310788_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230510

Division of Water Resources
Faci4ity �Numiber ;` i 7 $'tf(' . 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: q by Departure Time: `1 0 County: Region:
Farm Name: 'T 0ey-rin --iJ-r 2_ Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: ,�ay .1 e, .e-S Title:
—r
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
.Design Cniieht
`Swine. Capacity_ ` Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish `72 vo 63
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
"Other:-
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current -
Wet Poultry ' .,Capacity _Pop. °
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current ,
`Dry Poulfry Canacitv Pon:
—.Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
besigtA, Current
Cattle Capacity , Pop. .
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
,Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
/
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
E,],<A
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
Ej NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑'1�10
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
To
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - 1 $ Date of Inspection: 5 10 2
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: q—
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): U_ ID,—�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
to ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No ®-<A ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0140 ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes F To ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes UNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [:]Yes [:k o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes D-Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [340 ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes YNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes E�r<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes �lo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists [:]Design [:]Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes L�'1VU ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes E]/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [-]Yes 2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: 3 1 - Date of Inspection: 10 77
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes EKo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes Ike ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes E],Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No �lA ❑ NE
❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 040 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes FD'wu ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �NE
❑ Yes
El.3�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
[Z"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[:jN`o
❑ NA
❑ NE
t omments (re eraato gnestion #I: Explain any,:,YES answers;anaror,any aaartiona►,recommenaanons or any other comments
iTse dravviari s,4f °faOHW*6"hetter e$ �vjahi situations,(use' Aditianal pales as necessary). e.
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: ' iiggw 3sio
Date: 5-1 10 �43
511212020