20130545 Ver 3_401 Application_20150515

CUSS U3
ECS CAROLINAS, LLP "Setting the Standard for Service'
u Geotechnical • Construction Materials - Environmental • Facilities NC Registered Eng,neenng Firm; 1478
May 15, 2015
Ms. Karen Higgins
NCDENR -DWR, 401/Wetlands Unit $ PAUD
512 North Salisbury Street, Archdale Building - 9t" FIOor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Reference: Pre - Construction Notification Application Ace fir; Request for 401 Water Quality Certification
Peanut Drive Site MAY ?l
196 and 222 Peanut Drive 1 20JY
Edenton, Chowan County, North Carolina DENR
ECS Project No: 06- 20402 -A 401 8 SU F ES
Dear Ms. Higgins:
Please find five copies of the Pre - Construction Notification Application for the
approximate 27 acre site located at 196 and 222 Peanut Drive in Edenton, Chowan
County, North Carolina. The purpose of this project is to expand Jimbo's Jumbo's Plant
Facility with associated driveways, office space, and parking space.
On behalf of Jimbo's Jumbo's and Stocks Engineering, PA, I am requesting that a 401
Water Quality Certification and concurrence letter be issued for the project. Mr. Kyle
Barnes with the United States Army Corps of Engineers has approved the permit
application and associated mitigation credits. A copy of his letter and the invoice for the
credits are attached in this application. I've also attached the permit application and
associated exhibits providing details to the proposed project impacts.
The associated 401 Water Quality Certification Fee is included as an attachment. Please
feel free to contact me at 919.861.9910 if you have any questions concerning this
request of if additional information is required. Thank you in advance for your timely
consideration of this matter.
* ** Please provide a receipt for fees* **
Sincerely,
ECS Carolinas, LLP
r
- C
Cory Darnell
Environmental Project Manager
Attachment: Pre - Construction Notification Application
401 Water Quality Certification Fee - $240.00
9001 Glenwood Avenue. Raleigh, NC • 27617 -7505 • T 919 -861 -9910 • F: 919 -861 -9911 • v"mecsllrnited corn
ECS Capitod, Services, PLLC • ECS Carolinas LLP • ECS Central, PLLC • ECS Florida, LLC • ECS Mid - Atlantic, LLC • ECS Midwest, LLC • ECS Southeast, LLC • ECS Texas LLP

J.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW- 2014 -02357 County: Chowan U.S.G.S. Quad: NC- EDENTON
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Permittee: Jimbo's Jumbos
Mr. Paul Britton
Address: 185 Peanut Drive
Post Office Box 465
Edenton, NC, 27932
Telephone Number: (252) 482 -9061
Size (acres) 23.88 Nearest Town Edenton
Nearest Waterway Queen Ann Creek River Basin Albemarle. North Carolina, Virginia.
USGS HUC 3010205 Coordinates Latitude: 36.085055
Longitude: - 76.58927
Location description: The project area includes two parcclti one includes an esistina iudustri �I deyclonment and the second is
an undeveloped forestry tract. The project site is located off of Peanut Drive near the intersection with North Broad Street in
the town of Edenton in Chowan County, North Carolina.
Description of projects area and activity: _Tlie applicant is expanding au esistinQ indush ial nr�nuiaclurini! plant which requires
the filling of 0.1167 acres of jurisdictional wetlands
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
Q Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number or Nationwide Permit Number: 39
SEE ATTACHED RGP or NWP, GENERAL, REGIONAL AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted application and attached information dated February 24, 2015. Any violation of the attached
conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, a Class
I administrative penalty, and /or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified,
suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or
modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of
the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the
activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are
under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the
activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management in Elizabeth City, NC, at (252) 264 -3901.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals /permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Kyle Barnes at 910 - 2514584 or Kvle.W.Barnes(nlusace.armv.mil.
Corps Regulatory Official: _ Date: April 20, 2015
Expiration Date of Verification: arch 18, 2017

MW- 2014.02357
Determination of Jurisdiction:
A. ❑ Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project
area. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process
( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
C. ® There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
D. ❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued . Action ID: SAW-
Basis For Determination: The US Army Corps of Engineer 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual and the Atlantic
and Gulf Coast Region Supplement
Remarks: 0.1167 acres of iurisdictional wetlands were identified within the project area
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation /determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B
and C above).
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 101415
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
Phone: [phone]
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by June 19, 2015.
* *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence. **
Corps Regulatory Official:
L � o 1. JAB-A-
Kyle 13 es
Date of JD: April 20, 2015
Expiration Date of JD: April 20, 2020

SAW- 2014 -02357
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our customer Satisfaction Survey online at httn://reaulatory usacesurvey com /.
Copy fiunished:
Agent: ECS Carolina. LLP
Cory Darnell
Address: 9001 Greenwood Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
Telephone Number: (919) 861 -9910

SAW- 2014 -02357
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
April 20, 2015
Regulatory Division
ORM ID: SAW -2014 -02357
Mr. Paul Britton
Jimbo' Jumbo's
,222 Peanut Drive
Edenton, North Carolina 27932
Permit Special Conditions
Your work is authorized by Nationwide Permit 39 provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the
attached General Conditions and the following Special Conditions:
a. All work authorized by this permit must be performed in strict compliance with the submitted plans,
which are a part of this permit.
b. The Permittee shall mitigate for 0.1167 acre of Section 404 wetlands associated with this project
by payment to The Great Dismal Swamp Restoration Bank, LLC.- Timberlake (GDSRB) in an amount
determined by the GDSRB sufficient to perform 0.1167acre of non - riparian wetland restoration
mitigation in the 03010205 MJC' Thic -,- ..,;t ;. Im --I., —a-- aL_ r__.___ ..
If you have not already done so, you should contact Ms. Karen Higgins, North Carolina Division of Water
Quality, telephone, ( 919) 807 -6360 regarding Section 401 Water Quality Certification. This nationwide permit
does not relieve you of the responsibility to obtain other required State or local approval. This verification will
be valid unless the nationwide authorization is modified, reissued or revoked.
Thank you for your time and cooperation. Questions or comments ma be addressed to Kyle Barnes,
Washington Regulatory Field Office, telephone [phone]. Kt jg

Action ID Number: SAW - 2014 -02357 County: Chowan
Permittee: Jimbo's Jumbos
Paul Britton,
Project Name: Britton, Paul/Chowan/PreAu
Date Verification Issued: April 20,.2015
Project Manager: Kyle Barnes
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Attn: Kyle Barnes
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. Failure to comply with any terms or conditions of this authorization may
result in the Corps suspending, modifying or revoking the authorization and /or issuing a Class I
administrative penalty, or initiating other appropriate legal action.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee Date

aq ";. R ;wr+ %, �'. ,. �. " ^L "S +°�d� 'z,* n.,�!'R �� "t`'ii4' i5� . '4'� r�. � . � � �. �.,Z �, ,ra {k- x ,xt" 'n.,• � . u�•s:', -nxur'�;',s'�, -� � �roti-y"
'";*wr' s ^.,. t., }" , , " "'b`.r3.,, t { �x' T4.;t .^° emp .A : °$.,i� ,, yP'",.v ,✓'W'i"''+ "'.a s K"xk ^,c x o ,:H "`,.;,',
"i V,
� l •���1�{.4.t9.�R } ,y, ,, '''a" .�1n1'�y, ,V. ' i b N°: e 1 • + • 'f
WA ao
„ al t1 Milk, 1��►�r , "r
_ Britton, Applicant: -Jimbo's Jumbos
Paul - File Number: SAW-2014'02357 Date: Apri120, 2015
_
Attached is: I See.Section below
RU
INITI PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of ermission p
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of ermission ) B
PERMIT_ DENIAL l C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION - E
rw „M r
J; hl "l 'TUL*�M ' °`ii'� }' 4 " .. 3', .'cx ^,rm' dam, x^.r• ^r.a wi+,„r+t ^e ,+. x & ,N,h wnxn+
ySETI0154I1' bi��l ,Q ^w, + g .bpnons:arii t 'admintstrati'vep�a� oEtlieaboved''rr�t r "°
�
^ +�1;11(iltl�Il,Fils'lnk'a a�l f���tin a >.^, �S�- ii,}.
. ; � rtn !�i � . 4. �tY” rk' • is :�i�< i �; � . �`+ *- ' °ce ^�lr.:; .,,,�. .� i.. i r },.
l�' ic►n�£at��Fnit �i'ait�331'J'" ,� ,`; " "� ter :;� : , r,' -��;+�.��� R .' . � H `, �ro a ' � 1.,, .,� � ' its��,"
_ - s__ r7'• � � '� �+y'i`o w � e xnm5r5��.e ,. :. T•d � °F.a ,: _q:�b t^�?k'�i zaw'`9';. %�aR t. n c` n� F'4 �spt� .,� .�» � „e "n �'�
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
O ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
G OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section 11 of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
13: PROFFERED )PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
C ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
0 APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL, INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
If you have questions regarding this decision and /or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn:
Kyle Barnes
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact:
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD -PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room I OM 15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
Phone :`(404 562 =5137
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigation_
Date:
5i nature of appellant or
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
Telephone number:
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal
Officer, CESAD -PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room l OM 15, Atlania, Georgia 30303 -8801
Phone: [phone]

i
I
1
i
2 ¢U2 W
2n
O �h x¢Zp
W U
OAT 24 N
ab � 2 d�eO°2vlfn-
� O UW OWp�J
% yfn ixp n\
\dQ
8o�zgo�,
p
O
or
� Q:
3W
t76 4 Yom. Ck, y
���
ypp�
UL�,yW4i4�
�tiW��i
l
W WC433U 0°�¢
2 ¢U2 W
2n
O �h x¢Zp
W U
OAT 24 N
ab � 2 d�eO°2vlfn-
� O UW OWp�J
% yfn ixp n\
\dQ
8o�zgo�,
p
O
or
O �UWJOO�
3W
t76 4 Yom. Ck, y
���
ypp�
UL�,yW4i4�
�tiW��i
l
e��g� •�ryh
3 a
J
•
/
4
2 ¢U2 W
2n
O �h x¢Zp
W U
OAT 24 N
ab � 2 d�eO°2vlfn-
� O UW OWp�J
% yfn ixp n\
\dQ
8o�zgo�,
p
O
or
�1 3
Y4 `�
'o 't
7
\ Z
y��O
�g,
O �UWJOO�
3W
t76 4 Yom. Ck, y
���
ypp�
UL�,yW4i4�
�tiW��i
l
e��g� •�ryh
3 a
�1 3
Y4 `�
'o 't
7
\ Z
y��O
�g,
O �UWJOO�
3W
w��aWq�
���
ypp�
UL�,yW4i4�
�tiW��i
l
e��g� •�ryh
r J��
w
0
d�y
\ \� �-1
go
LM 00
r�
^ d
EtZ2^ gg OpNyO
oQO is P"IV
��?e Un Cahn wf C?�
vOjW
Ec
V o 'K2 2o�°
04aC 020N
Ot LL:
_ jjUO ^O jtWm
j18 U py22 h Wp�O Q�
2 2 U
h � � ��oo ro o30 2
Q> N ZM
� ZQ � �Q22 crf 00 `ti p
ZcV °Q §£ z
3.r C]^ � Q�ti f inFtn N
0n O�W4�
�� ~� �13t33�3Ip3�tu
ly m z�z z'z z hI
I
o�.dy °s
J �
'6maB
1
I
i
I
t*
i
0
Q�
�S
O�
0
3z i
gs �
q4 G
Hd
ti0
q� 4i
C
�n CV dOWgN
t�
h
NN
O
f _
E
o,
Z NN
J Q
3W
a
e��g� •�ryh
3 a

The Great Dismal Swamp Restorationl3ank, LLC
P. O. Box 6186
Chesapeake, VA 23323
April 21, 2015
Mr. Mike Stocks
Stocks Engineering, PA
1100 Eastern Ave
P.O. Box 1108
Nashville, NC 27856
Dear Mr. Stocks:
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
This letter is to confirm that The Great Dismal Swamp Restoration Bank, LLC has reported the
purchase of 0.12 Non - Riparian mitigation credits for Permittee Paul Britton. The project is
Jimbo's Jumbo's Plant Expansions, Edenton - Chowan County, NC. The credits were sold from
our Timberlake mitigation bank for Project SAW- 2014 - 02357, HUC Code 03010205.
Mr. Kyle Barnes, US Army Corps of Engineers has also been notified of this purchase.
It has been a pleasure assisting you with this purchase. Thank you.
Sincerely,
r
Beverly hite
Manage Accounting / Sales
GDSRB
CC: File

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
January 22, 2015
DWR # 13 -0545 Ver. 2
Chowan County
Jimbo's Jumbos, Inc.
Attn: Mr. G. Dallas Barnes, Registered Agent
413 Main Street
Severn, NC 27877
Subject Property: Peanut Drive
UT to Queen Anne Creek, Chowan River Basin
On -Site Determination
Dear Mr. Barnes:
On December 30, 2014, at the request of Mr. Cory Darnell of Engineering Consulting Services, PLLC,
Anthony Scarbraugh conducted an on -site determination to review unnamed tributary (UT) to Queen Anne
Creek. During his review, he evaluated the stream using the DWR Stream Classification Form. He evaluated
the stream ^reach labeled "13 -0545 Ver. 2" at N 36.08413, W 76.59227 and found evidence that this is a
man -made feature outside -of a natural valley -way. Please note the stream determination for stream reach
"13- 0545" was issued on May 23, 2013 and was determined to be a man -made feature outside of a natural
valley -way. This determination was conducted in accordance with 15A NCAC .026.0211.
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) has determined that the feature labeled as "13 -0545 Ver. 2" on
the attached map, and highlighted in red has been determined to be a man -made feature. This feature
and any other wetlands and surface waters should be identified on any future plans for this property.
The owner (or future owners) should notify the DWR (and other relevant agencies) of this decision in any
future correspondences concerning this property. This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years
from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR
or Delegated Local Authority that a surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request
a determination by the Director. A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the
Director in writing % Karen Higgins, DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,
NC 27699 -1650. Individuals that dispute a determination by the DWR or Delegated Local Authority that
"exempts" a surface water from the buffer rule if applicable may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must
act within 60 days of the date_ that you receive this letter. _Applicants are hereby notified that the 60 -day
statutory appeal time does not start until the affected party (including downstream and adjacent
landowners) is notified of this decision. DWR recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in
order to be certain that third party appeals are made in a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a
written petition, which conforms to Chapter 1506 of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of
Division of Water Resources — Water Quality Regional Operations Section — Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mail, Washington, NC 27889
Phone: [phone] Fax: 252 - 975-37161 Internet: www.nodemr.gov
An E91W OppaAudh n A( MOM Action Employer — Made In pan by recycled paper

limbo's Jumbo, Inc.
Mr. G. Dallas Barnes, Registered Agent
Stream Determination
Page 2 of 2
Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699 -6714. This determination is final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days.
This letter only addresses, the applicability to the existence of a man -made feature and does not approve
any activity. Nor does this letter approve any activity within Waters of the United States or Waters of the
State. If you have any additional questions or require additional information please call Anthony
Scarbraugh in the Washington Regional Office at (252) 948 -3924.
Sincerely,
Robert Tankard, Assistant Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
Attachment: Figure 5 Flagging Location Map
cc: DWR 401 &Buffer Permitting Unit
File Copy
Zee B. Lamb, Edenton - Chowan Partnership, Inc.'
305 West Freemason Street, Edenton, NC 27932
Cory Darnell, ECS Carolinas, LLP, 9001 Glenwood Avenue, Raleigh, NC 27617
Rename 13 -OS45 Ver. Z

TIE WE7LANDAVUSUTARY LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE APPROXIMATE THEY HAVE BEEN DELINEATED BY ECS ON 12/23/ZD14.
THE PREVIOUS 8 ACRES WERE VERIFIED BY THE USACE AND NCOWR ON V30/13 AND 5128h9 THE BITE WAS EXPANDED TO 1=30 INCLUDE AN
ADDITIONAL 15 ACRES. THIS AREA HAS NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY USACE OR NCDWR AND HAS NOT BEEN SURVEYED THIS MAP !S FOR
PRELIMINARY PLANNING PURPOSES. JUR L AREAS ARE SUBJECT TO AGENCY VERIFICATION. STATE BUFFERS ARE NOT
REOUIRED FOR THE SITE
�-
w
APPro imate Locallm of Site Boundary
© Approxhlate Location of Wetland
•...`•.. )4)Pm) dnate Locatbn of Potential Jurisdictional Feature
llllllMI APProximate Location of Culvert
DP -1 o APIMwJMaiie Location of Data Point
2D APPMAMete Location of Marginal Wetland Area
assesses
oximate Location of Non - Jurisdictional Feature
Potential
Jurlsdicbonal
Tributary
SOURCE:
Google Earth
2013 Aerial Photograph and
ECS Field Notes
Not to Scale
OP-3
FLAG A MdBEF
WETLANDMURISDICTIONAL
TRIBUTARY FLAGS =
STREAM/POND FLAGS =
Stream Flags = 0
Pond Flags = 0
Wetland Flags = 20
Told Flags = 20
DP -1
W7 b W20
DP -2
Jul a
Trbutary
am 1b Riiqi0M1ft HIM
WatOr� Clu"08dw s CIM C: NSW
Wbtw*W = Chowen River Bain
Body : awn Anne Creek
LOW Suffdr RagWroIna t : None
FIGURE 5
FLAGt'M LOCATION MAP
Peanut Farm
222 Pewu Drive
Edenton, Chowan County, North Carolina
ECS Project No. Ot3.204o2 -A

'A# n r..
Office Use Only -
t Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification PC Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
la Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number, 39 or General Permit (GP) number
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes ❑ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply).
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
For the record only for DWQ 401
For the record only for Corps Permit -
because written approval is not required?
Certification.
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If
El Yes No
so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1h
® Yes ❑ No
below
project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
ject Information
e of project
Jumbo's Jumbo's Plant Expansion Project /�Ul
nty:
Chowan
rest municipality / town-
Rbde
Edenton Ay
division name. iJ
noonly, T.I.P. or state 40� �� eU F
project p
ner Information
e(s) on Recorded Deed.
Edenton - Chowan Development Corp (P arcel 1) / JJ Peanut Company (Parcel 2)
3b Deed Book and Page No.
Parcel 1- 1./1969, Parcel 2 - 307/484
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)•
Mr. Paul Britton
3d. Street address:
Parcel 1- 196 Peanut Drive, Parcel 2- 222 Peanut Drive
3e. City, state, zip:
Edenton, NC
3f Telephone no.
252 - 482 -9061
3g. Fax no.,
252 - 482 -7857
3h. Email address-
PBntton @jimbosjumbos corn
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
® Agent ❑ Other, specify
4b.
Name -
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
4d
Street address -
4e.
City, state, zip.
4f
Telephone no
4g.
Fax no.
4h
Email address
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name:
Mr Cory Darnell
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
ECS Carolinas, LLP
5c.
Street address:
9001 Glenwood Avenue
5d
City, state, zip.
Raleigh, NC 27612
5e
Telephone no:
919 - 861 -9910
5f.
Fax no
5g
Email address.
Cdarnell @ecslimited com
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
781500281563
lb Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)-
Latitude: 36.05'2 38" Longitude* - 76.35'
27 32"
(DD DDDDDD) ( -DD DDDDDD)
1c Property size
Parcel 1- 8 88 acres, Parcel 2- 15 acres acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project.
Queen Anne Creek
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water,
C,NSW
2c River basin.
Chowan River
3. Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application*
The site is currently undeveloped land which has been recently timbered. This site is realitively flat with a highpoint area
located in the center portion of the site, situated north /south parallel to Peanut Drive, which is located along the western
propertry boundary The southern adjacent property is developed with the JJ Peanut Company The vicinity consists of
wooded land and developed with commercial properties.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property.
0.2279 acres
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
0.0 feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project,
The purpose is to construct a 304,554 square foot building as an Oil Roasting Expansion to the existing facility. The new
portion of the building will include, but not limited to, office, driver check -in area, product finishing, product packaging,
incoming supplies, oil roasting, raw in -feed, blanching, incoming to blanching, and supporting areas. The proposed plan
has semi - trailer parking for approximately 50 trucks. The proposed plan has employee parking lots for approximately 128
cars.
3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used'
The overall project consists of developing the site with an Oil Roasting Expansion to the existing facility. One
jurisdictional tributary (RPW) is located on the exterior perimeter of the site. In order to develop the site as needed, three
permanent impacts are proposed to this feature. The site dramge will be directed into a newly installed piping system
which outlets into three separate Stormwater Quality Basins
Storm drainage will sheet flow into a proposed concrete channel along the front portion of the site into SWQ area #1 and
SWQ area #2. The system will be designed for approximately 85% total suspended soilds (TSS) removal and then will
discharge back into the existing perimeter ditches that currently convey the runoff The rear of the site will drain through a
pipe system (impact RPW #2) into SWQ Basin #3. It will also be designed for 85% TSS removal and it will discharge
through an existing pipe (impact RPW #3) to the existing ditch system off -site.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the pasty
Yes El No El Unknown
Comments -
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
F] Preliminary ®Final
of determination was made?
4c
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: ECS Carolinas; LLP
Name (if known) Ryan Conchilla /Cory Darnell
Other:
4d
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
12/30/2014
5.
Project History ,
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑Yes No ❑Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
6.
Future Project Plans
6a
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b
If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
® Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number -
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ - non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary
W1 ❑ P [-IT
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: 0.0
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ - non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
31. Comments. 0 0
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to-lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d
4e
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
relatively
01 ®P ❑ T
permanent water
Fill/ Clearing
Jurisdictional
01167
(RP\M
Tributary
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑ PEI T
4E Total open water impacts
0.1167
4g. Comments. Three impacts are proposed to the existing RPW located on -site which totals 0 1167 acres. The first impact is
3,126.65 square feet or 0.072 acres and consists of 579 cubic yards of fill The second impact is 1,845 40 square feet or
0.042 acres and consists of 180 cubic yards of fill. Approximately 216 feet of 24" RCP will installed in this area to divert flow
into SWQ #3: The third impact is 111 13 square feet or 0.003 acres and consists of 34 cubic yards of fill. Approximately 8 feet
of 18" RCP will be installed within the RPW
S. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d
5e.
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
number
of pond
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5E Total T_
LEE
E_
5g. Comments -
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no.
5i Expected pond surface area (acres) -
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres) -
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Bu=impact Q)
If projcted riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
brequire mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
B uffer impact
6c
6d.
6f.
6g.
number —
Permanent (P) or
Reason
for
Stream name
j6e
er
gation
Zone 1 impact
(square feet)
Zone 2 impact
(square feet)
Tem ora
im act
uired9
B1 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
The site was designed to minimize impacts to the RPW located on -site by the proposed installation of a piping system which
will direct stormwater drainage sheet flow into three separate Stormwater Quality Basins. However, due to the size of the
proposed building expansion and the size and location of the existing RPW, impacts to this jurisdictional feature could not be
avoided.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Three Stormwater Quality Basins will be constructed on -site to reduce TSS removal to 85% and will then discharge back into
the existing perimeter ditches that currently convey site runoff.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply);
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, mitigation option will be used for this
TED] igation bank
:which
project
yment to in -lieu fee program
mittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
T
uantity
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

mments:
mplete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
F
roval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested.
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature.
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested.
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested*
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested-
acres
4h. Comments -
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
FE.
Diffuse Flow Plan
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
❑ Yes ® No
lb. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
6593%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
FIfthis ject DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
ject DOES require a Stor mwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan -
sie will drain via a newly installed pipe system into three separate Stormwater Quality Basins. The SWQ Basins are
shown on the overall map. Storm drainage will sheet flow into a proposed concrete channel along the front the
portion of
site into SWQ area #1 and SWQ area #2. System will be designed for 85% TSS removal and then will discharge back
into the existing perimeter ditches that currently convey the runoff. The rear of the site will drain through a pipe system
(impact RPW #2) into SWQ Basin #3. It will also be designed for 85% TSS removal and it will discharge through an
existing pipe (impact RPW#3) to the existing ditch system off -site.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ® Certified Local Government
g ❑DWQ Stormwater Program
:JE01
DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Town of Edenton
❑ Phase II
3b Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
® NSW
apply (check all that apply):
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
® Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ HQW
El ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other,
4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
® Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met'
® Yes ❑ No
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
use of public (federal /state) land?
❑ Yes ® No
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application? ❑ Yes ® No
2c If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s).
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? ❑Yes ® No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sewage disposal is public gravity with the Town of Edenton
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

• m J;rs�:S c° °tt, .", _ `'� _ ,:o. _ yr .,w �.
,. _ r a - Vin. _
,
• - , ^!
'
S.' Endangered Spades and Designated Critical,Habitat',(Corp � merit
r s= Require )
5a. Will.this project,occur in or near an,area with federally, protected apecies or,
� liebltat?° _ t �° - ❑ Yes
® No
5b. Have, you�checked with'
"the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act.
impacts ? ❑ Yes
® No
.5c. ' If yes, indicate the USFWS Feld Office you have contacted. ❑ Raleigh
_ ' ❑ Asheville,
What data °sounces,did you use to determine whether your site would'impact Endangered Species Designated
'Habitat?,
or Critical
FWS,On -line Database
6:' •Essdntial,Fish` Habitat (Cor`ps'Requirement
. ).
^a t v _
6a. Will this:project "occurin or near an'a de' i
rea, s gnated as essential fish habitat? ❑`Yes ®No
6b. What,dataaources. did, you.use to determine Whether your site would'impacUEssentiel Fish Habitat?
FWS.Ori=lirre Database
11 7. Historic or + 'Ore historlc Culturai1Resources (Corps Requirement)
Ta. W III °this project'' occur °in`'or "nea`r`'an a'reaethat'i 4 state; federal-or tribal'
governments have designated as,having,historic or cultural preservation
status. (e.g.; NationalyHistoric Trust designotion:or properties, significanfiin ❑_ Yes ® No
�NOAK,Cal`O ins histc "
ry
aril archaeology)?
7b. What d8ta sources did 'you use:to,deterrrtine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
State Historic Preservation Office= Online Database Review
8- Tilood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Wilt,this project occurin i 'FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain? ❑ Yes 1@ No
8b. If yes,,explain howrproject meets FEMA`requirements:
8c. What sources) did you use to make the ficodpiain determination? FEMA On -line Map Service Center
Cory Darnell 02/24/2015
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name A Icant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is slid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

:s
ss N.. •
s
1
,
s. '�, , . a •''� ••t .
.x
J]
InItnn _
Approximate Site Boundary
SOURCE•
s'
+� 1
♦y A i
t
e
4
i
•<j
FIGURE 1
United States Geological Survey SITE LOCATION MAP
Peanut Drive
7.5 - Minute Series Topographic Map: 196 and 222 Peanut Drive
Edenton, North Carolina Quadrangle Edenton, Chowan County, North Carolina
Dated 19871 Contour Interval = 2 Meters Fig
Scale: 1" = 2,000' ,. ECS Project No. 06- 20402 -A

cr
4
r
.s
t�
i > r•[ I
"w Y '
i
LEGEND
Approximate
Site Boundary
Wetlands
- FreOrNmer Emergent
_ FresbMW FerestediSMub
- EsWnne wW Mann* Dee "w
EsWme ww Mann*
Fmwr* lv Fond
- Lake
- R.*nne
olha
SOURCE:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
National Wetlands Inventory
Mapping Program
Scale: 1" = 2,000'
0- ON
FIGURE 3
NATIONAL WETLANDS
INVENTORY MAP
Peanut Drive
196 and 222 Peanut Drive
Edenton, Chowan County, North Carolina
r
ECS Project No. 06- 20402 -A

ZONE X
f
s
ZONE X -
ti
r�
ZONE. X _ t
a
ZONE AE
. ZONE AE
ZONE X
ZONE AE ZONE AE
ONE X ZONE X
ZONE E X
ZONE X
tj
ZONE
Approximate Site Boundary
SOURCE: -: -.W. FIGURE 4
FEMA FIRM MAP
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping
Program Website Peanut Drive
Panel 3720781500J 196 and 222 Peanut Drive
Dated October 16, 2008 Edenton, Chowan County, North Carolina
Scale: 1" = 1,000'
ECS Project No. 06- 20402 -A

THE JURISDICTIONAL TRIBUTARY LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE APPROXIMATE. THEY HAVE BEEN DELINEATED BY ECS
QN 01 8f2013 AND 12/23/2014. THE PREVIOUS 8 ACRES WERE VERIFIED BY THE USACE AND NCDWR ON 4/30/13 AND 5/23/13. THE
SITE WAS EXPANDED TO INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL 15 ACRES. THIS SITE BOUNDARY HAS BEEN VERIFIED BY USACE AND NCDWR
ON 12/30/14. IT HAS NOT BEEN SURVEYED. THIS MAP IS FOR PRELIMINARY PLANNING PURPOSES. STATE BUFFERS ARE NOT
RP:nl IIRFfI Fr1R TWP CITC
LEGEND
Approximate Location of Site Boundary
�— Approximate Location of Jurisdictional Tributary
Approximate Location of Culvert
DP -1 0 Approximate Location of Data Point
Approximate Location of Non - Jurisdictional Feature
State Buffer Requirements: None
Watershed Classification = Class C: NSW
Watershed = Chowan River Basin
Nearest Water Body = Queen Anne Creek
Local Buffer Requirements: None
Jurisdictional
Tributary
SOURCE:
Google Earth
2013 Aerial Photograph and
ECS Field Notes
Not to Scale
DP -1
DP -3
FLAG NUMBERS /INFO
WETLAND /JURISDICTIONAL - 'Wetland Bo
TRIBUTARY FLAGS =
STREAM /POND FLAGS =
Stream Flags = 0
Pond Flags = 0
Wetland Flags = 0
Total Flags = 0
4 . .
DP -2
Jurisdictional
Tributary
Starts at
Yellow /Green
DWR Flag
Jurisdictional
Tributary
FIGURE 5
FLAGGING LOCATION MAP
Peanut Farm
196 and 222 Peanut Drive
Edenton, Chowan County, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 06- 20402 -A

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTMCATION4
1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property /properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmingtnn M.9trirt, I1.S. Army. Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
L do o 4ct L' 1,?x4 7Va, --- /) - 2,2-- 20 l q--
Property Owner (please print) Date
1 , �i ��
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
F] I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps provide a p1diming JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
U1 am requesting that the Corps investigate the property /project area for the presence or
absence of WoUSs and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an pprnoved JD (this may or may not include a sttrvey plat).
®�1 am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property /project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT /USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
S Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4
f

„
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Pro)ectfStte: Poax> eft rrACM City /County: e'R}OA , GVVIQSX � Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner. ' y��l�? ' /11,i State: Sampling Point: ' DP _
Invesfigator(s): Section, Township, Range•
Landfonn (hillsicpe, terrace, etc.): __ Local relief (concave, convex, none): 401\6 Slope (%): O--
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Let: 3(0 606,027.7v Long: Datum:�� ry
Sod Map Unit Name: ? F61 asscaon: Orf
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (if no, explain In Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances” present? Yes—V—/ No
Are Vegetation . Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answer's in Remarks.)
SUMMARY '& FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features. etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes V--,, No is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _;� No within a Wetland? Yes No ,
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No /=
Remarks:
i�ilV
ns old. %pi�o Sin r�t'c. �dl F
y �
HYDROLOGY
Watland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicaton"minimum of two reauiredl
Primary I f one s
e
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (BB)
Surface Water (A1)
High
Aquatic Fauna (813)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Water Table (A2)
Saturation
10 -� Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (810)
(A3)
Water Marks
TQ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
Moss Trim Lines (818)
(BI)
i. Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
g Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (83)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C8)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muds Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
[1 Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(87)
FAC- Neutral Test (DS)
❑ Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
Sphagnum moss (DB) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes �..,� No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): o��,•
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary frirr e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Amty Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0

41
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree stratum (Plot size: _ 30 ) % Cover S69des? Status
Multiply by,
OBL species
2. ftnc f fobrVO\
i40 Yes FA_
3. -ia
�lf,�� sir4ca.L��l +O. 40 Yom_ fA(:
4.
FACU species
5.
UPL species
6.
Column Totals:
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: _ 20% of total cover: _
gaoling r b St
(Plot size: _ a )
1. ?,n�a.
�d YFS FAC,
2.
3.
4.
S.
6.
7.
8.
Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover., 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1. PICU7yU:i�OS�0.
nay [o� _'cP11. Lto ES r-fir-w
2.
J
3.
4.
5.
8.
7.
S.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover- o'*+ 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
(Plot size:
1._61n11" ro}k3tnt
% j0\�0- 10 YE_ FAP.
2.
3.
4.
5
Total Cover n
L_ Ad
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sampling Point: D a ti
Number of Dominant Spades
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: tQ (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: -_ , (6)
Percent of Dominant Species OC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by,
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology Must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
DeflnMons of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Saplfng/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 It (1 m) tell.
Herb -All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 it tell.
Woody vine -Ail woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No..;-.
Vi(a&vvi p i f\e SWw-) Q MSex\N-Acdoi5iS i/. S S.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2 0

aw
(SOIL
c_ _H_ e_ DP'(
Profile Description: (Descnlbe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Dept
(Ind=)
- Matrix
Red ox Features
Color fmolst) -t
�'.�
_
�_
lb!� 21.2- loo
—
zarf\ --- Remarks
14-10
Ii 90
51af /ff �o �o�nc M wom st�oi:walb�-5 �)nrl
7/1
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soots (1720)
(MLRA 1538)
7.t
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
►py{ 8o
_%GtAr 20 on
�_ �_ L 1Q
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
'�_ 70
10 �� �°N 3o cv(\c. Clad --
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P. T)
3Indicators of hydrophyttc vegetation and
Hydric Sob Indicators: (Applicable to all
Histosof (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Hisfic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
z , Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A8) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Minersl,(A7) (LRR P, T. U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
b` 1 cm Mudt (A9) (LRR P. T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al t)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A18) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1j (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (SS)
Oark Surface (S7) (LRR P. S, T, U)
Type:
Depth (inches):
LRRs, unless otherwise noted,)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soots
0 Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (89) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
my Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Piedmont Floodplain So is (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Redox Dark Surface (F8)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soots (1720)
(MLRA 1538)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
(F8)
Very Shadow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain In Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P. T)
3Indicators of hydrophyttc vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous, Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
ox% 17111w_& f ��fEs V\OA- ffesen-% 0CN
Hydric Soil Present? Yes V No
US Army corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Guff Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Pall f Faw'. City /County: _ FdOl ;Of'1 IQAIU kan Sampling Date: 7 SO (
Applicant/Owner: State: f`1 C. Sampling Point:`
Inv estigator(s): ri(all� ��0. a_�of Q� �1 Section, Township, Range:
Landfomt (n+nslope, terrace, etc): Local relief (concave, convex, none): 00 (W Slope (%): `%o
Subregion (LRR orMLRA): 1� Let: 3 °OS 101r, -If "Long: 7(n -4.35'22.90, PJ Datum:_, 4
Soli Map Unit Name: NWt classification: _ PF n1Rd_
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _� No (If no, explain In Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology etgnitkantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes I/ No
Are Vegetation Soli'" or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling oolnt locations. transeeha_ imnm4ant fesna.ee e.,.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yea No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Son Present? Yes No
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes �_ No within a Wetland? Yes No
nsvnVL.VVO
Wetland Hydrdogy indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minim��++ �f �� .d„aro,�i
Prim ary I c e II
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (Be)
.'Surface Water (A1)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
High Water Table (A2) r—T
Saturetlon
Marl Deposits (815) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (810)
(A3) 1ur
Water Marks
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (816)
(81) u
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows
Drift Deposit (B3)
(Ca)
Q Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sons (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
II Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg)
❑ GeomorpMc Position (D2)
a Iron Deposits (B5)
Q inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
Other (Explain in Remarks)
O Shallow Aquttard (D3)
(B7)
Water - Stained Leaves (tag)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Sphagnum moss (Da) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (Inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
capillary frin e
Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No —
Describe
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, serial photos, previous Inspections), if avanable:
Remarks:
INO rh%W9510�ts
on V%Qw�voats. VAS aka .
US Amly Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
/1YOVIVtO IrV111111P11� II NI{IPWI
Tree Stratum (Plot size:_ ��„ ). -� 2 Status
1. P►crs k[tt?[�fl
2.
3.
4.
8.
7.
B.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover. , 20% of total cover. ��
Saolina /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: r )
C M u yr ► c&- LX bcu a,- �010 .-YES, 15112
2.
3.
4.
5.
8.
7.
8
Total Cover
5A° `of total cover. 20% of total cover.
Sampling Point: J),P-Z
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: - (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
Percent of Dominant Spades
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1p._ (AIS)
Total % Cover
of:
Multlgly bE
X 1 a
OBL species
FACW species
x2- t l b
FAC species
_14.-
x 3 3 C
FACU species
�•
x4:
UPL species
x5= -�- --
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B!A=
9714vA hytic Vegetation Indicators:
Rapid Test for Hydrophyllc Vegetation
- - Dominance Test Is X50%
Q 3 - Prevalence Index Is 53.0'
Q Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Hain Stratum (Plot size: �-Y - ) ' Indlcators of hydrlc soli and wetland hydrology must
1. - \ilf%L�1S 16th f..L`jo �-�L.0 be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. ,�D°L _Irc Definitions of Four Vsgetation Strafe:
3.
4.
5.
8.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover.
Woody Vine Straalu�m�(9Plot size: 0 )
2.
3.
4.
5.
lip = Total Cover
50% of total cover. of total cover.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines. 3 In. (7.8 an) or
more In diameter at breast height (DISH), regardless of
height.
SapllnWShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 It (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
helghL
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes Y_ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
--IV—
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(Inches) Color(molst) %
Cglorfmolstl 46 Tvoe
_
0' 1('�y! S1 I00
_
Texture Remartcs
Laww
510
y mo(p ZD cnc- _
� .,
T : C- Concentration, DaDepleflon. RM=Reduced Matrix MS= Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise
=Location: PL =Pore Unlan. M =Matrix,
Histosoi (Al)
noted.)
indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Solis :
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR 8)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fi) (LRR O)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150")
Stratified Layers (AS) O
rganic�Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (FO)
Piedmont Floodpiain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
5 cm'Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P. T. U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(MLRA 1538)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Mkidk Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Mari (F10) (LRR U)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochdc (F11) (MLRA 161)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
lindicators of hydrophyflc vegetation and
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Delta Oculc (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Redox (S5)
Verfic (F18) (MLRA 150A,1608)
Piedmont Floodplaln Solis (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (SO)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 1530)
Restrictive Layer (N observed):
Type:
Depth (Inches):
Remarks:
�c
Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes / ` No
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0

_ WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA-FORM - Atlantic and GuR Cowl Piatn Region
Pr*cl/81ta: AhvlL Ot—h �- CRY/county. QSr*0niCh0LAAN Sampling Date: _Iota
APPtk;ent/Owner �
State: c" Sampling Point:
tnvesugstor(s): i hdri �1 Cnld!j� kt Section, Township, Range:
Landfoon (hilwope, terrace, old.): 7 Loral relief (concave; convex, none): NIa f `s.. Slope ( %): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA : Lot - 3 CO.O f ` L d Long: _ — 7G f �a T P ° Datum: r_, G S Y
Soli Map Untt'Nome: o NWI desal8catlon: _ PF (71 ffci
Are ciimatic / hydrolapk; conditions on the site typical-for no tine of year? Yea / No (if no, explain in Remarks.) —�
Are Vegetation ✓'. SoU or Hydrology eignlf envy disturbed? Are Normal Circumstencea "present? Yes Na
Ara Vegetation Sa't or Hydrology naturally problematic? Of needed, explain any_answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach efte map 'etiowrfng eamplft point Nations, hransede, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yea No _X_ Is the Sampled Area
Hydrla Sall Present? Yee _ X . No within a Welland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrgiogq Present? Yea No �,_,_
54e- W05 fitly tiMbwa� Y
HYDROLOGY,
Welland Hydrology Indicators.
Secandary Indicators tmtnlmum of two radl
ary Indicators (mwmum of one Is
re
Surface Soli`Cracits (86)
surface Water {A1)
8--
Aquatic Fauna (613)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (Be)
-High Water Table (A2)
Mad Deposits (815) (LRR U)
Oralnage Patterns (810)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01)
Mass Trim Lines (816)
,Water Marks`(B1)
'Sediment
Oxldlzed Rhizoapheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry - Season Water Table (C2)
° Depoeb,(82)
Preaence'of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (CS)
" Drift Deposits (83)
Recent Iran Reduction In Tilted Solis (CO)
68turation Visible on Aerial Imagery (CO)
AI&I Mat dr Cruet (&t)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
HOther
Geomo"c Position (02)
Iron Deposits (BS) °
(Explain In Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
13 Inundatkm,Vtalble on Aerial Imagery (87)
Q 11Veter- Stained i.eaves (fig)
FAC- Neutral, Ted (DS)
8
Sphagnum moss (D6) (LRR T, t1)
Fleld,Observatlone.,
Surface Wetse Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No � Depth (Indies): QQ rr
Saturation Present? Yes
No �_ Depth (inches): i- U r `
Wbdend Hydrology Present? Yes N00
includes osollaN frf e
Descalbe Recorded Data (scream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if avatiable:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.4

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use edent�tc frames of plants. Sampling Point: 3
Tree stratum (Plot size; )
Absolute Dominant indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover S `e� des? status
1'
Number of Dominant Spades
2.
14.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
5.
e.
That Are OBLL,, FIACWSor FAC: (aB)
7.
index workeheet:
8.
Total % Cover oR Mkdf ntv bv:
a Total Cover 0131. species
50% of total cover.
20% of total cover. FACW species x 2 n '^
SaoAnclShn Stratum
(Plot size: 20' J
FAC species x 3 e
1:
FACU species x 4 s
2•
UPL species �^ x 5 0
Column Totals: (A)
5.
•---� —•-• Prevalence Index a S!A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
7
®1 • Rapid Test for Hydr'ophydc Vegetation
0.2 - Dominance Test is >80%
8
3 - Prevalence index le 53.0'
a Total Cover ®. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
50% of total cover.
40 / )
20% of total cover.
'Indicators
1
of hydric soli and wetland hydrology must
L be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2'
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strafe:
3. _1loi a
4•-
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 31n. (7.8 cm) or
5•
.-� more In diameter at breast height (DSH), regardless of
height.
8.
7'
-----
-- SaptingfShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 ln. DSH and greater than 3.28 R,(1 m) teL
8.
g.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3:28 It tall.
10.
11.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 R in
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover. 2095 of total Dover.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: v )
I.
2.
4,
Hydrophytic
y Total Cover Vegetation
60% Of total Cover. 20% of total cover. ! PreeentT Yes No
remarks (if observed, fist nrorph0logical adaptations below), i '5f k- fi P -may
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plate Region - Version 2 0
r:

' Sampling Sofa
CIAQ pth he dca or or a.URMt e ,
/t ^1 h/jy��/JJJ
or In eatore.)
_Color tmaW
...�(t,_. � Color lenerntl �_ , .dyne_ .
jtl E�
---;-� -
`centrgtion �Oa letion
Rtal�Reduced�Metdx MS =Masked
Hydrlc Bolt indk;atme: (J "cable to ell LRRe � n Send �alne. - =Location: PL =Pore e
uNees;" ) ° indicators fbr,Pro6la 4800 Hyd c Bot1e
Heck Ed 1ped P0lyvaiue��Below iurface (88) (LRR S, T, U) z1 cm Muds (A9) (LRR,O)
b Fgafk Histiedon (AZ) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U
Black Hlatto (A9) Loam r,Mu Mineral F1 ) 2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR S)
Hydrogen Sulilde Y yq ( ) Iu+R O) re Reduced Vertic:(F18j (outelde MLRA 190 8
a (� ; loamy Oleyed lt9etrtx (F2)" ` 0.)
Skabiled Layers (As) • . ° � ,� n Depleted Metrbi (�) Pledmorit Floodplaln Solis (F19) (LRR P, 8, T)
Organic Bodies (A8) (LRR P, T. U) F ox:Dark Surface (F8) Anomalous Bright Loamy Sons (F20)
r 8 cm Mucky`Minerel (v) (LRR P, =T, U) ,` Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ ` ( (WLRA 1838)
Musk Presence,(A8) (LAR U) `RedoxDepreaelorrs (F8) Reif Parent'Matedal (TF2)
1 cm Muds (A9) (LRR P, T) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Mad (F10) (LRR Ut Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Depleted Belkiyu Dark Surface (A11)
;Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Iron Mad Odtdc (F11) (MLRA 181)
"coast pralde Redox'(,418) (MLRA 180A) Umbdc Surface (FM18) (LRR P )T, U) O, P, T) -'Indicators of hydmphytic vegetetlon and
4 'S8Mj Mucky Mineral (St) (LRR O, 8) Delta Ochdc (F1 Welland hydrology must be present,
:Sandy Oleyad Matrix (S4)� 1S1j unless dlshrrbed or problematic.
Sandy Redax (S6) Reduced.Verfia (Fie) (MLRA� 19flA,180B)
86ipped Matriir (S8) Wedm(iht Floodplaln Solis (1`19) (MLRA 148A)
Dark Surface 'Anomalous Bdght Loamy Solos (F20) (MLRA 149A 153C, 153D)
Reablctive,leyer (U,obsenred); -
Type, °
Depth (kudrae):
Remarks: Hydrtc 8otl Present? Yes,,,__
US Army Corps of EngkreaM
Aft ft and Gulf Cosetat Plsfn Region - Verelon 2,0

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form °should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION 1: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A.' REPORT COMPLETION DATE FORAPPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): April 30, 2013
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Washington Field Office
a PROJECT LOCATION AND'BACKGROUN6 INFORMATION:
State: North Carolina County/parishlborough: Chowan CityMEdenton I . Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree de 'tonal format)`: Lat. 36.30845° N, Long. 76.5902 - �9P.
�UniversalrTiansveraemercator.
Name of nearest waterbody: Queen Anne Creek
Name of nearest Tiaditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Edenton Bay
Na of watershed'& Hydrbiogic Unit Code (HUC): 03010205
®° ,Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/am available upon request.
(] .Chcckif other,sites (e.g., bffsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD fern: -
D• REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
E], 'Office(Disk),,D%teiikiniW6h. Date:
® -Field beterinipatio Date(s): April 30, 2013
SECTION II• - SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RRA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION`OF JURISDICTION.
Thane A o , "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
,review 'aiem' [Required)
-Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
�e Waters are presently Used; °or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstateor foreign commerce.
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERNT4ATION OF JURISDICTION.
There A "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CPR part 328) in the review area [Required)
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): r
❑ TNWs; ,including territorial seas
El ` "Wetlands} adjacent to TNWs
'Relatively permanent wateis2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non -RPWi that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ -We'tland's directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly;`abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Q Ir%undments of junsdictional waters
El ho (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non- wetland4aters: linear feet: width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: 0.2 acres.
e. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 19Lff ineatioii�l1Nanual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated Weters/wetlands (check if appllcable):s
El Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section M below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a 9NW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous now at least "seasonally"
(&&. typically 3 momhs).
Supporting documentation is presented in Section UP.

SECTION III•' CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND,WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The ageneies'will,assert jurisdiction over,TNWs and wetlands adjacent TNWs. H the aquatic resources a TNW, complete
Section M A.1 and Section M.D.I. only; if the, aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III A.1 and 2
and Seddon I M.1.;'otherwi see Section tILB below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wed"dadjacen_toTNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent ":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT is NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS a ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of theItibbtary and its adjacent wetlant*'if any, and it helps
determinembether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rgow� have been, met.
The agenciesmill assert jurisdiction over non- navigable.tributades of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
water`s" OWWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year =— imd or have conihmotis flow, at least seasonally (e g.,,typically 3
tenths):,A'wetiand'that`directly abuts an RPW "is also jurisdictional. Tf the;aquatic resource is not a TNW; but has year -round
(perema flow, skip to Section M.D.L If the aquatic resource is a wetland directk abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
Alp to Section III DA.' -`
A wedidd that 6 adjacent to,but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps,districts and
EPA`regions will inchuie in the record anyyavaileble-informwiion,that documents the existence of'a sigaificant neicus between a
relatively perriianent tributar that is'rnot pereanial,(and its'adjaoent wetlenda if any) and a traditional "ttavigatile water; even
though a,signiflcant nexus finding is not required as a matter'of law.
H the waterbody° le not a n RP,W;'or a` wetland directly abutting an RPW; a JD will regniie addiitional data to determine If the
waterbody has_a significant nexutr with a TNW: If,the.trtbutary.has adjacent wetlands, the °significant neatns eoalaadon must
consider the''tribute" in comliinaiion•withi an Of its adjacent wetlanda`Tlds sign ficaat nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical`purposes; the tributary and all of its adjacent, wetlands is used whetbe,r,the"review area ideittiflediri the JD request is
the tributary, or- its�i4acent�wetiands,,or,both. Uthe JD covers i iribaiiiiy with ai amnt;wetia�s, complete Section IILB.1 for
the tributary ;xSedion HLB:2 for "any o>asite wetlends;;and Section 1"3 for all wed"ds adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and ofPsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section BLC below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(1) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: 30 a s
Drainage' area: 10eccea
Average annual rainfall: 50 inches
Average annual snowfall: I inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with -TNW
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
® Tributary flows through 2 tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are 2 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 2 -S river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 2,•3 aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 2.5. aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to I WS: Queen Anne Creek to Edenton Bay.
Tributary stream order, if known:
`Note that the IngpxdotW Guidebook contains additional infornution regarding swates, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Plow mute can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) Geaecal Tributsiv Cliacai eaisiics (check all that aoolv)•
Tributary is:. , ❑ Natuual
® Artificial (than- made). Explain: railroad side ditch.
❑ Manipulated (man- altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect,to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 2 -3
Average depth :' 1 feex
Average side'slopes::Y (1 1 o aass�
Priniary;tributary substrate corn siti on (check all that apply):
®Silts I- jrSanda ❑ Concrete
❑ Cotibles. ,❑Oraveli ®Muck
❑ Bedrock , ®Vegetation. Typal% cover. 60
❑'Other. Explain: v
Tributary conditiorkstability,[e..g., highly eroding,'sloughing banks]. Explain:
rese o e/poo lain: no positive base flow observed.
NJ aly
Tribe
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): '%
(c) Flow,
Tributary provides for Ep
Estimate average number of flow,events in review area/year: 24
,'Describe flow 'regime
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Co n Characteristics:
Subsurface`alain findings:
De (or othei)test peEed:
Tdbutary',lias (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ AIiW ' (check all indicators that apply):
Q line impressed
clear,,natuiaf on the bank
❑
change's' "'ie character of soil
' ❑ =rshelving °:
0
❑`. vegetation knitted down, bent, or absent
❑
❑ 1eaf,litter disturbed 01"washed away
❑
❑ "sediment deposition
❑
g `
❑
❑ 'ostainin �
❑ Discontinuous OHWM! Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
ITigh Tide Line indicated by:
❑ oil or scutn,line along shoe; objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings/cbaracteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ otherl(list):
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
ine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Mean High Water Marls indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ physical markings;
❑ vegetation fines/changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Charecteristles:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: the drainage feature is a man -made ditch located along a nail road line.
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has boon removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the watabody,s flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the ageades will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

FWk
%
(i7), Biological . Chancel supports ail that apply):
0 kip corridor.'~` d haractw
istids (type, average width):'
❑ Wetland fringe.'CharacGistics:
El, Habitat fbr.'.',
Listed species. Explain findings:
❑�Fiihlojawn areas. Explain findings:
❑'061er environmentally- sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ AquaticAvildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Charach f ON d" a4l" to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Chaftetwbtics:
(a) General. Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wedand,sme• 0.2 acres
Wetland type. txpiain: scrub/shrub.
Welland quality. Explaimpoor.
Project' I
wetlands cross or save as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) Geni4 now Relationship with Non-TNW-
-Flow, W, LNVftii). Explain:
Surface flow is- K05
c6ract aiidcs;,
Subsurface flow: i lakwm Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or 9tker) test performed:
(c), Wetland Adiicencv Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ No"fAireidly'abutting
O'DIS , Crete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain: wetland am adjacent located acent to existing ditchline.
❑ Ecol6gical,connection., Explain..
❑ SeparaW,by.bcrTAmrrieF. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relations-hip) to TNW
Project wetlands are1'6:ijj4J river miles from TNW.
J .
waters are; l. aerial (itraight) miles from *W.'
Flow is from: "tow.
Tki_rirateIocafion of wetland as within the Vy_i:a:rrr
ales— floodplain.
(11) Chemical thaiicte&tics:
Cliaracterize wetland-system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
Aa*i6iistici;'etd.)- Explain: wetland area was previously cleared and timbered..
Identify specific pollutants, if lmown:
('iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
13 . Riparian buffer. Claracteristici (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation typelparcent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ IWerally listed species. Explain findings-
0 Fish/spawn area. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquadchvildl& diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wedand(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: *T
Approximately ( 0.2 ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland; °specify the following.,
MMWX abuts? (YIN) Size (in acres)
Directly abuts? (Y/N )
Size rn acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
a SIGNEFICANT,NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis, will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any, wed' fs,adjacerit to;the`ti�ibu- ta_ry'to determine if.they significantly atiiect the'chemical, physical, and biological integrity
Of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexdi exists if the tributary , in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speanl' die or.insubstantial e6ect on the chemical, physical and/or biol
ogical, integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when,evalnating signiflcantneaus include, butasi ft not limfted'to,the volume, dnratlon;`and frequeruy`otthe flow
of water in the tributary and its pi�a:iimfty to a TNW, and,, fiuictiona periormeil by.the tributary and all its'adjacent
wetlands: =lf is not appropriate to determiae'dgniticsnt nexm based solely on any epeciiic,thratiold,of distance (e g.,between a
tributary rand ite'adjaceuf wetlaod;orbetween a'tribntaiy.and the,TNWj: Similarly, the fact an adjjaeent-wetl'and lies within`or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of signiflc'ent nexus.
Draw connections etweei2=the`features documented and "the'efticts on the TNW, =as identifled in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in'the Instrucdonal'Gddebooi Factors to consider iutrldde, for example:
• Does the tributary, in,combination with its adjacentmetlands (if any), have the {capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs,'or to reduce the amount of pollutants or`flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecy_cle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, `spawning, or rearing young for species,that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in'combination-aith its adjacent wetlands Cif any), have the'capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the,tributary.1i,combidation with its adjacent wetlands'(if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
y biological integrity of the,TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or (mown to occur should be documented'
below:
1:. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNW& Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section MM:
Z Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs.- F.irplain findings of presence of absence of significant nexus below, Based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then 0" to Section ]U D:
3. 3igniflcant nexc>s findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section MD:
M DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS - THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLI):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
Q TNWs: linear feet width (tt), Or, acres.
El Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
Z. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically now year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: -
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section IMB. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

�i
"P_ rovide. estimates for juri in the r&iew area (check all that apply):
E; ,TY butaiy'wateis: linear feet width (ft):
Q Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirecdy,into TNWs.
Waterbody *k is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters:, , , linear feet, width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlaodsdirectiy shutting - RPW`tbat flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
"Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
.M - Wetlands direotl � abutting an RPW where tributaries tall " flow round. Provide data and rationale
❑ . Y g tyP� . Y yam_
indicating,that tributary is perennial in Section IILD.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
a,directly abutting an RPW: ,
Q Wetlands directly abutting an RPW -where tributaries typically now "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section fMll `and rationale in Section M.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
'abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: , acres.
S. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly, into TNWs.
Vetlin& that do not directly abut`an RPW, but when considered is combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated .adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C. '
Provide acreage estimates forjurisdictionat wetlands in the review area: acres.
a.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs..
13, Wetlands adjacent,to suchwaters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, hav&a significant nexus with a TM are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section M.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters!
As a general rule,-the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
.Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
�] Demonsimte'that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
Q Demonstrate that water is isolated with i'nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED UNTERSTATEOR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) :ro ,
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
Q from which fish or shellfish,are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑' which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Q Interstate or waters. Explain:
Q Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
°See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section ULD.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserlhig or declining CWA Jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent wftb Lire process described in the Corps/EPA M=w mtdmu Regarding CWA Act Midiedon Mowing Ra a w.

I
5�
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑, Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑, Other non -,wetland waters: acres.
Identify types) of waters:
0 Wetlands: acres.
F. NON,TiJRISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (C�:CK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
. Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
®, Review area included isolatedwaters with`no'substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC;' the review area�woutd have been regulated based solely on the,
p Waters do not meet the `.'Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction Explain:
[] Other: (explain, if not'covened above):
Provide acreage,estimates for non - jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i:e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture),'using best professional
ridgment (check'all that apply).
Non- wetland waters (E:e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
❑- Lakealponds:% acres.
Q .Other son- wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource.
El 'Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates'for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is ,required, for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters, (Le, rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
❑ ;. Lakee/pondi i acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands:',',- acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES,
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Date reviewed for JD (ebeek all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and r+egtiested, appropriately reference sources below):
®, Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
❑ Data sheets.piepared/submitted by'or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
' Corps navigable waters'• study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NhD data.. ' . ,
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:Edenton Quad.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
®, National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:Peanut Fawn.
❑ State /Local 'wetland inventory nags):
® FEMA/F1RM maps:'
❑ 100 -}rear Fl lain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs Aerial (Name & Date):
or' ❑ Other (Name.& Date):
Previous fdetermination(s). File no. and date of response letter.
❑, Applicabletsupporting case law:
Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

!
ICI
I
I
I
I
I�I
I�
I�
WN I
If
V D I
!' 1
� I
I
I
I
I
"gin
D
6
8
96
ge
"M
�- 914�I.M1'�+ V�r .C, } •� F j� �/yr<����M�f��� 'cV /A S° � r W r
b _ „rt. '; /'kM1• f A • "gn l.sg of t ,rs S'��3� /} \ g
y b ✓'l9C as ! Soh ar: d2ti'r�u�§ i
�;."� �� .a ii»°� -'p� a ` 1 •r{p`�ry�� 4'2���.,,�` • 2 �`�. ,�1`5y�4v� t ;�. yl..,w ,- _.:' - -•"• � � m D
NN
6 v D I IU
R 4
I
II t 1 • lj ��z 1
I! I !k Op � 1 �• ° 1
. � III ♦ s ' 1
�a. I
I ;III �� ; � � � � % •�
T € 1r JIMBO'S J M OS PLANT EXPANSION PROJECT s-rocKS ENGINEERING, P.A.
v A € WETLANDS IMPACT MAP - EDENTON, NORTH CAROLINA am ® men

• #
RCPT
88 L 24
'; rs .4 P?tt ;y4�Yz:i ?ls ati x:� l
GP
F 24• R
8 8
�"CP 88 tF 24" RCP
0
�;���.! � G-i � � � � o ° ° ° _� IN ✓. 18.0
lima
.,� - ■■
I�, f
t`C •
RPW IMPACT #1
3,126.65 -SF (0.072 Ac.)
=, 579 CY of FILL
` 1J% �s
JIMBO'S JUMBOS
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A.
1100 EASTERN AVENUE PHONE: [phone]
P.O. BOX 1108 FAX: [phone]
NASHVILLE, N.C. 27856 MOBILE: [phone]
111*.1
RPWI #1

?1.J9'
INV.
INV.
\
\ jv
, v 11
.'V
P 322 ly 8: --
W 121.�o
3.6J
RPW IMPACT #2
19, 620-15 SF 037 Ac.)
1180 CY of FILL
Lw�-u
,1� FIRE HYD.
1
1 00--,
A�-
3IMBO'S JUMBOS i
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A.
1100 EASTERN AVENUE PHONE: [phone]
P.O. BOX 1108 FAX: [phone]
NASHVILLE, N.C. 27856 MOBILE: [phone]
q
................
I REVISIONS I
LFILE NO. 2014-049
HORZ. SCALE: 1"=WO'
VERZT' SCALE: I NONE
RPWI #2