670032_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230516

i
-. W Division of Water Resources
Facile Number O Division of Soil andWater Conservation
O Other Agency
Cype of Visit: ®-Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
teason for Visit: ® Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: 5 Arrival Time: I a 50 V, Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: i �,�,�►_ (— 2 Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ���I f� i 1(� Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Region:
Phone: � 10 19 U S_S' � 0
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
=__ Design
CurrentDesign
, Current
Swine Capacity = Pop.
Wet Poultry Capacity
Pop.,
Cattle° , _ ~Capacity ' Pop.
Wean to Finish
Layer
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkey Poults
Other
Turkeys
Dairy Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? El Yes [210 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: -❑ Structure El Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? [—]Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No �iA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes I 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes F3/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 5/I2/2020 Continued
Page 1 of 3 5/I2/2020 Continued

Facility Number: (0'1 - 3 Z jDate of Inspection: t:;�- j 16 23
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 3 N ❑ N ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No [NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):�tT
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a [—]Yes E2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environm7No
1 threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E- Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ZI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes1No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes F31No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 0"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design [:]Maps [—]Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below
[:]Yes �o
❑ Yes YNo
❑ Yes E] 1V
ElYes No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Other:
❑ Yes EJ-N/o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes F./ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Ej'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: (!) I - 3 T I jDate of Inspection: S_ 2 2
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [T No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: o 1G
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes u o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes [ to ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
<o
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes E ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Commenfs (refer to question #): Explain any`YES answers and any adilittona[-rec®mmendtions orany other comments°
Use _drawings of facibty-#o`better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: Y S
Date: S ! IA. l Z3
511212020