19950601 Ver 1_Mitigation Information_19950227

SENT BY:EDSA — CHARLOTTE ; 8 -30 -95 ; 8.48AM ; 7043420251- 19197331338;4 1
E D S A
Memorandum
Date: August 30, 1995
To: Mr. Ron Ferrell, NCDEHNR -DEM
From: Craig R. Wyant, EDSA
Re: Addendum to Mitigation Plan
and Stormwater Management Plan
Pineville Towne Centre Site
Mecklenburg County, NC
Corps Action ID No.: 199203202
DEM Project No.: 95601
Post-it"' brand fax transmittal memo 7671
n of pegas ► I
From
.pt.wILTER & ALA Y
Phone# 513-t=,5344
Fax
X
The following items should be attached to the Mitigation Plan and Stormwater
Management Plan for the Pineville Towne Centre Site dated "Revised August 18,
1995" and should be considered as a permanent part of the plan:
1, velocities of all discharges and outfalls will be designed to be 5 fps or less or
otherwise nonerosive to vegetative channels for a 10 year storm. Discharges from wet
detention ponds will outlet to a vegetative filter at least thirty feet in length or an
approved equivalent wetland area.
2. The first inch of rainfall will be detained and released over a 2 to 5 day period
within wet detention ponds or an approved equivalent wetland area.
3. A reference wetland will be identified on -site which will serve to provide the
wetland hydrology success criteria for created wetlands. At least five monitoring wells
will be established within this reference area in order to record the normal hydrology .
for a period of one growing season. The data will be collected from the established
wells daily for the period March 1 to November 1 for the reference year. The .
percent of the recorded time which this area exhibits inundation or saturation within
the upper 12" will be considered the normal hydrology for the reference wetland._ If
the rainfall recorded for the reference year is determined to be more than 10%
greater or less than normal for the reference months according to NOAH records,
then the wetland hydrology success criteria for created wetlands will be 12.5% of the
growing season.
4. The nick point located at the southernmost extreme of the preserved wetlands
will be stabilized in order to prevent further erosion as a part of this plan,
5. The following hardwood species should not be planted or relocated as a part of
the vegetation requirement of the plan: Liquidambar styraciflua, Acer negundo, Salix
nigra.
end of memorandum
cc: John Dorney, NCDEHNR -DEM
Steve Lund, U.S. Army Corps
Kathy Abernethy, Panos Hotel Group
Edward D. Stone, Jr. and Associates Planners and Landscape Architect9
1919 South Boulevard, Trolley's End, Suite 102, charlotte, ti'C 28203 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]

r�
E D S A
July 11, 1995
Mr. Ron Ferrell
DEM Environmental Sciences Branch
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh NC 27626 -0535
Re: Pineville Towne Centre Site - Mitigation plan review
Dear Mr. Ferrell,
It was a pleasure to speak with you on the phone Monday. On behalf of the Panos
Hotel Group, I would like to thank you for the interest which you are taking in the review
of the mitigation plan design of the Pineville Towne Centre project and for your assistance
in resolving the details which are necessary to its successful implementation. As we had
discussed, there are several aspects of this plan which will require additional detail in order
for you to provide a thorough review. In summary, these items include the following:
1. We should clarify the purpose of the mitigation plan by describing in detail the end
result of what is being created; especially a description of the proposed hydrology
of the wetlands. This description can best be provided in the form of a water
budget and description of the type of wetland to be established in each area.
2. A test of the soil conditions below the proposed mitigation areas should be
conducted in order to determine their suitability for plant growth. If the soil below
the level to which these areas are to be graded is determined to be unsuitable for
optimal plant growth (ie. clay subsoil) then the plan should show that the
unsuitable soil be removed at a depth of 12 -18" below the proposed wetland grade
and replaced with a suitable cover soil prior to planting.
3. The monitoring wells which will be used should incorporate a screened bottom and
other details as described in the Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report
HY- IA-3.1 (August 1993) or other Corps guidance.
4. The use of bare root seedlings of woody wetland species which will provide
wildlife benefit (such as mast and fleshy fruit producing trees or shrubs) should be
considered as a preferred alternative or as supplemental to the use of relocated
and transplanted plants.
Each of these items will be addressed in detail once the topographic survey of the
site is completed. This survey is currently underway and is expected to be complete within
the next couple of weeks. Once the detailed topography is available, a greater level of detail
design can be provided for each of the mitigation sites. As we had discussed, general
elevations, as well as microtopographic variations within mitigation areas can be
established, groundwater and surface water depths and quantities can be determined, and
surface flow direction will be`known. It will be imperative to establish that the proper site
hydrology will function before any created wetland could be expected to become
successfully established. This will be accomplished by establishing a water budget for
each area which will describe inflow /outflow quantity and frequency /duration of inundation
or saturation within the area which will occur during the growing season.
Edward D. Stone, Jr. and Associates Planners and Landscape Architects
1919 South Boulevard, Trolley's End, Suite 102, Charlotte, NC 28203 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]

As this plan is developed in greater detail, I am looking forward to working closely
with you in order to assure that the created wetland areas will become successfully
established and functioning.
Again, I would like to thank you for your interest and assistance in the preparation
of the detailed design of this mitigation plan. It is our goal to create these wetland areas in a
manner which can become a standard for wetland design and establishment in the
Piedmont. I am confident that once the details of this plan are resolved and implemented,
and when these areas have become established and functioning, that they will provide a net
benefit of wetland function and value.
Sincerely,
Craig R. Wyant
Associate
cc: Greg Panos, Kathy Abernethy (Pans Hotel Group)

W
xi
- -------- -
- ----------
TT_
-----------
-------- -- ----
- --------- ---
ii
Li
"od j

Slate of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Managements
James B. Hunt; Jr., Governor ^
Jonathan B. Howes; Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., RE., Director
September 27, 1995
FILE COPS
Ms. Kathy Abernathy
Paiios Hotel Group
5936 Monroe Road
Suite 200
Charlotte, N.C. 28212
Dear Ms.. Abernathy:
Re Approval for mitigation and stormwater plans
Pineville Towne Centre Site
Mecklenburg County
DEM # 95601, COE # 199203202
Stormwater and mitigation plans submitted by Mr. Craig Wyant from EDSA on your
behalf and dated 18 August 1995 (revision) and 30 August 1995 (Memorandum) are
acceptable to DEM for complying with our 401 Water Quality Certification dated 13 July
1995. As discussed with Mr. Wyant on 26 September 1995 the following changes shall be
made in the above mentioned plans:
1. The inlets into Basin # 3 shall be adjusted as necessary to reduce the
potential for short circuiting.
2. The outlet from Basin # 6 shall be adjusted to result in the infl(.)w into
the wetland mitigation area to be at more of an oblique angle rather
° than perpendicular.
Also it is understood that if channelized flow develops in the wetland restoration area
as evidenced by site visits by the applicant or DEM, measures shall be taken to encourage
sheet flow. Similarly if additional or fewer openings are needed from the wet pond for Basin
# 2, adjustments will be made accordingly. We anticipate that if these changes are needed
that these adjustments can be made after the mitigation area is developed.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626 -0535 Telephone [phone] FAX 919 - 733.2496
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Aciion Employer 501, recycled/ 10% post- consurner p(lp,,

! Thank you for your and Mr. Wyant's hard work in developing this plan. We are
encouraged by this effort and look forward to working with you during plan implementation
and monitoring. Please call Mr. John Dorney at 919- 733 -1786 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
lI;
ston Howard, Jr P E.
95601.mit
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps.of Engineers Asheville Field Office
Mooresville DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Central Files
Craig Wyant, EDSA
e

ite of North Carolina
partment of Environment,
alth and Natural Resources
ision of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Proston Howard, Jr„ P.E., Director
A4t*A
[DEHNR
July 13, 1995
Mecklenburg County
DEM Project # 95601
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Ms. Kathy Abernathy
Panos Hotel Group
5936 Monroe Road
Suite 200 FILE C O P Y
Charlotte, N.C. 28212
Dear Ms. Abernathy:
You have our approval to place fill material in 1.90 acres of wetlands or waters for the purpose
of commercial fill at Pineville, N.C., as you described in your revised application dated 30 June 1995.
After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality
Certification Number 2671. This certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 26 when it
is issued by the Corps of Engineers.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If
you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application.
For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification. An
additional condition is that construction of the hotel site may commerce immediately but the remainder
of the Pineville Towne Centre cannot be constructed without final stormwater and wetland mitigation
plans. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with
your project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing,
send a written petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the
Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611:-7447. This certification and
its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Environmental Management under Section 401
of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919 - 733 -1786.
krely, owa rd, Jr. .
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Asheville. Field Office
Mooresville DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Central Files
95601.1tr
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626 -0535 Telephone [phone] FAX 919 - 733 -2496
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post- consumer paper

V
T -�C'A�
MITIGATION PLAN
AND
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
for
Pre - Discharge Notification (PDN)
Nationwide Permit #26
Application for
Section 401 Water Quality Certification
for
Pineville Towne Centre Site
Pineville, Mecklenburg County, NC
4 COO,. Ca\
c,r` 6V'U�* €gt
� y
r Qf'ec.,
ck 01,
J, q sn-'O
Applicant:
The Panos Hotel Group
5936 Monroe Road, Suite 200
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28212
Prepared by:
E D S A
Edward D. Stone, Jr. and Associates
1919 South Boulevard Suite 102
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203
(704) 373 -0534
Corps Action ID No.: 199203202
DEM Project No.: 95601
August 14, 1995
(Revised August 18, 1995)

Mitigation Plan for Pineville Towne Centre Site
Overview
In order to compensate for the losses of wetland functions and values which will
result from the proposed development activities on the ±28 acre Pineville Towne
Centre property, the applicant proposes in part to create 4.8 acres of new wetland
from upland and to preserve an additional 5.2 acres of existing high quality wetland.
Wetland which will be created or preserved will be protected from future impacts by
the applicant or by a group designated by the applicant for this purpose. Future
impacts or development of these areas will be deed restricted.
The intent and purpose of the mitigation proposal is to create areas of forested
floodplain wetland which are saturated within the root zone or inundated for a
significant portion of the growing season and will over time exhibit all characteristics
of jurisdictional wetland. The hydrology of wetland areas will be supported by
existing overland flow, newly generated stormwater runoff, and periodic overbank
flooding. Vegetation species selected will consist of hydrophytic species and will
provide benefits to wildlife habitat.
Those areas which will be utilized for the creation of new wetlands are all situated on
relatively level, generally open floodplain uplands which are near existing wetland
resources. These areas sit relatively low in topographic relief and will be graded to
receive runoff from upland areas as well as to benefit from periodic overbank
flooding. The vegetation in the majority of the proposed mitigation sites consists of
herbaceous successional growth of Ambrosia (ragweed) , Andropogon (broomsedge),
and Solidago (goldenrod); and mixed woody successional growth including Rubus
(blackberry), Crataegus saplings ( hawthorn), Prunus saplings (cherry), Acer saplings
(maple), Fraxinus saplings (ash), and Liquidambar saplings (sweet gum), among others.
The soils which occur in the area are mapped as Monocan series. This series naturally
exhibits some hydric indications throughout its profile and has inclusions which
exhibit pronounced hydricity. As a result of the above conditions, the proposed
mitigation sites should be well suited to the successful creation of new wetlands
which should over time exhibit the functions and values associated with other
floodplain wetlands.
Decription of Proposed Mitigation Areas r -r"O
The portions of the site which are intented to be converted to wetland for the
purpose of mitigation will be divided into discreet and self- contained cells. Each cell
will be provided with a dedicated upland drainage basin for the provision of
stormwater ru ff. The runoff generated by the dedicated upland basin will provide a
source of -- for the mitigation cell. Supplemental hydrology will be provided
by periodic overbank flooding from Little Sugar Creek and from precipitation falling
directly onto each site.
Individual cells have been designed as broad, shallow basins with a natural grade
berm surrounding the entire perimiter of the cell. At one or more points along the

perimeter berm, a broad opening has been provided which is set at an elevation
slightly higher than the elevation within the cell. This opening will serve two
functions; first it will withhold up to 12" of runoff or overbank flood within the
mitigation site so that it will be allowed to slowly percolate into the soil, and second it
will serve as an overflow so that excess runoff volume can be discharged into existing
wetland in a controlled manner. Since the berm surrounding the created wetlands
will be at natural grade, velocities at outflow points will be extremely low, typically
not exceeding existing rates. The bottom grades of proposed wetland cells will be a
flat gradient with no slope. Direction of flow through the cell has been determined
by the location of inflow and outflow locations. Water will enter the cell at its
upstream end and will be allowed to stack up to the depth of the elevation at the
outfall point. Flow will be created by the volume of new water entering the cell
displacing that which is already present, resulting in a very slow sheet flow over the
width of the cell, similar to the way water spreads when poured on a concrete slab.
The design of the mitigation area into cells allows flexibilty over the control of
hydrology within each cell through adjustments in flow entering the cell through
basin modification as well as adjustment to outflow by controlling the grade occuring
at outfall points. Cells have been designed initially to allow a maximum temporary
water depth of 12" assuming that normal soil percolation rates will allow this volume
be slowly absorbed vertically. If this water depth is too great, then the grade at the
outfall point can be lowered slightly to allow a lesser volume to be stored.
Hydrology criteria will be established by monitoring the normal hydrology of a
designated existing wetland area of the site which is considered to be a model for
created sites. The proposed location for this observation is just north of the sewerline
right -of -way, within the preserved wetland area near the center of the site. This area
has been observed to be periodically inundated or saturated for extended periods of
time during the growing season over a period of several years and exhibits favorable
wetland characteristics.
Although designed to be generally flat, a certain amount of microtopographic relief is
expected to occur within each cell as a result of grading and minor settling. Cells will
generally be a few inches deeper toward the center, becoming shallower toward the
edges. This slight change in grade in combination with microtopographic variations
will allow for effective species zonation and will over time provide community
diversity.
Methods of Construction
Prior to any activity occuring within the mitigation sites, all downslope areas,
especially creeks and wetlands will be protected from sedimentation by the
placement of silt fencing or other appropriate sedimentation control methods along
the boundary between the mitigation construction site and existing resources. All
-)mitigation areas will remain a distance of at least 10 feet from the top of the bank of
how �,, ' Little Sugar Creek and five feet from the top of bank of any other creek in order to
preserve the natural stream bank levee and to prevent shoreline erosion.

The land which will be converted from upland to wetland will be lowered in grade to
that of surrounding wetlands. On average, this difference in existing to proposed
grade is less than 24 ". Soil will be removed from all mitigation areas to a depth of
12" below proposed grade. The removed soil will be hauled to uplands and will not
be re- deposited in wetlands. The graded areas will then be backfilled to the
specified finished grade with a suitable topsoil. When the grade has been raised to
the appropriate level, runoff from upland areas will be directed into the area so that
it will be saturated or flooded during the early part of the growing season. As is the
case with most of the other wetlands on this site, the created wetlands will not be
expected to be saturated year round or for extended periods throughout the growing
season except during extreme conditions. Under normal conditions, the soil will be
inundated or saturated within the root zone throughout the late winter months and
for a period of at least 12.5% of the growing season. The This period of
inundation /saturation will be sufficient to establish the wetland hXdrologX necessary
for the maintenance of h dro h tic ve etation. water budget for each mitigation
,V ml area has been prepare w is is ased upon the attached stream gage data from
�a7t ' USGS, soil saturation and inundation data from SCS, and normally expected
precipitation records from NOAA for the Charlotte area.
As built drawings will be prepared for all mitigation ares upon completion of
construction. These drawings will show a survey of the boundary of each area, finished
grades, location of sample plots and monitoring wells, and locations of special
features such as inflow and outflow locations and grades.
Vegetation
p�
v
Hydrophytic vegetation will be initially established within mitigation sites by utilizing a;
combination of planted bare root seedlings and by relocating existing sapling" s of —`1
�2
Fraxinus, Acer rubrum, Acer negundo, Populus deltoides, Salix nigra, Liquidambar
styraciflua, Ulmus americana, and other wetland species which are presently
occurring in wetlands impacted by the proposed development. The relocated
^` '
saplings will be supplemented by new plantings of these species or other woody
wetland species which would be of benefit to wildlife as a food source such as
Quercus species or Carya species. If it is not possible to relocate these plants, then
r�4
plants of appropriate species will be purchased and planted in order to satisfy the
density requirements. If plants are to be purchased, they will be of a variety of sizes
and ages and will meet the normally expected standards for nursery stock. In addition
to woody tree and sapling species, herbaceous plants will be relocated in groups of
naturally occurring diversity from impacted wetlands or will be planted to
approximate a similar diversity.
to�

Selections from the following list of hardwood tree and shrub species will be utilized
in order to provide food sources for wildlife habitat:
Alnus serrulata
Carya species
Celtis laevigata
Crataegus species
Ilex decidua
Salix nigra
Amalanchier arborea
Celtis occidentalis
Cephalanthus occidentalis
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Quercus species
Viburnum species
At least two of the above species will be planted in each area. At least six species of
hardwood will be planted within each cell at the required densities with no
individual species comprising greater than 20% of the total stem quantity.
Herbaceous Species
In most of the existing wetlands, fewer than five or six herbaceous species occur
within a given area. The most prevalent individual dominant species is juncus effusus.
Other species which have been observed include Carex lurida and other Carex
species, Polygonum punctatum, Polygonum persicaria, and numerous grasses.
Specific plant species and quantities which will be utilized for the mitigation sites and
will be dependent upon the time of year in which planting occurs, species
availability, and number of plants which can be successfully relocated.
The mitigation sites will be planted at an initial density of approximately 500 woody
stems per acre or an approximate stem spacing of three meters. Woody plants will be
arranged in a manner which resembles that observed in surrounding wetlands with
2 groupings of plants of a similar hydrophytic category placed in the topographic
position best suited to the hvdroli is preferences of the species. Herbaceous species
will be planted in 25 to 50 cm diameter clusters at a density of 1000 clusters per acre
or will be seeded with a wetland seed mix at a rate which will result in a coverage of
at least 100 stems per square meter upon germination. All new plantings will consist
of species which are facultative wetland or obligate species.
All planting and seeding will be done from late fall to early spring. Areas which are
disturbed will be seeded immediately following disturbance with a mix of annual
ryegrass and millet in order to provide temporary stabilization of the areas in order to
reduce surface erosion.

Monitoring Reports
Once an area has been established and planted, its success will be monitored at
least annually during August/September in order to measure survival rate, growth,
species diversity, and to remove upland species and invasive weed species such as
blackberry, multiflora rose, kudzu, honeysuckle, poison ivy, or broomsedge. Each
�� annual monitoring event will consist of the observation of of two sample plots per
fib ^gyp acre which are .05 acres each in size. Permanent sample plot locations will be
identified for each mitigation cell upon their completion and will be recorded on
1S he as built drawing. At least one 36" deep monitoring well will be established
�a� raw-3 within each sample plot location according to the attached detail. Monitoring wells
wSkp�t�g will be observed on a monthly basis for the first year following installation in order to
establish a recor of by ro ogy t roughout the year.
During each monitor period at each sample plot, the number and species of each
®Q j surviving woody stem will be recorded and the percent aerial cover of the sample
Or plot will be estimated for each of the three most dominant species. Additional
wetland species will be recorded if their presence is significant. Wetland species
considered to be acceptable appear as FACW or OBL in the USFWS National List of
Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands, 1988 Summary. All measurements should be
recorded on a monitoring data form and the sample location estimated on a map of
the site. At least two representative photographs should be taken of the mitigation
area at each sample plot and should include a sign which indicates the date and plot
number. These photographs should be attached to the data form for the sample
plot.
At the time of monitoring, each monitoring well will be observed in order to record
the depth to water table in order to insure that adequate hydrology is available
during the early part of the growing season. Test its can be dug. at varous..loeations
throughout the site at the-time of inspection, in. order, to o.serve.,changes._in. -soil
characteristics and to verify the observations found within the monitoring well. Any
findings or observations should be recorded on the data form of the sample plot
nearest the observation.
�n .'R
One copy of all data forms, maps, and photographs of each sample plot will be
Jh
supplied to DEM Water Quality Branch and to the U.S. Army Corps for their file until
all areas have been successfully established and determined acceptable. If all areas
S`^
are not released within a period of three years from time of installation, then
�,
S
corrective measures must be taken on the remaining areas in order to insure their
Cdj
successful establishment or an agreement made at such time of an acceptable
alternate form of mitigation.
�i
A wetland area or portion thereof will be considered to be successfully created when
at the end of the three year period at least 320 woody stems per acre are surviving. If
this criteria is not met, the area is not considered to be successful and maintenance
�C
will need to be performed on the area in order to provide the required quantity.

�5
� C
N
� y
0
b
d
C y
A �
UQ
C
Oo
F+
b
N
N
� N
U �
h
1�
O
Fr
M
M
N
S
N �
D\ N
•r Q A
ii �
y
A x A
•'!
•"1
y
::'`•^r•' +•''•
:max:•'••:
O
Os
'r•
.y
`< � . n
y
UQ
� C
N
� N
U �
h
1�
O
Fr
M
M
N
S
N �
D\ N
•r Q A
ii �
y
A x A
y
::'`•^r•' +•''•
:max:•'••:
O
C•
O
�
`< � . n
UQ
N
� N
U �
h
1�
O
Fr
M
M
N
S
N �
D\ N
::'`•^r•' +•''•
:max:•'••:
�
rf
bar•
';;ri;,:e:
:.;+,;'.:::
�
�'
cra
C
to IQ
eb
Q
r
A
r.�
Q
eb
QQ
"rT
`D
N
� N
U �
h
1�
O
Fr
M
M
N
S
N �
D\ N

Water Budget
The following Table summarizes the characteristics of each proposed mitigation cell
relating to stormwater runoff as a primary source of wetland hydrology:
The total column in the above table indicates that the mitigation area will recieve
direct rainfall in combination with the runoff provided by the drainage basin area.
The attached charts from NOAA and USDA -SCS show the average annual inches of
rainfall which are expected in the Mecklenburg County area on a month by month
basis. The normal monthly rainfall is highest in January, February, March and July.
Other sources of hydrologic influence include overbank flooding. Based upon
gage data records of the USGS local office, Little Sugar Creek is expected to be out
of its banks an average of six times in eight years.
All mitigation areas are located within the portion of the site mapped as
having Monocan (MO) Soils. The USDA SCS Soil survey for Mecklenburg County
indicates that this soil is subjct to common and brief periods of flooding during the
months of November to May. The permeability of this soil is 0.6 to 2.0 inches per
hour at a depth to 43 ".
Mitigation sites have been designed to be flat depressions which are at the
approximate elevations of nearby wetlands. They have been designed as basins
which will hold shallow amounts of water from 6" to 12" deep for as long as it takes
for the water to percolate down. Percolation rates are expected to be rapid
throughout most of the year, however during winter months and during the early part
of the growing season, a seasonally high water table would prevent percolation and
would extend the period of shallow inundation. Cuts have been made on the
downstream side which will allow water depths greater than 12" to run off into
adjacent channels or wetlands.
Mitigation Area
Size
Contributing (Impervious)
Total
Basin Area
1 I to
.74 acres
1.62 acres
2.36 acres
2 3b , x38t
3.45 acres
5.39 acres
8.84 acres
3 �t a ` ��
.04 acres
1 .65 acres
1.69 acres
6 �tre
4
.09 acres
1.10 acres
1.19 acres
5 (no
.08 acres
.53 acres
0.61 acres
6 1gGtc{6
.49 acres
1.80 acres
2.29 acres
—10
`') , b c.ve5
The total column in the above table indicates that the mitigation area will recieve
direct rainfall in combination with the runoff provided by the drainage basin area.
The attached charts from NOAA and USDA -SCS show the average annual inches of
rainfall which are expected in the Mecklenburg County area on a month by month
basis. The normal monthly rainfall is highest in January, February, March and July.
Other sources of hydrologic influence include overbank flooding. Based upon
gage data records of the USGS local office, Little Sugar Creek is expected to be out
of its banks an average of six times in eight years.
All mitigation areas are located within the portion of the site mapped as
having Monocan (MO) Soils. The USDA SCS Soil survey for Mecklenburg County
indicates that this soil is subjct to common and brief periods of flooding during the
months of November to May. The permeability of this soil is 0.6 to 2.0 inches per
hour at a depth to 43 ".
Mitigation sites have been designed to be flat depressions which are at the
approximate elevations of nearby wetlands. They have been designed as basins
which will hold shallow amounts of water from 6" to 12" deep for as long as it takes
for the water to percolate down. Percolation rates are expected to be rapid
throughout most of the year, however during winter months and during the early part
of the growing season, a seasonally high water table would prevent percolation and
would extend the period of shallow inundation. Cuts have been made on the
downstream side which will allow water depths greater than 12" to run off into
adjacent channels or wetlands.

The following chart indicates the approximate quantity of water which will
flow into each
mitigation area from its basin in an average month throughout the
year in acre /inches
based upon NOAA normal
Charlotte
rainfall records:
Month
Basin
1
2
3
4
5
6
January
8.96
33.60
6.42
4.52
2.32
8.70
February
8.99
33.68
6.44
4.53
2.32
8.72
March
11.40
42.69
8.16
5.75
2.95
11.06
April
7.72
28.91
5.53
3.89
1.99
7.49
May
8.59
32.17
6.15
4.33
2.22
8.33
June
8.42
31.56
6.03
4.25
2.18
8.18
July
9.25
34.65
6.62
4.66
2.39
8.98
August
9.31
33.15
6.33
4.46
2.28
8.59
September
8.47
31.73
6.07
4.27
2.19
8.22
October
6.42
24.04
4.60
3.24
1.66
6.23
November
6.75
25.28
4.83
3.40
1.74
6.55
December
8.02
30.06
5.75
4.05
2.07
7.79
Given the quantity of water available during the early part of the growing season in
February and March and the occasional overbank flooding, and seasonal high water
table, there appears to be ample water available to support the wetland hydrology
requirement of inundation or saturation within the root zone for 12.5% of the
growing season.

Basin Summary
Basin #1
Total area of Basin 1.62 acres
Total impervious area 1.37 acres
Percentage impervious 84.6%
Storage area provided .74 ac.
Storage required first inch of rainfall 2.19 in. /.74 ac.
Basin #2
Total area of basin (including offsite)
Total impervious area
Percentage impervious
Permanent pool required @ 8' depth
Permanent pool provided
Storage required first inch of rainfall
Forebay provided
Basin #3
5.39 acres
3.71 acres
68.8%
3169 s.f.
43,560 s.f.
4.69 in. /1.0 ac.
10,890 s.f.
Total area of basin 1.65 acres
Total impervious area 1.00 acres
Percentage impervious 60.6%
Permanent pool provided 11,198 s.f.
Storage required first inch of rainfall 6.35 in. /.26 ac.
Basin #4
Total area of basin 1.10 acres
Total impervious area 0.64 acres
Percentage impervious 58.2%
Permanent pool required @ 3' depth 3169 s.f.
Permanent pool provided .09 ac.
Storage required first inch of rainfall 12.2 in. /.09 ac.

Basin #5
Total area of basin
Total impervious area
Percentage impervious
Storage required first inch of rainfall
Basin #6
Total area of basin
Total impervious area
Percentage impervious
Storage required first inch of rainfall
0.53 acres
0.23 acres
41.8%
6.63 in./.08 ac.
1.80 acres
1.37 acres
76.0%
-4.69 in. /1.0 ac.

60
SOIL SURVEY
TABLE 1. -- TEMPERATURE AND PRECIPITATION DATA
i Temperaturel ; Precipitationl
--- T - --- -- �----- T--- -'_T - ---.� T �..r - - --
years in , , ,2 years in 10,
1 i i i 10 will have -- Average i i will have -- ; Average ;
Month IAverage!Average!Averagel -� -- ;number ofiAveragel I -_:number of:Average
1 daily 1 daily 1 1 Maximum 1 Minimum 1 growing 1 1 Less 1 More ;days withlsnowfall
lmaximumiminimuml ltemperatureltemperaturel degree 1 !than -- ;than - -10.10 inch;
higher 1 lower I days2 I i 1 ; or more '
i i i 1 than -- : than -- i ! ! !
2A growing degree day is a unit of heat available for plant growth. It can be calculated by adding the
maximum and minimum daily temperatures, dividing the sum by 2, and subtracting the temperature below which
growth is minimal for the principal crops in the area (500 F).
-r ,
-r ,
°r
,
•r
,
�r
i
units
j in
j in
; in
,
,
In
January - - - -1
51.3 1
31.3 1
41.4
1
74
1
9
1
27
1 3.70
1 2.27
1 4.98
1 7
1
2.5
y - - - ,
February
54.1 ,
'
32.5 ,
43.3
,
74
,
12
,
29
, 4.08
, 2.67
, 5.35
, 8
,
1.6
March - - - - - - ,
61.6 ,
38.7 ,
50.2
1
84
,
20
,
117
, 4.58
, 3.11
, 5.92
, 8
,
1.4'
April ,
p '
72.3 1
48.4 1
60.4
1
90
1
31
I
316
1 3.37
1 2.26
1 4.37
1 6
1
.0
May--- - - - - -1
79.8 1
57.3 1
68.6
1
94
i
39
i
577
1 3.55
i 1.76
1 5.01
1 7
1
.0
June -- - - - - - ,
85.9
64.7 ,
75.4
1
98
52
,
762
, 3.56
1 1.91
1 4.89
1 6
1
.0
Jul
88.6 1
68.5 1
78.6
1
98
i
57
i
887
1 4.12
1 2.30
i 5.60
1 8
i
.0
August - - - - - ,
87.8 1
i
68.0 ,
77.9
i
,
98
i
,
57
i
,
865
i
, 3.91
i
2.01
i
1 5.45
i
, 7
1
.0
September - -;
82.3 1
61.8 1
72.1
1
95
1
46
1
663
1 3.19
1 .89
1 5.03
1 5
i
.0
October - - - -1
72.5 1
49.9 1
61.3
1
89
i
30
i
354
1 2.51
1 .64
1 4.01
i 4
1
.0
November - - -1
62.1 1
39.4 1
50.8
1
81
I
21
I
90
1 2.68
1 1.23
1 3.85
1 5
1
.1
December - - -1
52.9 1
32.9 1
42.9
1
74
1
11
1
40
1 3.56
1 1.94
1 4.88
1 6
1
.8
Year - - - - -1
70.9 1
49.5 1
60.2
1
100
i
7
1
4,727
i 42.81
137.55
147.87
1 77
1
6.4
1Recorded
in the
period
1951 -75
at
Charlotte,
N.C.
2A growing degree day is a unit of heat available for plant growth. It can be calculated by adding the
maximum and minimum daily temperatures, dividing the sum by 2, and subtracting the temperature below which
growth is minimal for the principal crops in the area (500 F).

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
TABLE 2. -- FREEZE DATES IN SPRING AND FALL
Probability
Temperaturel
or lower 1 or lower
Last freezing
temperature
in spring:
1 year in 10 1 1
later than -= 1 March 29 1 April 5 1 April 19
2 years in 10
later than -- 1 March 20 1 March 31 1 April 13
5 years in 10 1 1 1
later than -- 1 March 3 1 March 22 1 April 3
First freezing
temperature
in fall:
1 year in 10
earlier than -- 1 November 9 1 October 31 1 October 19
2 years in 10
earlier than -- 1 November 15 1 November 4 1 October 24
5 years in 10
earlier than -- i November 27 i November 11 1 November 2
i
1Recorded in the period 1951 -75
at Charlotte, N.C.
TABLE 3.-- GROWING SEASON LENGTH
i Daily minimum temperature
i during growing seasonl
1
Probability 1 Higher ;- _ Higher 1 Higher
1 than 1 than 1 than
i 240 F i 280 F 1 320 F
i Days Days Days
9 years in 10 1 237 1 218 1 192
8 years in 10 1 248 i 223 1 199
5 years in-10 1 269 1 233 1 212
2 years in 10 1 290 i 243 1 225
1 year in 10 1 301 1 248 i 232
1Recorded in the period 1951 -75
at Charlotte, N.C.
61

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
TABLE 16. - -SOIL AND WATER FEATURES
93
[Absence of an entry indicates the feature is not a concern. See text for descriptions of symbols and such terms
as "rare," "brief," and "perched." The symbol < means less than; > means greater than]
Flooding
Soil name and ;Hydro -! ,
map symbol 1 logic! Frequency 1 Duration
,group , ,
,
(Months
,
, --High water
, ,
1 Depth 1 Kind
, ,
table
,
!Months
,
, Bedrock
, ,
:Depth!Hard-
, , Hess
Risk of corrosion
,
!Uncoated !Concrete
, steel ,
, ,
,
, Ft i
,
, In ,
APB, ApD ---------- 1
B
!None- ------ -1 - --
! - --
1 >6.0 1 - --
1 - --
1 >60 1 ---
Moderate ,
Appling !
! !
!
! !
!
! !
!Moderate
!
CeB2, CeD2 -------- 1
B
!None--- - - - - -1 - --
! - --
1 >6.0 1 - --
1 - --
1 >60 1 - --
!Moderate !Moderate
Cecil
CuB *, CuD *: !
! !
!
! !
!
! !
! !
Cecil------- - - - - -1
B
!None--- - - - - -1 - --
! - --
1 >6.0 1 - --
1 - --
1 >60 1 - --
!Moderate !Moderate
Urban land.
DaB, DaD, DaE ----- 1
B
!None--- - - - - -1 - --
! - --
1 >6.0 1 - --
1 - --
1 >60 1 - --
!High - - - -- !Moderate
Davidson
En B, EnD ---- - - - - -- ,
C
!None -------- 1
, >6.0 , - --
, - --
, >60 , - --
!High ----- ! Moderate
Enon
GeB2, GeD2--- - - - - -;
B
!None--- - - - - -1 - --
! - --
1 >6.0 1 - --
1 - --
1 >60 1 - --
!High - - - -- !High.
eorgeville
GoB, GoD----- - - - - -!
C
!None--- - - - - -1 - --
1 - --
1 >6.0 1 - --
1 - --
120- 40!Rip-
(Moderate !High.
Goldston 1
! !
!
! !
!
! 1 pable! !
HeB --------------- 1
C
!None--- - - - - -1 - --
1 - --
11.0- 2.51Perched
!Jan- Mar!40- 60!Rip-
!High - - - -- !High.
Helena
i
, pable, ,
HuB *:
Helena------ - - - - -1
C
!None--- - - - - -1 - --
1 - --
11.0- 2.51Perched
!Jan- Mar!40- 60!Rip-
!High - - - -- !High.
, Pable, ,
Urban land.
IrA, IrB ---------- 1
D
!None--- - - - - -1 - --
1 - --
11.0- 2.01Perched
!Nov -Mar! >60 1 - --
!High - - -- -!Low.
Iredell
IuB *:
Iredell ---------- 1
D
!None--- - - - - -1 - --
1 - --
11.0- 2.01Perched
!Nov -Mar! >60 1 - --
!High - - -- -!Low.
Urban land.
LgB --------------- ;
C
!None--- - - - - -1 - --
1 - --
1 1. 0- 2.5!Apparent!Dec- May!48- 72IHard
!High - - - -- !High.
Li num
MeB, MeD ---------- 1
C
!None--- - - - - -! - --
! - --
1 >6.0 1 - --
1 - --
148- 601Hard
!High - - - -- :Moderate.
Mecklenburg
MkB *: !
! !
!
! !
!
! !
! !
Mecklenburg- - - - - -1
C
!None--- - - - - -1 - --
1 - --
1 >6.0 1 - --
1 - --
;48 -60 ;Hard
!High - - - -- !Moderate.
Urban land.
MO----------- - - - - -!
C
!Common ------ !Brief ----- ! Nov- May!0.5- 2.0!Apparent!Nov -May! >60 1 - --
!Moderate !High.
Monacan.
MS *:
Monacan----- - - - - -1
C
!Common ------ !Brief ----- I Nov- May!0.5- 2.0!Apparent!Nov -Mays >60 1 - --
!Moderate !High.
Arents.
a PaF---- - - - - -- 1
B
!None--- ---- -1 - --
! - --
1 >6 0 1 - --
1 - --
, ---
1 >60 '
,
,High - - - -- ,High.
Pacolet
See footnote at
end
of table.

92 SOIL SURVEY
TABLE 15. -- PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS -- Continued
Erosion
Soil name and 1 Depth 1 Permeability I Available !Soil reaction! Shrink -swell I factors
map symbol ! I !water capacity 1 1 potential ! ,
* See map unit description for the composition and behavior characteristics of the map unit.
MeB, MeD --------- 1
0 -7
!
0.6 -2.0
1
0.14 -0.19
1
5.6 -7.3
!Low------- - - - - -!
0.28
!
4
Mecklenburg 1
7 -34
1
1
0.06 -0.2
1
'
0.12 -0.14
1
5.6 -7.3
!Moderate-- - - - - -1
0.32
!
1
34-65
- --
1
!
MkB *:
!
!
!
! !
!
Mecklenburg - - - - -1
0 -7
1
0.6 -2.0
1
0.14 -0.19
1
5.6 -7.3
!Low------- - - - - -1
0.28
!
4
1
7 -34
1
0.06 -0.2
1
0.12 -0.14
1
5.6 -7.3
!Moderate-- - - - - -1
0.32
1
1
34 -65
1
- --
!
- --
!
- --
l---------- - - - - -!
- --
!
Urban land.
!
!
!
! !
!
!
MO---------- - - - - -!
0 -14
!
1
0.6 -2.0
!
1
0.14 -0.20
!
1
5.1 -7.3
! !
;Low------- - - - - -1
0.28
!
1
4
Monacan 1
14 -43
!
0.6 -2.0
1
0.14 -0.20
1
5.1 -7.3
;Low------- - - - - -1
0.28
;
1
43-65
1
- --
!
- --
!
- --
l-------- -- -- - --!
- --
!
MS *:
!
!
!
! !
!
Monacan---- - - - - -1
0 -14
!
0.6 -2.0
1
0.14 -0.20
1
5.1 -7.3
!Low------- - - - - -1
0.28
!
4
1
14 -43
!
0.6 -2.0
1
0.14 -0.20
1
5.1 -7.3
!Low------- - - - - -1
0.28
!
1
!
43-65
!
- --
Arents.
!
!
1 !
!
!
PaE, PaF --------- 1
0 -3
!
!
2.0 -6.0
!
1
0.08 -0.12
!
1
4.5 -6.0
! !
!Low------- - - - - -1
0.20
!
;
3
Pacolet 1
3 -31
!
0.6 -2.0
1
0.12 -0.15
1
4.5 -6.0
!Low------- - - - - -1
0.28
1
1
!
31 -65
!
!
- --
!
!
- --
!
- --
------- - - - - -- '
- --
PB3 *:
!
! !
!
Pacolet --------- 1
0 -3
!
0.6 -2.0
1
0.10 -0.14
1
4.5 -6.0
!Low------- - - - - -1
0.24
1
2
1
3 -31
!
0.6 -2.0
1
0.12 -0.15
1
4.5 -6.0
!Low------- - - - - -1
0.28
!
1
31 -65
1
- --
!
- --
!
- --
l---------- - - - - -!
- --
!
Udorthents.
!
!
!
! !
!
!
Pt*
!
!
!
! !
!
Pits
!
UL *, UO *•
!
!
!
! !
!
Udorthents
Ur *.
Urban land
!
!
!
!
! !
!
VaB, VaD---- - - - - -!
0 -8
!
2.0 -6.0
1
0.10 -0.14
1
4.5 -6.0
!Low------- - - - - -1
0.28
1
3
Vance ;
8 -33
!
0.06 -0.2
1
0.12 -0.15
1
4.5 -5.5
!Moderate-- - - - - -1
0.37
!
33 -50
!
- --
!
- --
!
- --
l---------- - - - - -!
- --
!
WkB, WkD, WkE,
!
!
!
! !
!
WkF-------- - - - - -!
0 -7
!
2.0 -6.0
;
0.11 -0.15
1
5.1 -6.5
!Low------- - - - - -1
0.28
!
2
Wilkes !
7 -15
!
0.2 -0.6
1
0.15 -0.20
1
6.1 -7.8
!Moderate-- - - - - -1
0.32
!
1
!
15 -45
!
!
- --
!
- --
!
- --
1---------- - - - - -!
- --
WuD *:
!
!
! !
!
Wilkes----- - - - - -!
0 -7
1
2.0 -6.0
!
0.11 -0.15
1
5.1 -6.5
!Low------- - - - - -1
0.28
1
2
7 -15
1
0.2 -0.6
1
0.15 -0.20
1
6.1 -7.8
!Moderate-- - - - - -1
0.32
!
15 -45
1
- --
!
- --
!
- --
1---------- - - - - -!
- --
!
Urban land.
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
* See map unit description for the composition and behavior characteristics of the map unit.

CORRECTED COPY PLEASE DESTROY COPY PREVIOUSLY RECEIVED
ISSN 0198 -3733
LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA
Q a 1a
1 8 v ANNUAL SUMMARY WITH COMPARATIVE DATA
CHARLOTTE,
. PPp
�'�CS Of
NORTH CAROLINA s
95
90
85
80
75
F
is:_ a
70
Ci7 .t 85
CO 60
d 55
Ix 50
fs7
CL v) 45
C? U3 40
E- 3.5
CO 30
25
20
15
10
5
7 3.00
O 2.00
E 1.00
Q fn 0.50
F 0.20
0.10
0 05
0 02
a.01
0.00
too
8
z F 0
? z 70
Cal 60
�j U 50
CL'
Z 40 30
20
10
0
i
FREEZING
Daily Data
10 20 30 10 2028 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30
JAN F'F ,'E3 MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
...... ..... . .. .. ..... .... .. ... ... .. ..............
...... .... t..
10 20 30 10 2028 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30
TU 20 30 IG 2028 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30
TEMPERATURE DEPICTS NORMAL MAXIMUM. NORMAL MINIMUM AND ACTUAL DAILY HIGH AND LOW VALUES (FAHRENHEIT)
PRECIPITATION IS MEASURED IN INCHES. SCALE IS NON- LINEAR
SUNSHINE. IS PFRCF.NT OF THE POSSIBLE SUNSHINE
CELSIUS
- 33
- 29
- 25
21
17
13
9
5
_ 1
-3
-7
- -11
- -15
I CERTIFY THAT THIS IS AN OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, AND IS COMPILED FROM
RECORDS ON FILE AT THE NATIONAL CLIMATIC DATA CENTER, ASHEYILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, 28801
NATIONAL NATIONAL NATIONAL
O OCEANIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITE, DATA CLIMATIC DATA CENTER DIRECTOR
ATMOSpWERIF. ADMINISTRATION AND INFORMATION SERVICE ASHEVILLE NORTH CAROLINA NATIONAL CLIMATIC DATA CENTER

1
N
NORMALS, MEANS, AND EXTREMES
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
tat I Tiinr- is OtO.0 hurt T7lnr- an°0.f..0 hrvaiinu- ri rOMn 107 oA0r1 710 TIMr 7M,r- r A c irf] &. .o w...
1!!I See Reference Notes on Page b8.
Page 3
to
JAN
FEB
I MAR
APR
MAY
JUNE
JUG Y
AUG
SEP
1 OC I I
NOV
DEC
YEAR
TEMPERATURE °F1
Normals
-Daily Maximum
50.3
53.6
61.b
72.1•
79.1
85.2
88.3
87.6
81.7
71.7
bl.7
52.6
70.5
-Dally Minimum
30.7
32.1
39.1
48.4
57.2
64.7
68.7
b8.2
62.3
49.6
39.7
32.6
49.4
- Monthly
40.5
42.9
50.4
60.3
68.2
75.0
78.5
77.9
72.0
60.7
50.7
42.6
60.0
Extremes
-Record Highest
50
78
81
90
93
.100
103
103
103
104
98
85
77
104
Year
1952
1989
1945
1960
1941
.1954
1986
1983
1954
1954
1961
1971
SEP 1954
-Record Lowest
50
-5
5
.4
24
32
45
53
53
39
24
11
` 2
-5
Year
1985
1958
1980
1960
1563
1972
1961
19b5
1967
1562
1950
I 1962
1AN 1985
NORMAL DEGREE DAYS:
Heating (base 65 0F1
7bO
619
459
155
50
0
0
0
10
166
429
694
3342
Cooling (base 65 0F)
0
0
7
14
149
304
419
400
220
33
0
0
1546
% OF POSSIBLE SUNSHINE
39
55
58
b2
69
b8
68
66
b7
65
67
59
57
63
MEAN SKY COVER (tenthsl
Sunrise - Sunset
40
6.2
6.1
b.0
5.5
b.0
5.9
b.2
5.9
S 7
4.8
5.4
5.9
5.8
MEAN .NUMBER OF DAYS:
Sunrise to Sunset
-Clear
41
9.4
8.7
9.2
10.0
6.1
7.6
6 6
7.b
5 2
13 3
11.4
10.3
111,4
-Partly Cloudy
41
6.2
b.0
8.1
8.5
10.1
10.9
11.7
12.b
9.4
7.4
6.4
6.0
103.0
- Cloudy
41
15.5
13.6
13.7
11.5
12.9
11.5
12.7
10.8
11.4
10,3
12.2
14.8
150.8
Precipitation
01 inches or more
50
10.0
9,b
11.0
8.8
9.6
9.7
11.4
9.6
7.3
6.7
7.9
9.5
111.0
Snow,lce pellets
1.0 inches or more
50
0.7
0.5
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.;
0.2
1.7
Thunderstorms
50
0.5
0.9
1.8
3.1
5.6
7.4
9.7
7.1
2 9
1.2
0.6
0.4
41.3
Heavy Fag Visibility
174 mile or Igss
50
3.7
2.9
2.5
1.3
1.0
1.1
1 1
1.5
1 1
1 9
3.2
4.1
26.4
Temperature F
-Maximum
90° and abode
29
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.7
7.1
12 9
10.b
3.8
V 2
0.0
0.0
3b.6
320 and below
29
1.8
0.4
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
2.7
- Minimum
32 and below
29
19.b
16.1
7.8
1.1
0.*
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.8
b.8
16.1
68.3
0° snd below
29
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1 0.0
0.0
1 0.0
0.0
0.0
- 0.0
0.0
0.1
AVG. STATION PRESS.1mb)
17
991.9
991.2
989.6
988.5
988.5
989.3
990.3
990.9
991 3
992.6
992.4
992.7
990.8
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 1%)
Hour 01
29
72
b8
68
68
78
80
83
84
b4
80
76
73
76
Hour 07 ILoca! lime)
29
89
',7
87
Hour 3
56
52
50
46
52
55
57
8
': 3
54
56
54
Hour 19
29
b0
55
1 52
49
1 58
62
1 b5
bb
be
bb
63
! 63
bl
PRECIPITATION (inches):
Water Equivalent
- Normal
3.80
3.81
4.83
3.27
3.64
3.57
3.92'
3.75
3.59
2.72
2.8b
3.40
43.16
- Maximum Monthly
50
7.44
7.59
8.76
7.64
12.48
8.26
9.122
9.98
10.89
8.33
8.68
7.49
12.48
Year
1962
1979
1980
1958
1975
1961
1941
1948
1945
1976
1985
1983
MAt 1975
- Minimum Monthly
50
0.45
0.74
0.58
0.30
0.11
0.41
0.53
U.bi
0.02
1
0.4b
0.43
T
Year
1981
1978
1965
1976
1941
1986
1983
1972
1954
1953
1973
1965
OCT 1953
- Maximum in 24 hrs
50
3.57
2.92
3.83
3,20
3.67
3.77
3 00
4 52
4.14
5 34
3.27
2.87
5.34
Year
1962
1973
1977
1962
1975
1949
1949
1476
1959
1976
1985
1912
OCT 1976
Snow,lce pellets
- Maximum Monthly
50
12.1
14.9
19.3
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.5
7.S
19.3
-Year
1988
1979
1960
1982
1968
1971
MAR 1960
- Maximum in 24 hrs
50
12.1
12.0
10.3
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.5
7.5
12.1
-Year
1988
1 1969
1 1983
1982
1
1
1968
1971
JAN 1988
WIND:
Maan Speed Imphl
40
7.9
8.3
8.8
8.8
7.5
6.9
6.5
6.4
6.7
b.9
.1.2
7.4
7,4
Prevailing Direction
though 1963
SW
NE
SW
S
Sw
SW
SW
S
NE
NNE
SSW
SW
SW
Fasrtest Obs. 1 Min.
-Direction 1!!1
10
31
07
25
25
33
19
32
12
21
.32
19
12
-Speed IMPHI
10
30
32
29
29
25
30
35
37
46
37
30
35
46
Year
1989
1984
1985
1982
1989
1987
1989
1986
1989
1979
(
1979
1989
SEP 1989
Peak Gust
-Direction 1!!1
6
NW
NE
SW
W
N
5
NW
N
E
N
5
NW
C
-Speed Imphl
6
49
53
49
46
46
49
48
53
87I
36
51
47I
87
-Date
1989
1984
1984
1986
1985
1987
1989
1986
1989
1987
1988
1987
1 SEP 1989
1!!I See Reference Notes on Page b8.
Page 3

PRECIPITATION (inches)
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
YEAR
1960
JAN
- -5, 74
FEB
6' 31_.
MAR
._ 4'''11
APR
7266
1 MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
ANNUAL
-33 7'r-
6.56
­1 . 74
3.. ?.5
1 4-8--T
74
0.60
2.99
44.05
1961
2.21
6 OF
4 40
4 05
1 3 19
8.26
1.43
4.07
0.06
0.73
2.73
6.03
43.64
1962
7.44
4.27
5.47
4.82
1.84
4.25
1.96
2.76
5.06
1.57
5.33
3.01
47.78
1963
2.71
3.15
5.28
2.69
2.91
2.01
2.19
3,55
3.70
0.02
3.46
3.04
34.71
1964
5.68
4.29
4.18
4.52
1964
2.11
5.39
4.83
2.32
7.20
2.05
3.18
46.64
1965
2.17
2.69
6.59
3.32
1,96
5.30
6.19
4.87
0.88
1,76
3.19
0.43
39.35
1966
3.79
5.59
2.13
1,73
3.61
2.58
1.86
2.36
5.42
2.29
1.19
2.58
35.13
1967
2.76
3.79
2.48
1.57
4,70
3.08
5.13
9.23
1.60
0.83
2.51
5.53
43.21
1968
4.95
0,87
4.96
2.73
2.45
6.63
5.13
0.88
1.46
3.02
4.68
2.29
40.05
1969
1..93
5.1s
4.04
3.49
2.03
2.32
3.48
5.14
4.83
1.33
1.14
4.87
39.79
1970
1.70
3.66
2.93
2.04
2.69
2.62
5.73
4.03
0,55
5.12
1,58
3,14
35.79
1971
3.40
5.19
4.87
2..79
4.47
5.09
4.99
2.89
2.68
6.88
2.96
2.24
48.45
1972
4,47
3,21
2.59
1,75
5.61
3.01
6.59
0.61
3.77
1,37
5.42
5.83
44,23
1973
4,14
4.44
6.96
2.13
4.31
4,91
3.62
2.31
3,15
2.38
0.46
5.32
44.13
1974
5.22
4.90
3.30
3.26
4.49
2.32
4.16
6.35
6.50
0.46
4.50
3.82
49,28
1975
6,14
3,50
7.62
1.69
12.48
1.86
7.5@
4,48
6.51
3.58
2.83
3.82
62.09
1976
1.89
1.13
4,36
0.30
4,26
3.84
2,26
0.90
5.55
8.33
3.37
5.60
41,79
1977
2,73
1,48
8.45
2.05
3.16
3.12
0.82
2.44
6.35
4,74
4.20
1.97
41.51
1978
6.80
0.74
4,97
2.69
4.91
4.19
4,03
8.11
1,16
1.18
2.81
3.13
44.72
$)1979
5.31
7,59
3.79
6.47
4.54.
4,72
4,74
1.27
9.69
2.95
4.61
1.36
57,04
1980
4,67
1.31
R 76
J..31
3 59
2.27
2.63
1.94
5.37
1.67
3.77
0.83
39,12
1981
0.45
3.63
2 12
0.67
4 27
1.81
6.61
2.67
3.42
3.94
0.87
6.23
36.69
1982
4.30
4.87
1.58
3.84
4 97
4.16
4.19
2.03
0.64
3.B3
3.05
4.23
41.69
1963
2.53
5.50
6.07
2.66
2.14
3.77
0.53
3.61
0,74
2.43
4.05
7.49
41.52
1984
4,09
5,90
5.89
4.50
4.78
2.95
5.96
3,95
1,74
0.75
2.08
2.40
44,99
1985
5.20
4.05
0,58
1.90
5.14
5.46
4,14
7.35
0.74
5,16
8,68
0.92
49.32
1986
1,02
1,03
3.01
1.20
1.63
0.41
2.26
.5.43
0.83
3.49
3.44
3.16
26.91
1987
4.78
5.19
3.65
2.44
0.99
2.98
1,38
2.76
6.87
0.84
4,05
3.39
39.32
1988
3.43
1.11
3.29
2.27
2.20
1.55
3.56
4.56
4.45
4,12
2.11
1,62
34.27
1989
1.61
4.67
4.92
2.58
5.37
3.20
6.30
2.99
7.27
4.08
3.14
3.66
49.79
Record
63.5
52.2
36.5
61.1
Record
Mean
3.77
3.93
4.32
3.22
1 3.54
1 3.87
1 4,69
1 4.57
1 3.35
2.96
2.74
3.66
44,64
aee me*erence Notes on 1-,age b0,
Page 4A
AVERAGE TEMPERATURE (deg. F) CHARLOTTE. NORTH CAROLINA
YEAR
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUG
SEP
OCT
DEC
ANNUAL
x1960
42,5
42 6
3 J
63.2
67.9
76.4
7 .9
79,
3.6
6
38,6
59.9
1961
38.7.
46.4
52.E
53.0
63.8
72.8
77.3
76.9
75.4
62.1
42.7
59.8
1962
39.4
46.7
48.2
58.4
74.5
74 7
78.6
77.0
71,2
62.6
r54.8
38.0
59.8
1963
37.3
37.5
54.1
62.9
68 8
75,3
77.9
78.9
70.1
63.6
35,6
59.6
1964
41.5
40.1
51.0
60.6
69.8
77.7
76.9
75.0
70.9
55.7
45.3
59.9
1965
41.5
44.6
46.8
62,4
73.4
73.3
77,8
78.0
73.1
59.6
44.0
60,5
1966
36.0
42.2
50.2
58.7
67.6
74,0
79.6
77.2
70.7
58.0
50.3
41,5
5819
1967
43.3
40.0
53.9
62.7
63.7
73.1
76.3
75,2
67.0
60.0
47,8
46.3
59.1
1968
37.9
38.7
51.6
59.0
64.8
73.8
77,0
79.3
71.4
60.6
49,4
38.6
58.5
1969
38.1
39.7
45.1
60.8
67,9
77,3
80.8
75.6
69.0
60.4
47,7
39.5
58.5
1970
34.7
41.1
48.6
61.2
68.2
74.4
79,5
78.9
75.9
63.6
49.7
44.7
60.0
1971
39.9
41.4
46.3
58.3
65.0
76.5
76.2
75.8
73.1
64.7
49.0
50.6
59.7
1972
44 6
40.4
49,1,
58.5
64,7
71,3
77.0
77,1
72.7
59.0
48.8
46.5
59.2
1973
39.6
40 0
54.1
57.6
F,4.7
74.7
78.5
7b.8
74.6
62.1
52.7
41.7
59.8
1974
49.8
44,0
55 ,.2
60.0
68.5
72.2
7b.9
75.9
68.4
58.3
49.9
42.1
60.1
1975
45.2
45.0
50.4
59.0
70.5
75.0
76.2
78.9
70.8
63.6
53.5
42.4
60.9
1976
39.3
50.2
54.7
59.9
65.0
72.4
76,9
76.1
69,5
55.5
44.1
39.1
58.6
1977
30.1
42,1
54,9
62.5
69.8
75.2
82,4
79.7
74,4
58.7
53.6
42.5
60.5
1978
316-9
36.7
49.4
61.5
66.7
76.2
78,9
79.0
74,2
60.1
56.2
44.8
60.0
91979
36.7
37,9
53.7'
60 2
67.7
71,6
76.6
78.4
70.4
59.3
52.9
43.7
59.1
1980
41,4
38.9
47,4
60.0
68.2
74.0
80.0
80.9
74,8
58.3
48.8
42.6
59,6
1981
36.1
44,2
48,5
64,2
65.1
78.2
78.7
75,1
70.2
58.0
51,3
39.3
59.1
1982
36.0
45.4
52.7
57.6
72.0
75.0
78,4
76.3
70.0
60.5
52.3
47,9
60,3
1983
38.8
41.8
50.6
54.9
66.7
73.9
80,7
80.2
71.1
61.0
50.0
39.6
59.1
1984
38.3
45.4
50.0
56 5
65.9
76.4
76,1
77,1
69.0
67.8
47.8
50.0
60.0
1985
35.6
43.1
54.0
61.4
68.0
75.8
77,4
75,7
70.6
64,8
58.6
39.7
60,4
1986
38.8
46.8
52.8
64.3
69,5
80.6
84,8
76.9
74,1
.64.0
53,2
43.4
62.4
1987
40.0
42,9
51.1
58.9
71.6
77,8
82.3
81,4
73.5
56.2
53.5
45.5
61.2
1988
35.8
43.4
52.7
60.6
68.4
75.3
79.6
80,9
71,8
56.3
53.0
43.8
60.1
1989
46.8
45.9
53.4
60.7
66.7
78.2.
79.6
77.8
71.8
63.5
52.2
36.5
61.1
Record
Mean
41.5
43.8
51.1
60.0
68.8
76.0
78.8
77,5
72.2
61.4
51.0
43.0
60.5
Max
50.5
53.5
61,6
71.0
79.5
86.2
88.4
86,9
81,7
71.8
61.1
52.1
70.4
Mtn
32.4
34.0
40.6
48.9
58.0
65.8
69.1
68.1
62.6
51.0
40.9
34.0
50.5
Dee n"Te�ence Notes on rage 00,
Page 48 .
J

7•
UNITED STATES w - - - - - --
(Nov. low U File N..
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR I --------------
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
WATER RESOURCES DIVISION
ft"00446*4 pelottul Tom"
Deecxsp n of &ging Station on ------ - - - - --
(Prepare description in accordance with outline on back of Form 9 -277. Plot cross section to scale.
Use Form 9-213A or 9-213E for cross section. Use second page of this form for sketch if room is available,
otherwise use Form 9-213C or 9 -213H. Initial and date all sheets.) *GM:,,�,,,_2
�0* `>UlW# W52 *3 �a � i` . X, C 11f62o i 1"7)
t , * as ��i~ q «S 8114 O"t of Bl&eerw** a"
4 -S SUM Waftem ftm M006- 1WR ftr lea. 7.
.laeaflttM . 7 sq a,. So wpm 3/4 of t ho b>r An is to ttho sity of Owlette
sad ft sdowbm amid urba is only #11*0y wbadsod
but *d*qptm dWsll+cppwele�t.
64N94 Its 1966 to Sart. 300 1974. � UAtsd April 140 1972 at..;
.»•►tai flog i 11, 1 and Unkv l e *temeed sulfa. Altd
��rtf►l
0>r8 ps#.s>Iard Wit.
,iii (• t -bra $ 6.9 ft ft post as t b
t#r� Ott ft ow Ilw ft. ad p 16 >QSetr p�irt 09 r
i s at sd W 17.196 ft. D of JA ft _ aewl 14
eE TA664"►
i sp1► r st tom . rt « ' ► so
V" I a� at *l *rte ftlo :.
ANIVAL- w4k- At aft swer awpor d by foes #ells
all low dogma AlIfito hm 6@ 4011 "OUSM 4" It AMt
j � )I y� z: 7
i 39.4 ft
:8tt+ar st gtar+otar 16.85 ft
t� frm d+ stt w We of 167 ft vlAW brldga whLe t 1#...:.
at fix+e 44wt istemou. 311110ta1 point foie is 14ft MA of brut**
to moat so,eft to 0"Wflow,
o-&A flood gait 1 %2 TONAwd s stdo about tw f4ft M#W &= tU fltlod Of 8/51/65
It- 5*"' 400894be to I t. J. Joe Hulas, naffille, N. 0.). tq. U# INNS stmt
Igggg"In.,do-Ofty of ftorlotteo lt. C.
Adl=W P 1 Gdselld arrow an demsttae sift b Upa kwlratl 89 ft trw
Soft ad.
x':41►. i+tfiaa Jlt. 8t .
•S ..

k
PRELIMINARY
arm ; .a a swow ref
•
- . �# � data a .BQ f*
by of M 1W.-
L f..
oai
id of 3mm mAI N., bar lid 041 ft eel of
Wn • ow 4060 !. 50 fig
of o � ta not 20 Ad 30
z
.','3 ..§��ri :r..� ia•1•: : -;3 °. ��..a'a . �t�`.` <i.f ..:,�i:'. .rte, a y.- ::,��: •.r.''i.v'^..'� .. .•'/�'.:,•ki'
t :mow

i r !
i !
,
,
ib
i�
i� i'
i i i i�' i•t ! � i � Q t 4;�
cr
r r r
!
� � ; � ! ! � !N i� i� ice► '�"- ' �
vim' P T ~ Z
i r AI 5 \ m -i
w m
O
i°p m
cs
w ;w_
j i i '• i� �� ;L. � i i � ;\ 1�� !!n � .Gym
:� iv i i ! i ice• OL `<
I• � r
j �I, �. 31 � Y �1' �•� r .,. k P . fff774��(��111��- .. i� �. � i. ; . { } '{ s.
,� � �.� �....,,t ° t- L <A2 1 d '�a Il �• t S"r ,,,,E �'ft �?, �,, � i i -� +�Y

6 -18

6 =20

2"PVC CAP
• 2"P VC PIPE
GLUE TOGETHER
WRVCGLUE f
6-
Figure 2. Homemade cap made of oversize PVC piping.
6-19

_SE��BY :EDSA - CHARLOTTE i 8 -30 -95 i 6.53AM i 7043420251 -► 818 733 8958 ►# 1
E D S A
Date: August 30, 1995
To: Mr. Ron Ferrell, NCDEHNR -DEM
From: Craig R. Wyant, EDSA
Re: Addendum to Mitigation Plan
and Stormwater Management Plan
Pineville Towne Centre Site
Mecklenburg County, NC
Corps Action ID No.: 199203202
DEM Project No.: 95601 .
Pr:"'" brand talc trmmkW memo 7811
I f at M" P. 2.
Ts
ftL"
N bVA
Fk 1419 ,111 -4MS1
�r ax:14 ut; C"I
The following items should be attached to the Mitigation Plan and Storrmwater
Management Plan for the Pineville Towne Centre Site dated "Revised August 18,
1995" and should be considered as a permanent part of the plan:
1. Velocities of all discharges and outfalls will be designed to be 5 fps or less or
otherwise nonerosive to vegetative channels for a 10 year storm. Discharges from wet
detention ponds will outlet to a vegetative filter at least thirty feet in length or an
approved equivalent wetland area.
2. The first inch of rainfall will be detained and released over a 2 to 5 day period
within wet detention ponds or an approved equivalent wetland area,
3. A reference wetland will be identified on -site which will serve to provide the
wetland hydrology success criterla for created wetlands. At least five monitoring wells
will be established within this reference area in order to record the normal hydrology
for a period of one growing season. The data will be.collected from the established
wells daily for the period March 1 to November 1 for the reference year. The
percent of the recorded time which this area exhibits inundation or saturation within
the upper 12" will be considered the normal hydrology for the reference wetland. If
the rainfall recorded for the reference year is determined to be more than 101/16
greater or less than normal for the reference months according to NOAH records,
then the wetland hydrology success criteria for created wetlands will be 12.5% of the
growing season.
4. The nick point located at the southernmost extreme of the preserved wetlands
will be stabilized in order to prevent further erosion as a part of this plan.
5. The following hardwood species should not be planted or relocated as a part of
the vegetation requirement of the plan: Liquidambar styraciflua, Acer negundo, 5alix
nigra.
and of memorandum
cc: John Dorney, NCDEHNR -DEM
Steve Lund, U.S. Army Corps
Kathy Abernethy, Panos Hotel Group
Edward D. stone, Jr. widl Aaociates Plwmers and Laetbcape Architects
1919 South Boulevard, Trolley's End. Suite 1D2, Charlotte, NC 28203 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]

O
LH Ln Ch
� R k
A ti
C cd td
$'0 N N
Lei k It
M M
.– N N
L k
w d' U'
C -0 cA �A
N en
Ln LM
Ln 4
M V N
ap
� 4 A
m
6. LM 01 01
Q1 N k R
CC1 aO
1 � � M ND
N
0 Z 0
CU M ri
o r A d1
LU
g 42 add coo
G
' d U.
Z #:6566 ESL BLB -149
R
r+1
a
M
LA
N
O
r
r
to
aD
M
a
un
N
R
co
M
�O
a
Ln
N
to
R
C
N
to
r
a�
to
N
6
d'
4
ZO�tE
N
C4
C
W
R
a,
N
ttf
r
d1
�f
n
OD
N
a
Q;
R
' N
a
M
R
LM
N
co
cA
R
M
to
Li
aD
M
co
N
CL
a
0
r
a
N
f�
t0L
$ f. N LM 0% N �► a a
%D M a% N to N aD
CA M c+ i M try N C4 M �
w
N %D w N ado
LD uD ♦D %d d' eM1 N �, V
R 4 k R k k R a k
o� n n N n n _R
t� %d ad n O N m Q
r r r r r r+ r N
00 ap aQ W GD %S %D K
it
Ln Ln co cn co A
R N ap �0 M h tm a �
ah
.-
N N N N N tV N
u
N r em�'! N cn "a n O —
CV ht CV N N •– � CV '�
aD A � q1 N 0 M tl� A
of LM in —
h ^ in eis h Q K
c ri d Ln Q t,A G M
M to %0 Ln to
r r r t .— V— T— r A
C) c M 0%a a K z
a tia �a a �a •r to
z
LM Ir
ql. col Ot Q� O �T Cf tp A O ee Z V z
O
ep N kin eD .RO
dJ ed
r to ep
M M M M M N N M . gu
Qs ! tip
'n C,5 N a 'E �.
V- V- N d cs 0<
cr
lmk •cc MM
tOil� N m d� N; O E M
co ao c► C6 ao %o
C O G
— b C
a to o z o w z tR uMn
Wdt5:9 : 98 -08 -9 31101HVHD - vsa3:AA AM

'AUG VP 4 1995
. r
MITIGATION PLAN
AND
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
for
Pre -Dis harge Notification (PDN)
Nati nwide Permit #26
A lication for
Section 401 Wa er Quality Certification
for
Pineville To ne Centre Site
Pineville, Meckle burg County, NC
Applica t:
The Panos Hot I Group
5936 Monroe Road, Suite 200
Charlotte, North Caro '\na, 28212
Prepared by:
E D S A
Edward D. Stone, Jr. and Assoc tes
1919 South Boulevard Suite 1
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203
(704) 373 -0534
Corps Action ID No.: 199203202
DEM Project No.: 95601
August 14, 1995

Mitieation Plan for Pineville Towne Centre Site
Overview
In order to compensate for the losses of wetland functions and values which will
result from the proposed development activities, the applicant proposes in part to
create 4.8 acres of new wetland from upland and to preserve an additional 5.2 acres
of existing high quality wetland. Wetland which will be created or preserved will be
protected from future impacts by the applicant or by a group designated by the
applicant for this purpose.
The intent and purpose of the mitigation proposal is to create areas of forested
floodplain wetland which are saturated within the root zone or inundated for a
significant portion of the growing season and will over time exhibit all characteristics
of jurisdictional wetland. The hydrology of wetland areas will be supported by
existing overland flow, newly generated stormwater runoff, and periodic overbank
flooding. Vegetation species selected will consist of hydrophytic species and will
provide benefits to wildlife habitat.
Those areas which will be utilized for the creation of new wetlands are all situated on
relatively level, generally open floodplain uplands which are near existing wetland
resources. These areas sit relatively low in topographic relief and will be graded to
receive runoff from upland areas as well as to benefit from periodic overbank
flooding. The vegetation in the majority of the proposed mitigation sites consists of
herbaceous successional growth of Ambrosia (ragweed) , Andropogon (broomsedge),
and Solidago (goldenrod); and mixed woody successional growth including Rubus
(blackberry), Crataegus saplings ( hawthorn), Prunus saplings (cherry), Acer saplings
(maple), Fraxinus saplings (ash), and Liquidambar saplings (sweet gum), among others.
The soils which occur in the area are mapped as Monocan series. This series naturally
exhibits some hydric indications throughout its profile and has inclusions which
exhibit pronounced hydricity. As a result of the above conditions, the proposed
mitigation sites should be well suited to the successful creation of new wetlands
which should over time exhibit the functions and values associated with other
floodplain wetlands.
Methods of Construction
Prior to any activity occuring within the mitigation sites, all downslope areas,
especially creeks and wetlands will be protected from sedimentation by the
placement of silt fencing or other appropriate sedimentation control methods along
the boundary between the mitigation construction site and existing resources. All
mitigation areas will remain a distance of at least 10 feet from the top of the bank of
Little Sugar Creek and five feet from the top of bank of any other creek in order to
preserve the natural stream bank levee and to prevent shoreline erosion.
The land which will be converted from upland to wetland will be lowered in grade to
that of surrounding wetlands. On average, this difference in existing to proposed

grade is less than 24 ". Soil will be removed from all mitigation areas to a depth of
12" below proposed grade. The removed soil will be hauled to uplands and will not
be re- deposited in wetlands. The graded areas will then be backfilled to the
specified finished grade with a suitable topsoil. When the grade has been raised to
the appropriate level, runoff from upland areas will be directed into the area so that
it will be saturated or flooded during the early part of the growing season. As is the
case with most of the other wetlands on this site, the created wetlands will not be
expected to be saturated year round or for extended periods throughout the growing
season except during extreme conditions. Under normal conditions, the soil will be
inundated or saturated within the root zone throughout the late winter months and
for a period of up to thirty days during the first part of the growing season. This period
of inundation /saturation will be sufficient to establish the wetland hydrology
necessary for the maintenance of hydrophytic vegetation. A water budget for each
mitigation area has been prepared which is based upon the attached stream gage
data from USGS, soil saturation and inundation data from SCS, and normally
expected precipitation records from NOAA for the Charlotte area.
Monitoring Wells
At least on 36" deep monitoring well will be established within each acre of wetland
mitigation area in order to observe water table depth during the followup monitoring
period. This monitoring well will be removed upon successful establishment of the
mitigation area. Each monitoring well will consist of a 36" long piece of screened and
perforated PVC pipe with a cap to prevent rainfall from entering the top of the pipe
constructed as described in the attached monitoring well detail. Wells should be
located in a site which is readily identifiable and marked for future location or should
be located by survey on a map of the property.
Vegetation
Hydrophytic vegetation will be initially established within mitigation sites by utilizing a
combination of planted bare root seedlings and by relocating existing saplings of
Fraxinus, Acer rubrum, Acer negundo, Populus deltoides, Salix nig Lii4uidambar °<
styr�aciflua, Ulmus americana, and other wetland species which are presently
occurring in wetlands impacted by the proposed development. The relocated
saplings will be supplemented by new plantings of these species or other woody
wetland species which would be of benefit to wildlife as a food source such as
Quercus species or Carya species. If it is not possible to relocate these plants, then
plants of appropriate species will be purchased and planted in order to satisfy the
density requirements. If plants are to be purchased, they will be of a variety of sizes
and ages and will meet the normally expected standards for nursery stock. In addition
to woody tree and sapling species, herbaceous plants will be relocated in groups of
naturally occurring diversity from impacted wetlands or will be planted to
approximate a similar diversity.
Selections from the following list of hardwood tree and shrub species will be utilized
in order to provide food sources for wildlife habitat:
Alnus serrulata

Amalanchier arborea
Carya species
Celtis occidentalis
Celtis laevigata
Cephalanthus occidentalis
Crataegus species
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Ilex decidua
Nyssa sylvatica
Quercu s eci —_geo�
,-;<-SaUx nigra
Viburnum species
Herbaceous Species
In most of the existing wetlands, fewer than five or six herbaceous species occur
within a given area. The most prevalent individual dominant species is )uncus effusus.
Other species which have been observed include Carex lurida and other Carex
species, Polygonum punctatum, Polygonum persicaria, and numerous grasses.
Specific plant species and quantities which will be utilized for the mitigation sites and
will be dependent upon the time of year in which planting occurs, species
availability, and number of plants which can be successfully relocated.
The mitigation sites will be planted at an initial density of approximately 500 woody
stems per acre or an approximate stem spacing of three meters. Woody plants will be
arranged in a manner which resembles that observed in surrounding wetlands with
groupings of plants of a similar hydrophytic category placed in the topographic
position best suited to the hydroligic preferences of the species. Herbaceous species
will be planted in 25 to 50 cm diameter clusters at a density of 1000 clusters per acre
or will be seeded with a wetland seed mix at a rate which will result in a coverage of
at least 100 stems per square meter upon germination. All new plantings will consist
of species which are facultative wetland or obligate species.
All planting and seeding will be done in the spring or fall. Areas which are disturbed
during summer or winter months will be seeded with an annual ryegrass in order to
provide temporary stabilization of the areas until appropriate planting times become
available.
Monitoring Reports
Once an area has been established and planted, its success will be monitored semi-
annually in order to measure growth, species diversity, and to remove upland species
and invasive weed species such as blackberry, multiflora rose, kudzu, honeysuckle,
poison ivy, or broomsedge. Each semi - annual monitoring event will consist of the
establishment of two sample plots per acre which are thirty feet in radius and ,QMu
representative of the growth occurring throughout the one acre area. At each
sample plot, the number and species of each surviving woody stem will be recorded x

and the percent aerial cover of the sample plot will be estimated for each of the
three most dominant species. A similar plot of ten feet in diameter will be
established within the thirty foot radius area for recording the three dominant
herbaceous species by percent cover. Additional wetland species can be recorded if
their presence is significant. Wetland species considered to be acceptable appear in
the USFWS National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands, 1988 Summary,
or other acceptable reference. All measurements should be recorded on a
monitoring data form and the sample location estimated on a map of the site. At
least two representative photographs should be taken of the mitigation area at each
sample plot and should include a sign which indicates the date and plot number.
These photographs should be attached to the data form for the sample plot.
At the time of monitoring, each monitoring well will be observed in order to record
the depth to water table in order to insure that adequate hydrology is available
during the early part of the growing season. Test pits . can be dug at various locations
throughout the site at the time of inspection in order t observe changes in soil
characteristics and to verify the observations found within the monitoring well. Any
findings or observations should be recorded on the data form of the sample plot
nearest the observation.
T' 0 jC+n5copy of all data forms, maps, and photographs of each sample plot will be
supplied to DEM Water Quality Branch and to the U.S. Army Corps for their file until
all areas have been successfully established and determined acceptable. If all areas
are not released within a period of two and one -half Years from time of installation,
then corrective measures must be to en on the remaining areas in order to insure
their successful establishment or an agreement made at such time of an acceptable
alternate form of mitigation.
1k
stiff �
��omc
A wetland area or portion thereof will be considered to be successfully created when
two successive semi - annual reports for a sample plot within the area indicate that at
least sixty percent of the area of the sample plot is covered by desirable wetland
species in any combination of woody and herbaceous species and that a minimum of
twenty -five woody stems of wetland species are surviving within the area. If more
than twenty five percent of the area of the sample plot is comprised of upland or
invasive species, the area is not considered to be successful and maintenance will
need to be performed on the area in order to remove these species.

Water Budget
The following Table summarizes the characteristics of each proposed mitigation site
relating to stormwater runoff as a primary source of wetland hydrology:
Mitigation Area Size Contributing (Impervious) Total
Basin Area
1 .74 acres 1.62 acres 2.36 acres
2 3.27 acres 4.10 acres 7.37 acres
3 .04 acres 1.65 acres 1.69 acres
4 .09 acres 1.10 acres 1.19 acres
5 .08 acres .53 acres 0.61 acres
6 .49 acres 1.80 acres 2.29 acres
The total column in the above table indicates that the mitigation area will recieve
direct rainfall in combination with the runoff provided by the drainage basin area.
The attached charts from NOAA and USDA -SCS show the average annual inches of
rainfall which are expected in the Mecklenburg County area on a month by month
basis. The normal monthly rainfall is highest in January, February, March and July.
Other sources of hydrologic influence include overbank flooding. Based upon
gage data records of the USGS local office, Little Sugar Creek is expected to be out
of its banks an average of six times in eight years.
All mitigation areas are located within the portion of the site mapped as
having Monocan (MO) Soils. The USDA SCS Soil survey for Mecklenburg County
indicates that this soil is subjct to common and brief periods of flooding during the
months of November to May. The permeability of this soil is 0.6 to 2.0 inches per
hour at a depth to 43 ".
Mitigation sites have been designed to be flat depressions which are at the
approximate elevations of nearby wetlands. They have been designed as basins
which will hold shallow amounts of water from 6" to 12" deep for as long as it takes
for the water to percolate down. Percolation rates are expected to be rapid
throughout most of the year, however during winter months and during the early part
of the growing season, a seasonally high water table would prevent percolation and
would extend the period of shallow inundation. Cuts have been made on the
downstream side which will allow water depths greater than 12" to run off into
adjacent channels or wetlands.

The following chart indicates the approximate quantity of water which will
flow into each
mitigation area from its basin in an average month throughout the
year in acre /inches:
Month
Basin
1
2
3
4
5
6
January
8.96
28.06
6.42
4.52
2.32
8.70
February
8.99
28.08
6.44
4.53
2.32
8.72
March
11.40
35.60
8.16
5.75
2.95
11.06
April
7.72
24.10
5.53
3.89
1.99
7.49
May
8.59
26.83
6.15
4.33
2.22
8.33
June
8.42
26.31
6.03
4.25
2.18
8.18
July
9.25
28.89
6.62
4.66
2.39
8.98
August
9.31
27.63
6.33
4.46
2.28
8.59
September
8.47
26.46
6.07
4.27
2.19
8.22
October
6.42
20.05
4.60
3.24
1.66
6.23
November
6.75
21.08
4.83
3.40
1.74
6.55
December
8.02
25.06
5.75
4.05
2.07
7.79
Given the quantity of water available during the early part of the growing season in
February and March and the occasional overbank flooding, and seasonal high water
table, there appears to be ample water available to support the wetland hydrology
requirement of inundation or saturation within the root zone for 12.5% of the
growing season.

66
­:S01L SURVE
TABLE l.--TEMPERATURE AND PRECIPITATION DATA
---- --r- --
Temperaturel Pr .4
ecipitationl
__T____7---f-years
years in UT ------- -
10 will have-:Z 1 Average will have-- I Average
: r
Month !Average!Average!Average ;number of1Averagej_ ------ Inumber oflAverage
Less 1 daily 1 daily 1 Maximum : Minimum 1 growing 1 1 L "
imaximumiminimumi ;temperature : temperature! More !days with:snowfall::
',
temperature! degree 1 :than--1than--;0.10 inch!
I higher lower 1 days2
I or more
than-- 1 than --
'
Units 7
January - - - -.1 51.3 1 31.3 1 41.4 1 74 9 i 27 1 3.70 1 2.27 1 4.98 1, 7
1 2.5
February - - -; 54.1 1 32.5 1 43.3 1 74 12 29 1 4.08 2.67 1 5.35 1 8 1.6 IN,
March- - - - - -I 61,6 1 38.7 1 50.2,; 84 I 20 I 117 1 4.58 1 3.11 1 5.92 I 8 1.4
April- - - - - -; 72,3 1 48.4 1 60,4 1 90 1 31 i 316 1 3-37.1 2.26 14.37 1 6 .01TF,
May - - - - -- 1 79.8 1. 57.3 1 68.6 1 94 i 39 1 577 '1 3.55 1 1.76 1 5.01 1, 7 1 .0
2J
June-- - - - - -1 85.9 1 64.7 1 75.4 1 98 52 i 762 1 3.56 1 1.91 1 4.89 1 6
.0
July-- - - - - -; 88.6 1 68.5 1 78.6 1 98 57 887 4.12 1 2.30 1 5.60 1 8 i
August - - - - -1 87.8 1 68.0 1 77.9 1 98 i 57 A 865 1 3.91 '1 2.01 ;.5.45 1 7 I .0
September--! 82.3 1 61.8 1 72.1 1 95 46 i 663 1 3.19 1 '89 1.5.03 1 5 i
October - - - -; 72.5 1 49.9 1 61.3 1 89 i 30 354 2.51 1 .64 1 4.91 4 i .0
November - - -; 62.1 1 39.4 1 50.8 1 81 I 21 1 90 1 2.68 1 1.23 1 3.85 1 5 1 1
December - - -1 52.9
1 32.9 1 42.9 1 74 40 1 3.56 1 1.94 1 4.88 1 6,
8'
Year - - - - -1 70.9 1 49.5 1 60.2 1 100 7 1 4,727 1 42.81 ;37-55 147.87 1 77
6.4
!Recorded in the period 1951-75 at Charlotte, N.C.
2A growing degree day is a unit of heat available for plant growth, It can be calculated by adding the
maximum and minimum daily temperatures, d ividing the sum by 2, and subtracting the temperature below which
growth is minimal for.the principal crops in the area (500 F).
z
IiM�

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.
93 . :.
TABLE 16. - -SOIL
AND WATER FEATURES
[Absence of an entry
indicates
the feature is not a concern. See text for descriptions of symbols and such terms
as "rare," "brief,"
and "perched." The symbol < means less than; > means greater than]
I Risk of corros on
—'-i
Soil name and ;Hydro
Flooding
-1 , ,
High water table Bedrock
; �—;— --;- �-; T' - -;
map symbol 1
logic{
Frequency 1 Duration !Months
1 Depth 1 Kind ;Months iDepth{Hard-
!Uncoated !Concrete "'
!group
i I 1
1 ! ! ! - i ness
I steel 1
Ft , , , In
ApB, ApD----- - - - - -!
B
!None--- - - - - -1 - -- ! - --
1 >6.0 1 - -- ! - -- 1 >60 1 - --
(Moderate !Moderate,
Appling
CeB2, CeD2 -------- ;
B
!None--- - - - - -1
- -_
>6.0 1 - -- 1 i >60 i. - --
I
'Moderate ;Moderate,;
Cecil
!
1 t ,
I
i
;.f166 t yt U
Cub CuD
,
Cecil- --- -- -- - - - -
B
' ' - -- ' ---
,None--- - - - - -, ,
>6 0 ,
' --- I --- ! >60 ! - -`
IModerate,lModerat'e1,,`
Urban land.
DaB, DaD, DaE ----- 1
B
!None--- - - - - -1 - -- ! - --
1 >6.0 1 - -- 1 - -- 1 >60 1 - --
!High - -- !Moderate`.
Davidson
EnB , EnD----------- I
C
!None ---- -- - - ! - -- ! ---
! >6.0 ! --- ! - -- ! >60` l
High- -- -lMOderate�,
Enon
GeB2, GeD2 -------- I
B
INone--- - - - --1 - -- 1 ---
1 >6. - -- - -- >60 '
0 1 1 1 ,.
1 Hi ' R:Sv`
,gh - -- -, High
Georgeville 1
I ! !
! ! 1 !
.,..
!
GoB GoD - - - - -- '
, - - - -,
C
,None- - - - -- --
' 1 - -- 1 - --
1 >6.0 1 - -- 1 - -- 120- 40!Rip-
!Moderate !High. ,
Goldston !
! ! !
! ! ! ! 1 pable!-
HeB---------- - - - - -I
C
!None --- - - - - - ! - -- 1 - --
11.0- 2.51Perched !Jan- Mar140- 60IRip-
,
!High = - -= -!High
Helena
1 gablel
HuB *:
Helena ------ - - - - - I
C
(None--- - - - - -! - -- I - --
11.0- 2.5IPerched !Jan- Mar!40- 60IRip-
High - - - -- !High;?
I pablei: ! ;
Urban land. !
I ! I
1 ! ! ! I
1
IIA,IrB -------- --
D
!None--- - - - - -1 - -- i - --
11.0- 2.01Perched !Nov -Marl >60 ! - --
!High - - -- - !Low
! I
IuB *;
,
Iredell ----------- 1
D
(None--- - - - - -1 - -- 1 - --
11.0- 2.01Perched 'Nov -Mar' >60 '
, , , - --
'
,High - - -- -,Low.
Urban,land.
LgB --------------- I
C
!None--- - - - - -1 - -- 1 - --
11. 0- 2.5!ApparentlDec- May!48- 72!Hard
!High----- 1High.
Lignum
MeB, MeD ----- - - - - - I
C
!None --- - - - - - I - -- i - --
1 >6.0 1 - -- 1 - -- 60'Hard 14 -
$ i
' '
,High - - - -- ,Moderate.
Mecklenburg
MkB *:
Mecklenburg - - - - -1
g ,
C
,None-- - - - - -- 1 - -- 1 - --
1 >6.0 1 - -- ' - -- 48- 60'Hard
, 1 ,
'
,High - - - -- ,Moderate.
Urban land.
MO ----------- - - - - - I
C
,Common ------ !Brief ----- ! Nov- May10.5- 2.0:ApparentlNov -May1 >60 1 - --
!Moderate !High
Monacan
MS*:
Monacan ----- - - - - - I
C
!Common - - - - -- !Brief - - - -- !Nov -Ma 10.5 -2.0!A arent'Nov -Ma
pp ! >60 � y1 I ---
y!
' ,Moderate !High.
Arents.
!
1
PaE, PaF ---------- I
B
I I I
(None--- - - - - -1 - -- 1 - --
1 1 1 1 1
i >6.0 i - -- i - -- 1 >60 1
I I
!High ----- 1High
Pacolet
See footnote at
end
of table.
S5

92 t ' ?, :SOIL SURVEY .
TABLE 15. -- PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS -- Continued
Soil name and }
Depth
I
Permeability
1
Available
1 I Erosion
!Soil reaction; Shrink - swell -} factors
map symbol }
I
!water
capacity
i
{ potential I�"T
-
In
In hr
,
In /in
{
pH
! !
K
{ T
MeB, MeD--- - - - - - - }
0 -7
1
0.6 -2.0
1
0.14 -0.19
1 5.6 -7.3
}Low------- - - - - -1
0.28
''} - 4
Mecklenburg 1
7 -34
1
0.06 -0.2
I
0.12 -0.14
1 5.6 -7.3
(Moderate-- - - - - -1
0.32
;
1
34-65
i
- --
---
- --
-- --- -- --- - --
I
i
Mecklenburg
0 -7
' ,
0.6 -2.0•
,
0.14-0.19
1 5.6 -7.3
,Low------- - - - - -I
0.28
I 4
{
7 -34
!
0.06 -0.2
1
0.12 -0.14
1 5.6 -7.3
!Moderate - - - - -- -1
0 32
'
,
1
34 -65
1
- --
- --
- --
' ------------ 7 '
Urban ,land. 1
I
{
I
1
I
!
1
I {
1
MO---------- - - - - -}
0 -14
}
0.6 -2.0
1
0.14 -0.20
1 5.1 -7.3
ILow ------------ 1
0.28
- 1 4.
Monacan 1
14 -43
,
0.6 -2.0
1
0.14-0.20
1 5 1 -7 3
1
.Low---- --- - --- -I
0.28
•1
'
1.
43 -65
i
- --
1
- --
! - --
-- - - - - --
.,.
,.
MS *: !
!
!
}
Monacan----- - - - -1'
0 -14
1
0.6 -2.0
!
0.14 -0.20
! 5.1 -7.3
I 1
!Low------- - - - - -1
028
.28
{
i 4
!
14 -43
1
0.6-2.0
!
0.14 -0.20
! 5.1 -7.3
!Low------- - - - - -1
0.
r ".. ":" ''- -•
Arents.
PaE, PaF ---- - - - - - }
0 -3
1
2.0 -6.0
1
0.08 -0.12
1 4.5 -6.0
!Low------- - - - - -1
0.20
1 3
Pacolet 1
3 -31
!
0.6 -2.0
1
0.12 -0.15
1 4.5-6.0
1
!Low---
0_28
'
'
1
31 -65
I
- --
- --
- --
-- - - - - --
PB3 *:
I
!
,
Pacolet -------- -I
0-3
1
o.6 -2.0
!
0.10 -0.14
! 4.5-6.0
ILow ..... -- - - =--1
I
.. 3 -31
1
0.6 -2.0
}
0.12 -0.15
! 4.5 -6.0
}Low------- - - - - -}
0.28
'1.1
31_65
{
- --
I
- -- '
! - --
i---------- - - - - -i
--
!'
Udorthents.
Pt*.
Pits
Udorthents
Ur *.
Urban land
VaB, VaD --------- 1
0 -8
1
2.0 -6.0
!
0.10-0.14
' 4
1 .5 -6.0
,Low- --- - - - - - -1
0.28
1
3
Vance !
8 -33
1
0.06 -0.2
1
0.12 -0.15
4.5 -5.5
,Moderate -- - - - - - ,
0.37
, '•
i
33 -50
!
- --
1
_ --
i - --
1---------- - - - - -1
- --
J
WkB, WkD, WkE,
WkF ------------- i
0 -7
!
2.0-6.0,
1
0.11 -0.15
! 5.1 -6.5
1
Mow -----------
0.28
Wilkes !
7 -15
1
0.2 -0.6
1
0.15 -0.20
, 1 6.1 -7.8
,M oderate-- - - - - -'
0.32
1. 2
•1-
1
15 -45
}
- --
!
---
! ---
l- ----- ---- --- - -!
WuD *: 1
1
1
Wilkes----- - - - - -1
0 -7
1
2.0 -6.0
1
0.11 -0.15
! 5.1 -6.5
'
ILow---- -- - ---- -l-
0.28
, 2'
!
7 -15
1
0.2 -0.6
1
0.15 -0.20
1 6.1 -7.8
!Moderate-- - - - - -1
0.32
!
1
15 -45
1
- --
1
- --
! - --
I-------- - - - - -- -I
- --
,
I
Urban land.
* See map unit description for the composition and behavior characteristics of the map unit.

•�� MOWN
E-
:a:
Cil
J W
F �
d �
Q:
G><7
a w
Cr] CK
F �
W
95
90
85
an
7,
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
3.00
p 2.00
F 1.00
d /> 0.50
H x 0.20
C Ci 0 10
U 00,
iJ
Do"
0.01
000
PLEASE DESTROY COPY PREVIOUSLY RECEIVED
ISSN 0198 -3733
LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA ` "' 0, ro".11
ANNUAL SUMMARY WITH COMPARATIVE DATA 9*
C P
CHARLOTTE, rw
NORTH CAROLINA s'4js °`
Daily Data rEISIUS
33
29
10 20 :10 10 20 28 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 10 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 1020 30
JAN F'I';fi MAR AI'R MAY JUN JUL, AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
100
z E 80 -
W70
60
Z
U 50
W 40 -
a 30
20 `
10
0 -
IV zu au I zu ze 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 3n
10 20 30 10 2028 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30
TEMPERATURE DEPICTS NORMAL MAXIMUM. NORMAL MINIMUM AND ACTUAL DAILY HIGH AND LOW VAI,UES (FAHRENHEIT)
PRECIPITATION IS MEASURED IN INCHES. SCALE; IS NON - LINEAR
SUNSHINE IF PFRE'F.NT OF THE POSSIBLE SUNSHINE,
I CERTIFY THAT THIS IS AN OfFICIAI PUBEICATION Of 'HE NAI;ONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, AND IS COMPILED FROM
RECORDS ON FILE AT THE NAIIONAL C;IMAIIC 9ATA CENTER, ASWEVIL,E, NORTH CAROLINA, 28801��//
NATIONAL NATIONAL NATIONAL
o a a OCEANIC AND ENVIRONMENIAI. SATELLITE, DATA CLIMATIC DATA CENTER DIRECTOR
AfMOSPWERIC ADMINISTRA'ION AND INFORMATION SERVICE ASHEVILLE NORTH CAROLINA NATIONAL CLIMATIC DATA CENTER
,
j
25
21
17
13
8
5
1 `
-3
-15
J ,. �
r I
7 T- I 4
10 20 30 10 2028 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30
TEMPERATURE DEPICTS NORMAL MAXIMUM. NORMAL MINIMUM AND ACTUAL DAILY HIGH AND LOW VAI,UES (FAHRENHEIT)
PRECIPITATION IS MEASURED IN INCHES. SCALE; IS NON - LINEAR
SUNSHINE IF PFRE'F.NT OF THE POSSIBLE SUNSHINE,
I CERTIFY THAT THIS IS AN OfFICIAI PUBEICATION Of 'HE NAI;ONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, AND IS COMPILED FROM
RECORDS ON FILE AT THE NAIIONAL C;IMAIIC 9ATA CENTER, ASWEVIL,E, NORTH CAROLINA, 28801��//
NATIONAL NATIONAL NATIONAL
o a a OCEANIC AND ENVIRONMENIAI. SATELLITE, DATA CLIMATIC DATA CENTER DIRECTOR
AfMOSPWERIC ADMINISTRA'ION AND INFORMATION SERVICE ASHEVILLE NORTH CAROLINA NATIONAL CLIMATIC DATA CENTER
,
j
25
21
17
13
8
5
1 `
-3
-15

J
1
LATITUDE: 35 °11,
MAR APR M�1'( JUNE JUL Y AUG �� P OC i NOV f7EC YEAR
TEMPERATURE °F:
?Y
NORMALS, MEANS, AND EXTREMES
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
N LONGITUDE; 80 05b' W ELEVATION: F! GRND 737 8AR0 138 TIME TUNE: EA$IERN W8AN: 13881. .'
la) JAN FEB
TEMPERATURE °F:
Normals
-Dally Maximum 5
50.3 5
53.6 6
61,6 7
72.1 7
79,1 8
85.2 8
88.3 8
87.6 8
81.7 7
71.7 b
bl,7 5
52.6 7
70.5
Daily Minimum 3
30.7 3
32.1 3
39.1 4
48.4 5
51.2 6
64,7 6
68.7 6
68.2 b
b2.3 4
49.6 3
39.7 3
32,6 4
49.4
- Monthly 4
40.5 4
42.9 5
50.4 6
60.3 6
68 2 7
75.0 7
78.5 7
77.9 7
72.0 b
b0.7 5
50.7 4
42.6 6
60.0
Extremes
- Record Highest 5
50 7
78 8
81 9
90 9
93 1
100 1
103 1
103 1
103 1
104 9
98 8
85 '
'77 1
104
Year 1
1952 1
1989 1
1945 1
19bO 1
1941 ' 1
1954 1
1986 1
1963 1
1954 1
1954 1
1961 1
1971' S
SEP 1954
-Record Lowest 5
50 •
•5 5
5 4
4 2
24 3
32 4
45 5
53 5
53 3
39 2
24 1
11 2
2 -
-5
Year 1
1985 1
1958 1
1966 1
1960 1
17b3 1
1972 y
y6: 9
96'. "
"671 9
962 1
1950 j '
'1962 A
AN 1965
NORMAL DEGREE DAYS:
Heating (base 65°FI 7
760 b
b19 4
459 1
155 5
50 0
0 0
0 0
0 !
!0 1
1bb 4
429 I _
_'694 3
3342
Cooling (base 650FI 0
0 0
0 7
7 1
14 1
149 3
304 4
419 4
400 2
220 3
33 .
.0 '
' '. 0' 1
1546
% OF POSSIBLE SUNSHINE 3
39 5
55 5
58 6
62 6
69 b
b8 b
b8 b
bb 6
67 _
_ 65 6
67 5
59 5
57 b
b3
MEAN SKY COVER (tenths)
Sunrise - Sunset 4
40 b
b.2 b
b.1 b
b.0 5
5.5 6
6 0 5
5,9 b
b.2 5
5 9 5
5.1 q.8. 5
5,4 5
5',y 5
5,8
MEAN NUMBER OF DAYS:
Sunrise to Sunset '
'
Clear 4
41 9
9.4 8
8.7 9
9.2 1
10.0 8
8.1 7
7.6 u
u L -
-1 b ;
; 2 3 3 1
11,4 1
10.'31 1
111,4
Partly Cloudy 4
41 b
b.2 6
6.0 8
8.1 8
8.5 1
10,1 1
10.9 1
1.; 1
12 b 4
4 7.4 6
6,4 6
6.0 1
103.0
13.7 1
11,5 1
12. 9 1
11,5 1
12,7 1
10,8 1
1,4 I 10.3 1
12.2. 1
14,8 1
150.8
Precipitation
01 . inches or more 5
50 1
10.0 9
9.b 1
11.0 8
8,8 9
9 b 9
9.7 1
11,4 9
9.6 7
7.31 6.7 7
7.9 9
9.5 1
111,0
Snow ,Ic0 pellets
1.0 inches or more 5
50 0
0.7 0
0.5 0
0.3 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 O
O U 0
0.0 0.0 0
0',► 0
0.2 1
1,7
Thunderstorms 5
50 0
0.5 0
0.9 1
1.8 3
3.1 5
5.6 7
7,4 9
9.7 7
7.1' 2
2..9 I- 1,2 '
''0!.6 :
: 0,4 4
41,3
Heavy fog Visibility
1/4 mile or Igas 5
50 3
3.7 2
2 9 2
2.5 1
1,3 1
1.0 1
1,1 1
1 1
1 5 2
2 1 i- 1 9 3
3 ? 4
4';1 2
26.4
- axamum '
29 0
0.0 0
0.0 O
O.0 0
0.3 1
1 7 7
7,1 1
12 9 1
10 b i
i 3 8 i 0 2 0
'
0.0 3
36.16
32° and below 2
29 1
1.8 0
0.4 0
0.4 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0.0 0
0.0 0
0.5 2
2.7
- Minimum
32 and below 2
29 1
19.b l
lb.1 7
7.8 1
1.1 ►
► 0
0.0 0
0,0 0
0.0 0
0.0 1 0.8 b
b.8 1
16.1 6
68,3
and below 2
29 0
0.1 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0.0 0
0.0 0
0,0 0
0,1
AVG. STATION PRESS.Imbl 1
17 9
991.9 9
991.2 9
989.6 9
988.5 9
988 5 9
989.3 9
990 3 9
990 9 9
991 3 992.6 9
992.4 9
992.7 '
' 990.8
RELATIVE HUMIDITY IXI -
- -
- ^
^ ^
f 7
Hour 01 2
29 7
72 b
b8 b
b8 b
b8 1
18 8
80 8
83 8
84 b
b4 80 f
76 7
73 7
76
Hour 07 2
29 7
78 7
76 7
79 7
78 8
83 8
84 b
b7 r
r. +9 1
1 90 87 8
83 7
79 8
83
Hour 19 2
29 b
b0 5
55 5
52 4
49 5
58 6
62 b
b'� F
8 '
: 53 5
54 i
i 56 5
54
_ T
T'
PRECIPITATION linchesl: _
Water Equivalent
Normal 3
3.80 3
3.81 4
4.83 3
3.27 3
3,b4 3
3,57 3
3.91' 3
3.75 3
3,59 2.72 2
2,86 3
3.40 4
43.16
- Maximum Monthly 5
50 7
7,44 7
7,59 8
8 76 7
7.64 1
12.46 8
8.26 9
9 12 9
9.98 1
10.89 8.33 8
8.b8 7
7,49 1
12.48
-Year 1
1962 1
1979 1
1980 1
1958 1
1975 1
1961 1
1941 1
11948 ;
; 1945 1976 1
1985 1
1983 !
! MAt 1975
- Minimum Monthly 5
50 0
0.45 0
0.74 0
0.58 0
0.30 C
C.11 0
0.41 0
0 53 G
G.bl 0
0.02 0
0.4b 0
0.43 1
1
Year 1
1981 1
1978 1
1985 1
1976 1
1941 1
1986 1
1983 1
1912 !
!9 °,4 i9b' 1
1973 1
1965 !
! OCT 1953
- Maximum In 24 hrs 5
50 3
3.57 2
2.92 3
3.83 3
3.20 3
3.61 3
3.77 3
3 OQ 4
4 ;2 q
q 74 j :• 34 .
.3,211 2
2 67 5
5.34
-Year 1
1962 1
1973 1
1977 1
19b2 1
1;75 1
1949 1
1949 9
978 I
I !9 9 i97b 1
1985 I
I 1972 O
OCT 1976
Snow,lce pellets
�
Maximum Monthly 5
50 1
12.1 1
14.9 1
19.3 0
0.1 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 C
C 0 0.0 2
2,5 7
7.5 1
19.3
-Year 1
80 1
1988 1
1979 1
1960 1
1982 1
1968 1
1971 M
MAR 1960
in 24 hrs 8
12,1 1
12.0 1
10.3 0
0.1 0
0 0 0
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 O
O V 0.0 2
2.5 7
7.5 1
12.1
-Year 1
1988 1
1969 1
1963 1
1982 1
M
1968 1
1971 .
.IAN 1988
WIND:
Mean Speed D
40 7
7.9 8
8.3 8
8.8 8
8.8 /
/ 5 b
b.9 6
6.5 6
6 4 6
6.'7. b
b.9 7
7.2 .
-'7.4 7
7,4
D(mph) 4
." -
through 1963 S
SW N
NE S
SW S
S S
Sw S
SW S
SW S
S N
Nt. N
NNE S
SSW "
" SW" S
SW
Fastest Obs. 1 Min.
-Direction 1!!1 1
10 3
31 0
07 2
25 2
25 3
33 1
19 3
3U 3
32 2
2 2
21 3
32 ;
;,.19 I
I 12
-Speed iMPHI 1
10 3
30 3
32 2
29 2
29 2
25 3
30 3
35 3
31 4
46 3
37 3
30 3
35 I
I 46
-Year 1
1989 1
1984 1
1985 1
1982 1
1989 1
1987 1
1989 !
!98b 1
1989 I
I 1979 1
1979 1
1989 S
SEP 1989
Peak Gust
-Direction I!!1 6
6 N
NW N
NE S
SW W
W N
N S
S N
NW N
N E
E I
I N S
S N
NW C
C
-Speed (mph) 6
6 4
49 5
53 4
49 4
4b 4
46 4
49 4
48 5
53 8
87 3
361 5
511 4
47 8
87
-Date 1
1989 1
1984 1
1984 1
1986 1
1985 1
1987 1
1989 9
986 1
1989 1
1987 1
1988 1
1987 S
SEP 1989

UNITED STATES ------
(Nov. 1964) p File No, I Waslin%ton'
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FWd ............
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ortot"I
WATER RESOURCES DIVISION Descr Prepared ,_. %/
by �teaa-
-- _--- - - - - -- --
Qmt-otago# Partial record ---al
Description of I.;aging Station on ------------
— --------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------
(Prepare description in accordance with outline on back of Form 9-277, Plot cross section to scale.
Use Form 9-213A or 9-213E for cross section. Use second page of this form for sketch if room is available,
otherwise use Form 9-213C or 9-213H. Initial and date all sheets.) * CPO: 1954-0-756-264
&"AN.—Lat $5*050061'o 14=4 80*52'38", 0*0-% sap i., 0691*46, N. C.; 11611 50; 1907)
Nooklobws Countyt at br"$* an Rote Rigibmay 51j, 0,,5 mile "#t of Pjavville,0 sad
4.3 911340 apstre'sla from oauth. UAW map No, 740
S_qAgM eq mi. So upper 3/4 of the basin is in the city a Marlotte
and La Wxwban and urban development. Tha remainder is only alightly urbanixod
but undergoing davelopamt.
119 1%5 to Sept. 309 1970. 90-establiabad APT11 JA# 1972 at
In tied S timing partul"record Stetson. 4r.
pwtial*T464rd statift.
J1djMx."qM"NftL( VPPW4 Two-inch pips 6.3 ft uns on post CA V4*t bad 5 ft
domamem from brifte at Sta. 330 ft. Top of pipe is retamse po"t of S%v aW
to at alevotion 17.736 ft. Dot= of gOWN is ft moom "M ISV40 4895 40two
lwm; Wo-laob p4w 6 A-1;ii f4ataftod to afteawo" "I of
"watreft brId" p1w at rt*t od#e of l Pt" to reew""
point of SaSo and is at o1ove as 9.063 ft.
jkMMI AM M&W.••axidso fit otto is *=savt0 igloo t
via". ft"M Channel bows 9110tly ften the' r1sht upstraft and to o4bm
6MW%V*m frva brifts. llewa;ttoas (~ 4*tt=);
OwswIL 00-00trem Side of kli4p) -1.0 ft
bridge fleet 19.4 tv
Boom of girder U.S6 It
frees demstrow old* of 167 ft vids br"S* vhich 4w Now
at fiv*-foot inta►ls. hitial Pout tot scuedings is loft aW *f bridge. *iiiai
to not subjest to everflov.
j• flo" to 1%2 roaabod & Stage *beat two feet b4ow tb&u the floW of 40 11.0 Oftotdi" to Mr. J. Joe Miller, Finoville, X. C.). hu4. 23* I%yl, #tW
13-09 ft -
Ablemas.—CLty of Marlette. X. C.
'144"M -WAIM.—RP I - adselad eeraly as dov"trean swo bringer kakwratl " ft from
Wt 44d.
va
SUN. aw tot" 329" 94',

PRELIMINARY
Odw .* t (& IM SO ate. t on arc arc of
ay. Ones dot= 20.00 ft
amb. ` I@ttsblisbad by wig dtviAes of UM In *1 1 , . ..
aet
• ! +I i4 "36 it
W ! « Kwd of 204 wA1 agrps'ct *d by 164 moil to root of
i" *IV twit so ft two" furor bride* aMt 26 ft i+apaftao twa= loft dd" of or**.
1+41T
81" . type "tax 30' ft
Ix 4 * Ud of 3d rta.0 4rtarwa vwtuaur %a foot *f' 24
to* pm tv" 27 ft bel v brldSo m left basic add So ft lg%&Wxd. WSW" S/4172
,fit /+°,`'inrr�r%r••:CA4fy. {''. .,..,. . -, ;1t' . •;r: ... F .. ... ..
L'
r 1 02

E
eCLOSED CA
RISER
U o
q.
P CLOSED CAP e
RISER
SCREEN
WELL POINT
SHALLOW WATER WELL
SCREEN
WELL POINT
PIEZOMETERS
Figure 1. Parts of piezometers and shallow monitoring wells.
6 -18

6" RISER
12-18*
SCREEN
Figure 3. Shallow monitoring well.
rCAP
SOIL MOUND
c
c
6 -20

1�82
:---3
Figure 2. Homemade cap made of oversize PVC piping.
G -19

N
fir-
Ak

r
sD
Bag,���A�4Y
11-4
.c i/ Q�eM n 9 11 L A.- A 45)%A fI V fm a �-
r = -s

Yr
Z sti7 s
rr

/IV
9/027
s � 1xx
lm5l' ;:2- atA-e
tw_oc-_ (oz7 4- 1 1 7) -eO4 -1�7
SD t� Sol'^�s
VAX Y6 Dr
V7

E D
Transmittal
To:
S
0
Kathy Abernethy - Panos Hotel Group,4on Ferrell - NCDEHNR -DEM
John Dorney — NCDEHNR —DEM, Steve Lund — U.S.Army Corps — Asheville
Project: Pineville Towne Centre Site Project No.: 3 .95073 (EDSA)
13 Enclosed Herewith
❑ Under Separate Cover
❑ For Your File
❑ As Requested
❑ For Review and Comment
❑ For Approval
LXvia various
Items Sent: No. of Copies: Dated:
Mitigation Plan and Stormwater Management Plan Rev. 9 -1 -95
(includes booklet and drawing)
Corps Action ID No. 199203202
DEM Proiect Number: 95601
Comments:
Attached plans incorporate the following:
1. Responses to agency comments regarding stormwater,
nick point repair, species selection, and reference
wetiand menitering.
2. Revised water budget inr iding ET rateG
3. Restrictive covenants.
4. Updated NOAA data.
By: Craig R. Wyant Date: Sept--- 4, 1995
cc:
Edward D. Stone, Jr, and Associates Planners and Landscape Architects
1 1919 South Boulevard, Trolley's End, Suite 102, Charlotte, NC 28203 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]

•• •s
MITIGATION PLAN
AND
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
for
Pre - Discharge Notification (PDN)
Nationwide Permit #26
Application for
Section 401 Water Quality Certification
for
Pineville Towne Centre Site
Pineville, Mecklenburg County, NC
- Applicant:
-The Panos Hotel Group
5936 Monroe Road, Suite 200
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28212
Prepared by:
E D S A
Edward D. Stone, Jr. and Associates
1919 South Boulevard Suite 102
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203
(704) 373 -0534
Corps Action ID No.: 199203202
DEM Project No.: 95601
September 1, 1995
(Supersedes Plans dated 8 -14 -95 & 8- 18 -95)

i
Mitigation Plan for Pineville Towne Centre Site
Overview
In order to compensate for the losses of wetland functions and values which will
result from the proposed development activities on the ±28 acre Pineville Towne
Centre property, the applicant proposes in part to create 4.8`acres of new wetland
from upland and to preserve an additional 5.2 acres of existing high quality wetland.
Wetland which will be created or preserved will be protected from future impacts by
the applicant or by a group designated by the applicant for this purpose. Future
impacts or development of these areas will be deed restricted in accordance with
the attached restrictive covenants (Exhibit B).
The intent and purpose of the mitigation proposal is to create areas of forested
floodplain wetland which are saturated within the root zone or inundated for a
significant portion of the growing season and will over time exhibit all characteristics
of jurisdictional wetland. The hydrology of wetland areas will be supported by
existing overland flow, newly generated stormwater runoff, and periodic overbank
flooding. Vegetation species selected will consist of hydrophytic species and will
provide benefits to wildlife habitat.
Those areas which will be utilized for the creation of new wetlands are all situated on
relatively level, generally open floodplain uplands which are near existing wetland
resources. These areas sit relatively low in topographic relief and will be graded to
receive runoff from upland areas as well as to benefit from periodic overbank
flooding. The vegetation in the majority of the proposed mitigation sites consists of
herbaceous successional growth of Ambrosia (ragweed) , Andropogon (broomsedge),
and Solidago (goldenrod); and mixed woody successional growth including Rubus
(blackberry), Crataegus saplings ( hawthorn), Prunus saplings (cherry), Acer saplings
(maple), Fraxinus saplings (ash), and liquidambar saplings (sweet gum), among others.
The soils which occur in the area are mapped as Monocan series. This series naturally
exhibits some hydric indications throughout its profile and has inclusions which
exhibit pronounced hydricity. As a result of the above conditions, the proposed
mitigation sites should be well suited to the successful creation of new wetlands
which should over time exhibit the functions and values associated with other
floodplain wetlands.
Stormwater Requirements
1. Velocities of all discharges and outfalls will be designed to be 5 fps or less or
otherwise nonerosive to vegetative channels for a 10 year storm. Discharges from wet
detention ponds will outlet to a vegetative filter at least thirty feet in length or an
approved equivalent wetland area.
2. The first inch of rainfall runoff will be detained from all developed portions of the
site and released over a 2 to 5 day period within wet detention ponds or an approved
equivalent wetland area.

3. The nick point located at the southernmost extreme of the preserved wetlands
will be stabilized in order to prevent further erosion as a part of this plan.
Decription of Proposed Mitigation Areas
The portions of the site which are intented to be converted to wetland for the
purpose of mitigation will be divided into discreet and self- contained cells. Each cell
wili be provided with a dedicated upland drainage basin for the provision of
stormwater runoff. The runoff generated by the dedicated upland basin will provide a
source of hydrology for the mitigation cell. Supplemental hydrology will be provided
by periodic overbank flooding from Little Sugar Creek and from precipitation falling
directly onto each site.
Individual cells have been designed as broad, shallow basins with a natural grade
berm surrounding the entire perimiter of the cell. At one or more points along the
perimeter berm, a broad opening has been provided which is set at an elevation
slightly higher than the elevation within the cell. This opening will serve two
functions; first it will withhold up to 12" of runoff or overbank flood within the
mitigation site so that it will be allowed to slowly percolate into the soil, and second it
will serve as an overflow so that excess runoff volume can be discharged into existing
wetland in a controlled manner. Since the berm surrounding the created wetlands
will be at natural grade, velocities at outflow points will be extremely low, typically
not exceeding existing rates. The bottom grades of proposed wetland cells will be a
flat gradient with no slope. Direction of flow through the cell has been determined
by the location of inflow and outflow locations. Water will enter the cell at its
upstream end and will be allowed to stack up to the depth of the elevation at the
outfall point. Flow will be created by the volume of new water entering the cell
displacing that which is already present, resulting in a very slow sheet flow over the
width of the cell, similar to the way water spreads when poured on a concrete slab.
The design of the mitigation area into cells allows flexibilty over the control of
hydrology within each cell through adjustments in flow entering the cell through
basin modification as well as adjustment to outflow by controlling the grade occuring
at outfall points. Cells have been designed initially to allow a maximum temporary
water depth of 12" assuming that normal soil percolation rates will allow this volume
be slowly absorbed vertically. If this water depth is too great, then the grade at the
outfall point can be lowered slightly to allow a lesser volume to be stored.
A reference wetland will be identified on -site which will serve to provide the
wetland hydrology success criteria for created wetlands. At least five monitoring wells
will be established within this reference area in order to record the normal hydrology
for a period of one growing season. The data will be collected from the established
wells daily for the period March 1 to November 1 for the reference year. The
percent of the recorded time which this area exhibits inundation or saturation within
the upper 12" will be considered the normal hydrology for the reference wetland. if
the rainfall recorded for the reference year is determined to be more than 10%
greater or less than normal for the reference months according to NOAA records,

then the wetland hydrology success criteria for created wetlands will be 12.5% of the
growing season. The proposed location for this observation is just north of the
sewerline right -of -way, within the preserved wetland area near the center of the site.
This area has been observed to be periodically inundated or saturated for extended
periods of time during the growing season over a period of several years and exhibits
favorable wetland characteristics.
Although designed to be generally flat, a certain amount of microtopographic relief is
expected to occur within each cell as a result of grading and minor settling. Cells will
generally be a few inches deeper toward the center, becoming shallower toward the
edges. This slight change in grade in combination with microtopographic variations
will allow for effective species zonation and will over time provide community
diversity.
Methods of Construction
Prior to any activity occuring within the mitigation sites, all downslope areas, .
especially creeks and wetlands will be protected from sedimentation by the
placement of silt fencing or other appropriate sedimentation control methods along
the boundary between the mitigation construction site and existing resources. All
mitigation areas will remain a distance of at least 10 feet from the top of the bank of
Little Sugar Creek and five feet from the top of bank of any other creek in order to
preserve the natural stream bank levee and to prevent shoreline erosion.
The land which will be converted from upland to wetland will be lowered in grade to
that of surrounding wetlands. On average, this difference in existing to proposed
grade is less than 24 ". Soil will be removed from all mitigation areas to a depth of
12" below proposed grade. The removed soil will be hauled to uplands and will not
be re- deposited in wetlands. The graded areas will then be backfilled to the
specified finished grade with a suitable topsoil. When the grade has been raised to
the appropriate level, runoff from upland areas will be directed into the area so that
it will be saturated or flooded during the early part of the growing season. As is the
case with most of the other wetlands on this site, the created wetlands will not be
expected to be saturated year round or for extended periods throughout the growing
season except during extreme conditions. Under normal conditions, the soil will be
inundated or saturated within the root zone throughout the late winter months and
for a period of at least 12.5% of the growing season or to the extent recorded within
the designated reference wetland. This period of inundation /saturation will be
sufficient to establish the wetland hydrology necessary for the maintenance of
hydrophytic vegetation. A water budget for each mitigation area has been prepared
which is based upon the attached stream gage data from USGS, soil saturation and
inundation data from SCS, and normally expected precipitation /evaporation records
from NOAA and Simmons Irrigation for the Charlotte area.
As built drawings will be prepared for all mitigation ares upon completion of
construction. These drawings will show a survey of the boundary of each area, finished
grades, location of sample plots and monitoring wells, location of reference wetlands

identified for hydrologic monitoring and locations of special features such as inflow
and outflow locations and grades.
Vegetation
Hydrophytic vegetation will be initially established within mitigation sites by utilizing a
combination of planted bare root seedlings and by relocating existing saplings of
Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Acer rubrum, Populus deltoides, Ulmus americana, and other
wetland species which are presently occurring in wetlands impacted by the proposed
development. The relocated saplings will be supplemented by new plantings of
these species or other woody wetland species which would be of benefit to wildlife
as a food source such as Quercus species or Carya species. If it is not possible to
relocate these plants, then plants of appropriate species will be purchased and
planted in order to satisfy the density requirements. If plants are to be purchased,
they will be of a variety of sizes and ages and will meet the normally expected
standards for nursery stock. In addition to woody tree and sapling species, herbaceous
plants will be relocated in groups of naturally occurring diversity from impacted
wetlands or will be planted to approximate a similar diversity.
Selections from the following list of hardwood tree and shrub species will be utilized
in order to provide food sources for wildlife habitat:
Alnus serrulata
Amalanchier arborea
Carya species
Celtis occidentalis
Celtis laevigata
Cephalanthus occidentalis
Crataegus species
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Ilex decidua
Quercus species
Viburnum species
At least two of the above species will be planted in each area. At least six species of
hardwood will be planted within each cell at the required densities with no
individual species comprising greater than 20% of the total stem quantity. The
following hardwood species should not be planted or relocated as a part of the
vegetation requirement of the plan: Liquidambar styraciflua, Acer negundo, Salix
nigra.
The mitigation sites will be planted at an initial density of approximately 500 woody
stems per acre or an approximate stem spacing of three meters. Woody plants will be
arranged in a manner which resembles that observed in surrounding wetlands with
groupings of plants of a similar hydrophytic category placed in the topographic
position best suited to the hydroligic preferences of the species.
Herbaceous Species
In most of the existing wetlands, fewer than five or six herbaceous species occur
within a given area. The most prevalent individual dominant species is Juncus effusus.
Other species which have been observed include Carex lurida and other Carex
species, Polygonum punctatum, Polygonum persicaria, and numerous grasses.

Specific plant species and quantities which will be utilized for the mitigation sites and
will be dependent upon the time of year in which planting occurs, species
availability, and number of plants which can be successfully relocated.
Herbaceous species will be planted in 25 to 50 cm diameter clusters at a density of
1000 clusters per acre or will be seeded with a wetland seed mix at a rate which will
result in a coverage of at least 100 stems per square meter upon germination. All
new plantings will consist of species which are facultative wetland or obligate species.
All planting and seeding will be done from late fall to early spring. Areas which are
disturbed will be seeded immediately following disturbance with a mix of annual
ryegrass and millet in order to provide temporary stabilization of the areas in order to
reduce surface erosion.

Monitoring Reoorts
Once an area has been established and planted, its success will be monitored at
least annually during August/September in order to measure survival rate, growth,
species diversity, and to remove upland species and invasive weed species such as
blackberry, multiflora rose, kudzu, honeysuckle, poison ivy, or broomsedge. Each
annual monitoring event will consist of the observation of of two sample plots per
acre which are .05 acres each in size. Permanent sample plot locations will be
identified for each mitigation cell upon their completion and will be recorded on
the as built drawing. At least one 36" deep monitoring well will be established
within each sample plot location according to the attached detail. Monitoring wells
will be observed on a monthly basis for the first year following installation in order to
establish a record of hydrology throughout the year.
During each monitor period at each sample plot, the number and species of each
surviving woody stem will be recorded and the percent aerial cover of the sample
plot will be estimated for each of the three most dominant species. Additional
wetland species will be recorded if their presence is significant. Wetland species
considered to be acceptable appear as FACW or OBL in the USFWS National List of
Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands, 1988 Summary. All measurements should be
recorded on a monitoring data form and the sample location estimated on a map of
the site. At least two representative photographs should be taken of the mitigation
area at each sample plot and should include a sign which indicates the date and plot
number. These photographs should be attached to the data form for the sample
plot. _
At the time of monitoring, each monitoring well will be observed in order to record
the depth to water table in order to insure that adequate hydrology is available
during the early part of the growing season. Test pits can be dug at various locations
throughout the site at the time of inspection in order to observe changes in soil
characteristics and to verify the observations found within the monitoring well. Any
findings or observations should be recorded on the data form of the sample plot
nearest the observation.
One copy of all data forms, maps, and photographs of each sample plot will be
supplied to DEM Water Quality Branch and to the U.S. Army Corps for their file until
all areas have been successfully established and determined acceptable. If all areas
are not released within a period of three years from time of installation, then
corrective measures must be taken on the remaining areas in order to insure their
successful establishment or an agreement made at such time of an acceptable
alternate form of mitigation.
A wetland area or portion thereof will be considered to be successfully created when
at the end of the three year period at least 320 woody stems per acre are surviving. If
this criteria is not met, the area is not considered to be successful and maintenance
will need to be performed on the area in order to provide the required quantity.

7
rn
O1
Q �
s�
C C\
N �
w
CQ
p C\
GS ~
A
G O�
z
1�1
CL -�
a�
a
00
0 W
ar �
L �
U C
ai R
3a
O
F p
tip
R
a�
p
O
O L
PC
C
O
M
R
C
•0
C
C
sC
bA
p
U
C
C
p
y p
w
a v,
4
o R
w
b
o
L
o
O d
rdA
R y
0
U
0
.+ ..
p
L 3
Im
+'
•y
y
CIO
at
S
.�.
L L
CJ
O
R m
O
u140
U
acc .�
C4
0 a
o
w
a'.Q
�•:f'S••1 ;r
Et
"Y
•
GC
C3
Kiiii
:: ??tititi
:> {
:0k%
a
00
0 W
ar �
L �
U C
ai R
3a
O
F p
tip
R
a�
p
O
O L
PC
C
O
M
R
C
•0
C
C
sC
bA
p
U
C
C
p
y p
w
a v,
4
o R
w
b
o
L
o
O d
R y
0
U
0
.+ ..
p
L 3
Im
+'
•y
y
CIO
at
S
.�.
L L
CJ
O
R m
O
u140
U
acc .�
C4
0 a
o
w
a'.Q
a
00
0 W
ar �
L �
U C
ai R
3a
O
F p
tip
R
a�

Attachments to Plan
Water Budget
Exhibit B - Restrictive Covenants
Climatic Data for Charlotte - NOAA & USDA -SCS
USGS Stream Gage Data
Soils Data for Monocan Series - USDA -SCS
Monitoring Well Details - U.S. Army Corps

O M r" N Ln d> N � O cC
ob CO 00 00 N �O Ln 01 Ln !� CO }•
> co
Q.� M M d M M M M M M N N M
3
to U) � � O O O N O O r- O � O
> LL] M N .- O
Q u
LO
O
a)
-C a) N 01 M M 00 .- n O Ln N cz
t� 00 Lq N O � M Ln !\ � M M
0 aJ to � 1,6 00 n li LN `- -a
O a)
10. N
u O N �O O> It 0o 00 m N M Ln 07
O -t M 1 0) Ln N N L) r-, �
Op 00
r-� 00 00 C6 00 00 1.6 kO 11: co
co
C
s O O c0 co Lr) Le) 00 M 00 Ln Lf) M 00 O �
+- O O 00 00 rl� N 00 � M N N a0
0 (3) K a> 00 K O Ln N
+'� N N M N N N N N N N N N M 3
u N N Lr) m N 00 m m 01 %O er N C
M M 0) O> N M N O
N N N N N r- N '•C
3
N
N M M N N 00 �--o It O co O
N M CO N r- N N Ln O N O O cri
0 a) O O M M co N n n Ln
�. 'O Ln Ln %D d It It Ln M Ln
u N M Ln 0> M Lr) %O �-o N It O Ln O
L!) Ln N 00 M N %�O It N N d O O
•C �t � � M � � d' _ � � M M � O
a)
Ln Lr) Ln Lr) O Ln Ln O
L Ln O O N N N Lr) Lt) N O N N Ln
O 2 4 00 M O L. 06 Ln O c'n M U
O a) %O %.O O M u•) Ln �.O Ln Ln N co
co
N
M 11
u N d 1.0 M Ln M N It N O M L.r)
co "t '- U) r- O %.O M O 00 N t O
�O C6 Ln 16 � � � 16 4 4 Ln � U Z
c
t�0 O Z i
O
C
76 M %0 00 N Ln r- O n M co E C
M M M -• O '.0 N d> M N LA fo — O U
Ln o -) a> ai N Co C> 0i O C> K 06 6 -O > U Z
rn c C L
N a)
r' m co o CO �O Ln Ln �t co �O >1 `�' t
u Ln �o rn Ln N O N o a) Q tv o
i
C C M M N 00 N d' M .- d Ln O N a)
(U - M M d N M M M M M N N M
N a+
LO U p U OU
(J Z C s N It O M .- 0> O � Ln 00 N tt Q Q'
t• Q co rP �t �O M Ln a) 't % 00 + L O
C) •� O O N N L1) O N 0o O1 p ^ `o Q U
U Q a+ �- r r �-- e- r r r r '- M to i
cr u m O
c U 0 u N m O N m M Ln Ln N N Ln cV
to .;� to � co
3
to m m N Ln � N co 't 't N o o p E o to
Oo C K 00 Oo C> 0o ao � � w ,I- V p i
Q
O O— O to
H O N Co 4- C
U Q 3 U O° E
O L L bA Q > Eb to
4- C m ro C
d�d U Li � Q � _ Q cn 0 Z 0 F- Z thoYU n

Water Budget
The following Table summarizes the characteristics of each proposed mitigation cell
relating to stormwater runoff as a primary source of wetland hydrology:
Mitigation Area Size Contributing (impervious) Total
Basin Area
1 .74 acres
1.62 acres
2.36 acres
2 3.45 acres
5.39 acres
8.84 acres
3 .04 acres
1.65 acres
1.69 acres
4 .09 acres
1.10 acres
1.19 acres
5 .08 acres
.53 acres
0.61 acres
6 .49 acres
1.80 acres
2.29 acres
The total column in the above table indicates that the mitigation area will recieve
direct rainfall in combination with the runoff provided by the drainage basin area.
The attached charts from NOAA and USDA -SCS show the average annual inches of
rainfall which are expected in the Mecklenburg County area on a month by month
basis. The normal monthly rainfall is highest in January, February, March and July.
Other sources of hydrologic influence include overbank flooding. Based upon
gage data records of the USGS local office, Little Sugar Creek is expected to be out
of its banks an average of six times in eight years.
All mitigation areas are located within the portion of the site mapped as
having Monocan (MO) Soils. The USDA SCS Soil survey for Mecklenburg County
indicates that this soil is subjct to common and brief periods of flooding during the
months of November to May. The permeability of this soil is 0.6 to 2.0 inches per
hour at a depth to 43 ".
Mitigation sites have been designed to be flat depressions which are at the
approximate elevations of nearby wetlands. They have been designed as basins
which will hold shallow amounts of water from 6" to 12" deep for as long as it takes
for the water to percolate down. Percolation rates are expected to be rapid
throughout most of the year, however during winter months and during the early part
of the growing season, a seasonally high water table would prevent percolation and
would extend the period of shallow inundation. Cuts have been made on the
downstream side which will allow water depths greater than 12" to run off into
adjacent channels or wetlands.

The following chart indicates the approximate quantity of water which will
flow into each
mitigation area from its basin in an
average month throughout the
year in acre /inches
based upon NOAA normal
Charlotte rainfall
records:
Month
Basin
1
2
3
4
5
6
January
8.96
33.60
6.42
4.52
2.32
8.70
February
8.99
33.68
6.44
4.53
2.32
8.72
March
11.40
42.69
8.16
5.75
2.95
11.06
April
7.72
28.91
5.53
3.89
1.99
7.49
May
8.59
32.17
6.15
4.33
2.22
8.33
June
8.42
31.56
6.03
4.25
2.18
8.18
July
9.25
34.65
6.62
4.66
2.39
8.98
August
9.31
33.15
6.33
4.46
2.28
8.59
September
8.47
31.73
6.07
4.27
2.19
8.22
October
6.42 _.
24.04
4.60
3.-24
1.66
6.23
November
6.75
25.28
4.83
3.40
1.74
6.55
December
8.02
30.06
5.75
4.05
2.07
7.79
Given the quantity of water available during the early part of the growing season in
February and March and the occasional overbank flooding, and seasonal high water
table, there appears to be ample water available to support the wetland hydrology
requirement of inundation or saturation within the root zone for 12.5% of the
growing season.

Basin Summary
Basin #1
Total area of Basin
Total impervious area
Percentage impervious
Storage area provided
Storage required first inch of rainfall
Basin #2
Total area of basin (including offsite)
Total impervious area
Percentage impervious
Permanent pool required @ 8' depth
Permanent pool provided
Storage required first inch of rainfall
Forebay provided
Basin #3
Total area of basin
Total impervious area
Percentage impervious
Permanent pool required @ 3' depth
Permanent pool provided
Storage required first inch of rainfall
Basin #4
Total area of basin
Total impervious area
Percentage impervious
Permanent pool required @ 3' depth
Permanent pool provided
Storage required first inch of rainfall
1.62 acres
1.37 acres
84.6%
.74 ac.
2.19 in. /.74 ac.
5.39 acres
3.71 acres
68.8%
3169 s.f.
43,560 s.f.
4.69 in. /1.0 ac.
10,890 s.f.
1.65 acres
1.00 acres
60.6%
11,198 s.f.
6.35 in. /.26 ac.
1.10 acres
0.64 acres
58.2%
3169 s.f.
.09 ac.
12.2 in. /.09 ac.

Basin #5
Total area of basin
Total impervious area
Percentage impervious
Storage required first inch of rainfall
Basin #6
Total area of basin
Total impervious area
Percentage impervious
Storage required first inch of rainfall
0.53 acres
0.23 acres
41.8%
6.63 in. /.08 ac.
1.80 acres
1.37 acres
76.0%
4.69 in. /1.0 ac.

E IHI-- - B
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
WHEREAS, Patios Hotel Group, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company
(the "Grantor "), is the owner of that approximate 28 ache, more or less, tract of land
bound in part by Townc Centre Boulevard, North Carolina Highway 51 and Little Sugar
Creek (the "Pans Hotel Development Project "), which property was acquired in Deed
recorded in Book �, page _,,,_„_, in the Mecktenburg County Public Registry (the
"Base Tract"),
WHEREAS, within the Base Tract, there are certain wetland areas (hereinafter
referred to as the "Mitigation Area ") which are being kept "in its natural condition in
perpetuity ", as such phrase is interpreted and construed from time to time by the United
States Army Corps of Engineers (the "Corps ") and the North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and Natural Resources -- Division of Environmental Management
("NCDEM *)P and
WHEREAS, Grantor has applied to the Corps for a Nationwide Permit No. 26
{the "Permit ") and to NCDEM for a 401 Water Quality Certification ( "WQC ") and in
,, connection with the Permit and WQC, Grantor is subjecting the property described herein
to the restrictions set forth below. ►
NOW, 1'HEREFoRE, the herein described property is made subject to the
following restrictions which shall run with the land and be binding on the Grantee herein,
its successors and assigns, as follows: The Permit and the WQC require the excavation
and/or filling of approximately 4.8 acres of new wetlands from up lands and the
preservation of approximately 5.2 acres of existing high quality wetlands, all of the
Mitigation Area located within the Base Tract which is adjacent to or in near proximity
to Little Sugar Creek in order to facilitate the development of the Panos Hotel
Development Project to construct a hotel on Towne Centre Boulevard and other
commercial establishments to be located within the Base 'Tract. As a special condition
to the issuance of the permit, the Corps and NCDEM are requiring that the Mitigation
Area be altered as described in the final mitigation plan so that the Mitigation Area
becomes jurisdictional wetlands. The terms and provisions of the Permit shall became
a part of this restriction and shall impose additional restrictions that prohibit the
placement of utility lines, filling, dredging, construction of walkways or natural trails,
or any other activity within the Mitigation Area, unless prior written approval has been
received from the Corps and NCDEM. A permanent easement shall run with the land
for the purpose of constructing, monitoring and maintaining such Mitigation Area in
accordance with the requirements of the Corps and NCDEM and such easement is hereby
Ut -7495

preserved for and on behalf of Grantor and its successors and assigns. The aforesaid
restrictions shall not prohibit any work relating to the Mitigation Area, the placement of
utility lincs outside the Mitigation Area or any ancillary work related to the creation,
monitoring and restoration of the Mitigation Area as required or permitted by the Corps
and the NCDEM as part of the Permit. Grantee shall not have any obligation to construct
or maintain the Mitigation Area or to take any remedial action if the monitoring indicates
that the area has not met the 1987 Cotes of Enginm Wetlands Delineation Manual
criteria.
VI -7495

ISSN 0198 -3733
LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA "` "1 °` ` °y
1993ANNUAL SUMMARY WITH COMPARATIVE DATA W r y'
CHARLOTTE,
NORTH CAROLINA Sr "'ES of
Daily Data CELSIUS
100
95
90
85
80
W 75
W x
a z 70
a w 85
a
-:4 d 80
Ira 55
W 50
a 45
W 40
A 35
30
25
20
15
z 3.00
0 2.00
1.00
d M 0.50
F x 0.20
(1, U 0.10
U z 0.05
0.02
a 0.01
Q 0.00
100
z80
F 0
Z 70
x w 60
U 50
Z 30
w
�. a 20
10
0
10 20 30 10 2028 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
10 20 30 10 2028 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30
10 20 30 10 2028 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30. 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30
TEMPERATURE DEPICTS NORMAL MAXIMUM, NORMAL MINIMUM AND ACTUAL DAILY HIGH AND LOW VALUES (FAHRENHEIT)
PRECIPITATION IS MEASURED IN INCHES. SCALE IS NON - LINEAR
SUNSHINE IS PERCENT OF THE POSSIBLE SUNSHINE
35
31
27
23
19
15
11
7
3
-1
-5
-9
I CERTIFY THAT THIS IS AN OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, AND IS COMPILED FROM
RECORDS ON FILE AT THE NATIONAL CLIMATIC DATA CENTER, ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, 28801
NATIONAL NATIONAL NATIONAL
O OCEANIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITE, DATA CLIMATIC DATA CENTER DIRECTOR
ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION AND INFORMATION SERVICE ASHEVILLE NORTH CAROLINA NATIONAL CLIMATIC DATA CENTER

SKI
METEOROLOGICAL DATA FOR 1993
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
LATITUDE: 35 013' N LONGITUDE: 80 056' W ELEVATION: FT GRND
I!!) See Reference Notes on Page 6B
Page 2
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUNE
ORKU
7SEPIMOCTE
JULY
NOVLrcDECBANYEARI
TEMPERATURE °F:
Averages
-Daily Maximum
-Daily Minimum
53.3
36.7
52.7
33.5
59.2
40.0
70.9
46.5
80.6
89.6
96.5
90.0
84.6 73.1
63.0
51.9
72.1
- Monthly
45.0
43.1
49.6
58.7
60.4
70.5
67.9
78.8
74.4
85.5
70.3
80.2
64.9 51.4
74.8 62.3
42.4
52.7
33.9
51.9
- Monthly Dewpt.
32.0
25.0
34.2
39.3
57.4
62.6
67.4
66.9
60.7 48.2
38.9
42.9
62.0
Extremes
29.7
46 9
- Highest
-Date
70
5
67
8
79
30
83
12
88
97
100
96
96 86
82
68
100
- Lowest
25
21
16
34
29
47
10
57
29
68
31
65
1 5
46 37
15
29
4
JUL 29
-Date
27
19
15
3
22
2
31
10
28 29
29
19
16
31
MAR 15
DEGREE DAYS BASE 65 °F:
Heating
612
610
469
199
16
0
0
0
12
139
384
677
3118
Cooling
0
0
0
15
195
419
643
476
313
62
21
0
2144
OF POSSIBLE SUNSHINE
37
53
54
72
57
65
69
59
60
58
56
47
58
AVG. SKY COVER (tenths)
Sunrise - Sunset
Midnight - Midnight
7.6
7.0
6.5
6.1
6.8
6.5
5.8
5.4
6.4
5.5
4.5
6.0
5.4
6.0
5.3
6.2
6.0
NUMBER OF DAYS:
6.2
5.1
4.6
6.0
5.1
5.8
5.4
5.7
5 7
Sunrise to Sunset
-Clear
- Partly Cloudy
5
3
7
6
8
4
7
14
6
12
8
15
14
7
10
10
13
9
104
- Cloudy
23
15
19
9
13
7
11
6
13
11
12
6
5
5
106
8
15
12
17
155
Precipitation
.01 inches or more
13
8
13
6
8
2
12
10
7
6
7
12
104
SnoK,Ice pellets,hail
1.0 inches or more
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
Thunderstorms
1
2
3
1
4
3
11
-
3
4
0
1
0
33
Heavy Fog, visibility
1/4 mile or less
3
2
2
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
2
Temperature OF
2
14
-Maximum
900 and above
320 and below
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21
30
18
7
0
0
0
76
- Minimum
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
320 and below
00 and below
8
0
14
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
12
44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
AVG. STATION PRESS. (mb)
994.9
991.2
989.5
987.8
988.8
990.2
989.2
990.5
990.7
990.9
994.6
990.5
990.9
RELATIVE HUMIDITY ( %)
Hour 01
Hour 07
69
78
62
67
67
74
62
70
77
82
72
73
78
76
75
75
71
71
Hour 13 (Local Time)
59
45
50
39
51
78
45
77
42
85
52
83
82
79
77
78
Hour 19
59
47
55
39
56
49
48
51
50
47
51
49
60
58
60
58
61
54
PRECIPITATION (inches):
Water Equivalent
-Total
- Greatest (24 hrs)
6.17
2.28
2.72
0.81
7.61
2.14
2.00
2.60
0.15
1.56
3.77
0.92
2.28
2.69
3.34
35.81
-Date
21
11 -12
12 -13
0.82
5- 6
1.16
4
0.12
12
0.41
24 -25
1.36
0.54
1.72
1.54
0.91
2.28
6- 7
16
29 -30
27
4- 5
JAN 21
Snow,Ice pellets,hail
-Total
- Greatest (24 hrs)
0.0
0.0
T
T
1.6
1.6
0.0
0.0
T
T
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.6
4.2
-Date
26
13
19
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.6
2.6
23
DEC 23
4IND:
Resultant
- Direction (!!1
-Speed (mph)
018
2.6
343
2.5
321
230
213
200
248
160
196
012
356
286
274
Average Speed (mph)
7.5
8.2
1.4
8.6
2.8
10.1
2.6
7.5
1.7
7.2
0.5
1.2
1.4
1.4
0.7
2.5
0.6
Fastest Obs. 1 Min.
6.5
6.1
7.1
6.7
6.8
7.7
7.5
- Direction (!!)
-Speed (mph)
29
22
29
24
30
33
23
28
20
35
35
23
21
35
20
-Date
24
23
28
13
26
26
25
13
20
35
23
28
21
22
30
35
Peak Gust
29
8
20
30
21
17
11
JUL 8
- Direction I!!)
-Speed (m hl
p
W
36
NW
37
SW
44
NW
43
SW
SW
SW
N
SW
SW
S
NW
SW
-Date
24
23
10
22
39
13
30
52
37
32
30
32
39
52
5
8
20
27
9
17
11
JUL 8
I!!) See Reference Notes on Page 6B
Page 2

i
(al
JAN
FEB
i
APR
I MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUG
I SEP
OC1
NORMALS,
MEANS,
AND
EXTREMES
i ^
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
I AT I Tiinr: 1, o71 -N In1ir171Inrf An °4L.. L1
r rUAT Ink• r
rCUn 717 °ADO 71A rimr 7n Mr• nccir°Li ,.,o n.• ,eoo,
t
I!!i See Reference Notes on Page 68,
Page 3
(al
JAN
FEB
I MAR
APR
I MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUG
I SEP
OC1
! NOV
GEC
YEAR
TEMPERATURE °F1
Normals
-Daily Maximum
50.3
53.6
61.6
72.1'
79.1
85.2
88.3
87.6
81.7
71.7
bl,7
52.6
70.5
-0aily Minimum
30.7
32.1
39.1
48.4
57.2
b4.7
68.7
68.2
62.3
49.6
39.7
32.6
49.4
- Monthly
40.5
42.9
50.4
60.3
68.2
75.0
78.5
77.9
72.0
bO.7
50.7
42.6
60.0
Extremes
- Record Highest
50
78
81
90
93
.100
103
103
103
104
98
85
77
104
Year
1952
1989
1945
1960
1941
.1954
1986
1983
1954
1954
1961
1971
SEP 1954
- Record Lowest
50
-5
5
4
24
32
45
53
53
39
24
11
` 2
-5
Year
1985
1958
1980
1960
1`763
1972
1961
19b5
1567
1562
1950
I 1962
JAN 1985
NORMAL DEGREE DAYS:
Heating (base 65 °F)
760
619
459
155
50
0
0
0
10
166
429
694
3342
Cooling [base 650FI
0
0
7
14
149
304
419
400
220
33
0
0
1546
X OF POSSIBLE SUNSHINE
39
55
58
62
69
b8
68
66
67
65
67
59
57
63
MEAN SKY -COVER (tenths)
Sunrise - Sunset
40
6.2
6.1
b.0
5.5
b.0
5.9
b.2
5.9
5 7
4.8
5.4
5.9
5.8
MEAN NUMBER OF DAYS:
Sunrise to Sunset
-Clear
41
9.4
8.7
9.2
10.0
6.1
1,6
b 6
7.b
5 2
13 3
11,4
10.3
111,4
-Partly Cloudy
41
6.2
b.0
8.1
8.5
10.1
10.9
11.7
12.b
9.4
7.4
6.4
6.0
103.0
- Cloudy
41
15.5
13.b
13.7
11.5
12.9
11.5
12.7
10.8
11.4
10.3
12.2
14.8
150.8
Precipitation
O1 inches or more
50
10.0
9.6
11.0
8.8
9.6
9.7
11.4
9.6
7.3
6.7
7.9
9.5
111.0
Snow,lce pellets
1.0 inches or more
50
0.7
0.5
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.:
0.2
1.7
Thunderstorms
50
0.5
0.9
1.8
3.1
5.6
7.4
9.7
7.1
2 9
1 1.2
0.6
0.4
41.3
Heavy Fog Visibility
1/4 mile or 18ss
50
3.7
2.9
2.5
1.3
1.0
1.1
1 1
1.5
2 1
t 9
3,2
4.1
26.4
Temperature f
j
-Maximum
90° and above
29
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.7
7.1
12 9
10.6
3 8
u 2
0.0
0.0
3b.6
32° and below
29
1.8
0.4
0.+
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
2.7
-Minimum
32 and below
29
19.b
1b.1
7.8
1.1
0.►
0.0
0.0•
0.0
0.0
0.8
b.8
16.1
68.3
00 and below
291
0.1
0.0
1 0.0
0.0
1 0.0
0.0
1 0.0
0.0 1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
AVG. STATION PRESS.1mb)
17
991.9
991.2
989.6
988.5
988.5
989.3
990.3
990.4
991 3
992.b
992.4
992.7
940.8
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 1%)
Hour 01
29
72
b8
-68
b8
78
80
83
84
b4
80
76
73
76
Hour 07 Il °cal lime[
29
78 --
76
79
78
83
_ 84
87
89
50
87�
83
79
83
Hour 13
29
56
52
50
46
52
55
57
58
V.7'
S3
! 54
56
54
Hour 19
29
b0
55
52
49
58
62
b5
bb
b8
bi,
b3
b3
61
PRECIPITATION (inches):
Water Equivalent
-Normal
3.80
3.81
4.83
3.27
3.b4
3.57
3.92'
3.75
3.59
2 72
2.86
3.40
43.16
- Maximum Monthly
50
7.44
7.59
8.76
7.64
12.48
8.26
9.12
4.98
10.89
8.33
8.68
7.49
12.48
Year
1962
1979
1980
1958
1575
1961
1941
1948
1945
1976
1985
1983
MP 1975
- Minimum Monthly
50
0.45
0.74
0.58
0.30
0.11
0.41
0.53
0.bl
0.02
1
0.4b
0.43
T
I
Year
1981
1978
1985
1976
1941
1986
1983
1972
1954
1953
1973
1965
OCT 1953
- Maximum in 24 hrs
50
3.57
2.92
3.83
3.20
3.67
3.77
3 00
4 52
4.74
5 34
3.27
2.87
5.34
-Year
1962
1973
1977
1962
1975
1949
1949
1978
19vi9
197b
1985
1972
OCT 1976
SnOw,lc0 pellets
- Maximum Monthly
50
12.1
14.9
19.3
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.5
7.5
19.3
-Year
1988
1979
1960
1982
1968
1971
MAR 1960
- Maximum in 24 hrs
50
12.1
12.0
10.3
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.5
7.5
12.1
-Year
1988
1969 1
1983
1982
1
1968
1971
1 JAN 1988
WIND'
Mean Speed Imphl
40
7.9
8.3
8.8
8.8
7.5
6.9
6.5
6.4
6.7
b.9
7.2
7.4
7.4
Preve11 ng Direction
through 1963
SW
NE
SW
S
SH
SW
SW
S
NE
NNE
SSW
SW
SW
Fastest Obs. 1 Min.
- Direction 1!!)
10
31
07
25
25
33
19
30
32
!2
21
32
14
12
-Speed [MPH)
10
30
32
29
29
25
30
35
37
46
37
30
35
46
Year
1989
1984
1985
1982
1989
1987
1989
1986
1989
I 1979
1979
1989
SEP 1989
Peak Gust
-Direction (!!1
6
NW
NE
SW
W
N
S
NW
N
E
N
S
NW
C
-Speed Imphl
6
49
53
49
46
46
49
48
53
87
3b
51
47
87
-Date
1989
1984
1984
1986
1985
1987
1989
1986
1989
1987
I
1988
1987
SEP 1989
I
I!!i See Reference Notes on Page 68,
Page 3

PRECIPITATION (inches) CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
YEAR
JA
- 5.774
EFN 8
6' 3 -
MAR
%i''1.1
APR
3. 2�
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
ANNUAL
1960
j 3 51
6.56
. 7a
3..25
1 . 48
3. 74
0.60
2.99
44.05
1961
2.21
6 6R
4 40
4 05
1 3 19
8.26
1.43
4.07
0.06
0.73
2.73
6.03
43.84
1962
7.44
4.27
5.4'7
4,82
1.84
4.25
1.96
2.76
5.06
1.57
5.33
3.01
47.78
1963
2.71
3.15
5.28
2.69
2.91
2.01
2.19
3.55
3.70
0.02
3.46
3,04
34.71
1964
5.68
4.29
4,18
4,52
0.89
2.11
5.39
4.83
2.32
7.20
2.05
3.18
46.64
1965
2.17
2.69
6.59
3.32
1.96
5.30
6.19
4,87
0.88
1,76
3.19
0.43
39.35
1966
3.79
5.59
2.13
1,73
3.61
2.58
1.86
2.36
5.42
2.29
1.19
2.58
35.13
1967
2,76
3.79
2.48
1.57
4,70
3.08
5.13
9.23
1.60
0.83
2.51
5.53
43.21
1968
4.95
0.87
4.96
2.73
2.45
6.63
5.13
0.88
1,46
3.02
4,68
2.29
40.05
1969
1,93
5.1q
4.04
3.49
2.03
2.32
3.48
5,14
4,83
1,33
1,14
4.87
39.79
1970
1.70
3.66
2.93
2.04
2.69
2.62
5.73
4.03
0.55
5.12
1.58
3,14
35,79
1971
3.40
5,19
4.87
2..79
4,47
5.09
4.99
2.89
2,68
6.88
2.96
2.24
48.45
1972
4,47
3.21
2.59
1.75
5.61
3.01
6.59
0.61
3,77
1,37
5,42
5.83
44,23
1973
4,14
4.44
6.96
2.13
4,31
4,91
3.62
2.31
3.15
2.38
0.46
5.32
44.13
1974
5.22
4.90
3.30
3.26
4.49
2.32
4.16
6.35
6.50
0.46
4.50
3.82
49.28
1975
6.14
3.50
7.62
1.69
12,48
1.86
7.5e
4,48
6.51
3.58
2.83
3.82
62,09
1976
1.89
1.,13
4,36
0.30
4,26
3.84
2.26
0.90
5,55
8.33
3.37
5.60
41,79
1977
2.73
1,4B
8.45
2.05
3.16
3.12
0.82
2.44
6.35
4,74
4,20
1,97
41,51
1978
6.80
0.74
4,97
2.69
4.91
4.19
4.03
8,11
1,16
1,18
2.81
3.13
44,72
01979
5.3T
7,59
3.79
6.47
4.54
4,72
4,74
1,27
9.69
2.95
4,61
1.36
57,04
1980
4,67
1.31
R 76
2.31
3 59
2.27
2.63
1.94
5.37
1.67
3.77
0.83
39.12
1981
0.45
3.63
2 12
0.67
4 27
1,81
6.61
2.67
3.42
3.94
0.87
6.23
36.69
1982
4.30
4 87
1,58
3.84
4 97
4.16
4.19
2.03
0.64
3.83
3.05
4.23
41.69
1983
2.53
5.50
6.07
2.66
2.14
3.77
0.53
3,61
0,74
2.43
4,05
7,49
41.52
1984
4.09
5.90
5.89
4.50
4.78
2.95
5.96
3.95
1,74
0.75
2.08
2.40
44,99
1985
5.20
4.05
0,56
1.90
5.14
5.46
4,14
7,35
0.74
5.16
8.68
0.92
49.32
1986
1.02
1,03
3,01
1.20
1,63
0.41
2.26
.5.43
0,83
3.49
3.44
3.16
26.91
1987
4.78
5.19
3.65
2.44
0.99
2.98
1.38
2.76
6.87
0.84
4,05
3.39
39.32
1988
3.43
1.11
3.29
2.27
2.20
1.55
3.56
4.56
4.45
4,12
2.11
1.62
34,27
1989
1.61
4.67
4.92
2.58
5.37
3.20
6.30
2.99
7.27
4,08
3.14
3.66
49.79
Record
52,2
36.5
61.1
Record
Mean
3.77
3.93
4.32
3.22
1 3.54
1 3.87
1 4,69
1 4.57
1 3.35
2.96
2.74
3.66
44,64
aee neTerence vo1es on rage oo.
Page 4A
AVERAGE TEMPERATURE (deg. F) CHARLOTTE. NORTH CAROLINA
YEAR
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
ANNUAL
x1960
42.5
42 6
39. 7
63.2
67.9
76.4
78.9
79, 7
73. 6
51 .8
38.6
59.9
1961
38.2
46.4
52.'
53 0
63.8
72 8
77.3
76.9
75.4
62.1
56.3
42.7
59.8
1962
39.4
46,7
4R.2
58.4
74,5
'74 7
78.6
77.0
71.2
62.6
48.0
38.0
59,8
1963
37 3
37.5
54.1
62.9
b8 8
75.3
77.9
78,9
70.1
63.6
52.7
35.6
59.6
1964
41.5
40.1
51.0
6p.6
69.8
77.7
76.9
75.0
70.9
55.7
54,8
45.3
59.9
1965
41.5
44.6
4b.8
62,4
73.4
73.3
77.8
78.0
73.1
59.6
51,4
44.0
6015
1966
36.0
42.2
50.2
58.7
67.6
74,0
79.6
77.2
70.7
58.0
50.3
41,5
58,9
1967
43.3
40.0
53,9
62,7
63.7
73.1
76,3
75.2
67.0
60.0
47.8
46.3
59.1
1968
37,9
38.7
51.6
59.0
64.8
73.8
77.0
79.3
71.4
60.6
49.4
386
585
1969
38.1
39.7
45.1
60.8
67,9
77.3
80.8
75.6
69.0
60.4
47.7
39,.5
58..5
1970
34.7
41.1
48.6
61.7
68.2
74.4
79.5
78.9
75.9
63.6
49.7
44.7
60.0
1971
39.9
41.4
46,3
58.3
65.0
76.5
76.2
75.8
73.1
64.7
49.0
50.6
59.7
1972
44 6
40.4
49,9,
58.°)
64,7
71.3
77.0
77,1
72,7
59.0
48.8
46.5
59.2
1973
39.6
40 0
54.1
57.6
9+4.7
74.7
78.5
76.8
74.6
62.1
52.7
41.7
59.8
1974
49.8
44,0
55.2
60.0
68.5
72.2
76.9
75.9
68.4
58,3
49.9
42.1
60.1
1975
45.2
45.0
50.4
5.9.0
70.5
75.0
76.2
78.9
70.8
63.6
53.5
42.4
60.9
1976
39.3
50.2
54.7
59.9
65.0
72.4
76,9
76.1
69,5
55.5
44,1
39.1
58.6
1977
30.1
42.1
54,9
62.5
69.8
75.2
82,4
79.7
74.4
58.7
53.6
42.5
60.5
1978
36.9
36.7
49.4
61.5
66.7
76.2
78.9
79.0
74.2
60.1
56.2
44,8
60.0
91979
36.7
37.9
53.7
60 2
67.7
71.6
76.6
78.4
70.4
59.3
52.9
43.7
59.1
1980
41,4
38.9
47,4
60.0
68.2
74.0
80.0
80.9
74.8
58.3
48.8
42.6
59,6
1981
36.1
44,2
48,5
64.2
65.1
78.2
78.7
75,1
70.2
58.0
51.3
39.3
59.1
1982
36.0
45.4
52.7
57.6
72.0
75.0
78,4
76.3
70.0
60.5
52.3
47,9
60.3
1983
38.8
41.8
50.6
54,9
66.7
73.9
80,7
80.2
71,1
61.0
50,0
39.6
59,1
1984
38.3
45.4
$0.0
56 5
65.9
76.4
76.1
77.1
69,0
67,8
47.8
50,0
60,0
1985
35.6
43,1
54.0
bl.4
68.0
75.8
77.4
75,7
7016
64,8
58.6
39.7
60,4
1986
38.8
46.8
52,8
64.3
69,5
80,6
84,8
76.9
74,1
64,0
53,2
43,4
62.4
1987
40.0
42.9
51.1
58.9
71.6
77,8
82.3
81.4
73.5
56.2
53,5
45.5
61.2
1988
35.8
43.4
52.7
60.6
68.4
75.3
79.6
80.9
.71,8
56.3
53.0
43.8
60.1
1989
46.8
45.9
53.4
60.?
66.7
78.2.
79.6
77.8
71.8
63.5
52,2
36.5
61.1
Record
Mean
41,5
43.8
51.1
60.0
68.8
76,0
78.8
77,5
72.2
61,4
51,0
43.0
60,5
Max
50.5
53.5
61.6
71.0
79.5
86.2
88.4
86.9
81.7
71.8
61.1
52.1
70.4
Mtn
32.4
34.0
40.6
48,9
58.0
65.8
69.1
68,1
62,6
51.0
40,9
34,0
50,5
.gee �eTerence ryoces on rage ou,
Page 48 .
J

PRECIPITATION (inches) CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
YEAR
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
ANNUAL
1964
5.68
4.29
4.18
4.52
0.89
2.11
5.39
4.83
2.32
7.20
2.05
3.18
46.64
1965
2.17
2.69
6.59
3.32
1.96
5.30
6.19
4.87
0.88
1.76
3.19
0.43
39.35
1966
3.79
5.59
2.13
1.73
3.61
2.58
1.86
2.36
5.42
2.29
1.19
2.58
35.13
1967 .
2.76
3.79
2.48
1.57
4.70
3.08
5.13
9.23
1.60
0.83
2.51
5.53
43.21
1968
4.95
0.87
4.96
2.73
2.45
6.63
5.13
0.88
1.46
3.02
4.68
2.29
40.05
1969
1.93
5.19
4.04
3.49
2.03
2.32
3.48
5.14
4.83
1.33
1.14
4.87
39.79
1970
1.70
3.66
2.93
2.04
2.69
2.62
5.73
4.03
0.55
5.12
1.58
3.14
35.79
1971
3.40
5.19
4.87
2.79
4.47
5.09
4.99
2.89
2.68
6.88
2.96
2.24
48.45
1972
4.47
3.21
2.59
1.75
5.61
3.01
6.59
0.61
3.77
1.37
5.42
5.83
44.23
1973
4.14
4.44
6.96
2.13
4.31
4.91
3.62
2.31
3.15
2.38
0.46
5.32
44.13
1974
5.22
4.90
3.30
3.26
4.49
2.32
4.16
6.35
6.50
0.46
4.50
3.82
49.28
1975
6.14
3.50
7.62
1.69
12.48
1.86
7.58
4.48
6.51
3.58
2.83
3.82
62.09
1976
1.89
1.13
4.36
0.30
4.26
3.84
2.26
0.90
5.55
8.33
3.37
5.60
41.79
1977
2.73
1.48
8.45
2.05
3.16
3.12
0.82
2.44
6.35
4.74
4.20
1.97
41.51
1978
6.80
0.74
4.97
2.69
4.91
4.19
4.03
8.11
1.16
1.18
2.81
3.13
44.72
91979
5.31
7.59
3.79
6.47
4.54
4.72
4.74
1.27
9.69
2.95
4.61
1.36
57.04
1980
4.67
1.31
8.76
2.31
3.59
2.27
2.63
1.94
5.37
1.67
3.77
0.83
39.12
1981
0.45
3.63
2.12
0.67
4.27
1.81
6.61
2.67
3.42
3.94
0.87
6.23
36.69
1982
4.30
4.87
1.58
3.84
4.97
4.16
4.19
2.03
0.64
3.83
3.05
4.23
41.69
1983
2.53
5.50
6.07
2.66
2.14
3.77
0.53
3.61
0.74
2.43
4.05
7.49
41.52
1984
4.09
5.90
5.89
4.50
4.78
2.95
5.96
3.95
1.74
0.75
2.08
2.40
44.99
1985
5.20
4.05
0.58
1.90
5.14
5.46
4.14
7.35
0.74
5.16
8.68
0.92
49.32
1986
1.02
1.03
3.01
1.20
1.63
0.41
2.26
5.43
0.83
3.49
3.44
3.16
26.91
1987
4.78
5.19
3.65
2.44
0.99
2.98
1.38
2.76
6.87
0.84
4.05
3.39
39.32
1988
3.43
1.11
3.29
2.27
2.20
1.55
3.56
4.56
4.45
4.12
2.11
1.62
34.27
1989
1.61
4.67
4.92
2.58
5.37
3.20
6.30
2.99
7.27
4.08
3.14
3.66
49.79
1990
3.81
5.65
3.57
2.03
4.99
0.90
2.71
3.47
1.75
14.72
2.75
3.23
49.58
1991
6.02
1.32
7.18
5.43
2.94
2.39
3.70
8.18
1.70
0.50
2.83
2.99
45.18
1992
3.28
4.31
4.93
2.51
3.59
6.83
1.78
3.46
8.18
6.21
5.84
2.81
53.73
1993
6.17
2.72
7.61
2.00
2.60
0.15
1.56
3.77
0.92
2.28
2.69
3.34
35.81
Record
lean
3.81
3.92
4.37
3.21 1
3.54 1
3.83 1
4.61 1
4.58 1
3.35
3.07
2.77
3.64
44.69
See Reference Notes on Page bb.
Page 4A
AVERAGE TEMPERATURE (deg. F) CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
YEAR
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUG
SEP
OCT
I NOV
DEC
JANNUAL
1964
41.5
40.1
51.0
60.6
69.8
77.7
76.9
75.0
70.9
55.7
54.8
45.3
59.9
1965
41.5
44.6
46.8
62.4
73.4
73.3
77.8
78.0
73.1
59.6
51.4
44.0
60.5
1966
36.0
42.2
50.2
58.7
67.6
74.0
79.6
77.2
70.7
58.0
50.3
41.5
58.9
1967
43.3
40.0
53.9
62.7
63.7
73.1
76.3
75.2
67.0
60.0
47.8
46.3
59.1
1968
37.9
38.7
51.6
59.0
64.8
-73.8
77.0
79.3
71.4
60.6
49.4
38.6
58.5
1969
38.1
39.7
45.1
60.8-
67.9
-77.3
80.8
75.6
69.0
60.4
47.7
39.5
58.5
1970
34.7
41.1
48.6
61.2
68.2
74.4
79.5
78.9
75.9
63.6
49.7
44.7
60.0
1971
39.9
41.4
46.3
58.3
65.0
76.5
76.2
75.8
73.1
64.7
49.0
50.6
59.7
1972
44.6
40.4
49.6
58.5
64.7
71.3
77.0
77.1
72.7
59.0
48.8
46.5
59.2
1973
39.6
40.0
54.1
57.6
64.7
74.7
78.5
76.8
74.6
62.1
52.7
41.7
59.8
1974
49.8
44.0
55.2
60.0
68.5
72.2
76.9
75.9
68.4
58.3
49.9
42.1
60.1
1975
45.2
45.0
50.4
59.0
70.5
75.0
76.2
78.9
70.8
63.6
53.5
42.4
60.9
1976
39.3
50.2
54.7
59.9
65.0
72.4
76.9
76.1
69.5
55.5
44.1
39.1
58.6
1977
30.1
42.1
54.9
62.5
69.8
75.2
82.4
79.7
74.4
58.7
53.6
42.5
60.5
1978
36.9
36.7
49.4
61.5
66.7
76.2
78.9
79.0
74.2
60.1
56.2
44.8
60.0
11979
36.7
37.9
53.7
60.2
67.7
71.6
76.6
78.4
70.4
59.3
52.9
43.7
59.1
1980
41.4
38.9
47.4
60.0
68.2
74.0
80.0
80.9
74.8
58.3
48.8
42.6
59.6
1981
36.1
44.2
48.5
64.2
65.1
78.2
78.7
75.1
70.2
58.0
51.3
39.3
59.1
1982
36.0
45.4
52.7
57.6
72.0
75.0
78.4
76.3
70.0
60.5
52.3
47.9
60.3
1983
38.8
41.8
50.6
54.8
66.7
73.9
80.7
80.2
71.1
61.0
50.0
39.6
59.1
1984
38.3
45.4
50.0
56.5
65.9
76.4
76.1
77.1
69.0
67.8
47.8
50.0
60.0
1985
35.6
43.1
54.0
61.4
68.0
75.8
77.4
75.7
70.6
64.8
58.6
39.7
60.4
1986
38.8
46.8
52.8
64.3
69.5
80.6
84.8
76.9
74.1
64.0
53.2
43.4
62.4
1987
40.0
42.9
51.1
58.9
71.6
77.8
82.3
81.4
73.5
56.2
53.5
45.5
61.2
1988
35.8
43.4
52.7
60.6
68.4
75.3
79.6
80.9
71.8
56.3
53.0
43.8
60.1
1989
46.8
45.9
53.4
60.7
66.7
78.2
79.6
77.8
71.8
63.5
52.2
36.5
61.1
1990
48.5
52.3
55.9
61.1
69.0
77.7
81.1
80.1
74.1
63.8
55.4
49.0
64.0
1991
43.1
48.4
55.2
64.4
74.0
77.6
82.2
78.4
73.8
63.5
51.4
48.2
63.4
1992
45.1
48.7
52.7
61.3
66.0
73.9
82.4
76.1
72.1
60.0
52.4
42.9
61.1
1993
45.0
43.1
49.6
58.7
70.5
78.8
85.5
80.2
74.8
62.3
52.7
42.9
62.0
Zecord
lean
41.5
44.0
51.2
60.0
68.8
76.0
78.8
77.6
72.2
61.5
51.1
43.2
60.5
lax
50.6
53.7
61.7
71.1
79.5
86.2
88.5
87.0
81.8
71.9
61.2
52.2
70.4
tin
32.5
34.2
40.7
49.0
58.1 I
65.8
69.2
68.2
62.6
51.0 I
41.0
34.1
50.5
See Reference Notes on Page 68.
Page 46

UNITED STATES
(NOT. low File No.
• DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR { rum ---------------
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY �Pnparcd __ SS
WATER RESOURCES DIVISION a-Al WX
by- - - - -- -- --
��e� l�tia!! ras:sar+d Ilrtr+Mreteobl.�,sb�ld
Desanption of b"aging Station on ------------
(Prepare description in accordance with outline on back of Form 9 -277. Plot cross section to scale.
Use Form 9 -213A or 9-213E for cross section. Use second page of this form for sketch if room is available,
otherwise use Form 9-213C or 9 -213H. Initial and date all sheets.) *G,O;,fb/--0-7WX4
0014t $54054060* um ,1 Ira t. lt. C.1 1162, i 1907 )
QW1111:7, at !„ 0#5 IAIA east of PlOWL110j, ag
4.3 stem wawa fie UAW Mp No. 7,
BrMum .*48.7 set ot. go qqm 3/4 of dw bo a Is in Area city of Culotta
ewd in sWmrbm avi urbsort is only sii*tly =b end
brat cgs elwrelptt.
a •*UftVb Ile 1%5 to Set. 30,E MO. 10-Wtabliahad AW1 14. 1972 ot.
J ) r1ew 4l od t� Al wl�sseed otatiOS. �d�� . »*0i � �i'6+3i� +�� paal��lwresar+l Wit.
1 lF.3 ft log on post eaa WI&t b
#foaa st fts. ft to of pals 1s t of 8
Is 17.7 ft. Oman of glee, I is ft now ace �* 1#=
Amm �I,Im6► rip 6 tea at Aide A#
2&----A del► ot elri' W �• Joel � U VI6
pelf 69 a s tat O ft. ,
by f4w
MOM&.04rifto A* sun in onwoo 10"1104W
run sto an
Y fssae ""ft*" aced is *bplitt
side *f b rS41) 01.0 ft
#Add flow 19.4 ft
tt(911t of 5"4W 16,86 ft
,fie ftm sidle of 167 ft wide k dge 4hiach $A.. .
•t five.f It ist1L" lei, hatul paint fear selmlifts ire of clad o brulio. -
!a not mbj4 at to er"rftw,
.•«A flood fa 1962 readwd a st"o Aeut tao fact MOM tbaa the fl*W of S /21 /05
step U.Sa'sGew "as to W. J. Joe VAllaso MwAl s N. C.). MS. 239, 19670, sts�
13.09 ft.
NAR.4 -cur of awlotte a X. C.
1090=0 -a*&&.-•RP ! • :daelsd es3'Oir sa dowasttm sift bsidpe bandsail 89 ft Beal
i ftd• ww

. PRELIMINARY
"Aft# ak* m romjwbbw w W* polio
a#
jj'' ((�y��
t f � tm 20*00 ft
*' ads i 44 M soma of
bait *welo
ut"
J& am, e g f�
1edE tos1 Ott 04 09' �
t i h b*Uw e b b" U" X14 /7a .
e-
?:S--1
w•� s �.rr -.�.i 'S�' _ 34 r.. ., t:'E� . . r.�.. o 'f!.. � � i .. •- —, �i.
'c 4 .... -.t. .._ 1, - .. '�'��' ..i-. e � .. 'y .�. ._'•+. .._ � _.. � _ c ..,.`��
s

♦ � r` t
,
t
s'
P4
00
E rn -
z
0
1 O0
G o
LL.
oN
z Q
W
i .
z � d
D > �Q1
^,
N � L
O �
H w �?
Z 0
M .i
G]�
Q
i
LAJ
Y
r
a
a
_�I
s
V;
�
7• 1�j�`
��r � �
i 1
^i
�
� V
i i i
I
o
r
m
IY
;
O
O;
M;
O i
Q; •O' v' • �'
too;
OI �i I
1 1
1 1
;
1 1 1 .'
\
\pl . �I �
/• \
�; �
�
�;
� ;
v'
I
N Nil:
•�
i ?
I I
;
i
� i i
�
�.; mss?
��•,'
.9;
� ?
�'
Zt.,
V1 v ;
� n?
;
-tit
1 t ♦ �
? , f
r;
Nf
N I
. ?
t
? � ,
r
r ?
Y
r
a
a
_�I

9 .� • sI M'ia �•' y�S "F 1 Yr �t LR.X �' i, �- �.r�-�� Y,.w,�, + � � <�"rs�t" �I ,' 5
c,J- � .w •. t7 d# � ,r '�l J`. Y� f �� a +. �`w� s .r�` i f r�l � r� `
X1'3" � r,. �'�• � , F�.. ... ;� / r' � •\ � tl{` �' `\� 1
g
1F ��l v � t f S w " ^�� • � � '.�� r "� • 1 � 1 f ����.. ' , ; t / e �i ,ti
W4
�'^' yr. ?< t 'is '1'?` -: � t t . �} , � j . � •.
8 �� � '� ,�i_y .rfi �t .y .b .: t d rr ,„ ,,{r ,L n :g �yY,`�.3._ � j. • �
� 11 > t;� -,Sc. �s4 � {�.• rrr :. � r s ' t r�� :. :��c c. ,r�^+ Ra ,� EE s � :c ,i
o "` •.iy' +.iW. ; "�• " .} L3 „s, < �. iy riac Sd3Z7 i3 �� * ?•
r
�1 y.F C.\ y3} ' � , i�j„£a^ ��. .i• �`_•�`r .�n;� .• '�i �it s'r.' yty�,_ Y e'r �,F �.
ig,if�`
'{�ri _� * � 1 X1.+6 a• �,y�. ;. ;r >r �i t tc s•,H �. „�t t rx �. N.. �?r _ � � (. s �`�. ,
t qty e y t .�, �2 r ;i' + �''�•'- , � .�a• y 't. jie r %+ } ��:�y_.
s. • , � �.r � ty rq � : � ����,L•` '{rt•' `_ - s">,..�^.� � � � 'tf -,.4• .s 'x+ •?dam. ;.�; '.�c•
7 �.. ♦ ,. >S r * y♦a � Ne • � . ,s �i �Jf / �, r e.. t 4 t ; e 1. rt1 � S ,,Y. ' . -''
�� �^iwn ..5.� ytA � +t Y _\ .1 m•' � �.:, 1� r ,d} � i �ti'�Y
e T s r (1
of + �• �� : � � s �' - r' _�`_Y� / %/ t t •,y e
Lbw +x t T t444 497
1420 -4��7 14J2 -491 ! 1 -•�
. a3K� >+ t t'••s . , _ Oki a .. ' .. „ ` \: ' r, �+
'�1'•s
T4h ra3i p {§ NA -r+ ¢
V189 1 � -1'T � �r •r [0�'(+7j . . _�' ':C -mrb r
r
"tf
IFZ1J"T '1 , K Jr4 4,81
1. _gN y 11
Yr ;r .;f"✓ r��.'t1 -.
<..r "� '+ +F ,TrCfc�,(y rc i � y r� � ., � ... � t i.. r "q•'

MECkLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 61
TABLE 2. -- FREEZE DATES IN SPRING AND FALL
Temperaturel
Probability I 240 F , 280 F i 320 F
I or lower ; or lower ; or lower
Last freezing
temperature
in spring:
1 year in 10
later than -= 1 March 29 1 April 5 1 April 19
2 years in 10
later than -- ; March 20 I March 31 1 April 13
5 years in 10
later than -- I March 3 1 March 22 1 April 3
First freezing
temperature I I I
in fall:
1 year in 10
earlier than -- I November 9 1 October 31 1 October 19
i
2 years in 10
earlier than -- 1 November 15 1 November 4 1 October 24
i
5 years in 10
earlier than -- I November 27 1 November 11 1 November 2
i
1Recorded in the period 1951 -75
at Charlotte, N.C.
TABLE 3.-- GROWING SEASON LENGTH
I Daily minimum temperature
I during growing seasonl
Probability i Higher , Higher i Higher
I than 1 than i than
i _240 F i 280 F i 320 F
Days I Days I Days
9 years in 10 1 237 I 218 I 192
8 years in 10 1 248 i 223 i 199
5 years in "10 I 269 1 233 I 212
2 years in 10 1 290 I 243 1 225
1 year in 10 1 301 i 248 1 232
1Recorded in the period 1951 -75
at Charlotte, N.C.

SOIL SURVEY
TABLE 1. -- TEMPERATURE AND PRECIPITATION DATA
i
Temperaturel
i
Precipitationl
-years in
, -
T - -
-T2 years in 1UT
- �T
-
-`--
i
10 will
have --
1 Average
1
;
will
have---!
Average
I
Month !Average!Average!Averagel
I
!number ofiAveragel
I
:number oflAverage
1
daily
1 daily 1
1
Maximum
1 Minimum
1 growing
1
1
Less
1 More
:days withisnowfall
lmaximumlminimuml
:temperature
:temperature;
degree
;
!than --
!than -- :0.10 inch!
! i
1
higher
1 lower
! days2
!
1
!
! or more
'
,
than --
'
, than --
'
,
'
,
'
,
'
,
'
,
i
,
°F
, c :
°E
,T-
�F
, cF
, Units;
_
In
�;
In
T In
In --
January '
51.3
1 31.3 1
41.4
1
74
! 9
i 27
1 3.70
1
2.27
1 4.98
: 7
1
2.5
February - - -1
54.1
1 32.5 1
43.3
1
74
i 12
i 29
1 4.08
1
2.67
: 5.35
1 8
1
1.6
March - - - - - - ,
61.6
, 38.7 ,
50.2
1
84
, 20
, 117
, 4.58
,
3.11
, 5.92
1 8
,
1.4'
April- - - - -71
72.3
1 48.4 1
60.4
1
90
i 31
: 316
i 3.37
1
2.26:
4.37
1 6
1
.0
May--- - - - - -1
79.8:
57.3 1
68.6:
94
: 39
i 577
1 3.55
1
1.76
1 5.01
1 7
1
.0
June-- - - - - -!
85.9
1 64.7 1
75.4
1
98
i 52
i 762
1 3.56
1
1.91
1 4.89
1 6
:
.0
July-- - - - - -1
88.6
1 68.5 1
78.6
i
98
i 57
i 887
1 4.12
1
2.30
1 5.60
1 8
1
.0
August - - - - -1
87.8
1 68.0 1
77.9
1
98
i 57
1 865
1 3.91
1
2.01
1 5.45
1 7
:
.0
September - -!
82.3
1 61.8:
72.1
1
95
i 46
! 663
1 3.19
1
.89
1 5.03
1 5
1
.0
October - - - -1
72.5
1 49.9 1
61.3
1
89
i 30
i 354
1 2.51
!
.64
1 4.01
1 4
1
.0
November - - -1
62.1
1 39.4 i
50.8
1
81
i 21
i 90
1 2.68
:
1.23
1 3.85
1 5
1
.1
December - - -1
52.9
1 32.9 1
42.9
1
74
i 11
! 40
1 3.56
1
1.94
1 4.88:
6
1
.8
Year - - - - -1
70.9
1 49.5 1
60.2
1
100
1 7
1 4,727
: 42.81
:37.55
:47.87
1 77
1
6.4
1Recorded in the period 1951 -75 at Charlotte, N.C.
2A growing degree day is a unit of heat available for plant growth. It can be calculated by adding the
maximum and minimum daily temperatures, dividing the sum by 2, and subtracting the temperature below which
growth is minimal for the principal crops in the area (500-F).

92
SOIL SURVEY
TABLE 15.-- PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS -- Continued
' ' i i i i Erosion
Soil name and 1 Depth 1 Permeability I Available ;Soil reaction; Shrink -swell ! factors
map symbol ; ! ;water capacity ! ; potential ! ,
* See map unit description for the composition and behavior characteristics of the map unit.
In
1
In /hr
;
In /in
1
pH
MeB, MeD --------- 1
0 -7
!
0.6 -2.0
1
0.14 -0.19
1
5.6 -7.3
;Low------- - - - - -;
0.28
i
1
4
Mecklenburg 1
7 -34
1
0.06 -0.2
1
0.12 -0.14
!
5.6 -7.3
;Moderate-- - - - - -1
0.32
1
1
34 -65
1
- --
!
- --
!
- --
;---------- - - - - -1
- --
;
MkB *:
Mecklenburg - - - - -1
0 -7
!
0.6 -2.0
1
0.14 -0.19
!
5.6 -7.3
!Low------- - - - - -1
0.28
;
4
1
7 -34
1
0.06 -0.2
;
0.12 -0.14
1
5.6 -7.3
;Moderate-- - - - - -1
0.32
1
1
34 -65
!
- --
1
- --
;
- --
l---------- - - - - -1
- --
1
Urban land.
MO---------- - - - - -!
0 -14
1
0.6 -2.0
1
0.14 -0.20
1
5.1 -7.3
!Low------- - - - - -1
0.28
!
4
Monacan 1
14 -43
1
0.6 -2.0
1
0.14 -0.20
1
5.1 -7.3
!Low------- - - - - -1
0.28
!
1
43 -65
!
- --
!
---
!
- --
;- --------- - - -- -!
- --
i
MS *:
Monacan---- - - - - -!
0 -14
1
0.6 -2.0
1
0.14 -0.20
1
5.1 -7.3
;Low------- - - - - -1
0.28
1
4
1
14 -43
!
0.6 -2.0
1
0.14 -0.20
1
5.1 -7.3
!Low------- - - - - -1
0.28
!
1
1
43 -65
!
!
- --
!
1
- --
1
- --
1-------- - - - - -- '
- --
'
Arents.
!
1 !
!
PaE, PaF --------- 1
0 -3
1
2.0 -6.0
1
0.08 -0.12
!
4.5 -6.0
!Low------- - - - - -1
0.20
!
3
Pacolet 1
3 -31
;
0.6 -2.0
1
0.12 -0.15
1
4.5 -6.0
!Low------- - - - - -1
0.28
!
1
31 -65
;
- --
;
- --
!
- --
;---------- - - - - -1
- --
!
PB3 *:
Pacolet---------!
0 -3
!
0.6 -2.0
1
0.10 -0.14
1
4.5 -6.0
!Low------- - - - - -!
0.24
!
2
!
1
3 -31
31 -65
i
!
0.6 -2.0
- --
1
;
0.12 -0.15
- --
!
;
4.5 -6.0
- --
;Low------- - - - - -1
1---------- - - - - -1
0.28
- --
!
1
Udorthents.
1
!
! !
1
Pt*
Pits
UL *, UO *.
Udorthents !
!
!
!
! !
!
Ur*
Urban land 1
!
!
!
1 !
!
VaB, VaD---- - - - - -;
0 -8
1
2.0 -6.0
!
0.10 -0.14
1
4.5 -6.0
;Low------- - - - - -1
0.28
1
3
Vance ;
8 -33
!
0.06 -0.2
1
0.12 -0.15
!
4.5 -5.5
!Moderate-- - - - - -!
0.37
!
1
1
33 -50
1
1
- --
1
- --
;
- --
;---------- - - - - -1
- --
;
WkB, WkD, WkE,
!
!
1 !
1
WkF ------------- 1
0 -7
;
2.0 -6.0
1
0.11 -0.15
!
5.1 -6.5
;Low------- - - - - -1
0.28
!
2
Wilkes 1
7 -15
!
0.2 -0.6
;
0.15 -0.20
1
6.1 -7.8
!Moderate-- - - - - -!
0.32
1
1
!
15 -45
!
- --
!
- --
1
- --
1---------- - - - - -!
- --
!
WuD *:
1
!
!
1 1
!
Wilkes----- - - - - -1
0 -7
!
2.0 -6.0
1
0.11 -0.15
1
5.1 -6.5
!Low------- - - - - -1
0.28
!
2
;
7 -15
!
0.2 -0.6
1
0.15 -0.20
1
6.1 -7.8
!Moderate-- - - - - -!
0.32
!
1
15 -45
!
- --
!
- --
!
- --
l---------- - - - - -!
- --
1
Urban land. !
1
!
!
1 !
1
* See map unit description for the composition and behavior characteristics of the map unit.

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
TABLE 16. - -SOIL AND WATER FEATURES
93
[Absence of an entry indicates the feature is not a concern. See text for descriptions of symbols and such terms
as "rare," "brief," and "perched." The symbol < means less than; > means greater than]
r__i_wuing
Soil name and ;Hydro -! ,
map symbol 1 logic! Frequency 1 Duration
,group , ,
,
;Months
,
, nigu wduur
, ,
1 Depth 1 Kind
, ,
cduie i oearOCK
, , ,
!Months !Depth!Hard-
, , , ness
i IS1sK oI- corroslot
, ,
!Uncoated ;Concrete
, steel ,
Ft i
, , In ,
ApB, ApD ---------- ,
B
,None --- - - - - - , - --
, - --
, >6.0 , - --
, , >60 , - --
,Moderate ,Moderate
Appling
CeB2, CeD2 -------- 1
B
;None--- - - - - -1 - --
; - --
1 >6.0 1 - --
; - -- 1 >60 1 - --
!Moderate ;Moderate
Cecil
CuB *, CuD *: !
! !
!
!
Cecil------- - - - - -!
B
!None--- - - - - -! - --
; - --
1 >6.0 1 - --
1 - -- 1 >60 1 - --
!Moderate ;Moderate
Urban land.
DaB, DaD, DaE ----- I
B
!None--- - - - - -1 - --
! - --
1 >6.0 1 - --
1 - -- I >60 1 - --
!High - - - -- !Moderate
Davidson
EnB, EnD ---------- 1
C
!None--- - - - - -1 - --
; - --
1 >6.0 ! - --
I - -- I >60 1 - --
IHigh ----- !Moderate
Enon
GeB2, GeD2 -------- 1
B
!None--- - - - - -! - --
I - --
1 >6.0 1 - --
1 - -- 1 >60 1 - --
!High - - - -- !High.
Geor eville
GoB, GoD ---------- 1
C
!None--- - - - - -! - --
! - --
! >6.0 ! - --
I - -- l20- 40IRip-
!Moderate !High.
Goldston !
! !
!
! !
! ! 1 gable! !
HeB --------------- 1
C
!None--- - - - - -1 - --
! - --
11.0- 2.51Perched
!Jan- Mar140- 60IRip-
!High - - - -- !High.
Helena '
,
'
� ,
,
'
, ,
' ' '
, , , gable, ,
HuB *:
Helena------ - - - - -1
C
!None--- - - - - -1 - --
! - --
11.0- 2.51Perched
!Jan- Marl40- 601Rip-
!High ----- Nigh.
! ! 1 pable! !
Urban land.
IrA, IrB ---------- 1
D
!None--- - - - - -1 - --
1 - --
11.0- 2.01Perched
!Nov -Mar! >60 1 - --
!High ----- !Low.
Iredell
IUB *:
Iredell ---------- 1
D
!None--- - - - - -1 - --
1 - --
11.0- 2.01Perched
!Nov -Marl >60 1 - --
!High - - -- -!Low.
Urban land.
LgB --------------- 1
C
!None--- - - - - -1 - --
1 - --
1 1. 0- 2.5!Apparent!Dec- May!48- 72!Hard
!High - - - -- !High.
Li num
MeB, MeD ---------- 1
C
!None--- - - - - -! - --
! - --
! >6.0 1 - --
1 - -- 148- 601Hard
!High - - - -- !Moderate
Mecklenburg
MkB *: !
! !
!
! !
! ! !
!
Mecklenburg- - - - - -1
C
!None--- - - - - -1 - --
1 - --
1 >6.0 1 - --
1 - -- 148- 601Hard
!High - - - -- !Moderate
Urban land.
MO----------- - - - - -!
C
!Common ------ !Brief -----
1 Nov- May!0.5-
2.0!Apparent!Nov -May! >60 1 - --
!Moderate !High.
Monacan
MS *:
Monacan----- - - - - -1
C
!Common ------ !Brief -----
! Nov- May!0.5-
2.0!Apparent!Nov -May! >60 1 - --
!Moderate !High.
Arents.
PaE, PaF---- -- - - - -I
B
!None--- - - - --1 - --
1 - --
1 >6.0 1 - --
1 - -- 1 >60 1 - --
IHigh - - - -- !High.
Pacolet
See footnote at
end
of table.

I
Y
S
t
a
RISER WELL POINT
SHALLOW WATER WELL
SCREEN
WELL POINT
PIEZOMETERS
Figure 1. Parts of piezometers and shallow monitoring wells.
6 -18
r
S
t
a
RISER WELL POINT
SHALLOW WATER WELL
SCREEN
WELL POINT
PIEZOMETERS
Figure 1. Parts of piezometers and shallow monitoring wells.
6 -18

e
AUGER
HOLE
c
6 =20

A
2" PVC CAP
I
2" PVC PIPE
GLUE TOGETHER
W/PVC GLUE
6,
Figure 2. Homemade cap made of oversize PVC piping.
6 -19
i
( " "i

DEM ID: ACTION ID:
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nation�A•ide Permit #): 26 (Pre - Discharge Notification)
JOINT FORM FOR
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGLNEER
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
DEPARTMENT OF THE A -MY
P.O, Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402 -1890
ATTN: CESAW -CO -E
Telephone [phone]
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES BRANCH
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
ATTN: MR. JOHN DORNEX
Telephone [phone]
ONE (l) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF ENGLN'E.ERS.
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE ,N.C. DIVISION OF E.WIRONI fENTAL MANAGEME;�'T.
PLEASE PRINT.
1. Owners Name: The Panos Hotel Group
2. Owners Address: 5936 Monroe Road_, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC, 28212
3. Owners Phone Number (Home): not available (Work): ( 704) 532- 6747
4. If AppUcable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number
Kathy Abernathy, The Panos Hotel Group, Same Address /Phone as Above.
Agent: Craicf R. Wyant, EDSA, 1919 South Blvd, Charlotte, NC, 28203
phone [phone]
,41
;Z;:
5. Location of work (MUST ATTACH MAP), County: -Mecklenburg PVC
Nearest Town or City: Pineville, North Carolina
Specific Locadon (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Project site is located on south side
of NC Highway 51 between Little Sugar Creek and Towne Centre Boulevard
consisting of approximately 28 acres, not including the STP site
6. Name of Closest Strearrt/River Little Sugar Creek, NC Stream Index 11 -137 -8
7. River Basin: Catawba River Basin
8. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout, SA, HQW, ORW, WS I, or WS 11? YES O NO �4
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property? YES K3 NO ( )
If yes, explain. Verbal authorization to place fill in 0.17 ac. of above headwater
wetlands for initial portion of US., has been included in this applica.
10. Estimated total number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, located on project site:
7.566 total wetlands on site,( ±2.85 ac. adjacent & 4.72 ac. above Headwater:
111. Number of acres of waters of the U,S, including wetlands , impacted by the propose4 roJ c:
' FlDC& 2.06 acres r
Drained: 0 acres
Flooded: 0 acres
Excavated: 0. 3 0 a c re s
Total Impacted: 2.36 acres

L.
12. Description of proposed work (Attach PLANS -8 1/2" X I I'• drawings only); Woo k will consist of
placement of fill or dredqing of above headwaters wetlands for develo -
ment of property per attached plans and descriptions.
13. Purpose of proposed work: To provide contiguous development p parcels closest to
road and furthest from high value wetland, floodway, and creek.(see attached)
14. State reasons why the applicant believes that this activity ust be carried out '
tY t rn wetlands. Also, note measures
taken to minimize wetland impacts. Commercial evelopmeat rea i res, conf-3-cruous frt�n +any
land, great effort has been made to avoid /minimize wetland impact(see attached)
15. You are required to contact the U.S. Fis'i and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) regarding the presence or any Federally listed orproposed for listing endangered or threatened species or critical
habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the proposed project. Have you done so? YESJX) NO[ )
RESPONSES FROM THE USF1,VS AN 'D/OR N'NIFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
16. You are required to contact the Stan Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence of historic
properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project? Have you done so? YES (X$ NO( )
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
L17. Additional information required by DF-M:
A. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the property. e . Attached
B. If available, representadve photog -aph of wetlands to be impacted by project. Attached
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the placement of the
delineation line. Attached
t
[I
1
1
1
D. If a stormwater management plan is required for this project, attach copy. Not required
E. What is land use of surrounding prepem? Commer�ia 1 dev oilmen+
F. If applicable, what is proposed me,-hod of sewage disposal? Existing publ ; r sani_tary cr�u�er
vwner s atgnature
Panos Hotel Group
Charlotte, NC

Pineville Town Centre Site
Pineville, Mecklenburg County, NC
Item # 12 Description of Proposed Work,
The applicant proposes tYabove lace fill material in approximately 2.06 acres and dredge
an additional 0.30 acres headwaters or isolated wetlands for the pupose of
preparing highway frontage land for development. The total wetland impact will be
2.36 acres for the entire site. All fill material will be clean and free from pollutants
and all construction sites will employ appropriate measures to control sedimentation
and erosion. Material dredged from wetlands will be placed outside of wetlands and
erosion of dredged material will be approporiately controlled. Wetlands which will
not be disturbed will be protected during and after construction from accidental
damage due to construction traffic, erosion, sedimentation, or other means of
degradation.
A total of 5.0 acres of new wetland will be created on -site from upland in order to
provide mitigation for losses of wetland functions and values. A total of 5.2 acres of
wetlands will remain undisturbed. Undisturbed wetlands and mitigation areas will be
preserved by the applicant or by a group designated by the owner for this purpose.
jItem #13 - Purpose of Proposed Work
The purpose of the proposed work is to allow the owner of the property to develop
this site for commercial or business development as it is currently zoned and to make
fullest use of the portions of the site which are best situated for this type of
development. Some impacts to a limited amount of above headwater or isolated
wetlands will occur as a result of this activity and a proposal to preserve high value
. wetlands and create new wetland areas to mitigate for these wetland losses is
included as a part of this application.
Item # 14 - State reasons why applicant believes that this activity must be carried
jThe Pineville Towne Centre site is currently zoned for use as commercial or business
development. Due to the nature of this type of development, the most necessary
portions of the site to the development are contiguous parcels located closest to
road frontage for visibility and vehicular access. The portions of the site which would
satisfy this need contain a limited amount of isolated or above headwaters wetlands
which would be impacted by this activity. The wetlands which will be impacted are
residual depressions or channels due to previous on -site agricultural or grading
activities which have been enhanced in recent years due to an increase in the
amount of urban stormwater runoff which enters the site from a number of point
source outlets.
1

Prior to the preparation of plans for the property, each wetland was rated using the
State wetland rating system and assigned a total score. Those wetlands which
resulted in a "high" or "very high" score reflecting wetland functions and values were
L avoided in their entirety. Of the remaining wetlands, only those which received
scores which were "moderate" or "low" were considered for fill or dredging.
Minimization of impacts to'the lower scoring wetlands was achieved by utilizing only
those wetlands necessary to provide enough contiguous developable land along road
frontage to economically justify the cost of the development.
1
a
1
Those wetlands which are furthest from road frontage and nearest to Little Sugar
Creek have been avoided and will be preserved. In an effort to preserve and
enhance water quality and to protect undisturbed wetlands, a large pond will be
dredged from a predominantly upland area near the center of the site to provide
additional storage volume for stormwater runoff before it is released into wetlands or
into Little Sugar Creek. The water quality of this pond and surrounding wetlands will
be preserved by the construction of forebays which will capture first flush runoff,
lower
'
peak volumes, and provide a means of maintenance by removal of
accumulated sediments and toxins. These forebays are located at the ends of
drainage easements situated to accomodate flow from existing stormwater outlets as
well as new runoff generated by the proposed development. The channel of Little
Sugar Creek has been deepened and widened over the years in order to improve its
flood control characteristics and does not appear to be a significant hydrologic
'
influence on the wetlands which will be impacted.
1
a
1

l
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Sterli 8M \ \
Silvermoun y� ,
'4W Ch
�1 \
1
600 :. -.Q�.. \ j .�\ ` ; r' 38
( a' /
W
. J Vd
587 \ \.
.. \J \
CWT:.•
�SSi)\ Piri ' j . : '•• '�ziii.. /
�-� • o 4 5,
f \✓'��\ Q` (1 .�I �l ` ��b wT .,• 5 ii 3882
,\ i /�.;1 C. –...'� , I;.6•� = % X587 \' ^:,.; ( ."' "- 60... �\• n
c —.( ; > ' \ ` . •� \ 'James K. Polk
sso y) /� • _ iBirthplace
3881
6t>D /• r �'� y O `rr o
Sewage
D Disposal -
:
i 0 70 Jo
PROJECT LOCATION Source: USGS 7 -1/2' Quad
Fort Mill, SC-NC
PINEVILLE TOWNE CENTER TRACT
Pineville, Mecklenburg County, NC
Preliminary Wetlands Delineation
Prepared by: North
Edward D. Stone, Jr. & Associates
Charlotte, NC Scale: 1"=2000'

04
1IM11i I
I =11 I Fm
9
ZZ
&IFT7
BE
ij
z
RE I
1IM11i I
I =11 I Fm

1/
1
1
t
I',-
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402 -1890
IN REPLY REFER TO
August 27, 1992
Regulatory Branch
Action ID. 199203202
Mr. Craig R. Wyant .
Edward D. Stone and Associates
1919 South Boulevard
Trolley's End, Suite 102
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
�;wli�C.�.b�•kti��:
Dear Mr. Wyant:
This is in response to your recent inquiry on behalf of Alabanc
Properties, Incorporated regarding the regulatory status of previously
delineated wetlands at the Pineville Towne Center Tract along Little Sugar
Creek off N.C. Highway 51 and Towne Center Boulevard at Pineville,
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The wetland boundaries at this site
were reviewed and approved by Mr. Steven Lund of my Asheville staff on
May 19, 1992.
Referring to the revised wetland delineation map of this site dated
May 19, 1992, we find that Wetland D as well as the "Dug Pond" near the
southwest corner of the property are both essentially isolated from any
connection to a surface tributary system. Wetlands A and B have their
primary hydrologic influence from and relationship to the small, headwaters
tributary to Little Sugar Creek entering the property from the west.
Wetland C, which consists of a linear, slough -like channel and associated
wetlands paralleling and eventually intersecting Little Sugar Creek, would
be considered adjacent to this larger stream by virtue of its surface
connection, proximity, and influence on water quality in the creek.
Nationwide Permit No. 26 (NWP 26) would therefore apply to Wetlands A, B, D,
and the "Dug Pond" but not to Wetland C. Notification would be required
under NWP 26 due to the amount of isolated and headwater wetlands on the
property (approximately 5.1 acres). We strongly recommend that any proposal
to fill such an area under NWP 26 include compensatory mitigation.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Lund at telephone (704)
259 -0857.
Sincerely,
J ne Wri h
hi Regula ory Branch

MER34ANO&A
s.
ut;
k.
. . . . . . . . . . .
1.
M.
E

ra
Ilk
A
e
DATE OF PHOTOGRAPHY: 3 -4 -75
SCALE: APPROXIMATELY 1" =400'

DATE OF PHOTOGRAPHY: 3 -9 -80
SCALE: APPROXIMATELY 1K =400'

d � ✓ 1
s
Jm
il.
�4 A
is � e
f
�� •
.4 itjYe �� •s y�
r•
-„"—
� A
�`r Kam.. � SR •� `..
8
• .t y#r ;
\M
a rh ! f'lo
� f•LF ' • f .
+� r
• .�V
r
IA
A, i
J'A • '3. 4 �,
fvd
_ ac
f i
At
+t;
200' 100' 0 200' 400'
Approximate Scale: 1" =200'
Date of photography:
February 12, 1990

Overview of proposed mitigation site.
Pre - Discharge Notification, NWP #26
Pineville Towne Centre Site
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Applicant: The Panos Hotel Group
View of Little Sugar Creek
Site Photos

O
BE
ci
T.
NIA
i.7
TT-.T----fTi'FF, M-77 I. ZT
-IT
zvy
18

Name of evaluato
-
Wetland ,location
f
t"0-
�. 1z Yes i
vti
F1 ❑ on pond or.- lake r
�
,.. ❑ on perennial stream;
,Y on inte'rmittant stream _
,k `''❑ within lnterstream cii«de
.M] other T't>Q(ior�F `4TµD
6F °vT�M WATT t
-
1
r y 1N lT ND RAT_I NG
h'�.r.Ir. .sY. -.,
Project name 'PM I�,IL- rowN>~ CELAmg S,re
�YWORKSH EET y Fourth' Version, Es
��K...�..ri.��:.'�4.•.
Dearest road W, I4tcaAwo.Y S I
'
County M V -A
e[��Wetland area = o•SS
acres Wetland width 35 ` ry 170 ` feet
Name of evaluato
-
Wetland ,location
f
t"0-
�. 1z Yes i
vti
F1 ❑ on pond or.- lake r
�
,.. ❑ on perennial stream;
,Y on inte'rmittant stream _
,k `''❑ within lnterstream cii«de
.M] other T't>Q(ior�F `4TµD
6F °vT�M WATT t
-
1
❑ predominantly 'organic humus;
R
muck, or peat
(3)
predominantly: mineral - non - sandy'
_ o 6" u�t5 r, FV- tt✓,�c.�
=.
❑predominantly: sandy .Flooding
and wetness
❑ semipermanent[y = to permanently
flo "oded or nundated = s
Hydraulic factors
,
❑seasonally .;;flowed or' inundated`;
❑ steep topography
Intermittantl flooded or- `tem ora
Y P rY
ditched or channelized
surface:. water
total wetland width >I 00 feet
❑ no evidence. o; flooding or ,surface .
water-n- : :.
Wetland type (select one)*
❑ 3ottomland hardwood forest
❑ Pine sava-na
❑ Headwater forest
❑ Freshwat =,- marsh
❑ Swamp forest
❑ Bog /fen
❑ Wet flat
❑ Ephemera' wetland
❑ Pocosin
❑ Carolina 5- ay
f ❑ Bog forest
)4 OtherL'uT —Fu=PL4t4 POOL-
*The rat:­� system cannot be applied to salt
or brackish marshes o- stream channels
1
n
U�l
weight
;
Water storage_
x 4.00 -
% �
Wetland Score
Bank /Shoreline stabilization
x 4.00 =
Pollutant removal _�*
x 5.00 =
,'
Wildlife habitat _�
x 2.00 =
O
5 Aquatic life value Z-
x 4.00 =
Uv Recreation /Education Z
x 1.00 =
%
Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and > 10% nonpoint
disturbance within 112 r-, le upstream, upslope, or radius
AREA A -IMPACT

Exterior view of wetland
Pre - Discharge Notification, NWP #26
Pineville Towne Centre Site
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Applicant: The Panos Hotel Group
Exterior view of wetland
Area:
A- Impact

Interior view of wetland
Pre - Discharge Notification, NWP #26
Pineville Towne Centre Site
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Applicant: The Panos Hotel Group
Interior view of wetland
Area:
A- Impact

WETLAND
RATING RKSHEET
.'WO
Project name Fwe 0t,L �
Dearest road TeAN" CeN-nzE. Rt.VD.
County ►fir nz e -t�J?nLIMx • Wetland area
�•S acres Wetland width s ±_feet
Name of evaluator l' ire R \s/Y6&r
P- Date
it
Adj acent land
i Wetland location
.
(within': 1/2: mile upstream, upslope,
{
'�� >�` ❑ on pond or 1a.ke .
or radius) • ` "' _
°❑ on perennial st ream,
❑ forested /naturaF vegetation
�,' on interrlazttant stream
❑ agriculture, urban /.suburban
i within �nterstream di�7de
❑
A;
❑impervious surface y_ 5d
r r
Dominant vegetatlo
r�
__.'Soil series Nio �to�cxa4�
�:
A.
'1���
r ..
1 2 1
❑ predominantly organic humus;'``
muck; or peat .
(3)Az:tX
predominantly mineral' non -sandy
` (c{) PoP� -tL� rxLi— otOEXS
❑ predominantly. sandy : "
Flooding and'-, wetness ;
w
❑ semipermanent ,,, =to "tly
"permahen
flooded 'o r
Hydraulic factors"
snundated ,.
® seasonally flo4�ed or;:'inundated'� „...,
_.
steep topography
❑ intermittantiy flooded' or temporary
,® ditched or channelized
surface: water,, " F
❑ total wetland -width >100 feet
❑ no'evidence_'of flooding or .surface
:,water...
Zell
Wetland type (select one)*
X Bottomland hardwood forest
❑ Pine savanna
❑ Headwater forest
❑Freshwater marsh
E3 Swamp forest
❑Bog/fen j
❑Wet flat
El Ephemera' wetland t
ED Pocosin
ED Carolina ;ay
❑ Bog forest
❑ Other f
r *The rating system cannot be applied
i
to salt or brackish marshes o- stream channels
Rweight
I1�
Water storage 4_
x 4.00 =
Wetland Score
A Bank /Shoreline stabilization
x 4.00
% Pollutant removal _rte*
x 5.00 =
Z
'
'
Wildlife habitat J4_
x 2.00 =
;O
Aquatic life value
x 4.00
Uv Recreation /Education
x 1.00 =
%
Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and > 10% nonpoint disturbance within 112 rr le upstream, upslope, or radius !,
(1) AREA B - PRESERVE

LAND,' RATING' _yWORKSH „EE--T,,, ` t,> 0
r,
Fourth Versio n
°. firer' �Yi�• �..: �_ u.. .:,J:;cr.c..ku:.�........z.�: ._:v._... 5.. :'.,._
,� ” - a f1x�i -.. u...li.�L:.t.1.•..t...... Y.,...i-- y:.wlitrR{ii. u'yt..a.L.....:�
Project name ,wry„ C_emJRR <DsTE Dearest road R>L
County MU-k + Pte►'( Z :(x. Wetland area Lq_1 acres Wetland width ISO _ —feet
N l ame of evaluator L� � X
W WN ate --
F` C = •. s
r �
Adjacent Ian,
Wetland. location d user��
=�r _ (within 1 /2 mile u) stream, �upslope,
❑ p on d o r- lake or radius
on )
on perennial. stream"� � �
❑forested /natura ve etatlan
on .intermittent stream g
" ❑ tiyithin interstream di��de ❑ agncuiture, urban /suburban
` ❑ impervio as surface D g`
❑ other
yr yDo min ant vegetation=
{ Soil series
(2) AC�2 t�F.Gtlin�
❑ predominantly . o -panic humus;,
muck, or peat (3)s° -`
'predominantly., mineral non- sandy
❑ predominantly, sandy Flooding and wetnss
❑ semipermanentEy.::,to permanently
flooded or inundated
"Hydraulic factors• ❑ seasonally flooded or Inundated
F-1 steep topography �. intermittently flooded' or temporary`
' F] ditched or channelized surface:'water
(� total wetland width >100 feet ❑ no evidence: of flooding or urface
water.
i /i / /if
Wetland type (select one)*
❑ Bottomland hardwood forest ❑ Pine sava7na
' ,K Headwater forest c. ,ATeareK ❑ Freshwater marsh
❑ Swamp forest ❑ Bog /fen
❑ Wet flat ❑ Ephemera wetland
' ❑ Pocosin ❑ Carolina Bay
t
❑ Bog forest ❑ Other t
*The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes o: stream channels
Rweight
I!� Water storage x 4.00
� Wetland Score
' An Bank /Shoreline stabilization x 4.00
Pollutant removal* x 5.00 = %
Wildlife habitat _4 x 2.00 = ;
Aquatic life value Z- x 4.00 =
Uv Recreation /Education x 1.00 = %
S Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and > 10% nonpoint disturbance within 112 n- le upstream, upslope, or radius
(2) AREA B - PRESERVE

Interior view of wetland to be preserved
Interior view of wetland to be preserved
Pre - Discharge Notification, NWP #26
Pineville Towne Centre Site Area:
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Applicant: The Panos Hotel Group
B-Preserve
A
PP P

F , .
Four RAT I NG WORKSHETrt Vsi
IAEILAND,
Project name �•�•��� �s To�ryti+E �r4 F StT _ Nearest road Tbwwt. C�,-re�aa�:i�vr�eo 11
'CountyMaeAi 8 r&iP6r Wetland area 1 I• acres Wetland width ± �oo� _feet
Name of evaluator V61 PANT nate
tT•"S� gat /T r `.. '
7F, "177 71:
WetlanciY location Adjacent land use
�=r {withlri' 1/2 mile upstream,upsiope," Y
•'`err ?i.r -t t H�` ... ..,�
w ' ❑ on pond or -lake , r v or radius) {
�, -❑ on perennial stream � �'
❑forested /nafiura` vegetation °o
nz ❑ on intormittant stream r
❑ agriculture urban /suburban_�o
❑ within lnterstream divide t
other�Ycb
❑ impervious surface >s� �0
Dominant vegetation,
Soil series�t��i
t ❑
predominantly-, organic humus;
muck, or peat w. ;_ :. (3)� t:uein�
predominantly. ;,mineral non- sandy ` (p) Lutes AuS
' ❑ predominantly, sandy _ i .Flooding and wetness
Y ❑ semipermanntly. to '; permanently
` Hydraulic factors flooded or inundated
❑ season 'ally Jloo-ded or ated
❑ steep topography intzrmittantly flooded or temporary.,;
' ❑ ditched or channel zed surface'. water 6YE2 uq �J
sue+ Augit
total wetland -width > 100 feet ❑ no evidence` o; floo Ing or sur.ce
-✓//// r/////////// r/////////✓///////////////////✓//////////////////////// / / /r / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /// iii////// / / / / / / / / / / /r / / / / / / / / / / / /i / / /iR.
Wetland type (select one)*
❑ Bottomland hardwood forest ❑ Pine savanna
❑ Headwater forest ❑ Freshwater marsh E'
❑ Swamp forest ❑Bog/fen
❑ Wet flat ❑ Ephemera' wetland
f. ,
' ❑ Pocosin ❑ Carolina Say f
❑ Bog forest R3 Other SrJcr.��,a Ftaaor''�.4�s+ t
T'2ot�5ij'ta1`� TC CiPtJ4t -k �
*The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes o- stream channels
' weight _
Water storage _ x 4.00
We Score
%
A Bank /Shoreline stabilization —� x 4.00 ;
Pollutant removal _* x 5.00 — !. '40
Wildlife habitat _ 4 x 2.00 =
Aquatic life value _�— x 4.00 44 %
' Recreation /Education x 1.00 =
Y S
GAdd 1 point if in sensitive watershed and > 10% nonpoint disturbance within 1/2 rr le upstream, upslope, or radius ;
�; s AREA B — IMPACT

Overview of wetland
n x
At
* to W (� nW �4� 1 �j �' n ' * ka•. '• LL�_"" �Y+ �'.'• � ..
Pre - Discharge Notification, NWP #26
Pineville Towne Centre Site
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Applicant: The Panos Hotel Group
Overview of wetland
Area:
B- Impact

I
1
1
LI
t
fl
1
`WETLAND RATING _WORKS Version,
P-oject name ToW9-t__ (A@TPr, SiTe Nearest road
Countv bdELAI A&?d.A2( ;; Wetland area y acres Wetland width V75' —feet
Name of evaluator llate
Wetland location ,,
�w ❑ on
d
pond or lake
,, : ❑ on perennial stream
Adl acent lan usr
(within 1/2,,,',,, mile
or radius)
upstream;;
series
❑ predominantly,-.'organic� humus;
i k _ t
_ mac , or pea
predominantly. mineral non -sandy
F-1 predominantly sandy
i .Flooding and wetness
❑ semlpermanent(y = to ,permanently
flooded or M '
Hydraulic factors .
snundated
j� seasonally fIoo-ded –or, :mandated
steep topography
❑ intermittantly flooded'' or tempgrary;
ditched or channelized DetG }"} D
surface water F
❑ total wetland width ?100 feet
❑ no evidence: of flooding or surface
water.:-:
Wetland type (select one)*
❑ Bottomland hardwood forest
❑ Pine savarna
C3 Headwater forest
❑ Freshwate, marsh I
❑ Swamp forest
❑ Bog /fen
❑ Wet flat
❑ Ephemera' wetland
❑ Pocosin
❑ Carolina S, ay
t: ❑ Bog forest
T& Other Uz d M4T R—
be applied to
*The rating system
l
salt or brackish marshes/ o, stream channels/
/cannot
/ / / //►
weight '
Water storage
x 4.00 =
A
Wetland Score
Bank /Shoreline stabilization _SZ
x 4.00 =
;
Pollutant removal _�_*
x 5.00 =
%
Wildlife habitat
x 2.00 =
;
;D
Aquatic life value _3—
x 4.00
NRecreation /Education
x 1.00 =
`_
-Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and > 10% nonpoint
disturbance within 1/2 rr.le upstream, upslope, or radius
AREA C - IMPACT I DUG POND

Exterior view of dug pond to be impacted
o. r
interior view of dug pond to be impacted
Pre - Discharge Notification, NWP #26
Pineville Towne Centre Site
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Applicant: The Panos Hotel Group
Area:
C- Impact

:YZ� 1111ETLAND RATING _WORKSHEET Fourth. Veryslon,_ 0
A w t > 4i
'+'•�' �.: i�'...•c'c..:r.L.G94NE._.Wi.b. •r, >� •.4. ..s_ o._o. psi: ?• 4-.. �-. 5,... ;:;._...._. �..,.. � ....- _..J= :..aaw`aJ.'.y..}s. `
Project name �rU _'�M _ Nearest road'culix tf&
County - MU41 =1.►l u�T. —Wed and area 17'e>5 acres Wetland width goo -«o' _meet
Name of evaluator get C-r V W W .1� �-t Hate
z�
Adjacent land use
Wetland location -t
- - (within 1/2 mile:; upstream, ipslope,
ro i a
on pond or .lake
or radius)
on perennial stream,
y, on.interinittant stream , ❑forested /natura` vegetation I
❑ -
Y ❑�ithiri �nterstream di«de ❑ agriculture, urban /suburban_�/o
r, ❑ urfAce
[] other
Impervious s
,� Dominant vegetation.
f Soil series
❑ predominantly organics hums;
(3)
muck, or peat
predominantly mineral non- sandy' (ti) uLwnu' ANt��ct�. At
❑ predominantly , sandy Flooding and wetness
❑ semipermanentfy permanently
;, Hydraulic factors flooded or snund ate
d
seasonally ...flooded or' °inundated
steep topography ❑ intermittantly flooded or temporary ;
' ❑ditched or channel; zed surfaceiwater-
1 total wetland -width >100 feet ❑ no evidence:' of flooding or surface
' .•,;;;;;;;,;,,;,;;,,;,,,,,,,,,;,;,,;;;,;;,;;,; �;;,, �,,, ,;,,,;,;;:,,,;,,;;;,,,,,,,,,,;; water;;;,,,, ;,;�,;,,,,�,,;,,,,,,,��,,,�;;,, -.
Wetland type (select one)*
X Bottomland hardwood forest ❑ Pine savanna
❑ Headwater forest ❑ Freshwats,- marsh E
❑ Swamp forest ❑ Bog /fen
❑ Wet flat ❑ Ephemera' wetland
'❑ Pocosin ❑ Carolina Say
. ❑ Bog forest p Other
*The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes o- stream channels
RRweicht —
Water storage x 4.00
� Wetland Score
A Bank /Shoreline stabilization _� x 4.00 =
Pollutant removal _r x 5.00 — Z'51
%
T — 4 S
U
Wildlife habitat 1 _ x 2.00 =
,
Aquatic life value x 4.00 = =::Z►.L'
Uv Recreation /Education x 1.00 = ° <°
r-
5
-Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and > 10% nonpoint disturbance within 112 r, le upstream, upslope, or radius
' AREA C - PRESERVE
r ^

Interior view of wetland to be preserved
NOW-
� -e
t `Ll
Interior view of wetland to be preserved
Pre - Discharge Notification, NWP #26
Pineville Towne Centre Site
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Applicant: The Panos Hotel Group
Area:
C- Preserve

WETLAND. RATING _WORKSHEET Fourth'; Version` }_ o
'•°'�'sd'.�<:c:..siinx'S. L�:a+.i..: .�.'�2A.',.f.+_.. .:.Y._ :,i:.= rs •xw��.,_;.:�w...��..,..a....._ .— ��Ia..i�:6.. .: i.; I
Project name t�iNE�r,LL+` Te�tN� C ;-eF 5 ►1-'%- Nearest road TjbNiwC F,$�E &,Yn .
County V Z:�eL.J R( .1G-- Wetland area o 3 t acres Wetland Nvidth * lop mAx feet
Name of evaluator ICS Y ate
�... '. -�' y.
4.4 Adjacent land use�'w�'�` ""
t 5'-Wetland~ 16catign u s
- (within 1/Z mire upstream, upslope,
`� ❑ on r
pond or lake
/ o radius)
w r4 .;❑ on perennial stream
Y oii intermittent stream ❑forested /nature` wegetatlon. % t
f.. `'❑ - ❑ agriculture,. urban /suburban-
within interstream divide
❑ ❑impervious surface tea'.
❑ other ��3Tir� t�cot�t
Dominant vegetation
Cw c
Soil series
IGtr✓D w� (2) �Ax Nc>;►r �uµG1
❑ predominantly organic humus,
s` muck; or peat (3)
predominantly. „mineral non- sandy`
r
F-1 predominantly. sandy ;Flooding and wetness '
❑ serplpermanentEy =to permanently
Hydraulic factors flooded or inundated
' ❑seasonally = .flooded or : Inundated
❑ steep topography
Intermittantly flooaed or temporary ,
❑ ditched or channelized surface water
Ototal wetland width . >I 00 feet ❑ no evidence: of flooding or ` .surface
water... ;
Wetland type (select one)*
f
❑ Bottomland hardwood forest ❑ Pine savarna
❑ Headwater forest ❑ Freshwate- marsh F
❑ Swamp forest ❑Bog /fen
❑ Wet flat ❑ Ephemera' wetland
ED Pocosin CJ Carolina 5-ay
❑ Bog forest Other ;2 e_ b Ai_ Q0�.44 i pt
MepaE47ej.to� ►
*The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes o: stream channels
n weight —
l1� Water storage x 4.00
S /n� Wetland Score
Bank /Shoreline stabilization O x 4.00 = /
% Pollutant removal x 5.00 =
Wildlife habitat x 2.00 =';
r ,
U Aquatic life value x 4.00 = %
Recreation /Education Z x 1.00 =
* Add 1 point i; in sensitive watershed and > 10% nonpoint disturbance within 1 /2 r- le upstream, upslope, or radius
fI////////,// f/ fff/,/, f„/ I//// ff// 6f//✓////✓/ f!•//+/I//I f✓ /I/I/I /I // / /r'I / /I/I/IIIIIII/ III+I I+//// ff/ fffAf//// i// Ie ' ✓IfI✓✓ ✓I✓ / +I ✓+ ✓f/ /.� ✓ //ff / ✓/�
' AREA D - IMPACT

Exterior view of isolatedwetland to be impacted
Interior view of isolated wetland to be impacted
Pre - Discharge Notification, NWP #26
Pineville Towne Centre Site
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Applicant: The Panos Hotel Group
Area:
D- Impact

0
1
l
0
Mitigation Plan for Pineville Towne Centre Site
Overview
In order to compensate for the losses of wetland functions and values which will
result from the proposed development activities, the applicant proposes in part to
create 5.0 acres of new wetland from upland and to preserve an additional 5.2 acres
of existing high quality wetland. Wetland which will be created or preserved will be
protected from future impacts by the applicant or by a group designated by the
applicant for this purpose.
Those areas which will be utilized for the creation of new wetlands are all situated on
relatively level, generally open floodplain uplands which are near existing wetland
resources. These areas sit relatively low in topographic relief and could be easily
graded to receive runoff from upland areas as well as to benefit from periodic
overbank flooding. The vegetation in the majority of the proposed mitigation sites
consists of herbaceous successional growth of Ambrosia (ragweed) or Andropogon
(broomsedge) and mixed woody successional growth including Rubus (blackberry),
Crataegus saplings ( hawthorn), Prunus saplings (cherry), Acer saplings ( maple),
Fraxinus saplings (ash), and Liquidambar saplings (sweet gum), among others. The soils
which occur in the area are mapped as Monocan. This series would naturally exhibit
some hydric indications throughout and would have inclusions which exhibit
pronounced hydricity. As a result of the above conditions the proposed sites should
be well suited to the successful creation of new wetlands which should over time
exhibit the functions and values associated with other floodplain wetlands.
Methods of Construction
Prior to any activity occurring within the mitigation sites, all downslope areas,
especially creeks and wetlands will be protected from sedimentation by the
placement of silt fencing or other appropriate sedimentation control methods along
the boundary between the mitigation construction site and existing resources. All
mitigation areas will remain a distance of at least 20 feet from the top of the bank of
Little Sugar Creek and ten feet from the top of bank of any other -creek in order to
preserve the natural stream bank levee and to prevent shoreline erosion.
The land which will be converted from upland to wetland will be lowered in grade to
that of surrounding wetlands. On average, this difference in existing to proposed
grade is less than 18 The removed soil will be hauled to uplands and will not be re-
deposited in wetlands. Once the grade has been lowered to the appropriate level,
runoff from upland areas will be directed into the area so that it will be saturated or
flooded during the early part of the growing season. As is the case with most of the
other wetlands on this site, the created wetlands will not be expected to be
saturated year round or for extended periods throughout the growing season except
during extreme conditions. Under normal conditions, the soil will be inundated or
saturated within the root zone throughout the late winter months and for a period of
up to thirty days during the first part of the growing season. This period of

1
1
7
1
inundation /saturation will be sufficient to establish the wetland hydrology necessary
for the maintenance of hydrophytic vegetation. -A small 36" deep monitoring well
will be established within each wetland mitigation area in order to observe water
table depth during the followup monitoring period. This monitoring well will be
removed upon successful establishment of the mitigation area. Each monitoring well
will consist of a 36" Fong piece of perforated PVC pipe with a cap to prevent rainfall
from entering the top of the pipe. Wells should be located in a site which is readily
identifiable and marked for future location or should be located by survey on a map
of the property.
Hydrophytic vegetation will be initially established within mitigation sites by
relocating existing saplings of Fraxinus, Acer rubrum, Acer negundo, Populus
deltoides, Salix nigra, Liquidambar styraciflua, Ulmus americana, and other wetland
species which are presently occurring in wetlands impacted by the proposed
development. The relocated saplings will be supplemented by new plantings of
these species or other woody wetland species which would be of benefit to wildlife
as a food source such as Quercus species or Carya species. If it is not possible to
relocate these plants, then plants of appropriate species will be purchased and
planted in order to satisfy the density requirements. If plants are to be purchased,
they will be of a variety of sizes and ages and will meet the normally expected
standards for nursery stock. In addition to woody tree and sapling species, herbaceous
plants will be relocated in groups of naturally occurring diversity from impacted
wetlands or will be planted to approximate a similar diversity. In most of the existing
wetlands, fewer than five or six herbaceous species occur within a given area. The
most prevalent individual dominant species is )uncus effusus. Other species which
have been observed include Carex lurida and other Carex species, Polygonum
punctatum, Polygonum persicaria, and numerous grasses. A list of specific plant
species and quantities will be prepared as a part of the construction documents for
the mitigation sites and will be dependent upon the time of year in which planting
occurs, species availability, number of plants which can be successfully relocated, and
agency recommendations.
The mitigation sites will be planted at an initial density of approximately 500 woody
stems per acre or an approximate stem spacing of three meters. Woody plants will
be arranged in a manner which resembles that observed in surrounding wetlands
with groupings of plants of a similar hydrophytic category placed in the topographic
position best suited to the hydrologic preferences of the species. Herbaceous species
will be planted in 25 to 50 cm diameter clusters at a density of 1000 clusters per
acre or will be seeded with a wetland seed mix at a rate which will result in a
coverage of at Ieast100 stems per square meter upon germination. All planting and
seeding will be done in the spring or fall. Areas which are disturbed during summer
or winter months will be seeded with an annual ryegrass in order to provide
temporary stabilization of the areas until appropriate planting times become
available.

P-1
Monitoring Reports
Once an area has been established and planted, its success will be monitored semi-
annually in order to measure growth, species diversity, and to remove upland species
and invasive weed species such as blackberry, multiflora rose, kudzu, honeysuckle,
poison ivy, or broomsedge: Each semi - annual monitoring event will consist of the
establishment of two sample plots per acre which are thirty feet in radius and
representative of the growth occurring throughout the one acre area. At each
sample plot, the number and species of each surviving woody stem will be recorded
and the percent aerial cover of the sample plot will be estimated for each of the
three most dominant species. A similar plot of ten feet in diameter will be
established within the thirty foot radius area for recording the three dominant
herbaceous species by percent cover. Additional wetland species can be recorded if
their presence is significant. Wetland species considered to be acceptable appear in
the USFWS National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands 1988 Summary,
or other acceptable reference. All measurements should be recorded on a
monitoring data form and the sample location estimated on a map of the site. At
least two representative photographs should be taken of the mitigation area at each
sample plot and should include a sign which indicates the date and plot number.
These photographs should be attached to the data form for the sample plot.
At the time of monitoring, each monitoring well will be observed in order to record
the depth to water table in order to insure that adequate hydrology is available
during the early part of the growing season. Test pits can be dug at various locations
throughout the site at the time of inspection in order to observe changes in soil
' characteristics and to verify the observations found within the monitoring well. Any
findings or observations should be recorded on the data form of the sample plot
nearest the observation.
One copy of all data forms, maps, and photographs of each sample plot will be
supplied to DEM Water Quality Branch and to the U.S. Army Corps for their file until
all areas have been successfully established and determined acceptable. If all areas
` are not released within a period of two and one -half years from time of installation,
then corrective measures must be taken on the remaining areas in order to insure
their successful establishment or an agreement made at such time of an acceptable
alternate form of mitigation.
'
A wetland area or portion thereof will be considered to be successfully created when
two successive semi- annual reports for a sample plot within the area indicate that at
least sixty percent of the area of the sample plot is covered by desirable wetland
species in any combination of woody and herbaceous species and that a minimum of
twenty -five woody stems of wetland species are surviving within the area. If more
than twenty five percent of the area of the sample plot is comprised of upland or
invasive species, the area is not considered to be successful and maintenance will
need to be performed on the area in order to remove these species.

GENERAL OBSERVATION AND OVERALL OMM NiTY CONDITION
SEMI - ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
AREA:
DATE:
SPECIES
RECORDED
'
CANOPY %COVER
COMMENT
SUB-CANOPY %COVER
COMMENT
L
TOTAL PERCENT OF UPLAND SPECIES
'
TOTAL PERCENT OF NUISANCE SPECIES
GENERAL OBSERVATION AND OVERALL OMM NiTY CONDITION

c�
1
t
t
1
1
1
1
1
1
t
1
1
1
1
MONITORING WELL
MEASURING STICK
CAP
GROUND LEVEL
1/4' HOLES
2 -3" PVC PIPE
I < ALIGN MARK TO TOP OF PIPE
E MEASURE DEPTH TO WATER
IN 1 INCH INCREMENTS

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
I
1
1
1
1
1
PINEVILLE TOWNE CENTER TRACT
PINEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC
PRELIMINARY ON -SITE
ROUTINE
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Prepared by:
Edward D. Stone, Jr. and Associates
Charlotte, North Carolina
Prepared for:
ALABANC PROPERTIES, INC.
AmSouth Bank
Roswell, GA
APRIL 3, 1992
NOTE; ALL AREAS SHOWN TO BE JURISDICTIONAL IN THIS DOCUMENT
SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS PRELIMINARY AND SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION
BY THE U.S. ARMY CORPS, WILMINGTON DISTRICT.

1
P,
fl
t
1
CONTENTS
Project Location
Wetland Determination Methodology
Vegetation Communities
Soils
Site Hydrology
Climatic Data
Sample Plot Documentation and Photographs
References
Preliminary Wetland Boundary Location Plan
P,
fl
t
1

IProject Location
The Pineville Towne Center Tract is located within the town of Pineville, Mecklenburg
County, NC near the intersection of U.S. 521 and N.C. 51 along Little Sugar Creek. The
site is on the South side of N.C. 51 (Pineville - Matthews Road) generally situated between
Towne Center Boulevard and Little Sugar Creek approximately one block West of U.S.
521. General site boundaries are formed by N.C. 51 to the North, Little Sugar Creek to
the West and South, and by Towne Center Boulevard and land owned by John Harris
(now or formerly) along the East. A developed outparcel (STP Consumer Services)
occupies the Northeastern corner of the site. The entire project is located within the Fort
Mill SC -NC USGS Quadrangle and within the watershed of the Little Sugar Creek.
1
I
1
1
11
11

1
Wetland Determination Methodology
Those portions of the site which have been identified (in a preliminary manner) as
jurisdictional under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act or Section 10 of the Rivers and
Harbors Act include the channel of Little Sugar Creek, its minor tributaries, and wetland
areas which satisfy the definition of a wetland in the "Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y- 87 -1 ", January 1987, U.S. Army Corps
Environmental Laboratory.
A routine on -site determination method utilizing the multi- parameter approach was
implemented to identify the upper wetland boundary of all areas which satisfy the three
parameters as described in the manual:
1. Hydrophytic Vegetation
2. Hydric Soils
3. Wetland Hydrology
The methodology was utilized to make the determination:
1. Preliminary data gathering and synthesis.
Data sources
USGS Quadrangle Map
National Wetlands Inventory Map
USDA -SCS Soil Survey
Flood Insurance Rate Maps
Mecklenburg County Engineering Department Flood Data
Applicant provided topography, boundary survey and flood data.
2. Selection of Routine on -site Determination Method
3. Identification of Plant Community Types
The site was divided into its major vegetation communities for charactization.
4. Transects were established approximately perpendicular to the major water course for
location of sample observation points.
5. Observation located
points were along transects within each major vegetation community
to observe and record the characteristics of hydrophytic vegetaion, hydric soils and wetland
hydrology.
Each sample observation point (sample plot) consisted of one or more 18 -24" deep test pits
dug with a spade to characterize soils and hydrology, and a thirty foot radius area to
characterize tree and woody vine species, and a five foot radius area to characterize a
representative sample of the sapling, shrub, and herbaceous plant species. All observed
data was recorded on an appropriate Data Form 1 as well as notation of Atypical Conditions
and Normal Environmental Conditions. A determination was made whether or not the
sample plot was a wetland based upon available and observed data Each sample plot has
been marked in the field with labelled pink and black striped flagging.

MWhen a wetland/non- wetland determination had been made at all sample plots, an upper
wetland boundary was assumed to occur between wetland plots and non - wetland plots.
Numerous additional test pits were dug along each transect to identify the boundary
location. These test pits have been marked in the field with orange and black striped
flagging. Once boundaries had been located along each transect, the characteristics at this
point were utilized to determine the boundary location between transects until the entire site
had been divided into wetland and non - wetland areas. This boundary was then confirmed
and adjusted through the use of visual observation and additional test pits on either side of
the line. All upper wetland boundaries have been located in the field with striped blue and
white surveyors flagging. Each flag has been assigned a number and has been located on a
topographic map of the site with a compass and field measurement.
t
r
t
1

7-j
Vegetation Communities
Only a small portion of the site remains in its original forested state, the remainder having
been cleared for agriculture, to clear storm damage, or for some other purpose. The areas
which remain cleared are dominated by grasses and forbs including Broomsedge
(Andropogon) and Goldenrod (Solidago).
Many areas of the site have become partially regrown with successional shrub or sapling
growth such as Green ash (Fraxinus), Blackberry (Rubus), Red cedar (Juniperus), and
Multiflora rose (Rosa).
The portions of the site which remain forested occupy the lowest elevations on the site.
These areas typically contain mature canopy species including Cottonwood (Populus),
American Elm (Ulmus), Box Elder (Acer), and Green Ash (Fraxinus).
Numerous additional species which occur within each type of area have been utilized to
characterize each community as being hydrophytic or not. The relative dominance of
species within each strata has been determined and the indicator status of each dominant
' species has been noted based upon "The National List of Plant Secies Which Occur in
Wetlands, 1988 National Summary" US Fish and Wildlife Service.
1

Soils
The soils of the site have been mapped by the Mecklenburg County office of the USDA
Soil Conservation Service and are documented on sheet 11 of the Mecklenburg County Soil
Survey.
Soils which have been identified on this property are generally comprised of three series:
IrB Iredell Fine Sandy Loam, 1 -8% slopes, Typic Hapludalfs
MeB Mecklenburg Fine Sandy Loam, 2 -8% slopes, Ultic Hapludalfs
MO Monocan soils, Fluvaquentic Eutrochrepts
11
Although none of the soils are listed as hydric in the National List of Hydric Soils, 1991,
Monocan soils are listed by the Mecklenburg County SCS as somewhat poorly drained and
are known to have hydric inclusions of Wehadkee series typically located within floodplain
depressions. Depth to seasonal high water table is 0.5 -2.0' in winter and early spring.
The majority of the floodplain portions of this site are mapped as Monocan series.
Iredell and Mecklenburg series are described as well drained to moderately well drained
soils which typically occur on broad ridges and upland sideslopes. Some Iredell soils are
described as having seasonal wetness due to impermeable clay subsoil. A perched water
table may be observed at 1.0 -2.0' during November through March under normal
conditions.
11

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
raG meo p
McD\J Y,PO � �� DaB
PaE CeD MO
tv �eeCeB2 / Ce0
,ye .
Pt DeD MO
ur Ce82 Dab
IrB ^* MeD CeD2 t CuB 63
r. `MeB IrB
^. MeB
MeB DaD DaB
8 IrB' M
MeB DaD w
MOP Ur UL.:
s IrB WkD
P
B IrA DaB� IrA
MeB - "MeR Iu8 -MeB
Me
MeD
�c �!o• Ir6 MeB
IrB .IrA�O °' I, MO ev , CeD'.
INQ- • MeB ^ FS a �O •IrA EnD r 2
I fAr &d
/ MeD p
sr
MeB i p / MeB G{ N
MeD �" CeB2
��� IrA IrB
k.
IuB'
40p: +)MO Iu8 i EnD
r IrB 8
Irg 4- Ir
IrB. CeD2
? DaD t,� \ Me
CeB2 \ 'MO
•+ ) %r ' MOB
' MO
1 DaB Ce62
st IrB
MeB
Iu6
09� MeB. it OD
�nl> Off P63 Ce82 / MO MeB 'Ur WkIrB
CeB2
rlpt.r ` MeQ �` Me8 Pineville . IrB
tt fl
MkB MeW- Me8':
y ,a t .MeD v
t Wk a lug :WkD'~ Ir
MeB 3P'aFI
c
>�',r„ ,• ��;' f��. 3.� �•�Ce82' Me6 -,. WkE Me6
Irg O IrB_
IrB WkD w `Nµ IrB WkB
WkD t m WkD
K<< q t ^ 'S"i WkE • / MeD y 1s WkD CeB2 ary d 5z� IrB
WkD
x.� `: McDMeB Cep _ F
C032 CeD2 eE; � = Mk13
DaB r .
F i I �` ' Y sN 1F rz7 09S sblep / PeE �B2 Q WkE W/ i
CeD2 kD f�
•o0'L\ _ - p� !y� PaE W O
CeB
PaF M01 CeD2 Me
3637 � f6 '
k .l�iu ,t o, '.t.� u'..1.; , °" • r.ts ., i :CeD2 `I„ w WkE
SOIL SURVEY Source: USDA -SCS Soil Survey
Mecklenburg County, NC Sheet 11
PINEVILLE TOWNE CENTER TRACT
Pineville, Mecklenburg County, NC
Preliminary Wetlands Delineation
Prepared by: North
Edward D. Stone, Jr. & Associates
Charlotte, NC Scale: 1"=2000'

LJ
1
1
F�
1
d
1
I :
1
1
.Rubigl 'R,2 05W
W
r i ► n'
All-
1 4..!
: • } '�r i!1 ! a . ! �' • fi'y` � ,- ^'•a t. ,/r 0 1 .�ri+ -,__,' 1��• i /`/� / `
A-.i ,i 1( 1• .
sac
Oil
It
q''� q ';, �i�� .' �j{�'' t,�,�'a' - ,; �i y. • "seaiXr .L, �� � l 'tti�• �� ,- ,. •1'
-Y-Z i Y '� - T: r \� rr' • ±, 4• -iii i/+ 41% r - 7lFY +' r � lam_. s'.... -�� , -�� ..mow '
V
t l
f — •d
! ~�� I t'�•� �` i : Y �•.,Y.'' P Y � Ia C' � �A ; • ? � i •�'•.��'':1:':''��i'�i: j-
T!�7.'.1 /. /f' °.y,. • •r'.. +;; i,1° 1 111 1 � - ,
'1.
) r.
Ff e ,
I� I
1
1
:r
1
• `l
1
1,
+
r..
1' �t
w a
�• - ' Y ,/� is l.e .. � � y + r F 1 � I'�I � t.� � f 1 ;� 1`.
Y rr ! t' �ir? ' i •' } � � ±:�•f • ( ~i i•r' i , , - +.'',. ii %iy::: '::: >:'7:i;�i� -' . ..
ti
SITE _
./ f - •
r �
�,• � t� %a•• j' �,r4 � • 1 : r r.•A,I Sari%�i� } r _..��� �v~, • �) I [ •�j,' _
1 I
1
4 a _
NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY Fort Mil S -N Qua map
Fort Mill SC -NC Quadrangle
PINEVILLE TOWNE CENTER TRACT
Pineville, Mecklenburg County, NC
Preliminary Wetlands Delineation
Prepared by: North
Edward D. Stone, Jr. & Associates
Charlotte, NC Scale: 1 1000 '

71
1
� i
t
1
Hydrology
The dominant hydrologic feature of the site is Little Sugar Creek which has a drainage
basin comprised of approximately 70 square miles. This stream is one of three major
streams draining the Charlotte urban area. Although the physical floodplain for this creek
is extensive, many years of flood control improvements including channel modifications
have significantly reduced the likelihood of overbank flooding except during extreme storm
events. The flood study information available from FEMA and from the Charlotte -
Mecklenburg Engineering Department indicate that the regulated floodway along Little
Sugar Creek was substantailly reduced in width along a portion of this site due to changes
in flooding characteristics. The width of this floodway has been reduced by as much as 591
feet in one area. The 100 year flood elevation is approximately 554.4 to 554.5 across the
site.
The secondary hydrologic feature of the site is the effect of concentrated stormwater due to
runoff from the central business district of Pineville. The stormwater reaches the site via
culverted outlets and works its way across the site following regular storm events. The
majority of the flow is confined to well defined stream channels, however periodic
overbank flooding of these minor channels allows sheet flow to work its way across the
site. A sewerline has been constructed through the center of the site and has been raised so
that the manhole elevations are above the 100 year flood elevation. This sewerline has
formed a dike which over the years has impeded the normal overland sheet flow and is the
apparent cause of a significant portion of the wetland area found on the site.
Other hydrologic features of the site include a small dug pond created for an unknown
purpose and a relic stream channel which serves as both an outlet for tributary flow and as
a backwater to Little Sugar Creek.
Numerous test pits have been dug throughout the site to observe the hydrologic effects of
groundwater during the early portion of the growing season. Each test pit was observed
over a period of more than one week during typical weather conditions. This information
was useful in the boundary determination process.

t
DATA FORM 1
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Applicant Application
Name: Number:
State: _County: ME(,K . Legal Description:
Date: 3 • Z[o • 9Z Plot No.: A • i
TRANSECT A
PLOT 1
Project P►t4Eytj,�,G
Name:
Township: Range:
Section:
Vegetation (list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (S if
only 1 or 2 layers)). Indicate species with observed morphological or known
physiological adaptations with an asterisk.
Indicator Indicator
Species Status Species Status
Trees Herbs
1. j.IONE 7. L.,OM(GEP.1s .JAFk)t41CA Fes-.
2. 8. AN -0bzOt' XgCh%4 FAG-
3. 9. Z AC4IYLZr!tu M 5?- G4 -TU?0% 4APL-
Saplings /shrubs Woody vines
'
4. F Z&c:IJ uS PEµ m-Gy wAH v-A FA 4.*( 10.. (.O N &E -12A J,APCN 1 GA F:A( -, "
5. 1ZCA%U5 AU-1U uS FA(.f. + 11. •—+
6. — 12. �-
X of species that are OBL, FACW, and /or FAC:I(o4 Other indicators: tg6"e
Hydrophytic vegetation: Yes No �_. Basis:
rSoil z; > u. vimr& 464moy LOAM
Series and phase: -$ % 4buppe% On hydric soils list? Yes ; Nom.
Mottled: 'Yes No_). Mottle color: WA ; Matrix color:l0 R
Gleyed: Yes No )C Other indicators: N46gS
Hydr.ic soils: Yes Nom_; Basis: MC> 4til�ttA�-c��.S �1CFS�EI.LT' .
Hydrology
Inundated: Yes ; No is Depth of standing water: 1.1 /0.
Saturated soils: Yes Nom. Depth to saturated soil: >18 u
Other indicators: j.(et"F-
Wetland hydrology: Yes ; No_.X_. Basis: Nd ItAZIC AJ%*% D�F�FJ�CR
Atypical situation: Yes_ ; No . ?AAjpYJ_1- cAN4ofFKr itFMbVtb.
Normal Circumstances? Yes_ No
Wetland Determination: Wetland ; Nonwetland
Comments: Pk�OT 4S I.O� W&KT'TG A DEI,)Et oPEp Akt;% 1014
Wt LAW DE . MAtJoe G4NOPY \/E6FTAT1C>N H4*16 BEEN
Determined by:ZAA1fij
B2 EO%4N.
1

ll
1
L
H
L
IJ
1
DATA FORM 1
WETLAND DETERMINATION
TRANSECT A
PLOT 2
Applicant Application Project Pit�tGyj,., .t;
Name: Number: Name:
State: _County:Mf"_Legal Description: Township: Range:
Date: Ct?. Plot No.: A,-74 Section:
Vegetation [list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (5 if
only 1 or 2 layers)]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known
physiological adaptations with an asterisk.
Indicator Indicator
Species Status Species Status
Trees Herbs
1. t 400 E 7. %AyPECtlOUM MU rl L tAK FALW
2. ••• 8. A RZtWX0N1A
3. 9. 4t mws EFFU,.US ;:ACaN +
`;'o Saplings /shrubs Woody vines
qo 4. FRAXINUs PeWA-6YwANIca FA(-W 10. ~10µE
5-10 5. Wl Mtlb ^L-&.T-A, fFduy+ 11.
5 -10 6. (ARa Le* AR4uTu5 t4c, u+ 12.
Si -tLl(. LJ oW
% of species that are OBL, FACW, and /or FAC:." Other indicators: P_GEM,_.
Hydrophytic vegetation: Yes -�L No Basis: > S. c!o OP 3>c>Mw6i, 4-tS •
Soil (KtAcWm To kAJ& W64ADM,6& INc.1.l6tpNS N�(A21G�
Series and phase: 140N0C.6N4 ''OIIJS On hydric soils list? Yes ; No V,
Mottled: Yeses_; No Mottle color: �R ti/s Matrix color:
;
IdY1Z �'1/a
Gleyed: Yes _ No •Other indicators: C* $Am e- Qf4CZ6P0N4. S ZII
Hydric soils: Yes _X No ; Basis: L-oW L{.IRUN►i� MA.r?�,c %yM Dtat-t
CI L-" I MCTTL-&s , ecoj' tow&& .
Hydrology
M
Inundated: Yes, _; No . Depth of standing water: 1 /r- -1 IN LOW 5(;iTS
Saturated soils: Yes _ Cam; No Depth to saturated soil: C)" TO CUR A4Z
Other indicators: \44 ETL, mm �tA.IN[+.�E �d� 1�1 *SCOUR- SEDIM4ENT'DeA061(fr4
Wetland hydrology: Yes_ ; No Basis: SL13cIE pIELrN Ityzle-A- rlpp(;t
Atypical situation: Yes )C _; No 1�eE,A hIAD l�2EVlOLJSL`( $E.�µ T1M�ER.�D
Normal Circumstances? Yeses(_ No
Wetland Determination: Wetland �� ; Nonwetland
Comments: 1MA►Z• 'Spt.litC_E OF NYDeoc,oCW aPPo1lLS 7 as MOM
c pC AµD 'STor- MwA.MM r-LINoFF VIA A C.cl�.� GRr' M T4G k4d.
Determined by: L.T'C. `lllY.d►[�(i":
B2

1
1
1
DATA FORM 1
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Applicant Application
Name: Number:
State: County: Legal Description:
Date: •2l0 •9Z. Plot No.: A - 3
TRANSECT A
PLOT 3
Project tVjgF l,A.t:.
Name: -rfz4.�
Township: Range:
Section:
Vegetation (list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (5 if
only 1 or 2 layers)]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known
physiological adaptations with an asterisk.
Indicator Indicator
Species Status Species Status
Trees Herbs ct'1,,
1. 140146 7. &MIS C IA Al TcKi6iWf0L4A FA�C,tJ�
2. 8. 5eT,6X A Ca�IW LA r A ��►C..
3. 9. h"t- 120PoC� V (P.& M C U-6 Fit."
Saplings /shrubs Woody vines
4. V4 W0= 41Uj U'jilS FL1l "t 10. Nome
5. PnPLJW jS 0Eavtosl tp c-+ 11.
6. """ 12.
% of species that are OBL, FACW, and /or FAC: y O .
Hydrophytic vegetation:, Yes No . <. Basis:
Other indicators: t-AW14E
Soil
Series and phase: MC *40C.A N SGlfa On hydric soils list? Yes ; No_2�_.
Mottled: Yes No _X. Mottle color: ; Matrix color: •S 4/4
Gleyed: Yes No X Other indicators: 0"e
Hydr.ic soils: Yss Nom_; Basis: No 1µts:CAp2? -,S µ1G14 G44am
Hydrology
Inundated: Yes ; No _X. Depth of standing water: Wk
Saturated soils: Yes ; No X Depth to saturated soil: ($��
Other indicators: } 4014C-
Wetland hydrology: Yes ; Nom_. Basis:
Atypical situation: Yes X; No F40 C- ddy0P( US46rA410NA
Normal Circumstances? Yeses No
Wetland Determination: Wetland ; Nonwetland
Comments: 46AMpLE QLAWr WC.ArEA ON WLtle, ZRNZ AA 8MiK
Determined by: L'Z•Yd.t�r
B2

' DATA FORM 1 TRANSECT B
WETLAND DETERMINATION ' PLOT 1
Applicant Application Project P(MSL)1L'L1G
Name: Number: Name: • -
State: t.itL County: M EC.K Legal Description: Township: Range:
' Date: 3. 31 Ql'�. Plot No.: S— I Section:
Vegetation [list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (5 if
only 1 or 2 layers)). Indicate species with observed morphological or known
' physiological adaptations with an asterisk.
Indicator Indicator
Species Status Species Status
Trees Herbs
1. �.tom E 7. C.ota Ic.EIZA .t4PbN �A �Ac.'"
2. una 8.
3. — 9.
Saplings /shrubs Woody vines
4. P_URUC% Azg:�utuS Faou♦ 10. N0N4e
5. t1 t,MLtS ALA'* FAG.0 t 11.
6. "0 12. —
% of species that are OBL, FACW, and /or FAC:J" Other indicators: W
Hydrophytic vegetation: Yes *1 No V, . Basis:4f,5'0 °yo OF Tb914i1aArit��
R& C, /
Soil tAE4Kt.ENe1U%& FINE SAtAw Gca+>,M
Series and phase: 2 -B % St oMdo On hydric soils list? Yes ; No,X—.
Mottled: Yes C ; No Mottle color: (p*yX'%13 ; Matrix color: 10YZ4l�yI
Gleyed: Yes No X Other indicators: N0*4G
Hydr.ic soils: Yes No X ; Basis: PlAg a 4422n1*JA T e- OL1600LIT'•
TOPOC,Wrtic. .tom off
Hydrology
Inundated: Yes ; No Depth of standing water:
Saturated soils: Yes ; No y_ Depth to saturated soil: ), 1%11 .
Other indicators: 1--40V 4F1
Wetland hydrology: Yes ; No ( Basis: (alp F6atnor- 04t.W.Aro
Atypical situation: Yes_; No GQ,d,QE D14s�'C!e$ED / CgRA�Ep
Normal Circumstances? Yes )C No
Wetland Determination: Wetland ; Nonwetland
Comments: PWT LtXATS0 ON 14 .IJSInE SLOPE &paA.( -8 T—
To eO4t:0 . NO CAt Copy c�ETA4-to1�4
Determined by:
B2

DATA FORM 1 TRAN SECT B
WETLAND DETERMINATION PLOT 2
Applicant Application Project
Name: A&PA-- Number: Name:
State: tij L County:(► Legal Description: Township: Range:
Date: 3 •3 l •9 Z Plot No.: M — 7, Section:
Vegetation [list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (5 if
only 1 or 2 layers)]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known
physiological adaptations with an asterisk.
' Indicator Indicator
Species Status Species Status
Trees Herbs
- 1. µE, 7. ?,&Wte UtA DICACToMt F, QRAAM F&t W
2. 8. E ,FFUUko9*
3. 9 . 4-,F.' &P-te. c.,r a u"r , SAG•
Saplings /shrubs Woody vines
4. FkA4CtP u-i pemiASKWdhttcA FA.c.W 10.
5. (ZtASL -z d.0Gxr(A -J 5 F.&C.U* 11. --�
6. 12.
% of species that are OBL, FACW, and /or FAC: Other indicators: 5P 4axiS
Hydrophytic vegetation: Yes X No Basis: > SO % OF LbN ekbg4 'S .
W-0 F4Lw , obt,
' Soil
(KNowN 'tn sA.J6 NYDiGc. lt�iGG.c.tRatt��
Series and phase: HC>i. c"t4 e,01tX, On hydric soils list? Yes ; No X
Mottled: Yes X No Mottle color: Z.5 Y 'TA; Matrix color: +S 4Wi —(0,/&
Gleyed: Yes ( No Other indicators: C:gej M e6U1tF"Z
Hydr.ic soils: Yes _ X No ; Basis: �pS�TLVE Fit � �1.IL�tt}k1�S
' (pw MArZ%%c tHttoMA t MCTT� -FJ�
Hydrology
Inundated: Yes _X; No Depth of standing water: A4-(o INA LOt..1�5T" !
Saturated soils: Yeses_; No Depth to saturated soil: To �VeF�►c.E•
Other indicators: W=LAt4 "F— PATTF�NI Edt1NLMtSCJtY &aotJr4
Wetland hydrology: Yes iC ; No Basis:
Atypical situation: Yes X No wo C,A.NoPy VEGL('*10w , St?0ett LWE oaSTgaGrs
N
? Y
i
Normal Circumstances? Yes _ o Ft�w OF bUJefAZ9
' 'tumor .
Wetland Determination: Wetland x ; Nonwetland
Comments: Q @&A gA.t, %sSm Pesotoufmt► -r Gt. "teb VS4EjA IOV4
ti5 SCJU. &S��dti 6ecwp . HY02oLa6y APpmtemRy FenM
t.Ot.J o f M I ►lot srzsm-
OVF.Q.� Determined by: G..e. WyAt T
p�tti '�'0 6T02M tNAj ER �2 —�--
4.F.wEe t,tNS MAS PZF.uF�TSD rLA""') ! �� u l.E
e=L1Cq aZ C -ZESk.

1
DATA FORM 1 TRANSECT B
WETLAND DETERMINATION PLOT 3
Applicant Application Project fPj�4Z0,L G
Name: Number: Name:
State: ounty: M EG(t Legal Description: Township: Range:
rDate: 3 3l-9ZL Plot No.: t; -3 Section:
Vegetation [list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (5 if
only 1 or 2 layers)]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known
physiological adaptations with an asterisk.
Indicator Indicator
Species Status Species Status
Trees Herbs
1. V40K6 7. 6A4gX (me, "Li q JM 0ri) SPP. WNW.
3. 9. Ama0z4" FAA.
Saplings /shrubs Woody vines
4 FA" 10. µot�4E
5. ACAX NEAUKCC>
6'. 12.
% of species that are OBL, FACW, and /or FAC: � �. Other indicators: S9l%-L,0 1l Z06rle-
Hydrophytic vegetation: Yes )< _ No Basis: > 'q'>%>
Soil
�� ►eF. K -t-bwN TO PAVQ td�,jt�tG. t ►k.�,tYvtcNrs)
Series and phase: MpWbcAM �1t% On hydric soils list? Yes ; No X
Mottled: Yes. C ^; No Mottle color: JcYZ 4/y ; Matrix color: IbYL 5 /Q�
Gleyed: 'Yes 'No m_ Other indicators: OiCta��_r� �mt"z�.tC�S -ra StL 7"�,C.1G
Hydr.ic soils: Yes :: No Basis: L:PW e_44rrM6. Mdr�►rc Q�r 'zot�tF�6
Hydrology
' Inundated: Yes ; No Depth of standing water: ►.( /Q.
Saturated soils: Yeses_; No Depth to saturated soil:
Other indicators: &ffkYGtSd NCL. -w W&TIAMD ft"t►46'64t., PA=Q
Wetland hydrology: Yes _X ; No Basis: %%airjug r4tQA tt.tn«a��5
Atypical situation: Yes)_; No . Wo t&"Of (18&F.-(4-T X4
Normal Circumstances? Yes_x_ No
Wetland Determination: Wetland X ; Nonwetland
Comments: 4ZEA. IS STUAfFb U)IT44ta( A R5t'00-D fLAT' t4t—&1t4AjSEt,0AL{
t "SW TO p&i?-tC>b4( o��� -aN� �`or.,) •F i�C�u�r�
InIL— , Determined by: Z��g�a W
B2

DATA FORM 1 TRANSECT B
WETLAND DETERMINATION PLOT 4
Applicant Application Project F>("e ktL.L&
Name: Dt Number: Name: Z&Au-
' State; 61 G County: MG[—V, Legal Description: Township: Range:
Date: IS ,'3l 'q Z. Plot No.: Section:
Vegetation (list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (5 if
only 1 or 2 layers)). Indicate species with observed morphological or known
' physiological adaptations with an asterisk.
Indicator Indicator
Species Status Species cies Status
Trees Herbs
�-' 1. ALez HF4RUI-tzo F&-4w 7• 6LyMUS VlZ4-Ak14"$
2. 8. L.AMtum Pur-Pazew 1 t 1P�.
3. 9. 4&I -AUK APA.r2►t.� E ��G.�1
Saplings /shrubs Woody vines
' 4. ALZr. He(WAW rrk � 10. FAe--
5
S. rtu QuS 4z6oaTuS Fb." 11. •---.
6. MdL;tlidA POM 1 FM& f:A4, 4 12.
Z of species that are OBL, FACW, and /or FAC: %. Other indicators:
Hydrophytic vegetation: Yes _>C, No Basis:
Soil
Series and phase: Wlbµoc64.t •c„p,LA, On hydric soils list? Yes ; No_.&—.
Mottled: Yeses; No Mottle color: Matrix color: LQX Vdl —4/(,
Gleyed: Yes No. Other indicators: p� E
Hydr.ic soils: Yqs No )C ; Basis: 6&IC-al4Z U"10 =m 1—&4zC &-
` NO POS�tIV� jµDIGA.�i�,c,,
Hydrology
Inundated: Yes ; No X . Depth of standing water: 9/,,&
Satuiated soils: Yes ; No C. Depth to saturated soil: ) IAll
Other indicators: ijn6lE
Wetland hydrology: Yes ; No Basis: (j,1t!)1GAX2V& wEU.D NED
Atypical situation: Yea ; No x
Normal Circumstances? Yeses_ No
Wetland Determination: Wetland ; Nonwetland X
Comments: h&`AP .E PLc:>T Lc e—L E,D 0U'jS(J>L o+ FLc:,QDi LA t N
t.KW�.' ►Z- oK d, g c� 9t QtztaPA F-Ext l
Determined by: lie . yC�1��{"'
B2

DATA FORM 1 T RAN SECT B
WETLAND DETERMINATION PLOT 5
Applicant Application Project 'Ptt- Sx..)i LE
Name: A�. t Number: Name: T =
State: e_County: C, Legal Description: Township: Range:
Date: �i — l 5 -°t2 Plot No.: P_> — 5 Section:
Vegetation [list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (S if
only 1 or 2 layers)]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known
physiological adaptations with an asterisk.
Indicator Indicator
Species Status Species Status
Trees Herbs
2. -- 8. SE'('ARI� G�F.rLitC.Clt.d.T A F�L+
3. -- 5 9. f1NpiZOPOC��N d�Q(�l1.11C.t1S Ems_
Saplings /shrubs Woody vines
' 4. ?e► --.`YLv4t-A:c -& F-&LW 10. 9CA-4G
S. UL.Mllej FA(Iui- 11.
6. ACXTL t1 &! 1d o j 12. —
% of species that are OBL, FACW, and /or FAC:50. Other indicators: acpwt'
Hydrophytic vegetation: Yes )< No Basis: C P-
Soil
Series and phase: MOW,©C,&,f`l On hydric soils list? Yes ; No,,.
' Mottled: Yes ; No m . Mottle color: NIA, ; Matrix color: JOYP. R /a -WZ
Gleyed: Yes No Other indicators:PAI,NNr oxtblt.l_Q 2WT T -Ct4ES
Hydr.ic soils: Yes Nom_; Basis: SL&A It�tQtf�.•r1ot•�s
` NC Gtt-GY , uC> Mo1TL -44(�-
Hydrology
Inundated: Yes ; No X . Depth of standing water: N A
Saturated soils: Yes ; Nom. Depth to saturated soil: > 11'!) ".
Other indicators: N4 ow F
Wetland hydrology: Yes ; No _X. Basis: No FVSMt)r- tt4atCAT0
Atypical situation: Yes X No
Normal Circumstances? Yes_ No
Wetland Determination: Wetland ; Nonwetland }�
Comments: �A,t,ry(J(,E aLo I-: tD �D Gt-t & smA,t li
Z� UG�� tTu t - L oc=� Pt.G�, t ti.t, ►40'j' bTLA-?-"STE1>
Determined by: &166
r B2

1
1
1
f]
[ I
1
1
1
DATA FORM 1 TRANSECT C
WETLAND DETERMINATION PLOT 1
Applicant Application Project P(t4EEJtL LL;.
Name: dam( Number: Name., Tz44-q-
State: 1.J e, County: Legal Description: Township: Range:
Date: 3.3) -9 2. Plot No.: 6 • Section:
Vegetation (list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (5 if
only 1 or 2 layers)). Indicate species with observed morphological or known
physiological adaptations with an asterisk.
Indicator Indicator
Species Status Species Status
Trees Herbs
1. I.ICti:E 7. 4MDt?OP060M VIZ6,1At AA IzLIA"
2. •.. 8. P&W 1444 M AG,ZcSjot ocS f:4(,W
3. 9. I.bt•IIcam, Q&PONICA F4C.'"
Saplings /shrubs Woody vines
4• �uNlt'LL`a vtRCatN1�1� F,4(.cl` 10. i�oNE
S. 11.
6'. 12.
Z of species that are OBL, FACW, and /or FAC:?.5 Other indicators:
Hydrophytic vegetation: Yes No K Basis: < 430'�o q6 Z-)=M:fa4m;Sr.
Soil MEc,Kt p.:.1aUtuR F:"COWD.,( uo�e►�'t
Series and phase: -1.1bOpo 4,%Lch4b � On hydric soils list? Yes ; No-.2�_.
Mottled: Yes ; No Mottle color: Ned• Matrix color: .S 41(q
Gleyed: Yes -No X Other indicators: NOME.
Hydr.ic soils: Yss No c; Basis: &XI64T GNRLMA :Fwezt1GH, Ar
x
Hydrology
Inundated: Yes ; No Depth of standing water: hl/b.
Saturated soils: Yes ; No X Depth to saturated soil:
Other indicators: n(.1t=
Wetland hydrology: Yes ; No�C_. Basis: MO IIATbt!�-A
Atypical situation: Yes X( ; No . VAAM F4644b No "V401%,(
Normal Circumstances? Yes X No
Wetland Determination: Wetland Nonwetland �C
Comments: S�,M� PtO� IS trpGd'�frp OK C� St>�(.p1�� AtbO�E
Determined by: L. �. �h{.bi•}`T"•
B2

DATA FORM 1
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Applicant Application
Name; AL.At'3A&V-, Number:
State: M/,, County: M FMK Legal Description:
Date: 3.31.97. Plot No.: G --XI
TRANSECT C
PLOT 2
Project �l(•6EVtl,I,E,
Name: 'rit.�
Township: Range:
Section:
Vegetation (list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (S if
only 1 or 2 layers)). Indicate species with observed morphological or known
physiological adaptations with an asterisk.
Indicator Indicator
Species Status Species Status
Trees Herbs
1. wc*-, E 7. ..i u ��.t.t S E c.lSt1S Fa W'f'
2.
8. ---
Saplings /shrubs
Woody vines
4• POPci�.t.�5 Dt.V�b►OES F!►(,'{"
10. WOµE
---
6.
12. --�
Z of species that are OBL, FACW, and
/or FAC: JqQ. Other indicators:
Hydrophytic vegetation: Yes X No
Basis: SO ego FAL,fFQw.
e!) q&
Soil
�1L.hdO�N To (•IealE idYL�tC. tt.lGc..CI'�:btitS)
Series and phase: MCMC>Cb.U,4
On hydric soils list? Yes
; Nom_.
'
Mottled: Yes ; No Mottle
color: ; Matrix color:
Gleyed: ilea -No Other indicators:
Hydr.ic soils: YOs X ; Basis:
IL1ULU- n -AT'SO pg AAtss
" -
L
Hydrology
'
Inundated: Yes _; No . Depth
of standing water: 1 O@. MORE
.
Saturated soils: Yes x ; No .
Depth to saturated soil: O
Other indicators: wg1 =z WAQILS
ow w2QQ..f tjQC%L%T:Ohi
'
Wetland hydrology: Yes_ X ; No
. Basis: pg2th ehlgm' lr•tuat&A
b
Atypical situation: Yes _e; No
. APP,+ wAp.Y bQ41 FROM
C.tPt.0"t• .
Normal Circumstances? Yes_ No
Wetland Determination: Wetland
X ; Nonwetland
Comments: T-klc, 1KAoem
FDZKCt< ' BY EXL404,T -10"
OF A44
'
dPPA.ZSNT%q t4 c" -- WBT%A#4D AMA y NO 114
LB j"
Oz OUTL.0 -, -
Determined by: 1 YA%t -4r
B2

fl
1
DATA FORM 1
WETLAND DETERMINATION
TRANSECT C
PLOT 3
Applicant Application Project >(t4 c)CLLZ
Name: !_�c3AGi Number: Name:
State: W -1 County: ME4X Legal Description: Township: Range:
Date: -,L 031 •g2, Plot No.: e. -% Section:
Vegetation (list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (5 if
only 1 or 2 layers)). Indicate species with observed morphological or known
physiological adaptations with an asterisk.
Indicator Indicator
Species Status Species Status
Trees Herbs
I. NONE 7. 4*CMA W Cq0 At.Tlas tt+aA FAG4 +
2. ..r 8. MIXGZ0 ;MC ,T&2rt1t4ATE UMV
3. 9. ( tpt2vFbGCN V1R4AtittC LLS r-AG:"
Saplings /shrubs Woody vines LAT44YZU16 kAk2V6UrLk9.7 Uk.-
4 . µpµg 10. MC*4 g
S. 11.
6. 12.
% of species that are OBL, FACW, and /or FAC:_Q. Other indicators:
Hydrophytic vegetation: Yes No _A_. Basis: < 'S0 FACr GALW 08�.
Soil I>e"Taltseb
Series and phase: Mcjt k�tb,td bbtt,.S On hydric soils list? Yes ; NO —),S-.
Mottled: Yes ; No Mottle color: (t1W, ; Matrix color: LIMJL. .
Gleyed: Yes - -No Other indicators: 1.:0 EGI"AMKL.E 114b1Q& z%
Hydr.ic soils: Yqa No ; Basis: Mjy- D PttA..o MQ3=tA L-
Hydrology
Inundated: Yes ; Nom. Depth of standing water: W 1A
Saturated soils: Yes ; No Depth to saturated soil:
Other indicators: unt4E •
Wetland hydrology: Yes ; No_ Gam. Basis:
Atypical situation: Yeses_; No tAl4 r) 1=tt l.- MA.jEQtAL, OV LL"V 4C*JW A'S0c t.E�
Normal Circumstances? Yes No .
Wetland Determination: Wetland ; Nonwetland
Comments: OdD. p EE�
,a, DLSy Raµc kuto. A VU LC.. ' McQA c+4&..tmr*L 0
Determined by: WC C &"r
B2

DATA FORM 1 T RAN SECT C
WETLAND DETERMINATION PLOT 4
tApplicant Application Project E=>(t4C-,/1L.LS
Name: GA.t34ML�- Number: Name: -rzA.c r'
State: Q L , County: Legal Description: Township: Range:
Date: Plot No.: C - -44 Section:
' Vegetation [list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (5 if
only 1 or 2 layers)]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known
physiological adaptations with an asterisk.
Indicator Indicator
Species Status Species Status
Hydrology
Inundated: Yes X ; No . Depth of standing water: + It
Satuiated soils: Yes —; No . Depth to saturated soil:
Other indicators: WLrAA►. N InMAIN"&S 0 &TJ2&9 4ll4 M4EIG4.7
Wetland hydrology: Yes_X_; No Basis:��u{,lpc�;•Ep
Atypical situation: Yes ; No 1C
Normal Circumstances? Yes ( No
Wetland Determination: Wetland X ; Nonwetland
Comments: IZELAC, sreSAM e444t4PSL. 1 L�64 � A.T�p
cspSTe�I ��Lous r�sYera wj Po �u'iu— eft OFLTNcEs LIinters
btnSZLCAI -� � S4U)-L NI&R&.Determined by:
' B2
Trees
Herbs
1. mc*4e
7. 44Z&,9 L.URtr*
2. --.
8. -JCU•K,LLS srr4:: as
A-
3.
9. STR.tlgP,uS
p4 ew
Saplings /shrubs
Woody vines OWuILPLLS NA-L -L t„lS,
OM..
4. r-M&,011.LU45 Dew 10. NONE TYPE", L- &TLFwA
5. —
11. .--.
6'. .-'^
12. —
% of species that are OBL.
FACW, and /or FAC: 1�, , Other indicators:
Hydrophytic vegetation:
Yes C No Basis: 11 SOi°ty F6,t-}•&QH1 69
L.
Soil
(Se2(r." KtACW04 ro "(X- IdYow'.. 1#4LC,tlyft4$J
Series and phase: MCnLt-
�(..Aty Setts, On hydric soils list? Yes ; No_2!L_.
Mottled: Yes _X_; No
Mottle color: 7.93 4/4; Matrix color: 2.SY (- A-r(c/r-
Gleyed: Yeses+ • No
Other indicators: aw t Dt"Q %= 'Zc7 — Miu
t�:.yvC,�2tr�pKS
Hydr.ic soils: Yqs X
No ; Basis: PCs,tnJfc 11.:niCAMJtc%. 4L.GYT
0LNOt.OMA
Hydrology
Inundated: Yes X ; No . Depth of standing water: + It
Satuiated soils: Yes —; No . Depth to saturated soil:
Other indicators: WLrAA►. N InMAIN"&S 0 &TJ2&9 4ll4 M4EIG4.7
Wetland hydrology: Yes_X_; No Basis:��u{,lpc�;•Ep
Atypical situation: Yes ; No 1C
Normal Circumstances? Yes ( No
Wetland Determination: Wetland X ; Nonwetland
Comments: IZELAC, sreSAM e444t4PSL. 1 L�64 � A.T�p
cspSTe�I ��Lous r�sYera wj Po �u'iu— eft OFLTNcEs LIinters
btnSZLCAI -� � S4U)-L NI&R&.Determined by:
' B2

DATA FORM 1 TRANSECT C
WETLAND DETERMINATION PLOT 5
Applicant Application Project
Name: n! AJ-5&W( — Number: Name:
State: 4_County: t:�eLK. Legal Description: Township: Range:
Date: 3 •3l •q2 Plot No.: d.• —S Section:
' Vegetation (list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (5 if
only 1 or 2 layers)). Indicate species with observed morphological or known
physiological adaptations with an asterisk.
Indicator Indicator
Species Status Species Status
Trees Herbs
1. wC*JE 7. AM3i' WA "Te 15►Ir -cy" t'AC4
2. 8. ^
3 • _+ 9.
Saplings /shrubs Woody vines
4. 206& MUvr f L=R4 V ?L• 10. v4e)t4e:
5. — — 11. —
6 . 12. —�-�•
Z of species that are OBL, FACW, and /or FAC:_Q. Other indicators: i►10t,AE.
Hydrophytic vegetation: Yes No . Basis: e, 9-0'% e4g.4�_�l�$l.,
Soil
Series and phase: M0t,4C% t4 Sdet* On hydric soils list? Yes ; No_.
Mottled: Yes ; No )C . Mottle color: N/A ; Matrix color: 10
Gleyed: Yes -No X Other indicators: N (pt4g
Hydric soils: Yqs No Basis: mm It��IC.1�TY�iLS
Hydrology
Inundated: Yes ; No )C Depth of standing water: M, /A
Saturated soils: Yes ; No X Depth to saturated soil:
Other indicators: �4Q14
Wetland hydrology: Yes ; No Basis:
Atypical situation: Yes ; No X
Normal Circumstances? Yeses_ No
Wetland Determination: Wetland ; Nonwetland
'Comments: L .00 ATEb C*4 'R I PAP -tAl4 13ERK I Wes. t>R�► N M
Determined by: L.Z. A[YA.P4 TT
B2

1
DATA FORM 1
WETLAND DETERMINATION
TRANSECT D
PLOT 1
Applicant Application Project Ft t tEYtt,c.r--
Name: %.l_�l ,t�t[� Number: Name: TgA44 --
State: Q6, _,County: ME;LiL Legal Description: Township: Range:
Date: 44-1-9Z. Plot No.: b--I Section:
' Vegetation [list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (S if
only 1 or 2 layers)]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known
physiological adaptations with an asterisk.
Indicator Indicator
Species Status Species Status
Trees Herbs
I. µ*E 7. Y'YR4q t- e.'�FcA.t d31..
2. 8. �,j.ut4W5 SFFu aa'3 F4,( W +•
3. 9. Luow tc-tA
Saplings /shrubs Woody vines
4. iO, .t}C h1l%iZA OaL. 10. 'jdc, e
S. •---. 11. -
6'. 12.
Z of species that are OBL, FACW, and /or FAC: IOC . Other indicators:' - kN t,o e=rz
Hydrophytic vegetation: Yes %C No Basis: > SOa}o Fe•c, F bQL..
Soil KfA kL+_fALit1P.6q �:NESoHaY LO&K
Series and phase: $ -+0°7v St -dpES On hydric soils list? Yes ; Nom_.
Mottled: Yea�C ^; No Mottle color:74-flt 44/4 ; Matrix color: 2&% '412 /S'( S/t
Gleyed: Yes_ -No Other indicators: GX:D>'ryb 4cttrb t MK [s�ttGiuc7[CA6
Hydr.ic soils: Yqs_ CX No ; Basis: Low eAt _�� 1M1:me -AP2Ds
Hydrology
Inundated: Yes y_; No . Depth of standing water:
Satuiated soils: Yes; No . Depth to saturated soil:
Other indicators: WF -rL49M btAtNAGE PfE?aa �'toQ6o#t✓ 4,e- Pol6iPOM
Wetland hydrology: Yes )d' No Basis:
Atypical situation: Yes_ X ; No gtgLY 2s6ULpLb FftH P1!&V(dd'6 GR- ItbtW -%.
Normal Circumstances? Yes_ No
Wetland Determination: Wetland X ; Nonwetland
Comments: N YNoLC4 Y IS f- HTIUL•Y P-S%u q OF G014Cz"T'?ATV>
WAgM 12umoff • AQS& 116 15.0LAreD DEPMSStOANE>cr-
�v ZO%.DV'/4' • Determined by: L-•jZ•
B2

1
DATA FORM 1 TRANSECT D
WETLAND DETERMINATION PLOT 2
Applicant Application Project
Name: AL,b, ,u /, Number: Name: ` L: -
State: _County: MC( Y, Legal Description: Township: Range:
Date: 44 -) •9Z. Plot No.: D —Z,, Section:
Vegetation (list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (5 if
only 1 or 2 layers)). Indicate species with observed morphological or known
physiological adaptations with an asterisk.
Indicator Indicator
Species Status Species Status
Trees Herbs
1. 7. SOL MA60 blWTKA.04A FAC.d+
2. `^ 8. V tZ(,tN tLLiS FAL.-
3. 9.
Saplings /shrubs Woody vines
4..1U$41ft 0* VtAWNIA14A, FAUJ- 10. Note
5. 2utsu s &e6UTUS FAW
6'. A.4ZP- NF.6t (A W bO FAUN 12.
X of species that are OBL, FACW, and /or FAC:_CO;�) Other indicators:
Hydrophytic vegetation: Yes No --14 . Basis: < �iC�`7o of t>Ot<ir(b1.}
Soil
r VW4L4&- AZW2Cq L4011M
Series and phase: 7.. -$0)0 On hydric soils list? Yes ; No
Mottled: Yes ; No C , Mottle color: M.k ; Matrix color: 10`(2 c}
Gleyed: Yes -No X Other indicators:
Hydr.ic soils: Yqs No Basis: giPLGL.M Z,J.IrJ?-,nMA.
L
Hydrology
Inundated: Yes ; No _ Cam. Depth of standing water: N /A
Saturated soils: Yes ; NoG _. Depth to saturated soil: > (F3�t
Other indicators: LIC*AF—
Wetland hydrology: Yes ; No Basis: No IN DIGATOZS
Atypical situation: Yes X _; No Q,DWAt l4et ) r-ILLt> � I-LO GAt4c"T
Normal Circumstances? Yes X No
Wetland Determination: Wetland ; Nonwetland
Comments: s4mpt e PLOT 14--, LoC."feD I t4
FI e ut> ort t DE SLCr�E AD.Ie,c,F�t"(" To
SU(�Eff >:Oht .b Determined by: S6LoWf
B2

1
References
1
1
n
1
J
1
r �
Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual TR YR -87 -1, 1987, U.S. Army Corps
National List of Plant Species Which Occur in Wetlands, 1988, US FWS
Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, June 1980, USDA SCS
Hydric Soils of the United States, 1990, NTCHS / SCS
Munsell Soil Color Charts, 1975, Kollmorgen Corporation
Flood Insurance Rate Map, Pineville,NC, June 2, 1988, FEMA
Little Sugar Creek Floodway Study, Mecklenburg County Engineering Department
Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas, June 1987, Albert E. Radford.
'
Aquatic andWetland Plants of the Southeastern United States,Monocotyledons, 1979,
Godfrey and Wooten
Aquatic and Wetland Plants of the Southeastern United States, Dicotolyledons, 198 1,
Godfrey and Wooten
Field Guide to Trees and Shrubs, 1972, George A. Petrides
Field Guide to the Grasses, Sedges, and Rushes of the U.S., 1980, Edward Knobel
Fruit and Twig Key to Trees and Shrubs, 1946, William M. Harlow
'
Wildflowers of North America, 1984, Frank D. Venning
Manual of the Grasses of the United States (two volumes), 1950 & 1971, Hitchcock.
1
1
n
1
J
1
r �

STORM OUTLET
c
T-
-1
U
`r s
A A
G 7 59 60 A
290 72
r,
.`v�i 2S•,0 .�31 / ♦ ®71• , 74
/ �v
62/ 70 / -
,Q
19 49 A, 68
r
/' , t •
�Q 32 76
52 A
PF
' .� 4 • +
,25 �1 51 , o �r ��tZ 94'- -� - -- �3 -- 92 a 7 \
Q� tb >S rho D/ icA T aN .v/d0 95 `r CS
,� 34 -soar — �+fv7� A- a
R - 24 AL •x• 409. •407 107, , 35 ♦ f ; 8
• - E;'SF� s3�f a9• ®/ , 103 *3.00 ac __� '& 8�
p3 FC 406• /C, 104 EARTHEN BERM---, , RF ♦ �C4 79 �
410 98 � �A
12•��,1k 36 ♦ 198 ° .'t `� •
All • >r DIS22 ,� • 406 � a J K3i.0 -ROADBED) ♦ \
♦♦1q l� 411 5 99 ;' 201. i
7 1tiC 48 ®� o
R�q A x404 so
8 ♦ 10 • ♦ 21 • .38 CHM� 14 QO 40Z 109x,; X100 �T $T
�y z
�a C
• i 15 ♦ ♦K --' i• 403. t j ` \ J ? R 6 A��
`e 2� r Z t.36 ac. H
' ` • ~---• 39 401 ♦ / $04 02 �. 208 \� T 85 t
• �' ♦ DUG CgyE �N 8
� � 16 A � 1 i
♦ ACi: `► 143 % `` 0 47• •; 305 j \ 3 207 POND ,205 84
1►3_ c • A ��� 112 \ . 30 L'yr 8
- • ♦ ♦ *17 141 rr�*41 46 113 •
2 `• 1i4 554.5 306• , .3Bt EC. '� \ A
38-
'!Qd
2 •�
4 ♦ \18 °1 42 43 Z45 45 ♦ p ♦ •302
3 i A 133' 1291. 125 44 �4 ti1RN� 307 y \ =
4 • . '23 STORM OUTLET .
19 , 1284 115• 308 9 ��
+ # r . 126 301
.
_ ..
WAY f"GE DISTRICfi BOUNAftYY .. - dv kil
,
=x �► 136 X121 'NE FO(,_OWS SLOPE OF ROAD j
N!
0 r � 120 • \ � �
s� cowSU1�IER ' �_ 9 ±.54 ac. ,, �� �<
SERVICES, NC.
� : '� I , ti
n '
DEED. 6068/578 STORM OUTLET S 11 STOR
yti 119 O U '
F \ \
(Q EL.554.2
NA
- - - -t— --- - - - - -- - - - JOHN W. HARRIS
4 FC p DEED: 5399/30 i
10/s
THIS 'TRACT WAS
TQ W C ti T r_ P B VD . ��_ - — ARY ,� �' NOT WVESTIGXMD
EL.554.2 X34
THIS TRP
pQT V S
PINEVILLE TOWNE CENTER TRACT NOT INVESTIGI ED -
x
ti
PINEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC r:F
PRELIMINARY ON -SITE
ROUTINE
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Prepared by:
Edward D. Stone, Jr. and Associates
Charlotte, North Carolina
Prepared for:
ALABANC PROPERTIES, INC.
AmSouth Bank
Roswell, GA
APRIL 3, 1992
REVISED APRIL 15, 1992
Raked h* 19, 1992
NOTE; ALL AREAS SHOWN TO BE JURISDICTIONAL IN THIS M
SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS PRELIMINARY AND SUBJECTT01
BY THE U.S. ARMY CORPS, WILMINGTON DISTRICT.
r i ,
f�
U >�41'1•' �" a
E� x
:t
r
rr
sc;
X � '
y
;�� tl_
Vt.
N /F
PINEALL.E TOV1M
CENTER ASSOC.
DEED: 5328/310
N /F
DEVESCO PAC$C
DEVELOPMENT P.
DEED: 5266/ 1
4
fi
U.S. HWY.. #521
�ry;�zy
LEGEND
• - -� WETLAND BOUNDARY
102 • NUMBERED BOUNDARY %E11
A5 TRANSECT / SAMPLE PLOT LOCATION
A SUPPLEMENTAL TEST PITS
(APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS)
t
Pmft* GENERAL OVERLAND FLOW PATTERNS
S. POIX ST
APPROXIMATELY
ONE ACRE
.. :. a 'sk ;• ., r k"-
Wmin
' fies that this copy of thb
the 'J iurisdction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act under the present law
and regulations as determined by the .unde vigned , Qn this e>ss
there is a change in the law or out
lion of Section 404 jurisdiction malty
not to exceed two years from this
F F
(name)4�
(title) ST-0 LO 6-Y- 6r — A'SHEV7_LL HZELD O
(date)
5-1 1414 2.
4�
i
�ry;�zy
LEGEND
• - -� WETLAND BOUNDARY
102 • NUMBERED BOUNDARY %E11
A5 TRANSECT / SAMPLE PLOT LOCATION
A SUPPLEMENTAL TEST PITS
(APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS)
t
Pmft* GENERAL OVERLAND FLOW PATTERNS
S. POIX ST
APPROXIMATELY
ONE ACRE
.. :. a 'sk ;• ., r k"-
Wmin
' fies that this copy of thb
the 'J iurisdction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act under the present law
and regulations as determined by the .unde vigned , Qn this e>ss
there is a change in the law or out
lion of Section 404 jurisdiction malty
not to exceed two years from this
F F
(name)4�
(title) ST-0 LO 6-Y- 6r — A'SHEV7_LL HZELD O
(date)
5-1 1414 2.
ENGINEERING SERVICES INC.
1700 EAST 9OUL£VARD CHARLOT -M NC "400' ,
4�
33 EL -553.9
r<.
a ! P .
•
t b or
32 EL. 553.9
"
s, ,.0 ,� r , . ^, r
'�
•
E9461
----
•
PREL#MIN -
1"u10o'
A
PQ*ArT
PINE VI LLE
TAC
GRAHAM ENTERPRISE
'"�•� ,..tea a _ i L[ tf'?
ENGINEERING SERVICES INC.
1700 EAST 9OUL£VARD CHARLOT -M NC "400' ,

BOUNDARY CURVE. CHART:
NORrN PAR MAP eon. ._
NOTES:
AREAS OF WETLANDS IDENTIFIED AND tLAOGED BY
ARMY CORPS OF CNOI EER! AND LAND EIION
ENOINEERIN© SERVICES. INC. TUIS 101 /UND II NED ;REiiNJ Aj$DfOr�141111 A JON1, I DETERMI O 'WATER
THE UND RSIONED ON THIS DATE. 11& i A aiAMOE I THE
LAN OR OUR PUBLISHED REoULATIONf• THIS DETc InAT1oN OF oECTIoN
404 JIM I /DICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PER OD NOT TO EXCEED
TWO YEAR! FROM THIS DATE.
NAME i
TITLE:
DATES
AREA A- IMPACT
STORM
OUTLET
L
•
1 1
7 566
AC.
ABOVE t L OOD
L lAoE
4.106
AC.
�
�•�
3. 460
1
►
+ I'�C�� ►',ice
cm-L.-
VMF
-
[ iii
•ilij�
•
�
•
. ��.�.
• Win.
w
1 .
•Y�
�o
WE 1 L ANDS AREA C LINE CHART:
/A, PLAT SNOWING
WETLANDS LOGAT I ON
P 1 NEV I LLE "I.OWNE GENT'RE
PINEVILLE, N.C.
SCALE: I' -100 CAROLINA SURVEYORS. INC.
DECEMBER 21, 1992 PIHEVII.IE. N.0
f IUG11 E. '61­11 T E. J r., NCR L 5
GRAPHIC SCALD'
0 100 200
drP FEE 1
JOHN W. NA14 R I S
(NOM OR FORMERLY)
DEED: 539D -309
707'AL hFIL ANDS
AREA
7 566
AC.
ABOVE t L OOD
L lAoE
4.106
AC.
��
�i1
3. 460
A C.
• tr•�r•�c1
cm-L.-
VMF
-
/A, PLAT SNOWING
WETLANDS LOGAT I ON
P 1 NEV I LLE "I.OWNE GENT'RE
PINEVILLE, N.C.
SCALE: I' -100 CAROLINA SURVEYORS. INC.
DECEMBER 21, 1992 PIHEVII.IE. N.0
f IUG11 E. '61­11 T E. J r., NCR L 5
GRAPHIC SCALD'
0 100 200
drP FEE 1
JOHN W. NA14 R I S
(NOM OR FORMERLY)
DEED: 539D -309
707'AL hFIL ANDS
AREA
7 566
AC.
ABOVE t L OOD
L lAoE
4.106
AC.
BE[ 0,4' FL DOD
L J,Vf_
3. 460
A C.
WETLAND FUNCTION AND VALUE
iow
MODERATE
HIGH
4 VERY HIGH
i�
NAUF RATED
SURFACE FLOW
A U. HWY #521 � -- - - - -- -- 1.
N!_ NCH MARK:
i USGS MON. ON BRIDGE (U ,S 952;
Or: SOUTHWEST BRIDGE ABUIrIP T
f:EV. 559 56
JUNE 59 1995
400
I
TINGI
DGY
E D S

f
s
3
t
R
J
r
- — .. - - - — — .. • - T.
WETLANQS AREA. A LINE CHART:
r
1
NOTES:
AREAS OF WETLANDS IDENTIFIED AND �LAOGED BY
ARMY OF 914 CNSERINCND LAND EIION
TNEIBOUNDAI(YEOFTTAE JURISDICI10g 0 IlEC ION^�O�ROFETY D +WATER
ICE E�tjHE PREt -NT L V AND R A DETE l"I 0 Y
E 110NED ON TMIt DATE. Uw.Ete 1104HE RE t A 1 THE
LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REoULATIO"S, THI DETE 3TN0� 0 SECTION
TWO YUARIDICTIOTHIS YDBE RELIED UPON FOR A PER �O
NAME
TITLE:
DATE s—
STORM
DRAINAGE OUTLET -
EASE NT --�
kORTN PER MAP t00k
T�' n
�.0
WETL ANDS A,RLA, A L114E CHART (CONTINUED) DRAINAGE
- - -- __a __ -- EASEMfX
R
't
c
U . S HWY #521
A PLAT 51,400NG
WETLAND LOGAT I ON
f' I NEV I LLE `I'OWNE CENTRE
i x
PINEVILLE. N.C.
SCALE: I --100 CAROLINPx SURVEYORS. INC.
DECEMBER 21. 1992 PINEVILLE, N.C.
I IUGI 1 E. H'H I T E. J r., NCR L S
GRAPHIC SCAL1.1-
0 LOO 200 400
JOHN W. HARRIS
(NOW OR FORMERLY)
DEED: 5399 -3pp
7ND
L-AND EE FILLED
W C's
M.= ETL:AND 13� DREDGED
O A,
1-fip,
�IAN
r-M-1 MI'T�GATI(
F FOREBAY
OP
(FN FEE 1)
7 0 7AL , I►E IL AAVS AWA 7. 51 ACS-
BEL_ Oh' Flat L INS: 3. 450 AC.
' C) BE .'REbERVED
1�.EN'i' PARCEL
i
1
14LNCF1 MARK:
�. USGS MON. ON BRIDGE (U S 052.
01: SOUTHWEST BRIDGE ABU1 MUTT
f:EV. 559.56
,
CONCEPTI
.l
tvt,r
PLAN
JUNE 1995 E D S A
- 517E
100ME CENIRE BLVD.
z
i
U.S. if*l 0521
i
V1C7Ni iY MAP
1 Nc SCA -t E 1
•
w��i'�•ii4m
•iw��
�� ��
I.1�•1��
twr M
1 '
All
R
't
c
U . S HWY #521
A PLAT 51,400NG
WETLAND LOGAT I ON
f' I NEV I LLE `I'OWNE CENTRE
i x
PINEVILLE. N.C.
SCALE: I --100 CAROLINPx SURVEYORS. INC.
DECEMBER 21. 1992 PINEVILLE, N.C.
I IUGI 1 E. H'H I T E. J r., NCR L S
GRAPHIC SCAL1.1-
0 LOO 200 400
JOHN W. HARRIS
(NOW OR FORMERLY)
DEED: 5399 -3pp
7ND
L-AND EE FILLED
W C's
M.= ETL:AND 13� DREDGED
O A,
1-fip,
�IAN
r-M-1 MI'T�GATI(
F FOREBAY
OP
(FN FEE 1)
7 0 7AL , I►E IL AAVS AWA 7. 51 ACS-
BEL_ Oh' Flat L INS: 3. 450 AC.
' C) BE .'REbERVED
1�.EN'i' PARCEL
i
1
14LNCF1 MARK:
�. USGS MON. ON BRIDGE (U S 052.
01: SOUTHWEST BRIDGE ABU1 MUTT
f:EV. 559.56
,
CONCEPTI
.l
tvt,r
PLAN
JUNE 1995 E D S A
- 517E
100ME CENIRE BLVD.
z
i
U.S. if*l 0521
i
V1C7Ni iY MAP
1 Nc SCA -t E 1

r
t
J
M
0,
BOUNDARY CURVE CHART:
■��u.�■■ .�i■► • •� -ic�z■ �t����r�• �ICC sc�■� �•ttrs �■,� ■r�c3■;, r.� �� •�.
"0""' PER m p 80n" _ _
NOTES:
AREAS OF WETLANDS IDENTIFIED AND FLAOOED BY
ARMY CORDI OF ENOINEER! AND LAND EtION
ENOINEERRIIN�O SERVICES. INC.
111E re01MIT131 "IF JUA jSD I CT I O OF U KTION1 ECT I ONA4O�RO ELY F1EDE EAtISWAT ER
ACT UNDER THE PREI.NT L Of AND A OU AS Di M NED Y
THE UNDER$ ONED ON THIS DATE. UNLESS HERE III A CHAN4E I THE
LAZY OR OUR PUBLISHED REOULATIONI. THI! DETERMINATION OF SECTION
404 JURISDICTION HAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PER OD NOT TO EXCEED
TWO YEAR! FROM THIS DATE.
N AME t y __
TITLE: --
DA1Ei
RESTAURANT (10900
PARKING (135 SPACI
�....�
L f
WETLANDS AREA A LINE CHART iCONTINUED)
i-1
s
ti
5z s
WETL ANDS AREA B LINE CHART:
PARKING (18 SPACES)
WETLANDS AREA C LINE CHART:
A, PLAT SHOWING
WETLANDS LOCATION
P I NEV 1 1,LE' TOWNS GENTRE
PINE ILLE. N.C.
SCALE: 1' -100 CAROLINA, SURVEYORS. INC.
DECEMBER 21. 1992 PINEVILIE N.C.
HUGH I E. WH ! 1 E J r.. NCR l_ S
`� • WETLAND TO
REMAIN
Ap
JONN w �inRA i s
PARKING (200 SPACES)
1l
1� ( NOR OR FORMEkt 1
DEED 5399 309
dog
U . S 11V l' 9 5 2 1
GRAPHIC SCALD'
100 200
clfJ FEE 1 1
70 IA Z hE IL
A/VUS
TO
566
AC
ABOVE
f!_OOD
l_ , r
4.
106
AC.
BF- l Oh'
Fl_ OOO
L J,V;�
3
460
AC
PARKING (18 SPACES)
WETLANDS AREA C LINE CHART:
A, PLAT SHOWING
WETLANDS LOCATION
P I NEV 1 1,LE' TOWNS GENTRE
PINE ILLE. N.C.
SCALE: 1' -100 CAROLINA, SURVEYORS. INC.
DECEMBER 21. 1992 PINEVILIE N.C.
HUGH I E. WH ! 1 E J r.. NCR l_ S
`� • WETLAND TO
REMAIN
Ap
JONN w �inRA i s
PARKING (200 SPACES)
1l
1� ( NOR OR FORMEkt 1
DEED 5399 309
dog
U . S 11V l' 9 5 2 1
GRAPHIC SCALD'
100 200
clfJ FEE 1 1
70 IA Z hE IL
A/VUS
AREA
566
AC
ABOVE
f!_OOD
l_ , r
4.
106
AC.
BF- l Oh'
Fl_ OOO
L J,V;�
3
460
AC
MITIGATION
t
SITE
f
N! NCH MARK
USGS MON . Oh BR i LOGE (U S • 52
C", SOUTHWEST BR f DGE A.LIU1r11_fi T
1 1 1=V . 559 56
400
PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
EDSA (REVISED 6- 30 -95)

I
N 091-1
pill
N 00
x A
x
9- sts
. 44
x lip
x
Z,L;,
%
x Tk
9,vts
S:Tts
4
N Gq7,6.
It
Jp:w,
1 171
04,
133J Z :1v%4b:h
133J 09
f
V74 -k
'r
pip,
k,wt
rU
C
4A8 3V
AGA8
u
't" t
109S6 :*ON POOM W30
L* I V
:'ON 01 uoi4:)V sdio
ZOZEDZ66t
N 0
q)JON 'a1101Je4:)
�ozgz 'cuilom.
Vf
Z01 aj!nS pie, alnog qjn0S 6[6[
'MP]
Sajepossv Pue latiols C] PiL
v s 0 3
:Aq pajudaid
Z [ZqZ: 'euqOJeD. qjj0N 'al1011e4D
oot aj!nS 'PeON aOJUOW 9E6S
dnojD 1a1OH soued aq.L
6*ZVG
:iue:)qddv
'all!XgUld
1AjunOD SinqualpaW
DN
al!S @JluaD allMO
_L 611!AaUld
UOQe:)1J!1JaD Aj!jenb jaleAA Lot, uoioaS
joj uope:)ijddV
fq
9Z# I!wJad aP!muO11VN
uOlIeDIP -aJd
4"v 9
(NUd) ION agM43SIG
Z. NVV iN3W]DVNVW N31VMW s
two w 319
Cl NV rn
NVId N01-LVD1JLJW
KP
IP
4M
16
0
D �Ioj 3sfl i0N CC]
NC)1-LDnNiSN0
9'
1VA0SdJV
0.dAqi
6 njqqvA*ftj dpZ q alp jo dW -A 4
go
1wwwww
4 uo*wH aqj AG; Wo UOM PaW I
-:)N 4S"A4P 1U1J"Su3 ug".O pail Voup"m aug
poll
oqi p mo!wzo
.0 Ampoo" qn awftw 't-
16-Wtt PWWP -3UJ os*Asu" amjoj*:)
-&*W
Aq A0AAM klt"M" put AaAMS puepa* uodn pa" " Pq
MA" PWPM A% #MWAqM
aw P"" am "MMP
VW3 Aq uvW allS Ajvu.mqj&M
too &ago
WAP
w9ema&uloo apild e Sum kpnww apow amm :Iut*lL*JP u* s!qj m uw!*umw Pw SWAM$
VA
011K
+
t
AL
00�,
fig
3N
7-
:]VA621NI HnOiNO3
133J-09 HONI L :11YOS
0s, L C gL
IF
nOHS H
'CRY No ---a -10
HAON ns low. qf, aD
�74
031 V G
966 L 'Zz� a k
%t4 -
low
Won
!NEW
-71 4
i16r
ZA
7,

r
•.
r
BOUNDARY CURVE CHART:
LUCTi A►InC ADCA A I Il.1C rwAOT-
AREA.
7.566
AC.
`��L•t L1i�
�•ii+ +
4.106
AC.
BE[ Oh' Al OOD
t �[
3. 460
AC.
• •
f
Vii• 1 � ','
.�: .
�r: •zrla�r■�i
•• •
► rr �•
0
�c+
%iF:ate
� ��i
LUCTi A►InC ADCA A I Il.1C rwAOT-
NOTES:
AREAS OF METLN01 IDENTIFIED AND AOOED BY
ARMY CORPS OF EW INEEIII AND LAND DESIGN
ENOINEERINO SERVICES. INC.
CIB D EP IEE r
IMATER
ATUND A HERESNtUtAllN AIONS AS TMIID Y
THE UNDERS TONED
ON THIS DATE. LINLE83 THERE I A CHANGE E SECTION
I THE
LAN OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS. TNIS DETERMINATION
404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PER OD NOT TO EXCEED
TWO YEARS FROM THIS DATE.
NAMES _
TITLE:
DATE i
!A•
STORM
OUTLET
L I
•ii�•�r I.1L' •a
[ii[•Y +L i�
. �cai�c• �t•�r•�a
• .:g.� -.tea
• 1 ./r ���•ii� .i�fa
•3FT +jf► ia"a
l� �•��ii:7� . .
�c ��i>� i •lla�,� rrs ctis
tAc tic 3m AV w,
• YiII ��.
[ii• K
.mss` � • .'
C 9
HORTH PER hAp Boom
WE T L ANDS AREA C LINE CHART:
AREA.
7.566
AC.
ABOVE A-L OOD
L lAof`
4.106
AC.
BE[ Oh' Al OOD
t �[
3. 460
AC.
• •
�r: •zrla�r■�i
•• •
► rr �•
0
�c+
%iF:ate
� ��i
�► . .
��i
�•air
�
+ • •jai
•i
I•�
���
3• •:�i[•li �lla�a•�
��
3•i t* •jam
I+ •a
:art Ala
-
�r
iii �•� i
�•
�a�ii
i
� •
a�rr
�,
.,
fold
X11'
�•�';a
�f•�
�L :
•R:
a�a�i'a�
•'i' iac
'AM
c•
��arii►a��•
•rw4m
+
��1.��
•� il�i 11a���
�a
aacla■�E�ii�
-�tis�
.
s •
a�cta�E�ir�
• �.
•
•�
r■�
ass
•a■rra�•
-
r•
+a��•
��r •roams
+y
�rIsm
• s
Elm
4f- li[mFla
■lfa•�
• • •I a+
110
IPW40
tim
4o
`�i�L
m
�•�
f -��ii-
•K•1.3i
r�r��iii
•iy � • T,a
.
ri ar
ter- a
war:
• . • � .
. .
TWI
�•I +'
-��i1i+ fia,
/I�
�
� �l+x•fila�
!• .
5��.
��7•�
�ii +T• ,ila -�
+
aria�r�;a
I�
►� r iImm
��
a�ii
aa�r
+�
+z
�r,a.�rc�t��r�
t►
•
t '
s
NOTES:
AREAS OF METLN01 IDENTIFIED AND AOOED BY
ARMY CORPS OF EW INEEIII AND LAND DESIGN
ENOINEERINO SERVICES. INC.
CIB D EP IEE r
IMATER
ATUND A HERESNtUtAllN AIONS AS TMIID Y
THE UNDERS TONED
ON THIS DATE. LINLE83 THERE I A CHANGE E SECTION
I THE
LAN OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS. TNIS DETERMINATION
404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PER OD NOT TO EXCEED
TWO YEARS FROM THIS DATE.
NAMES _
TITLE:
DATE i
!A•
STORM
OUTLET
L I
•ii�•�r I.1L' •a
[ii[•Y +L i�
. �cai�c• �t•�r•�a
• .:g.� -.tea
• 1 ./r ���•ii� .i�fa
•3FT +jf► ia"a
l� �•��ii:7� . .
�c ��i>� i •lla�,� rrs ctis
tAc tic 3m AV w,
• YiII ��.
[ii• K
.mss` � • .'
C 9
HORTH PER hAp Boom
WE T L ANDS AREA C LINE CHART:
U. S. HWY #521
■
JOHN W. HARA13
(NOM OR FORMERLY)
DEED: 5399 -309
A, PLAT SHOWING
WETLANDS LOCATION
PI NEV I LLE' TOWNE GEN`1'RE
PINEVILLE. N.C.
SCALE: I' -i00 CAROLINA SURVEYORS. INC.
DECEMBER 21, 1992 P I NEV I t_ t E N. C.
HUGH E. WHITE. Jr . ,NCRLS
GRAPHIC SSCA1.1:'
0 100 200 400
tltJ FEE])
)rUTAL tiETL ANO$
AREA.
7.566
AC.
ABOVE A-L OOD
L lAof`
4.106
AC.
BE[ Oh' Al OOD
t �[
3. 460
AC.
U. S. HWY #521
■
JOHN W. HARA13
(NOM OR FORMERLY)
DEED: 5399 -309
A, PLAT SHOWING
WETLANDS LOCATION
PI NEV I LLE' TOWNE GEN`1'RE
PINEVILLE. N.C.
SCALE: I' -i00 CAROLINA SURVEYORS. INC.
DECEMBER 21, 1992 P I NEV I t_ t E N. C.
HUGH E. WHITE. Jr . ,NCRLS
GRAPHIC SSCA1.1:'
0 100 200 400
tltJ FEE])
)rUTAL tiETL ANO$
AREA.
7.566
AC.
ABOVE A-L OOD
L lAof`
4.106
AC.
BE[ Oh' Al OOD
L INE
3. 460
AC.
u , r 4•
av n v z I
ry SITE
: TONNE CENTRE IRLVD.
U.S. 1,111". r521
VI01411Y MAP
(NO SCALE)
i