Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFINAL_U-5723_CCR_04_22_2015 STIP # U-5723 Union County COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PLANNER: Diana Young-Paiva, Three Oaks Engineering DIVISION: 10 ROUTE: US 74 PDEA ENGINEER: Zahid Baloch WBS: 46300.1.S1 AADTV: US 74: 55,000 US 601: 13,000 PDEA GROUP LEADER: John Conforti PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construction of improvements to the existing US 74/US 601 interchange CS PROJECT COORDINATOR: Elizabeth Shay CS SUPER APPROVAL: Existing No. of Lanes: US 74: six-lane divided with turn lanes US 601: two-lane undivided north of US 74, transitioning to four-lane south of US 74 Widening Existing Median: US 74: Yes Addition of Median(s) Record of Community Outreach or Public Involvement Activity Community Context STIP Project U-5723 is an interchange improvement for US 74 and US 601 in Monroe, which is the county seat of Union County. Monroe is located in the southern North Carolina Piedmont, less than 25 miles from the financial hub of downtown Charlotte, and approximately 12 miles from the South Carolina border. US 74 serves as the primary east-west corridor for the fast-growing Union County, and is an important commuter route between Monroe and Charlotte. US 601 (Skyway Drive) serves as a north/south gateway to Monroe; the project interchange is located approximately one mile north of the historic downtown area. The US 74 corridor provides an important intra-state connection between the western mountain region of North Carolina and the Port of Wilmington at the coast. NCDOT currently identifies US 74 as a Strategic Corridor, but will likely move the designation to the Monroe Bypass once construction is complete. The Monroe Bypass is a planned parallel toll road that will be built to the north of US 74. The land use fronting US 74 within the Direct Community Impact Area (DCIA) is dominated by commercial strip development consisting of offices, small individual retail businesses, shopping centers, fast food restaurants, and automobile-related businesses. The residential development within the DCIA is found mostly at the perimeter, at a distance greater than one parcel from US 74 and US 601 (Skyway Drive). The neighborhood in the southwestern quadrant of the DCIA, bounded by US 74, Concord Avenue, and Kerr Street, is a mix of single-family homes, duplexes, and small multi-family apartments, which are home to a low-income and Hispanic minority community. The residential development within the northwest quadrant of the DCIA is primarily made up of small- to medium-sized apartments that are home to a mix of low- to moderate-income populations. In the northeast quadrant of the DCIA, the residential development is rural/suburban in nature, made up of single-family homes. There are no residences in the southeast quadrant of the DCIA. Within the DCIA, US 74 includes two interchanges and three intersections: 1. Temple Street, located near the western terminus of the project, is a local two-lane street that intersects the westbound lanes of US 74 2. The US 74 and Concord Avenue interchange is located near the western terminus of the project, approximately 475 feet east of Temple Street TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 2 3. The US 74 and US 601 (Skyway Drive) interchange is the focus of this project 4. Miller Street is a local two-lane street that intersects the eastbound lanes of US 74, located east of US 601 (Skyway Drive) 5. Stafford Street (SR 1624), located at the eastern terminus of the project study area, intersects US 74 with a four-way signalized intersection; north of US 74, the road consists of 3 lanes, including one southbound left turn lane; south of US 74, the road consists of four lanes, including one northbound left turn lane. US 74 and US 601 (Skyway Drive) are oriented toward automobile travel. Pedestrian accessibility is restricted by a scarcity of pedestrian facilities. The facilities that do exist include: the two southernmost blocks of US 601, which have existing sidewalks and curb cuts/ramps, but no crosswalks; short unconnected stretches of sidewalk along US 74 between US 601 (Skyway Drive) and Stafford Street (SR 1624); and curb cuts/ramps at Stafford Street, which on the south side are unconnected to sidewalks. There are no existing bicycle facilities within the DCIA. TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 3 TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 4 Notable Community Characteristics, Concerns  Census data indicates a notable presence of minority and low-income populations meeting the criteria for Environmental Justice within the Demographic Study Area (DSA) and minority and low-income communities were observed within the DCIA during the site visit. The neighborhood in the southwest quadrant of the DCIA, bounded by US 74, Concord Avenue, and Kerr Street, is a mix of single-family homes, duplexes, and small multi-family apartments, which are home to a low-income and Hispanic minority community. The residential development within the northwest quadrant of the DCIA is primarily made up of small to medium sized apartments that are home to a mix of low- to moderate-income populations.  Census data indicates a Spanish language population that meets or exceeds the US Department of Justice Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Safe Harbor threshold within the DSA.  Although the population in the DSA grew at an average annualized rate of 1.5% from 2000 to 2010, no physical indicators of recent growth in the DCIA were observed during the site visit.  The Charlotte Regional Transportation Planning Organization (CRTPO) draft Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP), expected to be adopted by mid-2015, identifies the US 74 and US 601 (Skyway Drive) interchange, and all legs of the interchange, as needing improvement. The draft CTP also identifies US 74 and US 601 (Skyway Drive) as on-road bicycle facilities in need of improvement. It also recommends sidewalks for US 74, Concord Avenue, and US 601 (Skyway Drive) north of US 74 and recommends improvements to the existing sidewalks on US 601 south of US 74.  Within the DCIA, the existing pedestrian facilities on US 74 are limited, consisting primarily of short unconnected sections of sidewalks and curb ramps within the easternmost and westernmost areas of the study area.  During the site visit, two pedestrians were observed crossing US 601 (Skyway Drive) at Pedro Street, walking from the grocery store in the Monroe Plaza Shopping Center to the neighborhoods west of US 601 (Skyway Drive). In addition, two pedestrians were observed walking on the narrow shoulder of the Concord Avenue bridge over US 74.  The City of Monroe Greenway/Bikeway Master Plan proposes bike lanes for US 601 (Skyway Drive) through the project intersection.  The density of existing driveway access is notable; there are approximately 32 driveways within the project study area.  During the site visit, a notable number of tractor trailers, including intermodal trailers, were observed travelling through the project study area on US 74 and on the exit/entrance ramps for US 601 (Skyway Drive).  The project corridor is heavily used by Union County school buses. Currently, 37 school buses travel the corridor, making 55 trips each school day.  The City of Monroe Assistant Fire Chief reported that the project interchange is crucial to operations for Fire Station 5, which is located on US 601 North approximately 1.7 miles north of the project. The Assistant Chief noted that the interchange is critical to reaching parts of the response district of Station 5 and crucial for Station 5 being able to receive additional resources for aid in the event of an emergency. The interchange is equally important to EMS and police responses. Potential Community Impacts  While minority and low-income communities are present in the DCIA, no notably adverse community impacts are anticipated with the project; thus, impacts to minority and low-income populations do not appear to be disproportionately high and adverse. Benefits and burdens TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 5 resulting from the project are anticipated to be equitably distributed throughout the community.  Long term, mobility should improve because proposed interchange improvements will allow traffic to move through the interchange more efficiently.  Nearby roads may experience temporary congestion from additional vehicles, including tractor trailers and intermodal trailers, if the project requires a detour route during construction. The City of Monroe Fire Department and Union County Schools have expressed concern related to congestion on nearby roads if a detour is required during construction.  The Union County Schools TIMS Coordinator indicated that the project will have a high impact on school transportation and that increased travel time due to construction-related delays may necessitate adding buses. The Coordinator also noted that nearby roads that might potentially be used for detour routes are narrow and would be difficult for school buses to maneuver.  The City of Monroe Assistant Fire Chief indicated that the project will have a high impact on emergency response. He stated that if the design requires a detour, available roads and streets will be insufficient for the volume of traffic carried by US 74 and US 601 (Skyway Drive), and delays for emergency responses will be increased.  The project may have minor right of way impacts on residential properties located along the ramp from US 601 South (Skyway Drive) to US 74 West. The project may also have minor, permanent impacts on access to these properties, as well as temporary impacts during construction. The residences located on Fifth Street, which intersects this same ramp, may have temporary impacts to access during construction.  The project may have minor right of way impacts on business properties located near the interchange and there may also be minor, permanent changes to access. In addition, there may be temporary access impact to the businesses throughout the DCIA during construction.  The project may have minor, temporary impacts on access to two churches located adjacent to two US 74 exit ramps: Next Dimension Ministries is located in a small commercial/retail building next to the US 74 West exit ramp for Concord Avenue; Mt. Olive A.M.E. Zion Church is located next to the US 74 West exit ramp for US 601 North (Skyway Drive).  During construction, the project may have minor, temporary impacts on pedestrian mobility between the Monroe Plaza Shopping Center on the east side of US 601 (Skyway Drive), including the grocery store, and the neighborhoods located on the west side of US 601 (Skyway Drive).  Long-term, the project will have positive impacts on pedestrian and bicycle mobility if the project design accommodates planned pedestrian and bicycle improvements. The Comprehensive Transportation Plan recommends sidewalks for US 74, Concord Avenue, and US 601 (Skyway Drive) north of US 74, and recommends improvements to the existing sidewalks on US 601 (Skyway Drive) south of US 74. The City of Monroe Greenway/Bikeway Master Plan proposes bike lanes for US 601 (Skyway Drive) through the project intersection. Options/Recommendations  Because Limited English Proficiency (LEP) populations within the DSA exceed the U.S. Department of Justice Safe Harbor threshold, written translations of vital documents should be provided for Spanish populations, in addition to other measures assuring meaningful language access, as determined by NCDOT Public Involvement to satisfy the requirements of Executive Order 13166.  Because school buses operate within the study area it is recommended that the NCDOT Project Planning Engineer coordinate with Union County Public schools prior to any planned closures or construction that would result in delays to school bus transportation.  It is recommended that the NCDOT Project Planning Engineer coordinate with the City of TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 6 Monroe Fire Department, Police Department, and Emergency Management prior to any construction that may result in substantial delays for emergency vehicles.  It is recommended that the NCDOT Project Planning Engineer coordinate with the Monroe Department of Parks and Recreation, Monroe Planning Department, the CRTPO planning staff, and the NCDOT Division of Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation to evaluate the inclusion of planned bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the project design.  It is recommended that the NCDOT Project Planning Engineer ensure that pedestrian mobility along US 601 (Skyway Drive), and across US 601 (Skyway Drive) is maintained during construction. The project will not alter traffic capacity or travel patterns, reduce travel time, affect access to, or exposure of adjacent parcels, or create new transportation or land use nodes. Due to its minimal transportation impact causing activities this project will neither influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect and cumulative effects study will not be necessary. TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 7 COMMUNITY CONTEXT MAP TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 8 DEMOGRAPHIC STUDY AREA TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 9 REGULATORY APPLICATIONS INVENTORY & SCREENING AMERICAN INDIAN RELIGIOUS FREEDOM ACT [AIRFA] Is the project located in a county claimed as “territory” by the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians? YES NO ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE [EJ] Presence: Are there any populations living in the Demographic Study Area that meet the criteria for Environmental Justice? If so, for which EJ group(s) has the criteria been met (check all that apply): Minority Low-Income Census data indicates a notable presence of minority and low-income populations meeting the criteria for Environmental Justice within the DSA and minority and low-income communities were observed within the DCIA during the site visit. The small neighborhood in the southwest quadrant of the DCIA, bounded by US 74, Concord Avenue, and Kerr Street, is a mix of single-family homes, duplexes, and small multi-family apartments, which are home to a low-income Hispanic community. During the site visit, a Mexican grocery store and Spanish-language church that appear to serve this community were observed nearby on Concord Avenue, just outside the DCIA. The residential development within the northwest quadrant of the DCIA is primarily made up of small- to medium-sized apartments that are home to a mix of low-income populations and moderate-income populations. The criteria for Environmental Justice populations are met in all of the four block groups with the DSA:  Census Tract 204.01, Block Group 2, based on near poor population (16.4% vs. 7.2% for Union County)  Census Tract 204.04, Block Group 2, based on minority population (57.8% vs. 25.4% for Union County), population below poverty level (36.3% vs. 9.7% for Union County), and near poor population (16.4% vs. 7.2% for Union County).  Census Tract 204.04, Block Group 3, based on minority population (84.6% vs. 25.4% for Union County), population below poverty level (32.4% vs. 9.7% for Union County), and near poor population (34.9% vs. 7.2% for Union County)  Census Tract 204.04, Block Group 4, based on minority population (96.7% vs. 25.4% for Union County), population below poverty level (55.5% vs. 9.7% for Union County), and near poor population (12.3% vs. 7.2% for Union County) YES NO LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY [LEP] Are there any populations living in the Demographic Study Area that meet the criteria for Limited English Proficiency? Census data indicates a Spanish language population that meets or exceeds the US Department of Justice LEP Safe Harbor threshold within the DSA. There are 914 persons within the DSA (18.9 % of the DSA population) whose primary language is Spanish and who speak English less than very well. This Spanish language population is spread throughout the DSA as shown by the block group summary below: CT204.01 BG2 221 persons (11.8% of the block group) CT204.04 BG2 164 persons (11.6% of the block group) CT204.04 BG3 380 persons (53.1% of the block group) CT204.04 BG4 149 persons (17.5% of the block group) YES NO POTENTIAL SECTION 4(F) PUBLIC RECREATIONAL RESOURCES Are there any properties or areas that may be impacted by the project that are or may be protected under Section 4(f)? YES NO TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 10 National Trails System Are there any trails designated as part of the National Trails System (NTS) – that are also within the boundaries of a National Park – located in the vicinity of the project? YES NO SECTION 6(F) LAND & WATER CONSERVATION FUND RESOURCES Are there any areas protected under Section 6(f) in vicinity of the project? YES NO WILD & SCENIC OR NATIONAL RIVER INVENTORY [NRI] RIVERS Is there a water body in the project area that is designated al Wild and Scenic River, or listed on the National River Inventory? YES NO North Carolina Natural & Scenic Rivers Is the water body designated as a NC Natural & Scenic River? YES NO FARMLAND PROTECTION POLICY ACT [FPPA] SOILS Are there any farmland soils eligible for protection under the US Farmland Protection Policy Act [FPPA] that may be notably impacted by the project? (See Appendix for NRCS Farmland Soils Screening) YES NO AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS Are there any active agricultural operations located in the Direct Community Impact Area? YES NO VOLUNTARY & ENHANCED VOLUNTARY AGRICULTURE DISTRICTS [VAD/EVAD] Is there a Voluntary Agricultural District or Enhanced Voluntary Agricultural District in the vicinity of the project? YES NO COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS & NOTABLE FEATURES NOTABLE GROWTH RATE Has the population living around the project area experienced notable growth or decline in recent years? Decline 0.6% – 1% annual growth Greater than 1% annual growth (in DSA) Although the population in the DSA grew at an average annualized rate of 1.5% from 2000 to 2010, no physical indicators of recent growth in the DCIA were observed during the site visit. YES NO LOCAL AREA PLANS/GOALS Are there any local area plans, goals, or zoning initiatives specifically affecting the Direct Community Impact Area (e.g. bicycle, pedestrian, greenway, or transit plan; long range growth plan; thoroughfare plan; etc.)? Thoroughfare Plan- This plan for the CRTPO, which is responsible for long-range transportation planning for the Charlotte region, includes the City of Monroe. The plan classifies US 74 and US 601 (Skyway Drive) as major thoroughfares. Concord Avenue is classified as a major thoroughfare south of US 74, and as a minor thoroughfare north of US 74. Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) - This plan for the CRTPO is under development and expected to be completed mid-2015. Elements of the draft CTP maps that are relevant to this project include: Highway Map Inset N  Identifies the US 74/US 601 (Skyway Drive) interchange and the US 74/Concord Avenue interchange as being in need of improvement  Concord Avenue is identified as a Major Thoroughfare needing improvement  US 601 (Skyway Drive) is shown as a Major Thoroughfare in need of improvement south of US 74, and as a Major Expressway needing improvement north of US 74  US 74 is shown as a Major Expressway in need of improvement between US 601 (Skyway Drive) and the eastern project terminus, and as an Existing Boulevard between US 601 (Skyway Drive) and the western project terminus YES NO TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 11 Bicycle Map Inset N  Identifies US 74, US 601 (Skyway Drive), and Concord Avenue as On-road, Needs Improvement Pedestrian Map Inset N  Recommends sidewalks for US 74, Concord Avenue, and US 601 (Skyway Drive) north of US 74  Recommends improvements to the existing sidewalks on US 601 (Skyway Drive) south of US 74 Monroe Land Development Plan- The City of Monroe Planning Director reported that the Monroe Land Development Plan is currently being updated. The Zoning Map for the existing Land Development Plan shows that the US 74 corridor within the study area is zoned to support a commercial corridor. Most of the land within the DCIA is zoned for general business; however, some parcels that do not directly border US 74 are zoned for office transitional and high-density or multi-family residential. The residential development in the northeast quadrant is zoned residential low-density. Concord Area Master Plan- The City of Monroe Planning Director indicated that a small area plan for the area that includes the DCIA, called the Concord Area Master Plan, will be completed in Spring 2015. The draft plan includes a vision plan for hotel development on the south side of US 74 in both the southeast and southwest quadrants of the US 601 (Skyway Drive) interchange. City of Monroe Greenway/Bikeway Master Plan- The Monroe Parks Department is in the process of updating the City’s greenway plan. A draft of the update is anticipated to be completed in May 2015. The current master plan shows that bike lanes are proposed for US 601 (Skyway Drive) through the project intersection. TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 12 KNOWN PLANS FOR DEVELOPMENT & NEARBY STIP PROJECTS Are there any known plans for development activity in the vicinity of the project? The City of Monroe advertised a Request for Proposals in December 2014 for design of an intersection improvement project on Secrest Short Cut Road at US 74. This City project is located approximately 600 feet west of the DCIA boundary, and includes the addition of an additional southbound turn lane. The NCDOT Monroe Bypass toll road project (R-3329, R-2559) will extend nearly 20 miles from US 74 near I-485 in Mecklenburg County to US 74 between the towns of Wingate and Marshville (east of Monroe) in Union County. The proposed alignment approximately one to two miles north of, and parallel to US 74, is intended to provide for high-speed regional travel while maintaining access along existing US 74. A Final Supplemental Final Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision were issued in May 2014. Final design and right of way acquisition are ongoing; however, the construction date for the project is uncertain due to ongoing legal challenges against the project. The December 4, 2014, draft 10-year State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) contains two projects near the study area.  U-2549 (Monroe Northern Loop), US 74 to SR 1751 (Walkup Avenue) at SR 1763 (Bivens Road), is a 4.7 mile project to construct a two-lane loop road on new location. The project is located approximately 0.5 miles north of the DCIA. Right of way acquisition is scheduled to begin in FY 2024; project construction is currently unfunded.  U-5764 (US 74) is a 2.8-mile road widening project from Hanover Drive to SR 1007 (Rocky River Road). The southern terminus of U-5764 is located approximately 0.8 miles north of the DCIA. Right of way acquisition is scheduled to begin in FY 2021, followed by construction in FY 2023. YES NO BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND/OR GREENWAY FACILITIES Are bicycle, pedestrian, or greenway facilities located in the area? Existing pedestrian facilities within the DCIA are limited. On Skyway Drive, south of US 74, there are sidewalks with ramps on both sides of the road between King Street and the DCIA boundary, but no crosswalks. Along US 74, there are no sidewalks between Concord Avenue and US 601 (Skyway Drive), while there are several short, unconnected sections of sidewalks and curb ramps located along other portions of the highway. There are no existing bicycle or greenway facilities. YES NO BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY Were bicyclists or pedestrians observed in the area? During the site visit, two pedestrians were observed crossing US 601 (Skyway Drive) at Pedro Street, walking from the grocery store in the Monroe Plaza Shopping Center to the neighborhoods west of US 601 (Skyway Drive). In addition, two pedestrians were observed walking on the narrow shoulder of the Concord Avenue bridge over US 74. YES NO TRANSIT ACTIVITY Were bus routes observed in the area on the site visit? Were any special users observed using these facilities? YES NO COMMUNITY COHESION Were any specific signs or indicators of community cohesion observed /found? YES NO TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 13 WATER SUPPLY/WATERSHED Is the project area located in a water supply/watershed district? If so, what is the designation? WS-I WS-II WS-III WS-IV Protected Critical The project is within the Stewards Creek (Lake Twitty) WS-III water supply watershed protected area. YES NO NOTABLE WATER RESOURCE Are there any other notable traits of, or issues regarding, waters in the area? Check all that apply: 303(d) Impaired Outstanding Resource Waters High Quality Waters Trout Waters Applicable Basinwide Management Plan The project is within the EEP Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) 03040105070050 (Yadkin River Basin). YES NO FEMA BUYOUT PROPERTIES Are there any FEMA Buyout Properties in the vicinity of the project? YES NO ACCESS Are there any driveways or intersections located in the direct impact area? How is Right-of-Way in the project area held? No Control Partial Control Limited Control Full Control There are numerous driveways and intersections in the DCIA as described below. US 74 is a six-lane divided highway. The grassy median at the western terminus of the DCIA quickly transitions to a Jersey barrier that stretches approximately one-half mile eastward. Just east of US 601 (Skyway Drive), the Jersey barrier transitions back to a grassy median with a median crossover located east of Miller Street. Control of access along the south side of US 74 (eastbound lanes) ranges from Limited Control to Partial Control with the following access points: Beginning at the western terminus of the DCIA, there is one driveway for a tire business located adjacent to the exit ramp to Concord Avenue, and three business driveways located along the exit ramp. Concord Avenue (a two-lane road) crosses US 74 on a bridge; the interchange with US 74 is partial diamond with shared two-directional ramps. Limited Control of Access is maintained for approximately one-half mile between the Concord Avenue ramp and the ramps between US 601 North (Skyway Drive) and US 74 East; the roadway includes mountable curb and gutter without a sidewalk. US 601 (Skyway Drive) is a two-lane road that transitions to four lanes at the bridge over US 74; the interchange is the focus of the project. There is Partial Control of Access between US 601 (Skyway Drive) and the eastern terminus of the DCIA at Stafford Street (SR 1624), which is a four-way signalized intersection. There is one T- intersection with a two-lane local street (Miller Street) and there are sixteen driveways for retail and commercial businesses along this stretch of the project, a distance of approximately one-third mile. The roadway includes mountable curb and gutter without a sidewalk, except for an approximately fifty-foot section, where a sidewalk is located in front of a newly constructed car wash; the roadway also includes pedestrian curb cuts/ramps located at Miller Street and Stafford Street that are not connected to a sidewalk. Along the north side of US 74 (westbound lanes) control of access ranges from No Control to Partial Control. Between Stafford Street (SR 1624), the eastern terminus of the DCIA, and the ramps to/from US 601 North (Skyway Drive), there are five driveways for restaurants, a grocery store and a motorcycle dealership. The roadway includes mountable curb and gutter and is predominantly without a sidewalk, except for two short sections where sidewalks are located in front of two non-adjacent restaurants. YES NO TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 14 The shared two-directional ramps between US 601 South (Skyway Drive) and US 74 West also utilize a portion of E East Avenue (SR 1623), and includes an intersection with a narrow two-lane local road (Fifth Street) that provides access to three residences and one business via four driveways (two for the same office building, and two for residential properties). Between the ramp from US 601 South (Skyway Drive) and the shared two-directional ramps to/from Concord Avenue North, there is one driveway for an office building. Between Concord Avenue and the western terminus of the DCIA, there are five driveways: three for two automotive businesses, one for a restaurant, and one for a small retail/office center. There is one T-intersection with a two-lane local street (Temple Street). The roadway includes mountable curb and gutter without a sidewalk, except for a short sidewalk section in front of the small retail/office center adjacent to the Temple Street intersection; there are unconnected curb cuts at this same intersection. CEMETERY Is there a cemetery located in the project area? YES NO OTHER RECREATIONAL RESOURCE(S) OR ACTIVITY Is there any other recreational resource or observed activity in the project area (that is not a potential 4(f))? Hatley’s Family Skating Center is located at 1705 Concord Avenue. Skyway Lanes Bowling Alley is located at 1901 Skyway Drive. YES NO TRAFFIC GENERATING FACILITY OR NODE Is there a node or facility that generates a notable level of vehicular or pedestrian traffic located in the project area? The Monroe Plaza Shopping Center, Union Village Shopping Center, and other businesses and restaurants located within the project study area generate a notable level of vehicular traffic. The Monroe Plaza Shopping Center, which includes a grocery store, also appears to generate pedestrian traffic from the neighborhood located across US 601 South (Skyway Drive). YES NO SPECIAL USERS Are there any documented special users in the project area (e.g. tractor trailers, logging trucks, tractors or other agricultural equipment, or industrial traffic)? According to the City of Monroe Assistant Fire Chief, the project interchange is crucial to operations for Fire Station 5, which is located on US 601 North approximately 1.7 miles north of the project. The Assistant Chief noted that the interchange is critical to reaching parts of the response district of Station 5 and crucial for Station 5 being able to receive additional resources for aid in the event of an emergency. The interchange is equally important to EMS and police responses. During the site visit, a notable number of tractor trailers, including intermodal trailers, were observed travelling through the project study area on US 74 and on the exit/entrance ramps for US 601 (Skyway Drive). Union County school buses operate within the project study area. Currently, 37 buses make 55 trips through the project each school day. YES NO AIRPORT Is the project located within 1 mile of an airport? YES NO AREA/COMMUNITY CONTROVERSY Are there any known community concerns or controversy relative to the project? YES NO MARINAS/ MARINE REPAIR OPERATIONS Are there any marinas or marine repair operations in vicinity of the project? YES NO OTHER NEARBY SOCIO-ECONOMIC RESOURCES TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 15 Are there any other notable socio-economic resources located in the project area? Four churches are located within the DCIA: Next Dimension Ministries is located in a small commercial/retail building next to the US 74 West exit ramp for Concord Avenue; Mt. Olive A.M.E. Zion Church is located next to the US 74 West exit ramp for US 601 North (Skyway Drive); King of Glory Christian Ministries is located on East Myers Street in the southeast quadrant of the DCIA; and Christ Kingdom Restoration Ministries is located in the Monroe Plaza Shopping Center. The Council on Aging in Union County is located in the DCIA on Skyway Drive. The focus of this non-profit agency is assisting older adults with maintaining independent living. The Children's Developmental Services Agency (CDSA) of Union County is located on Pedro Street in the DCIA. CDSA is a regional early intervention center for infants and toddlers with developmental disabilities or delays. It offers evaluation, treatment, service coordination, and consultation services. YES NO POTENTIAL COMMUNITY IMPACTS MOBILITY AND ACCESS Are there any mobility or access effects likely to be associated with this project (e.g. barrier effect, multi-modal accommodation, available detours, non-motorist access to properties and facilities)? Long term, mobility should improve because proposed interchange improvements will allow traffic to move through the interchange more efficiently. Nearby roads may experience temporary congestion from additional vehicles, including tractor trailers and intermodal trailers, if the project requires a detour route during construction. The City of Monroe Fire Department and Union County Schools have expressed concern related to congestion on nearby roads if a detour is required during construction. The Union County Schools TIMS Coordinator indicated that the project will have a high impact on school transportation, and that increased travel time due to construction-related delays may necessitate adding buses. The Coordinator also noted that nearby roads that might potentially be used for detour routes are narrow and would be difficult for school buses to maneuver. If the designs require road closures during construction, the impact would be greatest during the months of August through June. The City of Monroe Assistant Fire Chief indicated that the project will have a high impact on emergency response. He stated that if the design requires a detour, available roads and streets will be insufficient for the volumes of traffic carried by US 74 and US 601 (Skyway Drive), and delays for emergency responses will be increased. The project may have minor permanent impacts on access to the residential properties located along the ramp from US 601 South (Skyway Drive) to US 74 West as well as temporary impacts during construction. During construction, the project may also have temporary impacts to access to the residences located on Fifth Street, which intersects this same ramp. During construction, the project may have minor, temporary impacts on pedestrian mobility between the Monroe Plaza Shopping Center on the east side of US 601 (Skyway Drive), including the grocery store, and the neighborhoods located on the west side of US 601 (Skyway Drive). YES NO COMMUNITY COHESION Is the project likely to alter the overall functioning of an identifiable district (e.g. interactions between, or isolation of, persons and groups; or change in the physical makeup of the community)? YES NO TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 16 COMMUNITY SAFETY Is the project likely to interact with any existing area crime issues (e.g. lighting, isolated areas)? YES NO SOCIO-ECONOMIC RESOURCES Are there any notable socio-economic resources that may be impacted (e.g. churches, schools, employment centers, community facilities, historic districts or buildings, named neighborhoods, or other traffic/ pedestrian generators, etc.)? The project may have minor, temporary impacts on access to two churches located adjacent to two US 74 exit ramps: Next Dimension Ministries is located in a small commercial/retail building next to the US 74 West exit ramp for Concord Avenue; Mt. Olive A.M.E. Zion Church is located next to the US 74 West exit ramp for US 601 North (Skyway Drive). YES NO BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES Are there any direct effects on area businesses or economic conditions likely to result from this project, including agricultural operations (e.g. business visibility)? The project may have minor right of way impacts on business properties located near the interchange; there may also be minor permanent changes to access. In addition, there may be temporary access impacts to businesses throughout the DCIA during construction. YES NO LOCAL LAND USE, CHARACTER & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANS Will the project have long term aesthetic effects (e.g. visual changes to the structure itself and/or on adjacent view-sheds) or change the existing character of the facility? YES NO OTHER Are there any other potential impacts associated with the project? The project may have minor right of way impacts on residential properties located along the ramp from US 601 South (Skyway Drive) to US 74 West. Long-term, the project will have positive impacts on pedestrian and bicycle mobility if the project design accommodates planned pedestrian and bicycle improvements. The Comprehensive Transportation Plan recommends sidewalks for US 74, Concord Avenue, and US 601 (Skyway Drive) north of US 74, and recommends improvements to the existing sidewalks on US 601 (Skyway Drive) south of US 74. The City of Monroe Greenway/Bikeway Master Plan proposes bike lanes for US 601 (Skyway Drive) through the project intersection. YES NO ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE Is the project likely to have a disproportionately high and adverse impact on identified Environmental Justice populations in the project area? YES NO Indirect and Cumulative Effects [Transportation Impact Causing Activities (TICAs)] *A confirmed TICA requires completion of the ICE screening tool. Absence of TICA(s) requires inclusion of the standard language ICE paragraph. TRAVEL TIMES Will the project result in travel time savings of more than one minute? YES NO TRAVEL PATTERNS Will the project permanently alter or affect the adjacent transportation network (i.e. new road connections)? YES NO PROPERTY ACCESS Will the project provide new or expanded access to properties? YES NO TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 17 PROPERTY EXPOSURE Will the project permanently increase exposure (i.e. Average Daily Traffic volume) to any properties in the area? YES NO ACTIVITY CENTERS Will the project open areas for concentrated, moderate to high intensity land development or redevelopment? YES NO RECOMMENDATIONS AVOIDANCE Alter the project so an impact does not occur. YES NO MINIMIZATION Modify the project to reduce the severity of an impact. YES NO MITIGATION Undertake an action to alleviate or offset an impact or to replace an appropriated resource. YES NO ENHANCEMENT Add a desirable or attractive feature to the project to make it fit more harmoniously into the community. YES NO COMMUNITY OUTREACH & PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Provide opportunities for early and continuing communication between the community and project staff. Because Limited English Proficiency (LEP) populations within the DSA exceed the U.S. Department of Justice Safe Harbor threshold, written translations of vital documents should be provided for Spanish populations, in addition to other measures assuring meaningful language access, as determined by NCDOT Public Involvement to satisfy the requirements of Executive Order 13166. YES NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION The nature of potential impacts warrant additional analysis (i.e. completion of the ICE screening tool). YES NO OTHER Any other recommendations based on potential impacts discovered. Because school buses operate within the study area, and because impacts related to road closures would be greatest during the school year, it is recommended that the NCDOT Project Planning Engineer coordinate with Union County Public schools prior to any planned closures or construction that would result in delays to school bus transportation. It is recommended that the NCDOT Project Planning Engineer coordinate with the City of Monroe Fire Department, Police Department, and Emergency Management prior to any construction that may result in substantial delays for emergency vehicles. It is recommended that the NCDOT Project Planning Engineer coordinate with the Monroe Department of Parks and Recreation, Monroe Planning Department, the CRTPO planning staff, and the NCDOT Division of Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation to evaluate the inclusion of planned bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the project design. It is recommended that the NCDOT Project Planning Engineer ensure that pedestrian mobility along US 601 (Skyway Drive), and across US 601 (Skyway Drive) is maintained during construction. YES NO TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 18 SOURCES Benton, Mandy, TIMS Coordinator, Union County Public Schools. E-mail mailto:mandy.benton@ucps.k12.nc.us (Local Schools Input Form, Appendix C). 12/17/2014. Charlotte, City of. Charlotte Area Transit System Schedules, 2014. http://charmeck.org/city/charlotte/cats/Pages/default.aspx. Website accessed 12/22/2014. Charlotte Regional Transportation Planning Organization. Draft Comprehensive Transportation Plan Maps, October 14, 2014. http://www.crtpo.org/plans-programs/comprehensive-transportation-plan . Website accessed 01/14/2015. Monroe, City of, 2014. Intersection Improvements Design RFP, December 15, 2014. http://www.monroenc.org/events/intersection-improvements-design-rfp/. Website accessed 12/29/2014. Monroe, City of, 2014. City of Monroe, North Carolina, Code of Ordinances. Published by American Legal Publishing Corporation. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/North%20Carolina/monroe/titlexvlandusage/chapter156zoningcode?f=te mplates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:monroe_nc$anc=JD_Chapter156 Website accessed 03/31/2015. Monroe, City of, 2005. Greenway/Bikeway Master Plan, April, 2005. Monroe, City of, 2009. Official City of Monroe Zoning Map. North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis (CGIA). Digital GIS Wild and Scenic Rivers data set. Geospatial data downloaded from http://data.nconemap.com/ on 11/06/2014. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) Division of Water Quality (now Division of Water Resources). North Carolina 2012 Clean Water Act Section 303(d) List of Impaired Waters. Geospatial data downloaded from http://data.nconemap.com/ on 11/06/2014. North Carolina DENR, Division of Water Resources. Water Supply Watersheds. Geospatial data downloaded from http://data.nconemap.com/ on 11/06/2014. North Carolina DENR, Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP). EEP Watershed Priority Map. http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/eep/priorities-map Website accessed 01/09/2015. North Carolina DENR. High Quality and Outstanding Resource Water Management Zones. Geospatial data downloaded from http://data.nconemap.com/ on 11/06/2014. North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), 2014. Comprehensive Transportation Plans interactive map. https://connect.ncdot.gov/projects/planning/Pages/Comprehensive-Transportation- Plans.aspx?county=orange. Website accessed 12/17/2014. NCDOT, 2014. Draft 10-year State Transportation Improvement Program, December 4, 2014. https://connect.ncdot.gov/projects/planning/Pages/Draft-STIP.aspx . Website accessed 12/17/2014. NCDOT, 2014. High Profile Projects & Studies, Monroe Bypass. http://www.ncdot.gov/projects/monroeconnector/. Website accessed 12/31/2014. NCDOT, 2014. NCDOT P3.0 Projects GIS map. http://ncdot.maps.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=defb244d156a4722a0cd56d2a4c97df2. Website accessed 12/17/2014. TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 19 NCDOT, 2008. Strategic Highway Corridors Vision Plan Division 10, 06/10/2008. https://connect.ncdot.gov/projects/planning/TPB%20%20Strategic%20Highway%20Corridors/SHC%20Vision%2 0Plan-Division10.pdf. Website accessed 12/17/2014. NCDOT, GIS Unit. GIS Data Layers for Integrated Statewide Road Network Data, Statewide Primary & Secondary Road Routes, NCDOT Bike Routes, Airports, and NCDOT Rail Track. Geospatial data downloaded from https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/gis/pages/gis-data-layers.aspx on 11/06/2014. NCDOT Transportation Planning Branch, 2014. Traffic Forecast for U-2753, No Build, 11/20/2014. Smith, Danny, Assistant Chief, Fire Department, City of Monroe. Email dsmith@monroenc.org (Local EMS Input Form, Appendix C). 01/02/2015/ Union County Planning Department. Union County 2025 Transportation Plan/Comprehensive Plan Update. http://www.unioncountyonevoice.com/ . Website accessed 12/17/2014. Union County Transportation Department. http://www.co.union.nc.us/Divisions/Transportation.aspx. Website accessed 12/22/2014. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000. U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year Estimates (2008-2012). U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) - National Geospatial Center of Excellence. USDA-NRCS Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO). http://datagateway.nrcs.usda.gov/ Website accessed 01/09/2015. United States Department of the Interior (USDOI), National Park Service (NPS), Land and Water Conservation Fund. http://waso-lwcf.ncrc.nps.gov/public/index.cfm. Website accessed 02/01/2015. USDOI NPS, Nationwide Rivers Inventory. Lower 48 NRI GIS Data. Geospatial data downloaded from http://www.nps.gov/ncrc/programs/rtca/nri/index.html on 11/11/2014. APPENDIX ITEMS A. Demographics Used in Tabular Form B. Site Photographs C. Local Input Forms TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 20 APPENDIX A: SUMMARY OF DEMOGRAPHICS USED IN TABULAR FORM Population Geography 2000 Geography 2010 2000 2010 Difference % Change Annualized Growth Rate CT 204.01, BG 2 CT 204.01, BG 2 2,226 2,64441818.8% 1.7% CT 204.02, BG 1 CT 204.04, BG 4 1,415 1,468533.7% 0.4% CT 204.02, BG 2 CT 204.04, BG 3 1,104 1,088-16-1.4% ‐0.1% CT 204.02, BG 3 CT 204.04, BG 2 1,541 2,07253134.5% 3.0% DSA Aggregate 6,286 7,272 98615.7% 1.5% Union County 123,677201,29277,61562.8% 5.0% North Carolina 8,049,3139,535,4831,486,17018.50% 1.7% Source: US Census Bureau, Census 2010 and Census 2000, Summary File 1 100% Data, Table P1 and P001 "Total Population" LEP Total Adult Pop Primary Language Group of Persons Who Speak English Less than Very Well Spanish Other Indo- Euro Asian/Pacific Other # % # % # % # % CT 204.01, BG 2 1,867 221 11.8%0 0.0% 46 2.5% 0 0.0% CT 204.04, BG 4 1,414 164 11.6%0 0.0% 12 0.8% 0 0.0% CT 204.04, BG 3 715 380 53.1%0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% CT 204.04, BG 2 850 149 17.5%0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% DSA 4,846 914 18.9%0 0.0% 58 1.2% 0 0.0% Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year Estimates (2008-2012), Table B16004, "Age by Language Spoken at Home for the Population 5+ Yrs" TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 21 Minority Population Total Population White, Non-Hispanic Minority Population* # % # % CT 204.01, BG 2 2,363 1,65470.0%709 30.0% CT 204.04, BG 2 1,553 65542.2%898 57.8% CT 204.04, BG 3 1,211 18615.4%1,025 84.6% CT 204.04, BG 4 1,595 523.3%1,543 96.7% DSA 6,722 2,54737.9%4,175 62.1% Union County 201,617 150,32574.6%51,292 25.4% * Minority population includes all races that are non-white and Hispanic populations that are also White. Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year Estimates (2008-2012), Table B03002, "Hispanic or Latino Origin by Race." Poverty Total Population Below Poverty Level Very Poor: Under 50% of Poverty Level Near Poor: Between 100% and 150% of Poverty Level # % # % # % CT 204.01, BG 2 2,351 2018.5%893.8% 38616.4% CT 204.04, BG 2 1,551 56336.3%895.7% 25516.4% CT 204.04, BG 3 1,211 39232.4%554.5% 42334.9% CT 204.04, BG 4 1,585 88055.5%1137.1% 19512.3% DSA 6,698 2,03630.4%3465.2% 1,25918.8% Union County 199,539 19,3569.7%6,4083.2% 14,4037.2% Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year Estimates (2008-2012), Table C17002 "Ratio of Income to Poverty Level in the Past 12 Months " TI P U - 5 7 2 3  Un i o n C o u n t y  CO M M U N I T Y C H A R A C T E R I S T I C S R E P O R T  A p r i l , 2 0 1 5  p a g e 2 2 Ra c e To t a l Po p u l a t i o n Wh i t e Bl a c k o r Af r i c a n Am e r i c a n Am e r i c a n In d i a n a n d Al a s k a N a t i v e Al o n e As i a n Na t i v e Ha w a i i a n / Pa c i f i c Is l a n d e r So m e o t h e r ra c e Two or more races Total Non-White # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % CT 2 0 4 . 0 1 , B G 2 2, 3 6 3 1 , 9 8 4 8 4 . 0 1 7 8 7 . 5 1 8 0 . 8 1 0 2 4 . 3 0 0 . 0 5 6 2 . 4 2 5 1 . 1 3 7 9 16.0 CT 2 0 4 . 0 4 , B G 2 1, 5 5 3 8 0 5 5 1 . 8 4 1 1 2 6 . 5 0 0 . 0 2 8 1 . 8 0 0 . 0 2 8 1 1 8 . 1 2 8 1 . 8 7 4 8 48.2 CT 2 0 4 . 0 4 , B G 3 1, 2 1 1 2 2 4 1 8 . 5 3 5 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 6 3 6 5 2 . 5 0 0 . 0 9 8 7 8 1 .5 CT 2 0 4 . 0 4 , B G 4 1, 5 9 5 6 3 4 3 9 . 7 9 6 1 6 0 . 3 0 0 . 0 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 9 6 1 6 0 . 3 DS A 6, 7 2 2 3 , 6 4 7 5 4 . 3 1 9 0 1 2 8 . 3 1 8 0 . 3 1 3 0 1 . 9 0 0 . 0 9 7 3 1 4 . 5 5 3 0 . 8 3075 45.7 Un i o n C o u n t y 20 1 , 6 1 7 16 4 , 9 7 1 8 1 . 8 2 3 , 7 1 5 11 . 8 8 8 2 0 . 4 3 , 2 0 6 1 . 6 7 0 0 . 0 5 , 5 7 1 2 . 8 3 , 2 0 2 1 . 6 36,646 18.2 So u r c e : U S C e n s u s B u r e a u , A m e r i c a n C o m m u n i t y S u r v e y 5 - y e a r E s t i ma t e s ( 2 0 0 8 - 2 0 1 2 ) , T a b l e B 0 2 0 0 1 , " R a c e . " Hi s p a n i c o r La t i n o O r i g i n To t a l Po p u l a t i o n Hi s p a n i c No t H i s p a n i c # % # % CT 2 0 4 . 0 1 , B G 2 2, 3 6 3 3 8 6 1 6 . 3 % 1 , 9 7 7 8 3 . 7 % CT 2 0 4 . 0 4 , B G 2 1, 5 5 3 4 3 1 2 7 . 8 % 1 , 1 2 2 7 2 . 2 % CT 2 0 4 . 0 4 , B G 3 1, 2 1 1 6 7 4 5 5 . 7 % 5 3 7 4 4 . 3 % CT 2 0 4 . 0 4 , B G 4 1, 5 9 5 5 8 2 3 6 . 5 % 1 , 0 1 3 6 3 . 5 % DS A 6, 7 2 2 2 0 7 3 3 0 . 8 % 4 , 6 4 9 6 9 . 2 % Un i o n C o u n t y 20 1 , 6 1 7 2 1 , 0 5 4 1 0 . 4 % 1 8 0 , 5 6 3 8 9 . 6 % So u r c e : U S C e n s u s B u r e a u , A m e r i c a n C o m m u n i t y S u r v e y 5 - y e a r E s t i ma t e s ( 2 0 0 8 - 2 0 1 2 ) , T a b l e B0 3 0 0 2 , " H i s p a n i c o r L a t i n o O r i g i n b y R a c e . " TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 23 APPENDIX B: SITE PHOTOS Figure 1: Concord Avenue ramps near western terminus showing business driveway access ramps to/from US 74 Figure 2: US 74 W, showing driveway access at end of ramp from US 601 Figure 3: Traffic from US 601 merging onto US 74 W Figure 4: Traffic from Concord Avenue stopped and queued, waiting to merge onto US 74 W Figure 5: Looking east, showing driveway access at end of US 601 ramp onto US 74 W Figure 6: Looking east at businesses along US 74, taken from US 601 bridge TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 24 Figure 7: Truck on ramp from US 601 and East Avenue to US 74 W, showing residential driveway access on ramp Figure 8: US 74 E showing driveway access at end of ramp from US 601 N Figure 9: Pedestrians crossing US 601 from Monroe Plaza Shopping Center going to neighborhood at King Street Figure 10: Monroe Plaza Shopping Center Figure 11: Example of unconnected sidewalk segments on US 74, shown at Miller Street and US 74 E Figure 12: Eastern terminus of the project study area at Stafford Street and US 74 TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 25 APPENDIX C: LOCAL INPUT FORMS UNION COUNTY SCHOOLS NC Department of Transportation Community Studies Group, Human Environment Section Local Schools Input Form for STIP Project U-5723 COMMUNITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT Using the project map below, please respond to the following questions by typing your answers in the space provided. Then save (Using the Save As… command) this file with a new file name for your records and e- mail the new file back to diana.young-paiva@threeoaksengineering.com or to edshay@ncdot.gov. If you would prefer to complete a hard copy of this form, please send all sheets to the following address or fax number below: Elizabeth Shay NCDOT Human Environment Unit 1598 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC, 27699-1583 Phone: (919) 707-6067 Fax: (919) 212-5785 TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 26 Project Description: Construction of improvements to existing US 74, US 601 interchange TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 27 Please rate the overall impact of this project on school transportation services: No Impact Low Impact Moderate Impact High Impact Check all that apply & provide a detailed explanation of your response in the field provided. How many School Buses use the project corridor each day? (total # of daily buses, total # daily of trips) Currently 37 Buses 55 Trips Based on your knowledge of the project area, do you have any concerns with the condition/capacity of potential detour routes, or the location of resources along these routes? Detour not attached; however, adjacent streets in the area are narrow and sometimes hard to maneuver. Are there any future time periods or events that you know of where a road closure would be of particular concern? Road closure during August – June would be a higher impact. June – August would be best scenario Is there anyone else you feel should be contacted regarding this project (i.e. local officials or stakeholders)? City of Monroe, Emergency personnel (fire, police, EMT) Are road names referenced by the names locals would use? Yes If there any other concerns you have regarding the potential impact of this project on school transportation services, or any additional comments? Please be as specific as possible. Increase in route and travel time will be necessary potentially adding buses to the fleet. Form Completed by (Include Title): Mandy Benton TIMS Coordinator Date: 12/17/14 TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 28 CITY OF MONROE FIRE DEPARTMENT NC Department of Transportation Community Studies Group, Human Environment Section Local EMS Input Form for STIP Project U-5723 COMMUNITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT Using the project map below, please respond to the following questions by typing your answers in the space provided. Then save (Using the Save As… command) this file with a new file name for your records and e- mail the new file back to diana.young-paiva@threeoaksengineering.com or to edshay@ncdot.gov. If you would prefer to complete a hard copy of this form, please send all sheets to the following address or fax number below: Elizabeth Shay NCDOT Human Environment Unit 1598 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC, 27699-1583 Phone: (919) 707-6067 Fax: (919) 212-5785 TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 29 Project Description: Construction of improvements to existing US 74, US 601 interchange TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 30 Please rate the overall impact of this project on Emergency Response Services: No Impact Low Impact Moderate Impact x High Impact Check all that apply & provide a detailed explanation of your response in the field provided. If there are concerns please specify. Be as specific as possible. (e.g. location in a high call volume area, closure could affect response to schools, weight restrictions, expected new development in the area, coordination with partner agency required to facilitate service) This interchange is crucial to operations from our Station 5. The interchange area is critical to reaching parts of the response district of Station 5. It is also crucial for Station 5 being able to receive additional resources for aid in the event of an emergency. This same condition applies to EMS and police responses. Based on your knowledge of the project area, do you have any concerns with the condition/capacity of potential detour routes, or the location of resources along these routes? In the event of the need to detour traffic completely away from this interchange there will be significant impact due to the volume of traffic. Available roads and streets will be insufficient for the volumes and delays for emergency responses will be increased. Are there any future time periods or events that you know of where a road closure would be of particular concern? no Is there anyone else you feel should be contacted regarding this project (i.e. local officials or stakeholders)? Yes, City Engineering for Monroe (jloyd@monroenc.org) and Chief of Police (bgilliard@monroenc.org). Are road names referenced by the names locals would use? yes If there any other concerns you have regarding the potential impact of this project on EMS services, or any additional comments? Please be as specific as possible. To hear directly from EMS you should contact Operations Director Tim Adams. (tim.adams@carolinashealthcare.org) Form Completed by (Include Title): Danny J. Smith, Assistant Chief Date: 02 Jan. 2015 TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 31 CITY OF MONROE PLANNING NC Department of Transportation Community Studies Group, Human Environment Section Local Planner Input Form for STIP Project U-5723 COMMUNITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT Using the project map below, please respond to the following questions by typing your answers in the space provided. Then save (Using the Save As… command) this file with a new file name for your records and e- mail the new file back to diana.young-paiva@threeoaksengineering.com or to edshay@ncdot.gov. If you would prefer to complete a hard copy of this form, please send all sheets to the following address or fax number below: Elizabeth Shay NCDOT Human Environment Unit 1598 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC, 27699-1583 Phone: (919) 707-6067 Fax: (919) 212-5785 TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 32 Project Description: Construction of improvements to existing US 74, US 601 interchange TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 33 Please rate the overall impact of this project on local Planning objectives: No Impact Low Impact Moderate Impact High Impact Without knowing what the proposed designs are, it is not possible to judge the potential impact. Check all that apply & provide a detailed explanation of your response in the field provided. Are there any known plans for development in the vicinity of the project? Based on your knowledge of the project area, do you have any concerns with the condition/capacity of potential detour routes, or the location of resources along these routes? The greatest concern would be the impacts on Concord Avenue and the Concord Avenue/US 74 interchange. Are there any future time periods or events that you know of where a road closure would be of particular concern? Are there any adopted plans for either pedestrian, greenway, bicycle, or transit facilities in the area? Please provide a description of how the plan applies to the project area, the title of the plan, its year of adoption, and the current status of its implementation. The City’s Greenway Plan shows planned bicycle routes/greenways along US 601 Skyway Drive, crossing US 74, and along Concord Avenue, crossing US 64. Are there any other adopted plans for growth that could directly affect this project? Are you aware of any special populations/ communities (e.g. minority, low-income, Limited English Proficiency) existing around the project? There is a low-income, Spanish-speaking population living in an area roughly bounded by the rear of properties adjacent to US 74 E on the north and east sides, Concord Avenue to the west, and Kerr Street to the south. Are there any FEMA buyout properties in the vicinity of the project? Does the project lie within a VAD or EVAD District? Is there anyone else you feel should be contacted regarding this project (i.e. local officials or stakeholders)? Are road names referenced by the names locals would use? US 601 is called Skyway Drive in the area near the project. TIP U-5723  Union County  COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT  April, 2015  page 34 Are there any additional comments you have for this project? There are several plans that are currently in the process of being updated: The CRTPO Comprehensive Transportation Plan, Monroe Land Use Plan is currently being updated. Draft maps are on the CRTPO website but NCDOT hasn’t yet adopted the plan. An update of the Land Use Plan is underway. In addition, an Area Plan for the area that includes the US 74/US 601 interchange will be completed Spring 2015. The plan, called the Concord Area Master Plan, addresses land use, aesthetics, transportation, streetscapes and greenspace. The draft plan includes a vision plan for hotel development on the south side of US 74 in both the southeast and southwest quadrants of the US 601 (Skyway Drive) interchange. In addition, the Parks Department is in the process of updating the Greenway Plan. The current plan shows proposed greenways along US 601 (Skyway Drive) and Concord Avenue crossing US 74. Form Completed by (Include Title): Personal interview with Lisa Stiwinter, Planning Director for the City of Monroe. Date: 01/09/2015