WQ0002653_Staff Report_20230221

ROY C0011ER
Gn Wrnor
ELIZABETH S BISER
See+,'fUry
RICHARD E. ROGERS. JR,
Oirecloe
KENNETH G. AND TONYA L. PAGE
601 VIRGIL ROAD
DURI IAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27703
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Page:
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
January 12, 2023
Subject: Acknowledgement of
Application No. WQ0002653
60t Virgil Rd. SFR
Single -Family Residence
Wastewater Irrigation System
Durham County
The Water Quality Permitting Section acknowledges receipt of your permit application and
supporting documentation received on January 11, 2023. Your application package has been assigned the
number listed above, and the primary reviewer is Cord Anthony.
Central and Raleigh Regional Office staff will perform a detailed review of the provided
application, and may contact you with a request for additional information. To ensure maximum efficiency
in processing permit applications, the Division of Water Resources requests your assistance in providing a
timely and complete response to any additional information requests.
If you have any questions, please contact Cord Anthony at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Nathaniel D. Thornburg, Branch Chic
Division of Water Resources
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section (Electronic Copy)
Laserfiche File (Electronic Copy)
�kw:. —A, Nurth Cor-,Wr .r Depar'trrterit of Errvi1mull••n1.al Quality I € lvkion of Wmcr Rv5ource�
�!` 511 N•n 11r 4alisht+r }' Srrrel � 3h17 M11r,iE �ervi-e Ccn[er I Raleigh, Nnrt h Carolina Li64q 1617
owa m em +cwin«.�nn �.r.. e�lY. i (1 i'7001)

State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
T)w Division of Water Resources
WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OPERATIONS SECTION
Division of Water Resources NON -DISCHARGE APPLICATION REVIEW REQUEST FORM
January 12, 2023
To: RRO-WQROS: Scott Vinson / Vanessa Manuel
From: Cord Anthony, Water Quality Permitting Section - Non -Discharge Branch
Permit Number: WQ0002653
Applicant: Kenneth G. and Tonya L. Page
Owner Type: Individual
Facility Name: 601 Virgil Rd. SFR
Signature Authority: Kenneth G. and Tonya L. Page
Address: 601 Virgil Rd., Durham, NC 27703
Permit Type: Single -Family Residence Wastewater Irrigation
Project Type: Renewal
Owner in BIMS? Yes
Facility in B1MS? Yes
Title: Owners
County: Durham
Fee Category: Single -Family Residence Wastewater Irrigaton Fee Amount: $0 -Renewal
Comments/Other Information: tonyapage3 a yahoo.com; arizonahill lhotmail.com
> Attached, you will find all information submitted in support of the above -referenced application for your review,
comment, and/or action.
> Please provide the name of the Regional Office reviewer to the Central Office staff.
> Within 45 calendar days of application receipt, please return a completed staff report to the Central Office reviewer
noted above.
FORM: WQROSNDARR 09-15 Page 1 of l

I

State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Lnvironnzentcrl Staff Report
Quality
To: ❑ NPDES Unit ® Non -Discharge Unit
Attn: Cord Anthony
From: Curtis Tyree
Raleigh
Application No.: WQ0002653
Facility Name: 601 Virgil Rd.
Durham NC, SFR
County: Durham
Note: This form has been adapted from the non -discharge facility staff report to document the review of both non -
discharge and_NPDES permit apXlications and/or renewals. Please complete all sections as they are applicable.
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or ❑ No
a. Date of site visit: 02-06-2023
b. Site visit conducted by: Curtis Tyree
c. Inspection report attached? Yes
d. Person contacted: Tonya Page and their contact information: 919-475-1754
e. Driving directions:
2. Discharge Point(s):
Latitude: Longitude:
Latitude: Longitude:
3. Receiving stream or affected surface waters:
Classification:
River Basin and Sub -basin No.
Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses:
II. PROPOSED FACILITIES: NEW APPLICATIONS
1. Facility Classification: SFR (Please attach completed rating sheet to be attached to issued permit)
Proposed flow:480 gpd
Current permitted flow:480 gpd
2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system?® Yes or ❑ No
If no, explain:
3. Are site conditions (soils, depth to water table, etc.) consistent with the submitted reports? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N: A
If no, please explain:
4. Do the plans and site map represent the actual site (property lines, wells, etc.)? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N.`A
If no, please explain:
5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N. A
If no, please explain:
FORM: WQROSSR 04 14 Pagel of 5

6. Are the proposed application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) acceptable? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N A
If no, please explain: _
7. Are there any setback conflicts for proposed treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
8. Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
9. For residuals, will seasonal or other restrictions be required? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N A
If yes, attach list of sites with restrictions (Certification B)
Describe the residuals handling and utilization scheme:
10. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:
11. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
III. EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N A
ORC: Certificate #: Backup ORC: — Certificate #:.,
2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
Description of existing facilities:
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow:
Explain anything observed during the site visit that needs to be addressed by the permit, or that may be important
for the permit writer to know (i.e., equipment condition, function, maintenance, a change in facility ownership,
etc.)
3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils, topography, depth to water table, etc.) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e.g., drainage added, new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain: _
6. Are the existing application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) still acceptable? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or ❑ No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N A
If no, please explain:
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 5

11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NIA
If
no, please complete the following ex and table if necessary):
Monitoring Well Latitude Longitude
o f 1f
a / fr
7 r it
{} I rf
fi / 1f
U f !r
{} f !I
U f fl
I of
f If
12. Has a review of all self -monitoring data been conducted (e.g., DMR, NDMR, NDAR, GW)? ❑ Yes or ❑ No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review:
Provide input to help the permit writer evaluate any requests for reduced monitoring, if applicable.
13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain: . _
14. Check all that apply:
® No compliance issues ❑ Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under JOC
❑ Notice(s) of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer -:comments (i.e., NOV, NOD, etc.)
If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle, please explain the status. Has the RO been
working with the Permittee? Is a solution underway or in place?
Have all compliance dates."conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N-A
If no, please explain: ..
15. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
❑ Yes 0NoTN.-A
If yes, please explain:
16. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:
17. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 3 of 5

IV. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance.renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain: _ _
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non -Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an
additional information request:
3
List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
Condition
5. Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
❑ Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
® Issue
❑ Deny a st c so )
6. Signature of report preparer: _
Signature of regional supervisor:
Date:
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 4 of 5

V. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 5 of 5