The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About090203_Routine_202302230 Division of Water Resources ❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number: 090203 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS090203 ❑ Denied Access Inactive Or Closed Date: County: Bladen Date of Visit: 02/23/2023 Entry Time: 09:00 am Exit Time: 12:00 pm Farm Name: Mr. Holmes Sites #1 - #14, #1 7, #18, Blueberry Sow, Blac Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Mailing Address: PO Box 487 Physical Address: 2313 Mr Holmes Farm Rd Region: Fayetteville Incident #: Owner Email: Phone: 910-296-1800 Warsaw NC 283980487 Garland NC 28441 Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC Location of Farm: Latitude: 34' 49' 09" Longitude: 78' 32' 41" From the intersections of NC 242 and SR 1002 in Ammon, go 2.0 miles north on NC 242 to farm entrance on right Question Areas: Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application Records and Documents Other Issues Certified Operator: William Victor Sutton Operator Certification Number: 26076 Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Mike Cudd On -site representative Mike Cudd Primary Inspector: Steve Guyton Phone: 910-433-3300 Inspector Signature: Date: Secondary Inspector(s): Inspection Summary: 9. fix leaks at 3081 and clean up sludge around barn and in containment Clean up sludge at 3096 at back of house and seed area of repair on containment. clean up sludge at barn 3085. This has been a ongoing issue at this farm with waste leaking from barns and going to secondary containments which waste is recovered and put in lagoons, The barns with chronic leaks need to be fixed as soon as possible, you can not continue to allow these barns to chronicly leak waste outside of the designed waste collection system. Page 1 of 5 Permit: AWS090203 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 090203 Inspection Date: 02/23/23 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Regulated Operations Swine Design Capacity Current promotions Swine - Farrow to Wean 3,350 3,350 Swine - Feeder to Finish 64,680 64,680 Swine - Wean to Feeder 10,600 10,600 Waste Structures Type Identifier Total Design Capacity: 78,630 Total SSLW: 10,500,350 Effective Built Closed Designated Observed Date Date Date Freeboard Freeboard Lagoon 2004 AMMON NUR 11/03/2005 D1/01/1993 29.00 60.00 Lagoon 2042 BLUEBERRY NUF 03/08/2005 D1/01/1998 19.80 36.00 Lagoon 2106 11/03/2005 01/01/1993 20.00 40.00 Lagoon 3081 11/03/2005 D1/01/1993 27.70 35.00 Lagoon 3082 11/03/2005 10/01/2019 33.00 46.00 Lagoon 3084 11/03/2005 D1/01/1993 20.00 24.00 Lagoon 3086 11/03/2005 01/01/1993 19.80 58.00 Lagoon 3088 10/03/2005 D1/01/1993 32.00 55.00 Lagoon 3090 11/03/2005 01/01/1993 32.00 55.00 Lagoon 3092 11/03/2005 D1/01/1993 32.00 49.00 Lagoon 3093 11/03/2005 01/01/1993 30.00 56.00 Lagoon 3096 11/03/2005 D1/01/1993 32.00 39.00 Lagoon 4205 06/14/2005 01/01/1993 27.60 55.00 Lagoon HOLMES 1 03/08/2005 10/01/2019 Lagoon HOLMES 10&11 03/08/2005 10/01/2019 Lagoon HOLMES 12&13 03/08/2005 10/01/2019 Lagoon HOLMES 14 03/08/2005 10/01/2019 Lagoon HOLMES 17&18 03/08/2005 10/01/2019 Lagoon HOLMES 2&3 03/08/2005 10/01/2019 Lagoon HOLMES 4&5 03/08/2005 10/01/2019 Lagoon HOLMES 6&7 03/08/2005 10/01/2019 Lagoon HOLMES 8&9 03/08/2005 10/01/2019 Lagoon NURSERY 06/14/2005 01/01/1993 08/23/2005 1 21.60 Page 2 of 5 Permit: AWS090203 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: Inspection Date: 02/23/23 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: 090203 Routine Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Discharge originated at: Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other ❑ a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ larc ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ ❑ ❑ waste management or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicablE ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? Waste Application Yes No NA NE 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? ❑ Hydraulic Overload? ❑ Frozen Ground? ❑ Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ PAN? ❑ Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑ Total Phosphorus? ❑ Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑ Evidence of wind drift? ❑ Application outside of application area? ❑ Crop Type 1 Corn, Wheat, Soybeans Page 3 of 5 Permit: AWS090203 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 090203 Inspection Date: 02/23/23 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Waste Application Yes No NA NE Crop Type 2 Small Grain Cover Crop Type 3 Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Oats) Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Croatan muck, frequently flooded Soil Type 2 Foreston loamy sand Soil Type 3 Torhunta mucky sandy loam Soil Type 4 Leon sand, 0 to 3% slopes Soil Type 5 Woodington loamy sand Soil Type 6 Pantego loam 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Records and Documents Yes No NA NE 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? ❑ Checklists? ❑ Design? ❑ Maps? ❑ Lease Agreements? ❑ Other? ❑ If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? ❑ Weekly Freeboard? ❑ Waste Analysis? ❑ Soil analysis? ❑ Waste Transfers? ❑ Weather code? ❑ Rainfall? ❑ Page 4 of 5 Permit: AWS090203 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: Inspection Date: 02/23/23 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: 090203 Routine Records and Documents Yes No NA NE Stocking? ❑ Crop yields? ❑ 120 Minute inspections? ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey ❑ 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ❑ ❑ 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipmen ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ (NPDES only)? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ appropriate box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 2106,3081,3082,3096 12-8-2022 308610-26-2022 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Other Issues Yes No NA NE 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit % ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Application Field ❑ Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑ Other ❑ If Other, please specify 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ CAW M P? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Page 5 of 5