20230733 Ver 1_7627.3_Penny Road_PCN_5.15.2023-compressed__20230522

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID#: SAW- 2023- Begin Date (Date Received): 5.22.23
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Evolve at Deep River
2. Work Type: ❑Private ❑Institutional ❑Government ❑Commercial
3. Project Description/Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
The site contains a single-family residence,agricultural out-buildings,fields and wooded land. The site is proposed for multi-family
residential development.
4. Property Owner/Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A41: MPW High Point, LLC & MCFT High Point, LLC
5. Agent/Consultant [PNC Form A5 —or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Michael Brame/Pilot Environmental, Inc.
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location—Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
2725 Highway 68 South
36.0372890/-79.9647060
8. Project Location—Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: 7813437884, 7813439314 and 7813438409
9. Project Location—County [PCN Form A2b]: Guilford
10. Project Location—Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: High Point
11. Project Information—Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: East Fork Deep River
12. Watershed/ 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Rocky/03040105
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ✓❑ Section 10 and 404 ❑
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit ❑Pre-Application Request
Nationwide Permit# ❑Unauthorized Activity
Regional General Permit# ❑Compliance
Jurisdictional Determination Request ❑No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

Office Use Only
Corps Action ID no. SAW-2023- Date received: 5/22/2023
' _ DWR project no. [Click enter.] Date received: 5/22/2023
Site Coordinates:
•:'_ Latitude (DD.DDDDDD): 36.037289'
NOW"GAQCXJNA Longitude(DD.DDDDDD): -79.964706'
ofQ"iwn� rw " Form Version 1.5, September 2020
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
(Ver. 1.5, September 2020)
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits and corresponding Water Quality Certifications
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk* are required. The form is not considered complete until all mandatory
questions are answered.
The online help file may be found at this link:
https:Hedocs.deg.nc.gov/WaterResources/O/edoc/624704/PCN%2OHelp%20File`/`202018-1-30.pdf
The help document may be found at this link:
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RequlatorV-Perm it-Program/Permits/2017-Nationwide-Perm its/Pre-
construction-Notification/
Before submitting this form, please ensure you have submitted the Pre-Filing Meeting Request Form as DWR will not be
able to accept your application without this important first step. The Pre-Filing Meeting Request Form is used to satisfy 40
C.F.R. Section 121.4(a)which states"At least 30 days prior to submitting a certification request, the project proponent shall
request a pre-filing meeting with the certifying agency." In accordance with 40 C.F.R. Section 121.5(b)(7), and (c)(5), all
certification requests must include documentation that a pre-filing meeting request was submitted to the certifying authority
at least 30 days prior to submitting the certification request.
Attach documentation of Pre-Filing Meeting Request to this Application.
Date of Pre-filing Meeting Request(MM/DD/YYYY) *: 3/3/2021
DWR ID# Click to enter. Version Click to enter. (If applicable)
A. Processing Information
County (counties)where project is located: * Guilford County
Is this a public transportation project? *
(Publicly funded municipal, state, or federal road, rail, ❑ Yes N No
or airport project)
Is this a NCDOT project? * ❑ Yes N No
If yes, NCDOT TIP or state project number: Click to enter.
If yes, NCDOT WBS number: * Click to enter.
N Section 404 Permit(wetlands, streams, waters,
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: * Clean Water Act)
❑ Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal
waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Page 1 of 22 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

❑x Nationwide Permit(NWP)
1 b. Permit type(s)? * ❑ Regional General Permit(RGP)
❑ Standard (IP)
This form may be used to initiate the standard/individual permit process with the USACE. Please contact your Corps
representative concerning submittals for standard permits. All required items can be included as separate attachments
and submitted with this form.
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? * ❑ Yes ❑x No
NWP number(s): NWP 29
RGP number(s): Click to enter.
1 d. Type(s)of approval sought from the DWR (check all that apply):
❑x 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification— Express
❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
❑ Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: * ❑ Yes ❑x No
For the record only for Corps Permit: * ❑ Yes ❑x No
1f. Is this an after-the-fact permit/certification application? * ❑ Yes ❑x No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for ❑ Yes ❑x No
mitigation of impacts?
If yes, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program.
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? * ❑ Yes ❑x No
1 i. Is the project located within an NC DCM Area of Environmental ❑ Yes ❑x No ❑ Unknown
Concern (AEC)? *
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed? * ❑ Yes ❑x No
If yes, you must attach a copy of the approval letter from the appropriate Wildlife Resource Commission Office.
Trout information may be found at this link: http://www.saw.usace.army.miI/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Program/Agency-Coordination/Trout.aspx
Page 2 of 22 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

B. Applicant Information
1 a. Who is the primary contact? * John McDonald
1 b. Primary Contact Email: * [e-mail]
1 c. Primary Contact Phone: * (###)###-#### [phone]
1 d. Who is applying for the permit/certification? * (check ❑ Owner 0 Applicant (other than owner)
all that apply)
1 e. Is there an agent/consultant for this project?* ® Yes ❑ No
2. Landowner Information
2a. Name(s)on Recorded Deed: * MPW High Point, LLC&MCFT High Point, LLC TIP
2b. Deed Book and Page No.: Click to enter.
2c. Responsible Party(for corporations): Mike Winstead
2d. Address*
Street Address: 2918-A Martinsville Road
Address line 2: Click to enter.
City: Greensboro
State/ Province/ Region: North Carolina
Postal/Zip Code: 27408
Country: United States
2e. Telephone Number: * (###)###-#### [phone]
2f. Fax Number: (###)###-#### Click to enter
2g. Email Address: * [e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name: John McDonald
3b. Business Name (if applicable): Evolve Construction, LLC
3c. Address:
Street Address: 2918-A Martinsville Road
Address line 2: ClicK to enter.
City: Greensboro
State/ Province/ Region: NC
Postal/Zip Code: 27408
Country United States
3d. Telephone Number: * (###)###-#### [phone]
3e Fax Number: (###)###-#### Click to enter.
Page 3 of 22 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

3f. Email Address: * [e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant(if applicable)
4a. Name: * Michael T. Brame
4b. Business Name: Pilot Environmental, Inc.
4c. Address: *
Street Address: 743 Park Lawn Court
Address line 2: Click to enter.
City: Kernersville
State/ Province/Region: NC
Postal/Zip Code: 27284
Country: U.S.
4d. Telephone Number: * (###)###-#### [phone]
4e Fax Number: (###)###-#### Click to enter.
4f. Email Address: * [e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter:*
Attach a completed/signed agent authorization form or letter. A sample form may be found at this link:
https://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Perm it-Program/Permits/2017-Nationwide-Permits/Pre-
construction-Notification/
Page 4 of 22 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1 a. Name of project: * Evolve at Deep River
1 b. Subdivision name (if appropriate): Evolve at Deep River
1c. Nearest municipality/town: * High Point, NC
2. Project Identification
2a. Property identification number(tax PIN or parcel ID): 7813438910-000, 7813438409-000&7813439314-000
2b. Property size (in acres): 17.5
2c. Project Address:
Street Address: 2725 Highway 68 South
Address line 2: Click to enter.
City: High Point
State/ Province/ Region: NC
Postal/Zip Code: 27265
Country: U.S.
2d. Site coordinates in decimal degrees (using 4-6 digits Latitude (DD.DDDDDD): * 36.037289'
after the decimal point): * Longitude (-DD.DDDDDD): *--79.964706°
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: * East Fork Deep River
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving WS IV*
water: *
The Surface Water Classification map may be found at this link:
https://ncdenr.maps.arcqis.com/apps/webappviewer/i ndex.html?id=6e l 25ad7628f494694e259c8Odd64265
3c. In what river basin(s) is your project located?
Cape Fear
Choose additional (if needed)
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is 030300030102
located: *
The Find Your HUC map may be found at this link:
https://ncdenr.maps.arcgis.com/apps/PublicInformation/index.htmI?appid=ad3a85aOc6d644aOb97cd069db238ac3
Page 5 of 22 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of
this application: *
Two single-family residences and several out-buildings including storage sheds and barns are located
on the eastern portion of the site. A sewer line easement is located on the western portion of the
site. The remainder of the site contains wooded land and maintained fields. The site is located in a
commercial area of High Point.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this ❑ Yes ❑x No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
4c. If yes, please give the DWR Certification number and/or Corps SAW-2023-
Action ID (ex. SAW-0000-00000): jClick to enter.]
Attach any pertinent project history documentation
4d. Attach an 8'/z x 11"excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of
the project site.
4e. Attach an 8'/2 x 11"excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map
depicting the project site.
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the 0.323 acres
property:
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent 1,454 linear feet
and perennial)on the property:
4g1. List the total estimated acreage of all existing open waters on the Click to enter. acres
property:
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a 264 unit apartment complex on the site.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: *
The overall project includes the construction of an apartment complex. In order to facilitate the proposed development
and construct the roads necessary to construct and access the apartment complex, it is necessary to impact two
streams and wetlands on the site. To facilitate the development of the site, clearing and grading the site is necessary.
Graders, haulers, excavators and other heavy equipment will be used during grading and construction of the site.
4j. Attach project drawings/site diagrams/depictions of impact areas for the proposed project.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or in ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
proposed impact areas?
Comments:
The site was delineated by Pilot Environmental in February 2022 (Pilot Project 7627, report dated February 28, 2022).
The site has not been verified by the USACE or the NCDEQ-DWR.
Name (if known): Catherine Carston
5b. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Pilot Environmental
Other: Click to enter.
5c. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, ❑ Preliminary ❑ Approved ❑ Emailed Concurrence
what type of determination was made? * ❑x Not Verified ❑ Unknown
Corps AID number(ex. SAW-0000-00000): SAW—2023-
Page 6 of 22 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

5d. List the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determination or State determination if a determination was made by
either agency.
Click to enter.
5d1. Attach jurisdictional determinations.
Page 7 of 22 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ❑x No
6b. If yes, explain.
The site is a proposed single phase development. There are no plans for future phases. Additionally, there are
no roads stubbed onto additional areas for future phases.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permit(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize
any part of the proposed project or related activity? This includes other separate and distant crossings for linear
projects that require Department of the Army authorization but don't require pre-construction notification.
No other permits are intended to be used.
Page 8 of 22 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
❑x Wetlands ❑x Streams-tributaries
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project ❑x Buffers ❑ Open Waters
(check all that apply):
❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, complete this table for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2a1. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. 2g.
Site#* Impact Impact Wetland Name* Wetland Type* Forested Jurisdiction Impact Area
Reason/Type* Duration* ?* Type* (ac)*
W1 Fill (Incl. Permanent WA Bottomland Yes Both 0.061
Riprap) Hardwood
Forest
W2 Fill (Incl. Permanent WB Bottomland Yes Both 0.002
Riprap) Hardwood
Forest
W3 Fill (Incl. Permanent WC Bottomland Yes Both 0.003
Riprap) Hardwood
Forest
W4 Fill (Incl. Permanent WD Bottomland Yes Both 0.010
Riprap) Hardwood
Forest
W5 Fill (Incl. Permanent WE Bottomland Yes Both 0.004
Riprap) Hardwood
Forest
W6 Choose one Temp/ Click to enter Choose one Y/N Choose one Click to
Perm enter
2g1. Total temporary wetland impacts Click to enter. ac
2g2. Total permanent wetland impacts 0.08 ac
2g3. Total wetland impacts 0.08 ac
2h. Comments:
Permanent wetland impacts W1, W2, W3 and W4 are associated with proposed roads that will provide access to the
site. The impacts include the associated grading limits to bring the roads up to grade, head walls and end walls and
associated rip rap to be placed as fill. Permanent Impact W5 is associated with fill from a slope associated with the
building pad for apartment building#2.
Page 9 of 22 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream/tributary impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site,
complete this table for all stream/tributary sites impacted.
**All Perennial or Intermittent streams must be verified by DWR or delegated local government
3a. 3b. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. 3h.
Site#* Impact Reason/ Impact Stream Name* Stream Jurisdiction Stream Width Impact length
Type* Duration* Type* Type* (avg ft) * (linear ft)
S1 Crossing/Culvert Permanent SA Perennial Both 5 62
S2 Fill (Intl. Riprap) Permanent SA Perennial Both 5 30
S3 Dewatering Temporary SA Perennial Both 5 5
S4 Crossing/Culvert Permanent SA Perennial Both 5.7 93
S5 Fill (Incl. Riprap) Permanent SA Perennial Both 5.7 30
S6 Dewatering Temporary SA Perennial Both 5.7 10
S7 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter
S8 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter
S9 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter
S10 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter
S11 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter
S12 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter
S13 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter
S14 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter
S15 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter
3i1. Total jurisdictional ditch impact: Click to enter. linear ft
3i2. Total permanent stream impacts: 215 linear ft
M. Total temporary stream impacts: 15 linear ft
34. Total stream and ditch impacts: 230 linear ft
3j. Comments:
Crossing 1 -The culvert/head walls and end walls will impact 0.0071 acres of stream channel. The rip rap will
impact 0.0034 acres of stream channel. The pump around will temporarily impact 0.0006 acres of stream
channel.
Crossing 2 -The culvert/head walls and end walls will impact 0.0122 acres of stream channel. The rip rap will
impact 0.0039 acres of stream channel. The pump around will temporarily impact 0.0013 acres of stream
channel.
Page 10 of 22 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other
open water of the U.S., individually list all open water impacts in the table below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. 4e1. 4f.
Site#* Impact Reason/ Impact Waterbody Name* Waterbody Jurisdiction Impact area (ac)*
Type* Duration* Type* Type*
01 Choose one Temp/ Click to enter. Choose one Choose one Click to enter.
Perm
02 Choose one Temp/ Click to enter. Choose one Choose one Click to enter.
Perm
03 Choose one Temp/ Click to enter. Choose one Choose one Click to enter.
Perm
04 Choose one Temp/ Click to enter. Choose one Choose one Click to enter.
Perm
4g. Total temporary open water impacts Click to enter. ac
4g. Total permanent open water impacts Click to enter. ac
4g. Total open water impacts Click to enter. ac
4h. Comments:
Open water impacts are not proposed.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction is proposed, complete the table below. (*This does NOT include offline stormwater
management ponds.)
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Pond ID Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (ac) Stream Impacts (ft) Upland
# purpose of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Impacts (ac)
P1 Choose one Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to
enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. enter.
P2 Choose one Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to
enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. enter.
5f. Total Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to
enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. enter.
5g. Comments:
Pond or lake construction is not proposed.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, permit ID no.: Click to enter.
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): Click to enter.
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): Click to enter.
5k. Method of construction:
Click to enter.
Page 11 of 22 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

6. Buffer Impacts (DWR requirement)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. Individually list all buffer impacts.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Catawba
6a. Project is in which protected basin(s)? ❑ Jordan ❑ Goose Creek ❑x Randleman
* (Check all that apply.)
❑ Other: Click to enter.
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Site#* Impact Type* Impact Duration* Stream Name* Buffer Zone 1 Impact* Zone 2 Impact*
Mitigation (sq ft) (sq ft)
Required?*
B1 Crossing/Culvert/ Permanent SA/Unnamed No 8,178 4,052
Bridge
B2 Crossing/Culvert/ Permanent SA/Unnamed No 7,609 2,043
Bridge
B3 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter.
B4 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter.
B5 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter.
B6 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter.
B7 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter.
B8 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter.
B9 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter.
B10 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter.
6h. Total temporary impacts: Zone 1: Click to enter. sq ft Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft
6h. Total permanent impacts: Zone 1: 15,787 sq ft Zone 2: 6,095 sq ft
6h. Total combined buffer impacts: Zone 1: Click to enter. sq ft Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft
6i. Comments:
Buffer impacts at each of the crossings is less than 1/3 of an acre and 150 linear feet. Buffer mitigation is not proposed.
Buffer authorization for the proposed impacts is being obtained from the City of High Point.
Please attach supporting documentation (impact maps, plan sheets, etc.)for the proposed project.
Page 12 of 22 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through project design:
The applicant has designed the proposed development to avoid impacts to the remainder of the streams and wetlands
on the site. With the exception of the necessary access roads and one small wetland impact associated with lot fill
from one of the apartment buildings, the development has been planned to avoid impacting other streams and
wetlands on the site. Stormwater devices have been designed in upland areas. The remaining roads, lots and utilities
have been designed to avoid additional impacts to jurisdictional areas.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize proposed impacts through construction techniques:
The clearing limits will be surveyed, staked and silt fencing and clearing limit fencing will be used. Disturbed areas will
be seeded and mulched to limit sediment from entering downgradient waters. Slope matting will be used on steep
slopes.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S., Waters of the State, or Riparian Buffers
2a. If compensatory mitigation is required, by whom is it required? * ❑ DWR ❑ Corps
(check all that apply)
2b. If yes, which mitigation option(s)will be used for this ❑ Mitigation Bank
project? * (check all that apply) ❑ In Lieu Fee Program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if using a Mitigation Bank (Must satisfy NC General Statute143-214.11 (d1).)
3a. Name of mitigation bank: Click to enter.
3b. Credits purchased/requested: Type: Choose one Quantity Click to enter.
Type: Choose one Quantity Click to enter.
Type: Choose one Quantity Click to enter.
Attach receipt and/or approval letter.
3c. Comments:
Click to enter.
4. Complete if Using an In Lieu Fee Program
4a. Attach approval letter from in lieu fee program.
4b. Stream mitigation requested: Click to enter. linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature: Choose one
NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the Mitigation Concepts tab on the Wilmington
District's RIBITS website: (Please use the filter and select Wilmington district)
https://ribits.usace.army.mil/ribits apex/f?p=107:27:2734709611497::NO:RP:P27 BUTTON KEY:O
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only): Click to enter. square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: Click to enter. acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: Click to enter. acres
Page 13 of 22 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

4g. Coastal (tidal)wetland mitigation requested: Click to enter. acres
4h. Comments:
Click to enter.
5. Complete if Providing a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If proposing a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan,
including the amount of mitigation proposed.
Click to enter.
5b. Attach mitigation plan/documentation.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules)— DWR requirement
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer ❑ Yes ❑x No
that requires buffer mitigation?
If yes, please complete this entire section —please contact DWR for more information.
6b. If yes, identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required in the table below.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact (square Multiplier Required mitigation
feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 Click to enter. Click to enter. Choose one Click to enter.
Zone 2 Click to enter. Click to enter. Choose one Click to enter.
6f. Total buffer mitigation required Click to enter.
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a mitigation bank or ❑ Yes El No
NC Division of Mitigation Services proposed?
6h. If yes, attach the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC Division of Mitigation Services.
6i. Comments:
Click to enter.
Page 14 of 22 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (DWR requirement)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers ❑ Yes ❑x No
identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other forms of stormwater treatment. If the
project is subject to a state implemented riparian buffer protection program, include a plan that fully documents
how diffuse flow will be maintained.
All Stormwater Control Measures (SCM) must be designed in accordance with the NC Stormwater Design
Manual (https://deg.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-resources/energy-mineral-land-permit-
guidance/stormwater-bmp-manual).
Associated supplement forms and other documentation must be provided.
❑ Level Spreader
What Type of SCM are you ❑ Vegetated Conveyance (lower seasonal high water table- SHWT)
providing? ❑ Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
(Check all that apply) ❑x Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
❑ Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the
buffer
For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here:
Attach diffuse flow documentation.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this an NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's ❑ Yes ❑x No
Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as
defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)? * El Yes ❑x No
To look up low density requirements, click here:
http://reports.oah.state.nc.us/ncac/title%2015a%20-%20environ mental%20guaIity/chapter%2002%20-
%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20h/15a%20ncac%2002h%20.1003.pdf
2c. IS the project over an acre? ❑x Yes ❑ No
2d. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP)
reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state- ❑x Yes ❑ No
approved local government stormwater program? *
Note: Projects that have vested rights, exemptions, or grandfathering from state or locally implemented
stormwater programs or projects that satisfy state or locally-implemented stormwater programs through use of
community in-lieu programs should answer"no" to this question.
2e. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply? ❑x Local Government
(Check all that apply) * ❑ State
If you have local government approval, please include the SMP on their overall impact map.
Page 15 of 22 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

Local Government Stormwater Programs * ❑x Phase II ❑ USMP
❑ NSW ❑ Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.*
High Point
State Stormwater Programs * ❑ Phase II ❑ HQW or ORW
❑ Coastal Counties ❑x Other
Comments:
A SWMP is required and will be submitted to the City of Hig Point for review and approval.
Page 16 of 22 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public(federal/state/local) ❑ Yes ❑x No
funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? *
1 b. If you answered "yes"to the above, does the project require
preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the ❑ Yes ❑ No
requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental
Policy Act(NEPA/SEPA)? *
1c. If you answered "yes"to the above, has the document review been
finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the ❑ Yes ❑ No
NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.)
Comments:
A NEPA or SEPA is not required.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A
NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), ❑ Yes ❑x No
DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or Riparian Buffer Rules
(15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
2b. If you answered "yes"to the above question, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
Click to enter.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future
impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby ❑ Yes ❑x No
downstream water quality? *
3b. If you answered "no", provide a short narrative description:
Additional development as a result of the proposed development is not anticipated.
3c. If yes, attach a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis (.pdf) in accordance with the most recent
DWR policy.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project? * ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
4b. If yes, describe in detail the treatment methods and dispositions (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater
generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a treatment plant, list the capacity
available at that plant.
Sewage will be discharged into existing sewer lines. The sewer connections were designed to avoid impacts to
streams and wetlands by being placed within the proposed road crossings. Additional stream and wetland impacts are
not proposed.
Page 17 of 22 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat(Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected ❑ Yes 0 No
species or habitat? (IPAC weblink: https://www.fws.gov/ipac/ffws.govl)*
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species ❑ Yes 0 No
Act impacts? *
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Choose one
5d. Is another federal agency involved? * ❑ Yes N No ❑ Unknown
If yes, which federal agency? Click to enter.
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Divisions 1-8? * ❑ Yes N No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the ❑ Yes 0 No
U.S.? *
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal? * ❑ Yes N No
Link to NLEB SLOPES document: http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NLEB/1-30-17-signed NLEB-
SLOPES&apps.pdf
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind
turbine(s)? * El Yes 0 No
If yes, please show the location of the wind turbine(s)on the permit drawings/project plans (attach .pdf)
5i. Does this project involve blasting and /or other percussive activities
❑ Yes ❑x No
that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers,
mechanized pile drivers, etc.? *
If yes, please provide details to include type of percussive activity, purpose, duration, and specific location of this
activity on the property (attach .pdf)
Page 18 of 22 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated
Critical Habitat? *
US Department of the Interior—Fish and Wildlife Service Official Species List from IPaC
4 listed species are identified on the IPaC report(attached). Tri-colored bat, Monarch butterfly, Schweinitz's sunflower
and Small whorled pogonia.
The areas where impacts are occurring (including areas witin 100 feet of the impact areas)consist of a thin area of
bottomland hardwood forested buffer that is approximately 40-50 years old based on the sizes of the trees. Dominant
hardwood species include sweet gum, green ash, poplar and maple. The sapling species observed include red maple,
green ash, sweet gum, box-elder, Chinese privet and American hornbeam. Areas outside of the wooded area consist
of densely vegetated overgrown wooded land and a sanitary sewer line easement. The densely wooded area is
dominated by tree saplings including sweet gum, eastern red cedar and low-lying vegetation that is dominated by
blackberry, greenbriar, poison ivy, Japanese stilt-grass, sedges and rush. The sanitary sewer line was installed
between 2020 and 2021. It is dominated by newly planted annual rye and fescue species. It is regularly mowed and
heavily maintained.
Tri-colored bat- Hibernacula was not observed within the proposed project areas (within 100 feet of the proposed
impacts). Wooded areas and mature trees that could afford suitable summer roosting habitat are present within the
project areas. Caves, mines or culverts that could be considered suitable winter habitat for the tri-colored bat are not
present. The Tri-colored bat is listed as Proposed Endangered and is not currently provided protection under the
Endangered Species Act.
Monarch butterfly—The monarch butterfly is identified by the IPaC report as a candidate species for listing under the
Endangered Species Act. Although the provisions of Section 7 of the ESA do not currently apply to candidate species
or other non-listed pollinators, the service recommends avoiding impacts to the monarch butterfly and assisting in the
protection and reestablishment of the butterfly and its habitat by use of seeds native to natural communities for soil
stabilization or revegetation of disturbed areas during project construction. Additionally,we did not observe milkweed
within the project areas. The Monarch butterfly is listed as a candidate species and is not currently provided protection
under the Endangered Species Act.
Schweinitz's sunflower—Schweinitz's sunflower is identified by the IPaC report as an endangered species. A utility
easement is located within the project area. The easement is newly installed and heavily maintained. It is also
dominated by planted rye and fescue species that are dense. Habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower is not present in the
project areas. The wooded areas included by the proposed project areas are a tin strip of bottomland hardwood forest
and dense wooded land that do not provide suitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower. Additionally, Schweinitz's
sunflower has not been identified within 10 miles of the site based on NHP records. Based on our field observations,
we have made a determination of no effect for this species.
Small whorled pogonia—Small whorled pogonia is identified by the IPaC report as a threatened species. The
bottomland hardwood forest is thin (along both sides of the stream)and is densely vegetated. Suitable habitat for
small whorled pogonia does not exist within the project areas. Additionally, there are no documented occurrences of
this species by the NHP within the HUC that includes the site. Based on our observations, we have made a
determination of no effect for this species.
Attach consultation documentation.
6. Essential Fish Habitat(Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as ❑ Yes ❑x No
an Essential Fish Habitat? *
Are there submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV)around
the project vicinity? * El Yes ❑x No El Unknown
Will this project affect submerged aquatic vegetation? ❑ Yes ❑x No ❑ Unknown
*
Explain: Click to enter.
Page 19 of 22 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

6b. What data source(s) did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Essential Fish Habitat Mapper—NOAA Fisheries
Page 20 of 22 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
Link to the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map (does not include archaeological data):
http://qis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural ❑ Yes ❑x No
preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or
properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data source(s) did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological
resources? *
NC Historic Preservation Office's HPOWEB 2.0. A"Surveyed Only" property was identified on the site (Jordan Dairy
Farm, GF 1421). An April 4, 2019 letter prepared by Ms. Renee Gledhill-Early indicates that the SHPO "concur that the
(former)Jordan Dairy Farm (GF1421) is not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under any
criteria for the reasons outlined in the report." A copy of the letter and report are included as attachments.
Other historic properties were not identified on the site or within 600 feet of the site. A copy of the SHPO Map is
included as an attachment.
7c. Attach historic or prehistoric documentation.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Link to the FEMA Floodplain Maps: https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? * ❑ Yes ❑x No
8b. If yes, explain how the project meets FEMA requirements.
Click to enter.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
National Flood Hazard Layer froom FEMA Web Map Service—Drawing 4 (Attached)
Page 21 of 22 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

H. Miscellaneous
Comments:
Please let me know if you need additional information in order to process this application.
Attach pertinent documentation or attachments not previously requested
I. Signature *
❑x By checking the box and signing below, I, as the project proponent, certify to the following:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete, to
the best of my knowledge and belief;
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401
certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time;
• The project proponent hereby agrees that submission of this PCN form is a"transaction" subject to Chapter
66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• The project proponent hereby agrees to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66,
Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• The project proponent hereby understands that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be
enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• As the project proponent, I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN/online form.
Full Name: * Michael T. Brame
* Michael
Signature:
Brameoa,e ozios ,,a3,ao400
5/22/2023
Page 22 of 22 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

Jurisdictional Determination Request
0
US ARmy Corp%
of[nglnoews
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination(JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District(Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.LM.mil/Missions/Re ug latoiyPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE&CHARLOTTE REGULATORY WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
FIELD OFFICES US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers 2407 West Fifth Street
151 Patton Avenue,Room 208 Washington,North Carolina 27889
Asheville,North Carolina 28801-5006 General Number:[phone]
General Number:[phone] Fax Number:[phone]
Fax Number:[phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington Avenue
3331 Heritage Trade Drive,Suite 105 Wilmington,North Carolina 28403
Wake Forest,North Carolina 27587 General Number:910-251-4633
General Number:[phone] Fax Number:[phone]
Fax Number:[phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D—PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D -NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service,prior to starting work.
Version:May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 2725 Hiahwav 68 South
City, State: High Point, NC
County: Guilford
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): See Attached
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Michael Brame, Pilot Environmental, In(
Mailing Address: Post Office BOX 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
Telephone Number: 336-310-4527
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
✓❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other,please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: MPW Hiqh Point & MCFT Hiqh Point
Mailing Address: 2725 Highway 68 South
High Point, NC
Telephone Number: 336-269-2208
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request(copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version:May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. 1,the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Michael Winstead
Print Name
Capacity: ✓❑ Owner ✓❑Authorized Agent'
5.17.23
Date
Attached
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ 1 intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
✓❑ Other: Client Requested
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols,skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties,please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version:May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION(JD)TYPE (Select One)
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination(PJD)provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States"or"navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed(33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary"in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination(AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States"or"navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner,permit applicant, or other"affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2)who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
❑ Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
'❑ Size of Property or Review Area -17.5 acres.
❑ The property boundary(or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version:May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 36.037289'
Longitude: -79.964706'
✓� A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than I Ix17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water,pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or"Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Wetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
❑ Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled"Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations"to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards.http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug latory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version:May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs,please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form'and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs,please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
❑ Vicinity Map
aAerial Photograph
❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan,previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
❑ Landscape Photos (if taken)
❑ NCWAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
❑ Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatoM/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App_A_Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
' Please see hqp://www.saw.usace.army.miIA4issions/Re ug latory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose:The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses:This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal,state,and local
government agencies,and the public,and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law.Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination(AJD),which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure:Submission of requested information is voluntary;however,if information is not provided,the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version:May 2017 Page 6

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: May 22, 2023
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Michael, T. Brame, Pilot Environmental, Inc.
Post Office Box 128, Kernersville, North Carolina 27285
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington, Evolve Deep River, SAW 2023-
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The site is located at 2725 Highway 68 South in
High Point,NC. The site contains a residence,agricultural out-buildings,fields and wooded land. The site is proposed for
multi-family residential development.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State:North Carolina County/parish/borough: Guilford County City:High Point
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 36.037289'Long.: -79.964706'
Universal Transverse Mercator:WGS 84
Name of nearest waterbody: East Fork Deep River
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH"MAY BE"SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Latitude(decimal Longitude Estimated amount of Type of aquatic Geographic authority to
Number degrees) (decimal degrees) aquatic resources in resources(i.e., which the aquatic resource
review area(acreage wetland vs.non- "may be"subject(i.e.,
and linear feet,if wetland waters) Section 404 or Section
applicable 10/404
WA 1-12 36.0369160 -79.9661460 0.08 acres Wetland 404
WB 1-2 36.0370920 -79.9664010 0.003 acres Wetland 404
WC1-2 36.0374200 -79.9662240 0.03 acres Wetland 404
WD 1-4 36.0377260 -79.9661170 0.01 acres Wetland 404
WE 1-7 36.0379330 -79.9648230 0.05 acres Wetland 404
WF 1-8 36.0384510 -79.9638130 0.15 acres Wetland 404
SA 36.0375690 -79.9661450 501 linear feet Non-wetland 404

SB 36.0382450 -79.9641590 953 linear feet Non-wetland 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that: (1)the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD,which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2)the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3)the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept
a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a
permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that
all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court;
and(7)whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD,the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If,during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources
in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in
the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
❑Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters'study:
❑U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑USGS NHD data.
❑USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
®U.S.Geological Survey map(s).Cite scale&quad name: Drawing 1
®Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:Drawings 2&2A
®National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: Drawing 3
❑State/local wetland inventory map(s):
®FEMA/FIRM maps: Drawing 4
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
®Photographs: ®Aerial(Name & Date):Drawing 5
or❑Other(Name&Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑Other information(please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Coms and should not be relied won for later jurisdictional
determinations.
May 22, 2023
Signature and date of Regulatory Signature and date of person
staff member completing PJD requesting PJD(REQUIRED,
unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable)t
Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing
an action.

Michael Brame
From: Heather LaGamba
Sent: Friday, March 3, 2023 9:44 AM
To: 401 [e-mail]
Subject: Pre-File Notice - Penny Road (7627.3)
We would like to submit a Pre-filing Notice for the following project:
Project Name: Penny Road (7627.3)
Project Owner: Evolve Construction, LLC
Project Owner's Address: 2918-A Martinsville Road. Greensboro, North Carolina 27408
Project County: Guilford
Type of project/Approval Sought: 401 WQC, Pre-Application Request Meeting Declined
Thank you and have a wonderful day!
Sincerely,
Heather LaGamba
336.345.9536(c)
336.310.4527(o)
P.O. Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
www.pilotenviro.com
[e-mail]
1

$PROJECT CONTACT INFORMATION REVISIONS
SITE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
a,e
PROPERTY OWNER:
MCFT HIGH POINT,LLC&MPW HIGH POINT,LLC FOR $ F
(TENANTS-INCOMMON) --
2918-A MARTINSVILLE ROAD
GREENSBORO,NORTH CAROLINA 27408
CONTACT:JOHN MCDONALD
PHONE:[phone] CELL,(336)4854658 OFFICE
EMAIL:jo CONSTRUCTION,
Evolve at DeepRiver
DEVELOPER: remOP�
EVOLVE CONSTRUCTION,LLC VIdNITY MAP
291 B-A MARTINSVILLE ROAD SCALE:I"=2000'
GRE ENSBORO,NORTH CAROLINA 2]408
CONTACT:JOHN MCDONALD
CIVI:PHONL.ENG9NE CELL,(336)485-06.580FFICE 2725 #2 HIGHWAY 68 SOUTH
EMAIL:john(�ilevolvecos.mm
CIVIL ENGINEER:
CPT ENGINEERING&SURVEYING,INC. HIGH POINT, N C
4400 TYNING STREET
HIGH POINT,NC 27265
CONTACT:CHUCK P.TRUBY,P.E.
PHONE:(336)812A800EXT.304
FAX:[phone]]80 EMAIL: DRAWING INDEX
chudRQcpangineedng.mm
SURVEYOR: CIVIL DRAWINGS
C)
CPT ENGINEERING&SURVEYING,INC. A 1 Cover Sheet Z m
r
4400 TYNING STREET _ ro
HIGH POINT,NC 2]265 I I �� `, I 2 Existing Conditions Plan N
3 Site Plan
CONTACT:JEFFREY L.CAISON,P.L.S. I I I I C9 N^
PHONE:[phone]EXT.302 I I v°°` f Y E' Ij I I I 4 Utility Plan 2a, NO
FAX [phone]]80 5 Grading and Drainage Plan LLI
EMAIL:je �M
ffc@cpte ng...rmg.mm / 1 1 �d I 1�U Q�
"m*`" 6.0 Erosion Control Plan m w
ARCHITECT: II l / �I I 6.1 Erosion Control Plan Nz LL
PLANWOR%ARCHITECTURE L-1 Landscape Plan(By Others) Z w U I
STREET ADDRESS '°s LP1 Lighting Plan(By Others)
CITY STATE,ZIP CODE �� / y««° g (�I I Z d
CONTACT:JERRY TAYLOR I•'°�^» o^ I II D1 Site Details Q Ow O O
PHONE[phone] / 1°tI "�� .�I;��III D2 Storm Drainage Details w10 EMAIL [e-mail] / 6/'�(I I: D3 Water Details Zoo z
PLANWORX.COM / _ _ _
, _.I 1 - %`. /,' .',III/' D4 Sanitary Sewer Details o a
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: ;e li/; ;I D5 Erosion Control Details LwLI 5
COMPANY NAME D6 Erosion Control Details Z
STREET ADORES. y / sz r %1/;I�Ij I/ D7 Erosion Control(NCGO1 Standards) C� w
CITY,STATE,ZIP CODE !
CONTACT:
PHONE: - a
EMAIL:
S i Ill
�+ ®gyp}J '#rg.
UTILITY CONTACT INFORMATION General:
1.Contsct or is responsible for locating all existing utilities poor to start of 1 _��� -`-h �a /�
CITY OF HIGH POINT mr.watiPn.
(PUBLIC SERVICES-WATER&SEWER)
2.All erosion mntrel devices shall be mnstmc[ed and maintained in A
CONTACT:TOM BECKETT accordance with the most tuner[standards of the Land Quality Section of the
211 SOUTH HAMILTON STREET NCDENR.
2nd FLOOR,SUITE 206
HIGH POINT,NC 21261 3.Stabilization stone under piping a,be placed as requiatl by City Inspector
OFFICE:(3m)8a33g65 when conditions wanant.
EMAIL:[e-mail]
4.As a minimum requirement,all graded areas not under pavement and within ""
the rightof-way and/or easements shall be prepared ferliliud and limed,
CITY OF HIGH POINT / Q
cetletl,and mulchetl immetliaaly upon completion of construction as follows
(ELECTRIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT) (AppIcatio —PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET): LU z
CONTACT:CURT BROWER Type I Sending(Lawns or her focal area.)100 lb..of lime
816 EAST GREEN STREET 201bs.of 10-20-20 or 201bs.of 10-10-10 in mmbination with 4lb.of 0-460 / Imo✓-",T- Z4 _
HIGH POINT,NC 27270 51bs.of tall fescue,mnaining a blend oft or more fall fescue.
OFFICE:(336)8833134 1 1b.oInblue or Kentucky Blueg
EMAIL:[e-mail] 1 Ib.of win rass
ter annual rye(November 1 a March 1)Type II Seeding(Ganarel or / / p •� 4
I—maint.n.nm a—)
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS 100 lb f 10-2 " / % �/ O Z
15.of of 10-20-, or fining of lend W2 it mmbination with 31bs.of 0-0G04
CONTACT:JEFF ELDRIDGE 1 lb of tall fescue,.de.(u a blendol2ormore tallfescue. �� .^ O 2623 UWHARRIE ROAD 1 lb.ofaericoa leapedeza(use unacarfiied seed August 15 a February 7) v'
W
HIGH POINT,NC 27263 Y4 lb.of German millet(May 1 to August 15) s Uj
1 OFFICE:(336)862353] ib.of rye grain(prior to May 1 or after August 15) : LU n O
` \11
MOBILE:[phone] Seeding mixtures other than those listed above must be approved by the City u u T
Inspector prior to seeding. s '^i Z
FAX [phone]g49 � (J)Technical Review Committee Endorsement Block for Site Plans
EMAIL:jeffeIdddg.Qpiedmontrgm 5.Priors requesting a final inspection,the Ownarmustsubmit Record £ Approved by the Technical Review Committee for 12..nth.(13ev.# )subject to the approval of any N �L
Dawirg.and Engineer's Certification a the Engineering Division's Record r 1 1 required street and utility plans and pmfles and approval of...paste land-disturbing permit andl.r erosion IL
NORTH STATE COMMUNICATIONS ncPamrrTheCanermustalsosubmit the constscti &,&Iistto the City eentrelplan
CONTACT:CASEY FOX 0 O z
110 N.ELM STREET 6.Al walk must carry a one-y wa ear randy a cover all d fmfs in materials and
HIGH POINT,NC 21261 wntl.nan.hip. GRID N:834008.765 LATITUDE:36002'15.678"
OFFICE:(336)88637W GRID E:1714260.872 LONGITUDE:-79°57'59.241" Direc[orof Planning and Development Data U F O
MOBILE:[phone]]9 ].Priora beginning any work within NCDOT rightof-way,the Contractor must u
FAX (336).y.f.. 8 8.Pr.copy of thing any ark ehe c.nhm.rt agreamant on thin jib site. G U I L F O R D COUNTY ` "
LU
EMAIL [e-mail] 8.Priors beginning any work,the contractor must notify the Engineering Field 1 r IV
Ofiice(]2]-2362)a anange for constmction inspection. / N r)L
9 °ta�QityLinkAt]2]��°f°rexisti°gwatera°°..overt°mg°°s. HIGH POINT NORTH CARO L I NA Developer's Certificate o Compliance
O
- We,EVOLVE CONSTRUCTION LLC,accept this submission as our plan of tlevelopmen[antl O
agae to install all required improvements and mmply with the mnditions of approval.
Airport Overlay District Notice PROPERTY OWNER p,° �Umllg �i$ ,�����., �/3/a3 }
Thie pedy is 1ccetM Wthln the City 0 High Point A,M.d per-Contact Name l Title Data
Overlay District antl a subject to eimsefl ovadlights antl to LU
mafirol.that ay5.eti,e l°natileee,eneentu,enthe MCFT High Point,LLC&MPW High Point,LLC(Tenants-In-Common)
are Inca ,.r the pmpeny.Ple.e.—,t°the aye
1 Dlnnn °.end the°I"°`High nnatct 2918-A MARTINSVILLE RD.,GREENSBORO,NC 27408 Dep.nmenlmPlannmga oe.el.ptnent car mein itrtnnn.non CONTRUCTION PLAN S MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE INSPECTION
on p°tetnia noise impacts. SERVICES DIVISION FOR APPROVAL AND PERMITS(BUILDING&
Thao cqa )of this. dlvl:ion are required i°P—da TRADES)FOR ALL STRUCTURES(BUILDINGS,CANOPIES,FENCES,
natMlcatiar that this Prup"la wthln tha.,an Ovaray pu DEVELOPER
Diatdnmall mapactiva lot mh a,,by means ulawniten FLAGPOLES,POLE LIGHTS,ETC.)
P
adlaaluaura aata,nant.
CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT[CONSTRUCTION COVER SHEET
Evolve Construction,LLC INSPECTION DIVISION AT(336)8 8 3-31 941 FOR ALL WATER AND SEWER
2918-A Martinsville Rd.,Greensboro,NC 27408 MAIN CONSTRUCTION;INCLUDING ALL WATER AND SEWER SERVICE (Dev.#GP-20- )
o TAPS,DRIVEWAY,SIDEWALK INSPECTIONS,STORM DRAINAGE AND
Contact:John McDonald ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE LOCATED IN THE SCALE: N.T.S.
INSPECTION FEES RIGHT-OF-WAY.THE CORE OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES
Phone:[phone] SHALL BE INSPECTED BY THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT DATE: 4/3/23
SANITARY SEWER: $0.75 x 0 LF=$0.00
Email:[e-mail] INSPECTOR.
WATER: $0.75 x 0 LF=$0.00 PROJECT: 1746-21
ROADWAY: $0.50 x 0 LF=$0.00 SUBMIT AS-BUILT DRAWINGS OF THE WATER,SEWER,AND STORM
STORM: $0.50X 0 LF=$0.00 ESTIMATED PROJECT TIMELINES SEWER SYSTEMS TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT UPON DRAWN BY: TM
TOTAL: =$0.00 PROJECT START DATE:AUGUST 1,2023 PROJECT COMPLETION,INCLUDING WATER METER AND CLEANOUT
C LOCATIONS.AS-BUILT DRAWINGS SHALL CONTAIN BOTH PUBLIC AND
y DATE FEES RECEIVED BY CITY OF HIGH POINT: PROJECT COMPLETION DATE:DEC.1,2023 PRIVATE UTILITY INSTALLATIONS. SHEET

REVISIONS
/ J I J { 1 t / / \� \ / — %/r/ °y \ I 9i / WILLARD Al y
PREMIER DR
—'� SITE
. ; a y
� (Y
J f i / 0-
� =z
1
w` _/r/ '� J/ ((11////i )I/oe/ I ( ( ); I
////// VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
����
LEGEND
/- / / ` —/� 10\+i'E /0 � 4L ie'+ + //�Xj
! \ I\ to I I 11 I I�) -11' I/ 1
v �( 1 // ��1 ° //i// 1/ I V1� 1 I I 1 \ I(I / i li / I I Il�(�vul�o �IRO�ROD
/// j , I \ l\� NIP/EIP O 1✓8'irE TI IRON PIPE
, /1/lf,/ J /f /- 11 III I I / ,� (f NIR/EIR O IRNEXISTIN6 IRON ROD (,)
—� +/' Y ++ %/// l l I ( I I ) \ JI I NMWEMNO IEVEXI5TIN6 MA6NETI,NAIL z
<\ ,\ / ! /__ — �����—— — / Sam ++++ / / / I I / \1 — re
\ / N�60` �// / / /i//// / / / I { I I I I1 }I / i I I I ` I ® NON-MONIR-IENTED PRINT
1 / 58 \q\a° A2 ///j/ J // / I 1 I I I / /I I !�I` MANHaE-STORN
�al6 �/// / / , / { I I ` II 1 I / I I l { I �3 MANHq-E SANITARY Z
/,�Itl df ! 1 I I' I / I1I1( I /I I )!1J MANSE rzM N
1 \ �� H / //( 'J 1 irz / 020 /% ✓i / ' I ` / J / I 1 MANHOLE-V TER 1LI j
lI /(�/' ��
// r I l METER.A5 RL
,1Y`�� Ss�95 //{�' G' / / / { f / I ( I/s7�''y / ) ; / I ' 11 1/ © MEtERSAS S O w LL
1(/DL / nPF Fro IAO 1 / W� 6•S 95 rs / /, l ( I I I I I I I I t + I/ I; I l 1/ l © METERi^IATER N O ,n Q
�'�� i / //1 /// / 1 I () 1 1 IJ ; ; i / I { 1l/i ELELTRILAL TRANSFORMER
�Yv_-- S�� / ( 1 yr y�/ 1 l 1 ( VAULT-ELELTRIG
\ \\ `✓///- // % l l'\ o ° ,y4 I. I _I —�� 598° �d 5AN 5Vbz F f_7 / 11 ! 1 /I 1 I \I{I�I(/ / I� i I 1 J/{l {{ 0 VAULT.As Z
l / 1 11 Ir J a
o VAULT-TELEPHCHEI OMM Z
._--- / / r \ \ 1 1 {11 �>;�� 0ww o�00
_ / / i 1JJ/ 1! © VA LT-A R z
_/ aaWW WN✓aa \�,� ---��9141 Ss �im o.A'DIIrFER ++ / / / / I 1( I / /i�i A/, ;�I I 1/ u0v VAULTa TIILTT Z oa y a
\ PAD.N�t7 z2�/2/ \J \ a ss� J l /P� r//// / / v 1 rlj!) l;� / ; , / { 1(I / al o 0
L ITWW \; STORM LNE w z
I1 �� _ /1 'l )� LLJ
Up
'.zaa 2€� / � / _�_� - / ^ry`� — — � ��1 /�// I ` �IIIJ( ' Q�
2RLP a D' �, 9 __ // / / p ) /y i / - Z
�- 13.45 I/ �9� /T;'y/ (/)!1 �' �4�ILPfP:-- \ _�---�—a .'-' J ///l/lI /l / // / // , Y I 1 1((!J!{1 /I� 1 , % I /l/ f)//1)I I //!/// SS —EILINE C7 w
8 .G2'/ :'Y/ // / �l / �// 100 —/ rJ �'—\1,////1 / // / / /' ' 2 � I /r I�{ ✓3� I'l/� l , (l t {Ill(/) DHN OVERHEAD ELEGTRIL Z O
^i0\. - /J J ' , J //) /(, F FIBEROPrIL MARKER LLJ
II/��►Irk.
I c5 / �-e / .T4 ' // ;11•`�D/� 'H / /----�.� v _�i/ ——J / z J (/// ( /// // / I 1 ) 1 �/1 Il 3� / / / �II/ / / 1 1l( ////) OT IA-IOIff lEDESTAL
�ccni enslx/ P 29.1 / / _— •I J— / / 1 �( YARD INLET /Vr'q�'I
15-1 L 468\.OPT % /\�J /�7—_/—j f� _ l/� // / / // // /j les¢—�m ,I 1 1 \)/11f11 iil/ l jljJl/lIJ1/lIJ o
/ / GATLH BASIN
/ — ' _� / / 000WO��� 0 3 I {//f / y /y II 1 /())( C GABLE BOX
\IFTcs INv lwr:le'm /1� ✓ /' 1\`f�l ,/ / /l/l 1 l / \ (1�!/({ ✓/r/ ,/I �// / / )/(ll� —c O 6AS LINE
MARKER `l .,/
(CONVERT,O DROP/LET) BCf�.22 i/�`yJ`�l 1\ J / h / (� ` \\l ` / /'/ / /l (!( / / I / I // /1 ) /�//!1 / �,/ / ' 1111)( /7/// a1$ POLE-I.MLltt POLE- LIT
1 { 830//76
m O;-OP
ALvE�ER
✓_ 'LL, � �I J 1IlI '%l l rrl ill(( lrf I MM VA
/ / I / J ` ( EXISTINGB IL UDIN6.-S DR G SRAVLL / lid
( , 1 I /�'� FIRE HY T
!
GENE INROAD
/ I e3 4�5 evsnns
12 1 z / / i I ) 4 riff! {/�l / / lit{{y/1 /jl/ I Ja/g/Zg�
/i / / / _ �� l J I 1 // I
e .qo ) J i l/ / /� 1 / 1 1 ( (J ( / �l / / L J I / 3/ (I/l)r r(l1/�' l ;/ I/Il 1� SITE INFORMATION:
/ )( I P T` ' h � �• / / '� ( / ) 1 ( r r / � "" �1 /S/
(� e
{ { 82.8 /J jr / � i III I )1fl/!l / / ' /�; 1//l l
— � J 1.ADDRESS:272542 INC HIGHWAY 68 N
aA 1 / l l
2.COUNTY GUILFORD COUNTY
MUC CITY OF HIGH POINT
L/
T3 tM+Iz + 3 Ppry 7813437884
Z
8 _
4� i / / / /// / I I`I f 1 4.7ARCEL NUMBER:167961
GN !LC' S00 Ex.I801RGP RCP en I+ / I // //J // / / —J T .SITE ACREAGE.18.02 AC.
PIpE&�I 834. / I ( i I ! I7� { Il I y , L /
r E //✓ �7'� /�/ / r — — I ` .DEED REFERENCE.IDS 7994 PG 27 S 8682 PG 2496 —
e�. / 1 s 1 / l l l l i l 6 62 D Z z
( 1I s / ' _ \ ILO
83801�, v F 73JY s 1 // / / / \ � EXI TING Bl11Lr��1ING3,DRI{/E{G VEL / ( \ J / l l 3 i I/ I/ \ 7.`PLAT REFERENCE: O
C� JQry/ J \ 3W `� �' S i/ // / _/ ANDCONCR TPTOpEREM�E / / ( /%� T� J/(l/l// /Y% i 7 ✓ ✓ — l /~`\
34 `( ItjV.84Te /� 1 I 1111 I I 1 l �� t� \ i��Y'� / III JJ(I/ ' ! /lf / ) f Z ii-4 L
.ij" �J�• y / 1
/y ING:CZ RM-16
\ �'S-�' 1, \/ /fl//l1 \,i� I /�'f/ i' / \ I 9.EXISTING LAND USE:RESIDENTIAL O a F v 8
N
I �� ,e ( / '4 N J 3 ——\ \ l I 1 I I`I J/ 0.PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN A(ZONE X)MINIMAL FLOOD
r— 4 q� _ \ `/ \ \\ (( ` I-�` �'8���� I I p/ //;,\\y' qQ. I RISK(AREA AS DESIGNATED BY FEMA. REFERENCE:FIRM MAP Z
-f / ,o-;% 's ( — �. / 6E �� —� \ PROPERTY L`{NE'STb BE��\ I ( 1 / 7�yi� �\ �\ 1 / / �\�\�gp� �,� / '� /1 \ NUM ER 3710781300J,DATED JUNE 18,2007). � V �
ryl ! , ./. O• ,w / 2 „��,` //ti J / —g \ \REMOVEp BVILEED G\R PMT\ \I �I / BRsn y �i �I I ///1// /, y j' � � \\`11.�ERTICAL DATUM:NAD83 X ♦— O
��,,yy,, �` \,sl �_ XIF�STING)UTI TY`�MS6`ME`R-TS O I 1/ INN' I 1 •�, / I 1 I I
E k' ' ���N' // / / // J�`y �'° 1 B DONE I 1 1 , /. {/!l!/Zi P/// �,l // \ LU FFi (V V
l \ E 3 E pRAINBD � C ( 1/ l �y +` —\\ �— � \ ` \�� (�I —I / /�/ °�% L / �v } IT
ly
SIR VL —' OLDD DEELiLIa
�' TO BE REMOVED \ 398.73 ly���1 \ \ \%P�ffD LINE g}
r ''� / ,�9 ! (Td BE REMOVED) i J IL
v \_ I � 141 W6 ( \ / P W- STING BUILDINGS.— n �/\ T� �: 1 \ \ / / /// / /'
p,,' per,,_ ,/ GENERAL NOTES: O J
/—yUr�� / DRIVES,GRAVEL AND / ry� ``' -pg \ \ \ \ \ i / l/l/4, f i� 1.ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES
/ CONCRETE TO BE -- _87P / )/L- 101
a ECI II I r / C l \ _ � 4q ' [[,�, 1 �i ' 73
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
/1"[/ R_EMOVEED�^- _ \ I \ , / 5�'° 1. , / $OILS TYPES: } 6
IN) �{7��jJ ( / o —~� _ \ I }�f// w S\e �/ / dnhB2,Mecklenburg sandy clay loam,2 t0 6 percent slopes, 2 ALL BEARING&ARE GRID BEARINGS. I I I
l EX5TINs^I � ryl—L— —�— 1�/�' ////�� \ 6 ��,,�(// ' / deratleyeodd ( 3.AREA COMPUTED BY COORDINATE GEOMETRY. �+'+
\O'U.E. `P8 6I P6�� * 7 T /ChA,Chewaa loam,0 to 2 percent slopes,frequently
J , L f00tletl 4.THE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTI LITIES SHOWN
� / \ \ \ r( �P %/ \WkE,Wilkes-POIndeXter-Wynottcomplex,15 to45 A REON ARE BASED ON ABOVE GROUND STRUCTURES AND
bq- y� @` / l \ / ) �J: ' \ RECORD DRAWINGS PROVIDED TO THE SURVEYOR.LOCATIONS
l L _ }I� i�b\ ,/ \ Ioercent slopes OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES/STRUCTURES MAYVAWFROM
v m �` \ \ 0� }�— /l �' ' '� LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON.ADDITIONAL BURIED UrILITIESI
S I F.Y.RI 11 ! HYDRO LOGIC SOIL GROUP.ChA,Rating:B/D STRUCTURES MAY BE ENCOUNTERED.NO EXCAVATIONS WERE
µ0A0 I / \ 00 �)/ ., •Oq6�� / i \ MhB2,Rating MADE DURING THE PROGRESS OF THIS SURVEY TO LOCATE
\� �t,� (� (�N( / \ BURIED UrILITIESI STRUCTURES.
ry I ^\ IH✓ 1 / / (tF- W"pb 0''� / / ` /�/�yy�(� \Yv✓\����,\ ✓ r/l �51Y;`- - J�-,i ' \ WkE:Rating D
UTILITIES WERE MARKED BY SUPERIOR EXISTING
LOOCATE.THIS SURVEYOR ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONDITIONS
�0°ryg y OF THE UTILITIES.ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MAY
N
N 5 \/ / NOTT BE BE SHOWN.
/3 i/O P� FAC B.ALLBUILDINGRANDSUREANDSUBSURFACE
a\\O \� W ggA•np b / / \ \/ / t/ IMPROVEMENTS ONANDADJACENTTOTHESITEARENOT SCALE: ill-60'
u \ \\ ^ ` / L a] C��• 6�2 I / „� ( �ppfA' // / /// F i /' / NECESSARI LVSHOWNHEREON.
/ � Airport Overlay District Notice /� \
/^J / (/ _ spmpe ISloaledwilM1inlbeCllyofHlgM1PoinlArpod 7.SUBSURFACE AND ENVIRONMENTALCONDITIONSWERENOT DATE: 4/3/23
/ / .611
/ I ' / \ I Overlay DiRrd.ndissjjedbeimefl ovedlighis entlb/ EXAMINED OR CONSIDERED ASAPART OF THIS SURVEY.NO
�yr/� q 5 q qD \R\ \ \ / �/ / 1 / aimrefl noise Ibat may be objetlionable tlepeneent upon iNe / STATEMENT IS MADE CONCERNING THE EXISTENCE OF
\ \ \ N \�/1\\ J / .Y =° / �. pNW ✓ / i v UNDERGROUND OR OVERHEAD CONTAINERS OR FACILITIES
\ 1 / antl lwation of the pmpeM Please referto the G�1 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OR DEVELOPMENT OF THIS TRACT. PROJECT: 1746-21
4. 4 ______ gcSE�3 // ) AiryndOverlayDim—n,guhtionaandlheCiryoR Point
\ , , Depedment of Planning&Developmenifir monnetion
_ o G' PhcP:evz4a �/ I ( en pmenual noise impaas. / GRAPHIC SCALE DRAWN BY: TM
60 30 0 60 120
e THIS IS NOTASURVEY.TOPOGRAPHIC DATATAKEN FROM LIDAR /^\+fif0xv:e/bzaa , / (� \ nairlebon lhatwwprdr is wimm be Airwn oeenar
SHEET
1 INCH- 60 FEET

TOP OF BANK Cl.OF STREAI ( J i I ' ` i �ARKING: 2 16 DEV.ORD. PARKING LOT TREE REQUIREMENTS: DIMENSION OF LLANTING AAE S:. AI" f J REVISIONS
+ 'Per CI of Hi hPoint Zonin Onlinance 5-Article C,S.W.. Etch 'g /` \ / WILLARD At 1,
MUL1T-FAMIL RESIDENTIAL WITH AMENITIES ty 9 e awfr panting. nt� gtrees,rymnaingm lo�ea myan<n,/�
REQUIRED: / ^\ 1TR(c) Each planting area o�-ni es,fintludir/g lM1o�l(n; p ngylots,j
/L / 1 TREE PER 12 PARKING SPACES**Se footnote shall have a minimum Sias o6 fi d s II nave I /gyp
/ 1 BEDROOM=1.50 / dimension are J Jla a,
ZONE2 / I / aEB SPACES PROVIDED area ofat least�``�liu drbtl( ) fy§�
2 BEDROOM 469 39 TREES(CANOPY) \ ` II / / / / \ 'Z� \ /� PREMIER DR
UNDISTURBED AREA OF 3BEDROOM=2.00 I R \ (/[�'� PARKING LO TI�EEI( N PV)/
VEGETATION BEGINNING AT THE 39 TR FPS REQUIRED \ YJI�/_ j Q
OUTER EDGE OF ZONE 1 AND / 1 J 1 BEDROOM.'96X1.50= 44 \ \V` 39 TREES PRNVI Epl /
EXTENDING LANDWARD A 2BEDR00M:132X 1.15=�231 \ 1 Iw - \ `\ ITw el /, / \ (®' ,1 w
MINIMUM OF 20 FEET. �� / r I / 3BEDROOM: WX2.00- 72 Fomnme \ \
EXCEPTIONS MUST BE \ t I I All neuorredevelopetl non rea�tlenl al off-street VxNng areas shall be
APPROVED BY THE WATERSHED / / TOTAL subs)tetetllo
REQUI RED-447 desgnel so th.t no P.-S space o IM1an agM(BO)f ,--the
REVIEW COMMITTEE(MC)PER �\ / I Trunk ofawnopy free WM1ere untl�rs ory trees ere rcenopy
SEC 6.2.9.C.10. / / / I PROVIDED'//469 { trees as prov tletl for'n Tables ll opark'ng space shall be more than
(NOT INCWDING35 GARAGE SPACES) sAy(60)feetfmmlM1etrunkofanurFfersrorylree ! 'l \2,E r� 1 TM' P >S"�.�\ ( I I <(Ve NDOVER
/ ✓ / I I PAVING NOTES: 1 )/�I (�,r �s2 I � /1 / \\ 1 / /l; ! I Rp "EPVE
REQUIRED OPEN SPACE�435 SF PER UNIT: f l f �f��
1 CONTRACTOR SHALL PRO IIDESMOOTHTRANSITIONSTOEXISTING \ / /
AN UNDISTURBED AREA OF °B °. 1 / _�/ t 164 UNITS x43�'SE=114,B40 SFt(2.636 ACRE3t)
VEGETATION EXTENDING A PAVEMEN WHERE APPLIGA LE 5° '(• i / //// /,� ` ( I i !
MINIMUM OF 30 FEET FROM TH //l1 I 1 2.CUTSM ETOEXISTVryiPAWMENTSHALLBESMWTMD -PROVIDED OPEN SPACE: \ \ /// /v} /-J
TOP OF BANK OR MEAN HIGH J REPAVEDTHASMOOT4TRANSITION.POSITIVE DRAINAGE SHALL BE \ // /- /// // / 1 i �'J / VICINITY MAP
WATER LEVEL OF OTHER WATE --_�O'- ED 0 / I MAINrAINEDATALLREP RARE- -PROVIDEDACTIVEOPENSPACE: T64SF(o.lsacREs.l / �A\4•J�/�L/)yJ,$ � //j� l / \I \ � \ I I /77
BODIES. iIMITS-OF 26 2 WHICH-SHALL 3.JOINTS ORSCORE MA SAKE TO BE SHARP AND CLEAN WITHOIfT 200,479 SF ° r,N /./// , �i I /
li&VE-IQO IM�.E O�I�SURFACE / I SHOWING EDGES OFJOIARING TOOL. /\ 29SF(0.69 ACRESt) (p.60 ACRE$)/�/ // +{;, / �\ II I i �r I I I/ la I �/ _I' N.T.S.
✓ !- AREA�- r / I // 44.981SF1 TOTAL/AC
/ A6
LIGH I DUTY PgVEMEWT: \ //r f//
PERE MIAL STREAM 155,498 SF G SZACRESf) /
HIISI(DENSITY QE\/FLQPI`$'(T / /\\ / r 2-1/2'$9.SC I /r-' \\ /� /r/+ P�'�,6"A6 F / lI
General:
1.Contractor ns ble for to h all eN t n t t es to star)of a resPo m n9 s 9 u Pnor \ (, / l� / / 28• /ro
�natro�ton / l++/+�� � 7
2.All ero control devices shall be constructed and maintained in �1\ / /� \ �.q¢ _. ' / ( �2,j `4/ 30? / � �{�yF+++/J/ /r J / 0\d }- I III}` ' I f 6
accortlance usih the most cunem Ioend,ms of the Lerel QNe ty"S-ecGort a th� \ I / / - J \ / c own oG.Agi-"- I/ I p168° _ r Y �/ _ / 6Z_ I
NCDENR ` / �a 01p;P' / /2 N5°5A<p` +` /r/5/ / / I / 3I 1 I / / , I no
- �q5' "( 3 SOILS TYPES: N
3.Stab zat on stone Intl.,piping to be placetl' qhi by 'ty in.p ctol ` S J J // X J / \q\ w -y// , - l / / x J I I / 11 U'
_ I PO 1 MhB2 Mecklenburg sandy clay loam,2 to 6 percent slopes, rn
when mod tons warrant f ` / / J\ _ ! �/ / / / I I i I I /3i ' 1 r !I I Z
` �\ 4z ////,, / /// // �.n / f motleraneverodetl }zM N
requ remen a 9a _no u I �\ / / / I N, ao!%J '� 1 I I i ) I' I I LLJ
4.As a minimum t II ded areas t ment and \ / 26°E ca ��� �/ _ / // P i / I ` I 1 l/ I rl ' ' I
CCqq ,I.,,, / ChA,Chewada loam,0 to 2 percent slopes,frequently
the nght,f way anW,,,semen shall be papaatl f,tli,\ MI l m,d, ` 10,TYPE L 0 /�• ;j i -/ m / ' flooded I'1
H _/ q,� /r /// / I o 1 / I >
,md,d antl m,lch.tlmm,xii-ly upon completion of construct on a�follows ~� �� / I��,WIZ ( I q�9\/ � I Y� „E Id04`I'q i ' �� Y �p/( / / / 9 m le`¢ I I I ` \ 11 ( I I ��i' 11 ME,WIkes Po ntlezter Wynott complex,15 to 45 wZ
(ApPl-ti..St.PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET). \\I / I �G _nYm 1 1rv,�•3QE�2 q% �5 Nbi�51'`�':E °OS'OT'c <3'I6 4 -( 55 �nv i I� 1 percent slopes N 0 LL
FEE ODq 1q 5 .! ' .. F�f) 59 5 i� >///i�.' `* 1 I I I l I / III 51/' y' HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP ChA Ratng B/D U
Type l Seeding(Lewns or other focal areas)1001 \ l / / I t B3l RceolO Bo52� 45' '� "C �� 1 / 1 ] l 1 / I 1 ME,Rahng9 DC Z�N Z /
I i' OV _N m� oz" _ / _I B \ \ 1 l � 1 i l l / �f F
lbs.oflme / \ O 'S4° ( -� _ S_�� ffiSLM16T +_ p,SM1NESt+� _J� / / / S 1\ ' ` I 'I 1 '/l iI if flu QOV �00
20 lb.of 1020M or 20 the of 10-10-10 in T - _ - ( -- -- -- ` / no
comb naton with 4 the of 0-060 tt L /J�_ _ 1 \ J Z
Subs of tallfeacue centann9ablend oft or morel \ ///� ✓ l� / / R=-B i // TRASH COLLECTION: Z_o¢ o?�
Tell6�0W /z/ TI ail �/ / / ,� , ' I 1/tl /I 1 j �/ I I II_ THE SITE SHALL USE DUMPSTERS FOR TRASH PICKUP.A pm
11b.ofNenbl. or Kentucky Bluegrass �- TW:3a] 29 2� %'' J \_. i ,� -. +i•EnA+NOS+ /. '� ^C�' l $ IJ 1 / 1 r 1 , I (I 0�
1 Ib.of usnter annual rye(November 1 m Marts 1)��- p of j TC/ �\ / +yE I� r r f 0.13�/CCRESg / /\ ` i / , 1 it CONCRETE PAD HAS BEEN DESIGNATED FOR THE w Q m
Type II Seed ng(General or low ma ntenance \ �k_v./ r 2"E __ / -'�_ __ ___ __ _ / / /I r, }) DUMPSTERS AND ALSO FORA COMPACTOR W o
1rea.) S-ZSEE f 38 l/f -- OPEN SPACE \.. / _- i G3 I I 1/ I
001be.fume _ ]�e f v€n-nrla' / i ..___e - / 1 / i iJ�/i i / ;/I ' , li % r1 l l w
`l / 3 57 ACRESt _ )
15 ros of 1020M or 15 lb..of 10-10-10m �� '- B ez i, fl / �( " "V f Ioo'aJ -R' "� `\ r� / 1--� r �l ✓3; �/� ,/1 I ) t If SIDEWALK NOTE: Z
cembnabon with 3 lb..of 046,0 41bs of fall 1 T / - -, J �ase / / 2 !! I �( I1/r SE
✓� ---� / / ° 1' ��' / 1°- , r r INSURE NO OBSTRUCTIONS WITHIN PROPOSED SIDEWALK w s
fescue coots n n blend oft or ore tall fescuas\ / \ _
1 Ib.ofseroea pedeza(use unacanfied seed 1 / 1-° / �r?/4 / -�i47�__/ y``J`� �.-'/ V / J� -`'ate J / ( / / / a I S! , / 1 r l / i� I J!( / l/ LOCATION(I.E.UTILITY POLES,FIRE HYDRANT,ETC.) �L1
August 15 to February 1) Tcrvewsrv/
V4 lb.of German m Ilet(May 1 ro August 15) \ ,5y iI B� / EY RFl t / -T -r- /�✓/ BWldingN 1 lb.of to Ma for after Au [15 Ex S M'�V024bi '�°gyp t I � /� _ 3 7 �
rye gran(.nor v 91s ) \ 1 _1 p ( /-� sroy / v - -� / // a°/ z;�•z m 1� a l \ I If /�,'' ,, l/ / ; If i/1/l J EXTERIOR LIGHTING NOTE'
Seeding m xt....ther than those I sled above -. _ m Im J/ / % v ( J '
must be approved by the City Inspector poor to \ C , \ / Garay. / ' M.3e / / l� 3 I I I// 1 / / ffj EXTERIOR EXIT DISCHARGE ILLUMINATION
seed n9 Ems air / g', - e Gt �FEssEro'1° f J ery \ ` / / g 1(.: N i 11 11� ✓ r'I i/l / ' Jr'f l//I/'/1 LIGHTING SHALL BE REQUIRED FROM ALL EXIT
5.Ed.,To requestng a finalnsp-ti.n the Owner levy e2�m V 6322 /* .\. �/ /JtI/r /,(' I)U� DOORS TO THE PUBLIC WAY IN COMPLIANCE , Cq�y�
mustsubmt Record Drawings and Engnee,s (CONVERT;ODROP/LET) 83 (' ) dc4c / ` 4 a / 1c 2 / J ''I�i = J )(/// ( �/ I / / r, ll /)f� WITH SECTION 1008 OF THE NCBC. �"(N A`C) ,
CeG.rbirat on[o the Eng neenng Dvson's RecoN 1 / 1\ 2 �w4a I lei` ( 1 / r/ I, j( lfj I/ , :' f
` I 830.]6 l J 11 ( \ .J / t eH Bp f v i o I i / / O� '-•.-
mn,t al,n h,ermustalsosubmtthe ` / Tc �// \ 19 ( / sa rs�4 - / / I l I J/ //� r'I!� flf/�//f� SIGNAGE NOTE: a�`$E
conawct on cne.kl at to the City In.ptc[or. `A '/.� xi vETlnups \- � �&2 T.. 6 a 1_ ! /
/ I / Y =.��I2 ... r , /� I ssv is , �anB_ .�/ / g ; II I i�I�� 3; , ;l1 ,l l�Iff, ll l ll i I � ���
6.Allwmkmustcarry aoneyearwerremyto I I / m 3 ) H / } / SIGN LOCATIONS ARE SHOWN AS CONCEPTUAL =Ct'. 1S V
cover all defects n matenals and workmanahieS/, l � j�J/ / m I � I 1 / ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO PERMIT. �y �
P'/ / TO
/ /I ��.°�� ✓; / ( rv / / I ��f/ / ' �l
7.Pro,to Beginning any work within NCDOT J
right-0f way the Contractor must hove acepy of / \ -/- q,s� ___4 a�- e>bp. ' /"�'/ 7 _/ 1 �,ao i/ i
thethae party encroachment agroement on the / I ! e3146 i -/If T' D, / \ °' \� I fr7fJ/i//%// 4 / / STRUCTURE REMOVAL NOTE:
job s to ( \0°2•\b° 3 I (f f /I / r I )// r f l I ANY STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVED SHALL J,��g�2g
L I ' b0 // �� o. / °e're 1 I I / 1 /1I / r i I) // f/ ) REQUIRE A DEMOLITION PERMIT FROM Q
B.Prorm beginning any work the contacmr must I/� N �.2� i lI `/ // 1 / / 't'�+vaaHi 8 9 J roh $ 1 / �)��)lJ/ l/ / BUILDING INSPECTIONS.
notify the Eng neenng F.id Office(]2]2362)tti ` �n ) " I / / 2 .a J ' / tB ay,Il / ST a _ , 'r w�� I / 3 i//r I( /�r
ahenge fo,conatacton nspecton 1�r'" 83 00 _ ( a / +y, VT B SHEI '/T°/ y y /
(:. 1. �// ry2 �o a=w _ �lriL3
9.ContactCity Link At]vAooO for ex sting water I ( _ I ��h e / ( / nr/e I s P ,�°/ g 8'm / Il / �J�/f ALL CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIAL SHALL
and sewerlocahona / ^+'� i \ 1 / I �' �l / CONFORM WITH THE CITY OF HIGH POINT
8 2.5 I �V/ I AA � /( / / I / 'a$ ll// / STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
> � \,3 \ � �
1I ° SITE INFORMATION: I� 4
eTCI 3t31 7 �_1 tt+ *12 f / / f/ / 17l 1 _ 1� J/��/ \I / .�/ \ z
/ / TIVE 1 �o I r / %/
�° ° SP (�/
Px b51'A l /(fir/ // J- l Zte. / I I I \ f /' �/-. l ^\`\ v j\� /J \ \ IL
�')p. EFm l \ 1.ADDRESS:2725#2 NC HIGHWAY 68 N ��/� O
ON �(,Y 00 Ex IBRCA , + I / / / I^v BWl"n I` I1 / r�' / \ il-
//nT�, 'gl3B ova Bns2 / /// / / / I 3yyneq} ) I / 1 / (// I (, 3,/�/ 1 C / �� /2.COUNTY:GUILFORD COUNTY Q
I '-1 i Tc - / ✓ z< ac // �S ten, - bad l I S c.wHEEL �//// �� /-�� MUNICIPALITY:CITY OF HIGH POINT F U
N 9 to ► - a x E�ht. ,. 6'6 SZ 1 �/l ;' _ 1(�1 O T rvJ.820. - - rvm IF ea>pp� / 1�lll r r \ \_t /tAJ G35,0 �/!2. �t�f ifG?'/ �/ J/ ~ i 3.PIN:7813437884 O IL
_ l ' ` 4.PARCEL NUMBER:167961 Z 111 � �O
r \ SAS R T .34 v ( Imy `�� �,� '� ] \ �JI / / ,q� \ 11/ l i o� % \ �1r r / % �� / :`)\ I 5.SITE ACREAGE:18.02 AC. n J�4L
p� �6 6.DEED REFERENCE:DB 7994 PG 2782;IDS 8682 PG 2496 Lu
II / �•y'`A�^� /i / v/ �`� I F ��
7.PLAT REFERENCE: O�
8.ZONING:CZ RM-16 � O
6 ark N; la
9.EXISTING LAND USE:RESIDENTIAL U Q
"�
OSW�yi 10.PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN A(ZONE X)MINIMAL FLOOD IL
o Yin / w ,2y (/ , / RISK AREAAS DESIGNATED BY FEMA.(REFERENCE:FIRM MAP O
r wvca F,1?h \ \ / tiP1 \a �� � / v / NUMBER 3710781300J,DATED JUNE 18,2007 O tl-
11.VERTICAL DATUM:NAD 83 ��nn
NO
I L Q I 5 q /
°/ N7�az�Tws^ Lu
�L�'i �\�/'
° 48 0 z 3e' ' eb \ Replacement of sidewalks and curb and cutter(standard not
/ w B 31 6" TEPS /
m LAYOUT NOTES: �i ` 11 ty�^� \✓ � i ( �,�,��L / ( ) '� �` � 0 `/ /I /�/%�/�� 1)Any unusetl curb openings/tlriveways will be closetl with sfantlartl curb antl gutter on curb antl
1.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR THE EXAC� EX R 1 -- / ��j� " / /PROPOSED `l S w 2 ) / J , / r � .AO� \ \ gnto streets.On ribbon P.-d sto-the driveway antl any pipe shall be romowd.
ievrp LOCATION OF UTILITY ENTRANCES,BUILDINGDIMENSIONS,ROOF LEADERS, i I J 1i�^,�y( PEDESTRIAN ` ` �\ \ 99�t �// f ,' ° �' >' / �' \ ge gsi ewe pairo ysi ewe
/ / \^ 0qb 2)Dama ro exis[in tl Ik shall be exiled to meet current Cit tl Ik stantlartls.
m v DOWNSPOU-I EXIT DOORS,EXIT RAMPS AND PORCHES. ItN t / 4 t\q PP'Py�/ GONNEGT ON
^ '"" \ /� / �y �gb5• '/ / ' \ \ Private Water.Sewer,and Storm Systems SITE
4 2.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO BUILDING FACE,FACE OF CURB, 61
OR EDGE OF SIDEW �/
3 ` oIr \\ / PPpp3 / /b / �'J/ ti\C1� / 1 / \\ All on-site u'hies shall be-tooted to the City of High Point standards.However,all utilities not PLAN
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2�'�.] 1 / �\'� \� // �,,r' ��, \ ! u
% \ 1 1 \\ \1\ / I r J 1 N�0'2�A�6• \ \ / \ '0 \ 1/f 1,// pr 3M3�ri / / , �\ t d thine publie easement or public Hghtof-way shall be private with maintenance to the water,
vi 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL LABOR AND MATERIALS FOR THE INSTAU-ATI tS1 ` \I \ / v / / I / ` /Y/,/, P / provided by the owners association or property owner(.).
OFTRAFFIG SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGSAS SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTl014 ) / \+ 1 �' f f
PLANS. 11 ` r^ / / a\ y e 3 / // \ \� de to Dr ins a for Buildin Pads standard note SCALE: 1"=60'
l \ / f / F/ / ) &Il n gW si es...It p ovine adequate d ainage f om the building foundation.For esidential
4.ALL NON4FANDSCAREDIstANDS SHALL BE PAINTED WHITE WITH STRIPES 4"WIDE / DATE: 4/3/23
AT 45°AND 2 FEET O.C. \ / / „/ / / (/ .hen io a rants shall slope a minimum of 6 inches within the first 10fettf Mr the on...i 1
\\`" / „•-440/ E\� / \ �(74-I '\ I / / referenretl in State Bliltling h,N Stme Building
tlreinage shall also be pmvitletl for new commercial
S.ALL STRIPING SHALL BE PAINTED WHITE 4"WIDE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. \ \ \\/� J t+�' �� / ON ✓ / ' / 1 cch-cumni colt,pliance with the NC State Builtling Catle.
\ ``J \ \ /� PROJECT: 1746-21
6.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO OTHER PLANS WITHIN THIS CONSTRUCTION SET \ \\ \ \ \ / / /l /` L�,p{�j --^9 �� / ,Z-�,% Iji RPE/ /£' / / /.T���iIT/v /v,kT
0 FOR OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION. \\ \\ \ I / / / / P_',*per{•bVS 3ry -- \ ' ,��P&i2'� X / ' ( lJl\t11HIC SCALE DRAWN BY: TM
1 /' �\ - 60 30 0 60 120
e THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.TOPOGRAPHIC DATA TAKEN )1 �(pey'/ ^ A
FROM LIDAR J I� i \ 1 I I / / / _- ``��a�'_-_ //' by �E /'' // / /'� / IINCH= 60 FEET SHEET 3

GRADING NOTES: / J } ) I I ~/ REVISIONS
1.ALLSITEWORKSHALLBEDONEINACCORDANCEWITHTEPLANSPREP//TTHH BVCPT 1 / / ////l \ I't'ILLF{Rp Al
SECTIONSING,THE OF THE NCDOT STNT ANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OR ROADWAVQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF HIGH INCONSTRtICPTIONO // II { 1 J ^ I \ / \ll r � Y
OTHER PERTINENT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS. \ / / // II } I l / / \\\ \ \ 1\ 11 / IT
at: PREMIER DR
2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY AT ALL TIMES WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL,STATE AND J rw( EE\X\z�� }
LOCAL LAWS,PROVISIONS,AD POLICIES GOVERNING S�AdFETYAD HEALTHT,�INP/L'UDING THE / r { I I I I I \ \ I I { ( P ( py SITEFEDE rD
PART S OFS DCLE 29 REGULATIONS,OCCUPATIONAL SAF�FETKANDHEALGIT4 TR,CLAPTE-1IR / / J v \ '1 w
CONSTRUCTION,AND SUBSEQUENT PUBLICATIONS UPDATING THESE REGULATIONS.
3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR EXAMINING THE AREAS AND CONDITIONS/
UNDERWHICHTHEPROJECTISTOBECONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF A BIgI
SUBMISSIONOFABIDSHALLBECONSTRUEDTOMEANTHECOMRACTORHASREVIEAJE E
SITE AND IS FAMILIARWITH THE CONDITIONS AND CONSTRAINTS OF THE SITE.
-� {/
4.BEFORE EXCAVATION,ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE LOCATEDPROPERALTHO IN TH�ERFIELD BV TiE
LOCATION OF A RI UTIILIT ES AND UNDERGROUNDLSTRUCT TM�RE-�PPR�%MAMTE AND MAV NOT ° /6 4 / J � I { I��/ i�
TE 811. / /.-- / I I I I \ g04y' /���/ J/ \ /{
AND EXACTLOCATION OF ALL N. UTILITIESANDFUDERGROU�ST FK3`iLE`SRMWE THE EXIST�CEr�/�,/-J/ I I I I I \ � // / �A\E�-� ���/I� / /�v / \.l \ I I 1 j I I (;I� j I� / / 1 {{ VICINITY MAP
___/ 2 /'� ///// V a{ j ` { / ) I / I 1 N.T.S.
5.ALL EXISTING TREES,VEGETATION,PAVEMENTS,CONCRETE FOUNBATIONS.STRDCTS#ND / I I / \ / ./ /� // // /\ II l 1 ( I/ I( t )/
ORGANICTOPSOIL SHALL BE STRIPPED AND REMOVEDFRQMNE`CONSTIjUGL06-A / �`�P / /// / >J l I
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ✓ / { \ \ // / t�--• \ ++ / /_ !/�/ // I { 1 / '' /
fi.SLOPES SHALL BE MAXIMUM 3H:1V(HORIZONTAL TO VERTICAL)UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. m'P
7.AN ASSUILT DRAWING OF NEW UTILITY SERVICES SHA MQEPREPARED BVTHE CONTRACTOR I /\\ / I I L, // // f 0T �y41/g PS1,TP.
AND SUBMITTED TO THE OWNERAND ENGINEER UPON COMPL�T,ION OF TEPROJECT. L/° �+ + /r �r(fJ�(. I��
S.ALL AREAS NOT PAVED SMALL BE TOPSOILED,SEEDED,MULCHED,-6R LeN45CAPED UNLESS { / / r i/� 36 I 1 I I ) I it I !j
OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS,SITESPECIFICATIONSORINSTRUCTEO BY 4- �N S / } �I I `"E INFORMATION:
THE OWNER. \ I / ( / /\ 1.5� �// 1 �(eA °h ✓+/ i7/ F�j/(__ I /1 7 I I I ` III I I
9.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE REPORT OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION ANDq4 q. / /f/�, / I }1 I I� I /{ //
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ANALYSIS PREPARED B DS CA110 AS,LIPPRIORTO INITIATION \ / / J \ -/ \ -•�•F-t // ) 6•25�• / + ++ /// / I S I' /) I /\i��1>P�PDRESS:2725#2 NC HIGHWAY 68N Z co
OF ANY EARTHWORK ACTIVITY. V� M
10.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO OTHER PLANS WIT111�T TRUCTI. TFOROTIER~ /� to\ -�� -- _�04fi. r ,q`E H / / ��// l { ' \ I I 12.�1(J NTY:GUILFORD COUNTY N
PERTIENT INFORMATION. I/ S/ �� ,1( I _e� o1�' y0 \q\ A2� /J/ / 35 I I I 1 I I �' I I jN{ NICIPALITY:CITY OF HIGH POINT �n
! I' p� I I I I {I I i I I Z
� �- N � i /I I }�M N LAYOUT NOTES: \ \ I / be �n // _ /��/ vd I r )I { y ( 1131'{f :7813437884 w _ M
\ l _/ //// / IaTYFec o2 ii ml r0 1 ( / �;'/ I
1.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLWSa--
w
FOR THE EXACT LOCATION S,UTILITY ENTRANCES,BUILDING \ / Q' /f ",p�L \ I ad��\/ ° .10°F ° l -= / 3 y 4 ( I } 1 \ I I r �/ I i J CEL NUMBER:167961 z IY
DIMENSIONS,ROOF LEADERS,DOWNSPOUTS,EXIT DOORS,EXIT
\
RAMPS AND PORCHES ` /} �` _oLUc ' PIPE ENO Ex. I "^'• Z�'/ ° ,c2'jE e� 8'
_ ACREAGE:18.02AC. a
2.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO BUILDING FACE,FACE OF CURB,OR 1 /'/ { 1' ' T2 \ 01053 -5�`
EDGE OF SIDEWALK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. t/ �'' BOIB NB 45 �f'6 / '( 1 I I S/ Z�N
oe/ -( ' GLAD REFERENCE:DB 7994 PG 2782:DB 8682 PG 2496 0 0
3.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL LABOR AND MATERIALS FOR,_ / _
THE INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC SIG NAGE AND PAVEMENT / J �\\ �y -�-{� � Rom- ++ V T / 16 = / \ I I 1 {/) 3fi �I-i I it (/ �`�r-�T REFERENCE: 0[>w O I
MARKINGS AS SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS.I / a �`'� _� y�'I�
'^ ti SS ^'5� -+ + / - �' i /II// I i i A/ I I II//J Z_O o N_
+ien+.Arms+ /' I I { ' 1 I I B.7,O,WING CZ RM-16 o o a a ro
4.ALL NONiMND PED ISt DS SHALL BE PAINTED WHITE` 29 2 V \ S Fg ^
WITH STRIPES4'WIDEAT45°AND 2 FEETO.C. _�_\ f>LO T/ {� + LyJ QO
\ p�7 �2a � 1'' l J/, ,�'Z�
s.AL STRIPING SHAL BE PAINTED WHITE-DE UNLESS .RCP 571_/fi 38 D ! ���' - j 4BaG3 {jI1+I / FRNSTING LAND USE RESIDENTIAL Z i�
\_ / I I IDN OPEN SPACE I I l �!'// I j
OTHERWISEACRES[ '' I ' / � I � w
/ qp 2 I OPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN A(ZONE X)MINIMAL FLOOD Z o
6.CON TRACTOR SHALL REFER TO OTHER PLANS WITHIN THIS \ -.� °° �-� I / / ( Lv
/ 1 Y y ) AREA AS DESIGNATED BY FEMA.(REFERENCE:FIRM MAP x
CONSTRUCTION SET FOR OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION rr �I
Aax/ /e\9 / z94nb q an- 10 I} 3DATED JUNE 18,2007). /'�I� a
/Bzabf EY,\' RATTY[ i a Irainpaz _ �• -,r`o` S / / / a8�5 11 I {{!/III /if y�RTICAL DATUM:NAD 83 L9
Ge gOe G1 S F EM 3Ba^ / I I i y (i Ill /I
EX AT 83B,9'1 - T 'e°tW �U 4 u I MI {I{ �l ✓ l '
B2� _ - m jl / 1 / i r rr i-UPON AREA CALCULATIONS:
CONVE O DROP INLET) q�U BC.22 1. u CeG .� / � � �3fi I •C { � � 1 I I I
IS' ec�b �, J ` ,J „K�a / - _ _ 8 'q„ r 2 // / v I \ I \) / '/ ' �l(!/ I I�{�ND AREA: EXISTING: 18.02 ACS.
$�1C,BUILT-UPON AREA: 0.74 ACS.(4.10%) pE>, 1
(/ IIBx. e3 oz / " • ti st „ / G� ,� / ! I IQNAL BULT-UPON AREA: 8.20 ACS.
nrP. ` TE i I} . , a _.R I �� I J,°/ _ 1 V �. // \: I{ { I IIIIIII l r /' I/ ^ r IIrI S.IMPERVIOUS TO BE DEMO'D: -0.74 ACS.(32,269 SF)
{t/ (1/ ( ) 1 �
''� 7.46 ACS.
OPOS D BUILT-UPON AREA: 7.46 ACS. 41.39
TAL B ILT-UPON AREA%:7.46118.02=41.39% J 4/3�23
151
�l( •® �l ` { I I / OWNE TO USE DAVIS LAKE REGIONAL STORMWATER POND.
�°�'� ( ti L( / �/ 2�,°� / SHUT 6TP ��h^. � � `� � / �
63 titi
I .I
�( I e � -. \ I �l ♦. �e// pl � s ts�&gym �I 1 ,��
2 flrfl SOILS TYPES:
(2)a'4r ' 32 g { / (((I f, / / MhB2 MecMenbum sandy clay loam,2 to 6 percent slopes,
"// J moderadey erod d
{ I ea ChA,Chewacla�am,0 to 2 percent slopes,frequently 'Q
11 I TC� ( / // / ,. f01 I 17/ 1 J/ // �11 / I \ r WkE,floodeWilkes-� dexter-Wynott complex,15 to 45 Z
XTENO .18" \ 833.41 I / / ET NiN 12 VE {o ( / / % _/ Poin ,ter
'.CP 5 L. 2' ITC 56 NN �/ `- •sq K P SP _ w, ,I l�� --/i �% II \ \ percent slop V
HYDROLO SOIL GROUP:CAA,Rating:B ID OL
by' / _ •1 /---lll I / �\ MhB2,Ratin C (� •^
: i� Q
\�I,I,yI, WkE.Rating:D �
11q �' \/- 1(�1 3 F-
TV
- rvJ.b2e.W- _EX�f10 '\ gV'* / a0�/ v�' F' A / M°IBhf 3g • I (918•s�EPs CSwHpEL Z '(/// i� O � 1
EXTEND X.�O" P xrF G G2 -� c° mC H IF.6qj I / z f I rya. m,t 0 'Vg / BOEOW NOTE:
AREAS. z
w RCPS .F. 8350 $ ,\ lL
Z
NO OBSTRUCTIONS WITHIN PROPOSED SIDEWALK r
l 9 _ / /l//1 3'y ��'„� / ` LOChTION(I.E.UT�ILITV POLES,FIRE HYDRANT,ETC.) T7 �L
I ` I ee ` L//// y1y°\\'7d'� /i ' J v//'\\` / MOLL -1 jL F-
B - / L 0E 1a -__ n \ ( I ffi �\�"\� 2 5p/ '/ r A Hate DrainA a for BuildingPads standard note IF-
-EL" l� Z
hI I / E fit _ ~ / // 2'tbb' 'p.dOG /1 All naiv.Fo ruction sites hall provitle adequate drainage from the building ioundaEon.For n'sitlential \ O
DRAIN BCGIN B` Z, ( r YY
B3R5I• 11 \(5 §/ I ' \,\ mnstmc[idr�th retles shall slope a minimum of 6 inches within the first fOfee[from the foundation as 1y 1
°WI W / S /\ I _
E �O• 2 Kjd �` 'a'6p 48 \ I 1 g a l I l /i P-ntic`-r p '3y/' / / �elerenred in N6� to B�ilding Cade.Adequate dreinage shall also be pnrvitletl for new commercial L
Cry �, comp' a with the NC Sfate Building Code.
6.sm Nn 1 gaNnl ReDiacement of;sidewalks and curb and gutter(standard note) Z > r
\ ' op F- / Ix � 1 \ 1 /'$�ffi\ //f s �r i( /i 1)Any waed curb�penin sl drivexays will be closed with standard curb and gutter on curb and Q O
�W ( ) 1 -.� .¢;�,4 3 O 1 r / l \a t 0 �$ A gutter streets.On ribbon�aved streets the driveway and any pipe shall be removed.
r v r'I day 2)D...geto existing sidewalkshall be repein:dto...t.umant Citysidewalk standards. U-
_ wee 92ti -� aen �r r a"'m (Q� O
gg wsr .o4 , `�- J
�„�.Y� Private Water,Sewer,and Storm Systems l�
GENERAL H.C.ACCESSIBILITY OTES: I6 QB B I\ I r' \B33 c ryll e f j 3 / �jb° L�% / J All on-site utilities shall be c nstmcted be the City m High Point stantlartls.However,all utilities not }
1.LANDINGS OUTSIDE ALL DOORS SHALL BE SIZED PER NCBC, T 1 1 la \1 / / �� A'I5 n� � G�}5\U, ' ///,�(' / / located within a public..4..nt or public rightof-way shall be prwate with maintenance to the water,
THE SAME ELEVATION AS THE FEE,AND SHALL HAVE A MAX.2% �.846 �� q sewer,and storm syat@ms provided by the owneia association or property owner(s). Lu
SLOPE INANYDIRECTION INCLUDING INTHE DIAGONAL. I .�!\\/ /` \
D_ 2.TiESLOPESINTHEH.C.PARKINGSPACEIACCESSAISLEAREA / / zzTW a O� �p�� G Responsibflity'10 Maintain Permanent Runoff Control Structures
w SHALL NOT EXCEED 2%INANY DIRECTION INCLUDING IN THE B48'� z3,6q, 1 / Ir -�� P�� G ' Statement (�
m DIAGONAL. 1 I I \�/ .Sl / ) / w6(31)6"kTEPS W� 8 mo { /j �2r ' A �r ` The property hall be.. ble for maintaining the completed turnoff central
o� I 1 II77N" A99"' I f//' / v f \ Prop.yownedby ponsi g pe permanent
3.THERE SHALL BE NO DESIGNATED PEDESTRIAN F.X / /PP��JED C ) / / f f �a� 2jAg0� structure as directed by thCgovemmenta office having jurisdiction for watershed p.tection.The
�p ROUTESISIDEWALKS WITHIN THE SITE,EXCEPT WHERE LABELED As A I �Jj p' 1 / / J � (eP�\ / PEDESTRIAN S 3 \\,, p/�t 3 / // •ay� / / \ \ poperty owners)of�at the time of required maintenance shall be jointly and severally liable for
a RAMPWITH RAILS,WHICH EXCEEDA5%SLOPE IN THE DIRECTION OF I INJ I / �Ir-' W' 03/ I GONnEGTION / -p(O�V, Z �/ ' J/ \ any and all costsa dot thereto.
TRAVEL II ^ Sze o1 / ,� °•OB /c1T%r'Oty ' a i ? \ n GRADING
i / p6\ b In fneWs ertif' ation of Runoff Control:
and
3 4.ALL PEDESTRIAN ROUTES>5%(1:20),IF ANY,ARE LABELED AS ` 1 `¢-,( \\1 / PM�`y,.%&y / / .Nj�w 0 / 7 /// V-`� I¢J'\' / ` r \\ codify t�tthiapal ontro runoHin cempli....Wththe City of High Point Stormweter Guidelines STORM DRAINAGE
'RAMPS'SHOWING \\I I \\ 1\\ I /f / J \ / �0°2'�q�6 1 ~l r / (�'J/ '�3d�\ �/ r \ I �rer puality ahtl F oad Control,antl that[he nmoff mn[ml measures shown on this plan race[or
-DIRECTION71 SLOPE,LEVEL LANDINGS AT TOP AND BOTTOM(MAX.2%SLOPE IN 1 I '7o Y /�i' T I / \ d tn. uidel' of the same Sto--.r G.id.lin..f.r W.t.r Q..Iity.nd Flood Control.
ZO ANY DIRECTION \ \1 \ I ^ / '- / A\'2J\'w t /3fi r / / r �
INCLUDINGIN THE DIAGONAL),RAILINGSIGUARORAILS,AND SHALL \ , b \ /{ SCALE. � =60'
^ / L ��• 6y2 \ // /� / a .��'•(N.....!?O''Pg seal
w F COMPLY WITH NCBC. \ \ \ \ 1 ) f J // I / / / £i ' / \
S.THERE SHALL BE LEVEL TURNING AREAS(MAX.2%SLOPE IN ANY \ \ \ / l^J / / /\ �%/J / / I/ ' ' } / �.y DATE: 4/3/23
J
DIRECTION I DLUDING IN THE DIAGONAL)ON ALL SIDEWALKS N / //� SEAL/
(INCLUDING SIDEWALKS ALONG STREETS)WHERE AN INTERSECTING (\ \ \\/� J I V �' I NW ✓ �� 1 '
SIDEWALK CONNECTS WITH IT. \ \ \\ \ / y / o g',% ///:� L / ?O' � 4 ::mac PROJECT: 1746-21
B.ALL STAIRS SHALL HAVE SLIGHTLY SLOPED LWDINGS IMAX.2% ) / / �����' 00��Joa'oFPRGP 862.93 GIN `� GRAPHIC SCALE
SLOPE INANY DIRECTION INCLUDING IN THE DIAGONAL),ATTHETOP \\\ / J / / Y60'" i 60 yp \ c // S DRAWN BY: TLy)
1 / �,�.p l I 60 30 0 60 120
AND BOTTOM AND SHALL COMPLY WITH NCBC. pi// �//rii / \��_\ - pr�i \ C
c 7.STAIRSISTEPSWITHLESS THAN A I2'ELEVATION CHANGE SHALL 1 �\ / , ` I { I J / / / G0�$ O f \E�/ / ' Z / ' (/ / \\ .� r/ /23 l INCH- 60 FEET SHEET J
COMPLVWITH NCBC 1003.5 1H / , /

rr i IJ. v y + + �� LAN FILL AREq,3
8''I MASTER METER �� 811 1 WATER @�p1 114S / WILLgR
W / 7 �00 � �'� 1p D DAIRY
y 8 RPZ IN HOT BOX RD
I / / 4
PREMIER DR
o >
CD i �/ji �' / z SITE Z
w J
( I O
I� U
r�/ r � � �- c�li WE N�0\lER 6 (L V
I PUMP ISCHARGE. PROVIDE Q
� Lu _
�LJ I� II SILT B G AND PEA GRAVEL Z
DISCHAkGE PAD 4 ==
EXISTING \ �`� VICINITY MAP
}
WETLANDS I " pC _ Z
I �R`I-RAP PIPE OUTLET
J 1 I B1 -BUFFER IMPACT I I \ P4. EMBED TO EXISTING
r ZONE 1 ROADWAY I WB -2 \ ST EAM BED ELEVATION. I U
J PERMANENT = WETLAND FILL AREA 2 1 �/ gn
N U
f I (8,178 S.F.) I b�./x
67 SF
/ STREAM IMPACT N
3 AVG. WIDTH 5.0' Q
v I J (312 SF) J
S1,S2,S3-STREAM IMPACTS I ' l I O
LU
y 1
S1-62 LF(312 SF)-96"CAP CULVERT
S2-30 LF(150 SF) EMBEDDED RIP-RAP
:-! I +
1-1 IS3-5 LF COFFER DAMS 25 SF + + /
00 62 LF 96"CAP C LV RT P E
co I � 1. X ST N6
M EX END X. 8" ETLANDS:
rlj
CD RCI 5I L.F� II o BON OF ,+WETLAND FILL AREA 1
I N 2,640 SF
STREAM C/L
z ) I TOE
3 I I BANK Z co
I P PE END
Z
00
a GP r, m F0
EX. I8"R 55 56 �;
, I Z
( - PAT INV. 3 I P Z
/ N M
o ZONE 2 ROADWAY I �u Q7 w _ 0
r_ PI E END PERMANENT I _ Z / ?4--C� 53 / z m w X
O�
2 �E� b��R�P (4,052 S.F.) � �G�_ � � � � o � � o
} IN\/III . 82 .�O ___�___ ___ —_I_ �— 24,,c /j o 8/� Garay o w Ld Z Z
_ -_
__ ____ _= EXTEND EX. 60" , `� N 4340 a o o 0
00
z _-- RCP 8 L.F. III ,/ , / FF/ c� w w o
a / � �N I I I /� �� �' Z o Q "t o co
Y
IF NECESSARY UNTIL PROPOSED I �-, / PIPE END w o a- a
w MANHOLE IS INSTALLED, TEMP. J fae�
m UPSTREAM SANDBAG COFFER DAM II II / EX. 24" RGP r / z o =v
FOR WORK AREA DEWATERING I h / �\\\ �- w
x \\\ �� \ r 8Q26 W a
S PUMP ADEQUATE TO e
SS �/ I MAINTAIN STREAM FLOWlph P �� LEGEND
7 / \ \ ——752—— EXISTING CONTOURS
T6 B ATfZ ICLY LAC A \ \ —750-PROPOSED CONTOUR
o ,' /�//�/ III EX P-ND I F TO CAP4U /\ / C `\ -------STREAM
1.0 30 15 30 '// f \\\ " Date:5/18/23
s / / i W TER R M TR A Tfja LL / \ ,
� �f \ #��X. GRATE INLET TEMPORARY IMPACT 5C LE tN= n�e_zi
A�HIS IN�T/j(L / / \\�\ STOP: 841.Q0 PERMANENT IMPACT w E
�//�� ``-�� � x SHEET 1
1 inch- 30 ft. �` I+ 1 *�� ��*�� '/� / FX 74" IN\/ nlJT• IINK WN� s of s

WILLARD DAIRY RD
�o W X.
R �:83 00 . 65 %/ \ \ ZONE 1 Z o TOP:
\A s 1 m o
R4E:17 426 .872 ��
� � I PREMIER DR (�
LATIT D : 36 02' .678" U / PUMP DI CHARGE. PROVIDE ` _
D -7 °57' 241" / SILT BAG AND PEA GRAVEL — — — — N z SITE co z
LO IT
DISCHARGE PAD y. J z o w
EX. J
� EX. �/ ZONE 2 m o
18"RGP / B2-BUFFER IMPACT (4� // RIP-RAP PIPE OUTLET` ) _
823.45 ZONE 1 ROADWAY —EXI5TIN6 �f IL f PERMANENT / PAD. EMBED TO EXISTING �, / �O� �U� �� S v c~ U
/ -STREAM BED ELEVATION. f y�ETLP�NDS FFT c�� �ER ti5 Q
/ (7,609 S.F.)
LU
WD 1-4
/ 1�19 WE p�E cA 0- O
WE FILL AREA 4Lu z
0 / ;+ 447 SF Q _
25 11I0INITY MAP
S4,S5,S6-STREAM IMPACTS / V '+ p- °=2000' ? LL
/ S4-93 LF(530 SF)-96"CAP CULVERT lJ l U z
S5-30 LF(171 SF) EMBEDDED RIP-RAP T ��'� = H Q
S6- 10 LF (57 SF)COFFER DAMS �O : gn — U
)'.24cla
X i/ OP OF ��' �UF�� � U IL
24�1 87 LF 96 CAP CULV\T PIPE / BANK Q
C / ° S REAM C/L' , LL
ti / v I 24 �� 4 >
N _ - Garage # G l.0
I , o- co / 1
N a
� F
STREAM C/L „ 23 FE 836.80
T P F
CDBAN 00 p 8 SANS
INLET) m / STREAM I PACT TARP S
`" 1 900 AVG.WI H 5.7' \ ,-,_ .
a / bed 530 SF) SUP TREAM SANDBAG COFFER
�bAM FOR WORK AREA 4.�
3 / U E ATERING S Zco
B2-BUFFER IMPACT / O PUMP ADEQUATE TO/ I
a ZONE 2 ROADWAY / 0 ��N . EXS IN6 U' n
i 5�`J ' -�Ii +. I MAINTAIN STREAM FLOW lye Z
o PERMANENT ISLANDS 834 8� � S
v (2,043 S.F.) �� �� i WG -2 10
+ s w Z "
N M
o O O + + + B2-BUFFER I PACT C ER o o
�� / / O + + + + + ZONE 2 ROADWAY 6 - N z �
w� �� _i' LAN FILL ARE9 3 PERMANENT �/ w w z = Z
8" MASTER METER I�� 114S / 1 Z z z
lc� 8 9 P WATER (2,347 S.F.) �8 Q o w r
of o 0
z 8"fill
IN HOT IBOX 90 �� o `� TRFA/���oo o, Sw 0 �e l w w o 00
F
a I � �� 6�L / /""/ e pv OZl a�a f -9 V o w o o ro
/ e _ ao�3 t _9 / LL z o =v
/
Lij
o
Q 4 Qom _ z Z
i / �OV / �� / M a
m (� LEGEND
/ Al � Q�� ——752 EXISTING CONTOURS
0 40 �Q 20 40 —750 PROPOSED CONTOUR
f
' I / /�// �O is OO I (/ -------STREAM
N I / / / Date:5/18/23
�r TEMPORARY IMPACT Pro e� Number.17 -21
SCALE 1"=3V
a l 1 inch — f PUMP DISCHARGE. PROVIDE / • 836.E rc a( PERMANENT IMPACT w E
I SILT BAG AND PEA GRAVEL : s SHEET 2 5

/ f WILLq
\ RD DAIRY
Of PREMIER DR
SITE
W
Ci
Lu
LU
�
(n z = Z
I
I0� VIGINIT10 P a< _ }I TYPE G MA
"=2000� AC _ z
rn PLANTING YARD
S
colool C4IC
TOB ^
J PIPE END EX. B _ i -- 0
\ 810.52 Toe
cn Tos �i` �I�� �o� o W� -�X. 55MH SS
Toa
a oB e(i co 0 TOP: 814.47 SS S�
M TOB eoi T5 N
T I aa
N 1TOB °�� 11 � SS JO
�-
o - 1 z_ — / SS—O CN
W +
/— e� 80I K- BUFFER IMPACT �j�j
) ZONE 2 GRADING �_�SS N OZ WETLAND FILL AREA SF + +
a i �0 WX. 55MH TEMP: 668 S.F. —�� � IV_ _ _ _ _ +
z ONE 1 Z o TOP: 816.17 _ �O1 ���� + EXISTING
3 Z rn ER WETLANDS z r-
ZONE 2 oz o .�-:-�.. + + w Z U N M
= 0 Cl) > w ILL!
z`
o _
_ Of
0 5TIN& 50' BUFFER V) U
x I Z w Z
U
W LANDS o w Z
x _ z � LEI Zz �o
o 00
FLAND FILL AREA 4 Z J z
a. SF %— CO w a N
00
D.f 0f o 0
Q / 840,30 30 0 15 30 Z z o a
�/7( Q 2
BR c� w
N z Z
� B
Q� 1�UFFF1� � \ R 1 inch = 30 ft. w a
B 2
c� ti 4��a� BR LEGEND,
n/ 752 EXISTING CONTOURS
0 �� 2 B —750—PROPOSED CONTOUR
N
3,St -------STREAM
/ / TEMPORARY IMPACT Project NuBmbe23
.1718-21
Gar 4" �dg Height, ��C 4N Fj E PERMANENT IMPACT W E SCALE,SHEET 3
3a n,/ age �# n. /011.,_ F�c_ _ ;�„ ATEn �/N
5 of 5

WILLARD DAIRY RD
f � �
Q
PREMIER DR
SITE C z
w J
tu
VICINITY MAP L a _ }
I��_2000� pC T 3 U Z
/ / �
C-4u
10 TYPE G ZoN� o
PLANTING YARD � � Tog � � B4-BUFFER IMPACT � � � � J
og � ZONE 2 GRADING EX. SSNI / `Q
0 PERM: 756 S.F. �T,BP�8SS01 , l
- T
801 g
Q \ TOB _Jk)B g01 �
Sri ^r SS /
�- 801 1 801 SS - /
ss
,1 � b z -EX. 55MH + —SS _
Lr) _ M p TOP: 814.4� SS �� 5�R _
z N SS �J� X , v o
' Z ro�- N x x
3 00
00
a� �S— SS N OZ WETLAND FILL AREA 5 + ✓+ X�x�x x�,�—� Z N
177 SF "� / ^ °'
�— — — — — EXISTING w Z N M
i 50� BUFFER + WETLANDS >
m ~ z
� oo
� � WE 1-1 N Z � a
NQ�
WI + t + 11 11 Z CJ U 2
W � Z =
Q OJ U_If E H O
In W J O Z QO
Z Z > W O F
O Z p 1 q- Z N
a- p d
W w Q W =
Z
W J O 0
m �— ��jOj' �' _
900 c� w
COp�
l a
c� LEGEND
0 ——752 EXISTING CONTOURS
30 0 15 30 —750—PROPOSED CONTOUR
N —-—-—-—STREAM
23
TEMPORARY IMPACT Pro bo N,mbee 1718-21
I scu-e 1•=3o•
U 1 inch = 30 ft. PERMANENT IMPACT w E
s SHEET o4

WILLARD DAI
/ RY RD
1 > CD ��` X. 55MH / �� �/ PREMIER DR
o f z SITE Z
TOP 811.31 � , z �
W
/ 4
} L B5-BUFFER IMPACT // S�FFT d ~ ? _
1 ZONE 2 GRADING / �'� OVER 0 H
( / TEMP: 2,549 S.F. I r- /` �� WE pDE ~ �j j fA A- V
/ � _
4 J =1�IGINITY MAP }
04
6
o f }
000
1
ro
�
V.
a / +
/ 00
00
+ 7.7
l N
a f / + —� ZLO
m�
0
+ G 45 f
oQ'
�I f14
I OJw U
-,Z�o OK+ + Q
N11 + O
/r W
E�5TIN� � 36 8 2
Ln
+ � C
+ Y I- J Z U_o
L�QZ
o Q�z
a=ro/ + �HYD. o+
J Zo
r v T "I � 6„ GV c0
z
c� / / 44/ LEGENDS
/ I
75z—
— EXISTING CONTOURS
30 0 15 30 —750—PROPOSED CONTOUR
N -------STREAM
23
TEMPORARY IMPACT Pro bo No6mbe.1746-21
I scu.e 1•=ao•
1 inch = 30 ft. PERMANENT IMPACT w E
SHEET 5
s of 5

REVISIONS
6v7� 50\ `��„ x T �� 1 WILLARD DAIRY RD
x7,0
PREMIER DR
f f l l / X. 55MH
� R :83 00 65 � %/ \\ \ ` \ ONE 1 � o TOP: 816.17 � w SITE Co
/ M>� 1 \ Z m
RAE17 42 .872
LATIT D : 36 02' C78:� g� U PUMP DI CHARGE. PROVIDE
o n T )� SILT BAG AND PEA GRAVEL
LOI�I�ITD -7 57 .241 / DISCHARGE PAD y O o FT
�F� EX. / 0 V, ZONE 2 m o c��� WENpwER
\GP / B2-BUFFER IMPACT �\ C4� / R P R� PIPE OUTLETS
3.45 �'
ZONE 1 ROADWAY . PAD. EMBED TO EXISTING — — — i BUFFER Z
PERMANENT EXI5TIN6 �j� `-'
(7,609 S.F.) / ST�AM BED ELEVATION.
y WETLANDS � / 1(IGINITY MAP z >o
/ =2000'
f DI-4
WETLAND FILL AREA 4
/ T :+ ; 447 SF NOTES: :
/
/ ZCJ �' '' '' 1, PROVIDE SILT BAG AT PUMP DISCHARGE,
S4,S5,S6-STREAM IMPACTS / V PROVIDE PEA GRAVEL PAD UNDER SILT BAG. All
S4-93 LF(530 SF)-96"CAP CULVERT 2. PUMPS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN DUPLICATE. pg�QQ $S
S5-30 LF(171 SF) EMBEDDED RIP-RAP ' I 3. PUMPS SHALL BE MANNED AND MAINTAINED AT Z3 A
S6- 10 LF (57 SF)COFFER DAMS Q ALL TIMES DURING WORK PERIOD, z
1 X '- T� %/ �� OP OF : ��I LEGENDS
87 LF 96 CAP CULVERT PIPE
BANK ——752—— EXISTING CONTOURS @ 2' INTERVALS
\(� / S REAM C/L1 --750 -- EXISTING CONTOURS @ 10' INTERVALS
O•D / olq (^I, �-+ 1 r , ' —Toe 50 T BROPOSED CONTOUR
EXISTIING TOP OF BANK
24 (�� �\ EXISTING TOE
l°' M
I n EXISTING STREAM
1
23 EXISTING WETLAND AREAWE
TC �'U STREAM C/L it �L
7� vT P F �\ PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACT
Q3 BAN 00
PROPOSED STREAM BUFER IMPACT Q
T) � � T STREAM I PACT � � � �i
900 AVG.WI H 5.7' \
la g3�. �o l bed (530 SF)� SUP TREAM SANDBAG COFFER STREAM IMPACT AREA �
E rC / .� FOR WORK AREA Ld �4
FWATERING STORM PIPE
B2-BUFFER IMPACT / U `'�� ' " � S
m / 0 N� O X5 IN6 Pu ADEQUATE TO DISTURBED LIMITS L
ZONE 2 ROADWAY � o ANDS- I MAI TAIN STREAM FLOW .4 _
PERMANENT c ' 30 0 1s 30
(2,043 S.F.) l
i UWG I-2 N+ N
B2-BUFFER IMPACT' 1 inch = 30 ft. �}
N r C ZONE 2 ROADWAY Q
+ LANDFILL ARE 3 (� ����I���III }
_ PERMANENT
CASTER METER 8" C� P WATER 114 S (2,347 S.F.) ''C�'` CA.. lU
m'Z IN HOT/BOX ��° �p oo TR �o sw \ .........
,
&C = SEAL
o 14984
SCALE:
. ,9 LNG I NEED.
\00 /�O� Co / / / _!� / '�/ '•� • \\�� DATE: 5/18/23
v
O< 4 V P PROJECT: 1746-21
III �
DRAWN BY: TM
SH
EET 2■1

REVISIONS
835
w
0
B CK OF CURB--I BACK OF C RB
U
830
G�
Z
v
zo
99
825
z �
z
820
J
a
TEMP.
SANDBAG
COFFER DAM
PIPE 24
7 LF @ 1.61
OF 96"CA WE
TEMP.
815 a SANDBAG
� COFFER DAM
EX GROUND 4
u.� CO E
E d Ld
12" _ EX.GROUND
F N ■v O
i 810
of N i
S TTT_
D c� 30 LF RIP-RAP PIPE OUTLET PAD.EMBED TO
O EXISTING STREAM BED ELEVATION. \\\��,\� CAR I /�O // V
z o z EMBED 96"RCP \` r • , '/ N
> z 12"BELOW STREAM BOTTOM p�. o f E S SIO �iiL-;
;=; QQ 9� .7 _J
zo SEAL - >
n 14984 lil
`m 8050 0 0 0 0 •• •��
16 v v v v
:9 !YGINEE�
P.
04 Do 0450 5/Ig/23 SCALE:1"=40'H, 1"=4'V
DATE: 5/18/23
PROJECT: 1746-21
DATUM ELEV DRAWN BY: TM
800.00
SHEET 2■2

REVISIONS
Cross section F'YLcpriSVeretAtldll pt��ter� INSTALL THE PERMANENT CULVERT CROSSINGS:
.c Mat to ab
or soil La.Wsiginvering xyxwmw
The culverts are to be installed in the dry within a 2 to 3 day
window of storm events. Sediment fencing shall be installed above
o and below the fill area, wrapping the fencing around the ends of the
pipe. Care will be taken to keep clearing and excavation of the
° stream banks and bed to a minimum. Stablilize all distrubed
�`R"W��� areas subject to flowing water with rip rap below the stream bed.
{} trlac>L Upon completion of crossing, fill, compact, and stailize the slopes
s�L,�ltu�aiucl;tU,w properly. Remove any in stream sediment control measures.
Top of riprap nthitnium
e` o thwkrums •nu>amum IF NOT ABLE TO INSTALL CROSSING IN THE DRY:
reek Luce
z. P
Then they must be installed with the use of Coffer/Sand bag Dams. z
!3. The dams will be installed above and below the culvert installations.
Pumps will be used to install culvert in the dry and divert Z
11
Gravel tWdonggeotemle stream through and away from the crossing installation. Silt fencing !9
'�. .o fabric, nerd will
be used parallel to the crossing to prevent down stream impacts. e t
Q_. The 1
installation of culvert will not proceed until the flow has been z
1 s
fiounm or ripa� d diverted.
mtntcrtiun� Upon completion of the culvert, divert flow to the permanent a
ZxNuodfinum culverts, install sediment fencing above the inlets and outlet, install W
rockaw outlet
protection, fill, compact and stabilize any part of the stream that is M
unstable appropriately. The temporary coffer dams shall remain intact
-'t•,CEEn * eer* Field Handbook i210�-EFH,Dec ember 1996j and functioning until the all the stream work/stabilizations has been
completed. After the stream is stabilized and flow has been diverted
then fill can be brought up and other utilities and headwalls installed.
Check and reinstall any silt fencing than needs to be repaired on a
regular basis during construction. Mat the slopes above the top of W/
bank
with erosion control matting as soon as permanent grade has been
GENERAL NOTES: GENERAL SEQUENCE: established if grass can not be establised. The culvert construction,
1. PRESERVE NORMAL BASE STREAM FLOW. 1. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. in 3: 4
order to divert the flow from temporary coffer dams to the ��U
2. IMPACT LENGTHS SHOULD NOT EXCEED 2. STOCKPILE GRAVEL (IF PRESENT) FOR USE AS p y �_
a THE LINEAR FOOTAGE AT THIS LOCATION STREAM BOTTOM RESTORATION MATERIAL. permanent pipes should be completed within two weeks. Any material lu CO
AS MANDATED BY THE PERMIT. 3. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY COFFER DAMS. that need to be stockpile d LU -a
3. 96" C.A.P. SHALL BE PLACED AS 4. PROVIDE ADEQUATE PUMP(S) TO DEWATER WORK near the stream banks will be protect by silt fencing and shall Q }=4
~ SHOWN, EMBEDDED IN STREAM BOTTOM, AREA. DO NOT REDUCE OR HALT STREAM BASE FLOW. remain no more than 1 week.
TO PROMOTE STREAM LIFE PASSAGE. DISCHARGE PUMP EFFLUENT INTO SILT BAG. DISCHARGE If stockpile is required for longer lengths of time it shall be moved
4. HAND PLACE RIP—RAP, NO DUMPED SILT BAG BEHIND SILT FENCE AT SILT FENCE OUTLET. _
above _
STONE. KEY IN PLACE. PROVIDE FILTER 5. INSTALL THE 96" C.A.P. CULVERT PIPE & HEADWALLS. C/� 'n rJ
FABRIC UNDERLINER. ` -(N Rp the temporary sediment basins that are planned for the site and r
6. PROVIDE CONSOLIDATED AGGREGATE BACKFILL Q' Ess� Z/ ' that will `r
5. PLACE TOP OF RIP—RAP OUTLET BETWEEN PIPES AND UNDER HAUNCHES. A LICENSED INC 0 '�0F otiy .2=PROTECTION TO MATCH EXISTING STREAM GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER AND THE CITY OF GREENSBORO be installed before the culvert installation. Sand bag dams will O A
NZO BED ELEVATION AT CULVERT OUTLET. DO INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT SHALL APPROVE BACKFILL = SEAL = be removed within 2 days after the culvert has been stabilized.
NOT IMPOUND WATER WITH RIP—RAP. PRIOR TO PLACING ROADWAY BASE COURSE. =n 14984
7. PROVIDE ANY REQUIRED SOIL BACKFILL IN SHORT,
WELL COMPACTED LIFTS. TEST FOR PROPER COMPACTION, FNG INE�� '
CONSULT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. S P. �
8. SEED UPLAND AREAS AS SOON AS GRADING ALLOWS. 11
SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR SEEDING SCHEDULE
REQUIREMENTS. 5/g/23 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
9. STABILIZE STREAM BANKS AFTER CHANNEL DATE: 5/18/23
U
_• REALIGNMENT IS COMPLETE. SEE RIP—RAP
PROJECT: 1746-21
REINFORCEMENT FOR STREAM BANKS CONSTRUCTION
DETAIL. DRAWN BY: TM
r SHEET 2.3

HT V. III '1'r' I ' �' ' / �� �, Tom % WILLARD REMMONS
/ / LAN FILL ARE 3
8'��MASTER METER 8 P WATER �� 114 S DAIRY RD
y 8" RPZ IN HOT BOX / 9 �0 o TR �o ,
PREMIER DR
I a � / // / / z SITE Co
Lli
CD
o
v I I PUMP IS6HA
SILT B� RGE. PROVIDE /
G AND PEA GRAVEL r / z
DISCHA�GE PAD VICINIT"r MAP r
EXI5TIN6 \ 4iRAP
/ i"=2000' W
WETLANDS I ` PIPE OUTLET /
J � B1 -BUFFER IMPACT I \ PAq�. EMBED TO EXISTING c � t
ZONE 1 ROADWAY (i WB I-2 NOTES:
PERMANENT = �1 STREAM BED ELEVATION. I 1. PROVIDE SILT BAG AT PUMP DISCHARGE. $
1 I W LAND FILL AREA 2 J,�/ PROVIDE PEA GRAVEL PAD UNDER SILT BAG.
\ I (8,178 S. gl- 67 SF I 3 STREAM IMPACT 2. PUMPS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN DUPLICATE. pS4 $S
AVG. WIDTH 5.0' 3. PUMPS SHALL BE MANNED AND MAINTAINED AT z
ALL TIMES DURING WORK PERIOD. 0
S1,S2,S3-STREAM IMPACTS I (312 SF) w
S1-62 LF (312 SF)-96"CAP CULVERT I LEGENDS
L�iI I
I 752-- EXISTING CONTOURS @ 2' INTERVALS
S2-30 LF (150 SF)EMBEDDED RIP-RAP 4 }
S3-5 LF COFFER DAMS 25 SF i --750 -- EXISTING CONTOURS @ 10' INTERVALS
-750-PROPOSED CONTOUR
- TOB TOB EXISTING TOP OF BANK
62 L&�D­
"CAP C LV RT P E T I ' B EXI5TN6 / EXISTING TOE
EXISTING STREAM
E X. 8" g33 AETLAND
RC 5 L. I y y I- + + + EXISTING WETLAND AREA WE
\\ I TOP OF WETLAND FILL AREA 1 + +
1 vy BANK
2,640 SF
AQ \ I i PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACT T
O 10 I STREAM C L 9
I TOE OF U
� PROPOSED STREAM BUFER IMPACT 3
PIPE END SANK �_
QEX, 1 8 RGP 55 56 STREAM IMPACT AREA lu Q
E O lu IL B1 -BUFFER IMPACT INS 3 I P STORM PIPE /� �L
ZONE 2 ROADWAY g3 I 1-.i } a
� � I - z O / 2�q_� � DISTURBED LIMITS
PellE END PERMANENT (�,P (4,052 S.F.) l� p- � 30 0 15 30
- ___ - -� �
w -__ ____ -- EXTEND EX. 60" 1 inch - 30 ft. "
o =__--_- i i 54zo - / -
x RCP 8 L.F. _
IF NECESSARY UNTIL PROPOSED i i `� '�N CAR0 ''% IU
�'. PIPE END ' 'Essi
MANHOLE IS INSTALLED, TEMP. i i �� \ J ; o F oti9` 7;i
UPSTREAM SANDBAG COFFER DAM 1 EX. 24 RC
'
SS OR WORK AREA DEWATERING/ SEAL v \� o - 14984 _
S \ \ :'3 .3.4- , 1 PUMP ADEQUATE TO � \�\ � ,y'. � � � SCALE.
/ i MAINTAIN STREAM FLOW. P =;9 NGINEE .•
S�J �C / i �`� ` DATE: 5/18/23
i T6 B �TRAT ICLY LAC A J `�`�'' ��� 7 S P.
EnFEND W T�CAP UR / \`���'�� \ / /~ `\ PROJECT: 1746-21
W TER R M TR A I `�` DRAWN BY: TM
S , , �T /�X. GRATE INLET
S ,1 IV�A H ,IS INEIT �=Dy 1 f, / ���� TnP. AAA An ~ 5�18�23 SHEET 7■7

REVISIONS
PROPOSED RADE
BACK OF CURB BACK OF CURB
I
83
II
83
U O
Z A4p
z S
Fa
82
j g
SEGMENTED CONCRETE BLOCK HEADWALL
w 3
\ I I DESIGNED BY OTHERS(SEE APPROVED WALL a
DESIGN PLANS FOR SPECIFICATIONS AND I W EMBEDDMENT REQUIREMENTS
8CF MAT 11EkISliVGg Op
E 182
� IPE 56
�
62 LF @ .65% OF 9 'CAP TEMP.
SANDBAG
iI I COFFER DAM
WE
�X G&
81575� __
EL 12" — — F 'Q
° mN �U
Z o 30 LF RIP-RAP PIPE OUTLET PAD.EMBED TO
w °J EXISTING STREAM BED ELEVATION. WW
a aX �j E a w Z EMBED 96"RCP L
12"BELOW STREAM BOTTOM z
a' 810
O°J
a��= N� \�N CARS' n u
a° \\\` '%� n
nNiu~io? in j :�O`. '�FESS/p ��/L
Nmcn 9< - O J
o SEAL = >
m -0+9 47 0 0 0450 1 0
n 14984 = lJd
DATUM E EV y F R
805.0 :9 NGINEE
,r
II111\\\
0 0 0 o v
SCALE:1"=40'H, 1"=4'V
°° 5 S 23
DATE: 5/18/23
PROJECT: 1746_21
0+9.47 0+00 0+50 1+00 DRAWN BY: TM
SHEET 1.2

REVISIONS
Cross section F'YLcpriSVeretAtldll pt��ter� INSTALL THE PERMANENT CULVERT CROSSINGS:
.c Mat to ab
or soil La.Wsiginvering xyxwmw
The culverts are to be installed in the dry within a 2 to 3 day
window of storm events. Sediment fencing shall be installed above
o and below the fill area, wrapping the fencing around the ends of the
pipe. Care will be taken to keep clearing and excavation of the
° stream banks and bed to a minimum. Stablilize all distrubed
�`R"W��� areas subject to flowing water with rip rap below the stream bed.
{} trlac>L Upon completion of crossing, fill, compact, and stailize the slopes
s�L,�ltu�aiucl;tU,w properly. Remove any in stream sediment control measures.
Top of riprap nthitnium
e` o thwkrums •nu>amum IF NOT ABLE TO INSTALL CROSSING IN THE DRY:
reek Luce
z. P
Then they must be installed with the use of Coffer/Sand bag Dams. z
!3. The dams will be installed above and below the culvert installations.
Pumps will be used to install culvert in the dry and divert Z
11
Gravel tWdonggeotemle stream through and away from the crossing installation. Silt fencing !9
'�. .o fabric, nerd will
be used parallel to the crossing to prevent down stream impacts. e t
Q_. The 1
installation of culvert will not proceed until the flow has been z
1 s
fiounm or ripa� d diverted.
mtntcrtiun� Upon completion of the culvert, divert flow to the permanent a
ZxNuodfinum culverts, install sediment fencing above the inlets and outlet, install W
rockaw outlet
protection, fill, compact and stabilize any part of the stream that is M
unstable appropriately. The temporary coffer dams shall remain intact
-'t•,CEEn * eer* Field Handbook i210�-EFH,Dec ember 1996j and functioning until the all the stream work/stabilizations has been
completed. After the stream is stabilized and flow has been diverted
then fill can be brought up and other utilities and headwalls installed.
Check and reinstall any silt fencing than needs to be repaired on a
regular basis during construction. Mat the slopes above the top of W/
bank
with erosion control matting as soon as permanent grade has been
GENERAL NOTES: GENERAL SEQUENCE: established if grass can not be establised. The culvert construction,
1. PRESERVE NORMAL BASE STREAM FLOW. 1. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. in 3: 4
order to divert the flow from temporary coffer dams to the ��U
2. IMPACT LENGTHS SHOULD NOT EXCEED 2. STOCKPILE GRAVEL (IF PRESENT) FOR USE AS p y �_
a THE LINEAR FOOTAGE AT THIS LOCATION STREAM BOTTOM RESTORATION MATERIAL. permanent pipes should be completed within two weeks. Any material lu CO
AS MANDATED BY THE PERMIT. 3. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY COFFER DAMS. that need to be stockpile d LU -a
3. 96" C.A.P. SHALL BE PLACED AS 4. PROVIDE ADEQUATE PUMP(S) TO DEWATER WORK near the stream banks will be protect by silt fencing and shall Q }=4
~ SHOWN, EMBEDDED IN STREAM BOTTOM, AREA. DO NOT REDUCE OR HALT STREAM BASE FLOW. remain no more than 1 week.
TO PROMOTE STREAM LIFE PASSAGE. DISCHARGE PUMP EFFLUENT INTO SILT BAG. DISCHARGE If stockpile is required for longer lengths of time it shall be moved
4. HAND PLACE RIP—RAP, NO DUMPED SILT BAG BEHIND SILT FENCE AT SILT FENCE OUTLET. _
above _
STONE. KEY IN PLACE. PROVIDE FILTER 5. INSTALL THE 96" C.A.P. CULVERT PIPE & HEADWALLS. C/� 'n rJ
FABRIC UNDERLINER. ` -(N Rp the temporary sediment basins that are planned for the site and r
6. PROVIDE CONSOLIDATED AGGREGATE BACKFILL Q' Ess� Z/ ' that will `r
5. PLACE TOP OF RIP—RAP OUTLET BETWEEN PIPES AND UNDER HAUNCHES. A LICENSED INC 0 '�0F otiy .2=PROTECTION TO MATCH EXISTING STREAM GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER AND THE CITY OF GREENSBORO be installed before the culvert installation. Sand bag dams will O A
NZO BED ELEVATION AT CULVERT OUTLET. DO INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT SHALL APPROVE BACKFILL = SEAL = be removed within 2 days after the culvert has been stabilized.
NOT IMPOUND WATER WITH RIP—RAP. PRIOR TO PLACING ROADWAY BASE COURSE. =n 14984
7. PROVIDE ANY REQUIRED SOIL BACKFILL IN SHORT,
WELL COMPACTED LIFTS. TEST FOR PROPER COMPACTION, FNG INE�� '
CONSULT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. S P. �
8. SEED UPLAND AREAS AS SOON AS GRADING ALLOWS. 11
SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR SEEDING SCHEDULE
REQUIREMENTS. 5/IS/23 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
9. STABILIZE STREAM BANKS AFTER CHANNEL DATE: 5/18/23
U
_• REALIGNMENT IS COMPLETE. SEE RIP—RAP
PROJECT: 1746-21
REINFORCEMENT FOR STREAM BANKS CONSTRUCTION
DETAIL. DRAWN BY: TM
r SHEET 1.3

Proposal for Environmental Services
Pilot Proposal 7627.3
March 3,2023
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
This form authorizes Pilot to act as our agent in stream/wetland matters including U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Resources field verification and
permitting.
Property Address: 2725 NC HWY 68, High Point, NC 27282
Applicant Information:
Name: Evolve Construction, LLC
Address: 2918-A Martinsville Rd, Greensboro, NC 27408
Telephone Number: 336 269-2208
Fax Number:
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Signature: �Ylq'?J_j Date: 5/9/23
4

AGENT AUTHORIZATION
This form authorizes Pilot to act as our agent in stream/wetland matters including U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Resources field verification and
permitting_
Property Address: 2725 NC Highway 68 S
High Point, NC 27282
Owner Information: MPW High Point, LLC & MCFT High Point, LLC TIC
Address: 2918-A Martinsville Road, Greensboro NC 27408
Telephone Number: 336-269-2208
Fax Number:
E-mail Address: johnC4evolvecos.com
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION REQUEST
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps)to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
MPW High Point, LLC (For itsett and as agent for MCFT High Point. LLC)
Print Name
Capacity: X Owner X Authorized Agent
Date S 1
By-
Signature Michael P Winstea if
Jr, Manager & Agent

Parcel Information
• __`�. � '' - ,.+.ram' wYM �—!
w�
• �r•�_.•._ wrw•�. rrrw•�r
•,�` � •...�..._ww ••moo
rrrwr aaw
� � k
•,6
�w.w_�. ww.ri.rA..wri.lrlW
•A1�
fit_.+.'��� �•_•�w ......� �r
•rww�� � ��r w.r
ewe,
.•ii�� r s v - �r ram, ��
•�r. ` � � W�� YrAY
r••
rA� �
wrrrrrr rir.
�� rrrw•Y •.�
e .'w•'war► J � � 4� ♦.W►wwl F.w.. `• .. - �v�.�wr. �� •J L''Y C�♦1�:.• . .. .

-- • .
- - � =1
___ �,......,,�...r.�..
•,.. _ -
.�_..,r
•ttS�'�' 't. �=�
s�...� ��.� y
��r�
�-�,�.�.�=����,,,, �.r�
- .wr w
MNY
����� 1 '��� �r
����� . �1A���r�
Q� 4 1. Pw�wr� .,w
w � ' `� ..
..:.... � � -.+rr
�.' -+r..�.v
-.r:... .�.....�
�� ' -�...
e ���► �� J s �... � � yrew�w Sri �OL1®C��a�rM ~�

-: �; I
5w do
J
�' s'; �,d •:, � r � ,.�� �.ti���♦ \v% � � / '���►yt . % � �.re� _ tom✓
I I .�
C�1 •� � 11�� •7>ti�� - _ ��'� ��� r it \•�� !J
1/1 �

' N
r�
7
I in
LEGEND
Site Boundary
Drawing 2 f �, Web Soil Map
USDA Web Soil Survey i • ►. Penny Road
Approximate 17.5-Acre Tract
of Guilford County, NC
Scale: 1" = 300' • High Point, Guilford County, NC
P��.•�T \ Pilot Project 7627

r
Fn rIR
A' •:,
r
.1'
a � .
Hhl
tic
EJ I [>
C B
LEGEND
Site Boundary
Drawing 2A Published Soil Map
USDA Soil Survey Penny Road
Of Guilford County, NC Approximate 17.5-Acre Tract
Published 1977, Sheet 31 High Point, Guilford County, NC
Not To Scale PILOT Pilot Project 7627
• • . . „ •r tMiAl ►(

n -
N
/ II
r
r
r
I
I
lrrlr
'1u
SDI!&%mdary
I IVOW'tf+t m"Br"
�� �/re�t+w�tf.{cTesled/S►�rub
Istvarr,e and Ms"Ck•egW4tf+
T , fftuwrry and INxrne
i re%tvAQtn Pond
�Uke
�� �IOMt►krc
. Other
NWI Map
Drawing 3 � . Penny Road
USFWS NWI 1
Approximate 17.5-Acre Tract
Wetlands Mapper High Point, Guilford County, NC
Scale: 1" = 500' P'WT g y
•G6aa 6%f a94Is104A6_4Z4 Pilot Project 7627

one
• •' -� LIMIT •F �
• ' UD
A�
l�
L
LEGEND
Site Boundary
1°bAnnual C harce FIc lc d Hazard
' �Regulatory Flriodoiav
Sped alFIciod,Vav
t area of U ridetemi i red Flr_�od Hazard
0 2°_-Annual 1:--Nance Flood Hazard
Future Cunditiorr+1° Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Area with Reduced Risk Due to Levee
1W
Drawing 4 FEMA FIRM
Penny Road
National Flood Hazard Layer ' Approximate 17.5-Acre Tract
From FEMA Web Map Service
High Point, Guilford County, NC
Scale: 1" = 500' •
Pilot Project 7627

N
- WF 1-8
(0.15 ac)
a- 5B
(953 Lf)
WE 1-7
WD 1-4 (0.05 ac)
(0.01 ac)
WC 1-2 —
(0.03 ac) SA
(501 Lf)
W B 1-2
(0.003 ac)
O DP-1
WA 1-12
(0.08 ac)
LEGEND
Site Boundary
FLAG NUMBERS/INFO
Perennial Stream
WETLAND FLAGS=
STREAM FLAGS= Wetland
Stream Flags= Limits WA 1-s Flag Number
Wetland Flags=35
Total Flags=35 DP-1 Data Point
THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE PRELIMINARY. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE AND/OR THE
NCDEQ-DWR.THIS EXHIBIT INCLUDES GPS LOCATIONS OF JURISIDICTIONAL FEATURES.
Drawing 5 Wetland Map
Satellite Imagery from ESRI Penny Road
and Pilot GPS Data Approximate 17.5-Acre Tract
Scale: 1" = 150' '.� High Point, Guilford County, NC
Date: 2.24.22 PII..OT Pilot Project 7627
r � � • . �i •r t M i A 1 ►

tows r a�wutc
+csan•tr►
United States Department of the Interior /
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh,NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: May 22, 2023
Project Code: 2023-0084613
Project Name: Evolve at Deep River
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species'presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information.An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

05/22/2023 2
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts)that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act(42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act(ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act(MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act(BGEPA)to
protect native birds from project-related impacts.Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project-related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project-related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.govibirds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186.php.

05/22/2023 3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
■ Official Species List
• Migratory Birds

05/22/2023 1
OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

05/22/2023 2
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2023-0084613
Project Name: Evolve at Deep River
Project Type: New Constr -Above Ground
Project Description: The site is proposed for development with an apartment community.
Project Location:
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/036.0372582,-79.96492054753301,14z
I
0
4
O
I�f
Counties: Guilford County, North Carolina

05/22/2023 3
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 4 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries1, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
MAMMALS
NAME STATUS
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis sub flavus Proposed
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Endangered
Species profile:httpss://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
INSECTS
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
FLOWERING PLANTS
NAME STATUS
Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3849
Small Whorled Pogonia Isotria medeoloides Threatened
Population:
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1890

05/22/2023 4
CRITICAL HABITATS
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S)MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL
ABOVE LISTED SPECIES.

05/22/2023 1
MIGRATORY BIRDS
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act!and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location.To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)in this area,but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 25
and Alaska.
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus Breeds Apr 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 20
and Alaska.

05/22/2023 2
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)throughout its range in the continental USA to Jul 31
and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)throughout its range in the continental USA Jul 31
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)throughout its range in the continental USA to Sep 10
and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)only in particular Bird Conservation Regions elsewhere
(BCRs)in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 31
and Alaska.
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.)A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort(see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated?The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12

05/22/2023 3
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
■probability of presence breeding season I survey effort —no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Ea
Non BCCe loll loll 0010 IM *110111! LF 1+++ mill $III 1I11 iiii
Vulnerable ���� ���� ���� ■r
Chimney Swift ++++ ++++ + + +"I MI 111111111111 llll IIN ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Kentucky Warbler ++++ ++++ ++++ ++P1 mill ���" i "+ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide
(CON) yy y
Prairie Warbler ++++ ++++ ++++ tW +y+ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Prothonotary Warbler ++++ ++++ ++++ F14 +++1 ,+++ ++0+ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed Woodpecker �o+* 00o01101 ++ 11 111 +110 ++1N UP 1+01 1111 0001 01+1

05/22/2023 4
BCC Rangewide
(CON) + +
Rusty Blackbird y
BCC-BCR +T*� ++++ T+++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ +*+0 ++++
T T
Wood Thrush ++++
BCC Rangewide ++++ +++T TT�I I� ■T*■ *166* ++i+ +++0 +0" 00++ ++++ ++++
(CON) ---K ■■M■ ■r== MML
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
■ Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library—/
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds
■ Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
MIGRATORY BIRDS FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area.When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network(AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding_,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s)which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information
Locator(RAIL) Tool.

05/22/2023 5
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding,wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look
at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each
bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated
with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not
breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC)that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA(including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non-BCC -Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or(for non-eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.

05/22/2023 6
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Lorin.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s)that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar).A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

05/22/2023 7
IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency: Private Entity
Name: Michael Brame
Address: 743 Park Lawn Court
City: Kernersville
State: NC
Zip: 27284
Email [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
LEAD AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION
Lead Agency: Army Corps of Engineers

SHPO
� � / - '�A off �� •'='
AP
fir;.-� .J ;�►
r • • 1 Q . e.
ri
rN•f.•�1...
.� 6 o
©O
La

Gm ww&dwn-
L
'f
ollp
esn

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M.Bartos,Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History
Secretary Susi H.Hamilton Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
April 4, 2019
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kate Husband
Office of Human Environment
NCDOT Division of Highways
FROM: Renee Gledhill-Earley
Environmental Review Coordinator
SUBJECT: Historic Structures Survey Report,NC 68 (Eastchester Drive) Improvements from SR 1523
(Hickswood Road) to SR 1556 (Gallimore Dairy Road), U-5974, PA 18-06-0008,
Guilford County,ER 19-0940
Thank you for your March 1, 2019, memorandum transmitting the report for the above
referenced undertaking.We have reviewed the report and offer the following comments.
Deep River Friends Meeting House and Cemetery (GF0504),which was NR listed in 1995 retains enough
integrity to convey its significance under criterion A in the area of Religion and Social History for its rich
history involving the many Friends who were prominent in early Quakerism, and has served as a social,
religious, and community center for generations. Members of Deep River had significant influence on
Guilford County's history,particularly in issues related to education, temperance, simplicity, slavery, and war.
The Meeting House and Cemetery meet Criteria Consideration A for religious properties that derive primary
significance from the history of the Quaker congregation and settlement of the Deep River area. The National
Register boundary remains adequate to encompass all associated resources.
We concur that the (former)Jordan Dairy Farm (GF1421) is not eligible for listing in the National Register of
Historic Places under any criteria for the reasons outlined in the report.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579 or
environmental.reviewgncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project,please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
cc: Mary Pope Furr,NCDOT, mfurr(2ncdot.gov
Location:109 East Jones Street,Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address:4617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax:[phone]-6599

Received: 03/07/2019
-•':= � Mate IIistoric Preservation Office
SY A rE OF NoRTFI CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Rov Coortat JAMLS H. TRotaxi%.III
Cxwt ►ntr Uwattur
ER 19-0940
Minh 1. 2019
MEMORANDUM Duc -- 3/29/l9
TO: Reno Gledhill-Farley li_ ce
Envlrunmcntul Rev be% Coordinator
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Utlicc
FROM: Katc I lusband
Archltcctural Histonan
NCDOT Division of Highways
SUBJECT: U-5974, N(* 68 (Enstchester Drive) Impmcma w. from SR 1523
(Hicksw vod Road) to SR 1556 (Gallinwre Dairy Road), PA 184)64)008,
Guilford County
F riclosod Please find the Histonc Structures Survey Report, surve) site datahasc. and
additional materials ti:►r the above referenced project for your review and comment per
36C-RF.800 Plcase contact me by phone [phone]) or cmad
(klhusbwW u;ncdut.gov)if you have any additional questions cx comments,
LbwAwr Id+.0 r.r. w w1V1 ft11a11go lersnll�
%t 1APAR1M1X111► 11A-%SJ4 K1A1nN ♦n 101-421241111 11).*OWNIUEK*K0
M>t A-111 WAS UMIlWAU%1 %IkJ110% ■.arrr..%t^%w 1-I177-1M1-MIS RALAU14 WC 2%14
U VI %I RV1C1 CIN11-A 1 wI
KAItX.1I%t :7evi1"1
11 r�nrr .w w wtY�1M

I --
Historic Structure Survey Report
NC 68 (Eastchester Drive) Improvements
from SR 1523 (Hickswood Road)to SR 1556 jfl
(Gallimore Dairy Road)
Y
TIP No. U-5974, WBS No.45962.1.1
High Point, Guilford County
.- :+4
Prepared for:
North Carolina Department of Transportation, r
Environmental Analysis Unit
1598 Mail Service Center F' '
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699-1598 �� R
Prepared by:
�i
HNTB North Carolina, PC
343 East Six Forks Road,Suite 200
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27609 ,
r� !Lie
HNTB Project No.64609
February 2019
r�
HNTB

Historic Structure Survey Report
NC 68 (Eastchester Drive) Improvements from SR 1523 (Hickswood Road)to
SR 1556 (Gallimore Dairy Road)
TIP No. U-5974, WBS No.45962.1.1
High Point, Guilford County
Prepared for:
North Carolina Depart me nt of Transportation, Environmental Analysis Unit
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699-1598
Prepared by:
HNTB North Carolina, PC
343 East Six Forks Road,Suite 200
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27609
HNTB Project No.64609
February 2019
Adam J. Archual—Principal Architectural Historian Date
HNTB North Carolina, PC
Mary Pope Furr, Supervisor Date
Historic Architecture Team
North Carolina Department of Transportation

Management Summary
The North Carolina Department of Transportation(NCDOT) proposes capacity improve mentsto NC 68
(Eastchester Drive)from SR 1523 (Hickswood Road)to SR 1556(GaIIimore Dairy Road) in High Point,
Guilford County. This project is subject to review under the Section 106 Program mat icAgreementfor
Minor Transportation Projects(NCDOT/NCHPO/FHWA/USFS, 2015).
An NCDOT architectural historian defined an area of potential effects(APE)and conducted preliminary
documentary research and a site visit to identify and assess all resources of approximately fifty years of
age or more within the APE. One resource warranted intensive NR eligibility evaluation and one
previously listed N R H P resource warranted revisiting; these two resources are the subjects of this
report. NCDOT architectural historians determined that all other properties and districts do not warrant
further study and evaluation due to lack of historical significance and/or integrity.
In July 2018, NCDOT-Division 7 requested HNTB North Carolina, P.C. (HNTB)complete NR-eligibility
evaluations for the two properties presented in the following report.Submitted separately are the
completed North Carolina Historic Preservation Office (NCH PO) survey site forms, geospatial data,and
photographic documentation.
HNTB conducted the survey and preparedthis report in accordancewith NCDOT's Historic Architectural
Resources,Survey Procedures and Report Guidelines,and the N CH PO's Report Standards for Historic
Structures Survey Reports/Determinations of Eligibility/Section 1061110 Compliance Reports in North
Carolina. These property evaluations meet the guidelines of NCDOT and the National Park Service (NPS).
As a result of these efforts, one property's National Register listed status is confirmed and one property
is recommended not eligible for listing in the NR.
Resource Name Deep River Friends Meeti ng House and Cemetery
HPO Survey Site# GF0504
Address 5300 W.WendoverAvenue,High Point
PIN 7813413764
Date(s)of Construction 1803;1875;1932-1947
Recommendation NRHP-Listed
Resource Name (Former)Jordan Dairy Farm
HPO Survey Site# GF1421
Address 2725#2 NC 68 North,High Point
PIN 7813437884
Date(s)of Construction 1903;1928;1965
Recommendation Not Eligible
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County i
HNTB North Carolina,PC February2019

Table of Contents
I. Project Location Maps......................................................................................................... 1
11. Introduction....................................................................................................................... 3
111. Methodology..................................................................................................................... 3
IV. Historical Background: The Deep River Community................................................................. 4
V. Deep River Friends Meeting House and Cemetery(GF0504): Property Description and Evaluation. 6
VI. (Former)Jordan Dairy Farm (GF1421): Property Description and Evaluation..............................17
VII. Sources............................................................................................................................34
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County i i
HNTB North Carolina,PC February 2019

1. Project Location . •
_.� 9
kt,
•
� :• 4
Legend
t r ,
�1�l
f 1 +1
� , r
Area ol Powntsal Effects
♦ t �
. 1
-� -' - Project Location • and
Area of Potential
. IrWOVOOwds
from SR'1523(Hicktwood ROM I to
_ ISM(Gallin-are •
airV Road)
GAm"ord CourtV Norm Carolina
. 111 111
TIP
/. U-5974 Guilford County
NorthHNTB • I I PC February2019

1
M F0504
it
i
Feet
f
0 t 00C 2,000
K 90 Legend
♦ti Area of PatenUal EMecta
M • �i Surveyed Boundary
_Nb
Evaluated Rescurce
�+ ik Street
1
Area of Potential Effects
and Evaluated Resources
TIP Propci U 5974
Proposed NC 88 tmprover-.wnls
• !�q tom SR 1523(Hckuwood Roed1 to
K e �Di SR 1556(Ga1HTwe Deny Rood)
Guttold Courtly,Nonh Cwoina
Feet
2,000 4.000
ay ZaRM 11C On.laq wCOOT Oar!C004 0s MlMMww Gram PC 301•
TIP No. U-5974 Guilford County 2
HNTB North Carolina,PC February2019

II. Introduction
The North Carolina Department of Transportation(NCDOT) proposes capacity improve mentsto NC 68
(Eastchester Drive)from SR 1523 (Hickswood Road)to SR 1556(GaIIimore Dairy Road) in High Point,
Guilford County.
The project is located in western Guilford County, approximately eleven miles west of the Guilford
County Courthouse in Greensboro, in the piedmont physiographic province of North Carolina.
Topography in the project vicinity is generally characterized bygently rolling, well-rounded hills and long
low ridges with a few hundred feet of elevation difference between the hills and valleys. Elevations
within the APE range from approximately 800 to 900 feet above mean sea level (AMSL).
The project is approximately 2.9 miles in length within an urbanized area. Land use in the project vicinity
is primarily commercial with some residential uses located towards the south end of the study area.
III. Methodology
TIP No. U-5974, Guilford County is subject to review under the Section 106 Programmatic Agreementfor
Minor Transportation Projects(NCDOT/NCHPO/FHWA/USFS, 2015). An NCDOT architectural historian
defined an area of potential effects(APE)and conducted preliminary documentary research and a site
visit to identify and assess all resources of approximately fifty years of age or more within the APE. One
resource warranted intensive NR eligibility evaluation and one previously listed NRHP resource
warranted revisiting;these two resources are the subjects of this report. NCDOT architectural historians
determined that all other properties and districts do not warrant further study and evaluation due to
lack of historical significance and/or integrity.
In July 2018, NCDOT-Division 7 requested HNTB to complete NR-eligibility evaluations for two
properties. HNTB conducted the field work on January 30, 2019 and pursued background research to
obtain a greater understanding of the historical development of the area and place resources within
their historic architectural context. HNTB consulted materialsat the Guilford County Register of Deeds,
Guilford County Public Library, North Carolina Collection, the NCHPO,and through internet searches.
The Guilford County GISand Registerof Deedswere accessed on-line during research.The following
report presents HNTB'sassessments of the two properties.
During fieldwork, the exterior of each resource was documented through written notes and
photographs. Access to the interior of the resources was limited. An on-site interview was conducted
with Darrin Jordan, current occupant at the(former) Jordan Dairy Farm.The surrounding landscape and
setting were photographed as well.
Each property is evaluated in this report for eligibility using the National Register Criteria for Evaluation
as outlined in 36 CFR Part 60.4. HNTB conducted the survey and prepared this report in accordance with
NCDOT's Historic Architectural Resources,Survey Procedures and Report Guidelines,and the NCH PO's
Report Standards for Historic Structures Survey Reports/De terminations of Eligibility/Section 1061110
Compliance Reportsin North Carolina. These property evaluations meet the guidelines of NCDOT and
the National Park Service (NPS).
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 3
HNTB North Carolina,PC February 2019

IV. Historical Background: The Deep River Community
Early European-American settlement of Guilford County was in a great migration,which took place
largelyfrom the 1740s to the 1770s; not from the more populous, eastern part of the colony, but from
the north, mainly down the Great Wagon Road from Pennsylvania. The county was settled by three
distinct groups: the German Calvinists and Lutherans,who settled for the most part in the eastern
portion of the county; the Scotch-Irish (Ulster Scots who had settled in Ireland for a century and were
staunch Presbyterians now fleeing) in the north and central part of the county; and the English and
Welsh Quakers, or Friends, who settled the western part of the county.I
By 1750 there were several communities of Friends in the Piedmont, mainly in what is now Guilford,
Alamance,and Randolph counties. As a rule, Friends held meetingsfirst in private houses, later building
small, simple meeting houses, generallyof log construction. In 1751, the first monthly meeting in the
Piedmont was established at Cane Creek in today's Alamance County. Three years later,a monthly
meeting was set up at New Garden in Guilford County and became the center of Quakerism in North
Carolina. Even before New Garden became fully established, Friends in Deep River had requested to
hold their own meetings at a member's house. It is believed settlement of the Deep River neighborhood
began around 1740,and minutes of meetings show that Friends in the Deep River area were holding
meetings at different houses in the community by 1753. By March of 1758,the Deep River community
had apparently erected their first meeting house. The Deep River School is believed to have been the
first school in the western part of Guilford County, and one of the first in the region, probably built in
the late-1750s when the first meeting house was bui It.2
The cultural and religious influences of Friends, together with the geographical limits on transportation
and trade,caused the Piedmont to develop as an area of small farms with few slaves. Limitations in
trade necessitated that these small-scale farmers and craftsmen produce the tools and goods necessary
to meet local needs in what was still largely a wilderness. The arrival of the railroad improved
connections and access to goods and materials in the mid-nineteenth century; however, despite the
increasing urbanization and industrialization of nearby Greensboro and High Point, Guilford County
remained largely agricultural at the turn of the twentieth century. Life centered on the farm and on local
institutions, churches,and the local school.3
According to Census records, winterwheat,oats,and Irish potatoes werethe predominant crops in
1870,and the county had one of the highest populations of swine, sheep, cows,and horses in the state.
By 1900,agricultural trends had shifted towards more, but smaller, farms.At the same time,81 percent
of thefarms in Guilford County reported dairy products. In addition to livestock and poultry, the largest
crops included corn,oats, wheat,grasses,clover,and orchard prod ucts.4
By 1920,dairying had become an important endeavor in the county. Commercial milk processing plants
began appearing in High Point in the early 1900s providing a convenient market for local product. The
sale of milk provided ready cash each month, as opposed to waiting for the annual harvest of row crops.
10ppermann,1995.
2Ibid.
3 Ibid.;Graybeal,1996.
4 Patrick,2001.
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 4
HNTB North Carolina,PC February 2019

Local milk was sold to ice cream factories in Greensboro and High Point; a creameryand pasteurizing
station was located in Greensboro.5
The year 1938 marked the beginning of a growth trend in North Carolina dairy herds and an
improvement in the overall quality of milk in the state. I n 1944,for the first time in North Carolina's
history, the state produced enough milk for both home consumption and export to other states. North
Carolina continued to appropriate funds specifically for dairy industry support in the annual budget from
that time to the present. Dairyfarmers were able to get more milk from each cow through better
nutrition, care,and facilities. Eventually this success resulted in overproduction, and some dairy herds
were sold off. As grocery chains grew la rger they developed their own in-store brands, which were often
sold at a lower price. This forced many dairies to merge with largercompanies such as Dairymen
Cooperative, which processed the dairy products for major grocerycha ins.6
Improvements in transportation and increasing urbanization and industrialization in nearby towns and
cities contributed to changes in agricultural practice in Guilford County in the latter half of the
nineteenth century. Dairy farming along NC 68 began to decline in the late 1960s as suburban sprawl
extended from the nearby cities of Greensboro and High Point, replacing agricultural land with new
residential and commercial developments. NC 68(Eastchester Road)through the study area has
attracted significant commercial development, characterized by business parks and shopping centers,
which has transformed the historic agricultural landscape.Several local roads in and near the study area,
including Gallimore Dairy Road,Clinard Farms Road, Morris Farm Road,and Dairy Point, attest to the
former importance of farming,and specifically the dairy industry, to this area of Guilford County.
5 Burchette,2004;Jurney et a l,1920;Mi ddlesworth,2006.
6 M i d d l eswo rth,2006.
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 5
HNTB North Carolina,PC February 2019

V. Deep River Friends Meeting House and Cemetery (GF0504): Property
Description and Evaluation
Resource Name Deep River Friends Meeti ng House and Cemetery
HPO Survey Site# GF0504
Address 5300 W.Wendover Avenue
PIN 7813413764
Date(s)of Construction 1803;1875;1947;c.1965
Recommendation NRHP-Listed
I�
I I/
Deep River Friends Meeting House,view to northwest
Physical Description
Located in the northeast corner of W. Wendover Avenue and NC 68(Eastchester Drive),the
approximately 17-acre Deep River Friends Meeting House and Cemeterywas listed in the NRHP in 1995
under Criterion A in the areas of Religion and Social History. Oppermann (1995)described the property:
The property is located on a slight rise in a triangle of land between NC Highway68, bustling
four-lane Wendover Avenue, and Penny Road.Visible from the south, east,and north, the
building faces east. From Penny Road a drive passes through a lawn in front of the meeting
house; north of the drive is the Friends cemeterywhich dates from the 1750s and contains
gravesand commemorative markers from the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. No
longer standing are the first meeting house, a ca. 1750 school (their sites are denoted by
commemorative markers), an 1828 school across Penny Road from the nominated property,an
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 6
HNTB North Carolina,PC February 2019

1 Meeting House r,1875 i
2 Educational Building Addition (1957)
3 Meeting House Addition 11990) ♦ ,
4 Parsonage(1947)
5 Pavilion (c. 1965)
6 Garage(c 2000) 4
7 Playground(date unknown)
Jilt
r
�" t •
6 2 11
IL
{ WIP:
f y '''r '
M '
Legend
._e .
Area of PcNent.el Effect*
•
&tvoyed Boundary
Pmcol
Deep River Friends Meeting House and Come"
N IIP Project U-5974 Proposed NC"Improvemarts
0 100 200 from SR 1523(Hiclawood Road)to
A 100000:Z=fNt SR 1556 lGaliimate Deity Road}
Gullord County,Borth Coroine
S. —AC O Ai4 Caws 05 MR1 NYI.Ca aw*PC 20ti,
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 7
HNTB North Carolina,PC February2019

1857-1858 school near the northeast corner of the graveyard,and a 1926 log structure built
south of the meeting house to serve as a Sunday School. Behind the meeting house today are a
series of brick additions, a paved parking lot, an open pavilion built of logs,and the 1947
parsonage.
Additional contributing objects were identified in the 1995 NRHP Nomination Form, including: the 1932
granite"School House Marker'at the location of thefirst school house in Guilford County in the
northeast portion of the cemetery;the 1830 Uppins Block, consisting of three large granite slabs for
mounting horses and carriages north of the current Meeting House; and the First Meeting House
Markers,consisting of small square markers of local soapstone placed by the congregation in 1934 to
mark the corners of the 1758 Meeting House, north of the current Meeting House. These features
remain intact on the property.
The NRHP Nomination Form identified two non-contributing buildings: the 1947 parsonage and a post-
1945 pavilion, due to their age at the time of the survey in 1995.The one-and-one-half story, side-gable
brick-clad parsonage featurestwo gable dormers on the fagade (south elevation)and a shed dormer in
the north elevation.The side gable roof is broken, though,with a slightly diminutive wing extending
from the west end of the house, offset along the house's fagade.A gable hood extends above the wood
panel door with two panes; the main entry is approached by a concrete stoop accessed by concrete
steps with brick sidewalls. An external brick chimney is located in the west elevation.Windows are
primarily 6/6 wood sash single units of varying size with a 24-pane fixed window in the primary fagade,
west of the entry.A gabled breezeway extends from the east elevation and rear of the house to connect
a two-bay carport under a large front gable,with a 6/6 wood sash in each gable end. The second story
dormers and the large front gable on the carport are clad in vinyl siding. The roof is clad in asphalt
shingles. As no representatives were on site at the time of the survey, access to the interior was not
granted.
-
dy
_
Parsonage fagade,view to the north Parsonage oblique view to southeast
The open log pavilion is located northeast of the parsonage and is visible in historic aerial imagery dated
1965.The gabled ends of the pavilion are clad in German siding and the roof is clad in shingles. The
structure is set on a concrete slab.A modern playground set is located directly west of the pavilion and
is enclosed with a chainlink fence.
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 8
HNTB North Carolina,PC February 2019

A two-bay, detached garage is located northwest of the parsonage.Two vinyl roll-up doors are present
in the gable end (east-facing)with a single entry in the south elevation. The garage is clad in a composite
board siding and the roof is clad in asphalt shingles. This structure post-dates the 1995 survey.
i t
IC
c w iL
�E.
Log pavilion,view to the northeast Garage,oblique view to northwest
The resource is bound by W. Wendover Avenue to the south, Penny Road to the East,and NC 68
(Eastchester Drive)to the west. Mature pine and hardwoods buffer the west and north property
boundaries; cedars, pine, and hardwoods are interspersed throughout the cemetery grounds, and the
Meeting House surrounds are formally landscaped. Three driveways access the property, each with a
consistent treatmentof bounding non-historic brick pillars mounted with metallamps and metalfencing
and gates.Two driveways enterthe property from Penny Road on either side of the cemetery;a row of
boxwoods shields the cemeteryfrom Penny Road.The southern Penny Road driveway traversesthe
entire property east-to-west, paralleling W. Wendover Avenue to the north of the Meeting House, south
of the cemetery,and terminates at guardrail east of NC 68.This road bed likely corresponds to a local
historic route, shown in historic aerial imageryand mapping into the 1970s. The road bed appears to
have been terminated at its west end in the late 1970s with the improvement of NC 68 on its current
alignment.A small parking lot is located east of the Meeting House, with a larger parking lot located
between the church and the parsonage.The third driveway enters the property from W. Wendover
Avenue between the church and the parsonage,which provides access to the larger parking lot. The
"Deep River Friends Meeting"historical marker(I D J-49) is located in the southeast portion of the
property, near the corner of W. Wendover Avenue and Penny Road.
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 9
HNTB North Carolina,PC February 2019

r.
Friends Cemetery,view to the southeast View to the west along W. WendoverAvenue,The Friends
Meeting House is visible mid frame.
Historical Background
The historic information for the property is taken from the Deep River Friends Meeting House and
Cemetery NRHP Nomination Form (Oppermann, 1995).
It is believed settlement of the Deep River neighborhood began around 1740, and minutes of meetings
show that Friends in the Deep River area were holding meetings at different houses in the community
by 1753. It is not known when they began to bury their dead in the graveyard, but it is likely the
graveyard began to be used around the time of the 1758 construction of the first Meeting House or
earlier.This first Meeting House was of log and remained in use until 1875 when the present brick
Meeting House was constructed.
Regular upkeep has occurred tothe Meeting House, as have a series of renovations. Though the interior
of the Meeting House was not accessed by this survey, the following observations were made by
Oppermann (1995):
Deep River's interior has been renovated and updated a number of times over the course of its
history. The most recent was a major renovation in 1967 and 1968 which gave the interior the
appearance of a modern church.The significant changes of the 1960s were: 1)the central part
of the west wall was recessed to the west to expand the choir space behind the pulpit, and a
new platform was built; 2)the folding doors to the classrooms of the Baraca [men's]and
Philathea [women's]were taken down to increase the size of the meeting room, and a cloak
room and "bride's room" were added at the back; 3) new benches, lighting fixtures, amplifying
equipment, and carpeting were installed; 4) the existing earthquake bolts were boxed in and
recessed lighting installed. These remodelings[sic] have changed the character of the interior of
the meeting house so that only the plan and envelope of the 1875 church remains, with its
windows and sashes and heart pine floors. This is in stark contrast to the high integrityof the
building's exterior.
Over the years the Meeting has expanded its complex to accommodate new uses and changing
trends. In 1926 a "log hut"was built south of the meeting house to accommodate increasing
Sunday School enrollment. By 1954, the log but was determined to be inadequate for the
growing activities of the meeting and plans were underway to build a new educational building.
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 10
HNTB North Carolina,PC February2019

The log but was demolished in 1956.The two-story, brick-veneered, gable-end building was
completed in 1957 adjacent to the west(rear)elevation of the meeting house; it held
classrooms, a kitchen and dining room, and pastor's study. A few years later brick connector
was built to join the new building to the west gable end of the meeting house. In 1990 a large
brick-veneered, story-and-one-half, gable-end addition extending east to west was attachedto
the south gable end of the 1957 building, covering its eastern exposure. All of the additions are
placed behind the west end of the 1875 building to limit their intrusion.
While the cemetery may date to the earliest Meeting House on this site (1758),the earliest physical
evidence remaining above ground and legible is an 1803 gravestone.The cemeterygrounds were
enlarged over the years as needed. The cemetery contains unmarked gravesfrom the eighteenth
century and a large number of gravestones reflecting Quaker tradition through three centuries: the first
graveswere unmarked,or marked with crude stones later removed; later,graveswere marked with
simple stones no higher than twelve inches. Despite Quaker dictates against taller stones, a number of
gravestones exceeded the stipulated limit—these were cut off or buried deeper in the mid- and late-
nineteenth century by righteous members. Later, however,gravestones of Friends could more closely
echo the styles of other protestant religions. No evidence remains of a wire fence and gates put around
the graveyard in 1908.
As early as 1908, an endowment fund was created for the intent of maintaining the cemetery. I n 1932
the site of the first Deep River school house was marked outside of the old boundary of the graveyard
(located in the northeast quadrant of the cemetery),at which time the remains of the chimney were still
visible. In 1934 the corners of the first Meeting House were marked with small soapstone stones.
The cemeteryalso retains evidence of a 1933 WPA project when many stones were removed, the rolling
topography was flattened,and overgrowth was replaced with mowed grass. It is not known whether
some of the "rocks" removed were early, unmarked, gravestones,or where they were relocated. More
recently in an unfortunate effort to clean gravestones, many stones were sandblasted. The cemetery
continues its historic and active use as a burying ground for Quakers and others, with new stones
positioned among the old in family plots ratherthan separated in old and new sections of the graveyard.
The cemetery retains its wooded and parkland setting.
As early as 1914 the minutes reference the need for a "minister's home in our meeting."This was two
years before Deep River had a paid pastor. The parsonage was finally built in 1947 by members of the
Meeting,volunteers, and day-labor.The parsonage was named Peele House in memory of former pastor
Joseph H. Peele who had initiated fundraising for the Parsonage Fund.
Architectural Context
Meeting House (1875)
The Italianate style became nationally popular at a time of economic depression in the South following
the Civil War;by the time most of the South had recovered,the style had been succeeded by other
popular styles. The Meeting House,though, illustrates an interest in and an awareness of contemporary
decorative styles, though their use and application is greatly simplified. In plan, the Deep River Meeting
House more closely follows the Greek Revival style than the typical box-shape often associated with
Italianate buildings; however, its brick construction and simplified Italianate detailing are notable
stylistic hallmarks.The restrained ornamentation found on the building is focused on the building's
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 11
HNTB North Carolina,PC February2019

fenestration,consisting of tall and narrow windows with segmental arches,characteristic of the
Italianate style.One of the few decorative elements of the Meeting House are the raised brick hood
molds above windows and doors. Nevertheless,the Meeting House is a simple building, and not a
radical departure from Quaker tradition.The flirtation with the Italianate was principally cosmetic; Deep
River did not embellish its church with unnecessary finery such as the ornamented brackets seen on
even simple Italianate buildings.'
The major disparity of Deep River from other Quaker meeting houses is its orientation with the principal
entrance at the gable end,a characteristic more common in other Protestant churches. Atypical Quaker
meeting house was entered from the long side with their interiors laid out accordingly; Deep River's end
entrance had a significant impact on the interior plan,which remained evident at the time of
Oppermann's(1995)survey despite extensive remodeling.The size of Deep River's 1875 building was
also a changefrom the small buildings found in other Quaker settlements. Even so, the Meeting House is
similar to earlier,traditional Quaker buildings in proportion, materials,and a simplicity that overrides
the building's use of ornamentation.8
Cemetery(1803—Present)
The cemetery's current form is largelythe result of the 1933 WPA"clean up",at which time the current
circulation was established and the grounds were cleared of undergrowth and rocks, leveled, and
grassed. As the result of a retrofit,the Friends Cemeterywas not made-over in a true "memorial park"
form, with strict uniformity and the occasional sculpture. However,the division of the cemetery into
four sections through the introduction of paths applied geometric order;and the clearing, leveling, and
grassing of the cemeterycreated the park-like or lawn setting gaining popularity in cemeteries across
the country in the decades following the Civil War.These improvements also had the practical effect of
making landscaping easier,as the power lawn mower was in common use.
u dhelbn�
0
aim CJ
d Qr—rA
Wr14n d I*cU*n C
j rr
Section Map of Deep River Friends Cemetery(Deep River Friends Meeting 2019)
0 pperma nn,1995.
$Ibid.
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 12
HNTB North Carolina,PC February2019

Overall, head stones are modest in style, consisting of an inscribed stone (often granite)upright tablet
set in the ground, or on a base, or a flat marker.Some obelisks are interspersed throughout the
cemetery;the obelisks tend to correspond with family plots that are set apart from surrounding burials
by stone coping. More substantial horizontal granite tablets tend to date to the twentieth century to
present,and typically mark a husband and wife.
Parsonage(1947)
According to Opperman (1995), the minimal traditional side-gabled cottage was built by members of the
meeting,volunteers, and day laborers. The source of the house plans is unknown. Growing
standardization in construction and design ideas shaped much of the suburban built environment
following World War 11.Though occurring in isolation on an institutional property for the
accommodation of the Meeting's pastor,the house style and type is typical of houses built in rapidly
growing suburbs throughout the country in the postwar years and is in-line with the Quaker building
tradition leaning towards simplicity. Much of the tremendous demand for houses in the North Carolina
Piedmont was met by design-build contractors who drew on published sources and their own
experience.9
Pavilion (c. 1965)
This simple log, open structure is recreational in purpose, probably for picnics and other outdoor
gatheringsatthe Friends Meeting,and rustic in style, characterized bythe natural wood (log)
construction. The exposed rafter beams appearto be the result of convenience as opposed to a stylistic
treatment.
Integrity
There is no evidence to suggest any of the buildings or features on the property have been moved from
their original location;therefore,integrity of location is intact. Integrityof association and feeling is
retained through the continued use of the Meeting House—in its extended form—and the cemetery.
Though the resource is shielded by wooded areasto the east and north,extensive suburban
development encroaches on all sides and diminishes integrity of setting.
The brick additions to the rear(west)of the 1875 Meeting House, replacement of the front steps and
railing,and the 1990s replacement and recessing of the double-leaf front doors with compatible wood
doors, has compromised the overall integrityof the building. Further,a major renovation completed in
1967-68 modernized the interior of the church, that changed the character of the interior so that only
the plan and envelope of the 1875 building remains with its windows and sashes and heart of pine
floors.10 As a result, the Meeting House does not retain integrity of design, material,andworkmanship.
Oppermann (1995) statedthatthe 1933 WPA-assisted clean up destroyed the integrityof any
eighteenth century remains present at that time. As such, the design represents the early 1930s effort.
The cemetery reflects changes in Quaker burial practices,including some reported cases where
subsequent efforts by congregants compromised the integrityof an earlier grave markerto bring it up to
current standards. These changes appearto have occurred historically and do not necessarily diminish
integrityof material and workmanship but reflectthe evolution of burial practices.
9 Bi s h it a nd Southern,2003;McAlester,2015.
10 Oppermann,1995.
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 13
HNTB North Carolina,PC February2019

Despite the addition of vinyl siding on the Parsonage,the majority of materials remain intact, including
the brick cladding, a variety of multi-pane historic wood windows, and historic doors, thus exhibiting
integrityof materials and workmanship. Though an interior survey was not conducted, the footprint is
intact and the Parsonage appears to retain integrity of design.
The design, material,and workmanship integrityof the log pavilion remains intact.
National Register Criteria Evaluation
The Deep River Friends Meeting House and Cemetery is listed in the NRHP under Criterion A for its
association with Religion and Social History.These associations remain intact,and significant.The Deep
River Meeting has a rich history involving many Friends who were prominent in early Quakerism, and
has served as a social, religious, and community centerfor generations.A list of family names of those
buried in the cemetery includes most of the Quakers significant to the early development of this part of
the county. Members of Deep River helped to shape Quaker attitudes in the county and state and had a
significant impact on slavery and secession issues in Guilford County. Several individuals of the Deep
River community, who were members of the Meeting House and who are buried in its cemetery,were
significant to the development of the region's Quaker history, settlement,education,social issues, and
religious history. Deep River's collection of Quaker funerary art reflects changing attitudes of the
Quakers and are a mirrorto the assimilation of thegroup's political and social attitudes into the society
and culture around them. Deep River has been used continuously as a meeting house for 110 years since
its construction in 1875, and the cemeteryhas been in use since the period of Quaker settlement in the
1750s. Itsearliest remaining gravestone was erected in 1803, which therefore serves as the opening
date for the period of significance for this nomination.11 Due to their age at the time of the NRHP
nomination in 1995, the 1947 Parsonage and c. 1965 log pavilion were considered non-contributing to
the property's significance.Considering the passage of time and the general good integrityof the
residence and recreational pavilion, these buildings should be considered contributingto the resource's
significance as features associated with the Friend's continued use of the property.
Criteria Consideration A(for religious properties)applies since Deep Riverderives its primary
significance from the history of its Quaker congregation and its association withthe settlement of the
Deep River area;the movement of the Friends into this area had an important impact on the
development of Guilford County."
Though several notable individuals in the county's and state'shistory have been historically associated
with the Deep River Friends, several of whom are buried on the property, the resource does not
illustrate the contributions of specific significant individuals. Therefore,consistent with the NRHP
Nomination, the resource is not considered eligible for listing under Criterion B.
Due to additions tothe Deep River Friend's Meeting House and the extent to which the interior has
been updated, the 1875 Italianate brick building is not recommended individually eligible under
Criterion C, consistent with the NRHP Nomination. Likewise, the Deep River Friend's Cemeteryhas
experienced changes over the years that reflect its growth and continued use and changing Quaker
attitudes towards burial practices as the community of Friends became assimilated into the more
mainstream practices of the region. Regardless,the collection of funerary art is not outstanding or
11 Ibid.
12Ibid.
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 14
HNTB North Carolina,PC February 2019

unique compared to other cemeteries from its period of development. Further,the cemetery's design
does not represent a significant or unique pattern or trend in ce mete rydesign, rather appears to be the
result of a fairly logical and utilitarian progression overt i me.Therefore,the Deep River Friends
Cemetery is recommended individually not eligible under Criterion C, consistent with the NRHP
Nomination.
The 1947 Parsonage and the c. 1965 log pavilion are not recommended individually eligible under
Criterion C; however, as stated above, due to the passage of time, both should be considered
contributing to the significance of the NR-listed property. The Parsonage is a modest residence typical of
postwar domestic construction with simple architectural treatments that lacks individual distinction.
Similarly, the log pavilion is a utilitarian, recreational structure employing common construction
techniques. As such, neither is recommended individually eligible for under Criterion C.
Though not explicitly addressed in the NRHP Nomination, it is unlikely that the resource would yield any
important historical information not readily availablefrom othersources. The resource is therefore
recommended not eligible under Criterion D.
National Register Eligible Boundary
The NRHP Nomination Form (Oppermann, 1995) described r.1NE
_
the boundary for the Friends Meeting House and Cemetery
as all of lot 11 described generally by Guilford County Tax
Map#7005-1022-11.The boundary encompasses the
portions of the property retaining integritythat are '� w b
historically associated withthe Deep River Meeting;these ' 21
include the cemeterywhich was begun in the mid-eighteenth
k
century and contains grave markers from as early as 1803, a aR#r Fk1Vit Il
and the 1875 Meeting House. Also incorporated in the ti� �� a f��aH j �
Q.
nominated area are significant resources which include the to_�su! ' `�
4raJ4. :Y r 1 �
Uppin' Blocks and commemorative markers of earliera. }
buildings.13 Also included are the parsonage and log pavilion
which were non-contributing due to age at the time of the Is: ;
NRHPNomination; however, these areconsidered zo
contributing as a result of this survey. 1x`11 `s'
The legal parcel associated with the Deep River Friends NRHP Listed Boundary(Oppermann,1995)
Meeting House and Cemetery(Guilford County Parcel
Identification No.7813413764) does not correspond tothe NRHP-listed boundary. As the 1995 NRHP
boundary remains accurate and appropriate for the resource,the corresponding tax map was overlaid
on current parcel data in ArcGISand a digital file for the NRHP-listed boundary created.The NRHP listed
boundary encompasses 17.1 acres within the legal parcel boundary. The NRHP listed boundary does not
include property in the southeast or southwest corners of the parcel which are grassed and landscaped
(approximately 0.5 acre)and wooded (approximately 1.45 acres), respectively. These areasare not
historically associated with the with the Deep River Meeting.
13Ibid.
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 15
HNTB North Carolina,PC February2019

�a
O
f 1 1V p�
r
A.AW . r E 4t4`'()4t4Z AtiltONO hJE
L NRHP-ltstod Boundary
_•
Parcel
. 0'
Deep River Friends Meeting House and Come"
K TIP Propel U-W?4 Proposed NC 6e Invii w vents
0 100 200 fmin SR 1523(Mtctawood Road)to
SR 1556(Galimcre Dairy Rood>
FrN� Gullortt County.Norm Cwo ine
Se —NC dtiV C—,"0: "NT/%,n,C —4 PC.06
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 16
HNTB North Carolina,PC February 2019

VI. (Former) Jordan Dairy Farm (GF1421): Property Description and
Evaluation
Resource Name (Former)Jordan Dairy Farm
HPO Survey Site# GF1421
Address 2725#2 NC 68 North,High Point
PIN 7813437884
Date(s)of Construction 1903;1928;1965
Recommendation Not Eligible
Jordan Dairy Farm,farm house,view to west
Physical Description
The (former)Jordan Dairy Farm consists of a farmhouse and multiple agricultural outbuildings on
approximately 17 acres north of High Point on the west side of NC 68 south of Premier Drive.The family
refers to the property as the Jordan Homestead.The property represents the remnants of an expansive
agricultural operation in this area of the county under the purview of the Jordan family in the first half of
the twentieth century.The house has been previously documented in local histories (Smith 1979;
Graybeal1996)as the "Jordon" House. This evaluation refers to the "Jordan"family, consistent withthe
spelling used by the family. "Jordon" is used in this evaluation in context,e.g., in reference to historical
documents and prior documentation.
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 17
HNTB North Carolina,PC February2019

II : •
P7MW
REMIER DRIVE
J _
,
• ' r� �A ' legend
-w
Area of Potenbal Effects
• Strayed Boundary
Jordan Dairy Farm Overview
N TIP Project U-59'4 Proposed NC 6e Irnprarernents
0 100 200 hom SR 1523(Mrckswood Road to
AFNf SR 1555(Galirnore Dairy Rood;
Gullord County.North Gwobne
Soir rrC 0W1 f Goa Caw►OS 00"Nnm Craar PC Xlif,
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 18
HNTB North Carolina,PC February2019

c
1 Jordan House ( �
2 SW/
3 Garage
4 Equipment Shed 1
5 Shed 2
6 Tack
8 Tack Room
7 VMs1 Houw
B Equorrer"Shod 2 w
j
9 Equipment Shed 3 .'
10 Dabk Cnb Barn s
11.Milk Parlor
12 Milk House
13 Shed 3 Legend
14 Sros
15 Corn Crib Surveyed Boundary
18 Granary Fencebne(aptxoximate)
17 Hey Balm Ico+lapsed)
15 CNcken Coops Parcel
19 Hog House
•
Jordan Dairy Farm •Site Map
nP Pir"ct U-5974 Propc*ed NC 68 InVoaertrenr�
Ci 50 100 Mryn SR 1523 1Kckswood Road)ki
mmmn 'Feat SR 15561Gabmore Dairy Road,;
Gwttord County North Carohna
za.c«Mc arra r...k.o c.Lr.Cyr.►wrs n.,r CAaard PC 2010
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 19
HNTB North Carolina,PC February2019

Jordan House (Farm House): This three-bay,single pile, two-story side gabled with cornice return
1-house faces east towards NC 68(Eastchester Drive). The house is clad with vinyl siding applied in the
1980s, which include the narrow eaves and porch ceiling. However,the original weatherboard siding is
reportedly intact beneath,according to the current owner.The vinyl siding obscures the foundation,
which is reportedly brick piers with concrete block infill. The single story hipped roof front porch is
supported by turned wood posts with decorative, pierced jigsawn brackets and likewise sits on brick
piers infilled with concrete block. The front door is a wood panel with light and is centered on the
fagade.Windows on the fagade are 6/6 wood sash with 4/4 wood sashes on other elevations; decorative
vinyl shutters are present on the main house mass. An exterior brick chimney is present on the rear
elevation in the north room and an interior brick chimney was observed breaking the center of the rear
roof slope. An interior survey of the house was not permitted,though the current owner indicated it
was updated with drywall and drop ceilings.The interview indicated the 1-house is a center hall with
quarter-turn staircase and two rooms on each floor.
�:
Jordan Housefagade,view to the northwest Jordan House oblique view to southeast
t
Jordan House rear elevation,viewto east Jordan House south elevation,viewto north
A rear,one-story ell was added to the north end of the house at an unknown time,though before 1965
based on historic aerial imagery.An enclosed, hip-roofed porch extends along the north elevation of the
ell addition. A second one-story ell addition extends from the west end of the rear ell paralleling the
main mass of the house and terminatesat its' southern end in a bay window with three 4/4 wood sash
windows under half-pyramidal roof. Historic aerial imagery indicates this second addition occurred
between 1965 and 1968. For a short period of time,this second addition resulted in a small rear
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 20
HNTB North Carolina,PC February 2019

courtyard which was filled in with a third shed addition roughly 45 years ago(early to mid-1970s). It was
with this last addition, according to the current owner,that indoor bathrooms were introduced to the
house.
Garage: The two-bay garage with apartment above was reportedly constructed on the property, north
of the Jordan house, in the mid-1960s; the garage appears in an aerial image dated 1965.The front
gable frame building is set on a concrete foundation and is clad in asbestos shingles. One wood panel
rolling garage door remains in the east elevation;the other appears to have been removed. A central
brick chimney breaks the roof ridge. The second story is lit by regularly placed 3/1 wood sash windows
of varying size and is accessed by a wood and glass door and stairwell in the southwest corner of the
structure.
i
•
ti
NV�
1
Garage oblique view of fagade,view to southwest South elevation of Garage,view to northeast
Shed 1: This small, gabled structure northwest of the Jordan House was in place by the mid-1960s based
on historic aerial imagery.The simple frame shed is clad with board-and-batten and features a board-
and-batten door in the east elevation; the roof is clad in standing seam metal.The structure sits on a
stone and mortar foundation and an open, post-framed shed extends from the south elevation.
Equipment Shed 1: This two-bay open equipment shed located north of the Jordan House was
constructed after 1982 based on historic aerial imagery.Wood posts support the side gable roof with
standing seam metal cladding.
Shed 1(foreground),view to northwest.Garage in EquipmentShed 1,view to northeast
background.
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 21
HNTB North Carolina,PC February2019

Shed 2: This prefabricated shed appears in historic aerial imagery after 1982.
Shed 3: This prefabricated shed appears in historic aerial imagery after 1999.
I
A
r
Shed 2,view to northwest Shed 3,view to south
Well House and TackRoom: The well house and tack room are located south of the equipment shed.
The concrete block well house sits on a poured concrete foundation and is covered with a wood frame
shed roof clad in standing seam metal.Asimple wood batten door is affixed to the south elevation. The
tack room is attached to the west elevation of the well house and is a simple wood frame structure with
an entry in the east elevation,adjacent and perpendicular to the west elevation of the well house. A
small window opening is located in the south elevation.The tack room featuresa front gable roof clad in
standing seam metal. These structures appear in aerial imagerydated 1965 and, based on materialsand
condition, were likely constructed in the late-1940s or early 1950s.
Equipment Shed 2: The equipment shed 2 is a large,four-bay pole-frame shed structure located south
of the Milk House. The structure is clad in metal siding and roofing. This structure is absent in aerial
imagerydated 1965, but appears in a 1982 aerial image. Based on materialsand conditions, equipment
shed 2 likely dates to the mid-1970s.
�j
1W
Well house(right)and tack room(left),view to northwest Equipmentshed 2,view to southwest
Equipment Shed 3: This side gable structure was relocated to the property after 1982 according to
historic aerial imagery.The current owner stated that this structure originated from anotherJordan
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 22
HNTB North Carolina,PC February 2019

property to the west.The structure was placed on a concrete block foundation directly south of the
double crib barn. A simple wood swinging double-door is located in the east elevation permitting access
to a small pasture enclosure, and the south elevation consists of a series of four wood sliding doors. All
other elevations are cladwith weatherboard.The roof features exposed raftertailsand open sheathing
clad in standing seam metal.
f ;
r'
1 ,
Equipment shed 3, view to the northeast Equipment shed 3 (left), double crib barn and silos
(right), view to the northwest
Double Crib Barn: The front gable double crib barn is reportedly as old as the main residence,dating to
at least 1903.The current owner indicated a similar style house was present on the site prior to 1903,
but burned. It is possible the barn maypredate 1903. However,field investigation did not provide
additional evidence that could conclusively confirm a date.
The breezeway is accessible by a sliding door in each gable end with eight animal pens (cribs) arranged
along either side. The barn is constructed of hand hewn logs fastened by mortise and tenon technique.
Later additions and alterations often employ nominal lumber fastened by nail or screw.The walls and
roof have open sheathing that is finished with German siding and a metal roof. The concrete block
foundation replaced a stone foundation at an unknown date.
1
y�
Double crib barn,view to east.Equipmentshed 3 at right, Double crib barn(right),equipmentshed 3(left)view to
milk parlorand silos atleft. southwest
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 23
HNTB North Carolina,PC February2019

Milk Parlor: The gabled milk parlor was added tothe north elevation of the double crib barn and is
accessible via a door from one of the animal pens. A raised concrete floor traverses the center of the
milk parlor and exits the north elevation via a doorway. The milk house would accommodate 22 cows at
a time.The building sits on a poured in slat concrete foundation and is clad with metal. Based on
mate rialsand construction technique,specifically the concrete foundation, the milk parlor and
complementary milk house (described below) were likely constructed around the same time as each
other and correspond to the development of thefarm for dairy production. This transition appearsto
have occurred in the late 1920s, contemporaneous with the adjacent silos.
Or
I
Milk Parlor,view to east Milk Parlor(center),view to southeast
Milk House: Located west of the milk parlor is the milk house, a small side-gabled frame structure.This
house stored the milk collected in the parlor for pick-up by a distributor. The milk house is set on a
poured in slat concrete foundation and is clad in weatherboard siding. A doorway is centered on the
south elevation and flanked by two window openings, however neither door nor windows remain.A
shed lean-to extends from the west elevation,enclosed on three sides, to forma tractor shed. Based on
materials and construction technique,the milk house appears to date to the late 1920s.
Milk House,view to northeast Milk House,view to southeast
Silos: Two metal panel silos on poured concrete foundations sit adjacent to the northeast corner of the
milk parlor.The initials of the three Jordan brothers(H.H.,C.E.,and R.T)are inscribed in the silo
foundations as are the presumed dates of construction, 1928(the western silo) and 1930(the eastern
silo). The silos housed silage fodder for the dairy cows.
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 24
HNTB North Carolina,PC February 2019

�.
Silos,view to southeast(Milk Parloratright) Silofoundation(east)detail, "H.H.J.912011930"
Corn Crib and Granary: These small auxiliary structures are located northeast of the silos and consist of
frame construction on stone piers. The dates of construction for these structures are unknown but may
pre-datethe conversion of the farm to dairying in the late 1920s based on construction technique and
materials.The corn crib consists of three bays, or two cribs and a breezeway, under a gable roof clad in
standing seam metal.The gable ends are clad in batten boards. The granaryis clad in metal siding and
the gable roof in standing seam metal.Simple metal-clad doors are located in each gable end.
dew
2 j
Corn Crib,view to southeast(granoryatleft) Corn Crib(left)and Granary(right),view to north
Chicken Coops: Two historic chicken coops—one of which is collapsed —are located northwest of the
Milk House and are associated with the remnants of a chicken run north and west of the simple
structures.The standing chicken coop is a simple shed structure with weatherboard siding and a door in
the east elevation. The south elevation is mostly open, showing exposed structural studs enclosed with
hardware cloth.
Hog House: A wood frame shed-roofed hog house is located north of the chicken coops. The simple
structure is set on a stone and log foundation with weatherboard siding. A narrow entryis located in the
west elevation.Similar to the chicken coops, the remnants of a n animal run extend from the west and
north side of the hog house.
Hay Barn (collapsed): North of the corn crib and granary is a hay barn that has fallen into disrepair and
recently collapsed.
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 25
HNTB North Carolina,PC February2019

L
Chicken coops,view to northwest Hog house,view to northeast
c
n
Hay barn(collapsed),view to northeast Work zone,view to north
Landscape
The roughly 17-acre agricultural property is divided into three distinct zones delineated by wood post
and barbwire fencing and a series of metal swinging gates: (1)the domestic zone, consisting of the
Jordan House and auxiliary outbuildings, including shed 1, the garage,and equipment shed 1; (2) the
work zone, consisting of shed 2,the tackhouse and well house, double crib barn, milk parlor, milk
house, and equipment sheds 2 and 3; and (3) the pasture,consisting of the silos, corn crib and granary,
hay barn (collapsed), shed 3, hog house, and chicken coops. Pastures remain to the north and west of
the domestic and work zones,though are no longer actively cultivated.The fencing and metal gates
delineating these zones are likely historic features,though the components have been updated and
replaced as needed. Interior fencelines are generally overgrown with hardwoods and cedar.
Circulation through the site is generally north-south trending.A historic driveway trace is evident
extending northeast from the house and intersecting NC 68 (Eastchester Drive)though is no longer in
use; entry to the property is gained via a shared gravel driveway from the south. This drive continues
through the property, past the double crib barn and the milk house, extending into the surrounding
pasture to the north and west.A road trace continues to the west through the property and crosses "the
branch",an unnamed tributary to the East Fork Deep River.The road trace crosses the branch on earth
placed on a large concrete pipe and then dissipates in the earth fill east of Penny Road.The branch flows
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 26
HNTB North Carolina,PC February2019

north along the west side of the property.An overhead transmission line was installed in the early 2000s
and parallels NC 68 along the east side of the property.
iL_ _' f`- .�fir '-itw ►
.4 rw a •
Pasture,view to the south from the northern property Pasture,view to the east
boundary
Historical Background
The Guilford County Tax Assessor attributes a 1903 construction date to the Jordan House; Smith (1979)
and Graybeal(1996) attributed a late-nineteenth century construction date.The form of the house was
widely popular throughout the late nineteenth century and into the early decades of the twentieth
century; the minimal applied ornamentation does not further refine a construction date. However,the
interview with the current owner suggests the Guilford County Tax Assessor date is accurate,and a 1903
construction date is maintained by this survey.
The 1895 Map of Guilford County depicts the name "N.P. Henly"northeast of the Deep River Friends
Meeting House in the area of the resource.The Jordon name appears in the November 1908 Map of
Guilford County northeast of the Deep River Friends Meeting House nearthe site of the resource and
roughly corresponds with the construction date of the house. Benjamin Arthur (February 20, 1869—
January 30, 1924) and Pearl Jordan (March 30, 1880—October23, 1931)14 were first listed in the Deep
River neighborhood of Guilford County in the 1910 census. The Jordan's maintained a"general farm"
and had five children, Hubert Henley("H.H."; May19, 1914—February 9, 1994), Clarence("C.E.";b. 1905,
d. unknown), Vera(b. 1907,d. unknown), Reuben ("R.T.", b. 1909,d. unknown), and Arthur(b. 1910,d.
unknown). According to the current owner, his grandfather H.H.assumed ownership of the Jordan
homestead; H.H.'s brothers C.E.and R.T.stayed close, helping out on the homestead and in the family's
dairy operation, occupying homes carved out of the Jordan family holdings. (As mentioned above, H.H.J,
C.E.J,and R.T.J.are engraved in the silo foundations.)
By 1930, H.H.was listed as the head of household and as an unpaid worker(member of family); he was
generally classified as a laborer on a dairy farm, presumably the Jordan Dairy Farm. H.H. married Opal
(Westmoreland) March 6, 1934 in Danville,Virginia and theirfirst son, Colon Hubert,was born
December 15, 1936 (d. March 2,2014). The 1920 Guilford County Soil Survey noted that farm labor in
14 Benjamin and Pearl Jordanareburied in the Deep River Friends Cemetery.
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 27
HNTB North Carolina,PC February2019

the county was scarce,and not available at all in some sections. Many farmers exchanged labor. In 1919,
less than 500 farms,or about 12 percent of the total, reported an expenditure for labor.15
The Jordan Dairy Farm wasa self-sufficient operation.Corn, wheat,oats, hay, tobacco,and cotton were
the most important crops in the county in the latter decades of the nineteenth century and early
twentieth century.Only the southeastern portion of the county was well-suited for cotton. As of 1920,
corn and wheat were the most important subsistence crops and tobacco was cultivated as the principal
cash crop in Guilford County. (The Jordan Dairy Farm lacks any evidence of an historic association with
tobacco farming.)Some of the wheat and corn was sold, however,oats, rye, hay and green grains were
generallygrown as feed for work stock and cattle. Practically every farm in the county produced garden
vegetablesfor home use, including but not limited to Irish potatoes, sweet potatoes, saccharine
sorghum, and small quantities of fruits, including apples, peaches, pears,cherries, grapes,and plums.16
In addition to dairy cows, the Jordan Dairy Farm kept work animals(horses and mules), and chickens and
hogs for household consumption. The farm reportedly kept about 150 chickens at any given time and
slaughtered about eight hogs a year to produce sausage.
Dairyfarming seems to have quickly become the principal focus and economic backbone of the Jordan
farm with the construction of the two silos in 1928 and 1930.As mentioned, the 1930 census record
indicates H.H.worked on a dairy farm (as opposed to the "general farm"operated at the time of the
1910 census) which would indicate the complementarydairying structures(i.e.,milk parlor and milk
house) were in place by 1930.
Dairyfarming along NC 68 beganto decline in the late 1960s as suburban sprawl extended from the
nearby cities of Greensboro and High Point, replacing agricultural land with new residential and
commercial developments. Opal Jordan sold 91 acresof dairy land in 1978 in the area of Penny Road.17
The Jordan Dairy Farm wasvisited by architectural historians in 1978-79 and in 1995 for regional
inventory studies for the NC Department of Cultural Resources. The inventories, though,focused on the
residence only. Smith (1979)first identified the house as the "Jordon House", at which time the vinyl
siding had not been applied. The short description notes the presence of molded trim,cornice,and
porch with sawn detail. The rear additions were present at this time.Graybeal(1996) recorded the
Jordon House and assigned the HPO Survey Site Number GF1421.Though the condition of the house
was not addressed, the mid-1990s photograph does appearto show the vinyl siding in place.
11 Jurney etal,1920.
16Ibid.
17 Burchette,2004.
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 28
HNTB North Carolina,PC February 2019

1 _
a-�•
'Jordon House"(Smith 1979) 'Jordon House"(Graybeal 1996)
Architectural Context
In Guilford County, prices for farm products remained deflated for thirty or more years afterthe Civil
War.Construction slowed until the economy began its recoveryand few buildings of distinction were
built in the county during the immediate post-war period. This continued for a longer period in this area
of small Quaker farmers generally uninterested in the latest stylistic trends. As a result, the architecture
of the area continued to be simple and modest throughout the nineteenth century and into the early
twentieth century,even when reflecting new artistic styles.18
Patrick(2001) describes two disparate paths rural domestic architecture followed in Guilford County in
the decades leading up to World War I.The path from which the Jordan House appearsto emerge is the
first described by Patrick,that characterized by the vernacular"triple-A"roof form associated with the
influential Model Farm and local subsistence farming. In 1868,the "Baltimore Association of Friends to
Advise and Assist Friends of the Southern States"established the Model Farm to demonstrate improved
methods of agriculture and animal husbandry to local farmers.The original farmhouse, a two-story,
three-bay,single-pile house with center hall plan and centergable on the fagade,set a precedent for
simple farm dwellings constructed during the next thirtyto forty years.The building type became
popular throughout Guilford County, and remained so into the early decades of the twentieth century.
Most of these houses, supported by small scale subsistence farming,were not large or elaborate.
Restrained stylistic details sometimes were applied to the basic form.19
Though lacking the centeredfront gable that defines the triple-A house form,the Jordan House exhibits
the basic characteristics of the simple house form and modest stylistic applications. The house plan and
form conforms to the nationally recognized I-house form. McAlester(2015) describes the two-story
I-house as a traditional British folk form with its origins in the pre-railroad era that experienced a
resurgence after the arrival of the railroad over much of the eastern United States.Graybeal(1996)
attributesthe "National Folk" style to the Jordan House,a style inspired bythe arrival of the railroad in
the latter half of the nineteenth century,which facilitated the construction of modest dwellings far from
watertransport.With this new mode of transportation,construction was no longer restrictedto the use
11 Oppermann,1995.
19 Pa trick,2001.
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 29
HNTB North Carolina,PC February 2019

of local mate rialsand lumber from distant sawmills could be moved more efficiently over longer
distances.
The assemblage of agricultural outbuildings associated with the Jordan Dairy Farm are common to dairy
farms from this period of development and consist of a series of structures associated with the housing
of livestock and processing of milk. The structures are utilitarian in design,conforming to standard
typologies and with minimal stylistic application, if any.
As illustrated in Patrick's(2001)survey in support of the intensive evaluation of the Futrell-MacKay-
Armstrong House, late nineteenth centuryand earlytwentieth century two-story, triple-bay,single pile
houses are well represented in Guilford County. Similar examples can be found throughout the
Piedmont region, and beyond. Very often, the house form is associated with an historic agricultural
component and agricultural outbuildings.
The Schoolfield-Hatcher Farm (GF1826) house
located northeast of Greensboro in Guilford
County was determined NRHP-eligible under
Criteria A and C in 2006.Though the house is in
r s _ overall poor repair,the two-story, single-pile,
triple-bay I-house features exterior end brick
chimneys, a feature common to the house form,
and a hipped roof front porch supported by
simple replacement wood posts. The
weatherboard siding was covered with asphalt
j' siding and a rear one-story ell addition with
attached shed porch extends from the west side
Schoolfield-Hatcher Farm(GF1826)house(atleft)and of the house. The house features cornice returns
framebarn(atright),viewto north and 6/6 wood sash windows.
The Foust-Carpenter and Dean Dick Farms
v
f; (GF4959) located southeast of Greensboro in
- Guilford County was listed in the NRHP in 2009
under Criterion A in the area of agriculture and
,t ;r ethnic heritage(black). The Foust and Carpenter
families constructed cluster of house and
�.a agricultural buildings along Mt. Hope Church and
Carpenter House Roads betweenthe mid-
nineteenth and mid-twentieth centuries.
According to the NRHP Nomination (Fearnbach,
2009), field patterns and road systems within the
- 325-acre farm district have been consistent since
Foust-Carpenterand Dean Dick Farms(GF4959)house, 1937.The circa 1898 weatherboa rd-clad fra me
view to northwest I-house rests on a continuous concrete block
foundation with deep boxed cornice and gable
end returns and a metal roof. The house features brick gable-end chimneys and 6/6 and 4/4 wood
sashes. This example includes narrow4/4 windows flanking the chimney on the north elevation.A
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 30
HNTB North Carolina,PC February2019

replacement flat-roofed entry porch with turned posts and a concrete floor shelters the double-leaf
front door, which has tall,arched,glazed panes over raised panels, some original hardware,and an early
twentieth-century screened door. A circa 1910 kitchen ell extends from the rear elevation and features a
gabled entrance porch on the north elevation with turned bracketed posts, a wood floor, and wood
steps. The recessed porch on the ell's south elevation was enclosed to create a bathroom in the 1950s.
The interior retainsflush board wall sheathing, beadboard ceilings, pine floors, four-panel doors, and
post-and-lintel mantels. The flush board walls of the north first-floor room were covered with knotty-
pine paneling in the 1940s. The ell encompasses a circa 1950s kitchen with paneled walls and a linoleum
floor at the west end,a pantry at the southwest corner of the kitchen,a central room with flush board
wall sheathing,and a circa 1950s bathroom south of the central room.20
The NRHP-listed Foust-Carpenter and Dean Dick Farms district encompasses six dwellings and 29
outbuildings on 325 acres.Among the inventory of contributing structures are: a late-nineteenth-
century tenant house; an early-twentieth-centuryframe barn; a circa 1930s frame barn; a frame corn
crib; a frame pack house; twoframe equipment sheds; a mid-to-late nineteenth-century log house with
frame additions; the ruins of a log tobacco barn;a circa 1875 tenant house; and a circa 1950s equipment
shed. The log tobacco barn northwest of the tenant house complex was moved to its current location
around 1947 from the Dickfamily property further north.The Dean Dick Farm includes a log dwelling,a
log milk barn,a frame icehouse, and three modern outbuildings. The district's most recently constructed
residence is a small frame house John B.CarpenterJr. and his fatherJohn B.Carpenter Sr.erected by the
lake in the southern section of their property in the 1940s.
The Thomas R.Greeson House and Farm (GF1923)
is located in the southeastern corner of Guilford
County. The resource was determined f
NRHP-eligible in 2015 under Criterion A in they ~
area of agriculture and Criterion C in the area of � '-
architecture.The two-story,three-bay, single-pile;
with rearwing I-house wasbuilt in 1881. The
house rests on a replacement concrete block
foundation and is clad in weatherboard siding _
with 6/6 wood sashes and operable louvered
wood shutters in most windows. The partial- -
width hipped roof porch is supported by turned
posts with decorative millwork brackets which
Thomas R.Greeson Houseand Farm(GF1923)house,
covers a centered,double-leaf wood and glass viewto northwest
doors. The side gabled roof has boxed eaves and
wide fascia in the gable ends with exterior end brick chimneys.21
Among the contributing agricultural outbuildings on the 90-acre Thomas R.Greeson House and Farm are
a wood frame well house, a nineteenth century one-and-one-half story log outbuilding, a c. 1920s
20 Fea rnbach,2009.
21 Groesbeck,2015.
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 31
HNTB North Carolina,PC February2019

machine shed, a mid-to late 1960s wood post machine shed, a log house (wood storage),a nineteenth
century log barn encased in a twentieth century frame structure,and a drive-through, frame corn crib.22
Integrity
Though the arrangement of the house and the outbuildings reflect historic organization and circulation
patterns consistent with dairy farming practices in the state and county, and the introduction of
outbuildings reflect its continued use as a dairy farm and homestead,the degree to which material
alterations and general disrepair have altered individual buildings results in an overall loss of historic
integrity. Despite this, and the loss of surrounding acreage historically associated with dairying on the
property,the collection of buildings continues to convey the feeling of an early twentieth century dairy
farm.Aside from equipment shed 2, there is no evidence to suggest any of the historic-age buildings
have been moved from their original location. Extensive commercial development along the NC 68
corridor—some of which has occurred on historic Jordan family landholdings—encroaches on all sides
of the property and altersthe resource's setting. Further,the introduction of the overhead transmission
line and towers in the early2000s along the east side of the property also contributes to the loss of
setting.Though several agricultural outbuildings remain on the property, the property no longer
operates as a dairy farm and complementary agricultural activities have also ceased;thus, integrityof
association is no longer intact.
Rear ell additions are commonly observed on turn-of-the-twentieth-century I-houses and reflect the
adaptation of a relatively modest house type for continued use. While two of the rear additions on the
Jordan House appear to date to the historic period, taken as a whole, and in consideration of the
reported interior updates,the house no longer represents an intact example of the type and design
integrity has been compromised. The associated, historic-age agricultural outbuildings similarly exhibit a
continuity of use, including the milk parlor addition to the double crib barn. However,the overall
disrepair of the agricultural outbuildings contributes to a loss of design integrityfor each building type.
Though the property retains some historic materials,specifically in the windows and porch supports on
the Jordan House, and the weatherboard and German siding remaining on complementary agricultural
outbuildings, material alterationsand general disrepair prevent the property from conveying integrityof
materialsand workmanship. The wholesale application of vinyl has altered the siding profile and muted
any other historic architectural features associated with the Jordan House.Similarly, the replacement of
the foundation on the double crib barn diminishes integrityof materialsand workmanship. In other
instances, the loss of windows and doors (e.g., milk house) prevent individual structures from conveying
integrityof materialsand workmanship.
National Register Criteria Evaluation
The Jordan Dairy Farm is recommended not eligible under Criterion A in the area of agriculture.Though
the property retains distinct zones,a full arrayof complementary outbuildings in association with a farm
house, and circulation patterns,the diminishment of the property's acreage coupled with the general
disrepair of the outbuildings and discontinued agricultural use of the property prevent it from conveying
a significant association with agricultural history. Though the Jordan Dairy Farm represents one of only a
few remaining agricultural propertieson the NC 68 corridor, other farm complexes in the county better
22Ibid.
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 32
HNTB North Carolina,PC February2019

represent historic farming practices from the early twentieth century,including the Thomas R.Greeson
House and Farm, Foust-Carpenter and Dean Dick Farms, and Ragsdale Farm.
The Jordan Dairy Farm is recommended not eligible under Criterion B,as research did not reveal an
association with individuals significant in local history. The Jordan family was one of several in the area,
and one of many in the county, practicing dairy farming in the first half of the twentieth century.
Research did not reveal individual members of the Jordan family that made an identifiable and
significant contribution to local history. Therefore,the resource is recommended not eligible under
Criterion B.
The Jordan Dairy Farm is recommended not eligible under Criterion C. While the house retainssome
historic materials,as evident in the wood sashes, doors, and porch columns and brackets, it no longer
represents an intact example of its type.Though rear additions were common to this modest house
type,the Jordan House appears to have undergone three distinct additions, most recently in the 1970s.
The diminished material integrity,compromised design integrity,and loss of integrityof setting,prevent
the Jordan House from conveying significance in the area of architecture.
Overall,the agricultural outbuildings represent common building types and lack individual distinction.
Though the double crib barn retains evidence of its log construction, the weatherboard cladding and
later update to the building foundation prevent it from being a good and representative example.
Likewise, material alterationsand general disrepair prevent the other complementary outbuildings from
conveying individual architectural significance.Therefore,these resources are recommended not eligible
under Criterion C.
It appears unlikely that the resource would yield any important historical information not readily
available from other sources. Therefore,the resource is recommended not eligible under Criterion D.
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 33
HNTB North Carolina,PC February2019

VI I. Sources
Bishir, Catherin W.and Michael T.Southern. A Guide to the Historic Architecture of Piedmont North
Carolina. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, 2003.
Burchette, Bob. "Dairy farming mo-oves away from area."News and Record.30 September 2004.
Accessed on-line 30 January 2019,www.greensboro.com/news/dairy-farming-mo-oves-away-from-
area/article 290df577-c787-508c-97b2-6a233359753d.html.
Deep River Friends Meeting. "Historic Cemetery".2019.Accessed on-line 18 February 2019,
www.deepriverfriends.com/cemetery/.
Fearnbach, Heather. "Foust-Carpenter and Dean Dick Farms" National Register of Historic Places
Registration Form, 2009.
Graybeal, Kaye.Historic Architecture Inventory, Guilford County, North Carolina. Guilford County Historic
Preservation Commission, 1996.
Groesbeck, Sarah."Architectural Survey and Evaluation, Replacement of Bridge No.272 Over Climax
Creek on Watchtower Road(SR 3368), Guilford County, North Carolina". March 2015. NCDOT WBS
No. 17BP.7R.86. NCHPO ER 15-0564.On-file at NCHPO, Raleigh.
"Historic Aerials".NETR Online.Accessed on-line 13 February 2019,www.historicaerials.com/viewer.
Jordan, Darrin. Personal interview.30 January 2019.
Jurney, R.C.,S.O. Perkins, W.A. Davis and W.D. Lee.Soil Survey of Guilford County, North Carolina. 1920.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.Accessed on-line
19 February 2019, www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/surveylist/soils/survey/state/?stateld=NC.
"Map of Guilford County, NC", Drawn by C.M. Miller C.E.,Salisbury, NC. 1908. Greensboro Public Library,
North Carolina Collection. Index NC 912.75662.M64: Map Case Drawer2.
"Map of Guilford County, NC", Published by D.W.C. Benbow,Greensboro, NC. 1895. Greenboro Public
Library, North Carolina Collection: Map Case Drawer B3.
McAlester,Virginia Savage.A Field Guide to American House. 2015.Alfred A. Knopf. New York.
Middlesworth, Chester Paul. "Dairy Industry".NCPedia. 2006.Accessed on-line 12 February 2019,
www.ncpedia.org/dairy-industr .
Oppermann, Langdon Edmunds. "Deep River Friends Meeting House and Cemetery'National Register of
Historic Places Registration Form, 1995.
Patrick,Vanessa. "Historic Architecture Resources Survey Report, Phase II Addendum: Intensive
Evaluation of Futrell-MacKay-Armstrong House,Guilford County, NC". March 2001. NCDOTTIP No.
U-2913A&B.On-file at NCHPO, Raleigh.
Smith, H. McKelden (Ed.).Architectural Resources:An Inventoryof Historic Architecture, High Point,
Jamestown, Gibsonville, Guilford County. North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, 1979.
TIP No. U 5974 Guilford County 34
HNTB North Carolina,PC February 2019

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirement Control Symbol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region EXEMPT
(Authority: AR 335-15,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Penny Road City/County: High Point/Guilford Sampling Date: 02/21/22
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: DP-1
Investigator(s): Pilot Section,Township, Range:
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): Floodplain Local relief(concave,convex,none): Slope(%): 0-2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.03700 Long:-79.96615 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla loam(ChA) NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
—Surface Water(Al) —True Aquatic Plants(1314) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
X High Water Table(A2) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Drainage Patterns(B10)
X Saturation(A3) —Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) —Moss Trim Lines(B16)
—Water Marks(131) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
—Sediment Deposits(132) —Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) —Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(133) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust(134) —Other(Explain in Remarks) —Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(135) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves(139) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(1313) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP-1
Absolute Dominant indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1 Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 2 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' ) FACW species 55 x 2= 110
1. Platanus occidentalis 10 Yes FACW FAC species 0 x 3= 0
2. FACU species 0 x 4= 0
3. UPL species 50 x 5= 250
4. Column Totals: 105 (A) 360 (B)
5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 3.43
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. _3-Prevalence Index is:53.0'
10 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover: 2 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) _Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Festuca heterophylla 50 Yes UPL 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Carex intumescens 30 Yes FACW be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Juncus effusus 15 No FACW Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4• Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH), regardless of
6 height.
7• Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines, less
8. than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9 (1 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
95 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 48 20%of total cover: 19 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5' Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-18 10YR 4/2 85 7.5YR 6/4 15 C M Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(Al) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147, 148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_Black Histic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Red Parent Material(F21)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, —Other(Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix(S6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirement Control Symbol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region EXEMPT
(Authority: AR 335-15,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Penny Road City/County: High Point/Guilford Sampling Date: 02/21/22
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: DP-2
Investigator(s): Pilot Section,Township, Range:
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): Floodplain Local relief(concave,convex,none): Slope(%): 0-2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.03705 Long:-79.96615 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla loam(ChA) NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
—Surface Water(Al) —True Aquatic Plants(1314) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
_High Water Table(A2) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Drainage Patterns(B10)
—Saturation(A3) —Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) —Moss Trim Lines(B16)
—Water Marks(131) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
—Sediment Deposits(132) —Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) —Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(133) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust(134) —Other(Explain in Remarks) —Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(135) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves(139) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(1313) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP-2
Absolute Dominant indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1 Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 1 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' ) FACW species 10 x 2= 20
1. Platanus occidentalis 10 Yes FACW FAC species 0 x 3= 0
2. FACU species 10 x 4= 40
3. UPL species 70 x 5= 350
4. Column Totals: 90 (A) 410 (B)
5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 4.56
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. _2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. _3-Prevalence Index is:53.0'
10 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover: 2 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) _Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Festuca heterophylla 70 Yes UPL 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Andropogon virginicus 10 No FACU be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4• Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH), regardless of
6 height.
7• Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines, less
8. than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9 (1 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
80 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 40 20%of total cover: 16 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5' Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-18 7.5YR 6/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(Al) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147, 148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_Black Histic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_Stratified Layers(A5) _Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Red Parent Material(F21)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, —Other(Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix(S6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0