HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0006075_Staff Report_20230515State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Staff Report
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 1 of 5
To: NPDES Unit Non-Discharge Unit Application No.: WQ0006075
Attn: Alys Hannum Facility name: Gem Mountain Gemstone Mine CLRS
From: Melanie Kemp
Asheville Regional Office
Note: This form has been adapted from the non-discharge facility staff report to document the review of both non-
discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals. Please complete all sections as they are applicable.
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? Yes or No
a. Date of site visit: September 20, 2022
b. Site visit conducted by: Melanie Kemp
c. Inspection report attached? Yes or No In LF
d. Person contacted: Kay Buchanan and their contact information: 828-765-6130 ext.
e. Driving directions: Take Hwy. 226 north to Spruce Pine. The facility is located on the left approximately
1 mile south of the Blue Ridge Parkway.
2. Discharge Point(s):
Latitude: Longitude:
Latitude: Longitude:
3. Receiving stream or affected surface waters:
Classification:
River Basin and Subbasin No.
Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses:
II. PROPOSED FACILITIES: NEW APPLICATIONS
1. Facility Classification: (Please attach completed rating sheet to be attached to issued permit)
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow:
2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal syst em? Yes or No
If no, explain:
3. Are site conditions (soils, depth to water table, etc) consistent with the submitted reports? Yes No N/A
If no, please explain:
4. Do the plans and site map represent the actual site (property lines, wells, etc.)? Yes No N/A
If no, please explain:
5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adequate? Yes No N/A
If no, please explain:
DocuSign Envelope ID: 69431AC9-6B87-4AFA-BFE7-1C8375F939AD
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 5
6. Are the proposed application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) acceptable? Yes No N/A
If no, please explain:
7. Are there any setback conflicts for proposed treatment, storage and disposal sites? Yes or No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
8. Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? Yes No N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
9. For residuals, will seasonal or other restrictions be required? Yes No N/A
If yes, attach list of sites with restrictions (Certification B)
Describe the residuals handling and utilization scheme:
10. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:
11. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
III. EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility? Yes No N/A
ORC: Certificate #: Backup ORC: Certificate #:
2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? Yes or No
If no, please explain:
Description of existing facilities:
28,800 gallon per day (GPD) wastewater treatment and closed- loop facility consisting of two 1,178 gallon
concrete settling tanks; a 2,000 square foot (ft) final settling pond (approximately 100 feet x 20 feet x 3
feet); and all associated piping, valves, controls, and appurtenances
Proposed flow:
28,800
Current permitted flow: Same as above
Explain anything observed during the site visit that needs to be addressed by the permit, or that may be important
for the permit writer to know (i.e., equipment condition, function, maintenance, a change in facility ownership, etc
3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? Yes or No
If no, please explain:
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e.g., drainage added, new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? Yes or No
If yes, please explain:
5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? Yes or No
If no, please explain:
6. Are the existing application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) still acceptable? Yes or No
If no, please explain:
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? Yes No N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? Yes or No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? Yes or No
If no, please explain:
See the edited description above. The facility does not have a recycling pump in their final settling pond.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 69431AC9-6B87-4AFA-BFE7-1C8375F939AD
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 3 of 5
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? Yes No N/A
If no, please explain:
11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? Yes No N/A
If no, please complete the following (expand table if necessary):
Monitoring Well Latitude Longitude
○ ′ ″ - ○ ′ ″
○ ′ ″ - ○ ′ ″
○ ′ ″ - ○ ′ ″
○ ′ ″ - ○ ′ ″
○ ′ ″ - ○ ′ ″
12. Has a review of all self-monitoring data been conducted (e.g., DMR, NDMR, NDAR, GW)? Yes or No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review:
No monitoring reporting requirements for this facility.
Provide input to help the permit writer evaluate any requests for reduced monitoring, if applicable.
13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? Yes or No
If yes, please explain:
14. Check all that apply:
No compliance issues Current enforcement action(s) Currently under JOC
Notice(s) of violation Currently under SOC Currently under moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments (i.e., NOV, NOD, etc.)
It was noted during the last inspection that the facility is not pumping water from the settling pond back
into the sluices. Additionally, there is no freeboard marker on the settling pond.
If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle, please explain the status. Has the RO been
working with the Permittee? Is a solution underway or in place?
The facility has requested a permit rescission based on updated rules (15A NCAC 02U.0113, item 18). They
have been denied a rescission because they do not recycle waste water, there is no freeboard marker in the
settling pond, and they do not have a spill control plan in place.
Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? Yes No N/A
If no, please explain: There is no freeboard marker in the settling pond. The facility does not recycle waste
water from the settling pond.
15. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
Yes No N/A
If yes, please explain:
16. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:
17. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
DocuSign Envelope ID: 69431AC9-6B87-4AFA-BFE7-1C8375F939AD
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 4 of 5
IV. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? Yes or No
If yes, please explain:
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non-Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an
additional information request:
Item Reason
3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
5. Recommendation: Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
Issue
Deny (Please state reasons: )
6. Signature of report preparer:
Signature of regional supervisor:
Date:
DocuSign Envelope ID: 69431AC9-6B87-4AFA-BFE7-1C8375F939AD
5/15/2023
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 5 of 5
V. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
The facility is aware of operational issues that need to be addressed in order to be compliant with permit. I will
continue to work with them to fix these issues, but the permit should be updated/issued in the meantime.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 69431AC9-6B87-4AFA-BFE7-1C8375F939AD