Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
NC0038822_Wasteload Allocation_19930125
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION PERMIT NO.: NCO038822 PERMITTEE NAME: Central Care, Inc. FACILITY NAME: Central Care, Inc. Facility Status: Existing Permit Status: Renewal Major Minor �1 Pipe No.: 001 Design Capacity: 0.010 MGD Domestic (% of Flow): 100 % Industrial (% of Flow): Comments: STREAM INDEX: 12-72-9481 RECEIVING STREAM: an unnamed tributary to Stewarts Creek Class: C Sub -Basin: 03-07-03 Reference USGS Quad: B 16NW, Dobson (please attach) County: Surry Regional Office: Winston-Salem Regional Office Previous Exp. Date: 4/30/93 Treatment Plant Class: I Classification changes within three miles: M On""ED >3mi. r'L 0 "11 Requested by: Jule Shanklin Prepared by: Reviewed by: (OA& p� t35 NO) Date: 10/30/92 Date: a Date: I � Modeler Date Rec. # z 'l % I Drainage Area (mi ) t7 . p, Avg. Streamflow (cfs): D.07S 7Q10 (cfs) 0 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 0 30Q2 (cfs) 0 Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acute/Chronic Instream Monitoring: Parameters f�;gF -D.0. 0 gcC*L cot-FoaM coN-oue-Tlu,ry Upstream Location AT t,ensr 100' upsrrzcAyK Downstream y Location AT sr 300' Dowasrag-7 ti Effluent Characteristics Summer Winter BOD5 (mg/1) 30 NH3-N (mg/1) D.O. (mg/1) TSS (mg/1) 60 3 F. Col. (/100 ml) Zoo o pH (SU) (— - 9I..- The facility discharges into a stream with 7Q10/30Q2=0 cfs. Removal of the discharge will be required if a more environmentally sound alternative is available. An engineering report evaluating alternatives to discharge is due 180 days prior to permit expiration along with the permit renewal application. As part of the report, the cost of constructing a treatment facility to meet limits of 5 mg/l BOD5, 2 mg/l NH3, 6 mg/l dissolved oxygen, and 17 ug/l chlorine must also be included if there are no alternatives to a surface discharge. Upon review of the results of the engineering report, the Division may reopen and modify this NPDES permit to require removal of the discharge, modified treatment designs, and/or revised effluent limitations within a specified time schedule. ��ICGn�88Zz Gt7—.S_i1s ©' Oc - r - _ C.rA- 'A (, G'fFQ,fc 1NC. 74�py:� to?s Syrc = 100 IZ/9Z � —71 �? 5ecli ©3v'703 BD /pop .lPt7D00J a; Facility Name: NPDES No.: Type of Waste: Facility Status: Permit Status: Receiving Stream: Stream Classification: Subbasin: County: Regional Office: Requestor: Date of Request: Topo Quad: FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION Central Care, Inc. NCO038822 Domestic - 100% Existing Renewal UT S tewarts Creek C 030703 S urry WSRO J. Shanklin 10/30/92 B 16NW Request # 7199 Stream Characteristic: USGS # Date: Drainage Area (mi2): 0.04 Summer 7Q10 (cfs): 0.0 Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 0.0 Average Flow (cfs): 0.075 30Q2 (cfs): 0.0 IWC (%): 100.0 Wasteload Allocation Summary (approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.) The facility discharges into a stream with 7Q10/30Q2=0 cfs. Removal of the discharge will be required if a more environmentally sound alternative is available. An engineering report evaluating alternatives to discharge is due 180 days prior to permit expiration along with the permit renewal application. As part of the report, the cost of constructing a treatment facility to meet limits of 5 mg/1 BOD5, 2 mg/1 NH3-N, 6 mg/1 DO, and 17 µg/1 chlorine must also be included if there are no alternatives to a surface discharge. Upon review of the results of the engineering report, the Division may reopen and modify this NPDES permit to require removal of the discharge, modified treatment designs, and/or revised effluent limitations within a specified time specified time schedule. Central Care has had 1 BOD5 and 2 Fecal coliform violations in the past year. The facility has had no instances of "no flow" up or downstream. D.O.'s are greater than 5 mg/l. Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers: Recommended by: S�w.a.,,,. � Date: i z 1 s @ z Reviewed by Instream Assessment: Date: a % Regional Supervisor: Date: 2. —5;3 - � zz_ /Permits & Engineering:z Date: RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: JAN 1 6 1993 2 CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS Existing Limits: Monthly Average Summer Winter Wasteflow (N4GD): 0.010 0.010 BOD5 (mg/1): 30 30 NH3N (mg/1): DO (mg/1): TSS (mg/1): 30 30 Fecal Col. V100 ml): 1000 1000 pH (SU): 6-9 6-9 Residual Chlorine (µg/1): Toxicity testing: TP (mg/1): TN (mg/1): Recommended Limits: Monthly Average Summer Winter WQ or EL Wasteflow (MGD): 0.010 0.010 BOD5 (mg/1): 30 30 NH3N (mg/1): . DO (mg/1): TSS (mg/1): 30 30 Fecal Col. (/100 ml): 200 200 pH (SU): 6-9 6-9 Residual Chlorine (µg/1): Toxicity testing: TP (mg/1): TN(mg/1): Limits Changes Due To: Parameters, Affected Change in 7Q10 data Change in stream classification Relocation of discharge _ Change in wasteflow Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.) Instream data New regulations/standards/procedures new zero flow policy, Fecal coliform New facility information Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of .the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed. X. X_ No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations. INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Upstream Location: at least 100 ft upstream Downstream Location: at least 300 ft downstream Parameters: temperature, DO, Fecal coliform, conductivity Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies: MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Adequacy of Existing Treatment Has the facility dem9a�gtrated the ability to meet the proposed ne�v limits with existing tre tment facilities? Yes l/ No �ssu�e' If no, which parameters cannot be met? Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No \� If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional office recommendations: If no, why not? Special Instructions or Conditions Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) _N (Y or N) (If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan) Additional Information attached? _N (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.