Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20150042 Ver 1_Martha Girolami_20150406Burdette, Jennifer a From: MARTHA W GIROLAMI <mgirolami @me.com> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 1:04 PM To: Burdette, Jennifer a; Devane, Boyd Subject: Fwd: Comments on Green Meadow SAW - 2014 -02254 permit /404 impact permit Attachments: Comments to the Corps April 6.docx Begin forwarded message: From: MARTHA W GIROLAMI <mgirolami(q-)_mac.com> Subject: Comments on Green Meadow SAW- 2014 -02254 permit /404 impact permit Date: April 6, 2015 12:32:58 PM EDT To: Brown Craig < Craig.J.Brown(c�usace.army.mil> Cc: karen.higgens(a)_ncdenr.gov Dear Mr. Brown Thank you for your consideration of these comments. Martha Girolami 473 Mount Pisgah Church Rd Apex, NC 27523 919- 362 -5759 1 April 6, 2015 Mr. Craig Brown U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Office 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587 Dear Mr. Brown, I appreciate your consideration of my comments on the application from Green Meadows, LLC seeking Department of the Army authorization to discharge fill material into jurisdictional wetlands and streams associated with coal ash pits to be located at the Brickhaven and Colon Road Mines in Chatham and Lee Counties, NC. I live in Chatham County and have closely followed this proposed project by Duke Energy and Charah /Green Meadows. My interest was provoked because I oppose the lack of Democracy, i.e. there was no local government involvement and collaboration in this decision to transport and dispose of millions of tons of coal ash in my county. Coal ash dumps are being imposed. Also, landfills should not be used for coal ash residuals and the permits from DENR are weak and fail to protect the people, environment and many plants and animals living in and around these two clay mines. The Chatham Board of Commissioners has unanimously passed a resolution opposing this coal ash dump at Brickhaven. Air Pollution and the Environment and Health: Air pollution is a probable danger to the transport routes and the clay mines and surrounding areas. Considerable tonnage of coal ash will be lost in material handling and transport. Green Meadows / Charah has no stated plans in its permit to do its material handling in an enclosed space to prevent dispersion and loss. There is no air permit. Citizens must rely on only nuisance complaints which may activate calls to keep the ash damp or some minimal strategy. Loosely tarped trucks and open rail cars are to be used with no sealed barriers to prevent blow out of ash. Material handling on site may involve backhoeing ash from rail cars to trucks or to the ground, dumping ash into mine cells. Both trucks, backhoe and especially "empty" rail cars will still contain ash that can be released to the air as they move around the site or return to the Sutton and Riverbend plants to be refilled. Since the fly ash portion of the coal ash residuals is low micron or submicron in size, it is very difficult to prevent dispersion over the countryside and to confine in any type of windy conditions or during the motion of transportation by rail or truck. To illustrate how coal ash is readily dispersed and released by Duke Energy or subcontractors, a few examples are given below. On April 3, 2015, two photos taken by a resident of the Brickhaven area on Corinth Road are attached. These show the air pollution from coal ash dust clouds coming off of the pond at the inactive Cape Fear power plant. Charah is causing significant pollution currently from trucking coal ash from the Duke Energy Asheville power plant to its Asheville airport coal ash construction fill project several miles down a rural highway. On February 4, 2015 a reporter with WSOTV in Charlotte interviewed a landowner along this road. He said that trucks drive by every two minutes and that "ash from the trucks has turned the road gray" and that to cut his grass "you have to wear a mask. The whole side of the road ...it's dust." The link below is to the article and video about this air pollution. http:././www.wso ctv.com/news/news/sp ecial-rep orts.19 -investigates- coal-ash- cleanup -problems.Inj 4j 41 April 3, 2015: photos taken of coal ash air pollution blowing from the Cape Fear In "Ash in Lungs: How Breathing Coal Ash is Hazardous to Your Health" released by Physicians for Social Responsibility and Earthjustice, the authors state that coal fly ash which is less than 2.5 microns in size, is able to go deep into your lungs. These particles are known to cause heart disease, asthma, stroke and COPD as well as silicosis (like asbestosis) and cancer. Also these dust particles contain toxic heavy metals and often radioactivity which are often carcinogens and neurotoxins. Almost all toxins to humans are toxic to wildlife as these metals become incorporated into their environment and food or are breathed in or pass through skin or membranes to damage health and viability. http: /Iearthjustice.org/news/press/ 2014 / ash -in- lungs- how - breathing- coal - ash -is- hazardous -to -your- health In summary, material handling combined with winds and poor practices can broadcast coal fly ash over many miles around the Brickhaven and Colon Road projects and all transport routes. Material handling has low standards, is not enclosed and regulations are minimal. Air pollution from coal ash is already impacting the target area in Chatham and other sites in NC. Toxicity is from the particle size which passes into the lung's aveoli, from metal toxicity and from radioactivity. The coal ash air pollution constitutes irreversible and permanent harm to environment and health. Project Size and Scope: The DENR permits call for 11.5 million Tons maximum storage of ash at the Brickhaven mine and 9 million Tons at Colon Road mine. However, the third page of the Green Meadows permit application (SAW- 2014 - 02254) under Project Description states that "Approximately 3 million tons of coal ash would be transported to the Brickhaven and Sanford Mines for use in mine reclamation." This is a serious difference in project size and impact. This discrepancy must be resolved since certainly the scale of the project is a fundamental consideration for your decision. Liability Transfer and Commercial Enterprise Duke Energy has transferred liability to Charah /Green Meadows for all environmental impacts that may occur at the coal ash dumps at the clay mines for the next 30 years. By buying the services of Charah /Green Meadows, Duke Energy which has enormous financial resources, is no longer responsible for its own coal ash wastes. Green Meadows as a limited liability corporation has minor cash reserves and assets. Also, by making the landfill /mine reclamation a commercial enterprise, by the laws of interstate commerce, the business must accept coal ash from outside the state of NC and from other companies besides Duke Energy in NC. Brickhaven and Colon Road will likely be new Superfund sites in 30 years and the finger pointing and blame game between these parties will prevent real and timely (if indeed this is possible) remediation actions. Groundwater and Clean up: The clean up moneys /bonds etc. are inadequate for a clean up if /when leaks occur in the linings. The DENR permit requires that only $2 million be set aside by Green Meadows for correction action for spills and leaks. Plastic liner manufacturers have no real knowledge of how long their liners will last. Email inquiries into liner HDPE liner longevity produced two longevity estimates of 5 and 20 years. But the coal ash and its toxic metal composition are forever. Also once a leak is detected, since the ash is buried in a large cell and is partially underground, how is it possible to find where the leak is and repair it? It cannot be done. All that can be done is watch the plume grow and put homes /farms on county water if available. Rivers and streams and the wildlife that depend on them receive this burden of pollution. Above Ground Storage Coal ash should be mixed with concrete and stored in above ground containment as discussed in the following article. Of course these storage bunkers must be sited at the source power plant. Two wrongs don't make a right. Dumping ash in unlined riverside pits at the power plants (first wrong) and dumping this coal ash 200+ miles away in Brickhaven and Colon Road (second wrong) do not make a right. The more than 100 million tons of coal ash at power plants across NC must be disposed of in above - ground bunkers at the source power plant and must NOT be transported across the state to Brickhaven and Colon Road mines. This salt -stone technology is discussed in this article. http: / /www.bredl.org/pdf4 /Coal ash report 14 -083 w ARpx A +B.pdf Selenium and HDPE Liners: Dr. A. Dennis Lemly, Research Fish Biologist with the USDA Forest Service and Department of Biology at Wake Forest University raises concerns that landfill liners and membranes are permeable to anions of selenium and points out that there are no "post closure data and no selenium measurements at all" in coal ash landfill performance applications. He reviews the toxicity of selenium, its high concentration in coal ash leachate and that "ammoniated coal ash, which is the predominant form produced today, enhances the leaching rate of elements that form anionic compounds in solution, in particular selenium, arsenic, molybdenum, fluoride, and vanadium." Dr. Lemly discusses an EPA report that states that "leakage through properly constructed HDPE GM primary liners that have undergone CQA monitoring will occasionally be in excess of 200 Lphd (liters per hectare per day) during active period of operation and up to 200 Lphd during post closure period." He states this may constitute an environmental hazard with "biological significance ". He goes on to evaluate this release saying that unless there is more than a 1000 fold dilution factor of the released leachate, containing a typical coal ash leachate concentration of selenium of 2000 microgram per liter, then the concentration of polluted water could be as much as 2 micrograms per liter. This concentration is toxic to fish and wildlife. There is no data that says a HDPE or any other type of membrane liner will not be permeable to certain anions specifically toxic selenium. This reliance on landfills and liners for coal ash residuals is not based on science or experience. As discussed in the previous section, the only safe storage of coal ash residuals is in above ground concrete bunkers using the salt stone technology. Reference: Lemly, A.D. 2010. Technical and Environmental Issues with Synthetic Liners Proposed for use in Coal Ash Disposal Applications. Technical Report to USEPA Available from the Author at the Department of Biology, Wake Forest University, Winston- Salem, NC 27109. The Need for a Hearing on the Green Meadows Permit: Since each citizen is allowed only 3 minutes to communicate to the hearing officers information, criticism and suggestions on the proposed Coal ash dumps in Brickhaven and Colon Road and since there are three permits being commented on in two meeting of three hours each, I do not think this is enough time. It is very unusual to have more than one permit commented on at a hearing. People need time to tell their stories, to describe their concerns. Some can spit out opinions in seconds and others need more time. Also, this accelerated process of coal ash clean up is mandated by the NC Legislature in its Coal Ash Management Act. There has never been a decree like this before. DENR has been under heavy and unsuitable pressure to create permits for a landfill type project based on very little time and scant environmental information. Normally a landfill permit will require over two years to complete but this permit has been developed in less than a year. Concerned citizens need to have a say on this one permit, not diluted or confused with the DENR permits. Due to the many significant and irreversible environmental risks of this permit application by Green Meadows, in my view, it should not be approved. Thank you Martha Girolami 473 Mount Pisgah Church Rd Apex, NC 27523 Chatham County 919 - 362 -5759