NC0065307_Wasteload Allocation_19910923

�ece✓!f �3/�l°Cv) S)!ix7t fe�poff aTt��t�t tAwm : a Wc-ks
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NCO065307 - oo t
PERNff= NAME: Worsley Companies, Inc. / Dixie Boy Truck
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major
Minor
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: 0.004 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
m
Comments:
not yet operational
N� r ^,tTFAu 001 (, ooZ ctMaw6
STREAM INDEX: 18-744611
N. e.
BCE asc�k2yE ro C-ee rsa+c
RECErViNG STREAM: Northeast Cape Fear River
Class: SC -Swamp
Sub -Basin: 03-06-17
Reference USGS Quad: J27SW, Castle Hayne (please attach)
County: New Hanover
Regional Office: Wilmington Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 5/31/91 Treatment Plant Class: I I
Classification changes within three miles:
Changes to SC na Cape Fear ca. 0.7 mi.
Requested by: Jule Shanklin
Prepared by:
Reviewed by: (ZM-4.. V
�ODw 13SC w
WkI%t.
[(\)_ Date: 10/9/90
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
10 0
5 0
Drainage Area (mil ) Avg. Streamflow (cfs): 189 2
7Q10 (cfs) Z4o.3 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) q+ (0 30Q2 (cfs) 157. 7
Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acute/Chronic
Instream Monitoring: L( /��
Parameters n •�. F6 J Gt lr�ViYI ��1 PiA L LQI)(fU L`
Upstream_ Location ' U Ctii'J_0/�160taDownstream Location �01amn Lax./
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BOD5 (mg/1)
-30
30
NH -N (mg/1)
D.O. (mg/1)
`7
TSS (mg/1)
30
F. Col. (/100 ml)
PH (SU)
6.6- .S
�.a-s•S

COMPLIANCE MONITORING
TRANSACTION: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION REPORT - TOTAL PERMIT
OPTION: TRX: 6MP KEY: NC0065307001
NPDES PERMIT NO-- NC0065307 FACILITY------- WORSLEY COMPANIES, INC.
PIPE NO-- 001 FACILITY CLASS- 2
DMR LOC-- E REGION/COUNTY-- 08 / NEW HANOVER
DMR YR/MO-- 8909 9008
START END
REPORT WILL BE PRINTED ON PRINTER-- NRP30
PRESS ENTER TO PRINT REPORT
**** NO DATA FOR DATES REQUESTED ****

COMPLIANCE MONITORING
TRANSACTION: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION REPORT - TOTAL PERMIT
OPTION: TRX: 6MP KEY: NC0065307001
NPDES PERMIT NO-- NC0065307 FACILITY------- WORSLEY COMPANIES, INC.
PIPE NO-- 001 FACILITY CLASS- 2
DMR LOC-- E REGION/COUNTY-- 08 / NEW NANOVER
DMR YR/MO-- 8809 8908
START END
REPORT WILL BE PRINTED ON PRINTER-- NRP30
PRESS ENTER TO PRINT REPORT
**** NO DATA FOR DATES REQUESTED ****

_
^'
^
.
^
GKEX88/MP
88/i6/9i
COMPLIANCE
EVALUATION
ANALYSIS
REPORT
PAGE i
PERMIT-~NC8065387
PIPE-~88i
REPORT
PERIOD:
9807-086
LOC---
E
FACILITY--WOR%LEY
COMPANIES,
INC.
DESIGN FLOW--
^0848
CLASS--2
LOCATION--WILMINGTON
REGION/COUNTY--88
NEW
HANOVER
58858
8808
88538
806i8
31616
58068
00300
000i8
MONTH
Q/MGD
BOD
RE%/T%% NH3+NH4~
FEC COLI
CHLORINE
DO
TEMP
LIMIT F
^8848 F
38^88
F 38^0
NOL
F 1808~8
NOL
F 5108
91/8i
.8025
42^8OF
16^8
25^48
144^8
^488
6^60
91/82
55^78F
38^OF
26^48
^8
^788
6^98
91/83
^8828
62^88F
290
4208
124^8
"608
6,68
91/04
^8828
23^50
13^8
62'i8
67^8
1588
6^78
91/05
^8028
21^58
3^8
3°28
^8
.688
6^88
91/06
^8428F
35^58F
28^8
908
55^0
^388
6,98
AVERAGE
^8i8i
48^83
21^i
28^13
65^8
^516
6^75
-----_,_
MAXIMUM
'8428
62^80
38^0
62^18
i44^8
^788
6^98
--------
MINIMUM
^8828
21^58
3^8
3^28
18
^300
6^68
--------
UNIT
MCD
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
0/iO8ML
MG/L
MG/L
DEG^C

.*^�~
^ ~
. .
GKEX88/MP 08/16/91
COMPLIANCE EVALUATION ANALY%I% REPORT PAGE 2
PERMIT .... .... NCO065307 PIPE .... .... 00i 9007-9106
FACIL%TY.... .... WOR%LEY COMPANIE%, 1)E91GN FLOW-- ^0040 CLASE.... .... 2
LOCATION .... .... WILMINCTON RECION/COUNTY--08 NEW HANOVER
004O0
MONTH PH
LIMIT 8.5 6^8
91/01 7.5-7.2
91/02 7.5-7.0
91/03 7.5--- 7^2
91/04 7.5.... 7.3
91/05 7.5--- 6^8
91/06 7.5.... 7^2
AVERACE ___.... ....
MAXIMUM 7.500
M%NIMUM 6.800
UNIT St.)

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Worseley Co./Dixie Boy Truck
NCO065307-001
Domestic -100%
Existing
Renewal
NE Cape Fear River
SC-Sw
030617
New Hanover
WiRO
J. Shanklin
10/9/90
J27SW
Request #
5901 AUN ;5 C� 1gg1
Pi4,aL!+furl R_�,'�nzl Of5cc
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
est
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
1499
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
26.3
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
94.6
Average Flow (cfs):
1892
30Q2 (cfs):
157.7
IWC (%):
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
WLA has been held due to the facility's stotmwater pipe #002. Facility is currently noncompliant
with respect to BOD5. Per WiRO, outfall 001 and 002 eventually connect to the same pipe and
discharge at the same point.
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
Recommended by:
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment
Regional Supervisor:
Permits & Engineeric
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: SEP 2 ? JK 1

2
Existing L,� imits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Recommended Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
0.004 0.004
30 30
5 5
30 30
6.8-8.5 6.8-8.5
Monthly Average
Summer
Winter WQ or EL
0.004
0.004
30
30 WQ
5
5 WQ
30
30
6.8-8.5 6.8-8.5
X Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

3
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: at least 100 ft upstream
Downstream Location: at least 300 ft downstream
Parameters: D.O., Fecal coliform, temperature, pH
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

Request No.: 5901
WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM ----------
Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Status:
Receiving Stream:
Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Quad:
Wasteflow (mgd):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal coliform (#/100ml):
pH (su) :
Worsley Co./Dixie
NC0065307 - 001
100% Domestic
exist/renew
NE Cape Fear River
SC-Sw
030617
New Hanover
Wilmington
J. Shanklin
10/9/90
J27SW
Boy Truck RECEIVED
JA.N 14 i St
est
Drainage area: 1499 sq mi
Summer 7Q10: 26.30 cfs
Winter 7Q10: 94.60 cfs
Average flow: 1892 cfs
30Q2: 157.70 cfs
MENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS
EXISTING PROPOSED
sum/win sum/win
0.004„ 0.004
30„ 30
5'
30 ✓
6.8-8.5
5
30
Toxicity Testing Req.:
---------------------------- MONITORING ----------------------------------
Monitoring parameters: D.O., Fecal coli, temperature, conductivity
Upstream (Y/N): Y Location: at least 100 ft upstream
Downstream (Y/N): Y Location: at least 300 ft downstream
----------------------------- COMMENTS -----------------------------------
This discharge (001) is an existing/renewal. The facility recently
received an A to C, so no compliance data is available.
Recommend renewal with existing limits.
Dilution ratio is high, so no Fecal limit or NH3-N limit will be applied.
Outfall 001 and 002 eventually connect to the same pipe and discharge at
the same point. The facility should be required to monitor each outfall
separately before the pipes are combined.
------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
Recommended by:
Date: `lo
Reviewed by / Q
Tech Support Supervisor: l 011,Lc� SUC(�10� Date:
Regional Supervisor:
Permits & Engineering:
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SUPPORT BY: —FEB 02 1221
Date:
Date:
2c'Tu/U1 � l0 7E({ SuPPo2T 5A( WiT4 Ntwu

'NICOo653o7
----`N Q, y Co. c.�t7t KtE �zyi iRucr
N.E. CAP&
SC-5vi✓ -
t ew; o-. oo4 M4D I
'Dh=1419�:
'70%= 2-6.3ek
%ltw--q'4.&e&
ro/3t�90
% rN
03oL 17
5Z7-5-�AT
Lim UP5T28AM
Wo25L6Y oN N.E.. Corr FSHz
� 's µERtaF[Na C4ePrJ_.9-Msn)
o 77m •Es HNp NO2)It Q1HSe 1•D/Y5 D)
�rr� �srcc
QEff'= �.QNY17
NSrn14— DHH1Nn4t-O�kE� r17 (l7 0� l`j�f M�Z �~ 2tv8(o(9 _ �7Z� FcDws AT
5 r E57[Fevti _p2ta8��vo_ '_25`;f- -- -
Ra✓c
9v ttf_
j D,A. = 1499 M: 3ogz= /9045
iQy _ --x 14.il Z/"3 as
7vto„_ i4 )x_1499-94.6A
1499 = (57• jc�s
6- 00, IS&(le"EV.,-- - sr_l�zcz) AT�_C
�tscr%A25t wZ �S_t'�C�gs� Sr �+wnTEe� Nico R�c�/ve STAnIDA2D Sre,en� w.rrt2 /��aMc7c�s

rrm
IJcoO(, S 3 U%
Wogs,-E Co. Tye- Axte goy Tl ucg- to/71/50
S.j W
lV L CAPE FEA.2 P4 ✓t /L O 30(o 17
"SF, _ 5vr SZZ7 SvV
L(_D(A &$L& 1 l So No Nkl-4 Al LIA4 ( r
£ PrP.,Qh0,�5 klA Q oAg Fpg -rdr S pJ Nor TAB /NTo 4l.CouNT QN y uPsr A,,&i
o/Z Apvvw ski SINcr ik&Y lyr' A L,4zAo `9 .&E c s t vEo
AQ4 d 1-0 C . 7tl�Y W/LL Gkr E)(I1i77� 1,0117-S.
/lib l eC�L Wlk 1 r-
�IZ
—.� Co �► �+ �� �'1,,����1P D /.1r,��yo�F �A G L l TI �5
I / o - -rtL" V(--- Ab7 2ECFA/F" j�? s� ArF per Our EP 8 c «
-jIAr TjaE a7-FIl U 5 (x t t o o Z) Cp/� Sri �.�p 4a To &Je Pr SCWA24 �
?o(N i , l ���c,LT_y u1 r� Be P6911 f VC-2 %y SAMPI C
_�— I116� ?IS

Request No.: 5902
------------------- WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM -----------
Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Status:
Receiving Stream:
Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Quad:
Worsley Co./Dixie Boy Truck
NC0065307 - 002
100% Industrial
Proposed/New
NE Cape Fear River
SC-Sw
030617
New Hanover
WiRO
J. Shanklin
10/9/90
J27SW
Drainage area:
Summer 7Q10:
Winter 7Q10:
Average flow:
30Q2:
RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS
est
1499 sq mi
26.30 cfs
94.60 cfs
1892 cfs
157.70 cfs
PROPOSED
mon avg daily max
Wasteflow (mgd) : NA{t2fZ��
Oil and Grease (mg/, l),: 30 60
Settleable solids Turbidity ( (NTU) :� 0.10 050 50
pH (su) 6.8-8.5
Toxicity Testing Req.: Acute, 24hr fathead test (first 5 events, then
annually)
----------------------------- COMMENTS -----------------------------------
Discharge is storm water runoff. Limits and monitoring
requirements per SOP. All volumes of wastewater leaving the facility
should be monitored. If continuous monitoring is not feasible, then dis-
charger shall record appx. time that discharge began and ended, along with
the instantaneous flow at the time of effluent sampling.
Recommend monitoring for the attached list of parameters on the same
schedule as the toxicity test. Monitoring and tox samples (grab) should
be taken at the same time, within 24hrs of beginning of the discharge
event. A reopener clause should be placed in the permit to allow for
limits to be placed on toxicants should the whole eff tox test indicate
toxic effects.
As per outfall 001, sampling should take place before outfall 001 and 002
are combined.
Recommended by: a d, �. p'y� Date: 1/719,.
Reviewed by Ye 60;4u lid /rco/rco
Tech Support Supervisor: CaraCG�q�@/VtGPP�pg� �, Date: 1(0 �-6
Regional Supervisor: Date:
Permits & Engineering:
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SUPPORT BY: FEB 14 1991
Date:

11/89
Facility Name !*' w5y a &Y 1 C.. Permit # NCoob530*7 — 002
ACUTE TOXICITY TESTING REQUIREMENT
Fathead Minnow 24 hr - Monitoring (Annual) for Episodic Events
The permittee shall conduct FIVE acute toxicity tests using protocols defined as definitive in
E.P.A. Document 600/4-85/013 entitled "The Acute Toxicity of Effluents to Freshwater and
Marine Organisms". The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow (Pimephales
promelas) 24 hour static test, using effluent collected as a single grab sample. Effluent samples
for self -monitoring purposes must be obtained below all waste treatment. Sampling and
subsequent testing will occur during the first five discrete discharge events after the effective date
of this permit. After monitoring of the first five toxicity tests, the permittee will conduct one test
annually, with the annual period beginning in January of the next calendar year. The annual test
requirement must be performed and reported by June 30. If no discharge occurs by June 30,
notification will be made to the Division by this date. Toxicity testing will be performed on the
next discharge event for the annual test requirement.
The parameter code for this test is TAE6C. All toxicity testing results required as part of this
permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Form (MR-1) for the month in which it
was performed, using the appropriate parameter code. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is
to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North -
Carolina Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream,
this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test.
Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10 26.3 cfs
Permitted Flow MGD
IWC%
Basin & Sub -Basin 03ot. t`j CGPF 1�
Receiving Stream A E . eaort F" R_ .__R___.
County dkdovvffL
Recommended by:
b. -
**Acute Toxicity(Fathead Minnow 24 hr) Monitoring, EPISODIC, -See Part 3 , Condition.

Monitoring List for Petroleum Contaminated Effluent
(Chemicals should be monitored by an EPA approved method equivalent to
detection levels obtainable by Methods 601 and 602 or better)
*Benzene
Dibromoethane (EDB)
1,2-Dichloroethane
*Ethylbenzene
Isopropyl ether
Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)
*Toluene
*Xylenes
(Chemicals to be monitored using an EPA approved method equivalent to the
detection levels obtainable by Method 625 or better)
Phenol
Naphthalene
* These parameters must be monitored to a detection level of 1 µg/I.

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.. NCO065307 - oo2
PERMlTTEE NAME: Worsley Companies, Inc. / Dixie Boy Truck
Facility Status: Proposed
Permit Status: - NW
Major
Pipe No.: 002
Design Capacity:
Minor q
* MGD
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
11 ".
1
It : u 1►I� 1
RECEIVING STREAM: Northeast Cape Fear River
Class: SC -Swamp
Sub -Basin: 03-06-17
Reference USGS Quad: J27SW, Castle Hayne (please attach)
County: New Hanover
Regional Office: Wilmington Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 00/00/00 Treatment Plant Class: 0
Classification changes within three miles:
Changes to SC (a Cie Fear ca. 0.7 mi.
Requested by: Jule Shanklin
nreuared by:
sewed by:NA
CUL i
I — Date: 10/9/90
Date:
Date. 4 �!
EL
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
Vos
to z o
^ o
Drainage � (mi ) I4,0L9 Avg. Streamflow (cfs): 118Q 2-
7Q10 (cfs) y&, 3 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 94. G 30Q2 (cfs) 1 57,
Toxicity Limits: IWC
Instream Monitoring:
% Acute/Chronic
Parameters
Upstream Location
Downstream Location
Effluent
Characteristics
-- MorITHf y
PA) �-J
BOD5 (m )
NH3-N (mg/1)
D.O. (mg/1)
TSS (mg/1)
4
F. Col. (/100 nil)
pH(SU)
Comments: , P4 Aomo 3�15/g2 New $of' FoR S*tZ/n WAT-Ea .
��

i:. ,: - DATE:��
t COMPUTED
€. JOB: GJo z5 %r — —
CHECKED BY: IP'•_ DATE:
DESCRIPTION: r'r_cr. r-�a'� ,.pri i-1 chec� o ui 12
IZ
$ 12u I Gy.J,U
Gnu 1
�•NGCKV4LV fj
y
Czeo')
Z Ld-9 z-
o(.1
SEP.
C
Av4• UISG:+AILCZ<
('E4K �`SU^ns=liE
DOSIIJCt VULV✓IE
��GLC TINE;
AVM e" -
1•LoLO hfs)
C n,.nv.kc �t5ci`w�c c R,�'a
VclouEh fafcc mcakAS
to 1es ? z FPs ,i < 9.0 (os
90.0 Gin
ZOO GAL
43 rn `^ z d4..i, =•n f5 i Cl riuv�.
? 1V tN
I-( mlh
ICO �ZPr"�
Richard Catlin & Associates, Inc.
III
_.. _.......,wJI I RC&A
m

., • --
'e

-J _
Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Worseley Co./Dixie Boy Truck
NCO065307 - ooz-
Industrial - 100%
Proposed
New
NE Cape Fear River
SC-Sw
030617
New Hanover
WiRO
J. Shanklin
10/9/90
J27SW
Request #
5902
AUG `-S019
`4totggbn Renton: f
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
na
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
1499
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
26.3
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
94.6
Average Flow (cfs):
1892
30Q2 (cfs):
157.7
IWC M:
cn
rm
a
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
This facility discharges runoff from small fuel storage/transfer area. This facility is-Sasically a
large truck stop. Technical Support concurs with WiRO's recommendation to delete toxicity
testing requirement and the organics testing. [ref. 5/15/91 memo from A. Preston oward].
However, Tech Support suggests a grab sample be taken of the facility's effluent, perhaps
annually, to test for toxicty (in-houseohould the facility show acute toxicity, organics
monitoring would then be required. LL,. w<< two? 4,
WLA was held due to question in SOP regarding these types of facilities.
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
Recommended by:
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment:
Regional Supervisor;L
Permits & Engineering:
Sv ,
C,
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: SFr 25 1- 1
4/1 - S&t4e wrrk (a> QEGk- `4 TL-D NtM we11b 41D WITH Neu? So rvF— T4ts.
� YR MoNITo2tu4
?1 6 1b N6 CAME kAZ- lUo Tu2B1iDrTy QE�Aj(LEn1T

2
TOXICS
Recommended Limits Monthly Average Daily Max. Mon. Frea WO/EL
pH (SU): 6.8-8.5 2/mon
Oil & Grease (mg/1): 30 60 2/mon
(See page three for special monitoring requirments.)
The following parameter(s) are water quality limited:
For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate receiving water will be
consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional
dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
X_ No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR CONDITIONS
As stated above, periodic toxicity testing is recommended. Should the facility's effluent exhibit
toxic effects, then organics monitoring and toxicity testing may be reinstated into the permit.
WASTELOAD SENT TO EPA? (Major) N (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how wasteload fits into basinwide plan.)
Additional Information attached? N_ (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

i
Co.�
SC-5vi✓
N
R
WOKSLEY �.
14P+t= ZB-3es
lqhry :199zcf5
'K Itw= 9'4.(o ds
QEff - a-Q 1NCj72
C. oef7
J z-75uV
%�� /+Li:S UPST2L.CM
Wong (-<:Y an/ N.L. (nrc FEAR
µ�.PccF fAJA fQLtF
Fra.-�No¢.i,�CrIPSe /7ir I.�Ny D>
us/n14-�RxrAA4�_Ji�, F AT ,!/7 0: /499A;' ("2r'-LDws 4.7
s
QZ(O$(clqDv �trj - Z-&c�S
PAJo = (ate r�s
701Gw : `IP r!s
p.A.
�iScnq.L, 7Gto� ° : 2c\i x 109
71 Do i4z6� 1499
so
3uQZ= _ InZvI' i49a _ 157.jcis
lCb,'Z ..is
DfScKViGCri% 001 /I65.r2V6li A -1„
�l6C/%424 it CV Z fy _ P20170.5cD n/A7['L-') wfLG /Lc-Lt/VE
pee W6A1T ar Tq62 IZFColkaEAI>,A7(oAl of WOO 10 PE72JU(T 71415', FAClu7y Fat.

z5AW
_ o3o(ci7
TZ7 SVV
-#QDZ Q,y� _� S�ulvh 4KT�2)
--bK 60 / , n( -A
wiu gr� APPueO
Tdf PLiAou-4 4UKTr%ioADFPE '6414 PP a/or rA96 INTO ACcauvl- 41'y aPsrztA.+I _
02 wpvw-T&zAr /�.SC/A�r6¢S SfNcg TH6Z'V6 ALJ"Ael &C-GEIVEO
,-dak 4 Tc Cr ilFy yul 4F.r FXlCiTmy, GI/YtIT$
/b <cAt, Llik I i
.._ Lo1L � �O'L �STok+" W/ITC�L- 2uNo FG F/!OM OrV li O SEr�f12A7D27 _
— -J/7/4o -. _SStt.G1(A.lt- ^bi _ � C�d!£J ST4 F.. P-Aoer-1�K7�1�—
I F = 7/Je O✓ lf.+GAS _(oJ 5-ooZ�--eclpe[14E-- ��°--T, oiJE DiSC//A�E
'Orr1J% %�l€. F('�I(-IIY WrGc. t3F ,€ QU,L'£ %o _5�m Lo,
0 AjiLAIA4 P)i New -fills WL'FORA U�VnL 5 g1. A,u"VO (T u/Js(4Ale:6
we—r4 M6M0 &- 94APrAly AtR 50 Vv4 STv¢/k 4,0 2uVoGF FAC/Lf77ES,

To: Permits and Engineering Unit
g g ,.
Water Quality Section
Date: September 27, 1991
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
County: New Hanover
Permit No. NCO065307
Review Engineer: Jule S anklin
E "VE
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION IDi
OCT
0 1 1991
1. Facility and Address:
Dixie Boy P Truck Stop w NCAL SUPPORT BRANCI'�
Jct . U.S. Hwys . 421 and 117
Worsley Companies, Inc.
Post Office Box 3227 `
Wilmington, North Carolina 28406
2. Date of Investigation: September 26, 1991
3. Report Prepared by: Edward Beck
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number:
Don Quinn
[phone]
5. Directions to Site: Located on the west side of The Cape
Fear River near Wilmington at the intersection of US HWY 421
and the HWY 117/133 bridge over the river.
6. Discharge Point: Latitude: 340 15' 10"
Longitude: 770 57' 06"
USGS Quad Sheet: Castle Hayne
7. Size: The site is approximately 2 acres with little area
for expansion.
8. Topography: Flat, filled marsh adjacent to tidal river.
9. Location of nearest dwelling: No dwellings other than truck
stop within 500 ft.

10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters:
Northeast Cape Fear River
a. Classification: Class SC swamp water (Proposed HOW)
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: 03-06-17
C. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent
downstream uses: Shipping and commercial .and sport
fishing.
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. Type of wastewater: 80% Domestic
20% Industrial
a. Volume of Wastewater: 0.004 MGD (Domestic waste)
0.0009 MGD (stormwater)
b. Types and quantities of industrial wastewater:
Stormwater collected from covered fuel bay area
C. Prevalent toxic constituents in wastewater:
Dissolved petroleum constituents
d. Pretreatment Program
in development: approved:
should be required: not needed:.<
2. Production rates in pounds per day: NA
3. Description of industrial process and applicable CFR Part
and Subpart:
4. Type of treatment: (existing) A 1500 gal grease trap, 30GPM
pump station, 4,000 GPD secondary package consisting of an
aeration basin, clarifier, aerated sludge holding, tablet
chlorinator, chlorine contact tank, flow recorder, effluent
pump station. The stormwater treatment system consists of a
1000 gal oil/water seperator, a pump station and force main
which connects to the effluent outfall line.
5. Sludge handling and disposal scheme: No sludge has been
disposed of yet. The company plans to obtain approval to
take sludge to an approved land disposal site. They have
been told to submit an application immediately.
6. Treatment plant classification: Class II.
7. SIC Code: 5541
Wastewater Code(s):Primary 10 Secondary 37
Main Treatment Unit Code: 060 3

PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grants
Funds? no
2. Special monitoring requests: Instream monitoring would not
be meaningfull and should not be required
3. Additional effluent limits requests:
4. Other:
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This small volume discharge should have little impact on the
receiving waters if it meets existing secondary effluent limits.
The company has installed catch basins and an oil/water separator
to collect stormwater in the vicinity of the covered fuel bays in
an attempt to improve the quality of stormwater leaving the site.
It is recommended that effluent limits and monitoring
requirements be placed in the permit for oil and grease. No
toxicity testing or chemicals scans should be required.
It is recommended that a permit be drafted for reissuance
and placed at public notice. If there is no significant
opposition it is recommended that the permit be reissued for a
period of five years.
Signature of Report Preparer
`--Pater Quality Regional Supervisor
2
Date
EB:NC65307.SEP
cc: Wilmington Regional Files
Technical Support Branch,
Central Files

,�o
5, US
, ll�A "�7
. V
Rik,
Rk
V, A
Sol
j!"
ce. 11
7
RADi
L: TOWE
;A. r
WN -10
LA
V
PAW
A A
l�
4,
K*
.-tMUDDY—i
PT
14; LU
40
0
r
i(TH CAROU,
- A evv,� o i
� 2. [�.
4mr t
fw4
WAIM"IN
IM I
MR.
, -24
71