HomeMy WebLinkAbout090088_Routine_202302240 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 090088 Facility Statu
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Date of Visit: 02/24/2023 Entry Time: 01:00 pm
Farm Name: Farm #3515, 3316, and 3723
Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC
Mailing Address: PO Box 487
Physical Address: Sr 1300 2462 Chicken Foot Rd
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Chicken Foot Rd. approx. 3 miles S.W. of Tar Heel
s: A
ctive Permit: AWS090088 ❑ Denied
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Bladen Region: Fayetteville
Exit Time: 3:00 pm Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: 910-296-1800
Warsaw NC 283980487
Saint Pauls NC 28384
Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Latitude: 34' 45' 06"
Access
Longitude: 78' 50' 48"
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: John S Cain Operator Certification Number: 23570
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Cudd
On -site representative Mike Cudd
Primary Inspector: Steve Guyton Phone: 910-433-3300
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Note. soil sample #1611 has a Zn. levele of 3880 you can nolonger use this area of your spray field. You can take deep samples
to determine where it is in the profile. conculet regional agronomisit,
Bermuda was overseeded and farm has cows.
records reviewed off site and another day.
Page 1 of 5
Permit: AWS090088 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 090088
Inspection Date: 02/24/23 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean 8,338 I 8,000
Total Design Capacity: 8,338
Total SSLW: 3,610,354
Waste Structures
Effective Built Closed Designated Observed
Type Identifier Date Date Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
15
04/26/2005
10/01 /2019
19.00
Lagoon
16-1
04/26/2005
10/01 /2019
19.50
Lagoon
16-2
04/26/2005
06/11 /2019
19.50
Lagoon
23
04/26/2005
06/11 /2019
19.50
Lagoon
3316
03/04/2005
D1/01/1998
199.00
64.00
Lagoon
3316-3723 SECONDAR'
03/04/2005
D1/01/1998
19.20
42.00
Lagoon
3515
03/04/2005
D1/01/1998
19.81
35.00
Lagoon
3616-3723 PRIMARY
03/04/2005
D1/01/1998
19.20
44.00
Page 2 of 5
Permit: AWS090088 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number:
Inspection Date: 02/24/23 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
090088
Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ larc
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicablE
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Page 3 of 5
Permit: AWS090088 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 090088
Inspection Date: 02/24/23 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass w/
Rye Overseed
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1 Butters
Soil Type 2 Autryville
Soil Type 3 Goldsboro
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Page 4 of 5
Permit: AWS090088
Inspection Date: 02/24/23
Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 090088
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Stocking?
Crop yields?
120 Minute inspections?
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipmen
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check th
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
f14her 1-1—
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
CAW M P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes No NA NE
EJ
El
35151
6-2-2022
❑■❑❑
❑■❑❑
W__
K1_ \IA
I.IC
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
❑■❑❑
El
El
❑■❑❑
❑■❑❑
❑■❑❑
Page 5 of 5