20071559 Ver 1_Application_20070917

E ~
.~~ G
o
~d +,,.-~ kZ ..
~ ~ _.. '
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ~~NDSANnwT~~~~,~, ~, •_,
DEPART7VIENT OF TRANSPORTATION ~` "'~`~~'
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
September 10, 2007
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
ATTENTION: Mr. David Baker
NCDOT Coordinator
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
07? ~5~9
SUBJECT: Regional General Permit 198200031 and Section 401 Water
Quality Certification Application for the proposed improvements
of SR1323 (Riverview Street) from the intersection of Iotla Street
to NC28 in Macon County. NCDOT Division 14, Federal Project
No. STP-28(1), State Project No. 8.1970801, TIP No. R-2408A.
$240.00 Debit work order 8.1970801, WBS Element 34427.1.1.
Dear Sir:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes improvements of
SR 1323 (Riverview Street) from the intersection of Iotla Street to NC 28 in Macon
County. The existing cross section is a two-lane road with travel lane width of 11 feet
and variable width shoulders. The road has substandard geometrics and an inadequate
typical section. Travel lanes and shoulders are narrow and the vertical and horizontal
alignments are deficient according to the current NCDOT design standards. Because of
the mountainous terrain, the road has steep drop-offs and large inclines on opposite sides
of the road. This makes it difficult to travel along this road with narrow lanes and sharp
curves that limit a driver's sight distance. The corridor is also a preferred route for tractor
trailer trucks. The proposed improvements consist of widening the current two-lane road
to two 12-foot travel lanes with 8-foot shoulders (4-foot paved for bicycles). The total
length of the project is approximately 0.9 mile long. There will be a total of 143 feet of
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] PARKER LINCOLN BUILDING,
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 272$ CAPITAL BLVD., SUITE 24O
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US RALEIGH NC 27604
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548

t r
permanent impacts to two jurisdictional streams on this project. There are no wetlands in
the project study area. Please find enclosed a copy of the permit drawings, roadway
design plans and Rapanos jurisdictional determination forms for the subject project.
IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
General Description: The project is located in the Little Tennessee River Basin within
HUC 06010202. There are two jurisdictional water resources within the project area for
R-2408A. These are UT1 and UT2 to the Little Tennessee River. The North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources classifies Little Tennessee River and
its tributaries as "C". The DWQ Index number for the portion of the Little Tennessee
River and the UTs flow is 2-(1). UT1 is a perennial stream with an average baseflow of 2
feet and an average depth of 1 - 4 inches. UT2 is a perennial stream with a an average
baseflow of 3 feet, with an average depth of 2 - 6 inches.
Jurisdictional Delineations: All streams were deemed to be perennial and jurisdictional
during a site visit by NCDOT staff on November 20, 2006. There are no jurisdictional
wetlands in the project study area. For impacts to individual sites, refer to Impact
Summary Table (Permit Sheet 2 of 12).
Permanent Impacts: Permanent impacts for this project total 143 feet.
• Site 1: located at station 28+5 -L- Rt. There will be 3 linear feet of permanent
impacts to UT1 to Little Tennessee River due to the installation of a headwall to the
upstream side. The current 24-inch pipe will be replaced with a 64-inch metal arch
pipe of the same 43 feet in length. The pipe will be 43 feet in length and will replace
the older structure without causing any permanent impacts. There is an 18-inch metal
pipe that is currently tied into the 24-inch pipe by the landowner at a junction box on
the downstream side. The junction box and 18-inch pipe will be removed and the
stream daylighted. NCDOT proposes to use mitigation credit from this site for the B
section, which is a separate permit application.
• Site 2: located at station 41+58 -L-Rt. There will be 401inear feet of permanent
impacts to UT2 to Little Tennessee River due to extension of the new pipe to
accommodate the widening of the roadway. The current 76-inch x 55-inch metal arch
pipe will be replaced with a 142-inch x 91-inch metal arch pipe. The new pipe will be
extended from 52 feet to 92 feet.
• Site 3: located at station 13+23 -Y1-. There will be 1001inear feet of permanent
impacts to UT2 to Little Tennessee River due to pipe extension and addition of a
headwall to the upstream side. The current 30-inch pipe is perched on the
downstream side will be replaced by a 75-inch x 55-inch metal arch pipe. The new
pipe will be 126 feet in length. The new pipe will be shifted to the south to allow
better hydrologic conveyance and to allow for aquatic species passage.
Temporary Impacts: Temporary impacts for this project tota10.01 acres.
Page 2 of 6

• Site l :located at station 28+5 -L-Rt. There will be <0.01 acre of temporary impacts
on the upstream side due to stream management during pipe installation.
• Site 2: located at station 41+58-L-Rt. There will be <0.01 acre of temporary impacts
on both sides due to stream management during pipe installation.
• Site 3: located at station 13+23 -Y1-. There will be <0.01 acre of temporary impacts
on both sides due to stream management during pipe installation.
Utility Impacts: There will be no utility impacts associated with this project.
Project Schedule: This project has a proposed let date of February 19, 2008 with a
date of availability of Apri12, 2008. The review date for this project is January 1,
2008.
NEPA DOCUMENT STATUS
An Environmental Assessment (EA) was submitted by the NCDOT in compliance with
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The EA was approved on Apri130,
2004 and covered both sections of the project. A Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) was approved on August 31, 2005. The EA explains the purpose and need for
the project; provides a complete description of the alternatives considered; and
characterizes the social, economic and environmental effects. After the EA was
approved, it was circulated to the federal and local agencies. Copies of the EA and
FONSI have been provided to regulatory review agencies involved in the approval
process. Additional copies will be provided upon request. Per conversation with David
Baker (USAGE) on June 21, 2007, as long as the A and B sections have independent
utility, this project can be permitted as two separate projects.
The subject project, R-2408A, is in compliance with 23 CFR Part 771.111(f) which lists
the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) characteristics of independent utility of a
project:
1. The project connects logical termini and is of sufficient length to address
environmental matters on a broad scope. The proposed project continues
improvements along Riverview Street from the intersection of Iotla Street to
NC 28.
2. The project is usable and a reasonable expenditure, even if no additional
transportation improvements are made in the area. The proposed
improvements redirects traffic away from the section of NC 28 through
downtown Franklin, alleviating traffic congestion in Franklin and assists local
traffic movement.
3. The project does not restrict consideration of alternatives for other reasonably
foreseeable transportation improvements, including minimal widening on the
existing alignment.
Page 3 of 6

FEDERALLY PROTECTED SPECIES
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed
Endangered, and Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of Section 7 and
Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of May 10, 2007, the
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists eight federally protected species
for Macon County. Table 1 lists the species, their status and biological conclusion.
Spotfin chub, Appalachian elktoe, and oyster mussel received a biological conclusion of
Unresolved in the Environmental Assessment (EA)for R-2408 (dated September 2005).
Surveys for the species have shown that the biological conclusion for spotfin chub,
Appalachian elktoe, and oyster mussel is No Effect for the A section. It was determined
that the largest UT on the A section was "very shallow and a high sediment load" and did
not provide habitat to support these species. The Indiana bat received a biological
conclusion of May Effect/Not Likely to Adversely Affect in the EA for R-2408. A
subsequent survey of the A section was conducted on July 27, 2007 by Mary Frazer. It
was determined that there was no good roosting habitat consisting of shaggy, sloughing
bark trees or large snags in the project area that bats would use. A biological conclusion
of No Effect was rendered for Indiana bat for R-2408A.
The Rock gnome lichen has been added to the list for Macon County since the original
EA was prepared. The proposed project is not expected to affect rock gnome lichen since
elevations within the project study area range between 2000 to 2200 feet above MSL,
below the reported minimum elevation of 5,000 feet above MSL for this species.
Suitable habitat, consisting of vertical rock faces with a high humidity regime, was not
identified within the project study area. A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage
Program (NCNHP) database on February 27, 2007 showed no known occurrence of rock
gnome lichen within three miles of the project study area.
Table 1. Federally Protected Species for Macon County

Common Name
Scientific Name
Status Habitat Biological
Ar-alvsis ,Conclusion
Bog turtle Clemmys muhlenbergii T (S/A) No habitat Not applicable
Spotfin chub Hybopsis monacha T No habitat No Effect
Appalachian elktoe Alasmidonta E No habitat No Effect
raveneliana
Littlewing pegias fabula E No habitat No Effect
earl ussel
Small whorled pogoni Isotria medeoloides T No habitat No Effect
Virginia spiraea Spiraea virginiana T No habitat No Effect
Indiana bat Myotis sodalis E No habitat No Effect
Rock gnome lichen Gymnoderma lineare E No habitat No Effect
Page 4 of 6

CULTURAL RESOURCES
Archaeology & Historical Structures: There are no known archaeological or historical
resources within the project area. The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
reviewed the project area and, based on those photos commented (in a memo dated June
25, 2002) that the structures over fifty years of age "are not eligible for listing in the
National Register of Historic Places." This memo is found in Appendix 3 of the EA.
There are no known archaeological sites within the proposed project area.
AVOIDANCE, MINIMIZATION, AND MITIGATION
Avoidance and Minimization: Avoidance examines all appropriate and practicable
possibilities of averting impacts to "Waters of the United States". The NCDOT is
committed to incorporating all reasonable and practicable design features to avoid and
minimize jurisdictional impacts, and to provide full compensatory mitigation of all
remaining, unavoidable jurisdictional stages; minimization measures were incorporated
as part of the project design.
• Best Management Practices will be followed for this project as outlined in "NCDOT's
Best Management Practices for Construction and Maintenance Activities".
• Currently piped streams will be improved to allow better hydrologic conveyance.
• Due to the close proximity of the project to the Little Tennessee River, NCDOT will
implement erosion and sedimentation control measures, as specified by NCDOT's
"Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds".
• New pipes will be buried approximately 12 inches below the stream bottom to allow
natural stream bottom materials to become established following installation and to
provide aquatic life passage during periods of low flow.
• Site 1 will have an 18 inch pipe tied to the junction box on the downstream side
removed and the stream daylighted
Miti atg ion: There will be a total of 143 linear feet of permanent stream impacts
associated with this project. There are no wetlands in the project area. No compensatory
mitigation is proposed as the project impacts total less than 150 feet and will not impact
HQW waters.
REGULATORY APPROVALS
Section 404 Permit: It is anticipated that the permanent impacts to UT1 and UT2 to Little
Tennessee River will be authorized under a Section 404 Regional General Permit
198200031 (NCDOT Bridges). Application is hereby made for Department of the Army
Regional General Permit 198200031 for the above-described activities.
Page 5 of 6

Section 401 Certification: In compliance with Section 143-215.3D(e) of the NCAC we will
provide $240.00 to act as payment for processing the Section 401 (General Certification
Number 3627) permit application previously noted in this application (see Subject line).
We are providing five copies of this application to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, for their review and
approval.
This project is located in a trout county, therefore comments from the North Carolina
Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) will be required prior to authorization by the
Corps of Engineers. By copy of this letter and attachment, NCDOT hereby requests
NCWRC review. NCDOT requests that NCWRC forward their comments to the Corps of
Engineers and the NCDOT within 30 calendar days of receipt of this application.
Thank you for your assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact Jason Dilday at [e-mail] or (919)
715-5535. The application will be posted at http://207.4.62.65lPDEA/PermApps/.
Sincerely
"„~
(,.~~/ Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.,
\" Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
W/attachment
Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ (5 Copies)
Ms. Marella Buncick, USFWS
Ms. Marla Chambers, NCWRC
Mr. Harold Draper, TVA
Dr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Victor Barbour, P.E., Project Services Unit
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. J. B. Setzer, P.E. (Div. 14), Division Engineer
Mr. Mark Davis (Div. 14), DEO
W/o attachment
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Majed Alghandour, P. E., Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. Scott McLendon, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. Steven Brown, P.E., PDEA Project Planning Engineer
Page 6 of 6

End R-2408A
-~ N

_r
m
m
7
fD
pl
fR
~~ N
.Z1
CD
2 S,Q'
~?~
/R~`
~~6 ~'~ ~
~Y
s~e0i ~^,
~~p'a Start R-2408A
~~
`' ~
.~~.
1
Y N~' ~~
~ VL'a•
L .~
O6 Zs
d _.
N N
G
J ~mr
J
VSgg1
F
0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.75
Miley-~-= '
R-2408A Macon County /Ljq
Improvements of SR 1323 (Riverview St) from
US441 to NC28 permit ~rawinp
st~~~t ..,1.- ~ --~--

• l
PROPERTY OWNERS
North Carolina Dept. of Transportation
Attn: Fronkie Dill Jr.
Sylva, NC 28779
~Iliam Martin
28 Guffie Rd. Franklin NC 28734
J 8~ A Investments of Sarasota Inc.
1715 Ray Cove Rd. Franklin NC 28734
Melonie C Downs
140 Shadow Branch Rd. Franklin NC 28734
Harley Carpenter Jr.
Box 394 Franklin NC 28734
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HI~HNAYS
dBAUFORT/PITT COUNTY
PRO~IBCT: iif6l.1.! lBr~
PBR1~[IT DRANINtlS POR
6RID0B~l0 ON SR1414
OVBR TRANTBR'S CRBBlC
SHBBT ~ OF ~,3 8/ 1lI6~
r-2408ahyd tsh.dgn 06/26/2007 01:34:16 PM

IMPACT SUM MARY
WETLAND IM PACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS

Site
NO.
StatlOrt

From/To
StrUCtUre
Size Permanent
FIII In
Wetlands
ac
Temp. Fill
In Wetlands
ac
Excavation
In Wetlands
ac Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
ac Hand
Clearing
in Wetlands
ac Permanent
SW
Impacts
ac Temp.
SW
Impacts
ac Exist. Chan.
Impacts
Permanent
ft Exist. Chan
Impacts
Temp.
ft Natural
Stream
Design
ft
1 L 28+05 64" X 43" CMPA <0.01 <0.01 3 4 N/A
2 L 41+58 142" X 91" CMPA 0.01 <0.01 40 48 N/A
3 Y1 13+23 73" X 55" CMPA 0.020 <0.01 100 25 N/A

TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.01 143 77 0
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MACON COUNTY
R-2408A
WBS - 34427.1.1
SHEET 05/31 /06
Permit Q+-aw;ng
Sheet ~ of ~_

~•l T ~
i'
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: R-2408A (Improvements of SR1323 (Riverview Street) from the
intersection of Iotla Street to NC28
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:NC County/parish borough: Macon City: Franklin
Center coordinates of site (1at/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35'11'40"° N, Long. 83'23'10'° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Little Tennessee River
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) Into which the aquatic resource flows: Little Tennessee River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit !.:ode (HUC): 06010202
Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
^ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
^ Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Appear to be no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in
the review area. [Required)
^ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
^ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): r
~] TNWs, including territorial seas
^ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
^ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
^ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 500 linear feet: 2 width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: 0.5 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries} of jurisdiction based on: Established by OHWM.
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
Z For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
~ Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW: .
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent": Wetlands associated with UT1 is outside the study area of
the project.
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.C below.
Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: 839 square miles
Drainage area: 0.04 square miles
Average annual rainfall: 54.4 inches
Average annual snowfall: 15.2 inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
® Tributary flows directly into TNW.
^ Tributary flows through 10 (or more] tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are 30 (or more) river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 30 (or more) aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are ! (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNWS:
Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the acid
West.
s Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

Tributary stream order, if known:
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that annlv):
Tributary is: ®Natural
^ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
^ Manipulated (man-altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 2 feet
Average depth: 0.25 feet
Average side slopes: 2:1.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
^ Silts ®Sands
® Cobbles ®Gravel
^ Bedrock ^ Vegetation. Type/% cover:
^ Other. Explain:
^ Concrete
^ Muck
Tributary condition stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: stable bank.
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain: riffle pools present.
Tributary geometry: ~2el~tively straig~it
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 7
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: ~sunal,flor>r?
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 20,(or_greater)
Describe flow regime: Perennial flow.
Other information on duration and volume: fairly consistent flow.
Surface flow is: Discrete and confined. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
^ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
® clear, natural line impressed on the bank ^
® changes in the character of soil ^
^ shelving
® vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
® leaf litter disturbed or washed away ^
^ sediment deposition ^
^ water staining ^
^ other (list):
^ Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
High Tide Line indicated by: ^ Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
^ oil or scum line along shore objects ^ survey to available datum;
^ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ^ physical markings;
^ physical markings/characteristics ^ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
^ tidal gauges
^ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: water clear.
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A naturnl or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): 30-50' wide wooded riparian fringe.
^ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
^ Habitat for:
^ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
^ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
^ Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
^ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Intermittent. flow. Explain:
Surface flow is: Discrete and canfiaed
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unlmown. Explain findings:
^ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
^ Directly abutting
^ Not directly abutting
^ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
^ Ecological connection. Explain:
^ Separated by berm barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are 30 (or more) river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 30 (or more) aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Wetland tolfrom navlgahle waters.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 500-year or greater floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
^ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
^ Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
^ Habitat for:
^ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
^ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
^ Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
^ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
Al] wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis:
Approximately (0.5) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directlyabuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (YM) Size (in acres)
Y 0.5
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed: The wetland located below the RPW
provides adequate habitat for various species of fauna and flora. The wetland also provides adequate storage potential for various
high rainfall events eliminating or at least providing a sort of water storage during storm events. This storage potential helps
reduce both point and non-point source pollutants and increasing water quality.
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLl~:
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
[] TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Q Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: NCDWQ stream form score over 30.

Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
® Tributary waters: 500 linear feet 2 width (ft).
^ Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
^ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
^ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
^ Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: RPW flows directly into wetland.
Q Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.5 acres.
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters 9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
^ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
^ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
^ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, IP.ICLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10
which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
BSee Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

• ~' f
[~ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
^ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
^ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
^ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
^ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
^ Wetlands: acres.
F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
^ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
^ Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
^ Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
^ Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non: jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
^ Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
^ Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
^ Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply -checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
^ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicandconsultant:
^ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicantlconsultant.
^ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
^ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
^ Corps navigable waters' study:
^ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
^ USGS NHD data.
^ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
^ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
^ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
^ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
[~ FEMA/FIRM maps:
^ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ^ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ^ Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
^ Applicable/supporting case law:
Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
^ Other information (please specify):

B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

1
~~" ~ ~ , r~~ 1 t r-~Jt JI ~ • • "`• ~ ,~~ 9~r~F I f f ~ i ~ M ` ~ 7' `` ` 4
hl ~+ ~ / + - ~ r~ r }p f 1 pry. _
~ I~'I ;` ~~•s ~ t r .J ~-- ~~ `` ' t ~ ~ •' ' { , - - (ms`s' -
~ .~!]/ 1 ~ ~ 1 Y~• =_ _, (~~ I 1 iVi~` 1 r ,1 ~• "' .' ~y ` ~' 1t ,`r •'.,, ~4 4 ', ' 1 ,,: ~ ` (..-...~ ~,
r . ~ ~ ~ 1' ~ (~~ 1c t i va " 7~ (¢ J / ~ r` (,+ ~ `i \ } ! `J y ,, _ ~-~-.~ .} dp ~` N `. t I V /
.1 t ;~ ~ ,~ ::K `'f 1 c ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ c ~d="ti+ it - t - J *~''~ {•~' i ~ . 1 ~` 1,.~ l~. _~--~"'"
` ~.,~ { ~+~,~~ i L!~,- .a ' :~-' `-~, ~ `'~ {\]!_!~/4' \,+~', .. 1/ r Jr ,,~ ~ t'ti.. ~,\'''~,,. .~ - y~ / Sir..
~"•;y \ y ~ '+ ~\'.. 5 ~ ° ~,..• ~~ ~ 1, • r ay~`:~`• ' ,~ ~ /• ( ~ ~r f--- ~.~ s ~. ~~ •=`•~l ~~~g,,
r `-`' ~~ I ~ ' ' ~ \,) ~f - p~8a '' +~ -~~, SR 1323 •(Riverview Street) ~ ~~
` V~ ~ •1 ., \\`_ of ' ~'~ y\ ~' ~' ~.1 \ `v ~l~`ti„ .,j a~ - ~. ~ • i%f/ i ~~'' 1''+.` l r~ ~ L _ I~ _ •`I • ( '~ ~~ '~.~
' 1 ; ;. '~ f . ~- ~. i + '.ti ~.JC ~~ ~ `~ -. L 1~- ~ ~~ ¢ • '\ 1 •,~ ; ;~'~! ... -~~` ,rte .. ""'1-... 11 ~( 1 •'~: ~ ~ t~ i
~~ ..c 1 '
f,r~_\~;;;r ,1 I f'-:.~...: }- ~~;~r~'1 ~~~ Wetland n ~' ~( ~: ' ~,~ ~~~~ ~`~.: ''`; 1+
~ I S ~ _ 'mot, ~' ~ ~ o • p• ` r, i' ~ -•... _ _ 1 '. ~ +\ \ r ~ffi,
'mow ~_'• ~' .~~\. ~` r ~ . _ ~ ..~i"~ ~t. ~ • ~, • ~ ~c ' ~ 11 • • • ~ ~.. , ~ ~'- -- ' ` ~- '`- {~ ~ Y
~~,~ `-_- 1-~ . ~`~ ~ 1 I .~`• \i -`- _ ~ 4 '~f~' ,fit UT 1 a -">~ , -._,` "_.~ ~~/f t - 4 .rte
r c` r' +•* `~.~'`~ ~ ~ ~ '~ l • r--~ /QV ~% ~..~. ~ - 1 1 r i t ~ '' ~ ,` ~i t _ -'• i ~
+'~ , lr
r ~ ~ ~ '~ , -"., ~\ +,\, . mar • ~ • •\ ,i1~C ~~~ i •.~ ~ ~~r;. / ' : • J fr •
C .' f t
Jurisdictional features associated with R-2408A

~I G
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: R-2408A (Improvements of SR1323 (Riverview Street) from the
intersection of Iotla Street to NC28
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:NC County/parish borough: Macon City: Franklin
Center coordinates of site (IatJlong in degree decimal format): Lat. 35'1 I'S2"° N, Long. 83'23'17°'W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Little Tennessee River
Name of neazest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) Into which the aquatic resource flows: Little Tennessee River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 06010202
Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
^ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) aze associated with this action and aze recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
[] Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Appear to be no "navigable waters of the U.S" within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in
the review area. [Required)
Q Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Q Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply):
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent watersz (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
[] Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
[] Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
^ Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
~] Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 10001ineaz feet: 3 width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: Established by OHWM
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
~ Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
Z For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
~ Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

a ~
SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanoshave been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.C below.
Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: square miles
Drainage area: square miles
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
^ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
^ Tributary flows through 10. (or more] tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are 30 (or more) river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 30 (or more) aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNWS:
Tributary stream order, if known:
° Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the arid
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

• ~ 1
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that annlvl:
Tributary is: ^ Natural
^ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
^ Manipulated (man-altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Vertical (1:1 or less).
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
^ Silts ^ Sands ^ Concrete
^ Cobbles ^ Gravel ^ Muck
^ Bedrock ^ Vegetation. Type/% cover:
^ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riflle/pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Relatively straight
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope):
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Intermittent but not seasonal flow
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 20 (or greater)
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Discrete and confined. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unlmown. Explain findings:
^ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
^ Bed and banks
^ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
^ clear, natural line impressed on the bank ^
^ changes in the character of soil ^
^ shelving ^
^ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent ^
^ leaf litter disturbed or washed away ^
^ sediment deposition ^
^ water staining ^
^ other (list):
^ Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
High Tide Line indicated by:
^ oil or scum line along shore objects
^ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
^ physical markings/characteristics
^ tidal gauges
^ other (list):
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
ine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
^ survey to available datum;
^ physical markings;
^ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A nature] or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a mck outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

~ ~ ~
(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
^ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
^ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
^ Habitat for:
^ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
^ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
^ Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
^ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Intermittent flow. Explain:
Surface flow is: Discrete and c©nfined
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
^ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
^ Directly abutting
^ Not directly abutting
^ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
^ Ecological connection. Explain:
^ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are 30 (or more) river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 30 (or more) aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Wetland to/from navigable waters.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 500-year or greater floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if ]mown:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
^ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
^ Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
^ Habitat for:
^ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
^ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
^ Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
^ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: 30 (or more)
Approximately ( )acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

t
For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acresl Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to cant' pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section IILD:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/VVETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
I. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
'[] TNWs: linear feet width (fl), Or, acres.
[] Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: NCDWQ stream form score over 30.
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: 1000 linear feet 3 width (ft).
^ Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
^ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
^ Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
^ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an 1tPW:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically.flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an 12PW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters 9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
'^ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
[] Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10
which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
^ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
^ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
^ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
^ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
gSee Footnote # 3.
e To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
[~ Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands: acres.
F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPL1~:
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
^ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
[^ Lakes/ponds: acres.
^ Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
[~ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
^ Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
[] Lakes/ponds: acres.
^ Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
^ Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply -checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
^ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
^ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
^ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
^ Corps navigable waters' study:
[,] U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
^ USGS NHD data.
^ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
~] U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
[,] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
[] National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
© FEMA/FIRM maps:
^ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
^ Photographs: ^ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ^ Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
^ Applicable/supporting case law:
Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
[] Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

I` ' r• ; I~ + ~ j r. , ' i . i~'D ~~~~~~j ~ ~ r• ~! ~ ~\ \,~,..~•~~ } !' ,.mot ~ i~ ~~,' ~~\; ~~ '•4~\ i t \.1~_ I ./
it .,1\ ?'~ r' ~~ ~` ..~_ ~ ~ Ii(~/T~~{+~ t ~ ~~~'~•' ,~~`-f~/] •~'• ff ~ t r ,~ ~...''- i~ s>ti\ ~'-. .• '- ,1 ~ ~6~
,.::,- 1., ~ t ~', ~ ! ;~ :s ` ~1 ! i \ ~ ~ i i' . f~ r Ar , `~ . a, n~ _ ra ~! /., q, r
f:::'.-~ y ~~-j y ~ r ~ ; ~ l':`•~ ~ ~ ~- \.; ..~ `r' P~BQ ~ ~ ~, . ~r ;~' ° ~ ;~•~ _,.' ~ i I`r ,.-,, SR 1323.(Riverview Street) '~ 4 !,m a
f . :.. r ~ \~ \\ `l
} : • _ r f ~ \ ~ s k~ y '..,_... `~ ~ a ; -___ • ~f t 11 ~ % ~ ~ ~ - ~i f t 1 ~ ~\SL • t '•~y `~.1•
~;/• f { i , ~~ ~ . .' -' s f f ~1 ~`~~ /\ ~ ~ ~. •~ f~- .i~a.. fj • ~\ k , ' ~ "T,t, .}.r. ~~.~ _ ~ I ~ _.., V f I
/ r, ~+{ }' ! f ~ /-~ t ~_~~` :` ~ ~ I ~J'` Wetland ~ 1r ~~ i-r ^, ~%r' qp,p ~~~•~w~,:- _ ` ~ //
f ~'~ \~` ~~~' f. ~ ....... - ~' • C~.~}~~~f; .r t ~ _ ~~~~~ /' rr'V'_ _ l' '1 of ice. •~~- ~ ~ ! W
` jam,'-`-~~ ~ t ~ l `+ •- ` ~' a ' ,_ - \ `- ~ r • p `' "' ._l~ ~ 1JJ °lj• ' ~~~ ~ ~~~•.
. ' .,~~r~+` `Y t~~ I ;° '~ ~~ /~- ~• ` .•_-._. _~~\ C\, /~,%r • ~ • • W I`r 4 !~. _ ~~'~~I rN ~'~~ ~•,~ ~~ ,• 1a5~ } `~` `,~ ^~~ ~ t1
'" r..._~ - - t ~ `~ •~'\ '~ `~ `'~ i-~ .._y, p~ f / 1, ` UT 1 ~-. '4 ~ ~ nldVl~w ~ ~•
~ ~\.~•l1 l '`•..~~_ -• qn i ''1 ~r~ f ~~ :s }!~ • ~ F 4 cf/~~ Li ~.~ ~~,'~,. ~ti... r~i '~ ~ d~ fj:
,! ii f. ~~ i, ~~ ''} j III y~` ~` ~ ti `._. `1 ~` ~ • t .. ~~ • •r ~ ,_ A ^1 w / ~ -
/ • ',~ / ~~ .\ ti 1 l • • • `,` f t • ~ `~ ~ •+t. .mac • fi.
t r. :1,117 r' ~ ~ { c ~ • • • r ~ i~ ~,., •
Jurisdictional features associated with R-2408A
l ,.
„~.
~;
t

Site 3 (13 +23-Y1-)
Previous plan drawings of the cross section of the placement of the new 75-inch x 55-inch
.metal arch pipe erroneously showed that the pipe would not be buried below the stream
bottom. Revised drawings of this site show the new pipe being buried at least 12-inches
below the stream bottom (Sheet 13). This will allow natural stream bottom materials to
become established following installation and provide aquatic passage during periods of low
flow. Because of the slope of the new pipe (<6%), a dissipater pad will be installed on the
downstream side of the pipe (Sheet 11). The addition of the dissipater pad will cause an
increase of 24 feet of permanent impacts to this site. Permanent impacts at this Site 3 will
increase to 124 feet.
Permanent impacts for the entire project will increase to a total of 167 feet (See Permit
Drawings Sheet 3).
Miti ag tion
The Ecosystem Enhancement Program will provide mitigation for 167 feet of permanent
impacts (acceptance letter pending).
Thank you for your assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please contact Mr. Jason Dilday at jldildayna,dot.state.nc.us or [phone].
A copy of this application will also be posted at
http://www.ncdot.or /g_do_h/preconstruct/pe/neu/Permit.html.
Sincerel ,
~. .
Gregory J. horpe, Ph.D., Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
cc:
W/attachment
Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ (5 Copies}
Ms: Marella Buncick, USFWS
Ms. Marla Chambers, NCWRC
Mr. Harold Draper, TVA
Dr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Victor Barbour, P.E., Project Services Unit
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. J. B. Setzer, P.E. (Div. 14), Division Engineer
Mr. Mark Davis (Div. 14), DEO
W/o attachment
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Majed Alghandour, P. E., Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. Scott McLendon, USACE, Wilmington
Ms. Beth Harmon, EEP
Mr: Todd Jones, NCDOT External Audit Branch
Mr. Steven Brown, P.E., PDEA Project Planning Engineer
Page 2 of 2

IMPACT SUM MARY
WETLAND IM PACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS

Slte
No.
Station

FromlTo
Structure
SIZe Permanent
FIII In
Wetlands
ac
Temp. Fill
In Wetlands
ac
Excavation
In Wetlands
ac Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
ac Hand
Clearing
in Wetlands
ac Permanent
SW
Impacts
ac Temp.
SW
Impacts
ac Exist. Chan.
Impacts
Permanent
ft Exist. Chan
Impacts
Temp.
ft Natural
Stream
Design
ft
1 L 28+05 64" X 43" CMPA <0.01 <0.01 3 4 N/A
2 L 41+58 142" X 91" CMPA 0.01 <0.01 40 48 N/A
3 Y1 13+23 73" X 55" CMPA 0.03 <0.01 124 25 N/A

TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.01 167 77 0
Bold text denotes revised impact numbers.
P~l~~t DraWtft~ NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Sheet_~of ~~ MACONCOUNTY
cv• 1~'S/2-o07 R-2408A
~~ ~ W BS - 34427.1.1
SHEET 05/31 /06

1iiTt! r Y'if
v
v "'
H ~
H' Z
r 0 ~ ~ ~
mz =~
=..~ZDm
2N0~
zH~~~
O
nDyD
~~
~ ~
O
Z r
`+ Z
~-. O r
Z
H ~ (A
N=m=
~ cn
m
_~ v
L
~ D Z v
rn~~o
~H~
~ZO~
~ ~ Z Z
m ~ ~ ~
v 0 ~
~ O
1EET 1 OF 1
840.31
E
A OPTIONAL MANHOLE
6" E
6„ L c
x x o ~- --~--1 0
a - ~ i~ ~- ~
I \r~ ~ +I w Q W O ~~ ~~ I LL
a ,~ ~
aw ~ t ,
~~ " --
~- -----~
•~~ 3 ~
6" M
SEE STANDARD 840.54 C
PLAN OPTIONAL LE COVER & FRAME ItSPBAR~ BA°
C. TO C.
BRICK YAY BE USED
TO ADJUST FRAME &
6" COVER TO SURFACE
ELEVATION MAX. 1'
D .• /
~ w '~ OUTLET PIPE •~
~ 6„ E OR F ~ "
T PIPE • • ~ • • , • ; SECTION
C-C OR D-D
E
,~
8"
-n
fi"
SECTION X-X
y.
Y
GENERAL NOTES:
CHAMFER ALL EXPOSED CORNERS 1".
USE CLASS "B" CONCRETE THROUGHOUT.
OPTIONAL CONSTRUCTION - MONOLITHIC POUR, 2" KEYWAY, OR
N4 BAR DOWELS AT 12" CENTERS AS DIRECTED 8Y THE ENGINEER.
USE FORMS TO CONSTRUCT THE BOTTOM SLAB.
IF REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE IS SET IN BASE SLAB OF 80X,
ADD TO BASE AS SHOVVNI ON STANDARD NO. 840.00.
PROVIDE ALL JUNCTION BOXES OVER 3'-6" IN DEPTH WITH STEPS
12" ON CENTERS IN ACCORDANCE WITN STD. N0. 840.66.
ADJUST THE STEEL, CONCRETE AND BRICK MASONRY QUANTITIES
TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION OF THE MANHOLE (I.E. DIAGONAL BARS
SHORTENED AROUND OPENING IN TOP SLAB, ADDITIONAL VARIABLE
HEIGHT BRICK MASONRY, OPENING IN TOP SLAB.)
MAX. DEPTH OF THIS STRUCTURE FROM TOP OF BOTTOM SLAB TO TOP
ELEVATION IS 12 FEET.
T N4 BAR
'1
~---~
8~
DOWEL
DIMENSIONS AND QUANTITIES FOR CONCRETE JUNCTION BOXES
DIMENSIONS OF BOX AND PIPE REINFORCEMENT TOP SLAB
ONS CUBIC YARDS TOTAL QUANTITIES
BOX AND SLABS DEDUCTIONS FOA ONE
PIPE CU.YDS.
PIPE SPAN WIDTH HEIGHT BARS "A" DIMENSI IN BOX

p
A
B
H
NO.
LENGTH
E
F TOP
SLAB BOTTOM
SLpg MLA!
FT. OF Hf. LBS.
REINF CU. YDS.
YIN. "H" C.S. R.C.
12" 2'-0" 2'-0" 2'-3" 12 2'-9" 3'-0" 3'-0" 0.167 0.167 0.185 22 0.750 0.015 0.024
15" 2'-3" 2'-3" 2'-6" 12 3'•0" 3'•3" 3'•3" 0.196 0.196 0.204 24 D.902 0.023 0.036
18" 2'•6" 2'-6" 2'-9" 14 3'-3" 3'-6" 3'-6" 0.227 0.227 0.222 30 1.065 0.033 0.049
24" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-3" 16 3'-9" 4'-0" 4'-0" 0.296 0.296 0.259 40 1.434 0.059 0.085
30" 3'-6" 3'-6" 3'•9" 18 4'-3" 4'-6" 4'•6" 0.375 0.375 0.296 51 1.860 0.092 0.127
36" 4'-O" 4'-0" 4'•3" 20 4'-9" 5'-0" 5'-0" 0.463 0.483 0.333 64 2.341 0.132 0.178
42" 4'-6" 4'-6" 4'-9" 22 5'-3" 5'-6" 5'•6" 0.560 D.560 0.370 77 2.878 0.180 0.243
48" 5'-4" 5'-4" 5'-3" 26 6'-3" 6'-4" 6'-4" 0.743 0.743 0.407 111 3.623 0.235 0.317
54" 5'-10" 5'•10" 5'-9" 28 6'-7" 6'-10" 6'-10" 0.885 0.885 0.444 126 4.283 0.297 0.401
60" 6'-6" 6'-6" 6'-3" 30 7'-3" 7'-6" 7'-6" 1.042 1.042 0.481 145 5.090 0.367 0.495
68" 7'-1" 7'-1" 6'_g" 32 7'-10" 8'-1" 8'-1" 1.210 1.210 0.518 169 5.917 0.444 0.589
Z
O ~
H ~-
Qa
H~C=7V
LLJaNZ
ooo=
°C z
a"°C
H
~I=-iyO J
o°c~n~
z ,~
~ H
a~
~ W
o
L~ ~C
Q
n

i--i m
Z W

Q
H 2
Q d
a
z
o
~
a

~ Q
a
o ~
~
~
Z
M
H
O
F-

~ W
~ =
H iv
r
rs 0 ~
W V
SHEET 1 OF 1
840.31
SECTION Y-Y

R-2408A ~ ' ~~o
b~
Site 1 S + ACT o
tatlon 2s 05 KATHRINE E. PENNINGT4N ET, AL. W~q~,, 5?00~
""S NQ~7~AfW,gp~RB
Place coir fiber matting below bankfull ~,~~~
elevation at the pipe inlet and outlet.
Establish vegetation above bankfull elevation. ~ 1q n ~ P
~~99547 ~ Z7 `~ q3'
87.09 It 2a+35.A3
- _. -. o r~ n9 27 `~ 59. ~-
r>:,~,,~+~ Urawiny
snbbeet ._,,~. ~ 13--
/~+C,v~S~ Ib~~~7o07
.- - .,
`*,,, F.
'ti„ ,~
`. ^.
L
E~ R/W
_. _......_'Z?,t11'f'"7 111
W
a
a
x
Scale 1" = 30'
30' 0 30' 60'
~~~LLLLL~DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE
WATER
DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
-r2408a ddc14 pt2permit,dgn 09128/2007 01:07;32 P
/W
/ ~

i +'~ ~
a NCO
u 0°Q>
~a F
r ~ '~ F .'L ._..'~.. ---~-
~ F .,
i~
i
i '~ ~
7~ ,F - ----- o INV=
26~'7b~~T ~~ ~~
50 ~, ~ ~o ~ 2015, I
i ~° Qoe z8+1.47
/ ~ T 1" X T11 J X 6/ 9I 60.00 RT w
F II
II
~',,,,./' ~ 26 + PORT I I
50• II ~8~-13.39
~~ II s9a5>:c
~~ ~~ ~ II ~s~.~6.7
A~SR~
,~~~~ III NORTH CARQLINA ~~
~~ ~, ~EPAfIMENT QF TRANSPQRTATlON
U~'~ ~~II GB S-29 PG 2132
,~~~~ II
~~ I~
II -,2
II

R-2408A
Site 1 Station 28+05
Place coir fiber matting below bankfull
elevation at the pipe inlet and outlet.
Establish vegetation above bankfull elevation.
Permit Drawing
Sheet _ b_ of
IZeu~d -olS~teb'~
Scale 1° = 30'
30' 0 30' 60'
DENOTES TEMPORARY
~,~ F
-r2408a dtlc14 pt2permit.dgn 09I28I2007 01:09;17 PM
ILL IN SURFACE
WATER
DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
~ P/ ~
6A/ ~Q~ ti~ Nm N 0~
2~ ti~ @h a ~ N
~' P ro
'L~t~ m~
'~ ~ a nr`°M
2m6 2m6 tim ti~~~ ~"~ N
/ ~ N
~~ R ~ N N
+ ~m~~ m C '~. 3 ~ ~

---~

.~m2
---'/.~pj~5
//i
0'
-~
%_ N. _ m
~ c 2~2~
~ d
e
S~~N~ti iw
W
~ ~~ 0
o o'
d ., ~ .. _-----.._.
j ~ ~ .~-~- ~L~''-~__ ao --2014 .OQ RT
T 1" X TI~" X 6' 9" o
2013x_ II
11
k ~ 39 201---'--'
0~~ 12 I! 2gk115RT
,2m`1 ~r
!I
NORTH INA
i~' ~DEPAf~~M 2~~ TRANSP
~~ II 12
'-"'2007 II
----------~ III
~~~~
\-\

/ ~." "" ,~
r20j~
~ ~
~ N
0
N
c~
ATI
a

R-2408A
Site 1 Station 28+05
CL Elsu.: 2A2ta.47~
zelType Pipe:
rAe Enterence;
r~Gon of Flow:
ldrological Method:
W. Control EieveGan
~a
110
~~
d71'O erg inlet
-~ [overt Efev..
'~ T.W
OuGeitnv. Elev. ?~r5~
,2~z5,7~
N.W.
LS, 1~_
Sa= ,oz5re
Permit Drawing
meet ? of ;'3
°l~ I~lS~2oe~
STATION
28 + 04.97
RORDWRY
------
RPPROXIMRTE UPSTRERM SECTION ,'~ ~'~
,,
\'~ EXIST ~G 24" P
~ IPE
'~, ROSITION,~~RT UPSTRERM
5 0 5 10 ~ - '
,- ~~,
~t
~ ,~ ,
Feet ____ ~___-____
PROPOSED 64" X 43' CMPR
~T UPSTRERM END
INVERT BURIED 1 FOOT
TIE IN TO PROPOSED JUNCTION
BOX
Plan Summary Data
Drainage Area; ~
Qesign ~req„ ~0 ~
Oesign D1sCl1.: 7+~ r ~.
Design H.W. Elev,: ~~! ~~
Q100 Oischarg.: ~~
4100 Elev.: 2a21. ~7
Overtopping Freq,: ? ~a~ ~r
Overtopping Dlsch.; 1'j0
Overtopping Eiav.: ?~25. ~7
END

R-2408A
Site 3 Station 13+23 -Y1-
Place coir fiber matting below bankfull
elevation at the pipe inlet and outlet.
Establish vegetation above bankfull elevation.
!riit ~r`"^"Q 13 ~
R~~S~d ,b~sl~o,
~ ~,
~\
~~ko$~~
} 5o.oa
1
old equipment/junk
i
s
9 ~~
~b~'1
_~.
a
~.
ENERGY DiSSP~TOR~f
Scale 1" = 30' aASSxI ~ RAP
30' 0 30' 60' ~ tP,,~ R SYTFFI~~~
i, G1 ~' ,.
WATER
DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
~i~L1~ FILL IN SURFACE
FILL IN SURFACE

<.
~~
1
1
Jt
I ~,,,

~-

N'AL`
~,,-''
>~

R-2408A
Site 1 Station 28+05
Place coir fiber matting below bankfull
elevation at the pipe inlet and outlet.
Establish vegetation above bankfull elevation.
~~ ~
11~t_1Z ~ 13
~,;~~ ~~~sl~~
Sale 1" = 30'
30' 0 30' 60'
e1~111~ DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE
WATER
DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
-r2408a ddc14 pt2permit.dgn 09/28/2007 01:14:11

R-2408A
Site 3 Station 13+23 Y1
Proposed 126' 73" x 55" CSPA
I?~rttut CMawinp
~ar+bt ~ 3 of 13
~~Sr~J ta~S~tae7
5 0 5 10
Feet
PROPOSED GRADE LINE AT CENTER LINE OF EXISTING NC 28
EXISTING 30 IN. PIPE .-~'~
_____ ________ AT ROAD CENTER LINE ~.--'~ APPROXIMATE DOWNSTREAM SECTION
- , ~, TO BE REMOVED ~'~
' ~ , --
PROPOSED~PIPE~'. ~~ ~~ ~' ,--'~~ APPROXIMATE UPSTREAM SECTION
~ ~ , ~, ~
AT ROAD CENTER~.LINE•~ ~~ ,' ,~ ,~'
INVERTS BURIED l~'~.., ~. ~ ~,~ ~~'
SLOPE _ .064 FT,/FT. ~~`` ---_~.-.-_-- `~
-r2408a ddc14 pt2permit.dgn 09128/2007 01:12:57

z
3
0
W
Q
LL
Q
N
Q
W
CG
V
Q
W
fY
Q
0
0
z
a
W
J
0
W
V
!A
H
V
W
0
0..
R-2408
N~ACON
SR 1323 and NC 28
COUNTY
PROJECT
BREAKDOWf~
MAP
.~_ ~,~
~~
1 ~
~'~ ~
I.O. N0. / D.S.R. N0. R-2408 B R-2408 A
STATE PROJECT N0. (P.E.1
PROJECT ENGINEER J. MOORE DIVISION 14
PROJECT DESCRIPTION NC 28 FROM SR 1323 TO SR 1335 SR 1729 (DEPOT STREET EXTENSIONITO NC 28
COUNTY /DIVISION MACON /DIV. 14 MACON /DIV. 14
LENGTH 2.T MI 0.9 MI
TYPE OF CONTRACT TURNKEY TURNKEY
REMARKS DESIGN BY DIVISION (DDC1
BEGIN R/W ACQUISITION (T,I.P.I FY-08 12-05
BEGIN R/W ACQUISITION (PRODUCTION(
PROPOSED LETTING (T.I.P.I FY-10 FY-08
PROPOSED LETTING (PRODUCTION(
EST. COMP. DATE IT.I.P.)
ESTIMATED R/W COST i 3,085,000 t 2,000,000
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST t 8,900,000 S 3 600 000
/'
~/
O
N

'''*~'-~t Drawing - - -- -
:~ ~ of I~

I
R-2408A
Site 1 Station 28+05
Place coir fiber matting below bankfull
elevation at the pipe inlet and outlet.
Establish vegetation above bankfull elevation.
5 55-=-
---- to -" S
6u~~a d
Scale 1" = 30'
30' 0 30' 60'
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE
WATER
DENOTES F1LL IN
SURFACE WATER
KATHRINE E. PENNINGTQN ET, AL.

~~
~. ,.
.,~~_
/~~
~,/
.~~ 2
~,~
~~
~+`~~
T r f L _'~ --~-
/ ~ . .
I! xs+aba~
9g 45R
~~~ NORTH CARpLINA
DEPA'MENT OF TRANSPORTATION
~I1 DB S-29 PG 2132
ii
~~
~2
i
~~
r2408a permit drawings.dgn 06!2012007 10:36:05 AM

K ~
R-2408A
Site 1 Station 28+05
Place coir fiber matting below bankfull
elevation at the pipe inlet and outlet.
Establish vegetation above bankfull elevation
Perms Crawin9 ~
Sfi>eet _,~._ ~ ~ --

2~6i
/~~/ ~ I
and
~~
N
/ ~7
e ti`s
M
ti~~~
timN ry~M ~
N
.;
m I5„ C
n
c
N
CO
a
Scale 1" = 30'
30' 0 30' 60'
WATER
DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE
L!G11_LLC~ FILL IN SURFACE
7
~mti
S
0
~~ / ~ ~
z ~u i
~.
~2e ~ z ~°~ ~~/
v o .zt'
~ ~
0tg DC w
inaWaa.
- 2016
c../nel . 20!`~ L~J.
cam/ ___.-~ II `~ r: ------
} zau
0~a ~~ ~ Z~k~15~t
2m`1 r! ~1 .7
---/ II z 9Q.a5Rz
/2~y DEPA ,MNORTH T INA
~~ mpg 9 + OB Z~- RANSP ATI
z ~~, S 29 P 2
~~~~
~, ~'"--~ II I
`~----zees ~~ 2
~~ i

..~
~ ~
•N
N
c~

r2408a permit drawings.dgn 06120/2007 10:36:35 AM

iti
R-2408A
Site 1 Station 28+05
Permit urawing
sneEcN2.or 3
STATI O N
28 + 04.97
ROADWAY
k
APPROXIMATE UPSTREAM SEOTIO~ 1`~
1
1
5 0 5 10
l
Feet
f
EXISTI~I~'~ 24" PIPE
~~~T ' IO~f A;~~ UPSTREAM
TO,~~E REMOVED
PROPOSED 04" X 43` CMPA
AT UPSTREAM E~1D
I~IUE~'T BURIED 1 FOOT
T IE I~ TO PRUPO;OED OPEC U'HA~!f~EL
~~T DO'~~I~STREAM E~ID
E~1D
r2408a permit drawings.dgn 0612012007 10:36:57 AM

4 ~
R-2408A
Site 2 Station 41+58
Place coir fiber matting below bankfull
elevation at the pipe inlet and outlet.
Establish vegetation above bankftlll elevation.
Qernat Drawing .~,
Sheet _~.,,_ ~ l.~
~~
3
Scale 1" = 30'
30' 0 30' 60'
WATER
DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
~i~~~/l~"~ FILL IN SURFACE
FILL IN SURFACE
a
~~
.~
~ ~c
/' 57
^~~ E
. ~ ~ f`\`~
// '„~~
l.J~' 41 k 3:36 ~~``
~d.O~Rt ~'.''`
' .~34;3D
ANTENNA ~~%6fl agzi
5 '~` ~`
~~ 0 €
s~ ~ ~
~~~ ~~
~~ ~ ,.
GutFer
.....
T
2t 5(E.40 Rt
~±.---
RZ
x ~
1
r2408a permit drawings.dgn 0612012007 10:37:26 AM

R-2408A
Site 2 Station 41+58
Place coir fiber matting below bankfull
elevation at the pipe inlet and outlet.
Establish vegetation above bankl'vll elevation.
Pem-it pawing ~,
Sheet ~ ~ .
Scale 1" = 30'
30' 0 30' 60'
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE
WATER
DENOTES F[LL IN
SURFACE WATER
r2408a permit drawings.dgn 06!2012007 10:38:21 AM

R-2408A
Site 2 Station 41+58
Proposed 92' 142" x 91" CSPA
Permit Drawing ~~2
Sheet ~ d~
5 0 5 10
Feet
PROPOSED GRADE LINE AT CENTER LI~I'F_ OF PROPOSED NC 28
EXISTING PIPE
-------------~ AT ROAD CENTER LINE APPROXIMATE UPSTREAM SECTION
`~ TO BE REMOVED
___._._.____~ `~` ,~~ APPROXIMATE DOWNSTREAM SECTION
~~ ~ ~, ~.
~~ \ ~~ /,
1 i ~~ /
~\ \ i / ',
~~ ~ i t ~'
r
~ ~ ~ 1i,
._ _ ._
PROPOSED PIPE
..................................... .........................................pT~ROA~O~ CE~~JTER LINE............................................_......................................
......................................................................
INVERTS BURIED I'
SLOPE = ,OOI FT<1FT,

~ f
R-2408A
Site 3 Station 13+23 -Y1-
Place coirfiber matting below bankfull
elevation at the pipe inlet and outlet.
Establish vegetation above bankfull elevation.
Permit DrBewit-Q
stmt 11 ot1~..
30' ~ 30' 60'
WATER
DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
~i j~'~~~ FILL IN SURFACE
FILL IN SURFACE
b~'
Q
~.
<,
//
J'
1
1
~S
W

~ ~,
~•~
15}4$•a~
} 50.00
1
old equipment/junk 1
,.--,
,---
YVA~
~~
r2408a permit drawings.dgn 0612012007 10:39:37 AM

R-2408A
Site 1 Station 28+05
Place coir fiber matting below bankfull
elevation at the pipe inlet and outlet.
Establish vegetation above bankfull elevation.
Permit aaw-ng f,~
s,~t _ ~~ °~---
x~~! 1~ ~ W
30' 0 30' 60'
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE
WATER
~,~/~ DENOTES F[LL IN
fCZULlLd SURFACE WATER

R-2408A
Site 3 Station 13+23 Y1
Proposed 126' 73" x 55" CSPA
Permit tk~wirp
Sheet ~ ~ (~-
5 0 5 10
Feet
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~PROPOSED GRADE LINE AT CENTER LINE nF EXISTING NC 28 _____________________~-
--------------
\~~~ APPROXIMATE UPSTREAM SECTION
,- --
.'
~,
~~_________~' EXISTING 30 IN. PIPE
AT ROAD CENTER LINE
PROPOSED PIPE ~ ~` TO BE REMOVED ~-~
_. A_T_ ROAD CENTER LINE ~~ { ,--~-~
J, ~.
INVERTS BURIED I' ~--~'
SLOPE _ ~3\ FT./FT. ~ ~ APPROXIMATE DOWNSTREAM SECTION
` ~` /
~° s "
^-.
r2408a permit drawings.dgn 06/2012007 10:40:34 AM

O ~9•

A ,
919 `~J-
`l
~ S.
F
(D
a

~

~~a.
~.
N.`
~
y ~7~
~:
~ .~
fD

~ ~~ ~
o
N
O
N ~
O

...~ T
~ ,~•
~
O
~ ~ ~t ~;
~~
•
~
~
'°
D

I
I
~ I
~~ I
fi
.o
~~
~~A ~
~~ j
}}~~ ! ~ ~
~~ ~
a~
r
~ ~ ~
~~
t o
OYi
~e
I ~_ ~<
!~ ttnn<
N M
000~~~ I
I
wee ~7~F
~r
~ ' f' /~
N ~ ' f
I~ ~.;
I P r r~'
N J~•f ~ N N I a 1
I
m
' ~
~"
~s ~ ~ e ' ~ s
~fr ~ `~
~ f!
Jf ~ '
i
~~ ~` j '
IIIIj".17e\\
~}
3
~>
G "_°
~~
4
r o~
~6
,3

4~ /
., ~
O A
~..~ 8fi
> ~y ? y
v~ ~a
i \ o~
H
G~
1
' ~ N
r
~, n
~ /
' I ~
N ~ /
' N~ \
O
u > ~Qi
o
K ,n
m
u ~
~~~
~~
~ ~ e
~ ~~ ° !~
~,~ e 4
N
m ~° g
$~~ ~00
e
•S
~ ~ k ~ ~~"~ ~ ~) ~ I
e g•~ ;
~ • ~ ~ / o'
N
..
7.r .. ., -~ '~ t
r ~ ,/ ,~
~~
w
r /
8, ~ +„/
. °~ $A;
~ °' ~'
s N ~ $~
m ~~ O \ ~'~
~ ~ \ ~~
N fiv ~ QY~'
~ 0.64 _ m = ~•
~ S
~~
s
Leo
a,# 3 ~ ~ <
'~• ~'"~
a ~+ ~~
~ ~ f
~s.~ 3 N59'I9~6'E
~~
~*c ~ ~. '~ r
L K
va t ~ ~ u
l ~ ~
yy I
`K~ t~ A ~ W
~' ~ ~ ~~ ~ m~ ~ O
~. ~ ¢~
N
°~ ~ ~ ..~ ~
~~~ q ~
~d• ~~
T ~ ~ ~.,~ ~ ~J R~ ~ ~ ~ j

i
tl/I!/YY
m
N
S
a
0
N
N
O
O
V
O
O
CO
N
W
~ ~~
~~
~~
0 0
~~-~_~
~~~~~~~~
~~ ~~~~o
~~ $~o~~~~~~
~ ~~ x~ '~~
O N ~ ~ ~`
N fQ N
C
i
1
` ~ s, ` t
~~~ ~ ~
m \
y ~^ ,.
,' ~, ~, \ x
~~ ~~~
~~ ~ ~
~$ ~~~
e ~~~
ON~~ \
~~_
~ ~~ ~
4
~~~ ~, ~~ 1
N ~ ~ ~ c~~
~,~ k
T j2g
^~ ~95~ ~~
o ~~g~
~R#~ ~
..~.. ~ i ~~')~
a ". H~ ,~,k ~ i
~~ x t`Q ~ ~=~1
Q ~~~~
a '.
~~~~
:~~• ~
~m•~... ~
i~
ti i r
~~~~ ~,
~'
° ._
~~
n~
O ~
y y~2
O ~
1~~
! fiY C' E .,

..-_.`_k-_.
oA r ~
R~ y ~r
'" 1/S
~ m $ .~1
pffi g :' ++
a O 6e
K~rPS .~2"b `` ~/
~ m'~' , r~/ ~;1
~~ ~
=m ~
r ,, )
6 ~ " ~'
.n
~ ~ a
A ~ "~
C~ ~ ~. ~ ~
f~ ~aYN ~
~ ~ ~~~
~~
.~~ .
' r ~. ,Q9'-y to~,
`~ ~ ~~©
1
~ o~=
(y NNS y
ti
G ' N m
r
ar x ' 3
a _
.p ~
o _ :~:
~~~
°~~
• ~~
~ , ~/
$ ~:
~,~ ~
^ ~ ~~ ~~
H
s • N
R
p^ ~ O4
~a ~
.~ ~/~
l ~ ~ $ rQdQ~
'Y~
~~ \ O
°fi
~~o
~ ~~
~, y~
~~
~?
8 ~
~ t
O u ti~
NN
~mzy
Om~
m
a
t
p ~~
m

'0
B~
to
cy~ M
w
~~
`1
~~/
~~
z
i

~~~
N
~~~ .x
~~ ~
,A(•, ~, ~ mIGV ~ i.
n Y~ \~~ ~ Y
~~' ~' r
~ ~ ~~,
+- ~~ : r~ ~F +'~f
.~ s+ o~ ~~ ~ ~ o
~ g ° °~
~ ~ ~ f/ t" "$c .
r ~
~\?
J~.
a ~ ~ ) 'f I f W 'rs is a
~, ``
~ ; ~ ~ ~
c~ ~~ ,~ ~ /~~•~' ( x
~~ w~ I~ ei y,, ~ f ,i cif p~ ~n
~ ~~ a ~ ~~ ~ Yak ~~
~g ~ ~ f' W~ id
{
n
bb/LI/0
:, ~ ~± ~ Wa
~~
~Nld 69'98+95 `6 t
' t /~ W
W n~ ~~
~,~ o =W .,
p % t L[/1/ h
Q Y M t \ W N
5 m j \
_ Z w + a \\ Wry
/' ~1
pp / I ' Yh
2~ I Wa
W
~~ ~ 5.,-
~{ ~s w , K
t 4 a ~~
r ~ '~ I o
i , ,~ Si
rg
~_ ~ ~ ~~
S K t 1 1 ~ W
r~ ~ 1 1
g 1~7 ~ ~ ', 15.2-.GS S iO 3 11 i ;
". ~~ ~p 0` ~ xd ~
m = ~ ~ ` e I ~ eQi N
ESL, °~~ ry 1~7 m
s / ~ ~g W Z 6 l\j! YJ
K
665•CGCS 59t.5~' 1
C.[55 ,LY'Sl. SSS73'S97 .09'K ~X i ~ ~. l~ ~. ~ ~ ~
-~ '~,~~
$d `\ ~~ 4 f
~w ~~ ~
J
~.. ~~ .( , i i j ~
~W ~ by ~ m~~ ~
W YI I.' ' ~ ~NH N ~ O
~© ~~ ~ Wg ~ ~ ~~ ~'
I~ W O w~ i w I ~~ NORA JEAN 8. A
=.{{00 0° ~ .1 ~ JAMES L.KtN5lAN0
~"~+C~OQ ~ I / DB U-i9 PG 246
25
Z Q `~Q.. ~ / ~`... y '00'E . ~ N •~ ~ NS9p~ ~ 185Y5.35'E
'~ti t,
W ~ `." Q ~ ~~;~... ;F T ac N .. ~ k
oiN nu boa ao•SL+o 9. / ' ~~ ~ ~. ,, ~ C~'
Z ~ Md 15•a 16 ~. ~~n~ W x
pp ~ ~` W
I =~~
~ ~
1( ~~Jtt N N
0
y r ~, / ~ 1111 ~ e S ~ ~ ~ ~a$
~. I Q
~~ ~~ ;} 1 111 ~~ .~, ~ x ~ ~
/ / I 1 ~
1
a~ ,o,'` / / ~ ~~ r 1 1!11 ~,~ 9t ~ X r
A
O
- ~ ._._r.- - r., t r 1
~~ ~ ~'" rv o 00 1 ~ ~~ N
o~ '6B• ~ A ~~4ya0 --~ 1 11 X..•---tic CO
/ ~ ~ .sir ^'`~ ~ UNE y
.. ~:.-.. ~.~•"~ ---,~i- ' ~ . ~ MATCH c
"~ ~ a m ~ , a
~. ---~ $ I )a~~^, /mar' ~o
- .Fy .. \. ~ vvi
'os O
..... to
t
- 1