures and stabilization measures in Reaches 1 and 2 while Reach 3 includes channel
realignment and profile adjustment to improve aquatic habitat and stability.See section B3e for a detailed description.Stream 3 is being impacted due
to the realignment of Grassy Creek toward the right bank The temporary impact on Stream 3 accounts for the section of stream that will be adjusted to
tie into Grassy Creek.Stream 4 is a low quality jurisdictional ditch To improve stability,the culvert at the upstream end is being extended 34 5 feet.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

r i
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries,tributaries, sounds,the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S.then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact(acres)
Permanent(P)or type
Temporary T
01 N/A Choose one Choose 0
02 Choose one Choose
03 Choose one Choose
04 Choose one Choose
4f.Total open water impacts 0
4g. Comments:n a
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed,the complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts(acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
purpose of pond (acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose one
P2 Choose one
5f.Total: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5g. Comments:n/a
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: n/a
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction: n/a
6. Buffer Impacts(for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes,then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation,then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑Other:
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer Impact Reason for impact Stream name Buffer Zone 1 Zone 2
number— mitigation impact impact
Permanent(P)or required? (square (square
Temporary T feet) feet
131 N/A N/A Yes/No 0 0
B2 Yes/No
B3 Yes/No
B4 Yes/No
B5 Yes/No
B6 Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts: 0 0
6i. Comments:n/a
Page 5 of 10

t
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
As this project is a stream habitat enhancement protect,it is impossible to completely avoid impacts to jurisdictional waters.However,considerations
were made to minimize disturbance to the extent necessary to provide appropriate functional uplift.One of the goals of the project is to enhance
eastern hellbender habitat Impacts to Wetlands C and D were completely avoided. Impacts to Wetland B and Stream 3 due to the realignment of
Grassy Creek were deemed necessary to address deficiencies in the dimension,pattern and profile of the larger channel
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Typical sediment and erosion control measures will be taken on site.Tree protection fencing will be used to protect jurisdictional waters that will not be
impacted Appropriately sized equipment will be utilized to prevent excessive compacting and minimize clearing Construction scheduling and staging
will be timed to minimize the amount of time spent working in the stream channel An Erosion and Sediment Control Plan will be submitted to the NC
Department of Energy,Mineral,and Land Resources for approval prior to construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S.or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes X❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by(check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes,which mitigation option will be used for this
El Payment to in-lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:n/a
Type: Choose one Quantity-
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Quantity:
Type: Choose one Quantity
na
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a.Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal)wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4h. Comments:n/a
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
n/a
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules)—required by DWQ
6a.Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires Yes No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes,then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 N/A 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 N/A 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required: o
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
N/A
N/A
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes,then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
n/a
❑Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑Yes ❑X No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
This project is a habitat improvement protect and does not include increases in impervious area.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan,then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
n/a
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? n/a
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? n/a
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply(check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑Yes ❑No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply []ORW
(check all that apply): ❑Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation(DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public(federal/state/local)funds or the Yes ❑ No
use of public(federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered"yes"to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑Yes ❑X No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act(NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered"yes"to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so,attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) Project is non-compensatory stream restoration/enhancement and therefore falls ❑Yes ❑NO
Comments: under the provisions of 15NCAC 01 C.0408 and does not require env documentation
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules(15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules(15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? El Yes ❑X No
2c. If you answered"yes"to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
n/a
3. Cumulative Impacts(DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project(based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑Yes ❑X No
additional development,which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered"yes"to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered"no," provide a short narrative description.
This project is a habitat improvement protect and will not lead to additional development
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge)of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater will not be generated as part of this stream enhancement protect.
Page 9of10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat(Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or FX1 Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The NC Natural Heritage Data Explorer was used to evaluate element occurrences within a one-mile radius of the project site.See attached for
additional information.
6. Essential Fish Habitat(Corps Requirement)
6a.Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
1998 Final Habitat Plan for the South Atlantic Region.Essential Fish Habitat Requirements for Fishery
South Atlantic Fishery Management Council Habitat and Ecosystem Atlas(http-//ocean.flondamarine org/safmc_atlas/)
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources(Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state,federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ❑X No
status(e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The NCSHPO GIS web service shows no historic or archaeological resources within a mile of the subject site.http.//gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a.Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements.
This project will not result in BFE increases and we will notify the appropriate floodplain officials of the relocation of Grassy Creek A LOMR will be
undertaken after the project is complete
8c.What source(s)did you use to make the floodplain determination?
NC Floodplain Mapping/FIRM
Jason Zink, PE �jo `�
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided
Page 10 of 10

PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION (PCN) FORM—ATTACHED INFORMATION
A3a-h. Owner Information 1. Pittman, Roger L&Mary L
973 Carters Ridge Rd
Spruce Pine, NC 28777
PIN:0799-00-22-5651
Deed Book:545; Page:38
2. GAP Corp.
C/O Spruce Center Assoc., L.P.
P.O. Box 20847
Greensboro, NC 20847
PIN:0799-03-12-9765
Deed Book: 189; Page: 345
3. Great Meadows, LLC.
Van F. Phillips, Manager/Member(828)765-9086
12019 South 226 Hwy
Spruce Pine, NC 2877
PIN:0799-03-23-3624
Deed Book: 131; Page:29
4. Spruce Pine Shopping Center
Great Meadows, LLC.
Van F. Phillips, Manager/Member(828)765-9086
12019 South 226 Hwy
Spruce Pine, NC 2877
PIN: 0799-03-13-9703
Deed information unavailable
S. Baker Family Partnership
11827 S. 226 Hwy
Spruce Pine, NC 28777
PIN:0799-03-14-7354
Deed Book: 292; Page:741
B1a. Property identification no. See Above.
(tax PIN or Parcel ID)
133d. Explain the purpose of the The proposed Grassy Creek stream enhancement and restoration
proposed project project is primarily a stream habitat improvement project.Grassy
Creek is a hatchery supported trout stream and also contains
eastern hellbender(Cryptobranchus alleganiensis).The goal of the
project is to improve in-stream habitat, improve water quality,
lower water temperatures,establish native riparian vegetation,and
improve recreational opportunities and access.
1

133e. Describe the overall project As described in section 133a.,the riparian corridor in the vicinity of
in detail, including the type of the project site is significantly disturbed, including paved areas and
equipment to be used urban development,a land fill,stream channelization, utilities,and
removal of native vegetative communities. This project seeks to
remediate the effects of these conditions to improve habitat for
instream organisms,especially eastern hellbender. Natural channel
design and related stream stabilization practices will be utilized.
Please see the attached plan set,typicals, details, and planting plan
for additional information.
Grassy Creek has been divided into three reaches based on existing
conditions and proposed treatments. Reach 1 (STA 0+13.3—3+01.8
=288.51-F temporary impacts) begins at the downstream end of the
reach to the south. This reach currently exhibits steep eroding
banks.Treatment measures include bank grading and boulder and
rock riffle structures.
Grassy Creek-Reach 2 (STA 3+01.8—10+45.4=743.61f temporary
impacts)exhibits slightly better stability and flows between the
landfill and the shopping center. Minimal disturbance will be
undertaken throughout this reach with instream habitat structures
being installed at strategic locations.
Grassy Creek—Reach 3 (STA 10+45.4-31+63.5=2118.11f temporary
impacts)flows from Reach 2 to the end of the project at Carters
Ridge Road.The first 3001f of the reach include channel realignment
slightly to the east to move the stream away from the severely
eroding left bank.Structures will be installed including log J-hook
vane,toe wood, rock cross vane and rock and boulder riffles.The
next approximately 4501f of the reach will include bank and profile
grading to stabilize the existing channel. From approximately
STA18+00 to 28+00 the stream is proposed to undergo priority one
stream restoration where the Grassy Creek is realigned on average
50'to the east into the existing floodplain.This section of channel
will include rock riffles with boulder clusters, log and rock
constructed riffles, log J-hook vanes,and toe wood.The realigned
portion of Grassy Creek-Reach 3 is encroaching upon wetland B
and stream 3 since those features exist within the right bank
floodplain.They are both lists as permanent impacts in section C3.
The last 4001f of the reach includes the transition back to the
existing stream channel.This reach includes a rock cross vane with
step to bring the stream back to the appropriate bed elevation
before flowing under the bridge at Carters Ridge Road.
In stream structures known to be beneficial to the hellbender will
be utilized on the projects.Constructed riffles of appropriate size
are expected to host juvenile and larvae hellbender.J-Hook vanes
with specific rock and log features will mimic shelter.Clusters of
2

large flat shelter rock with transition rocks will be installed.
Structures will be optimized for aquatic insect and crayfish habitat
for food sources.Studies of hellbender populations within the
Grassy Creek project site are ongoing. Findings related to species
site specific preferences will be incorporated into the final
placement of habitat structures within reaches.
Stormwater from the shopping center will be treated within three
constructed stormwater wetlands(CSW)along the project.These
CSWs are designed to remove nutrients and provide temperature
lowering. Details for these CSWs can be found in the attached
planset.
Typical stream construction equipment will be used including
backhoes and trackhoes.All appropriate sediment and erosion
control measures will be implemented and monitored throughout
construction.
F5d. Endangered Species and Federally protected species listed for Mitchell County with potential
Designated Critical Habitat habitat onsite include bog turtle, northern long-eared bat,
Appalachian elktoe,and Virginia spiraea.The NC Natural Heritage
Program data explorer was used to assess known occurrences of
protected species.According to NCNHP, none of these species or
any designated critical habitat were found to be within a mile of the
project site.As expected, eastern hellbender(Federal Species of
Concern)was found to exist within the project site. The northern
long-eared bat(NLEB) is thought to use trees as little as 3" dbh for
roosting during summer months.The forested areas along Grassy
Creek do contain suitable roost habitat for NLEB.Anita Goetz with
the Asheville USFWS office was contacted regarding potential
species and is currently reviewing the project for ESA Section 7 for
Virginia spiraea.According to her,the project should be exempt
from NLEB requirements.The NCNHP report is attached to this
permit application.
3

SAMPLE AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. PLAN NO. PARCEL ID: Co 22-
STREET ADDRESS: dto✓ ,?c-:) 6- -So,,41,
Please print: .,/� /
Property Owner: O�, i'Y ca,v�: Y Y ( c. :.
r' /f
Property Owner: �= : 1, ,f �/ Y
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Jason Zink of Zink Environmental, PLLC
(Contractor/Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address(if different than property above):
Telephone:
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature Authorized Signature
Date: Date:

SAMPLE AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. PLAN NO. PARCEL ID: x-%'79 a- (, 3- (? 7
STREET ADDRESS:
Please print: � �
Properly Owner: f�,00,ws ((-,C-
Property Owner:
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property,do hereby authorize
Jason Zink of Zink Environmental, PLLC
(Contractor/Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address(if different than property above):
Telephone:
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
r� /n eftt�jGL
Autl o ' ed Signature Authorized Signature
Date: 711 Date:

SAMPLE AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. PLAN NO. PARCEL ID: 0-7 q Of--C 3 - 12, Y
STREET ADDRESS:
Please print: f /
Property Owner: �,q�c�c C , w eL�(> ;�,Af(; L !L ��t� L(_L'
Property Owner:
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Jason Zink of Zink Environmental, PLLC
(Contractor/Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
Telephone: cf,:2c? Gv�
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Authoriz d Signature Authorized Signature
Date: G��� ✓ Date:

SAMPLE AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. PLAN NO. PARCEL ID: 11 cl 0 —0 3 — 01 7 3 S y
STREET ADDRESS: l I y02. 7 ����k �l tea(
7V
Please print:
Property Owner: Ba, ►-ti,�y
Property Owner: 1 e' A The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Jason Zink Zink Environmental, PLLC
of
(Contractor/Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address(if different than property above):
Telephone:
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature Authorized Signature
Date: Date:

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 11805 S 226 Hwv
City, State: Spruce Pine,NC
County: Mitchell
Directions: (Fmm Asheville)I-4UE to exit 72(US-70),11 miles then turn left onto US-221 N(In Marion),7 miles then turn left
onto NC 226N,turn left then night to slay on 226N toward Spruce Pine,Project is behind McM 6 Dollar General on right.
Parcel Index Number(s)(PIN): 1. 0799-00-22-5651, 2.0799-03-12-9765
3.0799-03-23-3624, 4.0799-03-13-9703, 5.0799-03-14-7354
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Jason Zink
Mailing Address: Zink Environmental,PLLC,129 Norwood Ave.,Asheville,NC 28804
Telephone Number: 828-273-8322
Electronic Mail Address': mink @gmail.com
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑✓ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other,please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: See item A3a-h.in attached PCN information
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address 3:
❑✓ Proof of Ownership Attached(e.g. a copy of Deed,County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data)
1 If available
2 Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version:December 2013 Page 3

jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION
1,the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the propertylproperties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers(Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
Coe, e: c, a r� mwv�
�� _Y
Pro rty Owner(pleade print) Date
V'
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
aI am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein_
This request does include a delineation.
F] I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation_
I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUSs and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
1 am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved JD(this may or may not include a survey plat).
F] I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS(conducted
by others)on a property/project area and provide an approved JD(may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols,skip to Part E.
s Waters of the United States
Version:December 2013 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION4 .
1,the undersigned,a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers(Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
t 899.
Property Owner(please print) Date
Prop e 2ergnature
E. JMSDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION TYPE
Select One_
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary ID for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUSs and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
1 am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved JD(this may or may not include a survey plat).
I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS(conducted
by others)on a property/project area and provide an approved JD(mayor may not
include a survey plat).
°For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols,skip to Part E.
s Waters of the United States
Version:December 2013 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION'
1,the undersigned,a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers(Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
t 899.
Property Owner(please print) Date'
x e�
Property er Signatu
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminga JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps provide a pEdjmjpAQ JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUSS and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved JD(this may or may not include a survey plat).
I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS(conducted
by others)on a propertylproject area and provide an approved JD(may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols,skip to Part E.
s Waters of the United States
Version:December 2013 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION
I,the undersigned,a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers(Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U-S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
rrp—erty Owner(p ase rint) Date
Zignature Prope
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
aI am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein_
This request does include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation_
I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUS' and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
MI am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved JD(this may or may not include a survey plat)_
❑ I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others)on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USAGE protocols,skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States
Version:December 2013 Page 4

jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION
I,the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U-S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
r-'� )' (--A Aa
Property Owner(please print) Date
' Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
1 am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUS 5 and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved JD(this may or may not include a survey plat)_
F] I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others)on a property/project area and provide an approved JD(may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols,skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States
Version:December 2013 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. ALL REQUESTS
❑✓ Map of Property or Project Area(attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
❑✓ Size of Property or Project Area 10 acres
W-1 I verify that the property(or project)boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
❑✓ Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Formb.
Project Coordinates: 35.891666 Latitude "82.065174 Longitude
Maps(no larger than 11x17)with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑✓ Large and small scale maps that depict,at minimum: streets, intersections,towns
❑✓ Aerial Photography of the project area
✓❑ USGS Topographic Map
0 Soil Survey Map
aOther Maps, as appropriate(e.g.National Wetland Inventory Map,Proposed Site
Plan,previous delineation maps,LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form.From Regulatory Guidance Letter No.08-02,dated June 26,2008
Version:December 2013 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information(when applicable)':
Wetlands: Tributaries:
Wetland Data Sheets$ a USACE Assessment Forms
Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
aLandscape Photos, if taken
0 Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
■ All aquatic resources(for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
■ Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
■ Locations of photo stations
■ Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
❑ Project Coordinates: Latitude Longitude
Maps(no larger than 11x17)with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections,towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate(e.g.National Wetland Inventory Map,Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
http://www.usace:army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits/rep supp.asox
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
http://Portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/get file7uuid=76f3c58b-dab8.4960-ba43.4Sb7fafO6f4c&eroupld=38364 and,
http://w ww.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/dots/regulatory/publicn6tices/2013/NCSAM bolt User Manual 130318.pdf
8 Delineation information must include,at minimum,one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version:December 2013 Page 6

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Jason Zink,Zink Environmental,PLLC
129 Norwood Ave,Asheville,NC 28804
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Grassy Creek Stream Enhancement
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Mitchell . City:.Spruce Pine
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 35.891666 °N; Long_ -82.065174 °W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Grassy creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non-wetland waters:
3677 linear feet: 3-40' width (ft) and/or acres.
Cowardin Class:
Stream Flow: Perennial
Wetlands: 0.13 acres.
Cowardin Class: palustrine forested 8 emergent
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal: none
Non-Tidal: none
1

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply- checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
❑✓ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant:
❑✓ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
app nt/consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:.
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑✓ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:spruce Pine 1:24K
❑✓ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation: Mitchell county 2004
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:.
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
✓❑ Photographs: ✓0 Aerial (Name & Date): ESR1 cis Service-2014 or
F� Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
2

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
'a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit(and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
3

This preliminary JD finds that there "may be"waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
a�
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED) (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)
4

Estimated
Site amount of Class of
Number Latitude Longitude Cowardin Class aquatic aquatic
resource in resource
review area
Grassy Creek 35.891760 -82.065083 R3UB1 3,189 If Non-section 10
—non-wetland
Stream 1— 35.889489 -82.064993 R3UB1 26 If Non-section 10
Silver Run —non-wetland
Stream 2 35.891453 -82.065307 R3UB2 218 If Non-section 10
—non-wetland
Stream 3 35.893914 -82.065050 R3UB1 227 If Non-section 10
—non-wetland
Stream 4 35.893799 -82.065832 R4SB5 243 If Non-section 10
—non-wetland
Wetland B 35.894065 -82.065177 PFO1 0.06 ac Non-section 10
—wetland
Wetland C 35.894735 -82.065965 PEM1 0.05 ac Non-section 10
—wetland
Wetland D 35.893259 -82.064733 PFO1 0.02 ac Non-section 10
—wetland

Grassy Creek - Photos
Photo 1. Grassy Creek - Reach 1 - facing
downstream near upstream end of project
Photo 2. Grassy Creek - Reach 2 - facing
upstream near STA 10+00
Photo 3. Grassy Creek - Reach 3 - left bank
erosion near STA 12+00
Photo 4. Grassy Creek - Reach 3 - Sewer line
crossing near STA 14+00
Photo 4. Grassy Creek - Reach 3 - facing
upstream near STA 23+00
Photo 5. Grassy Creek - Reach 3 - facing
downstream near STA 26+00

Photo 7. Stream 1 - Silver Run
Photo 8. Sewer line crossing on Stream 2
Photo 9. Stream 3
Photo 10. Stream 4 facing upstream

r -
1
7
�
.,
✓ice
� iilFtin'r F v�

1 • 4C
•
3. Base Imagery: ESRI Map Services.
tJN
•
•
Protect Site
•
•
r t
i
•�
Er"'It, a 0131VitD al G Ciety„i-fib
0 aoo 800
® Feet
1:12A001a1 onpnolAocufMnl sae 0185.11)
® Stantec
Rgect Location175613065
Spruce Fl,-. NC Vrepored by ALC on 2015-0)19
MHch.11 County
Cfent/Roject
Toe River Valley Watch
Grassy Creek Stream Enhancement
Fg— No.
1
Vicinity Map
USGS Spruce Pine 1:24K Quad

a SaB C UdW9
9\
\,
\ D
�dD \ W9 SdD
SdD
WgD WgC
Wg ,j \ \�
SCC
SdD gD
ScC WgD
SCC
SaB C
W 9
`; �\` WgD
W
SCC
ScC E C
Ud� WgD
e>- WgC Ud ScC ScC
j . CeE\ Ur
W
Ce WgD
CeEWg gC WgD Un
—'
—� SeC
— i—Z SaB cD
W9E D gC W BdA ScC
SaB gC EcD
WgC 1
� ,Ud �' ScC
WgD
SCC — / WgD
Fe / EcD
Wg 9 _ ( Ec SaBcD
IF 2 '
i gC
Fe� .,ScC ma "' - FeC2 ,' \'.
SdD
Sc EcD ScC
Sc - .. SaB
\
F 2 r ScC / C
ad02
0 400 Boo
24k Hydrography ® Fannin sandy Gay loam, 8 to 15 percent (FeC2) ® Feet
IV Roads ® Fannin sandy day loam. 15 to 30 percent (Fe D2) el000 la o p: oioocu e�+sae o+as 1 q
^0 Grassy Creek Fannin sandy day loam, 30 to 50 percent (Fe E2)
project Boundary . Saunook silt loam, 2 to 8 percent (SaB) Sta ntee
Soil Map Units . Saunook silt loam, 8 to 15 percent (ScC)
Aolecl Location 17561M
Bandana sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent (BdA) F� Saunook-Thunder complex, 15 to 30 percent (SdD) sp,ce Pine. MC P tt,ioc tl byALC on 10150.7-19
Mn -0 C—t'
® Cashiers sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent (Ca D) F7UdoAhenis, loamy (Ud)
cashiers sandy loam, 30 to 50 percent (CaE) Udonhents, loamy, stony (Un) crenvnoi.1
Toe River Valley Watch
® Chandler-Micaville complex, 15 to 30 percent (CeD) Urban land (Ur) Grassy Creek Stream Enhancement
o Chandler-Micaville complex, 30 to 50 percent (CeE) Water (W)
- Chandler-Micaville complex, 50 to 95 percent (CeF) Watauga sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent (WgC) ,
2
Evard-Cowee complex, 8 to 15 percent (EcC) 0 Watauga sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent (WgD)
Evard-cowee complex, 15 to 30 percent (EcD) Watauga sandy loam, 30 to 50 percent (WgE) Soil Map
USDA-NRCS Mitchell County Soil Survey

D O
O O
D d
—a
m�
O
3
o
00
No
W
O
vo
o 3
O
D
o3
m
N
7C7
CD
Z
0v0
N
o
A�
o
n
3
❑
O
Q
n
O
O
�
C
�
r+
7
�
0
7
_
O
VNp�i
O
CD
(D
�
O
�
E E E E E E E E E E
P Y 7 7 P P P P P P
o OO O O O o 0 0 0
O O O O O O O O O
O m m V m Un A W N
W W W W W W W W W W
m m N N Ur N N Lt I � N
m m m m m m m m m m
AAAA AAA A A A
O O O O O O O N
V m W N W A m (Jt m
m m OD OD W OD W m m m
N N N N N N N N N N
O O O pOH pOH O O O O O
(mir A A A A 0 (mir N N M
O m m m 0O N W N
( A m o N A A m v
(Oo N N N A N N m W W A
i E E E E E E E E E
YL a n? q q? o o g
00 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O
N OV 0oA W N IO3
W W W W W W W W
(Ir (P (n U U W (Jr W N Cn x
m m m m m N m N OD m
W W A A A (mD A ( m(pp A 0
N W V V A m Am -1
m o m m m v m
m W --AN (D v Am
U m
m m m m m m m m m
O O O O o O O o N O
m m m m m m m m O m
A A m (n (n (n [n U1 m N
O o�p wN ( m(�D� W m O O
W m A m -4 A N m O v
E F E f F f F
n n n n n a a
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 o y
OD V m (Jr A W N S
WA A N N N N
n O O m 0 N
N m A m m A m
m m m m m m m
N N N N N N N
O O mOm O mO mOm O
A A A
m m m m m m m
A (P V V m O
m tO N m m W W
m
D
-o
1
tv
N
CD s
f
a
CD
o
m
m
w m
D
a
a
(D
D
T
O
N
�
D
E E E E E E E E E E
P Y 7 7 P P P P P P
o OO O O O o 0 0 0
O O O O O O O O O
O m m V m Un A W N
W W W W W W W W W W
m m N N Ur N N Lt I � N
m m m m m m m m m m
AAAA AAA A A A
O O O O O O O N
V m W N W A m (Jt m
m m OD OD W OD W m m m
N N N N N N N N N N
O O O pOH pOH O O O O O
(mir A A A A 0 (mir N N M
O m m m 0O N W N
( A m o N A A m v
(Oo N N N A N N m W W A
i E E E E E E E E E
YL a n? q q? o o g
00 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O
N OV 0oA W N IO3
W W W W W W W W
(Ir (P (n U U W (Jr W N Cn x
m m m m m N m N OD m
W W A A A (mD A ( m(pp A 0
N W V V A m Am -1
m o m m m v m
m W --AN (D v Am
U m
m m m m m m m m m
O O O O o O O o N O
m m m m m m m m O m
A A m (n (n (n [n U1 m N
O o�p wN ( m(�D� W m O O
W m A m -4 A N m O v
E F E f F f F
n n n n n a a
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 o y
OD V m (Jr A W N S
WA A N N N N
n O O m 0 N
N m A m m A m
m m m m m m m
N N N N N N N
O O mOm O mO mOm O
A A A
m m m m m m m
A (P V V m O
m tO N m m W W
W m
N Z
0
Gi O
O A
n �.
Q
Q Q
3
� S
S
Q
7
n
CD
3
m
V:\1713\active\175613065\project\site-dato\ga\JD-mopN-2.mxd
Revised 2015-06-03 8y: zelerby
m
D
-o
W m
N Z
0
Gi O
O A
n �.
Q
Q Q
3
� S
S
Q
7
n
CD
3
m
V:\1713\active\175613065\project\site-dato\ga\JD-mopN-2.mxd
Revised 2015-06-03 8y: zelerby

.�.�•--'ice-�'- � �
..� '
� � y 4 i �Y � � , • 1 .,.. , z . i _ kms.. ; 'L "'�
Ail
• _. ,�".
O i.
_ 1
Ila
IL
Owner: PI N: 0799-00-22 -5651
PITTMAN ROGER L & MARY L N June 4, 2015
Tax Acct: 555662399
973 CARTERS RIDGE RD Land: $156,400 n 1:4,800
SPRUCE PINE NC 28777 N
Dwelling: $156,600 1 inch = 400 feet
Grantor: Total: $313,000 Mitchell County GIS
PITTMAN ROGER & DEAN Legal Ac: 6.95
Property Address: Deed Ref: 54538 DISCLAIMER: The information contained
185 GRASSY HILL DR Deed Date: 1/27/2014 on this page is NOT to be construed
or used as a "legal description".
Map information is believed to
be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed.

6/4/2015 Mitchell County,North Carolina
1 ♦ itchell Count-, North Cai-ohna
i sses%or's office
iµ
Parcel
Parcel ID Parcel Address Total Land& Data as of Assess Year Pay Year
Tabs Improvements
0799-00-22-5651 185 GRASSY HILL DR $313,000 5/24/2015 3:13:00 AM
Print View
Land
Improvements O'✓,.m nformation
Sales Disclosure Owner PITTMAN ROGER L&MARY L
Assessments Owner Address 973 CARTERS RIDGE RD
SPRUCE PINE NC 28777
Searches Transfer Date 01/27/2014
Address -- --
Parcel ID Location Information
Owner
Legal Desc. GIS 555662399 Section&Plat
District No. 12 State Assigned District No. 12
Functions Township No. 001 Routing No. 1
Home Parcel Address 185 GRASSY HILL DR Parcel Address 185 GRASSY HILL DR
Property Search Legal Desc.
Help
Feedback — --
Parcel Information Topography Services
Zoning Level N Water N
Property Class Code 511 High N Sewer N
Neighborhood Code 32 Low N Gas N
Neighborhood Factor .00 Rolling Y Electricity Y
Neighborhood Type B Swampy N Sidewalk N
Street or Road Code A Flood Hazard Alley N
Waterfront Property Type
Assessment Information
Current AV-Total Land $156,400 AV-Res.Land&Lots $0 Legal Acreage 6.9500
Current AV-Total Improv. $156,600 AV-Res.Improv. $0 Average AV/Acre $0
Total Land&Improvements $313,000 AV-Res. Land&Improv. $0 Appraisal Date 8/28/2013
AV-Commercial Land $156,400 AV-Non-Res.Land $0 Change Reason Desc. 21
AV-Comm.Improv. $0 AV-Non-Res.Imp. $0 Prior AV-Total Land $156,400
AV-Comm.Land&imp. $156,400 AV-Non-Res. Land&Improv. $0 Prior AV-Total Improv. $177,800
AV-Dwelling $127,700 AV-Classified Land $0 Adj. Factor Applied 0.00
AV-Farmland $0 AV-Homesite(s) $0
http:/Inc-mitchell-assessor.goverrmax.com/propertymax/ACAMA_indiana4abj)arcel v0701.asp?sid=3E82FD6589194A90AE99E5962EOE463E&t nm=base8J... 1/1

r+l.^ � �ft• fit. ( �.I' ,' t e - t�� r 'w
Eli
of
- .a: '`dam : ; 3'.; •
om Ilk 4
AN
S `
IL
Owner: PI N: 0799-03-12-9765
June 4, 2015
GAP CORP Tax Acct: 002016236 N
C/O SPRUCE CENTERASSOC,L.P. n 1:4,800
P O BOX 20847 Land: $696,900 N
GREENSBORO NC 27420 Dwelling: $3,294,900 1 inch = 400 feet
Grantor: Total: $3,991,800 Mitchell County GIS
HVM PARTNERS NO. 102 Legal Ac: 11.62
Property Address: Deed Ref: 189 345 DISCLAIMER- The information contained
12081 S 226 HWY Deed Date: 4/17/1985 on this page is NOT to be construed
or used as a "legal description".
Map information is believed to
be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed.

64!2015 Mitchell County,North Carolina
W,,, w-cssor's itchell Comity, North Carolina
Office
Parcel
Parcel ID Parcel Address Total Land& Data as of Assess Pay Year
Tabs Improvements Year
Parcel 0799-03-12-9765 12081 S 226 HWY $3,991,800 5/24/2015 3:13:00
Print View AM
Land
Improvements
Owner Information
Sales Disclosure
Assessments Owner GAP CORP C/O SPRUCE CENTER ASSOC L.P.
Owner Address P O BOX 20847
Searches GREENSBORO NC 27420
Address Transfer Date 04/1711985
Parcel ID
Owner Location information
Legal Desc. GIS 002016236 Section&Plat
Functions District No. 92 State Assigned District No. 92
Home Township No. 001 Routing No. 141
Property Search Parcel Address 12081 S 226 HWY Parcel Address 12081 S 226 HWY
Help Legal Desc.
Feedback
Parcel Information Topography Services
Zoning Level Y Water Y
Property Class Code 425 High N Sewer Y
Neighborhood Code 32 Low N Gas Y
Neighborhood Factor .00 Rolling Electricity Y
Swam
Neighborhood Type B Swampy N Sidewalk N
Street or Road Code A Flood Hazard Alley N
Waterfront Property Type
Assessment information
Current AV-Total Land $696,900 AV-Res.Land&Lots $0 Legal Acreage 11.6200
Current AV-Total Improv. $3,294,900 AV-Res. Improv. $0 Average AV/Acre $0
Total Land&Improvements $3,991,800 AV-Res. Land&Improv. $0 Appraisal Date 12/4/2013
AV-Commercial Land $696,900 AV-Non-Res.Land $0 Change Reason Desc. 21
AV-Comm.Improv. $3,294,900 AV-Non-Res.Imp. $0 Prior AV-Total Land $696,900
AV-Comm.Land&Imp. $3,991,800 AV-Non-Res.Land&Improv. $0 Prior AV-Total Improv. $3,261,600
AV-Dwelling $0 AV-Classified Land $0 Adj.Factor Applied 0.00
AV-Farmland $0 AV-Homesite(s) $0
http://no-mitchell-assessor.goverrwnax.com/propertymax/ACAMA incianafab,_Wcely0701.asp?sid=8524BIAB98104216B334114CC6B2F4EF 8t nm=basegJ... 1/1

r •Yr
_ 4• e
eL
Aw
AA
Iw
r IL _
Owner:
PI N:
0799-03-23-3 624
N June 4, 2015
GREAT MEADOWS INC
Tax Acct:
001 04 448 6
PO BOX 400
1:4,800
Land:
$272,700
A
SPRUCE PINE NC 28777
Dwelling:
$185,600
1 inch = 400 feet
Grantor:
Total:
$458,300
Mitchell County GIS
Legal Ac:
12.27
Property Address:
Deed Ref:
131 29
DISCLAIMER: The information contained
11805 S 226 HWY
Deed Date:
1/1/1900
on this page is NOT to be construed
"legal
or used as a description".
Map information is believed to
be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed.

3/19/2015 Mitchell County,North Carolina
itchell Cotmov, No>i•th Carolina
'sses.sor's Office
.71ir
Parcel
Parcel ID Parcel Address Total Land& Data as of Assess Pay Year
Tabs Improvements Year
Parcel 0799-03-23-3624 11805 S 226 HWY $458,300 1/28/2015 9:41:00
Print View PM
Land
Improvements
Sales Disclosure Owner information
Assessments Owner GREAT MEADOWS INC
Owner Address PO BOX 400
Searches SPRUCE PINE NC 28777
Address Transfer Date 01/01/1900
Parcel ID
Owner Location Information
Legal Desc. GIS 001044486 Section&Plat
Functions District No. 12 State Assigned District No. 12
Home Township No. 001 Routing No. 166
Property Search Parcel Address 11805 S 226 HWY Parcel Address 11805 S 226 HWY
Help Legal Desc.
Feedback
Parcel Information Topography Services
Zoning Level N Water Y
Property Class Code 447 High N Sewer Y
Neighborhood Code 32 Low N Gas Y
Neighborhood Factor .00 Rolling Y Electricity Y
Neighborhood Type B Swampy N Sidewalk N
Street or Road Code A Flood Hazard Alley N
Waterfront Property Type
Assessment Information
Current AV-Total Land $272,700 AV-Res. Land&Lots $0 Legal Acreage 12.2700
Current AV-Total Improv. $185,600 AV-Res. Improv. $0 Average AV/Acre $0
Total Land&Improvements $458,300 AV-Res. Land&Improv. $0 Appraisal Date 8/21/2013
AV-Commercial Land $272,700 AV-Non-Res. Land $0 Change Reason Desc. 21
AV-Comm.Improv. $185,600 AV-Non-Res. Imp. $0 Prior AV-Total Land $272,700
AV-Comm.Land &Imp. $458,300 AV-Non-Res. Land&Improv. $0 Prior AV-Total Improv. $178,600
AV-Dwelling $0 AV-Classified Land $0 Adj. Factor Applied 0.00
AV-Farmland $0 AV-Homesite(s) $0
http Jfio-mitchell-assessor.governmax.com/propertymax/ACAMA Indianaltab_pmcel v0701.asp?sid=DED5C434E157465783E11DB6213A29C9 8t rxn=base... 1/1

-EMMMV1;IMF
E�
1, •111 . � M � 7.
� i �. _ �h c • �` �, l,� � fit. .�
ti a - :t
r`, •.-• - ff - �� � Vii►
* .4" !• -
~,MINIM •� is 1 � �'�'�
a
kllfill
i t 1 .. 1 - vii.♦ y_ .�' R,
NNr iii} a -# �: { • �� s r' ,
p� r'
•ti � 1 ' , � �1� r `�',f'�i '� ,fir.= I r��' :3 �� .`!
w c IL =s '
Owner: PI N: 0799-03-13-9703
SPRUCE PINE SHOPPING CENTER N June 4, 2015
Tax Acct: 555557107
PO BOX 400 Land: $620,500 1:4,800
SPRUCE PINE NC 28777
Dwelling: $2,546,900 1 inch= 400 feet
Grantor: Total: $3,167,400 Mitchell County GIS
Legal Ac: 9
Property Address: Deed Ref' DISCLAIMER: The information contained
12019 S 226 HWY Deed Date: 1/1/1900 on this page is NOT to be construed
or used as a "legal description".
SPRUCE PINE Map information is believed to
be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed.

3119=15 Mitchell County,North Carolina
itchell County, North Carolina
sSessor's Office
Ail
Parcel
Parcel ID Parcel Address Total Land& Data as of Assess Pay Year
Tabs Improvements Year
Parcel 0799-03-13-9703 12019 S 226 HWY $3,167,400 1/28/2015 9:41:00
Print View PM
Land
Improvements
Sales Disclosure Owner Information
Assessments Owner SPRUCE PINE SHOPPING CENTER
Owner Address PO BOX 400
Searches SPRUCE PINE NC 28777
Address Transfer Date
Parcel ID
Owner Location Information
Legal Desc. GIS 555557107 Section&Plat
Functions District No. 12 State Assigned District No. 12
Home Township No. 001 Routing No. 148
Property Search Parcel Address 12019 S 226 HWY Parcel Address 12019 S 226 HWY
Help Legal Desc.
Feedback
Parcel Information Topography Services
Zoning Level Y Water Y
Property Class Code 426 Low N Sewer Y
Neighborhood Code 32 Gas Y
Neighborhood Factor .00 Rolling N Electricity Y
Neighborhood Type B Swampy N Sidewalk N
Street or Road Code A Flood Hazard Alley N
Waterfront Property Type
Assessment Information
Current AV-Total Land $620,500 AV-Res.Land&Lots $0 Legal Acreage 9.0000
Current"-Total Improv. $2,546,900 AV-Res. Improv. $0 Average AV/Acre $0
Total Land&Improvements $3,167,400 AV-Res. Land&Improv. $0 Appraisal Date 12/4/2013
AV-Commercial Land $620,500 AV-Non-Res.Land $0 Change Reason Desc. 21
AV-Comm.Improv. $2,546,900 AV-Non-Res.Imp. $0 Prior AV-Total Land $620,500
AV-Comm. Land&Imp. $3,167,400 AV-Non-Res.Land&Improv. $0 Prior AV-Total Improv. $2,436,400
AV-Dwelling $0 AV-Classified Land $0 Adj.Factor Applied 0.00
AV-Farmland $0 AV-Homesite(s) $0
http://nc-mitcholl-assessor.goverrmax.com/propertymax/ACAMA irKianaAab_pwcely070l.asp?sid=Fl81029E630F499083E54EEC5C9070EA&t nm=basegd... 1/1

♦ i ` !
r'to,
1f
Or
u l rw J,
Owner: PIN: 0799-03-14-7354 June 4, 2015
BAKER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LTD. Tax Acct: 009800380 N
11827 S 226 HWY Land: $416,300 n 1:4,800
SPRUCE PINE NC 28777 N
Dwelling: $741,600 1 inch= 400 feet
Grantor: Total: $1,157,900 Mitchell County GIS
Legal Ac: 3.33
Property Address: Deed Ref: 292 741 DISCLAIMER: The information contained
11827 S 226 HWY Deed Date: 1/3/1998 on this page is NOT to be construed
or used as a "legal description".
SPRUCE PINE Map information is believed to
be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: _ D _ 1!5 Project/Stte: S h �•rn j Latitude:
Evaluator. A, co I-e County: M � � `4 Longitude:
Total Points: Stream Determination(circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent L S Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial e.g.Quad Name:
if 219 or perennial if 230•
A. Geomorphology Subtotal Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1`Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2.Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 3
3.in-channel structure:ex.ruffle-pool,step-pool, 0 1 2 Q
ripple-pool sequence
4.Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5.Active/relict floodplain 0 2 3
6.Depositional bars or benches 0 1 3
7.Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 3
8. Headcuts o 1 2 3
9.Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11.Second or greater order channel No=0 es=
artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal= a�c�r.` kn tJSG-
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 ®
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0, 1 2 3 J
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15.Sediment on plants or debris 0 ,0.5 1 1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17.Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 s=3
C. Biology Subtotal= 1 D, 5 _
18. Fibrous roots in streambed ?" 3.j 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 , 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2
21.Aquatic Mollusks 1 2 3
22. Fish ;, 0.5 1 1.
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1•g
24.Amphibians 0.5 1 1.5
25.Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL= 1.5 Oth =0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes: v�c*L r,e 0 h20
On l a S
P b serve nto t I us k-o j 4.64 +t__.:o 4iryw-
Sketch:
-�
6 r_02fl Gina.�-

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: * �2 -' 0-u5
ProjecVSR9: G IaSS Cie e k
Latitude:
Evaluator. A Co (ern &n
County: M ►e
Longitude:
Total Points:
Strearn is at least intermittent +0,5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if t 19 or perennial if 230•
2. Sinuosity of channel along thatweg
0
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = -'� a • S
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1`Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
11 0.
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thatweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riflle- ooi, steplml,
ripple7pool sequence
0
1
�1
�y
3
4. Particle sae of stream substrate
0
1)
24. Amphibians
25. Algae
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0
1
1
FACW = 0.75;
3
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
Notes:
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
(11
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
1 0
1 0.5
1
L. 11. Second or greater order channel
I
o = Oy
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 13
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1 2 GD
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1 2 3
14. Leaf litter
(' T
11 0.
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0 , 0.5_
No = 0 Yes =
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3 '
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 ; /
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
_1,
i 0 1
2
3
22. Fish
0 , 0.5_
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
) 0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
25. Algae
0 0.5
0� 0.5
1
1
1.5
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
L = 1 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
a
Notes:
Sketch:
k
nom► v°� r da,* -r sQr
N►A` L, above be -a -ver dam -
e
r♦ - _
----------
CX_
►� - Weak �t�rv'l9gj - 61,_COLk dole P j-
-� a(� bt�>f a.is0 Foke-weed - hlgh el�va�-ion =close
�� ackan' 0evo".- ofn -Moto, w p -

skeP-wti`3
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 2 - (Q _ (5' Project/Site: �� c� q 6"ej. Latitude:
Evaluator. A County: M JCh e + Longitude:
Tota! Points:StreaStream Determination (circle one) Other
if t2:19 or perennial if 2 30• is at least intermittent Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
19
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 2 5.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1` Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
L-
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
-4i
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
1.5
5. Active/relict floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0
1
1
2
2
Y = 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
11. Second or greater order channel
f4o = 0 x;
Yes = 3
aranom ancnes are not rated; see discussions in manual -
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = q , .> 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1.
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1 1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Y = 3
C_ Bloloav (Subtotal = Ili, 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0 1
2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks i 0 1
2 3
22. Fish 1 6) 0.5
1 1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1 1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5 _
1 1.5
25. AlgaeCO)0.5
1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Oth r = .02
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
SIP
Sketch: 1;
�Z .3 `
V) a- t/P v
12 rts ` Q
L
44- Li LNIA -�J
�^5e � ,5foPe �dd.
�.t' -k+4L ��n-b 6 I-as.s� Crp¢ k
n°`l o (eve
e

1;- rA'1
vl-�A
NV nW0 Ctr"m idnnfif "fine Fnrm Versinn A-11
Date: - _ I s
Project/Slte: G r'A S Cr,
Latitude:
Evaluator. . CO ( Q m a V1
County: ! v l r Ci/12 ((
Longitude:
Total Points:
stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if 219 or iM=niaf if i 30•15
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool uence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
No = 0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0.5
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
B. Headcuts
0-1
1
2
3
9. Grade control
i0.5
--- b a,Q.o �. �o
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
Sketch: ,.----
5
C `�'��
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
= 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = l ,
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 /1-0
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 .1.
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 5 s
1
1.5
17. -Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
1
es = 3
C_ Bioloov (Subtotal= 1) )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) U1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
(0)
1
2 _
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
i
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
26. Wetland plants in streambed
0 0.5 1
FACW = 0.75; 0131-= 1.5 Othe = 0
1.5
•perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: .e-
d �S-Ev r- c v e,••
d c '
C2_P.
c�
&t„ .
--- b a,Q.o �. �o
Sketch: ,.----
5
C `�'��
I -e C J uof
w df -hof j►��, w! a-�c�lr-
b,.cke+
+able' - does ho -1-
4- 4 a'{ures

S-Fr� ct�w�
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # L (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for
the stream reach under assessment: /
1. Applicant's name: --rpV , 2. Evaluator's name:-
3. Date of evaluation: 110115- 4. Time of evaluation: �Z • _
5. Name of stream: U - /,%J 1 L - 6. River basin:Ymc.��
7. Approximate drainage area: �/,Z a C- 8. Stream order: A 21 on USC -,+.S L,,, 4- IS More-'
9. Length of reach evaluated: L-� 10. County: Alt (-I-7• �+ e U reA rJ
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): r/) /A-
Latitude (ex. 34,872312): 35, W52, Longitude (ex. -77,556611): ` Cd 2 ' o 1,
Method location determined (circle): P. Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby/roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) loca(tion)s
CiVt"iP�IC'
14. Proposed channel work (if any): trl U 0 ti
15. Recent weather conditions: 1-61A 11lp � ` _t G+ Gtr+j _
16. Site conditions at time of visit: 11AA A,
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
! Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is.there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point?YL-'S O; If yes, estimate the water surface area:gri
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad -map? ES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 'ZSa/o Residential 25-91. Commercigl % Industrial % Agricultural
7 % Forested _% Cleared / Logged :K-% Other ( G off//C// / .. )
22. Bankf ill width: 6--t, 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):.
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) 4NIoderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Yoccasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:
Evaluator's Signatur Date �) n! I-<—
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
2
ICHARACTERISTIOS
COREGJO ±"TAAN
11
Coastal Piedmont
?P7e's"e�nc,e,i—Cnow/#persisteitt�poolsin-,streain�-'�
0-i
5 —
1 0
Evideilee oIfoast1human alteration
efisO -_max.
0-6
'01-54X
-A —
L_
3
1parl Qn
Wfer max Llh
0-6
;0'-4
0, - '5
4
Evide6 chaij es
0-5
I extensive as MAX
1 O , -4
L 0-4
L
Ground'a-
i�
I
- 3
0- 4"
'0
s'0
gem etc, maxj-bfjj-6,'
L ),,
U_
Presence, 6 bd#lain
of adjacent' 6
4
0-4
10
77
n ME m vb`ints)'&___
'iUntrenchment floodplain access
-4,
7
0-'5
-
0-- 4'
0-2
th
centmetlands
—;(,no_m(ettAnds �Oofwfwa 06ftwelland
0-41- 4
�0-2-
9°
n �rsl s ity
1 0-5 11
lextemii'vem anne I I zat, i R jfdt gralWek0b m axtro ffilg)�
-0-4
0-3?
110' 1
edt' -ut
hifitflei
i -v -do . . . . . . . . . 4r.no sedifnent =,-maN "'ifi
0 - 5
-7,
0-4
0-4
S&A diversity el Cedsubstrate7
1L _JOW&§�_"�04 '
diverse-siz, e a
NA*
1 '0-4 K,
0 -,,5
dnce,6fch.annd1Rin,, On"orWidening
"Ev' e cisi
'IY
WWO ieincised4 !all
0- 5 11
G-4
0
-L 4e -1
ab allsil -`max"
-5,
3
Presencv�ofmajor bankfailures
e N 6 r c _eff o 9 i bn- =I _Y
'0-1 5t
0-5
0'-'5
'I 4i 11L�A
�Root�(Lelpth,,niiddensityonibanks
densejx-O%Mj,
� 0-3
0 5r/h,
"r6hft,,= m axli�o
115
m p-wkli agricu ti -k, 0
ri, fivistoc , rtfti6er production,
5-,
9=6
"' oQ ripp
1.4
L m axT61Atk)' 11
f'+ 20 N
10-3
-
—I
t ,
Hab - __ __ ..'r
- - -
01-6
-
01-6
i(litilb�r-nbAabitat,
its,
'iffog, - Canopycoverqge over st eambid,
A I- - I
, - S
0-5
'OL 5
maxjy,& �,
ji,6"m
SIibstra,fi(ejnbeddedn-ess
4 4W, de&=
NA*
0 -4
1-4
0,
Weinbed k-
jQose�strUCtUre_=irfak)j I
20
mv
fitiegrnl ertebraiesi(iseeipage 4),
It
7-1-- 1 - -1
0-4)
Oe 5$1
0
>w-
1VI.Vidence s� 6A),
p
-- a
resen*ceto amoAibians
A'-
0-4
V fi s in i Fiarms fishy -
0 4-;
0
r(noievide'nce���
-
4-
O 4
23
!Evidence o,,W-i H e•use
0-6
'0'-
76­eyjdence =,1nax'w
aq antlev
tie- denci,
5
TotAl"Points Possible too 1100 too
TO-TAL .SCORE (91so enter on first page)
5 S
Thf-.qp
2

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # Z (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name.—I"), L - Irl aLX�e" i t;('�'L. Evaluator's nameA CC? (0-1V�F�.��
3. Date of evaluation: 5 4. Time of evaluation: y) ~ j' • �'�
5. Name of stream: &P no — T 66usV 6. River basin:tJ
7. Approximate drainage area: S 2 A G J8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: 56)"
b" 10. County: l-4
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer ien�decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): A1Jal
Latitude (ex. 34,872312): %.5, fj� I q! 7 Longitude (ex. -77.556611): — V 2, to J 3 r 7
Method location detemiined (circle):I'S Topo Shect Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluat16n (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (it
15. Recent weather conditions
16. Site conditions at time of v
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section IU _Tidal Waters _Lssential rtsheries Habitat
Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? ES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 0 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YE NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 3a% Residential 33 -/.Commercial _% Industriall _% Agricultural
_% Forested _% Cleared / Logged 11% Other ( 6,211eCO "r )
22. Bankfull width: "J / 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): Z—'!.l
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%)_Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight XOccasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 2Z/ 0J/ S-
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
#
HHOW
PHISSTIC«S
ECORECI,OO1N PyO.IN�T GE
SHO+
Presence of flow /persistent pools in stream
no i]o_w or saturation - StrAn t7ow
G•oastal Piedmont Mountain
5
- max oin
Evidence of past human alteration
extensive alteration = no alteration =max in
.
Riparian zone
n buffer = 0„coni uo S wide buffer = maxi in
0 - 6
0 - 4 0 - 5
1
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
e_xtensi_v_e diSCh2--
�1
d
U
Groundwater discharge
no tliseh'ar. e = Os„tvetIandSI etc.
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
n0 flood ,lain = 0; extensive ood Iain
p” 7
Fent' renchment / floodplain access
dee entrenched = e e
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
�n4 wetlands = U; I ezatl 'a¢en —max
,
wetlands oin
C+hannel sinuosity
.extensive channelization = 0' natural meander
10
Sediment input
(extensile de oSi ion= 0;_little or nosediment =max 'ntsJ
0-5
0-4 0-4
I I
.
Size �Cc diversity of channel bed substrate
late diverse sizes = max
12
Evidence of !Li n idening
d 1, incised = 0' stab a bed & banks =
13
,e in points
Presence of major bank failures
11rosion = Q; no erosi, NT-7-5b1e banks
14
Root depth and density on banks
H
mo visible roots = 0; dense roots ,thr, u hoti =max aints
0 3 0 — 4 0 — 5 �
� 15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber produetlon
+su anfial im aetq.,0• no evidence =max -qan
0 — 5 0 — 4 0 — 5
16
H
Presence of riffl pool/ripple-pool complexes
(no riffles�P,i les or -ools = 0' w,elldevelo ed = n�ax pints)
-
0 3 0 - 5 0 - 6
d' 17
,E',,
Habitat complexity
(ilittle or no habitat = U, fre_ vent.varied habitats _ max
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
ono s>xa�- ince` etafio p; continuous cano .
19
Substrate embeddedness
r e I• embedded = t}; loose structure =max;
NA*
0 - 4 0,- 4 - �,,
�0 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4
.n .e- .ide ce0:,common, numerciu a es -max oints
,
Presen111 1117hibians
mo e_videnc-e - 0;_comm n es =max in)
4.0
,.a
0
22
ii”numerous -
Presence of fish
v
2<3
Evidence of wildlife use
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = m_ax oints�
� 0 - 6 0 - 5 0 - 5 %.
Total
Points Possible
l00 100 100
TUT L SCUI2+E
{also enter
onfrst
page)
.9C
* Th— k—
,f
uoa. ja .0 — —ata mu camb.
2

USACE AID# DWQ # Site #,yZ- (indicate on attached map)
; STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
►V
1. Applicant's name: -Mml2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation: C211 S� 4. Time of evaluation:
5. Name of stream: � Pyry t Gr -ASS w 6. River basin:
7. Approximate drainage area: �� c)- Q L 8. Stream order: i
9. Length of reach evaluated: 0, 10. County: �AA 4`6LO
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):ty a/
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3 5 1? 9 Longitude (cx. -77 556611): • 0 r, (1,?o
Mcthod location determined (circle): d� 'ropo Shect Ortho (Aerial) Pholo/GIS Other GIS Other
lY
131. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an/ ! ', --- l
d, landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
4-1- 1.1,1 ' 1 _ I_ 111.. _ — 1/J ....-
. - - I 11. P: I .. n 9 1
V
14. Proposed channel work (if any : O� _ i vL .S t^�tl r� �1 t' r • o -,--r--
15. Recent weather conditions:__ r 1/ cS k r(JA A
16. Site conditions at time of visit: `J L -L /1 1'1, Ll
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES ( if yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 6 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? <CED NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: [% Residential _% Commercial ZS-% Industrial _% Agricultural
Z S/o Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( }
22. Bankfull width: L7 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends 417requent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality. J/ ll
Total. Score (from reverse): Comments: l.�rr-41.1(1 CY.`M rpS-t•�4
1,\1 !� u L ,/; i. P C / ,t nn _I ' nJ– 6 A . i :.� n L i– R -r5 % 6— r. n �/. U n � /.
Evaluator's Signature 1- - :r" '-' `�Date v 4 13
This channel evaluation form is in ended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and enviro rmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
_.,_ ..... —1 --..lU ni waaial bucamZi.
2

USACE AID# DWQ # Site #� (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET,
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: -1—LVA/ ,fin/ 2. Evaluator's name: Cd -k^, 1 277C�
3. Date of evaluation: t) 4. Time of evaluation: M
5. Name of stream6. River basin: J
7. Approximate drainage area: ZOA-C - 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: 2-0i 10. County:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n /r4"
7
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): ,� • X 1 q 3 7 5 (- Longitude (ex. —77.556611): — 9 Z . O G, - ? 7 3
Method location determined (circle):t' Topo Sheet Ortho (Atrial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying streams) location):
r - ( rt.< ,9,/)
14. Proposed channel work (if
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of vi
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (9 If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES Q 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES 1�
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential /0 O % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
_% Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 3 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 5
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 41/o) ___Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (> 109/6)
25. Channel sinuosity: X Straight Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
G yr
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Evaluator's Signature - / Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and 4nvir4fnmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
CU-4k'
� / e Q Sampling Date. Z —10 -/S
Project/Site: g( -O-<514 � K•� �C"ity/County: /" ` t �"r^"�`'� � Sampling Point- �/t/•.$ 5-
Applicant/Owner. TO e- Iiiv� VCA �i24 W19L . State: �/ _ p g
Investigator(s): ( I Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ): Local relief (concave, convex, none): C.Oex o -y -e Slope (%):0- 7-flo
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Sod Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time oV year? Yes -V No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes !k, No
Are Vegetation Soil . or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site man showino samDlina point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _� No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes_ No
Wedand Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks. -1
W Q � Ol 4 6-w'-64 t //S � isj !u( CL- I6 r -f lxn �-- �/ � rPSS 1
Vv e ��G�.r.. c1. r cC n o + vn /t rz c C �Z? S S �(-'(�.0 . ►ria u�� ►[ ?
trek' O"� 67 -ras S y Cn.e�. e - - "LAO'S V/S DO l — W 5D
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two rmuiredl
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required* check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
Y Saturation (A3)
Oxidized RhizosphereS on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (61)
_ Presence of R• d,,red Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_
Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Recent ken Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Mu::k St Oat e �C•7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Other (Exa!rm if� !7c -.-narks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_
}� Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (134)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
t,
Surface Water Present? Yes K No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches). J r
, f
Saturation Present? Yes �„ No
Depth (inches): ��
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
y ogy
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

M
I
VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W 13
Absolute DominantIndicator Dominance Test worksheet:
°
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) v r Species? tatu Number of Dominant Species
1 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
5.
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AB)
5.
6_ Prevalence Index = B/A =
ZO
=Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover. _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size- ); 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1 _ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2 _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
J'
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of:Multiply
bv:
50% of total cover.
20% of total cover:
OBL species
x 1 =
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
1 Liv )
20 ` ^ '
�
FACW species
x2=
• �/f
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
FAC species
x 3 =
2.
FACU species
x 4 =
3.x5=
UPL species
4.
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
5.
6_ Prevalence Index = B/A =
ZO
=Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover. _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size- ); 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1 _ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2 _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
J'
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover _
Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1 -- v
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
2 --- --
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
3
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4.
5
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6.
7.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
8.
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
g
ft (1 m) in height.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.-
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Present? Yes AL No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
U G MW i i
US Army Corps of Engineers V I G{ , F l aye— MV j i �4) Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0
St&X_— tnA16a4 c,rtS cAA.t'SIDr
1.1-h•e- -F lO"n tS C -V (l S�"
- d,rD f "11 b"t f por

SOIL Sampling Point: Na We' -f -
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0 3 L
Redox
Color (moist)
Features
% Tvoe Loci
Texture Remarks
L
A� toy
0
c- Pt -
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Laver (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
1 Depleted Matrix (173)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain•, Sods (F19) (MLRA 148)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
on: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matnx
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Praire Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _2L No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: G r Q S s L4 CIL,
k-
City/County:
e 1 I C o• Sampling Date. 2•" iy' �.5
AppicanVOwrter:V
_ Surface Water (Al)
0.
State. �_ Sampling Point --�e�
Invest gator(s): C O
L
Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):
1(00li n10'
In Local relief (concave, convex, none): GOnC CkVe- Slope (%): -0-20
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Lat.
Long: Datum.
Soil Map Unit Name: n
ei a -`
IM &A 1 OeLM
NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions
on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation - Soil
. or Hydrology
significantly disturbed?
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes /K No
Are Vegetation , Soil
. or Hydrology
naturally problematic?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sod Present? Yes >_ No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks: We 4� o4,,A C iS b a 5 �i� J /� ''^^
!Y"1 /V G 4t i o 04-f Il0
Ye 1io S�vrmwo kr bAS%n
6-S •- W6 Do ( - vJCO
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that aoaly)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
X High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizosphures on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B7)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron R c'.a:.;:n. ir Tnk;d Sods (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C;)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Other (Explain in POrIL!ks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): ci
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size- ) v rSpecies? Status
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size -
1.
2.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: �l 0 )
2.
6
= Total Cover
Sampling Point:_ ING We f
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC,
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
Are OBL, FACW, FAC: ���
That or
(AB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
(B)
Prevalence Index = B!A =
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover. = 20% of iotas cover- r� Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. 12 k OL A.AiEQ ` 7 ` �: (7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
2.3 ,�a Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
't t 5"�" ��, r ; ' ' approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4.
than 3 in. (7 6 cm) DBH
5. Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6 approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height.
7. Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
g. herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9. ft (1 m) in height.
11
_ D = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 41 Q5 20% of total cover:'
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
= Total Cover Hydrophytic
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes Ail No
Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
r 6•� c e p �S W2��a v(o� w 0. - n Tri.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmon - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WC (' '
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color moi % Color (moist) % Tvce LL Texture Remarks
7,S L
RM=Reduced
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N.
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
'Location• PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbnc Surface (F13) (-MLRA 136, 122)
_ Piedmont Flnodp;am SG:is ( 10) (MLRA 148)
_ Red Parent Matenai (<<:; 0ALRA 127, 147)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes i< No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: 6F At o Cit /County: 't(,4't M Ie I i Sampling Date: «+ 15-
p
Applicant/Owner - r a 1 State: - - Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):` Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hdlslope, terrace, etc.): o o Local relief (concave, convex, none): lo /I e -/x Vim_ Slope (%).
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: -
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes V No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes V No
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
r SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes - ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes t/ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes t/ No
Remarks.
M 1�too� 0 ,
o -,r b u ry,
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (A1)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): N ��
Water Table Present? Yes �_ No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes �_ No
Depth (inches): e —
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
_
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Nt)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC. (A)
2' Total Number of Dominant
3• Species Across All Strata- 10 (B)
4.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling n Stratum (Plot size:
1. 13, ct/t-
2. f! r�/ar �i; r{;.f �{'��YrGI �ntt fry _646
3�
4.
5.
6.
Z.D = Total Cover
50% of total cover. D 20% of total cover.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ),
1.
Vo A vr,
3. 6V
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Total % Cover of.
Multiply by.
DEL species
x 1 =
FACW species .
x2= ---
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_✓2 - - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3 0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6. be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: /0 20% of total cover:_
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size:—) approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
1 _TU GU � -A S >; 7.0 w (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. I/ t7/fA_ A_f9 6-A, Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3 r approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4 than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
B. approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7.
8
9.
10.
11.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: S 20% of total cover: S
_Woodv•Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
3. C_-eA&5+r-U5 nr- bi CV o(!-� I 10 _ _
4.
5. Hydrophytic
_ 50 = Total over Vegetation
50/° of total cover:
° 2 S 20% of total cover: //) Present?
Remarks- (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Yes )// No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Alb
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-12, loyle L?-
G�_
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion. RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location. PL=Pore-Linin , M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,
148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes t No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
PrgecUSite: S Cit (County: M i c-i'1Q Date ' r O- ` I --
Sampling �1
ApplicanVOwner: a. State Sampling Pant
Investigator(s): PC, C o (d-y� Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hdlslope, terrace, etc.). r—Ioo of oWrt. Local relief (concave, convex, none)- C nn Cav VG Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: 1 Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: ZOL-nj 0.4i m, .SNWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _ X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil . or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site man showing samDlina point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
No k Is the Sampled Area
No %t within a Wetland? Yes No _ e _
No k
rtemarKs: j
S SP04 I5 in -PV ode lu-1/F\ a C roSS' r,-. S- J
syrc,,� -t . Tey p1 -Ca -(j u � �w-r � C) . k. a L r s .
Gla ! �� - .-� Yr , C-- Pk, -
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that aogly)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (A1)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concav7Surface(B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface k('71,
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Re rnmr )
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches).
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches).
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches). Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes NoxS
includes ca ilia fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 2
i Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) ° ver Soecies? Status Number of Dominant Species
J-
1_9 i n v S .S a b u t ?D 2 _Y SAG U That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC. (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant 1'y
3. Species Across All Strata: Y (B)
4.
Z10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover. 6 20% of total cover:_
Sapling Stratum (Plot size• )
1. A cer rtAgakm
2._ Iii /) US S f'Dh u S _ AC
4
2-0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover. /0 20% of total cover.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
3.
Percent of Dominant Species !, p-
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 73 (AB)
Total % Cover of
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 = D
FACW species O
x 2 =
Q0'
=�—
FAC species_
x 3
FACU species i0 D
x 4 =_.?-
UPL species
X5=
Column Totals. 7S
(A) Z S (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3,5
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
— 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
----- i be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
= Total Cover s cr..e ve..e..,.:..., of—f.•
50% of total cover 20% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1,R v b L's 0Lr-0 4-y s
2 re _—') . _� —
3.
4
7
9-
10
11
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: —� 20% of total cover:_
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
2.
4.
5.
s = Total Cover
50% of total cover. r 20% of total cover:
photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7 6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
it (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation X
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: _�`~t -1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of inmcetors.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remark-
0-15-
emarksD-IS o SL
_ D
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grams -Location rL=ro'e L"„„ , "'—,_,--.�•
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA '147,148)
_
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Soils (F19)
_
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (AID) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material 1,F7.1) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No _z_
5,1 Is 100 hl
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Q i City/County: U II i::, r -u Sampling Date: r
ApplicandOwner: G/ Q v State: /1]6 Sampling Point. d^"
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): 0 1 'r'A Local relief (concave, convex, none): l o n CC M Slope (%): (n - Z
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long- Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: (M- NWI classification -
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of ? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? YesI No
Are Vegetation . Soil . or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site maD showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No =K Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No
Wedand Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks: p �/ /� I,n` // 1 !11 t c�11Li]
U(J �V`/r %i..%�� �_ I v[��`.' L J T C 4�� - Y Y e— ,
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (All)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhlzospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (61)
_ Presence of Reduce: kor (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Renuctinii •r T:uea Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Suiface IC7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Other (Expiair in Rcmarys)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches).
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) ° ver Species? Status
I. Viovs C, a o E6_L-1
2. a. 1-10_y
3.
4.— -
Percent of Dominant Species 5� %
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (AB)
Sampling Point: L110 L ;�_
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata (B)
_SI_ = Total Cover
50% of total cover. Z5 20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size )
. 4e /0
2 ftG^ rjA
3
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply bv:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover: _ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Piot size: ) v _ 2 - Dominance Test is X50%
1. �"� n,r h�rrL. I S / �(_ — 3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
2. 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
3. Ln hti!J/1 e SIn�..w I -P 5 ELL data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4.LQ_a rt! s -► -Al art Al "42 I l �d _�� Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4 = Total Cover
f,
50% of total cover. 7 7 P 20% of total cover,_
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
6
7
[E
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover
Woody Vinetra�tum (Plot size: )
1 j�pX►t_o ti A 411 r0c1ielt.n/J-� C �_ RC
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover.
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ee d 4 -
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
SS
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 01,Ot
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' ' Loci Texture Remarks
—� L
YX
SL�
7s y
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sous (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Matenai IT21) (MLRA 127,147)
unless disturbed or problematic
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastem Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

3
a�
U
U
c0
O
7
N w
O c0
O Ln
t r,
U_
Z
m
C N
O C
O
C
C_
0N
ON
J "I
GRASSY CREEK STREAM ENHANCEMENT
DRAFT 60% DESIGN PLANS
TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH / SPRUCE PINE, NC
VICINITY MAP
NTS
NOTE: THE LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF THE REQUIRED
WORK MAY BE FIELD ADJUSTED BASED ON SITE
CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION
AND PER APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER.
INDEX OF SHEETS
TITLESHEET....................................................1
OVERVIEW.........................................................2
PLAN.............................. .................................. ..3-6
PLAN AND PROFILE .......... ................. .......... 7-10
CROSS SECTIONS.........................................11-12
TYPICAL SECTIONS.......................................13
STORMWATER WETLAND DETAIL ..........14
DETAILS.........................................................15-18
TOTAL SHEETS -M
=k-L:�Lg
JUN 1 2 15 JJ'
(3 Stantec
801 Jones Franklin Road Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
www.stantec.com

1111
Illi 111(1 ilii REARE-GRADE THE RIGHT BANK AND RIFFLE FROM STA 0+00 -2+00-
11 I I 111 GRADE THE POINT BAR FROM STA 2+00 - 3+00
\\\\\\111111
IIII\ ADD HABITAT ENHANCEMENT FEATURES
�\\ . ENHANCE EXISTING BED FEATURES TO PROMOTE STABILITY AND
HABITAT DIVERSITY
\ REACH 3:
• REALIGN CHANNEL AWAY FROM STEEP AND ERODING BANKS.
11 I I I I • ADJUST BED PROFILE TO MINIMIZE IMPACTS OF WATER AND SEWER
III . CROSSINGS. \= =_ _ = �� \ 1 \ _ l I 1 \IIII Il I I / �
I1 I I INCORPORATE HABITAT ENHANCEMENT FEATURES. \� J / I I \ / I III I I I / 11 PRIVA7F I<v`'
11111 1111 r r I I � � - 1 � I / 1 I f( I I Ill °R'�wAy
\\ \
I I1 Ii I i 111 / 11 /i// /iI IIII 111 /i // l I 11
II I II 1
4,
'W
l
\x\11 11
/ice _ # /
�\ 1 Il - -- -
— (I �/� ��l 111 I // _ _ _ _ — za CPP
NON-FUNCTIONING _ i I//
\ STORMWATER -=_ �.I,r/f�r_��=`
j/ WETLAND D
\ BASIN
STREAM 3
_ /
PERENNIAL /// — — \�\ ` _ _ — LOW HANGING �i�// / / ROCK ARMOR
0/0
WETLAN) B 24 CPP - P\ R LINEj r
.,,22+00 °p
%EXPOSED PIPE10+45 X00 -- — Nc TWO - 48" CMP
CROSSING "� 181, CPP – STREAM 1 - PERENNIAL
/h `/// / \ \ /
/
WETLAND C % 24" CPP I STREAM 2 / \ / E` BED AND
// �.� • L 48" CMP NN /
=— EXPOSED PIPE
CROSSING T
PIPE
CLEANOUT
� r
\ /
�- --I
18 CPP PIPE PERENNIAL, REAGN 2. Ct n CeT`1'EN1
18" CPP CLEANOUT J Hpg1TAT
GRAVEL DRAINAGE DITCH — \ / { / / / I —
�/ //
INTERMITTENTw.
I � BOULDER WALL v
ROCK ARMOR
I / 1 HWY 226 /
�RURX1015
Stantec
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
www.stantec.com
NorthOState
E N 'J I R 0 N M E r� T A L
C
) JENNINGS
ENVIRONMENTAL
ZINK ENVIRONMENTAL, PLLC
Legend
EXISTING CONTOURS-2FT
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
ROADS
-- .. - GRADING WAITS
OEXISTING DRAINAGE PIPE
® EXISTING SEWER MAN HOLE
EXISTING HYDRANT
CUA EXISTING POWER POLE
Client/Project
TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH
GRASSY CREEK STREAM ENHANCEMENT - 60% PLANS
-ern:
2
SITE OVERVIEW
0 100' 200'
1 •=200'
BOULDER AND ROCK RIFFLE
O
ROCK RIFFLE BASE
BOULDER CLUSTER
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND
LOG J -HOOK VANE
POWER LINE
SEWER UNE
�6
BOULDER J -HOOK VANE
GU WIRE
— —
— EXISTING TRIO/DRAIN DITCH
TOE WOOD
LOG AND ROCK RIFFLE
OEXISTING DRAINAGE PIPE
® EXISTING SEWER MAN HOLE
EXISTING HYDRANT
CUA EXISTING POWER POLE
Client/Project
TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH
GRASSY CREEK STREAM ENHANCEMENT - 60% PLANS
-ern:
2
SITE OVERVIEW
0 100' 200'
1 •=200'

lop"
r–ACH� \
REACN2
0
GRASSY SWALE \ 2�o
/ y Or LIN
��
— -_ —�` 4+00 — —`--� / — TWO - as° CMP
PL
STREAM 1
//��` \ PERENNIAL
/
:. yy ' — \ ` \ , NO IMPACTS
" �1
BOULDER AND ROCK RIFFLE
TYP. (SEE SHEET 16) \ \ \ FN►igN\ �� 6+00 '` y
7p,
— — —
' \ \
/ T
t
lclltab
Y
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
r f
NOTE: CONTOURS OUTSIDE OF MAIN CHANNEL ARE FROM NC
UDAR DATA (NOT FIELD RUN)
(3 stantec
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
www.stantec.com
NorthdState
E N V I R 0 N M E N T A L
JENNINGS
ENVIRONMENTAL
rwr..rr.rr
ZINK ENVIRONMENTAL, PLLC
Legend
E>GSM
PROP06EO THALwm
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
EIOSIMIO TOP OF BANK
RDADs
GROW LBIIIS
BOULDER AND ROCK N"M
• .
BOULDER CLUSMI!
•
TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH
LOO J -HOOK *K
BOULDER J -FM WE
J'
TOE WOW
E7MM SERER YAN HOLE
LOO AND ROCK F*M
dent/Project
ROCK ME mm
TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH
O EXISIM ORAR Af E PIPE
GRASSY CREEK STREAM ENHANCEMENT - 60% PLANS
E7MM SERER YAN HOLE
0 tv
POMiR LBE
SEMIER UNE
EXSM HYDRANT
Sheet No.
3
609
GUY EIRE
�' ppg1NC POM POLE
me
– — – E>=00 TM/MM o
PLAN

lb
OUTFALL STRUCTURE
TYP.
STREAM 2 PERENNIAL CONSTRUCTED STORMWATER
REACH 2 REACH 3 NO IMPACTS I \ WETLAND - 2 (SEE SHEET 14)
ENHANCE EXISTING POOL %
STA - 7+80'-9+10' \
ROCK AND BOULDER RIFFLE L \
EXISTING �
TYP. (SEE SHEET 16)
PRESERVE _ -- -" f CONSTRUCTED STORMWATER
`v
RIFFLE WETLAND WETLAND - 1 (SEE SHEET 14)
a -----_STA- / X O
n
—2580—
N �f •�' � / // � � — — — 2590 \ \ \ \ — — - — — - „— "—• /// � --------
_ — \ LOG J -HOOK VANE
a l / i —_ —_ —_ —_ _ ` \ \ \ \ \ \ TYP. (SEE SHEET 15)
o i j j r r — — — — \ \ \ \ TOE WOOD \ ROCK CROSS VANE JIf
c° o / / // ! — — — — — — TYP. (SEE SHEET 17) EXISTING WATER
/ —_---_ \ ---'--WITH STEP
Z i . �,•'•• j /// /� — — — — \ �� \ REALIGN C84NNE -- — — -- — — — — _CROSSING- — _ TYP. (SEE SHEET 15)
STABILIZE LAND DO NOT DISTURB. 1 _
--__ �_ _�_BANK
LEFT _
------------------
0.01
O '
_1
fl
/ _ — — — — �� �� �� _ — — / l/ l l / / -------------
LD
— !
—_ —_—_�_—_�=����_ �_=;-------_�
NOTE: CONTOURS OUTSIDE OF MAIN CHANNEL ARE FROM NC
LIDAR DATA (NOT FIELD RUN)\ \ \ ` \ ` ` \ — / / /
\�_ �_ ✓ — / / J MAY. 2015
Cllent/Project
North State Legend BOULDER NO ROCK RIFFLE E ROCK RIFLE BA. TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH
2ff© �� DRAINAGE �� GRASSY CREEK STREAM ENHANCEMENT - 60% PLANS
E N V I R O N M E N T A L —— 9 p BOULDER CLUSTER O.�� MAN HOLE
stantec PROPOSED T� POWER UNE ® S-IeetNo. 0 3o 60
PROPOSED TOP OF BAN( LOO J-FI001( VANE SEWER UNE � DasnNG HYDtW T 4 � •��•
JENNINGS
-`�
ENVIRONMENTAL � �M TDP OF BW BOULDER J -NOOK VANE MN W11RE
rnD�M �� �E elle
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300 "" """ ' ROADS r TOE W — — EwsnNG TM/DPM DITCH 3 PLAN
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606 —u — GRADM LIMITS
www.stantec.com ZINK ENVIRONMENTAL, PLLC LOG AM ROCK ROU

0�
0 0
UW
U /
Z 0
- o
u
C:
cv
O N
D
c c
o
01
o 'N
J �
a �
� o
o a
N�
0
0
�2
N ID
0^
0
N U
o �
N
U /
/
' r /
WATER LINE IN AREA. LOCATION SHOULD
BE CONFIRMED BEFORE CONSTRUCTION
'orfs `'IROCK J -HOOK VANE
BEGIN NEW
STREAM A IGNMENT
TYP. (SEE SHEET 18)
18" CPP -
18+00 dr
.Lilo •-__ .-- .• 1 1 .S
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
AND GRADING LIMITS
i
----- — 2570
t •,
11% A
o
T M PERMANENT
IMPACTS - 153.5 LF
22+00
0
24+00
24" CPP-
- WETLAND B
_- - - ROCK RIFFLE WITHPERMANENT
BOULDER CLUSTER - -�T� - „�� STREAM 3
- TYP. (SEE SHEET 15) 11I 1 TEMPORARY IMPACT
-z� / 0.036 ACRE
- ---- ---_� �� \ \ \ �I IMPACTS -34.5 LF IE IN
— — _— — _—_— — _ ��_� _� ?0 \ \ II / STREAM 3
6p0�� �� �� \ \ \ \ 1 — — — — STREAM 3
PERENNIAL
EXISTING NON-FUNCTIONING \� \\ If I 1 EXISTING POWER LINES / / / WETLAND B
- - ` _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - — ----- �� DETENTION BASIN \ WETLAND D CAUTION /
--------- ---�� ��;���_� ����\\\ \\ NO IMPACTS /
- - REMOVE EXISTING BERM TO
- - - - - - - - - MATCH ADJACENT GRADE. \ \ LOG AND ROCK
- AVOID EXISTING WETLAND \ \ \
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
\ \ \ \ 1 \\ \ \ \ TYP. (SEE SHEET 16)
NOTE. CONTOURS OUTSIDE OF MAIN CHANNEL ARE FROM NC
LIDAR DATA (NOT FIELD RUNT �\ I f If I I If I I I �' \ \ \ \ \\\\ \\ \\ \. / // / / / // / /
MAY. 2011
5
(5� Stantec
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
www.stantec.com
NorthdState
E N V I R O N M E N T A L
cI-
) JENNINGS
� ENVIRONMENTAL
r W+.w
LINK ENVIRONMENTAL, PLLC
Legend
-2rr
PROPOSED TNALWEG
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
IDWIDIG TOP OF BANK
ROADS
— — GRADING LN ITS
AYBOULDER
AND ROCK RIFFLE
• .
BOULDER CLUSTER
LOG J -1M WWE
BOULDER J -HOOT( VANE
TOE WOOD
LOG AND ROCK RIFFLE
ROCK WILE BASE
JURLSOIC IOIIK WERA O
® WETLAND IMPACTS
POWER LME
SEWER LINE
GUY WNiE
EXISTING TRO/DRAM DITCH
uienT/rrolect
TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH
0 Emma OPARV4GE PIPE GRASSY CREEK STREAM ENHANCEMENT - 60% PLANS
® OMMIG SEINER MAN NDLE 0 30' 6ot
Sneef No.
EXISIMIG HYDRANT
C Q� EXISTING POWER POLE me
PLAN

-,•i.• -
'•t� 18" CPP
CLEANOUT / STREAM 4
rf' '• ,;; �'..1••• ACCESS PERMANENT IMPACT -34.5 LF
G I
WHERE EXISTING PIPES ARE EXPOSED AND ENTERING
_' •'ti 24" CPP a , GRADED BANKS, PLACE BOULDER SILLS ON THE UPSTREAM
••.� : ' •°++ �•�• _ _ - __ / � - AND DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF THE PIPE SO THAT THE TOPS OF THE �
1 BOULDERS ARE AT EXISTING GRADE. EXTEND SILLS TO THE TOP
+ OF BANK AT A MINIMUM AND 10 FT BEYOND ANY MANHOLES OR
CONSTRUCTED CLEANOUTS WHERE THEY ARE ADJACENT TO THE TOP OF BANK. /
STORMWATER WETLAND -3
``��;, ','•� r,'� ���{1!` SILLS SHALL HAVE FOOTER BOULDERS AND ALL BOULDERS SHALL
+ ®�� BE 3 FT IN DIAMETER. /
•�'• OUTFALL TYP. /
�• � 1� \ STREAM 4
INTERMITTENT
STREAM 3 PERMANENT-
_�; IMPACTS - SEE SHEET 5 F i \�� �\ \ \ TIE IN EXISTING
STREAM 4
TRANSI77ON SMOG
EXISTING ROCK/BOULDER EXISTING C AN TO
EXPOSED PIPE NEt,
WALL
>\ l'
.�-lama, ROCK CR SS VANE
WITH STEP
EXPOSED SEWER \ PROPOSED RIFFLE TO \
LINE CROSSING FOLLOW EXISTING CHANNEL ACCESS F/ T —I
_ DO NOT DISTURB \
WETLAND B PERMANENT F \
IMPACT - SEE SHEET 5
_ y L—' -- --` �-- '-- 1�—1 —` .yam ,� • . . • - . ' • • >/
-_ \ ` \ \ ` \ _ 2570 CARTERS RIDGE RD
_ \ _ CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-- --- ---- — — \ WETLAND C —
\ — NO IMPACTS
NOTE. CONTOURS OUTSIDE OF MAIN CHANNEL ARE FROM NC
LIDAR DATA (NOT FIELD RUN) `/
AMY
(3 Stantec
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
www.stantec.com
NorthdState
E N V I R O N M E N T A L
CI;)
•r..ir....,�...r.JENNINGS
ENVIRONMENTAL
-
LINK ENVIRONMENTAL. PLLC
Legend
BOULDER NO ROCK RIFFLE
ROCK RFF.E BASE
CFent/Project
TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH
0�AL WEn ND
,��
O oRA�ACE PIPEGRASSY
CREEK STREAM ENHANCEMENT - 60% PLANS
• .
BOULDER CLUSTER
® DOSING SEWER MAN HOLE
TH
PROPOSED ALWEG
®
WETLAND IMPACTS
�.
Sneet No. O 30"PROPOSED
TOP OF BAN(
LOG J-FIOOK WNE
POWER LINE
1; DOSTW HYDRANT
6 •���
— — DTOP OF BANK
OSTNG
BOULDER J -NOOK WNE
SEWER UNE
CQ3 DOSTM POWER POLE
rtle
ROADS
OW WRE
PLAN
ME WOOD
GRAONG LIMITS
— — — E 114 TM/~ OrrCH
LOG AND ROCK RIME

STA 2+13.8
0�� 2}00
STA 0+76.5
(SEE SHEET 11)
xx
/O
Oxo �
CONSTRUCTION
ACCESS
NOTE CONTOURS OUTSIDE OF MAIN CHANNEL ARE FROM NC
LIDAR DATA (NOT FIELD RUN)
2580
X
\ 1
\
4+00 \ 1
I \ \ 1
\ 6+00
2,s8a \\ \ ~ 1}' h
8+00
2S9a
2580 - - - - - 2580 I
2575 �---�2575
2570 EXISTING THALWEG 2570
2565
2560
ZONTAL 1"=60' 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00
VERICAL 1"=6'
North
St�State
tanec ENVIRONMENTAL
,') JENNINGS
ENVIRONMENTAL
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606 C
www.stantec.com ZINK ENVIRONMENTAL, PLLC
2565
2560
5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 8+29 MAY, 2015
Le end
a
��r
BOULDER AND ROCK RIFFLE
` `'`� ROCK �E BASE
clenr/�oject
TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH
DUSTING CONTOUR9_21f
© JLDNK WETLAND
o oRArNecE PIPEGRASSY
CREEK STREAM ENHANCEMENT
- 60% PLANS
PROPOSED COMOURS-11 r
®
® 4
BOULDER CLUSTER
E7QSTNG SEWER MAN HOLE
Q 3Q' QQ'
— — E>OSTING TOP OF BMIK
11
LUG J—FI001C WE
POWER LSE
SEWER LINE
DUSTMIG HYDRMR•��•
Seel No.
7
RAS
BOULDER J—HOOK VANE
GUY WIRE
E1MMIG POWER POLE
line
— — GRADING WAITS
- — - OWNG 1RIB/DRAW DITCH
PLAN AND PROFILE
44,
TOE WOOD
LOG AND ROCK RIFFLE

(3 Stantec
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
www.stantec.com
North State
E N V I R O N M E N T A L
') JENNINGS
ENVIRONMENTAL
LINK ENVIRONMENTAL. PLLC
Legend
��
BOULDER AND ROac RFRE
EJOSM CONTOURS_41r
e o
BOULDER CLUSTER
PROPOM CONTOURS-IFr
s •
— — EpSTMIC TOP OF BANK
— — — IDWNG TRIO/DRAIN DM
LOG J -NOON VANE
ROADS
�®
BOULDER J -HOOK VMIE
— .. GRADING LIMITS
JW
TOE WOOD
LOG AND ROCK RIFFLE
Cfient/Project
TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH
o DOSTNNG DRAINAGE PIPE GRASSY CREEK STREAM ENHANCEMENT - 60% PLANS
® EXLSTNNG SEWER MAN HOLE S 0 $Q' 60'
Sheet No.
E)(ISrNNG HYORWT 8 10-8(ymemmmum
C0.3 EXISTING POWER POLE rtle
PLAN AND PROFILE
ROO( RIFFLE BASE
JU nwrom WETLAND
POWER UNE
SEWER UNE
GUY WIRE
— — — IDWNG TRIO/DRAIN DM
Cfient/Project
TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH
o DOSTNNG DRAINAGE PIPE GRASSY CREEK STREAM ENHANCEMENT - 60% PLANS
® EXLSTNNG SEWER MAN HOLE S 0 $Q' 60'
Sheet No.
E)(ISrNNG HYORWT 8 10-8(ymemmmum
C0.3 EXISTING POWER POLE rtle
PLAN AND PROFILE

STA 23+26.9 p r _ _ - " 1 NOTE: CONTOURS OUTSIDE OF MAIN CHANNEL ARE FROM NC
STA 19+48.4 (SEE SHEET 12) . �^"'r`- LIOAR DATA (NOT FIELD RUN)
_ STA 21+94.4
STA 18+ ,
cli
OD
ifs N 0
C'y- -to N N oD xa�s
.�...---------- ----- --- �� �— ate" � p }0 �—Yn. a 24}=
REMOVE EXISTING BERM TO i
2�0 MATCH ADJACENT GRADE. ° /
AVOID EXISTING WETLAND
°
° SI
2575 2575
TRANSITION TO
PROPOSED
ALIGNMENT �
/ ` — \
2570 �------� \�/ � 2570
0.5% BANKFULL/TOP OF BANK `
2565 ��_�-------- `----� _ 2565
2560
2555
HORIZONTAL V=60' 17+00
18+00
VERICAL 1"=6'
NorthaState
Stantec
E N V I R O N M E N T A L
19+00 20+00
�) JENNINGS
22+00
ENVIRONMENTAL
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300
,Y.'p
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
www.stantec.com
ZINK ENVIRONMENTAL. PLLC
TYPICAL RIFFLE J \ / --. 2560
TYPICAL MAX POOL
2555
19+00 20+00
21+00
22+00
23+00
24+00
24+88
MAY, 7015
Cfent/Project
Legend
BOULDER AND ROCK RIFFLE
ROCK RIFFLE BASE
TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH
O
EXISTING DRAINAGE PIPE
GRASSY CREEK STREAM ENHANCEMENT
- 60% PLANS
EXISTING CONTOURS -21`17
_
BOULDER CLUSTER
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND
G
EXISf1NG SEWER MAN HOLE
PROPOSED CONTOURS-1Fr
'
POWER UNE
Sleet No.
30r W.
LOG J -HOOK VANE
- - EXISTING TOP OF BANK
EXISTING
UNE�
IXISf1NG HYDRANT
9
09
10-60,GRADING
ROADSSEWER
F
-HOOK VANE
RTRIB/DRAIN
`�
IXT�NG POWER POLE
,Ile
LIMITS
WOOD
_ _ _ EASTINGGUY
DITCH
PLAN AND PROFILE
LOG AND ROCK RIFFLE

NOTE. CONTOURS OUTSIDE OF MAIN CHANNEL ARE FROM NC
LIDAR DATA (NOT FIELD RUN)
2570
o �
— STA 25t&.8 \� \
STA 27+70.5
ti
6
p.
yob
STA 29+69.3 STA 31+17.7
2570
Q
STA 28+58.0 — ce)
07.
•r +� 9
JCONSTRUCTION ACCESS
PRje95 R\oGE go
C-
2570
2570
_ EXPOSED SEWER LINE
2565 CROSSING EXISTING GROUND 2565
0.5% BANKFULLITOP OF BANK
I— — J�'rL EXPOSED PIPE CROSSING
2560 2560
TYPICAL RIFFLE 0.7' DROP OVER
2555 CROSS VANE TRANSITION SMOOTHLY 2555
TYPICAL MAX POOL WITH STEP TO EXISTING CHANNEL
2550
HORIZONTAL 1"=60' 25+00
VERICAL 1"=6'
(3 Stante
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
www.stantec.com
26+00
NorthaState
CE N V I R O N M E N T A L
JENNINGSyNMIR ONMEN�AL
c-l)
ZINK ENVIRONMENTAL, PLLC
27+00
28+00
29+00
30+00
31+00
31+82
2550
MAY, 2015 1
Legend
BOULDER AND ROCK RIF+U
ROCK WR.E BASE
Cfent/Project
TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH
— — — E>aSTIWG CONTOURS-21"Te
•,
J
.,j,.
f
rp•.
+
®
BOULDER CLUSTER
PROPOSED CONTOURS-1FT
®
POWER LSE
® E>aS11NG SEWER MAN HOLE
S-iee(No.
0 301
— — DOSTNG TOP OF BANK
LOO J—HOOK VANE1111111
.J
rocEXISTING HYDRANT
NOTE. CONTOURS OUTSIDE OF MAIN CHANNEL ARE FROM NC
LIDAR DATA (NOT FIELD RUN)
2570
o �
— STA 25t&.8 \� \
STA 27+70.5
ti
6
p.
yob
STA 29+69.3 STA 31+17.7
2570
Q
STA 28+58.0 — ce)
07.
•r +� 9
JCONSTRUCTION ACCESS
PRje95 R\oGE go
C-
2570
2570
_ EXPOSED SEWER LINE
2565 CROSSING EXISTING GROUND 2565
0.5% BANKFULLITOP OF BANK
I— — J�'rL EXPOSED PIPE CROSSING
2560 2560
TYPICAL RIFFLE 0.7' DROP OVER
2555 CROSS VANE TRANSITION SMOOTHLY 2555
TYPICAL MAX POOL WITH STEP TO EXISTING CHANNEL
2550
HORIZONTAL 1"=60' 25+00
VERICAL 1"=6'
(3 Stante
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
www.stantec.com
26+00
NorthaState
CE N V I R O N M E N T A L
JENNINGSyNMIR ONMEN�AL
c-l)
ZINK ENVIRONMENTAL, PLLC
27+00
28+00
29+00
30+00
31+00
31+82
2550
MAY, 2015 1
Legend
BOULDER AND ROCK RIF+U
ROCK WR.E BASE
Cfent/Project
TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH
— — — E>aSTIWG CONTOURS-21"Te
D JI DICT10NAl WETLAND
O D05fM1O DRAINAGE PIPE
GRASSY CREEK STREAM ENHANCEMENT
- 60% PLANS
®
BOULDER CLUSTER
PROPOSED CONTOURS-1FT
®
POWER LSE
® E>aS11NG SEWER MAN HOLE
S-iee(No.
0 301
— — DOSTNG TOP OF BANK
LOO J—HOOK VANE1111111
SEINER UNE
rocEXISTING HYDRANT
10
11111111
ROADS
QTS
GRADING LIMITS—
"
BOULDER J—HOOK VANE
GUY WIRE
DPOM POLE
r ne
—
TOE Wood
— — DOSIINC TRIO/DRAIN WNC0.3OSTING
PLAN AND PROFILE
LOG AND ROCK RITU

0+76.2
1590
2580
2590
1585
2570
1570
2585
1580
1575
\
2575
1565
1560
2565
258C
575
1570
1565
I
L�
2575
?575
L>.570
2560
2575
257(
-4U -LU U LU 4U
18+60.9
2560
2575
2570
2565
2560
2555
Ao -20 0 20 40
HORIZONTAL 1"=50'
VERICAL 1"=10'
2565
2580
2575
2570
2565
2560
2+13.8
585
2580
1575
580
2570
1570
2580
1575
2575
1565
1560
2565
575
1570
1565
I
1555
2575
1570
1565
1560
2560
2560
2575
2570
2565
2560
2555
Ao -20 0 20 40
HORIZONTAL 1"=50'
VERICAL 1"=10'
2565
2580
2575
2570
2565
2560
2+13.8
585
2580
2585
580
2570
2580
1575
2575
2565
575
1570
1565
2570
2565
2575
1570
1565
1560
2560
2570
2565
M1 -N U LU 9U
19+48.4
11+30.8
580
2580
2580
2570
1575
2575
2565
2575
1570
1565
2570
2565
257C
2565
1560
2560
2561
NorthaState
Stantec ENVIRONMENTAL
•) JENNINGS
ENVIRONMENTAL
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300 ,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
www.stantec.com ZINK ENVIRONMENTAL, PLLC
Legend
— — EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
-00 -20 0 20 40
12+62.1
2585
2580
2575
2570
2565
2560
21+94.4
-40 -20 0 20 40
2580-
2575
2580
2570
Ll
2575
2565
\
2570
2565
2560
2560
21+94.4
-40 -20 0 20 40
2580-
2575
2570
2565
\
2560
2555-
.100
-80
-60
40
-20
0 20
40
60
60
100
Dent/project
TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH
GRASSY CREEK STREAM ENHANCEMENT - 60% PLANS
Sheet N0.
11
71e
CROSS SECTIONS

2575 2575
2570 2570
2565 � 2565
2560 2560
2555 2555
2575 2575
2570 2570
2565 2565
zs6o zs6o
2555 2555
North�State Legend
Sta ntec E N V I R O N M E N T A L ��� EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
') JENNINGS
ENVIRONMENTAL
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300 ,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606 C
www.stantec.com ZINK ENVIRONMENTAL, PLLC
2575
zs7o
2565
2560
2555
2575 2575
2570 2570
2565 2565
2560 2560
2555 2555
[yenrirrotecr
TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH
GRASSY CREEK STREAM ENHANCEMENT - 60% PLANS
Sheet No.
12
me
CROSS SECTIONS
23+26.9
25+05.8
2575
27+70.5
2560
2580
2580
2580
2580
2ssa
2580
2575
2575
2555
2575
y
2570
2570
2570
2565
2565
2565
2560
2560
2560
2555
2555
2555
-120 .100 -80
SO .40 -20 0 20 40 60
-120
-100 -80
-60 -40 -20 0
20 40 60 80
-40
-20 0 20
40
28+58.0
29+69.3
31+17.7
2580
2580
2580
2580
2580
2580
2575
2570
2565
25604
2555
-40 -20 0
20 40
-40
-20 0
40
�0
-20 0 20
40
HORIZONTAL 1"=50'
VERICAL 1"=10'
MAY. 2015
2575 2575
2570 2570
2565 � 2565
2560 2560
2555 2555
2575 2575
2570 2570
2565 2565
zs6o zs6o
2555 2555
North�State Legend
Sta ntec E N V I R O N M E N T A L ��� EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
') JENNINGS
ENVIRONMENTAL
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300 ,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606 C
www.stantec.com ZINK ENVIRONMENTAL, PLLC
2575
zs7o
2565
2560
2555
2575 2575
2570 2570
2565 2565
2560 2560
2555 2555
[yenrirrotecr
TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH
GRASSY CREEK STREAM ENHANCEMENT - 60% PLANS
Sheet No.
12
me
CROSS SECTIONS
2575
2570
2565
2ssa
2555
2575 2575
2570 2570
2565 � 2565
2560 2560
2555 2555
2575 2575
2570 2570
2565 2565
zs6o zs6o
2555 2555
North�State Legend
Sta ntec E N V I R O N M E N T A L ��� EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
') JENNINGS
ENVIRONMENTAL
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300 ,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606 C
www.stantec.com ZINK ENVIRONMENTAL, PLLC
2575
zs7o
2565
2560
2555
2575 2575
2570 2570
2565 2565
2560 2560
2555 2555
[yenrirrotecr
TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH
GRASSY CREEK STREAM ENHANCEMENT - 60% PLANS
Sheet No.
12
me
CROSS SECTIONS
2575 2575
2570 2570
2565 2565
zs6o zs6o
2555 2555
North�State Legend
Sta ntec E N V I R O N M E N T A L ��� EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
') JENNINGS
ENVIRONMENTAL
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300 ,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606 C
www.stantec.com ZINK ENVIRONMENTAL, PLLC
2575
zs7o
2565
2560
2555
2575 2575
2570 2570
2565 2565
2560 2560
2555 2555
[yenrirrotecr
TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH
GRASSY CREEK STREAM ENHANCEMENT - 60% PLANS
Sheet No.
12
me
CROSS SECTIONS
North�State Legend
Sta ntec E N V I R O N M E N T A L ��� EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
') JENNINGS
ENVIRONMENTAL
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300 ,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606 C
www.stantec.com ZINK ENVIRONMENTAL, PLLC
2575
zs7o
2565
2560
2555
2575 2575
2570 2570
2565 2565
2560 2560
2555 2555
[yenrirrotecr
TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH
GRASSY CREEK STREAM ENHANCEMENT - 60% PLANS
Sheet No.
12
me
CROSS SECTIONS
2575 2575
2570 2570
2565 2565
2560 2560
2555 2555
[yenrirrotecr
TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH
GRASSY CREEK STREAM ENHANCEMENT - 60% PLANS
Sheet No.
12
me
CROSS SECTIONS
[yenrirrotecr
TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH
GRASSY CREEK STREAM ENHANCEMENT - 60% PLANS
Sheet No.
12
me
CROSS SECTIONS

REACH 2 — B TYPE STREAM
OUTSIDE !110
REACH 1 MID 3 — C TYPE STREAM
2.1
AN=
alwKFuL won+. W
ONSIDE 1111110410
ECFIO= PB �SIMG orDl , LNE STI11Qi (1,IP.) OIIOIRO PB staPE ora , SDYD:S \"•)
2:1 ABOVE TOE WOOD 2:1 ABOVE TOE WOOD
Tom, �•
NOTE THESE ARE TYPICAL DIMENSIONS. CONTRACTOR SHOULD REVIEW PROPOSED CONTOURS
AND PROPOSED CROSS SECTIONS FOR ACTUAL DIMENSIONS.
(N Stante
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
www.stantec.com
NorthaState Legend
CE N V I R O N M E N T A L
) JENNINGS
ENVIRONMENTAL
C-,
ZINK ENVIRONMENTAL, PLLC
RIFFLE POOL
REACH
Am (ft2) %KF (ft) QNAX (ft) 61 (ft)W/D AEKF (ft2) V✓�KF (k) QNAX (ft) PB SLOPE
1
1 & 2
82.4 1 34.0 1 3.3 2.4 1 14 120.35 1 40.8 6.1 1 8:1
NOTE THESE ARE TYPICAL DIMENSIONS. CONTRACTOR SHOULD REVIEW PROPOSED CONTOURS
AND PROPOSED CROSS SECTIONS FOR ACTUAL DIMENSIONS.
(N Stante
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
www.stantec.com
NorthaState Legend
CE N V I R O N M E N T A L
) JENNINGS
ENVIRONMENTAL
C-,
ZINK ENVIRONMENTAL, PLLC
NOTE: THESE ARE TYPICAL. DIMENSIONS. CONTRACTOR SHOULD REVIEW PROPOSED CONTOURS AND
PROPOSED CROSS SECTIONS FOR ACTUAL DIMENSIONS.
V SW HFAL Um SImrmz
AWOME LOW FIOrr
UM SLWAM
NOT TO SCALE
MAY. 2015
uxu' i n clue*
TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH
GRASSY CREEK STREAM ENHANCEMENT - 60% PLANS
Sheet No.
13
rile
TYPICAL SECTIONS
RIFFLE POOL
REACH
ABKF (ft2) W/D WBKF (ft) YNAX (ft) µLF (ft) DMAx LF (ft) We (ft) ABKF (ft2) %KF (ft) QNAx (k) PB SLOPE
3
82.4 14 34.0 3.6 15.4 1.3 10.2 128.8 40.8 6.1 10:1
NOTE: THESE ARE TYPICAL. DIMENSIONS. CONTRACTOR SHOULD REVIEW PROPOSED CONTOURS AND
PROPOSED CROSS SECTIONS FOR ACTUAL DIMENSIONS.
V SW HFAL Um SImrmz
AWOME LOW FIOrr
UM SLWAM
NOT TO SCALE
MAY. 2015
uxu' i n clue*
TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH
GRASSY CREEK STREAM ENHANCEMENT - 60% PLANS
Sheet No.
13
rile
TYPICAL SECTIONS

CONSTRUCTED STORMWATER WETLAND
FASyBOARD RISER DETAIL
FLASHBOARD RISER (OUTLET STRUCTURE)
PROFiE NEW
PIPE BARB I
RISER DAM ANKMENT WIDTH - 2 FT
=��,�.R7H�
DE TO EXISTING
2LAN-VIEW TOP OF RISER TO INVERT EXISTING GROUND
RISER DIAM = 2 FT OF BARRFI = TALBE-1
+-20 FT HDPE CORRUGATED 12"
20' HDPE
CORRUGATED INVERT OF BARREL TO
2" FIFE FIFE TD BOTTOM OF RISER= TABLE -1 FILL BOTTOM WITH
DAYLIGHT pT ],,,, FT OF CONCRETE
ELEV. SHOWN IN
TABLE- I
FLASHBOARD RISER NOTES
1. FLASHBOARD RISER SHOULD BE MADE OF ALUMINUM
2. RISER AND BARREL SHOULD BE PROPERLY ,:DINED AND GROUTED TC PREVENT LEAKING.
3. WOODEN FLASHBOARDS, COMPOSED OF PRESSURE TREATED 2"X6" LUMBER. SHOULD BE
INSTALLED TO AN ELEVATION SHOWY IN TABLE -I. BOARDS SHOULD FIT SECURELY TOGETHER TO
PREVENT LEAKING.
4. AN ORIFICE, SUFFICIENT TO HOLD PVC PIPE, WI DIAMETER SHOWN IN TABLE -1. WI'H
INVERT ELEVATION SHOWN 'N TALBE-1, SHOULD BE CUT IN THE APPROPRIATE FLASHBOARD.
5. TO REDUCE CLOGGING OF THE Offinm A 12' LENGTH OF PVC PIPE. WITH DIAMETER SHOWN
IN TALBE-1, SHALL BE INSTALLED THROUGH ORIFICE. AND SECURE -Y CAULKED. PIPE SHALL
PROTRUDE APPROX. 5" ON EACH SIDE, WITH AN ADDITIONAL 6" LENGTH CONNECTED VIA A
DOWNTURNED 45 DEGREE ELBOW ON THE WETLAND SIDE.
1. ELEVATIONS/LOCATIONS MAY BE ADJJSTED DURING
CONSTRUCTON BY FIELD ENGINEER BASED ON FIELD CONDITIONS.
2. MICROTOPOGRAPHY (WITHIN DESIGN CONTOURS) TO BE GRADED
PER DIRECTION OF THE FELD ENGINEER,
3. UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON THE PLANS, ALL SLOPES
SHALL BE GRADED TO MINIMUM 3:1 SLOPE (ABOVE DEEP POOL
ELEVATION) OR 2:1 SLOPE (BELOW DEEP POOL ELEVATION).
4. IF EXISTING SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS ARE
DETERMINED TO BE UNSUITABLE TO MAINTAIN THE DESIGNED
PERMANENT WATER ELEVATION, ALL AREAS WITHIN THE WETLAND
BELOW PERMANENT POOL ELEVATION SHALL BE OVEREXCAVATED BY
6" AND COVERED WITH 6" OF COMPACTED CLAY. CLAY SHALL BF
SOURCED AND INSTALLED, WITH MECHANICAL COMPACTION, TO
ACHIEVE PERMEABILITY LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 1X10--6
INCHES/SECONC. FIELD ENGINEER MUST APPROVE CLAY TYPE AND
SOURCE BEFORE INSTALLATION.
It,. IF EXISTING SOILS ARE DETERMINED ID BE UNSUITABLE FOR
DESIRED VEGETATION CROW H, ALL AREAS WITHIN THE WETLAND
BETWEEN TEMPORARY POOL ELEVATION AND 6- BELOW PERMANENT
POOL ELEVATION TO BE CVEREXCAVATED BY 3" AND COVERED WITH
3" TCPSO-L TO DESIGN=LEVATIONS. IF CONDITIONS PERMIT,
TOPSOIL MAY BE HARVESTED/STOCKPILED FROM THE SITE DURING
INITIAL GRADING
6. RIPRAP OR BOLLDER SPLASH ROCK TO BE PLACED AT THE
OUTLET OF EACH INSTALLED
PIPE PER DIRECTION OF THE FIELD ENGINEER.
5 stantec
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
www.stantec.com
ALL ELEVATIONS PRDFlLF VIEW - FLEVA'IONS
SHOWN IN IABLE-1
TOP OF EMBANKMENT
TOP OF
E
GRADE TO %ISTING
1 EARTH FLLL EXISTING GROUND
x-20 F1 HDPE CORRUGATED X12"
INVERT OF BARREL
CUTLFT OF BARREL
BOTTOM OF RISER
TABLE - 1
CONSTRUCTED STORMWATER WETLAND
1
2
3
EL. TOP OF RISER
2573.5'
2571.5'
2569.5'
EL BOTTOM OF RISER
2568.5'
2566.5'
2563.5'
TOP OF EMBANKMENT EL.
2574.0'
2572.0'
2570.0'
INVERT OF BARREL
2570.4'
2568.9'
2565.4'
OUTLET OF BARREL
2570.0'
2568.5'
2565.0'
FLASHBOARD EL.
2573.0'
2571.0'
2569.0'
PVC PIPE INVERT EL.
2572.0'
2570.0'
2568.0'
PVC PIPE DIAMETER
0.75"
0.75"
1.25"
TOP OF RISER TO INVERT OF BARREL
3.1'
2.6'
4.1'
INVERT OF BARREL TO BOTTOM OF RISER
1.9'
2.4'
1.9'
TOTAL RISER HEIGHT
5.0'
5.0'
6.0'
Nort haState
E N V I R O N M E N T A L
C
) JENNINGS
ENVIRONMENTAL
ZINK ENVIRONMENTAL, PLLC
Legend
PROPOSED OOMOUttS-1Fi
- - -
EMM CONTIMM-2ET
CONSTRUCTED STORMWATER WETLAND -1
CONSTRUCTED STORMWATER WETLAND - 2
FLASHBOARD
RISER
OUTLET PIPE
STREAM 2
2570
CONSTRUCTED STORMWATER WETLAND - 3
2570
STREAM 2
OUTLET PIPE
STREAM 4 ---% -J-
PIPE
PIPE EXISTING DRAINAGE
UNDER PROPOSED GRADE
2570 1
DISCHARGE FROM
EXISTING 1S' CP PIPE
TO BE TREATED IN WETLAND
REMOVE EXISTING
24" CP DRANAGE PIPE
OUTLET PIPE
IBOARD
FLASHBOARD
RISER
\570
2588
MAY.
C7enT/rFOleCT
TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH
GRASSY CREEK STREAM ENHANCEMENT - W% PLANS
Sneet No.
14
Tine
CONSTRUCTED STORMWATER WETLAND DETAIL

Lr)
CD
N �
O
O LD
L Lf)
Z /
c
In
p N
C C
O p
CL
J y
4 U
O
Xi. F NXESINO' CrIN 11E FN WU PODEM T AND DIDID WRL ANDI 0WA11 THE NND1
a IVDU MRN WOW IYIIL M110 EOOE OF WF1E W MAL WO 10 HALF MINEIAL
L LA P0R (T ALM) SWILL L N THE tuna Or 01100 L
L COMM 0 OROLIDIMM PUPS 2 FT 14IL M NEA OF WU Alt NMDM M EINEAN ROI
Om INSLL
{. COLTPW NRU %WADEMEE MT RANG RIXX VM EXINA 1 ITR IM OF M ON64EL.
S. MOD T[ LOM FILM C1M0113. RRF SIBN6On SINL ME AWED Tip' RBI GARDE
l WRn RR[ NOMN ON TK KRNS NO PWU AS OIIDCIC ROI R M PL AC11ML LEWIN
OF ROCK N WRES uM 1MW.
7. PL1Q 9%"w MMML ow N TE MAUL
-",INNER _ C Or ?/TNG GRIM,
MERM mL
r F40N -
IN. Ir OF r ROIL SUMSMmR
cQ9M A -A!
INCH AM WY ME
O M AT THE I=MGIIION
Of M DMNILI -
INL s LF Di N61�,R AND
il10TFR LDM6 I111IED �•
IIDN snNnNm
PUE,L FAMIIIC
A
20-71) 0m
MCW L 1IRH #2
SIDIE \
PDMOI LOO
l /
Womm 1p 5LL
IIEA
R KID D sIMMMII�
AT A ON. 10 LF B
(RNC) POOL \
FILM YIEN
1. ON. 1M' LOG DNMETER
L ON. 3' IOLILDEA DMM[TER
TOP OF IDUAM N 066 ELEV.
WU FAM
-MO02L NIN sow
CLAN A STONE 3 FT.
IP2F EA11 OF IDI( 1L
-POOR ML
-4A'
T%inll eDu9
6u MDuntiL
Um Iffm
OYFIIMB.
RRA hlllt
>1L
iR
SECTION A -A
AIDIRD RWACE
"m
/
aim"
STNE's M
!`
,/2 MNNFIIL aEwm
\.
Iowa
m alMa I10e°p
,..
Della lrl�\
SEMII-w
N
fIR�
INCH AM WY ME
O M AT THE I=MGIIION
Of M DMNILI -
INL s LF Di N61�,R AND
il10TFR LDM6 I111IED �•
IIDN snNnNm
PUE,L FAMIIIC
A
20-71) 0m
MCW L 1IRH #2
SIDIE \
PDMOI LOO
l /
Womm 1p 5LL
IIEA
R KID D sIMMMII�
AT A ON. 10 LF B
(RNC) POOL \
FILM YIEN
1. ON. 1M' LOG DNMETER
L ON. 3' IOLILDEA DMM[TER
TOP OF IDUAM N 066 ELEV.
WU FAM
-MO02L NIN sow
CLAN A STONE 3 FT.
IP2F EA11 OF IDI( 1L
-POOR ML
-4A'
T%inll eDu9
6u MDuntiL
Um Iffm
OYFIIMB.
RRA hlllt
>1L
iR
SECTION A -A
AIDIRD RWACE
"m
/
aim"
STNE's M
!`
,/2 MNNFIIL aEwm
\.
m alMa I10e°p
,..
Della lrl�\
SEMII-w
N
fIR�
1.4. Le .111. :LSI. .d,M..
0
(N Stantec
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
www.stantec.corn
NorthaState
E N V I R O N M E N T A L
�) JENNINGS
ENVIRONMENTAL
ZINK ENVIRONMENTAL. PLLC
Legend
MMIAM� Rsvwr
ROM LOM FLOW
.-► sm suers
UWACE IMADER
VAN" ONQ
slsnonE
ROFLF ct
1f�S
1. fFE1 M RDCK RMRE DEMI MEET 1s) FOR FIRIC
COMVIUCRDN
L IOLLOFPS SWILL OL 3 FT MMOM
RMFLE WOUM DII/OAIIIP
�.narZ R V) TIIIE
690-4M6 1.5 1 l0 AMNNIO OR.4
0A6-1.20 id t0 SIHM4IEM
1.$FLII 100 sL�NEselr
• UIMM am
•
THE SJW%UW FOR THE MERE AT SWCN 25+0 M 26+20 S
E MM CLANS 1 IW W REMCE SIAM PCIWK ASSOIATEM
111TH We= H4.
E•�Tt,�;rq�,� ,..o bF;;Q�•watr � .,r
_a
li •lYl..
NNE ANTE
20 -w
AMFACE
IDum1
&WML W" Orel
7
or SOOIII POOL
a1CM MNE PRAM INN
suIFA1z eMA9Mlts \
L� �-Poona IDum1s
OFti>R y//C[ MMLO
D6 1/3 TO
Ti�OMNSI6AI FILE OFROna
MOUIDE
MIE MOE
6LL
FOMNO BOLLM
PIE41R 016TL7 1F19M SUMFNE
IMLIDET. POMIC IMM WILL
IDT SE HIMM RY )
WM011lt -0 't
MIT-'ssaPE� r + r
SIIFACE NSIOEII
r r
POOL
PD91Ma Moum1
�.
d10BM 1yE nllNnwM c
�l 1;q _ •:JA .111. 1121
0
POOL /
19O USLOERS SNKL W MINIMUM J R DIAMETER
3. MAIL DROP OVER ENTIRE STRUCTURE SHALL BE DT
PT. SPLIT THE DROP EVENLY OVER THE STEPS.
cienTmo)ect
TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH
GRASSY CREEK STREAM ENHANCEMENT - 607. PLANS
Sleet No.
15
`9e
DETAIL
MAY. 20151

M
O
U) M
O
O (D
L N
00,
Z /
v
0
c c
0 0
C)-
. /
c c
"p rn
O N
J D
D
< U
C N
RAS:
1. "MOT CLASS A ROOK SHALL BE USED N THE NTLES TO CHINK DIPS N THE
IIIA -VINES WIDE NIH Now Bum& CONTRACTOR WAY SUBSITE STONE
XNE FOR 091119ND I= M PER 09669Ti APNgWL
MOIRr
2 THE IIOST RF TW W I09 -MISE 94ALL WE A SILL ON THE SAE SDE A6 THE
OUISDE BBD AND SNL WE FOOTER BOULDERS F Bi'DFM S PRESENT
ORECILY IELIS THE SU MZ BONDER THE Fwnm BOTADER WIT BE OMITTED
AT THE DOCRETDN OF THE ENCKER. THE MOST DO9NSIEAM 1919 -IME SMALL
HAVE A SAL GM THE SNE SDE AS THE OORNSIRFMA OITSOE MO.
1 NO COR RNNIET SHALL BE NUALLED N THE L0194 -LOW OY/NIFL COR
B/VIET 9MLL LE NSTNLED ABOVE THE INNER -BEIM SLICE. SEE TYPICAL
01065 -SECTION DATA FOR INNER WW 1NOIBNTOL
4. THE NORM NOWT of MV FROM ONE 99NF-YMME TO THE NEXT SWYl BE
NO 9111EAER TIM 0.12 FT. TE commaD WANT OF DROP OAR ALL THE
1011 -HIES N THE SAME RIFFLE SMALL NOT EXCEED THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF FALL
N THE RBFIB SLOPE
S. LOW PONT SNALL ALTERNATE LUT AM RIGHT OF CENTERLINE BY A WLIOIAIM OF
3 R.
L MM-VI/ES SHALL LE WWW SPACED MONO RIFFLE T14LWEO.
7. CON RtACIOR MAY INSTILL OWDERS IN PUCE OF LRCS AS PER ENOINEETS
AFPROWL
L 9b-PAIA" CONSSI910 OF NW CLASS A Ri RM SHALL BE PLAM 2
FEET BELOW SURFACE OF RFFLE AND SMALL N OYERIM1 NM I NOES of
SPASM GRAVEL N OLLE NO APPROAM TO VINES.
9. BOUAER4 SHALL E 3 FEET N OIANETER WIEI MIATE AIDS}
Pr /.IdRL[SLOR CIASBASTONE
1(
SPAMMING OMVEL IFFLE POCKlT
� POOL
— Loo
Foga R I — I It I—
�C AaINI,aLS�SECTION • W SI!♦IALBMM
1N9Ba 1AM11IL
BAI9ONL !ULE
IIA —„ r� I A SEI:TION C -C
Jumms
FIRMS
W9wL >at
MRL al
a
MNIw BOURDER
I NETIN - 30 Ft
IBR 11 NOME
(3 Stantec
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
www.stantec.com
Nort haState
ENVI RON MENTAL
c
JENNINGS
ENVIRONMENTAL
� r.r•..r.K.r.r
ZINK ENVIRONMENTAL, PLLC
Legend
4
BANKNLA
1 D
0
P� /PIFFLE SLOPE SBA STONE
pc
svAvwNO GPAVEL 1/
flf POCKET
t POOL
r► 9wlane
now
111'=1TCIiJ 1-r1-�ITi II_��Il�i� ITi1-L�—
SUFPA ma-
l•I.OIILt
NOTES:
1. THE MAMW MOUNT OF DROP RM 011E
7. T[ NP IEIL721 THE HFAER ND FOOREA
MINI -VANE TO THE NEVI SIML N NO
101AOFRf MNL E CHNIn M NAND NRH
GREATER THAN a3 PT: THE MOM
NIS. II
YD CONE FROM THE U9BTiAM
ANENT OF GLOP OVER ALL THE Wit -VANES
DIECIOHL
!WL NOT OCEED TE TOTAL ANNNT OF
FML N THE RIFFLE YORE
L THE ND LINK AIIIIE OF THE HDD BOULDERS
2. MNMWIS 7NL E ®WLLY VAOD N TE
OF INE IBM -INE 40 THE SW !RLL K
BEINDM 40-M OltiLLs.
ASU IM A RNCM OF THE RFFLE IOWL
L THE NEWTON OF THE SINIICIUMS CAN 1E
1 A WORK= OCA11131 NRI A BOOLT TWE
NTEMUI0FB FROM TIE 190NN MRIE 9 THE
CONOW A HTOMNIC RAM SNL BE ISED TO
LOGDON AM SNTNWIO OF EACH N940M
PLC[ NUMB AD LOOL
SIMICIIIE
4. TE IOLLM BNL ILOf'E FROM TIE M
10. 1114PRAI NIR WHOM OF NMI CLM A
nnlMK Ai WE INTO OF 1 E WF A 1/2 TO
SMLL Q RAM 2 !NI dOB SITZ OF
YA 0LWa1 R A I CF 3%-M
SHE AIO !WL E VARIAN tN 9 NM OF
F
X=
!EAGER NO it101E7R BO4D00 71V11 BE To
>r " OM91 N TE NIDE AMD NPKM
S AIRELT NIO THE BMR N WM A ANY TWO' R
TO Wft
BABNF3 THE IOBBWDY OF DIFiWM
OMORFC ARN90 TEM,
11. INIDOV SNL NE 3 FEET N DOIEIFR.
L ANT SOL OWUUM NANO THE PLIODWT OF
ffm PD�fEI C MEMODIL IIFOINIM AID
L THE TIOUM OR LOW POW? SHALL ALTERNATE
LEFT AND RIGHT OF 4 BY A MAITIRN OF 3
FT.
Vent/Project
TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH
GRASSY CREEK STREAM ENHANCEMENT - 60% PLANS
Sleet No.
16
me
DETAIL
MAY. 2015

In
z
c In
C3
C
0 O
� a
c �
'e, o+
ED m
< U
Q y
4 Stantec
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
www.stantec.com
STEP 1 MILVE LDW TENCH FOR TOE 11000.
OOIYOE FOOIOI TRE) CII M LOM miff AND
RACE FOOYOI LO
SECTION
. .H
rOOTFR LOG
N*MM 20 TO b
26"
BNB6UL
rDOnie LDC
PLANVIEW
S TFF„ RACE tiOl W9Wk (9RIO. L= VIM, TEE
TPS NO WATSN) KIWEEX NO ON TIP OF TIE
ROOY SIM
SIF!'. HALE TOOT WW UAS CNIIILVOEI) UU FW7M
LDOS
SECTION
STEP 5. NWK TEIPgW(Y WIMEA wtxw NO RAQ LAE
Lvrrwz
fLA1S
PLANVIEW
NorthoState Legend
E N V I R O N M E N T A L
c
) JENNINGS
ENVIRONMENTAL
ZINK ENVIRONMENTAL. PLLC
PLANVIEW
9R"
STOP 6. MPU WRN4m SOL LFLS NO L44M OF
CIRTOGS KTOM SOIL Lm 1P to BNA6ULL
SGOF.
`EP I AM TETPdtNTY CMPM NEW M S FAERGE INE
L=
RACE 9LNLDW BAL10T11 WOO THE OOUNT R
IIEOHT.
PLANVIEW
now
Ilan .d,El 4. .4.5 SI' l
v
PLANVIEW
STEP - SI.L LDLS AM OL"WO FU" 'NCH THE TOP R M
BVAOILL KNCIL RACE THE SILL Loa AT THE
BENWNIO NO ENO OF TIE TOE NOW STROCTLM
FORD. TO TIE ROW.
r
Yf1TEc.
PLACE SNNION LAYER OF SOIL O.ER THE LK CLITIM N STEP
& IEAC A L7 I= WOE SIRP If SON CONTROL BINAET
(CETSCORI KROWE 700} LAY THE EMU 00 THE UK
CIATRW SUM DW A %I11411dkill OF 10 FW Of THE RAOU
MEN TETE NEW C11TTRIM AM SOL RACE A CK R
MO( LAYER OF SOL CIM TE SMU GWY CINWIM THE
SOL BY USNG TE LTCAIITTR 91PJEY O 1N STE YOEILYWO
BLRTM NO LAOS ARE LOT DISPLACED aGYBED.
BBBI
STNTM 10 PACE TE Ell. MIM 11E !LL 3
TO 4 WO S" RICH THE FILE OF TE SLOP[ b CK4K A
SLIGHT WAL a 1 E OUTER FALF OF TIE MC E. NPL VIIL
BE DLPM 10 INE RAIK PUCE 2 RICHES OF TMOL Imo.
SOIMM Ml CLAWSL WON LbNTFAXXb W&WE FSI MM
KNWET am TIM SOL CVRIOT PPE TIMM GE OFEIGGB N
■MET. ww M OIO90W CONTACL BLmw 0 1K rm
OF INE SLCK NO CRFATE A WW RANIM IUWACE FOR 1 E
NEXT LAIQ OF LVE CUYINCS ON A 57 RCPE ASMY FLOW M
REPEAT TIE PROCEDURE AMC TO BLVD TIE MW SOL WW
ILO LK CUTIWIG WUL
RMCNST1WILT THE 9"ES 9X71 THAT THE MUVU 9 -WE
w1CHM THE PROP05ED CROSS SECTdW1 94kE.
AIOK THE LASE LVE MWSH LAYER ADD ADWOM 0106M
CONTLOL BLAWEION THE FACE OF THE SLOPE NO OTOU TIE
BLNWET LP ON TO THE BNITML BENCH NFA WIRY THE EDGE
OF TIE BIAIBET AND SE11W R NTH nNQS PER RN6 F
NECMARY. RISfALL A SEWND ROLL OF ERDSION COMIRDL
OL—V ON THE BVATLLL 9ENL7L
DELL WLY K MODIFIED BY FE1D ENINIFER
Client/Project
TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH
GRASSY CREEK STREAM ENHANCEMENT - 60% PLANS
Sheet No.
17
rine
DETAIL
MAY : I

nom:
I. GPS SETKEN BOULDERS SHALL BE MMI® BY FMINc
SEE TAME FIN BOULDERS TOGETHER RllGO1G MIH SiR11CME NCOCT CLASS A
ELEYRTIONSTD E THE CONIRACTp1 WILL BE RE QUM TO FII BOULDERS.
• BEFORE IN STALLING COIR MATTING. TILL •j% DM RMARG1W NL NI SHOT ROCK C1BCK OR
LIPPER D -I IN OF SOL TO HELP B�
v GETATIDR TO ESTABLISH RAKE SOL d2. UDIN �ID ASOPE.S MAYBE ADAISIED TO FT BY THE
VE
LEL AND ADD SEED AND MULCH BEFORE
INSTALLING CDR FIBER MATTING.
COIRMATTING'-- S. WOE ARM SIBl1 TE INTO THE BANK HALEWtT iElt D THE
zn BACKFIu A A• z 01NBIEL HAM NO &I ELEVATIONS. THE WE AMTS SHALL
PROPOSEDflAM6'L \ — RISE AT Z9-13 FROM THE CANNEL MARE AT AN ALIBLE OF
tTdR PATTING FROM 20-70 DEC. FROM THE ADJACENT TANCEMr UNE.Q OF MNOULL PROPOSED HETI
GPE roEFT. RUNNEL TOE _ i 4�� 4. ALL LATERALS ARE TO BE APPROVED Bt ENGINEER OR ENGINEER'SENGINEER'SsL
BEYOIO ZFTAL III •'In'f� DWI COMMRUCTIDN WNAGiR
N0. 2 $fOE /
BACIGILL SIXIM111dIA
`
PROPOSED
CHANNEL TOE 2 FT LONG 1 IN. • 21N NVOD STAKES
PROPOSED W2IN.GA,--DRO2FING NNL SAN(FLLL ELEWUW
MNKFULL AT TIE TOP TO HOLD MATTING Rom 91 LYIl
CqMArnNO SMALL BE PLACED ALONG SECTION A -A ILII VITO LAR A B � I HEAM SD
THE OUTSIDE W ALL SENOS AND KONG -' I ESLTNI{yl
BOTH SIDES OF TILE CHANNEL IN IBFFLE 2 SBIE Y I- BBCE UL
AREAS
PLAN ADOTIONAL STANINO MAY BE REQUIRED PLAN NEW SELECT MAF7BK - II .EI�
M RE THANSEPARATES FROM SOL BY CDR MATTING FROM TOE COR I, -I
1LL,.�III=III—u� 11
BIN.REASONABLE PURL OF BANK -1. SLOPE TO BE—FIRST FILTER FARK
MN
2 FT BEYOND B,INKFULL SLOPE BREAK BOBr
VERTICK 2FT CdA, MATTING �By•1My� ���
OVERLAP (TFT a:IW m A-9
NOMAn-
I I
MIN MIN r I I I -1I II 11I J I I
DRZONTOVERLAP A' n �. .H•. 5 FT (TYP) I I r""I I'•-'1 I I I j I CIJ I I-1 I - "EE"""" O� BOEADFR
M SECTION &B
.1.
IAN K 2- LONGI IN:zW—S'A S
OVER— W21N. GALL ROOFING NAIL
AT THE TDP TO HOLD MATTING
T - MATTING STAKING VIEW �CROSS SECON �M y A
u Far ro BriLc
IIML OF THE BOLDER
IS NOF TO E-.-RXK -
NO LNE STAKING ON PONT BAR
PLBAG
OUR—PINGPIANTNG SEEDLINGSSIIALL BE
KEPT C
IN MOIST
SIMILAR CONTAINER EA TVAS TBAGO PREVENTNT
THE
• • _ • _ OR CENTERLINE
ROOT SYSTEMS FROM DRYING �• • • • • • • • • SOUARE CUT
—NOW
BAR
PLAN NGBARSWLLLHAVEABIAMWTN Y
A TRIANGULA CROSS SECTION. AND BANK -1 BUDS (FADING UPMARD)
SHALL BE 12IN LONG, AIN NIDE AND 11N �I.,
THICK AT ENTER. BKF ELEVATION
ROOT PRUNING.
Al.L SEEWNGS SHKL BE ROOT PRUNED, IF IRIP STARES
LIVE NrnN0112". 1" OAMETERI
NECESSARY, SO NORCOTSEKTENO MORE
TUN tO INCHE9 (1MN (HON) BELOW TIE ROOT
COL-
- I
1 INSERTPLANTINGBAR AS I. REMOVE PLANTNOBAR J INSERT PLANTING BAR A PULL HANDLE OF BAR S. PUSH HANDLE IM—L. 6 LEAVE COMPACTION
SHOANANDPULLHANDLE ANOPIACESEEOUNG 21N T—PLANTER TOAARDPLAl'ER, FIRMING SdL AT TOP. HOLE OPEN WATER
TONNRDPLANTER AT CORRECT DEPTH FROA SEEDLING FRAIINOSOLAT THOROUGHLY r
BOTTOM
PIROPOSEO GROIPD
DIBBLE PLANTING METHOD PROPOSED STREAMBED AF20LE OUT—
USING THE KBC PLANTING BAR A --L
I
NOI ES. LAUF(FOR FLOOSPN BUFFER PLANTING AND UPLAND BUFFER PLANTING)
LIVE
I TREE REFORESTATION SHALL BE PLANTED S FT. ACCOROINO TO TECHNICAL SPECIFIGTIONS NOTES
1 LINE UAIQS 9HPLL SE PLANTED IN 2 STAGGERED ROWS. PARALLEL TO THE STREAM CHANNEL. M71NEEN THE BANKF-LL AND INNER
2 OTHER PLANING METHOD CAR BE USED WITH THE PERMISSION OF THE PL 0SUPERNSOR BERM STAGE
2 KLNAME SARETOBEAPPROVEDBYENGWERMEN MMSMSrt CONSTRUCTIONMANAGER 2. LINESTFJESSHKLKPLANTEDDSBOMSIDESKRIFFLESANDMTMEOUTSIDEBALMOFPODS
5. LNE STAKES SHALL K ORNEN UNTIL APPROKRATELY LA OF LINE STAKE IS NITRN GROUND
A E. A A STARTER HAE MAY BE REWIRED IF STALING TKROUGH MArnNIS ROCK OR COMPACTED SOLS
5. IF STARTER HOLE IS NEEDED. MINIMIZE AIR POCKET
B. ALL MATERIALS ME TO BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER OR ENONEERS ONSITE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
(I Stantec
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
www.stantec.com
NorthaState
ENVI RON MENTAL
C
) JENNINGS
ENVIRONMENTAL
ZINK ENVIRONMENTAL. PLLC
Legend
Client/P4Giecl
TOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH
GRASSY CREEK STREAM ENHANCEMENT - 60% PLANS
Sgee1 No.
18
DETAIL
MAY. 20151

CONTEXT MAP
1 tr =2OO rPROJECT
PERMANENT SEEDING SCHEDULE
TEMPORARY SEEDING MUST OCCUR WHEN DENUDED AREAS WILL NOT BE
T
JIJ N
LIJ
2 START
Conrr*nts
SEEDING MIXTURE
J J
'IF NO TEMPORARY SEEDING HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY PLACED ADD A COVER CROP
w
GERMAN MILLET q0
WITH PERMANENT SEEDING -CONSULT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR SPECIES a RATE '
06T1GR AMCE eIXINpARVr
oruowo Lesrfs TVP.
PARTRIDGE PEA 10
PERMANENT SEED MIXES (RIPARIAN AND WETLAND):
EIaST.a WETLAND.TYe.
l
��
CONSTRUCTEDcCSWDk(CS
Black Willow
ya 5svcaEE+
-
WETLAND I
LBS RATE (LEIACRE)
LB LBS) RIPARIAN BUFFER MIX' ERNMX %178 20
17 D.C.
cONSTRUChad ... z coo
Wje A. ,WAS
WETtArn ccsval
❑ D
(Cew
CONS O
LAND (CSWl
WETtI
ua'E` ,cEeE l
PROJECT
END N o
REVEGETATION & PLANTING SHEET SET INDEX
Ll COVER SHEET
L2-L3 STREAM REVEGETATION PLAN
L4 CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS (STORMWATER) REVEGETATION PLAN
SEEDING SCHEDULES
1. TO ENSURE SURVIVABILITY, WATER GRASS AT LEAST WEEKLY DURING DROUGHT.
2. CONTRACTOR TO KEEP RECORD OF SEED PURCHASE AND APPLICATION RATES FOR FINAL INSPECTION.
3. GROUND STABILIZATION REQUIRED IN (7) SEVEN DAYS ON PERIMETER AREAS AND SLOPES GREATER THAN 3-1 sun nanuNn cream neTinu �w, fin rievc r..�..r�co .,,�.�
TEMPORARY SEEDING SCHEDULE
PERMANENT SEEDING SCHEDULE
TEMPORARY SEEDING MUST OCCUR WHEN DENUDED AREAS WILL NOT BE
T
BROUGHT TO FINAL GRADE WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS (SEE NOTE 3 ABOVE).
PERMANENT SEEDING MUST OCCUR WITHIN 21 CALENDAR DAYS OF FINAL GRADING
Conrr*nts
SEEDING MIXTURE
SPECIES RATE (LB/ACREI
'IF NO TEMPORARY SEEDING HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY PLACED ADD A COVER CROP
w
GERMAN MILLET q0
WITH PERMANENT SEEDING -CONSULT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR SPECIES a RATE '
Si D ood
PARTRIDGE PEA 10
PERMANENT SEED MIXES (RIPARIAN AND WETLAND):
i
y
A small -stemmed sudangrasa may be substituted for Partridge Pea at a rate of
$ALN
50 blears
Black Willow
Shrub
SEEDING DATES' May 15 -Aug 15MIXES
LBS RATE (LEIACRE)
LB LBS) RIPARIAN BUFFER MIX' ERNMX %178 20
17 D.C.
SEEDING MIXTURE
Sambucus n" re canaderlsis
SPECIES RATE (LB/ACREI
RA
(12 LBS.) FLOODPLAIN MIX' ERNMX %154'. 20
(1 5 LBS.) WETLAND MIX. ERNMX %305-
RYE GRAIN
PARTRIDGE PEA 10
"e
o: ti
20
(50 LBS ) CONSERVATION LAWN ERNMX4113 100
SAILS
A small -stemmed sudangrns may be substituted for Partridge Pea at a
The nod man are available at ERNST CONSERVATION SEEDS (800 873 3321). Local
Shrub
rate of 501b4cre.
soufcn of similar antl mixn may be used ALL SEED MIXES TO BE HYDROSEEDED
sub S. carolariana
SEEDING DATES Feb 1 -May 15
Iris virgincs
Blue Flog tis
SEEDING MIXTURE
150
4' Pot
SPECIES RATE (LBlACRE)
SOIL AMENDMENTS
Hazel Alder
Perform sal testW for all areas and consult Landscape Architect for recommendations
RYE GRAIN 120
24"
PARTRI DGE PEA 10
LNDB
Lindera benzoin
Asmall-stemmed sudangran may be substituted for Partridge Pea at a rate of 50
MULCH.
HydiGseed
5o
INaofe
REEDING DATES Aug 15 30
permanent sesding with psyllium or other similar pant based taWfiw Alternatively,
appy 4.000-5.0001b/acre grain straw or
P equnalant cover of another suitable, weed -tree
RHOV
-Dec
mulching material
Shrub
SOIL AMENDMENTS
24'
Follow recommendation of soil tests Use only amendments sate for riparian ares
MAINTMAINT
MAINTENANCE
Acer negundo
MULCH.
fertilize. and mulch damaged vasa Immedia
ge tely after germination is visually
100
Appy 4.000 lot..,.Straw Anchor atfaw by tacking
unsuccessful or additional disturbance occurs to prevent successful seeding.
,u
MAINTENANCE
River Birch
Z
Refemia d growth Is not fully adequate. Topdrees with 5016facre or nitrogen in
36"
O
March 0f applicable) [fit Is necessary to extend temporary cover beyond June
Ca nus Carolinians
Ironwood
15th overseed vein man provided Reseed. re-fertilue and mulch Immediately
150
36"
following erovan or other damage
DIOV
GENERAL NOTES:
1. See Engineering Plans for all stream alignment information, including top of bank, toe or
slope, channel, grading and disturbance boundary,
2.Keep pant species most and shaded until installation (livestakes and barerools to be kept
cool, covered and moist). Do not leave in the sun or let plant dry out. Saturate container plant after
installation, soak kvestakes before panting.
3. Dg, pack, transport and handle all pant with care to ensure protection from injury. Store
pant in the manner necessary to accommodate Meir horticultural requirements. Heel -in pants if
necessary to protect root belt and keep from drying out.
4.Livestakes may altemativety, cut from the site or nearby when dormant however species
Stroud be equivalent in diversity,
5. All container plantings to be watered after panting (same clay) and continue to water on a
regular basis (min. of 2x Weekly) for at least six weeks.
6. Plants to be Planted in naturalized drift, in triangulated patterns to blend into natural swings.
7. Invasive nwc plant are recommended to be removed from as proposed planting areas and
as they realm to increase the change of native plant establishment. Removal by mechanical means
(hand Pulling) and/or spot treatment are recommended. For exotic invasive plant removal, use only
water safe herbicide within wetland and riparian areas and appy only, individually to each plant (do not
broadcast spray) to reduce contannination concerns. Rodeo (water safe) and Garton 3A are two types
of herbicides that can be used according to manufacturers instructions. Invasive plant existing on site
include but are not limited to Privel, honeysuckle, oriental bittersweet, and mutinoral rose.
8. No trees to be Planted within 10' of overhead utility lines (shrubs only).
9. No trees to be panted within view areas (as shown on plan).
10. Container plants to be held verilled/directed by Landscape Architect.
RIPARIAN PLANTING ZONE DESCRIPTIONS
_Splash Zone (18,252 SF 10.42 ACRES): Includes area along
toe of slope (4' wide typ.). This zone includes Livestakes
planted at T oC. on average and 2'0,c along outside bends
and aroundlabove structures.
-Bank Zone (26,352 SF / 0.6 ACRES): Includes area between
the Toa of Slope and Top of Bank (5'-10' wide typ.). This
zone includes barefoot seedlings planted at 10' o.c. and
Riparian Buffer Mix seeding. No bees beneath overhead rdilfies
(sMrbs only).
Upland Zone (88,978 SF t 2.0 ACRES): Includes area from
Top of Bank to the limit of disturbance. This zone includes
barefoot seedlings, container plants (as shown) and
Floodplain Mix seeding. No hares beneef r overhead uafities
(shrubs only).
Gnu Zone (13,677 SF 10.31 ACRES): Includes upland area
that is near alley/mod access and constructed wetlands. This
includes Conservation lawn mix and some container trees.
RIPARIAN REVEGETATION
Reference Plan on Sheet L2 and B
tiparian Planting Calculations
LANTING ZONES Area (SO Livestakes Barefoot Seedlings Container Plants
plash Zone (2'-1/2' o.c. typ) 18,252 3377 0 none
anklul(10'o.c.) 26,352 0 308 none
pland (10' o.c.) 88,978 0 1002 30
PLANTING SCHEDULE - RIPARIAN R1=V1=rr1=TATlnp1
TOTAL 3,377 1,310 30
S
Species
Cominnon Nan*
T
Quantity
Size
Conrr*nts
LNESTA(ES
CORA
Coccus amamum
Si D ood
Shrub
900
Liveatake
sub Ph soca s ilia
$ALN
Salix n' re
Black Willow
Shrub
900 1
Livestake
17 D.C.
SART)
Sambucus n" re canaderlsis
Elde
Shrub
1 677 1
Liverstake
sub Cephallanthus occidernalls
SAILS
Salix sericea
Si Wipow
Shrub
900
Liveetake
sub S. carolariana
BARER00T SEEDLINGS
Iris virgincs
Blue Flog tis
Emergent
150
4' Pot
ALNS
Alnus seruiata
Hazel Alder
Shrub
50
24"
4" Pot
LNDB
Lindera benzoin
Spicebush
Shrub
5o
24"
4" Pot
RHOV
Rhododendron viscosum
Swamp Azalea
Shrub
50
24'
sub Ca canthus flondus
ACEN
Acer negundo
Boxelder
Tree
100
36"
4" Pat
BETN
Betula niara
River Birch
Tree
150
36"
4" Pot
CARC
Ca nus Carolinians
Ironwood
Tree
150
36"
4" Pot
DIOV
Diospyros Virginians
Persimmon
Tree
100
36"
4"Pot
URT
Lincidendron tuligifiera
Tulip Poolar
Tree
150
36"
4" Pot
NYSS I
Nyasa syllvallics
Blackaurn
Tree
100
36"
4" Pot
PLAO
Piatanus occidentalis
Sycamore
Tree
210
36"
4" Pat
PRUS I
Prunus serotina
Black C
Tree
100
36'
12' D.C.
OUEP
Quercus phellos
WikxMOak
Tree
100
36"
As shown
CONTAINERS
Aroma arbu etas
C
Shrub
15
1 Gal.
SPN
Spiraea vi inion
\Arginia S 'rea
ShrubTBD
Shrub
1 Gel.
TBD, ma be ovided b client
BETH
Betula ri re
River Birch
Tree
5
3 Gal.
Field Located
CARC
Ca anus Carolinians
Conwood
Tree
5
3 Gel.
Field Located
ILEO
Ilex opaca
American Holly
Tree
10
3 Gal.
Field Located
MAiGT
Magnolia Itnoetela
Umbrella Tree
Tree
5
3 Gel.
Field Located
PLAO
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
Tree
5
3 Gel.
Field Located
CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS
REVEGETATION ZONE DESCRIPTIONS
ODeep Pool (1,752 sf)- This zone includes floating
and/or submerged aquatic plants with no plantings
around structures to reduce clogging.
Shollow Water (2,483 sf)-This zone includes
emergent plants.
Shallow Land (2,680 so. This zone includes
herbaceous plants and shrubs and Wetland Mix
seeding.
"Constructed We Mand Tnnas "t 'h'.' — rh;.
CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS
(STORMWATER REVEGETATION)
Reference Plan on Sheet L4
E
[E.
Common Noma
Typic
Ot*ntlly
Size
Comments
PerennieWHerbs aLm
:onstructed Wetlands Planting Calculations
ILANTING ZONES Area (s0 Herbaceous (4" or larger) Shrubs (1 gallon) Trees (3 gallon)
leep Pool 1752 81 none none
ha [low Water(2'o.c. spacl ng) 2488 697 none none
hallow Land (5'0.c. spacing for
hrubs, trees as shown) 2680 750 115 7
Total 1,528 115 7
PLANTING SCHEDULE - CONSTRIJCTom wFrl amm,
Symbol
Spades
Common Noma
Typic
Ot*ntlly
Size
Comments
PerennieWHerbs aLm
NLPP
Nuphar potIrsepsium
Spatterdock
Float Subm
30
4" Pot
12"o.c.
ELOA
Eachans ack;ularis
Spirerush
FlosorWSubmerged
30
4" Pot
17 D.C.
LLO
Ulasopss occiderda iS
ulasopsis
FloatinWSubmerged
21
4" Pat
12"o.c.
ACOC
Aconls calamus
sweetrag
Emergaink
150
4' Pot
12"o.c.
RN
Iris virgincs
Blue Flog tis
Emergent
150
4' Pot
12" o.c.
PONC
Pontedens cordsta
Pi;kerekveed
Emergeard
100
4" Pot
12" o.c.
JW
)uncus effusus
Sollrush
Emergent
197
4" Pot
iT o.c.
SCE
Sporgarsurn ouryearpurn
Giem Bur -reed
Em
50
4" Pot
12" o.c.
SCW
Scirpus actaus
Hardslem Rush
Em
50
4" Pat
12"o.c.
CARV
Carex vulpincklies
Fox
Herbaceous
200
4" Pot
12" o.c.
ASCI
Asclefton ltcarnats
Swamp Milkweed
Herbaceous
1 100
4" Pot
12" o.c.
CNAL
Chasmarahhan ladfograrl
River Oats
Herbaceous
I 10o
4"Pot
12'o.c.
EUPD
E IMtubsm
Joe Wised
hbrbaeaous
50
4" Pot
12"o.c.
HIBC
Hibiscus cocctles
Scarlet Rose Mellow
tlerbaceDlrS
50
4" Pot
12" o.c.
LOBC
Lobala
a relnal's
Cardinal Flower
IierWce00s
100
4" Pat
12" o.c.
SCN S vafdus
Shrubs a Trees
Soffstem Rush
Herbaceous
150
4" Pot
12' D.C.
ALMS I
Aln....Wa
Hazel Aber
Shrub
15
1 Gal.
As shown
AROA I
Aroma arbu etas
C
Shrub
15
1 Gal.
As shown
LEV
kx venkipta
W'
Shrub
20
1 Gal.
As shown
IJNDS
Lhldera benzoin
S 'shush
Shrub
30
1 Gal.
As shown
RHOV
Rhododendron vscoaum
Swam Azalea
Shrub
15
1 Gal.
sub Rosa lustrs
SPIA
abs
MaaOowsweet
Shrub
20
1 Gal.
As shown
SETN
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
4
3 Gal.
As shown
CARC
Ca caroktnne
Ironwood
Tree
3
3 Gal.
As shown
X
O
_Z
:D
V
W
E Q z
o CL O
w �
Z �
o E O LJJ _
3 v F-- W o
NN Q = Z
> LJJ z
CD D_' a
w w w
on >
d o LJJ U of
° a: U vac
Verticol Scole:
N/A
Horizontal Scale:
NA
SheeiL
1

1 Uj
Z,Z
Ammon
010
Q�Q
EXISTING PIPE ( IN CONCRETE
-rrrr-rrrrr ,r rlr.r-rrrrrr y
RIPARIAN PLANTING ZONE DESCRIPTIONS
®Splash Zone (18,252 SF 10.42 ACRES): Includes area along
toe of slope (4' wide typ.). This zone includes livestakes
Planted
at 3' o.a on average and 2' o.c, along outside bends
and around/above structures.
Bank Zone (26,352 SF / 0.6 ACRES): Includes area between
the Toe of Slope and Top of Bank (5-10' wide typ.). This
zone includes bareroot seedlings planted at 10'o c. and
RIF anan Buffer Mix seeding. No Imes beneath overhead utilities
(shrubs only).
Upland Zone (88,978 SF / 2.0 ACRES). Includes area from
Top of Bank to the limit of disturbance. This zone includes
bareroot seedlings, container plants (as shown) and
Floodplain Mix seeding. No heel beneath overhead utilities
(sMubs orrty).
Gross Zone (13,677 SF 10,31 ACRES): Includes upland area
that is near alley/road access and constructed wetlands. This
includes Conservation Lawn rnix and some container Irees
FUTURE TRAIL ALIGNMENT
(APPROX.)
GRADING LIMITS. TYP
CONTAINER PLANT LEGEND
ALNS
HAZELALDER
0
AROA
CHOKEBERRY
ILEV
WINTERBERRY
0
LINDB
SPICEBUSH
®
RHOV
SWAMP AZALEA
0
SPIA
MEADOWSWEET SPIREA
®
SPIV
VIRGINIA SPIREA (TBD)
O
BETN
RIVER BIRCH
O
CARC
IRONWOOD
O
ILEO
ILEX OPACA
0
MAGT
UMBRELLATREE
OPLAID
SYCAMORE
'All locations approximate (to be field located)
� r�bRIVEwar
� 1
PROJECT
START
ROCK ARMOR
OR
X
O
_Z
�D
V
LU
Vartieol Sed M:
N/A
Horizontal Seal:
t'r50'
Sheat No.:
L2

GRADING LIMITS.
TYP.
EXPOSED PIPE
CROSSING
FUTURE TRAIL ALIGNMENT
(APPROX. t
EXPOSED PIPE
CROSSING
� I
i
y I
f �I
PIPE — -
EANOUT 1
PROJE
END
RIPARIAN PLANTING ZONE DESCRIPTIONS
®Splash Zone (18,252 SF / 0.42 ACRES). Includes area along
toe of slope (4' wide typ.). This zone includes livestakes
planted at To c. on average and 2'o c along outside bends
and around/above structures.
Bank Zone (26,352 SF / 0.6 ACRES). Includes area between
the Toe of Slope and Top of Bank (5'-10' wide typ.). This
zone includes bareroot seedlings planted at 10' o.c. and
Riparian Buffer Mix seeding. No trees beneath overhead aalibes
(shrubs only).
Upland Zone (88,978 SF 12,0 ACRES). Includes area from
Top of Bank to the limit of disturbance. This zone includes
bareroot seedlings, container plants (as shown) and
Floodplain Mix seeding. No bees beneath overread utilities
(shrubs only).
Gniss Zone (13,677 SF 10.31 ACRES). Includes upland area
that is nearalley/road access and constructed wetlands. This
Includes Conservation Lawn rnix and some container trees.
PERENNIAL
STREAP.1
CONTAINER PLANT LEGEND
0
ALNS
HAZELALDER
Q
AROA
CHOKEBERRY
0
ILEV
WINTERBERRY
0
LINDB
SPICEBUSH
RHOV
SWAMP AZALEA
Q
SPIA
MEADOWSWEETSPIREA
®
SPIV
VIRGINIA SPIREA (TBD)
0
BETN
RIVER BIRCH
0
CARC
IRONWOOD
O
ILEO
ILEX OPACA
0
MAGT
UMBRELLA TREE
OPLAO
SYCAMORE
'All locations approximate (to be field located)
ow— I L.
EXISTING PIPE
IN CONCRETE
I
Pit
OVL
RE'40'
X
0
5
Cr
LL
Vertical Seale:
N/A
Horizontal $CON:
W.
Sheet No.:
L3

E /
E /
MAINTAIN CLEARANCE J\
AROUND OUTLET STRUCTURE, TYP.
SEEDING AROUND WETLAND el
WITH CONSERVATION LAWN MIX,
TYPICAL r
r
r
a
r
e /
a
^� r
M� J
CSW1 REVEGETATION PLAN
CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS
REVEGETATION ZONE DESCRIPTIONS
CONTAINER PLANT LEGEND
DeepPool (1,752 so -This zone includes floating
ALNS
and/or submerged aquatic plants with no plantings
Q
around structures to reduce clogging.
CHOKEBERRY
Shallow Water (2,488 sn-This zone includes
ILEV
emergent plants.
O
Shallow Land (2,680 sI This zone includes
SPICEBUSH
herbaceous plants and shrubs and Wetland Mix
RHOV
seeding.
CONTAINER PLANT LEGEND
Species
ALNS
HAZELALDER
Q
AROA
CHOKEBERRY
PerenniahMerbaceous
ILEV
WINTERBERRY
O
LINDB
SPICEBUSH
®
RHOV
SWAMP AZALEA
Q
SPIA
MEADOWSWEET SPI REA
®
SPIV
VIRGINIA SPIREA (TBD)
Q
BETN
RIVER BIRCH
O
CARC
IRONWOOD
Q
ILEO
ILEXOPACA
0
MAGT
UMBRELLATREE
OPLAID
Acorus calamus
SYCAMORE
Emergent
'All locations approximate (to be field located)
PLANTING SCHEDULE - CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS
SWnboll
Species
Common Nawar
Type
Quantity I
Size
Comnsrrts
PerenniahMerbaceous
NUPP
Nuphar km
Spattardock
FloatinWSubmerged
30
4" Pot __12-.c.
ELOA
Ekxharis acicularis
Spbenroh
F ubmer
30
4" Pot
17' o.c.
ULO
Ukaeopsis occidentalis
Ulaeopsis
Floating/Submerged
21
4" Pot
12' o.c.
ACOC
Acorus calamus
Sweetftag
Emergent
150
4` Pot
12" o.c.
RIV
Iris virainica
Blue Flag lis
Emergent
150
4" Pot
12" o.c.
PONC
Pontedena cordata
Pickerehveed
Emergent
100
4" Pot
12"o.c.
JUNE
Juncus eflusus
Soll ush
Fmaglent
197
4" Pot
12" o.c.
SCMn.
ASincamate
SwamMnkweed
Herbaceous
100
4"Pol
12"o.c.
CHthium
latifolium
River Oats
Herbaceous
100
4" Pot
12'o.c.
EUkan
hstulosm
Joe Weed
Herbaceous
50
4` Pt
12'o.c.
HBus
coccinea
Scarlet Rose ltslkrw
Herbaceous
50
4"Pot
12"o.c.LOia
cardinal's
Cardinal Fewer
herbaceous
too
4" Pal
17'o.c.
SCvalidus
SoflaIsm Rush
Herbaceous
1 150
4" Pot
12" o.c.
Shrubs i1 Trees
ALAS
Akns seruete
Hazel Alder
Shrub
15
1 Gal.
As shown
ARCA I
Aronia arbutldia
Chokeberry
Shrub
15
1 Gal.
As shown
LEV
lex verticinsta
Winterberry
Shrub
20
1 Gal.
As shown
UNDB
Lindera benzoin
Spicebush
Shrub
30
1 Gal
As shown
RHOV
SPIA
Rhododendron viscosum
rea alba
Swam Azalea
Msadowswasl
Shrub
Shrub
15
20
1 Gal.
1 Gal.
sub Rosa palustris
As shown
BETN
Betule nigra
River Birch
Tree
4
3 Gell.
As shown
CARC I
Carpinus caronniana
Ironwood
Tree
3
3 Gal.
As shown
E E \
SEEDING AROUND WETLAND MAINTAIN CLEARANCE
VNTH CONSERVATION LAWN MIX, AROUND OUTLET STRUCTURE, TYP.
TYPICAL \
F
a
CSW2 REVEGETATION PLAN
I
SEEDING AROUND WETLAND
WITH CONSERVATION LAWN MIX,
TYPICAL
NO PLANTING IN DEEP POOL WITH
OUTLET STRUCTURE
I
e
I
a
a
r
a
1
1
s
1
1
F
1
3
1
a
CSW3 REVEGETATION PLAN
'SEE STORMWATER PLANS FOR GRADING, POOL LOCATIONS, AND ALL STRUCTURE INFORMATION.
I
I
1
1
1
9
I
i
I I
"e
V1
8 N
_ of
O
w U
Z
W off'
ra
_ � n
f\ N
CL
X
O
Z
N
V
W
V7
_ Z
Q Z
Qz
u LJ1J ^
L LL
W Q z U
E W r
�N U Q z
wZ
a H— 6 a
° (n W
w
z > U
W QI
6 CJ Un
Vertical Scale:
N/A
11-a-to1 Scale:
1"=to
Sheet No.:
L4

S �
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Office of Land and Water Stewardship
Pat t0cCory Braan Grsrp Donald R. van der Vaart
Grn,ernor DirEctor Secretary
NCNHDE-129
March 26, 2015
Amber Coleman
Stantec
801 Jones Franklin Road
Raleigh, NC 27606
[e-mail]
RE: Grassy Creek Stream Enhancement; 175613065
Dear Amber Coleman:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources from our database that have been compiled for the project referenced
above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary submitted
with your request for information. These results are presented in the attached 'Documented Occurrences'
table and map.
Also attached is a table summarizing rare species and natural communities that have been documented
within a one -mile radius of the project boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that these natural
heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is included for
reference. In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that
we may update our records. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one -mile
radius, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning,
project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory
decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written
notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications.
Maps of NC Natural Heritage Program data may not be redistributed without permission from the NCNHP.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence
if a Dedicated Nature Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), or an occurrence of a Federally -
listed species is documented within or near the project area.
Thank you for your inquiry. If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need
additional assistance, please contact Allison Schwarz Weakley at allison.weakley_&ncdenr.gov or
919.707.8629.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Page 1 of 4

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Grassy Creek Stream Enhancement
Project No. 175613065
March 26, 2015
NCNHDE-129
Element Occurrences Documented Within Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
Date Status
Amphibian 27567 Cryptobranchus Hellbender 2012-08-22 Current 3 -Medium Species of Special G3G4 S3
alleganiensis Concern Concern
Natural Areas Documented Within Project Area
Site Name Representational Rating Collective Rating
North Toe River/Nolichucky River Aquatic Habitat R? (Unranked) C2 (Very High)
No Documented Managed Areas For This Site
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at www.ncnhp.org. Data query generated on March 26, 2015, source: NCNHP, 04 October 2014. Please resubmit your information request if more than
one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 4
i

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Grassy Creek Stream Enhancement
Project No. 175613065
March 26, 2015
NCNHDE-129
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Last
Element Accuracy Federal
State
Global State
Group
Observation
Occurrence Status
Status
Rank Rank
Date
Status
Amphibian 27567
Cryptobranchus
Hellbender
2012-08-22
Current 3 -Medium Species of
Special
G3G4 S3
alleganiensis
Concern
Concern
Dragonfly or 33446
Calopteryx amata
Superb Jewelwing
2004 -PRE
Historical 5 - Very ---
Significantly
G4 S1S2
Damselfly
Low
Rare
Freshwater Fish 15461
Etheostoma acuticeps
Sharphead Darter
2009-02-28
Current 4 - Low Species of
Threatened
G3 S1
Concern
Mammal 32947
Spilogale putorius
Eastern Spotted Skunk
1982 -PRE
Historical 5 - Very ---
Game Animal
G4 S2
Low
Natural 31401
Montane Oak --Hickory
---
Obscure 6- ---
---
G4G5 S4S5
Community
Forest (Acidic Subtype)
Unknown
Natural 31402
Rich Cove Forest
---
Obscure 6- ---
---
G4 S4
Community
(Montane Intermediate
Unknown
Subtype)
Reptile 6308
Crotalus horridus
Timber Rattlesnake
1935-06-28
Historical 4 - Low ---
Special
G4 S3
Concern
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius
of the Project Area
Site Name
Representational Rating
Collective Rating
Grassy Creek Forests
R4 (Moderate)
C5 (General)
North Toe River/Nolichucky River Aquatic Habitat
R? (Unranked)
C2 (Very High)
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name
Owner
Owner Type
Mitchell County Open Space
Mitchell County: multiple local government Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at www.ncnho.ora. Data query generated on March 26, 2015; source: NCNHP, 04 October 2014. Please resubmit your information request if more than
one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 4

NCNHDE-129: Grassy Creek Stream Enhancement
�4
.� I ti � 1. i� +4e,J / � • -. .p
OF -
411
3 .
March 26, 2015 1:25,470
o o
Project Boundary Managed Area (MAREA) .z o.a o.a 1
O0 0.35 0.7 1.4 km
Buffered Project Boundary Sou— Esn, RERE, DeL—. ToMTOT, In'—p mc--nt P Corp.
DNHP Natural Area (NHNA) GEBCO. USGS. FAO. NPS. NRCAN, Ge Base. IGN. Kadaster NL.
Page 4 of 4