20221571 Ver 1_Dirty Boots Phase II_Prospectus_DRAFT_combined_20230419

PROSPECTUS WILDLANDS CAPE FEAR 03 UMBRELLA
MITIGATION BANK
Draft Site Name: Dirty Boots Phase II Mitigation Site
Chatham County, NC
Cape Fear River Basin
February 9, 2023 HUC 03030003
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2023-00307
DWR# (To Be Determined)

PREPARED BY:
DRAFT PROSPECTUS
Wildlands Cape Fear 03 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Site Name: Dirty Boots Phase II Mitigation Site
Chatham County, NC
Cape Fear River Basin
HUC 03030003
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2023-00307
DWR# (To Be Determined)
W
WILDLANDS
E N G I N E E R I N G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 West Millbrook Rd, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]
February 9, 2023

FABLE OF CONTENTS
ExecutiveSummary............................................................................................................................1
1.0
Mitigation Bank Introduction and Objectives.......................................................................1
1.1
Introduction...............................................................................................................................
1
1.2
Bank Location............................................................................................................................
1
1.3
Goals and Objectives.................................................................................................................
1
1.4
Qualifications of Bank Sponsor.................................................................................................
2
2.0
Establishment and Operation of Mitigation Bank.................................................................3
2.1
Ownership Agreements.............................................................................................................
3
2.2
Landowner Information............................................................................................................ 3
2.3
Proposed Service Area...............................................................................................................
3
2.4
Need and Feasibility of Mitigation Bank...................................................................................
3
3.0
Ecological Suitability of Site.................................................................................................4
3.1
Bank Site Characterization........................................................................................................
4
3.2
Cultural Resources and Significant Natural Heritage Areas......................................................6
3.3
Threatened and Endangered Species........................................................................................7
3.4
Floodplain Compliance..............................................................................................................7
3.5
Site Constraints and Access.......................................................................................................
7
4.0
Mitigation Work Plan..........................................................................................................8
4.1
Stream Restoration...................................................................................................................8
4.2
Stream Enhancement 11.............................................................................................................8
4.3
Stream Preservation..................................................................................................................8
4.4
Wetlands...................................................................................................................................
9
4.5
Vegetation Plan.........................................................................................................................
9
5.0
Determination of Mitigation Credits..................................................................................10
5.2
Initial Allocation of Released Credits.......................................................................................
12
5.3
Subsequent Credit Releases....................................................................................................
12
6.0
Performance Standards and Monitoring Plan.....................................................................12
6.1
Stream Morphological Parameters and Channel Stability......................................................
13
6.2
Hydrology................................................................................................................................
13
6.3
Vegetation...............................................................................................................................
14
6.4
Other Parameters....................................................................................................................
14
7.0
Maintenance and Long -Term Sustainability.......................................................................15
7.1
Maintenance...........................................................................................................................
15
7.2
Adaptive Management............................................................................................................
16
7.3
Long Term Management Provisions........................................................................................
16
8.0
References........................................................................................................................16
TABLES
Table 1. Mitigation Goals and Objectives..........................................................................................2
Table2. Landowner Information......................................................................................................3
Table 3. Project Soil Type and Description........................................................................................6
Table 4. Federally Protected Species in Nash County, NC...................................................................7
Table 5. Proposed Easement Crossings.............................................................................................7
Table 6. Proposed Stream Mitigation Credits..................................................................................10
Table 7. Proposed Wetland Mitigation Credits................................................................................10
Table 8. Stream Credit Release Schedule........................................................................................11
Wildlands Cape Fear 03 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Dirty Boots Phase II Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus Page i

Table 9. Riparian Wetland Credit Release Schedule........................................................................11
Table10. Maintenance Plan............................................................................................................15
FIGURE;,
Figure 1 Service Area Map
Figure 2 Vicinity Map
Figure 3 NCDOT Draft STIP FY 2020-2029
Figure 4 USGS Topographic Map
Figure 5 Site Map
Figure 6 Watershed Map
Figure 7 Soils Map
Figure 8 Concept Map
Figure 9 LiDAR Map
APPENDICES
Appendix A Historic Aerials
Appendix B NCDWR Stream Classification Forms
Appendix C Existing Geomorphic Data
Appendix D EDR Radius Report Summary
Appendix E LSS Hydric Soil Report
Appendix F Landowner Authorizations
Wildlands Cape Fear 03 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Dirty Boots Phase II Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus Page ii

Executive Summary
Wildlands Holdings X, LLC ("Sponsor") proposes to develop the Wildlands Cape Fear 03 Umbrella
Mitigation Bank. Wildlands Holdings X, LLC is wholly owned by Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands).
The first site developed for the Bank will be the Dirty Boots Phase 2 Mitigation Site ("Site") which will
include work on Dirty Boots Creek and one unnamed tributary to Dirty Boots Creek in Chatham County,
NC. The purpose of the Bank is to provide stream and wetland mitigation credits to compensate for
impacts to Waters of the United States and/or State Waters within the service area, Hydrologic Unit
03030003 (Cape Fear 03), as depicted in Figure 1. The resulting conservation easement is estimated to
be 9.5 acres.
1.0 Mitigation Bank Introduction and Objectives
1.1 Introduction
The Dirty Boots Phase 2 Mitigation Site being established under the proposed Bank is located on an
active cattle farm. In addition to Dirty Boots Creek, the Site contains an unnamed tributary to Dirty
Boots that, for the purpose of this project, is referred to as UT1. The Site is located in the DWR Subbasin
03-06-12. All project streams flow to Bear Creek, which is classified as a Class C water.
A review of historic aerials from 1950 to 2021 shows the Site streams have existed in their approximate
locations over time. Even the forested areas are virtually the same. The eastern side of Dirty Boots Creek
Reaches 1-3 was cleared of trees between 1950 and 1961 and has remained so since then. Current land
use at the Site is a mix of agriculture, including active cattle, forestry, and hay pasture. Across the Site,
approximately 30 head of cattle are currently managed. The majority of the property has been in cattle
or hay pasture since about the 1970s.
Within the project area, the streams are mostly eroding, alternatingly incised, and severely impacted by
livestock access. Wetlands have been degraded due to channel incision, tree clearing, and livestock
access. Some stream length is less incised and eroded but still accessed by livestock. The wetlands on
the site have been cleared and trampled by livestock.
The Sponsor proposes to restore 1,146 linear feet (LF), enhance 768 LF, and preserve 585 LF of the site
streams. The Sponsor proposes to rehabilitate 2.04 wetland acres and enhance 0.84 wetland acres. This
stream and wetland mitigation will include a conservation easement area that is estimated to total 9.5
acres.
1.2 Bank Location
The proposed Bank (35.640582' N, 79.425046' W) is in western Chatham County approximately five
miles southeast of Siler City (Figure 1, Figure 2). The site is located within the Hydrologic Unit Code
(HUC) 03030003070020 and DWR Subbasin 03-06-12. The project site drains to Bear Creek which drains
to the Rocky River and eventually to the Deep River.
To get to the Site from Raleigh, NC take 1-40 West to US-1 South. Follow US-1 to US-421 North in
Sanford. Follow US-421 North for 17 miles to Elmer Moore Road. Go left on Elmer Moore Road, follow it
1.8 miles, go left on Bonlee Road for 0.4 miles and then right on Edwards Hill Church Road. The site is 0.3
miles on the left (downstream) and right (upstream).
1.3 Goals and Objectives
The proposed Bank described above will provide numerous ecological benefits within the Cape Fear
River Basin. Project benefits include site specific improvements and watershed scale benefits.
m Widllands Cape Fear 03 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Dirty Boots Phase II Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 1

The project goals and related objectives are described in Table 1. Project goals are desired project
outcomes and objectives are activities that will result in the accomplishment of goals. The project will be
monitored after construction to demonstrate success. A detailed monitoring program will be described
in the forthcoming mitigation plan.
Table 1. Mitigation Goals and Objectives
Goal
Objective
Expected Outcomes
Exclude livestock
Remove livestock from site or install
Reduce sediment, turbidity, nutrient, and
from streams and
livestock exclusion fencing along the
fecal coliform bacteria inputs.
wetlands.
conservation easement.
Construct stream channels that will
Improve stream
maintain stable cross -sections, patterns,
Reduce shear stress on channel boundary.
channel stability.
and profiles over time. Repair eroding
Reduce sediment inputs from bank erosion.
stream banks with bioengineering.
Install habitat features such as
Increase and diversify available habitats for
constructed riffles, cover logs, and brush
macroinvertebrates, fish, and amphibians,
Improve instream
toes in restored/enhanced streams. Add
leading to colonization and an increase in
habitat.
woody materials to channel beds.
biodiversity over time. Add complexity
including large woody debris (LWD) to the
Construct pools of varying depth.
streams.
Reconnect
Construct stream channels with
Allow more frequent flood flows to disperse
channels with
appropriate bankfull dimensions and
on the floodplain. Support geomorphology
floodplains.
depth relative to the existing floodplain.
and higher -level functions. Improve wetland
hydrology.
Restore wetland
Restore riparian wetlands and associated
hydrology,
y gy, soils,
soil structure by raising stream beds,
Raise local groundwater elevations.
and plant
plugging existing ditches, removing
Periodically inundate floodplain wetlands and
livestock impacts, and planting native
vernal pools.
communities.
wetland species.
Restore and
Plant native canopy and understory
Reduce sediment inputs from bank erosion
enhance native
species in riparian zone and plant native
and runoff. Increase nutrient cycling and
floodplain and
shrub and herbaceous species on
storage in floodplain. Provide riparian habitat.
streambank
streambanks. Treat invasive species within
Add a source of LWD and organic material to
vegetation.
the project area.
streams. Support all stream functions.
Permanently
Establish a conservation easement on the
Protect Bank from encroachment on the
protect the project
Bank.
riparian corridor and direct impact to streams
from harmful uses.
and wetlands. Support all stream functions.
1.4 Qualifications of Bank Sponsor
Wildlands Holdings X, LLC, the bank sponsor (Sponsor), is wholly owned by Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Wildlands is a multidisciplinary professional engineering firm that brings together the expertise
necessary to create outstanding ecological restoration projects in a timely and cost-effective manner. To
execute stream and wetland mitigation projects, Wildlands assembles a team of project specific
subcontractors to perform surveying, construction services, and planting. Each of these subcontractors
has substantial experience in stream, wetland, and buffer restoration in North Carolina and a substantial
full-time professional staff presence in North Carolina. For this project, Wildlands will serve as the
Authorized Agent.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Widllands Cape Fear 03 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Dirty Boots Phase II Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 2

Charlotte, NC 28203
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attn: Shawn Wilkerson
Email: [e-mail]
Establishment and Operation of Mitigation Bank
2.1 Ownership Agreements
The Site is located on one parcel owned by one individual, and an option agreement to record a
conservation easement for the Site has been signed by the landowner. Upon completion of the review
process for the bank prospectus, the Sponsor will submit a detailed mitigation plan and an umbrella
mitigation banking instrument (UMBI) for the site. The UMBI will provide detailed information regarding
bank operation and the long-term management of the Bank. Once the final mitigation plan is approved
and the accompanying instrument executed by members of the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the
Sponsor will record a conservation easement on the Bank.
2.2 Landowner Information
Table 2 lists the landowner name, parcel identification number(s), deed book number, page number,
and address associated with the parcel on the site.
Table 2. Landowner Information
Landowner
Parcel ID Number
Deed Book and Page Number
Address
Eddie Hancock Watkins
0005034
DB: 2298, PG: 0197
PO Box 80
Bonlee, NC 27213
2.3 Proposed Service Area
The Bank will be established to mitigate impacts to Waters of the United States and/or State Waters
within the service area depicted in Figure 1. This service area includes the Cape Fear 03 (Hydrologic Unit
03030003) and the cities of Pittsboro, Siler City, Asheboro, and parts of Greensboro.
2.4 Need and Feasibility of Mitigation Bank
2.4.1 Need
Basinwide
The Cape Fear 03 basin, as described in the DWR 2005 Cape Fear River Basin Water Quality Plan (WQP),
contains significant development in and around the municipalities mentioned above and has abundant
beef cattle operations. Several federal and state highways run through the basin including US-64, NC-87,
1-85, and 1-40. Developing a mitigation bank will allow unavoidable impacts to Waters of the United
States within the service area to be mitigated appropriately and provide a means for the economic
growth of this region to continue while ensuring aquatic resources and water quality are maintained.
This includes the potential widening for the roads within the watershed.
The Sponsor expects Bank customers will include private enterprises and public entities with North
Carolina Division of Transportation (NCDOT) as the primary client. Figure 3 depicts the potential projects
set forth by NCDOT for fiscal years 2020-2029 within the Cape Fear 03 watershed. This includes
transportation projects along several state, regional, and transition highways. Two megasites, the
Chatham-Siler City Advanced Manufacturing Site and the Greensboro -Randolph Mega Site are being
developed and will need stream and wetland mitigation credits.
Widllands Cape Fear 03 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Dirty Boots Phase II Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus Page 3

Local Subbasin
The proposed Bank is located in DWR subbasin 03-06-12 and HUC 003030003070050. The Site includes
an unnamed stream that will be called Dirty Boots Creek. Dirty Boots Creek flows into Bear Creek, the
Rocky River, and eventually the Deep River. Another unnamed tributary flows into Dirty Boots Creek and
will be called UT1 for this project. This Site is immediately upstream of an existing DMS full delivery
project, Dirty Boots Phase I, that was initiated in 2022.
The Site is located within the Division of Water Resources (DWR) Subbasin 03-06-12. The site is also
located in the planning area for the Upper and Middle Rocky River Local Watershed Plan (LWP). The Site
is upstream of the Bear Creek (Chatham) Aquatic Habitat, a Significant Natural Heritage Area that is
located at the confluence of Bear Creek and Sandy Branch (Figure 1). The Bear Creek Aquatic Habitat
flows directly into the Upper Rocky River Aquatic Habitat, which flows to the Lower Rocky River/Lower
Deep River Aquatic Habitat.
Implementation of this project will address the Cape Fear 03 CU-wide coals and the LWP goals by
including the restoration of riparian buffers, stream restoration, wetland restoration, and livestock
exclusion to improve stream and terrestrial habitats. Hydrologic function will be improved through the
reconnection of streams to their historic floodplains and re-establishment and rehabilitation of project
wetlands. These restoration activities will enhance the Site's ability to retain and remove nutrients and
cattle waste from adjacent upstream sources before they can be transported downstream into the Bear
Creek Aquatic Habitat and the Critical Habitat area of the Cape Fear shiner (Notropis mekistocholas) on
the Rocky River and the Deep River.
The watershed for Dirty Boots Creek is comprised of agriculture/pasture, forestland, and developed land
(60%, 27%, and 13% respectively). The UT1 drainage area consists of forest and agriculture/pasture (81%
and 19% respectively).
2.4.2 Feasibility
A Radius Map Report was ordered for the Bank through Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) and
obtained on April 11, 2022. No target properties, nor adjacent landowner properties, were listed in any
of the Federal, State, or Tribal environmental databases searched by EDR. A summary of the EDR report
is included in the appendix.
The Bank is located in a rural watershed where the dominant land uses are agriculture, forest, and
residential. The site is located near Siler City which could develop in the future as Chatham County
grows. Future changes in land use might alter the watershed but it is likely that low density residential
use would cause minimal change to site hydrology.
Based on the preliminary existing conditions assessments performed at the Bank in 2022, Wildlands is
confident that the site has substantial potential for the development of a viable mitigation bank. The
project will provide substantial uplift to the Rocky River watershed and the Cape Fear River Basin.
3.0 Ecological Suitability of Site
3.1 Bank Site Characterization
The Bank Site is currently maintained for livestock pasture with sparsely wooded buffers along the
project streams. The Site is a livestock operation with approximately 100 head of free-range beef cattle
on site throughout the year and 10 pigs. Cattle have access to pastures and streams. Pastures are
fertilized most years during spring or fall and livestock waste is left to break down in place on pastures.
Most of the streams and wetlands on site have been heavily impacted by livestock access. The existing
conditions of Bank streams are described in Section 3.1.1, existing wetlands are described in Section
m Widllands Cape Fear 03 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Dirty Boots Phase II Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 4

3.1.2, and existing vegetation is described in Section 3.1.3. The appendix contains stream determination
forms and stream geomorphic data. Figure 4 is a topographic map of the site, Figure 5 illustrates the
existing Site conditions, and Figure 6 is a map of the project stream watersheds.
3.1.1 Existing Conditions - Streams
Dirty Boots Creek
Dirty Boots flows from north to south onto the Site. Reach 1 begins at a
headcut and the property line. The channel banks are incised and
intermittently unstable, with some having vegetation. The stream is
disconnected with its floodplain and current and historic cattle impacts
are present. The floodplain wetlands are experiencing a drainage effect.
Reach 2 continues south through a wooded area. There is evidence of
channelization. And toe of slope seepage on both sides of the floodplain
augments hydrology.
Reach 3 has lower bank heights because two existing culverts (farm road
and Edwards Hill Church Road) serve as downstream grade control. Areas
of bank instability and erosion are evident. A 100-foot utility easement
marks the downstream end of the reach.
Reach 4 is primarily stable with limited areas of erosion and incision on
both sides of Edwards Hill Church Road. Bank heights are typically low
and habitat features are embedded but appear to be providing function.
The stream is backwatered at the end of the reach at the property line
due to a debris jam caused by a fence across the creek.
UT1
UT1 Reach 1 is a short perennial reach that flows through a farm pond and drains east to Dirty Boots
Creek. It is a small, functioning channel with low bank heights, low to moderate channel incision, and a
stable profile.
UT1 Reach 2 starts at a headcut where the channel becomes incised and moderately unstable until its
confluence with Dirty Boots. Cattle are actively accessing UT1.
3.1.2 Existing Wetlands
Existing wetlands and partially drained wetlands or hydric soil areas occur within the riparian zones of
Dirty Boots Creek as well as along the lower portions of UT1. Wetland functions are impaired in these
areas to varying degrees. A hydric soil delineation was conducted on April 21, 2022 by a Licensed Soil
Scientist (LSS). The boundaries of the hydric soil delineation are shown in the LSS report in the
Appendix.
Generally, hydric soils are located within the active floodplain of Dirty Boots. There are also hillside seep
inputs that serve to wet hillside soils, especially along the eastern side of Dirty Boots. In some areas,
because of the productive hillside discharge, the hydric soils extend 6 to 8 feet in elevation above the
top of the bank of Dirty Boots. This is primarily a wooded wetland area that is partially drained by the
incised channels and cattle paths that funnel surface flow directly to the stream.
Forested areas are dominated by red maple, willow oak, river birch and tulip poplar. Many of the
mature trees are heavily buttressed, providing evidence of historic inundation. In addition to the
wooded area, this wetland covers portions of the open pasture along the left bank of Dirty Boots.
Pasture areas are dominated by a mix of wetland sedges and rushes with a mix of pasture grasses and
Widllands Cape Fear 03 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Dirty Boots Phase II Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 5

tall fescue on ridges within the microtopography. Hydric soils were delineated within the majority of the
proposed easement and extended beyond the boundary in many cases.
3.1.3 Existing Vegetation
The condition of the riparian buffer along project streams varies throughout the site. Dirty Boots
Reaches 1, 2, and 3 and UT1 have healthy riparian buffers from the upstream origin of the project
downstream to the existing power line right of way. The overstory is composed of mixed oaks, tulip
poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) and river birch (Betula nigra) with smaller amount of red maple (Acer
rubrum) and sweet gum (Liq uidam bar styraciflua). Scattered loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) are found at the
higher elevations. The riparian buffer along UT1 can be described in the same way as Dirty Boots as it is
in the same forested area. The eastern side of the proposed easement along the headwaters of Dirty
Boots has some areas of open pasture without a consistent forested buffer. Much of this area is
composed of partially drained wetlands dominated by various wetland sedges and rushes with
occasional pasture grasses. Evidence of recent cattle grazing was noted in these areas.
3.1.4 Soils
The floodplain areas of the proposed project are mapped by the Chatham County Soil Survey as
primarily a Cid-Ligum complex (Figure 5). This complex transitions from a silt loam to a silt clay loam
with depth before reaching first a consolidated bedrock layer and then unconsolidated bedrock layer.
This series often contains inclusions of Wehadkee, which were identified during soil mapping exercises.
Cid-Ligum and Wehadkee are listed on the National Hydric Soil list. The upstream portions of all the
project tributaries are located in the Cid silt loam or Callison-Lignum mapping units. These moderately
well drained soil types have very high runoff characteristics but are well suited to planting hardwood
tree species.
Table 3. Project Soil Type and Description
Soil Name
Description
Cid-Lignum Complex
Generally found in interfluves. Moderately to well drained with bedrock layer 20-60
inches deep.
Cid
Moderately well drained soil generally found summit or interfluves, Wehadkee inclusions
often found in floodplains.
Callison-Lignum
Like Cid, a moderately well drained soil generally found summit or interfluves, Wehadkee
Complex
inclusions often found in floodplains.
Wehadkee
Poorly drained hydric soil, found in active floodplains. Inclusion to Cid Lignum.
Source: Soil Survey of Chatham County, North Carolina, USDA-NRCS,
https://websoilsurveV.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurveV.aspx
3.2 Cultural Resources and Significant Natural Heritage Areas
No sites listed on the National Register with the State Historic Preservation Office are located
immediately adjacent or within the project area. The archaeological site files at the North Carolina Office
of State Archaeology (OSA) have not been reviewed at this time. All appropriate cultural resource
agencies will be contacted for their review and comment prior to any land disturbing activity.
Several registered Natural Heritage and Managed Areas located within two miles include the Ore Hill
(Exceptional Rating), Rocky River Subbasin Riparian Aquatic Habitat Area (Exceptional), the Knoll Ridge
(Moderate Rating), a Foothills Land Conservancy Easement, a NC Land and Water Fund Project, and
Triangle Land Conservancy Easements.
m Widllands Cape Fear 03 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Dirty Boots Phase II Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 6

3.3 Threatened and Endangered Species
Wildlands searched the USFWS and North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) databases to
identify federally listed threatened and endangered plant and animal species for Chatham County, NC.
Table F.6 details the current list of threatened and endangered species for Chatham County. A cursory
pedestrian survey conducted on April 8, 2022 indicated that the project area does not provide suitable
habitat for any of the listed species. Wildlands will conduct a full review for protected species upon
award of the contract and will coordinate with USFWS and NCWRC as necessary based on that review.
Table 4. Federally Protected Species in Nash County, INC
Species
Federal Status
Habitat
Birds
Red -cockaded woodpecker
Endangered
Open pine woodlands and savannahs with large specimen trees.
(Picoides borealis)
Little to no hardwoods.
Flowering Plant
Harperella (Ptilimnium
Endangered
Inhabits seasonally flooded rocky streams on granite outcrops
nodosum)
that are sheltered from rapidly moving water.
Clams
Atlantic Pigtoe (Fusconaia
Threatened
Inhabits coarse sand and gravel in small creeks to large rivers
masoni)
with excellent water quality and silt free substrates.
Fish
Cape Fear shiner (Notropis
Inhabits streams and rivers with gravel, cobble, and boulder
mekistocholas)
Endangered
substrate. Found in slow pools, riffles, and runs. They are often
found near water willow beds.
Habitat information from the following website: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/report/species-listings-by-current-range-
county?fips=37037
3.4 Floodplain Compliance
The Site is represented on the Chatham County Flood Map 3710868800J. The Site is located within
FEMA Zone X and has minimal associated flood risk. Project tributaries are not FEMA mapped and do
not have associated models. Wildlands will communicate with the local floodplain administrator in
Chatham County to determine if a floodplain development permit is required.
The project will be designed to avoid adverse floodplain impacts or hydrologic trespass on adjacent
properties or local roads.
3.5 Site Constraints and Access
Two crossings are proposed at the Site to maintain landowner access to pastures and to acknowledge an
existing utility corridor easement. The culvert at Crossing 1 will be designed with the restored stream
bed profile to allow for aquatic organism passage. Crossings are summarized and numbered below in
Table 5 and on Figure 8.
Table 5. Proposed Easement Crossings
No.
Width (ft)
Location
Internal or
Crossing Type
Purpose
External
1
50
Dirty Boots — Reach 3
Internal
New Culvert
Cattle Crossing
Utility Corridor— No
2
100
Dirty Boots — Reach 3
External
Utility Crossing
Culvert
The easement boundaries around streams proposed for mitigation credit provide the required 50-foot
minimum riparian buffer for Piedmont streams. The entire easement area can be accessed for
construction, monitoring, and long-term stewardship from Edwards Hill Church Road. The Brooks Field
m Widllands Cape Fear 03 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Dirty Boots Phase II Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 7

Airport and the Siler City Municipal Airport are located approximately 4 miles and 6 miles from the Site
respectively.
4.0 Mitigation Work Plan
Wildlands will begin the project by identifying the best design approach to meet the stated project
objectives and implement the appropriate degree of intervention. A combination of analog, empirical,
and analytical design approaches will potentially be used. All project resources will be designed to create
stable, functional stream channels and riparian wetlands.
4.1 Stream Restoration
All project reaches are proposed for restoration with
the exception of Dirty Boots Reaches 3 and 4, and UT1
Reach 1. The restoration reaches will be designed and
built with appropriate dimension, pattern, and profile
to allow for frequent overbank flooding, provide stable
bank slopes, enable biological lift, and reconnect
streams with existing floodplains. Reference streams
will be identified and will serve as one of the primary
sources of information on which restoration designs are
based. Wildlands has developed a general approach to
be used as the basis for stream restoration design. The
design approach, which is tailored to each site, continues to develop as additional projects are
implemented.
All reaches are proposed for restoration designed with a Priority 1 approach, raising channel beds to
reconnect them with existing floodplains. Livestock will be excluded from the proposed project area.
Stream structures will be installed to promote water quality, stabilize the bed and banks, provide
bedform diversity, and increase aquatic and terrestrial habitat. Wildlands plans to evaluate stream
substrate and determine appropriate gradations/bed features for the Site streams. At this stage,
Wildlands believes most of these channels will be built using a threshold channel approach with a gravel
substrate. Wildlands believes based on other work in this area that appropriate substrate will be able to
be harvested on -site.
4.2 Stream Enhancement II
Dirty Boots Reach 3 and UT1 Reach 1 are slated for an Enhancement II approach. In general, these
reaches are geomorphically stable in their current conditions and have lower bank height ratios, low
bank slopes, and a lesser degree of bank erosion than reaches slated for restoration. Dirty Boots Reach
3 will be enhanced by excluding cattle, providing buffer plantings (predominately on the left bank
floodplain), completing targeted bank stabilization and adding grade control structures near proposed
Crossing 1. This Ell is proposed at a 2.5:1 credit ratio. The riparian buffer for UT1 Reach 1 is healthy and
contains a relatively mature canopy. Exclusion of cattle, including the upstream pond, understory
plantings, and targeted bank work is the justification of a 3:1 Ell ratio for UT1 Reach 1. Although the
density of invasive species in these two reaches is low, they will be treated.
4.3 Stream Preservation
Dirty Boots Reach 4 will be preserved by treating invasive species and providing long-term protection
through a conservation easement.
Widllands Cape Fear 03 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Dirty Boots Phase II Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 8

4.4 Wetlands
Three activities will be used to improve wetland hydrology to justify wetland rehabilitation in the areas
identified in Figure 8. First, cattle paths serving to funnel overland flow directly to receiving streams will
be removed to enhance floodplain storage. Second, in areas of active pasture, reestablishment of soil
structure will be improved through ripping and scarification of surface soils. This will break up
compaction and encourage infiltration and subsurface discharge to project streams. Third, and likely
most relevant, the restoration of incised streams using Priority 1 techniques will serve to effectively
change the subsurface flow gradient and discharge characteristics of the groundwater table to the
receiving stream. Tree planting and invasive species treatment will also occur in these areas to establish
a healthy riparian wetland buffer.
In areas that currently qualify as jurisdictional wetlands that are located adjacent to streams that are not
incised, wetland enhancement activities will occur. This will include fencing out livestock, planting,
invasive species treatment, and modification of compacted soils, if necessary.
Wetland rehabilitation areas will be located in areas of jurisdictional wetlands where a suite of wetland
functions have been degraded. Rehabilitation would typically be in areas where floodplain drainage has
been altered through channel incision or in areas where the floodplain drainage has been altered by
cattle damage or ditching to accelerate surface water runoff to the receiving streams.
The Site includes areas of wetland rehabilitation and enhancement. Because some of the wetland
rehabilitation areas are located in forested areas, the overall credit ratio is proposed at 2:1.
Rehabilitation areas are adjacent to streams that will be restored from an incised condition using a
Priority 1 restoration approach. Wetland enhancement is also proposed at a 2:1 ratio.
4.5 Vegetation Plan
Native riparian buffers will be planted along restored
and enhanced stream reaches, in all proposed wetland
restoration zones, and in all riparian restoration areas.
The ecological uplift can be summarized as transforming
an agriculturally impacted area to a protected riparian
corridor. Buffer restoration will involve planting
appropriate native tree species along the riparian
corridor. Herbaceous riparian vegetation will also be
planted, but additional herbaceous plants are expected
to re-establish naturally and through the placement of a
native seed mix in disturbed areas. Live stake shrub
species will be planted along restored streams.
Vegetation management and herbicide applications will
be needed over the first few years of tree establishment in the riparian buffer restoration areas to
prevent encroachment of invasive species. Portions of the site that have been maintained as cleared
agricultural fields will require little site preparation other than select herbicide treatments or limited
mechanical clearing to remove undesirable underbrush prior to planting.
The planting plan will be based on an appropriate nearby reference community and past project
experience. The plan will be developed to restore appropriate strata (canopy, understory, shrub, and
herbaceous layers). Vegetation planted in restored wetland areas will be based on species identified
within appropriate reference locations and professional experience based on site conditions.
Widllands Cape Fear 03 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Dirty Boots Phase II Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 9

Areas with an existing wooded riparian corridor will be treated for invasive species. The Site will be
protected in perpetuity under a conservation easement and will be marked per IRT guidelines.
5.0 Determination of Mitigation Credits
The mitigation stream and wetland credit calculations were derived using the US Army Corps of
Engineers' Stream Mitigation Guidance and was based on Wildlands' conceptual design for maximum
ecological uplift. Given the existing conditions of the stream channels, wetlands, the disturbance factors,
and the constraints, management objectives for each reach have been established.
The Site will be a combination of stream restoration and enhancement level II activities. Stream
restoration is proposed at a ratio of 1:1 and enhancement level II is proposed at ratios of 2.5:1 or 3:1 as
listed below. In general, if enhancement level II areas are located within wooded areas with minimal
opportunity for vegetative uplift but cattle have access and limited stream work is required, the 3:1 ratio
is proposed. Stream preservation is proposed at a 10:1 ratio. The management objective, the mitigation
type, and proposed amount of mitigation is presented in the below in Table 6.
Table 6. Proposed Stream Mitigation Credits
Stream Credits
Reach
Management Objectives
Type of Mitigation
Length
Ratio
Stream
(feet)
Credits
RESTORATION
Restore appropriate dimension, pattern,
Dirty Boots Reach 1
and profile with Priority 1 restoration.
Install habitat structures, allow bankfull
594
1
594
Dirty Boots - Reach 2
floodplain access. Establish native riparian
Restoration
303
1
303
buffer and exclude cattle, execute long
UT1 - Reach 2
term protection instrument, mark
249
1
249
easement.
Restoration Subtotal:
1,146
1,146
ENHANCEMENTII
Exclude cattle, treat invasive species,
Dirty Boots - Reach 3
stabilize banks and add structures where
477
2.5
191
needed, establish native riparian buffer
Enhancement II
UT1 - Reach 1
where needed, execute long term
291
3
97
protection instrument, mark easement.
Enhancement II Subtotal:
768
288
PRESERVATION
Dirty Boots Reach 4
Treat invasive species, long term
Preservation
585
10
59
protections instrument, mark easement.
Preservation Subtotal:
585
59
TOTAL
2,499
1,493
Table 7. Proposed Wetland Mitigation Credits
Wetland credits
Type of
Area
Wetland
Area
Management Objectives
Ratio
Mitigation
(Acres)
Credits
Exclude livestock, reduce soil compaction,
Rehabilitation
2.04
2
1.02
W-1
remove concentrated floodplain flow paths
as needed, re-establish Priority 1 stream
(rehabilitation areas only)
Enhancement
1.69
2
0.85
TOTAL:
1 3.73
1.87
m Widllands Cape Fear 03 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Dirty Boots Phase II Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 10

5.1.1 Credit Release Schedule
All credit releases will be based on the total credit generated as reported by the as -built surveys of the
Bank. Under no circumstances shall the Bank be debited until the necessary Department of Army (DA)
authorization has been received for its construction or the District Engineer (DE) has otherwise provided
written approval for the project in the case where no DA authorization is required for construction of
the mitigation project. The DE, in consultation with the IRT, will determine if performance standards
have been satisfied sufficiently to meet the requirements of the release schedules below. In cases where
some performance standards have not been met, credits may still be released depending on the
specifics of the case. Monitoring may be required to restart or be extended, depending on the extent to
which the site fails to meet the specified performance standard. The release of project credits will follow
the Monitoring Requirements and Performance Standards for Compensatory Mitigation in North
Carolina, dated February 9, 2013. The proposed credit release schedule is shown in Tables 8 and 9.
Table 8. Stream Credit Release Schedule
Credit
Interim
Total
Release
Credit Release Activity
Release
Released
Milestone
1
Bank Establishment
15%
15%
Completion of all initial physical and biological improvements made
2
15%
30%
pursuant to the Mitigation Plan
First year monitoring report demonstrates channels are stable and interim
3
performance standards have been met
10/
40%
Second year monitoring report demonstrates channels are stable and
4
interim performance standards have been met
10/
50%
Third year monitoring report demonstrates channels are stable and interim
5
performance standards have been met
10/
60%
Fourth year monitoring report demonstrates channels are stable and
65%
6
interim performance standards have been met
5o �
(75%')
Fifth year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are
75%
7
being met
10o �
(85%')
Sixth year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are
80%
8
being met
5%
(90%.)
Seventh year monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable,
90%
9
performance standards have been met.
10%
1
(100%.)
*A 10% reserve of credits to be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met.
Table 9. Riparian Wetland Credit Release Schedule
Credit
Interim
Total
Release
Credit Release Activity
Release
Released
Milestone
1
Bank Establishment
15%
15%
Completion of all initial physical and biological improvements made
2
15%
30%
pursuant to the Mitigation Plan
First year monitoring report demonstrates interim performance standards
3
10%
40%
are being met
Second year monitoring report demonstrates interim performance
4
10/
50%
standards are being met
Third year monitoring report demonstrates interim performance standards
5
15%
65%
are being met
m Widllands Cape Fear 03 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Dirty Boots Phase II Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 11

Credit
Interim
Total
Release
Credit Release Activity
Release
Released
Milestone
Fourth year monitoring report demonstrates interim performance
6
5%
70%
standards are being met
Fifth year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are
being met; Provided that all performance standards are met, the IRT may
7
allow the Bank Sponsor to discontinue hydrologic monitoring after the fifth
15%
85%
year, but vegetation monitoring must continue for an additional two years
after the fifth year for a total of seven years
Sixth year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are
8
being met
5%
90%
Seventh year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are
9
10%
100%
being met, and project has received close-out approval
5.2 Initial Allocation of Released Credits
The initial allocation of released credits is defined as Bank Establishment in the 2013 Wilmington District
credit release schedule guidance document. The initial allocation can be released without prior written
approval of the DE upon satisfactory completion of the following activities:
a. Execution of the UMBI by the Sponsor and the USACE.
b. Approval of the final mitigation plan.
c. Recordation of the conservation easement and delivery of a title opinion acceptable to the
USACE.
Delivery of the financial assurances described in the mitigation plan.
404 permit verification for construction of the site, if required.
5.3 Subsequent Credit Releases
All subsequent credit releases must be approved by the DE, in consultation with the IRT, based on a
determination that required performance standards have been achieved. For stream projects, a reserve
of 10% of a site's total stream credits shall be released after four bankfull events have occurred in
separate years, provided the channel is stable and all other performance standards are met. In the event
that less than four bankfull events occur during the monitoring period, release of these reserve credits
shall be at the discretion of the IRT. As the bank approaches milestones associated with the credit
release, Wildlands will submit a request for credit release to the DE along with documentation
substantiating achievement of criteria required for release to occur. This documentation will be included
with the annual monitoring report.
6.0 Performance Standards and Monitoring Plan
The performance criteria for the Site will follow approved performance criteria presented in the October
2016 IRT Mitigation Monitoring Guidance. Annual monitoring and semi-annual site visits will be
conducted to assess the condition of the completed project. Specific performance standard components
are proposed for stream morphology, hydrology, and vegetation. The stream restoration reaches of the
project will be assigned specific performance criteria components for hydrology, vegetation, and
geomorphology. The enhancement II reaches will be assigned specific performance criteria components
for vegetation only. Performance criteria will be evaluated throughout the (up to) seven years of post -
construction monitoring. If all stream, vegetation, and hydrologic performance criteria have been
successfully met and at least four bankfull events have occurred during separate years, Wildlands may
propose to terminate stream and/or vegetation monitoring after five years with written approval from
m Widllands Cape Fear 03 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Dirty Boots Phase II Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus Page 12

the USACE and North Carolina Interagency Review Team (IRT). An outline of the performance criteria
components follows.
6.1 Stream Morphological Parameters and Channel Stability
Dimension
Riffle cross sections on the restoration reaches should be stable and should show little change in
bankfull area, bank height ratio, and width -to -depth ratio. Riffle cross sections should fall within the
parameters defined for channels of the appropriate stream type. If any changes do occur, these changes
will be evaluated to assess whether the stream channel is showing signs of instability. Changes in the
channel that indicate a movement toward stability or enhanced habitat include a decrease in the width -
to -depth ratio in meandering channels or an increase in pool depth. These sorts of bed changes do not
constitute a problem or indicate a need for remedial actions. If channel changes indicate a movement
toward stability, remedial action will not be taken.
In order to assess channel dimension performance,
permanent cross sections will be installed on restoration and
reaches per the IRT Mitigation Monitoring Guidelines
(October 2016). Each cross section will be permanently
marked with pins to establish its location. Cross section
surveys will include points measured at all breaks in slope,
including top of bank, bankfull, edge of water, and thalweg.
Cross section and bank pin surveys (if applicable) will be
conducted in monitoring years one, two, three, five, and
seven.
Profile and Pattern
Longitudinal profile surveys will be conducted during the as -built survey but will not be conducted
during the seven-year monitoring period unless other indicators during the annual monitoring indicate a
trend toward vertical and lateral instability. If a longitudinal profile is deemed necessary, monitoring will
follow standards as described in the Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated Guide to Field
Technique (Harrelson et. al., 1994) for the necessary reaches.
Substrate
Channel substrate materials will be sampled with the pebble count method along restoration, and
enhancement I reaches. These reaches should show maintenance of coarser materials in the riffle
features and smaller particles in the pool features. A reach -wide pebble count will be performed in each
restoration reach each monitoring year for classification purposes. A pebble count will be performed at
each surveyed riffle cross-section, only during the as -built survey to characterize the pavement.
6.2 Hydrology
Stream
Four bankfull flow events, occurring in separate years, must be documented on the restoration reaches
within the seven-year monitoring period. Stream monitoring will continue until success criteria in the
form of four bankfull events in separate years have been documented. Bankfull events will be
documented using photographs and either a crest gage or a pressure transducer, as appropriate for Site
conditions. The selected measurement device will be installed in the stream within a surveyed riffle
cross section. Photographs will also be used to document the occurrence of debris lines and sediment
deposition.
Where restoration activities are proposed for intermittent streams, monitoring gages will be installed to
track the frequency and duration of stream flow events. Continuous surface water flow within the
Widllands Cape Fear 03 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Dirty Boots Phase II Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus Page 13

tributaries must be documented to occur every year for at least 30 consecutive days during the seven-
year monitoring period. This 30-day period of flow can occur at any point during the year. Additional
monitoring may be required if surface water flow cannot be documented due to abnormally dry
conditions.
WPtlanrl
Groundwater monitoring will be conducted for seven years after construction to evaluate the hydrologic
state of the restored wetland areas. Wetland groundwater gages will be installed in accordance with the
techniques and standards described in the USACE document entitled "Technical Standard for Water -
Table Monitoring of Potential Wetland Sites" (ERDC TN-WRAP-05-2, June 2005). Groundwater
monitoring gages will be established throughout the wetland area to adequately characterize the
different soils, vegetation communities, and surface topographic variations that are found across the
site. According to Table 1 in the USACE Mitigation Guidance update, Wehadkee soils have a wetland
saturation range of 12-16% of the growing season. Based on this, the final criteria for the wetland
hydrology will be groundwater levels within 12 inches of the soil surface for a minimum period of 12% of
the growing season.
6.3 Vegetation
The final vegetative success criteria will be the survival of 210 planted stems per acre in the riparian
corridors at the end of the required monitoring period (year seven). The interim measure of vegetative
success for the Site will be the survival of at least 320 native species stems per acre at the end of the
third monitoring year and at least 260 stems per acre at the end of the fifth year of monitoring. Also,
trees must average seven feet in height at the end of the fifth monitoring year, and ten feet in height at
the end of the seventh monitoring year. If this performance standard is met by year five and stem
density is trending towards success (i.e., vigor), and invasive species are not threatening ecological
success, monitoring of vegetation on the Site may be terminated with written approval by the USACE in
consultation with the IRT. The extent of invasive species coverage will also be monitored and controlled
as necessary throughout the required monitoring period.
Vegetation monitoring quadrants will be installed across the Site to measure the survival of the planted
trees. The number of monitoring quadrants required, and frequency of monitoring will be based on the
October 2016 IRT Mitigation Monitoring Guidance. Vegetation monitoring will occur in the summer and
will follow the CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation (2008).
6.4 Other Parameters
Photo Reference Stations
Photographs should illustrate the Site's vegetation and morphological stability on an annual basis. Cross
section photos should demonstrate no excessive erosion or degradation of the banks. Longitudinal
photos should indicate the absence of persistent mid -channel bars within the channel or vertical
incision. Grade control structures should remain stable. Deposition of sediment on the bank side of vane
arms is preferable. Maintenance of scour pools on the channel side of vane arms is expected.
Photographs will be taken once a year to visually document stability for seven years following
construction. Permanent markers will be established and located with GPS equipment, so that the same
locations and view directions on the Site are photographed each year. Photos will be used to monitor
restoration and enhancement areas, as well as vegetation plots.
Longitudinal reference photos will be established at regular intervals along the channel by taking a
photo looking upstream and downstream. Cross sectional photos will be taken of each permanent cross
section looking upstream and downstream. Reference photos will also be taken for each of the
Widllands Cape Fear 03 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Dirty Boots Phase II Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 14

vegetation plots. Representative digital photos of each permanent photo point, cross section, and
vegetation plot will be taken when the stream and vegetation assessments are conducted. The
photographer will make every effort to consistently maintain the same area in each photo over time.
Visual Assessments
Visual assessments should support the specific performance standards for each metric as described
above. Visual assessments will be performed along stream reaches on a semi-annual basis during the
seven-year monitoring period. Problem areas such as channel instability (e.g. lateral and/or vertical
instability, instream structure failure/instability and/or piping, headcuts), vegetation health (e.g. low
stem density, vegetation mortality, invasive species, or encroachment), beaver activity, or livestock
access will be noted. Areas of concern will be mapped and photographed and will be accompanied by a
written description in the annual report. Problem areas will be re-evaluated during each subsequent
visual assessment. Should remedial actions be required, a plan of action will be provided in the annual
monitoring report.
Benthic Macroinvertebrates
If required by DWR as part of the project's permitting process, benthic macroinvertebrate sampling will
be performed on the restored site. Any required sampling will be performed using DWR Standard
Operating Procedures for Benthic Macroinvertebrates (October 2012).
7.0 Maintenance and Long -Term Sustainability
7.1 Maintenance
The Bank shall be monitored on a regular basis and a physical inspection of the project shall be
conducted at a minimum of once per year throughout the post -construction monitoring period until
performance standards are met. These site inspections may identify site components and features that
require routine maintenance. Routine maintenance will be conducted to rectify identified deficiencies
and may include the activities listed in Table 10.
Table 10. Maintenance Plan
Component /
Feature
Maintenance through project close-out
Routine channel maintenance and repair activities may include chinking of in -stream
structures to prevent piping, securing loose coir matting, and supplemental installations of live
Stream
stakes and other target vegetation along the channel. Areas where stormwater and floodplain
flows intercept the channel may also require maintenance to prevent bank failures and head -
cutting. Beaver dams that inundate the streams channels shall be removed and the beaver
shall be trapped.
Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the targeted community.
Routine vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include supplemental planting,
Vegetation
pruning, mulching, and fertilizing. Exotic invasive plant species affecting the viability of the
mitigation shall be controlled by mechanical and/or chemical methods. Any vegetation control
requiring herbicide application will be performed in accordance with the NC Department of
Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations.
Site boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the bank site
Site
and adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker, bollard, post, tree -
blazing, or other means as allowed by site conditions and/or conservation easement. Boundary
Boundary
markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on an as -needed
basis.
m Widllands Cape Fear 03 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Dirty Boots Phase II Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 15

7.2 Adaptive Management
Upon completion of site construction, the Sponsor will implement the post -construction monitoring
protocols and minor remedial actions (routine maintenance) will be performed as needed for the
duration of the monitoring period. The Sponsor will notify the USACE immediately if monitoring results
or visual observations suggest a trend towards instability, major remedial actions are needed, or that
performance standards cannot be achieved. Should major remedial measures be required, the Sponsor
will submit a Corrective Action Plan and coordinate with the USACE until authorization is secured to
conduct the adaptive management activities. The Sponsor is responsible for funding and/or providing
the services necessary to secure any necessary permits to support the proposed major remedial
adaptive management actions, to implement the corrective action plan, and to deliver record drawings
that depict the extent and nature of the work performed. If the USACE determines that the Bank is not
meeting performance standards or the Sponsor is not complying with the terms of the instrument, the
USACE may take appropriate actions, including but not limited to: suspending credit sales, utilizing
financial assurances, and/or terminating the instrument.
7.3 Long Term Management Provisions
The Sponsor will institute a Long Term Management Plan responsible for assessing the condition of the
Bank and implementing maintenance provisions to maintain performance of the Bank. The proposed
conservation easement will help to ensure that only IRT-allowable activities take place. This easement
will be transferred to an IRT-approved non-profit organization once monitoring success criteria have
been achieved.
The provider for long term management of the sites is anticipated to be Unique Places to Save
(UP2Save). UP2Save is a 501c3 nonprofit committed to land conservation through conservation planning
and management. The funding mechanism for long term management will be a stewardship
endowment funded by Wildlands. Contact information for UP2Save is listed below.
Unique Places to Save
206 Causeway Drive #206
Wrightsville Beach, NC 28480
Phone: [phone]
Email: info@ uniqueplacestosave.org
To monitor the project's continued success, a Long Term Management Plan will be implemented
following the seven-year monitoring period. All components of the bank will be inspected annually or
less frequently as needed to ensure that the Bank remains stable in perpetuity. Sources of instability or
other deficiencies will be addressed. Invasive species will be managed annually or less frequently as
needed to ensure the long term survivability of the planned native vegetation community. All reporting
will be documented and kept on file for future reference.
8.0 References
Geologic Map of North Carolina 1:500,000 scale, 1985. Compiled by Philip M. Brown at el. Raleigh, NC,
North Carolina Geological Survey.
https://ncdenr.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapSeries/index.html?appid=a8281cbd24b84239b29cd2ca7
98d4a10
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 2011. Web Soil Survey.
http://websoiIsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR), 2005. Cape Fear Basinwide Water Quality Plan,
accessed at: https:Hdeq.nc.gov/media/309/download
Widllands Cape Fear 03 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Dirty Boots Phase II Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 16

NC Division of Mitigation Services. 2009. Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priorities
NCDMS Summary of Findings and Recommendations for the Rocky River (Upper & Middle) and Bear
Creek Local Watershed Plan. NCDMS 2005. Upper Rocky River LWP Detailed Assessment and
Targeting of Management Report. https://deg.nc.gov/media/8073/download
Soil Survey of Chatham County, North Carolina, USDA-NRCS, accessed at
https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx
Widllands Cape Fear 03 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Dirty Boots Phase II Mitigation Site
Draft Prospectus
Page 17

Blood Run
Siler City
Municipal
Triangle
Triangle Land
Conservancy Easement
Knoll Ridge Registered
Heritage Area
----1003020070
' Knoll Ridge
1
I
I S
I
I
Y
i
Project
Location
Rocky River Basalt
Bluffs and Levees
L
il
Rocky Ver Subbasin
iparian Aquatic Habitat
�gisteredlHeritage Area
e -
_ _ 03030003060060
03030003020080 ,(� (� j Goldston.
Bennett/Hardpan and/Bennett,Lon I@af J
i�i�//////./ 1
Pi a Restordti%n/Aria jegist red
1 S AArea _ /i' _ _ - - �� -, G
30300030600
0 Project Location 0 Water Supply Watershed NC Natural Heritage Program
Five Mile Radius - Water Features Managed Areas
County Line 0 Water Quality TRA 0 NC Historic Preservation Areas
Municipalities Habitat TRA
Local Watershed Plan
Hydrologic Unit Code (14-Digit) Hydrology TRA 303d Listed Streams
Q River Basin Significant Natural Heritage Areas IS Airports
0 0.75 1.5 Miles Figure 1 Vicinity Map
ktW I L D L A N D S Dirty Boots Mitigation Site
ww ENGINEERING Cape Fear River Basin 03030003
�J Chatham County, NC

Figure 2 Site Map
0,,* W I L D L A N D S o sso 30o Feet Dirty Boots Mitigation Site
Cape Fear River Basin 03030003
ENGINEERING � �
Chatham County, NC

rA
I I
1 I
_ 1
I 1
r 1 �
Siler City, NC 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle
on,
Proposed Conservation Easement
1,_,=
Figure 3 USGS Map
OTV,W1LDLANDS 0 200 400 Feet Dirty Boots Mitigation Site
E N G I N E E R I N G I I I Cape Fear River Basin 03030003
�J Chatham County, NC

Figure 4 Watershed Map
kv,-WlLDLANDS 0 300 600 Feet Dirty Boots Mitigation Site
E N G I N E E R I N G I I I I tCape Fear River Basin 03030003
Chatham County, NC

1 I
1 I
I
1 1
Project Location
Proposed Conservation Easement
Perennial Project Streams
Intermittent Project Streams
Non -Project Streams
CaB - Callison - Lignum complex, 2-6% Slopes
CkC - Cid silt loam, 6-10% Slopes
CmB - Cid-Lignum complex, 2-6% Slopes
CkC
Figure 5 Soils Map
*VW1LDLANDS 0 200 400 Feet Dirty Boots Mitigation Site
E N G I N E E R I N G Cape Fear River Basin 03030003
I I I
Chatham County, NC

Figure 6B Concept Map
Option W I L D L A N D S 0 150 300 Feet Dirt
P
E N G I N E E R I N G I i I i I -I. y Boots Mitigation Site
„ttttttlll"`III Cape Fear River Basin 03030003
Chatham County, NC

i i C3�3G3�9
�u G3�9 iWJ
1 • �
�ilu L3�a � i
Elevation (Feet)
Value
555
470
Project Location
Proposed Conservation Easement
® Proposed Internal Crossings
Proposed Stream Restoration
Proposed Stream Enhancement II
Proposed Stream Preservation
Non -Project Streams
•Q Reach Breaks
U,TL3 Reach 1,
Figure 7 UDAR Map
WOW I L D L A N D S 0 200 400 Feet Dirty Boots Mitigation Site
E N G I N E E R I N G Cape Fear River Basin 03030003
Chatham County, NC

Appendix A
Historic Aerials

a 4
• 4
t AP _* ,
r

I '
4
' r
.1' c4 f� �. {1� �.1� h • y � ti
0
i 4' w ,� ' It
R -! a!/ 5•
4
✓ ram• � � `Xa (. � �}�� Y �} r �k. .}� €�r # i
.45
r #„# 10
* j
Olt,
'I
{
. r�l �i �.�' I �{F ham* �1 .y[•'�* F ' ��5 / 1
3 _
T W. �.
r y k yy
4.� `i ' } .� �.I��-' • - GYP Y
-
r
i 4
F }_ Ara■) �„•,►:
N � 1�� a N � y t ' .i � ��a
f, w
INQUIRY #:6868133.5
YEAR: 1961 S +� L. a r#' t'• � .40,14
(rEDR
.•iw� hi �� .rr rdr _fir , r .ems. �t'A�,L, �

ON
r^
i. itfoi-
.
141
44,
. - , i R v Orr 4 . ,. �. • .
r• ,flyy r '�'• �y�ra�'n��.,.:.','�;f jjL x-i'r T.�,: i�.
1
R '•� ..�. �'�•�r"�-,�fF �!'� '.^r .fir'
Y c 1
two r' 1,
,t' y :r ' ti p ..' �' . _ . • �..+ ` , -.� ,.
`S�. ....". I ''�'•�. .y �,� � •, ,. � �i. • �: ►1�r .•. ,, •sir ►. ' � -,•r ��.>'

J ,
_ .� � r`�`.� Jig,' • • . .. �
• �J' t #
a•F , S - �� f
r !•,;
��
_ ' L f 1 ■
1 J _ • J
OFF, t
,••,,rt F rL+
IP
1 ! 1
Ir
oy
I h'
' dam! �' _ • r.•— r t �k !!� yJ- _ a F .
Pk •• "1 +
T ` L
r}J L! .4 _ 1 •
i
IF
t .
f r
'.
ApIc
�� •__� J.
do
� L L
� � r
! },
1 _
! !+
INQUIRY #: 6868133.5
YEAR: 1973
500' (rEDR
W.lf►� ddo

f
,r
11
. I F
� t
i
-AA
-AA

i
•+
i
INQUIRY k 6868133.5 N
YEAR: 1999
= 500' FOR
I

r

+,�':,S y^'�i�4';1 ti'.• + 1.'rAr .1 ^��3�. 1,+. r -.c if. r-r='Y "v - i ►
477
Y,
,.:r�si : ��; � :`.�, .,•fir r '' �•
i Y ;j f i rah• � � - - +
' }s'�'�s,•=fi t :• y Al.
1.
�..` ,� - 1 y ,,�y r= r � ' .-` 1T' �� r try+.�i; 'a tr' i •'� }.. a� �r : • C`� '`%+ r
I _� ;.� _ _ i o; J it A�- '� ,�. i .l'�• . � .y �' '' _
o.
r� '#}:Sr i•�, ■jr •.. �. � i7;1�',fl, ••��.!•�r�- '� { � �lr+. 'r .C.,+�. ••Z •�t � r
Vt
;� i �. + �a:' '.er1 { .Y�,• r�r F {;S "r �a •r"r `:[+i �i �.+� }ti �4+
ti-�+r �yf�i,_{�y'�.Y. •.+e�f� �•- :s, �i��S.�•�♦�:t`4 �ir'•i�`�'�! � ��' ,�t.
_ : �i6 P,+sa''- ++}+_ +: a ;v� �� �,'7r�rJ 'r, :'� ' a.� � �'f ; �+�:> ;'�� - I y �"� �•r
.4
'. •+ � ��e- ti"'!�•� {� � 1 i f�,j'�h a •r, #Y _ r .+
.. r.+ r•. `�l�y :r
41
41
r
- s - ►-<t ti. r.

4
A
li

it
i
4
—4
17,k
iIlk
W
Au
v e;
0
.• }i YIf �r ��,
• s y�M,
44
• Yi w 1 +•
INQUIRY k 6868133.5 t � +� ■ ' , Y �■ `�
N �'+ • '`
YEAR: 2016 w ''
�'.■ ��
= SL
500' FOR
t�

Appendix 6
NCDWR Stream Classification Forms

NC D%VQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.111 OJ &.I
Date: Lit z
Project/Site: Dti 1{ 1 &JS L7,
Latitude: 3j , b 10?
Evaluator: G
County: C�a (4
Longitude: —
Total Points:
Stream rs at least intermittent 3 s f
Stream Determination circle a
Other
J
rfa 19 or erenntal tfa 30• p
Ephemeral Intermittent erennta
e g Quad Name: r
n ram)
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = `v
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3 In -channel structure ex riffle -pool, step -pool,
n le- ool sequence
0
1
2
4 Panicle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
2
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
Ck
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
2
3
9 Grade control
0
0.5
1
10 Natural valley
D
05
1
11 Second or greater order channel
No - 0
Yes = 8
anmcial ditches are not rated: see dis ssions in manuai
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = )
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14 Leaf litter
1.5
05
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1 5
15 Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1 5
17 Sod -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C Biology (Subtotal = 1�
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19, Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22 Fish
0.5
1
15
23 Crayfish
0.5
1
1 5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1 5
25 Algae
0
1
1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1
Other =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p 35 of manual
Notes-
Sketch-
Z3
MY

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 0-119 S
Date: f 6
Projectl5ite: 7Z
Latitude: �S �� 3 `r
Evaluator: C
County: t
Longitude: —
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 2 5.7 j
Stream Determi ati circle one)
Other
7
Ephemeral a mitten Perennial
e g Quad Name: j (�✓G t
if 2 19 orperennial if a 30'
A. Geomor hold (Subtotal = i 3 5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
is Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex raffle -pool. step -pool.
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8 Headcuts
1
2
3
9 Grade control
0
0.5
Q1
1 5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
/�
11 Second or greater order channel
Na =
Yes = 3
arbuciai ❑ilcne5 are nul idled. see d 5 u`- " 11:In nlanuai
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = e"�) )
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
B
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14, Leaf litter
1.5
61P
05
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
n
0.5
1
1.5
16 Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
o =
Yes = 3
C. Biolo Subtotal = 7,
18- Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22 Fish
0.5
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
0.5
1
1 1 5
24 Amphibians
05
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
15
26 Wetland plants in streambed
AC = 0.7 OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods- See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 0"' 1 / K"'J�
Date: 9/6
Project/site. UT2A
Latitude: 3:46 tl!V7
Evaluator:
County: G G (AAvt
Longitude: — 79,q �3a
Total Points:
rs '� `�
Stream Determ i circle one)
Other 1 /
r r f
ifa19 erennalifermltfent
riz 19 or erennral B z 30"
Ephemeral n ermltten Perennial
eg Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure ex riffle -pool, step -pool,
rile- oot sequence
0
1
3
4 Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
Qoj
1
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
n1
2
3
8 Headcuts
0
2
3
9 Grade control
a5
1
1 5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1 5
11 Second or greater order channel
C=
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rates; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _ )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1
0.5
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
15
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
CO.5
1
1 5
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 7.7 ) �'
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants to streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
(y
1
2
3
21, Aquatic Mollusks
0
2
3
22 Fish
D,%
05
1
1.5
23 Crayfish
0
1 05
1 1
15
24, Amphibians
0:
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26 Wetland plants in streambed
ACW =
OBL = 1 5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be tdenitfied using other methods See p. 35 of manual_
Notes:
Sketch:

Appendix C
Existing Geomorphic Data

98
95
04
93
ul
92
9;
E
f
E 5 10 15 20 25 34 35 -.
'Mit-
Approximate Bankfull Flood Prone Area ---------- Low Bank Height
Bankfull Mrftnsions
Flood Dimensions
10.3
x-section area (it. sq-)
22-4
W flood prone aria iitl
10.8
' width(ft)
Z-1
' enttenchrnent ratio
0.9
mean depth (ftj
1.8
low bank height 0 t 1
1.2
max depth 00
16
low bank height ratio
11,3
weztedpet imeter(it)
0.3
hydraulic radius(ft)
11-4
width-depthiatie
nfu
97
96
95
i 94
u�
92
] 5 1C 15 20 25 30
v th
Approximate Bankfull Flood Prone Area ---------- Low Bank Height
9ankfur Dimensions
Flood Dimensions
10.5
x-section area (ft.sp. ]
30- 0
W flood prone area (10
11.8
width 00
2.5
entrenchment ratio
0.3
mean depth [it)
1.7
low bank height (it)
1.7
' maH depth (ftj
1-0
' low bank height ratio
12.8
wetted perimeter 00
0.8
hydraulic radius [ft1
13.5
' width -depth ratio

Cross Section 3. T3 Reach 2 -
Approximate Bankfull Flood Prone Area ---------- Low Bank Heigh
Bankfull Dimensions
FWd Dirmnsions
3.1
x-section area (ft.sq j
51D.0 W flood prone area (it)
6.8
width (it)
7.3 entrenchment ratio
0.S
mean depth UO
1.4 low bank height (ft)
0.8
max depth 00
1.7 low bank height ratio
7.0
wetted perimeter Ifs }
0.4
h9draulloradiusV0
14.8
width -depth ratio
Approximate Bankfull Flood Prone Area ---------- Low Bank Heigh
Bankfull pensions
Flood ❑rme(ts*ns
6.8
x-section area Vt. sq.)
25.3 W flood prone area (It)
8.2
width (it)
3.1 ' entrenchment ratio
0.8
' mean depth 00
1.8 ' low bank height (it)
1.5
' max depth (f0
1.1 ' low bank height ratio
&8
' wetted perimeter (h)
0.8
hgdrauke radius (it)
9.7
width -depth ratio

Me
0 5 FV 30 �o
Afttnt
Approximate Bankfull Flood Prone Area ---------- Low Bank Heigh
Ban kfuI Dimensions
Flood Dimensions
4.2
x-section area (ft, sq-1
7.4 bl flood prone area (it)
5.6
` width Ift)
1.3 ' entrenchment ratio
08
` mean depth 00
2.5 'low bank height (It)
11
` mace depth 00
2.2 "low bank height ratio
6.5
' wetted perimeter 00
0-7
' hydraulic radius Ih)
7.4
` width -depth ratio
riffle
r=
rF
I
n
IFi
LL
to 20 25
Approximate Bankfull Flood Prone Area ---------- Low Bank Heigh
6ant.full Dimensions
Flood Dimensons
20
re -section area (it. sq.)
7.6
6J flood prone area (ft)
4.5
' width 40
1.7
' entrenchment ratio
0.4
' mean depth 00
2-2
'tow bank height (141
0.7
' max depth Ift)
3.1
'low bank height ratio
4.9
` wetted perimeter 00
0.4
' hydraulic radius (it)
10.2
' width -depth ratio

Cross
Section
7, T1 Reach 2
r
Approximate Bankfull Flood Prone Area ---------- Low Bank Heigh
Sankfull Dimensions
flood Dimenwons
2.8
x-section area(lt.sq.)
7.3 W flood prone area (l+l
5.3
' width lft)
1.4 '*entrenchment ratio
0.5
`mean depth lft)
2.6 "low bank height VO
0.8
` mare depth (ftl
3.3 'low bank height ratio
5.8
` wetted perimeter (it)
4.5
"'hydraulic radius 00
9.8
' width -depth ratio
F;roxss Section 8. Dirty Soots Reach I.
r �
Approximate Bankfull — Flood Prone Area ---------- Low Bank Height
Bankfull OffMnsions
FiDod Dimensions
2.7
x-section area fit. sq.)
200.0
W Ilood prone area (f t)
3.8
` width 00
513
'4 entrenchment stir,
0.7
' mean depth 00
46
'low bank height 00
1.2
max depth 00
4.0
'low bank height ratio
4.7
wettedperimeter 1.10
0.6
' hydraulic radius Y0
5.3
` width -depth ratio

Approximate Bankfull
riffle
tf) 20
Ohm tft]
Flood Prone Area
Banktull Dimensions
8.0
x-sectionarea (ft.sq.)
8.6
` width (It)
0.9
mean depth (10
1.3
max depth 00
&S
`wetted petimeter (It)
0.8
9 hydraulic radius 00
3.2
` width -depth ratio
30 35 40
Low Bank Height
Flood Dimensions
30.0 ' W floodprone area 00
3.5 ' entrenchment ratio
4.2 ' low bank height (ft1
3.2 low bank height ratio

Appendix D
EDR Radius Report Summary

Dirty Boots Mitigation Site
Edwards Hill Church Road
Bear Creek, NC 27207
Inquiry Number: 6868133.2s
February 22, 2022
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
(rEDR www.edrnet.com
FORM-LBD-MGA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
Executive Summary-------------------------------------------------------
ES1
Overview Map
2
Detail Map
3
Map Findings Summary----------------------------------------------------
4
Map Findings
8
OrphanSummary---------------------------------------------------------
9
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking
GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum------------------------------------------
A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary-------------------------------------------.
A-2
Physical Setting Source Map
A-7
Physical Setting Source Map Findings----------------------------------------
A-8
Physical Setting Source Records Searched------------------------------------.
PSGRA
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC6868133.2s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E1527-21), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
EDWARDS HILL CHURCH ROAD
BEAR CREEK, NC 27207
COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
35.6359940 - 35- 38' 9.57"
79.4225430 - 79- 25' 21.15"
Zone 17
642832.1
3944522.5
544 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map: 13702510 SILER CITY, NC
Version Date: 2019
South Map: 13702444 BEAR CREEK, NC
Version Date: 2019
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from: 20140827
Source: USDA
TC6868133.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

F- MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
EDWARDS HILL CHURCH ROAD
BEAR CREEK, NC 27207
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP
ID SITE NAME ADDRESS
NO MAPPED SITES FOUND
DATABASE ACRONYMS
RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ELEVATION DIRECTION
6868133.2s Page 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL___________________________ National Priority List
Proposed NPL________________ Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS -------------------- Federal Superfund Liens
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Delisted NPL__________________ National Priority List Deletions
Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
FEDERAL FACILITY__________ Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS_________________________ Superfund Enterprise Management System
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
SEMS-ARCHIVE-------------- Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action
CORRACTS__________________ Corrective Action Report
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
RCRA-TSDF------------------ RCRA- Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-LQG------------------- RCRA- Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG------------------- RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG----------------- RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity
Generators)
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS_________________________ Land Use Control Information System
TC6868133.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US ENG CONTROLS_________ Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROLS --------- Institutional Controls Sites List
Federal ERNS list
ERNS_________________________ Emergency Response Notification System
Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites
NC HSDS_____________________ Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities
SHWS------------------------- Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities
SWF/LF_______________________ List of Solid Waste Facilities
OLI____________________________ Old Landfill Inventory
DEBRIS_______________________ Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
LCID__________________________ Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
LUST -------------------------- Regional UST Database
LAST__________________________ Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
INDIAN LUST_________________ Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUST_________________ State Trust Fund Database
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST____________________ Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST___________________________ Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST___________________________ AST Database
INDIAN UST__________________ Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL______________ No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP__________________ Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
VCP___________________________ Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
BROWNFIELDS______________ Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS----------- A Listing of Brownfields Sites
TC6868133.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY_______________________
Recycling Center Listing
HIST LF_______________________
Solid Waste Facility Listing
INDIAN ODI___________________
Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
ODI___________________________
Open Dump Inventory
DEBRIS REGION 9___________
Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
IHS OPEN DUMPS___________
Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL_________________ Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL_______________________ National Clandestine Laboratory Register
PFAS-------------------------- PFAS Contamination Site Listing
Local Land Records
LIENS 2_______________________ CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS________________________
Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS________________________
Spills Incident Listing
IMD___________________________
Incident Management Database
SPILLS 90____________________
SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80____________________
SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR_________
RCRA- Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
FUDS_________________________
Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD__________________________
Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS_______
State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR_______________
Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST____________
EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA_________________________
Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS__________________________
Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS--------------------------
Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD__________________________
Records Of Decision
RMP__________________________
Risk Management Plans
RAATS________________________
RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP___________________________
Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS_________________________
PCB Activity Database System
ICIS___________________________
Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS__________________________
FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS_________________________
Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE______________
Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA______________
Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER________
PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO ---------------------
Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS____________________
FIFRA/TSCATracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS_____________________
Incident and Accident Data
TC6868133.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CONSENT____________________
Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV_____________
Indian Reservations
FUSRAP______________________
Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA_______________________
Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS____________
Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS______________________
Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES____________________
Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES ---------
Abandoned Mines
FINDS -------------------------
Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
DOCKET HWC----------------
Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
ECHO -------------------------
Enforcement & Compliance History Information
UXO ---------------------------
Unexploded Ordnance Sites
FUELS PROGRAM___________
EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
AIRS__________________________
Air Quality Permit Listing
ASBESTOS___________________
ASBESTOS
COAL ASH____________________
Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS______________
Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance -----------
Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES------------------------
NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC----------------------------
Underground Injection Wells Listing
AOP---------------------------
Animal Operation Permits Listing
CCB___________________________
Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
PCSRP------------------------
Petroleum -Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
SEPT HAULERS______________
Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
MINES MRDS-----------------
Mineral Resources Data System
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP_____________________ EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto ----------------- EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner_____________ EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
4Q 7 :1019IT/4 141XCT91T/:I 7,I Mtl:1,III /_1YN:IV1*1
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS____________________ Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF_______________________ Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST____________________ Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were not identified.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
TC6868133.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
There were no unmapped sites in this report.
TC6868133.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7

OVERVIEW MAP - 6868133.2S
*
Target Property
A
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
♦
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
A
Manufactured Gas Plants
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
0 1/4 1/2 1 Mlles
Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
Special Flood Hazard Area (1%) Disposal Sites
0.211/. Annual Chance Flood Hazard
National Wetland Inventory
State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Dirty Boots Mitigation Site
CLIENT: Wildlands Eng, Inc.
ADDRESS: Edwards Hill Church Road
CONTACT: Tasha lGng
Bear Creek NC 27207
INQUIRY #: 6868133.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.635994 / 79.422543
DATE: February 22, 2022 3:49 pm
Copyright �o 2022 EDR, Inc.(,) 2015 Tom Tom Rel. 2015.

DETAIL MAP - 6868133.2S
*
Target Property
A
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
♦
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
A
Manufactured Gas Plants
t
Sensitive Receptors
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
0 1 /16 1 /B 1 /4 Mlles
Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
National Wetland Inventory Disposal Sites
State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Dirty Boots Mitigation Site
CLIENT: Wildlands Eng, Inc.
ADDRESS: Edwards Hill Church Road
CONTACT: Tasha lGng
Bear Creek NC 27207
INQUIRY #: 6868133.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.635994 / 79.422543
DATE: February 22, 2022 3:52 pm
Copyright �o 2022 EDR, Inc.(,) 2015 Tom Tom Rel. 2015.

Appendix E
Licensed Soil Scientist Report

A,
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
Date:
Project/Site:
County, State:
Sampling Point/
Coordinates:
Investigator:
Soil Series:
SOIL BORING LOG
4/21/2022
Dirty Boots Mitigation Site
Chatham County, NC
Soil Profile GA (35.641009,-79.424519)
W. Grant Lewis
Wehadkee (based on field assessment)
I
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
Type
Location
D-1
10 YR 4/2
100
loam
1-8
10 YR 5/1
70
10 YR 6/1
25
D
M
fine sandy loam
10 YR 4/6
5
C
PL
8-14
10 YR 5/2
90
10 YR 6/1
5
D
M
sandy clay loam
10 YR 4/4
5
C
M
14+
10 YR 6/1
95
10 YR 4/6
5
C
M
sandy clay
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Locaction: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
Signature:
Name/Print:
W. Grant Lewis
�yQFVsoft
0

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Date:
4/21/2022
Project/Site:
Dirty Boots Mitigation Site
County, State:
Chatham County, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates:
Soil Profile GB (35.639869,-79.423965)
Investigator:
W. Grant Lewis
Soil Series:
Wehadkee (based on field assessment)
A- 00t
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
Type
Location
0-2
10 YR 3/2
100
loam
2-10
30 YR 5/1
90
10 YR 5/6
10
C
M
sandy clay
10+
10 YR 5/1
60
10 YR 6/ 4
30
C
M
sandy clay
10 YR 5/6
10
C
M
Type: C--Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Locaction: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
Signature:
Name/Print:
W. Grant Lewis
SOIL
.��Eat'►t 2
4

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693 )%
SOIL BORING LOG Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Date:
4/21/2022
Project/Site:
Dirty Boots Mitigation Site
County, State:
Chatham County, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates:
Soil Profile GC (35.636609,-79.423158)
Investigator: W. Grant Lewis
Soil Series: Wehadkee (based on field assessment)
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
Type
Location
0-3
10 YR 4/3
100
loam
3-8
10 YR 6/2
90
10 YR 4/6
30
C
M
clay loam
8-14
10 YR 7/2
90
30 YR 6/8
30
C
M
clay loam
I
14-20
10 YR 7/2
80
10 YR 6/6
20
C
M
sandy clay loam
J
f
!
�
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Locaction: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
r� 1
Signature:
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis
rSOIL se

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693 J%
SOIL BORING LOG Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Date: 4/21/2022
Project/Site: Dirty Boots Mitigation Site
County, State: Chatham County, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates: Soil Profile GD (35.633992.-79.422253)
Investigator: W. Grant Lewis
Soil Series: Wehadkee (based on field assessment)
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
Type
Location
0-2
10 YR 4/3
100
loam
2-8
10 YR 7/1
97
30 YR 5/8
3
C
M
silt loam
8-14
10 YR 7/3
90
10 YR 5/8
2
C
M
clay loam
10 YR 6/1
8
D
M
14-20
10 YR 7/4
90
10 YR 5/6
5
C
M
sandy clay loam
10 YR 5/2
5
D
M
2D+
10 YR 7/2
45
10 YR 7/6
45
C
M
sandy clay loam
10 YR 5/2
10
D
M
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Locaction: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
Signature: ! "'
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Date: 4/21/2022
Project/Site:
County, State:
Sampling Point/
Coordinates:
Investigator:
Soil Series:
Dirty Boots Mitigation Site
Chatham Countv. NC
Soil Profile GE (35.636926,-79.420825)
W. Grant Lewis
Wehadkee (based on field assessment)
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Notes:
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
Type
Location
0-2
10 YR 4/2
100
-
100
loam
2-9
10 YR 5/1
90
10 YR 4/6
10
C
M
clay loam
9-18
10 YR 7/2
85
10 YR 5/6
10
C
M
clay loam
10 YR 5/1
5
D
M
18+
10 YR 6/1
80
30 YR 6/6
30
C
M
silty clay loam
10 YR 4/1
10
D
M
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. LOCactlon: PL=Pore umng, M=Matrx.
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
Signature:
Name/Print:
w
W. Grant Lewis

=
N
O
OM
N
-
Ui
Z
O
O
Fay
0
zQ 0
a
N
LLB
o
0 w
m�
o
C)
F
Q
��
Q
r
l
m
+'
Fcn
�_
L
i
a
Z
L.L
10
m
O
!6
L
N
3
N
m
0
m
O
a`
a`
U
o
o
U)
a`
r-_`
-Wy

Appendix F
Landowner Authorizations

LANDOWNER AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRITION:
Deed Book: Estate File Number 13 E 0279 County: Chatham
Parcel ID Number: 0005034
Street Address: 173 Bonlee School Road, Bear Creek, NC
Property Owner: Eddie Hancock Watkins
The undersigned, registered property owner of the above property, does hereby authorize
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. to take all actions necessary for the evaluation of the property as a
potential stream, wetland and/or riparian buffer mitigation project, including conducting stream
and/or wetland determinations and delineations, as well as issuance and acceptance of any required
permit(s) or certification(s). I agree to allow regulatory agencies, including the US Army Corps of
Engineers, to visit the property as part of these environmental reviews.
Property Owners(s) Address: PO Box 80, Bonlee, NC 27213
(if different from above)
Property Owner Telephone Number: 919-770-3545
I hereby certify the above information to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
t
&gd-� &;2V�4
�- 3d-ate
(Property Owner Authorized Signature) (Date)