310395_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230418

�, , • Division of Water Resources .
�. acil%ty'Number . ' y �� O Division. of Soil and Water Conservation
�•
e0 Other.Agency
type of Visit: 8 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ® Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit:
E-
Arrival Time:
(' ���1
T
Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name:
- P-
Q �a✓vim
Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: rj�" �? Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
M
= Design Current
Swine, Capacity P'Pop-
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish T 60
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other .,.
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design. Current:„ •°Design ' Currrent.. '
Wit Poultry Capacity Pop.� Cattle _ Capacilty
Layer
Non -Layer
�A Design, ; Current, .
Drv0P nitry t anaeity Pnn_�
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
w
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [—]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ NoVA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes VNo
NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 1" ot> - I o11 - V ('r- 0 1 �� 511212020 Continued
Page I of 3 1" ot> - I o11 - V ('r- 0 1 �� 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: i - ; j Ot jDate of Inspection: 1
`2
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
D<10 0 NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No 5KA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
0 Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes DO ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [D 5o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes EfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [ZrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
Ye ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
_ Y
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
E2/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[t]'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[3/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
2
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check t appropriate box below. �s ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard aWaste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes b ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: tj2
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ s �Fo
�❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
ppropriate box(es) below.
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 4
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [:]No E2/NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes Ito ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes LeNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [ s to ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes KOO
❑ NA ❑-NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
cU
soli s l
AA
`l J Y\ tip-- �� L ►M vWZc�! ' r.--
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date: Z 3
S/l2,72020