20150491 Ver 1_401 Application_20150515

Kimley »>Horn
Transmittal
Date: May 14, 2015 Job Number: 015630084
Project Name: Storm Water Improvements at 817 Allister Drive
To. Karen Hip-2ins
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street, 9t" Floor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
We are sending these by
US Mail ® FedEx F-] Hand Deliver
Other.
We are sending you
® Attached F] Under separate cover via
the following items
Shop Drawings 0 Prints/Plans E] Samples F-1 Specifications 0 Change Orders
® Other 404/401 Pre - Construction Notification Package (NWP #27)
Copies Date No. Description
4
5/14/2015
1
404/401 Pre - Construction Notification Package (NWP #27)
1
5/14/2015
2
PCN Application Fee Check
2
5/14/2015
3
Full -Size Plan Sheets
4
5/14/2015
4
Half -Size Plan Sheets
These are transmitted as checked below:
® For your use 0 Approved as submitted Resubmit Copies for approval
As requested E] Approved as noted ® Submit Copies for distribution
For review and comment 0 Returned for corrections R Return EJ Corrected prints
Remarks:
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 704 -409 -1802.
Copy to: File
Signed
ris Tinklenberg, P
2000 South Boulevard Suite 440 'Charlotte; NC 28203

Corps Submittal Cover Sheet
Please provide the following info:
20 , 5
1. Project Name: Stream Stabilization at 817 Allister Drive
2. Name of Property Owner /Applicant: Charlotte - Mecklenburg Storm Water Services
3. Name of Consultant /Agent: Kimley -Horn & Associates, Inc.
*Agent authorization needs to be attached
4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s): N/A
Q
7r'
5. Site Address: 817 Allister Drive
7. City: Charlotte
8. County: Mecklenburg
9. Lat: 35.191511 Long: - 80.720566 (Decimal Degrees Please)
10. Quadrangle Name: Mint Hill
11. Waterway: Unnamed Tributary to McAlpine Creek
12. Watershed: HUC: 03 05 0103 /Catawba
13. Requested Action:
• Nationwide Permit # 27
General Permit #
• Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre - Application Request (Mitigation Proposal)
The following information will be completed by the Corps office:
AID:
Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM Begin Date
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404
Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose:
Site /Waters Name:
Keywords:

Kimley » >Horn
May 7, 2015
Ms. Crystal Amschler
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801 -5006
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: 404/401 Permit (Nationwide 27) Application
Stream Stabilization at 817 Allister Drive
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Ms. Amschler and Ms. Higgins:
On behalf of our client, Charlotte- Mecklenburg Storm Water Services, Kimley -Horn is submitting the
enclosed point Section 404/401 Preconstruction Notification Application for the above referenced
project for your review pursuant to a Nationwide Permit #27 and General 401 Water Quality
Certification number 3885. This application is to conduct stream restoration for the purposes of
improving water quality, bank stabilization, and aquatic habitat in an unnamed tributary to McAlpine
Creek located at approximately 35.191511 °N, - 80.720566 0W. The following information is included
as part of this application submittal:
• Project Summary Sheet
• Pre - Construction Notification Form
• Project Site Figures
• Figure 1 — Vicinity
• Figure 2 — USGS Topo (Mint Hill Quadrangle, 1993)
• Figure 3 — SSURGO Soils (2014 Aerial Photograph)
• Figure 4 — Jurisdictional Features and Improvements (2014 Aerial Photograph)
• Construction Drawings for 817 Allister Drive Stream Stabilization
• Project Site Data forms
• USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet
• NCDWQ Stream Identification Form
• Project Site Photo Pages
• USACE Approved Jurisdictional Determination (Rapanos) Form
The project is located at 817 Allister Drive in the City of Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North
Carolina. Existing land use in the vicinity of the project includes single family residential properties.

Kimley> »Horn
Page 2
The 404 /401 (NWP 27) application presents site conditions evaluated by Kimley -Horn staff (Jason
Claudio -Diaz, P.E. and Chris Tmklenberg, PWS) on December 18, 2014 and April 9, 2015. The
stream delineation was performed by utilizing survey prepared by a licensed surveyor (verified by
Kimley -Hom).
The proposed project seeks to restore /stabilize 149 linear feet of two Unnamed Tributaries to
McAlpine Creek. The project will require 61 linear feet of temporary impacts to install impervious
dikes and a pumped diversion to allow for work in dry conditions. The project will result in
permanent impact -no net loss of waters of the US to 149 linear feet of two perennial RPW's and 61
linear feet of temporary impacts from the restoration activities necessary to improve stream functions
and reduce bank erosion. The proposed project will result in a net gain of 8 linear feet of waters of
the US.
Please feel free to contact Isaac Hinson at (704) 336 -4495 if you have any questions, or if additional
information is necessary.
Sincerely,
KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Environmental Scientist
Attachments
Cc: Isaac Hinson, PWS
Charlotte - Mecklenburg Storm Water Services
600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
Bryan Tompkins
USFWS Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801

Kimley > >> Horn
Project Summary Sheet
Project Name: Stream Stabilization at 817 Allister Drive
Applicant Name and Address: Isaac Hinson
Charlotte- Mecklenburg Storm Water Services
600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
Telephone Number: 704- 336 -4495
Type of Request: ® Nationwide PCN (NWP # 27) ❑ Indivic
® Jurisdictional Determination ❑ Other:
Included Attachments: ® Project Plans ® USGS Map
❑ Agent Authorization ® Delineation Sketch
❑ Data Forms (Up & Wet) ® NCDWR Stream Forms
❑ NCEEP Confirmation ® Aerial Photo
❑ Agency Correspondence ❑ Other:
lual Permit Application
® NRCS Soil Survey
❑ Delineation Survey
® USACE Stream Forms
® Site Photos
❑ Other:
Check if applicable: ❑ CAMA County ❑ Trout County ❑ Isolated Waters
❑ Section 7, ESA ❑ Section 106, NHPA ❑ EFH
❑ Mitigation Proposed (❑ NC EEP ❑ On -Site ❑ Off -Site ❑ Other)
County: Mecklenburg Nearest City /Town: Charlotte
Waterway: UT to McAlpine Creek
H.U.C.:03050103
Property Size (acres): —0 3
Site Coordinates (in decimal degrees): 35.191511 ON
River Basin: Catawba
USGS Quad Name: Mint Hill
Approx. Size of Jurisdiction on Site (acres): 0.03
- 80.720566 °W
Project Location: The project area is located at 817 Allister Drive in the City of Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North
Site Description: Existing land use in the vicinity of the project includes single family residential properties.
Impact Summary (if applicable): The project will result in permanent impact -no net loss of waters of the US to 149
linear feet of two perennial RPW's and 61 linear feet of temporary impacts from the restoration activities necessary to
improve stream functions and reduce bank erosion The protect will result in a net -gain of 8 linear feet of waters of the
NWP
Open Water
(acres)
Wetland
(acres)
Stream Channel
Intermittent and /or Unimportant
Aquatic Function
Perennial and /or Important
Aquatic Function
#
Temp.
Perm.
Temp.
Perm.
Temp.
Perm.
Temp.
Perm.
If
ac
If
ac
If
ac
if
Ac
27
61
.01
149
0.02
Total
Total Permanent Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
149
Kimley -Horn Contact: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS Direct Number: —(704)_409 -1802
Email: chris.tinklenberga kimley- hom.com

o�oFywjn
Office Use Only.
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
TED Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number. 27 or General Permit (GP) number -
1c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corpse
❑ Yes ® No
1d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)-
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit.
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes ® No
1g
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes ® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2.
Project Information
2a
Name of project
Stream Stabilization at 817 Allister Drive
2b
County
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town
Charlotte ^ _
2d. Subdivision name
1 C4
N/A �IU��_� 0 V L5 nn
2e. NCDOT only, T.I P or state
project no
N/A luu� �v I
MAY ti ,
3.
Owner Information I
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
Robert W. and Marjorie S. Sims DENR - Wq�RESO— S I
40i R R� �Grr� _
3b
Deed Book and Page No.
Book 03903 Page 283, Book 28653 Page 775
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
3d
Street address
817 Allister Drive
3e
City, state, zip
Charlotte, NC 28227
3f
Telephone no:
704- 563 -5109
3g
Fax no.'
3h.
Email address.
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a Applicant is.
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Public Agency
4b Name.
Isaac Hinson, PWS
4c Business name
(if applicable).
Charlotte - Mecklenburg Storm Water Services
4d Street address:
600 East Fourth Street
4e. City, state, zip.
Charlotte, NC 28202
4f. Telephone no.
704- 336 -4495
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address
ihinson @ci charlotte.nc.us
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a Name:
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc.
5c Street address
2000 South Boulevard, Suite 440
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28203
5e. Telephone no.-
704 - 409 -1802
5f. Fax no
5g Email address-
Chris Tinklenberg @ Kimley- Horn.com
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
13503216
1 b Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude. 35.191511 Longitude - 80.720566
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1c Property size:
0 36 acre
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc ) to
Unnamed tributary to McAlpine Creek
proposed project
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
McAlpine Creek
2c River basin:
Catawba
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application-
The project area is located at 817 Allister Drive in the City of Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The
project areas are primarily residential and located in existing right -of -ways. Existing land use in the vicinity of the project
includes single family residential properties
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
NA
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property.
-267 If of existing stream on 817 Allister Drive.
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The purpose of the project is to enhance small sections of two stream channels by installing stabilization structures and
the removal of permanent and temporary build -up of debris which causes flooding at the project site. Along main tributary
the project proposes to replace an abrupt 4 -foot vertical drop downstream of a channel blockage with a series of grade
control structures that should better promote aquatic life passage through the project area. Additionally, both channels on
the subject property are unstable and experiencing both vertical and horizontal erosion
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project will utilize natural channel design techniques to remove a blockage and address the instabilities within the stream
channels In- stream structures will be used to create grade control, provide in- stream habitat, enhance aquatic life passage
through the project area and to help protect the banks. A typical channel section will be constructed to help alleviate the high
shear stresses currently experienced by the channels by adding a floodprone area where the higher flows from rain events
can be dissipated. Overall, the design seeks to stabilize the channels, reduce erosion, improve in- stream habitat and
geomorphology, alleviate residential flooding and protect the utilities It is anticipated that a back -hoe and /or mini excavator
will be used to shape the channels and construct the in- stream structures. The work will be performed in the dry by utilizing a
pump- around system.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments
El Yes ®No El Unknown
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency /Consultant Company.
Other:
4d
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b
If yes, explain.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
1a Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact number—
Type of
Permanent (P) or
Type of impact
Type of
Forested
jurisdiction
Area of
Temporary (T)
wetland
(Corps - 404,
impact
(if known)
10
(acres)
DWQ — non -
404, other
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments -
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d
3e
3f.
3g.
Stream impact number -
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of
Average
Impact
Permanent (P) or
(PER) or
jurisdiction
stream
length
Temporary (T)
intermittent
(Corps -
width
(linear
(INT)?
404,10
(feet)
feet)
DWQ -
non -404,
other)
S1 - Impact 1
® P ❑ T
Restoration /Stabilization
UT to
McAlpine
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
7
85
Creek
S1 - Impact 2
Installation of Impervious Dike
UT to
McAlpine
® PER
® Corps
7
10
❑ P ® T
and Pump Around
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
S1 — Impact 3
❑ P ® T
Installation of Impervious Dike
UT to
McAlpine
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
7
46
Creek
S2 - Impact 4
Installation of a Constructed
UT to
McAlpine
® PER
® Corps
7
10
® P ❑ T
Riffle
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
S2 - Impact 5
® P ❑ T
Restoration /Stabilization
UT to
McAlpine
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
7
54
Creek
S2 - Impact 6
Installation of Impervious Dike
UT to
McAlpine
® PER
® Corps
7
5
❑ P ® T
and Pump Around
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 210
31. Comments: The proposed project will result in a net gain of 8 linear feet of waters of the US
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number—
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P
03 ❑P
04 ❑P
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
K Total
5g. Comments
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
51 Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar-Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
6c
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
B1 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑ PEI T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
Rock toe protection will be used to reduce the amount of grading necessary and will also serve to prevent the design from
impacting several large trees on both banks.
1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Several of the measures that will be implemented in order to minimize impacts include the utilization of a pump- around to
facilitate work in the dry, the use of temporary erosion control matting and planting of native vegetation for stabilization. All
sediment and erosion control and de- watering measures will be removed upon completion of construction and the temporary
areas of disturbance will be stabilized and restored to pre - construction contours.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U S. or Waters of the State?
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested.
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h. Comments
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f Total buffer mitigation required:
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0 % (No impervious added)
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why Linear public transportation projects will
be required to treat stormwater runoff to the Maximum Extent Practicable in accordance with the practices described in the
NCDOT Best Management Practices (BMP) Manual. No new development
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered `yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
The project objective is to repair current erosion and stabilize the stream channel in order prevent future erosion from
occurring on the subject property. These repairs will not result in additional development
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
❑ Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Database, Pedestrian survey performed by Kimley Horn staff
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Database
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FIRM Panel 4651 (Effective March 2, 2009); Flood Risk
Information System (FRIS)
Isaac Hinson, PWS
5/7/2015
Date
ApplicanflAgent's Signature
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided )
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

ng Trail -
-Hunt Re
Bonlyn -Dr c��o
J
B�O a
Q� �° o
IF
a
T �\a 'q /t U m
o\m �0
o
Inc oL� Y9 Mission- Hills -Rld
G.ASTOti 21 Y9 CARARRUS
21
29 Figure 1 �a
2s �� b
74 sot 10 a
74 c
co
KIAN[it UNION ,� O
O�
— S_heringtonWay
iQ
N
trine
n. ct
11 - f�,
�Spi09
ayo � obey G
Title: Legend:
Figure 1 - Vicinity
Project Area D&*t*- VKkh"bwY
N Meck Co. Streams WATER
Kimley> »Horn swices
0 600 1,200 Feet
I I I

• S
r�
a Q) r •
• oy ��/1 dos mean , w�A dew �ry ♦ i •
., g+ythwood;L - -n * • • •
RW
s
• �`�.�` � ._ . * ` • • ate. C� � o " F`� * ' � � •
U _ • • •
Jd
• ,off • ,� ;• • +•:, •
e.'
4v e+ �� r • • • !
. • . • • w�n •
• - • O� • i .Ol • • • i aat
- n •
011 ?19 s • • G.0
41 ! 1•
rV
iu • ! + + • • E • o. ♦• .• .gyp '. E�'��;
CO
w B a, • •ot•�
s ti •`flies , w r`" f 4w
• • F'ei� • • a • • ��� 4b * • aY
• • Ct i ! a, r �o •oo
� � • ,,o � • • 1 pr ♦ • •� � yea �• 'Ip
Ilk
M,ssion- HiIIs.Ro �`\`�' • ' i N C' r ht=:; 2013f��ti alGe'raphi o•iety).cubetli
AL Title. Legend:
Figure 2 - USGS Topo (Mint Hill Quadrangle, 1993)
Project Area LAWotte•Mec ?lcnD ✓q
STORM
iv WATER
Kimley #> Horn Servjc°5^
0 250 500 Feet
I i I

* �' • N. Mecklenburg County SSURGO Soil Survey
r X�
Symbol Description
Ce62 Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 t 8 pe rcent slo es
CeD2 Cecil sandy clay loam, 8 t 15 percent slopes
t CeB2 ; CuB Cecil -Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent
En6 lEnonsandyloam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
He6 IHelena sandy loam, 2 to 8 ercent slopes
EnB
nT
`.. y
4 - c
NZI
t. ' i�,- • ,�. ' � �' .; . � � .' � 'tip�
CeD2
+fit
Title: Legend:
Figure 3 - SSURGO Soils (2013 Aerial Photograph)
Project Area C�sdoGrNeckknDurr
N Meck Co. streams WATER
Kimley > >> Horn 5 � =
0 100 200 Feet
I i I

'o
IHf
R
n '
i
e
GENERAL NOTES
PROPOSED CURB ELEVATIONS:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SET AND ADJUST PROPOSED CURB ELEVATIONS AS NECESSARY TO
ENSURE PROPER LONGITUDINAL GRADE FOR DRAINAGE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RETAIN
EXISTING PAVEMENT, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS:
PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE DIMENSIONS ARE FROM EXPANSION JOINT TO EXPANSION
JOINT. MATCH REPLACEMENT MATERIALS TO THE EXISTING SURFACE ACCORDINGLY:
o CONCRETE - SIX INCH PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE (3600 PSI).
o ASPHALT - (COMMERCIAL) TWO INCH SF9.58 COURSE AND FOUR INCH 119.08
INTERMEDIATE COURSE.
(RESDENTAL) TWO INCH SF9.5B COURSE AND FOUR INCH AGGREGATE
BASE (ABC) COURSE.
a GRAVEL - SIX INCH INCIDENTAL STONE
SIDEWALK SHALL BE FOUR INCHES THICK, AND SIX INCHES THICK AT DRIVEWAY CROSSINGS,
PER CITY STD. NO. 10.22.
DRAINAGE STRUCTURES:
GRADES, ELEVATIONS AND LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. AS DIRECTED BY THE
ENGINEER, THEY MAY BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOMMODATE UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS. STATIONS,
OFFSETS AND ELEVATIONS REFER TO THE CENTER OF DROP INLETS. MANHOLES AND JUNCTION
BOXES, AND THE MIDPOINT OF THE LIP FOR CATCH BASINS. ALL PIPES SHALL BE RCP CLASS
III, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
WEEPHOLES ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, A MINIMUM OF 1
WEEPHOLE PER STRUCTURE. WEEPHOLES ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE BOTTOM 1/3 OF
STRUCTURE AND COVERED ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE STRUCTURE BY A BAG MADE OF FILTER
FABRIC AND FILLED W//78 STONE. THERE MALL BE NO SEPARATE PAYMENT FOR THIS WORK.
UTILITIES:
UTILITIES ARE ILLUSTRATED FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. THE CITY WILL NOT BE HELD
R SpON". F FOR TH A RA Y OF IrI TTY I nCATION`; SI 5 DEPTHS, OR FOR
COMPLETENESS OF UTILITY INFORMATION
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY AND MEET WITH ALL UTIUTY
OWNERS, THE CITY UTIUTY COORDINATOR AND CITY INSPECTOR WHOSE FACILITIES WILL BE
AFFECTED TO DETERMINE UTILITY LOCATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL UTILITIES
FROM DAMAGE CAUSED BY HIS OPERATIONS OR THOSE OF HIS AGENTS. THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL HOLD THE CITY HARMLESS FOR ANY THIRD -PARTY INCONVENIENCE CREATED BY WORK
OF HIS OWN FORCES OR THAT OF HIS AGENTS. ANY DAMAGES INCURRED SHALL BE THE
CONTRACTORS FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY.
AS NEEDED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST/RELOCATE THE SANITARY SEWER AND WATER
LINES ONLY. ALL OTHER ADJUSTMENTS /RELOCATIONS WILL BE PERFORMED BY THE VARIOUS
UTILITY OWNERS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WORK NTH UTILITY OWNERS SO AS
NOT TO ADVERSELY AFFECT THE PROJECT SCHEDULE. THE CITY WILL NOT BE HELD
RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DELAYS OR DISRUPTIONS TO THE WORK SCHEDULE OF OTHER UTILITY
OWNERS.
FOR UTILITY LOCATES CALL NORTH CAROLINA ONE -CALL 6 1 -800- 632 -4949
a FOR LOCATES OF UTILITIES NOT MEMBERS OF NORTH CAROLINA ONE -CALL CONTACT
PROJECT MANAGER & UTILITY COORDINATOR.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST ALL WATER VALVES, WATER METER BOXES AND WATER
VAULTS TO FINISHED GRADE. WATER METERS LOCATED IN SIDEWALKS OR CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS
SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN CONCRETE BOXES.
GAS UNES WILL BE ADJUSTED/RELOCATED AS NEEDED BY PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS AT LEAST TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION.
GENERAL NOTES
TOLERANCE:
STRUCTURES INCLUDING STORM DRAIN PIPE. STORM STRUCTURES, SEWER PIPE, AND RETAINING
WALLS SHALL HAVE A TOLERANCE OF *010 FEET. STRUCTURES INCLUDING RISERS, WEIRS.
AND ORIFICES, SHALL HAVE A TOLERANCE OF ±0.05 FEET.
STREAM IMPROVEMENT STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A VERTICAL TOLERANCE OF ±0.10 FEET,
AND A PLANIMETRIC TOLERANCE OF *0.50 FEET,
SIDE SLOPES:
LIMITS OF PROPOSED SLOPES ARE INDICATED IN THE PLANS, DETAILS AND STANDARD
DRAWINGS. THE MAXIMUM SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED A 3 1 (HORIZONTAL TO VERTICAL)
UNLESS DESIGNATED BY THE ENGINEER. A CUT SLOPE OF 2:1 MAXIMUM WILL BE USED ONLY
AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
EROSION CONTROL:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
APPROPRIATE CITY AND STATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ORDINANCES. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT STANDING WATER DUE TO CONSTRUCTION. DISTURBED AREAS
SHALL B SEEDED AND MULCHED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER. THE
E EO EE E
SHALL FOLLOW THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES INCLUDED IN THIS PLAN SET.
ACCESSIBLE RAMPS AND DEPRESSED CURB:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT 6 -INCH THICK CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE RAMPS AT
INTERSECTIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST REVISIONS FOR ACCESSIBLE RAMP DETAILS,
CONSTRUCTION PLANS & NCOOT STANDARD DRAWINGS.
SA WCU TS:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAWCUT EXISTING ASPHALT AND /OR CONCRETE SURFACES PRIOR
TO REMOVAL UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY ME ENGINEER. SAW CUT WIDTH SHALL BE
1 FOOT MINIMUM FROM THE EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT. SAW CUT PAVEMENT SHALL BE
REPLACED AS WELL AS ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT REQUIRED TO TIE -IN TO FACE OF
PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER.
PAVEMENT DEGRADATION FEE:
CDOT HAS DETERMINED THAT NO PAVEMENT DEGRADATION FEE 15 TO BE ASSESSED.
CDOT AND E &PM HAVE AGREED ON THE STREET CUTS FOR WHICH A PAVEMENT DEGRADATION
FEE 15 REQUIRED. THE DEGRADATION FEE ASSESSMENT SHALL BE PAID VIA INTERNAL CITY
MECHANISMS (DTI) PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION
TRAFFIC CONTROL:
TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOST CURRENT EDITION OF THE 'WORK
AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL HANDBOOK" (WATCH).
BASE SURVEY DATA
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND WATER LINE: EXISTING CONDITIONS TAKEN FROM GROUND SURVEY BY R.B. PHARR AND
ASSOCIATES DATED 1/28/2015.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE CARE WHEN WORKING AROUND SANITARY SEWERS AND WATER
I LINES. SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR DAMAGE EXISTING SEWER OR WATER ONES, HE SHALL
IMMEDIATELY REPLACE THE LINE AT HIS EXPENSE WITH DUCTILE IRON PIPE. THE CONTRACTOR
! SHALL REPLACE SANITARY SEWER AND /OR WATER UNE, WITH A MINIMUM TEN FOOT SECTION
OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE WHEN DRAINAGE PIPE COMES WITHIN TWO FEET OF SAID UNES,
I VERTICALLY OR HORIZONTALLY.
€ SUBSURFACE PLANS:
( NO SUBSURFACE PLANS ARE AVAILABLE ON THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR MAY MAKE
EHIS OWN INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS.
MAIL BOXES:
i THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RELOCATE ALL MAIL BOXES AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 107 -12 OF THE
NCOOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROADS AND STRUCTURES. COORDINATE THIS WORK WITH
THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE.
FENCES:
CL ■ THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND RESET FENCES AS NOTED ON THE PLANS AND /OR AS
T DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
TREES, SHRUBS, AND HEDGES:
5 f THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE TREES. SHRUBS. AND HEDGES WITHIN THE UMITS OF DISTURBANCE
1 UNLESS SHOWN ON THE PLANS TO BE PROTECTED AMID THOSE THAT FALL WITHIN THE TREE PROTECTION
BARRIERS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO PROTECT TREES AND SHRUBS OUTSIDE OF CUT/FILL LINES IN
ADDITION TO THOSE THAT RECEIVE TREES /SHRUB PROTECTION BARRIERS. WHEN ROOT PRUNING IS
NECESSARY. CUT ROOTS CLEANLY USING A DISC TRENCHER OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD IN ACCORDANCE
y, WITH SECTION 01000 OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. PRUNING
SHALL BE PER THE LATEST STANDARD OF THE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL (TYP.)
USE PLYWOOD FORMS WHEN TREE ROOTS ARE ADJACENT TO PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER OR SIDEWALK.
a USE OLD STD. 40.11 FOR BRIDGING TREE ROOTS, TREES SPECIFIED BY THE PLANS TO HAVE ASPHALT
CURBING MUST USE CLO STD. 40.13. TREE PROTECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE 1W1H CUD 5M, 40.02
AND WITH SECTION 1000 OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. WHEN THE
TREE IS CLOSE TO THE WORK AREA TREE PROTECTION OLD STD. 40.12 SHALL BE USED.
CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN APPROVAL FROM THE CITY PRIOR TO REMOVING ANY TREES. IN ADDITION.
ALL TREES LOCATED WITHIN THE LOD THAT ARE TO REMAIN AFTER CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE INSPECTED
_ BE THE CITY TO VERIFY THEY ARE SUITABLE TO REMAIN.
FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION STAKING THE PROJECT TEAM (CONTRACTOR. CITY INSPECTOR. CITY ARBORIST
Y AND CONSULTANT. IF APPLICABLE) WILL HOLD AN ON -STE MEETING TO ENSURE THE UNITS OF
c DISTURBANCE AND THAT TREES PROPOSED FOR PROTECTION ARE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED. THE TEAM WALL
WALK THE PROJECT AREA AND AGREE ON THE TREES TO BE PROTECTED AND THOSE TO REMOVE. DISCUSS
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. AND IDENTIFY ANY ADDITIONAL TREES TO PROTECT THAT WERE NOT
c ORIGINALLY MARKED AS SUCH. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE OVEN APPROVAL FOR TREE REMOVAL IN
NRITNG. AFTER APPROPRIATE TREE PROTECTION HAS BEEN INSTALLED AND BEFORE ANY CLEARING OR
c REMOVAL CAN BEGIN.
THERE WALL BE NO ADDITIONAL PAYMENT FOR TREE PROTECTION INSTALLED AROUND ADDITIONAL TREES
IDENTFIED FOR PROTECTION.
THE CONTRACTOR ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR "IN -KIND" REPLACEMENT OF TREES DAMAGED THAT HAVE
BEEN MARKED FOR PROTECTION OR NOT MARKED FOR REMOVAL.
ABBREVIATIONS
ABAND.. ......ABANDONED
TO SCALE
A D .. ...............................
ALGEBRAIC
DIFFERENCE ASPH ..........
ASPHALT
APPRO X ..........................
APPROXIMATELY
B /C ...... ...........................BACK
OF CURB
BIT .............. .....................BITUMINOUS
BM .......... ...............BENCH
MARK
BRG..... __.......BEARING
OF INT
CB..... _. ...............CATCH
BASIN
C &G .... ...........................CURB
AND GUTTER
CL. . ......... ... ...
­*.C1­EARANCIE CA
FENCE ... ..........................CHAIN
LINK FENCE
CMP ........... .....................CORRUGATED
MTL
PIPE CONIC ...._.._...........
CONCRETE
C ON ST ........ ....................CONSTRUCTION
UTILITY ESMT
DB ........ ...........................DEED
BOOK
DCB ....... ..........................DOUBLE
CB
DI ......... ...........................DROP
INLET
D A ... ...............................
D I AM E TE R
DW .... ...............................
DRIVEWAY
D VEW Y
DIM ............ ......................DIMENSION
H
SOUTH
E .......... .............. ...........
EAST/E ASTI N G
EA.... ...............
EACH
ELEV....... _..... _ .............-
ELEVATION
EDP ...... ...........................EDGE
OF PAVEMENT
ESMT­ ............
EASEMENT
EXIST ................EXISTING
STANDARD
F /C ...... ...........................FACE
OF CURB
FES.... _ ... .........................FLARED
END SECTION
FH ....... ............................FIRE
HYDRANT
FOC ... ................._........_FIBER
OPTIC CABLE
GV ....... ............................GAS
VALVE
HORIZ ...... ........................HORIZON
TAL
INT .............. ....................INTERSECTION
TYPICAL
IN V ......... .........................INVERT
GROUND
VIP ......... ...........................IRON
PIN SET
L........... ...........................LENG
M
LF ........... .........................LINEAR
FOOTAGE
LT......... ...........................LEFT
WITH
Ib..... ...............................
POUND
LP ......... ..........................LIGHT
POLE
MAX........ _. _... _.... _. _......MAXIMUM
VALVE
MIN .......... ........................MINIMUM
PENNY NAIL SET
MONO ...........................
. -MONOU THIC
mph .... _ .... ...._ ..............MILES
PER HOUR
MTL... _.......... _ ................METAL
N . _... - .............................
NORTH/NORTHING
NTS ..........................NOT
TO SCALE
O /H .........................
OVER HEAD
OC._...._....._........_..ON
CENTER
PAVT ........................
PAVEMENT
PC .. ..........................POINT
OF CURVATURE
PERM ........................PERMANENT
PG ............................
PAGE
PI ... ..........................POINT
OF INT
P...­ .......................PK
NAIL SET
PP .. ..........................POWER
POLE
PROP ........................
PROPOSED
PSE ..........................PERM
SW ESMT
PT .. ..........................POINT
OF TANGENCY
PIA. ...______....__...POINT
OF VERT INT
PUE ..........................PERM
UTILITY ESMT
r ...............................
RADIUS
RT ..............................
RIGHT
RCP ..... .....................REINFORCED
CONC
PIPE RELOC ..............RELOCATE
R/W ..........................RIGHT
OF WAY
S ...............................
H
SOUTH
SO .. ..........................STORM
DRAIN
SF ... .........................SQUARE
FOOT S/R
FENCE ......................SPLIT
RAIL FENCE
SS ..... .......................SANITARY
SEWER
STA ..........................
STATION
STD ..........................
STANDARD
SW ............................
SIDEWALK
TAN ..........................
TANGENT
TCE ...........................TEMP
CONST ESMT
TEMP ........................
TEMPORARY
TP ..... .......................TRAVERSE
POINT
T/W ........................TEST
WIRE
TYP ..........................
TYPICAL
U/G ..........................UNDER
GROUND
VC .... ........................VERTICAL
CURVE
VERT .........................
VERTICAL
W........ _ ...........
........ WEST
W / ............................
WITH
WM . ..........................WATER
METER W
VAULT ......................WATER
VAULT
WV . ..........................WATER
VALVE
60p .........................SIXTY
PENNY NAIL SET
'........ _.. _.... _...........
FOOT
..... ...........................INCH
mark HJ
' -I AR,em NOW
I
Fkmmrary SMael * i'Y
1
{
SITE
- d
s
- i
SITE LOCATION MAP
NOT TO SCALE
CONVENTIONAL SIGNS
a
Proposed Property Line ............... __ ... _ ..... - - i
Existing Property
Maintained as R/W Line ............................ -
ExistingStructures ....... ................... » ... „_„ -
Railroad Tracks .......... ................._... » „..._....
Proposed Edge of Pavement .............. _ ....
Fence........................ ......................---”' "--" y.
Slope Stake Line ............................. _ ... ..... c F —
Temporary Construction Easement __. ».. ».. — e e —
Sidewalk(Lltilily Easement ............. __ ....... — SUE SUE —
CR
Storm Drainage Easement ........... _............. — SI sDE— L©
OExisting Gas Line ........ ..............._... » ........... c c ° T `�
i
Existing Water Line ................................ „..... w w
Existing Sanitary Sewer .............. __.............. — SS SS —
Existing Underground Telecommunications
Existing Underground Electric _..... » » » » ».... UE UE
z
Existing Storm Drainage ............_... » » „ ». » „. = Isalslsl� Z c
v.
Proposed Storm Drainage . ......... _... » „ » „... ».
c
ExistingTree .......................................................... ...... » ... __ ....... ... � •� °'
WM
Existing Water Meter ...................................... .......... .. ... ..... --------- ❑
wv
Existing Water Valve ................... ............................ » ..... ... _
GV
ExistingGas Valve ............................................................ __...------ D<
Existing Sanitary Sewer Manhole ............... .... . ................. ..- _- _.....0
Proposed Sanitary Sewer Manhole .............................. „ ... __ ... _ ... � o_
i¢i `
Existing Storm Drain Manhole ... ...... ....................... __.�.__ -- at
Proposed Storm Drain Manhole._ ........... ..................___.- __.___.•
Existing Telephone Manhole ........................... .............. »... » » » »... » ».„.Q �-
Proposed Telephone Manhole ......................................... ... » ... _». ».�
Existing Electric Manhole ............ ............................................ ....... „_ O m
Proposed Electric Manhole ............................................................. „..„
c`
Existing Catch Basin .................................................... „ ... ......... ». ... ».E� +
ProposedCatch Basin ................................................ _ „ ..... ....... ...... i -
ExistingLight Pole ................... ................................ ... _ „ ... „ ... ......
ProposedLight Pole ....... ........................... ............... _ ... __._ „_
Existing Utility Pole ............................................................. - " ... _ ... 'O. s n
I7
Guy Wirt.. ...................................... .. ........................ - ..... ..... . -------
-
ProposedUtility Pole ................................................. ... » .......... -... y`
IronPin .............................................................. ............. „ „........___...__ C
ExistingFire Hydrant ................................... ............ »... „. ».. „. » „ ». » „ ». .
ProposedFire Hydrant .......................... .......................... .. ... -.___.
Existing Drop Inlet .................. ................................. » » » ... __.__ ». „_ ».L3 PRELIMINARY
Proposed Drop Inlet .................................................. » ». » »__.____».. NOT FOR
—®
Accessible Ramp ....................................................... _ ».....___._ CONSTRUCTION
Tree Protection .......................................................... » ... ....... ��
Proposed Guardrail .................................. ........................... »...
SillFence .......................................................... .. ............ .. ......... _
Proposed Curb & Gutter, Cone. Drive, Sidewalk-.....­­... t'
Proposed Asphalt Pavement ............................. ....... „ ......... „_ L:a
Proposed Rip Rap Ditch .................................................... ..... ... % ✓)
..
ProposedGravel .................................................. „_ ...... _._ „_. „..
Proposed Pavement Removal ............. ................__. »__._ „... „_. t= Q
Proposed Sidewalk Bridging Tree Roots._.......».....»_. -».»». W
ProposedMill ....................................................... _ ... _ ... „ ... „.. F.I
z
L` V
Know wears below.
Call before you dig
— GC
O
O
O
fV
0
0
ty
^C
O
n
O
O
O
W
.�1

W ;
b'
O
I'
WC
I I'
N'
U '
in
u 1
0
+r, S l (P -RP W) - Impact 3
/ / ^ \ 461f- Temporary
ANIMEA M.
NIKON D 41s Installation of Impervious Dike/
.. x554?' 727 / \ Rock Check Dam
LOT 64: PIN }y -M04i ?
X n
°M1tr EY. •1 � <
/ S1(P -RPW) - Impact 1 °.Er ^"» a ; w1ncR�
/ 85 If - Permanent -No Net Loss TEMPORARY EASEMENT, AVOID
Rest orationdStabilization DISTURBING SEPTIC TANK. EXACT
81f -Net Gain (9311' LOCATION OF SEPTIC TANK IS Total) \ TEMPORARY
UNKNOWN, CONTRACTOR TO NE STORY BRICK HOUSE CONSTRUCTION
/ EXERCISE DUE CARE 1.242 So. FT.
'a, 7 ENTRANCE y$
/ \. ° r d
ROBERT W. AND MARJORIE S. SIMS 11
AMANw R. N1 1: S1(P- RPW)- Impacl2 DB. 28987, PG. 761 P wrN sraoP vnTN�
08. 249x6, Pc. 2e9 LOT 10; BLOCK 5; MB. 1923, PG. 385 5 STEPS
LOT 65: El ocK 1; Me. x1, Pc. ]2] 10 If - Temporary PROJECT AREA, SEE PIN: 135 - 032 -10 cARPORD
PIN: 133- 0x2 -39 Installation of tmpervious Dike SHEETS 3 AND 4 PnriD
and Pump Around 43 753 SQ. Fr-
and OR 1.0044 AGES _
w Al C,
•"• � —� GRPVEI � y
a �
i e
v i
STIR C. LO OAM•IC1aN �. L// - - x; PROPERTY FOLLO a • • `- ^
DL 27006. Pc. 116 i \ CENTERLINE OF CRE ' -a yr .
LOT 36: BLOCK 2: \ I I \1-[ °0' 1 50
MB. 22, PG. 1II w WaS °pa E �a
PIN: 135 - 1322 -66 �/j,r na , TEMPO RY
STAGING EA `r E nc E - E ,��, �1z.
CREEK r 1°R •,�/ ^ \ 55
ss ,".,,,.. eoiacwn r s. net � � �• r� - I I °r as � � - ' �r�na - - :r�. eva,
�� na imp". wetyN� 1°• 11¢ nNr 1 I � � � _ na � � nwiA �: TnEE r 196 F, - - - S�
°',qr Nr IW?UINn• w Q � •'� �� r � - _ _ - - - - V ��� I •'a_�r - - / I m- ,ao o' °"""` w r �, �\ �
a lrrz • r lrrt r ■
k z X r - -- - - e
' I y E - Is• Im S2(P -RPW) - Impact 5
�a�a MP a HE` 0 5411- Permanent -No Net Loss
—°s° ��•I a 6 eI m`,�e Restoration /Stabilization
jI' I f l
S2(P- RPW)- Impact 4
1` — ® F ..i ®— — �: as s`li Pa — — — — — — 10 If - Permanent -No Net Loss
TEMPORARY EASEMENT I MICHAEL AND VERONICA MCP.EA '0N l I I Install Constructed Riffle
DB, 10554, PG. 344 I I I
ROBERT C AND JAN R. FULLER I LOT B; BLOCK 5; MB. 8, PG. 197
DB. 10013, PG. 389 PIN: 135 - 032 -08 1 1 I TEMPORARY EASEMENT
TODD C. AND MAY M. 7CEoN x LOT 7; BLOCK 5; MB. 8, PG. 197 21,023 S0. FT.
Da 20035. Pc. s3z 1 PIN: 135- 032 -07 OR D. a ACRES
LOT 6: BLOCK 3: MB. a, M 167 22.464 �. �. ° / I DEANNA WILLIAMS
PIN: 1}5- 032 -o6 1 OR 0.5137 ACRES
\ ' / D8. BLOCK 5; B. 125
DECK SO4 -'a°�w DECN ' I LOT 9; BLOCK 5 03 0 PC. 595
E\ t PIN: 135 - 032 -09
OR 6.4384 ACRES
I
so.
KWD W
If - Temporary
stallation of Impervious Dike
Td Pump Around I
�//
it 18
/7153...
I
\ I I
I
I
I
I 1
SIDEWALK
K
� e I
I d I
I
I I
wrou Nu I
TEMPORARY I al
CONSTRUCTION g
ENTRANCE I
of
� N1YT �I 1
H
w Tm s, 165Qa �.. w.as euSD r
rMa" mr.4W4 rr.. 191
ELWOOD DRIW s
ASPI T 60' PUB(,C
M�
a Rp M- Of- WAYr�S 4W
W >aoN 5
_. 49°n
CONCRETE
a
I
6J I I ¢e\ \5,034
1
I I
I I / sTOST� w
I W
]EPFPggE50 SAE
OR 0.0269 l-S
I I I
AFTER PROJECT ACCEPTANCE BY
THE CITY REPAIR DRIVEWAY TO
MATCH PRE - CONSTRUCTION
CONDITIONS
0 \�
E Eu
s
Sam d
A' _
s�
ul
IN13
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 10 20 40
Ofa4EKPY 8
CONCR
Th�
\
DECK
70 \
N
0
00
N
1
1P
M Pw
s o..0.1 1.�° r•o
/
/
1
s sS ,
fsl
�
Ss V TM /
I>
o
a
1
U
t
so.
KWD W
If - Temporary
stallation of Impervious Dike
Td Pump Around I
�//
it 18
/7153...
I
\ I I
I
I
I
I 1
SIDEWALK
K
� e I
I d I
I
I I
wrou Nu I
TEMPORARY I al
CONSTRUCTION g
ENTRANCE I
of
� N1YT �I 1
H
w Tm s, 165Qa �.. w.as euSD r
rMa" mr.4W4 rr.. 191
ELWOOD DRIW s
ASPI T 60' PUB(,C
M�
a Rp M- Of- WAYr�S 4W
W >aoN 5
_. 49°n
CONCRETE
a
I
6J I I ¢e\ \5,034
1
I I
I I / sTOST� w
I W
]EPFPggE50 SAE
OR 0.0269 l-S
I I I
AFTER PROJECT ACCEPTANCE BY
THE CITY REPAIR DRIVEWAY TO
MATCH PRE - CONSTRUCTION
CONDITIONS
0 \�
E Eu
s
Sam d
A' _
s�
ul
IN13
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 10 20 40
Ofa4EKPY 8
CONCR
Th�
\
DECK
70 \
N
0
00
N
1
1P
M Pw
s o..0.1 1.�° r•o
/
/
55
s sS ,
fsl
�
Ss V TM /
NUMENT •M 059'
I (M NG �DNAO E %
N' 53 . '+].]l
I E= x09.9]
I EIEV°
]1196 INAw BB)
I I
) I /
NGS MONUMENT 'M 061 ,
ASPN�T /
—AFTER PROJECT ACCEPTANCE BY
THE CITY REPAIR DRIVEWAY TO
MATCH PRE - CONSTRUCTION
CONDITIONS
Know what s below.
Call before you dig
e Ig'a
o 1
r °
It w o =
F6
°
N
IS
n
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
O
O
O
C
0
00
cu
fsl
�
I>
o
a
LWL �
r,^
Vl O
(7] O
Q O �
O
r^
! ■ASV/
I
CIO

�Id
n '
O
a I
I I
a 'f
oll
m
< )
f\ '
700
am
i TEMPORARY EASEMENT
LP �
'TIE TO 5.
EXISTING 'TIE TO
GROUND °
GROUND x 694.7 .—a— _ F GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET PROOSED *8 LF TREE { PROTEECTION FENCE PER PROPOSED 0 5 70 20
JEMSTING
*12 LF TREE
6ga t CLDSM 40.02 PROTECTION FENCE PER
10• MINT ` _ _ _ — z 693.5 CLDSM 40.02 x 693.3
x 693.9 C
TYPICAL SECTION 93 6 A PROPOSED CREEK ®6" TREE EXISTING CREEK
(NOT L SECT CENTERLINE CENTERLINE
PROPOSED CREEK D
gg" T {F
FLOWPATH 6n ` e
\ x 693.6 c � I y 6929` 1
x E932 B ` / 11 ` 6" TREE o
1 +56 \ - T E TRIPLE �O /24" Ti �• TR SIN
3 B 3 T 5 _ 3.1 s 118 I m 15" g" TREE /
700 � \�\4 � +.�{� -� '_ 5�95� _ _ � �7pG — = =— — — j'•J- -�� _ �' �
�(& -
w- 6
_ y7
3 1 692
-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 a 10 20 70 40 50 \ \ \ J 1 I `6 _ 6 2.2
SECTION "A -A" —t B J CHECK DAM, SEE
EU ° °- �� D C LIP
` e ° DETAIL SHEET 4
l A
1 +74 ` PRESERVE TREES
700
590
� D
700 \ x 693.6 3 Sa93.0 7
694.4
x 693.1 x 692.
x
PROPOSED *1230 SY OF DISTURBED AREA TO BE SEEDED WITH r-,,,S\\H ED`o
TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEEDING TO MATCH EXISTING
PER THE SEEDING SCHEDULES ON SHEET 6. APPROXIMATELY
690 275 SY OF RIPARIAN SEED MIX UNDER COIR MATTING AND 955 SY
OF NON - RIPARIAN SEED MIX IN ALL OTHER AREAS EXCEPT
UNDER COIR MATTING
$so 680
575 675
-80 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 70 40 50
SECTION "B -B"
1 +95
e90
700
590
680 fi80
E75 50 -40 -30 -20 -10 a 10 20 30 40 50 75
SECTION "C -C"
2+21
i 700
v fi
n° 3
ego
5c 1
1
E
660
675 50 La _3o -20 -10 a ID 2D 20 40
SECTION "D -D"
700
J 660
6]5
So
+2b Y +uu 2 +51
PROFILE
NOTE:
1. LOGS SET AT 0% SLOPE.
2. FLOW ROCK SET AT ELEVATION
SHOWN IN PROFILE. THE REMAINING
BOULDERS SHALL SLOPE TOWARDS
THE BANKS AT 1 %.
tZ
f'
l
O
z ^ w y Z
x` c
c cu ..1
C
` ' c
i
I
=1'I�IIa l�i:
O
PRELIMINARY O
NOT FOR
O
CONSTRUCTION
o
A�
�M
n�
+m
+�
W
+ + °m
em
±m a>
x
Q
U
L''
>
•�
<1 <>
N�
�
n
O
Lr:
G
0
692
U
i
O
Z
O
Q
Q
O
x>
r
C
�
x
W
Know whars below.
�o
Call before you dig.
-
M
EX5TNG GRADE AT N w
+�
E%ISIINC CENTE]iIJHE
1 >
EXISTING GRADE AT
�>
om
PROPOSED GiTIIERIINE
< J
O o
m
I
�w
II>
ry
N
^
e
e>
<
nm
II�
I
/
PROPOSED Cj1A0
AT POSED LINE
J//
nE TO En5111
/
688
688
U
I�
I�J�1
LOG (TW)
nE TO EXISTING
9MOCR (M)
U
685
685
h
�
CT
�
m
n
r
m
+2b Y +uu 2 +51
PROFILE
NOTE:
1. LOGS SET AT 0% SLOPE.
2. FLOW ROCK SET AT ELEVATION
SHOWN IN PROFILE. THE REMAINING
BOULDERS SHALL SLOPE TOWARDS
THE BANKS AT 1 %.
tZ
f'
l
O
z ^ w y Z
x` c
c cu ..1
C
` ' c
i
I
=1'I�IIa l�i:
O
PRELIMINARY O
NOT FOR
O
CONSTRUCTION
A�
�M
W
Q
U
L''
>
•�
�
C
O
Lr:
G
0
U
i
O
Z
O
Q
Q
O
r
C
�
x
W
Know whars below.
Call before you dig.
-
M
x

O ;
4�
m
n I
N
f
O
a �
I j
a s
'TIE TO
EXISTING TIE TO
GROUND EXISTING
GROUND
DITCH TYPICAL SECTION
(NOT TO SCALE)
1 +50
700
O
PRELIMINARY
____
..
__
___
___. _ _.
700
690
O
_
_... ..
_ _.
ago
0°5-50
-40
—s0
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40 508°5
SECTION "A -A"
/z xZZZZ, i,
PROPOSED 10 TONS RIP RAP
BELOW WOOD BRIDGE AND
a�aAROUND EXISTING FOOTERS
PROPOSED 5'X10'CONSTRUCTED
RIFFLE, 1' DEEP WITH WELL GRADED
MIX OF #57 2 " -12" RIP RAP AND
ONSITE EARTH MATERIAL
1 +65 PERMANENT SEEDING TO MATCH EXISTING PER THE SEEDING SCHEDULES ON
SHEET 6 APPROXIMATELY 95 SY OF RIPARIAN SEED MIX UNDER COIR MATTING
700
990
ago
975
-50 -40 -00 -20 -10 0 10 20 00 40 50
SECTION "B -B"
AND 355 SY OF NON - RIPARIAN SEED MIX IN ALL OTHER AREAS EXCEPT UNDER
COIR MATTING. Egg
700
ago
N
aeo
675
1+60
U 333
700
17
i
o
m .Q
< b
n y
% LY
« ,a
R
0
0 a75
! -SO -10 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50
SECTION "C -C"
0
S i
a
1 +95
N
V
700
N a
ig
ego
i�
]C
V
E
aao
a75
SECTION "D -D"
700
690
660
675
ago
680
975
EMSRNG GRADE
\
AT CENTERLINE
692
SET ELEVATION TO MATCH-/
THE ELEVATION UPSTREAM
OF WOOD BRIDGE
EL- 690.903
PROPOSED GRADE
AT CENTERLINE
688
a
f EMSMNG PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
BGILOER (TIP)
� m
t0
m� NN
II n°p m0
<J
NW
+b
<
b nN
11> }tD
n gl
rn � < 1 } W
.o
< }gyp V) N
<> ° m
FW +e N1O
WW 1 1
1> <
F H
N W
+00 PROFILE 2+00
' ,,
I I I � i r ck
\ \�\\
111
t
-TIE TO EASING
664
x
NORTH
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 5 10 20
NOTE:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT REMOVE
ANY TREES OR DISTURB CONCRETE
PAD WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL
FROM CITY.
5'
ca �tq
I�
;I
i11� r
O o
m � �
/^ > z
97 «o
G z S V
N
0
0
N
III
O
PRELIMINARY
O
O
NOT FOR
p
CONSTRUCTION
C
0
O
0
0
C
z
O
o
z
Q
�
O
�
W
Know whaYs B@IOW.
0111 before you dig
-
z �
- �

71
o
U
N
Y 1
o {
E
c
NOTES
1. General:
Live stakes are to be installed on exposed stream banks as shown below. The Engineer reserves
the right to reject any "stakes" that do not meet the above mentioned criteria. The Contractor shall
replace rejected work at no additional cost to the owner.
Materials:
*Live stakes are to be dormant (cut fall or winter) and gathered locally or purchased from
commercial supplier.
-Stakes must be freshly cut with side branches removed, but with bark intact (ensure that the bark
is not stripped during the cutting, preparation, or installation of the stake).
*Cuttings are to be collected using a saw or pruning shears (not an ax).
I 3. Preparation:
*One end must be cut at an angle for insertion into the soil and the other end must be cut square
I
I for tamping.
r •Cuttings must be kept fresh and moist prior to installation.
fj
*Cuttings must be prepared from 0.5 to 2 -inch diameter stock and approximately 2 to 3 feet in
length.
I
4. Installation:
i
• Install stakes the same day they are prepared.
• Installation should occur only between November 15 and March 15
*Start the installation nearest to the stream and work up the bank'floodplain.
I •Cuttings must be installed right side up with the buds pointing upward.
•Cuttings should be tamped into the ground at right angles to the slope and angled slightly
downstream.
I
•They are to be tamped into the ground for approximately 4/5 oftheir length.
-Cuttings that split or become "mushroomed" must be replaced.
i •Stakes should be installed in a random configuration to prevent gullies and promote a more
natural effect in the re- vegetated area-
FLAT TOP END
0,0UN0
LATERAL BUD , , SURFACE
BARK IOom
SIDE BRANCH _
REMOTER
� F
I
LOW SEASONAL
14TO TABLE
A6' TAPER
BUTT UO
LIVE STAKE DETAIL
N'S
2' -3' UVE CUTTING
LIVE STAKES
fABLUSHm PLANT SHOWN
i INFORMATION ONLY
INSTALL SPLIT 2' X 12'
DEAD STOUT STAKES PER SPE019CATfONS
PER MANUFACTURERS REQUIREMENTS
NOTE:
IF USING WOVEN COIR
FIBER MAT, INSTALL
LONG STRAW MULCH
BENEATH MAT.
DIRECTION
OFF ROW
KEY RIP RAP INTO
EXISTING BANK
NON -WOVEN TYPE II
FILTER FABRIC
�BANKFULL
ELEVATION
AM FLOW
z.5 _ --
MIN.
BACKFILL W/ 5X2.5' DEEP
GRADATION OF 2 " -12' RIP
RAP, 057 STONE AND
NATURAL MATERIAL
NON -WOVEN TYPE II PRE- FORMED SCOUR HOLE.
FILTER FABRIC (UNDER DEPTH VARIES.
ENTIRE STRUCTURE)
COIR FIBER
MAT NG
ANCHORS ON
3' CENTERS
STREAM BED
PLAN VIEW
1B'
ANCHORS ON
V CENTERS
IN TRENCH
—EXTEND MATTING BELOW TOE OF
SLOPE AND KEY INTO STREAMBED
MIN. 6'
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
NOTES.
IN AREAS TO BE MATTED, ALL SEEDING, SOL
AMENDMENTS. AND SOIL FNNEPARAl10N MUST BE
COMPLETED M ACCO DA N WITH THE PRO ECT
SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF COIR
FIBS MATTING.
TORS p
ENTERS
ANCHORS
6-X6' MIN. TRENCH
WVODEIJ STAKE
�I
INSTALLATION GUIDE FOR COIR FIBER MATTING
EXISTING GROUND
(17' POIX. WIDTH)
2' 2' _ KEY BOULDERS INTO EXISTING GROUND
BANKFULL DRIP RAP, PLACE LARGER BOULDERS
ELEVATION 2.0' AS FOOTER ROCKS (PLACE FOOTER
APPROX. ROCKS BELOW BOTTOM ELEVATION
I 2' -S OF CHANNEL). BOULDERS ARE TO
(TYP.) BE APPROVED BY DESIGNER PRIOR
. TO INSTALLATION.
f'FiQFJLE
—FILL GAPS WITH RIP
4' -5' — RAP
SECTION A-A
BACKFILL W/ 1.0' DEEP
GRADATON OF 2' -12' RIP
RAP, 057 STONE AND
NATURAL MATERIAL
STEP POOL STRUCTURE
NOT TO SCALE
TOP OF BANK
PROFILE
';
M
V �y
i
O °y
Y
te g
m °
g
d O Z
Imo
: ter,
a ' zo C
i
'1111
U
L
p MI I I <
o
o
I I
n
�
SEDIMENT CONTROL STRUCTURAL STONE
-
Q
STONE (05 OR 057) (5' -12' RIP RAP)
O
O
COO
c
w 'SS
ry
1
Know whars below.
BASE OF I
TOP OF BANK
Call before you dig.
O
STREAM
PRELIMINARY
O
TOP VIEW
NOT FOR
O
2
T r
CONSTRUCTION
NO
STREAM BED-/
FRONT VIEW
MO
W
TEMPORARY ROCK SILT G-IECK /CHECK DAM
NOT TO SCALE
U
L
a
o
Q
O
O
1
Know whars below.
Call before you dig.
-
Lr,
x

i
I
tit
9
HEADER BOULDER ,TYP. SCOUR POOL, WELL GRADED MIX OF
SEE PROFILE FOR ELEVATION 2 " -12" RIP RAP, i57 STONE AND
NATURAL CHANNEL MATERIAL
FL....�W O
i `n
\ ^ 2
`BED w ,
WELL GRADED MIX OF 2 " -12" Y MIN. rr
g RIP RAP, /57 STONE AN
z W `
L NATURAL CHANNEL MATERIAL FOOTER BOULDER ` Z e GJ
E BOULDERS IN VANE ARM SHOULD NOT BE
E - GAPPED OR HAVE ANY SIGNIFICANT SPACES °oo
! EXCAVATED TRENCH FOOTER BED. 6" DEPTH OF 057 STONE !�
3B FOR ROCK CRO55 Y
Z F VANE CONSTRUCTION NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYP.
E M SECTION A -A
a i
N TIE INTO SPECIFIED
r BANKFULL ELEVATION a,
a HEADER BOULDERS
N FLOW
's
6
F
rNONWOVEN BACKFILL WITH NATURAL
CHANNEL MATERIAL 1.0• MIN. FOOTER BOULDERS . FLOW HEADER LOG, TYP. SEE
o is WELL GRADED MIX OF 2 " -12" GEOTEXTILE BOULDERS IN VANE ARM SHOULD — PROFILE FOR ELEVATION i
N i RIP RAP, 057 STONE AND FABRIC, TYP. NOT BE GAPPED OR HAVE ANY - II
NATURAL CHANNEL MATERIAL SEC.TIt SIGNIFICANT SPACES C
O 'a,
BED
'ly '� 'W \
/ CJ
BACKFILL (TYP), SEE f MIN.
5 COVER UPSTREAM FACES Y 2/3 BASE MOTH
I
i °w W SEPARATE DETAIL y MN.
EXCAVATED POOL
a WITH NONWOVEN z; .z
I p GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYP. m 'm A I EXCAVATED TRENCH TF SEE o i A BA SEP RATE (TYP)
v o NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYP.
9°o g g; KEY INTO BANK A NAIL FILTER FABRIC TO BACK OF LOG,
MINIMUM OF 4.0' SEE PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS
WELL GRADED MIX OF 2" -12' PRELIMINARY
� RIP RAP, i57 STONE AND —
i NATURAL CHANNEL MATERIAL
o POOLS EXCAVATED I NOT FOR
d PER PROFILE
BOULDERS TO BE SECTION A -A CONSTRUCTION
3
FOOTER LOG ( o BURIED AND PLACED
AT END OF LOGS
< HEADER LOG
I
� WELL GRADED MIX OF 2 " -12" I
a RIP RAP, /57 STONE AND
3
NATURAL CHANNEL MATERIAL P
HEADER BOULDER
a
I Ty
L A POOL EXCAVATED PER PROFILE A
$# FOOTER BOULDER OR DIRECTION OF ENGINEER WRAP 6" UP TOE OF SLOPE
1. DO NOT EXCAVATE POOL TOO CLOSE TO FOOTER LOG.
Z CLASS 'A' STONE BE e PLAN VEW PLAN VEW 3 PACT A UL T�POSSIBLE OR AT THEN Q
HEADERS AND FOOTERS
♦. POOL DEPTH SHOU(p Z TO 3 TIMES BANK LL DEPTH. Ui
S MIN. LOG SIZE
6. MN. BOULDER SIZE 20'.
e BOULDER STEP LOG SILL U ;:
NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE
N
f
aK
I
Y Si
S "
O
O
Kno whatsbeIOW.
Call before you dig -
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
cc
b
0
V
0
O
O
O
O
R,
L1J

nl0
�I
�I
YI
O
C
LPUMP ° J
AROUND GRADATION OF
HOSE N 8 " -12" RIP RAP
1 L
2
PLAN
PUMP
AROUND
HOSE
o °
i0
FILTER FABRIC
SECTION A -A
ENERGY DISSIPATOR FOR PUMP AROUND HOSE
BYPASS PUMPING FOR CULVERT CONSTRUCTION T
BYPASS PUMPING SEQUENCE
I. SET UP BYPASS PUMP AND TEMPORARY PIPING. PLACE OUTLET
OF TEMPRRARY PIPE TO MINIMIZE EROSION AT DISCHARGE SITE OR
PROVIDE TEMPORARY ENERGY DISSIPATION MEASURES. FIRMLY
ANCHOR PUMP AND PIPING,
2.CONSTRUCT OUTLET PROTECTION IF NEEDED.
3.CONSTRUCT IMPERVIOUS DIKE UPSTREAM OF WORK AREA TO
IMPOUND WATER FOR BYPASS PUMP INTAKE. USE A FLOATING
INTAKE FOR PUMPS WHERE POSSIBLE
4. CONSTRUCT AN IMPERVIOUS DIKE DOWNSTREAM, IF NECESSARY, TO
ISOLATE WORK AREA
5. CHECK OPERATION OF PUMP AND PIPING SYSTEM
EUPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. REMOVE IMPERVIOUS DIKE,
BYPASS PUMP, AND TEMPORARY PIPE.
BYPASS PUbPM NOTES
(.BYPASS PUMP (2" MIN.) SHALL HAVE SUFFICIENT CAPACITY TO
ADEQUATELY DIVERT STREAM BASE FLOW.
2.AN ENERGY DISSIPATOR FOR PUMP AROUND HOSE SHALL BE USED
WHEN PUMPING CLEAN WATER AROUND THE WORK AREA.
3.DEWATERING DEVICE SHALL BE A SPECIAL STILLING BASIN PER
NCDOT 1630.06 AND SHALL BE USED WHEN PUMPING SEDIMENT
LADEN WATER FROM THE WORK AREA
4.THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO CONSTRUCT
THE PROPOSED CULVERTS DURING LONG PERIODS WHEN
PRECIPITATION IS NOT ANTICIPATED. SHOULD RAIN BE
ANTICIPATED, AN 8" MIN. EMERGENCY BYPASS PUMP MAY BE
PROVIDED TO PREVENT WATER FROM FLOWING THROUGH THE
REWIRED TEMPORARY PIPE AND DIVERT WATER SAFELY AROUND
THE WORK AREA
5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR STABIUZING THE
WORK AREA IN ADVANCE OF ANY EVENT THAT WILL NOT BE
PUMPED AROUND THE WORK AREA, BUT PASSED THROUGH THE
WORK AREA WITH THE TEMPORARY PIPE SHOWN ON THIS SHEET.
THE IMPERVIOUS DIKE SHALL NOT PERMIT SEEPAGE OF WATER INTO
THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OR CONTRIBUTE TO SILTATION OF THE
STREAM. THE IMPERVIOUS DIKE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF AN
ACCEPTABLE MATERIAL IN THE LOCATIONS NOTED ON THE PLANS OR
AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
ACCEPTABLE MATERIALS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO
SHEET PILES, SANDBAGS, AND /OR THE PLACEMENT OF AN
ACCEPTABLE SIZE STONE LINED WITH POLYPROPYLENE OR OTHER
IMPERVIOUS FABRIC.
EARTH MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE USED TO CONSTRUCT AN
IMPERVIOUS DIKE WHEN IT IS IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH THE STREAM
UNLESS VEGETATION CAN BE ESTABLISHED BEFORE CONTACT WITH
THE STREAM TAKES PLACE.
i
O
•• T M
d - s
j m o
J L i
d Z�v
o
i;
E
n
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
a
0 �
W Q
V] W
� C
Q
Know what`s below.
Call before you dig. -
t� x
0
0
O
N
O
CIO
V
a
►�
O
O
O
O
O
W
I.1
MANAGING THE WATERCOURSE:
BYPASS PUMPING
a
015CK.RIE NOSE
_ ENEROY pSEIMiIOM -�
S ti
y0
F T
�6 U
" ERVIOVf Ofd
y
STREAM BANK
ooggyi�
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN
"'A3aoe
•
z i y p O
y H LL OJ
EXISTING TERRAIN
—TOf D<b1NR
WPERVgUS DINE
M—ERIR OL11 L —
{SPECIAL STILLING BASIN)
N z
C3
O
-RE
_. wORN AREA
E TO 1— •u
� Avs a D ipEs sECURE.Y
N011TN D.XLM OEP111 "VXT Of TIONSPONTATgM "PI FOR 10R4n '*" AN YAM1El1ANGE ACTMTrf
AYOYfi N04]
fA ^
0 6
15.0' TO 20.0'
m 2
° a
r m
< z
N
cz
H
I y
8" OF SEDIMENT CONTROL STONE
o J
r °
FILTRATION GEOTEXTILE
I~-
Z y
NOTES
i
d
j n
USE NO. 5 OR NO. 57 STONE FOR SEDIMENT
N V
J
H T
CONTROL STONE.
LU
_
PROVIDE STABILIZED OUTLET TO STREAM BANK.
y
WOOD PALLETS MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF STONE
AND GEOTEXTILE AS DIRECTED. A SUFFICIENT NUMBER
OF PALLETS MUST BE PROVIDED TO ELEVATE THE ENTIRE
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN ABOVE NATURAL GROUND.
MEET N oc i
\07 r0 SSA,=
T i � �
7630.06
11530.06
BYPASS PUMPING FOR CULVERT CONSTRUCTION T
BYPASS PUMPING SEQUENCE
I. SET UP BYPASS PUMP AND TEMPORARY PIPING. PLACE OUTLET
OF TEMPRRARY PIPE TO MINIMIZE EROSION AT DISCHARGE SITE OR
PROVIDE TEMPORARY ENERGY DISSIPATION MEASURES. FIRMLY
ANCHOR PUMP AND PIPING,
2.CONSTRUCT OUTLET PROTECTION IF NEEDED.
3.CONSTRUCT IMPERVIOUS DIKE UPSTREAM OF WORK AREA TO
IMPOUND WATER FOR BYPASS PUMP INTAKE. USE A FLOATING
INTAKE FOR PUMPS WHERE POSSIBLE
4. CONSTRUCT AN IMPERVIOUS DIKE DOWNSTREAM, IF NECESSARY, TO
ISOLATE WORK AREA
5. CHECK OPERATION OF PUMP AND PIPING SYSTEM
EUPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. REMOVE IMPERVIOUS DIKE,
BYPASS PUMP, AND TEMPORARY PIPE.
BYPASS PUbPM NOTES
(.BYPASS PUMP (2" MIN.) SHALL HAVE SUFFICIENT CAPACITY TO
ADEQUATELY DIVERT STREAM BASE FLOW.
2.AN ENERGY DISSIPATOR FOR PUMP AROUND HOSE SHALL BE USED
WHEN PUMPING CLEAN WATER AROUND THE WORK AREA.
3.DEWATERING DEVICE SHALL BE A SPECIAL STILLING BASIN PER
NCDOT 1630.06 AND SHALL BE USED WHEN PUMPING SEDIMENT
LADEN WATER FROM THE WORK AREA
4.THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO CONSTRUCT
THE PROPOSED CULVERTS DURING LONG PERIODS WHEN
PRECIPITATION IS NOT ANTICIPATED. SHOULD RAIN BE
ANTICIPATED, AN 8" MIN. EMERGENCY BYPASS PUMP MAY BE
PROVIDED TO PREVENT WATER FROM FLOWING THROUGH THE
REWIRED TEMPORARY PIPE AND DIVERT WATER SAFELY AROUND
THE WORK AREA
5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR STABIUZING THE
WORK AREA IN ADVANCE OF ANY EVENT THAT WILL NOT BE
PUMPED AROUND THE WORK AREA, BUT PASSED THROUGH THE
WORK AREA WITH THE TEMPORARY PIPE SHOWN ON THIS SHEET.
THE IMPERVIOUS DIKE SHALL NOT PERMIT SEEPAGE OF WATER INTO
THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OR CONTRIBUTE TO SILTATION OF THE
STREAM. THE IMPERVIOUS DIKE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF AN
ACCEPTABLE MATERIAL IN THE LOCATIONS NOTED ON THE PLANS OR
AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
ACCEPTABLE MATERIALS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO
SHEET PILES, SANDBAGS, AND /OR THE PLACEMENT OF AN
ACCEPTABLE SIZE STONE LINED WITH POLYPROPYLENE OR OTHER
IMPERVIOUS FABRIC.
EARTH MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE USED TO CONSTRUCT AN
IMPERVIOUS DIKE WHEN IT IS IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH THE STREAM
UNLESS VEGETATION CAN BE ESTABLISHED BEFORE CONTACT WITH
THE STREAM TAKES PLACE.
i
O
•• T M
d - s
j m o
J L i
d Z�v
o
i;
E
n
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
a
0 �
W Q
V] W
� C
Q
Know what`s below.
Call before you dig. -
t� x
0
0
O
N
O
CIO
V
a
►�
O
O
O
O
O
W
I.1
MANAGING THE WATERCOURSE:
BYPASS PUMPING
015CK.RIE NOSE
_ ENEROY pSEIMiIOM -�
" ERVIOVf Ofd
•
S S
PRO,iC(
—TOf D<b1NR
WPERVgUS DINE
M—ERIR OL11 L —
{SPECIAL STILLING BASIN)
-RE
_. wORN AREA
E TO 1— •u
� Avs a D ipEs sECURE.Y
N011TN D.XLM OEP111 "VXT Of TIONSPONTATgM "PI FOR 10R4n '*" AN YAM1El1ANGE ACTMTrf
AYOYfi N04]
BYPASS PUMPING FOR CULVERT CONSTRUCTION T
BYPASS PUMPING SEQUENCE
I. SET UP BYPASS PUMP AND TEMPORARY PIPING. PLACE OUTLET
OF TEMPRRARY PIPE TO MINIMIZE EROSION AT DISCHARGE SITE OR
PROVIDE TEMPORARY ENERGY DISSIPATION MEASURES. FIRMLY
ANCHOR PUMP AND PIPING,
2.CONSTRUCT OUTLET PROTECTION IF NEEDED.
3.CONSTRUCT IMPERVIOUS DIKE UPSTREAM OF WORK AREA TO
IMPOUND WATER FOR BYPASS PUMP INTAKE. USE A FLOATING
INTAKE FOR PUMPS WHERE POSSIBLE
4. CONSTRUCT AN IMPERVIOUS DIKE DOWNSTREAM, IF NECESSARY, TO
ISOLATE WORK AREA
5. CHECK OPERATION OF PUMP AND PIPING SYSTEM
EUPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. REMOVE IMPERVIOUS DIKE,
BYPASS PUMP, AND TEMPORARY PIPE.
BYPASS PUbPM NOTES
(.BYPASS PUMP (2" MIN.) SHALL HAVE SUFFICIENT CAPACITY TO
ADEQUATELY DIVERT STREAM BASE FLOW.
2.AN ENERGY DISSIPATOR FOR PUMP AROUND HOSE SHALL BE USED
WHEN PUMPING CLEAN WATER AROUND THE WORK AREA.
3.DEWATERING DEVICE SHALL BE A SPECIAL STILLING BASIN PER
NCDOT 1630.06 AND SHALL BE USED WHEN PUMPING SEDIMENT
LADEN WATER FROM THE WORK AREA
4.THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO CONSTRUCT
THE PROPOSED CULVERTS DURING LONG PERIODS WHEN
PRECIPITATION IS NOT ANTICIPATED. SHOULD RAIN BE
ANTICIPATED, AN 8" MIN. EMERGENCY BYPASS PUMP MAY BE
PROVIDED TO PREVENT WATER FROM FLOWING THROUGH THE
REWIRED TEMPORARY PIPE AND DIVERT WATER SAFELY AROUND
THE WORK AREA
5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR STABIUZING THE
WORK AREA IN ADVANCE OF ANY EVENT THAT WILL NOT BE
PUMPED AROUND THE WORK AREA, BUT PASSED THROUGH THE
WORK AREA WITH THE TEMPORARY PIPE SHOWN ON THIS SHEET.
THE IMPERVIOUS DIKE SHALL NOT PERMIT SEEPAGE OF WATER INTO
THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OR CONTRIBUTE TO SILTATION OF THE
STREAM. THE IMPERVIOUS DIKE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF AN
ACCEPTABLE MATERIAL IN THE LOCATIONS NOTED ON THE PLANS OR
AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
ACCEPTABLE MATERIALS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO
SHEET PILES, SANDBAGS, AND /OR THE PLACEMENT OF AN
ACCEPTABLE SIZE STONE LINED WITH POLYPROPYLENE OR OTHER
IMPERVIOUS FABRIC.
EARTH MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE USED TO CONSTRUCT AN
IMPERVIOUS DIKE WHEN IT IS IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH THE STREAM
UNLESS VEGETATION CAN BE ESTABLISHED BEFORE CONTACT WITH
THE STREAM TAKES PLACE.
i
O
•• T M
d - s
j m o
J L i
d Z�v
o
i;
E
n
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
a
0 �
W Q
V] W
� C
Q
Know what`s below.
Call before you dig. -
t� x
0
0
O
N
O
CIO
V
a
►�
O
O
O
O
O
W
I.1

0
0
0
0
N
O
O
Oi0
O
U
OEJ
0
0
0
0
0
W
M

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Charlotte - Mecklenburg -Storm Water Services 2. Evaluator's name: Jason Claudio -Diaz
3. Date of evaluation- 12/18/2014
5. Name of stream- UT to McAlpine Creek - Stream 1
7. Approximate drainage area. 95 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated- 100 ft.
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees
4. Time of evaluation: 9:00 am
6. River basin. Catawba
8. Stream order: 1
10. County. Mecklenburg;
12. Subdivision name (if any)-
Latitude (ex 34 872312): 35.191511 Longitude (ex -77 556611) - 80.720566
Method location determined (circle) GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GIS Other GI Othe Survey /GIS
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location)- The reach
under evaluation is located perpendicular to Allister Drive and west of 817 Allister Drive.
14. Proposed channel work (if any) Stabilization/Restoration using, natural channel design techniques
15. Recent weather conditions: 0 09 inches of precipitation within 72 hours
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Cloudy, 40 degrees
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known. Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (1 -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 85 % Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
15 % Forested _% Cleared / Logged % Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 7ft. 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3ft.
24. Channel slope down center of stream Flat (0 to 2 %) X Gentle (2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: _Straight X Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g , the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream
may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score
assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 43 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 2/13/2015
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering
the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score
resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or
requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
Characteristics
Eco -re ion Point Range
Score
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
I
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0 - 5
0-4
0 - 5
3
(no flow or saturation = 0, strong flow= max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0 -6
0 -5
0 -5
2
extensive alteration = 0, no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0 - 6
0-4
0 - 5
1
(no buffer = 0, contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
(extensive discharges = 0, no discharges = max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0- 4
3
Q
(no discharge = 0, springs, seeps, wetlands, etc = max points)
V.
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
2
(no flood lam = 0, extensive Flood lam = max points)
x
2
Entrenchment/ floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
2
W
(deeply entrenched = 0, frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
0
no wetlands = 0, large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
1
(extensive channelization = 0, natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
(extensive deposition= 0, little or no sediment = max points)
I I
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0 - 4
0 - 5
2
(fine, homogenous = 0, large, diverse sizes = max points)
1 2
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 5
2
(deeply incised = 0, stable bed & banks = max points)
� .
13
Presence of major bank failures
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 - 5
3
(severe erosion = 0, no erosion, stable banks = max points)
M
1 4
Root depth and density on banks
0 - 3
0-4
0 - 5
2
(no visible roots = 0, dense roots throughout = max points)
F
V)
1 5
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 5
4
(substantial impact =0, no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle- pool /ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
2
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0, well-developed = max points)
Q
1
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 - 6
0-6
3
F-
(little or no habitat = 0, frequent, varied habitats = mar points)
M
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0- 5
0- 5
0- 5
2
Q
(no shading ve etation = 0, continuous canopy = max points)
=
1 9
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0 - 4
0-4
3
(deeply embedded = 0, loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0 - 5
0
(no evidence = 0, common, numerous types = mat points)
C7
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
Q
(no evidence = 0, common, numerous types = max points)
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0 - 4
0-4
0
(no evidence = 0, common, numerous types = max oints
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0 -6
0 -5
0 -5
2
(no evidence = 0, abundant evidence = mar points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
loo
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
43
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Charlotte - Mecklenburg Storm Water Services 2. Evaluator's name: Chris Tinklenberg
3. Date of evaluation• 4/9/2015 4. Time of evaluation: 1.35 pm
5. Name of stream: Unnamed Tributary - Stream 2 6. River basin: Catawba
7. Approximate drainage area: 49 acres 8. Stream order: 1
9. Length of reach evaluated: 100 ft. 10. County: Mecklenburg
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex 34 872312)• 35.191118 Longitude (ex -77 556611) - 80.720539
Method location determined (circle). GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aenal) Photo /GIS Other Gl Othe Survey /GIS
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): The reach
under evaluation is located perpendicular to Elwood Drive and northeast of the Elwood Drive and Allister Drive intersection.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Stabilization/Restoration using natural channel design techniques
15. Recent weather conditions- Temperatures in the 70's and no precipitation within 72 hours
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Mostly sunny, 85 degrees
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known. Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point9 YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey9 YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use- 85 % Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
15 % Forested _% Cleared / Logged % Other ( )
22. Bankfull width. 2 -3ft 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3 -411.
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2 %) X Gentle (2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep (> 10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: X Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream
may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score
assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 43 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 4/9/2015
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering
the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score
resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or
requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
Characteristics
Eco -re ion Point Range
Score
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
I
Presence of flow/ persistent pools in stream
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 5
4
(no flow or saturation = 0, strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
2
(extensive alteration = 0, no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
1
(no buffer = 0, contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
(extensive discharges = 0, no discharges = max points)
.�
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
2
U(no
discharge = 0, springs, seeps, wetlands, etc = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
2
(no floodplain = 0, extensive floodplain = max points)
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
2
06
(deeply entrenched = 0, frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
0
(no wetlands = 0, large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
1
(extensive channelization = 0, natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
3
(extensive deposition= 0, little or no sediment = max points)
I I
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0 - 4
0 - 5
2
(fine, homogenous = 0, large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 5
2
(deeply incised = 0, stable bed & banks = max points)
F"
13
Presence of major bank failures
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 - 5
3
J
(severe erosion = 0, no erosion, stable banks = max points)
M
Q
14
Root depth and density on banks
0 - 3
0 - 4
0 - 5
1
(no visible roots = 0, dense roots throughout = max points)
� A
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 5
4
(substantial impact =0, no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle- pool /ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
3
(no riffles/ripples or pools =0. well-developed = max points)
Q
I
Habitat complexity
0 - 6
0 - 6
0 - 6
2
F
(little or no habitat = 0, frequent, varied habitats = max points)
M
1 8
Canopy coverage over streambed
0 - 5
0 - 5
0 - 5
2
Q
(no shading vegetation = 0, continuous canopy = max points)
=
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0 - 4
0-4
3
(deeply embedded = 0, loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0 - 5
0
>
(no evidence = 0, common, numerous types = max points)
C7
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
C
(no evidence = 0, common, numerous types = max points)
22
Presence offish
0 - 4
0-4
0 - 4
0
(no evidence = 0, common, numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0 -6
0 -5
0 -5
2
(no evidence = 0, abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
loo
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
43
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date 12/18/2014
Project/Site 817 Alister Drive -
Stream 1
Latitude 35 191511
Evaluator Jason Diaz/
County Mecklenburg
Longitude -80720566
Jake Maschoff
0
1
Total Points: 33
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e g Quad Name Mint Hill
if z 19 or perennial if >_ 30
3
1
A Geomorphology Subtotal= 17 5
_AiSserit
1NeakHa t
;Mod'e_rate;
- Stron _
_Score,_
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
1
3 In- channel structure ex riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
oolsequence
0
1
2
3
1
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
2
5 Active /relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
2
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
2
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
2
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
3
1 2
9 Grade control
0
0 5
1
1.5
1
10 Natural valley
0
0 5
1
1 5
1.5
11 Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
a artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav Subtotal = 95
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
1
14 Leaf litter
1 5
1
05
0
1
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
05
1
1 5
0.5
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
05
1
1 5
1
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
C. Bioloav Subtotal = 6
18 Fibrous roots In streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20 Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
0
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22 Fish
0
05
1
1 5
0
23 Crayfish
0
05
1
1 5
0
24 Amphibians
0
05
1
1 5
0
25 Algae
0
05
1
1 5
0
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5, Other = 0
0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes
Blockage and debris observed within the channel

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date 4/9/2015
Project/Site 817 Alister Drive -
Stream 2
Latitude 35 191118
Evaluator Chris Tinklenberg
County Mecklenburg
Longitude -80720539
Total Points: 32
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e g Quad Name Mint Hill
if z 19 or perennial if z 30
0
1
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 17
A6sent
Weak.,_
Moderate
, _ Stron
;_ Score, _
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
1
-T In- channel structure ex riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
poolsequence
0
1
2
3
2
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
2
5 Active /relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
2
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
2
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9 Grade control
0
0 5
1
1 5
1
10 Natural valley
0
0 5
1
1 5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
a artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B Hvdroloav Subtotal =
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14 Leaf litter
1 5
1
05
0
1
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
05
1
1 5
1.5
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
05
1
1.5
0.5
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
C. Bioloav Subtotal = 6
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance )
0
1
2
3
0
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22 Fish
0
05
1
1 5
0
23 Crayfish
0
05
1
1 5
0
24 Amphibians
0
05
1
1 5
0
25 Algae
0
05
1
1 5
0
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5, Other = 0
0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes
Persistent flow throughout length of evaluated reach
Strong baseflow observed upstream /off -site
Last rain event Greater than 72 hours

I Ilutu I agy J
— " -,- 1!� -�` "' -
S2 - Unnamed Tributary looking downstream above the
LU
bridge
S2 - Unnamed Tributary looking upstream from below the pedestrian bridge
Title Photo Pages
Prepared For Storm Water Improvements at 817 Allister Drive
Project Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
STORM
16'ATER Date Project Number
4/17/15 015630084
Prepared By
Kimley » Horn

Photo Page 4
T r
t
f
"�Y' r • �a +Sr
*•rip. =t � "-e
S2 — Unnamed Tributary below the pedestrian bridge looking at bank erosion along the
right bank and in- channel debris -am
N � �
G -
a.,3 Vz :*
1 yt�g.�1 rte. ' � • -1
45
S2 — Unnamed Tributary looking upstream at eroded banks and in- channel debris jam
Title Photo Pages
Prepared For Storm Water Improvements at 817 Allister Drive Prepared By
Project Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
ST
O ii Kimley,>>Horn
WATER Date Project Number
WATER
1 015630084

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State: North Carolina County /parish/borough: Mecklenburg City Sharlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format) Lat 35.1915110 N, Long. -80 720566° W.
Umversal Transverse Mercator: 1983
Name of nearest waterbody: UT to McAlpine Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows. Catawba River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03050103
® Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request
0 Check if other sites (e.g , offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc .) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SiTE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
® Office (Desk) Determination Date. December 18, 2014
® Field Determination. Date(s)- December 18, 2014
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. BHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Arse o "navigable waters of the U S " within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
M Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U S " within Clean Water Act (CWA) Jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply). t
M TNWs, including territorial seas
0 Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent watersz (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
E] Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
0 Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
0 Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
El Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters- 163 linear feet 7 width (ft) and /or 0 03 acres
Wetlands- acres
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: iEstablistied'by OHWM.
Elevation of established OHWM (if known)
2. Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable) :3
El Potentially jurisdictional waters and /or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below
Z For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e g , typically 3 months)
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III F

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.I. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.I and 2
and Section III.D.I.; otherwise, see Section IIIM below
1. TNW
Identify TNW n /a.
Summarize rationale supporting determination.
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent': n/a.
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section IH.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section HI.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: ac e
i
Drainage area: acres
Average annual rainfall 43 inches
Average annual snowfall- inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW
❑ Tributary flows through ,2 tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are PickList river miles from TNW
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW
Project waters are Piek'tist aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are IPick., aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain
Identify flow route to TNW5:
Tributary stream order, if known:
" Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the arid
West
s Flow route can be described by identifying, e g , tributary a, which Flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW

(b) General Trtbuta[y Characteristics (check all that apply)
Tributary is ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man -made) Explain
❑ Manipulated (man - altered). Explain-
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply)-
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover.
❑ Other Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e g, highly eroding, sloughing banks] Explain Highly eroding; Incised in most areas.
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain
Tributary geometry.'ill' List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope) %
(c) Flow
Tributary provides for ' Pick istL• ist
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year iPick ListList
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: 'Pick List. Characteristics*
Subsurface flow: PickrList Explain findings
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply)-
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply).
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
❑ shelving
❑
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
❑ sediment deposition
❑
❑ water staining
❑
❑ other (list)-
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
if factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
❑ High Tide Line indicated by: ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum,
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings,
❑ physical markings /characteristics ❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list)
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g, water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality: general watershed characteristics, etc )
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known
'A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e g , where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices) Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e g, flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break
'Ibid

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor Characteristics (type, average width). ft.
❑ Wetland fringe Characteristics-
El Habitat for.
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity Explain findings-
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics-
Properties
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type Explain.
Wetland quality Explain-
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW
Flow is: Pick•List. Explain
Surface flow is: Pick-ListList
Characteristics -
Subsurface flow Pick List Explain findings- Wetland is located at the toe of slope.
❑ Dye (or other) test performed.
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW•
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain.
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick -List river miles from TNW
Project waters are •Pick. L''ist aerial (straight) miles from TNW
Flow is from- Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplam
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e g, water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface, water quality; general watershed
characteristics, etc ) Explain
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer Characteristics (type, average width).
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover Explain
❑ Habitat for.
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings•
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species Explain findings
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity Explain findings
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if anyL_
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts9 (Y/N Size (in acres) Directly abuts9 (Y/N Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed.
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and /or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III D
2. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section IiI D.
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D.
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area
M TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
F1 Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial. NC DWQ Stream ID form ranks >30
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e g , typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section iii B Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply).
® Tributary waters 163 linear feet 7 width (ft)
Other non - wetland waters acres.
Identify type(s) of waters
Non -RPWs8 that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
El Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is junsdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply)
El Tributary waters. linear feet width (ft)
Other non - wetland waters- acres.
Identify type(s) of waters
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
F1 Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
0 Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year -round Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section iII.D 2, above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW-
El Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section ❑LB and rationale in Section iii D 2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area. acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictionall Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates forjunsdictional wetlands in the review area acres
6. Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U S ," or
F1 Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (i -6), or
El Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below)
E. ISOLATED JINTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE) WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE CONLMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): 10
0 which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
El from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
n which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce
El Interstate isolated waters Explain:
El Other factors Explain-
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
'See Footnote # 3
v To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section 111 D 6 of the Instructional Guidebook
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps /EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates for Jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply)
El Tributary waters linear feet width (ft)
El Other non - wetland waters- acres
Identify type(s) of waters
Wetlands. acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR)
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction Explain
El Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non - jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of Junsdiction is the MBR
factors (i e , presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
udgment (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i e, rivers, streams)- linear feet width (ft)
❑ Lakes /ponds: acres
Other non - wetland waters. acres List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands. acres
Provide acreage estimates for non - jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply)-
❑ Non - wetland waters (i.e, rivers, streams) linear feet, width (ft)
❑ Lakes /ponds acres.
❑ Other non - wetland waters. acres. List type of aquatic resource
0 Wetlands acres
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant Kimley -Horn
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas.
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
® U.S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale & quad name. 124,000 Mint Hill Quad (1993)
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Mecklenburg County SSURGO Soils.
National wetlands inventory map(s) Cite name
El State /Local wetland inventory map(s)
FEMA/FIRM maps
100 -year Floodplam Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs ® Aerial (Name & Date). 2013 Mecklenburg County Aerial Photography
or ® Other (Name & Date)- Site Photographs; December 18, 2014
❑ Previous determination(s) File no. and date of response letter
El Applicable /supporting case law:
❑ Applicable /supporting scientific literature.
El Other information (please specify)-
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD: .