20150503 Ver 1_Categorical Exclusion_20150514

PROGRAMMATIC
CATEGORICAL
EXCLUSION APPROVAL
ME I
D
MAY 1 4 2015
RECEIVED
DCM WILMINGTON, NC
APR 17 2015

NCDOT PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE)
ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
For use by a Local Government Agency
TIP Project No. U -5534B
WBS Element 44096 & 43819
Federal Project No. STPDA- 0332(44)
A. Project Description:
The City of Wilmington proposes a public walkway underneath the
Heide Trask (Wrightsville Beach) Drawbridge which will serve as the northern
terminus (Phase IHB) of the Gary Shell Cross -City Trail in Wilmington, New
Hanover County. The Gary Shell Cross -City Trail will be approximately 15
miles long upon completion, providing bicycle and pedestrian access to numerous
recreational, cultural, and educational destinations in Wilmington.
Phase IIIB consists of a public walkway underneath the Heide Trask Drawbridge
to provide a designated crossing for cyclists and pedestrians across US 74 -76
(Wrightsville Avenue) on the mainland side of the drawbridge in Wilmington. It
begins in the northeast quadrant of the Wrightsville Avenue /Airlie Road
intersection near the terminus of Phase IIIB of the Trail (currently in design). It
ends in the southeast quadrant of the same intersection, approximately 450 linear
feet from the Bridge Tender Marina parking lot.
The project location is shown in Figure 1. This project is listed as U -5534B in the
current 2012 -2018 NCDOT State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)
(October 2014), and construction is anticipated to begin in early 2015.
The proposed walkway will be comprised of a timber bridge with composite
decking and timber handrails. Under the existing drawbridge, the walkway will
have an 8 -foot clear distance (width between the rails). The walkway begins in
the northeast quadrant of the Wrightsville Avenue /Airlie Road intersection near
the terminus of Phase IIIB of the Trail (currently in design). It ends in the
southeast quadrant of the same intersection, near the Bridge Tender Marina
parking lot. Figure 2 shows the design and Figure 3 shows a 3D rendering of the
proposed walkway.
This project will be built within existing NCDOT right of way. The estimated
construction cost for the proposed project is $563,100.
B. Purpose and Need:
The purpose of the proposed project is to provide a safe crossing for cyclists and
pedestrians across US 74 (Wrightsville Avenue). The walkway also is part of the
Gary Shell Cross -City Trail, which is a key piece of the City of Wilmington's
Trails and Greenways System. Its construction will help address a need for
alternative transportation in the City that is safer and more convenient for
citizens.
PCE -100L 1 November 2014

NCDOT PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (PU
ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
The Wilmington City Council approved the development of the Cross -City Trail
in June 2008 as a project that will:
• Provide a safe built environment that encourages healthy, active lifestyles;
• Help to clear roadway congestion and pollution by providing a safe route
for alternative transportation;
• Impact economic viability through increased tourism, jobs, and property
values; and
• Improve quality of life by increasing opportunities for recreation,
experiencing a sense of community, and connecting with nature.
The Cross -City Trail is shown as a Planned Bicycle Route in the Bicycle Element
of the 2030 Wilmington APO Long -Range Transportation Plan.
C. Proposed Improvements — Select ALL Activities that apply to the Project,
regardless of TYPE
Circle one or more of the following Type I activities:
1. Non - construction activities (program activities).
2. Approval of utility installations along or across a transportation facility.
OConstruction of bicycle and pedestrian lanes, paths, and facilities.
4. Activities included in the State's "highway safety plan" under 23 USC 402
(programs administered by the Division of Motor Vehicles).
5. Transfer of Federal lands pursuant to 23 USC 317 when the subsequent
action is not a FHWA action.
6. The installation of noise barriers or alterations to existing publicly owned
buildings to provide for noise reduction.
7. Landscaping.
8. Installation of fencing, signs, pavement markings, small passenger
shelters, traffic signals, and railroad warning devices.
9. Emergency repairs under 23 USC 125 (Governor Declared Emergency).
10. Acquisition of scenic easements.
11. Determination of payback under 23 CFR Part 480 for property previously
acquired with federal -aid participation.
12. Improvements to existing rest areas and truck weigh stations.
PCE -100L 2 November 2014

NCDOT PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE)
ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
D. Ridesharing activities.
14. Bus and Rail car rehabilitation.
15. Alterations to facilities or vehicles in order to make them accessible for
elderly and handicapped persons.
16. Program administration, technical assistance activities, and operating
assistance to transit authorities to continue existing service or increase
service to meet changes in routine demand.
17. The purchase of vehicles by the applicant where the use of these vehicles
can be accommodated by existing facilities or by new facilities which
themselves are within a CE.
18. Track and rail bed maintenance and improvements when carried out
within the existing right of way.
19. Purchase and installation of operating or maintenance equipment to be
located within the transit facility and with no significant impacts off the
site.
20. Promulgation of rules, regulations and directives.
21. Replacement of guardrail.
Circle one or more of the following Type Il activities:
1. Modernization of a highway by resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation,
reconstruction, adding shoulders, or adding auxiliary lanes (e.g., parking,
weaving, turning, climbing).
a. Restoring, Resurfacing, Rehabilitating, and Reconstructing
pavement (3R and 4R improvements)
b. Widening roadway and shoulders without adding through lanes
C. Modernizing gore treatments
d. Constructing lane improvements (merge, auxiliary, and turn lanes)
e. Adding shoulder drains
f. Replacing and rehabilitating culverts, inlets, and drainage pipes,
including safety treatments
g. Providing driveway pipes
h. Performing minor bridge widening (less than one through lane)
i. Slide Stabilization
j. Structural BMP's for water quality improvement
PCE -100L 3 November 2014

NCDOT PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE)
ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
2. Highway safety or traffic operations improvement projects including the
installation of ramp metering control devices and lighting.
a. Installing ramp metering devices
b. Installing lights
C. Adding or upgrading guardrail
d. Installing safety barriers including Jersey type barriers and pier
protection
C. Installing or replacing impact attenuators
f. Upgrading medians including adding or upgrading median barriers
g. Improving intersections including relocation and/or realignment
h. Making minor roadway realignment
i. Channelizing traffic
j. Performing clear zone safety improvements including removing
hazards and flattening slopes
k. Implementing traffic aid systems, signals, and motorist aid
1. Installing bridge safety hardware including bridge rail retrofit
3. Bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement or the construction of
grade separation to replace existing at -grade railroad crossings.
a. Rehabilitating, reconstructing, or replacing bridge approach slabs
b. Rehabilitating or replacing bridge decks
G. Rehabilitating bridges including painting (no red lead paint), scour
repair, fender systems, and minor structural improvements
d. Replacing a bridge (structure and/or fill)
4. Transportation corridor fringe parking facilities.
Construction of new truck weigh stations or rest areas.
6. Approvals for disposal of excess right -of -way or for joint or limited use of
right -of -way, where the proposed use does not have significant adverse
impacts.
7. Approvals for changes in access control.
Construction of new bus storage and maintenance facilities in areas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such
construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and located on or near
a street with adequate capacity to handle anticipated bus and support
vehicle traffic.
9. Rehabilitation or reconstruction of existing rail and bus buildings and
ancillary facilities where only minor amounts of additional land are
required and there is not a substantial increase in the number of users.
PCE -100L 4 November 2014

NCDOT PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE)
ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
10. Construction of bus transfer facilities (an open area consisting of
passenger shelters, boarding areas, kiosks and related street
improvements) when located in a commercial area or other high activity
center in which there is adequate street capacity for projected bus traffic.
11. Construction of rail storage and maintenance facilities in areas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such
construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and where there is no
significant noise impact on the surrounding community.
12. Acquisition of land for hardship or protective purposes, advance land
acquisition loans under section 3(b) of the UMT Act. Hardship and
protective buying will be permitted only for a particular parcel or a limited
number of parcels. These types of land acquisition qualify for a CE only
where the acquisition will not limit the evaluation of alternatives,
including shifts in alignment for planned construction projects, which may
be required in the NEPA process. No project development on such land
may proceed until the NEPA process has been completed.
13. Acquisition and construction of wetland, stream and endangered species
mitigation sites.
14. Remedial activities involving the removal, treatment or monitoring of soil
or groundwater contamination pursuant to state or federal remediation
guidelines.
D. Special Project Information:
Impact to Existing Resources. A natural resources investigation was
conducted in the project study area on September 11, 2013. Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) Areas of Environmental Concern (AECs) occurring
within the study area include the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (ICW) which
is designated as a Public Trust Water. AECs include all lands within 75 feet of
the normal high water level (NWL) of the waterway. In addition, coastal
wetlands are also included as CAMA regulated AECs.
A detailed delineation of the normal high water mark (NHW) of the ICW and
wetlands within the project study area was conducted on November 11, 2013.
The NHW mark along the ICW denotes the limits of tidally influenced open
water in the study area that is subject to USACE and NCDCM jurisdiction.
Two tidal salt marsh wetlands are located within the open water area of the
study area, totaling 0.43 acres, which also are regulated by the USACE and
NCDCM. The site was field reviewed by NCDCM staff on November 11, 2013
to verify the normal high water line and coastal wetland areas. Natural
resources within the project area, including the coastal wetlands and the NHW
line, are shown on Figure 4.
PCE -100L 5 November 2014

NCDOT PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION ( CE)
ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
Based on coordination with the USACE and NCDCM, while the project will be
constructed adjacent to and partially above sensitive environmental features
such as tidal salt marsh and open water habitats, the proposed project is not
anticipated to have any substantial impact on any unique or important natural
resources.
The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) website (updated January 24,
2014) lists 12 federally protected (threatened or endangered) species known to
occur in New Hanover County. A biological conclusion of "No Effect" was
determined for each species. The "No Effect" call is the result of lack of
suitable habitat or the little to no impact of what marginal habitat is there. In
addition to the twelve listed species, the northern long -eared bat and the red
knot are proposed for listing.
Scientific Name
Common Name
Federal
Status
Habitat
Present
Biological
Conclusion
Alligator mississippiensis
American alligator
T (S /A)
Yes
No Effect
Acipenser oxyrinchus
o rinchus
Atlantic sturgeon
E
Yes
No Effect
Thalictrum cooleyi
Cooley's meadowrue
E
No
No Effect
Carex lutea
Golden sedge
E
No
No Effect
Chelonia mydas
Green sea turtle
T
Yes
No Effect
Caretta caretta
Loggerhead sea turtle
T
Yes
No Effect
Myotis septentrionalis
Northern long -eared bat
P
yes
Not
Required
Charadrius melodus
Piping plover
T
No
No Effect
Picoides borealis
Red- cockaded
woodpecker
E
No
No Effect
Calidris camw rufa
Red knot
P
No
Not
Requir ed
Lysimachia asperulaefolia
Rough - leaved loosestrife
E
No
No Effect
An:aranthus pumilus
Seabeach amaranth
T
No
No Effect
Acipenser brevirostrum
Shortnose sturgeon
E
Yes
No Effect
THchechus manatus
West Indian manatee
E
Yes
No Effect
E — Endangered, T — Threatened, P — Proposed, T (S /A) — Threatened due to similarity of
appearance
The Bald eagle was removed from the Endangered Species List on August 8,
2007. It is, however, protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. There is nesting and foraging habitat within
the study area. Surveys performed on September 12, 2013 found no nests
within the project study area. A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage
Program (NCNHP) database, updated July 2014, indicated no occurrences of
bald eagles within one mile of the project study area.
The project area is disturbed, and while the proposed alignment does extend
over the NHW line into the ICW, the aquatic area is beneath an existing
PCE -1001, 6 November 2014

NCDOT PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE)
ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
NCDOT drawbridge, and adjacent to an active marina and navigational channel
with heavy boat traffic (ICW).
In the scoping response letter from USFWS (October 21, 2013, attached), the
Service noted that this project is anticipated to have minimal impact on fish and
wildlife resources.
The proposed walkway is adjacent to the Wrightsville Recreational Area, a
stream on the 2012 Section 303(d) list for impaired use for aquatic life due to
loss of use. According to the scoping response letter from NCDENR Division
of Water Resources (October 28, 2013, attached), the agency is very concerned
with sediment and erosion impacts that could result from this project. NCDWR
requests that road design plans provide treatment of the storm water runoff
through best management practices.
This project includes development within the Special Flood Hazard Area
(SFHA). The scoping response letter from the NC Department of Public Safety
(October 29, 2013) noted that any development within the SFHA will require a
floodplain development permit from the municipality having jurisdiction; this
project is primarily within New Hanover County and the project owner is the
City of Wilmington. They also stated that all structures, elements, and utilities
should be protected to the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation in accordance
with the local ordinance and 44 CFR 60.3.
The DENR Wilmington Regional Office noted in their scoping response letter
(attached) that an underground storage tank (UST) is located adjacent to the
project at 1418 Airlie Road (the Bridge Tender Marina, at the southern end of
the proposed walkway). The Bridge Tender Marina property is labeled "high
risk" because of the contaminant plume that was discovered in April 2007. The
adjacent NCDOT property in the southwest quadrant of the bridge also is
considered high risk because it is in the path of the contaminant plume, and
because it is within 250' of the observed incident. The assessment and cleanup
phase is underway. The source of the contaminant is a well that is out of use;
contaminate levels are very low, and NCDENR plans to abandon the site, but it
cannot be properly abandoned because a generator or transformer has been
installed on top of the well site. NCDENR staff stated during conversations
that no impact to the UST is anticipated since the proposed walkway does not
cross over the well.
In a letter dated November 4, 2013 (attached), the State Historic Preservation
Office (HPO) stated that the Heide Trask Memorial Bridge was determined
eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) in 2005 under
Criterion C for engineering. At a meeting on April 14, 2014, SHPO determined
that there would be no effect on historic resources (the concurrence form is in
the appendix). In the November 2013 letter, HPO also stated that there are no
recorded archaeological sites within the project area, and an archaeological
survey is not recommended.
PCE -100L 7 November 2014

NCDOT PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCEI
ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
Permits. Encroachments into the NHW of the ICW and AEC areas will require
authorization from the USACE under Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act
and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. It is anticipated that a USACE
Regional General Permit (GP) 56 (Piers, Docks, and Boathouses) will be
prepared. GP 56 can authorize activities under both Section 10 and Section 404.
Under GP 56, special conditions include two requirements.
• Special Condition (d) says "The width of any pier will not exceed six
feet, unless the Corps determines, in writing, that a greater width is
necessary for safe use, to improve public access, or to support a water
dependent use that cannot otherwise occur." USACE and NCDCM
have agreed to allow a wider path (7.5 feet) in the interest of safety and
public use.
• Special Condition (h) says "Docks and piers extending over wetlands
will be elevated sufficiently (minimum of three feet above the wetland
substrate to prevent total shading of vegetation, substrate, or other
elements of the aquatic environment."
The project also will require a Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the
NC Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) and a CAMA Major Development
Permit from the NC Division of Coastal Management. Because erosion control
and a CAMA Major Permit are required, a State Stormwater Permit also is
required. This project may require a Consent Agreement from USACE and
may require a USCG bridges permit.
Public Involvement. A public meeting was held on October 8, 2013 from 5:00
to 6:30 p.m. at St. Andrews on the Sound Church in Wilmington. Twenty -two
people attended, and comments were received from nine people. The proposed
design was shown. There were no major objections raised to the proposed
project, and comments were generally in favor of building the project for
bicycle /pedestrian safety reasons.
Scoping Responses. Scoping letter responses from the US Army Corps of
Engineers, US Fish and Wildlife Service, NCDENR (Division of Water
Resources and Division of Coastal Management), NC Wildlife Resources
Commission, State Historic Preservation Office, and NC Department of Public
Safety are attached.
PCE -100L 8 November 2014

NCDOT PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE)
ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
E. Threshold Criteria
ECOLOGICAL YES
(1) Will the project have a substantial impact on any ❑
unique or important natural resource?
(2) Does the project involve habitat where federally
listed endangered or threatened species may occur? X
(3) Will the project affect anadromous fish? ❑
(4) If the project involves wetlands, is the amount of
permanent and/or temporary wetland taking less than
one -tenth (1/10) of an acre and have all practicable measures
to avoid and minimize wetland takings been evaluated? X
(5) Will the project require the use of U. S. Forest Service lands? ❑
(6) Will the quality of adjacent water resources be adversely ❑
impacted by proposed construction activities?
(7) Does the project involve waters classified as Outstanding Water ❑
Resources (OWR) and/or High Quality Waters (HQW)?
(8) Will the project require fill in waters of the United States ❑
in any of the designated mountain trout counties?
(9) Does the project involve any known underground storage ❑
tanks (UST's) or hazardous materials sites?
PERMITS AND COORDINATION
(10) If the project is located within a CAMA county, will the
project significantly affect the coastal zone and/or any
"Area of Environmental Concern" (AEC)?
(11) Does the project involve Coastal Barrier Resources Act
resources?
(12) Will a U. S. Coast Guard permit be required?
PCE -100L 9
YES
NO
/1
1:1
X
X
X
X
X
NO
X
❑ X
❑ X
November 2014

NCDOT PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE)
ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
(17)
Will the project have a disproportionately high and adverse
YES
NO
(13)
Will the project result in the modification of any existing
❑
low - income population?
X
regulatory floodway?
If the project involves the acquisition of right of way, is the
X
(14)
Will the project require any stream relocations or channel
❑
(19)
Will the project involve any changes in access control?
changes?
X
SOCIAL ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
YES
NO
(15)
Will the project induce substantial impacts to planned
❑
X
(21)
growth or land use for the area?
X
(16)
Will the project require the relocation of any family or
❑
Is the project included in an approved thoroughfare plan
business?
and/or Transportation Improvement Program (and is,
X
(17)
Will the project have a disproportionately high and adverse
human health and environmental effect on any minority or
❑
low - income population?
X
(18)
If the project involves the acquisition of right of way, is the
❑
amount of right of way acquisition considered minor?
X
(19)
Will the project involve any changes in access control?
❑ X
(20)
Will the project substantially alter the usefulness
and/or land use of adjacent property?
X
(21)
Will the project have an adverse effect on permanent
local traffic patterns or community cohesiveness?
X
(22)
Is the project included in an approved thoroughfare plan
and/or Transportation Improvement Program (and is,
❑
therefore, in conformance with the Clean Air Act of 1990)?
X
(23)
Is the project anticipated to cause an increase in traffic
❑
volumes?
X
(24)
Will traffic be maintained during construction using existing
❑
roads, staged construction, or on -site detours?
X
(25) If the project is a bridge replacement project, will the bridge
be replaced at its existing location (along the existing facility)
and will all construction proposed in association with the ❑
bridge replacement project be contained on the existing facility? N/A
PCE -100L 10 November 2014

NCDOT PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE)
ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
YES NO
(26) Is there substantial controversy on social, economic, or
environmental grounds concerning the project? X
(27) Is the project consistent with all Federal, State, and local laws ❑
relating to the environmental aspects of the project? X
(28) Will the project have an "effect" on structures /properties
eligible for or listed on the National Register of Historic Places? X
(29) Will the project affect any archaeological remains which are
important to history or pre - history? X
(30) Will the project require the use of Section 4(f) resources
(public parks, recreation lands, wildlife and waterfowl refuges,
historic sites, or historic bridges, as defined in Section 4(f)
of the U. S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966)? X
(31) Will the project result in any conversion of assisted public
recreation sites or facilities to non - recreation uses, as defined
by Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Act
of 1965, as amended? X
(32) Will the project involve construction in, across, or adjacent
to a river designated as a component of or proposed for
inclusion in the National System of Wild and Scenic Rivers? X
F. Additional Documentation Required for Unfavorable Responses in Part E
Item 2 — (Federally Listed Endangered or Threatened Habitat).
Of the 12 federally protected (threatened or endangered) species known to occur
in New Hanover County, the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP)
database identified four that have been known to occur within one mile of the
project:
Atlantic sturgeon — Water depths within the project area can fluctuate, so
marginally suitable habitat for Atlantic sturgeon is present within the project area
in the open water areas of the project. However, due to the low water levels
typically present within the project area, and due to the minimal impact to the
aquatic environment from the proposed project, the biological conclusion is "No
Effect."
Northern long -eared bat — Suitable winter hibernacula is not present within the
study area, however suitable summer roosting habit is likely present throughout
PCE -100L 11 November 2014

NCDOT PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE)
ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
the corridor. Since the species is not currently protected, pedestrian surveys for
suitable roosting habitat are not required, however Kimley -Horn staff did review
the project corridor in mid - August and early September and no bats were
observed. Additionally, a review of the NCNHP database, updated July 2014,
indicated no known occurrences of northern long -eared bat within the study area
or within 1.0 mile of the study area. Due to the potential for suitable summer
roosting habitat, but lack of known occurrences, a biological conclusion is Not
Required due to Proposed Status.
American alligator — Suitable habitat for American alligator is present within the
study area in the open water and salt marsh areas of the project area, however due
to the typically shallow water and the heavy boat traffic along the ICW, it is
unlikely that American alligator is found within the project area. Additionally, a
review of NHP records (updated July 2014) indicates no known occurrences of
American alligator within the project area or within 1.0 mile. Due to the lack of
known occurrences and the minimal impact anticipated to the aquatic impacts
within the project area, it has been determined that the proposed project will have
no effect on this species. It should be noted that since American alligator is listed
as threatened due to similarity of appearance, Section 7 consultation with the US
Fish and Wildlife Service is not required. A biological conclusion is Not
Required due to its status as Threatened Due to Similarity of Appearance (TS /A).
West Indian manatee — West Indian manatee has been recorded in all open water
habitats throughout the county. However, the West Indian manatee utilizes
freshwater and marine habitats with depths of 5 to 20 feet. The water depths in
the vicinity of the proposed project range from 0 to 2 feet, depths too shallow to
provide habitat for the manatee. In addition, precautionary measures for
construction activities in North Carolina waters used by the manatee have been
outlined by the Raleigh Field Office of the USFWS. If the Guidelines for
Avoiding Impacts to the West Indian Manatee (USFWS, 2003) are implemented
by the contractor during construction, the biological conclusion is "No Effect."
G. PCE Approval
TIP Project No. U -5534B
WBS Element 44096
Federal -Aid Project No. STPDA - 0332(44)
Project Description:
The City of Wilmington proposes a public walkway underneath the
Heide Trask (Wrightsville Beach) Drawbridge which will serve as the northern
terminus (Phase IIIB) of the Gary Shell Cross -City Trail in Wilmington, New
Hanover County. The Gary Shell Cross -City Trail will be approximately 15
miles long upon completion, providing bicycle and pedestrian access to numerous
recreational, cultural, and educational destinations in Wilmington.
PCE -100L 12 November 2014

NCDOT PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE)
ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
Phase IIIB consists of a public walkway underneath the Heide Trask Drawbridge
to provide a designated crossing for cyclists and pedestrians across US 74 -76
(Wrightsville Avenue) on the mainland side of the drawbridge in Wilmington. It
begins in the northeast quadrant of the Wrightsville Avenue /Airlie Road
intersection near the terminus of Phase IIIB of the Trail (currently in design). It
ends in the southeast quadrant of the same intersection, approximately 450 linear
feet from the Bridge Tender Marina parking lot.
The project location is shown in Figure 1. This project is listed as U -5534B in the
current 2012 -2018 NCDOT State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)
(October 2014), and construction is anticipated to begin in early 2015.
The proposed walkway will be comprised of a timber bridge with composite
decking and timber handrails. Under the existing drawbridge, the walkway will
have an 8 -foot clear distance (width between the rails). The walkway begins in
the northeast quadrant of the Wrightsville Avenue /Airlie Road intersection near
the terminus of Phase HIB of the Trail (currently in design). It ends in the
southeast quadrant of the same intersection, near the Bridge Tender Marina
parking lot. Figure 2 shows the design and Figure 3 shows a 3D rendering of the
proposed walkway.
This project will be built within existing NCDOT right of way. The estimated
construction cost for the proposed project is $563,100.
PCE -100L 13 November 2014

NCDOT PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE)
ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
Categorical Exclusion Action Classification: (Check one)
TYPE I (A) NO BOXES Checked
X TYPE I (B) ANY BOX Checked
refer to Section E
TYPE II(A) NO BOXES Checked
TYPE II(B) ANY BOX is Checked
Prepared By:
Jeffrey W. Moore, P.E., License No. 22436
Date Name, Title
Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc, (919) 677 -2175
Company /Agency, Telephone #
NOTE: Form needs to be completed by either a Professional Engineer (PE),
Biologist, Planner, or AICP
Prepared For: City of Wilmington, North Carolina
Local Government Agency
Reviewed:
Date roject De-v. Unit Wead / Division Representative
NCDOT - PDEA / NCDOT Division
NOTE: NCDOT Review may occur at either PDEA or the Division Office.
Mark through non - applicable position.
Approved: For Type I(B) or II(B) projects only:
Date Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
PCE -100L 14 November 2014

LEGEND Figure 1
Project Study Area `.,,i Wetlands New Hanover County Vicinity Map
Parcels �— Wilmington TIP Project U -5534B
g Wrightsville Beach City of Wilmington, North Carolina

LEGEND Figure 2
Proposed Concrete Sidewalk 0 50 100 Design Map
Feet TIP Project U -5534B
Proposed Boardwalk City of Wilmington, North Carolina

- MAN r
op
- ' S _
dollp
.r.

LEGEND Figure 4
Q Project Study Area - - Normal High Water Mark Natural Resources Map
Coastal Wetland TIP Project U -5534B
City of Wilmington, North Carolina

Regulatory Division
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
69 DARLINGTON AVENUE
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403 -1343
(TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY)
October 18, 2013
Action ID Nos. SAW- 2013 -2041; U -5534B New Hanover County
Mr. Jeff Moore, PE
Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 33068
Raleigh, NC 27636
Dear Mr. Moore:
Reference is made to your letter of October 15, 2013, regarding the project initiation for
Phase IIIB of the Cross -City Trail Greenway, a portion of a 15 mile trail crossing the City of
Wilmington, New Hanover County. Phase IIIB (U- 5534B) specifically addresses a public
walkway /pier under the Heide Trask Drawbridge (crossing the Intracoastal Waterway) to provide
safe passage across Hwy 74/76 to the southwest in Wrightsville Beach. The letter requested
information regarding potential environmental impacts and any permits or approvals that may be
required by the Corps.
We have reviewed the subject proposal and based upon a review of the information
provided and available maps, the construction of Phase IIIB is likely to cross jurisdictional
features within the study corridor. There appears to be jurisdictional areas that come under the
regulatory authority of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and
Harbor Act. Any discharge of excavated or fill material into waters of the United States and/or
any adjacent wetlands would require Department of the Army (DA) permit authorization.
Additionally any work under or over Section 10 waters would likely require a DA permit. The
type of DA authorization required (i.e., general or individual permit) will be determined by the
location, type, and extent of jurisdictional area impacted by the project, and by the project design
and construction limits.
Until additional data is furnished which details the extent of the construction limits of the
proposed project, and an onsite inspection is completed with regard to determinations of the
present of jurisdictional waters on the project property, we are unable provide specific comments
concerning DA permit requirements or a recommendation of alternatives. To assist you with
determining permitting requirements, we recommend that you perform a detailed delineation of
the streams and/or wetlands present on the project site. When this information becomes

available, it should be forwarded to our office for review and comment, as well as a
determination of DA permit eligibility.
Should you have any further questions related to DA permits for this project, please
contact me at 910- 251 -4611.
Sincerely,
Brad Shaver
Regulatory Project Manager
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
cc: (electronic)
Mr. Mason Herndon, NCDENR -DWQ
Mr. Stephen Lane, NCDENR -DCM
Mr. Steve Sollod, NCDENR -DCM
Mr. Fritz Rhode, NMFS
Ms. Jessi O'Neal Baker, NCDMF
Ms. Emily Hughes, USACE -New Hanover Project Manager
Ms. Liz Hair, USACE- Project Manager
Ms. Renee Gledhill- Earley, NCDCR (SHPO)
Mr. Chris Militscher, USEPA
Mr. Ron Lucas, FHWA
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Mr. Stonewall Mathis, NCDOT- Division 3

From: Jordan, Gary [mailto:gary_jordan @fws.gov]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 3:00 PM
To: Van Duyn, Meredith
Subject: Re: U -5534B (Cross -City Trail Phase IIIB) - Scoping/Start of Study
Ms. Van Duyn,
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service does not have any concerns or objections to this project. It
appears that impacts to fish and wildlife resources will be very minimal. Therefore, we do not
have any further comments. Thanks for the opportunity to review.
Gary Jordan
Fish and Wildlife Biologist
US Fish and Wildlife Service
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636 -3726
Phone: 919 - 856 -4520 x.32
Email: gary iordan(&fws. -oovv

rropiEn
if- - - k-
North Carolina
Department of Administration
Pat McCrory, Governor
November 21, 2013
Mr. Jeff Moore
City of Wilmington
c/o Kimley Horn & Assoc.
Post Office Box 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636 -3068
Bill Dau.ghtridge, Jr., Secretary
Re: SCH File 4 14- E- 0000 -0176; SCOPING; Proposed project is for Phase IIIB of the Cross
City Trail, a pedestrian walkway under the Heide Trask Drawbridge to provide a safe
crossing for cyclists and pedestrians across US 74/76 on the mainland side of the
drawbridge. NCDOT TIP U -5534B
Dear Mr. Moore:
The above referenced environmental impact information has been submitted to the State Clearinghouse
under the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
Attached to this letter are comments made in review of this document. The Department of Cultural
Resources has requested additional information prior to their concLu-rence with the above referenced
document.
Therefore, pursuant to 1 NCAC 25 .0506(c), this office recommends that supplemental documentation
providing the information requested by the Department of Cultural Resources be submitted to the
Clearinghouse for further review and comment.
Sincerely,
Crysta Best
State Environmental Review Clearinghouse
Attachments
cc: Region O
Mailing Address: Telephone: [phone] Location Address:
1301 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1301 State Courier 451 -0 1 -00 Raleigh, North Carolina
e -mail stale.elcarin; house @doa.nc.gov
An Equal Opporlunily/lfIffrmalive Aefion Emplover

Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Project Review Form
Project Number: 14 -0176 County: New Hanover
Due Date: 11/15/2013
Date Received: 10/25/2013
Project Description: Scoping - Proposed project is for Phase IIIB of the Cross City Trail, a
pedestrian walkway under the Heide Trask Drawbridge to provide a safe
crossing for cyclists and pedestrians across US 74/76 on the mainland side of
the drawbridge. NQMQ TIP._U 34@_ I'
NCDOT TIP U -5534B
This Project is being reviewed as indicated below:
Regional Office
Regional Office Area
In -House Review
— Asheville
f
Air
Air Quality
%/! Coastal Management
Fayetteville
✓
DWR- SurfaceWater
,/ DCM- Marine Fisheries
Military Affairs
Mooresville
Aquifer Protection
Y/ Parks & Recreation
_ Water Quality
Raleigh
f
DEMLR -LQ &SW
Waste Mgmt
✓ DWR- Transportation Unit
Washington
�
✓
UST
Water Resources M mt
g
M Hemdon
.— Wildlife
Wilmington
,/
DWR- PublicWater
Water Supply Section
,/ Wildlife —DOT T. Wilson
Winston -Salem
Manager Sign- Off/Region: Date: In -House Reviewer /Agency: `
Response (check all applicable)
No objection to project as proposed. No Comment
Insufficient information to complete review 0 er (specify or attach comments)
RECEIVED
If you have any questions, please contact:
Lyn Hardison at In.hardisonC,ncdenr.Rov or (252) 948 -3842 OCT 2 9 2013
943 Washington Regional Office Washington NC 27889
Courier No. 16 -04 -01
DC,M -VqD CITY

IWA
CDIE�IR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Pat McCrory Braxton C. Davis John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Director Secretary
MEMORANDUM
TO: Lyn Hardison
Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
FROM: Steve Sollod, DCM Transportation Project Coordinator
CC: Jeff Moore, Kimley -Horn Associates, Inc.
Debbie Wilson, DCM
Stephen Rynas, DCM
DATE: November 13, 2013
SUBJECT: Scoping Comments
U- 5534B, Project Initiation
Proposed Phase IIIB Cross -City Trail Pedestrian Walkway
New Hanover County, NC
Project Number: 14 -0176
The North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (DCM) has reviewed the scoping request for the above
referenced project. We appreciate the opportunity to provide information relevant to the potential permitting of
the proposed project by our agency and offer the following comments.
The City of Wilmington and the NC Department of Transportation (NCDOT) are beginning planning and
engineering studies for Phase IIIB of the Gary Shell Cross -City Trail in Wilmington, NC. The trail will provide
15 miles of bicycle and pedestrian access to various recreational, cultural, and educational destinations. Phase
IIIB consists of a public "walkway /pier" underneath the Heide Trask (Wrightsville Beach) Drawbridge over the
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway to provide safe crossing of Wrightsville Avenue (US74/76).
Based on the information provided in the scoping letter, it appears that the proposed project will impact Coastal
Area Management Act (CAMA), Areas of Environmental Concern (AEC). Therefore, the proposed project will
require a CAMA Permit. The applicant is encouraged to coordinate with DCM during the planning and design
phases to ensure that the project design and construction is in conformance with the rules of the NC Coastal
Resources Commission.
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at (919) 707 -9152, or via e-mail at
[e-mail]. Thank you for your consideration of the North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
1638 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1638
Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equel Opportunity i AfArmalve Action Employer

• . rl i
Forth Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission'
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Lyn Hardison, Environmental Assistance Coordinator
Division of Environmental Assistance and outreach, DENR
FROM: Travis Wilson, Highway Project Coardinator��/�/
Habitat Conservation Programme .
DATE: November 14, 2013
SUBJECT: Response to the start of study notification regarding fish and wildlife concerns for
the proposed pedestrian walkway under the Heide Trask Drawbridge, New
Hanover County, North Carolina. NCDOT TIP No. U- 5534B, SCH Project Rio.
14 -0176.
i
I
This memorandum responds to a request for our concerns regarding impacts on fisli and
wildlife resources resulting from the subject project. Biologists on the staff of the N. C, Wildlife
Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the proposed improvements. Our comments
are provided in accordance with certain provisions of the National Environmental Policy Acct (42
U,S,C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat, 401, as amended; ii6
U.S.C, 661 - 6674).
At this time we do not have any specific concerns related to this project; however, �b help
facilitate document preparation and the review process our general informational needs are.
outlined below:
i
1. Description of fishery and wildlife resources within the project area, includingja
listing of federally or state designated threatened, endangered, or special coicern
species. Potential lzoixow areas to be used for project construction should be
included in the inventories. A listing of designated plant species can be
developed through consultation with:
NC Natural Heritage Program
Dept, of Environment & Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1601.
WWW.ncnhp.ora
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27694721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

U -5534B Page 2 November 14, 2013
and,
NCDA Plant Conservation .Program
P. 0. Boy: 27647
Raleigh, N. C. 27611
(919) 733 -3610
2. Description of any streams or wetlands affected by the project. The need for
channelizing or relocating portions of streams crossed and the extent of such
activities.
3. Cover type maps showing wetland acreages impacted by the project. Wetland;
acreages should include all project - related areas that may undergo hydrologic
change as a result of ditching, other drainage, or filling for project construction.
Wetland identification may be accomplished through coordination with the S.
Army Corps of Engineers (COE), If the COE is not consulted, the person
delineating wetlands should be identified and criteria listed.
4. Cover type maps showing acreages of upland wildlife habitat impacted by the
proposed project. Potential borrow sites should be included.
5. The extent to which the project will result in loss, degradation, or fragmentatioip of
wildlife habitat (wetlands or uplands).
6. Litigation for avoiding, minimizing or compensating for direct and indirect
degradation in habitat quality as well as quantitative losses.
7. A cumulative impact assessment section which analyzes the environmental effects of
highway construction and quantifies the contribution of this individual project to
environmental degradation.
8. A discussion of the probable impacts on natural resources which will result from
secondary development facilitated by the improved road access.
9. if construction of this facility is to be coordinated with other state, municipal, or
private development projects, a description of these projects should be inal�ded in
the environmental document, and all project sponsors should be identified.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide input in the early planning stages for this
project. If we can further assist your office, please contact me at (919) 707 -0370.

4
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Programs
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Director Secretary
October 28, 2013
Mu 1 D) oil D]'7:,I►`I )1031
To: Jeff Moore, PE, Project Manager, Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc.
From: Mason Herndon, NC Division of Water Resources, Fayetteville Regional Office
Subject: Start of Study comments for Cross -City Trail Phase IIIB, proposed pedestrian walkway under the
Heidi Trask (Wrightsville Beach) Drawbridge in New Hanover County, NCDOT TIP Project U-
5534B, WBS 44096, Federal Aid Number STPDA- 0332(44)
Reference your correspondence dated October 15, 2013 in which you requested comments for the referenced
project. Preliminary analysis of the project reveals the potential for multiple impacts to streams and
jurisdictional wetlands in the project area. More specifically, impacts to:
# Discharges of sewage are prohibited to segments classified SB or SC with a pound sign according to the provisions of 15 NCAC
2B .0203 and 2H .0404(a) in order to protect adjacent shellfishing waters.
Further investigations at a higher resolution should be undertaken to verify the presence of other streams
and/or jurisdictional wetlands in the area. In the event that any jurisdictional areas are identified, the
Division of Water Resources requests that New Hanover County consider the following environmental issues
for the proposed project:
Project Specific Comments:
1. Wrightsville Recreational Area are class SB; 303(d) waters of the State. Wrightsville Recreational Area
is on the 303(d) list for unpaired use for aquatic life due to loss of use. NCDWR is very concerned with
sediment and erosion impacts that could result from this project. NCDWR requests that road design
plans provide treatment of the storm water runoff through best management practices as detailed in the
most recent version of NCDWR's Stormwater Best Management Practices.
2. DWR cannot comment on permit requirements with the limited information provided. Detailed field
delineation is required to determine the presence or absence of jurisdictional resources within the
project limits. In addition, NCDOT must provide an estimate of impacts to any resources located within
the construction limits of the project before we can specifically comment on DWR permit eligibility.
3. Please be advised that a 401 Water Quality Certification requires satisfactory protection of water quality
to ensure that water quality standards are met and no wetland or stream uses are lost. Final permit
Transportation and Permitting Unit One
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1617 North Carolina
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 %VatKt+[� l �/
Phone: 919 - 807 -63001 FAX: 919 - 807 -6488 i/ ;/
Internet: www.ncwaterouality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
Stream
Stream Index
303(d)
Stream Name
River Basin
Classifications
Number
Listing
Wrightsville Recreational Area
Cape Fear
SB#
18 -87 -24
Y
# Discharges of sewage are prohibited to segments classified SB or SC with a pound sign according to the provisions of 15 NCAC
2B .0203 and 2H .0404(a) in order to protect adjacent shellfishing waters.
Further investigations at a higher resolution should be undertaken to verify the presence of other streams
and/or jurisdictional wetlands in the area. In the event that any jurisdictional areas are identified, the
Division of Water Resources requests that New Hanover County consider the following environmental issues
for the proposed project:
Project Specific Comments:
1. Wrightsville Recreational Area are class SB; 303(d) waters of the State. Wrightsville Recreational Area
is on the 303(d) list for unpaired use for aquatic life due to loss of use. NCDWR is very concerned with
sediment and erosion impacts that could result from this project. NCDWR requests that road design
plans provide treatment of the storm water runoff through best management practices as detailed in the
most recent version of NCDWR's Stormwater Best Management Practices.
2. DWR cannot comment on permit requirements with the limited information provided. Detailed field
delineation is required to determine the presence or absence of jurisdictional resources within the
project limits. In addition, NCDOT must provide an estimate of impacts to any resources located within
the construction limits of the project before we can specifically comment on DWR permit eligibility.
3. Please be advised that a 401 Water Quality Certification requires satisfactory protection of water quality
to ensure that water quality standards are met and no wetland or stream uses are lost. Final permit
Transportation and Permitting Unit One
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1617 North Carolina
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 %VatKt+[� l �/
Phone: 919 - 807 -63001 FAX: 919 - 807 -6488 i/ ;/
Internet: www.ncwaterouality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

authorization will require the submittal of a formal application by the NCDOT and written concurrence
from NCDWR. Please be aware that any approval will be contingent on appropriate avoidance and
minimization of wetland and stream impacts to the maximum extent practical, the development of an
acceptable stormwater management plan, and the inclusion of appropriate mitigation plans where
appropriate.
General Project Comments:
5. The environmental document should provide a detailed and itemized presentation of the proposed
impacts to wetlands and streams with corresponding mapping. If mitigation is necessary as required by
15A NCAC 2H.0506(h), it is preferable to present a conceptual (if not finalized) mitigation plan with
the environmental documentation. Appropriate mitigation plans will be required prior to issuance of a
401 Water Quality Certification.
6. Environmental impact statement alternatives shall consider design criteria that reduce the impacts to
streams and wetlands from storm water runoff. These alternatives shall include road designs that allow
for treatment of the storm water runoff through best management practices as detailed in the most
recent version of NCDWR's Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual, July 2007, such as
grassed swales, buffer areas, preformed scour holes, retention basins, etc.
After the selection of the preferred alternative and prior to an issuance of the 401 Water Quality
Certification, the NCDOT is respectfully reminded that they will need to demonstrate the avoidance
and minimization of impacts to wetlands (and streams) to the maximum extent practical. In
accordance with the Environmental Management Commission's Rules { 15A NCAC 211.0506(h)),
mitigation will be required for impacts of greater than 1 acre to wetlands. In the event that mitigation
is required, the mitigation plan shall be designed to replace appropriate lost functions and values. The
NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program may be available for use as wetland mitigation.
8. In accordance with the Environmental Management Commission's Rules { 15A NCAC 2H.0506(h) },
mitigation will be required for impacts of greater than 150 linear feet to any single stream. In the event
that mitigation is required, the mitigation plan shall be designed to replace appropriate lost functions
and values. The NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program may be available for use as stream mitigation.
9. Future documentation, including the 401 Water Quality Certification Application, shall continue to
include an itemized listing of the proposed wetland and stream impacts with corresponding mapping.
10. NCDWR is very concerned with sediment and erosion impacts that could result from this project.
NCDOT shall address these concerns by describing the potential impacts that may occur to the aquatic
environments and any mitigating factors that would reduce the impacts.
11. An analysis of cumulative and secondary impacts anticipated as a result of this project is required. The
type and detail of analysis shall conform to the NC Division of Water Resource Policy on the
assessment of secondary and cumulative impacts dated April 10, 2004.
12. NCDOT is respectfully reminded that all impacts, including but not limited to, bridging, fill, excavation
and clearing, and rip rap to jurisdictional wetlands, streams, and riparian buffers need to be included in
the final impact calculations. These impacts, in addition to any construction impacts, temporary or
otherwise, also need to be included as part of the 401 Water Quality Certification Application.
13. Where streams must be crossed, NCDWR prefers bridges be used in lieu of culverts. However, we
realize that economic considerations often require the use of culverts. Please be advised that culverts
should be countersunk to allow unimpeded passage by fish and other aquatic organisms. Moreover, in

areas where high quality wetlands or streams are impacted, a bridge may prove preferable. When
applicable, NCDOT should not install the bridge bents in the creek, to the maximum extent practicable.
14. Whenever possible, NCDWR prefers spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require
work within the stream or grubbing of the streambanks and do not require stream channel realignment.
The horizontal and vertical clearances provided by bridges shall allow for human and wildlife passage
beneath the structure. Fish passage and navigation by canoeists and boaters shall not be blocked.
Bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream when possible.
15. Bridge deck drains shall not discharge directly into the stream. Stormwater shall be directed across the
bridge and pre - treated through site - appropriate means (grassed swales, pre - formed scour holes,
vegetated buffers, etc.) before entering the stream. Please refer to the most current version of
NCDWR's , Stormwater Best Management Practices.
16. Sediment and erosion control measures should not be placed in wetlands or streams.
17. Borrow /waste areas should avoid wetlands to the maximum extent practical. Impacts to wetlands in
borrow /waste areas will need to be presented in the 401 Water Quality Certification and could
precipitate compensatory mitigation.
18. The 401 Water Quality Certification application will need to specifically address the proposed methods
for stormwater management. More specifically, stormwater shall not be permitted to discharge directly
into streams or surface waters.
19. If concrete is used during construction, a dry work area shall be maintained to prevent direct contact
between curing concrete and stream water. Water that inadvertently contacts uncured concrete shall
not be discharged to surface waters due to the potential for elevated pH and possible aquatic life and
fish kills.
20. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, the site shall be graded to its preconstruction
contours and elevations. Disturbed areas shall be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and
appropriate native woody species shall be planted. When using temporary structures the area shall be
cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain saws, mowers, bush -hogs, or other mechanized
equipment and leaving the stumps and root mat intact allows the area to re- vegetate naturally and
minimizes soil disturbance.
21. Unless otherwise authorized, placement of culverts and other structures in waters and streams shall be
placed below the elevation of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48
inches, and 20 percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches, to
allow low flow passage of water and aquatic life. Design and placement of culverts and other
structures including temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may
result in dis- equilibrium of wetlands or streambeds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and downstream
of the above structures. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium is being
maintained if requested in writing by NCDWR. If this condition is unable to be met due to bedrock or
other limiting features encountered during construction, please contact NCDWR for guidance on how
to proceed and to determine whether or not a permit modification will be required.
22. If multiple pipes or barrels are required, they shall be designed to mimic natural stream cross section as
closely as possible including pipes or barrels at flood plain elevation, floodplain benches, and/or sills
may be required where appropriate. Widening the stream channel should be avoided. Stream channel
widening at the inlet or outlet end of structures typically decreases water velocity causing sediment
deposition that requires increased maintenance and disrupts aquatic life passage.

23. If foundation test borings are necessary; it shall be noted in the document. Geotechnical work is
approved under General 401 Certification Number 3883/Nationwide Permit No. 6 for Survey
Activities.
24. Sediment and erosion control measures sufficient to protect water resources must be implemented and
maintained in accordance with the most recent version of North Carolina Sediment and Erosion
Control Planning and Design Manual and the most recent version ofNCS000250.
25. All work in or adjacent to stream waters shall be conducted in a dry work area. Approved BMP
measures from the most current version of NCDOT Construction and Maintenance Activities manual
such as sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams and other diversion structures shall be used to prevent
excavation in flowing water.
26. While the use of National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps, NC Coastal Region Evaluation of Wetland
Significance (NC- CREWS) snaps and soil survey maps are useful tools, their inherent inaccuracies
require that qualified personnel perform onsite wetland delineations prior to permit approval.
27. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in order to minimize
sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants into streams. This equipment
shall be inspected daily and maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels,
lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
28. Riprap shall not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed in a manner that
precludes aquatic life passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures should be properly designed,
sized and installed.
29. Riparian vegetation (native trees and shrubs) shall be preserved to the maximum extent possible.
Riparian vegetation must be reestablished within the construction limits of the project by the end of the
growing season following completion of construction.
Thank you for requesting our input at this time. NCDOT is reminded that issuance of a 401 Water Quality
Certification requires that appropriate measures be instituted to ensure that water quality standards are met
and designated uses are not degraded or lost. If you have any questions or require additional information,
please contact Mason Herndon at (910) 308 -4021 or mason.herndon @ncdenr.gov.
ec: Brad Shaver, US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office
Stoney Mathis, Division 3 Environmental Officer
Travis Wilson, NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Stephen Lane, NC Coastal Management
Steve Sollod , NC Coastal Management
Jessi O'Neal Baker, NC Coastal Management
Ron Lucas, Federal Highway Administration
Chris Militscher, Environmental Protection Agency
Gary Jordan, US Fish and Wildlife Service
Jim Gregson, NCDWR, Wilmington Regional Office
Jackie Roddy, NCDWR
Hannah Headrick, NCDWR, Water Quality Programs
Lyn Hardison, DENR Environmental Assistance Coordinator
Sonia Carrillo, NCDWR Central Office
File Copy

Department of Environme>nt'and Natural Resources
Project Review Form
Project Dumber- 14 -0176 County: New Hanover Date Received: 10/25/2013
Due
Project Description: Scopinq - Proposed project is for Phrase UlD of the Cross City Trail, a
Pedestrian walkway under the Heide Trask Drawbridge to provide a safe
crossing for cyclists and pedestrians across US 74175 on the mainland side of
the drawbridge. jJC.p�QIp5y4. ?;YQ`�
NCDOT TIE' U -5534B
This Project is being reviewed as indicated below:
Regional Office
regional Office Area
In- 11DIUSe Review
Asheville
✓
Air D C t o 2-9 3-5
Air Quality 3 Q ty
V Coastal Management
Fayetteville
,/
DWR- Surface VJatert��
✓ DCM- Marine Fisheries
Military Affairs
Mooresville
Aquifer Protection
✓, Parks & Recreation
Water Quality
Raleigh
✓
DBMLR -LQ &SW tp Ism /
f
Waste Mgmt
_
✓ DWR- Transportation Unit.
T Washington
?�`�/
�
US'r t�t�
W� -, i11(f �
Water Resources tvigmt
M Herndon
,Wildlife
,/ Wilmington,
�,.;e. >•.::,:'.
✓
DWR - PubhcWater A
rater Supply Section
Wildlife - DOT . Wilson
— Winston -Salem
)o�DJt�
Manager Sign- Off/Region:
Response (check all applicable)
C: hi-House Reviewer /Agency;
No objection to project as proposed. No Comment
Insufficient information to complete review _ Other (specify or attach comments,)
If you have any questions, please contact;
Lyn Hardison at 1yn,hardison(@ncden1*-e0v 01• (252) 948 -3842
943 Washington Regional Office Washington NC 27889
Courier Igo. 16 -04 -01

�LaLe of ixortit t.arvint8
Depsirtment of Environment and Natural Resources Reviewing Office, Wilmington Regional Office
INTERGOV RIME, NTAL REVIEW - PROJECT COI!' MENTS Project Number �� ` � 1 JI Vr _Due Date: E,
After review of this proiecl it has been determined that one °NR permigs) and/or approvals indicated may need to be obtained In order for this project to comply with North
Carolina Law. Questions regarding these permits should bar addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the reverse of the form. A' applications. Information and guldelinas
relative. to these, plans and pennils are available from the some Regional Ofirce,
.. —
Normal Proms
Time
PERMITS
` SPL'C[AL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIRLlvIEftTPS
statutory time limit,
Pannfl tq eQllSnvct rSt. Operate WaSICWntar VGatmCnl
Application 9U days before begin construction or award o£consuuction contracts. On -site
Lj
(pelfl(ICS, aeWgt "e }'S[Cm e):IC1nTngna SeW(S systems
inspection. l ost•applicalion tcehni al conference usual. ;
(3 days)
1s
not discharging into state surface waters.
V
I
NPAFS - permit to discharge into sutiace water and/or
Application 190 days before begin activity. Op. -sltc inmocti.m, Preapplication conference
usual, Additionally, obtain permit to construct wulaw ter treatm rot facility- granted after
90 -]2G do
i []
permit to operate and construct waste;vater facilities
I NPDM Reply time, 30 days after receipt of plants or Issue of14PDE9 psrn»t- whichever is
(NIA) i
discharging into state. smfaeo waters.
i late 1
3U days
D
Water Use Permit
Pre- application reshnleel conference usually necessary
(NIA)
[]
Wall Consttueion Pennh
Complete application must be received and permit issued prior to the installation of a Well. j
7 days
(15 days',
Application copy must be served on cac}t afljacwt riparian property owner,On -site 1
jS days
�)
Dredge and Fill Permit
inspection. Pre- application conf°„renee usual, Filling trray require Eastimerg to File from
(90 Clays)
I
I
N.C. Doparunmt of Administration and FederelDrcdge eud Fill Permit.
I
`
Permit to construct & opsrate Ai: Pollution Abatement
facilities nisslon Sources as 15 A NCAC
Applicatiwn must be submittal and pttmil rerxived prier to consovalon and t
operation of Use source. If a pemtitis requlrod in a narez Withau local zoning.
i GO days
1 O
j
andlorF per
l (2Q.01 00 tfuu 2Q.0300)
f then Utere are additional requirements arid timelines (2Q.01'3).
Permit to construct k operate Tlanspormtion facility as
J — —�
Application must be submitted at !cast 90 days prior tocnnstructign or mndiflrntinn of the
—'
90 days
10
per 15 A NCAC (2D,0800, 2Q.0601)
1 sources —
l
j Q
t
Any open burning associated will' Subject P- Posal�
must be in compliance wilh 15 A NCAC 2DJ900
! Demolition or renovations of atnnaures containing i
1
r ,
1
1
asbestos material must be in cvmpiiance with 15 A
60 days
❑
NCAC 20.1110 (a) (I) Which requites notification and NIA
! (90days)
I
1
i removal prior to demolition. Contact Asbestos Control
t Group 919-707-5950. j
0
Comple>t Source Perrot required under 15 A NCAC
4
2D.0800
t
!
'rte Sedintentatton Partition Control Act of) 973 most be property Addressed for any !and disturbing activity. An erosion tk Sedimentation control Plan
I will be required if one urmore acres robe d)sturbed. Plan filed with proper Regional Office (fsnd Qnality Section) At least 30 days befolt beginning
1
t 20 days t
(30 days)
'
1 activity. A fee of $()5 for the first acre or any part of on acre.. An express review option, isavailable with additional fees.
r
( SedlintaratiDn and erosion control must be addressed in accordarnca with NCDOT's approved program. Particular attention should to glven to design and
(30 days)
v
1 Installation of appropriate permitter scdimew trapping devices as well as stabie stotmwater conveyances and outlets,
—
H
i
1 On -site inspection usual. Sltrety bond flkd with ENR Bond amount varies with type mine
30 days
❑ I
II
Mining Permit
! send number of acres of affected land. Any arc mined groaner than one acre must be
The appropriate bond must be received before the permit can be issued.
(60 days)
pormitied.
i ()n-site inspection by N.C. Division Forest Resources if ptnmit exceeds 4 days
I day
CJ
North Carolina Burning pernuk i
—
(NIA)
On -site inspection by RC. Division Forasl Resources required 'if more tharfive aces of
I da I
iSpecial
Ground Clearance Buming Permit • 22
around clearing aet'Ivhies are involved. Inspections should he requested at least loll days
A)
El
1
counties in coastal N.C. with organic SOIL'
` befort•. neural biro 1a planned."
-
-
(7
Off Refining Facilities
NIA
9G -120 der }re
(NIA)
If permit required, application 60 days before begin construction. Applicant must hire N.C.
14
qualified engineer to' prepare plans, inspect construction, certify construellon according
to RNR approved plops. May also require permit under mosquito control program. And a
30 days
Dan Safety Permit
404 permit fmm Corps of Engineers. An inspection of site is necessary TO verify Hazard
Classification. A minimum fee of $200.00 must accompany the npplicotlon. An additional
(60 days)
processing foe based on a percentage or the total project cost will be required
upon completion.

x v,ur/r uawnerus tauuu� avwuvnat tinges as nee /Ass -try, uctnp, ccnea} iv cxa commga auw+®-tip f
= 0 r-•f tis-t �C�ry - �•--r! rJ rH•'�- 4.�-- i�-'c_ rj
- ua azV�/� «�svr`3z y 21 f 5 L.•�r 7,s+�/AcAc� cr7 3lrr ant d-,=G..e.x—, 1 ti i l !r•: r7.,.r i
REGIONAL OT+MCF,.,S
Questions regarding these permits Should be addressed to tht
0 Asheville Regional Office 0 MooiesvilleRegional Office
2090 US Highway 70 610 Bast Center A.venne, Suite 301
Swannanoa, NC 28778 Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone] (704) 663 -1699
0 Fayetteville Regional Office
225 North Green Street„ Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301 -5043
[phone]
tnttrgovenimeival form September 2013
I7 Raleigh Regional Office
380013srrett Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
(919) 791 -4200
0 Washington.Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, N.0 27889
(252) 946 -6481
Regional Office marked below,
0•Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Emnsion
Wilmington, NC 28405
(910) 796 -7215
0 Winstoit- Slilem Regional Office
585 Waughiown Street
Winston- Salem, NC 27,107
(336) 771 -5000
Normal Pro=Titnt
PERM17B
SPECIAL APPUCATION PROCLDURES or RBOUTUNDI'l S
{statutory time lima)
File surety bond of S5,000 with ENR ninning to state of NC tondhional that
10 days
Q
Permit to drill exploratory 01) or gas well
any well opened-by drill operator shall, upon abandomnent, be plugged according to
NIA
EM rules andragulations,
Q
Geophysical Exploration Permit
Appdostion fi)6d•.with'•i31 T - at least JO dnys prior to.imie of pwmil. Application by
to days
letter. No standard appflcetlon'fomi
NIA
01
State Lakes Construction Pcrmii
Applicationfee-It diarj4d -based on structure 6= Mist indude desoflptiomi-&
15 -20 days
drawings of`stntcnrre.& proof of ownership ofrfptuianpropeaty.
NIA
Q
401 Aster Quality Certification
- -- NIA
60 days
! (130 days)
0
l
CA1vfA Permit for MAJOR development
$250,00 fee Must aecompeny application
55 days
(150 days)
Q
LAMA Permit for MINOR development
$50.00 fco'must•aecompany Application
22 days
(2.5 days)
Several gaodotic monamenis am located it) or near (he project area. if any monument needs to.be moved or destroyad, plow notifir
Q
N.C. Geodetic Survey, Box 27687 Jtalelph, NY. •27611
Q t
Abandonment of any wells, if rerlaired must he in accordance with Title 15A, Sub6hapner 2C.0100. i
Notification of the proper regional office is requested if "orphan" underground storage tanks (USTS) are discovor6d during soy excavation operation.
I j
f
Compliance with 15A NCAC 2H 1000 (Coma] Stomtwater Rules) is required.
45 days
(N/A)
Q
..._
Tar Pamlico or Neuse Ripadan'1luffor Ruinstrrialrod.
Plans and specifications forahe Construction, expansion, or alteration of a public water sys(etnn7ust beipproved by (lie Division of Water
1'
0
ResourceslPublic Water Supply Section prior to the award of s contract or the ini istioh6f eoastrudion aspat15A'NCAC 18C.03n0 et. seq. Plans and
10 days1
specifications should be subuohted to 1634 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carblioa 27699-1634. All publi6mater supply syawris must comply
with sue mid federal drinking water monitoring requiremenlx Twr more information, contact thePoLgV Water Supply Section, [phone].
rIf
existing water lines will bereloceted during, the constmction, plans for thewater line relocation—must be submitted to rite Division of Water
o
Re sourcenlPablic Water Supply Section at 1634 hail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1634. For rnoa InfrarnWon, Contact rite Public
30 Boys
WuerSupply Section, (9J9)707T9J00.
x v,ur/r uawnerus tauuu� avwuvnat tinges as nee /Ass -try, uctnp, ccnea} iv cxa commga auw+®-tip f
= 0 r-•f tis-t �C�ry - �•--r! rJ rH•'�- 4.�-- i�-'c_ rj
- ua azV�/� «�svr`3z y 21 f 5 L.•�r 7,s+�/AcAc� cr7 3lrr ant d-,=G..e.x—, 1 ti i l !r•: r7.,.r i
REGIONAL OT+MCF,.,S
Questions regarding these permits Should be addressed to tht
0 Asheville Regional Office 0 MooiesvilleRegional Office
2090 US Highway 70 610 Bast Center A.venne, Suite 301
Swannanoa, NC 28778 Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone] (704) 663 -1699
0 Fayetteville Regional Office
225 North Green Street„ Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301 -5043
[phone]
tnttrgovenimeival form September 2013
I7 Raleigh Regional Office
380013srrett Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
(919) 791 -4200
0 Washington.Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, N.0 27889
(252) 946 -6481
Regional Office marked below,
0•Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Emnsion
Wilmington, NC 28405
(910) 796 -7215
0 Winstoit- Slilem Regional Office
585 Waughiown Street
Winston- Salem, NC 27,107
(336) 771 -5000

NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE ��.GL;.r✓
DEPAR'T'MENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW
COUNTY: NEW HANOVER H12: OTHER STATE NUMBER: 14 -E -0000 -0176
DATE RECEIVED: 10/21/2013
AGENCY RESPONSE: 11 /15/2013
REVIEW CLOSED: 11/20/2013
MS CARRIE ATKINSON
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATEWIDE PLANNING - MSC #1554
RALEIGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
CAPE FEAR COG
CC &PS - DIV OF.EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
DENR - COASTAL MGT
DENR LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS
DEPT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: City of Wilmington
TYPE: National Environmental Policy Act
Scoping
DESC: Proposed project is for Phase IIIB of the Cross City Trai.l, a pedestrian walkway
under the Heide Trask Drawbridge to provide a safe crossing for cyclists and
pedestrians across US 74/76 on the mainland side of the drawbridge. NCDOT TIP
U -5534B
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -1301.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this offices at (919)807 -2425.
AS.A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED: Ll
SIGNED BY:
��2oi3
NO COMMENT F� COMMENTS ATTACHED
DATE: // — / 2- —.2-01z

NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW
COUNTY: NEW HANOVER H12: OTHER
MS RENEE GLEDHILL- EARLEY
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
DEPT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
MSC 4617 - ARCHIVES BUILDING
RALEIGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
CAPE FEAR COG
CC &PS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
DENR - COASTAL MGT
DENR LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS
DEPT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: City of Wilmington
TYPE: National Environmental Policy Act
Scoping
STATE NUMBER: 14 -E -0000 -0176
DATE RECEIVED: 10/21/2013
AGENCY RESPONSE: 11/15/2013
OCT 5 2a�3 VIEW CLOSED: 11/20/2013
HISTORIC PR SERVASION t}RE
t9, _aSL12�'
P,- (6�' 1'!�'
tol4aI,3
s �D k
DESC: Proposed project is for Phase IIIB of the Cross City Trail, a pedestrian walkway
under the Heide Trask Drawbridge to provide a safe crossing =or cyclists and
pedestrians across US 74/76 on the mainland side of the drawbridge. NCDOT TIP
U -5534B
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -1301.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this office at (919)807 -2425.
AS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED: 11 NO COMMENT 49 COMMENTS ATTACHED
SIGNED BY: �� r DATE: 1

COUNTY: NEW HANOVER
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW
H12: OTHER STATE NUMBER: 14 -E- 0000 -0176
DATE RECEIVED: 10/21/2013
AGENCY RESPONSE: 11/15/2013
REVIEW CLOSED: 11/20/2013
MS CAROLYN PENNY
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
CC &PS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ,� ?:fit_: •�.� �, � ,,,.;
FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PROGRAMf
ar+'a r
MSC # 4719 ��i' °, OCT 2013 �.
RALEIGH NC �.J
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION W"IVcz;
TI RV ED O
CAPE FEAR COG (r..: WA {�
CC &PS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT y *�
DENR - COASTAL MGT ' 2,3 2013
DENR LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS
DEPT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: City of Wilmington
TYPE: National Environmental Policy Act
Scoping
DESC: Proposed project is for Phase IIIB of the Cross City Trail, a pedestrian walkway
under the Heide Trask Drawbridge to provide a safe crossing for cyclists and
pedestrians across US 74/76 on the mainland side of the drawbridge. NCDOT TIP
U -5534B
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1301.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this office at (919)807 -2425.
AS A RESULT OF THIS JEVIEW T',E�/FOLT TJJ G IS SUBMITTED: El NO COMMENT COMMENTS ATTACHED
SIGNED BY: w , DATE: t 911dq 2 D/

North Carolina Department of Public Safety
Emergency Management
Pat McCrory, Governor Michael Aratb�erry, Director
Frank L. Perry, Secretary
October 29, 201.3
State Clearinghouse
N.C. Department of Administration
1301 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1301
Subject: Intergovernmental Review State Number: 14 -E- 0000 -0176
Cross City Trail, New Hanover County
As requested by the North Carolina State Clearinghouse, the North Carolina Department of
Crime Control and Public Safety Division of Emergency Management Office of Geospatial and
Technology Management (GTM) reviewed the proposed project listed above and offer the
following comments:
1. The project includes development within the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). Refer
to Flood Insurance Rate Map panel 3157. Any development within the SFHA will
require a floodplain development permit from the municipality having jurisdiction: either
the City of Wilmington, the Town of Wrightsville Beach, or New Hanover County.
Please be sure the respective local floodplain administrator reviews and issues permits for
each part of the proposed Cross City Trail within an SFHA.
2. All structures, elements, and utilities should be protected to the Regulatory Flood
Protection Elevation in accordance with the local ordinance and 44 CFR 60.3.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have any questions concerning the
above comments, please contact Dan Brubaker, P.E., CFM, the NC NFIP Engineer at (919) 825-
2300, by email at dan.brubalcer'1nc&s.gov or at the address shown on the footer of this
document.
Ashe, P.E., CFM
A, -,s nt Director
Geospatial and Technology Management Office
cc: John Gerber, NFIP State Coordinator
Dan Brubaker, NFIP Engineer
MAILING ADDRESS: GTM OFFICE LOCATION:
4218 Mail Service Center 4105 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh NC 27699 -4218 Raleigh, NC 27607
www.ncem.org Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Employer
:r��a3
�r s
As requested by the North Carolina State Clearinghouse, the North Carolina Department of
Crime Control and Public Safety Division of Emergency Management Office of Geospatial and
Technology Management (GTM) reviewed the proposed project listed above and offer the
following comments:
1. The project includes development within the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). Refer
to Flood Insurance Rate Map panel 3157. Any development within the SFHA will
require a floodplain development permit from the municipality having jurisdiction: either
the City of Wilmington, the Town of Wrightsville Beach, or New Hanover County.
Please be sure the respective local floodplain administrator reviews and issues permits for
each part of the proposed Cross City Trail within an SFHA.
2. All structures, elements, and utilities should be protected to the Regulatory Flood
Protection Elevation in accordance with the local ordinance and 44 CFR 60.3.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have any questions concerning the
above comments, please contact Dan Brubaker, P.E., CFM, the NC NFIP Engineer at (919) 825-
2300, by email at dan.brubalcer'1nc&s.gov or at the address shown on the footer of this
document.
Ashe, P.E., CFM
A, -,s nt Director
Geospatial and Technology Management Office
cc: John Gerber, NFIP State Coordinator
Dan Brubaker, NFIP Engineer
MAILING ADDRESS: GTM OFFICE LOCATION:
4218 Mail Service Center 4105 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh NC 27699 -4218 Raleigh, NC 27607
www.ncem.org Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Employer

UN
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Pat McCrory
Secretary Susan Kluttz
November 4, 2013
Jeff Moore
Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc.
PO Box 33068
Raleigh, NC 27636 -3068
Office of Archives and l listory
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: Cross -City Trial, Phase IIIB under Heide Trask Drawbridge, U- 5534B, Wilmington,
New Hanover County, ER 13 -2568
Dear Mr. Moore:
Thank you for your letter of October 15, 2013, concerning the above project, which proposes the construction
of a bicycle and pedestrian trail underneath the Heide Trask Drawbridge (US 74/76, Wrightsville Avenue).
There are no recorded archaeological sites within the project area. Because it appears that all of the work will
take place within the previously disturbed DOT right -of -way there is little likelihood that significant
undiscovered archaeological sites will be present. We do not recommend an archaeological survey in regards to
the project.
The Heide Trask Drawbridge was determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places in
2005 under Criterion C for engineering. Before we can comment on any potential effects that this project may
have on historic properties, please forward a copy of the site plan showing the existing and proposed trail,
bridge piers, and shoreline.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919- 807 -6579 or renee.gledhill-
earlevkncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced
tracking number.
Sincerely,
(Lac wcku�-�a
6�✓Ramona M. Bartos
cc: Mary Pope Furr, NCDOT, mfuu @ncdot.gov
Dawn Snotherly, Wilmington HPC, Dawn.Snothetly @wilmingtonnc.gov
Location 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax: [phone] -6599

Federal Aid #: STPDA- 0332(44) TIP #. U -5534B Countv: New Hanover
CONCURRENCE FORM FOR ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS
Project Description:
This project is Phase M of the Gary Shell Cross -City Trail. This phase consists of a public
walkway underneath the Heide Trash Drawbridge to provide a designated crossing for
cyclists and pedestrians across US 74/76 (Wrightsville Avenue) on the mainland side of
the drawbridge in Wilmington. It begins in the northeast quadrant of the Wrightsville
Avenue /Airlie Road intersection near the terminus of Phase IRB of the Trail (currently in
design). It ends in the southeast quadrant of the same intersection, approximately 450
linear feet from the Bridge Tender Marina parking lot.
On August S, 2014, representatives of the
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (HPO)
❑ Other
Reviewed the subject project and agreed on the effects findings listed within the table on the
reverse of this signature page.
Signed:
FHWA, for the Division Administrator, or other Federal Agency Date
(. U-a - s - l
Representative, HPO Date

H
N
W}
T
N
z
I
6
M
tn
U
N
M
M
O
A
a
ti
I
I.
x
w
b
q
O
N
t4
N
t37
C
C
LL
U
c
4o
V-
W
LU
O
z
m
b �
a
m
o
v
�En
Q
CL
a
•
r~
.
U �
I.
x
w
b
q