HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0004967_routine_202302230 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 090004 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS090004 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Date of Visit: 02/23/2023 Entry Time
Farm Name: Cain Complex
Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC
Mailing Address: PO Box 487
Physical Address: 882 Opportunity Ln
09:00 am
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Bladen Region: Fayetteville
Exit Time: 12:00 pm Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: 910-296-1800
Warsaw NC 283980487
White Oak NC 28399
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 34' 45' 35" Longitude: 78' 40' 27"
From Ammon take NC 242 South 2.4 miles, turn right onto SR 1325, go 5.9 miles to complex entrance on left.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William Victor Sutton Operator Certification Number: 26076
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Cudd
On -site representative Mike Cudd
Primary Inspector: Steve Guyton Phone: 910-433-3300
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
9. sludge from inside barn has come outunder door and is on the ground and into the ring road at both finishing houses. Mr.
Cudd called a contractor and later in the afternoon he sent pictures of the waste cleaned up. Maintaince will find out why the
discharge lines backed up waste in the house.
15. overseed has been planted but control weeds in spray fields.
Note only finisher has hogs.
reviewed records off site after inspection.
Page 1 of 5
Permit: AWS090004 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 090004
Inspection Date: 02/23/23 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Swine
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine - Farrow to Wean
2,500
0
Swine - Feeder to Finish
10,000
5,000
Swine - Wean to Feeder
7,000
0
Waste Structures
Type Identifier
Total Design Capacity: 19,500
Total SSLW: 2,642,500
Effective Built Closed Designated Observed
Date Date Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
7443-1
06/07/2006
31/01/1992
19.30
44.00
Lagoon
7443-2
06/07/2006
D2/04/1993
20.40
70.00
Lagoon
7443-3
06/07/2006
37/31/1992
19.90
60.00
Lagoon
7443-4
06/07/2006
D1/02/1992
22.00
62.00
Lagoon
DEPOT
08/08/2005
10/01/2019
Lagoon
DEPOT 1
11/07/2005
10/01/2019
19.00
Lagoon
FINISHER
03/23/2005
10/01/2019
Lagoon
FINISHER 2
11/07/2005
10/01/2019
19.00
Lagoon
NURSERY
03/23/2005
10/01/2019
Lagoon
NURSERY 3
11/07/2005
10/01/2019
19.00
Lagoon
SOW
03/23/2005
10/01/2019
Lagoon
SOW 4
11/07/2005
10/01/2019
19.00
Page 2 of 5
Permit: AWS090004 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number:
Inspection Date: 02/23/23 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
090004
Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ larc
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicablE
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Page 3 of 5
Permit: AWS090004 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC
Inspection Date: 02/23/23 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 090004
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass w/
Rye Overseed
Crop Type 2
Crab Grass
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Leon sand, 0 to 3% slopes
Soil Type 2
Centenary sand
Soil Type 3
Wagram fine sand, 0 to 6%
slopes
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
0
❑ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Page 4 of 5
Permit: AWS090004 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number:
Inspection Date: 02/23/23 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
090004
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipmen
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
il4her I-1—
Vn
AL. AIA
NC
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑ ❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit,
❑
0 ❑ ❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑ ❑
CAW M P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
Page 5 of 5