Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout310078_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230516U Division of Water Resources Facility Number � - E' O Division of Soil and Water Conservation O Other Agency of Visit: Reason for Visit: b Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access ,1 / Date of Visit: 1" (o Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: iq Region: tt/ e . Farm Name: S ( ra,cl /—:), Owner Name: 6%Lt. Q.A—IJ Mailing Address: Physical Address: Owner Email: Phone: Facility Contact: Title: /� OnsiteRepresentative: L(J( t i GiIJytG�� ti Zl A [✓!�_v` Certified Operator: 4� Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Design Current Swine Capacity Pop. to to Wean to Finish Other Phone: Integrator: Certification Number: Certification Number: Latitude: Longitude: Design Current Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Layer Non -Layer Design Current 1cCSV Design Current Cattle Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Cnlf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow Discharges and Stream Impacts / 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®'R ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued Facilit Number: '2 ( - " j Date of Inspection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes L o ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in):� 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes I�o ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ff No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ©-ido ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Q'<o ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes - Io ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑-- o ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E]No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Cq-No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [-No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes E314o ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes E Io ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes Efl4o ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Q o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking []Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Q-No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 2] No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 511212020 Continued Facility Number: '31 Date of Inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Lj>o ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: ❑ Yes F�_Ne- ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No [ ,NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [EI-No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ®-Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [D M ❑ NA ❑ NE 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [INo ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes [f"No ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [5"No ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings oflfacility to better explain situations (use additional snadditional pages as necessary). U "VI(l P64 ( td4s Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Phone: Cf sz?y Date: %2 3 Page 3 of 3 511212020