20150451 Ver 1_401 Application_20150515

o�aQF warFR pG j 4 Office Use Only
O; C�rps action ID no
o DWQ project no
Form Version 1 4 Jair jq,,ary 2%09
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
la
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 12 or General Permit (GP) number 3884
1c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corpse
NX Yes ❑ No
1d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
NX 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification.
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program
N Yes ❑X No
1g
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1 h
below
N Yes ❑X No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
N Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a
Name of project
Stokesdale 6" Pressure Improvement Project
_
2b
County
Guilford
__ )
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Stokesdale �'MAY
2d
Subdivision name
- --
2e
NCDOT only, T I P or state project no
3.
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
Piedmont Natural Gas easement - Individual owners listed on attached JD request
3b
Deed Book and Page No
- --
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
Jason Brown, Piedmont Natural Gas
3d
Street address
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
3e
City, state, zip
Charlotte, NC 28210
3f
Telephone no
(704) 731 -4681
3g
Fax no
(704) 731 -4098
3h
Email address
Jason brown @ pied montng corn
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify Party Responsible for Construction
4b
Name
Jason Brown
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
Piedmont Natural Gas
4d
Street address
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
4e
City, state, zip
Charlotte, NC 28210
4f
Telephone no
(704) 731 -4681
4g
Fax no
(704) 731 -4098
4h
Email address
iim brown @piedmontng corn
S.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Suzanne Herron
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
Energy Land & Infrastructure, PLLC
5c
Street address
1420 Donelson Pike, Suite A -12
5d
City, state, zip
Nashville, TN 37217
5e
Telephone no
(615) 383 -6300
5f.
Fax no
(615) 360 -8476
5g
Email address
suzanne herron @eli -Ilc com
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
7.
Property Identification
1a
Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
See attached plans and JD request
1 b
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude 36 234696 Longitude -79 938776
1c
Property size
174 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project
Haw River
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
2c
River basin
Cape Fear River Basin
3.
Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The planned alignment extends about 1 5 miles extending from Flatrock Road to near the Intersection of Hwy 158 and Southard Road Land use
generally consist of grass covered pasture land and moderately dense wooded areas between residential areas
3b
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property. 0 244
3c
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property 100
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The proposed project will construct a new 6" natural gas line between Highway 158 and Flatrock Road
3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
The proposed project will construct a 6" natural gas line by open cut At Ellison Road and Flatrock Road the line will be installed by conventional bore
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Z Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments EEE Consulting, Inc
4b
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Preliminary ❑ Final
4c
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known) Tina Sekula
Agency /Consultant Company EEE Consulting, Inc
Other
4d
April
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
22, 2015 letter from NCDENR, Winston -Salem Regional Office, Sue Homewood
5.
Project History
5a
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b
If yes, explain
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams —tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 P
Land Clearing
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0 099
W2 T
Land Clearing
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
003
W3 P
Land Clearing
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
00098
W4 T
Land Clearing
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
00005
W5 P
Land Clearing
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0 091
W6 T
Land Clearing
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0 014
2g Total Wetland Impacts:
0 244
2h Comments
W1 and W2 = Wetland WA (page 3011 -010)
W3 and W4 = Wetland WC (page 3011 -013)
W5 and W6 = Wetland WE/WF (page 3011 -014)
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a
3b
3c.
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial (PER) or
Type of
Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)?
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1 T
Underground Pipeline
Unnamed Tributary
INT
Corps
3
40
S2 T
Underground Pipeline
Unnamed Tributary
PER
Corps
3
40
S3
Choose one
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
80
31 Comments.
S1 = Stream SA (page 3011 -013)
S2 - Stream SC (page 3011 -014)
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then indivii ually list all open water impacts below
4a
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c
Type of impact
4d
Waterbody
type
4e
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f Total open water impacts
4g Comments
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below
5a
Pond ID number
5b
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f Total:
0
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑X No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require miticiation, then vou MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a. Project is in which protected basing
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other
6b
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Stream name
6e
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes /No
B2
Yes /No
B3 -
Yes /No
B4 -
Yes /No
B5 -
Yes /No
B6 -
Yes /No
6h Total Buffer Impacts:
0
0
61. Comments
Page 5 of 10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Best management practices will be used for erosion control measures during the construction of the line across wetlands and streams
lb Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Mats will be used for temporary equipment crossings of streams Silt fence and compost socks will be used along the protect
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a
Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type. Choose one
Type Choose one
Type Choose one
Quantity
Quantity
Quantity
3c
Comments.
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b
Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
Choose one
4d
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e
Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f.
Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation
Yes ❑X No El
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
15
6f Total buffer mitigation required:
o
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0%
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why
The proposed project is to construct an underground pipeline There will be no permanent above ground attributes to this protect
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Guilford Co
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
[]Yes ❑X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply)-
❑Session Law 2006 -246
❑Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

► .
F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b
If you answered "yes' to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA /SEPA)?
1c
If you answered "yes' to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter )
Comments
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213 0200)?
2b
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
El Yes ❑X No
2c
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or avadable�capacity of the subject facility
No wastewater will be generated
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
Yes X No
❑ ❑
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
Raleigh
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
April 3, 2015 letter from the United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service Raleigh ES Field Office
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑ No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
March 31, 2015 letter from the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, State Historic Preservation Office (attached)
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
North Carolina Flood Maps
Suzanne Herron, P E
1, V� , 0 � l A !��'
J
1Signature
May 5, 2015
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
(Applicant/Agent's
Date
(Agen 's si nature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided
Page 10 of 10

ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE
May 5, 2015
NC DWQ, WBSCP Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: PRE - CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION PACKAGE
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS, STOKESDALE 6" PRESSURE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
STOKESDALE, GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Enclosed please find a Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) package for the Stokesdale 6" Pressure
Improvement project in Guilford County, North Carolina The applicant for this project is Piedmont Natural
Gas, 4720 Piedmont Row Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina 28210
The proposed project will install a 6 -inch transmission pipeline to help with system demand and pressure
in the area The gas line is proposed outside the roadway right -of -way to avoid other utility lines that are
located within that space
At this time, we are applying for coverage under USACE Nationwide Permit 12 and for a 401 Water
Quality Certification under the NC DENR Water Quality Certification No 3884 The proposed project will
open cut the streams and wetlands crossed by the project The wetland area within the temporary and
permanent easements is 0 244 acres Two streams will be crossed Due to the small number of streams
and acreage of wetlands, we decided that the integrity of the streams could be protected with open
cutting
Enclosed please find the following parts of the permit application
• Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) form
• Five sets of plans (2 at 24 "x36" and 3 at 11 "x17 ")
• Check for $240 for Minor water quality applications
• Agent Authorization Form
• Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination dated March 18, 2015
• Waters of the U S (Including Wetlands) Delineation dated April 2015
• April 22, 2015 letter from NCDENR about the On -Site Determination
• Easement exhibits
• March 31, 2015 letter from the State Historic Preservation Office
• April 3, 2015 letter from the US Fish and Wildlife Service
• Guilford County Stream Buffer Use Request Form
Thank you for your consideration of this application If you have questions or need additional information
please contact Suzanne Herron at (615) 383 -6300 or by email at suzanne herron @eli -Ilc com
Sincerely,
ENERGY LAND & INF STRUCTURE, PLLC
3 rr _
Suzate He rron, P E, CPESC
Enclosures
1420 Donelson Pike, Suite A -12. Nashville. Tennessee 37217 www.eii- lic.com 615.383.6300
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL

ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Date: March 24, 2015
Project Information
Project Name: Stokesdale 6" Pressure Improvement Project
Type of Project: Installation of new natural gas line
Location: Guilford County, NC
Pror)erty Owner /Rearesentative Information
Business Name: Piedmont Natural Gas
Mailing Address: 4720 Piedmont Row Drive
City, State, Zip Code: Charlotte, NC 28210
Telephone No.: (704) 731 -4681
Contact Name: Jason Brown, Engineering Project Manager
Agent Information
Business Name:
Street Address:
City, State, Zip Code:
Telephone No.:
Contact Name:
Authorization
Energy Land & Infrastructure, PLLC
1420 Donelson Pike, Suite Al2
Nashville, TN 37217
(615) 383 -6300
Suzanne Herron
I, Jason Brown of Piedmont Natural Gas hereby authorize Energy
Land & Infrastructure, PLLC to act as agent with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C.
Division of Water Quality pursuant to obtaining the necessary Section 10/404/401 /Buffer
permits, as applicable, related to the above - referenced project(s).
Signature:
Date: 3/Zb /20
/S
14 ;Z�j)i A_ tsv;ic, Ta wwwEli- Ilc.com CIS38363
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL

�3e EEE Consulting, Inc.
L�_ Environmental, Engineering and Educational Solutions
3/18/2015
David Bailey
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina
Re: Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Stokesdale Six (6) Inch Transmission Pipeline
Stokesdale, Guildford County, NC
Dear Mr. Bailey,
EEE Consulting, Inc. (EEE) has been contracted by Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG) to execute a jurisdictional waters delineation in
Guildford County, North Carolina EEE has determined the limits of jurisdictional waters of the U.S (including wetlands) within
the boundaries of the site, and is requesting a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) to confirm those boundaries.
Surveys were conducted by EEE scientists on February 24, 2015, using methods outlined In the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetlands Delineation Manual and the 2012 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Data, figures, and pictures
to support these decisions are included with this request.
The proposed pipeline will extend approximately 8,000 feet starting at a tie -in at Southard Road and running easterly, on new
location, to an existing Transco Tap Station location on Flatrock Road (Figure 1).
Please contact me with any questions or comments at tsekula @EEE - Consulting com or (919) 650 -2463, ex 223.
Thank you,
Tina Sekula, PWS
Senior Environmental Scientist
EEE Consulting, Inc
enc. Jurisdictional Determination Request Form and Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form
8525 Bell Creek Road, Mechanicsville, Virginia 23116 • (804) 442 -3330 • (804) 442 -3334 (fax)
201 Church Street, Suite C, Blacksburg, Virginia 24060 . (540) 953 -0170 • (540) 953 -0171 (fax)
272 Bendix Road, Suite 260, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23452 . (757) 552 -1054 • (757) 301 -8747 (fax)
601 Cascade Pointe Lane, Suite 101, Cary, North Carolina 27513 • (919) 650 -2463
*Professional services in North Carolina are provided by EEE Consulting of NC, PC Lic # C -3945

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Enginsors.
W 4ninglon Dls ict
"this form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
to the appropriate Corps Field Off ice (or project.: manager. if known) via mail, electronic mail, or
facsimile. A current list of county assignments by Field Office and project manager can be
found on -line at: htta: / /wrvw.saw.usace.army. mil / Missions /Re ulatoryPermitPro ram.asps , by
telephoning: 910- 251 -4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below:
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Enaineers
IS Patton Avenue. Room 208
Ashevi Ile, North Carolina 28801 -5006
General Number. (828) 271 -7980
Fax Number- [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage aide Drive, Suite 105
W ake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: (919) 554 -4884
Fax Number: (919) 562 -0421
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 WCSt Fillh Street.
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number, (910) 251 -4610
Fax Number. (252) 975 -1399
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
U5 Army Corps or Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington. North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910 - 2514633
Fax Number: (910) 2514025
Version: December 2013 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, 1), E and E
NOTETO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES. lfyou are requestinga JD on bchalfofa
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part G.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTI- IORIZATION: Please be aware that all JD
requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the
determination, which may include inspection ofthe property when necessary. This form must be
signed by the current property owner to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorizationlnotification for JD
requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be
conducted according to the current NCDOT /IJSACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not
be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the rood Security Act of 1985. if you or
your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs; you
should also request a cerr ified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural
Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: December 2013 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address:
City, State:
County:
Directions:
7104 US 158
Stokesdale, NC 27357
Guildford County
Parcel Index Numbers) (PIN):
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address I:
Tina Sekula
601 Cascade Poinle Lane, Suile 101, Cary, NC 27513
919 65{) 2463
tsekula ©eee- corsulting, corn
Select one:
❑ 1 am the current property owner.
❑✓ 1 am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, Please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
See alt4ched Landowner Noliftcafion
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address3:
❑ Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County G1S/Parcel /Tax Record data)
' If available
2 Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
If available
Version: December 20 t3 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION'
1, the undersigned, a duly allLhorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and /or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1 849.
J114sor_4 P. a
t?1�.Ombf,n.NW-inBt G,4s G.
Property Owner (please print)
Owner
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETEMINATION TYPE
Select One:
3 I& 20i5'
Date
Wl1 am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
I aln requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUSs and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property!project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
F1I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a propertylproject area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
s Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 �� Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. ALL REQUESTS
FMap of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
Size of Property or Project Area 17 4
acres
�✓ I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. 11) REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form.
36.234696 - 79.938776
Project Coordinates: Latitude Longitude
Maps (no larger than 1 1x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
0 Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections; towns
® Aerial Photography of the project area
1 —4 USGS Topographic Map
ZSoil Survey Map
W1Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland tnventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08 -02, dated June 26, 2008
Version: December 2013 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
Wetland Data Sheets`
Tributaries:
0 ltSACE Assessment Forms
® Upland Data Sheets ® Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
Landscape Photos, if taken
❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible .Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data paints and /or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage/lincar footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
❑ Project Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
Maps (no larger than I I x 17) with Project boundary Overlay-
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g, National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
7 1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
http• / /www.usace army .mil /Missbns /Clvii1Vorks Regt�latoaProgramandPeimit 's /reQ supp.aspx
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at;
lit to: / /Dortal.ricdenr.ore/c /document librarvleet file? uuid= 76 c58b- dabB- 496D- ba4345b7fafO6f4c &sroupld =38364 ar0,
htto1 /ovww saw usace army mll /Portals159 /ddcs /regulatory /oublicnotices /2073 /N[SAM Draft User Manual 130318 pdf
a Delineation Information must include, at minimum, onE wetland data sheet for each wetland /community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
❑ Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
o All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identity)
Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage /linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
❑ Approved Jurisdictional Dctenrination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos
Forms) ")
❑ Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters.
Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland /community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 7

Jurisdictional Determination Request
1. REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL Or SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard -
copy submittals include at least one original Plat (to scale) that is no larger than 1 I "xl7"
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat; including
those larger than I I "Lk 17", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDI:) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
plats and return them via email to the requestor.
(1) PLATS SU13MII- 1'Ell) FOR APPROVAL
Must be scaled and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
F] Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
Must be legible
Must include a North Arrow, scale(s),'ritle, Property Information
Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings /metes
and bounds /GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
F] Must clearly depict surveyed p:opeity or project boundaries
❑ Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property
corner, USGS monument)
When Nvetlands are depicted:
• Must include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Must identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Version: December 2013 Page 8

Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ When tributaries are depicted:
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary Fligh Water Marks
(Olq WM) of tributary
• Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate
widths or s ur veyed OH W M)
• Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary"
all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tic -to
surveyed project /property boundaries
Must include the location of wetland data points andior tributary assessment
reaches
Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all watcrs not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands ", "non -
jurisdictional waters "). NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that
transport WoUS
Versron: December 2013 Page 9

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(2) C1:11TIFICATION LANGUAGE
F] When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plot accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a chonge in the low or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from
this dole. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual,"
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date
U5ACE Action 10 No.:
❑ When uplands rnvy lie present within a depicted Jurisdictional Botuidarym
include the following Corps Certification language:
'This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean WoterAct os determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the low or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction mcy be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned competed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual,"
Regulatory Official,
Title_
Date.
USACE Action ID No.:
Version: December 2013 Page 10

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(3) GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS). the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as:
❑ be at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
❑ include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross - referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
Rinclude a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version; December 2013 Page 11

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD): March 18, 2015
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Tina Sekula, 601 Cascade Pointe Lane, Suite 101, Cary, NC
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
USACE "Niimington Distinct, Raleigh Field Office
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
See "Below
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC County /parish /borough: Guildford City: Stokesdale
Center coordinates of site (]at/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 36234640 'N; Long - 79938776
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD 83
Name of nearest waterbody: Haw River
'W.
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non - wetland waters:
linear feet: width (ft) and /or acres
Cowardin Class: see Attached Table A
Stream Flow:
Wetlands- acres.
Cowardin Class:
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal-
Non-Tidal:

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
✓❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant: EEE consulting
❑✓ Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the
app ' nt/consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
✓❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1 24,000, summerfield, NC
✓❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation: ssuRCO 2014
✓❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: see Figure s
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑✓ Photographs. ❑✓ Aerial (Name & Date)- NAIR 2012 imagery
✓❑ Other (Name & Date): site photographs, 2/24/2015
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
or

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre- construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary-M, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization. and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary, (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.

This preliminary JD finds that there "maybe" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information.
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
dam'
114&A
A4 �.
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

Table A
Estimated
Site
Cowardin
Amount of
Class of Aquatic
Latitude
Longitude
Number
Class
Aquatic Resource
Resource
in Review Area
Non - Section 10
WA
36.235615
-79949454
PFO
0.18 ac
Wetland
Non - Section 10
WB
36.234507
- 79.940375
PFO
0.01 ac
Wetland
Non - Section 10
WC /WD
36.234696
- 79.938776
PFO
0.06 ac
Wetland
Non - Section 10
WE /WF
36 233611
- 79.934437
PFO
0 24 ac
Wetland
Non - Section 10
SA
36.234664
- 79.938684
R4
126 if
Stream
Non - Section 10
SB
36.234541
- 79.938673
R4
11 if
Stream
Non - Section 10
SC
36 233625
- 79.934746
R3
103 if
Stream

3 °
C®nsu ng, Inc.
Environmental, Engineerinq and Educational Solutions
Agent Authorizati ®n
I(we) authorize representatives of EEE - Consulting, Inc. to act as my (our) agent regarding the
proposed project as described below; to act on my (our) behalf; to take all actions necessary to
the processing, issuance, and acceptance of permits and any and all standard and special
conditions attached.
Project name: S -roKES9A rt 6 _P24SSuCLE I+- t920vrtl`1E1.rT
Located at/in: SToW-ESOAUC Gu I L FO 20 Cou rZT'q , NC
Owner /applicant
Signed:
1PiEDHa.XT IJATU6 -AL- GAS Co APA,
I jAsaw VIE Caow' -J
Date: 3 / I (ol Zo15
8525 Bell Creek Road, Mechanicsville, Virginia 23116 • (804) 442 -3330 a (804) 442 -3334 (fax)
201 Church Street, Suite C, Blacksburg, Virginia 24060 ° (540) 953 -0170 . (540) 953 -0171 (fax)
272 Bendix Road, Suite 260, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23452 • (757) 552 -1054 • (757) 301 -8747 (fax)
601 Cascade Pointe Lane, Suite 101, Cary, NC 27513 • (919) 650 -2463

MR, Piedmont
Natural Gas PEPCHERON
-Wi4 %9Q.irrs
November 21, 2014
Gracie J. and Robert L. Casey, SR.
8146 Flatrock Rd.
Stokesdale, NC 27357
Re Piedmont Natural Gas Pipeline Survey Activity Notice
Stokesdale
Pin Number(s) 7920657238
Dear Landowner,
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE
In order to maintain safe and reliable natural gas service to our customers in Guilford County, Piedmont Natural Gas
will be installing a new pipeline When completed, the new pipeline will run from an existing line on Flatrock Road to a
place near the intersection of Southard Road and Highway 158 in the Stokesdale area
To begin this project, a land survey and engineering study is needed to determine the exact route for the new pipeline
A surveyor's "right -of- entry" in order to perform the survey is provided for under North Carolina General Statute 40A
This letter is to let you know that your property has been identified for inclusion in this survey and to request your
permission for our surveying contractor, Energy Land & Infrastructure (ELI), and other individuals (geologists and
environmental scientists) to have access to your property in order to perform the preliminary survey and land
assessment Your receipt of this letter does not automatically mean that your property will fall in or along the actual
pipeline route
The survey process itself is typically routine and minimally disruptive to the property It may be necessary in some
cases, however, to take core soil samples during the engineering phase. Should that be the case, Piedmont Natural
Gas, or its contractor, will coordinate with individual property owners prior to the sampling process Piedmont is
committed to restoring any such area to its original state after the survey and assessment process has been
completed
If it is determined your property falls within the proposed pipeline route and that an easement is required, a
representative of Piedmont Natural Gas will contact you to negotiate the purchase of the land rights needed to proceed
with this project As a part of this process, a plat of your property will be prepared, showing where the proposed
easement for the pipeline project is situated in relation to your property This will NOT involve the purchase or
relocation of homes
Our schedule is such that we would ask for your approval by December 22, 2014 If we have not heard from you by
that time, we will assume that we have your permission to access your property for the purposes of this survey and
assessment under the NC General Statute stated above If you have any questions, you may contact our contract
right of way agent representative, Scott Petitfils, from Percheron Field Services, LLC at (336) 988 -8457 or by e-mail at
scott petitfils percheronllc com
Piedmont Natural Gas is committed to being as open and transparent as possible throughout this process and to
minimizing any inconvenience to you We look forward to working with you and thank you in advance for your
consideration
Sincerely yours,
Ryan Houck
Senior Land Agent
Piedmont Natural Gas

STOKESDALE, NC
LAND OWNER'S LIST
FINAL ALIGNMENT
COUNTY PIN#
PNG TRACT #
LANDOWNER
NOTES
PROPERTY ADDRESS
MAILING ADDRESS
CONTACT TELEPHONE#
7920657238 -000
1
Gracie J Casey and Robert L Casey (deceased)
Easement Acquired
8146 Flatrock Rd
Stokesdale, NC 27357
8146 Flatrock Rd
Stokesdale, NC 27357
336.420 -2486 cell
7920651238 -000
2
Richard D and Joy H Odom
Easement Acquired
8150 Flatrock Rd
Stokesdale, NC 27357
8150 Flatrock Rd
Stokesdale, NC 27357
336 - 209 -3080 his cell
7920549849 -000
3
Bruce L and Elaine J Chnstopher
Easement Acquired
8145 Flatrock Rd
Stokesdale, NC 27357
8149 Flatrock Rd
Stokesdale, NC 27357
336 - 580 -5619 his cell/ 336 - 580 -0078 her cell
7920542514 -000
4
Jack Byrd Johnson and Mary P Johnson (deceased)
Easement Acquired
8149 Flatrock Rd
Stokesdale, NC 27357
8149 Flatrock Rd
Stokesdale, NC 27357
336 - 643 -6888 hm
7920352300 -000
5
Leta B Climer Living Trust Agreement, Leta B Climer TR
(Scott Climer)
Easement Acquired
7027 Near Ellison
Rd
Stokesdale, NC 27357
21 Stone Gate
North Longdwood, FL
32779
336 -441 -2045 hm,
7920254295 -000
6
Ronald D Preston
8138 Shoeline Rd
Stokesdale, NC 27357
8103 Shoeline Rd
Stokesdale, NC 27357
336 - 362 -0956 cell
7920251406 -000
6A
Ronald D Preston
8202 Shoeline Rd
Stokesdale, NC 27357
8103 Shoeline Rd
Stokesdale, NC 27357
336 - 643 -2984 hm
7920153873 -000
7
Eva Sue Willi Quate
7022 Ellison Rd
Stokesdale, NC 27357
7018 Ellison Rd
Stokesdale, NC 27357
336 - 6434003 hm 336 - 317 -0317 cell.
7920058682 -000 1
8
G Allen Lindsey JR
Easement Acquired
7024 Ellison Rd.
Stokesdale, NC 27357
7024 Ellison Rd.
Stokesdale, NC 27357
336 430 -7866 cell
7910957586 -000
9
Culp Inc (Bill Callahan - Plant Manager)
7209 US Highway
158
Stokesdale, NC 27357
PO Box 2686
High Point, NC 27261
336385 -2666 wk
7920063038 -000
10
Jas G and Pamela M Harrell
7103 US Highway
158
Stokesdale, NC 27357
1308 Hawthorne
Ave
Reidsville, NC 27320
336 - 382 -0778 cell
7910969927 -000
11
Solutions Group LLC -(Owner John Tesh
Easement Acquired 1158
7105 US Highway
Stokesdale, NC 27357
PO Box 822
Welcome, NC 27374
336 -817 -7300 cell

r3 lEEE Consulting, Inc.
_Environmental, Engineering and Educational Solutions
Figure 1: Project Location Map
Stokesdale 6" Transmission Pipeline
Piedmont Natural Gas
Guilford County, North Carolina

Figure 2: USGS Topographic Quadrangle Map
��r IEEE Consulting, tokesdale 6" Transmission Pipeline
g, Inc. Inc Piedmont Natural Gas
Environmental, Engineering and Educational Solutions
Guilford County, North Carolina
15 -502 March 2015

Figure 3: Natural Color Aerial Map
r IEEE Consulting, tokesdale 6" Transmission Pipeline
g� Inc. . Piedmont Natural Gas
Environmental, Engineering and Educational Solutions
Guilford County, North Carolina
15 -502 March 2015

r3e�EEE Consulting, Inc.
6 7�j Environmental, Engineering and Educational Solutions
15 -502
Figure 4: NRCS Soils Maps
Stokesdale 6" Transmission Pipeline
Piedmont Natural Gas
Guilford County, North Carolina
March 2015

-7EEE Consulting, Inc.
`Environmental, Engineering and Educational Solutions
15 -502
Figure 5: National Wetlands Inventory Map
Stokesdale 6" Transmission Pipeline
Piedmont Natural Gas
Guilford County, North Carolina
March 2015

Field Data Points
Streams (R3) WA
Streams (R4) W
sc
Palustrine Forested (PFO
Project Study Area
10050 0 100 Feet �� �� _.� 10050 0 100 Feet
WB
f WCNVD
SA
100 50 0 100 Feet / S
100 50 0 100 Feet
Note: All delineated waters of the U.S. continue 0 750 1,500 3,000
outside of the Project Study Area Feet
3e
-IEEE Consulting, Inc.
Environmental, Engineering and Educational Solutions
Figure 6: Waters of the U.S Delineation Map
Stokesdale 6" Transmission Pipeline
Piedmont Natural Gas
Guilford County, North Carolina
15 -502 March 2015

Field Data Points
Streams (R3)
WA
Streams (R4) WE /WF
SC
Palustrine Forested (PFO ) -
Project Study Area `
100 50 0 100 Feet 10050 0 100 Feet
WB
WCNVD
` SA
100 50 0 100 Feet SB
100 50 0 100 Fee
Note: All delineated waters of the U.S. continue 0 750 1,500 3,000
outside of the Project Study Area Feet
Figure 7: Waters of the U.S Delineation Map (Aerial)
r EEE Consulting, Inc. Stokesdale 6" Transmission Pipeline
3
e� g� Piedmont Natural Gas
Environmental, Engineering and Educational Solutions
Guilford County, North Carolina
15 -502 March 2015

PNG Stokesdale 6" Transmission Pipeline
Guilford County, NC
1. W'.a DPW'. Facing west. 2/24/2105
I W'B DPW. Facing west. 2/24/2015
2. WA DP1 . Facing west. 2/24/2015
4. WB DP1 . Facing east. 2./24/2015
5. W'('/NN'D DPW'. Facing cast. 2/24/2015 6. W'C/W'D DM'. Facing west. 2/24/2015

PNG Stokesdale 6" Transmission Pipeline
Guilford County, NC
7. WE/WF DPW. Facing west. 2/24/2015
9. SA. Facing north (upstream). 2/24/2015
11. SC. Facing south (do" nstream). 2/24/2015
S. WE/WF DPU. Facing east. 2/24/2015
10. SB. Facing south (downstream). 2/24/2015

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Stokesdale Transmission Pipeline City /County: Stokesdale, Guilford County Sampling Date: 02/24/2015
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: WA DPU
Investigator(s): Tina Sekula and Daniel Roberts Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope ( %): 9
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.23563 Long: - 79.949421 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Clifford sandy loam, 6 to 10% slopes (CkC) NWI classification: Upland p
Are climatic/ hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) �/
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauiredl
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that aooly)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
— Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
u
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No , `
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point WA DPU
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30' )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Ltrtodendron tulrptfera
30
Yes FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 6 (A)
2 Acer rubrum
25
Yes FAC
3 Prunus serottna
15
Yes FACU
Total Number of Dominant 10
Species Across All Strata (B)
4
Percent of Dominant Species °
60%
5-
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B)
6
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
Total % Cover of Multiply by
8
70
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = 0
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30'
)
FACW species x 2 = 0
1 Acer rubrum
25
Yes FAC
FAC species x 3 = 0
2 Prunus serottna
10
Yes FACU
FACU species x 4 = 0
3 Quercus alba
10
Yes FACU
UPL species x 5 = 0
4
0
Column Totals (A) 0 (B)
5
Prevalence Index = B/A = 0.00
6
�
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8
_
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
g
9
0
3 - Prevalence Index is < -3 0'
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
30'
45
= Total Cover
_
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
e
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1 Lontcera /apontca
15
Yes FAC
—
2
'Indicators of hydric sod and wetland hydrology must
3
��
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4
0
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5
0
F
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
6
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7
height
8
0
Sapling /Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less i
g
�
than 3 in DBH and greater than or equal to 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
10
0
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
11
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
12
0
15
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
= Total Cover
height
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30' )
1 Lontcera japonica
20
Yes FAC
2 Smilax rotundtfolta
50
Yes FAC
3 Toxtcodendron radtcans
20
YYes—�-1 FAC
Hydrophytic
5
Vegetation X
6
Present? Yes ' ` No
90
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL
Sampling Point WA DPU
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Histosol (A1)
Redox Features
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc
Texture Remarks
0 -2
10YR 3/3
100
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
SiCL
2 -10
7.5YR 5/6
98
2.5YR 4/8 2 C M
SiCL
10 -18
7 5YR 516
90
5YR 5/8 10 C M
SiCL
'Type C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL =Pore Lininq, M =Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (A1)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1713) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
` ,
x
Depth (inches)
Hydric
Sod Present? Yes No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site Stokesdale Transmission Pipeline City /County Stokesdale, Guilford County Sampling Date 02/24/2015
Applicant/Owner Piedmont Natural Gas State NC Sampling Point WA DPW
Investigator(s) Tina Sekula and Daniel Roberts Section, Township, Range
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) Valley Local relief (concave, convex, none) None Slope ( %) 6
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat 36 235615 Long - 79.949454 Datum NAD 83
Sod Map Unit Name Clifford sandy loam, 6 to 10% slopes (CkC) NWI classification PFO p
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of years Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed'? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic'? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydrnc Sod Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (66)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (610)
X Saturation (A3)
X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (61)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water - Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches)
u
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches) 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes , ` No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
WA DPW
Sampling Point
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30' )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Acer rubrum
30
Yes FAC
7
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
2 Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Yes FAC
3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
10
No FACW
Total Number of Do
Species Across All Strata (B)
4
0
5-
Percent of Dominant Species o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 100% (A/B)
6
0
Prevalence Index worksheet
7
8
Total % Cover of Multiply by
OBL species x 1 = 0
60 = Total Cover
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30'
)
FACW species x 2 = 0
1 Sambucus nigra ssp canadensrs
20
Yes FAC
FAC species x 3 = 0
2 Cornus amomum
80
Yes FACW
FACU species x 4 = 0
3
0
UPL species x 5= 0
4
0
Column Totals (A) 0 (B)
5
Prevalence Index = B/A = 0.00
6
�
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators.
7
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
g
3 - Prevalence Index is < -3 0'
10
O
—
100
— 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
30'
=Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
1 Scrrpus atrovirens
20
Yes OBL
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2
0
'Indicators of hydric sod and wetland hydrology must
3
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5
0
6
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7
height
8
0
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9
than 3 in DBH and greater than or equal to 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
10
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
11
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
12
0
20
= Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30' )
height
1 Smilax rotundifolia
80
IYes FAC
2 Lonrcera japonica
40
Yes FAC
3
4
0
Hydrophytic
5
Vegetation
6
0
Present? Yes No
120
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL
Sampling Point WA DPW
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
_ Histosol (A1)
Redox Features
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type
Loc
Texture Remarks
0 -3
10YR 4/2
98
5YR 5/6 2 C
PL
SiCL
3 -6
IOYR 5/3
98
5YR 5/6 2 C
M
SiCL
6 -18
1OYR 5/2
80
5YR 5/6 20 C
M
SiCL
'Type C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL =Pore Lining, M =Matrx
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Fioodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
FHydri.oil
u
Depth (inches)
Present? Yes � ` No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site Stokesdale Transmission Pipeline City /County Stokesdale, Guilford County Sampling Date 02/24/2015
Applicant/Owner Piedmont Natural Gas State NC Sampling Point WB DPU
Investigator(s) Tina Sekula and Daniel Roberts Section, Township, Range
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none) Convex Slope ( %) 8
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat 36.234513 , Long - 79.940365 Datum NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name Poplar Forest sandy loam, 6 to 10% slopes (PoC) NWI classification Upland p
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks
Recently logged area
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (614)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
— Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches)
` /
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No x
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point WB DPU
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2 0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30' )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
E==
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 1 (A)
2
0
Total Number of Dominant
3
Species Across All Strata I (B)
4
Percent of Dominant Species o
100%
5-
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B)
6]
Prevalence Index worksheet.
7
Total % Cover of Multiply by
8
0
=Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = 0
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30'
)
FACW species x 2 = 0
1
FAC species x 3 = 0
2
0
FACU species x 4= 0
3
0
UPL species x 5= 0
4
0
Column Totals (A) 0 (B)
5
5
0
Prevalence Index = B/A = 0.00
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8
_
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
g
3 - Prevalence Index is 5 3 0'
10
0
_
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
30'
= Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
1 Lrqurdambar styracr/lua
20
No FAC
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2 MrcrosteQrum vrmrneum 90 Yes FAC
3 SolydaQo ruQosa
10
No FAC
'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4 &dens brpmnata
20
No FACU
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5
E==
6
F
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7
0
height
8
0
Sapling /Shrub –Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9
�
than 3 in DBH and greater than or equal to 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
10
Herb – All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
11
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
12
0
140
= Total Cover
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30' )
height
1
�_
2
3
Hydrophytic
5
Vegetation
6
C�
Present? Yes No
0
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point WB DPU
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(inches)
Color (moist)
% Color (moist) % Ty e Loc
Texture Remarks
0 -1
l OYR 4/3
100
SCL
1 -10
7.5YR 4/6
98 7 5YR 4/3 2 D M
SCL
10 -18
5YR 5/6
100
SCL
RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches)
Remarks
2Location PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Redox Dark Surface (176)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No! `
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site Stokesdale Transmission Pipeline City /County Stokesdale, Guilford County Sampling Date 02/24/2015
Applicant/Owner Piedmont Natural Gas State NC Sampling Point WB DPW
Investigator(s) Tina Sekula and Daniel Roberts Section, Township, Range
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) Valley Local relief (concave, convex, none) Concave Slope ( %) 6
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat 36.234507 Long - 79.940375 Datum NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name Poplar Forest sandy loam, 6 to 10% slopes (PoQ NWI classification PFO p
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks
Recently logged PFO
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_ Shallow Agwtard (D3)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches) 2
X
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches) 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes , ` No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point WB DPW
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30' )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 2 (A)
�0�-•--��
�'
Total Number of Dominant 2
3
Species Across All Strata (B)
5-
Percent of Dominant Species u
100%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B)
6
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of Multiply by
OBL species x 1 = 0
=
0 Total Cover
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30'
)
FACW species x 2 = 0
1
Acer rubrum
40
Yes FAC
FAC species x 3 = 0
2
FACU species x 4 = 0
3
0
UPL species x 5= 0
4
0
Column Totals (A) 0 (B)
5
5
�
Prevalence Index = B/A = 0.00
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8
_
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9
3 - Prevalence Index is s3 0'
10
—
40
— 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
30'
=Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb
Stratum (Plot size )
1
Liquidambar styractflua
10
No FAC
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2 Microstegium vimmeum 90 Yes FAC
3
AndropoRon virgtnicus
10
No FACU
'Indicators of hydric sod and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4
Btdens frondosa
20
No FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5
Juncus effusus
10
No FACW
6
Acer rubrum
10
No FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
7
Smilax rotundrfolia
10
No FAC
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
8
C=
Sapling /Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
g
�
than 3 in DBH and greater than or equal to 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
10
0
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
11
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
12
160
- Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30' )
height
1
2
3
Hydrophytic
5
Vegetation
6
0
Present? Yes No
0
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL
Sampling Point WB DPW
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
_ Histosol (A1)
Redox Features
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type
Loc
Texture Remarks
0 -4
7.5YR 5/2
95
7.5YR 5/6 5 C
M
SCL
4 -12
5YR 4/4
95
5YR 5/6 5 C
M
SCL
12 -18
I OYR 4/2
98
7 5YR 5/4 2 C
M
SCL
'Type C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sods3:
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed).
Type
u
Depth (inches)
Hydric
Sod Present? Yes � ` No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site Stokesdale Transmission Pipeline City /County Stokesdale, Guilford County Sampling Date 02/24/2015
Applicant/Owner Piedmont Natural Gas State NC Sampling Point WC DPU
Investigator(s) Tina Sekula and Daniel Roberts Section, Township, Range
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none) None Slope ( %) 12
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat 36.234698 Long - 79.938819 Datum NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name Poplar Forest sandy loam, 10 to 15% slopes (PoD) NWI classification Upland p
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sod Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (135)
Field observations-
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present9 Yes No
X Depth (inches)
u
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No � `
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
WC DPU
Sampling Point
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2 0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Ltrrodendron tultptfera
20
Yes
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 6 (A)
2 Acer rubrum
20
Yes
FAC
3 Ltqutdambar styrace/lua
20
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant 9
Species Across All Strata (B)
4 Ptnus vtrgtntana
20
Yes
NI
��—
Percent of Dominant Species o
67 /o
5
--
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B)
6
Prevalence Index worksheet.
7
8
Total % Cover of Multiply by
80
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = 0
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30'
)
FACW species x 2 = 0
1 Fagus Qrandtfoha
10
No
FACU
FAC species x 3 = 0
2 Acer rubrum
20
Yes
FAC
FACU species x 4 = 0
3 Quercus falcata
10
No
FACU
UPL species x 5 = 0
4 Ltrrodendron tultptfera
15
Yes
FACU
Column Totals (A) 0 (B)
5
0
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
g
3 - Prevalence Index is <3 0'
10
55
_
— 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
30'
= Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1 Btdens frondosa
20
Yes
FACW
—
2 Jumperus vtrgtntana
15
Yes
FACU
3 Ltqutdambar sryractflua
15
Yes
FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4 Acer rubrum
10
No
FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
No
5 Ltgustrum stnense
10
FACU
6
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7
0
height
8
0
Sapling /Shrub –Woody plants, excluding vines, less
g
�
than 3 in DBH and greater than or equal to 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
10
Herb – All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
11
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
12
0
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
70 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30' )
height
1 Lontcera /apontca
10
Yes
FAC
2
3
4
0-
Hydrophytic
5
Vegetation
6
0
Present? Yes No
10
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2 0

SOIL
Sampling Point WC DPU
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
(inches)
Color (moist)
% Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc
Texture Remarks
0 -2
10YR 3/3
100
SiCL
2 -10
10YR 3/6
100
SiCL
10 -18
I OYR 5/3
98 5YR 4/6 2 C M
SCL
_'Type C= Concentration, D= Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al1
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches)
Remarks
RM=
;duced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains `Location PL =Pore Lining, M =Matrix
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic
Hydric Sod Present) Yes No! `
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic
Hydric Sod Present) Yes No! `
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site Stokesdale Transmission Pipeline City /County Stokesdale, Guilford County Sampling Date 02/24/2015
Applicant/Owner Piedmont Natural Gas State NC Sampling Point WC DPW
Investigator(s) Tina Sekula and Daniel Roberts Section, Township, Range
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none) None Slope ( %) 10
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat 36.234696 Long - 79.938776 Datum NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name Poplar Forest sandy loam, 10 to 15 % slopes (PoD) NWI classification PFO p
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sod Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks
Hydrology and vegetation criteria display strong indicators of wetland conditions Soils may be derived from red parent material
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
X Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (69)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (813)
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present> Yes No
X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches) 8
u
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches) 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes , ` No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point WC DPW
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2 0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30' )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Acer rubrum
95
Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 3 (A)
2
0
0
Total Number of Dominant
3
3
Species Across All Strata (B)
4
5-
E=
Percent of Dominant Species o
100%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B)
6
0
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8
Total % Cover of Multiply by
95
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = 0
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30'
)
FACW species x 2 = 0
1
0
FAC species x 3= 0
2
0
FACU species x 4= 0
3
0
UPL species x 5= 0
4
0
Column Totals (A) 0 (B)
5
5
�
Prevalence Index = B/A = 0.00
7
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8
-�
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9
10
— 3 - Prevalence Index is 153 0'
0
— 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
30'
=Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
1 Platanus occrdentahs
30
No FACW
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2 Liquidambar styracrflua
40
Yes FAC
3 Lrgustrum smense
5
No FACU
'Indicators of hydric sod and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4 Scirpus atrovirens
10
No OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5 Nltcrostegium vummeum
80
Yes FAC
6 Symphyotrichum racemosum
10
No FACW
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
7 Bidens frondosa
10
No FACW
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
8
Sapling /Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9
than 3 in DBH and greater than or equal to 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
10
0
Herb – All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
11
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
12
185
= Total Cover
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30' )
height
1
2
3
4
0
Hydrophytic
5
Vegetation
6
0
Present? Yes No
0
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2 0

SOIL
Sampling Point WC DPW
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0 -3 1 OYR 3/3 100 StCL
3 -18 7.5YR 4/3 85 5YR 4/6 15 C M LC
'Type C= Concentration, D= Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1:
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Tvoe
Depth (inches)
RM= Reduced
MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
X Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic
Hydric Sod Present? Yes , ` No
Remarks
Meets red parent material description as described in F21 indicator. However the project is in MLRA 136. The project study area
appears to be within the approximate location of soils derived from red parent material based on Figure 34 in Regional Supplement
to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual:Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site Stokesdale Transmission Pipeline City /County Stokesdale, Guilford County Sampling Date 02/24/2015
Applicant/Owner Piedmont Natural Gas State NC Sampling Point WF DPU
Investigator(s) Tina Sekula and Daniel Roberts Section, Township, Range
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none) None Slope ( %) 20
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat 36.233581 Long - 79.934362 Datum NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name Poplar Forest sandy loam 15 to 35% slopes (PoE) NWI classification Upland p
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sod Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water - Stained Leaves (69)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (813)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations-
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches)
X
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No , `
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point WF DPU
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30' )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Quercus falcata
40
Yes FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 1 (A)
2 Acer rubrum
40
Yes FAC
�-
Total Number of Dominant
7
3
Species Across All Strata (B)
4
0
Percent of Dominant Species
14% �O
5-
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B)
6
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
Total % Cover of Multiply by
8
80
F
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = 0
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30'
)
FACW species x 2 = 0
1 Fagus grand�foha
20
Yes FACU
FAC species x 3 = 0
2 Ilex opaca
20
Yes FACU
FACU species x 4 = 0
3 Prnus vrrgrnrana
20
Yes NI
UPL species x 5 = 0
4 Junrperus vrrgrnrana
10
No FACU
Column Totals (A) 0 (B)
5
Prevalence Index = B/A = 0.00
6
�
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
g
—
3 - Prevalence Index is < -3 0'
10
70
_
— 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
30'
= Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1 Brdens frondosa
10
No FACW
2 Polystrchum acrostrchordes
20
Yes FACU
3 Junrperus vrrgrnrana
15
Yes FACU
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4 Fagus grandrfolra
15
Yes FACU
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
No
5 Mrcrostegrum vrmrneum
10
FAC
6
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7
0
height
8
O
Sapling /Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
g
0
than 3 in DBH and greater than or equal to 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
10
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
11
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
12
0
70
= Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30' )
height
1
2
3
4
�-
Hydrophytic
5
Vegetation u
6
Present? Yes No
0
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL
Sampling Point WF DPU
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
(inches)
Color (moist)
% Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc
Texture Remarks
0 -8
10YR 3/3
100
SCL
8 -16
l OYR 5/3
100
SCL
16 -18
1OYR 7/3
100
SCL
'Type C= Concentration, D= Depletion, I
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches)
Remarks
educed Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL =Pore Lining, M =Matrx
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Red Parent Material (1721) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2 0
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
Dark Surface (S7)
— 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Red Parent Material (1721) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site Stokesdale Transmission Pipeline City /County Stokesdale, Guilford County Sampling Date 02/24/2015
Applicant/Owner Piedmont Natural Gas State NC Sampling Point WF DPW
Investigator(s) Tina Sekula and Daniel Roberts Section, Township, Range
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) Valley Local relief (concave, convex, none) None Slope ( %) 15
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat 36.233611 Long - 79.934437 Datum NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name Poplar Forest sandy loam, 15 to 35% slopes (PoE) NWI classification PFO p
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed'? Are "Normal Circumstances" present9 Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic'? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
True Aquatic Plants (614)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
X Saturation (A3) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (131) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field observations-
Surface Water Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches) 13
\x/
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches) 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ' ` No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
The water table was observed at a depth of 13 inches
This does not meet the A2 High Water Table
indicator, which requires the water table to be
observed within 12 inches of the surface
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point WF DPW
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2 0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30' )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
80
Yes FAC
4
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
2 Acer rubrum
40
Yes FAC
3 Ltriodendron tulipifera
10
No FACU
Total Number of Dominant 4
Species Across All Strata (B)
4
0
5
Percent of Dominant Species u
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 100% (A/B)
6
0
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8
Total % Cover of Multiply by
130
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = 0
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30'
)
FACW species x 2 = 0
1 Pinus virgintana
20
Yes NI
FAC species x 3 = 0
2
0
FACU species x 4= 0
3
UPL species x 5 = 0
4
Column Totals (A) 0 (B)
5
5
�
Prevalence Index = B/A = 0.00
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
7
8
_�
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9
3 - Prevalence Index is s3 0'
10
—
20
— 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30' )
=Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1 Microstegium vimineum
90
Yes FAC
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2 Bidens frondosa
30
Yes FACW
3 AndropoQon vtrgtntcus
10
No FACU
Indicators of hydric sod and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4 Ligustrum sinense
10
No FACU
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
5 Smilax rotundifolia 10 No FAC
6
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7
0
height
8
0
Sapling /Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9
than 3 in DBH and greater than or equal to 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
10
0
11
Herb – All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
12
0
150
= Total Cover
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30' )
height
1
2
_-
3
5
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
6
Present? Yes No
0
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point WF DPW
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Redox Features
(MLRA 147, 148)
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Ty e Loc
Texture Remarks
0 -3
1 OYR 3/3
100
SCL
3 -13
l OYR 511
85
7.5YR 5/4 15 C M
SCL
13 -18
IOYR 6/1
90
IOYR 5/8 10 C M
SCL
'Type C= Concentration, D= Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type
Depth (inches)
RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains
2Location PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric So
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2 0

USACE AID# D4VQ # Site m (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET ,
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
I . Applicant's n---- Piedmont Natural Gas 2 E I T. Sekula
3. Date of evaluation: 2-24 -2015
5. Name of stream. SA (UT to Haw River)
7. Approximate drainage area: 18 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 126 If
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees
Latitude (e, 34 872312): 36.234664
. va uator s name.
4. Time of evaluation: 12:20pm
6. River basin: Cape Fear
8. Stream order: 1St
10. County- Guildford
12. Subdivision name (if any): _
Longitude (ex —77 556611): - 79.938684
Method location determined (circle). GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Renal) Photo /GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
South of Agatha Drive cul -de -sac.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): None
15. Recent weather conditions: Heavy snow. Temperatures below freezing.
16. Site conditions at time of visit-'Active snow fall.
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (@) If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map'.' YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 30 % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
40 % Forested 30 % Cleared / Logged _% Other (
22. Bankfull width.. aft 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1 f
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2 %) VGentle (2 to 4 %) _Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation. stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest). the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 71 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature _I laeo w 11'a, Date 31�a/�o�s
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03 To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
° _-
-',
ECORE'GION °POINT
RANGE,
SCORE,
Coastal
°��
Piedmont ° "°
_ °
°Mountain,• °
CHARACTERISTICS • , ° °
a.4
A _
°
Presence of flow/ persistent pools in stream -
`oint§
0 _ 5
: 0 P 4°
0 °= 5'
4
(no fl'ow°or saturation = 0; strong flow = max
2
Evidence 4f<past human alteration
0 - 6
0'— 5
0-5 ° •° ° °
cj
-(extensive alteration = 0; no- alteration = max points)
,3
Riparian zone, •
0 -6
-4
°` °
0
0 —5
`
4
no buffer = 0; cont i` us, wide buffer = max points) ,
4
Evidence °of nutrient or chemical discharges
0 0` -5
0 ° -4,
0 -4
4
extensive discharges = 0 ;.,no dischar° es =max oints
°
5
Groundwater discharge • ` ° ' :
°0 = °3`
0' "4
0 ° = 4 •.
4
(no discha a ='0; °s rin s; see s, wetlands, etc.` =_niaz,points) °
e
6
a Presence of adjacent floodplafn, . . ; ; ° •
°flood
e.0 — 4°
r0'— 4°
0 2'
4
do lain, e0 ;_ extensive flood lain = max points) °
° °
°=
a
.� e
• e , e Entrenchment' % floodplain access
_ 5
0" ` 4
0 —'2
4
dee I entrenched =•0; °fre uent floodin ° max oints
e Presence of adjicent.wetlands
—6
:0 -4
0 =2.
4
no wetlands = 0;-Iar` e.adjacent wetlands =.max points)
Clianitel §inuosity °
3
(extensive channeliza_1ion =.'0; °natural.meandef = ma)cpoints)'
=q'
° o . ', ; °° <Sedimen °t °input o
°de
4
(extensive ositibn= 6jittle*or no sedimen°t`= max<0. oihts).
°
11
Size & °diversi 6f ehannetbed substrate e �:
°homo
NA *e
;0 -4 `
°0 = °5
2
fine, enous = 0; lar e, diverse sizes:= max oints):
,
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
a °
-oints)
0 — 5°
0'— 4.
0, = °5
4
(dee 1° °iricised' =-0; stable .'bed & banks =.max'
,
_
°13':
° . Presenceo•f inajor'bank failures•: ° ° e`
0 -5
°
= °5•
5
(severe,erbsion ;0; noerosion; stable banks = max oints) °
PG
e�;
,14
c ° ° ° R6ot depth °indAen "sity on banks
0 -3
0 —•4e `
Oo °5<
4
_
(no visible foots - 6; dense roots throu hout = max points)
° °tu`re
15
Impact by agi icul '° °livestock or timber° production '
0 -5 °
'0°-4° °
0, e5>
2
°
°
(substantial'im° act ° =0; no <evid'ence °max oints)
•<16:
°Presence of riffle -pool /ripple -pool complexes,
° °
.
°0 -3
°`0, -5, e
0 —A °
2
(no riffles /ri les o_ r, ools °= 0; well-develo ed = ma_x o' hits )<
• 17 °
Habitat complexity • o
0 -6,
0=6°
0 -6
3
�.
little or no habitat = 0; fre uen"t, varied habitats = max 'oints) .
,
s Canopy coverage over streambed ° ° : e e •
= 0; =
°
(no shadiri ve etati6n continuous cano' max,poit ts).
°
°
19
Sulistrate embeddedness° ° .
c
'NA* °
0 — 4-
0 — 4,
2
w
dee l embedded; 0; loose structure = max),
° °
20 •
presence•of stream inveriebraies (see page•4)a
°no
0 -,4 ° `
OP °5
0 = 5°
Q
°evidence° = 0;.common,.numerous e`s = max oinis •
e
21
< Presence of amphibians ° °
°0
0
0 -4
O
O
•
(no evidence ° = 0; comnion,,numerous es =max _oints),
-4
_
-4
Presence of fish
0
(no evidence = 0; common,,numerous es = max points) ,
'
23 .
g °e ° ° . Evidence of wildlife' use
-
°0 -6
0<-5
° °0 -5 °,
3
no evidence = 0; aliundantevidence = max oints) °
,°
_
e
Total`Points,<Po §sililee' _
1`00' °
100° '
q d'Y F
S
TOTAL SCORE (also enier:om first° page) • ° ° ° ° °
c
7
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
ru- STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET 3
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Piedmont Natural Gas 2. Evaluator's name: T. Sekula
3. Date of evaluation: 2-24 -2015 4. Time of evaluation. 1-00pm
5. Name of stream: SB (UT to Haw River)
7. Approximate drainage area: 0.5 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 11 If
6. River basin: Cape Fear
8. Stream order: 1 st
10. County- Guildford
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (e\.34872312): 36.234541 Longitude (ex -77 556611)• - 79.938673
Method location determined (circle). GP. Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
South of Agatha Drive cul -de -sac.
14. Proposed channel work (if any). None
15. Recent weather conditions- Heavy snow. Temperatures below freezing.
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Active snow fall.
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES \ 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 30 ova Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
40 % Forested 30 % Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width. 2ft 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2ft
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2 %) Gentle (2 to 4 %) _Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep (> 10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight J�Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location. terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions. enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation to the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100. with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 49 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature 14 "_Luz. Date 3/ 42J.)0 s
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03 To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
ECOREGION POINT
ANGE
#
°CHARACTERISTICS
°R
SCORE
..
.Coastal Piedmont
IVlountain
1
Presence of'flow / persistent°pools in stream
°saturation
0 — 5° °
0 - 4,
0,— 5 °
-(no flow or ° = 0; strop flow =max points)
a °°
?
Evidence of past human alteration
0` =°6°
0-5 °
Q-5
3
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max° oints)'
3
Riparian zo ne° ° °
,(no buffer = 0; contiguous,- ° wide °
buffer = max• oints
° 0 — 6
0.74
Q-5,
4
4.
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0 —•5°
9=4
0 -4`.
4
extensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es -= max points)°
e . Groundwater discharge
3
Q
_'
s; seeps, wetlands, etc. max points)
•yo•
°li
Pressence °of adjacent floodplain ° ,°
°floodplain
°0 -4•
0' -4, °
0 -2
>,
no ° =.0; extensivefloodp•lam° =,max, oints)
_
Entrenchment / floodplain °acces?° e , ° e ...
°
`uent
2
q.
dee° I' entrenched= 0;, fre flooding = °'max' . oint's
°
8
° `o `Presence of adjacent•wetlanas
°max
a p. -•6°`•
°0°_.4
O -_ °21 ,
2
(no wetlands ° = 0;•Iar e.ad Scent wetlands° = points)
9
Channel sinuosity
rextensive channeliza_tion = 0, natural meander = max points),
�'— 5 °.
0 — 4°
_
0° 3
2
10
•Sedimenvinput'
° (extensive de oS41,0 = °0; °little or no sediment`= max oints)_°
0 _ 5
°0'- _4•
0 - 4
a
3
Size•& °diversity of channel•bed substrate `: :.
aNA *'
0-4
0 - °5,
(fine, homogenous = °0; lar ge, diverse °size`s °= max,• oin_ts °
Evidence of channel incision or widening • e° °
°
= (dee 1, '6mcised;= 0; stable bed & banks = max
13
° P,Fesence of major bank failures
°0= °5
•0 -5
0-5
4
= _
(severe °erosion° ;0; no °erosion, stable banks , max.pornts) • °
m
Root depth and'density on°banks
no visible roots ='6; dense roots-throu hout =,max° oints
15
limpaci by agriculture, 'livestock, or timber: production
� °
0 =�5
a
°�0- 4 °e°
0� -5 °
4
(substantiSlbim• act ° =0; no.evidence = maz oints)
°`
'Presence of° riffle - pool /ripple- pool;conii xes,`
°
°well-
2
:(no riffles /ri les of ools•= 0, develo ed = max.pornts) ,
°
c
�•
J7 °
a ° Habitat corriple'ziiy° ,` ° . e a °
0 ° 6, •
—
_
0 6
0, 6,
3
(little or'no habitat = 0, frequent, vaned habrtats _ max omts
Q,
18
°•Canopy coverage ovee streambed
`continuous
°0 = °5,
0-5
0 —°5, ° • °e°
5
no shading vegetation'= 0; canopy max,pomts ).
_
19
Substrate embeddedness °
NA *.
0 ° —° 4,
o — 4°
3
dee I embedded ° = 0, loose structure = max)° °
p
20.
,`P.resenceaof sfream,inverie6r,ates (see page 4)
0 —.4,
0.- 5' •
°
0 — 5 �: °
O
no evidence = 0, °common,,numerous t es°= max oints
21
Presence of amphibians °
°0 -4
0 — °4
0 -4
0
O°
(no,evidence = 0, °common,. numerous types = max oints)
Oa
22
Presence'of fish` ° ° °
0 — °4'
Q; -4.i° •
0 =4
O
•m°
°
(no evidence = 0, °common; numerous types = max oints
23
;'Evidence of wildlife use °
0 =`6° `
6-5
e
0 — 5
Q
.23
= 0, abundant evidence =max oin fs) °
9 Total Points Possible,
100
100
100
a `y` 'TOTAL SCORE (also,enter-on first page) t ° ° °
�- .
49
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams

I USACE AID# DWQ # Site #
I (indicate on attached map)
e ; STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Piedmont Natural Gas 2. Evaluator's name: T. Sekula
3. Date of evaluation: 2-24 -2015
5. Name of stream. SC (UT to Haw River)
7. Approximate drainage area: 110 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated- 103 If
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees
Latitude (ex 34 872312): 36.233625
4. Time of evaluation: 12:00pn1
6. River basin: Cape Fear
8. Stream order: 1 st
10. County: Guildford
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude (ca —77 555611): - 79.934746
Method location determined (circley GP Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
Forested area west of 8150 Flatrock Road.
14. Proposed channel work (if any)- None
15. Recent weather conditions: Heavy snow. Temperatures below freezing.
16. Site conditions at time of visit- Active snow fall.
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YE NO If yes. estimate the water surface area: 0.67acres
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YE NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 10 ova Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial 30 % Agricultural
60 % Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other
22. Bankfull width: 3.5
24. Channel slope down center of stream. _Flat (0 to 2 %)
25. Channel sinuosity. Straight ✓Occasional bends
23.. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2ft
✓Gentle (2 to 4 %) _Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep ( >10 %)
_Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification. etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified In the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the strea,a reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100. with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 76 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature t � (, 'L la, Date c3 /L Ip�t�i.S
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03 To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

C �
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
ECOREGION', POINT °
°RANGE
°
# °
° CHARACTERISTICS° S
SCORE °
coastal-- '
' '-Piedmont M
Mountain
° c
1 P
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream- -
-0-5 °
°0 - 4= 0
0-5
4
n64N or °
2 °
Evidence of, past human,alt cation 5
0 - 6 -° 0
0 - 5 °
0 - 5
5
° .
.(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max °
° °
; 0
03, :
:'Riparian zone' ° ° ` ° • ° ° 0
0 =`6` 0
0 - 4 0
0 `5' 4
4
° (
(no buffer = 0, contiguous, wide buffer = max points) °
°4 0
Evidence°of nutrient or chemical discharges' 4
0 .5° ° '
'0741,.
0 ° -° 4°
4
° ("extensive discharges = 0, no dischar es = max oints) ,
°° ° 'Groundwater discharge °
°
°Presence'of adjacent floodplain °
(rio�flood lain,= O;:extensive flood `
rae °
°7 -
Entrenchment / floodplain° access; ° ` • 3
°0, -5w 0
0 -4 O
Op - °2' .
3
- - °
e8° o
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0 - °6° a °
°0 °- 4° 0
4
4
(no wetlands =,0; large adjacent wetlands = max oints)-
g e
e ° Channel sinuosity ° 0
0 - 5 ;
;0'= 4- °° 0
0 = 3 . 3
3
( extehsive channelozaiione 0; natural meander = max° omts)
Sediment °input' 4
4
(extensive de °
11° °
° Size &.diversity of channel °bed substrate _
IVA* 0
_ 2
0­-5
°
2
•_(fi'ne, homo e' ous = .O;,lar e,,_diverse °sizes.= max omts).°
° >
12 0
Evidence of channel incision or widening `
`0 -5 4
0 ° =4 0
0 - =-
4
>° -
- (deep) -incised = 0; Aable-bed -& banks = max points) -
F" P
Presence of major bank failures .
a0. 5,•° 0
0 -5e a
5
5
°1 °
- °
a° °
°4 o
o ° °Root depth and density on bank`s ° '
'0-3- °
° ° °`0 - 4:* _ 0
0 `- 5 °
t�
(noyisible roots = 0; dense roots tlirou hout =,max° oinks)
° t
N °
° ° I
Impact by agricWtuie,= livestock•, or timber- production 2
2
_ �
�(substantial4in act -O', no °ev,idence =.max points):
s° 1
16 ;
; °°Presence °of riffle - pool /ripple= poorcomplexes ; ° ° O
Oa f3, 0
0 °- 5e
`a. H
(no .,riffles /n '
° .
• 1 (
Habitat complexity; •° ° ° ' °
0'= 6; ° 0
0 - 6, 0
3
M-' •
(little or' no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max •
m' C
18 n
Canopy, coverage ovee streambed
0 =.5; 0
0.- 5 °
0--5, 5
5
no shading ve etation °, =. 0, continuous,cano = max oinks 0
° 0
19 °
Substrate embeddedness 2
Nq *�.� e
e0,_°4 0
0._,q" °
2
p` (
(dee I embedded =° 0', loose °
°°
• ' P
20 0
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4);
0 5
0,= 5 0
5,
no evidence = 0; common, numerous °t° o
°=
21 0
e Presence of amphibians` e O
0 -4 O
Or -4• 0
0 -4
O
O .
. ' (
(no evidence = 0; °common, °numerous ty es = max oinks .
J
22
�
' 0
0 -4R 4: 0
0 P
m 2
3
Evidence of wildlife use
0`6° 4
0 - 5 -
-0-5
4
= 0, abundant evidence = max p
r Total, Points Possible 1
100. 1
100 °
° 100
a - _t0TAL °SCO,RE °(al'so enter,on�'first page)° ` a` ° 7
76
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date 2/24/2015
0
Project/Site Stokesdale Six Inch Transmission Pipeline
2
Latitude
36 234664
Evaluator T Sekula and D Roberts
0
County Guilford
2
Longitude
-78938673
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent A0 19 or pemnnial6? 30'
1 5
Stream Determination Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
05
Other
Stream Name SA
1245
U.
lintermittent
1
1 5
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 Continuity of channel bed and bank'
Yes= 3
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
1
0
1
2
3,
3 In- channel structure ex riffle -pool, step-pool, ripple-pool
sequence
0
1
2
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5 Active /relict Flood lain
0
1
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
1 1
2
3
9 Grade control
0
1 05
1
1 5
10 Natural valley
0
1 05
1
15,
11 Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
'artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
A Geomorphology Subtotal 12 5
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1 1
2
3 ,
13 Iron oxidizin bactena
0
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
1 5
1
05
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
U.
05
1
1 5
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 05
1
1 5
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No= 0
Yes= 3
B Hydrology Subtotal
16
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22 Fish
0
05
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
0
05
1
1 5
24 Amphibians
0
05
1
1 5
25 Algae
0
0 5
1
1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5 Other = 0
0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods
C Biology Subtotal
1� 1

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date 2/24/2015
0
Project/Site Stokesdale Six Inch Transmission Pipeline
2
Latitude
36 234541
Evaluator T Sekula and D Roberts
0
County Guilford
2
Longitude
-78938673
Total Points
Stream is at least intermittent if;! 19 or perennial dl 30'
1 5
Stream Determination Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
05
Other
Stream Name SB
25
0
lintermittent
1
15
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0 '
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Stronci
1 Continuity of channel bed and bank'
Yes= 3 ;
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
1
0
1
2
3'
3 In- channel structure ex riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool
se uence
0
1
2
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
,1
2
3
5 Active /relict flood lain
0
1
•,2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9 Grade control
0
1 05
1
13
10 Natural valley
0
1 05
1
15
11 Second or greater order channel
„ No := 0^
Yes = 3
'artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
A Geomorphology Subtotal j14
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
L 3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3 ,
14 Leaf litter
1 5
1
05
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
05
1
15
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0 '
05
1
15
17 Soil -based evidence of high water tables
No = 0
Yes= 3 ;
B Hydrology Subtotal
r`r I
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22 Fish
0
05
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
0
05
1
1 5
24 Amphibians
0
05
1
1 5
25 Algae
0
0 5
1
1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods
C Biology Subtotal
Notes Poor substrate for macros Found no macros in sampled leaf packs
Sketch
l

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4 11
Date 2/24/2015
0
Project/Site Stokesdale Six Inch Transmission Pipeline
2
Latitude
36 233625
Evaluator T Sekula and D Roberts
0
County Guilford
2
Longitude
-78934746
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent it 2 19 or perennial d z 30'
1 5
Stream Determination Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
05
Other
Stream Name SC
30
0
IPerennial
1
1 5
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Stronci
1 Continuity of channel bed and bank'
• Yes = 3
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
1
0
1
2
3
3 In- channel structure ex riffle -pool, step-pool, n
le- ool sequence
0
1
2
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5 Active /relict Flood lain
0
1
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
11
2
1 3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
1 3
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9 Grade control
0
05
1
1 1 5
10 Natural valley
0
05
1
1 15
11 Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
*artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
A Geomorphology Subtotal 16 5
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1 1
2
3
13 Iron oxidizin bactena
0
1 1
2
3
14 Leaf lifter
1 5
1
05
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
05
1
1 5
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
05
1
1 5
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
• Yes = 3
B Hydrology Subtotal
,6 5
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos in ote diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22 Fish
0
05
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
0
05
1
1 5
24 Amphibians
0
05
1
15
25 Algae
0
05
1
1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5 Other = 0
I 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods
C Biology Subtotal
t! 1

,.
Waters of the U.S. (Including Wetlands) Delineation
Six Inch Pressure Improvement Project
Stokesdale, Guilford County, NC
Prepared For:
Piedmont Natural Gas
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
Charlotte, NC 28210
Prepared By:
EEE Consulting, Inc.
601 Cascade Pointe Lane, Suite 101
Cary, North Carolina 27513
April 2015

Table of Contents
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................... ............................... 1
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ............................................................................... ..............................1
3.0 METHODOLOGY .................................................................................. ............................... 2
3.1 IN- OFFICE REVIEW ................................................................................... ............................... 2
3.2 FIELD INVESTIGATION ............................................................................. ............................... 2
4.0 FINDINGS ................................................................................................ ............................... 2
4.1 IN- OFFICE REVIEW ................................................................................... ............................... 2
4.2 FIELD INVESTIGATION ............................................................................. ............................... 3
5.0 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AND LIMITATIONS ............... ............................... 5
6.0 REFERENCES ......................................................................................... ............................... 6
Figures and Exhibits
Figure 1
Project Location Map
Figure 2
USGS Topographic Quadrangle
Figure 3
Natural Color Aerial
Figure 4
NRCS Soils
Figure 5
National Wetland Inventory Map
Figure 6
Waters of the U.S. Delineation Map
Figure 7
Waters of the U.S. Delineation Map (Aerial)
Exhibit 1 Site Photographs
Exhibit 2 Data Forms

April 2015 Stokesdale Six Inch Pressure Improvement Proiect
1.0 Executive Summary
EEE Consulting, Inc. (EEE) has conducted a delineation of jurisdictional waters of the U.S.,
including wetlands within a 17.4 -acre project study area located in Stokesdale, Guildford
County, North Carolina. Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG) is proposing a six -inch pressure
improvement project that will extend approximately 8,000 feet. This report is intended to
document the findings of the delineation investigation conducted by EEE in order to obtain a
preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE).
Jurisdictional wetlands and other waters of the U.S. are present within the property boundaries
including approximately 0.49 acres of palustrine forested (PFO) wetlands, 103 linear feet of
perennial stream (R3), and 137 linear feet of intermittent streams (R4).
2.0 Site Description
The proposed six -inch pressure improvement project will extend approximately 8,000 feet
starting at a tie -in at Southard Road and run easterly, cross country, to an existing Transco Tap
Station location on Flatrock Road in Stokesdale, Guildford County, NC (Figures 1 through 3).
Current land use within the project study area includes rural residential areas, horse and cattle
pastures, timbered areas, and forests. Elevations on the site range from approximately 820 to 920
feet above mean sea level (msl). The latitude and longitude of the approximate center of the site
are N 36.234696 °, W - 79.938776 °.
The proposed alignment is located within the Cape Fear River basin (HUC 03030002) and runs
through the headwaters of the Haw River watershed. Streams within the project study area drain
to the Haw River and eventually in Jordan Lake. The project study area falls within the Jordan
Lake riparian buffer protection area and is therefore subject to the Jordan Lake Rules. The Jordan
Lake Rules are a nutrient management strategy designed to restore water quality in the lake by
reducing the amount of pollution entering upstream. All streams and tributaries that appear on
either the U.S. Geographic Survey (USGS) topographic quadrangle or printed Natural Resources
Conservation Service (MRCS) Soil Survey maps are subject to the rules. Within the proposed
alignment, two tributaries (SA and SC, which are unnamed tributaries to the Haw River) are
subject to the Jordan Lake Riparian Buffer rules.
There are no designated Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), High Quality Waters (HQW), or
water supply watersheds (WS -1 or WS -TI) within 1.0 mile downstream of the project study area.
The North Carolina 2014 Final 303(d) list of impaired waters identifies no waters within the
project study area as an impaired water. According to the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA), no areas within the project study area are designated within the 100 -year flood
zone.
EEE Consulting Inc Paee I

April 2015 Stokesdale Six Inch Pressure Improvement Project
3.0 Methodology
3.1 In- office Review
Prior to conducting the onsite field investigation, relevant site - specific information was
reviewed, including the Summerfield, NC USGS topographic quadrangle map (Figure 2), natural
color aerial imagery (Figure 3), NRCS soils map data (Figure 4), and the U.S Fish and Wildlife
(USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Map (Figure 5). Site - specific background
information was reviewed to assess whether evidence indicative of wetlands or other waters of
the U.S. occurs within the property.
3.2 Field Investigation
Waters of the U.S. (including wetlands) were delineated pursuant to the (USACE) Wetland
Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y -87 -1 (1987 Manual), the USACE April 2012 Regional
Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and
Piedmont Region Version 2.0, (USACE, 2012) and subsequent regulatory guidance. Field work
was conducted by EEE environmental scientists Tina Sekula, PWS and Daniel Roberts on
February 24, 2015.
All soil colors were determined from moist, undisturbed peds using Munsell Soil Charts. NRCS
digital soils data and mapping were obtained from the NRCS website and were compared for
consistency to the observed conditions encountered during the field investigations. These data
were augmented by review of soils data for the property. Site photographs are included in
Exhibit 1.
Samples of vegetation, soils and hydrology were taken at representative locations in the wetlands
and adjacent non - wetland areas to determine the wetland boundaries. Wetland Determination
Data Forms describing representative plant communities, hydrology indicators, and soil
characteristics are included in Exhibit 2. Streams and wetlands were classified according to
Cowardin et al. (1979).
4.0 Findings
4.1 In- office Review
The available NCDWR stream database shows no mapped streams; however, the USGS
topographic mapping shows one intermittent stream identified as an unnamed tributary to Haw
Creek crossed by the proposed alignment (Figure 2). Based on aerial photography, the site is
partially forested with mature and successional growth, and includes horse and cattle pastures, as
well as residential areas.
The NRCS soils were mapped for the project study area and included eight soil map units
(Figure 4). The soil survey geographic database (SSURGO) for Guilford County was reviewed
EEE Consulting. Inc Page 2

April 2015 Stokesdale Six Inch Pressure Improvement Project
for the presence of hydric soils or soils with hydric inclusions, which may indicate a likelihood
of wetlands (USDA, 2014). As indicated by the results in Table 1 below, the proposed project
alignment does not cross mapped hydric soils.
Table 1. USDA Soils within the Project Study Area
' Map
Classification
Drainage
Hydric
U
Unit
Soil Name
Class
Soil
Symbol
PFO; Riparian wetland
0.01 ac
N/A
CIB2
Clifford sandy loam, moderately eroded, 2 to 6
Well Drained
No
SA
percent slopes
126 If
Subiect
CIC2
Clifford sandy loam, moderately eroded, 6 to 10
Well Drained
No
percent slopes
CkB
Clifford sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Well Drained
No
CkC
Clifford sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
Well Drained
No
NaB
Nathalie sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Well Drained
No
PoC
Poplar Forest sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
Well Drained
No
PoD
Poplar Forest sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes
Well Drained
No
PoE
Poplar Forest sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes
Well Drained
No
Review of the NWI mapping shows no wetlands crossed by the proposed alignment. Wetlands
mapped within a one mile radius of the proposed alignment are freshwater ponds classified as
PUBHh ( Palustrine, Unconsolidated Bottom, Permanently Flooded, Diked /Impounded wetland),
which are typically ponds used for agriculture (USFWS, 2012) (Figure 5).
4.2 Field Investigation
Jurisdictional wetlands and other waters of the U.S. are present within the project study area
including approximately 0.49 acres of palustrine forested (PFO) wetlands, 103 linear feet of
perennial stream (R3), and 137 linear feet of intermittent streams (R4) (Figures 6 and 7). Table 2
below identifies each jurisdictional feature located within the project study area.
Table 2. Jurisdictional features identified within the Project Study Area
_ Map ID
Classification
Size
Riparian Basin Buffer
WA
PFO; Headwater wetland
0.18 ac
N/A
WC
PFO; Riparian wetland
0.01 ac
N/A
WE /WF
PFO; Riparian wetland
024 ac
N/A
SA
Intermittent Stream
126 If
Subiect
SB
intermittent Stream
11 if
Not Subject
SC
Perennial Stream
103 If
Subject
SD
intermittent Stream
35 If
Not subject
EEE Consultinz, Inc Page 3

April_ 2015 Stokesdale Six Inch Pressure Improvement Project
Wetland WA (flag series WA): This wetland complex is a PFO headwater seep. The wetland is
located in the western most bend of the project study area and flows in a southerly direction
under an access road into a stream outside of the project study area. The receiving stream outside
of the project study area is subject to the Jordan Lake Rules. The origin of this stream falls
within 50 feet of the proposed alignment, therefore a portion of the protected buffer is located
within the project study area.
Wetland WC (flag series WCZ This small PFO riparian wetland lies in the western floodplain of
stream SA flowing just east of the center of the project study area.
Wetland WE/WF (flag series WE and WF): This PFO riparian wetland lies entirely within a
valley in the eastern third of the project study area, at the southern base of the northward bend.
Stream SC runs along most of its western border, while a hillslope encompasses the rest of the
western and all of the eastern border as it flows southward through the project study area.
Stream SA (flag series SA): This intermittent stream flows south perpendicularly through the
project study area. This stream appears to begin just north of the project study area within
residential properties, and continues flowing south out of the project study area. Stream SA is
shown on the NRCS soils map but not on the USGS topographic quadrangle; and is therefore
subject to the Jordan Lake Rules.
Stream SB (flaiz series SB): This intermittent stream begins just inside the southern boundary of
the project study area, east of Stream SA. The stream exhibits a large head cut, and has little
surface water drainage patterns flowing into it. Stream SB does not appear on either the NRCS
soils map or USGS topographic quadrangle; and is therefore not subject to the Jordan Lake
Rules.
Stream SC (flag series SC): This perennial stream is the only stream that appears on the USGS
topographic maps within -the project study area. Located on the eastern third of the project study
area, in the northward bend, the stream flows south, perpendicularly, through the project study
area. The stream flows along the base of a hillslope and, in portions, is the western boundary to
wetland WE/WF. Stream SC is shown on both the NRCS soils map and USGS topographic
quadrangle; and is therefore subject to the Jordan Lake Rules.
Stream SD (flag series SD): This intermittent stream flows through Wetland WE /WF before its
confluence with Stream SC. Stream SD does not appear on either the NRCS soils map or USGS
topographic quadrangle; and is therefore not subject to the Jordan Lake Rules.
The location of the waters of the U.S. within the property are depicted on the Wetland
Delineation Maps included as Figures 6 and 7. Photographs of data point locations,
representative wetland and non - wetland communities, and other existing conditions within the
property are included in Exhibit 1. The Wetland Determination Data Forms are included in
Exhibit 2.
EEE Consulting, Inc Page 4

April 2015 Stokesdale Six Inch Pressure Improvement Project
5.0 Regulatory Requirements and Limitations
The limits of waters of the U.S. described in this report are based on examination of field
conditions at the time of this investigation and may differ from future observations by others.
The jurisdictional nature of waters of the U.S. described in this report are subject to concurrence
from the USACE. A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request was made to the USACE
and N.C. Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). A field review was conducted on April 14,
2015. Representatives from USACE, NCDWR, and Guildford County were present. The
jurisdictional wetland boundaries and stream classifications as shown in this report have been
verified and confirmed by both USACE and NCDWR. These boundaries and classifications will
remain valid for a period of 5 years.
Section 404 (b)(1) of the Clean Water Act authorizes the USACE to regulate the placement of
fill in jurisdictional areas. Any proposed impacts to waters of the U.S. may require authorization
from the appropriate federal, state, and /or local regulatory agencies.
EEE Consultrniz, Inc Pa ee55

April 2015 Stokesdale Six Inch Pressure Improvement Project
6.0 References
Cowardin, L., V. Carter, F. C. Golet and E. T. LaRoe 1979. Classification of Wetlands and
Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Document OBS/79 -31.
U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Environmental Laboratory 1987. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual.
Technical Report Y -87 -1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experimental Station.
Vicksburg, MS. 100 pages.
Federal Emergency Management Agency. June 2007. Flood Map Service Center. Flood
Insurance Rate Map Panel 7920; Map Number 3710792000J. Map Revised June 18, 2007.
Available URL:
https: / /msc.fema.gov /portal/ search? AddressQuery= southard %20road %20stokesdale %2C %20NC
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Resources.
Interactive and Printable Maps. http: / /portal.ncdenr.org/web /wq /dwr- home -page. (Accessed:
February 13, 2015).
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Resources. 2010.
Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins. Version
4.11. Available URL: http: / /portal.ncdenr.org /c /document — library/get — file ?uuid= Oddc6eaI -d736-
4b55- 8e50- 169a4476de96 &groupld =38364
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Resources. Water
Quality Assessment and Impaired Waters List 2014 Final 303(d) list.
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/mtu/assessment.
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of
Agriculture. February 13, 2015).
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. April 2012. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region, Version 2.0. U.S. Army
Engineer Research and Development Center Environmental Laboratory, 3909 Halls Ferry Road,
Vicksburg, MS.
U.S. Department of Agriculture — Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1977. Soil Survey of
Guildford County, North Carolina.
U.S. Geological Survey. 1994. Summerfield, North Carolina, Topographic Quadrangle (7.5-
minute series). Reston: I sheet.
EEE Consulting, Inc Page 6

STO
Belews Lake%
FORSYfTH
Oak Ridge
�urce: E RI, NC
4
a Map
ROCKrNGHAM
Troublesome Creek
Stokesdale
Haw River
150
GUILFORD
Study Area
220
Summerfield
Greensboro
1.25 2.5
� Mile-J,
Figure 1: Project Location Map
�e-1EEE Consulting, Inc Stokesdale 6" Transmission Pipeline
g� Piedmont Natural Gas
Environmental, Engineering and Educational Solutions
Guilford County, North Carolina
15 -502 March 2015

Q
C�
C
_CU
C
L
(d
_U
L
Q
c0
d7
O
Q.
O
C�
D
N
a)
L
LL
a)
C
Q
C �
O C7
Eu
E O
u� c0
� Z
F- C
0
co E
Q) -0
m m
-0 a
a)
Y
O
f�
C_
O
m
U
L
Iz
O
Z
C
0
U
`o
0
C
O
O
• !A
Uc
0
U
w �
W
C
fd
0)
� C
Q1
C
c
C
O W
U�
v
WE
C
W°
W'
C
W
r-W-1
L! !J
r
O
N
L
U
c�
G
N
O
Li
r

CL
m
cc
a�
Q
L
O
O
U
L
Z
cYi
CU
L
rn
r
w
CL
c ca
_o C7
V) Co
E
c
0 C
Zo C
N �
�a
Ln
a�
0
C
0
v
U
L
L
0
Z
c
0
U
v
0
0
C7
N
C
O
3
O
• fn
U�
C
0
U
VI LU
W
cm
C
c
C
d
C
C
C
O W
U�
W
W
We
W
�M
Ln
0
N
L
u
N
O

CU
N C
CL
m .g c
a y o
�v
N oU U
O
3
N w M Z
U =Z
X M -
Z o
io E o
CD 'D U
0 m o
o 0
c
0
j
0
. to
U�
C
w 3
�LU
W
r4
C
G
m
G
C
O W
U�
C
m
WE
C
WO
0
W
Si
r�W
05
LO
0
N
t
V
N
O

CL
co
2
T
L
0
4.
C
C
N
C
C
0
co
Z
m
L
0
rn
LL
a
CL
•M,
C M
o U'
m
O
N m
OZ
ffl r.+
C
COC
C
�a
m
Ae
O
m
co
C
O
fo
U
O
Z
C
3
O
U
0
U
tA
C
O
O
• iA
U�
r
0
U
� 3
W
r
C
C
� C
5 N
A _r
C
C
C
0 W
U�
d
W�
W°
W'
W
r-w-1
�MJ
O
N
L
U
t9
N
O
Lo
r

Jr
o
Ln
O LL
O
O
M
N
Q
Q�
IL
C)
Q_
ccco
p
r
G
0 c
p
'- 0) ca
CL C
0
C
N
a o
L
C
cNa
W
N ca y
N
C z
ca
O
�0
.r
^
ca E o
N 0 U
CL) a
p
o
O
i
Q
Q
LL
U p
3
O:
N
O
U7
O
/
Q
p
LL
0
0
0
__ .. o
Ln
0
_
o
0
. N
U�
O
0
LL
_
LL
I�
7
W
C
C
•.-+
ii)
L—
C
A
T
^,
`
U
C
CL
LL
V
cm
c
a,
G
ca
cn unn
`o a
C)
E c
•L+
U
V
v
co co
N
��
mV)
W o
b
cc
3
0
LL
cn cn
a
a
9
W w
i
f°
a� y
c
NXIS
o cu
Q �
6�
--
Z
-
o

O
Ln
C) LL
O
o
M
N
—
C
= n
Q
co
U-
N
O
Q
O
r
Q
O
� a C
O
LO
O -
�, a .O
LIZ
lw
w
y C
m
N as Z
LO
cD E O
LPL
- a Co
V
y. O
0
0
N
O
U
�
O
�
LL
O
N
�
LA
LO
LO
r
O
Q
�
�
r
L-
O
O
0
Ln
O
O
N
r
o
3
O
• to
U0
O
o
LL
M W
(d
c
c
C
Q
°
M
Q'
LL
-a�
(9
L
r
O W
o
N
V)
U
�
-o
m
ca
CA
a)
m V
W Q
CO
3 "
W o
i�
cn
�`+
cn
a
a
W W
C y
t
o
Q :2 CL)
�M
Li
z

PNG Stokesdale 6" Transmission Pipeline
Guilford County, NC
Exhibit 1
1. WA DPW. Facing west. 2/24/2105
2. NN A DI't . Facing west. 2 /24/2015
I WC DPW. Facing east. 2/24/2015 4. WC DPU. Facing west. 2/24/2015
5. WE/WF DPW. Facing west. 2/24/2015 6. WE/WF DPU. Facing east. 2/24/2015

PNG Stokesdale 6" Transmission Pipeline
Guilford County, NC
Exhibit 1
7. SA. Facing north (upstream). 2/24/2015 8. SB. Facing south (downstream). 2/24/2015
9. SC. Facing south (downstream). 2/24/2015
11. SD. Facing south (downstream). 4/14/2015
10. SD. Facing north (upstream). 4/14/2015

Exhibit 2
Data Forms
USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms
NCDWR Stream Identification Forms

0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site Stokesdale Transmission Pipeline City /County Stokesdale, Guilford County Sampling Date 02/24/2015
Applicant/Owner Piedmont Natural Gas State NC Sampling Point WA DPW
Investigator(s) Tina Sekula and Daniel Roberts Section, Township, Range
Landform (hdlslope, terrace, etc ) Valley Local relief (concave, convex, none) None Slope ( %) 6
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat 36.235615 Long -79949454 Datum NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name Clifford sandy loam, 6 to 10% slopes (CkC) NWI classification PFO p
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators-
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (610)
X Saturation (A3)
X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches)
u
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches) 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes , ` No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point WA DPW
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30' )
% Cover
Species'? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Acer rubrum
30
Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
2 Liquidambar styract/lua
20
Yes FAC
3 Fraxmus pennsylvanica
10
No FACW
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata (B)
4
0
5-
Percent of Dominant Species u
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 100% (A/B)
6
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of Multiply by
60
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = 0
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30'
)
FACW species x 2 = 0
1 Sambucus ntgra ssp canadensis
20
Yes FAC
FAC species x 3 = 0
2 Cornus amomum
80
Yes FACW
FACU species x 4 = 0
3
0
UPL species x 5= 0
4
0
Column Totals (A) 0 (B)
5
Prevalence Index = B/A = 0 00
6
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7
S
.�
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9
O
3 - Prevalence Index is < -3 0'
10
—
100
— 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30' )
=Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1 Scirpus atrovrrens
20
Yes OBL
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2
3
'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
5
0
6
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7
0
height
8
0
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9
than 3 in DBH and greater than or equal to 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
10
0
11
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
12
0
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
20 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30' )
height
1 Smilax rotundifolia
80
Yes FAC
2 Lonicera /aponica
40
Yes FAC
3
5
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
6
Present? Yes No
120
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL
Sampling Point WA DPW
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Redox Features
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type
Loc
Texture Remarks
0 -3
l OYR 4/2
98
5YR 516 2 C
PL
SiCL
3 -6
10YR 5/3
98
5YR 5/6 2 C
M
SiCL
6 -18
10YR 5/2
80
5YR 5/6 20 C
M
SiCL
'Type C= Concentration, D= Depletion,
Hydric Sod Indicators•
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1',
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches)
Remarks
RM= Reduced
MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL =Pore Lining, M =Matrx
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sol
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site Stokesdale Transmission Pipeline City /County Stokesdale, Guilford County Sampling Date 02/24/2015
Applicant/Owner Piedmont Natural Gas State NC Sampling Point WA DPU
Investigator(s) Tina Sekula and Daniel Roberts Section, Township, Range
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc) Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none) Convex Slope ( %) 9
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat 36.23563 Long - 79.949421 Datum NAD 83
Sod Map Unit Name Clifford sandy loam, 6 to 10% slopes (CkC) NWI classification Upland p
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sod Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ ,Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water - Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches)
u
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No � `
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point WA DPU
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30' )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Liriodendron tulrprfera
30
Yes FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 6 (A)
2 Acer rubrum
25
Yes FAC
3 Prunus serouna
15
Yes FACU
Total Number of Dominant 10
Species Across All Strata (B)
4
0
Percent of Dominant Species 60%
5'
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B)
6
0
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of Multiply by
70
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = 0
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30'
)
FACW species x 2 = 0
1 Acer rubrum
25
Yes FAC
FAC species x 3 = 0
2 Prunus serotma
10
Yes FACU
FACU species x 4 = 0
3 Quercus alba
10
Yes FACU
UPL species x 5 = 0
4
Column Totals (A) 0 (B)
5
5
�
Prevalence Index = B/A = 0.00
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8
_
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
g
3 - Prevalence Index is s3 0'
10
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
30'
45
= Total Cover
—
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
Yes
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1 Lonrcera japonica
15
FAC
2
0
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5
6
O
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7
0
height
8
Sapling /Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
g
�
than 3 in DBH and greater than or equal to 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
10
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
11
I�
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
12
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
15 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30' )
height
1 Lonicera japonica
20
IYes FAC
2 Smilax rotundrfolia
50
IYes FAC
3 Toxicodendron radreans
20
=Yes
4
Hydrophytic
5
Vegetation
6
I__._ —I
Present? Yes No
90
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point WA DPU
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Cc
Texture Remarks
0 -2 10YR 3/3 100
SiCL
2 -10 7 5YR 5/6 98
2.5YR 4/8 2 C M
SiCL
10 -18 7.5YR 5/6 90
5YR 5/8 10 C M
SiCL
'Type C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL =Pore Lining M =Matrx
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
— 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches)
Remarks
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ! `
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site Stokesdale Transmission Pipeline City /County Stokesdale, Guilford County Sampling Date 02/24/2015
Applicant/Owner Piedmont Natural Gas State NC Sampling Point WC DPW
Investigator(s) Tina Sekula and Daniel Roberts Section, Township, Range
Landform (hdlslope, terrace, etc ) Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none) None Slope ( %) 10
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat 36.234696 Long - 79.938776 Datum NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name Poplar Forest sandy loam, 10 to 15 % slopes (PoD) NWI classification PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation , Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No _ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks
Hydrology and vegetation criteria display strong indicators of wetland conditions Soils may be derived from red parent material
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
X Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches) 8
u
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches) 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes , ` No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point WC DPW
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2 0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30' )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
Acer rubrum
95
Yes FAC
3
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
2
Total Number of Dominant 3
3
Species Across All Strata (B)
4
0
5-
�-
Percent of Dominant Species o
100%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B)
6
0
7
F
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8
E___
Total % Cover of Multiply by
OBL species x 1 = 0
=
95 Total Cover
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30'
)
FACW species x 2 = 0
1
0
FAC species x 3= 0
2
0
FACU species x 4= 0
3
0
UPL species x 5= 0
4
0
Column Totals (A) 0 (B)
5
6
Prevalence Index = B/A = 0.00
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7
8
_�
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
10
— 3 - Prevalence Index is < -3 0'
0
— 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb
Stratum (Plot size 30' )
=Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1
Platanus occidentahs
30
No FACW
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2
Liqurdambar styraciflua
40
Yes FAC
3
Ligustrum sinense
5
No FACU
'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4
Scirpus atrovirens
10
No OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5 Mtcrostegium vimtneum 80 Yes FAC
6
Symphyotrrchum racemosum
10
No FACW
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
7
Brdens frondosa
10
No FACW
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
8
0
Sapling /Shrub –Woody plants, excluding vines, less
g
�
than 3 in DBH and greater than or equal to 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
10
0
11
Herb – All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
12
185
= Total Cover
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30' )
height
1
0
2
3
4
0
5
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
6
Present? Yes No
0
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2 0

SOIL
Sampling Point WC DPW
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0 -3 10YR 3/3 100 SiCL
3 -18 7.5YR 4/3 85 5YR 4/6 15 C M LC
'Type C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (Al 0) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
X Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches)
Remarks
Hydric Sod Present? Yes X No
Meets red parent material description as described in F21 indicator. However the project is in MLRA 136. The project study area
appears to be within the approximate location of soils derived from red parent material based on Figure 34 in Regional Supplement
to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual-Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site Stokesdale Transmission Pipeline City /County Stokesdale, Guilford County Sampling Date 02/24/2015
Applicant/Owner Piedmont Natural Gas State NC Sampling Point WC DPU
Investigator(s) Tina Sekula and Daniel Roberts Section, Township, Range
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) Htllslope Local relief (concave, convex, none) None Slope ( %) 12
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat 36.234698 Long - 79.938819 Datum NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name Poplar Forest sandy loam, 10 to 15% slopees(PoD) NWI classification Upland p
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology, significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
— Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (84)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches)
` /
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No x
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point WC DPU
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Liriodendron tultpifera
20
Yes
FACU
6
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
2 Acer rubrum
20
Yes
FAC
3 Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant 9
Species Across All Strata (B)
4 Prnus vrrgrniana
20
Yes
NI
Percent of Dominant Species
67%
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B)
6
0
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of Multiply by
80
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = 0
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30'
)
FACW species x 2 = 0
1 Fagus grandtfoha
10
No
FACU
FAC species x 3 = 0
2 Acer rubrum
20
Yes
FAC
FACU species x 4 = 0
3 Quercus_falcata
10
No
FACU
UPL species x 5 = 0
4 Ltriodendron tulrprfera
15
Yes
FACU
Column Totals (A) 0 (B)
5
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6
�
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8
_
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is < -3 0'
10
55
_
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
30'
= Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
1 Bidens frondosa
20
Yes
FACW
'
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
2 Juniperus virgrmana 15 Yes FACU
3 Ltquedambar styraca/lua
15
Yes
FAC
'Indicators of sod and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4 Acer rubrum
10
No
FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
No
5 Ligustrum srnense
10
FACU
6
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7
height
8
0
Sapling /Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9
�
than 3 in DBH and greater than or equal to 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
10
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
11
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
12
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
70 - Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30' )
height
1 Lonecera japonica
10
Yes
FAC
2
3
®-
4
0
Hydrophytic
5
Vegetation X
6
Present? Yes ' ` No
10
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point WC DPU
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
% Color (moist) % Tvpe Loc
Texture Remarks
0 -2
10YR 3/3
100
SiCL
2 -10
1 OYR 3/6
100
SiCL
10 -18
IOYR 5/3
98 5YR 4/6 2 C M
SCL
'Type C= Concentration, D= Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches)
Remarks
RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No! `
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site Stokesdale Transmission Pipeline City /County Stokesdale, Guilford County Sampling Date 02/24/2015
Applicant/Owner Piedmont Natural Gas State NC Sampling Point WF DPW
Investigator(s) Tina Sekula and Daniel Roberts Section, Township, Range
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) Valley Local relief (concave, convex, none) None Slope ( %) 15
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat 36.233611 Long - 79.934437 Datum NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name Poplar Forest sandy loam, 15 to 35% slopes (PoE) NWI classification PFO p
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (614)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations.
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches) 13
X
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches) 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes , ` No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
The water table was observed at a depth of 13 inches
This does not meet the A2 High Water Table
indicator, which requires the water table to be
observed within 12 inches of the surface
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
WF DPW
Sampling Point
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30' )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Ltqutdambar styraci/lua
80
Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 4 (A)
2 Acer rubrum
40
Yes FAC
3 Ltrtodendron tultptfera
l0
No FACU
Total Number of D 4
Strata
Species Across All Strata (B)
4
0
5-
Percent of Dominant Species o
100%
-
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B)
6
0
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of Multiply by
130
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = 0
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30'
)
FACW species x 2 = 0
1 Ptnus vtrginrana
20
Yes NI
FAC species x 3 = 0
2
0
FACU species x 4= 0
3
0
UPL species x 5= 0
4
Column Totals (A) 0 (B)
5
5
�
Prevalence Index = B/A = 0.00
0
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7
8
-�
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9
0
10
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is < -3 0'
20
— 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30' )
=Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1 Microstegium vtmtneum
90
Yes FAC
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2 Bidens frondosa
30
Yes FACW
3 Andropogon vtrgtntcus
10
No FACU
'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
q Ltgustrum stnense
10
No FACU
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5 Smilax rotundtfolta 10 No FAC
6
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7
0
height
8
0
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
g
than 3 in DBH and greater than or equal to 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
10
0
11
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
12
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
150 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30' )
height
1
0
2
3
4
0
5
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
6
Present? Yes No
0
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

. f
SOIL Sampling Point WF DPW
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Dark Surface (S7)
Redox Features
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0 -3
1 OYR 3/3
100
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
SCL
3 -13
IOYR 511
85
7.5YR 5/4 15 C M
SCL
13 -18
10YR 6/1
90
IOYR 5/8 10 C M
SCL
wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic
'Type C= Concentration, D= Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches)
Remarks
RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site Stokesdale Transmission Pipeline City /County Stokesdale, Guilford County Sampling Date 02/24/2015
Applicant/Owner Piedmont Natural Gas State NC Sampling Point WF DPU
Investigator(s) Tina Sekula and Daniel Roberts Section, Township, Range
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none) None Slope ( %) 20
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat 36.233581 Long -79934362 Datum NAD 83
Sod Map Unit Name Poplar Forest sandy loam 15 to 35% slopes (PoE) NWI classification Upland p
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (66)
Surface Water (Al) _
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
— Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches)
` ,
Saturation Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No x
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2 0

R I
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point
WF DPU
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30' )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
Quercus falcata
40
Yes FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 1 (A)
2
Acer rubrum
40
Yes FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3
Species Across All Strata (B)
4
f
t
Percent of Dominant Species o
14%
5-
" —'t
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B)
6
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of Multiply by
80
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = 0
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30'
)
FACW species x 2 = 0
1
Fagus grand!folia
20
Yes FACU
FAC species x 3 = 0
2
flex opaca
20
Yes FACU
FACU species x 4 = 0
3
Pmus virginiana
20
Yes N1
UPL species x 5 = 0
4
Juntperus virginrana
10
No FACU
Column Totals (A) 0 (B)
5
Prevalence Index = B/A = 0.00
6
�
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
g
—
3 - Prevalence Index is < -3 0'
10
70
—
— 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
30'
= Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1
Bidensfrondosa
10
No FACW
—
2
Polystichum acrostrchotdes
20
Yes FACU
3
Juntperus v�rgrntana
15
Yes FACU
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4
Fagus grandrfolia
15
Yes FACU
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
No
5
Microstegium vunineum
10
FAC
6
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
rr----��
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7
height
8
0
Sapling /Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
g
�
than 3 in DBH and greater than or equal to 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
10
0
t
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
11
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
12
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
70 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30' )
height
1
r---�
t1
2
3
Hydrophytic
5
Vegetation u
6
Present? Yes No
0
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL
Sampling Point WF DPU
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
_ Dark Surface (S7)
(inches)
Color (moist)
% Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0 -8
l OYR 3/3
100
SCL
8 -16
10YR 5/3
100
SCL
16 -18
1OYR 7/3
100
SCL
'Type C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains `Location PL =Pore Lininq, M= Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators
Indicators for Problematic Hydric So1Is3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
` /
x
Depth (inches)
Hydric
Sod Present? Yes No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2 0

! C
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date 2124/2015
0
Project/Site Stokesdale Six Inch Transmission Pipeline
2
Latitude
36 234664
Evaluator T Sekula and D Roberts
0
County Guilford
2
Longitude
-78938673
Total Points
Stream is at least intermittent d 2 19 or perennial d 2 30'
15
Stream Determination Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
05
Other
Stream Name SA
1245
0
lintermittent
1
1 5
16 Organic debris lanes or piles
0
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 Continuity of channel bed and bank'
Yes= 3
0
1
Z' . ,
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
1
0
1
2
3
3 In- channel structure ex raffle- ol, step-pool, n
le- ool sequence
0
1
2
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5 Active /relict flood lain
0
1
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9 Grade control
0
05
1
15
10 Natural valley
0
05
1
15
11 Second or greater order channel
No = 0,
Yes = 3
'artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
A Geomorphology Subtotal
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
15
1
05
0,
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
05
1
1 5
16 Organic debris lanes or piles
0
05
1
1 5
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes= 3
B Hydrology Subtotal
t,°
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
- 0
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22 Fish
0
05
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
0
05
1
1 5
24 Amphibians
0
05
1
1 5
25 Algae
0
05
1
1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5 Other = 0
1 . 0 r
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods
C Biology Subtotal
L

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date 2/24/2015
0
Project/Site Stokesdale Six Inch Transmission Pipeline
2
Latitude
36 234541
Evaluator T Sekula and D Roberts
0
County Guilford
2
Longitude
-78938673
Total Points
Stream is at least intermittent d >_ 19 or perennial6? 30'
1 5
Stream Determination Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
05
Other
Stream Name SB
25
0
lIntermittent
1
1 5
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Stron
1 Continuity of channel bed and bank'
Yes= 3
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
1
0
1
2
3,
3 In- channel structure ex riffle -pool, step-pool, n
le- ool sequence
0
1
2
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5 Active /relict flood lain
0
1
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
1 3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
i
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9 Grade control
0
05
1
1 1 5
10 Natural valley
0
05
1
1 15
11 Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
'artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
A Geomorphology Subtotal 14
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
1 5
1
05
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
05
1
1 5
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
05
1
1 5
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes= 3
B Hydrology Subtotal
i7
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22 Fish
0
05
1
15
23 Crayfish
0
05
1
15
24 Amphibians
0
05
1
15
25 Algae
0
05
1
1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5 Other = 0
1 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods
C Biology Subtotal

. 1 a
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date 2/24/2015
0
Project/Site Stokesdale Six Inch Transmission Pipeline
2
Latitude
36 233625
Evaluator T Sekula and D Roberts
0"
County Guilford
2
Longitude
-78934746
Total Points,
Stream is at least intermittent if z 19 or perennial d z 30
1 5
Stream Determination Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
05
Other
Stream Name SC
30
0
Perennial
1
1 5
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0,
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 Continuity of channel bed and bank'
Yes= 3
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
1
0
1
1 2
3
3 In- channel structure ex nffle ol, step-pool, ripple-pool
se uence
0
1
2
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5 Active /relict flood lam
0
1
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
1 0
1
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
1
2,
3
9 Grade control
0
05
1
1 5
10 Natural valley
0
05
1
, 1 5
11 Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
"artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
A Geomorphology Subtotal 16 5
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
`3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0"
1
2
3
14 Leaf litter
1 5
1
05
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
05
1
1 5
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0,
05
1
1 5
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes= 3
B Hydrology Subtotal
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0 r
1
2
3
22 Fish
01
05
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
0=
05
1
1 5
24 Amphibians
0-
05
1
15
25 Algae
0„
05
1
1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5 Other = 0
i 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods
C Biology Subtotal
Ir - I

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
April 22, 2015
Mr. Tina Sekula
EEE Consulting Inc.
601 Cascade Pointe Lane, Suite 101
Cary NC 27513
Subject Property: Stokesdale Transmission Pipeline, Guilford County
On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Mitigation Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500)
Dear Ms. Sekula:
On April 14, 2015, at your request and in your attendance, Sue Homewood conducted an on -site
determination to review features located on the subject project for stream determinations with regards to
the above noted state regulations. David Bailey with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) was also
present at the site visit.
The Division acknowledges the areas and boundaries identified as jurisdictional wetlands by the USACE. The
attached maps accurately depict all stream determinations conducted during the site visit.
Please note that at the time of this letter, all intermittent and perennial stream channels and jurisdictional
wetlands found on the property are subject to the mitigation rules cited above. These regulations are subject
to change in the future.
The owner (or future owners) should notify the Division (and other relevant agencies) of this decision in any
future correspondences concerning this property. This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from
the date of this letter.
Winston -Salem Regional Office
Location 585 Waughtown St Winston - Salem, North Carolina 27107
Phone 336 - 771 -50001 FAX 336 - 771-46301 Customer Service 1- 877 - 623 -6748
Internet www ncwaterquality org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
NorthCarolina
Natura!!ry

Tina Sekula
Stokesdale Transmission Pipeline
April 22, 2015
Page 2 of 2
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the Division or Delegated Local
Authority that a surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination by
the Director. A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o
Wetlands and Buffers Permitting and Compliance Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650.
Individuals that dispute a determination by the Division or Delegated Local Authority that "exempts" surface
water from the buffer rule may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60 -day statutory appeal time does not start
until the affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. The
Division recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third party
appeals are made in a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699 -6714. This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing
within 60 days.
This letter only addresses the applicability to the mitigation rules and the buffer rules and does not approve
any activity within Waters of the United States or Waters of the State or their associated buffers. If you have
any additional questions or require additional information please contact me at 336 - 771 -4964 or
sue.homewood @ncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
Sue Homewood
Winston -Salem Regional Office
Enclosures: USGS Topo Map
EEE Consulting Map
cc: Jason Brown, PNG (via email)
Justin Gray, Guilford County (via email)
David Bailey, USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office (via email)
DWR, Winston -Salem Regional Office

re-, e EEE Consulting, Inc.
Environmental, Engineering and Educational Solutions
15 -502
Figure 2: USGS Topographic Quadrangle Map
Stokesdale 6" Transmission Pipeline
Piedmont Natural Gas
Guilford County, North Carolina
March 2015

Field Data Points
Streams (R3)
WA SD WE/WF
— Streams (R4)
SC
Palustrine Forested (PFO
Project Study Area ?'
\ \`, 1
101050 0 100 Feet ) 10050 0 100 Feet
WC
SA
SB
100 50 0 100 Feet
Note: All delineated waters of the U.S. continue 0 750 1,500 3,000
outside of the Project Study Area Feet
Figure 6: Waters of the U.S Delineation Map
r
3 IEEE Consulting, Inc Stokesdale 6" Transmission Pipeline
e� g� Piedmont Natural Gas
Environmental, Engineering and Educational Solutions
Guilford County, North Carolina
15 -502 April 2015

Exhibit A - Sheet 1 of 2 Millrun
NOTES 158 �r Road
\� C A R 1 All property lines and corners established using existing comers
\ '(
\A aao ��% found existing boundary evidence and deeds and plats of record in Ellison
!L e the Guilford County Register of Deeds office Road
O� asp �S.S / O dear r 2 All distances are honzonlal gntl distances, in feet The gntl factor for O
this project is 0 99986898 To compute ground coordinates for this zOC-
QQQ ,,,!!!x1 project, multiply by the Inverse of 0 99986898 $hOellne _
H�{ • I -'wy" _- = I 3 Subject a any and all easements, pear of -way streets and Road
f �'/4 ` 6�7", assessments as the same may appear of record in the Register of
S L- O 6 _ Deeds office, Clerk of Court, town or county tax offices or which may SITE
OQ-a. have been acquired by prescriptive use
4 This survey is intended for PNG easement acquisition A
C' �O S UR`)aaaC1Q -�` 5 NC gntl coordinates as shown hereon are based upon GPS
a9asae C) observations utilizing NCGa' network RTK system and are W
A/ F� eaa'a� referenced to the NAD 83 (NSRS 2007) datum
,1 vv \ 6 This map is not a cemfled survey and has not been reviewed by a
I I j j 111 rte' local govemment agency for compliance with any applicable land
Z -3 -li development regulations
7 A title report was not furnished to this surveyor, therefore, this survey VICINITY MAP
is subject to the findings of an accurate title examination and report
Tract 2 Dr. hard D 8, Joy x
\ D B 6567 Pg 2637
P B 115, Pg 98
PIN# 7920651238 /� y
Gravel
RIO) 11 Wood — i— Drive
_Fence
�I
N 905 = 905167 93 i
E = 1726034 58
Said point of beginning being
the southwest comer of the
property conveyed to Richard
D & Joy H Odom of record in
Deed Book 6567 Pape 2637
l
Proposed Tract_ 1
Temporary Gracie J Casey
Workspace D B 4644, Pg 1722
PIN# 7920657238
P4
N `Tract 3� I �6
O•
Bruce L & Elaine J Chnstopher `RO
D B 4758, Pg 001 �1 J
P B 129 Pg 101
PIN# 7920549849 I P9---,
IProposed
Permanent -�
N C STATE PLANE Easement U
NAD 83 (2011)
GEOID 2012a I
I Michael J Moore PLS L-5086 certify that this plat was drawn under my supervision f am an actual
= rvey mace under my supervision that the boundary lines not surveyed are irWicatetl wan dashes
lines as drawn from Information derived from the Guilford Count NC Re ster of Deed s offi Th t
Existing
-P5 Buildings
Existing
`qs Transco- Williams
8,r-g Station Easement
P8(\�
R uI L
s� MAY 0 015
the ratio of precision is greater than 1 10 000 that this plat meats the requirements of the Standards
DESCRIPTION
SO Fr
ACREAGE
of Practice for Lana Surveying in Norm Carolina (21 NCAC 56 1600)
7
0 578
\\
Thal srs Fiaf was preparetl For ,he purpose di easement acquisitien only antl i5 not mtentle0 Id h2 a
0 247
bouodary survey of me property shown hereon It is the intent of this plat the easement shall crass the
GRAPHIC
S
entire parcel
100
0
5o 100 200
That the control and des to tors survey were performed using GPS methods, that this survey is of
mother category such as the recombination of existing parrRla a court ordered survey or other
exwpaon to Ire defin't— of suedmsioo
1 inch= 100 ft
��-O� ��q c�'z -� Z- 3 -I S
MICHAEL J M OR L DATE
.,naurortsirvir —,
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD (OLD) O R(0)
PROPOSED PERMANENT r'�'�
EASEMENT
PROPOSEOTEMPORARY
VvORKSPACE
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION
SO Fr
ACREAGE
Permanent Easement
25 166
I
0 578
Temporary Worktpaca
1 10 771
0 247
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF GRACIE J CASEY
8146 FLATROCK ROAD, STOKESDALE, NC 27357
ELI PROJECT # 14 -21 -3011 1 PNG IR# 0230491
DATE 1.23 -15 1 SCALE V= 100' 1 SHEET 1 OF 2
T TRACOO - PIN# 7920657238
Piedmont
L =, Natural Gas
% ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE PLLC
1420 DONELSON PIKE SUITE Al2 • NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFFICE 615 -3a3 -6300 WWW ELI -LLC COM•LICENSE # P -1289
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL

N
CA,R
��
,0 • ®oFESS
¢z
ILO 2�
• nn <m �9
a, 1d
®�
v2o �0� -
0 Z
Cyq�•SURA ® ®a.0
C••J
� 111111111
LEGEND
Exhibit A - Sheet 2 of 2
PERMANENT EASEMENT LINE TABLE
LINE
DIRECTION
LENGTH
Pt
N75' 07' 31 "E
96 33'
P2
S33' 09'48"E
158 81'
P3
S53' 45' 40 "E
6695,
P4
S55' 34'16"E
fig 37'
P5
S55' 34 16'E
71 42'
P6
S46' 03' 40"E
90 03'
P7
S34' 10'07"E --
2961' —
P8
S82' 26' 28 "W
5609,
P9
N46' 03'40"W
79 92'
P10
N55' 34' 16'W
137 42'
P11
N53' 45 40'W
7683
P12
N33' 09' 48 "W
158 09'
P13
S75'07'31 "W
3988
P14
N40' 38' 16'W
2776'
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD (OLD) O R(0)
PROPOSED PERMANENT r "'Wh
EASEMENT �ro�
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
WORKSPACE
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION 50 FT
ACREAGE
Permanen, Easement 25,166
0578
1
Temporary'Nor s—. 10 771
0 247
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE LINE TABLE
LINE
DIRECTION
LENGTH
Ti
N75'07'31 "E
5266'
T2
S33'09 48 "E
259 09'
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF GRACIE J CASEY
_ 8146 FLATROCK ROAD, STOKESDALE, NC 27357
ELI PROJECT # 14- 21.3011 L __PNG IR# 0230491
DATE 1 -23 -15 SCALE, 1" = 100' ; SHEET 1 OF 2
0 - PIN# 7920657238
Piedmont
I, Natural Gras
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE, PLLC
i 1420 DONELSON PIKE SUITE AI2 • NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFFICE 615- 363 -6300 • WWW ELI -LLC COM•LICENSE A P -1289
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFI AS RUC tJRE • ENVIRONMENTAL

Exhibit A - Sheet 1 of 2
\ tlljjl ,I, tillr.x INV 1 CJ
`, p x4 i All property lines and comers established using existing comers
C A 'S 0 �, found existing boundary evidence, and deeds and plats of record In
\A
!1. as s a e a a a ®a , the Guilford Comity Register of Deeds office
�_ Naaa� ' S S / O `u �iJ, -� 2 All distances are horizontal grid distances, In feet The grid factor for
Q-O a o .y This project Is 0 99986898 To rompute ground coordinates for this
n u 9,! o project, multiply by the Inverse of 099986898
.�t)1�� _.... - �. 3 Subject to any and all easements, right -of -way streets and
i r �-(� assessments, as the same may appear of record In the Register of
�—
Shoehne
Road
= a L -5 8 a _
C'�m
Ile'. S URJ tae OO� \�
•aeaea sa ®aa \
j j 1 1 i i t
N�_3 �S
Deeds office Clerk of Court town or county tax offices, orwhich may
have been acquired by prescriptive use
4 This survey Is Intended for PNG easement acquisition
5 NO grid coordinates as shown hereon are based upon CPS
observations utilizing NCGs' network RTK system and are
referencetl to the NAD 83 (NSRS 2007) datum
6 This map Is not a certified survey and has not been reviewed by a
local government agency for compliance with any applicable land
development regulations
rien —tt Easement
Ellison
7 A title report was not furnished to this surveyor, therefore, this survey
Road
to
�
Is subject to the findings of an accurate title examination and report
Mlllrun
C� 58J
F Road
ACREAGE
rien —tt Easement
Ellison
0055
0 027
Road
to
�
J
/ SITE
0
i�
j
In
VICINITY MAP
, 1
t t Leonard J & Imogene Fields and
Charles B 6 9, PigF004 and '
O PIN# 7920650866
/
\ % Asphalt �
Gravel Drive �
N C STATE PLANE \ Drive Tract 4� t,
NAD 83 (2011) Richard D & Joy H Odom`
_GEOID 2012a _ - D P B 16567 , i g 2637 Tract 1
IR(0) DIST �— PIN# 7920651238 �'---
1 Gracie J Casey
Existing ` \ \\ / D B 4644, Pg 1722
30' Overhead PIN# 7920657238
Utility Easement \
Tract. Proposed \ Existing
Jack B & Mary P Johnson Permanent X / P3— V T2 Buildings
D B 3629, Pg 1080 Easement
PIN# 7920542514 Pi —Proposed
}t >4 T3 Temporary
�P4, Workspace
— — - - - - - -- P O B Easement
N=9 0 5167 93
E = 1726034 58
\ Said outh of beginning being
the property conveyed corner of the
I I \ property conveyed to Richard
1 Bruce L & Elaine J Christopher \ D & Joy H Odom of record In
V \ D B 4758, Pg 001 \ Deed Book 6567 Page 2637
i P 8 129, Pg 101 \
PIN# 7920549849 \
II ,�
I II \ \
II �
i 1 1
1 Michael J Moore OILS L5086 certify that this plat was drawn under my supenason from an actual
rvey made under my supervis,on that the boundary lines -rot suveyetl are indicated wah dashed Imes
as drawn from Information denved from the Guilford County NO Register of Deed s Office That me ratio
of pre—on is greaser than 1 10 000 that this piat meets the requirements of the Standards of Practice for
Land Surveying rn North Carolina (21 NCAC 56 1600)
That mrs plat was prepared for the purpose of .....tent acqurta —only anti not Inlentleo to oe a
ooundary survey of the property shown hereon It is the Intent of this plat the easement shall cross the GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)
entire parcel, 100 0 50 100 200
That ate control and ties to this survey were performed using GPS methods that This Survey is of another
category, such as the recorromabon of existing parcels a court ordered survey or other exception to the
li nefirnbon of subdivision
1 inch= 100 ft
- O � � I GR- 1�tOFSINITIHIS
MICHAEL 'J M MO E RE PLC PLS DATE
LEGEND EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD (OLD) Q TRIO)
PROPOSEOPERMANENT r MM'sh
EASEMENT
PROPOSEDTEMPORARY
WORKSPACE
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION
So FT
ACREAGE
rien —tt Easement
1383
1 185
0055
0 027
Temporary Wrx1,,; at a
ACROSS THE LANDS OF RICHARD D & JOY H ODOM
8150 FLATROCK ROAD, STOKESDALE, NC 27357
ELI PROJECT # 14 -21 -3011 1NG IR# 0230491
DATE 1 -23 -15 1 SCALE 1"= 100' 1 SHEET 1 OF 2
TRACT 002 - PIN# 7920651238
Piedmont
,> Mural Gas
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE, PLLC
1420 DONELSON PIKE SUITE Al2 • NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFFICE 615- 383 -6300 • WWW ELI -LLC COM•LICENSE # P -1289
ENGINEERS• SURVEYORS •INFRASTRUCTURE •ENVIRONMENTAL

�N CARO""
2e0 �,eSS� /0 1
p SUR �O
tiq ®a�aaa��3���
Exhibit A - Sheet 2 of 2
PERMANENT EASEMENT LINE TABLE
LINE
DIRECTION
LENGTH
Pi
N28' 57 44 'W
25 78'
P2
N75' 07'31'E
94 34'
P3
S33' 09'48"E
26 33'
P4
S75'07 31 "W
96 33'
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD (OLD) 0IR(0)
PROPOSED PERMANENT'S
EASEMENT
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
IAORKSPACE /
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION
SO FT
ACREAGE
Permanent Easement
2383
0 055
T moomry Workspace
1,785
0027
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE LINE TABLE
LINE
DIRECTION
LENGTH
Ti
N80' 23'06"E
54 54'
T2
S33' 09'48'E
2106'
T3
S75' 07' 31 "W
5266
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF RICHARD D & JOY H ODOM
8150 FLATROCK ROAD, STOKESDALE, NC 27357
ELI PROJECT # 14.21 -3011 J_ _ PING IR# 0230491
DATE 1.23 -15 ! SCALE 1"= 100' SHEET 2 OF 2
TRAC- T 002 - PIN# 7920651238
raft Piedmont
Natural Gas
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE PLLC
1420 OONELSON PIKE SUITE Al 2 - NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFFICE 615- 383 -6300 • WWW ELI -LLC COM•LICENSE X P -1289
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL

Exhibit A - Sheet 1 of 2
Mdirun
iiilrlrr,
NOTES
Road
iy1Alit
�
xx `, C A
x .` C ` R l7� ��i�
I All property lines and comers established using existing comers
found existing boundary evidence and deeds
Temporary Workspace
!i aaa a
�S S /O ° iL
and plats of record In
the Guilford County Register of Deeds office
2 All distances are horizontal distances,
�� EIIISOn T
41
Road
°
grid nt feet The grid factor for
this project is 0 99986898 To compute coordinates for this
o
F
-
ground
multiply by
project the Inverse of 099986898
nun ®
1 a 3 Subject to any and all easements right -ol -way streets and
assessments as the same may appear of record In the Register of
Shoelfne
Road 7
= a L- 86 =
a
Deeds office, Clerk of Court ,own or county tax offices, or which may
V
4 —
y0 a 2
have been acquired by prescriptive use
4 This survey is intended for PNG easement acquisition
i/
\ SITE
0
5 NC coordinates hereon
ea
gnd as shown are based upon GPS
6
"7,9 °a ®°aaa° O \
observations utilizing NCGs network RTK system and are
referenced to the NAD 83(NSRS
/
y\ \
2007) datum
6 has
"I t 1 I 1 11 I 1 i i i
local government agency for compliance
wdhtany app6cabledlay
nd
development regulations
7 A title report was not famished to this surveyor therefore this survey
VICINITY MAP
is subject to the findings of an accurate title examination and report
POB
Tract 4 \ T\ N = 905167 67
Jack B & Mary P Johnson Proposed p%- / E = 1725964 02
D B 3629, Pg 1080 Permanent p / / Said point of beginning being
the northeast comer of the
AsphaIPIN# 7920542514 Easement ��� j Property conveyed to Bruce L
P6 8 Elaine J Christopher of
Driveway P5
Fill record m Deed Book 4758
Page 001
P4�
T3� ` p2 / Gravel
\ Drive Existing
P �O 20' Utility
/ Easement
� Proposed � � \�
H I
Gravel� Temporary `
�o
r m c Drive Workspace
�aa� )
an
~ Ito ^ \
m IRol) E )
\
do o a I ) Existing
I I Budding Asphalt \
1 I I Drive
II �
II 3�
Bruce 1 \
N I I I L& � Elaine J Christopher
I D B 4758, Pg 001 I
1 I I P B 129, Pg 101
L 1 Dirt II PIN# 7920549849
I 1
a �IR(0) Drive I I I
II 1
II
I I Eric A &
( I Misty S G000ykoontz
D B 7192, Pg 2922
N C STATE PLANE I I`h~ � PIN# 7920643660
1
NAD 83 (2011) I I 1
GEOID 2012a
Michael J Moore PLO L 5086, certify that this plat was drawn under my supervision from an actual
rvey made tinder my superv,s,on that the boundary i,nes riot surveyetl ara intlicaled with dashed nines TfaCt 4
as drawn from information tlenved from the Guilford County, NC Register of Deed s Office That the ratio
of preosion Is greater •hen 1 10 000 that this Plat meets the requirements of the Standams of Proaice mr Jack 8 & Mary P Johnson
Lars Surveying in North Carolina (21 NCAC 56 16W), D B 3629 Pg 1080
Trial Inns pat was prepared for the purpose of easement acquisition only aria is not intended to be a PIN# 7920542514
ooundary survey of the property shown hereon a is the intent of this plat the easement shall cross the GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)
entire parcel 100 _ 050 too 200
That the control and ties to this survey were performed using GPS methods that this survey is of another
category su2 as the recombination of existing parcels a coup- ordered survey or other exception to the
aefimuon if submvnvon _ 1 Inch= 100 ft
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD TOLD) (l IR(0)
PROPOSED PERMANENT r,-, '-%
EASEMENT lion
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
WORKSPACE
— 15
DATE
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION
J SO FT
I ACREAGE
Permanen, Easement
2,588
0059
Temporary Workspace
1 530
3035
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF BRUCE L & ELAINE J CHRISTOPHER
8145 FLATROCK ROAD, STOKESDALE, NC 27357
ELI PROJECT # 14-21 -3011 1 PNG IR# 0230491
DATE 1 -23 -15 1 SCALE V= 100' 1 SHEET 1 OF 2
TRACT 003 - PIN# 7920549849
° Piedmont
i Natural Gas
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE PLLC
1420 DONELSON PIKE SUITE Al2 • NASHVILLE TN 37217
14F OFFICE 61S- 383 -6300 WWW ELI -LLC COM•LICENSE M P -1289
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCNRE •ENVIRONMENTAL

\ "\ 0111111"
c
� \A mmmma mo<
,•�� =eoFESS7��v y -1
0
m y 0 4U
C1�?,0 SUR m�0�;
Exhibit A - Sheet 2 of 2
PERMANENT EASEMENT LINE TABLE
LINE
DIRECTION
LENGTH
P1
S37° 49'07"E
46 44'
- P2
S75° 07'31'W - -
- 54 30'
P3
N37° 49'07"W
29 81'
P4
N27' 28' 29 "W
1705,
P5
N27° 28' 29 "W
1023,
P6
N87' 00' 16' E
5494
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD )OLD) Q IRt01
PROPOSED PERMANENT
EASEMENT
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
WORKSPACE
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION
I SO F-r
ACREAGE
Pemt_ent Easement
temporary Workspace
2 588
0 059
1530
0075
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE LINE TABLE
LINE
DIRECTION
LENGTH
T1
S75' 07' 31 "W
54 30'
T2
N37' 49'07'W
- 14 28'
T3
N40" 19' 16"E
54 22'
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF BRUCE L & ELAINE J CHRISTOPHER
8145 FLATROCK ROAD, STOKESDALE, NC 27357
ELI PROJECT # 14- 21.3011 1 PNG IR# 0230491
DATE 1 -23 -15 1 SCALE 1"= 100' 1 SHEET 2 OF 2
TRACT 003 - PIN# 7920549849
Piedmont
Natural Gas
ENERGY LAND b INFRASTRUCTURE PLLC
1420 DONELSON PIKE SUITE Al2 •NASHVILLE TN 37217 217
IrOFFICE 615- 383 -6300 • WWW ELI -LLC COM•LICE NSE * P -1289
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL

Exhibit A - Sheet 1 of 5
DESCRIPTION
SO FT
NOTES
158f
,,,Itf
2234
Temporary Workspace 1
C' A
I All property lines and comers established using existing corners
Temporary `Workspace 2
R O�
2 eaaaa ®eaaaa
found existing boundary evidence and deeds and plats of remrtl In
Ihe Guilford County Register Deeds
Ellison m
��•�
C�
�S S
oi office
Road CZ
O
Q` as / O ® 2 %
^
six " V9 -9
2 All distances are horizontal grid distances to feet The grid factor for
this project is 0 99986898 To compute ground coordinates for this
n
5
project multiply by the Inverse of 0 99986898
3 Subject to any and all easements right -of -way, streets and
Shoehne _
Road
1177���0000 a _
assessments, as the same may appearof record In the Reglsteroi
Deeds office, Clerk of Court, town or county tax offices, or which may
have been
SITE
- e 9 O��e
acquired by prescriptive use
4 This survey Is Intended for PNG easement acquisition
®e �Q a'o
O a S URe
5 NO grid coordinates as shown hereon are based upon GPS
®® ®ama OD
observations uhlizmg NCGs' network RTK system and are
referenced to the NAD 83 (NSRS 2007) datum
6 This map is not a certified survey and has not been reviewed by a
\
local government agency for compliance with any applicable land
development regal bons
7 A title report was not furnished to this surveyor, therefore, this survey
VICINITY MAP
N
Is subject to the findings of an accurate Idle examination and report
I
N C STATE PLANE
NAD 83 (2011)
Dan,.] GEOID 2012a
�f
C Cleven er &
POB
N = 905271 44
E = 1724281 19
Said point of beginning being
the southeast corner of the
property conveyed to Daniel
C & Cynthia M Clevenger of
record in Deed Book 4253,
Page 1816
g / Proposed
Cynthia levenger Pro M C p
D B 4253 Pg 1816 i Temporary
PIN# 7920451697 P ry
r Workspace 1
50'
Proposed
Temporary
Workspace 3
Proposed
Permanent
Easement
/ Proposed Existing
ngs T
L Temporary Buildings
Workspace 2
l Tract 5�
Leonard J &Imogene Fields and Charles
T & Emily Fields and Amy Fields Rumley
D B 5192 Pg 103
PIN# 7920550796
I
Proposed
Temporary
Workspace 5
Limits of 20— f
Garden
�- Asphalt I /
x Driveway
Mlllrun
Road
I
I
I
I I
i I
I
I
t I
t�
0
O
19O
Bruce L d Elaine J Christopher
Gravel D 4758 Pg 001
Leta B Climer Llmng Trus� Proposed Drive f P; 129' Pg 101
D B 6424, Pg 2286 Tem Temporary Pi N# 7920549849
PIN#7920352300 P ry ` �)
Tra�� Workspace 4
\ Jack B & Mary P Johnson
D B 3629, Pg 1080
PIN# 7920542514
1 Michael J Moore PLS L 5086, certify that this plat was drawn under my supervision from an actual
Mey made under my supervision that the oouneary lines not surveyee ere indicated witn dashed linos
as drawn from Information derived from Me Guilford County, INC Register of Dead s Office That the ratio
of precision is greater than 1 10 000 that Vies plat masts the requirements of the Standards of Practice
for Land Surveying in Norm Carolina (21 NCAC 56 1600)
That this plat was amoareo for the purpose of easement acqutsnion only and is not intendso to be a
boundary survey of the pmperry shown hereon It is the intent of this plat the easement shall cross the
entire parcel
Thai the control and Ges to this survey were performed using GPS methods, that this survey is of
nomer category sum as the recombination of existing parcels a court- ordered survey or other
exception to the definitonof submenson
'-
MIC� MO CITE
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD (OLD) 0 IR(0)
PROPOSED PERMANENT
EASEMENT
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
WORKSPACE
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION
SO FT
ACREAGE
Perm anen. Easement
91310
2234
Temporary Workspace 1
312
0007
Temporary `Workspace 2
2 629
0060
Temporary Wdre,pnce 3
1206
17 901
0028
0 411
1 empora y Workspoce 4
Temoorary Workspace 5
3429
0079
-.1—e s 11-11
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF JACK B & MARY P JOHNSON
8149 FLATROCK ROAD, STOKESDALE, NC 27357
ELI PROJECT # 14 -21 -3011 PNG IR# 0230491
DATE 1 -23 -15 I SCALE 1" = 307 SHEET 1 OF 5
TRACT 00 -1 - PIN# 7920542514
Piedmont
Natural Gas
ENERGY LAND & INFRA 5TRUCTURE, PL LC
1420 DONELSON PIKE SUITE Al2 • NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFf ICE 615 -3a3 -6300 WWW ELI -LLC COM-LICENSE k P-12189 $ •
ENGINEER SURVEYORS INERASTRUCTllRE •ENVIRONMENTAL

Exhibit A - Sheet 2 of 5
DESCRIPTION
1t„lllllil „r/
NOTES
158
\�r CAR �� '%
I All property lines and corners established using existing centers
found, existing boundary evidence, deeds
Charles T &Emil y Fields and
°s
a�
and and plats of record m
the Guilford County Register of Deeds office
Ellison
`0 0 ES S 70 ° A ��
2 All distances hoozontai
Road
''
are gird distances, in feet The quit factor for
this project Is 0 99986896 To compute ground coordinates for this
17 901
-yo ,�%�7�e1,'(�
protect, multiply by the Inverse of 0 ghl-cf 98
3
3 Subject to any and all easements right -of -way, streets and
assessments as the same may appear of record m the Register of
Shoeoad
Road
- < L_
Deeds office Clerk of Court town or county tax offices, or which may
rte_
\ �' SITE
1
' 992
have been acquired by prescriptive use
4 This survey Is Intended for PNG easement acquisition
yam \'
° O �•
5 NC coordinates as shown hereon based
N C STATE PLANE
®
9 .S UR`1
gntl are upon CPS
,C Q \
® ®eaeo °ea °�
observations Will NCGs' network RTK system and are
record in Deed Book 4253,
Proposed
referenced to the NAD 83(NSRS 2007) datum
6 This map 1s not a certified survey and has not been reviewed by a
Page 1816
local government agency for compliance with any applicable land
development regulations
7 Atd le rep oIf was not furnished to this surveyor therefore this survey
VICINITY MAP
N
is subject to the findings of an accurate title examination and report
f
Daniel C Clevenger & I
Cynthia M Clevenger
D B 4253 Pg 1816
PIN# 7920451697 1
1
IR(0) --
Proposed
Temporary
Workspace 1
T1
h�
(V
I•_
Tract 5 T4
Leta B Cllmer Living Trust �
D B 6424, Pg 2286 I
PIN# 7920352300
1
1 Michael J Moore PLS L -5086, certify that this pal was drawn under my supervision from an actual
survey made under my upe —on that the boundary lines not surveyed are indicated with dashed lines
as arawn from mformation derived tram the Gwifom County NC Register of Deed s Office That the ratio
or precision is greater than 1 10 u'DO mat ,his plat meets the requirements of me Standards of Practice
for Lane Surveying in North Carolina (21 NCAC 56 1600)
That this pat was prepared for the purpose of easement acquisition only and is not intended to oe a
boundary survey of the property shown hereon his he intent of Oils pat the easement shall cross the
entire parcel
That me control and ties to the survey were performed using GPS methods, that this survey is of another
category such as the recorimmalron of existing parcels a court - ordered survey or other exception to the
definition of subdivision
MICHAEL) MOORE, PL `..J `Q�= � DATE`(�
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD TOLD) QIR(0)
PROPOSED PERMANENT r ®.,,�
EASEMENT �01"IJ
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
WORKSPACE
AREATABLE
DESCRIPTION
P O B
Leonard J & Imogene Fields and
Permanent Easement
Temporary Workspace
/
N = 905271 44
Charles T &Emil y Fields and
0007
Temporary Workspace 2
E = 1724281 19
Amy Fields Rumley
Temporary Wbrkspaw 3
1,206
0028
D B 5192, Pg 103
17 901
001
Said point of beginning being
PIN 7920550796
�
the southeast corner of the
property conveyed to Daniel
N C STATE PLANE
C & Cyrdma M Clevenger of
NAD 83 (2011)
record in Deed Book 4253,
Proposed
GEOID 2012a
Page 1816
///��� Permanent
Easement
Daniel C Clevenger & I
Cynthia M Clevenger
D B 4253 Pg 1816
PIN# 7920451697 1
1
IR(0) --
Proposed
Temporary
Workspace 1
T1
h�
(V
I•_
Tract 5 T4
Leta B Cllmer Living Trust �
D B 6424, Pg 2286 I
PIN# 7920352300
1
1 Michael J Moore PLS L -5086, certify that this pal was drawn under my supervision from an actual
survey made under my upe —on that the boundary lines not surveyed are indicated with dashed lines
as arawn from mformation derived tram the Gwifom County NC Register of Deed s Office That the ratio
or precision is greater than 1 10 u'DO mat ,his plat meets the requirements of me Standards of Practice
for Lane Surveying in North Carolina (21 NCAC 56 1600)
That this pat was prepared for the purpose of easement acquisition only and is not intended to oe a
boundary survey of the property shown hereon his he intent of Oils pat the easement shall cross the
entire parcel
That me control and ties to the survey were performed using GPS methods, that this survey is of another
category such as the recorimmalron of existing parcels a court - ordered survey or other exception to the
definition of subdivision
MICHAEL) MOORE, PL `..J `Q�= � DATE`(�
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD TOLD) QIR(0)
PROPOSED PERMANENT r ®.,,�
EASEMENT �01"IJ
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
WORKSPACE
AREATABLE
DESCRIPTION
So FT
ACREAGE
Permanent Easement
Temporary Workspace
91310
2 2M
312
0007
Temporary Workspace 2
2629
0060
Temporary Wbrkspaw 3
1,206
0028
Temporary Wonspace 4
i— parary `NoNspace5
17 901
001
1 3429 1
0019
T
v
O
n
Mdlrun
;^ Road
LO
uE
P21
T5 Proposed
—P22 Temporary
P23 Workspace 3 I
2
�"—P24 r 4 j
Jack B & Mary P Johnson
D B 3629, Pg 1080
Proposed PIN# 7920542514
Temporary
Workspace 2
GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)
100 u 50 100 200
L
1 Inch = 100 ft
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF JACK B & MARY P JOHNSON
8149 FLATROCK ROAD, STOKESDALE, NC 27357
ELI PROJECT # 14- 21.3011 PNG IR# 0230491 _
DATE 1.23 -15 SCALE 1' = 100' SHEET 2 OF 5
'_T� 04 - PIN# 7920542514
7' Piedmont
} Gas
as
ENERGY CAND & INFRASTRUCTURE PLLC
1420 DONELSON PIKE SUITE Ala • NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFFICE 61S- 383 -6300 • WWW ELI -LLC COM•LICENSE # P -1289
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL

Exhibit A - Sheet 3 of 5
�)ttlilli,Il /rr
NOTES __
`, CAR
c
O� ��
___
i All property lines and corners established using existing corners
found existing boundary
aaaao ®®
m
evidence and deeds and plats of record in
the Guilford County Register of Deeds
O a° F �S 5 I P
%
office
2 All distances are horizontal distances,
O y
�-9
grid In feet The gntl factor for
this Project is 0 99986898 To compute ground coordinates for this
26,9
protect, by the inverse of 0 99986896
to any
L�(� ? 3 Subject a any and all easements right of-way, streets and
�I 1 � 1 assessments, as the same may appear of
l `7�ar(�,
- L- 0 6
recd
record to the Register of
Deeds offce Clerk of Court town
_
9
or county tax offices or which may
have been
Off' �e
�>
/GO
acgmred by Prescriptive use
4 This
®a
� me Q-,
survey is m(entletl for PNG easement acquisition
' Cisn ® ®r `S UR.Jo® ,QO
5 NO gnd coordinates as shown hereon are based upon GPS
observations utilizing NCGs'
7 N� \
®J
network RTK system and are
referenced to the NAD 83
F�
(NSRS 2007) del m
6 This
vs�
7
map is not a certified survey and has not been reviewed by a
- -��
local government agency for compliance with any applicable land
development regulations
7 A title report was not furnished to this surveyor, therefore this survey
is subject to the findings of an accurate title examination and report
0
N
10 i
N
L
Cn
tU
N
rn IC
J
�I
Leonard J & Imogene Fields and
Charles T & Emily Fields and
• Amy Fields Rumley
Proposed D B 5192, Pg 103
Millrun
Road
158 r Road
Ellison �T
Road
Shoelme Is
Road 7
// SITE
O
C,
VICINITY MAP
Garden "Nv' — y
/ Workspace 4
�C Tract x
_� / Existing
Jack B & Mary P Johnson / Buildings
D B 3629, Pg 1080
PIN# 7920542514 i
I x��
1 Michael J Moore PLS L 5086 cemly that tins plat was drawn under my supemvon from an actual
urvey made under my "Pell- Iher the edendary Lnss not surveyed are no- wish dashed Imes
as drawn from Information derived from the Gutlford County, NO Register of Deed s Office That the ratio
of precision a greater than 1 10 000 that this plat meets the requirements of the Standams o! Practice for
Land Surveying to North Carolina (21 NCAC 56 1600) '
That this plat was prepared for .ne purpose of easement acquisition only site Is trot Intended to be a
boundary survey of the property shown hereon It is the intent of this plat the easement shall Cross he
entire parcel
rhat the contra and ties to this survey were Performed using GPS methods that this survey is of another
category such as the recombination of existing Parcels a coun- emend survey or other exception to the
deflntaon of s,wlv,sidn
PLS e
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD (OLD) J IRG)
PROPOSED PERMANENT 1, ,
EASEMENT
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
WORKSPACE
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION
SO FT
ACREAGE
Permanent Easement
97 310
2 234
iemPo a r WoMspece1
Tempomy Workspace 2
112
0007
26,9
0060
Ternpurary WorksP,i. 3
1206
0028
Ie POrary Worxspace 4
Temporary Workspace S
17 301
0 411
p0)g
3429
Ij
Asphalt
Driveway m
N
N C STATE PLANE
NAD 83 (2011)
GEOID 2012a
GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)
too 0 50 too 200
i
1 Inch = 100 ft
�R4NTOR S INI I14L5
ACROSS THE LANDS OF JACK 8 & MARY P JOHNSON
_8149 FLATROCK ROAD, STOKES_DALE, NC 27357
ELI PROJECT # 14 -21 -3011 � PNG IR# 0230491
DATE 1 -23.15 1 SCALE F= 100' SHEET 3 OF 5
'TL RAGT 004 - PIN# 7920542514
I Piedmont
, I Natural Gas
ENERGY LAND £r INFRASTRUCTURE PLLC
1420 DONELSON PIKE SUITE Al2 • NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFFICE 615- 383 -6300 • WWW ELI -LLC COM`LICENSE If P -1289
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL

Exhibit A - Sheet 4 of 5 Mlllrun
n t, NOTES 51 g r Road
C A 7jAi, 1 All progeny lines antl comers established using existing comers ~�
Qe ®M ®r� Q� found existing boundary evidence, antl deeds and plats of recortl m Ellison T
`- u® e e ro ' the Gul mff County Register Of Deeds office m
C) e� ES S /O e 2 2 All distances are horizontal grid distances, in feet The grid factor for Road o
this project is 0 99986898 To compute ground coordinates for this
s project multiply by the inverse of 0 99986898 Shoellne
,,,[1' a �3
Subject to an and all easements right -of -way, streets and Road
I� W assessmenIs, as the same may appear of record in the Register of
s L- 6 = Deeds office Clerk of Court town or county tax offices or which may
O1Z " have been acquired by prescriptive use SITE
4 This survey is intended for PNG easement acquisition O
a wO J 5 NC gnd coordinates as shown hereon are based upon GPS d
Ciyq a `S UR re® ,Q0 observatwns utilizing NCGs' network RTK system and are
tt` \� \ referenced to the NAD 83 (NSRS 2007) datum
F� w J e Thrs map is not a certified survey and has not been reviewed by a
local government agency for compliance with any applicable land
d 7 devellopmenlregulabons
N7 A title report was not furnished to this surveyor therefore, this survey VICINITY MAP
Is subject to the findings of an accurate title examatabon and report
A( Leonard J & Imogene Fields and
Charles T & Emily Fields and ' t
Amy Fields Rumley
D B 5192 Pg 103
I PIN# 7920550796
Proposed
Permanent
N C STATE PLANE Easement —P8 _
NAD 83 (2011) I P7
®. — v �.M l s Iu
GEOID 2012a tl: c r n ° *-77
F' a n
4 o 9�
b asi ixC�yC�'y P a'F'�K,
Gravel Drive
71 0 GPs
P17 P16 5
Proposed P15'__T12
Temporary �f
ry
�? P10
r,
Workspace 4 Tract a P14
o I Jack 8 & Mary 9 Johnson �A , ` , Gravel
D B 3629, P 1080 - Drive
M PIN# 7920542514 P13
O
P
�x T10
Asphalt - -'1 \ \� Drive ­7
P12 \ Gravel
C Driveway 1 �\ Proposed Drive
�� _ P \
Temporary \
m ` Workspace 5
2 I Existing
1 Bwldtng \
Bruce L & Elaine J Christopher
I 1 11 D B 4758 Pg 001
j P B 129, Pg 101
1 Michael J Moore, PLS L 5086 Geri that this plat was drawn under my supervision from an actual PIN# 7920549849
survey me" under my --on Ina, the boundary lines not surveyed are inb, —. with dashed Imes
as drawn from obodabdn derived from the Guilford County NO Register of Deed s Office That the ratio
Of precision is greeter than 1 10 000 that this plat meets the regwrenenls of the Standards of Placate for
Law Surveying in North Carolina (21 NCAC 56 1600)
That this oat was prepared for the purpose 0 easement acquisition only and is not mteoded to be a
Wundary survey of the omnery shown hereon It is the intent Of this plat the . —roan shah cross the GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)
entire P.—[ 100 0 50 rod 200
That the control and ties to this survey were Performed using GPS methods that his survey is of another I V
category, such as the recombination of existing parcels a courtordered survey or other exception to the
deslnYition Jr�oltf_tsa_bdivision 1 inch = 100 fl
NICM,} fe00R PLS �Q ) -3— IS—
DATE GRANTOR S INIr1PL5
LEGEND
PROPER rY BOUNDARY LINE e
IRON ROD (OLD) OIR(0)
PROPOSED PERMANENT rl Mill
EASEMENT 11 s.�
PROPOSED TEMPORARY fis
wORKSPACE /�/
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION
SO FT
ACREAGE
Permanent Easement
97310
22J4
Temporary workspace 1
312
0 007
Temporary Workspace 2
2629
0060
Temporary workspace 3
1 206
0 028
remPOrarY Wod(spnce 4
Temporary Worksparn5
17 901
3,429
0 411
00 /9
t1iJtMtN I t-uk PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF JACK B & MARY P JOHNSON
8149 FLATROCK ROAD, STOKESDALE, NC 27357
ELI PROJECT # 14 -21 -3011 1 PNG IR# 0230491
DATE 1 -23.15 SCALE I"= IN ; SHEET 4 OF 5
TRACT 004�) -- PIN# 7920542514
Piedmont
rim .� Natural Gas
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE PCCC
1420 DONELSON PINE SUITE Ail - NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFFICE GIS -383 -6300 - WWW ELI-LLC COM•LICENSE # P-1289
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL

CARO"
=�aOFES3 /0,� 2
a°
Oa9 SUR �O
tiq ®m ® » ®aaa�r�
LEGEND
Exhibit A - Sheet 5 of 5
PERMANENT EASEMENT LINE TABLE
LINE
DIRECTION
LENGTH
P1
S69' 37 04 "E
123 46'
P2
S69' 37'04"E
25 00'
P3
N20' 22'56"E
2500,
P4
N20' 22'56"E
200 88'
P5
S84' 51' 03"E
722 27'
P6
S46' 45'58"E
26 53'
P7
N88' 14'02"E
645 13'
P8
S17' 19'55"E
1805,
P9
S19' 53'22"E
124 03'
PTO
S27' 28'29'E
7365,
P11
S87' 00'16'W
5494
P12
N27' 28'29"W
17 95'
P13
N27' 28'29"W
36 25'
P14
N19' 53'22"W
38 91'
P15
N19' 53'22"W
4944'
P16
N 19' 53'22"W
21 04'
P17
S88' 14'02"W
628 75'
P18
N46' 45'58"W
29 98'
P19
N84' 51'03'W
25581'
P20
N84" 51'03'W
361 00'
P21
N84' 51'03"W
5000,
P22
S20' 22'56"W
5000,
P23
S20' 22'56"W
52 32'
P24
S20' 22' 56 'W
135 36'
P25
N69' 37'04'W
181 92'
P26
N2" 04' WE
52 66'
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD (OLD) 0IR(0)
PROPOSED PERMANENT
EASEMENT
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
WORKSPACE
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION
SO PT
ACREAGE
Permanent Easement
Temporary Workspace'
97,310
2 234
312
2 629
1206
0007
0 060
0028
Temporary VJprkspace 2
Temporary W.,kepar e 3
Temporary Workspace 4
17 901
0 411
re- ary 'Norespace5
3429 1
0079
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE LINE TABLE
LINE
DIRECTION
LENGTH
TI
N65' 22'56'E
35 36'
T2
S2' 07' 04 "E
65 33'
T3
S20' 22'56"W
75 00'
T4
N69' 37'04"W
25 00'
T5
S57' 45'57"W
79 46'
T6
SBA' 14'02'W
643 58'
77
N46' 45'58"W
31 36'
T8
N84' 51'03"W
200 62
T9
N62' 21' 03 "W
52 26'
T10
SEE' 30' 31'W
50 00'
T11
N23' 32'51"W
75 00'
T12
N86' 30' 31 "E
50 00'
=A5EMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF JACK B & MARY P JOHNSON
_ 8149 FLATROCK ROAD, STOKESDALE, NC 27357
ELI PROJECT # 14 -21 -3011 1 PNG IR# 0230491
DATE 1.23 -15 1 SCALE 1'= 100' 1 SHEET 5 OF 5
TRACT 004 - PIN# 7920542514
s S€
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE PLLC
0 1420 DONELSON PIKE SUITE AIR • NASHVILLE TN 37217
Of'ICE 61S- 383 -6300 " WWW ELI-LLC COM•LICENSE M P -1289
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS - INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL

Exhibit A - Sheet 1 of 4
158
\\nitl111111111
`, CAR 7r�
c ` ee m o �i�
" ea ��
o®t" ! ES S /O D e iL J�
, -y
_ 1 `
NOTES
I All property lines and corners established using existing comers
found existing boundary evidence, and deeds and plats of record In
the Guilford County Register of Deeds office
2 All distances are horizontal grid distances in feet The gntl factor for
this project Is 0 99986898 To compute ground coordinates for this
project multiply by the Inverse of 0 9 ht of-way Subject to any and all easements, right of -way sireeis and
assessments as the same may appear of record in the Register of
a x
p� x
gash
yOC a �r
' a
�C + 4
J'i a a
a aaee S ®R, ®a CIO
y7r0L 11 I J I I1 t tjlk 3
3 ' I
Deeds office, Clerk of Court, town or county tax offices or which may
have been acquired by pre mptive use
4 This survey Is intended for PNG easement acquisition
5 observations grid coordinates as shown hereon are system upon are
observations uhfizing NCGs' network RTK system and are
referenced to the NAD 83 (NSRS 2007) datum
6 local go emment agency for comp) ance with tany applicable dland
developmenl regulations
SITE
Shoehne
Road
VICINITY MAP
7 A title report was not furnished to this surveyor, therefore, this survey
Temporary Worksaace 2
Is subject to the findings of an accurate title examination and report
0 072
\ Existing
\
ex
// Buildings
On; (Typical)
1 �
� -z / I
1 .
Proposed
Temporary t i
Workspace 1 I t
Proposed I
Permanent
Easement
:�E, gent/ Proposed
\ Tract 6
Temporary
Ronald D Preston
0 B 5503, Pg 652 ` Workspace 2
P B 138, Pg 20
PIN7l 7920254295
Drainage, Maintenance N /T�t 5� Proposed
and Utility Easement 1 Leta B Chmer Living Trust Agreement Temporary -
D B 6424, Pg 2286 Works ace 3
PIN# 7920352300 p
N Shoehne - _
Road -�'- --
N C STATE PLANE
NAD 83 (2011)
GEOID 2012a
I Michael J Moore PLS L -5086 carry trial this plat was drawn under my supervision from an actual
neIf made under my supervision that the boundary lines not surveyed are inoca ad with dashed lines
as drawn from mlormatlon derived from the Guilford County NC Register of Dead s Office That the ratio
of precisions greater than 1 10 000 that this Plat meets the requirements of the Standards of Practice for
Land Surveying in North Carolina (21 NCAC 56 1600)
That this plat was prepared for the purpose of easement acquisition only and is not mantled to be a
boundary survey of the property shown mention It is the intent of tnis plat the easement shall cross the
entire parcel
That the control and ties to this survey were pertamled using CPS methods that this survey ,s of another
category such as the recombination of existing parcels a could ordered survey or other exception to the
defmaion of subdivision
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD (OLD) 0 IR(OI
PROPOSED PERMANENT
EASEMENT
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
Wi7RKSPACE �/
DATE
l
GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)
300 0 150 300 600
1 Inch = 300 ft
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
® ACROSS THE LANDS OF LETA B CLIMER LIVING TRUST AGREEMENT
7027 ELLISON ROAD, ST_OKES_DALE, NC 27357
ELI PROJECT # 14 -21 -3011 1 PNG IR# 0230491
DATE 1 -26 -15 , SCALE 1" = 300' 1 SHEET 1 OF 4
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION
SO GT
ACREAGE
Perrei —I Easement
96 745
2 221
Temporary Workspace 1
1 897
0044
Temporary Worksaace 2
3 125
0 072
r—damry Workspace 3
2 573
0 055
ry' T��/Tr�O(�0�] -- ri�yPIN# 7920352300
1 p+ P'�MY i ont
1j Natural Gas
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE PL LC
1420 DONELSON PIKE SUITE Al2 I NASHVILLE TN 37217
14F OFFICE 615 -3B3 -6300 • WWW ELI -LLC COM- LICENSE # P -1289
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL

P 135 Pg ii ♦ ( ) P �a- .S.u:A..Iw�1 '\ \lei :,hd'''a�M4 j LL
PIN #7920163873 /.2 �n• t- �jy�.yfc'r"�,`.
O 2B' F ubhc Trail _ v N,5 T10 ` t ` �
T8 P11
V Easement A) P10
{ P12 � Proposed
P15 IR(o) T9 Temporary
Proposed
7 P14 Temporary Workspace 2
Traa 6A \ ) Workspace 1 Proposed I
/ Ronald n \ IR(o1� \ Permanent
/ DB 85039 PPg 2804 Drainage, Maintenance
PIN# 7920251406 \ and Utility Easement ` Easement
7 /) I
N Ronald D Preston /TfaCt 5
D B 5503 Pg 652 1
P B 138 P9 20 Leta B Cllmer Living Trust Agreement
PIN# 7920254295 D B 6424, Pg 2286 I
/ PIN# 7920352300
� � Shoeltne - /` •
O�d Katnryn Ann Dunn
D 8 7477 Pg 1474
P B 117 Pg 98 If
PIN# 7920341910 /
N C STATE PLANE
NAD 83 (2011) — —
GEOID 2012a
I Michael J Moore PLS L 5086, cenity that this plat was drawn under my cope —on from an actual
survey made under my supervision that the boundary tines npt surveyed are indicated with tlashed Imes
as drawn from information derived from the Guilford County NC Register of Deed s Office That me ratio
of precision rs th
greater than 1 10 000 that this plat meets e requirements of the Standards of Practice for
Land Surveying in North Carolina (21 NCAC 56 1600)
That this plat was prepared for the purpose of easement acquisition only and is not intended .a Its a
coundary survey of the property shown hereon It rs the intent of this plat the easement sha'I cap. the
entire parcel
That the control and ties to this survey were performed using GPS methods that ,his survey is of another
category such as the recombination of existing parcels a court ordered survey or other exception to the
definition of subdivision A
LEGEND
PROPERTv BOUNDARv LINE
IRON ROD (OLD) OIR(0)
PROPOSEDPERMANENT rrt�
EASEMENT
PROPOSEDTEMPORARY
WORKSPACE
�� .
AREA TABLE
Exhibit A - Sheet 2 of 4
SO FT
ACREAGE
Permanent Easement
158
\It11lIUIU1,,,
NOTES--- -
1 897
\v�x C A p iiv
O �'
1 All property lines and corners established using existing corners
found existing boundary deeds
ma
m1
evidence and and plats of record in
the Guilford County Register of Deeds office
p
Q- q
ma S S / O ®m 2 ��
�O ®'y
2 All distances are horizontal grid distances, to feet The grid factor for
this project is 0 99986898 To compute ground coordinates for this
9atha
�O �A
a - project multiply by the Inverse of 0 99986898
- /�►`�y/�� _VI A 3 Subject to any and all easements right -of -way, streets and
) 17
$
assessments as the same may appear of record In the Register of
_
I,
m
Deeds office, Clerk of Court, town or county tax offices, or which may
have been by
/
®
�0mm �
acquired prescriptive use
4 This survey Is intended for PNG easement acquisition
\;
Q J�i
r O oo ®OO �
5 INC grid coordinates as shown hereon are based upon GPS
observations utilizing NCGs' network RTK
SITE
®o .....mm
6.9
system and are
referenced to the NAD 83 (NSRS 2007) datum
Shoelme
6 This map Is not a cenified survey and has not been reviewed by a
_
'\\
1I \�
local government agency for compliance with any applicable land
P O B u l l l t -3 -15
N = 905723 60
development regulations
E = 1722143 52
7 A title report was not furbished to this surveyor therefore, this survey
VICINITY MAP
Is subject to the findings of an accurate title examination and report
Said point of beginning being
S60 °12'16 "E 335 10' from the
southwest corner of the
property conveyed to Leta B
Cllmer Living Trust
7 _
Existing' =„_
Buildings
Agreement of record in Deed /
Book 6424 Page 2286
_ (Typical) n� m ro ¢ a
^
�•,t� \
0 4 S m m m z J
19 4 a
a Jimmy D& Meiodle J Autrand c
088 P
P3 / 03 Pg 691 E
Leta
TRIO)
B Clime r Living Trust Agreemel�(
0 6424 Pg 2286
PIN# 792 0832 I 1- 21
TJ 11
�T2 N .
PIN# 7920253798
m T1 mina I
Oa19 IR(D)
''.. Drcos Lee &Ev u
O B 4264 Pg 189 IR 0 0
P 135 Pg ii ♦ ( ) P �a- .S.u:A..Iw�1 '\ \lei :,hd'''a�M4 j LL
PIN #7920163873 /.2 �n• t- �jy�.yfc'r"�,`.
O 2B' F ubhc Trail _ v N,5 T10 ` t ` �
T8 P11
V Easement A) P10
{ P12 � Proposed
P15 IR(o) T9 Temporary
Proposed
7 P14 Temporary Workspace 2
Traa 6A \ ) Workspace 1 Proposed I
/ Ronald n \ IR(o1� \ Permanent
/ DB 85039 PPg 2804 Drainage, Maintenance
PIN# 7920251406 \ and Utility Easement ` Easement
7 /) I
N Ronald D Preston /TfaCt 5
D B 5503 Pg 652 1
P B 138 P9 20 Leta B Cllmer Living Trust Agreement
PIN# 7920254295 D B 6424, Pg 2286 I
/ PIN# 7920352300
� � Shoeltne - /` •
O�d Katnryn Ann Dunn
D 8 7477 Pg 1474
P B 117 Pg 98 If
PIN# 7920341910 /
N C STATE PLANE
NAD 83 (2011) — —
GEOID 2012a
I Michael J Moore PLS L 5086, cenity that this plat was drawn under my cope —on from an actual
survey made under my supervision that the boundary tines npt surveyed are indicated with tlashed Imes
as drawn from information derived from the Guilford County NC Register of Deed s Office That me ratio
of precision rs th
greater than 1 10 000 that this plat meets e requirements of the Standards of Practice for
Land Surveying in North Carolina (21 NCAC 56 1600)
That this plat was prepared for the purpose of easement acquisition only and is not intended .a Its a
coundary survey of the property shown hereon It rs the intent of this plat the easement sha'I cap. the
entire parcel
That the control and ties to this survey were performed using GPS methods that ,his survey is of another
category such as the recombination of existing parcels a court ordered survey or other exception to the
definition of subdivision A
LEGEND
PROPERTv BOUNDARv LINE
IRON ROD (OLD) OIR(0)
PROPOSEDPERMANENT rrt�
EASEMENT
PROPOSEDTEMPORARY
WORKSPACE
�� .
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION
SO FT
ACREAGE
Permanent Easement
96 745
2 221
Temporary Workspace 1
1 897
0 044
Temporary Workspace 2
3,125
0072
temporary Workspace 3
2 573
0 Dig
GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)
200 0 100 200 40o
1 Inch = 200 ft
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO i INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF LETA B CLIMER LIVING TRUST AGREEMENT
7027 ELLISON ROAD, STOKESDALE, NC 27357
ELI PROJECT # 14 -21 -3011 1 PNG IR# 0230491
DATE 1 -26-15 ! SCALE I"= 200' I SHEET 2 OF 4
CTRACT 00� - PIN# 7920352300
raPiedmont
ij Natural Gas
IrENERGY LAND 6 INFRASTRUCTURE, PLCC
1420 DONEL50N PIKE SUITE Al2 • NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFFICE 615- 383 -6300 • WWW ELI -LLC COM•LICENSE # P -1289
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL

Exhibit A - Sheet 3 of 4
IT
N
m
m
a)
fe
a�
c
L
U
2
�O
Asa/
roc ha Or
SITE
,Shoehne
Rona
VICINITY MAP
PIN# 7920356610 I Dame) C 8 Cynthia M Clevenger
D B 4253 Pg 1816
PIN# 7910451697
I" P4 Proposed
Permanent
Easement
P5-11
/
Proposed
(� Temporary
Workspace 3
1
P6
Tract 5 pg
Leta B Chmer Living Trust Agreement T6 P7
I D B 6424, Pg 2286 T5—
PIN# 7920352300 T4
P8 1
Jack B 8 Mary P Johnson
D B 3629 Pg 1080
_ — PIN#7920542514
Tracy L 8 Crystal M Perdue
D B d748 Pg 18IA
P B 117 98 L �
PIN# 79203434 3825
Gudfom County
John 8 Caroyo C' "I", D B 7304 Pg 575
PIN# 7926444080
Fenuly Ltd Partnership
mQ o, 3 D B 4539 Pg 1506
P B 117 Pg 98 j
J PINK 7920346759 � I
/
` s
I Mlchael J Moore PLS L 5086 certify that :his plat was drawn under my supemsion from an actual
urvey made under my supervision that the bm.neery lines not surveyed are indicated with dashed Tines
as drawn from mfonnation derived from the Gu ifera County NC Regis- a Deed s Office That the rave
of precmon is greater than 1 10 000 that this plat meets the requirements or the Standards of Practice for
Land Surveying In North Carolina (21 NCAC 56 1600),
That this plat was prepared for the purpose of easement acquisition only and is net Intended to be a
boundary survey of the property shown nereon It is the intent of this plat the easement shall cross the
entire Parcel
That the control and ties to tiss survey were perforated using GPS methods that this survey is of another
category such as the recombination of e—ung parcels a court ordered survey or other exception to the
tleh of subdivision
a 3
MICHAEL) MOO -LS' - DATE I '��
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD (OLD) 0IR(0)
PROPOSED PERMANEN I r'�
EASEMENT
PROPOSEOTEMPORARY
WORKSPACE
AREA FABLE
NOTES
Iii,
ACREAGE
,o, C
\A CAR
1 All property lines and comers established using existing comers
found, existing boundary evidence, and deeds and
as
e�
plats of record In
the Guilford County Register of Deeds office
_SS / O aaa �iL �,
°Q- �i
1 All distances are horizontal grid distances, In feet The grid factor for
this project is 099986898 To compute for
a
y 9`
ground coordinates this
project, multiply by the Inverse of 0 99986898
a
-All ,�/�
3 Subject to any and all easements, nght -of -way, streets and
Oil I �-{/�_
-, ` W��
assessments as the same may appear of record in the Register of
L- 8 _
Deeds office of Court town or county tax offices, or which may
i �
have been acquired by prescriptive use
4 This survey Is intended for PNG easement
acquisition
5 NC
0 S UR`I�y® C1�.\
god coordinates as shown hereon are based upon GIPS
a ®® O
observations utilizing NCGs' network RTK system and are
referenced to the NAD 83(NSRS 2007) datum
6 This map is not a certified survey and has not been reviewed by a
local government agency for compliance with any applicable land
development regulations
7 A title report was not fumished to this surveyor, therefore this survey
is subject to the findings of an accurate title examination and report
11
I Daniel C
8 Cynthia M Clevenger
D
B 7614, Pg 2119
P B 124 Pg 57
IT
N
m
m
a)
fe
a�
c
L
U
2
�O
Asa/
roc ha Or
SITE
,Shoehne
Rona
VICINITY MAP
PIN# 7920356610 I Dame) C 8 Cynthia M Clevenger
D B 4253 Pg 1816
PIN# 7910451697
I" P4 Proposed
Permanent
Easement
P5-11
/
Proposed
(� Temporary
Workspace 3
1
P6
Tract 5 pg
Leta B Chmer Living Trust Agreement T6 P7
I D B 6424, Pg 2286 T5—
PIN# 7920352300 T4
P8 1
Jack B 8 Mary P Johnson
D B 3629 Pg 1080
_ — PIN#7920542514
Tracy L 8 Crystal M Perdue
D B d748 Pg 18IA
P B 117 98 L �
PIN# 79203434 3825
Gudfom County
John 8 Caroyo C' "I", D B 7304 Pg 575
PIN# 7926444080
Fenuly Ltd Partnership
mQ o, 3 D B 4539 Pg 1506
P B 117 Pg 98 j
J PINK 7920346759 � I
/
` s
I Mlchael J Moore PLS L 5086 certify that :his plat was drawn under my supemsion from an actual
urvey made under my supervision that the bm.neery lines not surveyed are indicated with dashed Tines
as drawn from mfonnation derived from the Gu ifera County NC Regis- a Deed s Office That the rave
of precmon is greater than 1 10 000 that this plat meets the requirements or the Standards of Practice for
Land Surveying In North Carolina (21 NCAC 56 1600),
That this plat was prepared for the purpose of easement acquisition only and is net Intended to be a
boundary survey of the property shown nereon It is the intent of this plat the easement shall cross the
entire Parcel
That the control and ties to tiss survey were perforated using GPS methods that this survey is of another
category such as the recombination of e—ung parcels a court ordered survey or other exception to the
tleh of subdivision
a 3
MICHAEL) MOO -LS' - DATE I '��
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD (OLD) 0IR(0)
PROPOSED PERMANEN I r'�
EASEMENT
PROPOSEOTEMPORARY
WORKSPACE
AREA FABLE
DESCRIPTION
SO FT
ACREAGE
Permanent Easement
96 745
2 221
Temporary Workspace 1
1 897
312
0044
0 072
Temporary Workspace 2
Temppmry Workspece 3
2 ,573
0059
N
N C STATE PLANE
NAD 83 (2011)
GEOID 2012a
GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)
200 _ 0 too 200 400
1 Inch = 200 ft
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC.
ACROSS THE LANDS OF LETA B CLIMER LIVING TRUST AGREEMENT
7027 ELLISON ROAD, STOKESDALE NC 27357 _
ELI PROJECT # 14 -21 -3011 1 PNG IR# 0230491
DATE 1 -26 -15 SCALE 1" = 200' 1 SHEET 3 OF 4
T 005 - PIN# 7920352300
rls�'] Piedmont
Natural Gas
ENERGY LAND & INFRA STRUCTURE. PLLC
1420 DONE LS ON PIKE SUITE Al2 •NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFFICE 61S- 3133 -6300 • WWW ELI.LLC COM•LICENSE N P -1289
ENGINEERS •SURVEYORS •INFRASTRUCTURE •ENVIRONMENTAL

Exhibit A - Sheet 4 of 4
a 92 y0a 44
C'y
SU
y�� R`I. * ® ®0O
„I ,�-3 -15
PERMANENT EASEMENT LINE TABLE
LINE
DIRECTION
LENGTH
P1
N66' 07'24"E
148 09'
P2
N66' 07 24 "E
N66' 07'24"E
210 57'
P3
10238
P4
S71' 49' 34•E
1463 37'
P5
SET 37'04"E
39 43'
P6
S2' 04' 46 "W
52 66'
P7
N69' 37'04'W
14 80'
P8
N69' 37' 04 "W
40 20'
P9
N71° 49'34"W
1120,
P10
N71' 49' 34 "W
1356 98'
P11
N71' 49'34"W
7500'
P12
S66' 07' 24'W
15 00'
P13
S66' 07'24"W
339 81'
P14
N25' 49' 16 'W
13 94'
P15
NEW 12' 44 "W
44 77'
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD (OLD) 0IR(OI
PROPOSED PERMANENT r
EASEMENT
PROPOSEDTEMPORARY%
WORKSPACE b.d ./ -
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION
SO FT
ACREAGE
Parma — Easomenl
96 745
2 221
Tomporary Workspace 1
1 897
0044
Temporary Workspace 2
3125
0072
Temporary Workspace 3
2573
0059
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE LINE TABLE
LINE
DIRECTION
LENGTH
T
N21' 07'38'E
35 25'
T2
N66° 07 38'E
4982
T3
S71' 49'34"E
37 21'
T4
S6' 30'03"W
51 50'
T5
N69' 37'04"W
51 50'
T6
N6' 30'03"E
51 06'
T7
S49' 47'30"W
29 36'
T8
N71' 49'34"W
50 00'
T9
S66' 07'24"W
5000,
T10
N55' 29'40"W
29 36'
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF LETA B CLIMER LIVING TRUST AGREEMENT
7027 ELLISON ROAD, STOKESDALE NC 27357
ELI PROJECT # 14 -21 -3011 PING IR# 0230491
DATE 1 -26 -15 SCALE 1" = 200' ; SHEET 4 OF 4
CT 005 ply- PIN# 7920352300
r
Piedmont
ont
Natural Gas
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE, PLLC
1420 DONELSON PIKE SUITE AI2 • NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFFICE 615 -383 -6300 WWW ELI -LLC COM•LICEN SE # P -1289
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL

Exhibit A - Sheet 1 of 2
158
/ / /
C A$' ` OC ,
®e® ®®
\� o e O ® /G
,a �0 9
,g ro _
e
®
NOTES rty lines and comers established using existing corners
found, exlsung boundary evidence, and deeds and plats of record In
the Guilford County Register of Deeds office
2 All distances are horizontal grid distances In feet The grid factor for
project is 0 99986898 To compute ground coordinates for this
project to any by the Inverse of 0 99986898
3 Subject to any and all easements, right -of -way streets and
�I
D
O�
Q' q 9ath
OC a Or�
t I �'�^(
_ Q 6 e `"�•/
w
ma�jGO �0 ®�
assessments as the same may appear of record In the Register of
Deeds office Clerk of Court, town or county tax offices or which may
have been acquired by prescriptive use
4 This survey is intended for PNG easement acquisition
SITE
® ®®
�,( ee® `S UR. c. 0
x / tie"'... . tv
\xv``
5 NC grid coordinates as shown hereon are based upon GPS
observations utilizing NCGs' network RTK system and are
referenced to the NAD B3 (NSRS 2007) datum
6 This map is not a cemfied survey and has not been reviewed by a
local government agency for compliance with any applicable land
development regulations
Shoe%
Road oe
7 A title report was not furnished to this surveyor, therefore this survey
is subject to the findings of an accurate title examination and report
VICINITY MAP
RID) Leta B Chimer 424, Trust Agreement I /
�� J
\ ( ) D B 6422 25 2286
0 PIN# 7920253798 tj
�rracU \ O
RIO) Existing
Dickle Lee 8 Eva Sue Ousts �� \ ..– Buildings
D B 4264 Pg 189 .i P O B
P 6 135 Pg 1 t (Typical) N= 905620 49
PIN #7920153873 ♦ _ E = 1722315 04
25' Public Trail
/ ti / ♦ I Said point of beginning being
ccess asemen
/ A Et
—` I the northwest corner the
/ �� n / ♦ / \ ` property conveyed t Ronald
i R
/JJ / / \ \ ♦ D Preston of record n Deed
Book 5503 Page 652
/ \ / P5
IRO
/
Ps P2
� � �. rte,.
P3
/ T3�\
` Leta B Cllmer Living Trust Agreement
T2
/ I D 8 6424,Pg 2286
Proposed PIN #7920352300
20' Public Utility Permanent
Easement Easement Proposed
Tt. II A ` Temporary
Ronald D Preston ' J Workspace
5069 P
Pg 204
P 8 \ \ Tract 6 N
PIN# 7920251406 �--- --
\ Ronald D Preston
D B 5503, Pig 652
P B 138, Pg 20
PIN# 7920254295
so. e
Existing
\ /�— Drainage, Maintenance &
Utility Easement 7 %%
i, Michael J Moore PLS L -5086 certify that this plat was drawn under my supervision from an actual
survey made under my supervision that the boundary lines not surveyed are Indicated with dashed lines
as drawn From mformabon do—pt from the Gunfom County NC Register of Deed s Office That the ratio
of precision is greater than 1 10 000 that this plat meets the requirements of the Standards of Practice for
Land Surveying in North Carolina (21 NCAC 56 1600)
That this plat was prepared for the purpose of easement acquisition only and is not intended to be a
boundary survey of the property shown hereon his the invent of Nis plat the easement shall cross the
entire tempt,
That the control and ties to this surrey were performed using GPS methods that this survey is of another
category such as the recombination of existing parcels a Court- Ordered survey or other exception to the
definition of subdivision
IX1P 3- 3 -4OtS
MICHAEL MOORE PLS w�v DATE
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD (OLD) J ]RIO)
PROPOSEDPERMANENT T.W
EASEMENT =y`�
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
WORKSPACE
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION
SO FT
ACREAGE
Permanent Easement
8,899
0 204
Temporary Workspace
2248
0052
N C STATE PLANE
NAD 83 (2011)
GEOID 2012a
GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)
tea a 50 100 200
1 Inch = 100 ft
G-OR S INMALS
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF RONALD D PRESTON
8138 SHOELINE ROAD, STOKESDALE, NC 27357
ELI PROJECT # 14 -21 -3011 PNG IR# 0230491
DATE 2 -26 -15 SCALE 1" = 100' 1 SHEET 1 OF 2
'T� 006 - PIN# 7920254295
r6ll'U Piedmont
Natural Gas
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE PLLC
1420 DONELSON PIKE SUITE Al2 • NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFFICE 615- 383 -6300 • WWW ELI -LLC COM- LICENSE # P -1289
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS - INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL

Exhibit A - Sheet 2 of 2
� \A
tl�a ...
F�-Ss /0�
.,ten
M o t-6
2,�m-7 0 '4u
PERMANENT EASEMENT LINE TABLE
LINE
DIRECTION
LENGTH
P7
S60' 12' 44 "E
179 80'
P2
S25° 48'40"E
13 94'
P3
S66° 07'24"W
18 44'
P4
S66° 07'24"W
33 85'
P5
N60' 12'44"W
83 27'
P6
NEW 12'44"W
78 32'
P7
N31' 14' 11"E
50 02'
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD IOLD) O IRI07
PROPOSED PERMANENT
EASEMENT 16
PROPOSEDTEMPORARY 'j /)
WORKSPACE L.�
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION
SO FT
ACREAGE
Permanent Easement
8,899
0204
Temporary Workspace
2 248
0 052
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE LINE TABLE
LINE
DIRECTION
LENGTH
T1
S12* 46'31"W
2493'
T2
S66' 07'24"W
29 10'
T3
N60' 12' 16 "W
78 49'
T4
N6° 51'23"W
24 93'
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF RONALD D PRESTON
8138 SHOELINE ROAD, STOKESDALE, NC 27357
ELI PROJECT # 14 -21 -3011 1 PNG IR# 0230491
DATE' 2 -26 -15 ( SCALE 1" = 100' 1 SHEET 2 OF 2
BRA PIN# 7920254295
,7A Piedmont
Natural Gas
--- -� - - -- PRLPA c-
% ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE, PLLC
1420 DONELSON PIKE SUITE AI2 • NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFFICE GIS -383 -6300 • WWW ELI -LLC COM•LICENSE # P -1289
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS •INFRASTRUCTURE •ENVIRONMENTAL

Exhibit A - Sheet 1 of 2 56
NOTES
i +� i� 1 All property lines and corners established using existing corners a
C • C A Q r found existing boundary evidence and deeds and plats of record In p`a
®61 ®ae ®�ao the Guilford County Register of Deeds office Q"
e� S S / O v a� 2 All distances are honzontal grid distances, In feet The grid factor for C �9a�ha
= a �C' -➢ mis project Is 0 99986898 To compute ground coordinates for this y + or
_ Q ® project, multiply by the Inverse of 0 99986898
3,,.... Subject to any and all easements right -of -way streets and
Fr r t'iM- L/� /eFBtrA1{S.{y' assessments, 58 the same may appear of recortl in the Register of
LyJ I,{$6 e _ Deeds office, Clerk of Court, town or county tax offices, orwhlch may
-Z' ro V�� 4 have been acquired by prescriptive use SITE
sew �0 e� 4 This survey is Intended for PNGeasement acquisition
5 NC gnd coordinates as shown hereon are based upon GPS
C,,CC�wroe S UR ,ee® �O observations utilizing NCGS network RTK system and are
v A/ ee e`veee 0 referenced to the NAD 83 (NSRS 2007) datum _
�L 6 This map is not a certified survey and has not been reviewed by a --- T- Sh0%
y 3 ass local government agency for compliance with any applicable land RDaCJ ne
7
development regulations
P O B 7 A tide report was not fumtshed to this surveyor therefore, this survey VICINITY MAP
N = 905719 86 is subject to the findings of an accurate tide examination and report
E = 1722141 45
Said point of beginning being — ` Leta B Chmer Living Trust Agreement EXISting
the northwest comer of the —IR(0) D B 6424, Pg 2286 �.— BDildings
property conveyed to Ronald P4 \ PIN# 7920253798
D Preston of record in Deed t,� (Typical)
Book 5069 Page 984
o- w
7 Proposed /
Permanent /
AIR - f '�
yx;`Ty' Easement
Dickie Lee 8 Eva Sue Quate
DB a164 Pg 189 ��
P B 135, Pg 11 / / }.`' +rg1Z
PIN# 792015381 /f �� VV Tracts
Leta 6 Gunter Living 7NSt Agreement
1P � D 8 6424, Pg 2286
P3 \ PING 7920352300
TRIO)
\\r,�� / Proposed i
Temporary
�i
/ \ Workspace _ 25' PubllC Trail
Access Easement
( 20' Public Utility ` `6q
Easement r'
Existing
Drainage, Maintenance &
Utlt E t �
—� \ ` i i y asemen
Trraac_t 6A
\ Ronald D Preston \
\ D B 5069, Pg 984
P B 138, Pg 20
O� %` \ PIN #7920251406 1 I Ronald Preston N
/ D B 5503, Pg 652
P 8 138, 20
PIN# 79202525 4295
VIA
�p
I, Michael J Moore PLS L -5086 certify that this plat was drawn under my supervision from an actual N C STATE PLANE
survey made under my supervision that the boundary Imes not surveyed aro Indicated with dashed lines
as drawn from Information derived from the Guilford County, NC Register of Deed's Office That the ratio NAD 83 (2011)
of precision is greater than 1 10000 that this plat meets the requirements of the Standards of Practice for
Lantl Surveying in North Carolina 121 NCAC 56 1600) GEOID 2012a
That this plat was prepared for the purpose of easement acquisition only and is not intended to be a GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)
boundary survey of the property shown hereon It s the Intent of this plat the easement shall crass the 100 0 50 100 _ 200
entire parcel
That the cont,ol survey and ties to this were Performed using GPS methods that this survey is of another
category sucn as the recomomahon of existing parcels a coon- ordered survey, or other exception to the 1 inch= 100 ft
definition of subdivision
CIA dis
MICHAEL MOORE PLS DA1E GRANTOR S INITIALS
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD (OLD) 0 IR(0)
PROPOSED PERMANENT
EASEMENT
PROPOSEOTEMPORARY
WORKSPACE
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION SO Fr ACREAGE
Permanent Easement 9 967 0 229
Temporary Workspace 1 3152 0072
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF RONALD D PRESTON
8202 SHOELINE ROAD, STOKESDALE, NC 27357 _
ELI PROJECT # 14 -21 -3011 1 PNG IR# 0230491 _
DATE 2 -26 -15 1 SCALE 1" = 100' 1 SHEET t OF 2
TRACT 06A - PIN# 7920251406
r6lPiedmont
I 's IVartureB Gas
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE PLLC
1420 OONELSON PIKE SUITE Al2 • NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFFICE 615- 383 -6300 - WWW ELI -LLC COM- LICENSE # P -1289
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD (OLD) 0 IR(0)
PROPOSED PERMANENT
EASEMENT
PROPOSEOTEMPORARY
WORKSPACE
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION SO Fr ACREAGE
Permanent Easement 9 967 0 229
Temporary Workspace 1 3152 0072
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF RONALD D PRESTON
8202 SHOELINE ROAD, STOKESDALE, NC 27357 _
ELI PROJECT # 14 -21 -3011 1 PNG IR# 0230491 _
DATE 2 -26 -15 1 SCALE 1" = 100' 1 SHEET t OF 2
TRACT 06A - PIN# 7920251406
r6lPiedmont
I 's IVartureB Gas
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE PLLC
1420 OONELSON PIKE SUITE Al2 • NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFFICE 615- 383 -6300 - WWW ELI -LLC COM- LICENSE # P -1289
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF RONALD D PRESTON
8202 SHOELINE ROAD, STOKESDALE, NC 27357 _
ELI PROJECT # 14 -21 -3011 1 PNG IR# 0230491 _
DATE 2 -26 -15 1 SCALE 1" = 100' 1 SHEET t OF 2
TRACT 06A - PIN# 7920251406
r6lPiedmont
I 's IVartureB Gas
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE PLLC
1420 OONELSON PIKE SUITE Al2 • NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFFICE 615- 383 -6300 - WWW ELI -LLC COM- LICENSE # P -1289
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL

�CA�/ZC�,,
d � f�
®� L- 0 6-v
2, ®9 oa�4u
G� ®ti0 SUR`Ia -o 0
Jwem �0\.
Exhibit A - Sheet 2 of 2
PERMANENT EASEMENT LINE TABLE
LINE
DIRECTION
LENGTH
P7
S60' 12'44"E
200 02'
P2
S310 14' 11 "W
50 02'
P3
N60' 12'44"W
93 59'
P4
N60' 12'44"W
105 07'
PS
N29' 40'07"E
50 00'
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD (OLD) Q IR10)
PROPOSED PERMANEN i r` ®y-h
EASEMENT
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
WORKSPACE
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION
SO FT
ACREAGE
Permanem Easemem
9 967
0 229
Temporary Workspace
3152
0072
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE LINE TABLE
LINE
DIRECTION
LENGTH
T7
S29' 47'44"W
30 01'
T2
N60' 12' 16 "W
10500,
T3
N29' 40'07"E
30 00'
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF RONALD D PRESTON
8202 SHOELINE ROAD, STOKESDALE, NC 27357
_ELI PROJECT # 14 -21 -3011 j PNG IR# 0230491
DATE 2 -26 -15 I, SCALE 1" = 100' SHEET 2 OF —2
�RACT� - PINT# 7920251406
ENERGY LAND 6 INFRASTRUCTURE, PLLC
J 1420 OONELSON PIKE SUITE Al2 • NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFFICE 615- 383 -6300 WWW ELI -LLC COM•LICENSE M P -1289
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL

Exhibit A - Sheet 1 of 1
NOTES
\11 t t C AC property lines and corners established using existing corners I All
\� a9aea� O� % found existing boundary evidence, and deeds and plats of record in ��.1 %
(�L ® ®® the Guilford County Register of Deeds office 1 58
o a� ES S / O a ,r 2 All distances are horizontal gnd distances, In feet The god factor for
e00Q�O ti ®✓� this project is 0 99986898 To compute ground coordinates for this
protect, multiply by the Inverse of 0 99986898 �9at
L _ 3 Subject to any and all easements, ngnl -of -way streets and C hq
LcJ W-L� assessments, as the same may appear of mcord in the Register of SITE oa0
i s Deeds office of Court town or county tax offices or which may
® have been acquired by prescriptive use
7 r9jL �0 ®� 4 This survey Is Intended for PNG easement acquisition
C' O S URV `G ' Q \ 5 NC god coordinates as shown hereon am based upon GPS
,( ® ®aaa.aseoaaa O observations utilizing NCGs' network RTK system and are Shoeline
r.9 referenced to the NAD 83 (NSRS 2007) datum
J 6 This map is not a certified survey and has not been reviewed by a Road
/ rrrjii li1111tttt
local government agency for compliance with any applicable land
ei 3 -�5 development regulations
7 A title report was not furnished to this surveyor therefore, this survey VICINITY MAP
Is subject to the findings of an accurate title examination and report
(
to
m
I
( I
x
t2
Is
S291 56,03"W
5000
Dlckle Lee & Eva Sue Quate
N60`1216 "W
7095
P3
N73' 06'39'W
to
N m
)
N73* 06'39'W
D B 4201, Pg 297
coNN
Nfl 08 42 -W
I
=Ol
jp
I
P7
PIN# 7920168110
T qoI
m�
yN
C��
I O.-N
��m
rp CA
Ua0
Oi
awry
I
P10
U tiro
o
°o1m
¢a
= rnm
Qao
`°2a
m .N
amrn
vmi�
'-O m�
S60-12 16 -E
POB
'd
p n
NoA
( c Z I
4t
a
m - o
air`
N = 905727 88
E= 172207723
al
mz
Ymz
Boa
=O
v_
I`cmz)
Proposed
Said point of beginning being
Po �9 9 9
a
'm
" 21
Permanent-
529 °56'03 "W 17 59' from the
N
1 (
northeast corner of the
UEasement
property conveyed to Dlckle
P9
P10
Lee 8 Eva Sue Quate of
record in Deed Book 4264,
�� 4v' i-. 174- ` Page 189
P8 �1nis;�sr °i*t� ,�.���'�= �;=,an <^a�>x.'�r._
P7 I ♦ ♦ is�w p �1 Property
�
i P6 Pond P4-l4`� f Line
a o ♦ ♦ act �al�� re -tox
'+tom,{'rvyg-
a m Traci 8 �' Dlckle Lee & Eva Sue Quate
" m Z G Allen Linsey, Jr D B 4264, Pg 189 '�`L
0 2 D 8 4614 Pg 1112 P B 135, Pg 11 P3 —�
PIN #7920058682 ♦ ♦ PIN# 7920153873 _
I Dennis & Lori Rlm1 ` Proposed T2
D 6 c.1. P
PERMANENT EASEMENT LINE TABLE
LINE
DIRECTION
LENGTH
PI
S291 56,03"W
5000
P2
N60`1216 "W
7095
P3
N73' 06'39'W
19609'
P4
N73* 06'39'W
5'0590'
P5
Nfl 08 42 -W
45290
P6
N89" 11 26 W
8291
P7
NW 02 36"W
4111
P8
No' 49' 29'E
3253
P9
S89" 11' 26'E
120 12
P10
S89 "0842 "E
45998'
"I
S73' O6' 39'E
774 69'
P12
S60-12 16 -E
7673
, g Sa. Temporary
PIN# 7920152267
Workspace
♦ � T
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE LINE TABLE
LINE
DIRECTION
LENGTH
Tt
S29`56'03'W
2500
T2
N64` 18' 28 "W
26270
I Michael J Moore PUS L 5086 peony that this plat was drawn under my superwsion from an actual
rvey made under my supervision that he boundary lines non surveyed ere intlicatetl with dashed lines
as drawn from information carved from the Guilford County, NC Register of Dead s Othce That he auo
of precision is greater titan 1 10 000 that this plat meets the requirements of the Standards of Practice for
Land Surveying in North Carolina (21 NCAC 55 1600)
That his plat was prepared for the purpose of easement acquisition only and is not intended to be a
boundary survey of the property shown hereon his the intent of this plat the easement shall cross the
smile parcel
GNANTOR a IYIT-
Thai the control antl ties 11 11, Survey w re pedorrt1e011,11 GPS metnptlS that this wrvey is of anomer
category such as the recombination of existing parcels a court- ordered survey or other exception to the
definition of subdivision
MICHAEUJ MOOR PL -DATE
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD (OLD) OIRIO)
PROPOSED PERMANENT
EASEMENT r �Y
PROPOSED TEMPORARY,
'ACRKSPACE
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION
SO FT
ACREAGE
Permanent Easement
70,612
1 621
Temporary Workspace
4 829
0 111
Gravel f
Drive
Existing
Buildings
(Typical)
Exlsting \
Overhead
Utility
Easement
V
1 ?-� /
i
P2— , / %VT1
Tract 6A
Ronald D Preston
D B 5069 Pg 984
PIN# 7920251406
\ N
r
N C STATE PLANE
NAD 83 (2011)
GEOID 2012a
GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)
200 0 100 200
1 Inch = 200 ft
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF DICKIE LEE & EVA SUE QUATE
7022 ELLISON ROAD, S_TOKESDALE NC 27357
ELI PROJECT # 14- 21.3011 PNG IR# 0230491
DATE 1 -26 -15 SCALE i" = 200' I SHEET 1 OF 1
BRACT 007 - PIN# 7920153873
■ iedmont
.x' Natural Gas
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE, PLLC
1 1420 DONELSON PIKE SUITE AI2 • NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFFICE 615 -3183 -6300 • WWW ELI -LLC COM•LICENSE # P -12139
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL

Exhibit A - Sheet 1 of 1
t,l\Ilil 'llllrll
\Y�� `, C A p iii
C ` ° , ` 0< %
®° a ° ° ° °w m ��
o®� ES S /
C °�C• �ti s, /;
r 13
INV I CJ
1 All property lines and corners established using existing
found existing boundary evidence and deeds and plats o,=d m
the Guilford County Register of Deeds office
2 All distances are horizontal grid distances in feet The grid factor for
this protect Is 0 99986898 To compute ground coordinates for this
project, multiply by the Inverse of 0 99986898
Subject to any and all easements right -of -way, streets and
assessments, as the same may appear of record In the Register of
L Q 6 y –
% ° 9 0 �°
C) °° G S U? "X- e��
°° O \
7,9 sa a °°
r�r r I I I I 1 I j t 11
Deeds otfce Clelk of Court, town or county tax oHlces, or which may
have been acquired by prescriptive use
4 This survey Is intended for PING easement acquisition
5 NO grid coordinates as shown hereon are based upon GPS
observations utilizing NCGs network RTK system and are
referenced to the NAD 83 (NSRS 2007) datum
This map is not a certified survey and has not been reviewed by a
local government agency for compliance with any applicable land
development regulations
TRIO) PIN# 7920067255
7 A title report was not furnished to this surveyor, therefore, this survey
0 007
is subject to the findings of an accurate title examination and report
Y
VICINITY MAP
I
Christopher D & Crystal L Reid Rusty R Albert
I
D B 7375, Pg 2426
D B 7037, Pg 2093
�O
g9alhG
TRIO) PIN# 7920067255
o�
0 007
P2
SITE
Shoelme
P3
Road
VICINITY MAP
I
Christopher D & Crystal L Reid Rusty R Albert
I
D B 7375, Pg 2426
D B 7037, Pg 2093
PIN# 7920066245—
TRIO) PIN# 7920067255
\ — — —
0 007
P2
M
to
--= x - -x —x —x— —A– — —
;
�
P3
N
Cl)
1
POB
N = 905967
10
I I
E = 1720688 86
Said point of beginning being
04
O)
the northwest corner of the
i
property conveyed to G Allen
Linsey Jr of record in Deed
C�
O
U) Tract 7
Book 4614, Page 1152
1 Dickie Lee & Eva Sue Quate
D 8 4264 Pg 189
PIN# 7920153873
Tract 9
a'�� �raN _
Culp, Inc
D B 7491, Pg 945
f�
PIN# 7910957586
N
N C STATE PLANE
NAD 83 (2011)
GEOID 2012a
I, Michael J Moore PLS L 5086 certify inat this plat was drawn under my supervision from an actual
rvey "... .' der my sup—.- net me bourldery lines not surveyed are irMtcaled vier desned lines
as drawn from irtfonnation derived from the Guilford County NO Register of Deeds Office That the ratio
of preasion is greater than 1 10 000 that this plat meals the requirements of the Standards of Practice for
Land Surveying in North Carolina (21 NCAC 56 1600)
That leis plat was prepared for the purpose of easement acquisition only and is not intended to be a
boundary survey of the property Shown hereon It is the intent of this plat the easement shall crass the
enure Iona,
That the central and ties to this survey were performed using GPS methods that this survey is of another
category such as the recombination of existing parcels a own -a defed survey or other exception to the
dehnnion of subdivision n r}
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD (OLD) C) Ric)
PROPOSED PERMANENT T3!' ',k
EASEMENT L =lA
PROPOSEDTEMPORARY
WORKSPACE �J
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION
SO FT
ACREAGE
Permanent Easement
1 325
0 007
P2
Proposed
Permanent
Easement
Tract 8
G Allen Linsey, Jr
D B 4614, Pg 1152
P B 114, Pg 138
PIN# 7920058682
PERMANENT EASEMENT LINE TABLE
LINE
DIRECTION
LENGTH
P1
S64° 02'36"E
41 11'
P2
N89° 11' 26 °W
37 22'
P3
NO" 49'29"E
17 47'
GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)
20 0 10 20 �0
1 Inch = 20 ft
,,,,a.lTUa s iwrwLs
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF G ALLEN LINSEY, JR
7024 ELLISON ROAD, STOKESDALE, NC 27357
ELI PROJECT # 14- 21.3011 1 PING IR# 0230491
DATE 1 -26 -15 1 SCALE I`= 20' 1 SHEET 1 OF 1
J ACT 008 - PIN# 7920058682
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE, PLLC
1420 OONELSON PIKE SUITE Al2 • NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFFICE 615- 383 -6300 • WWW ELI -LLC COM•LICENSE # P4289
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS - INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL

LAl null /"y – Vl fccL I VI Y
vvvy `, CAR ,
`` ® Q� ',
° ®+ ++ ° + + + °° '
ES S /0 2, �;
�O �9n a -9 =
Q
+ / –
NOTES
1 All progeny lines and comers established using existing corners
found exlstmg boundary evidence and deeds and plats of record In
the Guilford County Register of Deeds office
2 All distances are horizontal grid distances, In feet The grid factor for
this project Is 0 99986898 To compute ground coordinates for this
project, muihply by the inverse of 0 99986898
3 Subject to any and all easements nght -of -way streets and
as the same may appear of record in the Register of
e U� L_ O 6
u Off'+ 4
° ®+° `S ®R + °+° OC
5q p
J \ \
-3 -'�
Deeds office Clerk of Court, town or county tax offices or which may
have been acquired by prescriptive use
4 This survey Is Intended for PNG easement acquisition
5 NC grid coordinates as shown hereon are based upon CPS
observations utilizing NCGs re
' network RTK system and a
referenced to the NAD 83 (NSRS 2007) datum
6 local go government agency for compliance with l any applicable land
development regulations
13 521
7 A title report was not furnished to this surveyor therefore, this survey
I
is subject to the findings of an accurate title examination and report
VICIN
Fire Hydrant Southard Road
F
IQ way 5 6312 W)
s Proposed
MI Proposed Permanent
NTemporary 1 r Easement 2 I I I
Workspace
E t I I
it J Ea' K
- o of
Q)
to
Asphalt I
c. / Parking
L C I ^1Z
Concrete g_ dines G 8 Pamela M Harrell U
Pad D B 4426 Pg 146
P B 29 Pg 57
• O \\ W _ _ PIN# 792006303= �
_ _Gravel '�' �1�1���t•� `',:�; �"a
0 ® Drive
C - Septic Area A
O ®O \ J "Approximate
Location"
0 Proposed
I Existing Tracts Permanent ' T,a.8
7Buildings Easement 1 I G Allen Linsey Jr
(Typical) Culp, Inc B 161400986022
D B 7491, Pg 945
P B 110, Pg 57 N
PIN# 7910957586
GRANTOR e NIT -1
I Michael J Moore PLS L -5086 certify ,hat this plat was drawn under my super,sion from an actual
rvey mare under my supennsian inet the co—, I,— not surveyed are iM,catetl wen dashed lines
as drawn from information derived from the Guilford County NC Register of Dead s Office That the ratio
of pre —ori ,s greater roan 1 10 000 that (his plat meets the requirements of the Standards of Practice for
Land Surveying in North Carolina (21 NCAC 56 1600)
That this plat was prepared for the purpose of easement acqul5iedrl only and is not intended to ce a
boundary survey of the progeny shown hereon It is the Intent of this plat the easement Shall cross the
entire pafcel
That the control and ties to this survey were performed using GPS methods that this survey is 0 another
category such as the recomoination of existing parct,is a court- ordered survey or other exception o the
definition of subdivision
c3
MICHAEL) MOORE PLS DATE DATE
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD (OLD) O IR(0)
PROPOSED PERMANENT
EASEMENT
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
vvORKSPACE
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION
SO FT
ACREAGE
Permanent Easement 1
13 521
0 310
Permanent Easement 2
20,164
0 463
Temporary Workspace
5204
0119
t �
I
N C STATE PLANE
NAD 83 (2011)
GEOID 2012a
GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)
200 0 100 200 400
1 Inch = 200 ft
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF CULP, INC
7209 #2 US 158, STOKESDALE, NC 27357
ELI PROJECT # 14- 21.3011 PNG IR# 0230491
DATE 1 -26 -15 SCALE 1" = 200' 1 SHEET 1 OF 4
iR\ ACT 009 - PIN# 7910957586
.1 Piedmont
10110 Natural Gas
ENERGYLAND & INFRASTRUCTURE PLLC
1420 OONE LSON PIKE SUITE Al2 • NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFFICE 615- 3133 -6300 - WWW ELI-LLC COM•LICENSE + P -1289
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL

Exhibit A - Sheet 2 of 4
tu, ,I,Irfr, NOTES -- - - - - --
C 1 All property Imes and comers established using existing corners I %
/ i� found, existing boundary evidence and deeds and plats of record in 8
!L ,ve as ` the Guilford County Register of Deeds office )
ES S @J O ae ,y 2 All distances are honzontal god distances, In feet The grid factor for '9gar
�e�(� this project Is 0 99986898 To compute ground coordinates for this ma ha
protect multiply by the Inverse of 0 99986898 O ��
3 SUII to any and all easemems, nghl -of -way streets and
till _`' �''`et:'�Y/'1..s-C,. assessments, as the same may appear of record In the Register of SITE
I L- 0 6 _ Deeds office Clerk of Court, town or county tax offices or which may
i�A, ±��1� O have been acquired by preschphve use
/ ®-v0 • 4 This survey is intended for PNG easement acgwsihon ShOellne
S URV ° ®Q�.\ 5 NC gnd coordinates as shown hereon are based upon CPS �yygOn
�dIII ore_A observations utilizing NCGs network RTK system and are E� Road
q � eaa9® rO ` referenced to the NAD 83 (NSRS 2007) datum
TIT is map is not a derifed survey and has ( been reviewed by a
11 1 1 1211\ 3_15 8 local government agency for compliance with any applicable land
- development regulations
7 A title report was not fumished to this surveyor, therefore this survey VICINITY MAP
\ ' is subject to the findings of an accurate title examination and report
I �y C &C Concrete of Summerfiaid, Inc I T I ^ I I
D S 4730, Pg 1319
P B 29, Pg 57 e
\ PIN #7920064299 n ry
I y N � `O I
I James G& Pamela M Harrell oN° I N a N I
D B 4426, Pg 148 I
P B 29 Pg 57 \ o ^ I I 1
PIN# 7920063038 � � m ? � m ?
o m a O a
u.
Septic Area P2
a) "Approximate Location" P1
Proposed
Permanent 1 P o e
I ^� \�
� N= sosssss3
Easement 1
L E = 1720689 33
�)
(p Said point of beginning being �
the northeast comer of the
property conveyed to Culp,
' Inc of record in Deed Book
7491 Page 945
Culp Inc N Tract
D B 7491, Pg 945 n 1 G Allen Linsey Jr
P B 110, Pg 57 /� D B 4614, Pg 1152
IPIN# 7910957586 PIN# 7920058682
' 7 I
N C STATE PLANE
NAD 83 (2011)
GEOID 2012a
I Michael J Moore PLS L 5086 certify that this oiat was dawn now my Super- from an actual
rvey made under my --on that the boundary hoes not surveyea are mdicaled with dashes hnes
as Crawn fmm mformauon derived from the Guilford County NC Register of Deed s Office That the ratio
of oreasion is greater than 1 10 000 that this plat meets the requirements of the Standards of P -acute for
Land Surveying In North Carolina (21 NCAC 55 1600),
That this plat was prepared for the purpose of easement acquisition only and Is not Intended to be a
boundary survey of the property shown hemon It Is the Intent of this plat the easement shall Goss the
entire parcel
Thai the control and ties to this survey were performed using GPS methods that this survey 15 of another
Category such as the recomomahon of existing parcels a court- ordered survey or other exception to the
definition of subdwlslon
nA
MICHAEL M(
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD (OLD) Q IR(0)
PRO- OSEDPERMANENT
EASEMENT
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
WORKSPACE =
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION
SG FT
ACREAGE
Permanent Easement 1
13,521
0 310
Permanent Easement 2
20,164
0 463
Temporary Workspace
5204
0 119
GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)
loo 0 50 100 200
1 inch= 100 ft
GRANI OR S INITIAL S
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF CULP, INC
_ 7209 #2 US 158, STOKE_SDALE, NC 27_357
ELI PROJECT # 14 -21 -3011 i PNG IR# 0230491 _
DATE 1 -26 -15 SCALE 1 = 100' � SHEET 2 OF 4
'TACT 009 - PIN# 7910957586
h ' Piedmont
Natural Gas
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE, PLLC
e 1420 OONELSON PIKE SUITE AI2 • NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFFICE 615- 383 -6300 WWW ELI -LLC COM•LICENSE # P -1289
ENGINEERS •SURVEYORS •INFRASTRUCTURE •ENVIRONMENTAL

Exhibit A - Sheet 3 of 4
DESCRIPTION
NOTES
`, C A r1,
C ` RQ< %
1 All property lines and comers established using existing comers
m rn
found existing boundary
° ®e
!1.
evidence antl deeds and plats of record In
the Guilford County Register of Deeds office
`\ oR ES S /Q °
2 All distances are honzontal gnd distances In feet The gnd factor for
0463
this project is 0 99986898 To compute ground coordinates for this
��////�� �, �^ ��{{
IV�lij�p y' i
project multiply by the Inverse of 0 99986898
3 Subject to any antl all easements, fight -of -way streets and
_ I A , r i �'pg°�•'�7�'g�'"
_ -
L- 6
assessments as the same may appear of record In the Register of
Deeds office Clerk Court
® _
-" -
of town or county tax offices, or which may
have been acquired by use
° 9 O a 44/
prescriptive
4 This survey Is Intended for PNG easement acquisition
7 a® Q
5 NC coordinates as hereon
JFi� ®,
%
grid shown are based upon CPS
® ®R ® ®°- ^0
'
observations utilizing NCGs' network RTK system and are
referenced to the NAD 83
\
(NSRS 2007) datum
xv`
6 This map Is not a certified survey and has not been reviewed by a
local government agency for compliance with any applicable land
�}
devetopmentregutabons
7 A title report was not furnished to this surveyor, therefore, this survey
Is subject to the findings of an accurate title examination and report
VICINITY
Fire Hydrant _ —gyp% � Southard Road_
T3 T4 Fig /y "�� 18 CMP
AS Highway 158 (64'R o W)
Proposed �.
Temporary
Workspace
Tract 9
Culp, Inc - -�
D B 7491, Pg 945
P B 110 Pg 57
PIN# 7910957586
Asphalt
Parking
i
l
1
Concrete
Existing Pad
Buildings
(Typical)
-�o
Poe T
-N = 906535 20
E = 1719666 68
Said point of beginning being
the most northeast corner of
the property conveyed to
Culp Inc of record In Deed )
Book 7497 Page 945
Proposed
Permanent
Easement 2 I iJ
U)
N
•J
L
M
-. 2
N C STATE PLANE
__ NAD 83 (2011)
Tract u� GEOID 2012a
Envirogreen Solutions Group LLC I '
D B 7566 Pg 480 1
P B 29, Pg 57 1
PIN# 7910969267 I I
I
1
0 I Tract 10
James G & Pamela M Harrell
D B 4426, Pg 148
P'8 29, Pg 57
1 PIN# 7920063038
I
i Miche l J Moore PLS L -5986 certify that this pat was drawn uncer my supervision from an actual
urvey made under my superv,son thal the boundary Imes not surveyed are Indlcatee wdh dashed fines
as drawn from nformatmn derived from the Guilford County NC Register of Deeds Office Tnat the ratio
Of prepswn is greater than 1 10 000 that this plat meets the requirements of the Standards of Practice for
Land Surveying in North Carolina {21 NCAC 56 15001
That this plat was prepared for Me purpose of easement acquisition only and is net intended to be a
boundary survey of the property shown hereon II is the intent of this plat the easement snall crass me
entire parcel
That Inc control and ties to this survey were performed using GPS methods that this survey ,s of another
category such as the recombination of existing parcels a court ordered survey or other exception to the
definition of subdivision nn
MICHAEL) MOO E PLS DATE
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD (OLD) OIR(0)
PROPOSED PERMANENT
EASEMENT
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
WORKSPACE
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION
SO FT
ACREAGE
Permanent Easement 1
13,521
0 310
Permanent Easement 2
20,164
0463
Temporary Workspace
5,204
0 119
v
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF CULP, INC
7209 #2 US 158, STOKESDALE, INC 27357
ELI PROJECT # 14 -21 -3011 1 PNG IR# 0230491
DATE 1 -26 -15 1 SCALE 1" = 100' _ SHEET 3 OF 4
'BRACT 00 - PIN# 7910957586
Piedmont
Natural Gas
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE, PCCC
e 1420 DONELSON PIKE SUITE Al2 • NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFFICE 615 -383 -6300 • WWW ELI -LLC COM•LICENSE # P -1269
ENGINEERS •SURVEYORS •INFRASTRUCTURE •ENVIRONMENTAL

Exhibit A - Sheet
2�oFESS i0'`
Q 9< a =
®3ti
o�
o
SU'
R J �,, �O
L,)
PERMANENT EASEMENT LINE TABLE
LINE
DIRECTION
LENGTH
P7
SO* 49'29"W
50 00'
P2
N89' 12'49'W
210 04'
P3
N66' 42'49"W
130 66'
P4
S89' 12 49 "E
330 78'
P5
S10' 52' 12 "E
285 89'
P6
S1 °4618 "W
22846
P7
N 1 O' 52'12"W
442 86'
P8
N10' 52 12'W
7781 --
P9
S87' 31'53'E
51 39'
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD OLD) 0IR(0)
PROPOSED PERMANENT r ®'07
EASEMENT
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
WORKSPACE E7j77z.
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION
SO FT
ACREAGE
Pemarem Easement 1
13 521
0 310
Permanent Easement 2
Temporary Workspace
20,164
5204
0 463
0 119
4
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE LINE TABLE
LINE
DIRECTION
LENGTH
T1
N87' 36 21"W
7785'
T2
N2' 23'39'E
75 00'
T3
388' 36'02"E
4350,
T4
S87' 31'53"E
16 50
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF CULP, INC
7209 42 US 158, STOKE_SDALE, NC 27357
ELI PROJECT # 14 -21 -3011 1 PNG IR# 0230491
DATE 1 -26 -15 r SCALE 1"= 100' 1 SHEET 4 OF 4
TRH A PIN# 7910957586
K
ENE RGYLANO & INFRASTRUCTURE FLLC
e 1420 DONELSON PIKE SUITE AI2 • NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFFICE 615 -383 -6300 " WWW ELI -LLC COM•LICENSE # P -1289
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL

- Sheet 1 of 1
_ T
1
VICINITY MAP
PERMANENT EASEMENT LINE TABLE
NOTES
\x CA i,
R 0< %
`seen®
1 All property ti m
nes and corners established using existing coers
found existing boundary evidence and deeds and of record
®
plats
In the Guilford County Register of Deeds office
SS""'. / O a %/
C
2 All distances are horizontal grid distances In feet The grid factor for
this project Is 0 99986898 To compute ground coordinates far this
®
<�
project
Subject to any by the inverse of 0 99986898
3 Subject to any and all easements right -of -way streets and
L� %7' =p assessments, as the same may appear of record In the Register of
L- 0 6 b' -' `,'�••� Deeds Clerk may
=
office, of Court, town or county tax offices, or which
have been acquired by
O�'�
�sa'C1Z
prescriptive use
4 This survey is Intended for PING easement acquisition
130'06'
5 NC grid coordinates as shown hereon are based upon GPS
S URJ'
observations utilizing NCGs' RTK
®ae O
network system and are
referenced to the NAD 83 (NSRS 2007) datum
m � Z
I
This map is not a certified survey and has not been reviewed by a
I
local government agency for compliance with any applicable land
0-- --(�
development regulations
E I U
m 1 ¢ I
I
7 A title report was not furnished to this surveyor, therefore, this survey
I
is subject to the findings of an accurate title examination and report
Highway
158 (64• R o.W.)
@ 1 Survey by Vaughn Surveying
_ T
1
VICINITY MAP
PERMANENT EASEMENT LINE TABLE
LINE
DIRECTION
LENGTH
of
N69 12'49 W
47209
-2
N2` 24 24'E
5002-
P3
S89' 12' 49'E
34997
P4
S66'42 41
130'06'
N
T -� Nil
I �
No,nm _
DESCRIPTION
SO FT
�,p N
Permanent Easement
20,551
,o _ Anthony Ray 8 Robert M Joyner
01i, / _�
I
I
0 ;- n n m D B 3497 Pg 1945
^mu � P 29 Pg 57
c m a ? M I
N C STATE PLANE
NAD 83 (2011)
PIN# 7920062365
E o- mg 1 I I
CAC Concrete of Summertield Inc
D B 4730 Pg 1319
1 GEOID 2012a
o I
m m cv °� rn 1
LU d N
B 29, P 57
PP /920064299
,
I I
F ^
Go U
I
m � Z
I
I
I
E I U
m 1 ¢ I
I
POs
I
Septic Areas Shown per b I
1 M
N = 906002 38
I
I
@ 1 Survey by Vaughn Surveying
E= 172048922 _
n " 1 ' Company, Inc Dated 2 -10 -98 I
Said point of beginning being
N89 °12'49 "W 130 27' from
the southeast comer of the
I
m N
e N
tit j I
I
property conveyed to James
G & Pamela M Harrell of
Z o,
f
record in Deed Book 4426,
Proposed
1 � \�
Permanent �l
Page 148
y °
1 Septic
III
I
Easement \ Easement
`
n tt
up
iiiTAsty g,.t r „r sn ” ` 4
f # ;9' < ?at "�«'Wt— i$, r' . t. ,.� „rv's,. �..;t,'.fi- vv
Gravel Tact 9 P1
Drive Culp, Inc
\� 0 B 7491, Pg 945
\\ P B 110 Pg 57 Septic Area
\ PIN# 7910957586 "Approximate Loc
I Michael J Moore PI L -5066 certify that this plat was drawn under my supervision from an actual
survey made untler my supervision that the boundary lines not surveyed am indicated - ih dashed lines
as drawn from information derived from the Guilford County, NC Register of Deeds Office That the ratio
of prenaon is greater than 1 10 000 that this slat meals the requirements of Ilse Standards of Practice for
Land Surveymg in Norm Carolina 121 NCAG 56 16001
That this plat was prepared for the purpose of easement acquisition only and is not intended to oe a
t undary survey of he property shown nereon It is the intent of this plat the easement shall cross the
entire parcel
Trial the control and ties to this survey were performed using GPS methods that this —ey is of another
category, such as the recombination of existing parcels a court orrered Survey W other excepton to the
definition of subdivision
Ail _hti�Lvr -3 -15
MICHAEL MOORE PLS DATE
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD (OLD) 0 Pool
PROPOSED PERMANENT r "10 1�
EASEMENT i,
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
Vvi ACE ff� ly
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION
SO FT
ACREAGE
Permanent Easement
20,551
0 472
N89 °12'49 "W 130 27'
GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)
100 0 50 100 200
�I
L.
1 inch = 100 ft
GRANrooS IM1i--
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO., INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF JAMES G & PAMELA M HARRELL
7103 US 158 STOKESDALE, NC 27357
ELI PROJECT # 14- 21.3011 1 _PNG IR# 0230491
DATE 1.27 -15 r SCALE ti' = 100 _ 1 SHEET 1 OF 1
RACT 010 - PIN# 7920063038
Piedmont
Natural Gas
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE, PLLC
e 1420 DONELSON PIKE SUITE Al2 - NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFFICE GIS- 383 -6300 • WWW ELI -LL C COM•LICENSE if P -1289
ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE - ENVIRONMENTAL

Exhibit A - Sheet 1 of 2
NOTES
1 All property lines and corners established using existing corners
NC A R O �� f
found, existing boundary evidence, and deeds and plats of record in
m mmmo mom i
gad Deeds I
I•I
ma OF O
this project is 0 99986898 To compute ground coordinates for this
3 Subject to any and all easements right-at-way streets and S
SITE
r o
/
o �� ® _
Deeds office Clerk or Court town or county tax offices, or which may
_ 3
have been acquired by f
® -9 0 m ((/ 4
for PING p
O m
observations utilizing NCGs' network RTK system and are
On
m S
referenced to the NAD 83(NSRS 2007) datum
v �� 6
6 This map is not a cerllfed survey and has not been reviewed by a
r f r L i
government rntulat o
i I 11000 ` d
develop e
% 7
7 A title report was not fumished to this surveyor, therefore this survey
VICINITY MAP
_ _ _ — — Islsubject to the findings of an accurate title examination and report V
- N
N
18" CMP ---
_
Tract y )
Culp, Inc _max
D B 7491 Pg 945
P B 110, Pg 57 j
PIN# 7910957585 I
I
POB
N = 906011 69
E = 1719850 47
Said point of beginning being
the southwest corner of the 1
property conveyed to
Enwrogreen Solutions Group,
LLC of record in Deed Book
7566, Page 480, r–I
II
Asphalt
Parking
Concrete )
Pad
Or
Road
T
1 CL f I N C STATE PLANE
0o n
6 v N NAD 83 (2011)
I C rn rn'0 I GEOID 2012a
0—aao
m0 °Da'rn
p � N
1 ~ U) ^ CID 7k I Anthony Ray & Robert M Joyner
1 N Co CL Z I D B 3497, Pg 1945
(2 0 n- I P B 29, Pg 57
rn PIN# 7920062365
O
C
UJ i
Septic Areas Shown per
aEi m 1 I Survey by Vaughn Surveying
a ; 1 / Company, Inc Dated 2 -10 -98
t� J) V) 1
(6 (0
y�tt L1
"d a 0
a
� O Tract 10 �
d�- 1 James G & Pamela M Harrell
f_T1 D B 4426, Pg 148
tG,'f i Septic \ P B 29, Pg 57
Easement \ PIN# 7920063038
�P6 ` P8 Proposed
7
Permanent
tY. ° Easement
rjrt,;'C*yc�U1&'T
Buildings 1 i �\ P2 P1 — —
� � \\ Gravel Septic Area
(--,,(TypCal) Pry \\ _ `Drive "Approximate Location"
1 Michael J Moore, PLS L -5086 certity that this plat was drawn under my superwslon from an actual
rvey made u'tler my sup-on Inal the boundary lines not surveyed are mocaiW with dashed lines
as drawn from information derived from the Guilford County NC Register of Deeds Office That 're ratio
Of preps"' is greater than 1 10 OM that rnis plat meets the requvements of the Standards of Practice for
Land Surveying in North Cardona 121 NCAC 56 1600) GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)
100 _ 0 50 100 200
fhal this plat was prepared for the purpose of easement aCquisilipn only and is not inientled to rte a —
boundary Survey of the property shown hereon It is the intent Of This plat the easement shall cross the
entire parcel
1 finch = 100 ft
That the control and ties to this survey were performed using GOB methods that this survey is of another
category such as me recombination of existing parcels a court- ordered survey or other exception ,d the
definibOn of subdmslon
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD (OLD) Q TRIO)
PROPOSED PERMANENT r, �' III
EASEMENT Ate='
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
IMRKSPACE ya7Z
�`IJ
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION SO FT ACREAGE
Permanent Easement 12,627 0 290
Temoorary Workspace 1 223 0 028
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF ENVIROGREEN SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC
7105 US 158, STOKES_DALE, NC 27357
ELI PROJECT # 14 -21 -3011 PNG IR_# 0230491
DATE 1.27 -15 1 SCALE 1" - 100' SHEET 1 OF 2
'TRACT 011 - PIN# 7910969267
rimPiedmont
Natural Gas
ENERGY LAND 6 INFRASTRUCTURE PLLC
l 1420 DONELSON PIKE SUITE Al2 • NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFFICE SIS- 3a3 -G3DO WWW ELI -LLC COM•LICENSE # P -1269
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL
Or
Road
T
1 CL f I N C STATE PLANE
0o n
6 v N NAD 83 (2011)
I C rn rn'0 I GEOID 2012a
0—aao
m0 °Da'rn
p � N
1 ~ U) ^ CID 7k I Anthony Ray & Robert M Joyner
1 N Co CL Z I D B 3497, Pg 1945
(2 0 n- I P B 29, Pg 57
rn PIN# 7920062365
O
C
UJ i
Septic Areas Shown per
aEi m 1 I Survey by Vaughn Surveying
a ; 1 / Company, Inc Dated 2 -10 -98
t� J) V) 1
(6 (0
y�tt L1
"d a 0
a
� O Tract 10 �
d�- 1 James G & Pamela M Harrell
f_T1 D B 4426, Pg 148
tG,'f i Septic \ P B 29, Pg 57
Easement \ PIN# 7920063038
�P6 ` P8 Proposed
7
Permanent
tY. ° Easement
rjrt,;'C*yc�U1&'T
Buildings 1 i �\ P2 P1 — —
� � \\ Gravel Septic Area
(--,,(TypCal) Pry \\ _ `Drive "Approximate Location"
1 Michael J Moore, PLS L -5086 certity that this plat was drawn under my superwslon from an actual
rvey made u'tler my sup-on Inal the boundary lines not surveyed are mocaiW with dashed lines
as drawn from information derived from the Guilford County NC Register of Deeds Office That 're ratio
Of preps"' is greater than 1 10 OM that rnis plat meets the requvements of the Standards of Practice for
Land Surveying in North Cardona 121 NCAC 56 1600) GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)
100 _ 0 50 100 200
fhal this plat was prepared for the purpose of easement aCquisilipn only and is not inientled to rte a —
boundary Survey of the property shown hereon It is the intent Of This plat the easement shall cross the
entire parcel
1 finch = 100 ft
That the control and ties to this survey were performed using GOB methods that this survey is of another
category such as me recombination of existing parcels a court- ordered survey or other exception ,d the
definibOn of subdmslon
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD (OLD) Q TRIO)
PROPOSED PERMANENT r, �' III
EASEMENT Ate='
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
IMRKSPACE ya7Z
�`IJ
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION SO FT ACREAGE
Permanent Easement 12,627 0 290
Temoorary Workspace 1 223 0 028
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF ENVIROGREEN SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC
7105 US 158, STOKES_DALE, NC 27357
ELI PROJECT # 14 -21 -3011 PNG IR_# 0230491
DATE 1.27 -15 1 SCALE 1" - 100' SHEET 1 OF 2
'TRACT 011 - PIN# 7910969267
rimPiedmont
Natural Gas
ENERGY LAND 6 INFRASTRUCTURE PLLC
l 1420 DONELSON PIKE SUITE Al2 • NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFFICE SIS- 3a3 -G3DO WWW ELI -LLC COM•LICENSE # P -1269
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD (OLD) Q TRIO)
PROPOSED PERMANENT r, �' III
EASEMENT Ate='
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
IMRKSPACE ya7Z
�`IJ
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION SO FT ACREAGE
Permanent Easement 12,627 0 290
Temoorary Workspace 1 223 0 028
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF ENVIROGREEN SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC
7105 US 158, STOKES_DALE, NC 27357
ELI PROJECT # 14 -21 -3011 PNG IR_# 0230491
DATE 1.27 -15 1 SCALE 1" - 100' SHEET 1 OF 2
'TRACT 011 - PIN# 7910969267
rimPiedmont
Natural Gas
ENERGY LAND 6 INFRASTRUCTURE PLLC
l 1420 DONELSON PIKE SUITE Al2 • NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFFICE SIS- 3a3 -G3DO WWW ELI -LLC COM•LICENSE # P -1269
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF ENVIROGREEN SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC
7105 US 158, STOKES_DALE, NC 27357
ELI PROJECT # 14 -21 -3011 PNG IR_# 0230491
DATE 1.27 -15 1 SCALE 1" - 100' SHEET 1 OF 2
'TRACT 011 - PIN# 7910969267
rimPiedmont
Natural Gas
ENERGY LAND 6 INFRASTRUCTURE PLLC
l 1420 DONELSON PIKE SUITE Al2 • NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFFICE SIS- 3a3 -G3DO WWW ELI -LLC COM•LICENSE # P -1269
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL

Exhibit A - Sheet 2 of 2
N CARo
=t ®oFESSIa
®7 ,
<m
0 ' 4)
®® %Q JCG� ®9a
C' ®a S up, 00
as
PERMANENT EASEMENT LINE TABLE
LINE
DIRECTION
LENGTH
P1
9' 12' 49 "W
47 62'
P2
8' 57' 07 "W
11911,
P3
°46'1WE
24556'
P4
0` 52' 12 "E
LS
149 85'
P5
0' 52' 12 'E
5000,
P6
8` 57' 07 "E
5000,
P7
8` 57' 07'E
24 fit'
PS
S89° 12'49"E
48 92'
P9
S2° 24'24"W
50 02'
LEGEND
IROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
IRON ROD (OLD) 0IRIO)
PROPOSED PERMANENT
EASEMENT �v4v J
PROPOSEDTEMPORARI
VVORKSPACE
AREA TABLE
DESCRIPTION
SO FT
ACREAGE
Permanent Easement
12 627
0 290
Tamporary Workspace
1 223
0 028
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE LINE TABLE
LINE
DIRECTION
LENGTH
Tt
S49' 54' 39 'E
77 67'
EASEMENT FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO, INC
ACROSS THE LANDS OF ENVIROGREEN SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC
7105 US 158, STOKESDALE, NC 27357 _
ELI PROJECT # 14 -21 -3011 PNG IR #_0230491 _
DATE 1 -27 -15 SCALE I'= 100' ( SHEET 2 OF 2
RAC - PIN# 7910969267
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE, PLLC
1420 DONELSON PIKE SUITE AI2 • NASHVILLE TN 37217
OFf ICE 615- 383 -6300 WWW ELI -1 LC COM•IICENSE # P 4289
ENGINEERS •SURVEYORS •INFRASTRUCTURE •ENVIRONMENTAL

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Pat McCrory
Secretary Susan Kluttz
March 31, 2015
Paul Webb
TRC Solutions
50101 Governor's Drive, Suite 250
Chapel Hill, NC 27517
Office of Archives and 1-hstory
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: Piedmont Natural Gas Stokesdale 6" Pipeline Project, Guilford County, ER 15 -0577
Dear Mr. Webb:
Thank you for your letter of March 5, 2015, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919- 807 -6579 or
environmental.review tkncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
�FKRamona M. Bartos
Location- 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mading Address 4617 Mad Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax. [phone] -6599

QP�t�ENT OF United States Department of the Interior
ow ZT
a FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
-A Raleigh ES Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
CH 3 �s Raleigh, North Carolina 27636 -3726
April 3, 2015
Tina Sekula
EEE Consulting, Inc.
601 Cascade Pointe Lane, Suite 101
Cary, NC 27513
Re: PNG Stokesdale Pipeline- Guilford County, NC
Dear Ms. Sekula:
This letter is to inform you that a list of all federally- protected endangered and threatened species
with known occurrences in North Carolina is now available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service's (Service) web page at http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh. Therefore, if you have projects that
occur within the Raleigh Field Office's area of responsibility (see attached county list), you no
longer need to contact the Raleigh Field Office for, a list of federally - protected species.
Our web page contains a complete and frequently updated list of all endangered and threatened
species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16
U S C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), and a list of federal species of concerns that are known to occur in
each county in North Carolina.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non - federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized.
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally - listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally - protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
evaluation and can be found on our web page at littp: / /www.fws gov /raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes.
i "Che term "federal species of concern" refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of concern receive no legal protection and their designation does
not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or threatened
species. However. we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse unpacts to
federal species of concern

If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally - listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally - protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect. the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles
With regard to the above - referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our comments are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally- listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if. (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species,
including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control
measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction
site and any nearby down - gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found on our website at (http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh) to address and mitigate
secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality
We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).
2

It
We hope you find our web page useful and informative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis of this office at
(919) 856 -4520 ext. 26.
Sincerely,
P e Benjamin
Field Supervisor

List of Counties in the Service's Raleigh Field Office Area of Responsibility
Alamance
Beaufort
Bertie
Bladen
Brunswick
Camden
Carteret
Caswell
Chatham
Chowan
Columbus
Craven
Cumberland
Currituck
Dare
Duplin
Durham
Edgecombe
Franklin
Gates
Granville
Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
Hertford
Hoke
Hyde
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Martin
Montgomery
Moore
Nash
New Hanover
Northampton
Onslow
Orange
Pamlico
Pasquotank
Pender
4
Perquimans
Person
Pitt
Randolph
Richmond
Robeson
Rockingham
Sampson
Scotland
Tyrrell
Vance
Wake
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Wilson

MAILING ADDRESS 1420 Doneison Pike, Suite A -12
CITY, STATE: Nashville, TN ZIP CODE: 37217
PHONE NUMBER (0)- (615) 383 -6300 PHONE NUMBER (C)
PWATT suzanne.herron @elo- Ilc.com
SELECT ONE:
❑ I am the current property owner
❑ Interested buyer or under contract to purchase.
X I am an authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant.
❑ Other, please explain.
PHONE NUMBER (H) PHONE NUMBER (C)
EMAIL
X Proof of Ownerstup Attached (e g a copy of Deed, County GIS /Parcel /Tax Record data)

OF G
STREAM BUFFER USE o GUILFORD COUNTY
VEST FORM pn PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
REQUEST Post Office Box 3427
_ Greensboro, North Carolina 27402
�� r Phone [phone]
H c +R http / /www myguilford com/
NERCERTIFI 1T I.C?Nx p �."
O�
SECT,I®N�D yPROPERT i>
The undersigned applicant, a duly authorized owner on record of the property /project area does hereby authorize the
Applicant Agent listed to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of this
Jordan Lake Riparian Buffer Authorization and any and all standard and special conditions attached. From this, the assigned
Guilford County staff is pemutted to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site
investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U S. subject to Federal Jurisdiction under Section 404
of the Clean Water Act and /or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
Signature
Date:
SEC,rIONE BITF�FERIi�II' 1CTINFORI4TN�F''
Complete the chart below and list each buffer impact individually.
Buffer Impact ID
Activity or Use
[From table in 7 -1 -2 of
the GCDO]
Linear Impact
(feet)
Zone 1
Impact
(square feet)
Zone 2
Impact
(square feet)
Mitigation
Required.
(Yes or No)
Stream SA
Utility, non - electric,
perpendicular
crossings
g 'Ds s
34A5
2.7-116
No
Stream SC
y2
No
Total Buffer Impacts
11 o Ap
(0,50.1
3X13
*Please use same ID on all plan sheets and narrative.
I certify that this project meets all the following criteria for a determination of no practical alternatives.
A. The basic project purpose cannot be practically accomplished in a manner that would better minimize disturbance,
preserve aquatic life and habitat, and protect water quality;
B. The use or activity cannot practically be reduced in size or density, reconfigured, modified or redesigned to better
minimize disturbance, preserve aquatic life and habitat, and protect water quality, and
C. Best management practices shall be used as necessary to minimize disturbance, preserve aquatic life and habitat, and
protect water quality.
Further, I certify that, to the best of ipy knowledge and belief, all information supplied with this application is true and
accurate.
Print Name:
­11 1
C..nt­C V12.f Can
Date: � +

OF C.n
STREAM BUFFER USE GUILFORD COUNTY
REREQUEST FORM �p PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Q Post Office Box 3427
Greensboro, North Carolina 27402
Phone. [phone]
http / /www myguilford coin/
The following must accompany your application Failure to do so will result in your application being considered incomplete.
For assistance with this application, please contact Guilford County Planning & Development Department
X Digital Files and Paper Copies — provide digital files and paper copies of all plans and documents.
X Recorded Plat or Deed of Property
X Written Narrative describing the proposal — must include:
• Explanation of why this plan for the use or activity cannot be practically accomplished, reduced or reconfigured to
better minimize disturbance to the riparian buffer, preserve aquatic life and habitat and protect water quahty.
• Description of measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project.
• Description of measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
X Stream Determination — necessary for all submittals
X Jurisdictional Wetland Determination — if applicable
X Copy of 404 permit /401 certification — if applicable
Site Plan (2 copies to be submitted no larger than 24" x 36 ") Plans should be legible and clearly drawn by a licensed
Professional Engineer and /or Land Surveyor
• Legend
• Labels
• North arrow (_North oriented toward top of page)
• Property Boundaries
• Scale (Engineering), denoted graphically and numerically
• Existing topography at minimum 2 -foot intervals and finished grade
• Setbacks and property boundaries
• Buffer impact IDs, as specified in Section E — Buffer Impact Information
All plan sets should include the following:
• Natural drainage and manmade drainage features, including, water bodies, streams, Jordan Riparian Buffers Boundary, Floodplain,
and Wetlands Boundary, where applicable (note ephermal streams on site).
• Delineate the boundaries of the uses or land to be utilized for activities Delineate the location and dimensions of any proposed
disturbance in the riparian buffers
• Existing /Proposed utilities in the project area.
• Notes for specific uses or activities based on requirements in Section 7 -1 of the GCDO [including footnotes from Table of Uses
and activities 7 -1 -9
• All relevant development plan items that impact, effect or cause buffer disturbance
• Plans for any best management practices proposed to be used to control the impacts associated with the activity