The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNC0070459_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20150427 N PDE ) • AVA NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart Governor Secretary April 22, 2015 RECEIVEDIDENRIDWR Yadkin County Board of Education APR 2 7 2015 Attn: Dr. Todd Martin, Superintendent 121 Washington Street Water Quality Yadkinville, NC 27055 Permitting Section SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspections Yadkin County Board of Education Wastewater Treatment Plants Yadkin County Dear Dr. Martin: Ron Boone of the Winston Salem Regional Office (WSRO) of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR or the Division) conducted compliance evaluation inspections at the following facilities on April 16th, 2015: Facility Name NPDES Permit# Courtney Elementary School NC0029599 East Bend Elementary School NC0029611 Forbush Elementary School NC0029602 Forbush High School NC0071773 Starmount High School N00070459 The assistance and cooperation of Mark Matthews and Mitch Long, Operators in Responsible Charge (ORC), was greatly appreciated. Inspection reports are attached for your records and the inspection findings are summarized below. The following table shows important details about each plant: Facility Name Plant Type Latitude & Receiving Stream Receiving Stream Longitude Classification Courtney ES Sand Filter 36.067886, Harmon Creek WS-IV 80.602172 36.213194, East Bend ES Sand Filter 80.509137 Logan Creek C Forbush ES Activated Sludge 36.125681, Logan Creek WS-IV 80.498595 Forbush HS Activated Sludge36.142803, Forbush Creek WS-IV 80.559088 Starmount HS Activated Sludge 36.182031, South Deep Creek WS-III 80.769535 450 West Hanes Mill Road,Suite#30U,Winston-Salem,North carolina 1/105 Phone:336-776-98001 Internet:www.ncdenr.gov An Equal Opportunity\Affirmative Action Employer—Made in part by recycled paper SITE REVIEWS Mr. Boone reviewed the plants with Mr. Matthews and Mr Long. For the most part, all plants were in good condition and well maintained. The effluents were clear and there was no foam at the discharge points. The deficiencies that Mr. Boone did note are detailed below: 1. Several alarms at the plants did not function when tested. The school board needs to test all alarms and make sure they are operational. 2. The filter beds at Courtney and East Bend schools had a significant amount of algal and vegetative growth.This should be kept to a minimum by regularly raking the beds. DOCUMENTATION REVIEWS There were no problems noted with Mr. Matthews documentation for all five plants. Mr. Matthews had all the required documentation and it meets requirements. There were no other discrepancies noted. Please keep up the good work in ensuring the plants are properly operated and maintained and meeting all the terms and conditions of the permits. Please remember that violations of the permit are subject to enforcement actions not to exceed $25,000 per day, per violation. If you have any questions regarding the inspection or this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Boone or me at 336-776-9800. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, tAisz) \‘‘' W. Corey Basinger Regional Supervisor Water Quality Regional Operations Division of Water Resources Attachments: 1. BIMS Inspection Reports (x5—one for each plant) CC: Central Files NPDES Unit WSRO/SWP Files Yadkin County Board of Education Attn: Mark Matthews, Operator in Responsible Charge 121 Washington Street Yadkinville, NC 27055 United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved. EPA Washington,D.C.20460 OMB No.2040-0057 Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires 8-31-98 Section A:National Data System Coding(i.e.,PCS) Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type 1 El 2 IS I 3 I NC0029599 111 121 15/04/16 117 18 i 19 Ls] 2011 21111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 [ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 p6 Inspection Work Days Facility Self-Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA -- Reserved 671 L 1 701 I 71 I I 72 12 l 731 I 174 751 1 1 1 1 1 1 180 � Section B:Facility Data I l Name and Location of Facility Inspected(For Industrial Users discharging to POTW,also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date POTW name and NPDES permit Number) 10:00AM 15/04/16 14/01/01 Courtney Elementary School WWTP Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date 2529 Courtney-Huntsville 11:00AM 15/04/16 18/12/31 Yadkinville NC 27055 Name(s)of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data /// Mark C Matthews/ORC/336-679-3138/ Name,Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number Contacted Mark Matthews,121 Washington St Yadkinville NC 270557725//336-699-4481/ No Section C:Areas Evaluated During Inspection(Check only those areas evaluated) le Permit • Flow Measurement • Operations&Maintenance II Records/Reports W Self-Monitoring Program IN Facility Site Review • Effluent/Receiving Waters IN Laboratory Section D:Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) (See attachment summary) Name(s)and Signature(s)of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date Ron Boone WSRO WQ//336-776-9690/ Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date EPA Form 3560-3(Rev 9-94)Previous ns are obsolete. Page# 1 • NP DES yr/mo/day Inspection Type 1 • 31 NC0029599 I11 121 15/04/16 117 18 Lai Section D:Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter. Page# 2 Permit NC0029599 Owner-Facility: Courtney Elementary School VVVVTP Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Yes No NA NE (If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new 0 0 • 0 application? Is the facility as described in the permit? • 0 0 0 #Are there any special conditions for the permit? 0 II 0 0 Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? • 0 0 0 Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? • 0 0 0 Comment: None Record Keeping Yes No NA NE Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? • 0 0 0 Is all required information readily available, complete and current? • 0 0 0 Are all records maintained for 3 years(lab. reg.required 5 years)? • 0 0 0 Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? • 0 0 0 Is the chain-of-custody complete? • 0 0 0 Dates, times and location of sampling • Name of individual performing the sampling Results of analysis and calibration U Dates of analysis Name of person performing analyses • Transported COCs • Are DMRs complete:do they include all permit parameters? • 0 0 0 Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? 0 0 • 0 (If the facility is=or>5 MGD permitted flow)Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator 0 0 II 0 on each shift? Is the ORC visitation log available and current? • ❑ 0 0 Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? • 0 0 0 Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? • 0 0 0 Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? • 0 0 0 Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? 0 0 U 0 Comment: None Laboratory Yes No NA NE Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? • 0 0 0 Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters)performed by a certified lab? • 0 0 0 Page# 3 Permit NC0029599 Owner-Facility: Courtney Elementary School WWTP , Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Laboratory Yes No NA NE #Is the facility using a contract lab? • 0 0 0 #Is proper temperature set for sample storage(kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees 0 0 0 • Celsius)? Incubator(Fecal Coliform)set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/-0.2 degrees? 0 0 0 • Incubator(BOD)set to 20.0 degrees Celsius+/-1.0 degrees? 0 0 0 U Comment: None Flow Measurement-Influent Yes No NA NE #Is flow meter used for reporting? • 0 0 0 Is flow meter calibrated annually? 0 ❑ 0 • Is the flow meter operational? • 0 0 0 (If units are separated)Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? 0 0 • 0 Comment: Using well water meter readings. Septic Tank Yes No NA NE (If pumps are used)Is an audible and visual alarm operational? 0 • 0 0 Is septic tank pumped on a schedule? • 0 0 0 Are pumps or syphons operating properly? • 0 0 0 Are high and low water alarms operating properly? • 0 ❑ 0 Comment: None Sand Filters (Low rate) Yes No NA NE (If pumps are used)Is an audible and visible alarm Present and operational? ❑ MI 0 0 Is the distribution box level and watertight? 0 0 0 • Is sand filter free of ponding? • 0 0 0 Is the sand filter effluent re-circulated at a valid ratio? • 0 0 0 #Is the sand filter surface free of algae or excessive vegetation? 0 IN 0 0 #Is the sand filter effluent re-circulated at a valid ratio?(Approximately 3 to 1) • 0 0 0 Comment: None Disinfection - UV Yes No NA NE Are extra UV bulbs available on site? 0 0 0 0 Are UV bulbs clean? 0 0 0 0 Page# 4 • Permit: NC0029599 Owner-Facility: Courtney Elementary School VVVVTP Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Disinfection- UV Yes No NA NE Is UV intensity adequate? • 0 0 0 Is transmittance at or above designed level? • 0 0 0 Is there a backup system on site? • 0 0 0 Is effluent clear and free of solids? • 0 0 0 Comment: None Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? • 0 0 0 Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? • 0 0 0 If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? 0 0 U 0 Comment: None Operations&Maintenance Yes No NA NE Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? • 0 0 0 Does the facility analyze process control parameters,for ex:MLSS, MCRT, Settleable • 0 0 0 Solids, pH, DO,Sludge Judge,and other that are applicable? Comment: None • Page# 5 • United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved. EPA Washington,D.C.20460 OMB No.2040-0057 Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires 8-31-98 Section A:National Data System Coding(i.e.,PCS) Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type 1 L 2 IS I 3 I NC0029611 111 12 I 15/04/16 117 18�,.♦ 19 11.1 201 I 21111111II1II11I1111111111 I 111III I111IIIII D 166 Inspection Work Days Facility Self-Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA ---- Reserved---- 67 I 70 u 71 Li 72 L.N. LJ 73 I I 174 75j 1 1 1 1 1 1 180 Section B:Facility Data L.J Name and Location of Facility Inspected(For Industrial Users discharging to POTW,also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date POTW name and NPDES permit Number) 11:00AM 15/04/16 14/01/01 East Bend Elementary School WWTP NC Hwy 67 E Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date 12:00PM 15/04/16 18/12/31 East Bend NC 27018 Name(s)of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data /// Mark C Matthews/ORC/336-679-3138/ Name,Address of Responsible OfficialTitle/Phone and Fax Number Contacted Mark Matthews,121 Washington StYadkinville NC 27055772511336-699-4481/ No Section C:Areas Evaluated During Inspection(Check only those areas evaluated) IN Permit • Flow Measurement 1111 Operations&Maintenance IP Records/Reports •N Self-Monitoring Program NI Sludge Handling Disposal IN Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters W Laboratory Section D:Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) (See attachment summary) Name(s)and Signature(s)of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date Ron Boone WSRO WQ//336-776-9690/ . Signature of Management QA Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date EPA Form 3560-3(Rev 9-94)Previous edi are obsolete. Page# 1 NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type 1 • 31 NC0029811 111 121 15/04/18 1 17 18 Section D:Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) Page# 2 Permit NC0029611 Owner-Facility: East Bend Elementary School V WTP Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Yes No NA NE (If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new 0 0 • 0 application? Is the facility as described in the permit? • 0 0 0 #Are there any special conditions for the permit? 0 • 0 0 Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? • 0 0 0 Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? • 0 0 0 Comment: None Record Keeping Yes No NA NE Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? • 0 0 0 Is all required information readily available, complete and current? • 0 0 0 Are all records maintained for 3 years(lab. reg. required 5 years)? • 0 0 0 Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? • 0 0 0 Is the chain-of-custody complete? • 0 0 0 Dates,times and location of sampling • Name of individual performing the sampling • Results of analysis and calibration • Dates of analysis • Name of person performing analyses • Transported COCs • Are DMRs complete:do they include all permit parameters? • 0 0 0 Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? 0 0 • 0 (If the facility is=or>5 MGD permitted flow).Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator 0 0 • 0 on each shift? Is the ORC visitation log available and current? • 0 0 0 Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? • 0 0 0 Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? • 0 0 0 Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? • 0 0 0 Facility has copy of previous years Annual Report on file for review? 0 0 • 0 Comment: None Laboratory Yes No NA NE Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? • 0 0 0 Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters)performed by a certified lab? • 0 0 0 Page# 3 Permit NC0029611 Owner-Facility: East Bend Elementary School wVVTP Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Laboratory Yes No NA NE #Is the facility using a contract lab? • 0 0 0 #Is proper temperature set for sample storage(kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees • 0 0 0 Celsius)? Incubator(Fecal Coliform)set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/-0.2 degrees? 0 0 0 • Incubator(BOD)set to 20.0 degrees Celsius+/-1.0 degrees? 0 0 0 • Comment: None Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE Is composite sampling flow proportional? 0 0 II 0 Is sample collected below all treatment units? U 0 0 0 Is proper volume collected? • 0 0 0 Is the tubing clean? 0 0 IN 0 #Is proper temperature set for sample storage(kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees 0 0 0 • Celsius)? Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit(frequency,sampling type • 0 0 0 representative)? Comment: None Flow Measurement-Influent Yes No NA NE #Is flow meter used for reporting? • 0 0 0 Is flow meter calibrated annually? 0 0 • 0 Is the flow meter operational? • 0 0 0 (If units are separated)Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? 0 0 • 0 Comment: Use well water meter. • Septic Tank Yes No NA NE (If pumps are used)Is an audible and visual alarm operational? 0 • 0 0 Is septic tank pumped on a schedule? • 0 0 0 Are pumps or syphons operating properly? • 0 0 0 Are high and low water alarms operating properly? • 0 0 0 Comment: There are several alarms at this plant, some of which did not work during the inspection. They all need to be repaired. Sand Filters (Low rate) Yes No NA NE (If pumps are used)Is an audible and visible alarm Present and operational? 0 • 0 0 Page# 4 • Permit NC0029611 Owner-Facility: East Bend Elementary School VWVTP Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Sand Filters(Low rate) Yes No NA NE Is the distribution box level and watertight? 0 0 0 II Is sand filter free of ponding? • 0 0 0 Is the sand filter effluent re-circulated at a valid ratio? • 0 0 0 #Is the sand filter surface free of algae or excessive vegetation? 0 • 0 0 #Is the sand filter effluent re-circulated at a valid ratio?(Approximately 3 to 1) • 0 0 0 Comment: None Disinfection - UV Yes No NA NE Are extra UV bulbs available on site? • 0 0 0 Are UV bulbs clean? • 0 0 0 Is UV intensity adequate? • 0 0 0 Is transmittance at or above designed level? • 0 0 0 Is there a backup system on site? • ❑ 0 0 Is effluent clear and free of solids? • 0 0 0 Comment: None Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? • 0 0 0 Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? U 0 0 0 If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? 0 0 II 0 Comment: None Operations& Maintenance Yes No NA NE Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? • 0 0 0 Does the facility analyze process control parameters,for ex: MLSS, MCRT,Settleable • 0 0 0 Solids,pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable? Comment: None Page# 5 • United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved. EPA Washington,D.C.20460 OMB No.2040-0057 Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires 8-31-98 Section A:National Data System Coding(i.e.,PCS) Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type 1 u 2 ISI 3 N00029602 111 12 I 15/04/16 117 18 LA,- 19 I S 201 I 21111111 illIIIiitil1111 / / 1 / 11111111111111111166 Inspection Work Days Facility Self-Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA -- Reserved— — 671 I 70 L 71 J L I LJ I 72 I ru I 73 I " I 174 75J 1 1 1 1 1 1 180 Section B:Facility Data Name and Location of Facility Inspected(For Industrial Users discharging to POTW,also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date POTW name and NPDES permit Number) 12:00PM 15/04/16 14/01/01 Forbush Elementary School WWfP Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date 1400 Bloomtown Rd East Bend NC 27018 01:OOPM 15/04/16 18/12/31 Name(s)of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data /// Mark C Matthews/ORC/336-679-3138/ • Name,Address of Responsible OfficialTitle/Phone and Fax Number Contacted Mark Matthews,121 Washington St Yadkinville NC 270557725//336-699-4481/ No • Section C:Areas Evaluated During Inspection(Check only those areas evaluated) ill Permit • Flow Measurement w Operations&Maintenance II Records/Reports N Self-Monitoring Program 1111 Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review IIIEffluent/Receiving Waters E Laboratory Section D:Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) (See attachment summary) Name(s)and Signature(s)of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date Ron Boone WSRO WQ//336-776-9690/ Signature of Management Q&Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date EPA Form 3560-3(Rev 9-94)Previous edit are obsolete. Page# 1 NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type 1 • 31 NC0029802 111 121 15/04/16 1 17 18 1 c 1 Section D:Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter. Page# 2 Permit NC0029602 Owner-Facility: Forbush Elementary School VVVVfP Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Yes No NA NE (If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new 0 0 U 0 application? Is the facility as described in the permit? • 0 0 0 #Are there any special conditions for the permit? 0 • 0 0 Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? • 0 0 0 Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? • ❑ 0 0 Comment: None Record Keeping Yes No NA NE Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? • 0 0 0 Is all required information readily available,complete and current? • 0 0 0 Are all records maintained for 3 years(lab. reg. required 5 years)? • 0 0 0 Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? • 0 0 0 Is the chain-of-custody complete? • 0 0 0 Dates,times and location of sampling • Name of individual performing the sampling • Results of analysis and calibration • Dates of analysis • Name of person performing analyses • Transported COCs • Are DMRs complete:do they include all permit parameters? • 0 0 0 Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? 0 0 MI 0 (If the facility is=or>5 MGD permitted flow)Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator 0 0 • 0 on each shift? Is the ORC visitation log available and current? • 0 0 0 Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? • 0 0 0 Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? • 0 0 0 Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? • 0 0 0 Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? 0 0 U 0 Comment: None Laboratory Yes No NA NE Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? • 0 0 0 Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters)performed by a certified lab? • 0 0 0 Page# 3 Permit NC0029602 Owner-Facility: Forbush Elementary School VVVVTP • Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Laboratory Yes No NA NE #Is the facility using a contract lab? • 0 0 0 #Is proper temperature set for sample storage(kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees 0 0 0 • Celsius)? Incubator(Fecal Coliform)set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/-0.2 degrees? 0 0 0 IN Incubator(BOD)set to 20.0 degrees Celsius+/-1.0 degrees? 0 0 0 • Comment: None Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE Is composite sampling flow proportional? 0 0 • 0 Is sample collected below all treatment units? • 0 0 0 Is proper volume collected? • 0 0 0 Is the tubing clean? 0 0 IN 0 #Is proper temperature set for sample storage(kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees 0 0 0 • Celsius)? Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit(frequency,sampling type • 0 0 0 representative)? Comment: None Flow Measurement-Influent Yes No NA NE #Is flow meter used for reporting? • 0 0 0 Is flow meter calibrated annually? 0 • 0 0 Is the flow meter operational? • 0 0 0 (If units are separated)Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? 0 0 II 0 Comment: Use well water flow meter. Bar Screens Yes No NA NE Type of bar screen a.Manual • b.Mechanical ❑ Are the bars adequately screening debris? • 0 0 ❑ Is the screen free of excessive debris? • 0 0 0 Is disposal of screening in compliance? • 0 0 0 Is the unit in good condition? • 0 0 0 Comment: None Page# 4 • Permit NC0029602 Owner-Facility: Forbush Elementary School VWVTP Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Bar Screens Yes No NA NE Equalization Basins Yes No NA NE Is the basin aerated? • 0 0 0 Is the basin free of bypass lines or structures to the natural environment? • 0 0 0 Is the basin free of excessive grease? • 0 0 0 Are all pumps present? • 0 0 0 Are all pumps operable? • 0 0 0 Are float controls operable? • 0 0 0 Are audible and visual alarms operable? 0 • 0 0 #Is basin size/volume adequate? • 0 0 0 Comment: None Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE Mode of operation Ext.Air Type of aeration system Diffused Is the basin free of dead spots? • 0 0 0 Are surface aerators and mixers operational? 0 0 • 0 Are the diffusers operational? • 0 0 0 Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process? • 0 0 0 Does the foam cover less than 25%of the basin's surface? • 0 0 0 Is the DO level acceptable? 0 0 0 • Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/I) 0 0 0 • Comment: None Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater? • 0 0 0 Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier? ❑ 0 • 0 Are weirs level? • 0 0 0 Is the site free of weir blockage? • 0 0 0 Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting? • 0 0 0 Is scum removal adequate? • 0 0 0 Is the site free of excessive floating sludge? • 0 0 0 Is the drive unit operational? 0 0 • 0 Page# 5 Permit NC0029602 Owner-Facility: Forbush Elementary School VVWTP • Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE Is the return rate acceptable(low turbulence)? • 0 0 0 Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc? • 0 0 0 Is the sludge blanket level acceptable?(Approximately 1/4 of the sidewall depth) 0 0 0 • Comment: None Disinfection- UV Yes No NA NE Are extra UV bulbs available on site? • 0 0 0 Are UV bulbs clean? • 0 0 0 Is UV intensity adequate? • 0 0 0 Is transmittance at or above designed level? 0 0 0 • Is there a backup system on site? • 0 0 0 Is effluent dear and free of solids? • 0 0 0 Comment: None Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? • 0 0 0 Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? • 0 0 0 If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? 0 0 • 0 Comment: None Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE Is the capacity adequate? U 0 0 0 Is the mixing adequate? • 0 0 0 Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank? • 0 0 0 #Is the.odor acceptable? • 0 0 0 #Is tankage available for properly waste sludge? 0 0 0 • Comment: None Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? • 0 0 0 Does the facility analyze process control parameters,for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable • 0 0 0 Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge,and other that are applicable? Comment: None • Page# 6 United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved. EPA Washington,D.C.20460 OMB No.2040-0057 Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires 8-31-98 Section A:National Data System Coding(i.e.,PCS) Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type 1 u 2 [ 1 3 I NC0071773 111 12 1 15/04/16 117 181,. 19 L G I 201 21111111 111111111111111111 1111111 11111111111 p6 Inspection Work Days Facility Self-Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA — Reserved- 671 I 70 U 71 u 72 LN 731 1 174 751 1 1 1 1 1 1 180 Section B:Facility Data Name and Location of Facility Inspected(For Industrial Users discharging to POTW,also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date POTW name and NPOES permit Number) 01:OOPM 15/04/16 14/02/01 Forbush High School WWTP 1525 Fallon Rd Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date East Bend NC 27018 02:OOPM 15/04/16 18/12/31 Name(s)of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data /// Mark C Matthews/ORC/336-679-3138/ Name,Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number Contacted Mark Matthews,121 Washington St Yadkinville NC 270557725//336-699-4481/ No Section C:Areas Evaluated During Inspection(Check only those areas evaluated) go Permit El Flow Measurement 111 Operations&Maintenance • Records/Reports 411 Self-Monitoring Program • Sludge Handling Disposal • Facility Site Review NI Effluent/Receiving Waters W Laboratory Section D:Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) (See attachment summary) Name(s)and Signature(s)of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date Ron Boone WSRO WQ//336-776-9690/ Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date `‘‘ ‘)A-SL EPA Form 3560-3(Rev 9-94)Previous edition are obsolete. • Page# 1 NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type 1 • 31 NC0071773 I11 121 15/04/16 117 18 LI I Section D:Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter. Page# 2 • Permit NC0071773 Owner-Facility: Forbush High School WWTP Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Yes No NA NE (If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new 0 0 • 0 application? Is the facility as described in the permit? • 0 0 0 #Are there any special conditions for the permit? 0 • 0 0 Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? • 0 0 0 Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? • 0 0 0 Comment: None Record Keeping Yes No NA NE Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? • 0 0 0 Is all required information readily available,complete and current? U 0 0 0 Are all records maintained for 3 years(lab. reg.required 5 years)? • 0 0 0 Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? • 0 0 0 Is the chain-of-custody complete? • 0 0 0 Dates,times and location of sampling • Name of individual performing the sampling Results of analysis and calibration • Dates of analysis • Name of person performing analyses • Transported COCs • Are DMRs complete:do they include all permit parameters? • 0 0 0 Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? 0 0 • 0 (If the facility is=or>5 MGD permitted flow)Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator 0 0 • 0 on each shift? Is the ORC visitation log available and current? • 0 0 0 Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? • 0 0 0 Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? • 0 0 0 Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? • 0 0 0 Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? 0 0 • 0 Comment: None Laboratory Yes No NA NE Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? • 0 0 0 Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters)performed by a certified lab? • 0 0 0 Page# 3 Permit NC0071773 Owner-Facility: Forbush High School WWTP Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Laboratory Yes No NA NE #Is the facility using a contract lab? • 0 0 0 #Is proper temperature set for sample storage(kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees 0 0 ❑ • Celsius)? Incubator(Fecal Coliform)set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/-0.2 degrees? 0 0 0 • Incubator(BOD)set to 20.0 degrees Celsius+/-1.0 degrees? 0 0 0 • Comment: None Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE Is composite sampling flow proportional? 0 0 • 0 Is sample collected below all treatment units? • 0 0 0 Is proper volume collected? • ❑ 0 0 Is the tubing clean? 0 0 U ❑ #Is proper temperature set for sample storage(kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees 0 0 0 • Celsius)? Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit(frequency, sampling type • 0 0 0 representative)? Comment: None Bar Screens Yes No NA NE Type of bar screen a.Manual • b.Mechanical 0 Are the bars adequately screening debris? • 0 0 0 Is the screen free of excessive debris? • 0 0 0 Is disposal of screening in compliance? • 0 0 0 Is the unit in good condition? • 0 0 0 Comment: None Equalization Basins Yes No NA NE Is the basin aerated? • 0 0 0 Is the basin free of bypass lines or structures to the natural environment? • 0 0 0 Is the basin free of excessive grease? • 0 0 0 Are all pumps present? • 0 0 0 Are all pumps operable? • 0 0 0 Page# 4 • Permit NC0071773 Owner-Facility: Forbush High School wWTP Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Equalization Basins Yes No NA NE Are float controls operable? • 0 0 0 Are audible and visual alarms operable? 0 • 0 0 #Is basin size/volume adequate? • 0 0 0 Comment: None Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE Mode of operation Ext.Air Type of aeration system Diffused Is the basin free of dead spots? • 0 0 0 Are surface aerators and mixers operational? • • 0 0 0 Are the diffusers operational? • 0 0 0 Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process? • 0 0 0 Does the foam cover less than 25%of the basin's surface? • 0 0 0 Is the DO level acceptable? 0 0 0 • Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/I) 0 0 0 • Comment: None Flow Measurement-Effluent Yes No NA NE #Is flow meter used for reporting? • 0 0 0 Is flow meter calibrated annually? • 0 0 0 Is the flow meter operational? • 0 0 0 (If units are separated)Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? • 0 0 ❑ Comment: None Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater? • 0 0 0 Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier? 0 0 • 0 Are weirs level? • 0 0 0 Is the site free of weir blockage? • 0 0 0 Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting? • 0 0 0 Is scum removal adequate? • 0 0 0 Is the site free of excessive floating sludge? • 0 0 0 Is the drive unit operational? 0 0 • 0 • Page# 5 Permit: NC0071773 Owner-Facility: Forbush High School VVWTP Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE Is the return rate acceptable(low turbulence)? • 0 0 ❑ Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc? • 0 0 0 Is the sludge blanket level acceptable?(Approximately%of the sidewall depth) 0 0 0 • Comment: None Disinfection -UV Yes No NA NE Are extra UV bulbs available on site? • 0 0 0 Are UV bulbs clean? • 0 0 0 Is UV intensity adequate? • 0 0 0 Is transmittance at or above designed level? 0 0 0 • Is there a backup system on site? • 0 0 0 Is effluent clear and free of solids? • 0 0 0 Comment: None Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? • 0 0 0 Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? • 0 0 0 If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? 0 0 • 0 Comment: None Aerobic Disiester Yes No NA NE Is the capacity adequate? • 0 0 0 Is the mixing adequate? • 0 0 0 Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank? • 0 0 0 #Is the odor acceptable? • 0 0 0 #Is tankage available for properly waste sludge? 0 0 0 • Comment: None Operations& Maintenance Yes No NA NE Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? • 0 0 0 Does the facility analyze process control parameters,for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable • 0 0 0 Solids, pH, DO,Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable? Comment: None Page# 6 United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved. EPA Washington,D.C.20460 OMB No.2040-0057 Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires 8-31-98 Section A:National Data System Coding(i.e.,PCS) Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type 1 N ( 2U I 3 I N00070459 111 12 15/04/16 117 18 Lir. 19 s 2011 21111111 1111111111111111111111111 11111111111 r Inspection Work Days Facility Self-Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA - Reserved 671 LJ L 1 701 I 71 I I 72 1 ti 1 731 I 174 751 1 1 1 1 1 1 18° ySection BFacilityData LJ1 Name and Location of Facility Inspected(For Industrial Users discharging to POTW,also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date POTW name and NPDES permit Number) 02:OOPM 15/04/16 14/01/01 Stamtount High School WWfP 2516 Longtown Rd Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date Boonville NC 27011 03:OOPM 15/04/16 18/12/31 Name(s)of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data H/ Mark C Matthews/ORC/336-679-3138/ Name,Address of Responsible OfficiaVTitle/Phone and Fax Number Contacted Mark Matthews,121 Washington St Yadkinville NC 270557725//336-699-4481/ No Section C:Areas Evaluated During Inspection(Check only those areas evaluated) op Permit • Flow Measurement • Operations&Maintenance IP Records/Reports 1* Self-Monitoring Program • Sludge Handling Disposal 111 Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters W Laboratory Section D:Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) (See attachment summary) Name(s)and Signature(s)of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date Ron Boone WSRO WQ//336-776-9690/ Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date EPA Form 3560-3(Rev 9-94)Previous editi are obsolete. • Page# 1 NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type 1 31 NC0070459 I11 121 15/04/18 117 18 [El Section D:Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) Please refer to that attached inspection summary letter. Page# 2 Permit: NC0070459 Owner-Facility: Starmount High School WWTP Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Yes No NA NE (If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new 0 0 • 0 application? Is the facility as described in the permit? • 0 0 0 #Are there any special conditions for the permit? 0 • 0 0 Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? • 0 0 0 Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? • 0 0 0 Comment: None Record Keeping Yes No NA NE Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? • 0 0 0 Is all required information readily available,complete and current? • 0 0 0 Are all records maintained for 3 years(lab. reg. required 5 years)? • 0 0 0 Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? • 0 0 0 Is the chain-of-custody complete? • 0 0 0 Dates,times and location of sampling • Name of individual performing the sampling Results of analysis and calibration Dates of analysis Name of person performing analyses • Transported COCs • Are DMRs complete:do they include all permit parameters? • 0 0 0 Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to'users and DWQ? 0 0 • 0 (If the facility is=or>5 MGD permitted flow)Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator 0 0 • 0 on each shift? Is the ORC visitation log available and current? • 0 0 0 Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? • 0 0 0 Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? • 0 0 0 Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? • 0 0 0 Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? 0 0 II 0 Comment: None Laboratory Yes No NA NE Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? • 0 0 0 Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters)performed by a certified lab? • 0 0 0 Page# 3 Permit NC0070459 Owner-Facility: Starmount High School WWTP • Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Laboratory Yes No NA NE #Is the facility using a contract lab? • 0 0 0 #Is proper temperature set for sample storage(kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees 0 0 0 II Celsius)? Incubator(Fecal Coliform)set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/-0.2 degrees? 0 0 0 • Incubator(BOD)set to 20.0 degrees Celsius+/-1.0 degrees? 0 0 0 III Comment: None Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE Is composite sampling flow proportional? 0 0 • 0 Is sample collected below all treatment units? • 0 0 0 Is proper volume collected? ■ 0 0 0 Is the tubing clean? 0 0 • 0 #Is proper temperature set for sample storage(kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees 0 0 0 IN Celsius)? Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit(frequency,sampling type • 0 0 0 representative)? Comment: None Flow Measurement- Influent Yes No NA NE #Is flow meter used for reporting? • 0 0 ❑ Is flow meter calibrated annually? 0 • 0 0 Is the flow meter operational? • 0 0 0 (If units are separated)Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? 0 0 • 0 Comment: Using well water meter readings. Bar Screens Yes No NA NE Type of bar screen a.Manual • b.Mechanical 0 Are the bars adequately screening debris? • 0 0 0 Is the screen free of excessive debris? • 0 0 0 Is disposal of screening in compliance? • 0 0 0 Is the unit in good condition? • 0 0 0 Comment: None Page# 4 • Permit NC0070459 Owner-Facility: Starmount High School WW1-13 Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Bar Screens Yes No NA NE Equalization Basins Yes No NA NE Is the basin aerated? • 0 0 0 Is the basin free of bypass lines or structures to the natural environment? • 0 0 0 Is the basin free of excessive grease? • 0 0 0 Are all pumps present? • 0 0 0 Are all pumps operable? • 0 0 0 Are float controls operable? • 0 0 0 Are audible and visual alarms operable? 0 • 0 0 #Is basin size/volume adequate? • 0 0 0 Comment: None Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE Mode of operation Ext.Air Type of aeration system Diffused Is the basin free of dead spots? • 0 0 0 Are surface aerators and mixers operational? 0 0 • 0 Are the diffusers operational? • 0 0 0 Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process? • 0 0 0 Does the foam cover less than 25%of the basin's surface? • 0 0 0 Is the DO level acceptable? 0 0 0 • Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/I) 0 0 0 • Comment: None Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater? • 0 0 0 Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier? 0 0 • 0 Are weirs level? • 0 0 0 Is the site free of weir blockage? • 0 0 0 Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting? • 0 0 0 Is scum removal adequate? • 0 0 0 Is the site free of excessive floating sludge? • 0 0 0 Is the drive unit operational? 0 0 U 0 Page# 5 Permit: NC0070459 Owner-Facility: Starmount High School VVVVfP + Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE Is the return rate acceptable(low turbulence)? • 0 0 0 Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc? U 0 0 0 Is the sludge blanket level acceptable?(Approximately%4 of the sidewall depth) 0 0 0 • Comment: None Pumps-RAS-WAS Yes No NA NE Are pumps in place? • 0 0 0 Are pumps operational? • 0 0 0 Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site? • 0 0 0 Comment: None Disinfection - UV Yes No NA NE Are extra UV bulbs available on site? • 0 0 0 Are UV bulbs clean? • 0 0 0 Is UV intensity adequate? • 0 0 0 Is transmittance at or above designed level? 0 ❑ 0 U Is there a backup system on site? • 0 0 0 Is effluent Gear and free of solids? • 0 0 0 Comment: None Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? • 0 0 0 Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? • 0 0 0 If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? 0 0 • 0 Comment: None Aerobic Diqester Yes No NA NE Is the capacity adequate? • 0 0 0 Is the mixing adequate? • 0 0 0 Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank? • 0 0 0 #Is the odor acceptable? • 0 0 0 #Is tankage available for properly waste sludge? 0 0 0 II Comment: None Page# 6 • • Permit NC0070459 Owner-Facility: Starmount High School VVVVTP Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Operations&Maintenance Yes No NA NE Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? • 0 0 0 Does the facility analyze process control parameters,for ex:MLSS, MCRT,Settleable • 0 0 0 Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable? Comment: None Page# 7