20150437 Ver 1_More Info Received_20150526

Homewood, Sue
From: Michael Brame < mbrame @pilotenviro.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 9:20 AM
To: Bailey, David E SAW; Homewood, Sue
Cc: Jon Ford; Homer Wade; Brad Luckey
Subject: RE: Request for Additional Information: proposed Taylor's Landing s /d,McLeansville,
Guilford Co., NC; SAW - 2015 -00989 (UNCLASSIFIED)
Attachments: 1447 - Revised PCN - Taylor's Landing-5.26.15-signed bsl.pdf
Good Morning David and Sue,
Please see responses below and the attached revised PCN /supporting attachments. Please let me know if you have
additional questions or need anything else.
Sincerely,
Michael Brame, PWS
336.708.4620 (c)
336.310.4527 (o)
P.O. Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
www.pilotenviro.com
mbrame @pilotenviro.com
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Bailey, David E SAW [ mailto: David.E.Bailey2 @usace.army.mil]
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 11:29 AM
To: Michael Brame; Jon Ford
Cc: Brad Luckey; Homewood, Sue
Subject: Request for Additional Information: proposed Taylor's Landing s /d,McLeansville, Guilford Co., NC; SAW -2015-
00989 (UNCLASSIFIED)
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Messrs. Ford and Brame,
Thanks for your PCN and attached plans, dated 5/1/2015 and received 5/4/2015, for the above referenced project. I
have reviewed the information with respect to verification of a Nationwide Permit 29 and offer the below comments to
be addressed before your application can be considered complete. Please submit the requested information (via e -mail
is fine) within 30 days of receipt of this Notification, otherwise we may deny verification of the use of the Nationwide
Permit or consider your application withdrawn and close the file:
1) The boundaries of Wetland WA /WAA were expanded during Wednesday's JD verification site visit. Please flag the
new wetland boundaries in the field and send the updated wetland field sketch to my attention. Further, upon GIS
review (see attached) at the office it appears that the southwest section of the property (not reviewed on Wednesday) is
in a geomorphic position that commonly includes wetlands; please confirm whether or not this area was reviewed
during any of your site visits and, if so, describe /document the conditions with respect to the 3 wetland parameters.
Also, please update the PCN, plans, and other necessary documents as necessary and send to my attention.

[RE: MTB] Please find the attached revised PCN and plans addressing revision of wetland WA /WAA boundary during
recently conducted USACE site verification. Additionally, please find the attached data form, collected from the lowest
lying area within the drainage swale located on the southwestern portion of the site. Pictures from the data point
location are also attached for your review. Likewise, since the initial submittal, the City of Greensboro has provided
documentation in regards to potential surface water riparian buffers. This documentation is also attached to the
updated PCN.
2) Section D1a (pertaining only to the lot layout) on your PCN does not entirely address avoidance and minimization of
adverse effects to Waters of the US as required by Nationwide Permit Conditions # 23 a and b. As briefly discussed
during our field meeting on 5/13/2015, more information is required to address the practicability of completely avoiding
impacts to the wetlands in question while still accomplishing your project purpose of constructing a residential
subdivision. For example, could Lots 69 and 70 be combined into one lot in order to avoid wetland impacts? Is the
purpose of wetland fill in lots 63, 64, and 68 related to the dwelling and or access to the lot, or simply for lot (backyard)
fill? If the latter, would the lot still be usable without filling those wetland fringe areas, as they occur along the back of
the lots? One way to show practicability would be to overlay a typical building envelope for both the dwelling and
access (driveway) on these lots, in addition to other considerations such as setbacks, to show whether or not the
proposed fill is related to the dwelling /access or simply backyard fill.
[RE: MTB] Please find the attached revised PCN and plans that further detail avoidance and minimization.
3) With respect to PCN section F7b, and given that the HPOWEB shows a two potential historic properties close to the
project area, have you contacted SHPO to request their comments about the proposed project?
[RE:MTB] As indicated on the attached PCN, the NC SHPO has not been contacted in regards to the proposed project.
Based on a review of the HPOweb, one surveyed property (GF 1414 - Jefferson Academy) is identified within the
proposed project area. The HPOweb does not identify this property as being listed on the National Register of Historic
Places. Furthermore, based on our field observations, the residence has not been maintained for a significant amount of
time and has deteriorated to dilapidated conditions. Photographs of the dilapidated residence are included with the
attached revised PCN. Other residential properties identified by HPOweb as surveyed are located on adjacent property
east of the site, across Birch Creek Road (GF- -house and GF0458 Charles D. Cobb house) and on adjacent property west
of the site (GF -- house). Based on our field observations and residential nature of the proposed project, it is our opinion
that the proposed project will not negatively affect or significantly impact the potential for the off -site properties to be
listed on the National Register of Historic Places, should they in fact be determined to be eligible for listing on the
National Register of Historic Places at a later time
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Dave Bailey
David E. Bailey, PWS
Regulatory Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE- SAW -RG -R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone], Ext. 30.
Fax: [phone]
Email: David. E. Bailey2 @usace.army.mil

The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at http : / /regulatory.usacesurvey.com /.
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

4 ,34F W ATR¢G
7 r
oNii� -'Z
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Taylor's Landing
2b.
County:
Guilford
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Greensboro
2d.
Subdivision name:
Taylor's Landing
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Lomanaco Properties, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
Book 7085, Page 1240
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Mr. Jon Ford
3d.
Street address:
PO Box 474
3e.
City, state, zip:
Summerfield, NC 27558
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
jford747 @msn.com
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Bradley S. Luckey
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Pilot Environmental Inc.
5c.
Street address:
PO Box 128
5d.
City, state, zip:
Kernersville, NC 27285
5e.
Telephone no.:
336.708.4997
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
bluckey @pilotenviro.com
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
8805455687
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.09939 Longitude: - 79.66148
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
24.37 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Little Alamance Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -IV, NSW
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site contains dilapidated residences, associated outbuildings, grass covered fields and wooded land. The site is
located in a residential area of Greensboro.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.48 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
streams =0', open waters =0.45 acres
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to provide access /utility infrastructure and to facilitate development of the site as a
residential sub - divison.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project consists of developing the site with a 91 lot residential sub - division. In order to provide safe line -of-
site access to the residential sub - division, an access road from Birch Creek Road is necessary. Additionally, utilities will
be provided with the access road right -of -way. To facilitate the construction of the access road and development of the
site, clearing and grading the site is necessary. Graders, haulers, excavators and other heavy equipment will be used
during grading and construction of the site.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: Corps and DWR site visit schduled 5/13/15-
5/15/15
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: Pilot Enviromental
Name (if known): Bradley Luckey /Michael Brame
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
The project is not part of a phased project. Impacts to streams /wetlands, outside of those proposed in this appilication,
are not anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
® Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
Fill
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.087
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.087
2h. Comments: A total of 0.087 acres of wetland need to be filled for grading and proposed construction of the residential lots.
Mitigation should not be requried due to cumulative impacts being less than 0.10 acres.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments: Stream impacts are not being proposed.
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ® P ❑ T
Unnamed
Fill
Pond
0.058
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
0.058
4g. Comments: A total of 0.058 acres of open water (pond) will need to be filled for grading and proposed construction of an
access road and utility infrastructure.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Pi
Stormwater
0.66
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments: The pond will treat stormwater and remove at least 85% TSS. The stormwater management plan is being
submitted to the City of Greensboro separate of this application.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ®No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
0.66
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
23.7
5k. Method of construction:
Excavated in high ground.
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar-Pamlico ®Other: Jordan Lake
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
re uired?
B1 ❑P ❑T
F-1 Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P ❑T
F-1 Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
F-1 Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: According to a May 20, 2015 letter from the City of Greensboro (attached) an ephemeral channel is located
down - gradient of the pond on the site. Therefore, riparian buffers are not proposed to be impacted by the proposed project
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Due to the use of the site for residential development, a road must be constructed to provide access to the site. The road has
been designed in a location that allows for safe line -of -sight along Birch Creek Road, while also providing interconnectivity to
an existing residential sub - division located west of the site. The location of the road crossing has been designed to cross the
narrowest portion of the pond. Additionally, the location of the proposed sewer line is located beneath the proposed road right
of way, thus avoiding other potential impacts to jurisdictional features located on the site.
The location of the site and climate of the marketplace for residential properties within the vicinity of the site dictates that the
proposed development of the site as a residential sub - division must be conducted in an affordable nature for consumers. As
proposed, the project caters to these demands of the market by offering reasonably affordable housing. As a result of the
affordable nature of residences and lots, the margin of profitability based on the number of lots is less than within areas of
higher end residential properties. Therefore, the site has been designed to maximize the number of residential lots while also
having a primary focus on avoidance and minimization to jurisdictional features. Initial designs of the site allowed for a total of
128 residential lots. However, this would have resulted in greater impacts to the pond and wetlands located on the site and
thus, was not considered to be a viable alternative.
A second design, as submitted within the initial permit application reduced the number of lots to a total 91 lots. This design
was based on maximizing the number of lots, while also meeting the City of Greensboro zoning requirements (minimum 7,000
square feet and appropriate setbacks. Additionally, the lot layout was designed to satisfy developer setback requirements for
pad location. Within the second design, proposed lots between 70 and 71 were eliminated due to the presence of wetlands.
Proposed impacts to lots 66, 72 and 73 were avoided due to reduction of lot site. Likewise, lots 68 to 70 were re- designed
with a different orientation, thus, reducing the amount of impact to the head of the wetland.
A third design, as submitted within this reply for additional information, has further reduced the amount of impacts to wetlands
located on the site by reducing impacts associated with lot fill and grading activities. In doing so, an additional 0.003 acres of
wetlands are being avoided. The impacts to wetlands associated with lots, as proposed in the latest design, is necessary for
the grading and construction of the residential building pads.
The site contains a 0.45 acre pond and 0.48 acres of wetlands. The remaining 0.392 acres of pond and 0.399 acres of
wetland have been avoided.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The clearing limits will be staked and silt fence will be used. Disturbance limits will be surveyed, staked and marked with high
visibility fencing. The pond will be pumped to lower the water elevation such that work will be conducted in the dry. Following
construction, disturbed slopes will be stabilized with permanent seeding, matting and temporary slope linings. Best
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

management practices will be implemented during construction activities to avoid sediment discharge into downgradient water
bodies.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c.
Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
40.4%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
A 0.66 acre stormwater pond has been designed to treat stormwater runoff. The stormwater pond has been designed to
treat at least 85% total suspended solids. The stormwater pond has been designed to treat stormwater based on the site
being 40.4% impervious. The stormwater plan is being mailed to the City of Greensboro for review and is not included in
this permit application.
® Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Greensboro
® Phase II
® NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
® Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
® Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
® Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ® No
Comments: A NEPA or SEPA is not required as part of this project.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We are not aware of additional development that will result which will impact nearby downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater from the residences will be disposed of by municipal sewer service provided by the City of Greensboro. No
stream or wetland impacts will occur that are associated with sewage disposal and /or installation of sewage lines.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
We consulted the Natural Heritage Program Website to determine if federally protected endangered or threatened
species inhabit the Mcleansville, NC Quadrangle (the quadrangle that contains the site). There are no federally listed
protected endangered or threatened species that have been identified on this quadrangle.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Based on our knowledge of the site, the site is not located in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat. Best
management practices and the construction of stormwater ponds will prevent sediment from entering down - gradient
waterbodies which may contain fish.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
We reviewed the SHPO Map (http: / /gis.ncdcr.gov /hpoweb /) to identify historic and /or archaeological resources of the site.
The map identified a surveyed historic property at the site. However, based on our observations, the surveyed property is
a dilapidated residence. A copy of the map is included as an attachment.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM 3710880500J, dated June 18, 2007
Digitally signed by Bradley S. Luckey
DN: cn= Bradley S. Luckey, o =Pilot
Bradley S. Luckey
�r Environmental, Inc., ou,
email= bluckey @pilotenviro.com, c =US
5/26/15
Date: 2015.05.26 09:18:26 - 04'00'
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

I
PHASE IN
PHASE II - 5EGTION� BIRGH GREEK RIDGE
E RCN GREEK RIDGE (151 R11 56, P6, 1351 131 °
P B. 143, P6. bl
0
M/4� [& 30' UTIL. 5W. -
r12� O
r T (15) - ✓� fp (121-
(231
ti6o1 (1591 \ I {, 2l
°o1'2B'E z1o.15' �-
A 1`106 S1'F _ n 112\
SITE DATA:
51TE AREA: 24311 AGRE5
PIN: 880545568'7
DEED REFERENCE: DB 7085 P6.1240
EXI5TIN6 ZONING: a)-R -S,.,
BORUM
evg
GRID NORTH
NAP 83 / N5R5 2011
ya
og� �
tiA
BETTY Lou hEESE
DB 4410, PG. W99
PIN 8805465505
a NO5 °03'4214 \\
\Q 112.64' \\
!L y fAFTl 6. LLA \
%O.B. 2889. P6.420 \
-Xe e'%PIN 880/116635
6 �
WATER5HED: LAKE MAGINT05H H5 -IV
I HELEN P. KE TO N /
I HELEN M. 6 366
DB, 1457, PG. 3bb
PIN 8805359864 /
GNARLE5 6. DUKE
VF. rn e VIRMA M
x / OB. 4408, P6. 430
NO2 °43'46 E 40785' SQ NO5°3819 E � / PIN eeosa 1297
POND AREA "B"
19,183 5F - 0.45 AG TOTAL AREA
POND GRO55IW7 m
s 2,544 5F - 0.058 AG TOTAL AREA rn
5EE 5HEET WLl -2 U;
33 POND REMAINING
11,239 5F - 039 AG N
m
N1yr %� T-�mBl B13`'`'
_m
T�FLI � 4314" BI9 BIS � 10`O�
13366' o, 820 ,08 13
JANIfTTE D. LLNA$ VW
DB 7143, Pb. 595
PIN 8/03156081 m i
� ¢ f
5Z2--¢ a
AI
v'
WETLAND AREA "A"
IMPAGT AREA "6-1"
933 5F - 0.024 AG TOTAL AREA
WETLAND AREA "G"
19,268 5F - 0.442 AG TOTAL AREA
G36 3,801 5F - O.OSI AG. TOTAL
AREA IMPAGTED - 5EE SHEET WLI -2
38 34632 15,461 5F - 0.355 AG. TOTAL
,3q 331gcll 16GI5 0114 TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED
N 0141 ;Z 113 GI3
�G21 611 G12
IMPAGT AREA Y -2"
0122 GIO 2,168 5F - 0.063 AG TOTAL AREA
Gl 018 Gq
Gb
II
o �(M'���kf PA,
°'
Q, vb QD- S'FIG
V
Y Z¢ 0 2,169 5F - 0.06 AG TOTAL AREA -- �
STREAM POINT � -�
AMETTE D. DLW.6 0 n b65 5F - 0.02 AC. OFF 51TE AREA - '' o �jATLAND AREA "G"
D.@2656,P6.611 N 854996.g430\g g 3}z TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED -
4Naeos4b E 1804832.1110 `���, COORDINATE TABLE
ry F=- = - POINT NORTH EAST
„� WETLAND AREA "G" 07 N 8-5530.7947 E 1$04419.4401 ,
Nob•zr34°E
505.11'
R= 130.13 L= 42135'
1'I
u
STREAM "5Z" \
GOORDINATE TABLE
POINT NORTH EAST
5ZI N 8550842243 E 18048446813
5Z2 N 8550323026 E 18048303330 J
z
a
D
Ln
n�
A5 N 855085.7194 E 1804$48.7719 DO N 8554203442 E11304640. Gib N 855bb5.4325 E 1$04495.7411
Bll N 8554349839 E 1804632.6395 611 N 8556683691 E 1804500.1052 e e e e e
Ab N85511OA454 E18048522339 EN2 N8554322411 E18046205124 618 N8555112077 E1804510.9798 Executed this th day of �.�`"
Al N 8551253142 E ISO4849b111 813 N 8553913693 E 18046218351 CH N 8555984345 E 18045201110
A9 N SYI85�97 E 118048315010615 BIS N 85534134q4 E
85 E 11804640.9 620
6 N 855587.4 E 1804552.40228 ��,, N • •� A R0
A10 N 8551932980 E 1804802A800 616 N 8553131041 E 1804649.4545 622 N 8555141245 E 1804576.6552 Registration No. L -3131 QQ� ESS l ` ° •C�'ji
t All N 55511b,005 E 1804196.1208 Bll N 8552 9 6 3311 E 180415513063 623 N 8555444985 E 1804511.9267 Homer 5. Wade Ign re • • ° �OF 0/v ° • 9
Al2 N 85517]4105 E 18048093988 018 N 85525$3199 E 18046682660 624 N 855514LI10 E 18045;%31004 b2l Eugene U. Ste.
013 N 8551508233 E 1804823.4821 819 N $55226.1093 E 115046$0.7294 0125 N 855498.0310 E 18045990140 6reensboro, N.G. �Ar7 - SEAL
A14 N 855121b090 E 1804840.9090 B20 N 8551821481 E 18046918143 626 N 8554800821 E 1130-0021.4351
B21 N 85512153158 E 180410bb183 621 N 8554663085 E 1 Ab2bD800 21420
1 AIS N 855105509 E 18048475119 Dote L- 3 7 31
Alb N 8551010980 E 1804842.1322 022 N 85:0945926 E 1504123D 628 N 855438.g2b E 1804bl3,4lg1
823 N 8550708691 E 1204723.0560 0129 N 855438.9260 E 18046139719
All N 8550839992 E 18048313781 B24 N 855071.9178 E ISO4134b531 0130 N 8554322411 E18046203124 C °
Alb N 855063bb42 E 1804812:0466 B25 N 8550182114 E 18047495874 C31 N 8555984060 E 1804520.6149 • 9ti 'l� `
t AM N 855034.2311 E 1804812.1164 B2b N 855094.&481 E 1804784.1623 G32 N 8555745650 E 18045113111 '� • . D S UR',J
821 N 8551125863 E 1804820.2926 633 N 855X%43516 E 16044911299 0 C
828 N 8551255123 E 1804829.123b 634 N 8555516148 E 18044134620 ,�'i Me R S ,o'
B30 N 8551b1 1933 E 1804$96.99 636 N 855541 -0604 E 1804419 93340
VIGINITY MAP
(NOT TO 5GALE)
YVETLAND5 FLAGGED IN THE FIELD
APRIL 3 AND MAY 15, 2015 BY PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL, ING. AND
FIELD SURVEYED BY BORUM, KADE AND
A550., P.A.
WETLAND IMPAGT 5UMMRRY
AREA "A" - 2,1601 5F - 0.064 AG. - NO IMPAGT PROPOSED
(MINU5 865 5F - 0.020 AG. OFF5ITE)
/ AREA "G" - 101,268 5F - 0.442 AG. - 3,801 5F - 0.081 AG. IMPAGTED
TOTAL NET 21,112 5F - 0.486 AG. - TOTAL IMPAGT 3,801 5F - 0.081 AG.
L POND GR0551 NG 5UMMARY
POND AREA "B" - 101,183 5F - 0.454 AG. - 2,544 5F - 0.058 AG. POND GRO551N6
GRAPHIG 5GALE
BWA
-
COORDINATE TABLE
L38 N855548.1315
E0044623615
C�k
a
�. i 1 . N,',-,4 ,
POINT
NORTH
EAST
C39 N 855554.1434
E 00448bb523 '.., ,.
/Y ]
O
o -
v �
"B"
O
N 855434.9839
E 1804632b395
G40 N8555b1b 111
0141 N 855587B20b
E1804515.125b
E 6O4529b507' j
POND AREA
G2
N 855451UN64
E 18046312403
LU
s
OORDINATE TABLE
tu
(,
/
°
EAST
(b
u $ ate
E
��
BI 11651111.1124 E 1804186.7274
"A°
1� 3355bli161n
5U2VEYORS G 3MMALTM
ND AREA 02 N 8551&%.5923 E 1804119.9918
fl
!
P6S4, ATIT
83 N 855206.7901 E 1804755.1001
COORDINATE TABLE
C8
019
N 85561 -2253
N 855655.0019
E 18046026131
E 1804595bllb
I hereby certify that the Survey prepared by me entitled WETLAND IMPAGT MAP - TAYLOR5 LANDING
Q,
EASEMENT
POINT
84 N 85522121 -1 E 18041345491
NORTH EA5T B5 N 855244.0111 E 1804131.1961
610
N 855699.&263
E18045601026
was actually made upon the ground and that it and the informatlon,course%di5tonce5
o
DB 3673 P6.1433
Al
N 855032.9496 E 18048435255 B6 N 8552195328 E 004699.1191
611
612
N 855738.1043
N 85519109X1
E 1804535.&409
E 18045332221
shown actually exist.. The purpose of his Survey is to show the delineated wetlands as flogged
A2
81 N 855321.[0,•65 E 1804672.1586
N855048b104 E 1804836.1354
GI3
N 855$018659
E 18 04519 18 40
in the field by PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL NG. v ry information is taken From a
A3
A4
N 855059.1458 E 115048402151 B8 N 855340.9815 E 1553.1542
N 8550111445 E 1804842D251 N 855377.1638 E 1804653.1542
015
05
N 8557546214
N 855714.4444
E 1045180111
E 1804502.7195
wetland survey b'! Boruvn, e5 A dated May 18, 2015.
A5 N 855085.7194 E 1804$48.7719 DO N 8554203442 E11304640. Gib N 855bb5.4325 E 1$04495.7411
Bll N 8554349839 E 1804632.6395 611 N 8556683691 E 1804500.1052 e e e e e
Ab N85511OA454 E18048522339 EN2 N8554322411 E18046205124 618 N8555112077 E1804510.9798 Executed this th day of �.�`"
Al N 8551253142 E ISO4849b111 813 N 8553913693 E 18046218351 CH N 8555984345 E 18045201110
A9 N SYI85�97 E 118048315010615 BIS N 85534134q4 E
85 E 11804640.9 620
6 N 855587.4 E 1804552.40228 ��,, N • •� A R0
A10 N 8551932980 E 1804802A800 616 N 8553131041 E 1804649.4545 622 N 8555141245 E 1804576.6552 Registration No. L -3131 QQ� ESS l ` ° •C�'ji
t All N 55511b,005 E 1804196.1208 Bll N 8552 9 6 3311 E 180415513063 623 N 8555444985 E 1804511.9267 Homer 5. Wade Ign re • • ° �OF 0/v ° • 9
Al2 N 85517]4105 E 18048093988 018 N 85525$3199 E 18046682660 624 N 855514LI10 E 18045;%31004 b2l Eugene U. Ste.
013 N 8551508233 E 1804823.4821 819 N $55226.1093 E 115046$0.7294 0125 N 855498.0310 E 18045990140 6reensboro, N.G. �Ar7 - SEAL
A14 N 855121b090 E 1804840.9090 B20 N 8551821481 E 18046918143 626 N 8554800821 E 1130-0021.4351
B21 N 85512153158 E 180410bb183 621 N 8554663085 E 1 Ab2bD800 21420
1 AIS N 855105509 E 18048475119 Dote L- 3 7 31
Alb N 8551010980 E 1804842.1322 022 N 85:0945926 E 1504123D 628 N 855438.g2b E 1804bl3,4lg1
823 N 8550708691 E 1204723.0560 0129 N 855438.9260 E 18046139719
All N 8550839992 E 18048313781 B24 N 855071.9178 E ISO4134b531 0130 N 8554322411 E18046203124 C °
Alb N 855063bb42 E 1804812:0466 B25 N 8550182114 E 18047495874 C31 N 8555984060 E 1804520.6149 • 9ti 'l� `
t AM N 855034.2311 E 1804812.1164 B2b N 855094.&481 E 1804784.1623 G32 N 8555745650 E 18045113111 '� • . D S UR',J
821 N 8551125863 E 1804820.2926 633 N 855X%43516 E 16044911299 0 C
828 N 8551255123 E 1804829.123b 634 N 8555516148 E 18044134620 ,�'i Me R S ,o'
B30 N 8551b1 1933 E 1804$96.99 636 N 855541 -0604 E 1804419 93340
VIGINITY MAP
(NOT TO 5GALE)
YVETLAND5 FLAGGED IN THE FIELD
APRIL 3 AND MAY 15, 2015 BY PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL, ING. AND
FIELD SURVEYED BY BORUM, KADE AND
A550., P.A.
WETLAND IMPAGT 5UMMRRY
AREA "A" - 2,1601 5F - 0.064 AG. - NO IMPAGT PROPOSED
(MINU5 865 5F - 0.020 AG. OFF5ITE)
/ AREA "G" - 101,268 5F - 0.442 AG. - 3,801 5F - 0.081 AG. IMPAGTED
TOTAL NET 21,112 5F - 0.486 AG. - TOTAL IMPAGT 3,801 5F - 0.081 AG.
L POND GR0551 NG 5UMMARY
POND AREA "B" - 101,183 5F - 0.454 AG. - 2,544 5F - 0.058 AG. POND GRO551N6
GRAPHIG 5GALE
BWA
�®
: .ni 1TFf,ry RTR
C�k
a
�. i 1 . N,',-,4 ,
Plan ] # 1 .'.
7 _71-
11 I.m•
� ,
5EAL5
O
PRO,EGT:
OMERAEVELOPER:
L01,110 GO RMTilf3115
PO BOX 414
9"'ERFILEO, NORTH CAROLINA 21358
0%) 430 -9008
LONTAGT: JON FORD
VRAMI BY: MRO
DATE: MAY L 2015
REV1510N5,
MAY 18, 2015 - AREA "G" REVI5ED
MAY 20, 2015 - AREA "G° REVISED
%UT TITLE:
WETLAND
IMPAGT
M AP
FLE NO FALomw \Toy[o -LOVA 'Mtla4l
DRAY" 5GALE: I• = 200•
PLAN 5EET NO.
WLI
-I
C�k
a
O
o -
v �
OC
o oc
1L
o J
LU
s
tu
(,
°
..t
V
ii]
a
�
Q,
w w
N
� �
o
OMERAEVELOPER:
L01,110 GO RMTilf3115
PO BOX 414
9"'ERFILEO, NORTH CAROLINA 21358
0%) 430 -9008
LONTAGT: JON FORD
VRAMI BY: MRO
DATE: MAY L 2015
REV1510N5,
MAY 18, 2015 - AREA "G" REVI5ED
MAY 20, 2015 - AREA "G° REVISED
%UT TITLE:
WETLAND
IMPAGT
M AP
FLE NO FALomw \Toy[o -LOVA 'Mtla4l
DRAY" 5GALE: I• = 200•
PLAN 5EET NO.
WLI
-I

EO
0
24
POND AREA "B°
Iq,183 5F - 0.454 AG TOTAL AREA
— POND GRO551N6
2,544 5F - 0.058 AG TOTAL AREA
POND REMAININ6
11,23q 5F - 03% A%
73
51 TE DATA:
51TE AREA: 2437± AGRES
PIN: 8805455687
DEED REEERENGE: DB 7085 P6.1240
EXI5TIN6 ZONING: GO -R -5
WATERSHED: LAKE MAGINTO5H W5 -IV
G318 ;� G36
G35
Iq,268 5F - 0.442 AG TOTAL AREA
IMPACT AREA "6-1" G388, y 3,801 F - 0.081 AG. TOTAL AREA IMPAG
033 5F - 0.024 AG �G34 15,4615E - 0.355 AC. TOTAL
TOTAL AREA G361 TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED Gib
eG33 GIS GE GI1
72 71 ;' G331 GIq
G41
G41
y
GE
0
70
05 6�
G14
- GI2
Gil
IMPACT AREA "6-2"
2,168 5F - 0.063 AG.
TOTAL AREA
SURVEYOR'S G�TIFIGI4TION
I hereby certify that the survey prepared by me entitled WETLAND IMPAGT MAP - TAYLORS LANDING
was actually made upon the ground and that it and the information,cour5e54i5tances
shown actually exist. The purpose of this su ey is to show the delineated wetlands os flagged
in the field N PILOT ENVIRONMENTA
NG. All information i5 taken from a
wetland survey by Borum, Wade and A
ate5 A d May 15, 2015.
Executed this 20th day OF
2 15
Registration No L -3 31
CA RO
• •
,��
Homer 5. Node
I otur Q p4 Ess 10,1, -7
621 Eugene Gt. 5te. IOO
Greensboro, N.G.
♦♦..,,,,
SEAL
27420
Ate _
L -3731
li
0, OG
so
S.
o v
VIGINITY MAP
(NOT TO 5GALE)
WETLANDS FLAGGED IN THE FIELD
APRIL 3 AND MAY 15, 2015 BY PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL, ING. AND
FIELD SURVEYED BY BORUM, WADE AND
A550., P.A.
BOR U,y
sy9
O�
GRID NORTH "F
NAD S3 I N5R5 2011 10
A�
a`
•b•a
5�y
D
n
BW/A►\
G1/WR>X-V&DKk-
X47
U?ERFIL 036) 430-q a RA aT3se
(3361 430 -90DB
C4%TMT, 1ON FORD
AREA "A" - 2,10 5F - 0.064 AG. - NO IMPAGT PROP05ED
(MINUS 865 5F - 0.020 AG. OFF5ITE)
AREA "G" - Iq,268 5F - 0.442 AG. - 3,801 5F - 0.081 AG. IMPAGTED
��
&urvcvrrrs
Q
a
`"51015'
MAY 18, 2015 - AREA V REVISED
I'6,r 7 iL7l h3
.- ,771?
53
1;
A
S:A«
PROXGT:
WETLAND IMPAGT SUMMARY
G1/WR>X-V&DKk-
X47
U?ERFIL 036) 430-q a RA aT3se
(3361 430 -90DB
C4%TMT, 1ON FORD
AREA "A" - 2,10 5F - 0.064 AG. - NO IMPAGT PROP05ED
(MINUS 865 5F - 0.020 AG. OFF5ITE)
AREA "G" - Iq,268 5F - 0.442 AG. - 3,801 5F - 0.081 AG. IMPAGTED
TOTAL NET 21,112 5F - 0.486 AG. - TOTAL IMPAGT 3,801 5F - 0.081 AG.
POND GR0551 NG SUMMARY
DRAM by; MRO
Q
a
`"51015'
MAY 18, 2015 - AREA V REVISED
d
?
SHEET TITLE
WETLAND
IMPAGT
HAP
FEE ND: F:Y.AnagcoNTra�lp5 -Lwfng Ucd-
o
O
li
0, OG
so
]L
o v
PLAN 51EET W.
11 LI -2
J Z
O
w
—
0
CZ
o
3 m
o �
m
� z
N
°C
J ,U
WETLAND IMPAGT SUMMARY
G1/WR>X-V&DKk-
X47
U?ERFIL 036) 430-q a RA aT3se
(3361 430 -90DB
C4%TMT, 1ON FORD
AREA "A" - 2,10 5F - 0.064 AG. - NO IMPAGT PROP05ED
(MINUS 865 5F - 0.020 AG. OFF5ITE)
AREA "G" - Iq,268 5F - 0.442 AG. - 3,801 5F - 0.081 AG. IMPAGTED
TOTAL NET 21,112 5F - 0.486 AG. - TOTAL IMPAGT 3,801 5F - 0.081 AG.
POND GR0551 NG SUMMARY
DRAM by; MRO
POND AREA "B" - Iq,183 5F - 0.454 AG. - 2,544 5F - 0.058 AG, POND GRO551N6
GRRPHIG SGALE
�T� �/� /'T/� �ry /�/�
0 T 501 IDOT 150` 2007
DATE: MAY I, "5
`"51015'
MAY 18, 2015 - AREA V REVISED
MAY 20, 2015 - AREA 'G' REVISED
SHEET TITLE
WETLAND
IMPAGT
HAP
FEE ND: F:Y.AnagcoNTra�lp5 -Lwfng Ucd-
DRAMN65ME: I• _ 50'
PLAN 51EET W.
11 LI -2
IN 501

GRID NORTH
NAP 83 / N51R5 2011
'-� r ✓, i'— JACK50N P. KEETON \
I HELEN W. KEETON
I (J1 \ D.B. 195,, PG. 366
AN 8805359864 \
X601 (isv� \ \(i ✓i — —
A N Ob'07'28'E (126N (24 \ \
LWE5 G. RXE 22015' I-
J5
(125 `�' x \ 1 VIRGINIA DIKE
", G✓ D.B. 440b, P61430
YET
POND
>1 I
\- IS
� 17 -
3
O
� Ib
II
IS 14 13 12 Is
VQ 23366'
JANAETTE D. 1
DR 1743, 515002
AN 880".1458081
22
24
!02'4346 E 40185
0' 0I 0100&
74 73 72
l5
IF
��
�\Q N05 -t?q'E � PIN 8805461291
NOb'27'34'E
32 33 \ 35 \
O4- 41 42
Ida 0 �
WIN
Q
a p d \�f •
46
45
\ 8I 82
R 130.13 L = 421 '
DRI,'A,
ati
N 0 D
\\ c
\\ <0
43
44
29283 9' VIGINITY MAP
°� (NOT TO 5GALE)
VB BETTY LOU .jq `L
AN DbO54b99005 \ "V
WETLANDS FLAGGED IN THE FIELD
APRIL 3 AND MAY 15, 2015 BY PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL, ING. AND
rm'03'42'w FIELD 5URVEYED BY BORUM, WADE AND
Q u2b4' \ o
�C Z
.913 LLitPLS
a� 6 `3,PIN 880r1b6635 � / /�
bob ��Q JN10 ' 354
87 / O \
0f0y�j0ENE0,
'
i
5U2NEYDRS CWHIGATION
� I hereby certify that the survey prepared by me entitled WETLAND IMPACT MAP - TAYLORS LANDING
Was actually made upon the ground and that it and the informotion,cour5esdi5tonces
shown actually exist. The purpose of this vey is to show the delineated wetlands as flagged
in the field by PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL IN _ II bo motion is taken from a
wetland survey by Borum, Wade o iotes, dated May A 2015.
„4nu
Executed this 20th ay of ,2 15 ,.�'' 'R�.,
Registration No. L-313
Homer 5. Wade ature �� •Q�qF ESS 10ti9` �7
b21 Eugene Gt. Ste. 100
i 111 Greensboro, N.G. SEAL
21420 D e
L -3731
1 ti • %. SURV4 -`.
,11 R
S.
AREA "A" - 2,lbq 5F - 0.0b4 AG. - NO IMPACT PROPO5ED
(MINU5 8(95 5F - 0.020 AG. OFF5ITE)
/ AREA "G" - 101,268 5F - 0.442 AG. - 3,801 5F - O.Obl AG. IMPAGTED
TOTAL NET 21,112 5F - 0.486 AG. - TOTAL IMPAGT 3,801 5F - 0.081 AG.
LPONI? GR0551 NG 5UMMARY
POND AREA "B" - Iq,183 5F - 0.454 AG. - 2,544 5F - 0.058 AG, POND GRO551N6
B A
Z_
�
N 1 F 7 ,,I
N ,' "9 ,.
SEALS
PROJECT:
51TE
DATA;
\
�
z
51TE AREA:
24.31± AGRE5
\
PIN:
8805455681
o —
Q, o
PHASE III
DEED REEERENGE:
DB 1085 P67.1240
PHASE II - 5ELTION 8
BIRCH CREEK RIDGE 1 \
RE. 143, PG, bI rl�,
BIRCH CREEK RIDGE
P.B I %, PG. 135 136
-
� EXISTING ZONING:
- -- —
- - -"
GE)—R-5
(,
30' unL. E54T .
—
✓)
j
\(1�1)
NATER5WD.
LAKE MAGINT05H W5 —IV
rsn�
Ex e•SM. 5EYER
s r
GRID NORTH
NAP 83 / N51R5 2011
'-� r ✓, i'— JACK50N P. KEETON \
I HELEN W. KEETON
I (J1 \ D.B. 195,, PG. 366
AN 8805359864 \
X601 (isv� \ \(i ✓i — —
A N Ob'07'28'E (126N (24 \ \
LWE5 G. RXE 22015' I-
J5
(125 `�' x \ 1 VIRGINIA DIKE
", G✓ D.B. 440b, P61430
YET
POND
>1 I
\- IS
� 17 -
3
O
� Ib
II
IS 14 13 12 Is
VQ 23366'
JANAETTE D. 1
DR 1743, 515002
AN 880".1458081
22
24
!02'4346 E 40185
0' 0I 0100&
74 73 72
l5
IF
��
�\Q N05 -t?q'E � PIN 8805461291
NOb'27'34'E
32 33 \ 35 \
O4- 41 42
Ida 0 �
WIN
Q
a p d \�f •
46
45
\ 8I 82
R 130.13 L = 421 '
DRI,'A,
ati
N 0 D
\\ c
\\ <0
43
44
29283 9' VIGINITY MAP
°� (NOT TO 5GALE)
VB BETTY LOU .jq `L
AN DbO54b99005 \ "V
WETLANDS FLAGGED IN THE FIELD
APRIL 3 AND MAY 15, 2015 BY PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL, ING. AND
rm'03'42'w FIELD 5URVEYED BY BORUM, WADE AND
Q u2b4' \ o
�C Z
.913 LLitPLS
a� 6 `3,PIN 880r1b6635 � / /�
bob ��Q JN10 ' 354
87 / O \
0f0y�j0ENE0,
'
i
5U2NEYDRS CWHIGATION
� I hereby certify that the survey prepared by me entitled WETLAND IMPACT MAP - TAYLORS LANDING
Was actually made upon the ground and that it and the informotion,cour5esdi5tonces
shown actually exist. The purpose of this vey is to show the delineated wetlands as flagged
in the field by PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL IN _ II bo motion is taken from a
wetland survey by Borum, Wade o iotes, dated May A 2015.
„4nu
Executed this 20th ay of ,2 15 ,.�'' 'R�.,
Registration No. L-313
Homer 5. Wade ature �� •Q�qF ESS 10ti9` �7
b21 Eugene Gt. Ste. 100
i 111 Greensboro, N.G. SEAL
21420 D e
L -3731
1 ti • %. SURV4 -`.
,11 R
S.
AREA "A" - 2,lbq 5F - 0.0b4 AG. - NO IMPACT PROPO5ED
(MINU5 8(95 5F - 0.020 AG. OFF5ITE)
/ AREA "G" - 101,268 5F - 0.442 AG. - 3,801 5F - O.Obl AG. IMPAGTED
TOTAL NET 21,112 5F - 0.486 AG. - TOTAL IMPAGT 3,801 5F - 0.081 AG.
LPONI? GR0551 NG 5UMMARY
POND AREA "B" - Iq,183 5F - 0.454 AG. - 2,544 5F - 0.058 AG, POND GRO551N6
B A
Z_
�
N 1 F 7 ,,I
N ,' "9 ,.
SEALS
PROJECT:
ON ERAkVELOPER:
LOMONX0 I&ISTHM
Po &7X 414
9"IERFILED, NORTH CAROLINA 2135b
036) 430 -1006
CONTACT: JON FORD
DRAM BY: PRo
DATE: MAY 1, 2015
REV151ON5:
MAY 18, 2015 AREA 'G' REVISED
MAY 20, 2015 AREA 'C REVI5ED
5HEET TITLE:
WETLAND
IMPACT
M AP
FILE ND, F:U.aa XT9WS- LaId.-91 eLL d -eN
DRAMNG SCALE: I• = 200.
PLAN 5EET N0.
NLI -3
r
�
z
O
o —
Q, o
w
o IY
W
J
LU
o
a �
3
_
o�
[p
a
�w
w
CV
� CY
_
o
_
0
ON ERAkVELOPER:
LOMONX0 I&ISTHM
Po &7X 414
9"IERFILED, NORTH CAROLINA 2135b
036) 430 -1006
CONTACT: JON FORD
DRAM BY: PRo
DATE: MAY 1, 2015
REV151ON5:
MAY 18, 2015 AREA 'G' REVISED
MAY 20, 2015 AREA 'C REVI5ED
5HEET TITLE:
WETLAND
IMPACT
M AP
FILE ND, F:U.aa XT9WS- LaId.-91 eLL d -eN
DRAMNG SCALE: I• = 200.
PLAN 5EET N0.
NLI -3

rArJ.,q
City of Greensboro
J North Carolina
May 20, 2015
Michael Brame, PWS
Pilot Environmental
P.O. Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
Re: Taylors Landing 128 Birch Creek Rd.
Dear Mr. Brame:
The City of Greensboro has been involved with the review and permitting of the proposed
development and permit application of Mr. Jon Ford of Taylors Landing, LLC. We can confirm that
Mr. Ford's application was approved by the Watershed Protection Stormwater Water Staff of the
Greensboro Technical Review Committee, and that we consider this application "approved" based on
the information submitted and reviewed for this development.
Greensboro's TRC process is designed to allow City Staff and the developer to interact and address all
necessary issues prior to commencement of the design of the project. This matter was first discussed at
a sketch plan on June 26, 2014. Mr. Ford's design engineer Borum Wade and Associates, P.A. met
with the Technical Review Committee and received comments regarding the proposed development
shown on the preliminary sketch plan. Following the meeting, site specific evidence dated July 14,
2014 determined that an ephemeral channel was present onsite. Ephemeral channels in the Jordan
Watershed do not require stream buffers and therefore a stream buffer was not deemed required for
the development of the site.
The Technical Review process continued with a submittal on January 27, 2015 and subsequently the
Watershed Protection Stormwater Review point of Greensboro Technical Review Committee
approved the plan on March 12, 2015. While revisions to the existing plan were resubmitted on April
22, 2015, after further review, it is the City's opinion that the City's buffer requirements are
adequately fulfilled based on the ephemeral call previously mentioned.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter please feel free to contact me at (336) 373 -2695.
enn' er chneier
fate City Attorney, City of Greensboro
cc:
Mr. David Phlegar
P.O. Box 3136 1 Greensboro, NC 27402.3136 • www.greensboro- ne.gov (336) 373 -CITY (2489) - TTY # 333 -6930

Stormwater Manager, Water Resources
Mr. Michael Borchers, PE
Engineering Manager, Water Resources
Mrs. Virginia Spillman, PE
Stormwater Engineering Supervisor, Water Resources

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Taylor's Landing City /County: Greensboro /Guilford Sampling Date: 05/18/2015
Applicant /Owner: Jon Ford State: North Carolina Sampling Point: DP -SW Swale
Investigator(s): Brame, PEI Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Hardwoods Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Slope ( %): 2 -3 Lat: 36.097003 Long: 79.661622 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Helena sandy loam (HeC) NWI Classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
JUMIVIAKY UI' I'INUINGJ — Attacn site map snowing sa piing point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) _
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
_
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches): >12"
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches): >12"
_
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
DP -SW
Sampling Point Swale
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
Liquidambar straciflua
20
Y
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 12 (B)
2. Acer rubrum 15 Y FAC
3. Quercus alba 15 Y FACU
4. Quercus phellos 15 Y FACW
5.
6
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75 (A /B)
7.
8.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
65 = Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
30' )
FACW species X2=
1.
Liquidambar straciflua
10
Y
FAC
FAC species X 3 =
FACU species X4=
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5 Y FACW
3.
Juniperus virginiana
5
Y
FACU
UPL species X 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
4
5.
6.
7.
8.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
9•
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
10.
X 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
3 - Prevalence Test is :5 3.0'
20 = Total Cover
Herb
Stratum (Plot size:
30' )
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1.
Eulalia viminea
10
Y
FAC
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Smilax rotundifolia 10 Y FAC
3. Parthenocissus quinquefolia 5 Y FACU
4
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
6.
7.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm)
8.
9.
or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
10.
regardless of height.
11.
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
12.
25 = Total Cover
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
30' )
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
1.
Toxicodendron radicans
10
Y
FAC
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
2. Vitis rotundifolia 5 Y FAC
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
6.
15 = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL Sampling Point: DP -SW Swale
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Tye Loc2 Texture Remarks
0 -4 10YR 4/3 100
L
4 -18 2.5Y 4/2 90
10YR 4/6 10 RM M L
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Suface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (s4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
31ndicators of Hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
Stripped Matrix (S6)
disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes X No
Remarks:

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Drainage Swale on SW Portion of Site
Photograph 1- View of Swale to the north.
Photograph 2 - View of Swale to the east.

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Drainage Swale on SW Portion of Site
Photograph 3 - View of to the south.
Photograph 4 - View of Swale to the west.

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Photograph 1 - View of dilapidated residence.
Photograph 2 - View of dilapidated residence.

Homewood, Sue
From: Michael Brame <mbrame@pi|otenvim.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May Z6'ZUl59:30AM
To: Homewood, Sue
Subject: RE: Taylor's Landing
In addition to what we submitted, the channel started at the bottom of the slope, off-site. I have also asked Homer form.
copy of the stormwater plans/status. I will forward to you upon receipt. Have a good day. I
Mic1hii-'el Brime,, PWS
336.708.4620 (c)
336.310.4527 (o) F REY: �� ���
P.O. Box 128
Kernersvi||e' NC 27285 P I L O T ENVIRONMENTAL I N C
From: Michael Brame
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2015 11:35 AM
To: Homewood, Sue; Brad Luckey
Cm: Bailey, David E SAW
Subject: RE: Landing
VVe have been waiting for the city letter and | think vve received itFriday. VVe are addressing all the comments and
revising the P[Napplication. You should get everything onTuesday. Enjoy the rest of your weekend.
336.708.4620 (c)
336.310.4527 (o)
P.O. Box 128
KerneoviUe\N[Z7Z85
F1E:
1 6111
PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL INC
From: Homewood, Sue
Sent: Sunday, May Z4 2015 11:30AM
To: Brad Luckey; Michael Brame
Cc: Bailey, David E3AVV
Subject: Taylor's Landing
Brad/Mike,
1

During the site visit David indicated a point where a tributary started (I can't remember if it was the channel coming
from the pond or at the bottom of the dam slope. Since the maps in the permit file will be the final approved version
would you please show that point. I can't tell from the plans if it'll be within this property or just below it. David also
found another small wetland that day and the plans /permit submittal need to be updated to reflect that (and any
changes to the lot layout ?)
I'll also need documentation from the City regarding whether the pond has buffers. I know Virginia is working on
that. And can you tell me if the stormwater plan is already approved through the City? I'll need a copy and it's much
easier to get a copy now verses after the permit is issued.
Thanks
Sue Homewood
NC DENR Winston -Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Resources — Water Quality Programs
450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300 (Please note my new contact information)
Winston Salem NC 27105
Voice: (336) 776 -9693
Cell: (336) 813 -1863
E -mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
®snail . corrsspordpncs to acid 'rori this ssncisr is subJpct to thp N.C. ;Public Records i_aw acid may bp disclospd o Uiiird par iss.
®snail . corrsspordpncs to acid 'rori this ssncisr is subJpct to thp N.C. ;Public Records i_aw acid may bp disclospd o Uiiird par iss.

Homewood, Sue
From: Michael Brame <mbrame@pilotenviro com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 2 29 PM
To: Homewood, Sue, Bailey, David E SAW
Cc: Brad Luckey
Subject: RE Request for Additional Information proposed Taylor's Landing s/d,McLeansville,
Guilford Co, NC, SAW -2015-00989 (UNCLASSIFIED)
Good Afternoon Sue,
Wetland easements will be recorded on Final Plat (deed notifications), and, Lots 69, 70 and 71 will be graded/filled while
the remainder of the site is being graded Please let me know if you need anything else. Have a good day
Sincerely,
Michael Brame, PWS
336 708 4620 (c)
336 310 4527 (o)
P 0 Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
www pilotenviro com
mbrame@pilotenviro com
P E 1
PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL INC
From: Homewood, Sue [mailto sue homewood@ncdenr gov]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 10 25 AM
To: Michael Brame, Bailey, David E SAW
Cc: Brad Luckey
Subject: RE: Request for Additional Information proposed Taylor's Landing s/d,McLeansville, Guilford Co , NC, SAW -
2015 -00989 (UNCLASSIFIED)
Mike,
Our GC requires deed notifications for any lots that retain wetlands or streams. Now that the plan has been modified to
include leaving some wetlands on lots, will this be a problem for the developer? if so, we need to address it before I
issue the permit
2Q D6ed`rVot1fr6ati6hS or -similar, rtiech6nisms,stiall tie°p4aced,on all r ined-juri 6ictbnal,'
Wetlands, waters;` and protecrre buffers'Miittiin the project boundariis-in'orcfer to assure.,
corripliance;ivr future arettand,,,water,,and• 6uffer #mpact;r,:l�tiesse rtier ianisms spall be' ptit=iri
i in oth� : �_ r �. �.� �, ,A
r 't -(heli e " b` or'o€` a 1"`I �ih�ctiever� ri
,sample died notiticatfin,c tV be do+�+in wade isrc►re�thep4fli,+ +efiler Unit,rrsi site t
�htt '1 `f>ncden .' har s t saw a mi' `The ,tekt-of,th
'd -4 notification may, be, niodifieda"s appropilate to suit,to a; pecifrc;project
k
Dri urn tiiatiQn`df`deeo notificat ris;s6all t e,pr�pvided`ta the vislon,trpvn request:
Can you also tell me if the developer will be filling/grading the wetland for the lots 69, 70 and 71, or if he'll be leaving
them until they are sold?
Sue Homewood
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
1