NC0022187_Permit Issuance_19941209

4
r r.
' State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
• Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Mr. Christopher Bryant
Star Enterprise
303 Fellowship Road
CS-18
Moorestown, NJ 08057
Dear Mr. Bryant:
44V*
'A.
C)EHNR
December 9, 1994
Subject: Permit No. NCO022187
Star Enterprise - Paw Creek
Mecklenburg County
- In accordance with your application for discharge permit received on February 16, 1994,
we are forwarding herewith the subject state - NPDES permit. This permit is issued pursuant
to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 .1 and the Memorandum of
Agreement between North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection agency dated
December 6, 1983.
A public hearing was held on September 14, 1994 to gather comments regarding the
issuance of this permit. As a result of the meeting, the final permit requirements were changed
from the draft permit. In summary, the monitoring frequency for organic compounds is now
2/month and an. EPA 610 analysis is required. Also, EPA 624 and 625 analyses are required
on discharges from the retention pond and the loading rack oil/water separator. Please review
this permit carefully for changes from the draft.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit
are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request
within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a
written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed
with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer 27447, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27611 -7447. Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Please take notice this permit is not transferable. Part II, E.4. addresses the requirements
to be followed in case of change in ownership or control of this discharge.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be
required by the Division of Environmental Management or permits required by the Division of
Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental
permit that may be required.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Mr. Jay Lucas at
telephone number 919/733-5083.
Sincerely,
uri-Anal Signed By
hAPrKtoaon Adrd, Jr., P.E.
cc: Mr. Jim Patrick, EPA
Mooresville Regional Office

•r 1
Permit No. NCO022187
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1,
other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Star Enterprise
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at
Paw Creek Terminal
410 Tom Sadler Road
Paw Creek -
Mecklenburg County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Gum Branch in the Catawba River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in
Parts I, II, and III hereof.
This permit shall become effective January 1, 1995
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on August 31, 1996
Signed this day December 9, 1994
original Signed By
A. Preston Howard, Jr.
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Environmental Management
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit No. NC0022187
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
Star Enterprise
is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate the existing oil/water separation system consisting of a detention pond and
oil/water separator located at Paw Creek Terminal, 410 Tom Sadler Road, Paw Creek,
Mecklenburg County (See Part III of this Permit), and
2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on tfe'� attached map into an
unnamed tributary to Gum Branch which is classified Class WS-IV waters in the Catawba River
Basin.

It
A. (1). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FINAL
Permit No. NCO022187
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall
serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below:
Effluent Characteristics
Flow**
Oil and Grease
Total Suspended Residue
Turbidity
Acute Toxicity****
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylene
Naphthalene
Methyl Tert Butyl Ether
Phenols
Lead
EPA 610*****
EPA 624 and 625
Discharge Limitations
Monitoring
Requirements
Lbs/ day Unft (specify)
Measurement
Sample
*Sample
Mon. AM Daily Max Mon. Avg Daily Max
Frequency
Tvue
Location
Weekly
Instantaneous
E
45.0 mg/I
2/Month
Grab
E
45.0 mg/I
2/Month
Grab
E
***
2/Month
Grab
E
Annually
Grab
E
2/Month
Grab
E
2/Month
Grab
E
2/Month
Grab
E
2/Month
Grab
E
2/Month
Grab
E
2/Month
Grab
E
1.0 µg/I
2/Month
Grab
E
2/Month
Grab
E
Quarterly
Grab
E
Quarterly
Grab
******
* Sample Locations: E - Effluent
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements specified above shall be taken at the following location(s): the nearest accessible
point after final treatment but prior to actual discharge to or mixing with the receiving waters.
Monitoring will be conducted during normal work hours.
** All volumes of wastewater leaving the facility shall be monitored. If continuous flow monitoring is not feasible, then the discharger shall
record the approximate time that discharge began and ended, along with the instantaneous flow at the time of effluent sampling.
This Permit imposes no limitation of the discharge of storm water runoff uncontaminated by any industrial or commercial activity and not
discharged through any oil/water separator or other treatment equipment or facility.

A. (1). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FINAL Permit No. NCO022187
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall
serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below:
*** The discharge shall not cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU. If the turbidity exceeds these levels due to natural
background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity in the receiving water.
**** Acute Toxicity (Pimephalas 24 hour) Monitoring, Annual, See Part III, Condition E.
*****The effluent shall be tested for the presence of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons that are indicative of middle distillate fuels
using the EPA Method 610. The permittee shall also identify the top ten prominent peaks documented during the analysis.
****** See Part III, Condition G.
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored 2/month at the effluent
by grab sample.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

tq-lV �Gf'I+.T irJ`co �iTTRGk4z� ' --
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NCO022187
PERMr= NAME: Star Enterprise
FACILITY NAME: Paw Creek Terminal
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity:
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
Minor �l
100 %
Comments:
This permit is for the discharge of stormwater from a bulk fuel storage
terminal.
RECEIVING STREAM: an unnamed tributary to Gum Branch
Class:'e waz
Sub -Basin: 03-08-34
Reference USGS Quad: F15SW (please attach)
County: Mecklenburg
Regional Office: Mooresville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 00/00/00 Treatment Plant Class:
Classification changes within three miles:
Requested by: Jays Lucas
Prepared bye
Reviewed by:_ l /`/L
Date: 4/6/94
Date: t A Y �.
Date:
Modeler
#
S" li2L±
.
Drainage Area (mi2y 0.02 Average Flow (cfs): 0.02
s7Q10 (cfs): 0.0 w7Q10 (cfs): 0.0 3002 (cfs): 0.0
Annual Acute [Fathead Minnow] 24 hr. Toxicity Test
Monthly Average Daily Maximum Frequency
Flow (MGD)
variable variable
Oil and Grease (mg/l):
45 2 / month
pH (SU):
6-9 2 / month
TSS (mg/1):
45 2 / month
Turbidity' (NTU)
50 2 / month
Benzene (µg/I):
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
Toluene (µg/l):
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
Xylene (4/1) :
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
Ethylbenzene (µg/I):
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity best
MTBE (µg/I):
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
Naphthalene (µg/I):
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
Phenols (4g/1):
1.0 2/morth
The discharge shall not cause the turbidity of the receiving water to
exceed 50 NTU. If the turbididty exceeds these levels due to natural
background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in
the turbidity of the receiving water.
All volumes of wastewater leaving the facility must be monitored. If continuous
monitoring is not feasible, then the discharger shall record the approximate
times that discharge began and ended, along with the instantaneous flow at the
time of effluent sampling. Monitoring for Benzene, Toluene, Naphthalene, and
Xylene using an EPA approved method to a detection level of at least 1 ppb.
Also recommend monitoring for methyl tort -butyl ether (MTBE) and Ethyl
benzene using an EPA approved method. This monitoring should be performed
at the same time that the whole effluent toxicity test sample is taken annually.
A reopener clause should be placed in the permit to allow limits to be placed on
toxicants should the facility fail its whole effluent toxicity test.

yr
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request #E N7� 18
Facility Name:
Star Enterprise - Paw Creek Terminal � IRp, . El-r pF
IV,,
NPDES No.:
8
REsOUncEs
Type of Waste:
Industrial 100%
Facility Status:
MAY g
Permit S tus:
R neExis�wagl
1994
Receiving Stream:
unnamed tributary to Gum
IV
Branch 11VISION OF InIP,ONIgiNrq(
Stream Classification:
WS
MOORfSyQ1 NgNACfgffNT
Subbasin:
03-08-34
RfGIpNq� OFFICE
County:
Mecklenburg
Stream Characteristic:
Regional Office:
Mooresville 5g&
USGS # 02.1429.1345
Requestor:
Lucas
Date: 1989
Date of Request:
4/6/94
Drainage Area (mi2): 0.02
Topo Quad:
F15SW
Summer 7Q10 (cfs): 0.0
Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 0.0
Average Flow (cfs): 0.02
30Q2 (cfs): 0.0
IWC (%): 100 %
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Phenols analysis indicate WS standard exceeded. Will recommend limit.
Analysis of benzene, toluene, xylene, and naphthalene indicate < 0.1 µg/l levels.
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
Recommended by:
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment:
Regional Supervisor: _
Permits & Engineering:
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SUPPORT BY:
-7, f
a MAY . ►1.11.1
s//,-3
JUN 0 3 1994
.fw zh' 11V V%1A
i62C7

Existing Limits
Flow (MGD)
Oil and Grease (mg/1):
pH (SU):
Settleable Solids (ml/1):
Tubidity * (NTU)
Benzene (µg/l):
Toluene (µg/1):
Xylene (µg/1):
MT 3E (µg/1):
Naphthalene (µg/1):
Phenols (µg/1):
TOXICS/CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Mon. Avg. Daily Max. Frequency
variable variable
30 60 2/month
6-9 2/month
0.1 0.2 2/month
50 2/month
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
* The discharge shall cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU. If the turbididty exceeds these
levels due to natural background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity of the
receiving water.
Recommended Limits
Mon. Avg. Daily Max. Frequency WQ/EL
Flow (MGD)
variable variable
Oil and Grease (mg/1):
45 2/month
pH (SU):
6-9 2/month
�h}g�Snlirlc f�m141,
9,1 --$: 2/month
Tubidity * (NTU)
50 2/month
Benzene (µg/l):
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
Toluene (µg/1):
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
Xylene (µgft
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
Ethylbenzene (µg/l):
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
MTBE (µg/l):
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
Naphthalene (µg/1):
Phenols (µ ):
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
OW OW) 1.0 [02B (f) (3) (D)] � / rAM+1
l! 6 C w�yi�
.0211
-f 5 a/mOY\4h
OI
* The discharge shal)rcause
the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU. If the turbididty exceeds these
levels due to natural background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity of the
receiving water.
Type of Toxicity Test: Acute / Fathead Minnow 24 hr
Monitoring Schedule: Annual
Instream Monitoring nr
Upstream Location
Downstream Location
_x_ Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

MISCELLANEOUS .ANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Special Instructions or Conditions
All volumes of wastewater leaving the facility must be monitored. If continuous monitoring is not feasible, then the
discharger shall record the approximate times that discharge began and ended, along with the instantaneous flow at the
time of effluent sampling. Monitoring for Benzene, Toluene, Naphthalene, and Xylene using an EPA approved method to
a detection level of at least 1 ppb. Also recommend monitoring for methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) and Ethyl benzene
using an EPA approved method. This monitoring should be performed at the same time that the whole effluent toxicity
test sample is taken annually. A reopener clause should be placed in the permit to allow limits to be placed on toxicants
should the facility fail its whole effluent toxicity test.
Explain exact pathway of discharge ( i.e. storm sewer to tributary, etc.)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

Facility Name Star Enterprise - Paw Creek Terminal Permit # NCO022187 Pipe # 001
ACUTE TOXICITY MONITORING (ANNUAL)
The permittee shall conduct annual toxicity tests using protocols defined as definitive in E.P.A.
Document 600/4-85/013 entitled "The Acute Toxicity of Effluents to Freshwater and Marine
Organisms." The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas) 24 hour
static test, using effluent collected as a single grab sample. Effluent samples for self -monitoring
purposes must be obtained below all waste treatment. The permittee will conduct one test annually, with
the annual period beginning in January of the calendar year of the effective date of the permit. The
annual test requirement must be performed and reported by June 30. If no discharge occurs by June 30,
notification will be made to the Division by this date. Toxicity testing will be performed on the next
discharge event for the annual test requirement.
The parameter code for this test is TAE6C. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit
condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was
performed, using the appropriate parameter code. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent
to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Rd.
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical
measurements performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response
data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if
chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit
may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test. Failure to
submit suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10
0.0 cfs
Permitted Flow
n/a MGD Recommended by:
IWC
100 %
Basin & Sub -basin 03-08-34 - —�
Receiving Stream
ut Paw Creek
County
Mecklenburg Date a mwf, ovo,
AAM Fathead 24 Version 10191

Page 1
Note for Marcia Toler-McCullen
From: Dave Goodrich
Date: Sun, Jul 31, -1994 10:01 AM
Subject: RE: WLAs in region
To: Carla Sanderson
Cc: Marcia Toler-McCullen
All WLA's were received and were accidentally kept in the permit files. This was my fault.
They came in during a cutoff period in late May/early June when I was pushing everyone
hard to get as many permits as possible to notice. I made the decision to allow some folks to
draft permits directly from the fact sheet and told them to put the fact sheet in Marcia's box
after the draft was completed. I know this is not normal procedure but I felt it was necessary
at the time. I gathered together the three fact sheets and placed them in Marcia's box today. I
assure you I am NOT continuing this practice and I apologize for any confusion it caused.
From: Carla Sanderson on Wed, Jul 13, 1994 8:59 AM
Subject: WLAs in region
To: Dave Goodrich
I got a call from Mike P. this morning about three WLAs they know they sent back but are on
the >45 day list sent to the region.
1. Precedent-36871
2. Star Enterprise-22187
3. Louis Dreyfus Energy-21971
Do you know anything about these. Did any go to GP?
Please let me know and I will get Marcia to change the log.
Thanks!

Facility Name:
w Permit Number:
Engineer:
Subbasin:
Receiving Stream:
USGS quad #:
Request Number:
Date:
Expiration date:
Star Enterprises - Paw Creek Terminal
NCO022187
Lucas
03-08-34
unnamed tributary to Gum Branch
F15SW
7818
4/6/94
Existing WLA checked: x
Staff Report:
Topo checked: x
USGS Flows confirmed:
PIRF / APAMS: nr
IWC Spreadsheet: nr
Stream Classification: x WS
Nutrient Sensitivity:
Instream Data: nr
Brief of WLA Analysis
Previous WLA's
1984: pH and Oil & Grease limits
1989: current limits including Settleable Solids, Turbidity, and Toxicity Testing.
Toxicity
Facility has a record of >100% passing. Six tests have revealed this, therefore requirement will be annual and for a 24 hr
Acute Fathead minnow LC50 test, per Matt Matthews recommendation.
Staff Report
"The efflluent discharges inside the bulk storage spill containment area which then travels to a lower elevation where it is
contained and released with a controlled outlet. The spill containment area only receives runoff from rainfall events and
the oil / water separator. After discharging into the unnamed tributary to Gum Branch, the receiving stream then empties
into a holding pond constructed by Colonial Pipeline." Staff Report, 1989
"The types of fuels stored are regular unleaded, premium unleaded, mid -grade (Which is a mixture of regular unleaded
and premium unleaded), high sulfur diesel, and low sulfur diesel." Staff Report, 1994
DMR's
Phenol's exceed standard... will need to limit [0.1 µg/l WS]
Parameter
Quantity Detected
Benzene
< 0.1
µg/I
< 0.1
µg/I
< 0.1
µg/I
< 0.1
µg/I
< 0.1
µg/I
Toluene
< 0.1
µg/l
< 0.1
µg/I
< 0.1
µg/I
< 0.1
µg/I
< 0.1
µg/I
Xylene
< 0.1
µg/I
< 0.1
µg/l
< 0.1
µg/I
< 0.1
µg/I
Naphthalene
< 0.1
µg/i
< 0.1
µg/I
< 0.1
µg/I
< 0.1
µg/I
< 0.1
µg/I
Month
1/12/93
9/15/92
8/21 /92
7/31/92
6/16/92
1/12/93
9/15/92
8/21/92
7/31/92
6/16/92
1/12/93
9/15/92
8/21 /92
7/31/92
1/12/93
9/15/92
8/21 /92
7/31/92
6/16/92
comments...
standard 1.19 µg/I [WS classification]
standard 11 µg/I [WS classification]
no standard: monitor
no standard: monitor

C H E M B A CII<'��ro�«•
• P. O. BOX 19198, CHARLOTTE, N. C. 28219
TEL. [phone]
FAX #: [phone]
June 16, 1992
I:14MI11.611
Analysis of Water Sample
MADE FOR: Texaco/Star Enterprises
P.O. BOX 88
Paw Creek, N.C. 28130
MARKED: Sample received at Chem-Bac Labs, Inc. on 06/10/92
ANALYSIS: ACID EXTRACTABLES
parts per million
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol----------
< .010
2-Chlorophenol-------------------
< .010
2,4-Dichlorophenol---------------
< .010
2,4-Dimethylphenol---------------
< .010
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
------- < ,010
2-Nitrophenol--------------------
< .010
4-Nitrophenol--------------------
< .010
Pentach l orophenol----------------
< .010
.
Phenol ---------------------------
< .010
\Sall-
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol------------
< .010
PURGEABLES
parts per
million
Benzene ------------ < .010
Bromodichloromethane-------
< .010
Bromoform------------------
< .010
Bromomethane----------------
< .010
Carbon Tetrachloride ----------
< .010
Chlorobenzene------------------< .010
Chloroethane-------------------<< .010
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether ---------
< .010
Chloroform ----------------------
< .010
Chloromethane------------------
< .010
Dibromochloromethane------------
< .010
1,2-Dichlorobenzene--------------
< .010
1,3-Dichlor6benzene--------------
< •010
1,4-Dichlorobenzene--------------
< .010
1,1-Dichloroethane-----------------
< •010
1,2-Dichloroethane-----------------
< ,010
1,1-Dichloroethane------------------
< .010
trans-1,2-Dichloroethane------------
< .010
INDEPENDENT LABORATORIES • CHEMISTS • BACTERIOLOGISTS
CONSULTANTS
TESTING • INSPECTION •
DEV ELOPMENT •
QUALITY CONTROL

i
C H E M, B A C
II• P. O. BOX 19198, CHARLOTTE, N. C. 282.19
TEL. [phone]
FAX #: [phone]
PAGE 2
TEXACO
PURGEABLES
parts per million
1,1,2,-2-Tetrachloroethane---------- < .010
Tetrachloroethene-------------------- < .010
'Toluene -------------------------------- < .010
1,.1,1-Trichloroethene------------------ < .010
1,1,2-Trichloroethene------------------ < .010
Trichloroethane------------------------ < .010
Trichlorofluoromethane----------------- < .010
Vinyl Chloride -------------------------- < .010
BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLES FOLLOW ON NEXT PAGE
Respectfully su mitted,
CHEM�-BA L 0 DRIES, INC.
J.C: Wubbe 1
Supervising Chemist
JCH/th
INDEPENDENT LABORATORIES • CHEMISTS • BACTERIOLOGISTS • CONSULTANTS
TESTING • INSPECTION • DEVELOPMENT • QUALITY CONTROL

1 C H E M B A C
II• P. O. BOX 19198, CHARLOTTE, N. C. 28219
TEL. [phone]
FAX #: 704,394-6382
BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLES
TEXACO
parts per million
Acenaphthene----------- < .010
Acenaphthylene---------- < .010
l.
Anthracene-------------- < .010
Aldrin------------------- < .010 a
Benzo(a) anthracene------- < .010
Benzo(b) fluoranthene < .010
_____-\q92
Benzo(k) fluoranthene < .010 30
Benzo(a)pyrene------------- < .010 t cop,
Benzo(
Benzylgbutyl phthalate ----- < .010 GENE ��4
-BHC---------------------- < .010
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether --- < .010
Bis(2-chloroethoxyl) methane ------ < .010
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate --- ------ < .010
Bis(2-chlorisopropyl) ether ----------- < .010
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ------------- < .010
Chlordane --------------=---------------- < .010
2-Chloronaphthalele---------------------- < .010
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ----------- -- < .010
Chrysene---- ----------------------------- < .010
4,4' DDD--------------------------------- < .010
4,43.-DDE--------------------------=------ < .010
4,4'-DDT--------------------------------- <.010
Dibenzo(a,h) anthracene------------------ < .010
Di-n-butylphthalate------------=--------- < .010
1,3-Dichlorobeneze------------------------ < •010
1,2-Dichlorobeneze--------------=---------- < .010
1,4-Dichlorobeneze--- ----=------------------ < .010
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidi.ne---------------------- < .010
Dieldrin------------------------------------ <.010
Diethyl phthalate ---------------------------- < .010
Dimethyl phthalate --------------------------- < .010
2,4-Dinitrotoluene--------------------------- < .010
2,6-Dinitrotoluene--------------------------- < .010
D9=n-octyphthalate----- =------------------- -- < .010
Endosulfan sulfate --------------------------- < .010
Endrin Aldehyde ------------------------------ < .010
Fluoranthene---------------------------------- < .010
Fluorene------------- --------------------------- <..010
Heptachlor ------------ <..010
INDEPENDENT LABORATORIES • CHEMISTS BACTERIOLOGISTS CONSULTANTS
TESTING • INSPECTION • DEVELOPMENT • QUALITY CONTROL

y - v
e
C H E M B A C
II• P. O. BOX 19198, CHARLOTTE, N. C. 28219
TEL. [phone]
FAX #: [phone]
.BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLES
TEXACO
parts per million
Heptachlor Epoxide --------- < .010
Hexachlorobenzene----------- < .010
Hexachlorobutiadene---------- < .010
Hexachloroethane-----=-------- < .010
Indeno(1,2,3-cd) pyrene-------.< .010
Isophorone-------------------- < .010
Naphthalene ------------------- < .010 ,
Nitrobenzene ------------------ < .010
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ----- < .010
PCB-1016----------------------- < .010
PCB-1221----------------------- <.010
PCB-1232------------------------- < 010
PCB-1242--------------=----------- < .010
PCB-1248--------------------------- < .010
PCB-1254--------------------------- <.010
PCB-1260---------------------------- < .010
Phenanthrene------------------------ < .010
Pyrene------------------------------ <.010
Toxaphene---------------------------.<.010
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene-------------= <.010
Respectfully s bmitted,
EM-B ASO DRIES, INC.
J. Hu 1
Supervising Chemist
JCH/th
INDEPENDENT LABORATORIES CHEMISTS • BACTERIOLOGISTS CONSULTANTS
TESTING • INSPECTION .• DEVELOPMENT • QUALITY CONTROL