WQ0000672_Renewal (Application)_20230426

Initial Review
Reviewer Nathaniel.Thornburg
Is this submittal an application? (Excluding additional information.) *
Yes No
Permit Number (IR) * WQ0000672
Applicant/Permittee City of Lumberton
Applicant/Permittee Address 700 Lafayette Street, Lumberton, NC 28358
Is the owner in BIMS? Yes No Is the facility in BIMS?
Owner Type
Facility Name
County
Fee Category Major
Is this a complete application?*
Yes No
Signature Authority
Signature Authority Title
Signature Authority Email
Document Type (if non -application)
Email Notifications
Municipal
City of Lumberton Class B Residuals Program
Robeson
Does this need review by the hydrogeologist? * Yes No
Regional Office
CO Reviewer
Admin Reviewer
Fee Amount
Complete App Date
04/26/2023
Yes No
$395
Below list any additional email address that need notification about a new project.
Email Address
Comments to be added to email notfication
Comments for Admin
Comments for RO

Comments for Reviewer
Comments for Applicant

Submittal Form
Project Contact Information
Please provide information on the person to be contacted by NDB Staff regarding electronic submittal, confirmation of receipt, and other correspondence.
Name* Michael Cody Hunt
Email Address*
[e-mail]
Project Information
.........................
Application/Document Type*
New (Fee Required)
Modification - Major (Fee Required)
Renewal with Major Modification (Fee
Required)
Annual Report
Additional Information
Other
Phone Number*
9107385311
Modification - Minor
Renewal
GW-59, NDMR, NDMLR, NDAR-1,
N DAR-2
Residual Annual Report
Change of Ownership
We no longer accept these monitoring reports through this portal. Please click on the link below and it will take you to the correct form.
https://edoes.deq.nc.gov/Forms/NonDischarge_Monitoring_Report
Permit Type:*
Wastewater Irrigation
High -Rate Infiltration
Other Wastewater
Reclaimed Water
Closed -Loop Recycle
Residuals
Single -Family Residence Wastewater
Other
Irrigation
Permit Number:*
WQ0000672
Has Current Existing permit number
Applicant/Permittee *
Lower Cape Fear Water and Sewer Authority
Applicant/Permittee Address*
700 Lafayette Street, Lumberton, NC 28358
Facility Name*
City of Lumberton Class B Residuals Program
Please provide comments/notes on your current submittal below.
At this time, paper copies are no longer required. If you have any questions about what is required, please contact Nathaniel Thornburg
at [e-mail].
Please attach all information required or requested for this submittal to be reviewed here.
(Application Form, Engineering Plans, Specifications, Calculations, Etc.)
City of Lumberton Renewal _V4 Submittal.pdf 87.9MB
Upload only 1 PDF document (less than 250 MB). Multiple documents must be combined into one PDF file unless file is larger
than upload limit.
* By checking this box, I acknowledge that I understand the application will not be accepted for pre -review until the fee (if required) has
been received by the Non -Discharge Branch. Application fees must be submitted by check or money order and made payable to the
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ). I also confirm that the uploaded document is a single PDF with all parts
of the application in correct order (as specified by the application).
Mail payment to:
NCDEQ — Division of Water Resources
Attn: Non -Discharge Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Signature
M,chae/ Cod Nvtil
Submission Date 4/21/2023

PO Box 390
Lumberton, NC 28359
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
April 20, 2023
N.C. Environmental Quality-DWQ
Information Processing Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Attention: Compliance Representative
Subject: Residuals Land Application Renewal for City of Lumberton
Land Application Program
(City of Lumberton WQ0000672)
Dear Compliance Representative:
The City of Lumberton is submitting a renewal application for their current Residuals Land Application
Permit WQ0000672. Enclosed is:
1. Response to NCDEQ Letter 1-3-23
2. RLAP 06-16 Form
3. RLAP Calculation Spreadsheets
4. Operation and Maintenance Plan
5. Residuals Source Certification (Form RSC 06-16) — WWTP and WTP
6. Quantitative Justification
7. Residuals Sampling Plan
8. Laboratory Analytical Data
9. Land Application Site Certifications
10. LASC 06-16 Form
11. Vicinity/Setback Application Maps
12. Soils Maps
13. Soil Scientist Report for New Application Sites
14. Topo Maps: Surface Waterbodies
15. County Board Notification
16. Soils and Agronomy Report
17. Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rates for Existing Sites

Modifications to the permit are as follows:
1. Addition of the Lumberton WTP as a residuals source.
Removal of 8 fields, those fields being: NC-RO-18-01, NC-RO-18-01, NC-RO-21-01, NC-RO-
21-02A, NC-RO-21-0213, NC-RO-21-03, NC-RO-21-04, and NC-RO-21-05.
Addition of 33 fields in Robeson County, those fields being: NC-RO-17-04A, NC-RO-17-05,
NC-RO-17-06, NC-RO-17-07, NC-RO-20-15, NC-RO-20-16, NC-RO-20-17, NC-RO-20-18,
NC-RO-20-19, NC-RO-20-20, NC-RO-20-21, NC-RO-40-1, NC-RO-40-2, NC-RO-40-3, NC-
RO-40-4, NC-RO-40-5, NC-RO-40-1, NC-RO-40-2, NC-RO-40-3, NC-RO-40-4, NC-RO-40-5,
NC-RO-40-6, NC-RO-40-7, NC-RO-40-8, NC-RO-42-1, NC-RO-42-2, NC-RO-42-3, NC-RO-
42-4, NC-RO-42-5, NC-RO-42-6, NC-RO-42-7, NC-RO-42-8, and NC-RO-42-9.
Should you need more information regarding this land application program, please contact me at 910-
738-5311.
k;j
Michael C. Hunt
Enviro-Choice Recycling

RESPONSE TO NCDEQ LETTER 1-3-23

PO Box 390
Lumberton, NC 28359
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
March 18, 2023
N.C. Environmental Quality-DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Attention: Mr. Zachary J. Mega
Subject: Response to Letter Dated 1-3-23
Mr. Mega,
We have updated the permit application to address the comments as follows (in red):
C. Application (FORM: RLAP 06-16):
1. Section III — Residuals Land Application Program Information:
a. Item 3 — A new ORC Designation form was completed and was sent to Drew at
the Fayetteville office (cc'd you to the email as well).
b. Item 4.a. — The calculated PAN values are incorrect. Please correct these values.
See Section E.3.e. PAN worksheets have been corrected.
c. Item 4.c. — The minimum acreages calculated are based on incorrect first -year and
five-year PAN values. Please update this table using the correct PAN calculations.
See Section E.3.e. Updated
E. Application (FORM: RSC 06-16):
If the City of Lumberton WTP is to be added back onto this permit as a residuals source
facility, a separate FORM: RSC 06-16 must be completed and a vicinity map, process
flow diagram, quantitative justification, sampling plan, laboratory analytical reports, and
PRNAR compliance documentation must be provided. Please make sure to adjust the
proposed maximum dry tons per year and all related calculations to account for the
additional residuals source facility. [15A NCAC 02T .1104(b)] These adjustments have
been made, as well as the new forms.
2. Summary for FORM: RSC 06-16:
a. Lumberton WWTP permit number has been updated to NC0024571.

b. Status code for the City of Lumberton WTP to "New" and provide a proposed dry
tonnage. A new RSC form was completed and this was elected..
Section II — Residuals Quality Information:
a. Item 3 — The TCLP results are from August 26, 2021. Please provide the latest lab
results. If the lab reports list "ND" as the result, please list the detection limit for
the analyte instead. The results for the reactivity test should be filled out as well.
[15A NCAC 02T .1104(b)] This has been corrected on all forms.
b. Item 4 — The reported metal concentrations are from August 26, 2021. Please
provide the latest lab results. If the lab results are reported on a wet weight basis
(mg/L), please convert them to a dry weight basis (mg/kg) using the total solids
percentage before reporting them in this table. Please provide a worksheet
showing these conversions. [15A NCAC 02T .1104(b), 02T .1105] Latest lab
results are contained in the most recent submittal.
c. Item 5.b. — The reported nutrient/micronutrient concentrations are from August
26, 2021. Please provide the latest lab results. If the lab reports list "ND" as the
result, please list the detection limit for the analyte instead and use this value for
calculations. [15A NCAC 02T .1104(b)] Updated.
d. Item 5.c. — The calculated SAR is incorrect. Please recalculate using the latest lab
results. Using the previously reported values, we are getting a SAR of 9.27, which
is close to the allowable maximum without special recommendation. SAR has
been recalculated. Also, recommendations from USDA are included.
e. Item 5.e. — The calculated PAN values are incorrect. Please recalculate these
values using the latest lab results and reference the attached worksheet example.
Recomputed utilizing attached spreadsheets.
K. Application (FORM: LOA 06-16):
For future application submittals, please list the City of Lumberton under the
"Applicant's name" section on the first page of the LOA instead of the landowner. No
response is required.
2. For Site NC-RO-17, "Y" is filled out in the "Lease" columns, but no lessee is provided
on the last page of either LOA. On the LASC, the lessee is listed as Delois Allen. Please
add the lessee's information to these two LOAs. Signature has been added.
For Field NC-RO-20-03 and Fields NC-RO-20-06 through NC-RO-20-08, Section IV of
the LOA should only be filled out if fields are to be transferred from a different permit to
WQ0000672. Please remove this information as these fields are already part of this
permit. We were advised early on that every landowner had to resign these forms since
this renewal is treated as a new permit not a modified permit.

4. For Fields NC-RO-39-07 and NC-RO-39-08, "Y" is filled out in the "Lease" column, but
no lessee is provided on the last page of the LOA or the LASC. Please change it to "N" if
there is no lessee for these fields. Has been fixed to reflect accuracy.
L. Application (FORM: LASC 06-16):
1. Comparing the LASC to the previous permit's Attachment B, Fields NC-RO-18-01, NC-
RO-18-02, and NC-RO-21-01 through NC-RO-21-05 are missing from this application.
Are these fields to be removed from this permit? For future application submittals, please
summarize any new, modified, transferred, or removed fields in the cover letter to aid in
review. Noted in cover letter.
2. For Fields NC-RO-16-16 through NC-RO-16-19, the lessee listed on the signed LOA is
Arrin Ozzell Baker and not Delois Baker. Please correct. This is corrected, Campen Farm
owns this, Arrin leases.
For Fields NC-RO-17-01 through NC-RO-17-04, there are duplicate Field IDs with
different acreages. Please remove the duplicates and update the total acreage to be
certified for this permit. If the previously permitted fields are increasing in acreage,
please list them as modified and not renewed. These have removed duplicates and adds
are managed as A, B, C.
4. For Site NC-RO-17, the landowner is listed as either Lumberton Municipal Airport or the
City of Lumberton while the corresponding LOAs list the landowner as only the City of
Lumberton. Please verify and update. We agree this is confusing, however the
landowner's are correct. However, the City owns the airport so the signatory is the same.
5. For Fields NC-RO-39-05 and NC-RO-39-06, Barbara Bullard is listed as the landowner
with Patrick Bullard as the lessee, however, Patrick Bullard is listed as the landowner
with no lessee on the signed LOA. Please correct. Corrected.
6. For Field NC-RO-39-09, there is no listed lessee, but on the signed LOA Patrick Bullard
is listed as the lessee. Please update. Updated.
Vicinity/Setback Maps:
For information on completing vicinity/setback maps please refer to the items listed
under 15 NCAC 02T .1104(c)(1) and Map Guidance for Residuals Land Application
Fields, which has been attached. Please update all vicinity/setback maps for the
following:
a. The title block for each map should contain the county where the site is located,
the landowner's name, the name of the permittee and/or permit number, and the
Site ID/Field IDs. Has been updated to include.
b. The total field acreages and net applicable acreages (application area) for each
field after setbacks are considered should be included on each map. Added.

c. Show linework for streams, surface water, channels, and ditches on each map.
Some maps do not have this delineated, while others do. Updated.
d. For all setback radii, please show a symbol in the center representing what the
setback is for (i.e., off -site dwelling, well, surface water, etc.) Please note that for
surface application by vehicle and injection/incorporation by irrigation there is no
required setback for on -site dwellings. Some maps do not show these icons, while
others do. [15A NCAC 02T .1108] Updated.
e. Add a note to each map stating "The compliance boundary is established at either
250 feet from the residuals land application area or 50 feet within the property
boundary, whichever is closest to the residuals land application area." [15 NCAC
02T .1104] Added to maps.
f. Recommend that map legends across all maps have the same content and follow
the same symbology. Changed.
g. Recommend decreasing the line weight for the application area boundary for
readability. On some maps, it appears that the application area is overlapping with
setback radii. Changed
h. Recommend labeling at least one road on each map with a visible font/outline.
Labeled
2. On the Site NC-RO-16 map:
a. What is the small radius between Fields 5 and 6? Owner owns the property, at one
time there was a mobile home there that has been removed. Labeled at his request.
b. Please show the 400-foot setbacks for the off -site dwellings located at 735 and
769 Solomn Road. This may reduce the application area of Field 8. Added.
c. Please show the 400-foot setback for the off -site dwelling in the rear of the
property located at 313 Solomn Road, just south of Field 6. Added.
d. Why is there one radius larger than the others in the bottom left? Corrected.
3. The two maps for Site NC-RO-17 are duplicated. Please remove these in the resubmittal.
Removed.
4. On the Site NC-RO-20 map for Fields 6-8 and 14:
a. There are additional stray labels on the right side. Please remove. Removed.
b. What is the group of small radii next to Field 8 denoting? Unbuffered homes
owned by the landowner.
5. On the Site NC-RO-20 map for Field 18, there is an off -site dwelling labeled within the
unsuitable area. This appears to be owned by the same owner who owns the field and
should be an on -site dwelling encompassed in the parcel boundary. Please update. Label
added.
6. On the Site NC-RO-20 map for Fields 19-21:

a. Field 20 appears to extend beyond the delineated parcel boundary. Please adjust
the application area or confirm the landowner owns the adjacent parcel and show
this. Mr. Hammonds does indeed own this parcel.
b. Why are there setbacks shown for on -site dwellings intersecting Field 20? Please
note that for surface application by vehicle and injection/incorporation by
irrigation there is no required setback for on -site dwellings. Has been deleted.
7. On the Site NC-RO-39 map for Fields 7-8, there appear to be surface water setbacks
missing near Field 7. Please delineate these. Setback is shown on new map.
8. On the Site NC-RO-40 map for Fields 1-2, there appear to be symbols used on the map
that are not shown in the legend. There also appears to be a missing parcel outline where
the unsuitable area boundary crosses outside the parcel boundary. Please correct.
Corrected.
9. On the Site NC-RO-40 map for Fields 3-7, Field 5 extends beyond the delineated parcel
boundary. Please adjust the application area or confirm the landowner owns the adjacent
parcel and show this. Landowner owns adjacent parcels.
N. Soils Maps:
For information on completing soil maps please refer to 15A NCAC 02T .1104(c)(2)(A)
and Map Guidance for Residuals Land Application Fields, which has been attached.
Please update all soil maps for the following:
a. The title block for each map should contain the county where the site is located,
the landowner's name, the name of the permittee and/or permit number, and the
Site ID/Field IDs. Corrected
2. There are no soil maps included for Fields NC-RO-20-15 through NC-RO-20-18. Please
submit these.
There are soil maps included for Fields NC-RO-41-01 through NC-RO-41-10, NC-RO-
43-01, and NC-RO-43-02, but these are not listed anywhere else in the application. If
these were added by mistake, please remove them. If they were not, please provide the
additional documentation for these fields and update the rest of the application
accordingly.
Soil Scientist Report:
No borings were completed for the Fields NC-RO-20-15 through NC-RO-20-18. Please
submit a soil scientist report per 15A NCAC 02T .I 104(c)(2)(A) for these fields. These
are being transferred from the PWC permit, per earlier conversations with Mr. Nate Roth
of NCDEQ these were evaluated at time of PWC permit and don't have to be redone.
2. Why were borings performed and analyzed for Fields NC-RO-41-01 through NC-RO-41-
10, NC-RO-43-01, and NC-RO-43-02 if they are not listed in the LASC for this permit
application? If these were added by mistake, please remove them. If they were not, please
provide the additional documentation for these fields and update the rest of the

application accordingly. These fields have been removed, landowners were not compliant
with signing LOAs at this time.
O. Topographic Maps:
1. For information on completing topographic maps please refer to Map Guidance for
Residuals Land Application Fields, which has been attached. Please update all
topographic maps for the following:
a. The title block for each map should contain the county where the site is located,
the landowner's name, the name of the permittee and/or permit number, and the
Site ID/Field IDs. Updated
b. Recommend removing the soil boring locations shown on some of the maps as
this is not required for topographic maps. Removed
R. Soils and Agronomy Report:
1. For Site NC-RO-17, the listed acreages do not match the LASC. Please correct.
2. For Site NC-RO-40:
a. The listed acreages do not match the LASC. Please correct. Corrected
b. For Field 2, the soil type is listed as GoA — Goldsboro Loamy Sand while the
LASC lists Ra -Rains Sandy Loam. Please verify and update to match. Corrected
c. For Field 6, the soil type is listed as NoA — Norfolk Loamy Sand while the LASC
lists Ra — Rains Sandy Loam. Please verify and update to match. Corrected
3. For Site NC-RO-42, the soil type for Field 3 is listed as Ra — Rains Sandy Loam while
the LASC lists Me — Meggett Fine Sandy Loam. Please verify and update to match.
Corrected
4. For Site NC-RO-20, the soil type for Field 20 is listed as GoA — Goldsboro Loamy Sand
while the LASC lists Co — Coxville Loam. Please verify and update to match. Corrected
5. The Heavy Metals Soils Reports for Sites NC-RO-17 and NC-RO-40 are corrupted and
the text is garbled. Please resubmit these. Corrected

RLAP 06-16 FORM

State of North Carolina
DWR
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Division of Water Resources 15A NCAC 02T .1100 — RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RLAP 06-16 & SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and
sunnorting documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
General — This application is for treatment, storage, transport, and/or land application of Class B residuals (may include residuals that
are generated from a water treatment plant or other type facilities) on the proposed or currently approved land application site(s) under
15A NCAC 02T .1100.
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Residuals Land Application Program (FORM: RLAP 06-16) Application: (All Application Packages):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Residuals Land Application Program (FORM: RLAP 06-16) form. Please
do not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to
the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
The Applicant's Certification on Page 5 of this form shall be signed in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .0106(b). An alternate
person may be designated as the signing official if a delegation letter is provided from a person who meets the criteria in 15A
NCAC 02T .0106(b).
❑ If this project is for a modification of an existing permit, submit one copy of the existing permit.
❑ Please submit this application form at least 180 days prior to the expiration date on the existing permit, or 90 days prior to
operation of proposed facility(ies) for application packages involving new or changes to treatment and storage units.
B. Application Fee (New and Major Modification Application Packages)
® Submit a check, money order or electronic funds transfer made payable to: North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ).
Facility Classification New Permit Major Modification'
Major (land are permitted for > 300 acres) F $1,310 F $395
Minor (land are permitted for < 300 acres) F_ $810 $245
' - A major modification shall be defined as any permit modification that: increases the generating facility's residuals dry tonnage;
adds additional land application areas not previously approved for that particular program [including transferring of field(s) from
one program to another]; adds additional residuals sources; or includes the addition of new treatment or storage units/processes not
previously permitted. There is no fee for minor modifications to a permit.
C. Cover Letter (All Application Packages)
® List all items included in the application package, as well as a brief description of the requested permitting action.
D. Environmental Assessments (Maybe Required —See 15A NCAC 1C .03
❑ Sub:-- ` - --- of the Findings of No Significant Impact (FONSI) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Also, include
info N/A any mitigating factor(s) from the Environmental Assessment (EA) that impact the construction of the residuals
treat :orage facilities. An EA may also be required for private systems if any public funds and/or lands are used for
the construction of the subject facilities.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 1 of 3

E. Operation and Maintenance Plan (New and Renewal Application Packages)
® For Modification Application, if there are any changes to the existing plan, submit an updated O&M plan.
® Submit the O&M Plan in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1110 and include at a minimum:
® Operational functions; describe the operation of the program to show what operations are necessary for the program to
function and by whom the functions are to be conducted.
® Maintenance schedules; may include equipment calibration, maintenance of signs, etc.
® Safety measures; may include safety training program, manuals, signs, etc.
® Spill response plan; including control, containment, remediation, emergency contact information, etc.
® Inspection plan including the following information;
® Names and titles of personnel responsible for conducting the inspections.
® Frequency and location of inspections, including those to be conducted by the ORC, and procedures to assure that the
selected location(s) and inspection frequency are representative of the residuals management program.
® Detailed description of inspection procedures including record keeping and actions to be taken by the inspector in the event
that noncompliance is observed.
® Sampling and monitoring plan including the following information;
® Names and titles of personnel responsible for conducting the sampling and monitoring.
® Detailed description of monitoring procedures including parameters to be monitored.
® Sampling frequency and procedures to assure that representative samples are being collected. Fluctuation in temperature,
flow, and other operating conditions can affect the quality of the residuals gathered during a particular sampling event. The
sampling plan shall account for any foreseen fluctuations in residuals quality and indicate the most limiting times for
residuals to meet pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements (e.g. facilities that land apply multiple times per
year but have an annual sampling frequency, may need to sample during winter months when pathogen reduction is most
likely to be negatively affected by cold temperatures.
THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL ITEMS (G to M) ARE REQUIRED FOR DEDICATED PROGRAM ONLY.
F. Program Determination
❑ Dedicated residuals land appli ims are ones in which land application sites meet the criteria in 15A NCAC 02T
.110202). Specifically, a resit N/A plication program is designated as dedicated if any of the following are applicable:
❑ Any land application site ci ie residuals land application program that receives residuals at rates or frequencies
greater than agronomic rates.
❑ Any land application site certified for the residuals land application program that is used primarily for residuals disposal,
and agricultural crop production is of secondary importance.
❑ Any land application site certified for the residuals land application program that receives residuals through fixed irrigation
facilities or irrigation facilities fed through a fixed supply system.
❑ Please contact the Non -Discharge Permitting Unit if you need any assistance in determining whether your residuals program
falls under the dedicated program definitions.
G. Program Information
Q Provide an explanation of why a do N/A ;m is required instead of a conventional non -dedicated system.
❑ Provide an explanation of the dedic _ _ _ and its operation.
H. Detailed Site Maps (All New or Modification Application Packages)
❑ Submit three (3) sets of standard size plans and two (2) sets of I I" by 17" plans (electronic format is acceptable - Adobe PDF
only). For Modifications, submit plans specific to the modification(s) only.
❑ Plans must include the following minimum items:
❑ A general location map, a vicinity map and a topographic map with contours not exceeding 10 feet or 25% of the total site
relief and showing all facility rc' ' ' ' ' res and fences within the land application area.
❑ The location of all wells (incl N/A and construction details if available), streams (ephemeral, intermittent, and
perennial), springs, lakes, pond, urface drainage features within 500 feet of the land application site(s).
❑ Delineation of the review and compliance boundaries
❑ Setbacks as required by 15A NCAC 02T .1108
❑ Site property boundaries within 500 feet of all waste treatment, storage, and disposal site(s).
❑ A map showing the entire irrigation area with an overlay of the suitable irrigation area depicted by the soil scientist's
evaluation. The irrigation plans shall show each nozzle/emitter and wetted area (when applicable). Clearly label spray
irrigation zones as they will be operated.
❑ Plans must depict a completed design and not be labeled with preliminary phrases (e.g., FOR REVIEW ONLY, NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION, etc.) that indicate that they are anything other than final plans. However, the plans may be labeled with
the phrase: FINAL DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 2 of 3

I. Project Evaluation and Receiver Site Management Plan (All New Application Packages or Modifications that include new sites)
® Submit a project evaluation and a receiver site management plan (if applicable) with recommendations concerning cover crops
and their ability to accept the proposed application rates.
J. Hydrogeologic Report (All New Application Packages or Modifications involving increasing the total design capacity)
❑ Submit a detailed hydrogeologic e accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1104(d)(4) and current Division Policy
available at: bt!p://www.ncwater.orN/A cies_and _Regulations /. The document shall be signed, sealed and dated by a
qualified professional.
K. Engineering Design Documents (All New or Modification Application Packages with fixed irrigation facilities or irrigation
facilities fed through fixed supply system)
❑ Submit engineering design documents that have been signed, sealed, and dated by a NC licensed Professional Engineer and/or
Professional Land Surveyor in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T . 1104(d)(2). For Modifications, submit an updated site map
specific to the modificatinn(c) only
❑ The design documents the following minimum items:
El Engineering plans f N/A Iand equipment except those previously permitted unless they are directly tied into the new
units or are critical __ ,.....—tanding of the complete process;
❑ Specifications describing materials to be used, method of construction, and means for ensuring quality and integrity of the
finished product including leaking testing; and
❑ Engineering calculations including hydraulic and pollutant loading, sizing criteria, hydraulic profile, total dynamic head
curve analysis for each pump, and irrigation design.
❑ Soil mapping units shown on all disposal sites.
L. Water Balance (All New Application Package nr M-iffications that include new sites utilizing fixed irrigation facilities or
irrigation facilities fed through fixed supply systi N/A
❑ Submit a completed and accurate water bal, dance with 15A NCAC 02T J 104(d)(5) and current Division Policy
available at: http://www.ncwater.org/Rules_roucies_and_Regulations/.
M. Property Ownership Documentation (All New or Modification Application Packages involving new and/or relocated treatment
or irrigation components)
❑ Property ownership docm ill consist of one of the following:
❑ Legal documentation i N/A (i.e., GIS, deed or article of incorporation), or
❑ Written notarized inter a agreement signed by both parties with a plat or survey map, or
n An easement running with the land specifically indicating the intended use of the property and meeting the requirements of
15A NCAC 02L .0107(f), or
❑ A written notarized lease agreement signed by both parties, indicating the intended use of the property, as well as a plat or
survey map.
ONE ORIGINAL AND TWO COPIES OF THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL
SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS, SHALL BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
WATER QUALITY PERMITTING SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
By U.S. Postal Service:
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
By Courier/Special Delivery:
512 N. SALISBURY STREET
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27604
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 3 of 3

State of North Carolina
DWR
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Division of Water Resources 15A NCAC 02T .1100 — RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
FORM: RLAP 06-16
I. APPLICANT INFORMATION:
1. Applicant's name: City of Lumberton
Applicant type: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporation ❑ General Partnership 11 Privately -Owned Public Utility
❑ Federal 0 State ® Municipal L■ County
Signature authority's name per 15A NCAC 02T .0106: Corey Walters Title: Public Works Deputy Director
Applicant's mailing address: PO Box 1388
City: Lumberton State: NC Zip: 28359-�
Telephone number: [phone] Email Address: ciwalterskci.lumberton.nc.us
2. Consultant's name: Enviro-Choice Recycling, LLC License Number (for P.E.): _
Affiliation: ❑ On Staff ® Retained (Firm: )
Consultant's mailing address: PO Box 390
City: Lumberton State: NC
Zip: 28360-�
Telephone number: [phone]
Email Address: envirochoicenckgmail.com
3. Agronomist's name:
License Number: 0—
Affiliation: ❑ N/A ❑i On Staff
0 Retained (Firm: )
Agronomist's mailing address: —A
City: State:
Zip: �-
Telephone number: (_) =
Email Address: _
4. Soil Scientist's name: Robert P. Willcox, Jr License Number: 1098
Affiliation: ❑ N/A ® On Staff
❑ Retained (Firm:
Soil Scientist's mailing address: 7231B Summerfield Road
City: Summerfield
State: NC Zip: 27358-
Telephone number: [phone]
Email Address: robp_willcoxmabesoil.com
5. Fee submitted: $1,310 (See Instruction B)
IL PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Application is for (check all that apply): 0 new, 0 modified, 14 renewed permit
2. If this application is being submitted to renew or modify an existing permit, provide the following:
Permit number: W00000672
Date of most -recently issued permit: April 27, 2017
Date of most -recently certified Attachment A (if different than the permit): September 14, 2020
Date of most -recently certified Attachment B (if different than the permit):
FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 1 of 5

III. RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM INFORMATION:
1. Residuals Processing Facility's physical address: 700 Lafayette Street
City: Lumberton State: NC
Coordinates: Latitude: 34° 36' 20.1024"
Datum: WGS 84
Method of measurement: Google Earth
Zip: 28358-,
Longitude: 78' 59' 30.426"
Level of accuracy: —25 It
2. County where residuals land application program is headquartered: Robeson
3. List the Operator In Responsible Charge (ORC) and all Back -Up ORCs for the residuals land application program, their
certification numbers, and their affiliations in the following table:
4
Designation
Name
Affiliation
Certification Number
ORC
Matthew F. Markus
Subcontractor
1010549
Back -Up ORC
Paul J. Ivey
Subcontractor
1011842
Additional Back -Up
ORCs
(if applicable)
Henry B Harper Jr.
Chief Operator
1009036
If an ORC and at least one Back -Up ORC are not currently designated for this residuals land application program, provide the
candidates' names, affiliations, and an estimated time schedule for each candidate's completion of the required training school
and certification test:
Complete the following tables regarding management of the residuals land application program:
a. Plant Available Nitrogen Summary: Determine the maximum plant available nitrogen (PAN) generated by all residuals
source -generating facilities as currently certified and proposed for certification with this application and list the results in the
following table:
Maximum amount of residuals to be certified: 4500 dry tons per year.
PAN
Pounds of PAN per Dry Ton
(Weighted Average)
Pounds of PAN per Year
Surface
Incorporation
or Injection
Surface
Incorporation
or Injection
First -Year
29.56
31.13
133,020
140,085
Five -Year Maximum Adjusted
42.18
43.75
189,810
196,875
b. Land Application Site Use Summary: Summarize information regarding the land application sites as currently certified and
proposed for certification with this application:
Category
Use
Acres
Comments
Crops
Forest or Plantation
Row Crops
759.1
Hay
154.59
Pasture
402.69
Total:
1,316.38
Methods
Surface
557.28
Incorporation or Injection
759.1
Total:
1,316.38
FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 2 of 5

c. Residuals Land Application Summary: Determine the minimum acreage required to land apply the residuals as currently
certified and proposed for certification assuming the scenarios listed in the following table:
Assumed
Application Rate
(lbs PAN/ac yr)
Acres Required Using
First -Year PAN Concentrations
Acres Required Using
Five -Year Maximum Adjusted PAN
Concentrations
Surface
Incorporation or
Injection
Surface
Incorporation or
Injection
50
2,465.10
2,595.60
3,518.10
3,648.60
100
1,232.55
1,297.80
1,759.05
1,824.30
150
821.70
865.20
1,172.70
1,216.20
200
616.28
648.90
879.53
912.15
6. If applicable, provide a plan and a schedule to resolve any known issues that would prevent land application of the proposed
residuals due to the violation of North Carolina Administrative Code (e.g. not enough storage, not enough land, vector reduction
practices not in place, etc.): Applicant will dewater residuals and haul solids to landfill and/or compost facility if needed.
7. Specify type of residuals program (See Instruction F): ® Non -dedicated ❑ Dedicated
If Dedicated, specify the following (check all that apply):
Residuals program contains any land application site(s) that receives residuals at rates or frequencies greater than agronomic
rates, explain;
❑ Residuals program contains any land application site(s) that is used primarily for residuals disposal, and agricultural crop
production is of secondary importance, explain;
❑ Residuals program contains any land application site(s) that receives residuals through fixed irrigation facilities or irrigation
facilities fed through a fixed supply system, explain;
IV. RESIDUALS SOURCE INFORMATION: (Required for all new, renewed, or modified residuals source)
Complete and submit the following Residuals Source Certification and all associated documentation.
R
Residuals Source
Certification
V. LAND APPLICATION SITE INFORMATION: (Required for all new, renewed, or modified land application site)
Complete and submit the following Land Applications Site Certification and all associated documentation.
19-1
Land Application Siite
Certification. doc
FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 3 of 5

Note: Item VI. Applicable to Dedicated Program with fixed irrigation system only.
VI. DESIGN INFORMATION FOR FIXED IRRIGATION SYSTEM
1. The irrigat N/A A Spray ❑ Drip
2. Disposal system is: LJ existing ❑ proposed.
3. Minimum depth to mean seasonal high water table (SHWT) within irrigation sites(s) per Soil Scientist's Evaluation: feet
below ground surface. Rules 15A NCAC 02T .0505(p) requires at least one -foot vertical separation between SHWT and ground
surface.
4. Are there any artificial drainage or water movement structures within 200 feet of any irrigation area?
❑ Yes or ❑ No If Yes, please explain if the soil scientist report addresses artificial structures and please indicate if
structures are to be maintained or modified:
5. Loading rates recommended by the Soil Scientist Evaluation:
Soil Series
Fields within Soil Area
Recommended
Loading Rate
(in/hr)
Recommended
Loading Rate
in/yr
6. Design loading rates are equal or less than the loading rates recommended by Soil Scientist?
❑ Yes or ❑ No If No, explain why 15A NCAC 02T .0505(n) is not met:
7. Non -dedicated System Design (fill in the appropriate information for either a spray or drip irrigation system):
Field / Zone
Design Area
(ft2)
Number of
Nozzles
Maximum Application
Rate ( allons/hr)
Design Annual Loading
Rate ( allons/ r)
Total
Spray Irrigation Design Element
Plan Sheet
Number
Specification
Pa a Number
Wetted diameter of nozzles
ft
Wetted area of nozzles
It,
Nozzle capacity
gpm
Nozzle manufacturer / model
/
Elevation of highest nozzle
ft
FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 4 of 5

Applicant's Certification (signing authority must he in compliance with 15 A NCAC 02'r .0106):
The applicant or any affiliate has not been convicted of an environmental crime, has not abandoned awastewater facility without proper
�osure, does not have an outstanding civil penalty where all appeals have been exhausted or abandoned, are compliant with any active
compliance schedule, and do not have any overdue annual fees under Rule 15A NCAC 02T .0105.
Yes ❑ No, Explain;
1,
Loren
[Signature Authority's Name -- PLEASE PRINT)
PRINT) (Title)
attest that this application for
(Facility Name)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the Division of Water Resources
may not conduct a technical review of this program and approval does not constitute a variance to any rules or statutes unless specifically
granted in the permit. Further, any discharge of residuals to surface waters or the land will result in an immediate enforcement action,
which may include civil penalties, injunctive relief, and/or criminal prosecution. I will make no claim against the Division of Water
Resources should a condition of this permit be violated. I also understand that if all required parts of this application are not completed
and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package will be returned to me as
incomplete.
Note: In accordance with North Carolina General Statutes § I43-215.6A and § 143-215.6B, any person who knowingly makes any false
statement, representation, or certification in any application shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor, which may include a fine not to
exceed $10,000 as well as civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation.
Signature:
e-e �,
Date:
FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 5 of

RLAP CALCULATION SPREADSHEETS

Wastewater Treatment Plant
1) SAR Calculation
%Total Solids- 280
Na Ca Mg
31,000 9,900 1,700 mg/kg
868 277 48 mg/L
m Eq= 37.74 13.86 3.97
m Eq =(mg x Valence T) / Molar Mass
SAR= 37.74
2.99
12.64
2) PA------ e
19Year PAN (Surf-)= 24,560 mg/kg 49.1216s/DT
19Year PAN (Inj./Inc)= 25,860 mg/kg 51.72 lbs/DT
1. Yea,
2nd Yeai
3rd Yeai
4th Y-
5th Yeai
Ammonia-N(NH3)=
2,600
mg/kg
Mineralization Rate(MR)=
0.4
Nitrate+Nitrite-N(NOx)=
2300.00
mg/kg
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)=
55,000
mg/kg
Volatilization Rate(VR)=
0.5
Surface Application
1.0 Injection/Incorporation Application
Surface Application
Inj-ion/Incorporation
Appliation
Remaining
Remaining
Organic
Organic
TKN
PAN
PAN
Nitrogen
TKN
PAN
PAN
Nitrogen
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(Ibs/DT)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(Ibs/DT)
(mg/kg)
55,000
24,560
49.12
31,440
55,000
25,860
51.72
31,440
31,440
6,288
12.58
25,152
31,440
6,288
12.58
25,152
25,152
2,515
5.03
22,637
25,152
2,515
5.03
22,637
22,637
1,132
2.26
21,505
22,637
1,132
2.26
21,505
21,505
1 538
1 1.08
1 20,967
21,505
1 538
1 1.08
1 20,967
Total 1 35,033 1 -07 I Total 1 36,333 1 72.67
Application Five -Year Max. Adj. Pan(Surfaco)= 35,033 mg/kg %Error= 0.00%
Application Five -Year Max. Adj. Pan(Inj./Inc)= 1 36,333 mg/kg %Error= 0.00%
3) PAN Summery
Maximum Dry Tons Permitted Per Year= 2,500 DT/yr
11
Residuals Land Application Summary
Maximum Dry Tons Permitted Per Year= 2,500 DT/yr
5) Metals tart
19 Year PAN=(MR x )TKN-NH3))-(VR, NH3)+ NOx
2nd Year PAN =2nd Year TKN x (MR/2)
3rd Year PAN =3rd Year TKN x (MR/4)
4fh Year PAN =4fh Year TKN x (M R/8)
5fh Year PAN =5th Year TKN x (M R/16)
1316.38 Certified aue,
Loading
Parameter Ceiling Kg/Hec Ibs/aue
Arsenic
75
41
36
Cadmium
85
39
34
Copper
4,300
1,500
1,338
Lead
840
300
267
Merwry
57
17
15
Molybdenum
75
N/A
N/A
Nickel
420
420
374
Selenium
100
100
89
Zinc
7,500
2,800
2,498
2nd Year TKN =)1st Year TKN-NH3)-(MR x (1. Year TKN -NH3))
Lab report
Pass/Fail
Pass/Fail
(mg/Kg)
(Kg/Hectare)
(Ibs/aue)
2.39
0.00000
0
1
0.00000
0.00000
0
0
431
7.26
0.00000
0.00000
0
0
0.0155
5.79
0.00000
0.00000
0
0
27.8
5
0.00000
0
953
0.00000
0

Water Treatment Plant
1)
%Total Solids= 1.60
Na
Ca Mg
2,500 1
3,700 1 420 1mg/kg
40
59 7 mg/L
m Eq= 1.74
2.96 0.56
mEq = (mg x Valence
N) / Molar Mass
SAR=
1.74
1.33
2)
1st Vear PAN(S.rface)=
117 mg/kg 0.2316s/DT
1. Vear PAN (Inj./Intl=
129 mg/kg 0.261bs/DT
Ammonia-N(NH3)= 24 mg/kg
Mineralization Rate(MR)= 0.1
Nit--Nitrite-N(NO.)= 29.00 mg/kg
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen(TKN)= 780 mg/kg
Volmili-ion Rate(VR)= 0.5 Surface Application
1.0 Injection/Inmrpo-io. Application
Surf ace Application
Injection/Incorporation Application
Remaining
Remaining
7NN
PAN
PAN
Organic
Nitrogen
7NN
PAN
PAN
Organic
Nitrogen
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(Ibs/DT)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(Ibs/DT)
(mg/kg)
780
680
646
630
622
117
34
16
8
1 4
0.23
0.07
0.03
0.02
1 0.01
680
646
630
622
1 618
780
680
646
630
1 622
129
34
16
8
1 4
0.26
0.07
0.03
0.02
1 0.01
680
646
630
622
1 618
��ae� I 1 1 local I 1 1
Application Five-Vear Max. Adj. P..(S.rface)= 1,668 mg/kg %Error= 834.21%
Appli-ion Five- Vear Max. Adj. Pan (Inj./Inc)= 1,833 mg/kg %Error= 861.97%
3) PAN Summery
Maxim. m Dry Tons Permitted Per Vear= 2,000 DT/yr
a
Residuals Land Application Summery
Maximum Dry Tons Permitted PerVear= 2,000 DT/yr
5) Metals test
Lit Vear PAN= (MR. (TKN- NH3)) -(VR. NH3) + NO.
2nd Vear PAN= 2nd Vear TKN.(MR/2) 2nd Vear TKN=(Lit VearTKN-NH3)- (MR .(1st Vear TKN-NH3))
3,,1 Vear PAN =3rd Vear TKN. (MR/4)
4th Vear PAN =4th Vear TKN. (MR/8)
5th Vear PAN =Sth Vear TKN. (MR/16)
L316.38 C,affied acres
Parameter
Ceiling
Loading
Kg/Hec
Ibs/acre
Arsenic
75
41
36
Cadmium
85
39
34
Copper
4,300
1,500
1,338
Lead
840
300
267
Mercury
57
17
15
Molybdenum
75
N/A
N/A
Nickel
420
420
374
Selenium
100
100
89
Zinc
7,500
2,800
2,498
Lab report
Pass/Fail
Pass/Fail
(mg/Kg)
ft/Hectare)
(Ibs/acre)
2.39
0.00000
0
1
0.00000
0.00000
0
0
431
7.26
0.00000
0.00000
0
0
0.0155
5.79
0.00000
0.00000
0
0
27.8
5
0.00000
0
953
0.00000
0

OPERATION AND MAINETNANCE PLAN

Corresponding
ENVIRO--CaHOff
Name: City of Lumberton WWTP Biosolids
Requirements:
V_Aw
Operations & Maintenance Plan
Permit WQ000672: 4
Prepared By: Carrigan I. Harris, Environmental Scientist
Revision #: 2
Revision Date: 3/31 /23
Approved By: Michael C. Hunt, Principal Manager
Effective Date: 4/31/23
Signature:
Page 1 of 7
1.0 Purpose
1.1 Ensure the requirements of Residuals Permit # WQ0000672 for The City of Lumberton WWTP are met.
Requirements are included for both City of Lumberton (Permittee & ORC) and Enviro-Choice Recycling,
LLC (land application contractor).
2.0 Personnel
The following is a list of personnel in the order they are to be contacted when information needs to be shared.
2.1 Enviro-Choice Recycling
2.1.1 John "Paul' Ivey, Operations Manager, Biosolids ORC
2.1.2 Matthew Markus, Assistant OM
2.2 City of Lumberton
2.2.1 Henry Harper, WWTP ORC
2.2.2 Corey Walters, Asst. Wastewater Div. Manager- Operations
3.0 Operational Functions
WWTP: The operational function of this project involves mixing the dual holding tanks at the WWTP with in
tank mixers to achieve a well -mixed and consistent material that is suitable for land application.
WTP: The residuals holding basin will be manually mixed prior to haul -off and pumped into sub -contractor
vehicles.
Both sources will be spread at agronomic rates that are determined using the Realistic Yield Expectations
(RYE) as outlined in Section II 10 of permit WQ0000672, the amount of other nutrient sources the landowner or
operator has applied, and the residuals nutrient and metal sample that is current for that monitoring period. It is
going to be spread with a liquid applicator that spread the material in such a way to achieve a consistent spread
pattern. The material is going to be land applied on fields that have a crop growing on them that are going to
either be grazed or cut for animal feed.

Revision #: 2
Name — City of Lumberton WWTP Biosolids Operations & Maintenance Plan Revision Date: 03/31/23
Effective Date: 04/31/23
WQ0000672 Page 2 of 7
4.0 Maintenance Schedules
Enviro-Choice Recycling, LLC will follow the maintenance schedule as recommended by the Enviro-Choice
Recycling manager for the equipment necessary to complete the job.
5.0 Safety Measures
Lumberton and Enviro-Choice Recycling believe in operating in a safety conscious manner and all employees
participate in safety training that is designed to help employees recognize safety issues and take steps to prevent
accidents from occurring. In addition, all Lumberton and Enviro-Choice employees have the authority to stop
operations if they think any aspect of the operation is going to cause environmental or personal harm.
6.0 Spill Response Plan
In the unlikely event of a spill, the following actions shall be taken immediately:
6.1 Management of Spill Clean-up Activities: The Enviro-Choice Recycling Operations Manager shall
take immediate charge and initiate clean-up activities. Enviro-Choice labor and equipment is to be
utilized. In the event additional labor and equipment is required, assistance may be requested from the
City of Lumberton, the NC Department of Transportation, and other private contractors as necessary.
6.2 Halt the Source of the Spill: Such as a ruptured container or damaged transport unit.
6.3 Contain the Spill: Form a barrier. Sufficient quantities of straw shall be used for such purposes.
Earthen barriers may be constructed to augment the straw bale containment area of the spill. The
Operations Manager or the person in charge on the spill site will advise the clean-up personnel where to
get the straw, lime, and other items necessary to complete the clean-up operation, i.e., local farmers, farm
supply centers, nurseries, etc.
6.4 Initial Clean -UP: Employ front-end loaders, vacuum equipment, sludge application vehicles, and/or a
local septic tank service to remove as much of the spilled material as possible. Straw and/or sand should
be scattered in the spill area to soak up the remaining material. The straw- and sand -soaked material will
be collected and removed to a disposal area approved by representatives of the state regulatory agency.
6.5 Final Clean -Up: Employ rotary brush sweeper if needed, and apply lime to the spill area upon the
approval of the clean-up efforts by the state regulatory representative. If the event occurs on private
property, the clean-up will be completed to the satisfaction of the property owner and state regulatory
representatives. The ultimate goal will be to restore the spill area to its original condition if possible.

Revision #: 2
Name — City of Lumberton WWTP Biosolids Operations & Maintenance Plan Revision Date: 03/31/23
Effective Date: 04/31/23
WQ0000672 Page 3 of 7
6.6 Notification: As soon as possible after the spill occurs, the Enviro-Choice Recycling, Operations
Manager or designee will notify City of Lumberton staff and the Enviro-Choice office. Enviro-Choice
office staff are then responsible for notifying other key personnel.
6.7 Reporting: City of Lumberton staff will notify the Fayetteville regional office of the NCDEQ by
telephone [phone]) as soon as possible, but not more than 24 hours after, or on the next working
day following the occurrence. The Enviro-Choice Recycling Operations Manager shall provide a written
report within 48 hours of the spill to the City of Lumberton staff. The report shall list all relative
information and actions taken. With the assistance of Enviro-Choice Recycling staff, City of Lumberton
staff will file a written report to the Fayetteville Regional office of the NCDEQ within 5 days of the
occurrence. For after hours reporting, the Division's emergency number shall be called to report all
incidences (800-858-0368 or 910-433-3300)
7.0 Inspection Plan
Inspections for the land application of residuals will be conducted on a minimum of a weekly basis at the land
application site during the land application activities of this project. The inspection frequency is based on the
time frame that it is going to take to complete the project and the amount of dry tons to be land applied from this
facility. The inspections will consist of inspecting a current field that is being applied as well as inspecting
random fields that have been completed. Inspections will be conducted by Michael C. Hunt, Enviro-Choice
Recycling, Principal Manager. Inspections will also be conducted by Matthew Markus, Operation Manager.
These inspections will consist of the following:
7.1 Verifying that the Pre -Operations Check List has been completed and signed by both Operations and
Technical staff.
7.2 Checking the calculated loads to insure the correct amount of residuals are being land applied.
7.3 Ensure that all manned equipment has a copy of the permit and the operations and maintenance plan.
7.4 Insure that the field has been flagged properly and that all buffers are being adhered to.
7.5 Insure that the Crop and Landowner Verification form has been filled out.
7.6 Insure proper signage is posted.
7.7 Verifying that the correct number samples of the residuals have been taken and that it meets the criteria
for land application.
7.8 The records will be kept in the Synagro project files in the respective office for the project. Copies of all
records will be forwarded to the City of Gastonia and kept on file.

Revision #: 2
Name — City of Lumberton WWTP Biosolids Operations & Maintenance Plan Revision Date: 03/31/23
Effective Date: 04/31/23
WQ0000672 Page 4 of 7
7.9 Enviro-Choice and City of Lumberton will immediately inform the other party if any of the following
conditions are noted. City of Lumberton staff shall report by telephone to the Fayetteville Regional
Office at 910-433-3300 as soon as possible but no later than 24 hours after or the next working day
following the occurrence or the first knowledge of the occurrence of the following:
7.9.1 Any occurrence with the distribution program resulting in the land application of
significant amounts of material that is abnormal in quantity or characteristics.
7.9.2 Any failure of the distribution system that results in the release to surface waters.
7.9.3 Any time that self -monitoring indicates that the facility has gone out of compliance with
the permit.
7.9.4 Any process failure that results in the system not adequately treating the residuals.
7.9.5 Any spill or discharge from a vehicle or piping system during residuals transportation.
7.9.6 Any release that requires immediate reporting outside of normal business hours shall be
called in by City of Lumberton staff to NCDEQ at 1-800-858-0368, or 1-919-433-3300.
These numbers are to be called in the event of a release to surface waters or imminent
failure of a storage system when the event occurs outside of normal business hours.
7.9.7 With the assistance of Enviro-Choice staff, City of Lumberton staff will file a written
report in the form of a letter to the Fayetteville Regional office of the NCDEQ within 5
days of the occurrence, outlining the actions taken or proposed actions taken to ensure that
the problem does not recur.

Revision #: 2
Name - City of Lumberton WWTP Biosolids Operations & Maintenance Plan Revision Date: 03/31/23
Effective Date: 04/31/23
WQ0000672 Page 5 of 7
8.0 Sampling and Monitoring Plan
Sampling for this project consists of sampling the residuals prior to land application occurring in order to
insure that the residuals are suitable for land application.
8.1 The samples will be collected from the aerobic digester lagoon that holds the residuals.
8.2 Michael C Hunt, Enviro-Choice - Principal Manager, or designee is responsible for sample collection.
8.3 Nutrient, metal and TCLP sample aliquots will be collected randomly and consist of at least 10 individual
aliquots mixed together in order to get the composite sample for these parameters.
8.4 The residuals shall be sampled annually for TCLP, including the following. (Regulatory level in
milligrams per liter in parentheses.)
Arsenic (5. 0)
1, 4-Dichlorobenzene (7. 5)
Nitrobenzene (2. 0)
Barium (100. 0)
1, 2- Dichloroethane (0. 5)
Pentachlorophenol (100. 0)
Benzene (0. 5)
1, 1 - Dichloroethylene (0. 7)
Pyridine (5. 0)
Cadmium (1. 0)
2, 4- Dinitrotoluene (0.13)
Selenium (1. 0)
Carbon
tetrachloride (0. 5)
Endrin (0. 02)
Silver (5. 0)
Chlordane (0. 03)
Hexachlorobenzene (0. 13)
Tetrachloroethylene (0.7)
Chlorobenzene
(100.0)
Heptachlor (and its hydroxide) (0.
008 )
Toxaphene (0. 5)
Chloroform (6. 0)
Hexachloro- 1, 3- butadiene (0. 5)
Trichloroethylene (0. 5)
Chromium (5. 0)
Hexachloroethane (3. 0)
2, 4, 5 - Trichlorophenol (400. 0)
m -Cresol (200. 0)
Lead (5. 0)
2, 4, 6-Trichlorophenol (2. 0)
o -Cresol (200. 0)
Lindane (0.4)
2, 4, 5 - TP (Silvex) (1. 0)
p -Cresol (200.0)
Mercury (0. 2)
Vinyl chloride (0. 2)
Cresol (200. 0)
Methoxychlor (10. 0)
2, 4- D (10. 0)
Methyl ethyl ketone (200. 0)
8.5 For all the parameters listed in Sections 8.6, 8.7 & 8.8 below, the residuals will be sampled at a frequency
based on the following chart:
Dry Tons Generated
short tons per ear
Monitoring Frequency
Established in 40 CFR 503 and 15A NCAC 02T.1111
<319
1 time per year
=>319-1,650
1/ uarter 4 times per ear
=>1,650 - <16,500
1/60 Days 6 times per ear
=>16,500
1/month 12 times per ear

Revision #: 2
Name — City of Lumberton WWTP Biosolids Operations & Maintenance Plan Revision Date: 03/31/23
Effective Date: 04/31/23
WQ0000672 Page 6 of 7
8.6 Metal & Nutrient parameters to be analyzed:
Aluminum
Mercury
Potassium
Ammonia -Nitrogen
Molybdenum
Selenium
Arsenic
Nickel
Sodium
Cadmium
Nitrate -Nitrite Nitrogen
Sodium Adsorption
Ratio (SAR)
Calcium
Percert Total Solid
TKN
Copper
pH
Zinc
Lead
Phosphorus
Magnesium
Plant Available Nitrogen
(by calculation)
8.7 Residuals will be sampled for fecal coliform to demonstrate pathogen requirements have been met. Seven
separate samples will be collected and analyzed.
8.8 For Vector Attraction Reduction compliance purposes, the arithmetic mean of SOUR data from seven
samples taken periodically during the monitoring period specified in your permit will be considered
sufficient.
9.0 Environmental Impacts
9.1 The environmental aspects for biosolids may be affected by this procedure.
9.2 This procedure helps assure that land application is conducted in a safe, efficient manner, while ensuring
compliance with laws and regulations and to minimize exposure, negative environmental impacts and
public relations concerns.
9.3 Not following this procedure could result in improper biosolids handling and potential noncompliance
and/or monetary fines.
10.0 Deviations from this procedure must be documented by completing a Corrective/Preventative Action
Report.

Revision #: 2
Name - City of Lumberton WWTP Biosolids Operations & Maintenance Plan Revision Date: 03/31/23
Effective Date: 04/31/23
WQ0000672 Page 7 of 7
11.0 Revision History:
Revision
C/PAR #
Reason for
Revision
Description of Revision
Date
#

RESIDUALS SOURCE CERTIFICATION
FORM RSC 06-16 (WWTP AND WTP)

State of North Carolina
DWR
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Division of Water Resources RESIDUALS SOURCE CERTIFICATION
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RSC 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and
supporting documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
General — This certification provides detailed information of residuals source generating facility and its residuals quality for land
application, distribution, or disposal in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1100. Do not submit this certification for review without
a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 11-15, FORM: DCAR 11-15, or FORM: SDR 11-15).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Residuals Source Certification (FORM: RSC 11-15):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Residuals Source Certification (FORM: RSC 11-15) form. Please do not
make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to the
application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they refer.
® For new or renewed permits, submit a separate certification for each source facility.
❑ For modified permits, submit a separate certification for only those facilities that are affected by the proposed modification.
® Complete the residuals source facility summary page. List all new, renewed, or modified facilities.
B. Residuals Source -Generating Facility Information:
® For each source facility, attach the following:
® Vicinity map - A vicinity map that shows the location of the facility and meets all of the criteria in the "Map Guidance for
Residuals Land Application Permits".
® Process flow diagram and/or narrative - A detailed narrative and/or process flow diagram that describes how the residuals
are to be generated, treated, processed, and stored at the facility.
® Quantitative justification for residuals production rate - A quantitative justification for the value provided in Item I. 8.
Ensure that the amount of residuals listed is the maximum amount expected to be generated by the facility for the life of
the permit. In addition, ensure that this amount is equivalent to that which is actually to be land applied, distributed,
and/or disposed, including any chemicals, amendments, or other additives that are added to the residuals during
processing.
® Sampling plan - A detailed sampling plan for the residuals source -generating facility. Ensure that the plan identifies
sampling points, sampling frequency, sample type, as well as the Division -certified laboratory to be used. In addition,
ensure that the plan details how the facility and/or the residuals are monitored for any applicable pathogen reduction and
vector attraction reduction requirements. Note that all sampling and monitoring must be completed on the residuals as
they are to be land applied, distributed, and/or disposed.
C. Residuals Quality Information:
® For each source facility, attach the following:
® Laboratory analytical reports and operational data - reports for all laboratory analyses used to complete this certification.
® Documentation that the facility complies and/or the residuals comply with any applicable pathogen reduction and vector
attraction reduction requirements.
® For new facility that may have not yet been constructed and analytical results of residuals cannot be obtained, please
attach analytical results of residuals generated from a similar facility along with the description of similarities of the two
facilities.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 1 of 1

RESIDUALS SOURCE FACILITY SUMMARY
Applicant's name: City of Lumberton
Status
Code°
Facility Permit Holder
Facility Name
County
Permit Number
Maximum Dry Tons Per Year
Current b
Proposed
R
City of Lumberton
City of Lumberton
Wastewater Treatment Plant
Robeson
NCO024571
2000
2500
'Status Code for source facility are: ♦ N (New) ♦ R (Renewed) ♦ M (Modified) ♦ D (Deleted)
b The amount of residuals currently permitted for distribution, land application, or disposal (i.e, not applicable to new facility).
SUMMARY FOR FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 1

DWR
Division of Water Resources
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
RESIDUALS SOURCE CERTIFICATION
FORM: RSC 06-16
I. RESIDUALS SOURCE -GENERATING FACILITY INFORMATION (See Instruction B.):
1. Facility Name: City of Lumberton
2. Facility permit holder is: ULI Federal, 0 State, 0 Local Government, or 0 Private.
Facility permit issued by: Div. of Water Resources, Div. of Environmental Health,
or Other (explain: M.
3. Facility contact person and title: Corey Walters, Public Works Deputy Director
Complete mailing address: P.O Box 1388
City: Lumberton State: NC Zip: 28359=
Telephone number: [phone] E-mail address: ciwaltersgci.lumberton.nc.us
4. Facility physical address: 700 Lafayette Street
City: Lumberton State: NC Zip: 28358
Coordinates: Latitude: 34' 36' 20.1024" Longitude: 78' 59' 30.426"
Datum: WGS 84 Level of accuracy: —25 ft
Method of measurement: Google Earth
5. Purpose of the facility:
treatment of municipal wastewater, treatment of 100% domestic wastewater,
treatment of potable water, treatment of 100% industrial wastewater,
treatment of industrial wastewater mixed with domestic wastewater,
(approximate percentages: _ % industrial and _ % domestic)
other (explain: _ ).
6. Does the facility have an approved pretreatment program: Yes No
7. Facility permitted/design flow: E MGD and facility average daily flow: 0 MGD
8. Average amount of residuals being generated at this facility 2,000 dry tons per year.
9. Specify the following regarding treatment and storage volumes available at the facility:
Type and volume of residuals treatment: N/A
Type and volume of residuals storage (i.e., outside of residuals treatment units): _
II. RESIDUALS QUALITY INFORMATION (See Instruction C.):
1. Specify if residuals are regulated under:
40 CFR Part 503 or 40 CFR Part 257.
Note: Only residuals that are generated during domestic/municipal wastewater treatment processes are regulated under 40
CFR Part 503, otherwise, the residuals are regulated under 40 CFR Part 257.
2. Specify if residuals are defined under 15A NCAC 02T.1102(6) as:
Biological 0 Non -Biological
Note: Biological residuals are residuals that have been generated during the treatment of domestic wastewater, animal
processing wastewater, or the biological treatment of industrial wastewater (biological treatment is a system that utilizes
biological processes including lagoons, activated sludge systems, extended aeration systems, and fixed film systems).
FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 1 of 5

3. Hazardous Waste Determination: Complete the following to demonstrate that the residuals are non -hazardous under
RCRA: (Note - this item does not have to be completed for facilities that are less than 0.5 MGD in design flow that treat
100% non -municipal, domestic wastewater only)
a. Are the residuals listed in 40 CFR §261.31-§261.33: 0 yes ® no
If yes, list the number(s): _
b. Specify whether or not the residuals exhibit any of the characteristics defined by 40 CFR §261.21-
261.24: P yes 0 no.
Fill in the following tables with the results of the latest toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) analysis as
well as those for corrosivity, ignitability, and reactivity:
Laboratory: Pace Analytical Date of analysis: 2/02/2023
Passed corrosivity test: yes no. pH: s.u. (2 <pH < 12.5)
Passed ignitability test: yes no. Flashpoint: 170 OF (> 140°F)
Passed reactivity test: ® yes ao. HCN: 0.75 mg/kg (<250) & H2S: 75 mg/kg (<500)
TCLP Parameter
Limit
(mgfi)
Result
(m917)
TCLP Parameter
Limit
(m917)
Result
(mg17)
Arsenic
5.0
0.2
Hexachlorobenzene
0.13
0.008
Barium
100.0
1.0
Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene
0.5
0.02
Benzene
0.5
0.0066
Hexachloroethane
3.0
0.018
Cadmium
1.0
0.1
Lead
5.0
0.20
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.5
0.0066
Lindane
0.4
0.000005
Chlordane
0.03
0.008
Mercury
0.2
0.02
Chlorobenzene
100.0
0.0052
Methoxychlor
10.0
0.00001
Chloroform
6.0
0.01
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
200.0
0.068
Chromium
5.0
0.2
Nitrobenzene
2.0
0.018
m-Cresol
200.0
0.007
Pentachlorophenol
100.0
0.05
o-Cresol
200.0
0.009
Pyridine
5.0
0.037
p-Cresol
200.0
0.007
Selenium
1.0
0.5
Cresol
200.0
0.009
Silver
5.0
0.1
2,4-D
10.0
0.0018
Tetrachloroethylene
0.7
0.015
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
7.5
0.016
Toxaphene
0.5
0.016
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.5
0.010
Trichloroethylene
0.5
0.0096
1,1-Dichloroethylene
0.7
0.012
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
400.0
0.016
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.13
0.050
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2.0
0.011
Endrin
0.02
0.0000050
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
1.0
0.00097
Heptachlor and its Hydroxide
0.008
0.0000050
Vinyl Chloride
0.2
0.01
FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 2 of 5

4. Metals Determination: Complete one of the following tables (i.e., as applicable) to demonstrate that the residuals do not
violate the ceiling concentrations for metals regulated under 15A NCAC 02T .1105.
a. For Distribution/Land Application: Fill in the following table with the results of the latest analyses (i.e., on a dry weight
basis) for the following metal parameters:
Laboratory: Pace Analytical and Date of analysis: 2/27/2023
Parameter
Ceiling
Concentration Limits
(ClassA & ClassB)
(mglkg)
Monthly Average
Concentration Limits
(Class A Only)
(mglkg)
Result
(mglkg)
Arsenic
75
41
35
Cadmium
85
39
3
Copper
4,300
1,500
15
Lead
840
300
18
Mercury
57
17
0.22
Molybdenum
75
n/a
7.7
Nickel
420
420
27
Selenium
100
100
32
Zinc
7,500
2,800
17
i:� ��errsrr�ri��rs!rr�siie+tr��er+�t�xus �reesssTs�vessres�rs��r_a:ae�esse*ssrsee�rr.�s�ersesrsszeeti� . eerrnrsraesa
Distance F1.om Disposal
Unit ♦o R.111.1�7.�..1, ♦o
mrrrcrc
Closest Property Line
/,,,,etei.R eI eeb .,1
Ar-senir.
Cr-o
Nickel
0 25
34
289
240
� 15b<59
44
229
240
59'1�5
4s3
264
220
n �':75bt4< loo
46
440
320
n 1 nn_�,, <
5-3,
464
31 A
1-25
4;2
454
420
Resuh
FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 3 of 5

5. Nutrient/Micronutrient Determination: Complete the following:
a. Total solids: 2.8 %.
b. Fill in the following table with the results of the latest analyses (i.e., on a dry weight basis) for the following nutrient and
rmcronutnent parameters:
Laboratory: Pace Analytical and Date of analysis: 2/27/2023
Parameter
Result
(mglkg)
Aluminum
16000
Ammonia -Nitrogen
2600
Calcium
9900
Magnesium
1700
Nitrate -Nitrite Nitrogen
2300
pH (Standard Unit)
6.4
Phosphorus
16000
Potassium
4300
Sodium
31000
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
55000
c. Using the results listed in Item IL 5b. above, calculate the sodium adsorption ration (SAR): 12.64
[Note: If residuals contain SAR of 10 or higher, the applicant shall obtain recommendations from the local Cooperative
Extension Office, the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, the Natural Resource Conservation Service, a
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist, or an agronomist, prior to land application of residuals. The recommendations shall
address the sodium application rate, soil amendments (e.g., gypsum, etc.), or a mechanism for maintaining site integrity
and conditions conducive to crop growth]. USDA Agronomist was consulted, recommendation is to apply gypsum as
recommended in soil analyses where needed. No immediate recommendations since all soils are sandy and up to a 20 SAR
is allowable without further actions.
d. Specify the mineralization rate to be used in calculating the plant available nitrogen (PAN) of the residuals: %. This
rate is a (check one): default value, or actually established.
If the residuals are not generated from the treatment of municipal or domestic wastewater, explain or provide technical
justification as to why the selected default value is appropriate to be applied to these residuals:
e. Calculate the PAN for the residuals (i.e., on a dry weight basis) and fill the results in the following table:
Application Method
First (1s) Year PAN
Five -Year
Maximum Adjusted PAN
(mglkg)
(mg/kg)
Surface
24,560
35,033
Injection/Incorporation
25,860
36,333
6. Other Pollutants Determination: Specify whether or not there are any other pollutants of concern in the residuals and provide
the results of the latest analyses:
FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 4 of 5

7. Pathogen Reduction: Per 15A NCAC 02T.1106, specify how residuals will meet the pathogen reduction requirements:
a. For Distribution/Land Application of Class A or Equivalent:
71 A fecal coliform density that is demonstrated to be less than 1,000 MPN per gram of total dry solids,
or
JJ A salmonella sp. density that is demonstration to be less than 3 MPN per 4 grams of total dry solids.
AND one of the followings (except for non -biological residuals):
14 Alternative 1 [15A NCAC 02T.I 106(b)(3)(A)] - Time/Temperature Compliance.
q Alternative 2 [15A NCAC 02T.I 106(b)(3)(B)] - Alkaline Treatment.
q Alternative 3 [15A NCAC 02T.I 106(b)(3)(C)] - Prior Testing for Enteric Virus/Viable Helminth Ova.
q Alternative 4 [15A NCAC 02T.I 106(b)(3)(D)] - No Prior Testing for Enteric Virus/Viable Helminth Ova.
JA Alternative 5 [15A NCAC 02T.I 106(b)(3)(E)-(K)] - Process to Further Reduce Pathogens (PFRP).
Specify one: composting, 0 heat drying, 77 heat treatment,
thermophilic aerobic digestion, ❑ beta ray irradiation,
El gamma ray irradiation, or ❑ pasteurization.
b. For Land Application of Class B:
Alternative 1 [15A NCAC 02T.I 106(c)(1)] - Fecal Coliform Density Demonstration.
Alternative 2 [15A NCAC 02T.I 106(c)(2 - Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens (PSRP).
Specify one: El aerobic digestion, air drying, ❑ anaerobic digestion,
El composting, or lime stabilization.
c. For Surface Disposal:
11 Select One of the Class A or Equivalent Pathogen Reduction Alternatives in Item II. 7a. above.
J Select One of the Class B or Equivalent Pathogen Reduction Alternatives in Item II. 7b. above.
J Exempt -If Daily Cover Alternative is chosen in Item II.8. below [15A NCAC 02T.1106(a)(2)].
J Not Applicable - Non -Biological Residuals with NO Domestic Wastewater Contribution.
8. Vector Attraction Reduction (VAR): Per 15A NCAC 02T.1107, specify how residuals will meet the VAR requirements:
El Alternative 1 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(1)] - 38% Volatile Solids Reduction (Aerobic/Anaerobic Digestion).
El Alternative 2 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(2)] - 40-Day Bench Scale Test (Anaerobic Digestion).
El Alternative 3 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(3)] - 30-Day Bench Scale Test (Aerobic Digestion).
Alternative 4 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(4)] - Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate Test (Aerobic Digestion).
El Alternative 5 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(5)] - 14-Day Aerobic Processes.
El Alternative 6 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(6)] - Alkaline Stabilization.
El Alternative 7 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(7)] - Drying of Stabilized Residuals.
El Alternative 8 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(8)] - Drying of Unstabilized Residuals.
El Alternative 9 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(9)] - Injection.
El Alternative 10 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(10)] - Incorporation.
q Alternative for Surface Disposal Units Only - Soil/Other Material Cover [ 15A NCAC 02T.I 107(b)(2)].
Ja Not Applicable - Non -Biological Residuals with NO Domestic Wastewater Contribution.
Note: For animal processing residuals, only alternatives 9 or 10 may be chosen due to the nuisance conditions that typically
occur when these residuals are applied and left on the land surface.
FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 5 of 5

State of North Carolina
DWR
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Division of Water Resources RESIDUALS SOURCE CERTIFICATION
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RSC 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and
supporting documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
General — This certification provides detailed information of residuals source generating facility and its residuals quality for land
application, distribution, or disposal in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1100. Do not submit this certification for review without
a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 11-15, FORM: DCAR 11-15, or FORM: SDR 11-15).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Residuals Source Certification (FORM: RSC 11-15):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Residuals Source Certification (FORM: RSC 11-15) form. Please do not
make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to the
application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they refer.
® For new or renewed permits, submit a separate certification for each source facility.
❑ For modified permits, submit a separate certification for only those facilities that are affected by the proposed modification.
® Complete the residuals source facility summary page. List all new, renewed, or modified facilities.
B. Residuals Source -Generating Facility Information:
® For each source facility, attach the following:
® Vicinity map - A vicinity map that shows the location of the facility and meets all of the criteria in the "Map Guidance for
Residuals Land Application Permits".
® Process flow diagram and/or narrative - A detailed narrative and/or process flow diagram that describes how the residuals
are to be generated, treated, processed, and stored at the facility.
® Quantitative justification for residuals production rate - A quantitative justification for the value provided in Item I. 8.
Ensure that the amount of residuals listed is the maximum amount expected to be generated by the facility for the life of
the permit. In addition, ensure that this amount is equivalent to that which is actually to be land applied, distributed,
and/or disposed, including any chemicals, amendments, or other additives that are added to the residuals during
processing.
® Sampling plan - A detailed sampling plan for the residuals source -generating facility. Ensure that the plan identifies
sampling points, sampling frequency, sample type, as well as the Division -certified laboratory to be used. In addition,
ensure that the plan details how the facility and/or the residuals are monitored for any applicable pathogen reduction and
vector attraction reduction requirements. Note that all sampling and monitoring must be completed on the residuals as
they are to be land applied, distributed, and/or disposed.
C. Residuals Quality Information:
® For each source facility, attach the following:
® Laboratory analytical reports and operational data - reports for all laboratory analyses used to complete this certification.
® Documentation that the facility complies and/or the residuals comply with any applicable pathogen reduction and vector
attraction reduction requirements.
® For new facility that may have not yet been constructed and analytical results of residuals cannot be obtained, please
attach analytical results of residuals generated from a similar facility along with the description of similarities of the two
facilities.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 1 of 1

RESIDUALS SOURCE FACILITY SUMMARY
Applicant's name: City of Lumberton
Status
Code
Facility Permit Holder
Facility Name
County
Permit Number
Maximum Dry Tons Per Year
Current b
Proposed
N
City of Lumberton
City of Lumberton Water
Treatment Plant
Robeson
NC0378010
2000
'Status Code for source facility are: ♦ N (New) ♦ R (Renewed) ♦ M (Modified) ♦ D (Deleted)
b The amount of residuals currently permitted for distribution, land application, or disposal (i.e, not applicable to new facility).
SUMMARY FOR FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 1

DWR
Division of Water Resources
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
RESIDUALS SOURCE CERTIFICATION
FORM: RSC 06-16
I. RESIDUALS SOURCE -GENERATING FACILITY INFORMATION (See Instruction B.):
1. Facility Name: City of Lumberton
2. Facility permit holder is: U Federal, 0 State, 0 Local Government, or 0 Private.
Facility permit issued by: Div. of Water Resources, Div. of Environmental Health,
or Other (explain: M.
3. Facility contact person and title: Corey Walters, Public Works Deputy Director
Complete mailing address: P.O Box 1388
City: Lumberton State: NC Zip: 28359=
Telephone number: [phone] E-mail address: ciwaltersgci.lumberton.nc.us
4. Facility physical address: 1451 Lowery Street
City: Lumberton State: NC Zip: 28359
Coordinates: Latitude:34.62655 Longitude:79.02500
Datum: WGS 84 Level of accuracy: —25 ft
Method of measurement: Google Earth
5. Purpose of the facility:
treatment of municipal wastewater, treatment of 100% domestic wastewater,
treatment of potable water, treatment of 100% industrial wastewater,
treatment of industrial wastewater mixed with domestic wastewater,
(approximate percentages: _ % industrial and _ % domestic)
other (explain: _ ).
6. Does the facility have an approved pretreatment program: Yes ® No
7. Facility permitted/design flow: 16 MGD and facility average daily flow: 5 MGD
8. Average amount of residuals being generated at this facility 500 dry tons per year.
9. Specify the following regarding treatment and storage volumes available at the facility:
Type and volume of residuals treatment: N/A
Type and volume of residuals storage (i.e., outside of residuals treatment units): _
II. RESIDUALS QUALITY INFORMATION (See Instruction C.):
1. Specify if residuals are regulated under:
40 CFR Part 503 or ® 40 CFR Part 257.
Note: Only residuals that are generated during domestic/municipal wastewater treatment processes are regulated under 40
CFR Part 503, otherwise, the residuals are regulated under 40 CFR Part 257.
2. Specify if residuals are defined under 15A NCAC 02T.1102(6) as:
Biological 11 Non -Biological
Note: Biological residuals are residuals that have been generated during the treatment of domestic wastewater, animal
processing wastewater, or the biological treatment of industrial wastewater (biological treatment is a system that utilizes
biological processes including lagoons, activated sludge systems, extended aeration systems, and fixed film systems).
FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 1 of 5

3. Hazardous Waste Determination: Complete the following to demonstrate that the residuals are non -hazardous under
RCRA: (Note - this item does not have to be completed for facilities that are less than 0.5 MGD in design flow that treat
100% non -municipal, domestic wastewater only)
a. Are the residuals listed in 40 CFR §261.31-§261.33: 0 yes no
If yes, list the number(s): _
b. Specify whether or not the residuals exhibit any of the characteristics defined by 40 CFR §261.21-
261.24: P yes 0 no.
Fill in the following tables with the results of the latest toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) analysis as
well as those for corrosivity, ignitability, and reactivity:
Laboratory: Pace Analytical Date of analysis: 2/03/2023
Passed corrosivity test: yes no. pH: s.u. (2 <pH < 12.5)
Passed ignitability test: yes no. Flashpoint: 170 OF (> 140°F)
Passed reactivity test: ® yes ❑no. HCN: 2_7 mg/kg (<250) & H2S: <500 mg/kg (<500)
TCLP Parameter
Limit
(mgfi)
Result
(m917)
TCLP Parameter
Limit
(m917)
Result
(mg17)
Arsenic
5.0
0.2
Hexachlorobenzene
0.13
0.0080
Barium
100.0
1.0
Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene
0.5
0.02
Benzene
0.5
0.0086
Hexachloroethane
3.0
0.018
Cadmium
1.0
0.01
Lead
5.0
02
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.5
0.00033
Lindane
0.4
0.000005
Chlordane
0.03
0.0080
Mercury
0.2
0.02
Chlorobenzene
100.0
0.0052
Methoxychlor
10.0
0.00001
Chloroform
6.0
0.010
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
200.0
0.068
Chromium
5.0
0.2
Nitrobenzene
2.0
0.018
m-Cresol
200.0
0.007
Pentachlorophenol
100.0
0.05
o-Cresol
200.0
0.009
Pyridine
5.0
0.037
p-Cresol
200.0
0.007
Selenium
1.0
0.5
Cresol
200.0
0.007
Silver
5.0
0.1
2,4-D
10.0
0.0019
Tetrachloroethylene
0.7
0.015
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
7.5
0.016
Toxaphene
0.5
0.016
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.5
0.010
Trichloroethylene
0.5
0.0096
1,1-Dichloroethylene
0.7
0.0072
214,5-Trichlorophenol
400.0
0.016
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.13
0.012
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2.0
0.011
Endrin
0.02
0.000005
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
1.0
0.001
Heptachlor and its Hydroxide
0.008
0.000005
Vinyl Chloride
0.2
0.01
FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 2 of 5

4. Metals Determination: Complete one of the following tables (i.e., as applicable) to demonstrate that the residuals do not
violate the ceiling concentrations for metals regulated under 15A NCAC 02T .1105.
a. For Distribution/Land Application: Fill in the following table with the results of the latest analyses (i.e., on a dry weight
basis) for the following metal parameters:
Laboratory: Pace Analytical and Date of analysis: 2/27/2023
Parameter
Ceiling
Concentration Limits
(ClassA & ClassB)
(mglkg)
Monthly Average
Concentration Limits
(Class A Only)
(mglkg)
Result
(mglkg)
Arsenic
75
41
55
Cadmium
85
39
4.6
Copper
4,300
1,500
50
Lead
840
300
28
Mercury
57
17
0.42
Molybdenum
75
n/a
12
Nickel
420
420
41
Selenium
100
100
50
Zinc
7,500
2,800
27
is���errsrr�ri��rs!�:rrsiie+tr��ne+lrr�rius�reeesre*s�vtireses�rs��r_arae�esse*ssrsee�rrrs�ers�srsszeeti� .rrirrrsrsesa
Distance F..om Disposal
to BofifldaFy to
Closest Property Linee
Ar-senir.
Cr-o
NickeUnit
0 25
34
289
240
� 15bt4< 59
44
229
240
59'��5
3s3
264
220
n �':75bt4< loo
46
440
320
n 1nn— 425
5-3,
464
31 A
1-25
4;2
454
420
Resuh
FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 3 of 5

5. Nutrient/Micronutrient Determination: Complete the following:
a. Total solids: 1.6 %.
b. Fill in the following table with the results of the latest analyses (i.e., on a dry weight basis) for the following nutrient and
rmcronutnent parameters:
Laboratory: Pace Analytical and Date of analysis: 2/27/2023
Parameter
Result
(mg1kg)
Aluminum
160000
Ammonia -Nitrogen
24
Calcium
3700
Magnesium
420
Nitrate -Nitrite Nitrogen
29
pH (Standard Unit)
5.8
Phosphorus
3600
Potassium
500
Sodium
2500
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
6500
c. Using the results listed in Item IL 5b. above, calculate the sodium adsorption ration (SAR): 1.31
[Note: If residuals contain SAR of 10 or higher, the applicant shall obtain recommendations from the local Cooperative
Extension Office, the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, the Natural Resource Conservation Service, a
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist, or an agronomist, prior to land application of residuals. The recommendations shall
address the sodium application rate, soil amendments (e.g., gypsum, etc.), or a mechanism for maintaining site integrity
and conditions conducive to crop growth].
d. Specify the mineralization rate to be used in calculating the plant available nitrogen (PAN) of the residuals: 10 %. This
rate is a (check one): ® default value, or ❑ actually established.
If the residuals are not generated from the treatment of municipal or domestic wastewater, explain or provide technical
justification as to why the selected default value is appropriate to be applied to these residuals: this waste is generally
similar to compost or raw soil based on research data, therefore 10% was utilized.
e. Calculate the PAN for the residuals (i.e., on a dry weight basis) and fill the results in the following table:
Application Method
First (1st) Year PAN
Five -Year
Maximum Adjusted PAN
(mg1kg)
(mg/kg)
Surface
117
1,668
Injection/Incorporation
129
1,833
6. Other Pollutants Determination: Specify whether or not there are any other pollutants of concern in the residuals and provide
the results of the latest analyses:
FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 4 of 5

7. Pathogen Reduction: Per 15A NCAC 02T.1106, specify how residuals will meet the pathogen reduction requirements:
a. For Distribution/Land Application of Class A or Equivalent:
A fecal coliform density that is demonstrated to be less than 1,000 MPN per gram of total dry solids,
or
A salmonella sp. density that is demonstration to be less than 3 MPN per 4 grams of total dry solids.
AND one of the followings (except for non -biological residuals):
q Alternative 1 [15A NCAC 02T.I 106(b)(3)(A)] - Time/Temperature Compliance.
q Alternative 2 [15A NCAC 02T.I 106(b)(3)(B)] - Alkaline Treatment.
q Alternative 3 [15A NCAC 02T.I 106(b)(3)(C)] - Prior Testing for Enteric Virus/Viable Helminth Ova.
EJ Alternative 4 [15A NCAC 02T. 1106(b)(3)(D)] - No Prior Testing for Enteric Virus/Viable Helminth Ova.
J Alternative 5 [15A NCAC 02T.I 106(b)(3)(E)-(K)] - Process to Further Reduce Pathogens (PFRP).
Specify one: ❑ composting, 0 heat drying, heat treatment,
❑ thermophilic aerobic digestion, beta ray irradiation,
❑ gamma ray irradiation, or pasteurization.
b. For Land Application of Class B:
J Alternative 1 [15A NCAC 02T.I 106(c)(1)] - Fecal Coliform Density Demonstration.
J Alternative 2 [15A NCAC 02T.I 106(c)(2 - Process to Si ficantly Reduce Pathogens (PSRP).
Specify one: aerobic digestion, air drying, ii anaerobic digestion,
I composting, or lime stabilization.
c. For Surface Disposal:
El Select One of the Class A or Equivalent Pathogen Reduction Alternatives in Item II. 7a. above.
El Select One of the Class B or Equivalent Pathogen Reduction Alternatives in Item II. 7b. above.
El Exempt -If Daily Cover Alternative is chosen in Item II.8. below [ 15A NCAC 02T.1106(a)(2)].
0 Not Applicable - Non -Biological Residuals with NO Domestic Wastewater Contribution.
8. Vector Attraction Reduction (VAR): Per 15A NCAC 02T.1107, specify how residuals will meet the VAR requirements:
Alternative 1 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(1)] - 38% Volatile Solids Reduction (Aerobic/Anaerobic Digestion).
Alternative 2 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(2)] - 40-Day Bench Scale Test (Anaerobic Digestion).
Alternative 3 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(3)] - 30-Day Bench Scale Test (Aerobic Digestion).
Alternative 4 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(4)] - Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate Test (Aerobic Digestion).
Alternative 5 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(5)] - 14-Day Aerobic Processes.
Alternative 6 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(6)] - Alkaline Stabilization.
Alternative 7 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(7)] - Drying of Stabilized Residuals.
Alternative 8 [15A NCAC 02T. 1107(a)(8)] - Drying of Unstabilized Residuals.
Alternative 9 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(9)] - Injection.
Alternative 10 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(10)] - Incorporation.
Alternative for Surface Disposal Units Only - Soil/Other Material Cover [ 15A NCAC 02T.I 107(b)(2)].
Not Applicable - Non -Biological Residuals with NO Domestic Wastewater Contribution.
Note: For animal processing residuals, only alternatives 9 or 10 may be chosen due to the nuisance conditions that typically
occur when these residuals are applied and left on the land surface.
FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 5 of 5

QUANTITATIVE JUSTIFICATION

Quantitative Justification for Residuals Production Rate
WWTP Source Description:
During the previous permit year 2022, the City produced 1993 dry tons (2021) the City produced
1263 dry tons of residuals. In 2021 Lumberton produced 1263 dry tons, and 1952 dry tons in
2020. Therefore, it is predicted that 2,000 tons will be produced in 2023 at minimum considering
growth (2,500 dry tons is proposed to account for overages).
WTP Source Description:
The City has not applied water treatment plant residuals since at least 2004, when 1200 dry tons
were applied. There is currently a large amount of residuals on hand in the basin, therefore it is
expected that the first couple of years will incur a larger portion of the proposed total application
amount and therefore an allotment of 2,000 dry tons is requested. After basin is emptied, it is
assumed that an average of 500 dry tons/year will be required for disposal.
Justification for All Sources:
The loading rates and nutrient calculations are attached hereto for each individual portion of the
residuals.
In order to determine the maximum dry tonnage that could be applied on the fields in the current
permit, an average PAN assuming the lowest feasible values for row crop plantings (corn) and
actual values for pasture/hay crops the weighted average PAN is approximately 150 lbs
PAN/acre. Assuming an application of 4500 dry tons, a weighted average of WWTP Residuals
(56%) and WTP Residuals (44%), the following is a summary of the residuals land application
scenarios:
Assumed
Acres Required
Application
Acres Required
(Five -Year Max. Adj.
Rate
(1st Year PAN)
PAN)
(lb PAN/ac-
Yr)
Surface
Inj./Inc.
Surface
Inj./Inc.
50
2,465.10
2,595.60
3,518.10
3,648.60
100
1,232.55
1,297.80
1,759.05
1,824.30
150
821.70
865.20
1,172.70
1,216.20
200
616.28
648.90
879.53
912.15
Since the five-year maximum will require the most acreage it was used to determine the
maximum amount of dry tonnage to be permitted.
With this permit renewal, we will have 1,316.38 acres permitted, which is well above the
necessary acreage to account for 4,500 dry tons max. Should the City ever come close to this dry
tonnage in the future, alternative dewatering means will be utilized at that point to ensure we
remain below the permit limits.

RESIDUALS SAMPLING PLAN

Residuals Sampling Plan
Wastewater Treatment Plant Description
The Lumberton Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) is located at 700 Lafayette St in Lumberton North
Carolina. The WWTP is under continuous operation to treat incoming wastewater prior to effluent
discharge to the Lumber River. The majority of wastewater influent is domestic with some industrial.
Residuals are produced constantly during this process; all residuals produced are stabilized via aerobic
digestion. A plant diagram is attached below:
17Q?C}ll.f7R1NATWN -�
A
Figure 1: Process Flow Diagram WWTP
Sewaee Treatment Process
LUMBERTON "w Fa
PIPING AND VALVE;
SCHEMATIC
HOLDING
TANK 3
4
l—
HEADWORKS
The wastewater treatment process includes the headworks, grit chamber, aeration basins, secondary
clarifiers and chlorine contact tanks for disinfection, digesters, and holding tanks. The receiving stream is
the Lumber River. Waste activated sludge and primary sludge are mixed and fed to an aerobic digester
for stabilization.
The digested biosolids are then transferred to holding tanks for storage until loaded into transportation
vehicles and transported to the land application sites.

Water Treatment Plant Description
The Lumberton Water Treatment Plant (WTP) is located at 1451 Lowery Street, Lumberton, NC. The
water that is used by the City of Lumberton is surface water that is pumped from the Lumber River and
Seven (7) deep wells located near the Lumber River. The Wells and Lumber River are fed from the Black
Creek Aquifer. The Wells and River are blended together for Alkalinity and color dilution. Residuals are
produced constantly during this process; all residuals produced are resultant from the "settled" process
described below. A plant diagram is attached below:
LUMBER RIVER 1KG_
3 TANK
n q wetk 41bD5� wd 3 �SGij wd 6 fSD7] wel 715DO) 2 M. G.
:!•YU'-
B()pSTER
C
1 M.G wd 2(SO 31 a s_. VMI5TSOG)
TANK
TANK
1 Am1xd P1
wale raw water
meld rau! '
4 M a.
RESERVaS
dwtrbubon
Pums
SAMPLE PMNT
RAW WATER OP 1)
Q TREATED WATER JSPZ
SETTLED EAST [SP31
SETTLED WEST ISPp
© FILTERED TSP51
COANNED FILTER EFF [CFI]
FINISHED WATER lE M I
fAmad wat W, dl. 'ed salt
flph
_ffSP5 SP5 1Sf12
SETTLED
WEST
SETTLED
EAST
®
SP4
■
SP3
Figure 2: Process Flow Diagram WTP
Pathogen Reduction
COMPLIANCE OPERATIONAL CHNICALSADDED
x UQU ID AL UM
x PRIMARY LIME- FULYAMINE. CARBON. POLYMER
TANK
2
x
x
x afLORPNE
k SE•-ONDARY LIME-MOSPHATE. FLOURIDE. CH:l r •.�
• i}tLORIN£
1 M.G.
TANK
Not Applicable - Non -Biological Residuals with NO Domestic Wastewater Contribution therefore no
sampling is required.
Vector Attraction Reduction
Not Applicable - Non -Biological Residuals with NO Domestic Wastewater Contribution therefore no
sampling is required.

Pollutants
Representative sampling of the residuals is conducted by a subcontractor on a quarterly schedule. This is
the required minimum monitoring frequency based upon annual residuals production for land
application. The samples that are collected are analyzed at Eurofins Environment Testing Southeast,
Cary, Inc (NC Lab ID #591) and Cameron Testing Services (NC Lab ID #654). The quarterly representative
residuals are collected in teflon plastic bottles from the holding tanks on -site. The samples are packed
on ice and delivered to the following labs:
Eurofins
102 Woodwinds Industrial Ct A
Cary, NC 27511
Cameron Testing Services
219 S. Steele Street
Sanford, NC 27330
The laboratory analyzes the residuals for the following parameters:
Arsenic ( 5. 0)
1, 4-Dichlorobenzene ( 7. 5)
Nitrobenzene ( 2. 0)
Barium ( 100. 0)
1, 2- Dichloroethane ( 0. 5)
Pentachlorophenol ( 100. 0)
Benzene ( 0. 5)
1, 1 - Dichloroethylene ( 0. 7)
Pyridine ( 5. 0)
Cadmium ( 1. 0)
2, 4- Dinitrotoluene ( 0. 13)
Selenium ( 1. 0)
Carbon tetrachloride ( 0. 5)
Endrin ( 0. 02
Silver ( 5. 0)
Chlordane ( 0. 03)
Hexachlorobenzene ( 0. 13)
Chlorobenzene ( 100. 0)
Heptachlor ( and its hydroxide) (0. 008)
Toxaphene ( 0. 5)
Chloroform ( 6. 0)
Hexachloro- 1, 3- butadiene ( 0. 5
Trichloroethylene ( 0. 5)
Chromium (5. 0)
Hexachloroethane ( 3. 0
2, 4, 5 - Trichlorophenol
400.0)
m -Cresol ( 200. 0)
Lead ( 5. 0)
2, 4, 6 -Trichlorophenol ( 2. 0)
o -Cresol ( 200. 0)
Lindane ( 0.4)
2, 4, 5 - TP ( Silvex) ( 1. 0)
p -Cresol (200.0)
Mercury ( 0. 2)
Vinyl chloride ( 0. 2)
Cresol ( 200. 0)
1 Methoxychlor ( 10. 0)
2, 4- D ( 10. 0)
1 Methyl ethyl ketone ( 200. 0)
Aluminum
Mercury
Potassium
Ammonia -Nitrogen
Molybdenum
Selenium
Arsenic
Nickel
Sodium
Cadmium
Nitrate -Nitrite Nitrogen
Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)
Calcium
Percert Total Solid
TKN
Copper
pH
Zinc
Lead
Phosphorus
Magnesium
Plant Available Nitrogen (by
calculation)

LABORATORY ANALYTICAL DATA

(�7neAnalXical' ANALYTICAL REPORT
November 29, 2022
13
Hunt Environmental Associates
Sample Delivery Group: L1559561
Samples Received: 11/18/2022
Project Number:
Description: Enviro-Choice Recycling
Report To: Cody Hunt
3330 Saddletree Road
Lumberton, NC 28359
Entire Report Reviewed By: q�"h
Heather J Wagner
Project Manager
Results relate only to the items tested or calibrated and are reported as rounded values. This test report shall not be
reproduced, except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. Where applicable, sampling conducted by Pace
Analytical National is performed per guidance provided in laboratory standard operating procedures ENV-SOP-MTJL-0067and
ENV-SOP-MTJL-0068. Where sampling conducted by the customer, results relate to the accuracy of the information provided,
and as the samples are received.
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
Hunt Environmental Associates L1559561 11/29/22 16:29 1 of 21

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cp: Cover Page
Tc: Table of Contents
2
Ss: Sample Summary
3
Cn: Case Narrative
4
Sr: Sample Results
5
WW-3 L1559561-01
5
Qc: Quality Control Summary
7
Total Solids by Method 2540 G-2011
7
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1
8
Wet Chemistry by Method 365.4M
10
Wet Chemistry by Method 4500NOrg C-2011
11
Wet Chemistry by Method 9012 B
12
Wet Chemistry by Method 9034-9030B
13
Wet Chemistry by Method 9045D
14
Wet Chemistry by Method 9056A
15
Wet Chemistry by Method D93/1010A
16
Mercury by Method 7471B
17
Metals (ICP) by Method 6010D
18
GI: Glossary of Terms
19
Al: Accreditations & Locations
20
Sc: Sample Chain of Custody
21
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG:
DATE/TIME: PAGE:
Hunt Environmental Associates L1559561
11/29/22 16:29 2 of 21

SAMPLE SUMMARY
Collected by Collected date/time Received date/time
WW-3 L1559561-01 Solid Carrigan Harris 11/17/22 09:35 11/18/22 09:00 , C
P
Method
Batch
Dilution
Preparation
Analysis
Analyst
date/time
date/time
Total Solids by Method 2540 G-2011
WG1962847
1
11/22/2210:20
11/22/22 10:38
CMK
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1
WG1963217
1
11/28/221118
11/29/22 1136
CAT
Wet Chemistry by Method 365.4M
WG1963223
5
11/27/22 17:30
11/28/2217:18
CAT
Wet Chemistry by Method 4500NOrg C-2011
WG1963220
5
11/27/22 17:29
11/28/2216:10
CAT
Wet Chemistry by Method 9012 B
WG1963212
3
11/24/2216:19
11/28/221109
JCS
Wet Chemistry by Method 9034-9030B
WG1963060
1
11/22/22 09:50
11/24/22 08:31
CAG
Wet Chemistry by Method 9045D
WG1964541
1
11/25/22 09:30
11/25/22 1130
KAD
Wet Chemistry by Method 9056A
WG1963305
1
11/23/2216:45
11/23/22 22:11
LBR
Wet Chemistry by Method D93/1010A
WG1962791
1
11/21/22 03:00
11/21/22 03:00
WOS
Mercury by Method 7471B
WG1962672
1
11/23/22 09:43
11/24/221100
SRT
Metals (ICP) by Method 6010D
WG1963650
1
11/23/2215:02
11/24/2218:37
KMG
Location
FC
Mt. Juliet, TN
Mt. Juliet, TN
Mt. Juliet, TN
Mt. Juliet, TN
Mt. Juliet, TN
Fn
Mt. Juliet, TN
Mt. Juliet, TN
Mt. Juliet, TN
Fr
Mt. Juliet, TN
Mt. Juliet, TN
Rc
Mt. Juliet, TN
F,
SAI
RC
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME:
Hunt Environmental Associates L1559561 11/29/22 16:29
PAGE:
3 of 21

CASE NARRATIVE
FP
All sample aliquots were received at the correct temperature, in the proper containers, with the
appropriate preservatives, and within method specified holding times, unless qualified or notated within
the report. Where applicable, all MDL (LOD) and RDL (LOQ) values reported for environmental samples
FC
have been corrected for the dilution factor used in the analysis. All Method and Batch Quality Control
are within established criteria except where addressed in this case narrative, a non-conformance form
or properly qualified within the sample results. By my digital signature below, I affirm to the best of my
FS
knowledge, all problems/anomalies observed by the laboratory as having the potential to affect the
quality of the data have been identified by the laboratory, and no information or data have been
knowingly withheld that would affect the quality of the data.
0
Fr
Rc
4�z
F,
Heather J Wagner
[Al
Project Manager
RC
Project Narrative
All Reactive Cyanide results reported in the attached report were determined as totals using method 9012 B.
All Reactive Sulfide results reported in the attached report were determined as totals using method 9034-903013.
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
Hunt Environmental Associates L1559561 11/29/22 16:29 4 of 21

SAMPLE RESULTS - 01
L1559561
WW-3
Collected date/time: 11/17/22 09:35
Total Solids by Method 2540 G-2011
Result
Qualifier Dilution Analysis
Batch
Analyte %
date / time
Total Solids 2.66
1 11/22/202210:38
WG1962847
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1
Result (dry)
Qualifier RDL (dry) Dilution
Analysis
Analyte mg/kg
mg/kg
date / time
Ammonia Nitrogen 465
376 1
11/29/20221136
Wet Chemistry by Method 365.4M
Batch
WG1963217
Result (dry) Qualifier RDL (dry) Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg date / time
Phosphorus, Total 15300 3760 5 11/28/202217:18 WG1963223
Wet Chemistry by Method 4500NOrg C-2011
Result (dry) Qualifier RDL (dry) Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg date / time
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, TKN 61400 V 3760 5 11/28/202216:10 WG1963220
Wet Chemistry by Method 9012 B
Result Qualifier
RDL
Analyte mg/kg
mg/kg
Reactive Cyanide ND
0.750
Wet Chemistry by Method 9034-9030B
Result Qualifier
RDL
Analyte mg/kg
mg/kg
Reactive Sulfide ND
75.0
Wet Chemistry by Method 9045D
Dilution Analysis Batch
date / time
3 11/28/20221109 WG1963212
Dilution Analysis Batch
date / time
1 11/24/2022 08:31 WG1963060
Result Qualifier
Dilution Analysis
Batch
Analyte su
date / time
pH 7.12 T8
1 11/25/20221130
WG1964541
Sample Narrative:
L1559561-01 WG1964541:7.12 at20.4C
Wet Chemistry by Method 9056A
Result (dry) Qualifier
RDL (dry) Dilution
Analysis
Analyte mg/kg
mg/kg
date / time
Nitrate -Nitrite ND
752 1
11/23/2022 22:11
Wet Chemistry by Method D93/1010A
Batch
WG1963305
Result Qualifier Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte Deg. F date / time
Ignitability DNI at170 1 11/21/2022 03:00 WG1962791
Mercury by Method 7471B
Result (dry) Qualifier RDL (dry) Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg date / time
Mercury ND 1.50 1 11/24/20221100 WG1962672
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
Hunt Environmental Associates L1559561 11/29/22 16:29 5 of 21

SAMPLE RESULTS - 01
L1559561
WW-3
Collected date/time: 11/17/22 09:35
Metals (ICP) by Method 6010D
Result (dry)
Analyte
mg/kg
Arsenic
ND
Barium
169
Cadmium
ND
Chromium
136
Lead
ND
Selenium
ND
Silver
ND
Qualifier RDL (dry)
mg/kg
75.2
18.8
18.8
37.6
18.8
75.2
37.6
Dilution Analysis
date / time
1 11/24/202218:37
1 11/24/202218:37
1 11/24/202218:37
1 11/24/202218:37
1 11/24/202218:37
1 11/24/202218:37
1 11/24/202218:37
Batch
WG1963650
WG1963650
WG1963650
WG1963650
WG1963650
WG1963650
WG1963650
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
Hunt Environmental Associates L1559561 11/29/22 16:29 6 of 21

WG1962847
Total Solids by Method 2540 G-2011
Method Blank (MB)
(MB) R3364272-1 11/22/22 10:38
MB Result
Analyte
Total Solids 0.00200
MB Qualifier MB MDL MB RDL
L1559657-03 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY
L1559561-01
(OS) L1559657-03 11/22/22 10:38 • (DUP) R3864272-3 11/22/22 10:38
Original Result DUP Result Dilution DUP RPD DUP Qualifier DUP RPD
Limits
Analyte % % %_
Total Solids 81.8 81.7 1 0.165 10
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
(LCS) R3864272-2 11/22/22 10:38
Spike Amount LCS Result
Analyte
Total Solids 50.0 50.0
LCS Rec. Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier
100 85.0-115
ACCOUNT:
Hunt Environmental Associates
PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
L1559561 11/29/22 16:29 7 of 21

WG1963217 QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1 L1559561-01
Method Blank (MB)
(MB) R3366055-1 11/29/22 11:18
MB Result MB Qualifier MB MDL MB RDL
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
Ammonia Nitrogen U 7.00 10.0
L1559179-17 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
(OS) L1559179-17 11/29/22 1123 • (DUP) R3366055-3 11/29/22 1125
Original Result DUP Result Dilution DUP RPD DUP Qualifier DUP RPD
(dry) (dry) Limits
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg
Ammonia Nitrogen ND ND 1 0.000 20
L1559561-01 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
(OS) L1559561-01 11/29/22 1136 • (DUP) R3366055-6 11/29/22 1137
Original Result DUP Result DUP RPD
Dilution DUP RPD DUP Qualifier
(dry) (dry) Limits
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg
Ammonia Nitrogen 465 464 1 0.269 20
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
(LCS) R3866055-2 11/29/22 1120
Spike Amount LCS Result LCS Rec. Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg
Ammonia Nitrogen 500 540 108 90.0-110
L1559179-17 Original Sample (OS) • Matrix Spike (MS) • Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
(OS) L1559179-17 11/29/22 1123 • (MS) R3366055-4 11/29/22 1126 • (MSD) R3366055-5 11/29/22 1127
Spike Amount Original Result MS Result (dry) MSD Result MS Rec. MSD Rec. Dilution Rec. Limits MS Qualifier MSD Qualifier RPD RPD Limits
(dry) (dry) (dry)
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
Ammonia Nitrogen 599 ND 616 622 103 104 1 80.0-120 0.922 20
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
Hunt Environmental Associates L1559561 11/29/22 16:29 3 of 21

WG1963217 QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1 L1559561-01
L1559561-01 Original Sample (OS) • Matrix Spike (MS)
(OS) L1559561-01 11/29/22 1136 • (MS) R3366055-7 11/29/22 1139
Spike Amount Original Result MS Result (dry) MS Rec.
(dry) (dry)
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
Ammonia Nitrogen 18800 465 20600 107
Dilution Rec. Limits MS Qualifier
1 80.0-120
ACCOUNT:
Hunt Environmental Associates
PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
L1559561 11/29/22 16:29 9 of 21

WG1963223 QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY
Wet Chemistry by Method 365.4M L1559561-01
Method Blank (MB)
(MB) R3365761-1 11/23/22 16:41
MB Result MB Qualifier MB MDL MB RDL
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
Phosphorus, Total U 5.00 20.0
L1559561-01 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
(OS) L1559561-01 11/23/22 1718 • (DUP) R3365761-9 11/23/22 1719
Original Result DUP Result Dilution DUP RPD DUP Qualifier DUP RPD
(dry) (dry) Limits
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg
Phosphorus, Total 15300 14800 5 3.81 25
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
(LCS) R3865761-2 11/28/22 16:42
Spike Amount LCS Result LCS Rec.
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg
Phosphorus, Total 151 154 102
Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier
78.9-121
L1559561-01 Original Sample (OS) • Matrix Spike (MS) • Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
(OS) L1559561-01 11/23/22 1718 • (MS) R3365761-10 11/23/22 1720 • (MSD) R3365761-11 11/23/22 1722
Spike Amount Original Result
MS Result (dry)
MSD Result MS Rec.
MSD Rec. Dilution Rec. Limits
MS Qualifier MSD Qualifier RPD RPD Limits
(dry) (dry)
(dry)
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
Phosphorus, Total 7520 15300
21400
20600 80.1
70.2 5 50.0-150
3.57 25
ACCOUNT:
PROJECT:
SDG:
DATE/TIME: PAGE:
Hunt Environmental Associates
L1559561
11/29/22 16:29 10 of 21

WG1963220
Wet Chemistry by Method 4500NOrg C-2011
Method Blank (MB)
(MB) R3865731-1 11/23/22 1514
MB Result MB Qualifier MB MDL MB RDL
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, TKN U 4.48 20.0
L1559561-01 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY
L1559561-01
(OS) L1559561-01 11/23/22 16:10 • (DUP) R3365731-9 11/23/22 16:11
Original Result DUP Result Dilution DUP RPD DUP Qualifier DUP RPD
(dry) (dry) Limits
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, TKN 61400 62600 5 1.98 20
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
(LCS) R3865731-2 11/28/22 15:15
Spike Amount LCS Result LCS Rec.
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, TKN 508 524 103
Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier
75.2-121
L1559561-01 Original Sample (OS) • Matrix Spike (MS) • Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
(OS) L1559561-01 11/23/22 16:10 • (MS) R3365731-10 11/23/22 16:13 • (MSD) R3365731-11 11/23/22 16:14
Spike Amount Original Result
MS Result (dry)
MSD Result MS Rec.
MSD Rec. Dilution Rec. Limits
MS Qualifier MSD Qualifier RPD RPD Limits
(dry) (dry)
(dry)
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, TKN 15000 61400
76000
71100 97.0
64.4 5 90.0-110
V 6.67 20
ACCOUNT:
PROJECT:
SDG:
DATE/TIME: PAGE:
Hunt Environmental Associates
L1559561
11/29/22 16:29 11 of 21

WG1963212
QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY
Wet Chemistry by Method 9012 B
L1559561-01
Method Blank (MB)
C p
(MB) R3365736-1 11/23/22 1105
MB Result MB Qualifier MB MDL MB RDL
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
TC
I
Reactive Cyanide U 0.0390 0.250
FS
L1559700-01 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
[�n]
(OS) L1559700-01 11/23/22 1110 • (DUP) R3865736-3 11/23/22 1111
Original Result DUP Result Dilution DUP RPD
DUP Qualifier DUP RPD
Limits
F
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg
Reactive Cyanide ND ND 1 27.0
P1 20
L1560754-05 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
GI
(OS) L1560754-05 11/23/22 1126 • (DUP) R3865736-6 11/23/22 1129
Original Result DUP Result Dilution DUP RPD
DUP Qualifier DUP RPD
Limits
FAI
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg
Reactive Cyanide ND ND 1 0.000
20
FSc
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
(LCS) R3865736-2 11/28/22 1106
Spike Amount LCS Result LCS Rec.
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg
Reactive Cyanide 2.50 2.33 93.3
Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier
85.0-115
L1560545-02 Original Sample (OS) • Matrix Spike (MS) • Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
(OS) L1560545-02 11/23/22 11:17 • (MS) R3865736-4 11/23/22 1118 • (MSD) R3865736-5 11/23/22 1119
Spike Amount Original Result MS Result
MSD Result MS Rec.
MSD Rec. Dilution Rec. Limits
MS Qualifier MSD Qualifier RPD RPD Limits
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
mg/kg
Reactive Cyanide 1.67 ND 3.20
3.13 192
188 1 75.0-125
J5 J5 2.24 20
Sample Narrative:
MS: Matrix spike failure due to matrix interference.
MSD: Matrix spike failure due to matrix interference.
ACCOUNT:
PROJECT:
SDG:
DATE/TIME: PAGE:
Hunt Environmental Associates
L1559561
11/29/22 16:29 12 of 21

WG1963060
Wet Chemistry by Method 9034-9030B
Method Blank (MB)
(MB) R3364771-1 11/24/22 08:31
MB Result
Analyte mg/kg
Reactive Sulfide U
MB Qualifier MB MDL MB RDL
mg/kg mg/kg
30.0 75.0
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
(LCS) R3864771-2 11/24/22 08:31
Spike Amount LCS Result
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg
Reactive Sulfide 100 88.2
QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY
L1559561-01
LCS Rec. Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier
88.2 53.8-124
ACCOUNT:
Hunt Environmental Associates
PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
L1559561 11/29/22 16:29 13 of 21

WG1964541 QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY
Wet Chemistry by Method 9045D L1559561-01
L1558786-02 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
(OS) L1553736-02 11/25/22 1130 • (DUP) R3364993-2 11/25/22 1130
Original Result DUP Result Dilution DUP RPD
Analyte su su
pH 7.39 7.39 1 0.000
Sample Narrative:
OS: 7.39 at20.8C
DUP: 7.39 at 20.9C
L1560364-11 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
DUP Qualifier DUP RPD
Limits
(OS) L1560364-11 11/25/22 1130 • (DUP) R3364993-3 11/25/22 1130
Original Result DUP Result
Dilution DUP RPD DUP Qualifier DUP RPD
Limits
Analyte su su
pH 7.67 7.67
1 0.000 1
Sample Narrative:
OS: 7.67 at 20C
DUP 7.67 at19.9C
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
(LCS) R3364993-1 11/25/22 1130
Spike Amount LCS Result
LCS Rec. Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier
Analyte su su
pH 10.0 9.91
99.1 99.0-101
Sample Narrative:
LCS: 9.91 at20.7C
ACCOUNT:
PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
Hunt Environmental Associates
L1559561 11/29/22 16:29 14 of 21

WG1963305
Wet Chemistry by Method 9056A
Method Blank (MB)
(MB) R3365039-1 11/23/22 17:43
MB Result
Analyte mg/kg
Nitrate -Nitrite U
MB Qualifier MB MDL MB RDL
mg/kg mg/kg
1.06 20.0
L1559181-22 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY
L1559561-01
(OS) L1559131-22 11/23/22 20:56 • (DUP) R3365039-3 11/23/22 2111
Original Result DUP Result Dilution DUP RPD DUP Qualifier DUP RPD
(dry) (dry) Limits
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg
Nitrate -Nitrite ND ND 1.04 8.27 15
L1559681-01 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
(OS) L1559631-01 11/23/22 22:25 • (DUP) R3365039-6 11/23/22 22:40
Original Result DUP Result DUP RPD
Dilution DUP RPD DUP Qualifier
(dry) (dry) Limits
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg
Nitrate -Nitrite ND ND 1 0.000 15
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
(LCS) R3865039-2 11/23/22 17:57
Spike Amount LCS Result LCS Rec.
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg
Nitrate -Nitrite 40.0 42.2 106
Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier
80.0-120
L1559181-22 Original Sample (OS) • Matrix Spike (MS) • Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
(OS) L1559131-22 11/23/22 20:56 • (MS) R3365039-4 11/23/22 21:26 • (MSD) R3365039-5 11/23/22 2141
Spike Amount Original Result
MS Result (dry)
MSD Result MS Rec.
MSD Rec. Dilution Rec. Limits
MS Qualifier MSD Qualifier RPD RPD Limits
(dry) (dry)
(dry)
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
Nitrate -Nitrite 105 ND
118
118 108
109 1.04 80.0-120
0.397 15
ACCOUNT:
PROJECT:
SDG:
DATE/TIME: PAGE:
Hunt Environmental Associates
L1559561
11/29/22 16:29 15 of 21

WG1962791 QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY
Wet Chemistry by Method D93/1010A L1559561-01
L1558094-02 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
(OS) L1553094-02 11/21/22 03:00 • (DUP) R3363647-3 11/21/22 03:00
Original Result DUP Result Dilution DUP RPD
Analyte Deg. F Deg. F
Ignitability DNI at170 DNI at170 1 0.000
L1558860-01 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
DUP Qualifier DUP RPD
Limits
i
10
(OS) L1553360-01 11/21/22 03:00 • (DUP) R3363647-4 11/21/22 03:00
Original Result DUP Result Dilution DUP RPD DUP Qualifier DUP RPD
Limits
Analyte Deg. F Deg. F
Ignitability DNI at170 DNI at170 1 0.000 10
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) • Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (LCSD)
(LCS) R3363647-1 11/21/22 03:00 • (LCSD) R3363647-2 11/21/22 03:00
Spike Amount LCS Result LCSD Result LCS Rec.
LCSD Rec.
Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier LCSD Qualifier RPD RPD Limits
Analyte Deg. F Deg. F Deg. F
Ignitability 126 129 129 103
103
95.6-104 0.000 10
ACCOUNT:
PROJECT:
SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
Hunt Environmental Associates
L1559561 11/29/22 16:29 16 of 21

WG1962672
Mercury by Method 7471B
Method Blank (MB)
(MB) R3364322-1 11/24/22 10:40
MB Result MB Qualifier MB MDL
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg
Mercury U 0.0180
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
(LCS) R3864822-2 11/24/22 10:43
Spike Amount LCS Result LCS Rec.
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg
Mercury 0.500 0.480 96.0
QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY
L1559561-01
MB RDL
mg/kg
0.0400
Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier
80.0-120
L1559883-02 Original Sample (OS) • Matrix Spike (MS) • Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
(OS) L1559333-02 11/24/22 10:45 • (MS) R3864822-3 11/24/22 10:48 • (MSD) R3864822-4 11/24/22 10:57
Spike Amount Original Result MS Result MSD Result MS Rec. MSD Rec. Dilution Rec. Limits MS Qualifier MSD Qualifier RPD RPD Limits
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
Mercury 0.500 ND 0.475 0.446 94.9 89.2 1 75.0-125 6.24 20
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
Hunt Environmental Associates L1559561 11/29/22 16:29 17 of 21

WG1963650
Metals (ICP) by Method 6010D
Method Blank (MB)
(MB) R3364334-1 11/24/22 1720
MB Result
MB Qualifier MB MDL
Analyte mg/kg
mg/kg
Arsenic U
0.518
Barium U
0.0852
Cadmium U
0.0471
Chromium U
0.133
Lead U
0.208
Selenium U
0.764
Silver U
0.127
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
(LCS) R3864884-2 11/24/22 17:23
Spike Amount
LCS Result
Analyte
mg/kg
mg/kg
Arsenic
100
85.3
Barium
100
88.0
Cadmium
100
86.6
Chromium
100
86.0
Lead
100
89.9
Selenium
100
86.7
Silver
20.0
17.4
LCS Rec.
85.3
88.0
86.6
86.0
89.9
86.7
87.1
QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY
L1559561-01
MB RDL
mg/kg
2.00
0.500
0.500
1.00
0.500
2.00
1.00
Rec. Limits
80.0-120
80.0-120
80.0-120
80.0-120
80.0-120
80.0-120
80.0-120
LCS Qualifier
L1559172-16 Original Sample (OS) • Matrix Spike (MS) • Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
(OS) L1559172-16 11/24/22 17:26 • (MS) R3864334-5 11/24/22 17:34 • (MSD) R3864334-6 11/24/22 17:36
Spike Amount
Original Result
MS Result
MSD Result
MS Rec.
MSD Rec.
Dilution Rec. Limits
Analyte
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
Arsenic
100
ND
91.1
77.0
91.1
77.0
1 75.0-125
Barium
100
12.1
104
89.4
92.1
77.3
1 75.0-125
Cadmium
100
ND
92.7
79.1
92.6
79.0
1 75.0-125
Chromium
100
4.07
94.8
80.0
90.7
76.0
1 75.0-125
Lead
100
24.2
116
102
92.1
77.4
1 75.0-125
Selenium
100
ND
93.4
79.9
93.4
79.9
1 75.0-125
Silver
20.0
ND
18.5
15.8
92.5
78.9
1 75.0-125
MS Qualifier MSD Qualifier RPD
16.8
15.3
15.9
16.9
13.5
15.5
15.9
RPD Limits
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
ACCOUNT:
Hunt Environmental Associates
PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
L1559561 11/29/22 16:29 13 of 21

GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Guide to Reading and Understanding Your Laboratory Report
The information below is designed to better explain the various terms used in your report of analytical results from the Laboratory. This is not
intended as a comprehensive explanation, and ifyou have additional questions please contactyour project representative.
Results Disclaimer - Information that may be provided by the customer, and contained within this report, include Permit Limits, Project Name,
Sample ID, Sample Matrix, Sample Preservation, Field Blanks, Field Spikes, Field Duplicates, On -Site Data, Sampling Collection Dates/Times, and
Sampling Location. Results relate to the accuracy of this information provided, and as the samples are received.
Abbreviations and Definitions
u
Fc
Fss]
(dry)
Results are reported based on the dry weight ofthe sample. [this will only be present on a dry report basis for soils].
MDL
Method Detection Limit.
Fn
ND
Not detected at the Reporting Limit (or MDL where applicable).
RDL
Reported Detection Limit.
Fr
RDL (dry)
Reported Detection Limit.
Rec.
Recovery.
RPD
Relative Percent Difference.
Fc
SDG
Sample Delivery Group.
U
Not detected at the Reporting Limit (or MDL where applicable).
Analyte
The name ofthe particular compound or analysis performed. Some Analyses and Methods will have multiple analytes
reported.
Ifthe sample matrix contains an interfering material, the sample preparation volume or weight values differ from the
F
Dilution
standard, or if concentrations of analytes in the sample are higher than the highest limit of concentration that the
laboratory can accurately report, the sample may be diluted for analysis. If a value different than 1 is used in this field, the
result reported has already been corrected for this factor.
These are the target % recovery ranges or % difference value that the laboratory has historically determined as normal
Rc
Limits
for the method and analyte being reported. Successful QC Sample analysis will target all analytes recovered or
duplicated within these ranges.
Original Sample
The non -spiked sample in the prep batch used to determine the Relative Percent Difference (RPD) from a quality control
sample. The Original Sample may not be included within the reported SDG.
This column provides a letter and/or number designation that corresponds to additional information concerning the result
Qualifier
reported. If a Qualifier is present, a definition per Qualifier is provided within the Glossary and Definitions page and
potentially a discussion of possible implications ofthe Qualifier in the Case Narrative if applicable.
The actual analytical final result (corrected for any sample specific characteristics) reported for your sample. Ifthere was
no measurable result returned for a specific analyte, the result in this column may state "ND" (Not Detected) or "BDL"
Result
(Below Detectable Levels). The information in the results column should always be accompanied by either an MDL
(Method Detection Limit) or RDL (Reporting Detection Limit) that defines the lowest value that the laboratory could detect
or report for this analyte.
Uncertainty
(Radiochemistry)
Confidence level of 2 sigma.
A brief discussion about the included sample results, including a discussion of any non -conformances to protocol
Case Narrative (Cn)
observed either at sample receipt by the laboratory from the field or during the analytical process. If present, there will
be a section in the Case Narrative to discuss the meaning of any data qualifiers used in the report.
Quality Control
This section ofthe report includes the results ofthe laboratory quality control analyses required by procedure or
Summary (Qc)
analytical methods to assist in evaluating the validity ofthe results reported for your samples. These analyses are not
being performed on your samples typically, but on laboratory generated material.
This is the document created in the field when your samples were initially collected. This is used to verify the time and
Sample Chain of
date of collection, the person collecting the samples, and the analyses that the laboratory is requested to perform. This
Custody (Sc)
chain of custody also documents all persons (excluding commercial shippers) that have had control or possession ofthe
samples from the time of collection until delivery to the laboratory for analysis.
This section ofyour report will provide the results of all testing performed on your samples. These results are provided
Sample Results (Sr)
by sample ID and are separated by the analyses performed on each sample. The header line of each analysis section for
each sample will provide the name and method number for the analysis reported.
Sample Summary (Ss)
This section ofthe Analytical Report defines the specific analyses performed for each sample ID, including the dates and
times of preparation and/or analysis.
Qualifier
Description
J5
The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination, spike value is high.
P1
RPD value not applicable for sample concentrations less than 5 times the reporting limit.
T8
Sample(s) received past/too close to holding time expiration.
v
The sample concentration is too high to evaluate accurate spike recoveries.
ACCOUNT:
PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
Hunt Environmental Associates
L1559561 11/29/22 16:29 19 of 21

ACCREDITATIONS & LOCATIONS
Pace Analytical National 12065 Lebanon Rd Mount Juliet, TN 37122
Alabama
40660
Nebraska
N E-OS-15-05
Alaska
17-026
Nevada
TN000032021-1
Arizona
AZ0612
New Hampshire
2975
Arkansas
88-0469
New Jersey—NELAP
TNO02
California
2932
New Mexico
TN00003
Colorado
TN00003
New York
11742
Connecticut
PH-0197
North Carolina
Env375
Florida
E87487
North Carolina'
DW21704 _
Georgia
NELAP
North Carolina 3
41
Georgia'
923
North Dakota
R-140
Idaho
TN00003
Ohio—VAP
CL0069
Illinois
200008
Oklahoma
9915
Indiana
C-TN-01
Oregon
TN200002
Iowa
364
Pennsylvania
68-02979
Kansas
E-10277
Rhode Island
LA000356
Kentucky' 6
KY90010
South Carolina
84004002
Kentucky 2
16
South Dakota
n/a
Louisiana
A130792
Tennessee'"
2006
Louisiana
LA018
Texas
T104704245-20-18
Maine
TN00003
Texas5
LABO152
Maryland
324
Utah
TN000032021-11
Massachusetts
M-TNO03
Vermont
VT2006
Michigan
9958
Virginia
110033
Minnesota
047-999-395
Washington
C847
Mississippi
TN00003
West Virginia
233
Missouri
340
Wisconsin
998093910
Montana
CERT0086
Wyoming
A2 LA
A2LA— ISO17025
1461.01
AIHA-LAP,LLC EMLAP
100789
A2 LA — ISO 17025 5
1461.02
DOD
1461.01
Canada
1461.01
USDA
P330-15-00234
EPA—Crypto
TN00003
Drinking Water 2 Underground Storage Tanks 3 Aquatic Toxicity "Chemical/Microbiological 5 Mold 6 Wastewater n/a Accreditation not applicable
Not all certifications held by the laboratory are applicable to the results reported in the attached report.
Accreditation is only applicable to the test methods specified on each scope of accreditation held by Pace Analytical.
Rc
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME: PAGE:
Hunt Environmental Associates L1559561 11/29/22 16:29 20 of 21

„c-panyFp,...� ddiess.
Hunt Environmental Associates
3330 Saddletree Road
Lumberton, NC 28359
RE?pi]r; to
Cody Hunt
Project Description:
Enviro-Choice Recycling -
Phone 910-6I4-S945
Collected by {print).
ected b slgnaturel:
immedl ate
Packed o ce N _ i K
Sample ID
City/State
Collected:
project #
acility ID #
Billing Information
Accounts Payable I Pres
PO Box 390 Chk
Lumberton, NC 28359
tman I 1
1 l�ii�L' I-,Yri� 1Dn y'L
r4
O
Z
4
nor
T
J Please Circle:
A/C- PT MT CT
,x,
O
=
m
Z
-6
O
Z
Lab Project#
HLINTENVLNC-ENVIRQ
N
=
E
_
-
=
OE
QJ
IL
a.
d
a
IL
1 =
vs
.6
P.O.#
Rush? (Lab MUST Be Notified)
Quote ii F
Same Cay
Five Day
!'
_Next bay
_5 Day (Rad only)
Date Results Needed
Two Day _ 10 Day (Rad Only)
Three Day
Comp/Grab
Matrix'
De�pth­D.te
Tame
e€ li- In I T E d
,a ry O E
E z I L an
in w 4-1
_ Ne ( p
Z ~
E
y I =•=
No.
of CL f,l, A U
t3 zLA
Q U lei
:ntrs V7 nt ry a--: L1C Q Q
= O
LL z Z CL a �
7 x x x x I x I x x
Chain of Custody Page_of
/--'P
ace,
a FpetE Fu4cxLlne SCI[iiCF
MT JULIET, TN
11ob5leeanon Rd Mourn lui•eC try 3712i
I Su6m,tnng a sample via th,s ch+in of custody
cor, teWtm ackt Aedg ..and .K.-eFta ..tire
Pace Teems and Cond,tinns found at:
hlms:R,nfo.yaceisbt lmfhubls/pas amed+,d
trvms.pdf
SDG# it 1'5� r 5UI
Tab; C039
kcctnum: HUNENVLNC
PreloRin: P955622
PM: 973 -Heather) Wagner
PB: _ E
5hlpped Via: FedEX Grounin
RemarKS I Sample # Rah only) ,
i Matrix:
i5 Soi} AIR Air F -Filter
iW - Groundwater B - Bioassay
NW - Waste Water
)W - Drinking Water
?T - Other
�iemark Vl J� �J� i V� C 1 Vt� ��� I d
(
(j 1
4L T 1 wtr utn ���—
"'"��'” - ww 111
Samples returned via:
UPS _FedEx Courier Tracking#��a �
+ , ' jam! ��
1 pH _ Temp _
�j�
Y/1 Flow Dther- ��
P-{�
Q �� 1 ��2
! J
R
COC Seal Present/Intact: 1 Y -N
cQC Signed/Accurate: �Y —n
BQttlea arrive intact. ty _
Correct bottles used: !Y N
Sufficient volume sent: �_N
Tf Rot�lica! ie —
V4A Zero Headspace: _�Y _N
Preservation Correct/Checked: N
RAD Screen <0.5 mR/hr:
Hell ishe by: (Sign ue)
l
XT'
Time:
��
Recelvedby- (Signature)y
i�
-
Received by: ;Signature) TemgPdAf
Trip Blank Received: /No
HCL l MeoH
TOR
Relin shed by i n
` }
D e:
Time:
C Bottles Received:
r Z!
- --'-`--�'- "_-
If preservation required by Login: Dail
Relinquish (Signa
D te: Time: _
Received r lab by: {Signature}
-
Date: Time:
Hold:
E
Condition
NCF

tiff eurofins
Environment Testing
ANALYTICAL REPORT
PREPARED FOR
Attn: Cody Hunt
Hunt Environmental Associates �
3330 Saddletree Rd
Lumberton, North Carolina 28360
Generated 3/28/2023 6:49:11 AM Revision 1
JOB DESCRIPTION
City of Lumberton- TCLP
JOB NUMBER
752-2248-1

The test results in this report relate only to the samples as received by the laboratory and will meet all requirements of the
methodology, with any exceptions noted. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the express written
approval of the laboratory. All questions should be directed to the Eurofins Environment Testing Southeast, LLC Project
Manager.
- (ca-, 44 4
Authorized for release by
Bill Scott, Project Manager
Bill. [e-mail]
Designee for
Stephanie Franz, Project Manager
stephanie.franzaet.eurofinsus.com
[phone]
Generated
3/28/2023 6:49:11 AM
Revision 1
12
13
74
1-5
Eurofins Savannah is a laboratory within Eurofins Environment Testing Southeast, LLC, a company within Eurofins Environment Testing Group of Companies
Page 2 of 40 3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
Laboratory Job ID: 752-2248-1
Table of Contents
Cover Page ..............................................
1
Table of Contents .........................................
3
Definitions/Glossary.......................................
4
Case Narrative ...........................................
5
Detection Summary ........................................
6
Client Sample Results ......................................
7
Surrogate Summary .......................................
12
QC Sample Results ........................................
15
QC Association Summary ...................................
27
Lab Chronicle ............................................
31
Certification Summary ......................................
33
Method Summary .........................................
34
Sample Summary .........................................
35
Chain of Custody ..........................................
36
Receipt Checklists .........................................
38
12
13
74
75
Page 3 of 40
Eurofins Raleigh
3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

Definitions/Glossary
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
Qualifiers
GC Semi VOA
Qualifier Qualifier Description
J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
Metals
Qualifier Qualifier Description
F1 MS and/or MSD recovery exceeds control limits.
F2 MS/MSD RPD exceeds control limits
General Chemistry
Qualifier Qualifier Description
HF Field parameter with a holding time of 15 minutes. Test performed by laboratory at client's request.
J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
Glossary
Abbreviation These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.
a Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis
%R Percent Recovery
CFL Contains Free Liquid
CFU Colony Forming Unit
CNF Contains No Free Liquid
DER Duplicate Error Ratio (normalized absolute difference)
Dil Fac Dilution Factor
DL Detection Limit (DoD/DOE)
DL, RA, RE, IN Indicates a Dilution, Re -analysis, Re -extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample
DLC Decision Level Concentration (Radiochemistry)
EDL Estimated Detection Limit (Dioxin)
LOD Limit of Detection (DoD/DOE)
LOQ Limit of Quantitation (DoD/DOE)
MCL EPA recommended "Maximum Contaminant Level"
MDA Minimum Detectable Activity(Radiochemistry)
MDC Minimum Detectable Concentration (Radiochemistry)
MDL Method Detection Limit
ML Minimum Level (Dioxin)
MPN Most Probable Number
MQL Method Quantitation Limit
NC Not Calculated
ND Not Detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)
NEG Negative / Absent
POS Positive / Present
PQL Practical Quantitation Limit
PRIES Presumptive
QC Quality Control
RER Relative Error Ratio (Radiochemistry)
RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry)
RPD Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points
TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)
TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)
TNTC Too Numerous To Count
Job ID: 752-2248-1
12
13
74
75
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 4 of 40 3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

Case Narrative
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
Job ID: 752-2248-1
Laboratory: Eurofins Raleigh
Narrative
Job Narrative
752-2248-1
Job ID: 752-2248-1
Comments
No additional comments.
Receipt
The samples were received on 2/3/2023 10:46 AM. Unless otherwise noted below, the samples arrived in good condition, and where
required, properly preserved and on ice. The temperature of the cooler at receipt was 3.00 C.
GC/MS VOA
No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.
GC/MS Semi VOA
No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.
GC Semi VOA
No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.
Metals
No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.
General Chemistry
Methods 335.4, 9012B, SM 4500 CN E: The matrix spike / matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) recoveries for preparation batch 680-762486
and analytical batch 680-762691 were outside control limits for one or more analytes, see QC Sample Results for detail. Sample matrix
interference and/or non -homogeneity are suspected because the associated laboratory control sample (LCS) recovery is within
acceptance limits.
Method 9034: The matrix spike / matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) recoveries for preparation batch 680-762213 and analytical batch
680-762259 were outside control limits for one or more analytes, see QC Sample Results for detail. Sample matrix interference and/or
non -homogeneity are suspected because the associated laboratory control sample (LCS) recovery is within acceptance limits.
No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page.
Organic Prep
No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.
VOA Prep
No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.
F47
12
13
74
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 5 of 40 3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

Detection Summary
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
Job ID: 752-2248-1
Client Sample ID: WWTP-Q1
Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-1
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Cyanide, Total
soil pH measured in water at deg C
Temperature
2.7 J
7.2 HF
17.1 HF
4.2
1.1
mg/Kg
Su
Degrees C
1 * 335.4-1993 R1.0 Total/NA
1 9045C Total/NA
1 9045C Total/NA
Client Sample ID: WTP
Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-2
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Cyanide, Total
soil pH measured in water at deg C
Temperature
5.4 J
5.7 HF
17.1 HF
5.7
1.5
mg/Kg
Su
Degrees C
1 * 335.4-1993 R1.0 Total/NA
1 9045C Total/NA
1 9045C Total/NA
Client Sample ID: WTP-Q1
Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-3
CAnalyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Flashpoint
>140
Degrees F
1 1010B Total/NA
Client Sample ID: WTP
Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-4
CAnalyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Flashpoint
>140
Degrees F
1 1010B Total/NA
m
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Page 6 of 40
Eurofins Raleigh
3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

Client Sample Results
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Job ID: 752-2248-1
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
Client Sample ID: WWTP-Q1
Lab Sample
ID: 752-2248-1
Date Collected: 02/02/23 11:30
Matrix: Solid
Date Received: 02/03/23 10:46
Method: SW846 8260D - Volatile Organic
Compounds by GC/MS - TCLP
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
D Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1,1-Dichloroethene
<0.0072
0.020
0.0072
mg/L
02/19/23 20:48
20
1,2-Dichloroethane
<0.010
0.020
0.010
mg/L
02/19/23 20:48
20
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
<0.0092
0.020
0.0092
mg/L
02/19/23 20:48
20
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
<0.068
0.20
0.068
mg/L
02/19/23 20:48
20
Benzene
<0.0086
0.020
0.0086
mg/L
02/19/23 20:48
20
Carbon tetrachloride
<0.0066
0.020
0.0066
mg/L
02/19/23 20:48
20
Chlorobenzene
<0.0052
0.020
0.0052
mg/L
02/19/23 20:48
20
Chloroform
<0.010
0.020
0.010
mg/L
02/19/23 20:48
20
Hexachlorobutadiene
<0.050
0.10
0.050
mg/L
02/19/23 20:48
20
Tetrachloroethylene
<0.015
0.020
0.015
mg/L
02/19/23 20:48
20
Trichloroethylene
<0.0096
0.020
0.0096
mg/L
02/19/23 20:48
20
Vinyl chloride
<0.010
0.020
0.010
mg/L
02/19/23 20:48
20
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
106
70 -130
02119123 20:48
20
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)
100
70 -130
02119123 20:48
20
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
105
70 -130
02119123 20:48
20
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
96
60-124
02119123 20:48
20
Method: SW846 8270E - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
- TCLP
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
D Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
<0.016
0.050
0.016
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 18:04
1
Pyridine
<0.037
0.25
0.037
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 18:04
1
Hexachlorobenzene
<0.0080
0.050
0.0080
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 18:04
1
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
<0.012
0.050
0.012
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 18:04
1
Hexachloroethane
<0.018
0.050
0.018
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 18:04
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
<0.020
0.050
0.020
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 18:04
1
Pentachlorophenol
<0.050
0.25
0.050
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 18:04
1
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
<0.011
0.050
0.011
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 18:04
1
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
<0.016
0.050
0.016
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 18:04
1
Nitrobenzene
<0.018
0.050
0.018
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 18:04
1
o-Cresol
<0.0090
0.050
0.0090
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 18:04
1
m & p - Cresol
<0.0070
0.050
0.0070
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 18:04
1
Cresol
<0.0090
0.050
0.0090
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 18:04
1
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
2,4,6-Tnbromophenol (Surr)
81
30-130
02119123 07:59
02120123 18:04
1
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)
83
25 -130
02119123 07:59
02120123 18:04
1
2-Fluorophenol (Surr)
37
10 -130
02119123 07:59
02120123 18:04
1
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr)
110
35-131
02119123 07:59
02120123 18:04
1
Phenol-d5 (Surr)
25
10 -130
02119123 07:59
02120123 18:04
1
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr)
71
30 -130
02119123 07:59
02120123 18:04
1
Method: SW846 8081 B - Organochlorine Pesticides (GC) - TCLP
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
D Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
Chlordane (technical)
<0.0080
0.025
0.0080
mg/L
02/19/23 08:03
02/20/23 17:32
1
Endrin
<0.0000050
0.0025
0.0000050
mg/L
02/19/23 08:03
02/20/23 17:32
1
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
<0.0000050
0.0025
0.0000050
mg/L
02/19/23 08:03
02/20/23 17:32
1
Heptachlor
<0.0000050
0.0025
0.0000050
mg/L
02/19/23 08:03
02/20/23 17:32
1
Heptachlor epoxide
<0.000010
0.0025
0.000010
mg/L
02/19/23 08:03
02/20/23 17:32
1
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 7 of 40 3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

Client Sample Results
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
Job ID: 752-2248-1
Client Sample ID: WWTP-Q1 Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-1
Date Collected: 02/02/23 11:30 Matrix: Solid
Date Received: 02/03/23 10:46
Method: SW846 8081 B - Organochlorine Pesticides (GC) - TCLP (Continued)
Analyte Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
Methoxychlor <0.000010
0.0025
0.000010
mg/L
Toxaphene <0.016
0.25
0.016
mg/L
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier
Limits
DCB Decachlorobiphenyl 92
30 -130
Tetrachloro-m-xylene 62
30 -130
Method: SW846 8151A - Herbicides (GC) - TCLP
Analyte Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
2,4-D <0.0018
0.011
0.0018
mg/L
Silvex (2,4,5-TP) <0.00097
0.0089
0.00097
mg/L
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier
Limits
DCAA 97
26 -137
Method: SW846 6010D - Metals (ICP) - TCLP
Analyte Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
Arsenic <0.20
0.20
0.20
mg/L
Barium <1.0
1.0
1.0
mg/L
Cadmium <0.10
0.10
0.10
mg/L
Chromium <0.20
0.20
0.20
mg/L
Lead <0.20
0.20
0.20
mg/L
Selenium <0.50
0.50
0.50
mg/L
Silver <0.10 F1
0.10
0.10
mg/L
Method: SW846 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) - TCLP
Analyte Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
Mercury <0.020 F1 F2
0.020
0.020
mg/L
General Chemistry
Analyte Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
soil pH measured in water at deg 7.2 HF
Su
C (SW846 9045C)
Temperature (SW846 9045C) 17.1 HF
Degrees C
Client Sample ID: WWTP-Q1
Date Collected: 02/02/23 11:30
Date Received: 02/03/23 10:46
D Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
02/19/23 08:03
02/20/23 17:32
1
02/19/23 08:03
02/20/23 17:32
1
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
02119123 08:03
02120123 17:32
1
02119123 08:03
02120123 17:32
1
D Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
02/20/23 09:22
02/22/23 02:06
1
02/20/23 09:22
02/22/23 02:06
1
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
02120123 09:22
02122123 02:06
1
D Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:32
1
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:32
1
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:32
1
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:32
1
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:32
1
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:32
1
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:32
1
D Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
02/20/2312:38
02/21/2310:56
1
D Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
02/16/23 14:42
1
02/16/23 14:42 1
Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-1
Matrix: Solid
Percent Solids: 2.9
General Chemistry
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
Cyanide, Total (MCAWW 2.7 J 4.2 1.1 mg/Kg * 02/08/23 10:11 02/09/23 10:31 1
335.4-1993 R1.0)
Sulfide (SW846 9034) <2100 2100 2100 mg/Kg * 02/07/23 07:08 02/07/23 09:31 1
Client Sample ID: WTP Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-2
Date Collected: 02/02/23 12:00 Matrix: Solid
Date Received: 02/03/23 10:46
Method: SW846 8260D - Volatile Organic Compounds by GUMS - TCLP
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
1,1-Dichloroethene <0.0072 0.020 0.0072 mg/L 02/19/23 21:07 20
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 8 of 40 3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

Client Sample Results
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Job ID: 752-2248-1
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
Client Sample ID: WTP
Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-2
Date Collected: 02/02/23 12:00
Matrix: Solid
Date Received: 02/03/23 10:46
Method: SW846 8260D - Volatile
Organic Compounds by GC/MS - TCLP
(Continued)
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit D
Prepared Analyzed
Dil Fac
1,2-Dichloroethane
<0.010
0.020
0.010
mg/L
02/19/23 21:07
20
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
<0.0092
0.020
0.0092
mg/L
02/19/23 21:07
20
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
<0.068
0.20
0.068
mg/L
02/19/23 21:07
20
Benzene
<0.0086
0.020
0.0086
mg/L
02/19/23 21:07
20
Carbon tetrachloride
<0.0066
0.020
0.0066
mg/L
02/19/23 21:07
20
Chlorobenzene
<0.0052
0.020
0.0052
mg/L
02/19/23 21:07
20
Chloroform
<0.010
0.020
0.010
mg/L
02/19/23 21:07
20
Hexachlorobutadiene
<0.050
0.10
0.050
mg/L
02/19/23 21:07
20
Tetrachloroethylene
<0.015
0.020
0.015
mg/L
02/19/23 21:07
20
Trichloroethylene
<0.0096
0.020
0.0096
mg/L
02/19/23 21:07
20
Vinyl chloride
<0.010
0.020
0.010
mg/L
02/19/23 21:07
20
Surrogate
%Recovery Qualifier
Limits
Prepared Analyzed
Dil Fac
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
109
70 -130
02119123 21:07
20
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)
100
70 -130
02119123 21:07
20
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
104
70 -130
02119123 21:07
20
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
95
60-124
02119123 21:07
20
Method: SW846 8270E - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLP
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
D Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
<0.016
0.050
0.016
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 17:38
1
Pyridine
<0.037
0.25
0.037
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 17:38
1
Hexachlorobenzene
<0.0080
0.050
0.0080
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 17:38
1
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
<0.012
0.050
0.012
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 17:38
1
Hexachloroethane
<0.018
0.050
0.018
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 17:38
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
<0.020
0.050
0.020
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 17:38
1
Pentachlorophenol
<0.050
0.25
0.050
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 17:38
1
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
<0.011
0.050
0.011
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 17:38
1
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
<0.016
0.050
0.016
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 17:38
1
Nitrobenzene
<0.018
0.050
0.018
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 17:38
1
o-Cresol
<0.0090
0.050
0.0090
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 17:38
1
m & p - Cresol
<0.0070
0.050
0.0070
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 17:38
1
Cresol
<0.0090
0.050
0.0090
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 17:38
1
Surrogate
%Recovery Qualifier
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
2,4,6-Tnbromophenol (Surr)
69
30-130
02119123 07:59
02120123 17:38
1
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)
63
25 -130
02119123 07:59
02120123 17:38
1
2-Fluorophenol (Surr)
29
10 -130
02119123 07:59
02120123 17:38
1
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr)
105
35-131
02119123 07:59
02120123 17:38
1
Phenol-d5 (Surr)
19
10 -130
02119123 07:59
02120123 17:38
1
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr)
57
30 -130
02119123 07:59
02120123 17:38
1
Method: SW846 8081 B - Organochlorine
Pesticides
(GC) - TCLP
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
D Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
Chlordane (technical)
<0.0080
0.025
0.0080
mg/L
02/19/23 08:03
02/20/23 17:51
1
Endrin
<0.0000050
0.0025
0.0000050
mg/L
02/19/23 08:03
02/20/23 17:51
1
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
<0.0000050
0.0025
0.0000050
mg/L
02/19/23 08:03
02/20/23 17:51
1
Heptachlor
<0.0000050
0.0025
0.0000050
mg/L
02/19/23 08:03
02/20/23 17:51
1
Heptachlor epoxide
<0.000010
0.0025
0.000010
mg/L
02/19/23 08:03
02/20/23 17:51
1
Methoxychlor
<0.000010
0.0025
0.000010
mg/L
02/19/23 08:03
02/20/23 17:51
1
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 9 of 40 3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

Client Sample Results
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
Job ID: 752-2248-1
Client Sample ID: WTP Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-2
Date Collected: 02/02/23 12:00 Matrix: Solid
Date Received: 02/03/23 10:46
Method: SW846 8081 B - Organochlorine Pesticides (GC) - TCLP (Continued)
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
Toxaphene
<0.016
0.25
0.016
mg/L
Surrogate
%Recovery Qualifier
Limits
DCB Decachlorobiphenyl
94
30 -130
Tetrachloro-m-xylene
72
30 -130
Method: SW846 8151A - Herbicides
(GC) - TCLP
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
2,4-D
<0.0019
0.012
0.0019
mg/L
Silvex (2,4,5-TP)
<0.0010
0.0094
0.0010
mg/L
Surrogate
%Recovery Qualifier
Limits
DCAA
91
26.137
Method: SW846 6010D - Metals
(ICP) - TCLP
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
Arsenic
<0.20
0.20
0.20
mg/L
Barium
<1.0
1.0
1.0
mg/L
Cadmium
<0.10
0.10
0.10
mg/L
Chromium
<0.20
0.20
0.20
mg/L
Lead
<0.20
0.20
0.20
mg/L
Selenium
<0.50
0.50
0.50
mg/L
Silver
<0.10
0.10
0.10
mg/L
Method: SW846 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) - TCLP
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
Mercury
<0.020
0.020
0.020
mg/L
General Chemistry
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
soil pH measured in water at deg
5.7 HF
Su
C (SW846 9045C)
Temperature (SW846 9045C)
17.1 HF
Degrees C
D Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
02/19/23 08:03
02/20/23 17:51
1
Prepared
Analyzed
DY Fac
02119123 08:03
02120123 17:51
1
02119123 08:03
02120123 17:51
1
D Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
02/20/23 09:22
02/22/23 01:01
1
02/20/23 09:22
02/22/23 01:01
1
Prepared
Analyzed
DY Fac
02120123 09:22
02122123 01:01
1
D Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:40
1
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:40
1
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:40
1
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:40
1
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:40
1
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:40
1
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:40
1
D Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
02/20/2312:38
02/21/2311:07
1
D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
02/16/23 14:42 1
02/16/23 14:42 1
Client Sample ID: WTP
Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-2
Date Collected: 02/02/23 12:00
Matrix: Solid
Date Received: 02/03/23 10:46
Percent Solids: 2.0
General Chemistry
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL MDL Unit
D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
Cyanide, Total (MCAWW
5.4 J
5.7 1.5 mg/Kg
02/08/23 10:11 02/09/23 11:24 1
335.4-1993 R1.0)
Sulfide (SW846 9034)
<2900
2900 2900 mg/Kg
02/07/23 07:08 02/07/23 09:31 1
Client Sample ID: WTP-Q1
Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-3
Date Collected: 02/02/23 11:30
Matrix: Water
Date Received: 02/03/23 10:46
General Chemistry
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL MDL Unit
D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
Flash point (SW846 1010B)
>140
Degrees F
02/09/23 10:00 1
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 10 of 40 3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

Client Sample Results
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
Job ID: 752-2248-1
Client Sample ID: WTP Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-4
Date Collected: 02/02/23 12:00 Matrix: Water
Date Received: 02/03/23 10:46
General Chemistry
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
Flashpoint (SW846 101013) >140 Degrees F 02/09/23 10:45 1
12
13
74
75
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 11 of 40 3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

Surrogate Summary
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Job ID: 752-2248-1
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
Method: 8260D - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
BFB
DBFM
TOL
DCA
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID
(70-130)
(70-130)
(70-130)
(60-124)
LCS 680-763978/4 Lab Control Sample
102
97
99
93
LCSD 680-763978/5 Lab Control Sample Dup
103
97
100
98
MB 680-763978/8 Method Blank
108
100
104
95
Surrogate Legend
BFB = 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
DBFM = Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)
TOL = Toluene-d8 (Surr)
DCA = 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
Method: 8260D - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: TCLP
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
BFB
DBFM
TOL
DCA
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID
(70-130)
(70-130)
(70-130)
(60-124)
752-2248-1 WWFP-Q1
106
100
105
96
752-2248-2 WTP
109
100
104
95
LB 680-763738/1-A Method Blank
109
100
106
96
Surrogate Legend
m
BFB = 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
DBFM = Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)
TOL = Toluene-d8 (Surr)
DCA = 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
Method: 8270E - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
TBP
FBP 2FP
TPHL
PHL
NBZ
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID
(30-130)
(25-130) (10-130)
(35-131)
(10-130)
(30-130)
LCS 680-763973/2-A Lab Control Sample
84
76 35
104
25
75
MB 680-763973/1-A Method Blank
71
73 34
110
23
65
Surrogate Legend
TBP = 2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr)
FBP = 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)
2FP = 2-Fluorophenol (Surr)
TPHL = Terphenyl-d14 (Surr)
PHL = Phenol-d5 (Surr)
NBZ = Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr)
Method: 8270E - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: TCLP
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
TBP
FBP
2FP
TPHL
PHL
NBZ
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
(30-130)
(25-130)
(10-130)
(35-131)
(10-130)
(30-130)
752-2248-1
WWFP-Q1
81
83
37
110
25
71
752-2248-2
WTP
69
63
29
105
19
57
752-2248-2 MS
WTP
81
76
33
100
23
77
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 12 of 40 3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

Surrogate Summary
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates Job ID: 752-2248-1
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
Method: 8270E - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: TCLP
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
TBP
FBP 2FP TPHL PHL NBZ
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID
(30-130)
(25-130) (10-130) (35-131) (10-130) (30-130)
752-2248-2 MSD VVTP
83
72 31 103 22 70
LB 680-763695/1-D Method Blank
-----------------------------------------
75
66 29 105 19 57
Surrogate Legend
TBP = 2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr)
FBP = 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)
2FP = 2-Fluorophenol (Surr)
TPHL = Terphenyl-d14 (Surr)
PHL = Phenol-d5 (Surr)
NBZ = Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr)
Method: 8081B - Organochlorine Pesticides (GC)
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
DCBP1
TCX1
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID
(30-130)
(30-130)
MB 680-763974/1-A Method Blank
105
76
Surrogate Legend
DCBP = DCB Decachlorobiphenyl
m
TCX = Tetrachloro-m-xylene
Method: 8081 B - Organochlorine Pesticides (GC)
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
DCBP2
TCX1
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID
(30-130)
(30-130)
LCS 680-763974/2-A Lab Control Sample
95
60
Surrogate Legend
DCBP = DCB Decachlorobiphenyl
TCX = Tetrachloro-m-xylene
Method: 8081 B - Organochlorine Pesticides (GC)
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: TCLP
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
DCBP2 TCX2
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (30-130) (30-130)
752-2248-1 VVVVTP-Q1 92 62
Surrogate Legend
LDCBP = DCB Decachlorobiphenyl
TCX = Tetrachloro-m-xylene
Method: 8081 B - Organochlorine Pesticides (GC)
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: TCLP
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
DCBP1 TCX1
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (30-130) (30-130)
752-2248-1 MS VVVVTP-Q1 96 67
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 13 of 40 3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

Surrogate Summary
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates Job ID: 752-2248-1
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
Method: 8081 B - Organochlorine Pesticides (GC) (Continued)
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: TCLP
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
DCBP1 TCx1
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (30-130) (30-130)
752-2248-1 MSD WWFP-Q1 93 66
752-2248-2 WTP 94 72
Surrogate Legend
DCBP = DCB Decachlorobiphenyl
TCX = Tetrachloro-m-xylene
Method: 8081 B - Organochlorine Pesticides (GC)
Matrix: Solid Prep Tvpe: TCLP
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
DCBP1 TCX2
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (30-130) (30-130)
LB 680-763695/1-E Method Blank 102 66
Surrogate Legend
DCBP = DCB Decachlorobiphenyl
TCX = Tetrachloro-m-xylene
Method: 8151 A - Herbicides (GC)
Matrix: Solid
Prep
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
Total/NA
DCPAA2
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
(26-137)
LB 680-764058/7-A
Method Blank
90
LCS 680-764058/2-A
Lab Control Sample
85
MB 680-764058/1-A
Method Blank
89
Surrogate Legend
DCPAA = DCAA
Method: 8151A - Herbicides (GC)
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: TCLP
Lab Sample ID
752-2248-1
752-2248-2
752-2248-2 MS
752-2248-2 MSD
MSD
Surrogate Legend
DCPAA = DCAA
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
Client Sample ID
DCPAA2
(26-137)
WWTP-Q1
97
WTP
91
WTP
88
--------------
WTP
93
Page 14 of 40
Eurofins Raleigh
3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

QC Sample Results
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Job ID: 752-2248-1
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
Method: 8260D - Volatile Organic
Compounds
by GC/MS
Lab Sample ID: MB 680-763978/8
Client Sample ID: Method
Blank
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 763978
MB MB
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
D Prepared Analyzed
Dil Fac
1,1-Dichloroethene
<0.00036
0.0010
0.00036
mg/L
02/19/23 14:24
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
<0.00050
0.0010
0.00050
mg/L
02/19/23 14:24
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
<0.00046
0.0010
0.00046
mg/L
02/19/23 14:24
1
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
<0.0034
0.010
0.0034
mg/L
02/19/23 14:24
1
Benzene
<0.00043
0.0010
0.00043
mg/L
02/19/23 14:24
1
Carbon tetrachloride
<0.00033
0.0010
0.00033
mg/L
02/19/23 14:24
1
Chlorobenzene
<0.00026
0.0010
0.00026
mg/L
02/19/23 14:24
1
Chloroform
<0.00050
0.0010
0.00050
mg/L
02/19/23 14:24
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
<0.0025
0.0050
0.0025
mg/L
02/19/23 14:24
1
Tetrachloroethylene
<0.00075
0.0010
0.00075
mg/L
02/19/23 14:24
1
Trichloroethylene
<0.00048
0.0010
0.00048
mg/L
02/19/23 14:24
1
Vinyl chloride
<0.00050
0.0010
0.00050
mg/L
02/19/23 14:24
1
MB MB
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed Dil Fac
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
108
70 -130
02119123 14:24 1
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)
100
70 -130
02119123 14:24 1
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
104
70 -130
02119123 14:24 1
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
95
60-124
02119123 14:24 1
Lab Sample ID: LCS 680-763978/4
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 763978
Spike
LCS LCS
%Rec
Analyte
Added
Result Qualifier
Unit
D %Rec
Limits
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.0500
0.0507
mg/L
101
70-130
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.0500
0.0505
mg/L
101
70 - 130
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.0500
0.0501
mg/L
100
70 - 130
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
0.250
0.214
mg/L
86
69 - 114
Benzene
0.0500
0.0502
mg/L
100
70 - 130
Carbon tetrachloride
0.0500
0.0509
mg/L
102
70 - 130
Chlorobenzene
0.0500
0.0507
mg/L
101
70 - 130
Chloroform
0.0500
0.0506
mg/L
101
70 - 130
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.0500
0.0494
mg/L
99
70 - 130
Tetrachloroethylene
0.0500
0.0495
mg/L
99
70 - 130
Trichloroethylene
0.0500
0.0509
mg/L
102
70 - 130
Vinyl chloride
0.0500
0.0486
mg/L
97
66 - 129
LCS LCS
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 102 70- 130
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 97 70- 130
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 99 70 - 130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 93 60- 124
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 15 of 40 3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

QC Sample Results
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Job ID:
752-2248-1
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
Method: 8260D - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS (Continued)
Lab Sample ID: LCSD 680-763978/5
Client Sample
ID: Lab Control Sample Dup
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 763978
Spike
LCSD LCSD
%Rec
RPD
Analyte
Added
Result Qualifier Unit
D %Rec
Limits
RPD
Limit
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.0500
0.0503
mg/L
101
70-130
1
20
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.0500
0.0501
mg/L
100
70 - 130
1
50
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.0500
0.0503
mg/L
101
70 - 130
0
30
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
0.250
0.211
mg/L
84
69 - 114
2
30
Benzene
0.0500
0.0502
mg/L
100
70 - 130
0
30
Carbon tetrachloride
0.0500
0.0513
mg/L
103
70 - 130
1
30
Chlorobenzene
0.0500
0.0509
mg/L
102
70-130
0
30
Chloroform
0.0500
0.0501
mg/L
100
70 - 130
1
30
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.0500
0.0499
mg/L
100
70 - 130
1
20
Tetrachloroethylene
0.0500
0.0497
mg/L
99
70 - 130
0
30
Trichloroethylene
0.0500
0.0506
mg/L
101
70 - 130
1
30
Vinyl chloride
0.0500
0.0491
mg/L
98
66 - 129
1
30
LCSD LCSD
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Burr) 103 70- 130
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 97 70- 130
Toluene-d8 (Surr) 100 70 - 130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 98 60- 124
Lab Sample ID: LB 680-763738/1-A
Matrix: Solid
Analysis Batch: 763978
LB LB
Analyte Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Prep Type: TCLP
D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
1,1-Dichloroethene
<0.0072
0.020
0.0072
mg/L
02/19/23 15:35
20
1,2-Dichloroethane
<0.010
0.020
0.010
mg/L
02/19/23 15:35
20
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
<0.0092
0.020
0.0092
mg/L
02/19/23 15:35
20
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
<0.068
0.20
0.068
mg/L
02/19/23 15:35
20
Benzene
<0.0086
0.020
0.0086
mg/L
02/19/23 15:35
20
Carbon tetrachloride
<0.0066
0.020
0.0066
mg/L
02/19/23 15:35
20
Chlorobenzene
<0.0052
0.020
0.0052
mg/L
02/19/23 15:35
20
Chloroform
<0.010
0.020
0.010
mg/L
02/19/23 15:35
20
Hexachlorobutadiene
<0.050
0.10
0.050
mg/L
02/19/23 15:35
20
Tetrachloroethylene
<0.015
0.020
0.015
mg/L
02/19/23 15:35
20
Trichloroethylene
<0.0096
0.020
0.0096
mg/L
02/19/23 15:35
20
Vinyl chloride
<0.010
0.020
0.010
mg/L
02/19/23 15:35
20
LB LB
Surrogate
%Recovery Qualifier
Limits
Prepared Analyzed
Dil Fac
4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr)
109
70-130
02119123 15:35
20
Dibromofluoromethane(Surr)
100
70-130
02119123 15:35
20
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
106
70 -130
02119123 15:35
20
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
96
60-124
02119123 15:35
20
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 16 of 40 3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

QC Sample Results
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Job ID: 752-2248-1
Project/Site: City of Lumberton-
TCLP
Method: 8270E - Semivolatile
Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Lab Sample ID: MB 680-763973/1-A
Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 764133
Prep Batch: 763973
MB MB
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
D Prepared
Analyzed Dil Fac
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
<0.0032
0.010
0.0032
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 15:06 1
Pyridine
<0.0074
0.050
0.0074
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 15:06 1
Hexachlorobenzene
<0.0016
0.010
0.0016
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 15:06 1
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
<0.0024
0.010
0.0024
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 15:06 1
Hexachloroethane
<0.0036
0.010
0.0036
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 15:06 1
Hexachlorobutadiene
<0.0040
0.010
0.0040
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 15:06 1
Pentachlorophenol
<0.010
0.050
0.010
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 15:06 1
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
<0.0022
0.010
0.0022
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 15:06 1
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
<0.0032
0.010
0.0032
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 15:06 1
Nitrobenzene
<0.0036
0.010
0.0036
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 15:06 1
o-Cresol
<0.0018
0.010
0.0018
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 15:06 1
m & p - Cresol
<0.0014
0.010
0.0014
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 15:06 1
Cresol
<0.0018
0.010
0.0018
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 15:06 1
MB MB
Surrogate
%Recovery Qualifier
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
2,4,6-Tnbromophenol(Surr)
71
30-130
02119123 07:59
02120123 15:06
1
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)
73
25 -130
02119123 07:59
02120123 15:06
1
2-Fluorophenol (Surr)
34
10 -130
02119123 07:59
02120123 15:06
1
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr)
110
35-131
02119123 07:59
02120123 15:06
1
Phenol-d5 (Surr)
23
10 -130
02119123 07:59
02120123 15:06
1
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr)
65
30 -130
02119123 07:59
02120123 15:06
1
Lab Sample ID: LCS 680-763973/2-A
Matrix: Solid
Analysis Batch: 764133
Analyte
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Pyridine
Hexachlorobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Hexachloroethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Pentachlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
Nitrobenzene
o-Cresol
m & p - Cresol
Cresol
Surrogate
2,4,6-Tnbromophenol (Surr)
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)
2-Fluorophenol (Surr)
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr)
Phenol-d5 (Surr)
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr)
LCS LCS
%Recovery Qualifier
84
76
35
104
25
75
Spike
Added
0.200
0.400
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.400
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.400
Limits
30-130
25-130
10-130
35-131
10-130
30-130
LCS LCS
Result Qualifier
0.136
0.183
0.175
0.196
0.129
0.146
0.386
0.190
0.180
0.152
0.109
0.103
0.212
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample
Prep Type: Total/NA
Prep Batch: 763973
% Rec
Unit
D %Rec
Limits
mg/L
68
13 - 130
mg/L
46
10 - 130
mg/L
88
30 - 130
mg/L
98
37 - 130
mg/L
65
12 - 130
mg/L
73
12 - 130
mg/L
97
24 - 130
mg/L
95
28 - 130
mg/L
90
26 - 130
mg/L
76
32 - 130
mg/L
54
21 - 130
mg/L
52
19 - 130
mg/L
53
20 - 130
0
Page 17 of 40
Eurofins Raleigh
3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

QC Sample Results
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Job ID: 752-2248-1
Project/Site: City of Lumberton-
TCLP
Method: 8270E - Semivolatile
Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Lab Sample ID: LB 680-763695/1-D
Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 764133
Prep Batch: 763973
LB LB
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
D Prepared
Analyzed Dil Fac
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
<0.016
0.050
0.016
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 15:56 1
Pyridine
<0.037
0.25
0.037
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 15:56 1
Hexachlorobenzene
<0.0080
0.050
0.0080
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 15:56 1
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
<0.012
0.050
0.012
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 15:56 1
Hexachloroethane
<0.018
0.050
0.018
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 15:56 1
Hexachlorobutadiene
<0.020
0.050
0.020
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 15:56 1
Pentachlorophenol
<0.050
0.25
0.050
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 15:56 1
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
<0.011
0.050
0.011
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 15:56 1
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
<0.016
0.050
0.016
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 15:56 1
Nitrobenzene
<0.018
0.050
0.018
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 15:56 1
o-Cresol
<0.0090
0.050
0.0090
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 15:56 1
m & p - Cresol
<0.0070
0.050
0.0070
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 15:56 1
Cresol
<0.0090
0.050
0.0090
mg/L
02/19/23 07:59
02/20/23 15:56 1
LB LB
Surrogate
%Recovery Qualifier
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed Dil Fac
2,4,6-Tnbromophenol(Surr)
75
30-130
02119123 07:59
02120123 15:56 1
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)
66
25 -130
02119123 07:59
02120123 15:56 1
2-Fluorophenol (Surr)
29
10 -130
02119123 07:59
02120123 15:56 1
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr)
105
35-131
02119123 07:59
02120123 15:56 1
Phenol-d5 (Surr)
19
10 -130
02119123 07:59
02120123 15:56 1
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr)
57
30 -130
02119123 07:59
02120123 15:56 1
Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-2 MS
Client
Sample ID: WTP
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 764133
Prep Batch: 763973
Sample
Sample
Spike
MS MS
%Rec
Analyte
Result
Qualifier
Added
Result Qualifier
Unit
D %Rec
Limits
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
<0.016
1.00
0.654
mg/L
65
13-130
Pyridine
<0.037
2.00
0.874
mg/L
44
10-130
Hexachlorobenzene
<0.0080
1.00
0.858
mg/L
86
30-130
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
<0.012
1.00
0.969
mg/L
97
37 - 130
Hexachloroethane
<0.018
1.00
0.669
mg/L
67
12 - 130
Hexachlorobutadiene
<0.020
1.00
0.730
mg/L
73
12 - 130
Pentachlorophenol
<0.050
2.00
1.87
mg/L
94
24 - 130
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
<0.011
1.00
0.950
mg/L
95
28-130
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
<0.016
1.00
0.900
mg/L
90
26 - 130
Nitrobenzene
<0.018
1.00
0.763
mg/L
76
32 - 130
o-Cresol
<0.0090
1.00
0.542
mg/L
54
21 - 130
m & p - Cresol
<0.0070
1.00
0.507
mg/L
51
19 - 130
Cresol
<0.0090
2.00
1.05
mg/L
52
20 - 130
Surrogate
MS MS
%Recovery Qualifier
Limits
2,4,6-Tnbromophenol (Surr)
81
30- 130
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)
76
25- 130
2-Fluorophenol (Surr)
33
10- 130
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr)
100
35- 131
Phenol-d5 (Surr)
23
10 - 130
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr)
77
30 - 130
0
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 18 of 40 3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

QC Sample Results
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Job ID:
752-2248-1
Project/Site: City of Lumberton-
TCLP
Method: 8270E - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-2 MSD
Client Sample ID:
WTP
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 764133
Prep Batch: 763973
Sample Sample
Spike
MSD MSD
%Rec
RPD
Analyte
Result Qualifier
Added
Result Qualifier
Unit
D %Rec
Limits
RPD
Limit
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
<0.016
1.00
0.607
mg/L
61
13-130
7
50
Pyridine
<0.037
2.00
0.840
mg/L
42
10-130
4
50
Hexachlorobenzene
<0.0080
1.00
0.876
mg/L
88
30-130
2
50
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
<0.012
1.00
0.973
mg/L
97
37 - 130
0
50
Hexachloroethane
<0.018
1.00
0.611
mg/L
61
12 - 130
9
50
Hexachlorobutadiene
<0.020
1.00
0.670
mg/L
67
12 - 130
9
50
Pentachlorophenol
<0.050
2.00
1.97
mg/L
99
24 - 130
5
50
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
<0.011
1.00
0.933
mg/L
93
28-130
2
50
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
<0.016
1.00
0.866
mg/L
87
26 - 130
4
50
Nitrobenzene
<0.018
1.00
0.693
mg/L
69
32 - 130
10
50
o-Cresol
<0.0090
1.00
0.488
mg/L
49
21 - 130
10
50
m & p - Cresol
<0.0070
1.00
0.475
mg/L
47
19 - 130
7
50
Cresol
<0.0090
2.00
0.963
mg/L
48
20 - 130
9
50
MSD MSD
Surrogate
%Recovery Qualifier
Limits
2,4,6-Tnbromophenol (Surr)
83
30- 130
2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)
72
25- 130
m
2-Fluorophenol (Surr)
31
10 - 130
Terphenyl-d14 (Surr)
103
35- 131
Phenol-d5 (Surr)
22
10 - 130
Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr)
70
30 - 130
Method: 8081 B - Organochlorine Pesticides (GC)
Lab Sample ID: MB 680-763974/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 764106 Prep Batch: 763974
MB MB
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit
Chlordane (technical) <0.00016 0.00050 0.00016 mg/L
Endrin <0.00000010 0.000050 0.0000001 mg/L
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
Methoxychlor
Toxaphene
Surrogate
DCB Decachlorobiphenyl
Tetrachloro-m-xylene
D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
02/19/23 08:03 02/20/23 15:24 1
02/19/23 08:03 02/20/23 15:24 1
0
<0.00000010
0.000050
0.0000001
mg/L
02/19/23 08:03
02/20/23 15:24
1
0
<0.00000010
0.000050
0.0000001
mg/L
02/19/23 08:03
02/20/23 15:24
1
0
<0.00000020
0.000050
0.0000002
mg/L
02/19/23 08:03
02/20/23 15:24
1
0
<0.00000020
0.000050
0.0000002
mg/L
02/19/23 08:03
02/20/23 15:24
1
0
<0.00032
0.0050
0.00032
mg/L
02/19/23 08:03
02/20/23 15:24
1
MB MB
%Recovery Qualifier
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
105
30 -130
02119123 08:03
02120123 15:24
1
76
30 -130
02119123 08:03
02120123 15:24
1
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 19 of 40 3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

QC Sample Results
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Job ID: 752-2248-1
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
Method: 8081 B - Organochlorine Pesticides (GC) (Continued)
Lab Sample ID: LCS 680-763974/2-A
Client Sample ID:
Lab Control Sample
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 764106
Prep Batch: 763974
Spike LCS LCS
%Rec
Analyte
Added Result Qualifier
Unit D %Rec
Limits
Endrin
0.0000400 0.0000388 J
mg/L 97
30 - 130
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
0.0000400 0.0000334 J
mg/L 83
30. 130
Heptachlor
0.0000400 0.0000388 J
mg/L 97
30. 130
Heptachlor epoxide
0.0000400 0.0000352 J
mg/L 88
30. 130
Methoxychlor
0.0000400 0.0000479 J
mg/L 120
30. 130
•
LCS LCS
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier
Limits
DCB Decachlorobiphenyl 95
30- 130
Tetrachloro-m-xylene 60
30 - 130
Lab Sample ID: LB 680-763695/1-E
Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 764106
Prep Batch: 763974
LB LB
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL
Unit
D Prepared
Analyzed Dil Fac
Chlordane (technical) <0.0080
0.025 0.0080
mg/L
02/19/23 08:03
02/20/23 15:06 1
Endrin <0.0000050
0.0025 0.0000050
mg/L
02/19/23 08:03
02/20/23 15:06 1
gamma-BHC (Lindane) <0.0000050
0.0025 0.0000050
mg/L
02/19/23 08:03
02/20/23 15:06 1
Heptachlor <0.0000050
0.0025 0.0000050
mg/L
02/19/23 08:03
02/20/23 15:06 1
Heptachlor epoxide <0.000010
0.0025 0.000010
mg/L
02/19/23 08:03
02/20/23 15:06 1
Methoxychlor <0.000010
0.0025 0.000010
mg/L
02/19/23 08:03
02/20/23 15:06 1
Toxaphene <0.016
0.25 0.016
mg/L
02/19/23 08:03
02/20/23 15:06 1
LB LB
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits
Prepared
Analyzed Dil Fac
DCB Decachlorobiphenyl 102
30 -130
02119123 08:03
02120123 15:06 1
Tetrachloro-m-xylene 66
30 -130
02119123 08:03
02120123 15:06 1
Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-1 MS
Client Sample ID: WWTP-Q1
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 764106
Prep Batch: 763974
Sample Sample
Spike
MS
MS
%Rec
Analyte
Result Qualifier
Added
Result
Qualifier
Unit
D %Rec
Limits
Endrin
<0.0000050
0.00200
0.00205
J
mg/L
103
30 - 130
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
<0.0000050
0.00200
0.00179
J
mg/L
89
30- 130
Heptachlor
<0.0000050
0.00200
0.00217
J
mg/L
109
30-130
Heptachlor epoxide
<0.000010
0.00200
0.00190
J
mg/L
95
30. 130
Methoxychlor
<0.000010
0.00200
0.00232
J
mg/L
116
30. 130
MS MS
Surrogate
%Recovery Qualifier
Limits
DCB Decachlorobiphenyl
96
30- 130
Tetrachloro-m-xylene
67
30 - 130
Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-1 MSD Client Sample ID: WWTP-Q1
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 764106 Prep Batch: 763974
Sample Sample Spike MSD MSD %Rec RPD
Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit
Endrin <0.0000050 0.00200 0.00213 J mg/L 107 30 - 130 4
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 20 of 40 3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

QC Sample Results
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Job ID: 752-2248-1
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
Method: 8081 B - Organochlorine Pesticides (GC) (Continued)
Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-1 MSD
Client Sample ID: WWTP-Q1
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 764106
Prep Batch: 763974
Sample Sample
Spike
MSD MSD
%Rec RPD
Analyte Result Qualifier
Added
Result Qualifier
Unit D %Rec
Limits RPD Limit
gamma-BHC (Lindane) <0.0000050
0.00200
0.00207 J
mg/L 103
30 - 130 15
Heptachlor <0.0000050
0.00200
0.00234 J
mg/L 117
30 -130 8
Heptachlor epoxide <0.000010
0.00200
0.00190 J
mg/L 95
30 -130 0
Methoxychlor <0.000010
0.00200
0.00256
mg/L 128
30 -130 10
MSD MSD
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier
Limits
DCB Decachlorobiphenyl 93
30- 130
Tetrachloro-m-xylene 66
30- 130
Method: 8151A - Herbicides (GC)
Lab Sample ID: LB 680-764058/7-A
Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 764347
Prep Batch: 764058
LB LB
Analyte Result Qualifier
RL
MDL Unit
D Prepared
Analyzed Dil Fac
2,4-D <0.0019
0.012
0.0019 mg/L
02/20/23 09:22
02/21/23 23:57 1
Silvex (2,4,5-TP) <0.0010
0.0096
0.0010 mg/L
02/20/23 09:22
02/21/23 23:57 1
LB LB
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed Dil Fac
DCAA 90
26 -137
02120123 09:22
02121123 23:57 1
Lab Sample ID: MB 680-764058/1-A
Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 764347
Prep Batch: 764058
MB MB
Analyte Result Qualifier
RL
MDL Unit
D Prepared
Analyzed Dil Fac
2,4-D <0.00018
0.0011
0.00018 mg/L
02/20/23 09:22
02/22/23 00:18 1
Silvex (2,4,5-TP) <0.000096
0.00088
0.000096 mg/L
02/20/23 09:22
02/22/23 00:18 1
MB MB
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed Dil Fac
DCAA 89
26 -137
02120123 09:22
02/22/23 00:18 1
Lab Sample ID: LCS 680-764058/2-A
Client Sample ID:
Lab Control Sample
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 764347
Prep Batch: 764058
Spike
LCS LCS
%Rec
Analyte
Added
Result Qualifier
Unit D %Rec
Limits
2,4-D
0.00640
0.00445
mg/L 70
21 -130
Silvex (2,4,5-TP)
0.00160
0.00121
mg/L 76
31 -144
LCS LCS
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier
Limits
DCAA 85
26-137
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 21 of 40 3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

QC Sample Results
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
Method: 8151A - Herbicides (GC) (Continued)
Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-2 MS
Matrix: Solid
Analysis Batch: 764347
Sample Sample
Spike
MS MS
Analyte Result Qualifier
Added
Result Qualifier
Unit
2,4-D <0.0019
0.0650
0.0495
mg/L
Silvex (2,4,5-TP) <0.0010
0.0163
0.0136
mg/L
MS MS
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier
Limits
DCAA 88
26-137
Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-2 MSD
Matrix: Solid
Analysis Batch: 764347
Sample Sample
Spike
MSD MSD
Analyte Result Qualifier
Added
Result Qualifier
Unit
2,4-D <0.0019
0.0684
0.0542
mg/L
Silvex (2,4,5-TP) <0.0010
0.0171
0.0158
mg/L
MSD MSD
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier
Limits
DCAA 93
26-137
Method: 6010D - Metals (IC
Job ID: 752-2248-1
Client Sample ID: WTP
Prep Type: TCLP
Prep Batch: 764058
% Rec
D %Rec Limits
76 21-147
84 31 - 144
D %Rec
79
92
Client Sample ID: WTP
Prep Type: TCLP
Prep Batch: 764058
%Rec RPD
Limits RPD Limit
21-147 9 50
31-144 15 50
Lab Sample ID: MB 680-763918/1-A
Matrix: Solid
Analysis Batch: 764151
Analyte
MB MB
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Prep Type: Total/NA
Prep Batch: 763918
D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
Arsenic
<0.020
0.020
0.020
mg/L
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:19 1
Barium
<0.10
0.10
0.10
mg/L
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:19 1
Cadmium
<0.010
0.010
0.010
mg/L
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:19 1
Chromium
<0.020
0.020
0.020
mg/L
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:19 1
Lead
<0.020
0.020
0.020
mg/L
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:19 1
Selenium
<0.050
0.050
0.050
mg/L
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:19 1
Silver
<0.010
0.010
0.010
mg/L
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:19 1
Lab Sample ID: LCS 680-763918/2-A
Client Sample ID:
Lab Control Sample
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 764151
Prep Batch: 763918
Spike
LCS LCS
%Rec
Analyte
Added
Result Qualifier
Unit
D %Rec
Limits
Arsenic
2.00
2.01
mg/L
100
80 - 120
Barium
2.00
2.11
mg/L
106
80 - 120
Cadmium
1.00
0.994
mg/L
99
80 - 120
Chromium
2.00
2.10
mg/L
105
80 - 120
Lead
10.1
10.2
mg/L
101
80 - 120
Selenium
2.00
1.96
mg/L
98
80 - 120
Silver
1.00
0.989
mg/L
99
80 - 120
0
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 22 of 40 3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

QC Sample Results
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Job ID: 752-2248-1
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
Method: 6010D - Metals (ICP) (Continued)
Lab Sample ID: LB 680-763695/1-C
Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 764151
Prep Batch: 763918
LB LB
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
D Prepared
Analyzed Dil Fac
Arsenic
<0.20
0.20
0.20
mg/L
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:30 1
Barium
<1.0
1.0
1.0
mg/L
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:30 1
Cadmium
<0.10
0.10
0.10
mg/L
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:30 1
Chromium
<0.20
0.20
0.20
mg/L
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:30 1
Lead
<0.20
0.20
0.20
mg/L
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:30 1
Selenium
<0.50
0.50
0.50
mg/L
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:30 1
Silver
<0.10
0.10
0.10
mg/L
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:30 1
Lab Sample ID: LB2 680-763695/4-C
Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 764151
Prep Batch: 763918
LB2 LB2
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
D Prepared
Analyzed Dil Fac
Arsenic
<0.20
0.20
0.20
mg/L
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:43 1 Is
Barium
<1.0
1.0
1.0
mg/L
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:43 1
Cadmium
<0.10
0.10
0.10
mg/L
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:43 1
Chromium
<0.20
0.20
0.20
mg/L
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:43 1
Lead
<0.20
0.20
0.20
mg/L
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:43 1
Selenium
<0.50
0.50
0.50
mg/L
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:43 1
Silver
<0.10
0.10
0.10
mg/L
02/17/2313:14
02/20/2313:43 1
Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-1 MS
Matrix: Solid
Analysis Batch: 764151
Analyte
Sample Sample
Result Qualifier
Spike
Added
MS MS
Result Qualifier
Unit
Client Sample ID: WWTP-Q1
Prep Type: TCLP
Prep Batch: 763918
%Rec
D %Rec Limits
Arsenic
<0.20
3.20
3.26
mg/L
102
75 - 125
Barium
<1.0
3.20
3.15
mg/L
99
75. 125
Cadmium
<0.10
1.60
1.67
mg/L
104
75. 125
Chromium
<0.20
1.60
1.70
mg/L
106
75 - 125
Lead
<0.20
1.60
1.70
mg/L
106
75 - 125
Selenium
<0.50
3.20
3.12
mg/L
97
75 - 125
Silver
<0.10
F1
1.60
0.291 F1
mg/L
18
75-125
Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-1 MSD
Client Sample ID: WWTP-Q1
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 764151
Prep Batch: 763918
Sample
Sample
Spike
MSD MSD
%Rec RPD
Analyte
Result
Qualifier
Added
Result Qualifier
Unit
D %Rec
Limits RPD Limit
Arsenic
<0.20
3.20
3.14
mg/L
98
75 - 125 4 20
Barium
<1.0
3.20
3.04
mg/L
95
75 - 125 4 20
Cadmium
<0.10
1.60
1.59
mg/L
100
75 - 125 4 20
Chromium
<0.20
1.60
1.63
mg/L
102
75 - 125 4 20
Lead
<0.20
1.60
1.61
mg/L
101
75 - 125 5 20
Selenium
<0.50
3.20
2.96
mg/L
92
75-125 5 20
Silver
<0.10
F1
1.60
0.277 F1
mg/L
17
75. 125 5 20
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 23 of 40 3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

QC Sample Results
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Job ID: 752-2248-1
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA)
Lab Sample ID: MB 680-764125/12-A
Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 764337
Prep Batch: 764125
MB MB
Analyte Result Qualifier
RL MDL Unit
D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
Mercury <0.00020
0.00020 0.00020 mg/L
02/20/2312:38 02/21/2310:46 1
Lab Sample ID: LCS 680-764125/13-A
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 764337
Prep Batch: 764125
Spike LCS LCS
%Rec
Analyte
Added Result Qualifier Unit
D %Rec Limits
Mercury
0.250 0.248 mg/L
99 80 - 120
Lab Sample ID: LB 680-763695/1-F
Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 764337
Prep Batch: 764125
LB LB
Analyte Result Qualifier
RL MDL Unit
D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
Mercury <0.020
0.020 0.020 mg/L
02/20/2312:38 02/21/2310:53 1
Lab Sample ID: LB2 680-763695/4-D
Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 764337
Prep Batch: 764125
LB2 LB2
Analyte Result Qualifier
RL MDL Unit
D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
Mercury <0.020
0.020 0.020 mg/L
02/20/2312:38 02/21/2311:10 1
Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-1 MS
Client Sample ID: WWTP-Q1
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 764337
Prep Batch: 764125
Sample Sample
Spike MS MS
%Rec
Analyte Result Qualifier
Added Result Qualifier Unit
D %Rec Limits
Mercury <0.020 F1 F2
0.0830 0.0646 F1 mg/L
78 80-120
Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-1 MSD
Client Sample ID: WWTP-Q1
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: TCLP
Analysis Batch: 764337
Prep Batch: 764125
Sample Sample
Spike MSD MSD
%Rec RPD
Analyte Result Qualifier
Added Result Qualifier Unit
D %Rec Limits RPD Limit
Mercury <0.020 F1 F2
0.0830 0.0846 F2 mg/L
102 80-120 27 20
Method: 1010B - Ignitability, Pensky-Martens
Closed -Cup Method
Lab Sample ID: MB 680-762640/1
Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Matrix: Water
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 762640
MB MB
Analyte Result Qualifier
RL MDL Unit
D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
Flashpoint >140
Degrees F
02/09/23 07:59 1
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 24 of 40 3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

QC Sample Results
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Job ID: 752-2248-1
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
Method: 1010B - Ignitability, Pensky-Martens
Closed -Cup Method (Continued)
Lab Sample ID: LCS 680-762640/2
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample
Matrix: Water
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 762640
Spike
LCS LCS %Rec
Analyte
Added
Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits
Flashpoint
147
147 Degrees F 100 96 - 106
Lab Sample ID: LCSD 680-762640/5
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup
Matrix: Water
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 762640
Spike
LCSD LCSD %Rec RPD �
Analyte
Added
Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit
Flashpoint
147
147 Degrees F 100 96 - 106 0
Method: 335.4-1993 111.0 - Cyanide, Total
Lab Sample ID: MB 680-762486/1-A
Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 762691
Prep Batch: 762486
MB MB
Analyte Result Qualifier
RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
Cyanide, Total <0.028
0.11 0.028 mg/Kg 02/08/23 10:11 02/09/23 11:08 1
Lab Sample ID: LCS 680-762486/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 762691 Prep Batch: 762486
Spike LCS LCS %Rec
Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits
Cyanide, Total 0.600 0.658 mg/Kg 110 90 - 110
Method: 9034 - Sulfide, Acid Soluble and Insoluble (Titrimetric)
Lab Sample ID: MB 680-762213/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 762259 Prep Batch: 762213
MB MB
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
Sulfide <60 60 60 mg/Kg 02/07/23 07:08 02/07/23 09:31 1
Lab Sample ID: LCS 680-762213/2-A
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 762259
Prep Batch: 762213
Spike
LCS LCS
%Rec
Analyte
Added
Result Qualifier
Unit D %Rec Limits
Sulfide
1250
797
mg/Kg 64 50 - 150
Lab Sample ID: LCSD 680-762213/3-A
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 762259
Prep Batch: 762213
Spike
LCSD LCSD
%Rec RPD
Analyte
Added
Result Qualifier
Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit
Sulfide
1210
973
mg/Kg 80 50 - 150 20 50
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 25 of 40 3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

QC Sample Results
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
Job ID: 752-2248-1
Method: 9045C - pH
Lab Sample ID: LCS 680-763776/4 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 763776
Spike LCS LCS %Rec
Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits
soil pH measured in water at deg 7.01 7.0 Su 100 79 - 126
C
0
12
13
74
75
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 26 of 40 3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

QC Association Summary
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
GC/MS VOA
Leach Batch: 763738
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
752-2248-1
WWFP-Q1
752-2248-2
WTP
LB 680-763738/1-A
Method Blank
Analysis Batch: 763978
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
TCLP
Solid
1311
TCLP
Solid
1311
TCLP
Solid
1311
Job ID: 752-2248-1
Prep Batch
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
752-2248-1
WWFP-Q1
TCLP
Solid
8260D
763738
752-2248-2
WTP
TCLP
Solid
8260D
763738
LB 680-763738/1-A
Method Blank
TCLP
Solid
8260D
763738
MB 680-763978/8
Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
8260D
•
LCS 680-763978/4
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
8260D
LCSD 680-763978/5
Lab Control Sample Dup
Total/NA
Solid
8260D
GC/MS Semi VOA
Leach Batch: 763695
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
752-2248-1
WWFP-Q1
TCLP
Solid
1311
752-2248-2
WTP
TCLP
Solid
1311
LB 680-763695/1-D
Method Blank
TCLP
Solid
1311
752-2248-2 MS
WTP
TCLP
Solid
1311
752-2248-2 MSD
WTP
TCLP
Solid
1311
Prep Batch: 763973
Prep Batch
m
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
752-2248-1
WWFP-Q1
TCLP
Solid
3510C
763695
752-2248-2
WTP
TCLP
Solid
3510C
763695
LB 680-763695/1-D
Method Blank
TCLP
Solid
3510C
763695
MB 680-763973/1-A
Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
3510C
LCS 680-763973/2-A
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
3510C
752-2248-2 MS
WTP
TCLP
Solid
3510C
763695
752-2248-2 MSD
WTP
TCLP
Solid
3510C
763695
Analysis Batch: 764133
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
752-2248-1
WWFP-Q1
TCLP
Solid
8270E
763973
752-2248-2
WTP
TCLP
Solid
8270E
763973
LB 680-763695/1-D
Method Blank
TCLP
Solid
8270E
763973
MB 680-763973/1-A
Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
8270E
763973
LCS 680-763973/2-A
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
8270E
763973
752-2248-2 MS
WTP
TCLP
Solid
8270E
763973
752-2248-2 MSD
WTP
TCLP
Solid
8270E
763973
GC Semi VOA
Leach Batch: 763695
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method Prep Batch
752-2248-1
WWFP-Q1
TCLP
Solid
1311
752-2248-2
WTP
TCLP
Solid
1311
LB 680-763695/1-E
Method Blank
TCLP
Solid
1311
752-2248-1 MS
WWFP-Q1
TCLP
Solid
1311
752-2248-1 MSD
WWFP-Q1
TCLP
Solid
1311
Page 27 of 40
Eurofins Raleigh
3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

QC Association Summary
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
GC Semi VOA (Continued)
Leach Batch: 763695 (Continued)
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID
752-2248-2 MS VVTP
752-2248-2 MSD VVTP
Prep Batch: 763974
Prep Type Matrix
TCLP Solid
TCLP Solid
Job ID: 752-2248-1
Method Prep Batch
1311
1311
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
752-2248-1
VVVVTP-Q1
TCLP
Solid
3510C
763695
752-2248-2
VVTP
TCLP
Solid
3510C
763695
LB 680-763695/1-E
Method Blank
TCLP
Solid
3510C
763695
MB 680-763974/1-A
Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
3510C
LCS 680-763974/2-A
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
3510C
•
752-2248-1 MS
VVVVTP-Q1
TCLP
Solid
3510C
763695
752-2248-1 MSD
VVVVTP-Q1
TCLP
Solid
3510C
763695
Prep Batch: 764058
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
752-2248-1
VVVVTP-Q1
TCLP
Solid
8151A
763695
752-2248-2
VVTP
TCLP
Solid
8151A
763695
LB 680-764058/7-A
Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
8151A
MB 680-764058/1-A
Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
8151A
LCS 680-764058/2-A
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
8151A
752-2248-2 MS
VVTP
TCLP
Solid
8151A
763695
L752-2248-2 MSD
VVTP
TCLP
Solid
8151A
763695
Analysis Batch: 764106
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
752-2248-1
VVVVTP-Q1
TCLP
Solid
8081 B
763974
752-2248-2
VVTP
TCLP
Solid
8081 B
763974
LB 680-763695/1-E
Method Blank
TCLP
Solid
8081 B
763974
MB 680-763974/1-A
Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
8081 B
763974
LCS 680-763974/2-A
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
8081 B
763974
752-2248-1 MS
VVVVTP-Q1
TCLP
Solid
8081 B
763974
752-2248-1 MSD
VVVVTP-Q1
TCLP
Solid
8081 B
763974
Analysis Batch: 764347
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
752-2248-1
VVVVTP-Q1
TCLP
Solid
8151A
764058
752-2248-2
VVTP
TCLP
Solid
8151A
764058
LB 680-764058/7-A
Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
8151A
764058
MB 680-764058/1-A
Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
8151A
764058
LCS 680-764058/2-A
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
8151A
764058
752-2248-2 MS
VVTP
TCLP
Solid
8151A
764058
752-2248-2 MSD
VVTP
TCLP
Solid
8151A
764058
Metals
Leach Batch: 763695
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method Prep Batch
752-2248-1
VVVVTP-Q1
TCLP
Solid
1311
752-2248-2
VVTP
TCLP
Solid
1311
LB 680-763695/1-C
Method Blank
TCLP
Solid
1311
LB 680-763695/1-F
Method Blank
TCLP
Solid
1311
Page 28 of 40
Eurofins Raleigh
3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

QC Association Summary
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
Metals (Continued)
Leach Batch: 763695 (Continued)
Lab Sample ID
Client Sampl
LB2 680-763695/4-C
Method Blank
LB2 680-763695/4-D
Method Blank
752-2248-1 MS
WWFP-Q1
752-2248-1 MSD
WWFP-Q1
Prep Batch: 763918
ID Prep Type
Matrix
TCLP
Solid
TCLP
Solid
TCLP
Solid
TCLP
Solid
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
752-2248-1
W WTP-Q 1
752-2248-2
WTP
LB 680-763695/1-C
Method Blank
LB2 680-763695/4-C
Method Blank
MB 680-763918/1-A
Method Blank
LCS 680-763918/2-A
Lab Control Sample
752-2248-1 MS
WWFP-Q1
752-2248-1 MSD
WWFP-Q1
Prep Batch: 764125
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
752-2248-1
WWFP-Q1
752-2248-2
WTP
LB 680-763695/1-F
Method Blank
LB2 680-763695/4-D
Method Blank
MB 680-764125/12-A
Method Blank
LCS 680-764125/13-A
Lab Control Sample
752-2248-1 MS
WWFP-Q1
752-2248-1 MSD
WWFP-Q1
Analysis Batch: 764151
Prep Type
Matrix
TCLP
Solid
TCLP
Solid
TCLP
Solid
TCLP
Solid
Total/NA
Solid
Total/NA
Solid
TCLP
Solid
TCLP
Solid
Prep Type
Matrix
TCLP
Solid
TCLP
Solid
TCLP
Solid
TCLP
Solid
Total/NA
Solid
Total/NA
Solid
TCLP
Solid
TCLP
Solid
Job ID: 752-2248-1
Method Prep Batch
1311
1311
1311
1311
Method
Prep Batch
3010A
763695
3010A
763695
3010A
763695 •
3010A
763695
3010A
3010A
3010A
763695
3010A
763695
Method
Prep Batch
7470A
763695
7470A
763695
7470A
763695
7470A
763695
7470A
7470A
7470A
763695
7470A
763695
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
752-2248-1
WWFP-Q1
TCLP
Solid
6010D
763918
752-2248-2
WTP
TCLP
Solid
6010D
763918
LB 680-763695/1-C
Method Blank
TCLP
Solid
6010D
763918
LB2 680-763695/4-C
Method Blank
TCLP
Solid
6010D
763918
MB 680-763918/1-A
Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
6010D
763918
LCS 680-763918/2-A
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
6010D
763918
752-2248-1 MS
WWFP-Q1
TCLP
Solid
6010D
763918
752-2248-1 MSD
WWFP-Q1
TCLP
Solid
6010D
763918
Analysis Batch: 764337
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
752-2248-1
WWFP-Q1
TCLP
Solid
7470A
764125
752-2248-2
WTP
TCLP
Solid
7470A
764125
LB 680-763695/1-F
Method Blank
TCLP
Solid
7470A
764125
LB2 680-763695/4-D
Method Blank
TCLP
Solid
7470A
764125
MB 680-764125/12-A
Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
7470A
764125
LCS 680-764125/13-A
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
7470A
764125
752-2248-1 MS
WWFP-Q1
TCLP
Solid
7470A
764125
752-2248-1 MSD
WWFP-Q1
TCLP
Solid
7470A
764125
Page 29 of 40
Eurofins Raleigh
3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

QC Association Summary
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
General Chemistry
Analysis Batch: 762190
Lab Sample ID
752-2248-1
752-2248-2
Prep Batch: 762213
Client Sample ID
WWFP-Q1
WTP
Prep Type Matrix
Total/NA Solid
Total/NA Solid
Job ID: 752-2248-1
Method Prep Batch
Moisture
Moisture
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method Prep Batch
752-2248-1
WWFP-Q1
Total/NA
Solid
9030B
752-2248-2
WTP
Total/NA
Solid
9030B
MB 680-762213/1-A
Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
9030B
LCS 680-762213/2-A
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
9030B
LCSD 680-762213/3-A
Lab Control Sample Dup
Total/NA
Solid
9030B
Analysis Batch: 762259
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
752-2248-1
WWFP-Q1
Total/NA
Solid
9034
762213
752-2248-2
WTP
Total/NA
Solid
9034
762213
MB 680-762213/1-A
Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
9034
762213
LCS 680-762213/2-A
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
9034
762213
LCSD 680-762213/3-A
Lab Control Sample Dup
Total/NA
Solid
9034
762213
Prep Batch: 762486
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method Prep Batch
752-2248-1
WWFP-Q1
Total/NA
Solid
Distill/CN
752-2248-2
WTP
Total/NA
Solid
Distill/CN
MB 680-762486/1-A
Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
Distill/CN
LCS 680-762486/2-A
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
Distill/CN
Analysis Batch: 762640
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method Prep Batch
752-2248-3
WFP-Q1
Total/NA
Water
1010B
752-2248-4
WTP
Total/NA
Water
1010B
MB 680-762640/1
Method Blank
Total/NA
Water
1010B
LCS 680-762640/2
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Water
1010B
LCSD 680-762640/5
Lab Control Sample Dup
Total/NA
Water
1010B
Analysis Batch: 762691
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
752-2248-1
WWFP-Q1
Total/NA
Solid
335.4-1993 R1.0
762486
752-2248-2
WTP
Total/NA
Solid
335.4-1993 R1.0
762486
MB 680-762486/1-A
Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
335.4-1993 R1.0
762486
LCS 680-762486/2-A
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
335.4-1993 R1.0
762486
Analysis Batch: 763776
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
752-2248-1
WWFP-Q1
Total/NA
Solid
9045C
752-2248-2
WTP
Total/NA
Solid
9045C
LCS 680-763776/4
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
9045C
0
Page 30 of 40
Eurofins Raleigh
3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

Lab Chronicle
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Job ID: 752-2248-1
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
Client Sample ID: WWTP-Q1
Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-1
Date Collected: 02/02/23 11:30
Matrix: Solid
Date Received: 02/03/23 10:46
Batch Batch
Dilution
Batch
Prepared
Prep Type Type Method
Run Factor
Number
Analyst
Lab
or Analyzed
TCLP Leach 1311
763738
KF
EET SAV
02/16/23 15:53
TCLP Analysis 8260D
20
763978
UI
EET SAV
02/19/23 20:48
TCLP Leach 1311
763695
KF
EET SAV
02/16/23 15:53
TCLP Prep 3510C
763973
MR
EET SAV
02/19/23 07:59
TCLP Analysis 8270E
1
764133
OK
EET SAV
02/20/23 18:04
TCLP Leach 1311
763695
KF
EET SAV
02/16/23 15:53
TCLP Prep 3510C
763974
MR
EET SAV
02/19/23 08:03
TCLP Analysis 8081 B
1
764106
JCK
EET SAV
02/20/23 17:32
TCLP Leach 1311
763695
KF
EET SAV
02/16/23 15:53
TCLP Prep 8151A
764058
KD
EET SAV
02/20/23 09:22
TCLP Analysis 8151A
1
764347
JCK
EET SAV
02/22/23 02:06
TCLP Leach 1311
763695
KF
EET SAV
02/16/23 15:53
TCLP Prep 3010A
763918
RR
EET SAV
02/17/23 13:14
TCLP Analysis 6010D
1
764151
BCB
EET SAV
02/20/23 13:32
TCLP Leach 1311
763695
KF
EET SAV
02/16/23 15:53
TCLP Prep 7470A
764125
JKL
EET SAV
02/20/23 12:38
TCLP Analysis 7470A
1
764337
BJB
EET SAV
02/21/23 10:56
Total/NA Analysis 9045C
1
763776
SM
EET SAV
02/16/23 14:42
Total/NA Analysis Moisture
1
762190
TD
EET SAV
02/06/23 20:36
Client Sample ID: WWTP-Q1
Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-1
Date Collected: 02/02/23 11:30
Matrix: Solid
Date Received: 02/03/23 10:46
Percent Solids: 2.9
Batch Batch
Dilution
Batch
Prepared
Prep Type Type Method
Run Factor
Number
Analyst
Lab
or Analyzed
Total/NA Prep Distill/CN
762486
JAS
EET SAV
02/08/23 10:11
Total/NA Analysis 335.4-1993 R1.0
1
762691
JAS
EET SAV
02/09/23 10:31
Total/NA Prep 9030B
762213
JAS
EET SAV
02/07/23 07:08
Total/NA Analysis 9034
1
762259
JAS
EET SAV
02/07/23 09:31
Client Sample ID: WTP
Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-2
Date Collected: 02/02/23 12:00
Matrix: Solid
Date Received: 02/03/23 10:46
Batch Batch
Dilution
Batch
Prepared
Prep Type Type Method
Run Factor
Number
Analyst
Lab
or Analyzed
TCLP Leach 1311
763738
KF
EET SAV
02/16/23 15:53
TCLP Analysis 8260D
20
763978
UI
EET SAV
02/19/23 21:07
TCLP Leach 1311
763695
KF
EET SAV
02/16/23 15:53
TCLP Prep 3510C
763973
MR
EET SAV
02/19/23 07:59
TCLP Analysis 8270E
1
764133
OK
EET SAV
02/20/23 17:38
TCLP Leach 1311
763695
KF
EET SAV
02/16/23 15:53
TCLP Prep 3510C
763974
MR
EET SAV
02/19/23 08:03
TCLP Analysis 8081 B
1
764106
JCK
EET SAV
02/20/23 17:51
TCLP Leach 1311
763695
KF
EET SAV
02/16/23 15:53
TCLP Prep 8151A
764058
KD
EET SAV
02/20/23 09:22
TCLP Analysis 8151A
1
764347
JCK
EET SAV
02/22/23 01:01
[a
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 31 of 40 3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

Lab Chronicle
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Job ID: 752-2248-1
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
Client Sample ID: WTP
Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-2
Date Collected: 02/02/23 12:00
Matrix: Solid
Date Received: 02/03/23 10:46
Batch Batch
Dilution
Batch
Prepared
Prep Type Type Method
Run
Factor
Number
Analyst
Lab or Analyzed
TCLP Leach 1311
763695
KF
EET SAV 02/16/23 15:53
TCLP Prep 3010A
763918
RR
EET SAV 02/17/23 13:14
TCLP Analysis 6010D
1
764151
BCB
EET SAV 02/20/23 13:40
TCLP Leach 1311
763695
KF
EET SAV 02/16/23 15:53
TCLP Prep 7470A
764125
JKL
EET SAV 02/20/23 12:38
TCLP Analysis 7470A
1
764337
BJB
EET SAV 02/21/23 11:07
Total/NA Analysis 9045C
1
763776
SM
EET SAV 02/16/23 14:42
Total/NA Analysis Moisture
1
762190
TD
EET SAV 02/06/23 20:36
Client Sample ID: WTP
Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-2 mi
Date Collected: 02/02/23 12:00
Matrix: Solid
Date Received: 02/03/23 10:46
Percent Solids: 2.0
Batch Batch
Dilution
Batch
Prepared
Prep Type Type Method
Run
Factor
Number
Analyst
Lab or Analyzed
Total/NA Prep Distill/CN
762486
JAS
EET SAV 02/08/23 10:11
Total/NA Analysis 335.4-1993 R1.0
1
762691
JAS
EET SAV 02/09/23 11:24
Total/NA Prep 9030B
762213
JAS
EET SAV 02/07/23 07:08
Total/NA Analysis 9034
1
762259
JAS
EET SAV 02/07/23 09:31
Client Sample ID: WTP-Q1
Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-3
Date Collected: 02/02/23 11:30
Matrix: Water
Date Received: 02/03/23 10:46
Batch Batch
Dilution
Batch
Prepared
Prep Type Type Method
Run
Factor
Number
Analyst
Lab or Analyzed
Total/NA Analysis 1010B
1
762640
AS
EET SAV 02/09/23 10:00
Client Sample ID: WTP
Lab Sample ID: 752-2248-4
Date Collected: 02/02/23 12:00
Matrix: Water
Date Received: 02/03/23 10:46
Batch Batch
Dilution
Batch
Prepared
Prep Type Type Method
Run
Factor
Number
Analyst
Lab or Analyzed
Total/NA Analysis 1010B
1
762640
AS
EET SAV 02/09/23 10:45
Laboratory References:
EET SAV = Eurofins Savannah, 5102 LaRoche Avenue, Savannah, GA 31404, TEL [phone]
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 32 of 40 3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

Accreditation/Certification Summary
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates Job ID: 752-2248-1
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
Laboratory: Eurofins Savannah
Unless otherwise noted, all analytes for this laboratory were covered under each accreditation/certification below.
Authority Program Identification Number Expiration Date
North Carolina (WW/SW) State 269 12-31-23
The following analytes are included in this report, but the laboratory is not certified by the governing authority. This list may include analytes for which
the agency does not offer certification.
Analysis Method
Prep Method
Matrix
Analyte
1010B
Water
Flashpoint
335.4-1993 R1.0
Distill/CN
Solid
Cyanide, Total
7470A
7470A
Solid
Mercury
8270E
3510C
Solid
Cresol
9045C
Solid
soil pH measured in water at deg C
9045C
Solid
Temperature
Moisture
Solid
Percent Moisture
Moisture
Solid
Percent Solids
11
12
13
74
75
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 33 of 40 3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

Method Summary
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
Job ID: 752-2248-1
Method
Method Description
Protocol
Laboratory
8260D
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
SW846
EET SAV
8270E
Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
SW846
EET SAV
8081 B
Organochlorine Pesticides (GC)
SW846
EET SAV
8151A
Herbicides (GC)
SW846
EET SAV
6010D
Metals (ICP)
SW846
EET SAV
7470A
Mercury (CVAA)
SW846
EET SAV
1010B
Ignitability, Pensky-Martens Closed -Cup Method
SW846
EET SAV
335.4-1993 R1.0
Cyanide, Total
MCAWvV
EET SAV
9034
Sulfide, Acid Soluble and Insoluble (Titrimetric)
SW846
EET SAV
9045C
pH
SW846
EET SAV
Moisture
Percent Moisture
EPA
EET SAV
1311
TCLP Extraction
SW846
EET SAV
3010A
Preparation, Total Metals
SW846
EET SAV
3510C
Liquid -Liquid Extraction (Separatory Funnel)
SW846
EET SAV
5030B
Purge and Trap
SW846
EET SAV
7470A
Preparation, Mercury
SW846
EET SAV
8151A
Extraction (Herbicides)
SW846
EET SAV
9030B
Sulfide, Distillation (Acid Soluble and Insoluble)
SW846
EET SAV
Distill/CN
Distillation, Cyanide
None
EET SAV
Protocol References:
EPA= US Environmental Protection Agency
MCAWvV= "Methods For Chemical Analysis Of Water And Wastes", EPA-600/4-79-020, March 1983 And Subsequent Revisions.
None = None
SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates.
Laboratory References:
EET SAV = Eurofins Savannah, 5102 LaRoche Avenue, Savannah, GA 31404, TEL [phone]
12
13
74
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 34 of 40 3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

Sample Summary
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Project/Site: City of Lumberton- TCLP
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Matrix
Collected
Received
752-2248-1
WWFP-Q1
Solid
02/02/2311:30
02/03/2310:46
752-2248-2
WTP
Solid
02/02/2312:00
02/03/2310:46
752-2248-3
WFP-Q1
Water
02/02/2311:30
02/03/2310:46
752-2248-4
WTP
Water
02/02/2312:00
02/03/2310:46
Job ID: 752-2248-1
Page 35 of 40 )

r
O
U
l6
41 �
�cLO�
N -c N m
O Z rn
0 Q N
N r O
Lu U a
d
O
Z
0 0
yY yY
m wz UNl�pU� o m14
C
i
.0
T
T
T
N O Z NN �N (aq
xz¢zZZxr¢� ar o
�
`
E
E
Q
n
9
O
C
'<
�.
LO
a
C m Q
0
W
Z Ny
`
N
ii
N 2zt5Z2 �QQ ua w°w t
tit,
o
�r
o
o
a
a <moowLLc�x_�Y�o
1y<,
m
c
^2
?rr
u
d
E
w
v
w
z
33
0
0
E
O
�
y
{,
�� �
a
d W
y
CON
t
3''S r'
U
N
y
d
7
N
N
4';•.v'
;li c
Q
N 41
y
Q
tlJ
c
N
y1�
MN
O
a
rz
U
P044OW le"I Y'96C
2,
Q
094O6 KO `oeos
tt„
O
O
O
2
a
a
a
E
3OLZ8'M"'SWO9'VOLVL'QOW9
Z`
X
O
�
r
OOA d131 O09Z8
t
0,0
E
u
�
�
CO)a
w
a�
E
+F
tjoNyi0,8e;V
etcjWescpe�e�IT�'P�$Ij
'3�5
`
s N
o. r_
_ r
u
H
.
`
• S $
,
O'
O
J LL
ui U)
t■
o
m
m
E
o
E
co
G I G S�
5 (p.
i
p
T V CA
�
_
O
N
3
O
z
-o
W
N U
�•
'S
CL
r
x
d�
v
`
0
C
i
c
y
a
0
a)
N
N
(0
(a
a
j
y
C
L
a)E
E
E
n
G
tr
a
`
ii
N
a
d
N
N
_'
CIS
CO
0
O
a
;vim
of
Y
�U�77
p
b
CO
—
O
N
N
c
o
¢
2
�
�
E
o
_�
E
a)
N
w
C
>
O
O
�
ui-79
d.
s•+
= Z
N
N
a,
a
a
fn rn
+.+
o
a
W
co
CO
O
N
Y
N
o Y
C
�,
Up
�p C
ui O
(7
.O
N
a N
�
L
Z 0_
J
Z
N
N
w
Ul d
N
O
mU
o. 7
E x
m m
a(h
O `!
�J
U
pZ
c
o
'm °
E E
m U
'p`^I—
N
f0
O
N
O-
E
c
c
U
Ci
cJ
U
¢
U N
a
w
0-
m
fn
y y
a
w
w
Z
Q�
13
14
e 36 of 40
3/28/2023

0,40 0
m 0 w o 0
z N N w EL
c� E
SZ <ZZZ
2
<
o �s
. 9
a
.
0
E
o
E
o
M
0
C
Lj 2
U
'o
g 6<0,
6 �o
Z
A
T-
o T: 8
E <
CL
Cr
C
C)
04
<
o mzr,i�� ZE < w w
V) 5
0
0
cu
a.
,
2 < m 0 a w LL (D:r
2 w'
0;0*'
X
t
w
E
E
E
E 12 A
'6
N mE
W
c,
39t,06
X
x
c
-j
0(
o
o
6
sDPIDlJsGd dIOI
X
><
15
a)
-E
m
6w tf
o
u)
ui
-E
0
Q)
8000MCOIS
1
x
x
z
3
o
�1'
E
C7
4)
spilos'AllilcielluBI loco i,
X
x
o .2
a)
E
j�
Aft
30A dIOI Z-t ict/ciolizo
X
X
0
E, b
It
5
cy,
E
o
o, w
w
w
IN
21�
NO 1111slGIVSCE
x
x
I > 5
co
S- w
a
M1,1VOW
2
o
X
X
d-101 i LKLIM09
a)
'5 (u
E E
o
4Z
E
d-101 I
x
T)
C)
w �c
f
c
>
>
>
o
z
V m
CLO
w
w
o
Hd jana djOj I I.I.C1,130M
X
X
F,
o
cu
<
F
-6,
3 LL
Lb m
x Ad
-6 �M
m
5 j
t4
m -E
Sc
4
c,
c-
o
K
E E%
o
u
o
1c)
E
1
E m
how
o
E
am
(D Ec�
E
c
a.AE
co
U)
—W
m
III
E
cr
c,
�.E
WGl
ZQ
cr
i� �2
15
K
c\I
E
E
E
-ii
w 0
c\l
0
E
m
u
E
u)
a-
k
E
o ti g
> u)
q
w
o
'6
w
a)
o
w
z
R
m
LL
m
w
0
0
o
ID
w
>
7D
E3
o
Im
c')
ID
0
=
m
m
73
,
m
22
o'
tz
B 0
E
a
I
<
0
u
4
R
8--
�p
,
z
1
;�
ob
0
'd
5;
C
6
LO
C"I
D m
LL
a)
w
-S
11
n
c
-
u)
x
C
C)
rl�
E
z
m
I —
z
� (b
-0
r
C
co
c')
6
co
E
c>
-if
c �2
E
m
5
b-
E
'a
Z
(-0
<
w
A C)
m, m
z R
IL
0
LLI
w
of
of
Page 37 of 40
3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)
M

Login Sample Receipt Checklist
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates Job Number: 752-2248-1
Login Number: 2248
List Number: 1
Creator: Yonish, Rachel
Question
List Source: Eurofins Raleigh
Answer Comment
Radioactivity wasn't checked or is </= background as measured by a survey
True
meter.
The cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact.
True
Sample custody seals, if present, are intact.
True
The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or
True
tampered with.
Samples were received on ice.
True
Cooler Temperature is acceptable.
True
Cooler Temperature is recorded.
True
COC is present.
True
COC is filled out in ink and legible.
True
COC is filled out with all pertinent information.
True
Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC?
True
There are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC.
True
Samples are received within Holding Time (excluding tests with immediate
True
HTs)
Sample containers have legible labels.
True
Containers are not broken or leaking.
True
Sample collection date/times are provided.
True
Appropriate sample containers are used.
True
Sample bottles are completely filled.
True
Sample Preservation Verified.
True
There is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested
True
MS/MSDs
Containers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is
True
<6mm (1/4").
Multiphasic samples are not present.
True
Samples do not require splitting or compositing.
True
Residual Chlorine Checked.
True
12
13
74
15
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 38 of 40 3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

Login Sample Receipt Checklist
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates Job Number: 752-2248-1
Login Number: 2248
List Number: 2
Creator: Givens, Keshia
Question
List Source: Eurofins Savannah
List Creation: 02/04/23 11:53 AM
Answer Comment
Radioactivity wasn't checked or is </= background as measured by a survey
N/A
meter.
The cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact.
True
Sample custody seals, if present, are intact.
True
The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or
True
tampered with.
Samples were received on ice.
True
Cooler Temperature is acceptable.
True
Cooler Temperature is recorded.
True
COC is present.
True
COC is filled out in ink and legible.
True
COC is filled out with all pertinent information.
True
Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC?
N/A
There are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC.
True
Samples are received within Holding Time (excluding tests with immediate
True
HTs)
Sample containers have legible labels.
True
Containers are not broken or leaking.
True
Sample collection date/times are provided.
True
Appropriate sample containers are used.
True
Sample bottles are completely filled.
True
Sample Preservation Verified.
N/A
There is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested
True
MS/MSDs
Containers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is
N/A
<6mm (1/4").
Multiphasic samples are not present.
True
Samples do not require splitting or compositing.
True
Residual Chlorine Checked.
N/A
12
13
74
15
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 39 of 40 3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

Login Sample Receipt Checklist
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Job Number: 752-2248-1
Login Number: 2248 List Source: Eurofins Savannah
List Number: 3 List Creation: 02/20/23 01:16 PM
Creator: Ogletree, Emma
Question Answer Comment
Radioactivity wasn't checked or is </= background as measured by a survey
meter.
The cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact.
Sample custody seals, if present, are intact.
The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or
tampered with.
Samples were received on ice.
Cooler Temperature is acceptable.
Cooler Temperature is recorded.
COC is present.
COC is filled out in ink and legible.
COC is filled out with all pertinent information.
Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC?
There are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC.
Samples are received within Holding Time (excluding tests with immediate m
HTs)
Sample containers have legible labels.
Containers are not broken or leaking.
Sample collection date/times are provided.
Appropriate sample containers are used.
Sample bottles are completely filled.
Sample Preservation Verified.
There is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested
MS/MSDs
Containers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is
<6mm (1/4").
Multiphasic samples are not present.
Samples do not require splitting or compositing.
Residual Chlorine Checked.
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 40 of 40 3/28/2023 (Rev. 1)

tiff eurofins
Environment Testing
ANALYTICAL REPORT
PREPARED FOR
Attn: Cody Hunt
Hunt Environmental Associates �
3330 Saddletree Rd
Lumberton, North Carolina 28360
Generated 3/9/2023 8:20:19 AM
JOB DESCRIPTION
City of Lumberton
JOB NUMBER
752-3600-1

The test results in this report relate only to the samples as received by the laboratory and will meet all requirements of the
methodology, with any exceptions noted. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the express written
approval of the laboratory. All questions should be directed to the Eurofins Environment Testing Southeast, LLC Project
Manager.
Generated
3/9/2023 8:20:19 AM
Authorized for release by
Stephanie Franz, Project Manager
stephanie.franz(a-)et.eurofinsus.com
[phone]
12
13
74
Eurofins Savannah is a laboratory within Eurofins Environment Testing Southeast, LLC, a company within Eurofins Environment Testing Group of Companies
Page 2 of 27 3/9/2023

Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Project/Site: City of Lumberton
Laboratory Job ID: 752-3600-1
Table of Contents
Cover Page ..............................................
1
Table of Contents .........................................
3
Definitions/Glossary.......................................
4
Case Narrative ...........................................
5
Detection Summary ........................................
6
Client Sample Results ......................................
7
QC Sample Results ........................................
9
QC Association Summary ...................................
13
Lab Chronicle ............................................
16
Certification Summary ......................................
18
Method Summary .........................................
20
Sample Summary .........................................
21
Chain of Custody ..........................................
22
Receipt Checklists .........................................
25
12
13
74
Page 3 of 27
Eurofins Raleigh
3/9/2023

Definitions/Glossary
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Project/Site: City of Lumberton
Qualifiers
Metals
Qualifier Qualifier Description
J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
General Chemistry
Job ID: 752-3600-1
Qualifier Qualifier Description
4 MS, MSD: The analyte present in the original sample is greater than 4 times the matrix spike concentration; therefore, control limits are not
applicable.
J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
Glossary
Abbreviation These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.
a Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis
%R Percent Recovery
CFL Contains Free Liquid
CFU Colony Forming Unit
CNF Contains No Free Liquid
DER Duplicate Error Ratio (normalized absolute difference)
Dil Fac Dilution Factor
DL Detection Limit (DoD/DOE)
DL, RA, RE, IN Indicates a Dilution, Re -analysis, Re -extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample
DLC Decision Level Concentration (Radiochemistry)
EDL Estimated Detection Limit (Dioxin)
LOD Limit of Detection (DoD/DOE)
LOQ Limit of Quantitation (DoD/DOE)
MCL EPA recommended "Maximum Contaminant Level'
MDA Minimum Detectable Activity (Radiochemistry)
MDC Minimum Detectable Concentration (Radiochemistry)
MDL Method Detection Limit
ML Minimum Level (Dioxin)
MPN Most Probable Number
MQL Method Quantitation Limit
NC Not Calculated
ND Not Detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)
NEG Negative / Absent
POS Positive / Present
PQL Practical Quantitation Limit
PRIES Presumptive
QC Quality Control
RER Relative Error Ratio (Radiochemistry)
RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry)
RPD Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points
TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)
TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)
TNTC Too Numerous To Count
12
13
74
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 4 of 27 3/9/2023

Case Narrative
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Project/Site: City of Lumberton
Job ID: 752-3600-1
Laboratory: Eurofins Raleigh
Narrative
Job Narrative
752-3600-1
Comments
No additional comments.
Job ID: 752-3600-1
Receipt
The samples were received on 2/27/2023 1:22 PM. Unless otherwise noted below, the samples arrived in good condition, and where
required, properly preserved and on ice. The temperature of the cooler at receipt was 2.60 C.
Metals
No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.
General Chemistry
Method 351.2: The matrix spike / matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) recoveries for preparation batch 680-765497 and analytical batch
680-765770 were outside control limits for one or more analytes, see QC Sample Results for detail. Sample matrix interference and/or
non -homogeneity are suspected because the associated laboratory control sample (LCS) recovery is within acceptance limits.
F47
Method 365.4: The instrument blank for analytical batch 680-765771 contained Phosphorus greater than the method detection limit (MDL) M
but less than the RL. MMethod 353.2: The instrument blank for analytical batch 680-766049 contained nitrate nitrite as N greater than the method detection limit
(MDL), and were not reanalyzed because detection <1/2RL. The data have been qualified and reported.
No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page.
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 5 of 27 3/9/2023

Detection Summary
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Job ID:
752-3600-1
Project/Site: City of Lumberton
Client Sample ID: Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Lab
Sample ID: 752-3600-1
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
Dil Fac
D
Method
Prep Type
Sodium Adsorption Ratio
76
0.10
0.10
NONE
1
20B
Soluble
Aluminum
16000
590
200
mg/Kg
1
*
6010D
Total/NA
Calcium
9900
1500
220
mg/Kg
1
*
6010D
Total/NA
Copper
310
74
15
mg/Kg
1
*
6010D
Total/NA
Magnesium
1700
1500
270
mg/Kg
1
*
6010D
Total/NA
Nickel
29 J
120
27
mg/Kg
1
*
6010D
Total/NA
Potassium
4300
3000
320
mg/Kg
1
6010D
Total/NA
Sodium
31000
5900
1600
mg/Kg
1
6010D
Total/NA
Zinc
590
59
17
mg/Kg
1
6010D
Total/NA
Ammonia
2600
90
39
mg/Kg
10
350.1-1993 R2.0
Total/NA
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl
55000
15000
8900
mg/Kg
20
351.2-1993 R2.0
Total/NA
Phosphorus
16000
1500
810
mg/Kg
5
365.4-1974
Total/NA
Total Solids
2.8
0.10
0.10
%
1
SM 254OG
Total/NA
Nitrate Nitrite as N
2300 J
3000
820
mg/Kg
50
353.2-1993 R2.0
Soluble
pH
6.4
1
1
Su
1
9045D
Soluble
Temperature
19.8
1
1
Degrees C
1
9045D
Soluble
Client Sample ID: Q1-2 WTP
Lab
Sample ID: 752-3600-2
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
Dil Fac
D
Method
Prep Type
Aluminum
160000
920
310
mg/Kg
1
*
6010D
Total/NA
Calcium
3700
2300
340
mg/Kg
1
*
6010D
Total/NA
Copper
50 J
110
23
mg/Kg
1
*
6010D
Total/NA
Zinc
140
92
27
mg/Kg
1
*
6010D
Total/NA
Ammonia
24
16
6.9
mg/Kg
1
*
350.1-1993 R2.0
Total/NA
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl
6500
1300
780
mg/Kg
1
*
351.2-1993 R2.0
Total/NA
Phosphorus
3600
520
290
mg/Kg
1
*
365.4-1974
Total/NA
Total Solids
1.6
0.10
0.10
%
1
SM 254OG
Total/NA
pH
5.8
1
1
Su
1
9045D
Soluble
Temperature
19.9
1
1
Degrees C
1
9045D
Soluble
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 6 of 27 3/9/2023

Client Sample Results
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Project/Site: City of Lumberton
Job ID: 752-3600-1
Client Sample ID: Q1-2 TCLP WWTP Lab Sample ID: 752-3600-1
Date Collected: 02/27/23 09:00 Matrix: Solid
Date Received: 02/27/23 13:22 Percent Solids: 3.3
Method: USDA 20B - Sodium Adsorption Ratio - Soluble
Analyte
Result Qualifier
Sodium Adsorption Ratio
76
Method: SW846 6010D - Metals (ICP)
Analyte
Result Qualifier
Aluminum
16000
Arsenic
<35
Cadmium
<3.0
Calcium
9900
Copper
310
Lead
<18
Magnesium
1700
Molybdenum
<7.7
Nickel
29 J
Potassium
4300
Selenium
<32
Sodium
31000
Zinc
590
Method: SW846 7471 B - Mercury (CVAA)
Analyte
Result Qualifier
Mercury
<0.22
General Chemistry
Analyte
Result Qualifier
Ammonia (MCAWW 350.1-1993
2600
R2.0)
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl (MCAWW
55000
351.2-1993 R2.0)
Phosphorus (EPA 365.4-1974)
16000
Total Solids (SM 2540G)
2.8
General Chemistry - Soluble
Analyte
Result Qualifier
Nitrate Nitrite as N (MCAWW
2300 J
353.2-1993 R2.0)
pH (SW846 9045D)
6.4
Temperature (SW846 9045D)
19.8
Client Sample ID: Q1-2 WTP
Date Collected: 02/27/23 09:30
Date Received: 02/27/23 13:22
RL
MDL
Unit
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
0.10
0.10
NONE
03/06/2314:06
1
RL
MDL
Unit
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
590
200
mg/Kg
*
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:53
1
59
35
mg/Kg
*
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:53
1
15
3.0
mg/Kg
*
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:53
1
1500
220
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:53
1
74
15
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:53
1
30
18
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:53
1
1500
270
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:53
1
30
7.7
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:53
1
120
27
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:53
1
3000
320
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:53
1
74
32
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:53
1
Is
5900
1600
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:53
1
59
17
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:53
1
RL
MDL
Unit
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
M
0.68
0.22
mg/Kg
*
03/01/23 08:18
03/01/23 17:20
1
RL
MDL
Unit
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
90
39
mg/Kg
*
03/07/23 19:40
03/08/23 00:25
10
15000
8900
mg/Kg
*
03/01/23 09:35
03/02/23 12:56
20
1500
810
mg/Kg
03/01/23 09:35 03/02/23 10:58 5
0.10
0.10
%
03/01/2315:30 1
RL
MDL
Unit
D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
3000
820
mg/Kg
03/04/2317:49 50
1
1
Su
02/28/2311:51 1
1
1
Degrees C
02/28/23 11:51 1
Lab Sample ID: 752-3600-2
Matrix: Solid
Percent Solids: 1.9
Method: USDA 20B - Sodium Adsorption Ratio - Soluble
Analyte Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
Sodium Adsorption Ratio <0.10
0.10
0.10
NONE
03/06/2314:06
1
Method: SW846 6010D - Metals (ICP)
Analyte Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
Aluminum 160000
920
310
mg/Kg
*
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:56
1
Arsenic <55
92
55
mg/Kg
*
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:56
1
Cadmium <4.6
23
4.6
mg/Kg
*
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:56
1
Calcium 3700
2300
340
mg/Kg
*
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:56
1
Page 7 of 27
Eurofins Raleigh
3/9/2023

Client Sample Results
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Project/Site: City of Lumberton
Job ID: 752-3600-1
Client Sample ID: Q1-2 WTP Lab Sample ID: 752-3600-2
Date Collected: 02/27/23 09:30 Matrix: Solid
Date Received: 02/27/23 13:22 Percent Solids: 1.9
Method: SW846 6010D - Metals (ICP) (Continued)
Analyte
Result Qualifier
Copper
50 J
Lead
<28
Magnesium
<420
Molybdenum
<12
Nickel
<41
Potassium
<500
Selenium
<50
Sodium
<2500
Zinc
140
Method: SW846 7471 B - Mercury (CVAA)
Analyte
Result Qualifier
Mercury
<0.42
General Chemistry
Analyte
Result Qualifier
Ammonia (MCAWW 350.1-1993
24
R2.0)
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl (MCAWW
6500
351.2-1993 R2.0)
Phosphorus (EPA 365.4-1974)
3600
Total Solids (SM 2540G)
1.6
General Chemistry - Soluble
Analyte
Result Qualifier
Nitrate Nitrite as N (MCAVVW
<29
353.2-1993 R2.0)
pH (SW846 9045D)
5.8
Temperature (SW846 9045D)
19.9
RL
MDL
Unit
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
110
23
mg/Kg
*
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:56
1
46
28
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:56
1
2300
420
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:56
1
46
12
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:56
1
180
41
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:56
1
4600
500
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:56
1
110
50
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:56
1
9200
2500
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:56
1
92
27
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:56
1
RL
MDL
Unit
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1.3
0.42
mg/Kg
*
03/01/23 08:18
03/01/23 17:23
1
RL
MDL
Unit
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
Is
16
6.9
mg/Kg
*
03/07/23 19:40
03/07/23 22:38
1
1300
780
mg/Kg
*
03/01/23 09:35
03/02/23 10:20
1 M520
290
mg/Kg
*
03/01/23 09:35
03/02/23 08:16
1
0.10
0.10
%
03/01/2315:30
1
RL
MDL
Unit
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
110
29
mg/Kg
03/04/2317:49
1
1
1
Su
02/28/2311:51
1
1
1
Degrees C
02/28/23 11:51
1
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 8 of 27 3/9/2023

QC Sample Results
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Job ID: 752-3600-1
Project/Site: City of Lumberton
Method: 6010D - Metals (ICP)
Lab Sample ID: MB 680-765412/1-A
Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 765840
Prep Batch: 765412
MB MB
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL
Unit
D Prepared
Analyzed Dil Fac
Aluminum
<6.4
19
6.4
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:05 1
Arsenic
<1.1
1.9
1.1
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:05 1
Cadmium
<0.094
0.47
0.094
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:05 1
Calcium
<7.0
47
7.0
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:05 1
Copper
<0.47
2.4
0.47
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:05 1
Lead
<0.58
0.94
0.58
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:05 1
Magnesium
<8.6
47
8.6
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:05 1
Molybdenum
<0.25
0.94
0.25
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:05 1
Nickel
<0.85
3.8
0.85
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:05 1
Potassium
<10
94
10
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:05 1
Selenium
<1.0
2.4
1.0
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:05 1
Sodium
<52
190
52
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:05 1
Zinc
<0.55
1.9
0.55
mg/Kg
02/28/2315:49
03/02/2319:05 1
Lab Sample ID: LCS 680-765412/2-A
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 765840
Prep Batch: 765412
Spike
LCS LCS
%Rec
Analyte
Added
Result Qualifier
Unit
D %Rec
Limits
Aluminum
455
451
mg/Kg
99
80 - 120
Arsenic
9.09
7.84
mg/Kg
86
80. 120
Cadmium
4.55
4.20
mg/Kg
92
80. 120
Calcium
455
438
mg/Kg
96
80. 120
Copper
9.09
9.35
mg/Kg
103
80. 120
Lead
45.9
43.4
mg/Kg
95
80. 120
Magnesium
455
443
mg/Kg
97
80 - 120
Molybdenum
9.09
8.73
mg/Kg
96
80 - 120
Nickel
9.09
8.60
mg/Kg
95
80 - 120
Potassium
634
632
mg/Kg
100
80 - 120
Selenium
9.09
7.34
mg/Kg
81
80 - 120
Sodium
459
450
mg/Kg
98
80 - 120
Zinc
9.09
8.68
mg/Kg
95
80 - 120
Method: 7471 B - Mercury (CVAA)
Lab Sample ID: MB 680-765452/12-A
Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 765728
Prep Batch: 765452
MB MB
Analyte Result Qualifier
RL
MDL Unit
D Prepared
Analyzed Dil Fac
Mercury <0.0067
0.021
0.0067 mg/Kg
03/01/23 08:18
03/02/23 08:18 1
Lab Sample ID: LCS 680-765452/13-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 765728 Prep Batch: 765452
Spike LCS LCS %Rec
Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits
Mercury 0.212 0.219 mg/Kg 103 80 - 120
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 9 of 27 3/9/2023

QC Sample Results
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Project/Site: City of Lumberton
Job I D: 752-3600-1
Method: 350.1-1993 R2.0 - Nitrogen, Ammonia
Lab Sample ID: MB 680-766455/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 766466 Prep Batch: 766455
MB MB
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
Ammonia <0.13 0.30 0.13 mg/Kg 03/07/23 19:40 03/07/23 22:34 1
Lab Sample ID: LCS 680-766455/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 766466 Prep Batch: 766455
Spike LCS LCS %Rec
Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits
Ammonia 4.99 3.77 mg/Kg 76 75 -125
Method: 351.2-1993 R2.0 - Nitrogen, Total Nitrogen
Lab Sample ID: MB 680-765497/1-A
Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 765770
Prep Batch: 765497
MB MB
Analyte Result Qualifier
RL
MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl <12
20
12 mg/Kg 03/01/23 09:35 03/02/23 10:07 1
Lab Sample ID: LCS 680-765497/2-A
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 765770
Prep Batch: 765497
Spike
LCS LCS %Rec
Analyte
Added
Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl
159
164 mg/Kg 103 75-125
Lab Sample ID: 752-3600-1 MS
Client Sample ID: Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 765770
Prep Batch: 765497
Sample Sample
Spike
MS MS %Rec
Analyte Result Qualifier
Added
Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl 55000
5960
53100 4 mg/Kg -25 75 -125
Lab Sample ID: 752-3600-1 MSD
Client Sample ID: Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 765770
Prep Batch: 765497
Sample Sample
Spike
MSD MSD %Rec RPD
Analyte Result Qualifier
Added
Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl 55000
5800
61300 4 mg/Kg # 116 75 -125 14 40
Method: 353.2-1993 R2.0 - Nitrogen, Nitrate -Nitrite
Lab Sample ID: MB 680-766049/3
Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 766049
MB MB
Analyte Result Qualifier
RL
MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
Nitrate Nitrite as N <0.028
0.10
0.028 mg/Kg 03/04/23 17:10 1
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 10 of 27 3/9/2023

QC Sample Results
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Project/Site: City of Lumberton
Job I D: 752-3600-1
Method: 353.2-1993 R2.0 - Nitrogen, Nitrate -Nitrite (Continued)
Lab Sample ID: LCS 680-766049/4
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 766049
Spike
LCS LCS
%Rec
Analyte
Added
Result Qualifier
Unit D %Rec Limits
Nitrate Nitrite as N
1.00
1.02
mg/Kg 102 80 - 120
Lab Sample ID: MB 680-766047/1-A
Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Soluble
Analysis Batch: 766049
MB
MB
Analyte Result
Qualifier
RL MDL Unit
D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
Nitrate Nitrite as N <0.55
2.0 0.55 mg/Kg
03/04/23 17:33 1
Lab Sample ID: LCS 680-766047/2-A
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Soluble
Analysis Batch: 766049
Spike
LCS LCS
%Rec
Analyte
Added
Result Qualifier
Unit D %Rec Limits
Nitrate Nitrite as N
19.8
21.2
mg/Kg 107 80 - 120
Lab Sample ID: LCSD 680-766047/3-A
Client
Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Soluble
Analysis Batch: 766049
Spike
LCSD LCSD
%Rec RPD
Analyte
Added
Result Qualifier
Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit
Nitrate Nitrite as N
19.9
21.1
mg/Kg 106 80 - 120 0 20
Method: 365.4-1974 - Phosphorus, Total
Lab Sample ID: MB 680-765497/1-A
Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 765771
Prep Batch: 765497
MB MB
Analyte Result Qualifier
RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
Phosphorus <4.4
7.9 4.4 mg/Kg 03/01/23 09:35 03/02/23 09:23 1
Lab Sample ID: LCS 680-765497/2-A
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 765771
Prep Batch: 765497
Spike
LCS LCS %Rec
Analyte
Added
Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits
Phosphorus
159
169 mg/Kg 107 70-130
Lab Sample ID: 752-3600-1 MS
Client Sample ID: Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Matrix: Solid
Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 765771
Prep Batch: 765497
Sample Sample
Spike
MS MS %Rec
Analyte Result Qualifier
Added
Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits
Phosphorus 16000
5960
23400 mg/Kg 125 70-130
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 11 of 27 3/9/2023

QC Sample Results
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Project/Site: City of Lumberton
Method: 365.4-1974 - Phosphorus, Total (Continued)
Lab Sample ID: 752-3600-1 MSD
Matrix: Solid
Analysis Batch: 765771
Sample Sample Spike
Analyte Result Qualifier Added
Phosphorus 16000 5800
Method: 9045D - pH
Lab Sample ID: 752-3600-1 DU
Matrix: Solid
Analysis Batch: 1505
Sample Sample
Analyte Result Qualifier
pH 6.4
Temperature 19.8
Method: SM 254OG - Total, Fixed, and Volatile Solids
Lab Sample ID: MB 680-765594/1
Matrix: Solid
Analysis Batch: 765594
MB MB
Analyte Result Qualifier RL
Total Solids 100 0.10
Lab Sample ID: 752-3600-1 DU
Matrix: Solid
Analysis Batch: 765594
Sample Sample
Analyte Result Qualifier
Total Solids 2.8
Job I D: 752-3600-1
Client Sample ID: Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Prep Type: Total/NA
Prep Batch: 765497
MSD
MSD
%Rec RPD
Result
Qualifier
Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit
23100
mg/Kg # 124 70-130 1 30
Client Sample ID: Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Prep Type: Soluble
DU
DU
RPD
Result
Qualifier
Unit D RPD Limit
6.4
SU 0.6 25
19.4
Degrees C 2
Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Prep Type: Total/NA
MDL Unit
D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
0.10 %
03/01/2315:30 1
Client Sample ID: Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Prep Type: Total/NA
DU
DU
RPD
Result
Qualifier
Unit D RPD Limit
2.83
% 0.4 5
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 12 of 27 3/9/2023

QC Association Summary
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Job ID: 752-3600-1
Project/Site: City of Lumberton
Metals
Analysis Batch: 428267
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
752-3600-1
Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Soluble
Solid
20B
752-3600-2
Q1-2 WTP
Soluble
Solid
20B
Prep Batch: 765412
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
752-3600-1
Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Total/NA
Solid
3050B
752-3600-2
Q1-2 WTP
Total/NA
Solid
3050B
MB 680-765412/1-A
Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
3050B
LCS 680-765412/2-A
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
3050B
Prep Batch: 765452
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
752-3600-1
Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Total/NA
Solid
7471 B
752-3600-2
Q1-2 WTP
Total/NA
Solid
7471B
MB 680-765452/12-A
Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
7471 B
LCS 680-765452/13-A
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
7471 B
Analysis Batch: 765728
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
752-3600-1
Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Total/NA
Solid
7471 B
765452
752-3600-2
Q1-2 WTP
Total/NA
Solid
7471B
765452
MB 680-765452/12-A
Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
7471 B
765452
LCS 680-765452/13-A
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
7471 B
765452
Analysis Batch: 765840
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
752-3600-1
Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Total/NA
Solid
6010D
765412
752-3600-2
Q1-2 WTP
Total/NA
Solid
6010D
765412
MB 680-765412/1-A
Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
6010D
765412
LCS 680-765412/2-A
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
6010D
765412
General Chemistry
Leach Batch: 1500
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
752-3600-1
Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Soluble
Solid
DI Leach
752-3600-2
Q1-2 WTP
Soluble
Solid
DI Leach
752-3600-1 DU
Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Soluble
Solid
DI Leach
Analysis Batch: 1505
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
752-3600-1
Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Soluble
Solid
9045D
1500
752-3600-2
Q1-2 WTP
Soluble
Solid
9045D
1500
LCS 752-1505/2
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
9045D
752-3600-1 DU
Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Soluble
Solid
9045D
1500
Prep Batch: 765497
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
752-3600-1
Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Total/NA
Solid
Digestion
752-3600-2
Q1-2 WTP
Total/NA
Solid
Digestion
MB 680-765497/1-A
Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
Digestion
0
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 13 of 27 3/9/2023

QC Association Summary
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Job ID:
752-3600-1
Project/Site: City of Lumberton
General Chemistry (Continued)
Prep Batch: 765497 (Continued)
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
LCS 680-765497/2-A Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
Digestion
752-3600-1 MS Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Total/NA
Solid
Digestion
752-3600-1 MSD Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Total/NA
Solid
Digestion
Analysis Batch: 765594
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
752-3600-1 Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Total/NA
Solid
SM 254OG
752-3600-2 Q1-2 WTP
Total/NA
Solid
SM 254OG
MB 680-765594/1 Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
SM 254OG
752-3600-1 DU Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Total/NA
Solid
SM 254OG
Analysis Batch: 765697
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
752-3600-1 Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Total/NA
Solid
Moisture
752-3600-2 Q1-2 WTP
Total/NA
Solid
Moisture
Analysis Batch: 765770
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
752-3600-1 Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Total/NA
Solid
351.2-1993 R2.0
765497
752-3600-2 Q1-2 WTP
Total/NA
Solid
351.2-1993 R2.0
765497
MB 680-765497/1-A Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
351.2-1993 R2.0
765497
LCS 680-765497/2-A Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
351.2-1993 R2.0
765497
752-3600-1 MS Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Total/NA
Solid
351.2-1993 R2.0
765497
752-3600-1 MSD Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Total/NA
Solid
351.2-1993 R2.0
765497
Analysis Batch: 765771
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
752-3600-1
Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Total/NA
Solid
365.4-1974
765497
752-3600-2
Q1-2 WTP
Total/NA
Solid
365.4-1974
765497
MB 680-765497/1-A
Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
365.4-1974
765497
LCS 680-765497/2-A
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
365.4-1974
765497
752-3600-1 MS
Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Total/NA
Solid
365.4-1974
765497
752-3600-1 MSD
Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Total/NA
Solid
365.4-1974
765497
Leach Batch: 766047
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method Prep Batch
752-3600-1
Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Soluble
Solid
DI Leach
752-3600-2
Q1-2 WTP
Soluble
Solid
DI Leach
MB 680-766047/1-A
Method Blank
Soluble
Solid
DI Leach
LCS 680-766047/2-A
Lab Control Sample
Soluble
Solid
DI Leach
LCSD 680-766047/3-A
Lab Control Sample Dup
Soluble
Solid
DI Leach
Analysis Batch: 766049
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
752-3600-1
Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Soluble
Solid
353.2-1993 R2.0
766047
752-3600-2
Q1-2 WTP
Soluble
Solid
353.2-1993 R2.0
766047
MB 680-766047/1-A
Method Blank
Soluble
Solid
353.2-1993 R2.0
766047
MB 680-766049/3
Method Blank
Total/NA
Solid
353.2-1993 R2.0
LCS 680-766047/2-A
Lab Control Sample
Soluble
Solid
353.2-1993 R2.0
766047
LCS 680-766049/4
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Solid
353.2-1993 R2.0
LCSD 680-766047/3-A
Lab Control Sample Dup
Soluble
Solid
353.2-1993 R2.0
766047
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 14 of 27 3/9/2023

QC Association Summary
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Project/Site: City of Lumberton
General Chemistry
Prep Batch: 766455
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
752-3600-1
Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
752-3600-2
Q1-2 WTP
MB 680-766455/1-A
Method Blank
LCS 680-766455/2-A
Lab Control Sample
Analysis Batch: 766466
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
752-3600-1
Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
752-3600-2
Q1-2 WTP
MB 680-766455/1-A
Method Blank
LCS 680-766455/2-A
Lab Control Sample
Job ID: 752-3600-1
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
Total/NA
Solid
3-154
Total/NA
Solid
3-154
Total/NA
Solid
3-154
Total/NA
Solid
3-154
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
Prep Batch
Total/NA
Solid
350.1-1993 R2.0
766455
Total/NA
Solid
350.1-1993 R2.0
766455
Total/NA
Solid
350.1-1993 R2.0
766455
Total/NA
Solid
350.1-1993 R2.0
766455
12
13
74
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 15 of 27 3/9/2023

Lab Chronicle
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Job ID: 752-3600-1
Project/Site: City of Lumberton
Client Sample ID: Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Lab Sample ID: 752-3600-1
Date Collected: 02/27/23 09:00
Matrix: Solid
Date Received: 02/27/23 13:22
Batch Batch
Dilution
Batch
Prepared
Prep Type Type Method Run
Factor
Number
Analyst
Lab or Analyzed
Soluble Analysis 20B
1
428267
RSR
EET PIT 03/06/23 14:06
Soluble Leach DI Leach
1500
CB
EET ESC 02/28/23 10:25
Soluble Analysis 9045D
1
1505
CB
EET ESC 02/28/23 11:51
Total/NA Analysis Moisture
1
765697
KG
EET SAV 03/02/23 11:09
Total/NA Analysis SM 2540G
1
765594
PG
EET SAV 03/01/23 15:30
Client Sample ID: Q1-2 TCLP WWTP
Lab Sample ID: 752-3600-1
Date Collected: 02/27/23 09:00
Matrix: Solid
Date Received: 02/27/23 13:22
Percent Solids: 3.3
Batch Batch
Prep Type Type Method
Dilution
Run Factor
Batch
Number Analyst
Lab
Prepared
or Analyzed
Total/NA Prep 3050B
765412
BCB
EET SAV
02/28/2315:49
Total/NA Analysis 6010D
1
765840
BJB
EET SAV
03/02/23 19:53
Is
Total/NA Prep 7471 B
765452
JKL
EET SAV
03/01/23 08:18
Total/NA Analysis 7471 B
1
765728
JKL
EET SAV
03/01/23 17:20
Total/NA Prep 3-154
766455
PB
EET SAV
03/07/23 19:40
Total/NA Analysis 350.1-1993 R2.0
10
766466
PB
EET SAV
03/08/23 00:25 M
Total/NA Prep Digestion
765497
SM
EET SAV
03/01/23 09:35
Total/NA Analysis 351.2-1993 R2.0
20
765770
AS
EET SAV
03/02/23 12:56
Soluble Leach DI Leach
766047
EO
EET SAV
03/03/23 12:00
Soluble Analysis 353.2-1993 R2.0
50
766049
EO
EET SAV
03/04/23 17:49
Total/NA Prep Digestion
765497
SM
EET SAV
03/01/23 09:35
Total/NA Analysis 365.4-1974
5
765771
AS
EET SAV
03/02/23 10:58
Client Sample ID: Q1-2 WTP
Lab Sample ID: 752-3600-2
Date Collected: 02/27/23 09:30
Matrix: Solid
Date Received: 02/27/23 13:22
Batch Batch
Prep Type Type Method
Dilution
Run Factor
Batch
Number Analyst
Lab
Prepared
or Analyzed
Soluble Analysis 20B
1
428267
RSR
EET PIT
03/06/23 14:06
Soluble Leach DI Leach
1500
CB
EET ESC
02/28/23 10:25
Soluble Analysis 9045D
1
1505
CB
EET ESC
02/28/23 11:51
Total/NA Analysis Moisture
1
765697
KG
EET SAV
03/02/23 11:09
Total/NA Analysis SM 254OG
1
765594
PG
EET SAV
03/01/23 15:30
Client Sample ID: Q1-2 WTP
Lab Sample ID: 752-3600-2
Date Collected: 02/27/23 09:30
Matrix: Solid
Date Received: 02/27/23 13:22
Percent Solids: 1.9
Prep Type
Batch
Type
Batch
Method
Dilution
Run Factor
Batch
Number Analyst
Lab
Prepared
or Analyzed
Total/NA
Prep
3050B
765412 BCB
EET SAV
02/28/23 15:49
Total/NA
Analysis
6010D
1
765840 BJB
EET SAV
03/02/23 19:56
Total/NA
Prep
7471 B
765452 JKL
EET SAV
03/01/23 08:18
Total/NA
Analysis
7471 B
1
765728 JKL
EET SAV
03/01/23 17:23
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 16 of 27 3/9/2023

Lab Chronicle
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Project/Site: City of Lumberton
Job ID: 752-3600-1
Client Sample ID: Q1-2 WTP Lab Sample ID: 752-3600-2
Date Collected: 02/27/23 09:30 Matrix: Solid
Date Received: 02/27/23 13:22 Percent Solids: 1.9
Batch
Batch
Dilution
Batch
Prepared
Prep Type
Type
Method
Run Factor
Number
Analyst
Lab
or Analyzed
Total/NA
Prep
3-154
766455
PB
EET SAV
03/07/23 19:40
Total/NA
Analysis
350.1-1993 R2.0
1
766466
PB
EET SAV
03/07/23 22:38
Total/NA
Prep
Digestion
765497
SM
EET SAV
03/01/23 09:35
Total/NA
Analysis
351.2-1993 R2.0
1
765770
AS
EET SAV
03/02/23 10:20
Soluble
Leach
DI Leach
766047
EO
EET SAV
03/03/23 12:00
Soluble
Analysis
353.2-1993 R2.0
1
766049
EO
EET SAV
03/04/23 17:49
Total/NA
Prep
Digestion
765497
SM
EET SAV
03/01/23 09:35
Total/NA
Analysis
365.4-1974
1
765771
AS
EET SAV
03/02/23 08:16
Laboratory References:
EET ESC = Eurofins Raleigh, 102-A Woodwinds Industrial Court, Cary, NC 27511, TEL [phone]
EET PIT = Eurofins Pittsburgh, 301 Alpha Drive, RIDC Park, Pittsburgh, PA 15238, TEL [phone]
EET SAV = Eurofins Savannah, 5102 LaRoche Avenue, Savannah, GA 31404, TEL [phone]
0
12
13
74
Page 17 of 27
Eurofins Raleigh
3/9/2023

Accreditation/Certification Summary
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates Job ID: 752-3600-1
Project/Site: City of Lumberton
Laboratory: Eurofins Raleigh
Unless otherwise noted, all analytes for this laboratory were covered under each accreditation/certification below.
Authority Program Identification Number Expiration Date
North Carolina (VWV/SV) State 591 12-31-23
The following analytes are included in this report, but the laboratory is not certified by the governing authority. This list may include analytes for which
the agency does not offer certification.
Analysis Method Prep Method Matrix Analyte
9045D Solid Temperature
Laboratory: Eurofins Pittsburgh
All accreditations/certifications held by this laboratory are listed. Not all accreditations/certifications are applicable to this report.
Authority
Program
Identification Number
Expiration Date
Arkansas DEQ
State
19-033-0
06-27-23
California
State
2891
04-30-23
Connecticut
State
PH-0688
09-30-22
Florida
NELAP
E871008
06-30-23
Georgia
State
PA 02-00416
04-30-23
Illinois
NELAP
004375
06-30-23
Kansas
NELAP
E-10350
03-31-23
Kentucky (UST)
State
162013
04-30-23
Kentucky (WW)
State
KY98043
12-31-23
Louisiana
NELAP
04041
06-30-22
Louisiana (All)
NELAP
04041
06-30-23
Maine
State
PA00164
03-06-24
Minnesota
NELAP
042-999-482
12-31-23
New Hampshire
NELAP
2030
04-04-23
New Jersey
NELAP
PA005
06-30-23
New York
NELAP
11182
04-01-23
North Carolina (VWV/SVV)
State
434
12-31-23
North Dakota
State
R-227
04-30-23
Oregon
NELAP
PA-2151
02-06-24
Pennsylvania
NELAP
02-00416
04-30-23
Rhode Island
State
LAO00362
12-31-22'
South Carolina
State
89014
04-30-23
Texas
NELAP
T104704528
03-31-23
US Fish & Wildlife
US Federal Programs
058448
03-31-23
USDA
US Federal Programs
P330-16-00211
06-21-24
Utah
NELAP
PA001462019-8
05-31-23
Virginia
NELAP
10043
09-14-23
West Virginia DEP
State
142
03-31-23
Wisconsin
State
998027800
08-31-23
Laboratory: Eurofins Savannah
Unless otherwise noted, all analytes for this laboratory were covered under each accreditation/certification below.
Authority
North Carolina (VWV/SVV)
Program
State
Identification Number Expiration Date
269 12-31-23
The following analytes are included in this report, but the laboratory is not certified by the governing authority. This list may include analytes for which
the agency does not offer certification.
Analysis Method Prep Method Matrix Analyte
350.1-1993 R2.0 3-154 Solid Ammonia
351.2-1993 R2.0 Digestion Solid Nitrogen, Kjeldahl
Accreditation/Certification renewal pending - accreditation/certification considered valid.
[a
12
13
74
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 18 of 27 3/9/2023

Accreditation/Certification Summary
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates Job ID: 752-3600-1
Project/Site: City of Lumberton
Laboratory: Eurofins Savannah (Continued)
Unless otherwise noted, all analytes for this laboratory were covered under each accreditation/certification below.
Authority Program Identification Number Expiration Date
The following analytes are included in this report, but the laboratory is not certified by the governing authority. This list may include analytes for which
the agency does not offer certification.
Analysis Method Prep Method
Matrix
Analyte
353.2-1993 R2.0
Solid
Nitrate Nitrite as N
365.4-1974 Digestion
Solid
Phosphorus
Moisture
Solid
Percent Solids
SM 254OG
Solid
Total Solids
in
12
13
74
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 19 of 27 3/9/2023

Method Summary
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Project/Site: City of Lumberton
Job ID: 752-3600-1
Method
Method Description
Protocol
Laboratory
20B
Sodium Adsorption Ratio
USDA
EET PIT
6010D
Metals (ICP)
SW846
EET SAV
7471 B
Mercury (CVAA)
SW846
EET SAV
350.1-1993 R2.0
Nitrogen, Ammonia
MCAVWV
EET SAV
351.2-1993 R2.0
Nitrogen, Total Nitrogen
MCAVWV
EET SAV
353.2-1993 R2.0
Nitrogen, Nitrate -Nitrite
MCAVWV
EET SAV
365.4-1974
Phosphorus, Total
EPA
EET SAV
9045D
pH
SW846
EET ESC
Moisture
Percent Moisture
EPA
EET SAV
SM 2540G
Total, Fixed, and Volatile Solids
SM
EET SAV
3050B
Preparation, Metals
SW846
EET SAV
3-154
Ammonia ( Sediments)
EPA
EET SAV
7471 B
Preparation, Mercury
SW846
EET SAV
DI Leach
Deionized Water Leaching Procedure
ASTM
EET ESC
DI Leach
Deionized Water Leaching Procedure
ASTM
EET SAV
Digestion
Digestion, Hot Block
EPA
EET SAV
Protocol References:
ASTM = ASTM International
EPA= US Environmental Protection Agency
MCAVWV = "Methods For Chemical Analysis Of Water And Wastes", EPA-600/4-79-020, March 1983 And Subsequent Revisions.
SM = "Standard Methods For The Examination Of Water And Wastewater"
SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates.
USDA = "USDA Agriculture Handbook 60, section 2013".
Laboratory References:
EET ESC = Eurofins Raleigh, 102-A Woodwinds Industrial Court, Cary, NC 27511, TEL [phone]
EET PIT = Eurofins Pittsburgh, 301 Alpha Drive, RIDC Park, Pittsburgh, PA 15238, TEL [phone]
EET SAV = Eurofins Savannah, 5102 LaRoche Avenue, Savannah, GA 31404, TEL [phone]
11
12
13
74
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 20 of 27 3/9/2023

Sample Summary
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates
Project/Site: City of Lumberton
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Matrix Collected Received
752-3600-1 Q1-2 TCLP WWTP Solid 02/27/23 09:00 02/27/23 13:22
752-3600-2 Q1-2 WTP
Solid 02/27/23 09:30 02/27/23 13:22
Job ID: 752-3600-1
12
13
74
Page 21 of 27
Eurofins §4403

r
O
U
_m
.0
CD CO
N �
0' 3 LO r-
Vi O N
o U
w 3 Z rn
N O
W o U a
v
U U
N N
ZM
C O V O ON V 9 C Qa v1 ry a
ON O
C
^L•'
C
C
C
N O Z N m a u1 U 2 N L
= Z¢ Z Z Z 2 H¢ i a F o
� U
v
N
E
lO
E
A
E
C
G
'O
�
C
r
Vd
aUQV
tdO)
N
Nouo ¢ c ¢F Q
o
M
A
f0
SZ
N2Z�z
uoww of
G O
O lL
0 r
U
O-
a
a
a
.a O
'O j
S
saeu)e;uoo jo jagwnN le3oy
"
Q
i
c
E�
E
E
z
, • U _
E .o
�
~
0
o
d
0
Hd - 09406
m
v m
Z,
E
v
N
fa
3
as
4'S9£'Z'LS£
^
y
N Q
N N
ro p
w
)
-E
E
Z`
(D
xON - said Z'£S£
Z
d
t
BIUOWWV-LOS£
Z�
-_
0)
y
v
a
slalaW 40L09-OOL09
Z
2
Qf
o
CA
Q
c
U
U
C
uopenoo 14B!em tiO - einlslow
'Z
L
.,
o.
N
r4
2
a
a
a
E
sPlloS lelol - 00179Z
Z:
_
N
au
d
v
oleo ays OIeD ays eoz
�
_
12
R
0
w
Un
Un
s
2 N
m
_ L
i
(oN Jo sak) aldweg paja;lld plald
le n
`U.
O
O
c
c
c
IC
C�
E T V 8,
a d
EF.
��
O
Y
Nfn
N
N
c
C
m
N
a
-
y
N
v c
A
L
d£ o
a
I(J
E
E
E
o
o
E
a
CD
o r
0
�
�
�3
a
ca
w�
q
(n
a
0
O
O
. _j
ti
a
f.
C
L
C
N
CL
co
N
U
Z
��
L_
cQ
I
CO
o
>
a
a)
e
—
o
Of
CO
1
°
E
E
E
c
d
E
r
o
v -o
c
—` �`
an d
c
O
E
CO N
++
c=
o >•
aW
O
L
ao
a N
c
c
E
m
Z
m
Y
O
C
Qi
U U
6 O
m C
a 7
O
M
d M
E N
7 m
i.J
U
Z
c
L
_ V
E
2CL
(J
ui
E
b
=
c
c
U
V
dU
U
E=
U
ach
¢
cJ in
r
a
E
w
o
a
iq
R
N
.r
O
a.
m
0
E
w
e 22 of 27
3/9/2023

i
t^
i
p
o
c
� a
_o
�
I
O
ra
h
h
d
� O
� C
N �
G v
4
OD
7 �
P
V
C
V C
O
L
4 C I
i
l
J
Y
�
O
U
O
U
�
�
c
�
O
Nc
C UL°'
C
C
Z of
., N CO
C
w o U �
:?
m
>,
N
m c
O
u� N
M O o
N
a E
pON OOp ON UUS!v t
a.•
S ZQ Z ZZSI-dam
O
c
,O
m
•V
m
D >L
n N
m L
S v `m. QS
J Q a U
U m -- m m E p p ••
�
Szr:l'zz�a¢uoww t
�3
n
a_
4UpwwC4=_-�YJ o
,W,
N
N
co
m
PO4low leo01(cow) tale0 ayg 80ZIi.`hX I X 1 I I I I I i I
!rl
N
t`
_ a a
o o
(i Vi
d E co
E CL m mz
m t- It 11
Y��
w E E
aE.:;o ac m
E z s: y
a co c, LL�j
d
N N N
N
,f
m N
L �
V- rn U
- c
m J
I7
C
C
5
on
a
C
E
E
E`
E
t o c
� c c
Ol L
o
= P
N
E ; w
Q
N
N
aSc
m
�1
E
E
E m
w- E
m
Q
E
m
w
N
u
•C]
L
O
p
O
~ C v
o
h J
)
u
y
co
0
y
mm
a
(D
a c U
mE6
O
E
o c CLJ
w•
= N N
\ �
V
N
o .
j
c
N j N
O~
O
m
E
E m
O- c
a
a
E
UO O=
o
H zlE
Q N
G
a
2:
2t
N
p?}
U
U
U
p�
Q
2 9 a
E
m
n
o6
E
N
2 O U
m E
D N CO
G
C
C
a m
E
c
E
E N N
U
J
U
N
L
F N �
� C P
U a
ro
_
n:sxY
p m p
m
� Nm
m
N
E
E
E
mmr
cu
g
m
v
C N
nN
0
E a�
o
co
W m m
c 0 "
� d c
W
ni uJ E
v
m
m W
Q
v
ocW
z
n E
O
U)
w'
7
a
c
O
vj
c
c m
a
Q
=
D
U
m E
=
s`
�d0
a
'
m t oo
h
m
s
5z
m o
O c m
U)
.°n
o n
a m
o
CL
0
W
ir
_, P gP 23of 27 r X 3/9/2023

I
0
z
0 V 0 0
0 w
x Z%��', 0��aj
0 T.2
. M�
2
z 7 FT o
0 2i z OaOwmF- n
w
r
o
E
0
o
u
0
0
L)
<
Or t6 N3 �f ZG
Q
W
0 (D
(D
Z < 0
1: -E < 0
0 TW
z
0
a)
C?
it C,
h
C)
w 1: , . E
z z < <
0 z El w w
2
C>
0
LO
2 4
(D
2 w
.I
I-
I < co L) a w 1: y
CL
'65 .
'E!
E
E
E 12 A
0 s
C�
E
0
i-5 t,4
z
M
m
6�
a
CD
6
0(
0
1
Z
E
76 0
0
z
0)
p0qiew ILOO-1 (Clow) /einIsloW
x
X
0
6r) z
d)
E
rr
a)
)119;OH d IS061Cl/t,99C
x
x
R
0
E
0
OE
a)
:3
NIMOH-d-Iss6la/Z M
x
x
0
m
pomew 1U30-1 ((Ioyy) /E)Opgz
x
x
>
2
W
HDV3-1-101s9Jd-Z M
x
x
0
c
Lm
C 2 .
0
2
eluoWmvM Mosr
X
X
a)
5 cu
E
Islelow
sdaid Bulpnioul 9� C� (OOW) soqoe/00�09.
x
X
c
m
N
C:
c
2 0
'6 z
t6 02
m
ff
w
0
0
doJd-
ERLOLIGUOL
x
x
4i
le! 2
dam
E
m
CL
0)
0
co
E
a
65
0- C:
x
3 U-
Lb U)
-0
U)
U)
F= E
c
0
E
E
M. E
c)-2
2 dam.,0
CL m F m
0 '0
E CL 0
It
U)
0
cli
c3 E
C� c E
j
E E•6
m 2
m
m0)
(n
w
U)
w
w
cu
(10
E
>
2
CO
:s 0
0 ru
0
04
C>
u
(0
CL
E
E
E
7a
M
o
0
U)
IM
'ru
a_
cl m
a-
10
a-F-
an)0
E
0
0
ul
0 vl*
2 -0 F'
N
min E
2
>
7V
w
0
z
2
03
0
:F�
LL
is 2
U)
0
w
>
ao
W
rn
C)
-2
c
0
—
CD
CO
.3
u
F-
C?
C\l
u
I
C-4
E
t�.
z
0
t
a)
D
c
r
0
LO
a
a)
'43
C,)
(D
E
a)
C:
u
0)
(D
-C
0
z
>
(1)
tq
1?
N
LO
-6 i5
:3
Q.
r
0
4)
w
0
00
00
r�
a)
F=
P
CL
-�,
Q)
Q)
a)
u
LL
(1)
m
.
0
Iq
14
E :3
(D
-j
C)
11 5�
.,
-0
r
CL
q--
2
-j
C:
>
q
to
15
E
2!
S.
-3
(n
E
0 Z,
w
U)
10
�;
E
m
Z
E
EL
T,
U
0
w
Q�
uj
w
a
w
w
Page 24 of 27
3/9/2023

Login Sample Receipt Checklist
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates Job Number: 752-3600-1
Login Number: 3600
List Number: 1
Creator: Yonish, Rachel
Question
List Source: Eurofins Raleigh
Answer Comment
Radioactivity wasn't checked or is </= background as measured by a survey
True
meter.
The cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact.
True
Sample custody seals, if present, are intact.
True
The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or
True
tampered with.
Samples were received on ice.
True
Cooler Temperature is acceptable.
True
Cooler Temperature is recorded.
True
COC is present.
True
COC is filled out in ink and legible.
True
COC is filled out with all pertinent information.
True
Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC?
True
There are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC.
True
Samples are received within Holding Time (excluding tests with immediate
True
HTs)
Sample containers have legible labels.
True
Containers are not broken or leaking.
True
Sample collection date/times are provided.
True
Appropriate sample containers are used.
True
Sample bottles are completely filled.
True
Sample Preservation Verified.
True
There is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested
True
MS/MSDs
Containers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is
True
<6mm (1/4").
Multiphasic samples are not present.
True
Samples do not require splitting or compositing.
True
Residual Chlorine Checked.
True
12
13
14
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 25 of 27 3/9/2023

Login Sample Receipt Checklist
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates Job Number: 752-3600-1
Login Number: 3600
List Number: 3
Creator: Watson, Debbie
Question
List Source: Eurofins Pittsburgh
List Creation: 03/01/23 12:43 PM
Answer Comment
Radioactivity wasn't checked or is </= background as measured by a survey
N/A
meter.
The cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact.
True
Sample custody seals, if present, are intact.
True
The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or
True
tampered with.
Samples were received on ice.
True
Cooler Temperature is acceptable.
True
Cooler Temperature is recorded.
True
COC is present.
True
COC is filled out in ink and legible.
True
COC is filled out with all pertinent information.
True
Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC?
N/A
There are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC.
True
Samples are received within Holding Time (excluding tests with immediate
True
HTs)
Sample containers have legible labels.
True
Containers are not broken or leaking.
True
Sample collection date/times are provided.
True
Appropriate sample containers are used.
True
Sample bottles are completely filled.
True
Sample Preservation Verified.
True
There is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested
True
MS/MSDs
Containers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is
True
<6mm (1/4").
Multiphasic samples are not present.
True
Samples do not require splitting or compositing.
True
Residual Chlorine Checked.
N/A
12
13
14
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 26 of 27 3/9/2023

Login Sample Receipt Checklist
Client: Hunt Environmental Associates Job Number: 752-3600-1
Login Number: 3600
List Number: 2
Creator: Sims, Robert D
Question
List Source: Eurofins Savannah
List Creation: 02/28/23 11:23 AM
Answer Comment
Radioactivity wasn't checked or is </= background as measured by a survey
N/A
meter.
The cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact.
True
Sample custody seals, if present, are intact.
True
The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or
True
tampered with.
Samples were received on ice.
True
Cooler Temperature is acceptable.
True
Cooler Temperature is recorded.
True
COC is present.
True
COC is filled out in ink and legible.
True
COC is filled out with all pertinent information.
True
Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC?
True
There are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC.
True
Samples are received within Holding Time (excluding tests with immediate
True
HTs)
Sample containers have legible labels.
True
Containers are not broken or leaking.
True
Sample collection date/times are provided.
True
Appropriate sample containers are used.
True
Sample bottles are completely filled.
True
Sample Preservation Verified.
N/A
There is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested
True
MS/MSDs
Containers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is
N/A
<6mm (1/4").
Multiphasic samples are not present.
True
Samples do not require splitting or compositing.
True
Residual Chlorine Checked.
N/A
12
13
14
Eurofins Raleigh
Page 27 of 27 3/9/2023

LAND APPLICATION SITE CERTIFICATIONS

State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
DWR Division of Water Resources
15A NCAC 02T A 100 — LAND OWNER AGREEMENT
Dlvlsion of Water Resources FORM: LOA 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted the Apolicant shall submit one original and two copies of the a lication and
suoporting documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non -Discharge Permitting Unit.
General — This document is an agreement between the Applicant and land owner(s) of residuals receiving sites for land application of
Class B residuals (may include water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .I 100. Do not submit
this agreement for review without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 0646).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Land Owner Agreement (FORM: LOA 06-16):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16) form. Please do
not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to
the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
® Prepare a separate agreement for each set of land application sites that are owned or operated by an entity other than the
Applicant.
® A copy of the completed and appropriately executed agreement must be provided to the landowner and the lessee/operator.
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUALS TO PRIVATELY OWNED LAND
The undersigned landowner or his representative hereby permits:
Applicant's name: Arrin Ozzell Baker
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to land apply residuals from the following facility(ies) onto the following land
application site(s) (i.e., see attached setback maps) in accordance with the stipulations and restrictions as given in this
Agreement:
Residuals Source Special note
Site/Field 1D Lease Land Use Intended Use of Crops (no-till/over-seed/
(yes/no) Cropping Patterns (optional) pasture)
Animal Feed City of Lumberton
NC-RO-16-1 N Row Crops WWTP
NC-RO-16-2 N Row Crops Animal Feed City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-RO-16-3 N Row Crops Animal Feed City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-RO-16-4 N Row Crops Animal Feed City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-RO-16-5 N Row Crops Animal Feed City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-RO-16-G N Row Crops Animal Feed City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-RO-lb-7 N Row' Crops Animal Feed City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-RO-16-B N Row Crops Animal Feed City of Lumberton
WWTP
The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the Permittee
receives, in consideration, the use of the land application site(s) described above for the disposal of the residuals.
This Agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division's permit for the residuals land application program and shall be renewed
each time this permit is renewed.
The undersigned landowner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions and stipulations until such
time as written notification, given 30 calendar days in advance, modifies or cancels this .Agreement.
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page I of

STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative shall not enter into any additional residuals application contracts or agreements with another permitted
entity for the site(s) specified by this Agreement,
2. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land application site(s) to a third parry, the landowner shall
be responsible to ensure that the third party agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
3. The landowner or his representative shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement until all of the site restrictions (under Section 11) are met.
4. Notification of cancellation of this Agreement shall be immediately forwarded to NCDENR-DWR, Non -Discharge Permitting Unit, 1617 Mail
Service Center. Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.
5. The Permittee must request and obtain a permit modification from the Division prior to a transfer of the land application site(s) to a new
landowner. In addition, the current landowner shall give a notice to the new landowner that gives full details of the residuals applied at the land
application site(s).
6. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning the residuals land application program,
including an analysis of constituents of the residuals. residuals application methods, schedules for typical cropping patterns, a description of the
equipment used by the Permittee.
7. The Permittee will provide the landowner or his representative with a copy of the residuals permit prior to commencement of any residuals land
application event and a copy of the results of each soil analysis.
8. If the soil pH of the land application site(s) is not maintained at 6.0 or greater, sufficient amounts of time shall be applied to achieve a final soil
pH of at least 6.0, unless an agronomist provides information indicating that the pH of the soil, residuals and lime mixture is suitable for the
specified crop.
9. The landowner or his representative and the Permittee will agree on residuals application rates and schedules based on crop patterns, results of
soil samples, and the permitted application limits.
10. The landowner or his representative will provide the Permittee with information regarding the amount and analysis ofother sources of nutrients
(e.g., fertilizer, unregulated animal waste, etc.) that have been applied to the land application site(s).
1 I. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns for
the land application sites) prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule residuals land application
events at appropriate periods.
12. Specific residuals land application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on the land application site(s) by the Permittee, the landowner, or
his representative prior to and during a residuals land application event.
13. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, local officials, and State officials or their representatives to; enter and
inspect any property, premises, or place on or related to the land application site(s) at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining
compliance with the permit; establish monitoring facilities on or near the land application site(s) as required by the permit; copy any records
that must be kept under the terms and conditions of the permit; take necessary leachate, surface water. groundwater, or soil samples during the
term of, and 12 months after termination of, this Agreement..
II. RESTRICTIONS:
1. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee and/or the landowner or his representative to control public access to the land application
site(s) during active use and for the 12-month period following a residuals land application event. Such controls may include the posting of
signs that indicate the activities being conducted at the land application site(s).
2. Animals shall not be grazed on the land application site(s) for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event. land application
sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods after such residuals land application
events.
3. Food crops, feed crops, and fiber crops shall not be harvested for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event.
4. Food crops with harvested parts that touch the residuals/soil mixture and are totally above the land surface shall not be harvested for a 14-month
period following a residuals land application event.
5_ Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 20-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for four months or longer prior to incorporation into the soil.
6. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 38-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for less than four months prior to incorporation into the soil.
7. Turf grown on land where residuals are applied shall not be harvested for a 12-month period following a residuals land application event.
III. ALTERNATIVES FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS INSIDE THE COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY: (please check one)
15A NCAC 021.0107(d) prohibits water supply wells within the compliance boundary. However, 15A NCAC 02T .0105(h) allows the compliance
boundary to be placed closer to the waste disposal area- such that the water supply well is situated outside of the compliance boundary provided
the groundwater standards can be met at the newly -established compliance boundary. Please mark one of the following;
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is needed for field(s) ID:
(Please include the rationale for the requested re -location of the compliance boundary and attach a map showing the newly proposed compliance
boundary to the application package)
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is not needed for this site.
IV. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FIELD TRANSFER: (if needed)
❑ The land application field(s) ID: , is currently permitted under another residuals land application program: Permit Number WQ:_
. The land owner hereby acknowledge that by signing this agreement. he/she is requesting that the field(s) be removed from the
previously permitted residuals land application program and transferred into the new program;
(Name of the new program)
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 2 of 3

Landowner's Certification:
I certify that I am a deeded landowner of the above -referenced land application site(s) and am authorized to make decisions
regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of other deeded landowners OR that I am otherwise authorized, through
a power of attorney or other legal delegation, to make decisions regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of the
deeded landowners. 1 certify that the above -referenced land application site(s) are not included in any waste disposal contract or
agreement with another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity. Furthermore, I certify that I have read this Agreement,
understand the stipulations, restrictions, alternatives for water supply wells inside the compliance boundary, acknowledgement of
field transfer, and do hereby grant permission to the Perm ittee to land apply residuals to the land application site(s) as specified
herein. `
Landowner name: tr
V
city: ?4 m"ac_ State: C_ Zip: 2.03 7Z
Phone: E-mail address: 4a r VA a.
Signature: Date: Z
NORTH CAROLINA, Obe COUNTY
I, the undersigned Notary Public do hereby certify that f Y
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
-�
WITNESS my hand and official sea] this the s
GAN
day of Mar( i( _ •
Signature and sea]: x•
My commission expires: AUB 1=� .
TW
'�rtr
Lessee's/Operator's Certification:
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee/operator name:
Address:
City:
Phone:
Signature:
Permittee's Certification:
State:
E-mail
Date:
Zip:
] certify that I have read this Agreement an[d d�o,he1r-ebbyy agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Signing official name: COr� "� 7
Signature:
Date:
,ZDpa,
FORM: LOA 06- l 6 Page 3 of 3

State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
DWR Division of Water Resources
15A NCAC 02T .I100 —LANDOWNER AGREEMENT
Division of Water Resources
FORM: LOA 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and
supporting documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non-Disc'hat-ge Permitting Unit.
General —This document is an agreement between the Applicant and land owner(s) of residuals receiving sites for land application of
Class B residuals (may include water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with 15A NCAC 021 .I 100. Do not submit
this agreement for review without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 06-16).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Land Owner Agreement (FORM: LOA 06-I6):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16) form. Please do
not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to
the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
® Prepare a separate agreement for each set of land application sites that are owned or operated by an entity other than the
Applicant.
® A copy of the completed and appropriately executed agreement must be provided to the landowner and the lessee/operator.
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUALS TO PRIVATELY OWNED LAND
The undersigned landowner or his representative hereby permits:
Applicant's name: James T Campen; Mary Spey Surles
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to land apply residuals from the following facility(ies) onto the following land
application site(s) (i.e., see attached setback maps) in accordance with the stipulations and restrictions as given in this
Agreement:
Lease Land Use or Residuals Source Special note
Site/Field 1D Intended Use of Crops (no-till./over-seed/
(yeslno) Cropping Patterns (optional) pasture)
NC-RO-16-16 V Row Crops Animal Feed City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-RO-16-17 Y Row Crops Animal Feed City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-RO-16-18 Y Row Crops Animal Feed City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-RO-16-19 l' Row Crops Animal Feed City of Lumberton
WWTP
The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the Permittee
receives, in consideration, the use of the land application site(s) described above for the disposal of the residuals.
This Agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division's permit for the residuals land application program and shall be renewed
each time this permit is renewed.
The undersigned landowner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions and stipulations until such
time as written notification, given 30 calendar days in advance, modifies or cancels this Agreement.
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page I of

-1. STIPULATIONS:
I. The landowner or his representative shall not enter into any additional residuals application contracts or agreements with another permitted
entity for the site(s) specified by this Agreement.
2. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land application site(s) to a third party, the landowner shall
be responsible to ensure that the third party agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
3. The landowner or his representative shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement until all of the site restrictions (under Section I1) are met.
4. Notification of cancellation of this Agreement shal I be immediately forwarded to NCDENR-DWR, Non -Discharge Permitting Unit, 1617 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.
S. The Permittee must request and obtain a permit modification from the Division prior to a transfer of the land application site(s) to a ne%N
landowner. In addition, the current landowner shall give a notice to the new landowner that gives full details of the residuals applied at the land
application site(s).
6. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning the residuals land application program,
including an analysis of constituents of the residuals, residuals application methods, schedules for typical cropping patterns, a description of the
equipment used by the Permittee.
7. The Permittee will provide the landowner or his representative with a copy of the residuals permit prior to commencement of any residuals land
application event and a copy of the results of each soil analysis.
8. If the soil pH of the land application site(s) is not maintained at 6.0 or greater, sufficient amounts of lime shall be applied to achieve a final soil
pH of at least 6.0. unless an agronomist provides information indicating that the pH of the soil, residuals and lime mixture is suitable for the
specified crop.
9. The landowner or his representative and the Permittee will agree on residuals application rates and schedules based on crop patterns, results of
soil samples, and the permitted application limits.
10. The landowner or his representative will provide the Permittee with information regarding the amount and analysis of other sources of nutrients
(e.g., fertilizer, unregulated animal waste, etc.) that have been applied to the land application site(s).
11. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns for
the land application site(s) prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule residuals land application
events at appropriate periods.
12. Specific residuals land application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on the land application site(s) by the Permittee, the landowner, or
his representative prior to and during a residuals land application event.
13. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, local officials, and State officials or their representatives to; enter and
inspect any property, premises, or place on or related to the land application site(s) at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining
compliance with the permit; establish monitoring facilities on or near the land application site(s) as required by the permit copy any records
that must be kept under the terms and conditions of the permit; take necessary leachate, surface water, groundwater. or soil samples during the
term of, and 12 months after termination of. this Agreement.
11. RESTRICTIONS:
L Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee and/or the landowner or his representative to control public access to the land application
site(s) during active use and for the 12-month period following a residuals land application event. Such controls may include the posting of
signs that indicate the activities being conducted at the land application site(s).
2. Animals shall not be grazed on the land application site(s) for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event. Land application
sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods after such residuals land application
events.
3. Food crops, feed crops, and fiber crops shall not be harvested for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event.
4. Food crops with harvested parts that touch the residuals/soil mixture and are totally above the land surface shall not be harvested for a 14-month
period following a residuals land application event.
5. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 20-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for four months or longer prior to incorporation into the soil.
6. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 38-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for less than four months prior to incorporation into the soil.
7. Turf grown on land where residuals are applied shall not be harvested for a 12-month period following a residuals land application event.
II'LALTERNATIVES FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS INSIDE THE COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY: (please check one)
15A NCAC 02L .0107(d) prohibits water supply wcl Is within the compliance boundary. However, 15A NCAC 02`1' .0105(h) allows the compliance
boundary to be placed closer to the waste disposal area, such that the water supply well is situated outside of the compliance boundary provided
the groundwater standards can be met at the newly -established compliance boundary. Please mark one of the following;
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is needed for field(s) ID:.
(Please include the rationale for the requested re -location of the compliance boundary and attach a map showing the newly proposed compliance
boundary to the application package)
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is not needed for this site.
IV. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FIELD TRANSFER: (if needed)
❑ The land application field(s) ID: , is currently permitted under another residuals land application program; Permit Number WQ:J
. The land owner hereby acknowledge that by signing this agreement, he/she is requesting that the field(s) be removed from the
previously permitted residuals land application program and transferred into the new program;
(Name of the new program)
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 2 of 3

Landowner's Certification:
I certify that I am a deeded landowner of the above -referenced land application site(s) and am authorized to make decisions
regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of other deeded landowners OR that I am otherwise authorized, through
a power of attorney or other legal delegation, to make decisions regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of the
deeded landowners. I certify that the above -referenced land application site(s) are not included in any waste disposal contract or
agreement with another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity. Furthermore, I certify that I have read this Agreement.
understand the stipulations, restrictions, alternatives for water supply wells inside the compliance boundary, acknowledgement of
field transfer, and do hereby grant permission to the Permittee to land apply residuals to the land application site(s) as specified
herein.
1
Landowner name:
Address:3, ��_ 4 25 3 ` A
city: 1W :i e"^fg5 State: A,11, zip: 5, 7 7
Phone:/d 7�1_Lf Z�}� E-mail address:
Signature: Date: Z Z 2_'
1 If
NORTH CAROLINA. COUNTY
1, the undersigned Notary Public do hereby certify that
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my brand and official seal this the
day of ' Y 1v\�f G� 20 1- '
a
Signature and seal:
My commission expires:
Lessee's/Operator's Certification:
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee/operator name: r +'
Address:
City: rD V6 v State: &I C zip:
Phone: 9 Z l E-mail address:41 rm e r �C of' (� —
Signature: Date: 2 r ZO 2
Permittee's Certification:
I certify that I have read this Agreement and doherebyagree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Signing official name: cy r""oJ"
Signature:
Date: 3 #1-7 /202 2
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 3 of 3

Llh4;�
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Division of Water Resources
15A NCAC 02T .1100 — LAND OWNER AGREEMENT
FORM: LOA 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and
supporting documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non-Dischat:ge Permitting Unit.
General — This document is an agreement between the Applicant and land owner(s) of residuals receiving sites for land application of
Class B residuals (may include water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1100. Do not submit
this agreement for review without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 06-16).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Land Owner Agreement (FORM: LOA 06-16):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16) form. Please do
not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to
the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
® Prepare a separate agreement for each set of land application sites that are owned or operated by an entity other than the
Applicant.
® A copy of the completed and appropriately executed agreement must be provided to the landowner and the lessee/operator.
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUALS TO PRIVATELY OWNED LAND
The undersigned landowner or his representative hereby permits:
Applicant's name: City of Lumberton
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to land apply residuals from the following facility(ies) onto the following land
application site(s) (i.e., see attached setback maps) in accordance with the stipulations and restrictions as given in this
Agreement:
Site/Field ID
Lease
Land Use or
Intended Use of Crops
Residuals Source
Special note
(no-till/over-seed/
(yes/no)
Cropping Patterns
(optional)
pasture)
NC-RO-17-1
Y
Row Crops
Animal Feed
City of Lumberton
WWTP
Animal Feed
City of Lumberton
NC-RO-17-2
Y
Row Crops
WWTP
NC-RO-17-4
Y
Row Crops
Animal Feed
City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-RO-17-4A
Y
Row Crops
Animal Feed
City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-RO-17-6
Y
Row Crops
Animal Feed
City of Lumberton
WWTP
The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the
Permittee receives, in consideration, the use of the land application site(s) described above for the disposal of the residuals.
This Agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division's permit for the residuals land application program and
shall be renewed each time this permit is renewed.
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 1 of 3

1. STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative shall not enter into any additional residuals application contracts or agreements with another permitted
entity for the site(s) specified by this Agreement.
2. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land application site(s) to a third party, the landowner shall
be responsible to ensure that the third party agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
3. The landowner or his representative shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement until all of the site restrictions (under Section II) are met.
4. Notification of cancellation of this Agreement shall be immediately forwarded to NCDENR-DWR, Non-Dischargc Permitting Unit, 1617 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.
5. The Permittee must request and obtain a permit modification from the Division prior to a transfer of the land application site(s) to a new
landowner. In addition, the current landowner shall give a notice to the new landowner that gives full details of the residuals applied at the land
application site(s).
6. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning the residuals land application program,
including an analysis of constituents of the residuals, residuals application methods, schedules for typical cropping patterns, a description of the
equipment used by the Permittee.
7. The Permittee will provide the landowner or his representative with a copy of the residuals permit prior to commencement of any residuals land
application event and a copy of the results of each soil analysis.
8. If the soil pH of the land application site(s) is not maintained at 6.0 or greater, sufficient amounts of lime shall be applied to achieve a final soil
pH of at least 6.0, unless an agronomist provides information indicating that the pH of the soil, residuals and lime mixture is suitable for the
specified crop.
9. The landowner or his representative and the Permittee will agree on residuals application rates and schedules based on crop patterns, results of
soil samples, and the permitted application limits.
10. The landowner or his representative will provide the Permittee with information regarding the amount and analysis of other sources of nutrients
(e.g., fertilizer, unregulated animal waste, etc.) that have been applied to the land application site(s).
11. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns for
the land application site(s) prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule residuals land application
events at appropriate periods.
12. Specific residuals land application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on the land application site(s) by the Permittee, the landowner, or
his representative prior to and during a residuals land application event.
13. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, local officials, and State officials or their representatives to; enter and
inspect any property. premises, or place on or related to the land application site(s) at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining
compliance with the permit; establish monitoring facilities on or near the land application site(s) as required by the permit; copy any records
that must be kept under the terms and conditions of the permit; take necessary leachate, surface water, groundwater, or soil samples during the
term of. and 12 months after termination of, this Agreement.
11. RESTRICTIONS:
1. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee and/or the landowner or his representative to control public access to the land application
site(s) during active use and for the 12-month period following a residuals land application event. Such controls may include the posting of
signs that indicate the activities being conducted at the land application site(s).
2. Animals shall not be grazed on the land application site(s) for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event. band application
sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods after such residuals land application
events.
3. Food crops, feed crops, and fiber crops shall not be harvested for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event.
4. Food crops with harvested parts that touch the residuals/soil mixture and are totally above the land surface shall not be harvested for a 14-month
period following a residuals land application event.
5. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 20-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for four months or longer prior to incorporation into the soil.
6, Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 38-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for less than four months prior to incorporation into the soil.
7. Turf grown on land where residuals are applied shall not be harvested for a 12-month period following a residuals land application event.
III. ALTERNATIVES FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS INSIDE THE COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY: (please check one)
5A NCAC 02L A107(d) prohibits water supply wells within the compliance boundary. However, 15A NCAC 02T .0105 h allows the compliance
boundary to be placed closer to the waste disposal area, such that the water supply well is situated outside of the compliance boundary provided
the groundwater standards can be met at the newly -established compliance boundary. Please mark out of the following;
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is needed for field(s) ID:
(Please include the rationale far the requested re -location of the compliance boundary and attach a map showing the newly proposed compliance
boundary to the application package)
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is not needed for this site.
IV. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FIELD TRANSFER: (if needed)
❑ The land application field(s) ID: , is currently permitted under another residuals land application program; Permit Number WQ:_
. The land owner hereby acknowledge that by signing this agreement, he/she is requesting that the field(s) be removed from the
previously permitted residuals land application program and transferred into the new program;
(Name of the new program)
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 2 of 3

(Name of the new proerant)
Landowner's Certification:
I certify, that I am a deeded landowner of the above -referenced land application site(s) and am authorized to make decisions
regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behall'ol'other deeded landowners OR that I am otherwise authorized, through
a power of attorney or other legal delegation, to make decisions regarding the use of the land application site(s, on behalf of the
deeded landowners. I certify that the above -referenced land application site(s) are not included in any waste disposal contract or
agreement with another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity. Furthermore, I certify that I have read this Agreement.
understand the stipulations, restrictions, alternatives for water supply wells inside the compliance boundary, acknowledgement of
field transfer, and do hereby grant permission to the Permittee to land apply residuals to the land application site(s) as specified
herein,
0y
I...andowner name: 01IrL. . -----
Address: go-( '*
City: Lvij\60� _State:A)c Zip:
I>
Phone: E-mail address: ...........
Signature: Date. !P -cam. 3
NORTH CAROLINA. COUNTY
t, the undersigned Notary Public do hereby certify that
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this, the. Illi,
day of
Signature and seal:
My commission expires:
Lessee's/Operator's CertificAtion-
I certify that I have read this
Lessee/operator name:
Address: &41
� T,
ment and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
City: state: �---Zip:
Phone: E-mail address)<10 A —
Signature'; Date: l ;0
Permittee*s Certification:
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Signing o cial name; 60 1 c4 w9ki" _
Signature:
Date: 1-2-3-2-1
FORM: I,OA 06-16 Page 3 ot'3

State of North Carolina
DWR
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
15A NCAC 02T .1100 — LANDOWNER AGREEMENT
Division of Water Resources
FORM: LOA 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and
surwortin2 documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non -Discharge Permitting Unit.
General — This document is an agreement between the Applicant and land owner(s) of residuals receiving sites for land application of
Class B residuals (may include water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with 1 SA NCAC 02T .I 100. Do not submit
this agreement for review without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 06-16).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Land Owner Agreement (FORM: LOA 06-16):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16) form. Please do
not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to
the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
® Prepare a separate agreement for each set of land application sites that are owned or operated by an entity other than the
Applicant.
® A copy of the completed and appropriately executed agreement must be provided to the landowner and the lessee/operator.
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUALS TO PRIVATELY OWNED LAND
The undersigned landowner or his representative hereby permits:
Applicant's name: City of Lumberton
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to land apply residuals from the following facility(ies) onto the following land
application site(s) (i.e., see attached setback maps) in accordance with the stipulations and restrictions as given in this
Agreement:
Residuals Source Special note
Site/Field ID Lease Land Use Intended Use of Crops (no-till/over-seed/
(yes/no) Cropping Patterns
rns (optional} pasture)
NC-RO-17-3 Y Row Crops Animal Feed City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-RO-17-5 Y Raw Crops Animal Feed City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-RO-l7-7 Y Row Crops Animal Feed City of Lumberton
WWTP
The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the
Perm ittee receives, in consideration, the use of the land application site(s) described above for the disposal of the residuals.
This Agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division's permit for the residuals land application program and
shall be renewed each time this permit is renewed.
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 1 of 3

This Agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division's permit for the residuals land application program and
shall be renewed each time this permit is renewed.
The undersigned landowner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions and
stipulations until such time as written notification, given 30 calendar days in advance, modifies or cancels this Agreement.
L STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative shall not enter into any additional residuals application contracts or agreements with another permitted
entity for the site(s) specified by this Agreement.
2. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land application site(s) to a third party, the landowner shall
be responsible to ensure that the third party agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
3. The landowner or his representative shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement until all of the site restrictions (under Section 11) are met,
4. Notification of cancellation of this Agreement shall be immediately forwarded to NCDENR-DWI?, Non -Discharge Permitting Unit, 1617 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.
5. The Permittee must request and obtain a permit modification from the Division prior to a transfer of the land application site(s) to a new
landowner. In addition, the current landowner shall give a notice to the new landowner that gives full details of the residuals applied at the land
application site(s).
6. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning the residuals land application program,
including an analysis of constituents of the residuals, residuals application methods, schedules for typical cropping patterns, a description of the
equipment used by the Permittee.
7. The Permittee will provide the landowner or his representative with a copy of the residuals permit prior to commencement of any residuals land
application event and a copy of the results of each soil analysis.
8. If the soil pH of the land application site(s) is not maintained at 6.0 or greater, sufficient amounts of lime shall be applied to achieve a final soil
pH of at least 6.0, unless an agronomist provides information indicating that the pH of the soil, residuals and lime mixture is suitable for the
specified crop.
9. The landowner or his representative and the Permittee will agree on residuals application rates and schedules based on crop patterns, results of
soil samples, and the permitted application limits.
10. The landowner or his representative will provide the Permittee with information regarding the amount and analysis of other sources of nutrients
(e.g., fertili7er, unregulated animal waste, etc.) that have been applied to the land application site(s).
11. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns for
the land application site(s) prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule residuals land application
events at appropriate periods.
12. Specific residuals land application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on the land application site(s) by the Permittee, the landowner, or
his representative prior to and during a residuals land application event.
13. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, local officials, and State officials or their representatives to; enter and
inspect any property, premises, or place on or related to the land application sitc(s) at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining
compliance with the permit, establish monitoring facilities on or near the land application site(s) as required by the permit; copy any records
that must be kept under the terms and conditions of the permit; take necessary leachate, surface water, groundwater, or soil samples during the
term of, and 12 months after termination of, this Agreement.
11. RESTRICTIONS:
1. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee and/or the landowner or his representative to control public access to the land application
site(s) during active use and for the 12-month period following a residuals land application event. Such controls may include the posting of
signs that indicate the activities being conducted at the land application site(s).
2. Animals shall not be grazed on the land application site(s) for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event. Land application
sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods after such residuals land application
events.
3. Food crops, feed crops, and fiber crops shall not be harvested for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event.
4. Food crops with harvested parts that touch the residuals/soil mixture and are totally above the land surface shall not be harvested for a 14-month
period following a residuals land application event.
5. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 20-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for four months or longer prior to incorporation into the soil.
6. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 38-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for less than four months prior to incorporation into the soil.
7. Turf grown on land where residuals are applied shall not be harvested for a 12-month period following a residuals land application event.
HLALTERNATIVES FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS INSIDE THE COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY: (please check one)
15A NCAC 02L .0107(d) prohibits water supply wells within the compliance boundary. However, 1.5A NCAC 02T _0105(h) allows the compliance
boundary to be placed closer to the waste disposal area, such that the water supply well is situated outside of the compliance boundary provided
the groundwater standards can be met at the newly -established compliance boundary. Please mark one of the following;
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is needed for field(s) ID:
(Please include the rationale for the requested re -location of the compliance boundary and attach a map showing the newly proposed compliance
boundary to the application package)
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is not needed for this site.
IV. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FIELD TRANSFER: (if needed)
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 2 of 3

Landowner's Certification:
I certify that I am a deeded landowner of the above -referenced land application site(s) and am authorized to make decisions
regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of other deeded landowners OR that I am otherwise authorized, through
a power of attorney or other legal delegation, to make decisions regarding the use of the land application sites) on behalf of the
deeded landowners. I certify that the above -referenced land application site(s) are not included in any waste disposal contract or
agreement with another municipality. contractor. or other permitted entity. Furthermore, I certify that I have read this Agreement.
understand the stipulations, restrictions, alternatives for water supply wells inside the compliance boundary, acknowledgement of
field transfer. and do hereby grant permission to the Pertnittee to land Apply residuals to the land application site(s) as specified
herein.
Landowner name: W,.,L
Address
City: -w"` state: u C _..__ Zip: �35
Phone: �0� ( E-mail address: 14tu, Nlf Ct..
Signature: r3 ����—`r.�.......__._ l::)ate:
NORTH CAROLINA, b� e_ < 0 COUNTY
I, the undersigned Notary Public do hereby certify that N _ Zt► .� ... .>>ii►ttitttttl
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution ofthe forgoing instrumer►t►�J„ �.« ..
WITNESS my hand and offici I seal this the -
day of ?t) y i'e _
- _._..
Signature and seal: ._....-_...-... � ..�_ _.... _. 'r!�Cs7�..-..__..�1...,._V
My commission
Lessee's/Operator's Certification;
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
I..essee•'operator name:
Address:
C"ity: .... c� State: Q�.(i- Zip:
Phone: _.. 12V *I- E-mail address: L01 ei�' ! 1)'4 40 A Ar�•��__ —__
Signature; _ _ J C �� - Date: �� i % 2 2_
Perrnittee's C'ertiCcation:
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Signing official name:
4v5
Signature: -.>.___..__.__......__ Date;
FORM- LOA 06- I b Page 3 of

DWR
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Division of Water Resources
15A NCAC 02T .1100— LAND OWNER AGREEMENT
FORM: LOA 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted the A22licant shall submit one original and two co ies of the application and
supportine documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section 's Non -Discharge Permitting Unit.
General — This document is an agreement between the Applicant and land owner(s) of residuals receiving sites for land application of
Class 8 residuals (may include water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1100. Do not submit
this agreement for review without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 06-16).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Land Owner Agreement (FORM: LOA 06-16):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16) form. Please do
not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to
the application may be made. as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
® Prepare a separate agreement for each set of land application sites that are owned or operated by an entity other than the
Applicant.
® A copy of the completed and appropriately executed agreement must be provided to the landowner and the lessee/operator.
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUALS TO PRIVATELY OWNED LAND
The undersigned landowner or his representative hereby permits:
Applicant's name: Ronald Hammonds
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to land apply residuals from the following facility(ies) onto the following land
application site(s) (i.e., see attached setback snaps) in accordance with the stipulations and restrictions as given in this
Agreement:
Site/Field ID
Lease
Land Use or
Intended Use of Crops
Residuals Source
Special note
(no-till/over-seed/
(yesJno)
Cropping Patterns
(optional)
pasture)
NC-RO-20-3
N
Pasture/Hay
Pasture/Hay
City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-RO-20-6
N
Row Crops
Pasture/Hay
City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-RO-20-7
N
Row Crops
PasturelHay
City of Lumberton
WWTP
_
NC-RO-20-8
N
Row Crops
Animal Feed
City of Lumberton
WWTP
The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the
Permittee receives, in consideration, the use of the land application site(s) described above for the disposal of the residuals.
This Agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division's permit for the residuals land application program and
shall be renewed each time this permit is renewed.
The undersigned landowner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions and
stipulations until such time as written notification, given 30 calendar days in advance, modifies or cancels this Agreement.
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page i of 3

1. STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative shall not enter into any additional residuals application contracts or agreements with another permitted
entity for the site(s) specified by this Agreement.
2. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land application sites) to a third party, the landowner shall
be responsible to ensure that the third party agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
3. The landowner or his representative shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement until all of the site restrictions (under Section I1) are met.
4. Notification of cancellation of this Agreement shall be immediately forwarded to NCDENR-DWR. Non -Discharge Permitting Unit, 1617 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.
5. The Permittee must request and obtain a permit modification from the Division prior to a transfer of the land application site(s) to a new
landowner. in addition, the current landowner shall give a notice to the new landowner that gives full details of the residuals applied at the land
application site(s).
6. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning the residuals land application program.
including an analysis of constituents of the residuals, residuals application methods, schedules for typical cropping patterns. a description of the
equipment used by the Permittee.
7. The Permittee will provide the landowner or his representative with a copy of the residuals permit prior to commencement of any residuals land
application event and a copy of the results of each suit analysis.
8. If the soil pH of the land application site(s) is not maintained at 6.0 or greater, sufficient amounts of lime shall be applied to achieve a final soil
pH of at least 6.0, unless an agronomist provides information indicating that the pH of the soil, residuals and lime mixture is suitable for the
specified crop.
9. The landowner or his representative and the Permittee will agree on residuals application rates and schedules based on crop patterns, results of
soil samples, and the permitted application limits.
10. The landowner or his representative will provide the Permittee with information regarding the amount and analysis of other sources of nutrients
(e.g., fertilizer, unregulated animal waste, etc.) that have been applied to the land application site(s).
11. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns for
the land application site(s) prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule residuals land application
events at appropriate periods.
12. Specific residuals land application area boundaries shall he clearly marked on the land application site(s) by the Permittee. the landowner, or
his representative prior to and during a residuals land application event.
13. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, local officials, and State officials or their representatives to; enter and
inspect any property. premises, or place on or related to the land application site(s) at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining
compliance with the permit, establish monitoring facilities on or near the land application site(s) as required by the permit, copy any records
that must be kept under the terms and conditions of the permit: take necessary leachate, surface water, groundwater, or soil samples during the
term of. and 12 months after termination of. this Agreement.
11. RESTRICTIONS:
1. Appropriate measures must betaken by the Permittee and/or the landowner or his representative to control public access to the land application
site(s) during active use and for the t2-month period (allowing a residuals land application event. Such controls may include the posting oi'
signs that indicate the activities being conducted at the land application site(s).
2. Animals shall not be grazed on the land application site(s) for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event. Land application
sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods after such residuals land application
events.
3. Food crops, feed crops, and fiber crops shall not be harvested for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event.
4. Food crops with harvested parts that touch the residuals/soil mixture and are totally above the land surface shall not be harvested for a 14-month
period following a residuals land application event.
5. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 20-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for four months or longer prior to incorporation into the soil.
6. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 38-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for less than four months prior to incorporation into the soil.
7. Turf grown on land where residuals are applied shall not be harvested for a 12-month period following a residuals land application event.
III. ALTERNATIVES FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS INSIDE THE COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY: (please check one)
15A NCAC 02L .0107(d) prohibits water supply wells within the compliance boundary. However, 15A NCAC 021 .o 105(h) allows the compliance
boundary to be placed closer to the waste disposal area. such that the water supply well is situated outside of the compliance boundary provided
the groundwater standards can be met at the newly -established compliance boundary. Please mark one of the fallowing;
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is needed for field(s) ID:
(Please include the rationale for the requested re -location of the compliance boundary and attach a map showing the newly proposed compliance
boundary to the application package)
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is not needed lar this site.
IV. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FIELD TRANSFER: (if needed)
® The land application field(s) ID: NC-RO- 0 2.9 i0.11 12 is currently permitted under another residuals land application program: Permit
Number WQ: 0000527 . The land owner hereby acknowledge that by signing this agreement, he/she is requesting that the
field(s) be removed from the previously permitted residuals land application program and transferred into the new program:
City of Lumberton
(Name of the new program)
FORM: LOA 06-I6 Page 2 of 3

Landowner's Certification:
I certify that I am a deeded landowner of the above -referenced land application site(s) and am authorized to make decisions
regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of other deeded landowners OR that I am otherwise authorized, through
a power of attorney or other legal delegation, to make decisions regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of the
deeded landowners. I certify that the above -referenced land application site(s) are not included in any waste disposal contract or
agreement with another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity. Furthermore, I certify that I have read this Agreement,
understand the stipulations, restrictions, alternatives for water supply wells inside the compliance boundary, acknowledgement of
field transfer, and do hereby grant permission to the Permittee to land apply residuals to the land application site(s) as specified
herein.
Landowner name: ZeA IV 40 A M'9'j V5
Address: I -11 Y 14o K ► tqj j 75 'RC
City: UN. �l �� State: J , C • ZipP ) 6360
Phone: 010 -7-3T-; 1-L � E-mail address: / > '�-V L�[? t 1 • [� �
Signature �- �%��'�` Date:'-�
NORTH CAROLINA,�COUNTY I
I, the undersigned Notary Public do hereby certify that Mf\G. k A Co F'6YYlYY1and C
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this the L
day of WASV , 20
Signature and seal:
My commission expires:
Lessee's/Operator's Certification:
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee/operator name:
Address:
City:
Phone:
Signature:
Permittee's Certification:
State: Zip:
E-mail
Date:
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Signing official name: (arw ) j . Wos I kr3
Signature:
Date:
Pa&-Ar
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 3 of 3

W'R -
Division of Water Resources
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
15A NCAC 02T .1 i00 —LANDOWNER AGREEMENT
FORM: LOA 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and
supporting documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non -Discharge Permitting Unit.
General — This document is an agreement between the Applicant and land owner(s) of residuals receiving sites for land application of
Class B residuals (may include water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with 15 A NC 2T .I 100. Do not submit
this agreement for review without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 06-16).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Land Owner Agreement (FORM: LOA 06-16):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16) form. Please do
not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to
the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
® Prepare a separate agreement for each set of land application sites that are owned or operated by an entity other than the
Applicant.
® A copy of the completed and appropriately executed agreement must be provided to the landowner and the lessee/operator.
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUALS TO PRIVATELY OWNED LAND
The undersigned landowner or his representative hereby permits:
Applicant's name: Charles H. Brown
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to land apply residuals from the following facility(ies) onto the following land
application site(s) (i.e., see attached setback maps) in accordance with the stipulations and restrictions as given in this
Agreement:
Site/Field ID
Lease
(yes/no)
Land Use or
Cropping Patterns
Intended Use of Crops
Residuals Source
(optional)
Special note
(no-till/over-seed/
pasture)
NC-RO-20-4
Y
I{ay
Animal Feed
City of Lumberton
WWTP
The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the Permittee
receives, in consideration, the use of the land application site(s) described above for the disposal of the residuals.
This Agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division's permit for the residuals land application program and shall be renewed
each time this permit is renewed.
The undersigned landowner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions and stipulations until such
time as written notification, given 30 calendar days in advance, modifies or cancels this Agreement.
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 1 of 3

I. STIPULATIONS:
I. The landowner or his representative shall not enter into any additional residuals application contracts or agreements with another permitted
entity for the site(s) specified by this Agreement.
2. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land application site(s) to a third party, the landowner shall
be responsible to ensure that the third party agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
3. The landowner or his representative shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement until all of the site restrictions (under Section 1I) are met.
4. Notification of cancellation of this Agreement shall be immediately forwarded to NCDENR-DWR, Non -Discharge Permitting Unit, 1617 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh. NC 27699-1617.
5. The Pentittee must request and obtain a permit modification from the Division prior to a transfer of the land application site(s) to a new
landowner. in addition, the current landowner shall give a notice to the new landowner that gives full details of the residuals applied at the land
application site(s).
6. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning the residuals land application program,
including an analysis of constituents of the residuals. residuals application methods, schedules for typical cropping patterns, a description of the
equipment used by the Permittee.
7. The Permittee will provide the landowner or his representative with a copy of the residuals permit prior to commencement of any residuals land
application event and a copy of the results of each soil analysis.
8. If the soil pH of the land application site(s) is not maintained at 6.0 or greater, sufficient amounts of lime shall be applied to achieve a final soil
pH of at least 6.0, unless an agronomist provides information indicating that the pH of the soil, residuals and lime mixture is suitable for the
specified crop.
9. The landowner or his representative and the Permittee will agree on residuals application rates and schedules based on crop patterns, results of
soil samples, and the permitted application limits.
10. The landowner or his representative will provide the Permittee with information regarding the amount and analysis of other sources of nutrients
(e.g., fertilizer. unregulated animal waste, etc.) that have been applied to the land application site(s).
11. The landowner or his representative will infirm the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns for
the land application site(s) prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule residuals land application
events at appropriate periods.
12. Specific residuals land application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on the land application site(s) by the Permittee, the landowner, or
his representative prior to and during a residuals land application event,
13. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee. local officials, and State officials or their representatives to: enter and
inspect any property, premises, or place on or related to the land application site(s) at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining
compliance with the permit; establish monitoring facilities on or near the land application site(s) as required by the permit; copy any records
that must be kept under the terms and conditions of the permit; take necessary leachate, surface water, groundwater, or soil samples during the
term of. and 12 months after termination of, this Agreement.
II. RESTRICTIONS:
1. Appropriate measures must betaken by the Permitter and/or the landowner or his representative to control public access to the land application
site(s) during active use and for the 12-month period following a residuals land application event. Such controls may include the posting of
signs that indicate the activities being conducted at the land application site(s).
2. Animals shall not be grazed on the land application site(s) for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event. Land application
sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods after such residuals land application
events.
3. Food crops, feed crops. and fiber crops shall not be harvested for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event.
4. Food crops with harvested parts that touch the residuals/soil mixture and are totally above the land surface shall not be harvested for a 14-month
period following a residuals land application event.
5. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 20-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for four months or longer prior to incorporation into the soil.
6. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 38-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for less than four months prior to incorporation into the soil.
7. Turf grown on land where residuals are applied shall not be harvested for a 12-month period following a residuals land application event.
111.ALTERNATIVES FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS INSIDE THE COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY: (please check one)
15A NCAC 02L .0107(d) prohibits water supply wells within the compliance boundary. However, 15A NCAC 02T .0105(h) allows the compliance
boundary to be placed closer to the waste disposal area, such that the water supply well is situated outside of the compliance boundary provided
the groundwater standards can be met at the newly -established compliance boundary. Please mark one of the following;
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is needed for field(s) ID:
(Please include the rationale for the requested re -location of the compliance boundary and attach a map showing the newly proposed compliance
boundary to the application package)
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is not needed for this site.
IV. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FIELD TRANSFER: (if needed)
❑ The land application ficld(s) ID: , is currently permitted under another residuals land application program: Permit Number WQ
. The land owner hereby acknowledge that by signing this agreement, he/she is requesting that the field(s) be removed from the
previously permitted residuals land application program and transferred into the new program:
(Name of the new program)
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 2 of 3

Landowner's Certification:
1 certify that I am a deeded landowner of the above -referenced land application site(s) and am authorized to make decisions
regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of other deeded landowners QR that I am otherwise authorized. through
a power of attorney or other legal delegation, to make decisions regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of the
deeded landowners. I certify that the above -referenced land application site(s) are not included in any waste disposal contract or
agreement with another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity. Furthermore, I certify that I have read this Agreement,
understand the stipulations, restrictions, alternatives for water supply wells inside the compliance boundary, acknowledgement of
field transfer, and do hereby grant permission to the Permittee to land apply residuals to the land application site(s) as specified
herein.
Landowner name: C
City
Phone:
Signature:
State: f Y L [D Zip.
Date:���!a
rn A. M r T U G-04r6-i'S COUNTY
1, the undersigned Notary Public do hereby certify that !- 6 T) - 1 f t GP 0 H fi'LJ
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged e due execution of the Forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this the gq
day of G 20
Signature and see]: - - -
t ��' oma -
My commission expires: Notary Public
Maryland _
Lessee's/Operator's Certification: My Commission Exn1+0s Iplq�rrp2
I certify that I have read this reeg=�:w
gree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as ified herein.
Lessee/operator name:
Address: ��
City: A-be-dco)(1 State: AX, Zip: -----
Phone: E-mail address: 48
Signature: Date: 312.5 I-L 0-n
Permittee's Certification:
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Signing official name: C O"_ �L
Signature:
Date:
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 3 of 3

State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
DWR
15A NCAC 02T .l l00 — LANDOWNER AGREEMENT
Division of Water Resources FORM: LOA 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted the A licant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and
supporting documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non-Dischar e Permitting Unit.
General — This document is an agreement between the Applicant and land owner(s) of residuals receiving sites for land application of
Class B residuals (may include water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1100. Do not submit
this agreement for review without a corresponding application forth (FORM: RLAP 06-16).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Land Owner Agreement (FORM: LOA 06-16):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16) form. Please do
not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to
the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
® Prepare a separate agreement for each set of land application sites that are owned or operated by an entity other than the
Applicant.
® A copy of the completed and appropriately executed agreement must be provided to the landowner and the lessee/operator.
AGREEMENT FORTH E LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUALS TO PRIVATELY OWNED LAND
The undersigned landowner or his representative hereby permits:
Applicant's name: Ta lco. Inc.
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to land apply residuals from the following facility(ies) onto the following land
application site(s) (i.e., see attached setback maps) in accordance with the stipulations and restrictions as given in this
Agreement:
Residuals Source Special note
Site/Field lA Lease Land Use or Intended Use of Crops (no-till/over-seed/
(yes/no) Cropping Patterns (optional) pasture)
Animal Feed City of Lumberton
NC-RO-20-14 Y Row Crops WWTP
The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the Permittee
receives, in consideration, the use of the land application site(s) described above for the disposal of the residuals.
This Agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division's permit for the residuals land application program and shall be renewed
each time this permit is renewed.
The undersigned landowner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions and stipulations until such
time as written notification, given 30 calendar days in advance, modifies or cancels this Agreement.
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page] of 3

I. STIPULATIONS:
I. The landowner or his representative shall not enter into any additional residuals application contracts or agreements with another permitted
entity for the site(s) specified by this Agreement.
2. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land application site(s) to a third party, the landowner shall
be responsible to ensure that the third party agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
3. The landowner or his representative shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement until all of the site restrictions (under Section 11) are met.
4. Notification of cancellation of this Agreement shall be immediately forwarded to NCDENR-DWR, Non -Discharge Permitting Unit, 1617 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.
5. The Permittee must request and obtain a permit modification from the Division prior to a transfer of the land application site(s) to a new
landowner. In addition, the current landowner shall give a notice to the new landowner that gives full details of the residuals applied at the land
application site(s).
6. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning the residuals land application program,
including an analysis of constituents of the residuals. residuals application methods, schedules for typical cropping patterns, a description of the
equipment used by the Permittee.
7. The Permittee will provide the landowner or his representative with a copy of the residuals permit prior to commencement of any residuals land
application event and a copy of the results of each soil analysis.
8. If the soil pH of the land application site(s) is not maintained at 6.0 or greater, sufficient amounts of lime shall be applied to achieve a final soil
pH of at least 6.0. unless an agronomist provides information indicating that the pH of the soil, residuals and lime mixture is suitable for the
specified crop.
9. The landowner or his representative and the Permittee will agree on residuals application rates and schedules based on crop patterns, results of
soil samples, and the permitted application limits.
10. The landowner or his representative will provide the Permittee with information regarding the amount and analysis of other sources of nutrients
(e.g., fertilizer, unregulated animal waste, etc.) that have been applied to the land application site(s).
11. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns for
the land application site(s) prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule residuals land application
events at appropriate periods.
12. Specific residuals land application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on the land application site(s) by the Permittee, the landowner, or
his representative prior to and during a residuals land application event.
13. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, local officials, and State officials or their representatives to; enter and
inspect any property, premises, or place on or related to the land application site(s) at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining
compliance with the permit; establish monitoring facilities on or near the land application site(s) as required by the permit; copy any records
that must be kept under the terms and conditions of the permit; take necessary leachate, surface water, groundwater, or soil samples during the
term of. and 12 months after termination of. this Agreement.
11. RESTRICTIONS:
L Appropriate treasures must be taken by the Permittee and/or the landowner or his representative to control public access to the land application
sites) during active use and for the 12-month period following a residuals land application event. Such controls may include the posting of
signs that indicate the activities being conducted at the land application site(s).
2. Animals shall not be grazed on the land application site(s) for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event_ Land application
sites that are to be used far grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods after such residuals land application
events.
3. Food crops, feed crops, and fiber crops shall not be harvested for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event.
4. Food crops with harvested parts that touch the residuals/soil mixture and are totally above the land surface shall not be harvested for a 14-month
period following a residuals land application event.
5. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 20-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for four months or longer prior to incorporation into the soil.
6. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested fora 38-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for less than four months prior to incorporation into the soil.
7. Turf grown on land where residuals are applied shall not be harvested for a 12-month period following a residuals land application event.
III.ALTERNATIVES FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS INSIDE THE COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY: (please check one)
I SA NCAC 02L .0107(d) prohibits water supply wells within the compliance boundary. However, 15A NCAC 02T .01051hj allows the compliance
boundary to be placed closer to the waste disposal area, such that the water supply well is situated outside of the compliance boundary provided
the groundwater standards can be met at the newly -established compliance boundary. Please mark one of the following;
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is needed for field(s) ID:
(Please include the rationale for the requested re -location ofthe compliance boundary and attach amap showing the newly proposed compliance
boundary to the application package)
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is not needed for this site.
IV. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FIELD TRANSFER: (if needed)
❑ The land application field(s) 1D: , is currently permitted under another residuals land application program; Permit Number WQ:_
. The land owner hereby acknowledge that by signing this agreement, he/she is requesting that the field(s) be removed from the
previously permitted residuals land application program and transferred into the new program;
(Name of the new program)
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 2 of 3

Landowner's Certification:
I certify that I am a deeded landowner of the above -referenced land application site(s) and am authorized to make decisions
regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of other deeded landowners OR that I am otherwise authorized. through
a power of attorney or other legal delegation, to make decisions regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of ihr
deeded landowners. I certify that the above -referenced land application site(s) are not included in any waste disposal cuia tci of
agreement with another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity. Furthermore, I certify that I have read this Awreentent_
understand the stipulations, restrictions, alternatives for water supply wells inside the compliance boundary, acknowledgement of
field transfer, and do hereby grant permission to the Permittee to land apply residuals to the land application site(s) as specified
herein.
Landowner name: 7 �1 (At LLItk-
Address: o? 41 73 Ail 6w_r�
City: 6
Gr►�0Le JJ State: � , G .
Phone: I%0 13q' 0 Y6� E-mail address:
Signature:
Zip:—
�1�� GR�}�xi47�>�ru�Sc
[late: 3 1,?* 1_20..�
NORTH CAROLINA, __ n d Y>�P— S u vn COUNTY (-{
1, the undersigned Notary Public do hereby certify that �5 e-t 1 C11 %r
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this the ok 5
day of , 20
Signature and seal:
My commission expires:
Lessee's/Operator's Certification:
I certify that I have read
Lessee/operator name:
and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Address: l L.\ q &,Vrwo \d —V—d
City: N \im�e xA uo _ State: tj
Phone:
Signatt
Permittee's Certification:
certify that 1 have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Signing official name: Ca W"I�
Signature:
Date: 30q
4br►1
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 3 of 3

DWR
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Division of Water Resources
15A NCAC 02T .1100 — LAND OWNER AGREEMENT
FORM: LOA 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and
supporting documentation
For more it�brmation, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Nora -Discharge Pervuiuing bait.
General — This document is an agreement between the Applicant and land owner(s) of residuals receiving sites for land application of
Class 8 residuals (may include water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1100. Do not submit
this agreement for review without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 06-16).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Land Owner Agreement (FORM: LOA 06-16):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16) form. Please do
not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to
the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
® Prepare a separate agreement for each set of land application sites that are owned or operated by an entity other than the
Applicant.
® A copy of the completed and appropriately executed agreement must be provided to the landowner and the lessee/operator.
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUALS TO PRIVATELY OWNED LAND
The undersigned landowner or his representative hereby permits:
Applicant's name: Ronald Hammonds
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to land apply residuals from the following facility(ies) onto the following land
application site(s) (i.e., see attached setback maps) in accordance with the stipulations and restrictions as given in this
Agreement:
Lease
Land Use or
Residuals Source
Special note
Site/Field ID
(yes/no)
Cropping Patterns
Intended Use of Crops
(optional)
(no-till/over-seed/
pasture)
NC-RO-20-15
N
Pasture/Hay
PasturelHay
City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-RO-20-16
N
Pasture/Hay
Pasture/Hay
City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-RO-20-17
N
PasturelHav
Pasture/Hay
City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-RO-20-I8
N
Pasture/Hay
Pasture/Hay
City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-RO-20-19
N
Row Crops
Animal Feed
City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-RO-20-20
N
Posture/Hay
Pasture/Hay
City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-RO-20-21
N
Row Crops
Animal Feed
City of Lumberton
WWTP
The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the
Permittee receives, in consideration, the use of the land application site(s) described above for the disposal of the residuals.
This Agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division's permit for the residuals land application program and
shall be renewed each time this permit is renewed.
The undersigned landowner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions and
stipulations until such time as written notification, given 30 calendar days in advance, modifies or cancels this Agreement.
FORM: IAA 06-16 Page 1 of 3

1. STIPULATIONS:
I. The landowner or his representative shall not enter into any additional residuals application contracts or agreements with another permitted
entity for the site(s) specified by this Agreement.
2. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land application site(s) to a third party, the landowner shall
be responsible to ensure that the third party agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
3. The landowner or his representative shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement until all of the site restrictions (under Section 11) are met.
4. Notification of cancellation of this Agreement shall be immediately forwarded to NCDENR-D WR, Non -Discharge Permitting Unit, 1617 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.
5. The Permittee must request and obtain a permit modification from the Division prior to a transfer of the land application site(s) to a rte,.%
landowner. In addition, the current landowner shall give a notice to the new landowner that gives full details of the residuals applied at the land
application site(s).
6. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning the residuals land application program.
including an analysis of constituents of the residuals, residuals application methods, schedules for typical cropping patterns, a description of the
equipment used by the Permittee.
7. The Permittee will provide the landowner or his representative with a copy of the residuals permit prior to commencement of any residuals land
application event and a copy of the results of each soil analysis.
S. If the soil pH of the land application site(s) is not maintained at 6.0 or greater, sufficient amounts of lime shall be applied to achieve a final soil
pH of at least 6.0, unless an agronomist provides information indicating that the pH of the soil, residuals and lime mixture is suitable for the
specified crop.
9. The landowner or his representative and the Permitter will agree on residuals application rates and schedules based on crop patterns, results of
soil samples. and the permitted application limits.
10, d'he landowner or his representative will provide the Permittee with information regarding the amount and analysis of other sources of nutrients
(e.g„ fertilizer, unregulated animal waste, etc.) that have been applied to the land application site(s).
i I. The landowner or his representative will infirm the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns for
the land application site(s) prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule residuals land application
events at appropriate periods.
12. Specific residuals land application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on the land application site(s) by the Permittee, the landowner, or
his representative prior to and during a residuals land application event.
13. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, local officials, and State officials or their representatives to; enter and
inspect any property, premises, or place on or related to the land application site(s) at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining
compliance with the permit; establish monitoring facilities on or near the land application site(s) as required by the permit: copy any records
that must be kept under the terms and conditions of the permit: take necessary leachate, surface water, groundwater, or soil samples during the
term of, and 12 months alter termination of. this Agreement.
If. RESTRICTIONS:
1. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permitter and/or the landowner or his representative to control public access to the land application
site(s) during active use and for the 12-month period following a residuals land application event. Such controls may include the posting of
signs that indicate the activities being conducted at the land application site(s).
2. Animals shall not be grazed on the land application site(s) for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event. Land application
sites that are to be used for grating shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods alter such residuals land application
events.
3. Food crops. feed crops. and fiber crops shall not be harvested for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event.
4, food crops with harvested parts that touch the residuals/soil mixture and are totally above the land surface shall not be harvested fora 14-month
period following a residuals land application event.
5. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not he harvested for a 20-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for four months or longer prior to incorporation into the soil.
6. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 38-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for less than four months prior to incorporation into the soil.
7. Turf grown on land where residuals are applied shall not be harvested for a 12-month period following a residuals land application event
IIf. ALTERNATIVES FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS INSIDE THE COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY: (please check one)
15A NCAC 02L .0107(d) prohibits water supply wells within the compliance. boundary. I lowever, 15A NCAC 02T .01051h) allows the compliance
boundary to be placed closer to the waste disposal area. such that the water supply well is situated outside of the compliance boundary provided
the groundwater standards can be met at the newly -established compliance boundary. Please mark one of the following;
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is needed for I ield(s) iD:
(Please include the rationale for the requested re -location of the compliance boundary and attach a map showing the newly proposed compliance
boundary to the application package)
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is not needed for this site.
IV, ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FIELD TRANSFER: (if needed)
❑ The land application field(s) IIJ: , is currently permitted under another residuals land application program: Permit Number \ Q:_
. The land owner hereby acknoNN ledge that by signing this agreement. he/she is requesting that the field(s) he removed from the
previously permitted residuals land application program and transferred into the new program. -
(Name of the new program)
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 2 of 3

Landowner's Certification:
I certify that I am a deeded landowner of the above -referenced land application site(s) and am authorized to make decisions
regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of other deeded landowners OR that I am otherwise authorized, through
a power of attorney or other legal delegation, to make decisions regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of the
deeded landowners. I certify that the above -referenced land application site(s) are not included in any waste disposal contract or
agreement with another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity. Furthermore, I certify that I have read this Agreement,
understand the stipulations, restrictions, alternatives for water supply wells inside the compliance boundary, acknowledgement of
field transfer, and do hereby grant permission to the Permittee to land apply residuals to the land application site(s) as specified
herein.
Landowner name: v5
Address:
City: t ttRW� wl�r1�75 # dr `` I� -
W+n %-o nl State: , C •
(p !►
Phone: 3 Q 7 �� � r E-mail address: 4AkAWAA6--
Signature: i�'Q-W{r — �mv-'-`��-'" Date:
NORTH CAROLINA, CONY
I, the undersigned Notary Public do hereby certify that
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this the 2 +h •'"�j14��N�,�����'''
1 .•
day of lilCa ug-}- _ , 20 .rr _ %_4
.G
Signature and seal:
My commission expires:
IIPAX ,Goo,
"
Lessee's/Operator's Certification:
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee/operator name:
Address:
City:
Phone:
Signature:
Permittee's Certification:
State:
E-mail address:
Date:
Zip:
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified erem.
Signing official name: Cdru J. wve I >
Signature: -OeDate:
91-2(i-AI
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 3 of 3

State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental (duality
Division of Water Resources
ISA NCAC 02T .11Ut} — LANDOWNER AGREEMENT
Division of WAter Resources FORM: LOA 06-16
please use the following Instructions a+ a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
itional
instructions and checking Failhe ure to suhlnivided ht©apse f tll help l a requireduce a itemsQuicker review fiUM kind reduce will lead to additional pro ass ngha tdnrevi w timeount of forthe
information requested. Fa
permit application- Useless nth rwi a toted the A licanl shall submit )ne on inat and two co fes of the >i lieaEion an
sunnorlin- documentation
Fin. tttE�rc> iylnl'ltraliuts, 1•i.vil lite 11-atev Oitcilily Perntiltitt��.Sc�cYi��tt'ti 'v:r n:L)is� Isar ' 1'c�r- iU ' 0 ,if
General —'11t1s dtxtnttent is an itgrersnesn liettvt�n the Applicant and land owner(s) of residuals receiving sites For land application ni'
fi
class 13 residuals ("lay include water treauttew plant or other
her type
y reorma %) in accordance
RLAp R6ithh1 A NC; 4( g. l', , I 1 il(f,. Do trot cubmii
this agreement far review without a correspondingapplication
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and tt��u copies 01'tite application and supporting documentation listed
heiow.
A. Lund Owner Agreement (FORM: LOA Oh-I6):
®Suhtt)it the castsplcted gull apprl)prla+ei% c\cctlie(I [.and Application Site C'ertilication (T'ORM: I.ASC f}(t-16) turns. Please do
not in:+kr suty iplete nand Foment changes la this lin•nt. 11, necessary for clarity' ter dot to space resll•ictinn%. irtlachnICII(s to
ate application niay be made, as long as the attachments are uunthercd to correspond In the section and item to which tiny
refer.
® ch set of land upplicntian sites that are owned or operated by an entity other than tile
I�rt pare a separate agrecntent for e:+
Applicant.
�id apprnpl•iulei� executc(i agreement provided he •avidcd to the landowner and the Eesseelopc:ratur.
A Copy of tile completed a_f
A(.'RFF.MENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUALS TO PRIVATELV OWNED LAND
Tile undersigned landowner or his representntive hereby permits:
Applir;uri', name: itobest 1�. 13askcrvill' Jr.
hereinafter referred to as the Permitiec, to land apply residuals from the following faciiity(ics) ono► (Ile rolinwin�.; [stud
applicalion sile(s) (i.e., see atlnched setback [naps) in acrordaure with the stipulations and restrictions as giycn it' tells
Agreement: --i— —
'_i.�_—•--- -----
Lease
Y Lan,i l�sc or --- � Intended else of Crops
SitelField ID
(yes/nu)
Chipping 11allern%
animal Feed
N('-R()-28-1
1'
Row ('roils
\,
Row ('raps Animal FcM
NC-RO-28-2
y
_
Row Crops Feed
NC-110-28dM
- —
Residuals Snuree
(optional)
City or Lumberton
_ _\VW TP
City or Lumberton
-_ WWTV --
City or Lumberton
Special note
(no-tillInver-seed!
paslurei
L _
The landowner or his rrisresrnlsslive receirex, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals white the Permittee
receives, in consideration, the use of the land application sleets) deserilsetl above for the disposal of the residuals.
this Agreement shall rcmnin in effect for the length or the Division's permit ror the residuals land application program mids1s:s!! be reus�ttr�l
earls lime this permit is renewed.
'I'he undersigned landowner or his representative gull the Pernsittre agree to abide biro the fulittwing restrictions :tad stiputntiutls until such
time as written notification, Riven '<it calendar days in ativance, modifies or cancels this Agreement. Nags: I of 3
1:0It M : LOA 06-1 b

4r1 PU LATI ONS:
i. 'l,he lantltlw'ner or his rCpre,rn1116VC shall not enter loos al,)} additional residuals applicationetatiraef, or alrecntents wiih ananhcr pern►tttc,
entity ibr by this Agrerinent.
3. yhuuld the lalxinlwner or hi, lCprCsClttaliC Ic;,,C or otherwise permit the u
vse of the land a{,plicntiun sitcts) to a third purl\, Y11e tattJlll\114r shalt
he respuncihlc to etnsllrC. that Ihe. third part) rtgrecs ❑nd con►plies \with ilia ternis and cundilio s ni'diis Agreement.
i, her lundol\nerur lii. reprCst1he lhC ~hall adht:rt: S'to tfle 1,rtivisitlllr' of -this Agreement until ail ol'thC site restricliolls (under Secliotl 11) it,r noel.
a. Notification a!'canrcllaYiu,t al'this Agr"inelll shitll Ix ilnmediatel} forwarded to N{'DENIt-MR. Nnn-1)isehalte lacrnniuing lhnit. 1f,f 7 Mail
ticrvice C'enWr. Raleigh. NC 27(199-I(s17.
ilia 1'crn)i1teC must rctllic.1 still oflt:;in a {sermil ,nnditicalit,n froll lik flivisi,m prior w a transfer (if the t1Slt[I iljlj)IiL'SiUSH) tiltC(ti) Ir1 a mall`
kuxlo,wnrr. In addition, the curreill lundvwur shall gi\C a notice lu the new landowwr that giros 11111 dCtails t)"lic residuals applied al the land
application sitc(s)•
6. '! fit perinittee has pruvidol the i:nndow+icr or hi, reprCSCntative %vitl) hirontialion and Bala concerning lha residuals land tip d"-r ip program.
inCludillg an :unah sis ol'ct+nsiiunCtnts ut'the rrrith,:d,. rC,idual, apphwtion methods sCltedulcs flap typical Cropping patterns
a dcseriptinn nl'the
cquipinent nscd kV the I'Mitillcc,
7. I'hC i'ernniuCC tell! provide the I:uldna•aer tw hits rc7,re,entadve ►vi11n a copy onhe residuals pcmtit Prior to cummcncCluCin{ of any n-sidual, land
application cvcnl and it Cody of llic resuits at"each soil tntltl)'xis. of linlo applicti to
$. If tile sail pit of Ili llillt �`tilt)luC�ruI1S)[ni ((pRi1 ntiktiilll. i1ILHinfllnmal O Itllldflail ng6.0 or `Ihal lllC1pEll nfthe Soitl. rcyidual-r•iand time tali ltlrctl .+litahlcFl lr tfic
pit or at Ic:ast 6. }, f-
sliecilied Crop.
9. 1'i1c landowner or his representative and the 11crillill" will agree oil residuals ;tpplicodon rates ta,d SchcduiCS based on Crop
%tali stumples. ln)d Ihv pertnilicd application limns.
lantkxvner ur hi, nprc.rnodivt \!ill Ina. ide the l'crmillee with iniiMilti itln rtigurdhig IN: all,uunt noel analysix of other �anrc,:s ofnotI ic'ttl,
Cciiiiiier, unregulated animal,wa�tc. cat.) IIi:,F have iiCcn applied to the land applitalirin sitct.;i•
mvisitills or
! f . l hr lands>5+'kicatiun his
,it irl pr nr x, �cfswill
plt,tlliintlthe ;Llcnaa llillee 'if cnshlr flip PerutilieC to ant. ndttllistrlgrcean iOns' to lint an Ilse auk nsi look Ilnr><i pt} lieutiun
the lalul app
evenis al :Ippropriatc iseriod...
12. Specific resitlu,tls land :,(>i,lication a ca houndtiries shall he clearly tnarkad an the bald 111)plica1ion SiiC(si by the I'ernlilier, Ili': lan(Irnvner, or
Iris represelmative prior to :Ind during a residuals Ilux1 applil:athwl event, W: enter and
13, I'hr iun,fuwwtlrr or his rrpresCtnaliwC Ilrcchy un �illrtlrcl:ued Ia,LthC lan,l tIp131ic:ni+Nq site(s) t tit\atremoni,thk little 1;)re olficials or their rtl t purix)sc or delen"ining.
inspec•i an' prtYlka't1. 1)r,:lnixs. 5u place
enitll,(,1r,L'e \\!Ili tl,e {,erlilni: C,.la1)Itsll I1inllnittr111L t;icdllir, [Ill or near Il land appllt::aiull :ire{s) as rc{ittircd I,) doe perrsnil: cop!' ony rct.•nrt s
that n,u.F he l,e1n under the trans and condition, ni' the permit: takC aeccr-,ar)- lcacilalue stiriarc wale r, gr„until\, titer. or soil samples dtrrint the
Lerni of. and 12 Inonth's aficr lerminaijoil tit. tilis Agreeincnt.
II. RESTRICTIONS:
I. rkppropfiljjc
for tile n? irtile
Ilen iticeall
otl lhn5iln�l:,trrsiduals laidowncr or nd upplicsli untevcnl�tatiuch controls slay include the IlostinE1or
sii!ns tllat intlit ntc the activities hCitll! conducted :u the I:tnl a{ll,hutlion.ilctsl.
?. Animals shall not he grunt d tn, tier land appiic:uion sitcls) [or a .30-day period C011MViog a residuals land applic:ait)il Cvcnl. Lund u1)pitcauni!
sites, ilu►t tire it) hC used for groping shall hive fenein-! Ihai Will tic as" to prewCut nit:L:I:ss {luring, these peril{, atit-r,ueh residuah land llpp '
events.
3. Ftxxl Crops. teCtl t;nsps, and lilxr crops sisals not lit: llun'CstCt1 liar a 3R1-day period li,lluui„g a rC,idual, ""it'applic;it inn 4w'eitt.
4. Food ,nips with #wrl'Csled earl, that luueh Iltr residttats±sail mixture and are totalh :lht,vr the land un k:kC chaff n.,t hr harvested ki,r -.I I a -month
puriud iidtnwinl! ;► residuals hand upplicalion C5 Cnt.
;. he t.,atxl crops %rill, h;lra,cNwd part, halo\► the surface of dw land ,, nil bar Cstcd liar a 3tt-punch peritxl lblltnving a residtl:tts l:until ;tt,l,lic: i n,u
event wilco the rCsitituda rLnlaitl utl tile loon u,rlaIM liar tour motltlls or 11)neer prior to incol'puratian into the soil.
h. {:ut)I crops %vilh harvcsied parts hCiow• the surlacc ul'tlic land shall, tilt he harvesitKl lisp a 313-,nontln pCnud fiilluw ing a resiihrlis larnl :nl,ptic :sins �i
eventU'I►rn (lne rC,lllremainGilremain on the land x,rl'aCC liar tcs II)an four monihs prior to incorporation into ilia suit.
7. 7 nrf grown oil land 5ahcrc residuals ;trC applied ,hall not he harvcsled liar a 12-monist period fi111uwil)g a residuals land upplicatkitl evctlr.
n
111.AUVERNATIYIE:S FOR WATER SUPPLY W F1.1.S 1NSIDlu'CNF C'OhIPi.iANC£ BOUNDARY: (please check 11�}11a1(ows the compliance
l i,1 t'A(' O31..111(171t11 pn,hihits ►rater tiulsph tvell„rilhin the compliance buundan•. ! lunrvCr.
houndury It) 11' PlUvcd c1uxC!' to the cr:Isw dispus;tl area. sot h that the water supph' Svel1 is ;iulatt d outside ,st";f,c ct,inpllnllCC ixlliFxlttr)' pl't5cltictil
the gn,anchv;nter,Yandnrds can be filet at ilia 11CM\-established colmpliance hotiudan% Please marls one of the fallowing;
[] A re-ticliuCd cnnnpliance lxsundary is ncedcd ti,r lieidis)10:
{111Casc in<ItaEC the rationale liarr the requested re -location al'thC cunlpliantx htst Mary and alluel n Wrap shnwittg the newly propetscd Ctunpli:ureC
hnandary to the application p;ICkagO
❑ A re -defined compliancC huuutlar\ is sat nCcdrtl tier this site.
W.ACKNOWLF.DurNIENT OF FIE.I,D TRANSFER: (if needed)
❑ The land application lieklls) IM i, Canenlly pe,•illitwk under at+t,lher nsidianls land application proarun: permit Ntnnhcr tlrtl.---
_, :neknmeiCd{;t ng Ibis aglc:ement, lie/she is rcquestiltk Thal lhr licltlls) he rcluovo- fr1►m IhC
I'he land owner hereby that by signi
ptcwiutl;h �i into the permitwd 1'e-,iduals land application "laraiu antii
translcrrenew
(Name of the nC\v prograill)
Babe ? of 3
FORM: LOA 06-16

Landowner's Certi('iCation:
certify that 1 atn it deeded landowner of the above -referenced land application site(s) anti ;un tiutli"r#/' '+ - . .
regarding, the use of the land application site(s) Wt laeftali'of other deeded landowners OR that I an► othv- � .
a power of attorney or other legal delegation. to
deci%ions retarding the use of the land Wlicaticm sitef+i ��u beh:tl# ��I the
deeded landowners. I certily that the above-relcrenced land application she(s) are not included in .toy wliste disposal contract or
agreetnetit with another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity. Full hennore. I certi!'y that I have read this Agreement,
ttndei Land file stiptttilt kuis, restrictions, alternatives for water supply wells inside the cotlipliance boundary, acknowledgement al'
field tratisfer, and du hereby grant permission to the Perniitto--c to land apply residuals to the land Application sitc(s) as specified
herein. I
I andowner name, �v 6ea
S
� at✓ Sta%e: C lip: ZP5/0
city: i� A .4 �.
is -mall address:Sfiy1N
Signature: ._�� �`"— bate:
NORTH CARE. LINA, �C �_�S.�C]___v—. COUNTY
1. the undersigned Notary Public des hereb} certify that
personally appeared hefoPc nk this day and aektiowiedLvd dw due execution of the: fnrgoitng i�is%rumcns.
WITNESS my hand and of-Acial seat thin the
SignatUrr and seal:
My Commission expinrs;
I,cxsee'slOperator's Cerfiiicolion:
certify ilia% I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by tiie stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
I..essec/operator nallIC: t q f�V�U c' [j
Address:�.._n__ _ .._.
r _ Zip: - � ?
City: r. State. rr
Phone; F-mail address:
---F
SionatklrC: ---- '— -
Perttt'sttee's Certif-tc.11ion.
1 certify that I have read this Agreenienl and do hereby Agee to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specif led herein.
Signing 0 cial name: �"r` ��`
signature:
Page 3 o f 3
FORM: LOA 06-15

State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
DWR
15A NCAC 02T A 100 — LAND OWNER AGREEMENT
Division of Water Resources FORM: LOA 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted the Applicant shall submit one original and two co ies of the application and
supportine documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non -Discharge Permitting Unit.
General — This document is an agreement between the Applicant and land owner(s) of residuals receiving sites for land application of
Class B residuals (may include water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .l 100. Do not submit
this agreement for review without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 06-16).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Land Owner Agreement (FORM: LOA 06-16):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16) form. Please do
not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to
the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
® Prepare a separate agreement for each set of land application sites that are owned or operated by an entity other than the
Applicant.
® A copy of the completed and appropriately executed agreement must be provided to the landowner and the lessee/operator.
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUALS TO PRIVATELY OWNED LAND
The undersigned landowner or his representative hereby permits:
Applicant's name: Barbara Bullard LF EST.
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to land apply residuals from the following facility(ies) onto the following land
application site(s) (i.e., see attached setback maps) in accordance with the stipulations and restrictions as given in this
Agreement:
Special note
Lease
Land Use or
Intended Use of Crops
Residuals Source
(no-till/over-seed/
Site/Field ID
es/no
{y )
Cropping Patterns
pp g
(optional)
pasture)
Animal Feed
City of Lumberton
NC-I10-39-1A
V
Pasture
WWTP
Y
Pasture
Animal Feed
City of Lumberton
NC-RO-34-15
WWTP
Y
Pasture
Animal Feed
City of Lumberton
NC-RO-34-02
WWTP
The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the Permittee
receives, in consideration, the use of the land application site(s) described above for the disposal of the residuals.
This Agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division's permit for the residuals land application program and shall be renewed
each time this permit is renewed.
The undersigned landowner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions and stipulations until such
time as written notification, given 30 calendar days in advance, modifies or cancels this Agreement.
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page l of 3

1. STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative shall not enter into any additional residuals application contracts or agreements with another permitted
entity for the site(s) specified by this Agreement.
2. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land application site(s) to a third party, the landowner shall
be responsible to ensure that the third party agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
3. The landowner or his representative shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement until all of the site restrictions (under Section II) are met.
4. Notification of cancellation of this Agreement shall be immediately forwarded to NCDENR-DWR, Non -Discharge Permitting Unit, 1617 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.
5. The Permittee must request and obtain a permit modification from the Division prior to a transfer of the land application site(s) to a new
landowner, In addition, the current landowner shall give a notice to the new landowner that gives full details of the residuals applied at the land
application site(s).
6. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning the residuals land application program.
including an analysis of constituents of the residuals, residuals application methods, schedules for typical cropping patterns, a description of the
equipment used by the Permittee.
7. The Permittee will provide the landowner or his representative with a copy of the residuals permit prior to commencement of any residuals land
application event and a copy of the results of each soil analysis.
8. If the soil pl-I of the land application sitc(s) is not maintained at 6.0 or greater, sufficient amounts of lime shall be applied to achieve a final soil
pH of at least 6.0, unless an agronomist provides information indicating that the pH of the soil, residuals and lime mixture is suitable for the
specified crop,
9. The landowner or his representative and the Permittee will agree on residuals application rates and schedules based on crop patterns, results of
soil samples, and the permitted application limits.
10. The landowner or his representative will provide the Permittee with information regarding the amount and analysis of other sources of nutrients
(e.g., fertilizer, unregulated animal waste, etc.) that have been applied to the land application site(s).
11. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns for
the land application site(s) prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule residuals land application
events at appropriate periods.
12. Specific residuals land application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on the land application sites) by the Permittee, the landowner, or
his representative prior to and during a residuals land application event.
13. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, local officials, and State officials or their representatives to; enter and
inspect any property, premises, or place on or related to the land application site(s) at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining
compliance with the permit; establish monitoring facilities on or near the land application site(s) as required by the permit: copy any records
that must be kept under the terms and conditions of the permit: take necessary leachate, surface water, groundwater, or soil samples during the
term of, and 12 months after termination of, this Agreement.
Il, RESTRICTIONS:
1. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee and/or the landowner or his representative to control public access to the land application
site(s) during active use and for the 12-month period following a residuals land application event. Such controls may include the posting of
signs that indicate the activities being conducted at the land application site(s).
2. Animals shall not be grazed on the land application site(s) for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event. Land application
sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods after such residuals land application
events.
3. Food crops, feed crops, and fiber crops shall not be harvested for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event.
4. Food crops with harvested parts that touch the residuals/soil mixture and are totally above the land surface shall not be harvested for a 14-month
period following a residuals land application event.
�. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 20-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for four months or longer prior to incorporation into the soil.
6. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested fora 38-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for less than four months prior to incorporation into the soil.
7. Turf grown on land where residuals are applied shall not be harvested for a 12-month period following a residuals land application event.
Ill. ALTERNATIVES FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS INSIDE THE COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY: (please theek one)
15A NCAC 02L .0107(d) prohibits water supply wells within the compliance boundary. However, 15A NCAC 021' .0105th1 allows the compliance
boundary to be placed closer to the waste disposal area, such that the water supply well is situated outside of the compliance boundary provided
the groundwater standards can be met at the newly -established compliance boundary. Please mark one of the following;
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is needed for field(s) ID:
(Please include the rationale for the requested re -location of the compliance boundary and attach a map showing the newly proposed compliance
boundary to the application package)
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is not needed for this site.
IV. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FIELD TRANSFER: (if needed)
❑ The land application field(s) ID: . is currently permitted under another residuals land application program; Permit Number WQ:—
. The land owner hereby acknowledge that by signing this agreement. he/she is requesting that the field(s) be removed from the
previously permitted residuals land application program and transferred into the new program:
(Name of the new program)
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 2 of 3

Landowner's Certification:
I certify that 1 am a deeded landowner of the above -referenced land application site(s) and am authorized to make decisions
regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of other deeded landowners OR that I am otherwise authorized, through
a power of attorney or other legal delegation, to make decisions regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of the
deeded landowners. I certify that the above -referenced land application site(s) are not included in any waste disposal contract or
agreement with another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity. Furtherrrtore, I certify that I have read this Agreement,
understand the stipulations, restrictions, alternatives for water supply wells inside the compliance boundary. acknowledgement o
field transfer, and do hereby grant permission to the Permittee to land apply residuals to the land application site(s) as specified
herein. A / A
Landowner name:
Address:
city: 7-=0A;% 1� mo a - — state:_ N G zip:
Phone: t E-mail address: N
Signature: Date:
NORTH CAROLINA, U OuNTY
1, the undersigned Notary Public do hereby certify thatla-idata-Y a Aur
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
...........
WITNESS my hand and official seal this the
�] g pTAR Y %.
day of V �Ir _ '_
Signature and seal:
Pust, 2
My commission expires: ���; •... ,...••�:
°'••, qX COO ,,,►�•
Lessee's/Operator's Certification:
I certify that I have read thi Agreement and do
Lessee/operator name:
Address:
15LAFA l�iYLeltwff�p
Signature:
Permittee's Certification:
State:
to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do
g� hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Signing official name:
Co W'+, (ice
3/��
Signature: _ Date: ..
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 3 of 3

State of North Carolina
' Department of Environmental Quality
DWR Division of Water Resources
15A NCAC 02T .1100 — LANDOWNER AGREEMENT
Division of Wxter Resources FORM: LOA 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted the A licant shall submit one original and two copies of the 812plication and
supporting documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non -Discharge Permitlin Unit.
General — This document is an agreement between the Applicant and land owner(s) of residuals receiving sites for land application of
Class B residuals (may include water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1 100. Do not submit
this agreement for review without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 06-16).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Land Owner Agreement (FORM: LOA 06-16):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Land Application Site Certification (FORM: L.ASC 06-16) form. Please do
not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to
the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
® Prepare a separate agreement for each set of land application sites that are owned or operated by an entity other than the
Applicant.
® A copy of the completed and appropriately executed agreement must be provided to the landowner and the lessee/operator.
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUALS TO PRIVATELY OWNED LAND
The undersigned landowner or his representative hereby permits:
Applicant's name: Quindale Bullard; Luzette Bullard
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to land apply residuals from the following facility(ies) onto the following land
application site(s) (i.e., see attached setback maps) in accordance with the stipulations and restrictions as given in this
Agreement:
Residuals Source Special note
Site/Field ID Lease Land Use or Intended Use of Crops (no-till/over-seed/
(yeslno) Cropping Patterns (optional) pasture)
NC-RCl-34-3 Y Pasture Animal Feed City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-39-4 Y Pasture Animal Feed City of Lumberton
WWTP
The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the Permittee
receives, in consideration, the use of the land application site(s) described above for the disposal of the residuals.
This Agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division's permit for the residuals land application program and shall be renewed
each time this permit is renewed.
The undersigned landowner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions and stipulations until such
time as written notification, given 30 calendar days in advance, modifies or cancels this Agreement.
FORM: LOA 06-16 Pagel of 3

1. STiPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative shall not enter into any additional residuals application contracts or agreements with another permitted
entity for the site(s) specified by this Agreement.
2. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land application site(s) to a third parry, the landowner shall
be responsible to ensure that the third party agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
3. The landowner or his representative shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement until all of the site restrictions (under Section 11) are met.
4. Notification of cancellation of this Agreement shall be immediately forwarded to NCDENR-DWR, Non -Discharge Permitting Unit, 1617 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617,
5. The Permittee must request and obtain a permit modification from the Division prior to a transfer of the land application site(s) to a new
landowner. in addition, the current landowner shall give a notice to the new landowner that gives full details of the residuals applied at the land
application site(s).
6. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning the residuals land application program,
including an analysis of constituents of the residuals, residuals application methods, schedules for typical cropping patterns, a description of the
equipment used by the Permittee.
T The Permittee will provide the landowner or his representative with a copy of the residuals permit prior to commencement of any residuals land
application event and a copy of the results of each soil analysis.
8. If the soil pH of the land application site(s) is not maintained at 6.0 or greater, sufficient amounts of lime shall be applied to achieve a final soil
pH of at least 6.0. unless an agronomist provides information indicating that the pH of the soil, residuals and lime mixture is suitable for the
specified crop.
9. The landowner or his representative and the Perniittee will agree on residuals application rates and schedules based on crop patterns, results of
soil samples, and the permitted application limits.
10. The landowner or his representative will provide the Permittee with information regarding the amount and analysis of other sources of nutrients
(e.g., fertilizer, unregulated animal waste. etc.) that have been applied to the land application site(s).
1. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns for
the land application site(s) prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule residuals land application
events at appropriate periods.
12. Specific residuals land application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on the land application site(s) by the Permittee, the landowner, or
his representative prior to and during a residuals land application event.
13. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, local officials, and State officials or their representatives to; enter and
inspect any property, premises, or place on or related to the land application site(s) at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining
compliance with the permit: establish monitoring facilities on or near the land application site(s) as required by the permit; copy any records
that must be kept under the terms and conditions of the permit. take necessary leachate, surface water, groundwater, or soil samples during the
term of. and 12 months after termination of. this Agreement.
11. RESTRICTIONS:
1. Appropriate measures must betaken by the Permittee and/or the landowner or his representative to control public access to the land application
site(s) during active use and for the 12-month period following a residuals land application event. Such controls may include the posting of
signs that indicate the activities being conducted at the land application sitc(s).
2. Animals shall not be grazed on the land application site(s) for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event. Land application
sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods after such residuals land application
events.
3. Food crops, feed crops, and fiber crops shall not be harvested for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event.
4. Food crops with harvested parts that touch the residuals/soiI mixture and are totally above the land surface shall not be harvested for a 14-month
period following a residuals land application event.
5. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 20-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for four months or longer prior to incorporation into the soil.
6. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 38-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for less than four months prior to incorporation into the soil.
7. Turf grown on land where residuals are applied shall not be harvested for a 12-month period following a residuals land application event.
111.ALTERNATIVES FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS INSIDE THE COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY: (please check one)
15A NCAC 02L .0107(d) prohibits water supply wells within the compliance boundary. However, 15A NCAC 02T .0105(h) allows the compliance
boundary to be placed closer to the waste disposal area, such that the water supply well is situated outside of the compliance boundary provided
the groundwater standards can be met at the newly -established compliance boundary. Please mark one of the following;
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is needed for field(s) ID:
( Please include the rationale for the requested re -location of the compliance boundary and attach a map showing the newly proposed compliance
boundary to the application package)
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is not needed for this site.
IV. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FIELD TRANSFER: (if needed)
❑ The land application field(s) ID: , is currently permitted under another residuals land application program; Permit Number WQ:—
The land owner hereby acknowledge that by signing this agreement, he/she is requesting that the field(s) be removed from the
previously permitted residuals land application program and transferred into the new program;
(Name of the new program)
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 2 of

Landowner's Certification:
I certify that I am a deeded landowner of the above -referenced land application site(s) and am authorized to make decisions
regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of other deeded landowners OR that I am otherwise authorized, through
a power of attorney or other legal delegation, to make decisions regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of the
deeded landowners. I certify that the above -referenced land application site(s) are not included in any waste disposal contract or
agreement with another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity. Furthermore, I certify that I have read this Agreement,
understand the stipulations, restrictions, alternatives for water supply wells inside the compliance boundary, acknowledgement of
field transfer, and do hereby grant permission to the Permittee to land apply residuals to the land application site(s) as specified
herein.
Landowner name:
Address
?j"I" Ili%
City: 4U) [ A_4d -- _ State: /Y +L i Zip: O% 0 3 :9 3
Phone: lag - ssR l " D jy l E-mail address: —_
Z�Signature: I't-1 i�r yCl /� o ua"'Cn Date: - --
DO
NORTH CAROLINA, RArm COUNTY
I, the undersigned Notary Public do hereby certify that _I j All:? Ail'_l'
personally appeared before me this day and ac/kjnowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this the f
day of 0,T , 20 22 r•• 'N
U f.%% Y
Signature and seal:
My commission expires:
=s
COU;IL 4 •4•
Lessee's/Operator's Certification:
I certify that I have read thA Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
n .
name:
Address:
C ity:
e
Phone:
Signature:
Permittee's Certification:
State:
E-mai
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
�Signing official name:
� -_��
Signature:
Date:
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 3 of 3

DWR
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Division of Water Resources
15A NCAC 02T .1100 — LAND OWNER AGREEMENT
FORM: LOA 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and
supporting documentation
For more information, visit the Wuter Duality Permitting Section's Non -Discharge Permitting Unit.
General — This document is an agreement between the Applicant and land owner(s) of residuals receiving sites for land application of
Class B residuals (may include water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1 100. Do not submit
this agreement for review without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 06-16).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Land Owner Agreement (FORM: LOA 06-16):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16) form. Please do
not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to
the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
® Prepare a separate agreement for each set of land application sites that are owned or operated by an entity other than the
Applicant.
® A copy of the completed and appropriately executed agreement must be provided to the landowner and the lessee/operator.
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUALS TO PRIVATELY OWNED LAND
The undersigned landowner or his representative hereby permits:
Applicant's name: Patrick Bullard
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to land apply residuals from the following facility(ies) onto the following land
application site(s) (i.e., see attached setback maps) in accordance with the stipulations and restrictions as given in this
Agreement:
Residuals Source Special note
SitelField ID Lease Land Use or Intended Use of Crops (no-till/over-seed!
(yes/no) Cropping Patterns (optional) pasture)
NC-RO-39-5 N Pasture Animal Feed City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-RO-39-6 N Pasture Animal Feed City of Lumberton
WWTP
The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the Permittee
receives, in consideration, the use of the land application site(s) described above for the disposal of the residuals.
This Agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division's permit for the residuals land application program and shall be renewed
each time this permit is renewed.
The undersigned landowner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions and stipulations until such
time as written notification, given 30 calendar days in advance, modifies or cancels this Agreement.
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 1 of 3

1. STIPULATIONS:
- I. The landowner or his representative shall not enter into any additional residuals application contracts or agreements with another permitted
entity for the site(s) specified by this Agreement.
2. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land application site(s) to a third party, the landowner shall
be responsible to ensure that the third party agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
3. The landowner or his representative shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement until all of the site restrictions (under Section 11) are met.
4. Notification of cancellation of this Agreement shall be immediately forwarded to NCDENR-DWR, Non -Discharge Permitting Unit, 1617 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.
5. The Permittee must request and obtain a permit modification from the Division prior to a transfer of the land application site(s) to a new
landowner. In addition, the current landowner shall give a notice to the new landowner that gives full details of the residuals applied at the land
application site(s).
6. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning the residuals land application program.
including an analysis of constituents of the residuals, residuals application methods, schedules for typical cropping patterns, a description of the
equipment used by the Permittee.
7. The Permittee will provide the landowner or his representative with a copy of the residuals permit prior to commencement of any residuals land
application event and a copy of the results of each soil analysis.
8. If the soil pH of the land application site(s) is not maintained at 6.0 or greater, sufficient amounts of lime shall be applied to achieve a final soil
pH of at least 6.0, unless an agronomist provides information indicating that the pH of the soil, residuals and lime mixture is suitable for the
specified crop.
9. The landowner or his representative and the Permittee will agree on residuals application rates and schedules based on crop patterns, results of
soil samples, and the permitted application limits.
10. The landowner or his representative will provide the Permittee with information regarding the amount and analysis of other sources of nutrients
(e.g., fertilizer, unregulated animal waste, etc.) that have been applied to the land application site(s).
11. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns for
the land application site(s) prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule residuals land application
events at appropriate periods.
12. Specific residuals land application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on the land application site(s) by the Permittee, the landowner. or
his representative prior to and during a residuals land application event.
13. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, local officials, and State officials or their representatives to; enter and
inspect any property, premises, or place on or related to the land application site(s) at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining
compliance with the permit: establish monitoring facilities on or near the land application site(s) as required by the permit; copy any records
that must be kept under the terms and conditions of the permit; take necessary leachate, surface water, groundwater. or soil samples during the
term of, and 12 months after termination of, this Agreement.
11. RESTRICTIONS:
1. Appropriate measures must betaken by the Permittee and/or the landowner or his representative to control public access to the land application
site(s) during active use and for the 12-month period following a residuals land application event. Such controls may include the posting of
signs that indicate the activities being conducted at the land application site(s).
2. Animals shall not be grazed on the land application site(s) for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event. Land application
sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods after such residuals land application
events.
3. Food crops, feed crops, and fiber crops shall not be harvested for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event.
4. Food crops with harvested parts that touch the residuals/soil mixture and are totally above the land surface shall not be harvested for a 14-month
period following a residuals land application event.
5. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested fora 20-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for four months or longer prior to incorporation into the soil.
6. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 38-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for less than four months prior to incorporation into the soil.
7. Turf grown on land where residuals are applied shall not be harvested for a l2-month period following a residuals land application event.
III. ALTERNATIVES FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS INSIDE THE COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY: (please check one)
15A NCAC 02L .0107(d) prohibits water supply wells within the compliance boundary. However, 15A NCAC 02T .0105 h allows the compliance
boundary to be placed closer to the waste disposal area, such that the water supply well is situated outside of the compliance boundary provided
the groundwater standards can be met at the newly -established compliance boundary. Please mark one of the following;
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is needed for field(s) ID:
(Please include the rationale for the requested re -location of the compliance boundary and attach a map showing the newly proposed compliance
boundary to the application package)
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is not needed for this site.
IV. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FIELD TRANSFER: (if needed)
❑ The land application field(s) ID: . is currently permitted under another residuals land application program, Permit Number WQ:_
. The land owner hereby acknowledge that by signing this agreement, he/she is requesting that the field(s) be removed from the
previously permitted residuals land application program and transferred into the new program;
(Name of the new program)
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 2 of 3

Landowner's Certification:
1 certify that l am a deeded landowner of the above -referenced land application site(s) and am authorized to make decisions
regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of other deeded landowners OR that I am otherwise authorized. through
a power of attorney or other legal delegation, to make decisions regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of the
deeded landowners. I certify that the above -referenced land application site(s) are not included in any waste disposal contract or
agreement with another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity. Furthermore, I certify that I have read this Agreement,
understand the stipulations, restrictions, alternatives for water supply wells inside the compliance boundary, acknowledgement of
field transfer, and do her by grant permission to the Permittee to l d appEy residuals to the land application sites) as specified
herein.
Landowner name: rJ
City
State:
Signature:
NORTH CAROLINA,
1, the undersigned Notary Public do hereby certify that
COUNTY
Date: 20 Z 4-
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this the _
day of 20 Z
Signature and seal:
M commission expires: ( v �' oC' `•2'
Y F
Lessee's/Operator's Certification: ­884tuum
I certify that t have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee/operator name:
Address:
City:
Phone:
S i gn ature:
Permittee's Certification:
State:
E-mail
Date:
Zip:
I certify that I have read this Agreement and dt�o hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Signing official name: � w` kTD -
Signature:
Date:
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 3 of 3

State of North Carolina
DWR
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Division of Water Resources 15A NCAC 02T .1100 — LAND OWNER AGRFEMENT
FORM: LOA 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and
supporting documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
General — This document is an agreement between the Applicant and land owner(s) of residuals receiving sites for land application of
Class B residuals (may include water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1 1 00. Do not submit
this agreement for review without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 06-16).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Land Owner Agreement (FORM: LOA 06-16):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16) form. Please do
not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to
the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
® Prepare a separate agreement for each set of land application sites that are owned or operated by an entity other than the
Applicant.
® A copy of the completed and appropriately executed agreement must be provided to the landowner and the lessee/operator.
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUALS TO PRIVATELY OWNED LAND
The undersigned landowner or his representative hereby permits:
Applicant's name: Lyndon Bullard
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to land apply residuals from the following facility(ies) onto the following land
application site(s) (i.e., see attached setback maps) in accordance with the stipulations and restrictions as given in this
Agreement:
Site/Field ID
The
Lease
(yes/no)
Land Use or
Cropping Patterns
Intended Use of Crops
Residuals Source
(optional)
City of Lumberton
WWTP
City of Lumberton
WWTP
Special note
(no-till/over-seed/
pasture)
NC-RO-39-7
NC-RO-39-8
N
N
Pasture
Pasture
Animal Feed
Animal Feed
landowner or his re resent
p
at�ve receiv
'
es, m cons�derat�on, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the Permittee
receives, in consideration, the use of the land application site(s) described above for the disposal of the residuals.
This Agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division's permit for the residuals land application program and shall be renewed
each time this permit is renewed.
FORM: LOA 06-16
Pagel of 3

STIPULATIONS:
I, the landowner or his representative shall not enter into any additional residuals application contracts or agreements with another permitted
entity for the site(s) specified by this Agreement:
2. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land application site(s) to a third parry, the landowner shall
be responsible to ensure that the third party agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
3. The landowner or his representative shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement until all of the site restrictions (under Section 11) are met,
4. Notification of cancellation of this Agreement shall be immediately forwarded to NCDENR-DWR, Non -Discharge Permitting Unit, 1617 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.
5. The Permittee must request and obtain a permit modification from the Division prior to a transfer of the land application site(s) to a new
landowner. In addition, the current landowner shall give a notice to the new landowner that gives full details of the residuals applied at the land
application site(s).
6. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning the residuals land application program,
including an analysis of constituents of the residuals, residuals application methods, schedules fortypical cropping patterns, a description of the
equipment used by the Permittee.
7. The Permittee will provide the landowner or his representative with a copy of the residuals permit prior to commencement of any residuals land
application event and a copy of the results of each soil analysis.
8. If the soil pH of the land application site(s) is not maintained at 6.0 or greater, sufficient amounts of lime shall be applied to achieve a final soil
pH of at least 6.0, unless an agronomist provides information indicating that the pH of the soil, residuals and lime mixture is suitable for the
specified crop,
9. The landowner or his representative and the Permittee will agree on residuals application rates and schedules based on crop patterns, results of
soil samples, and the permitted application limits.
10. The landowner or his representative will provide the Permittee with information regarding the amount and analysis of other sources of nutrients
(e.g., fertilizer, unregulated animal waste, etc.) that have been applied to the land application site(s).
11. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns for
the land application site(s) prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule residuals land application
events at appropriate periods.
12. Specific residuals land application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on the land application site(s) by the Permittee, the landowner, or
his representative prior to and during a residuals land application event.
13. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, local officials, and State officials or their representatives to; enter and
inspect any property. premises, or place on or related to the land application site(s) at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining
compliance with the permit; establish monitoring facilities on or near the land application site(s) as required by the permit; copy any records
that must be kept under the terms and conditions of the permit; take necessary leachate, surface water, groundwater, or soil samples during the
term of, and 12 months after termination of, this Agreement.
if. RESTRICTIONS:
1. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee and/or the landowner or his representative to control public access to the land application
site(s) during active use and for the 12-month period following a residuals land application event. Such controls may include the posting, of
signs that indicate the activities being conducted at the land application site(s).
2. Animals shall not be grazed on the land application site(s) for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event. Land application
sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods after such residuals land application
events.
3. Food crops, feed crops, and fiber crops shall not be harvested for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event.
4. Food crops with harvested parts that touch the residuals/soil mixture and are totally above the land surface shall not be harvested for a 14-month
period following a residuals land application event.
5. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 20-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for four months or longer prior to incorporation into the soil.
6. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 38-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for less than four months prior to incorporation into the soil.
7. Turf grown on land where residuals are applied shall not be harvested for a 12-month period following a residuals land application event.
I 11. ALTERNATIVES FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS INSIDE THE COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY: (please check one)
15A NCAC 02L .0107(d) prohibits water supply wells within the compliance boundary. However, 15A NCAC 02T , 105 h allows the compliance
boundary to be placed closer to the waste disposal area. such that the water supply well is situated outside of the compliance boundary provided
the groundwater standards can be met at the newly -established compliance boundary. Please mark one of the following;
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is needed for field(s) ID:
(Please include the rationale for the requested re -location of the compliance boundary and attach a map showing the newly proposed compliance
boundary to the application package)
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is not needed for this site.
IV. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FIELD TRANSFER: (if needed)
❑ The land application field(s) ID: , is currently permitted under another residuals land application program: Permit Number WQ:^
. The land owner hereby acknowledge that by signing this agreement, he/she is requesting that the field(s) be removed from the
previously permitted residuals land application program and transferred into the new program;
(Name of the new program)
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 2 of 3

Landowner's Certification:
I certify that I am a deeded landowner of the above -referenced land application site(s) and am authorized to make decisions
regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of other deeded landowners OR that l am otherwise authorized, through
a power of attorney or other legal delegation, to make decisions regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of the
deeded landowners. I certify that the above -referenced land application site(s) are not included in any waste disposal contract or
agreement with another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity. Furthermore, I certify that I have read this Agreement,
understand the stipulations, restrictions, alternatives for water supply wells inside the compliance boundary, acknowledgement of
field transfer, and do hereby grant permission to the Permittee to land apply residuals to the land application site(s) as specified
herein.
Landowner name:
City: State:_-� �' Lip:
Phone: 91 C) - M �_/ 5: 5-, E-mail address:
Signature. Date:
NORTH AROI_.INA, e Q C SOi'1 COUNTY
I, the undersigned Notary Public do hereby certify that RY
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this the L.�
day of `i , 20 2. e°.•.....
: 0•� pJ
Signature and seal:
My commission expires: 2
Pull
Lessee's/Operator's Certification: 1PAX
I certify that l have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lesseeloperator name:
Address:
City:
Phone:
Signature:
Permittee's Certification:
State:
E-mail address:
Date:
Zip:
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Signing official name:
Signature: Date:
3IaZ°r%2Z
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 3 of 3

State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
DWR Division of Water Resources
Division of Water Resources 15A NCAC 02T .1100 -- LAND OWNER AGREEMENT
FORM: LOA 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the a lication and
supporting documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non -Discharge Permitting_ Unit.
General — This document is an agreement between the Applicant and land owner(s) of residuals receiving sites for land application of
Class B residuals (may include water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T . 1100. Do not submit
this agreement for review without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 06-16).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Land Owner Agreement (FORM: LOA 06-16):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16) form. Please do
not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to
the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
® Prepare a separate agreement for each set of land application sites that are owned or operated by an entity other than the
Applicant.
® A copy of the completed and appropriately executed agreement must be provided to the landowner and the iesseeloperator.
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUALS TO PRIVATELY OWNED LAND
The undersigned landowner or his representative hereby permits:
Applicant's name: Tracy Elizabeth Bullard
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to land apply residuals from the following facility(ies) onto the following land
application site(s) (i.e., see attached setback maps) in accordance with the stipulations and restrictions as given in this
Agreement:
Site/Field ID
NC-RO-39-9
Lease
(yes/no)
V
Land Use or
Cropping Patterns
Flay
Intended Use of Crops
Animal Feed
Residuals Source
(optional)
City of Lumberton
WWTP
Special note
(no-till/over-seed/
pasture)
The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals wnne the rerminee
receives, in consideration, the use of the land application site(s) described above for the disposal of the residuals.
This Agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division's permit for the residuals land application program and shall be renewed
each time this permit is renewed.
The undersigned landowner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions and stipulations until such
time as written notification, given 30 calendar days in advance, modifies or cancels this Agreement.
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page I of 3

I. STIPULATIONS:
1_ The landowner or his representative shall not enter into any additional residuals application contracts or agreements with another permitted
entity for the site(s) specified by this Agreement.
2. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land application site(s) to a third party, the landowner shall
be responsible to ensure that the third party agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
3. The landowner or his representative shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement until all of the site restrictions (under Section 11) are met.
4. Notification of cancellation of this Agreement shall be immediately forwarded to NCDBNR-DWR, Non -Discharge Permitting Unit, 1617 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.
5. The Permittee must request and obtain a permit modification from the Division prior to a transfer of the land application site(s) to a new
landowner. In addition, the current landowner shall give a notice to the new landowner that gives full details of the residuals applied at the land
application site(s).
6. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning the residuals land application program,
including an analysis of constituents of the residuals, residuals application methods, schedules for typical cropping patterns, a description of the
equipment used by the Permittee.
7. The Permittee will provide the landowner or his representative with a copy of the residuals permit prior to commencement of any residuals land
application event and a copy of the results of each soil analysis.
8. If the soil pH of the land application site(s) is not maintained at 6.0 or greater, sufficient amounts of time shall be applied to achieve a final soil
pH of at least 6.0, unless an agronomist provides information indicating that the pH of the soil, residuals and time mixture is suitable for the
specified crop.
9. The landowner or his representative and the Permittee will agree on residuals application rates and schedules based on crop patterns, results of
soil samples, and the permitted application limits.
10. The landowner or his representative will provide the Permittee with information regarding the amount and analysis of other sources of nutrients
(e.g.. fertilizer, unregulated animal waste, etc.) that have been applied to the land application site(s).
11. 'The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns for
the land application site(s) prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule residuals land application
events at appropriate periods.
12. Specific residuals land application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on the land application site(s) by the Permittee, the landowner, or
his representative prior to and during a residuals land application event,
13. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, local officials, and State officials or their representatives to, enter and
inspect any property, premises, or place on or related to the land application site(s) at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining
compliance with the permit; establish monitoring facilities on or near the land application site(s) as required by the permit; copy any records
that must be kept under the terms and conditions of the permit; take necessary leachate. surface water, groundwater, or soil samples during the
term of, and 12 months after termination of, this Agreement.
U. RESTRICTIONS:
1. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee and/or the landowner or his representative to control public access to the land application
site(s) during active use and for the 12-month period following a residuals land application event. Such controls may include the posting of
signs that indicate the activities being conducted at the land application site(s).
2. Animals shall not be grazed on the land application site(s) for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event. land application
sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods after such residuals land application
events.
3. Food crops, feed crops, and fiber crops shall not be harvested for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event.
4. Food crops with harvested parts that touch the residuals/soil mixture and are totally above the land surface shall not be harvested fora 14-month
period following a residuals land application event.
5. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 20-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for four months or longer prior to incorporation into the soil.
6. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 38-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for less than four months prior to incorporation into the soil.
7. Turf grown on land where residuals are applied shall not be harvested for a 12-month period following a residuals land application event.
III. ALTERNATIVES FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS INSIDE THE COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY: (please check one)
1 SA NCAC 02L .0107(d) prohibits water supply wells within the compliance boundary. However, 15A NCAC 02T .010i(h) allows the compliance
boundary to be placed closer to the waste disposal arcs, such that the water supply well is situated outside of the compliance boundary provided
the groundwater standards can be met at the newly -established compliance boundary. Please mark one of the following,
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is needed for fields) ID:
(Please include the rationale for the requested re -location of the compliance boundary and attach a map showing the newly proposed compliance
boundary to the application package)
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is not needed for this site.
IV. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FIELD TRANSFER: (if needed)
❑ The land application field(s) ID: , is currently permitted under another residuals land application program; Permit Number WQ:_
. 'The land owner hereby acknowledge that by signing this agreement, he/she is requesting that the field(s) be removed from the
previously permitted residuals land application program and transferred into the new program;
(Name of the new program)
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 2 of 3

Landowner's Certification:
I certify that I am a deeded landowner of the above -referenced land application site(s) and am authorized to make decisions
regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of other deeded landowners OR that I am otherwise authorized, through
a power of attorney or other legal delegation, to make decisions regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of the
deeded landowners. I certify that the above -referenced land application site(s) are not included in any waste disposal contract or
agreement with another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity. Furthermore, I certify that I have read this Agreement,
understand the stipulations, restrictions, alternatives for water supply wells inside the compliance boundary, acknowledgement of
field transfer, and do hereby grant permission to the Permittee to land apply residuals to the land application site(s) as specified
herein.
Landowner name: r * 4 6C-' ',a, �1""
Address: „'�+'^ 1 r�
City: Z.LLrniext?-� State: Zip:
Phone: " 1 1 A Jp 17" E-mail address: te"41dvc Q
Signature: Date: (3� 1 �p2Z
NORTH OLINA, PO&W COUNTY
1, the undersigned Notary Public do hereby certify that %oe A r
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the d . execution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this the
day of MAY, c h 20
e
Signature and seal:_r�
W L� S' a
My commission expires: I�;� '• G
Lessee's/Operator's Certification: '"'��un6st,'���
I certify that I have read thi regiment and do hereby ee to a de by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee/operator name: AY A
Addre V.01 1' fix, � UtP l
City: -
Phone:
S i gnatu
Permittee's Certification:
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Signing official name: f
�'1 " " t -
Signature: Date:
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 3 of 3

State of North Carolina
nWR Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
15A NCAC 02T .1100 — LAND OWNER AGREEMENT
Division of Water Resources
FORM: LOA 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two conies of the application and
supporting documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non -Discharge Permitting Unit.
General — This document is an agreement between the Applicant and land owner(s) of residuals receiving sites for land application of
Class B residuals (may include water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .l 100. Do not submit
this agreement for review without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 06-16).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Land Owner Agreement (FORM: LOA 06-16):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16) form. Please do
not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to
the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
® Prepare a separate agreement for each set of land application sites that are owned or operated by an entity other than the
Applicant.
® A copy of the completed and appropriately executed agreement must be provided to the landowner and the lessee/operator.
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUALS TO PRIVATELY OWNED LAND
The undersigned landowner or his representative hereby permits:
Applicant's name: Lumbee Holdings, LLC c/o Ben Chavis
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to land apply residuals from the following facility(ies) onto the following land
application site(s) (i.e., see attached setback maps) in accordance with the stipulations and restrictions as given in this
Agreement:
Site/Field ID
Lease
(yes/no)
Land Use t
Cropping Patterns
Intended Ilse of Crops
Residuals Source
(optional}
Special note
(no-till/over-seed/
pasture)
Animal Feed
City of Lumberton
NC-RO40-1
N
Pasture/Hay
WWTP
NC-R040-2
N
PasturelHay
Animal Feed
City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-RO-40-3
N
Pasture/Hay
Animal Feed
City of Lumberton
W TP
NC-RO-40-4
N
Pasture/Hay
Animal Feed
City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-R040-5
N
PasturelHay
Animal Feed
City of Lumberton
WWTP
Pasture/Hay
Animal Feed
City of Lumberton
NC-RO 40-fi
N
WWTP
Pasture/Hay
Animal Feed
City of Lumberton
NC-RO-40-7
N
WWTP
Pasture/Hav
Animal Feed
City of Lumberton
NC-RO40-8
N
WWTP
The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the
Permittee receives, in consideration, the use of the land application site(s) described above for the disposal of the residuals.
This Agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division's permit for the residuals land application program and
shall be renewed each time this permit is renewed.
The undersigned landowner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions and
stipulations until such time as written notification, given 30 calendar days in advance, modifies or cancels this Agreement.
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page I of 3

I. STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative shall not enter into any additional residuals application contracts or agreements with another permitted
entity for the site(s) specified by this Agreement.
2. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land application site(s) to a third party, the landowner shall
be responsible to ensure that the third party agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
3. The landowner or his representative shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement until all of the site restrictions (under Section 11) are met.
4. Notification of cancellation of this Agreement shall be immediately forwarded to NCDENR-DWR, Non -Discharge Permitting Unit, 1617 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.
5. The Permittee must request and obtain a permit modification from the Division prior to a transfer of the land application site(s) to a new
landowner. In addition, the current landowner shall give a notice to the new landowner that gives full details of the residuals applied at the land
application site(s).
6. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning the residuals land application program,
including an analysis of constituents of the residuals, residuals application methods, schedules for typical cropping patterns, a description ofthe
equipment used by the Permittee.
7. The Permittee will provide the landowner or his representative with a copy of the residuals permit prior to commencement of any residuals land
application event and a copy of the results of each soil analysis.
8. If the soil pH of the land application site(s) is not maintained at 6.0 or greater, sufficient amounts of time shall be applied to achieve a final soil
pH of at least 6.0, unless an agronomist provides information indicating that the pH of the soil, residuals and lime mixture is suitable for the
specified crop.
9. The landowner or his representative and the Permittee will agree on residuals application rates and schedules based on crop patterns, results of
soil samples, and the permitted application limits.
10, The landowner or his representative will provide the Permittee with information regarding the amount and analysis of other sources of nutrients
(e.g., fertilizer, unregulated animal waste, etc.) that have been applied to the land application site(s).
11. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns for
the land application sites) prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule residuals land application
events at appropriate periods.
12, Specific residuals land application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on the land application site(s) by the Permittee, the landowner, or
his representative prior to and during a residuals land application event.
13. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, local officials, and State officials or their representatives to; enter and
inspect any property, premises, or place on or related to the land application site(s) at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining
compliance with the permit; establish monitoring facilities on or near the land application site(s) as required by the permit, copy any records
that must be kept under the terms and conditions of the permit; take necessary leachate, surface water, groundwater, or soil samples during the
term of, and 12 months after termination of, this Agreement.
11. RESTRICTIONS:
1. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee and/or the landowner or his representative to control public access to the land application
site(s) during active use and for the 12-month period following a residuals land application event. Such controls may include the posting of
signs that indicate the activities being conducted at the land application site(s).
2. Animals shall not be grazed on the land application site(s) for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event. Land application
sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods after such residuals land application
events.
3. Food crops, feed crops. and fiber crops shall not be harvested for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event.
4. Food crops with harvested parts that touch the residuals/soiI mixture and are totally above the land surface shall not be harvested for a 14-month
period following a residuals land application event.
5. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 20-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain an the land surface for four months or longer prior to incorporation into the soil.
6. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 38-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for less than tour months prior to incorporation into the soil.
7. Turf grown on land where residuals are applied shall not be harvested for a 12-month period following a residuals land application event.
I 11. ALTERNATIVES FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS INSIDE THE COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY: (please check one)
15A NCAC 02L .0107(d) prohibits water supply wells within the compliance boundary. However, 15A NCAC 02T .010a li allows the compliance
boundary to be placed closer to the waste disposal area, such that the water supply well is situated outside of the compliance boundary provided
the groundwater standards can be met at the newly -established compliance boundary. Please mark one of the following;
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is needed for field(s) ID:
(Please include the rationale for the requested re -location of the compliance boundary and attach a map showing the newly proposed compliance
boundary to the application package)
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is not needed for this site.
IV. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FIELD TRANSFER: (if needed)
❑ The land application fields) ID: , is currently permitted under another residuals land application program; Permit Number WQ:_
. The land owner hereby acknowledge that by signing this agreement, he/she is requesting that the field(s) be removed from the
previously permitted residuals land application program and transferred into the new program;
(Name of the new program)
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 2 of 3

Landowner's Certification:
I certify that I am a deeded landowner of the above -referenced land application site(s) and am authorized to make decisions
regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of other deeded landowners OR that I am otherwise authorized, through
a power of attorney or other legal delegation, to make decisions regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of the
deeded landowners. I certify that the above -referenced land application site(s) are not included in any waste disposal contract or
agreement with another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity. Furthermore, I certify that I have read this Agreement,
understand the stipulations, restrictions, alternatives for water supply wells inside the compliance boundary, acknowledgement of
field transfer, and do hereby grant permission to the Permittee to land apply residuals to the land application site(s) as specified
herein. * -
Landowner name:
City: L1 - Stater Zip:— m�U
Phone: �f}r� -� ��1 E-mail address:
Signature: r Date: —
NORT+COLINA, Tom+ scn COUNTY
1, the undersigned Notary Public do hereby certify that 1
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
J
WITNESS my hand and official seal this the A
r`�
day of �ii aTl .t 20
Signature and seal: �(�t(�Ll1�1Y1
My commission expires: I
Lessee's/Operator's Certification:
t certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee/operator name:
Address:
City:
Phone:
Signature:
Permittee's Certification:
State:
E-mail address:
Date:
Zip:
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Signing official name: _,okr*,1 �' 4u:>
Signature:
Date:
q- 'FG -a l
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 3 of 3

9 R
Division of Water Resources
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
15A NCAC 02T A 100 — LAND OWNER AGREEMENT
FORM: LOA 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and
suvoortine documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Nun -Discharge Permitting Unit,
General — This document is an agreement between the Applicant and land owner(s) of residuals receiving sites for land application of
Class B residuals (may include water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T . 1100. Do not submit
this agreement for review without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 06-16).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Land Owner Agreement (FORM: LOA 06-16):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16) form. Please do
not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to
the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
® Prepare a separate agreement for each set of land application sites that are owned or operated by an entity other than the
Applicant.
® A copy of the completed and appropriately executed agreement must be provided to the landowner and the lessee/operator.
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUALS TO PRIVATELY OWNED LAND
The undersigned landowner or his representative hereby permits:
Applicant's name: James McGirt
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to land apply residuals from the following facility(ies) onto the following land
application site(s) (i.e., see attached setback maps) in accordance with the stipulations and restrictions as given in this
Agreement:
Special note
Site/Field ID
Lease
Land Ilse or
Intended Use of Crops
Residuals Source
(no-till/over-seed/
(yes/no)
Cropping Patterns
(optional)
pasture)
NC-RO-42-1
Y
Row Crops
Animal Feed
City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-RO-42-2
Y
Row Crops
Animal Feed
City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-RO42-3
Y
Row Crops
Animal Feed
City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-RO42-4
Y
Row Crops
Animal Feed
City of Lumberton
WWTP
NC-RO-42-5
Y
Row Crops
Animal Feed
City of Lumberton
WWTP
l'
Row Crops
Animal Feed
City of Lumberton
NC-RO-42-6
WWTP
Y
Row Crops
Animal Feed
City of Lumberton
NC-RO-42-7
WWTP
y
Row Crops
Animal Feed
City of Lumberton
NC-RO-42-8
WWTP
ti
Row Crops
Animal Feed
City or Lumberton
NC-R042-9
WWTP
The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the appueu residuals wnue ine rermirnee
receives, in consideration, the use of the land application site(s) described above for the disposal of the residuals.
This Agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division's permit for the residuals land application program and shall be renewed
each time this permit is renewed.
The undersigned landowner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions and stipulations until such
time as written notification, given 30 calendar days in advance, modifies or cancels this Agreement.
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page I of 3

STIPULATIONS-
I. The landowner or his representative shall not enter into any additional residuals application contracts or agreements with another permitted
entity for the site(s) specified by this Agreement.
2. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land application site(s) to a third party, the landowner shall
be responsible to ensure that the third party agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
3. The landowner or his representative shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement until all of the site restrictions (under Section 11) are met.
4. Notification of cancellation of this Agreement shall be immediately forwarded to NCDENR-DWR, Non -Discharge Permitting Unit, 1617 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617,
5. The Permittee must request and obtain a permit modification from the Division prior to a transfer of the land application site(s) to a new
landowner. In addition, the current landowner shall give a notice to the new landowner that gives full details of the residuals applied at the land
application site(s).
6. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning the residuals land application program,
including an analysis of constituents of the residuals, residuals application methods, schedules for typical cropping patterns, a description of the
equipment used by the Permittee.
7. The Permittee will provide the landowner or his representative with a copy of the residuals permit prior to commencement of any residuals land
application event and a copy of the results of each soil analysis.
8. If the soil pH of the land application site(s) is not maintained at 6.0 or greater, sufficient amounts of lime shall be applied to achieve a final soil
pH of at least 6.0, unless an agronomist provides information indicating that the pH of the soil, residuals and lime mixture is suitable for the
specified crop.
9. The landowner or his representative and the Permittee will agree on residuals application rates and schedules based on crop patterns, results of
soil samples, and the permitted application limits.
10. The landowner or his representative will provide the Perntittee with information regarding the amount and analysis of other sources of nutrients
(e.g., fertilizer, unregulated animal waste, etc.) that have been applied to the land application site(s).
11. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns for
the land application site(s) prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule residuals land application
events at appropriate periods.
12. Specific residuals land application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on the land application site(s) by the Permittee, the landowner, or
his representative prior to and during a residuals land application event.
13. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, local officials, and State officials or their representatives to; enter and
inspect any property, premises, or place on or related to the land application site(s) at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining
compliance with the permit; establish monitoring facilities on or near the land application site(s) as required by the permit; copy any records
that must be kept under the terms and conditions of the permit; take necessary leachate, surface water, groundwater, or soil samples during the
term of, and 12 months after termination of, this Agreement.
II. RESTRICTIONS:
1. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee and/or the landowner or his representative to control public access to the land application
site(s) during active use and for the 12-month period following a residuals land application event. Such controls may include the posting of
signs that indicate the activities being conducted at the land application site(s).
2. Animals shall not be grazed on the land application site(s) for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event. Land application
sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods after such residuals land application
events.
3. Food crops, feed crops, and fiber crops shall not be harvested for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event.
4. Food crops with harvested parts that touch the residuals/soil mixture and are totally above the land surface shall not be harvested for a t 4-month
period following a residuals land application event.
5. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 20-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the Iand surface for four months or longer prior to incorporation into the soil.
6. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 38-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for less than four months prior to incorporation into the soil.
7. Turf grown on land where residuals are applied shall not be harvested for a 12-month period following a residuals land application event.
III. ALTERNATIVES FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS INSIDE THE COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY: (please check one)
15A NCAC 02L .0107(d) prohibits water supply wells within the compliance boundary. However, 15A NCAC 02T .0105 h allows the compliance
boundary to be placed closer to the waste disposal area, such that the water supply well is situated outside of the compliance boundary provided
the groundwater standards can be met at the newly -established compliance boundary. Please mark one of the following;
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is needed for field(s) ID:
(Please include the rationale for the requested re -location of the compliance boundary and attach a map showing the newly proposed compliance
boundary to the application package)
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is not needed for this site.
IV. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FIELD TRANSFER: (if needed)
❑ The land application field(s) ID: , is currently permitted under another residuals land application program; Permit Number WQ:_
. The land owner hereby acknowledge that by signing this agreement, he/she is requesting that the field(s) be removed from the
previously permitted residuals land application program and transferred into the new program;
(Name of the new program)
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 2 of 3

Landowner's Certification:
I certify that I am a deeded landowner of the above -referenced land application site(s) and am authorized to make decisions
regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of other deeded landowners OR that I am otherwise authorized, through
a power of attorney or other legal delegation, to make decisions regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of the
deeded landowners. I certify that the above -referenced land application site(s) are not included in any waste disposal contract or
agreement with another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity. Furthermore, I certify that I have read this Agreement,
understand the stipulations, restrictions, alternatives for water supply wells inside the compliance boundary, acknowledgement of
field transfer, and do hereby grant permission to the Permittee to land apply residuals to the land application site(s) as specified
herein. y� /�
Landowner name:7'�r / "�
Address: )2 -1 n)
City: J��1N,. \2tA_kc-d State: Zip: Z g'35700
Phone: Z5 ZI 6 Z E-mail address: ca e:
Signature: Date: ©�
NORTH C INA, Q COUNTY
1, the undersigned Notary Public do hereby certify that
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this the
day of r , 20 r••
Signature and seal:
My commission expires: Ij 'J I? 40cr 1 , q-0IS %__0aa 00
Lessee's/Operator's Certification:
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee/operator name: L
Address: ) 91 { _R&55
City: IAA Mber 4- ---\
State: N (_ Zip: Z $ 35 ??
Phone: 910) E-mail address: Co,-.,j k Qtr jI'n e4 e gwta%/. Co.71
Signature: Date: �� r7 k
Permittee's Certification:
i certify that 1 have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Signing official name: , _ Glrt4) T . wftl��
Signature:
Date: 1 0 — l -.21
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 3 of 3

LASC 06-16 FORM

DWR
Division of Water Resources
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
LAND APPLICATION SITE CERTIFICATION
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and
supporting documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non -Discharge Permitting
General — This certification provides detailed information of receiving sites for land application of Class B residuals (may include water
treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1100. Do not submit this certification for review without
a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 06-16 or FORM: SDR 06-16).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16) form. Please do
not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to
the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
® For new or renewed permits, submit the requested information for all land application sites.
❑ For modified permits, submit the requested information for only those sites that are new, transferred or affected by the proposed
modification.
B. Land Application Site Information:
® The status of the land application site with respect to this residuals land application program must be provided in table I. The
status categories�n�
ding codes are as follows:
♦ New (N) ♦ Modified (M) ♦ Transferred (T) ♦ Deleted (D)
® Attach the followiith each status code:
Status Code
Required Item
N
R
T
M
County Board
Notification.doc
Land Owner
Agreement
(If applicable)
Setback Waiver
Agreement
An updated vicinity/setback map in accordance with the "Man Guidance
for Residuals Land Application Permits"
✓
✓
✓
A soils and agronomic evaluation in accordance with the "Soil Scientist
✓
Evaluation Policy"
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 06-161'age 1 of

An updated accounting of the land application site's cumulative pollutant
loading rates (CPLRs)
Status Code
Required Item
N
R
T
M
For previously permitted sites without a soil series name indicated in the
Attachment B, submit County Soil Survey Map (or equivalent) clearly
indicate the location of the land application site and in accordance with
the soil map requirements in the "Soil Scientist Evaluation Policy"
Acknowledgement of field transfer from Land Owner (Fields may not be
permitted to multiple Permittees over the same timeperiod)
* This item may be required for land application site with a status code "M", please contact the Division if you need assistant in
determining attachment requirements.
® Crop Type should include the most likely crop types for the life of the permit (five years).
® Predominant Soils Series Name must be either the name of the soil indicated in Attachment `B" of the existing permit, or name
of the soil series as provided by the licensed soil scientist.
® Predominant Soil Mapping Unit or Representative Slope: Either the Soil Mapping Unit or the representative slope of each site
must be provided. The predominant soil -mapping unit must be consistent with the predominant soil series name. Please note
that the soil mapping units are variable between Counties, so care should be taken in properly identifying the correct mapping
unit. If a representative slope is provided, it must be determined accordingly:
❑ For sites previously permitted for use, but do not have an established soil mapping unit (the mapping unit provides
information on both the soil series name and the slope of the soil), the Applicant may determine the representative slope
by using the average slope provided in the County Soil Survey (or equivalent). A soil type with a slope range of 4 - 8%
would have a representative slope of 6%.
❑ New Sites to be permitted must have slopes determined as part of the soils report prepared by a licensed soil scientist.
❑ Acceptable methods for determining location coordinates (i.e., latitude and longitude) and their corresponding codes are as
follows:
• Address Matching (ADD)
• Aerial Photography with Ground Control (AER)
• Cadastral Survey (SUR)
• Conversion from Coordinate Plane (CP)
• Conversion from Township -Section -Range (TSR)
• Conversion from Universal Trans Mere (UTM)
• Map Interpretation by Digital or Manual Extraction (MAP)
C. Waterbody and Classifications Information: (new sites only)
• Digital or Raw Photo Extraction (EXT)
• Geodetic Quality GPS Survey (GEO)
• LORAN-C Navigation Device (LOR)
• Navigation Quality GPS (GPS)
• Remote Sensing (RS)
• Zip Code Centroid (ZIP)
® Use an 8.5 by 11-inch copy of the portion of a 7.5-minute USGS Topographic Map to identify the location where the residuals
program activities are planned to occur as well as the closest downslope surface waters as clearly as possible. Each map portion
must be labeled with the map name and number, the identified location, and be of clear and reproducible quality.
❑ Surface water body classifications information may be found at: hLtp:Hdeg.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-
resources/planning/classification-standards/classifications
❑ Any questions concerning the waterbody and its classification, please contact the Division's regional offices.
❑ A list of the Division's regional offices, their county coverage, and their contact information may be downloaded at:
hLtp:Hdeg.nc.gov/contact/regional-offices
❑ General Instructions: There are 17 river basins in North Carolina. Each basin has associated waterbodies with assigned
subbasins, location descriptions, stream index numbers and established classifications.
1. Identify the project area on a 7.5 minute USGS topographical map (an 8.5 x 11-inch sheet showing the project area
should be submitted with the permit application regardless of whether a Stream classification was completed).
2. Determine the names of all the closest down slope surface waters from the project site. For unnamed tributaries, see
Table 1: Unnamed Tributaries Entering Other States or for Specific Basin Areas. Label any unnamed tributaries as "UT
to stream name" as the waterbody name.
3. Open the link hLtp:Hdeg.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/planning/classification-standards/classifications.
❑ Stream Classification Process: One of the options below may be used depending on the known initial project information.
❑ KNOWN BASIN WHERE CLOSEST DOWN SLOPE SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED
1. Select proper basin from the List all Waterbodies in Basin sorted report. Sort hydrologically as this will provide
the proper location descriptions if multiple runs.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 06-16Page 2 of 3

2. Locate the name of the identified waterbody (from General Directions) on the list.
3. For multiple listings of the same waterbody name in the report, select and verify the location description. The term
"source" in the description means the beginning of the waterbody segment (most upstream point).
4. Record all Basins, Stream Index Numbers and Classifications applicable to the project.
❑ KNOWN COUNTY WHERE CLOSEST DOWN SLOPE SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED
1. Select the proper county from the List all Waterbodies in county, hydrologically report.
2. Locate the name of the identified waterbody (from General Directions) on the list.
3. For multiple listings of the same waterbody name in the report, select and verify the location description. The term
"source" in the description means the beginning of the waterbody segment (most upstream point).
4. Record all Basins, Stream Index Numbers and Classifications applicable to the project.
❑ UNKNOWN BASIN WHERE CLOSEST DOWN SLOPE SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED
1. Use the Clickable basin map to hydrologically sorted list report.
2. Click on the approximate project location to bring up the hydrologically sorted list.
3. Locate the name of the identified waterbody (from General Directions) on the list.
4. For multiple listings of the same waterbody name in the report, select and verify the location description. The tern
"source" in the description means the beginning of the waterbody segment (most upstream point).
5. Record all Basins, Stream Index Numbers and Classifications applicable to the project.
❑ Notes on index number and unnamed streams:
Unnamed Streams 15A NCAC 02B .0301(i).
❑ Any stream which is not named in the schedule of stream classifications carries the same classification as that assigned
to the stream segment to which it is tributary (at the point of entry) except:
(A) unnamed streams specifically described in the schedule of classifications;
(B) unnamed freshwaters tributary to tidal saltwaters will be classified "C"; or
(C) after November 1, 1986, any newly created areas of tidal saltwater which are connected to Class SA waters by
approved dredging projects will be classified "SC" unless case -by -case reclassification proceedings are conducted.
❑ The following river basins have different policies for unnamed streams entering other states or for specific areas of the
basin:
Unnamed Tributaries Entering Other States or for Specific Basin Areas
Hiwassee River Basin
Streams entering Georgia or Tennessee shall be classified "C Tr."
Little Tennesse River
Basin And Savannah
River Drainage Area
Streams entering Georgia or Tennessee shall be classified "C Tr." Such streams in the Savannah
River drainage area entering South Carolina shall be classified 'B Tr."
French Broad River
Basin
Streams entering Tennessee will be classified 'B."
Watauga River Basin
Streams entering the State of Tennessee are classified "C."
Broad River Basin
Streams entering South Carolina are classified "C."
New River Basin
Streams entering the State of Tennessee are classified "C."
Catawba River Basin
Streams entering South Carolina are classified "C."
Yadkin -Pee Dee River
Basin
Streams entering Virginia are classified "C," and such streams entering South Carolina are
classified "C."
Lumber River Basin
Streams entering South Carolina are classified "C Sw."
Roanoke River Basin
Streams entering Virginia are classified "C." Except that all backwaters of John H. Kerr Reservoir
and the North Carolina portion of streams tributary thereto not otherwise named or described
shall carry the classification 'B," and all backwaters of Lake Gaston and the North Carolina
portion of streams tributary thereto not otherwise named or described shall carry the classification
"C and B."
Chowan River Basin
Streams entering Virginia are classified "C."
Tar -Pamlico River
Basin
All drainage canals not noted in the schedule are classified "C Sw." except the main drainage
canals to Pamlico Sound and its bays which shall be classified "SC."
Pas uotank River Basin
All drainage canals not noted in the schedule are classified "C."
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 06-16Page 3 of

LAND APPLICATION SITE CERTIFICATION
Applicant's name: City of Lumberton
Land application sites currently certified: 761.8 net acres and Total to be certified: 1,316.38 net acres.
L LAND APPLICATION SITE INFORMATION (See Instruction B):
Status
Codea
Site/Field ID
Landowner(s)
Lessee(s) or
O erator s
P ()
Net
Acres
County-
Crop(s)
Predominant Soil
Series Name
Mapping
Unit or Rep.
Slope'
R
NC-RO-16-01
Baker, Arrin Ozzell
10.57
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
Ra- Rains Sandy
0 to 2% slopes
R
NC-RO-16-2
Baker, Arrin Ozzell
3.05
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
GoA- Goldsboro
0 to 2% slopes
R
NC-RO-16-3
Baker, Arrin Ozzell
2.81
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
GoA-Goldsboro
0 to 2% slopes
R
NC-RO-16-4
Baker, Arrin Ozzell
3.67
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
Ra- Rains Sandy
0 to 2% slopes
R
NC-RO-16-5
Baker, Arrin Ozzell
'
9.4
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
Ra- Rains Sandy
0 to 2% slopes
R
NC-RO-16-6
Baker, Arrin Ozzell
,
20.32
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
NoA- Norfolk
0 to 2% slopes
R
NC-RO-16-7
Baker, Arrin Ozzell
16.29
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
NoA-Norfolk
0 to 2% slopes
R
NC-RO-16-8
Baker, Arrin Ozzell
AME
6.72
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
WaB-Wagram
0 to 6% slopes
R
NC-RO-16-16
Campen, James T.; Surles, Mary Sydney
Baker, Arrin Ozzell
5.11
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
WaB-Wagram
0 to 6% slopes
R
NC-RO-16-17
Campen, James T.; Surles, Mary Sydney
Baker, Arrin Ozzell
6.62
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
WaB-Wagram
0 to 6% slopes
R
NC-RO-16-18
Campen, James T.; Surles, Mary Sydney
Baker, Arrui Ozzell
12.32
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
WaB-Wagram
0 to 6% slopes
R
NC-RO-16-19
Campen, James T.; Surles, Mary Sydney
Baker, Arrin Ozzell
0.99
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
WaB-Wagram
0 to 6% slopes
N/R
NC-RO-17-01
Lumberton Municipal Airport
Allen, Delois
44.89
Robeson
Row Crops
Jo -Johns Sandy
0 to 2% slopes
N/R
NC-RO-17-02
City of Lumberton
Allen, Delois
51.35
Robeson
Row Crops
Lu-Lumbee
0 to 2% slopes
N/R
NC-RO-17-03
City of Lumberton
Allen, Delois
41.89
Robeson
Row Crops
Lu-Lumbee
0 to 2% slopes
N/R
NC-RO-17-04
Lumberton Municipal Airport
Allen, Delois
65.94
Robeson
Row Crops
Jo -Johns Sandy
0 to 2% slopes
N/R
NC-RO-17-04A
Lumberton Municipal Airport
Allen, Delois
70.10
Robeson
Row Crops
Jo -Johns Sandy
0 to 2% slopes
N/R
NC-RO-17-05
Lumberton Municipal Airport
Allen, Delois
33.51
Robeson
Row Crops
Jo -Johns Sandy
0 to 2% slopes
N/R
NC-RO-17-06
Lumberton Municipal Airport
Allen, Delois
26.72
Robeson
Row Crops
Lu- Lumbee Sandy
0 to 2% slopes
N/R
NC-RO-17-07
Lumberton Municipal Airport
Allen, Delois
30.76
Robeson
Row Crops
Jo -Johns Sandy
0 to 2% slopes
R
NC-RO-20-03
Hammonds, Ronald G.
29.56
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
WkB-Wakulla
0 to 6% slopes
R
NC-RO-20-04
Brown, Charles H.
Hammonds, R. G.
30.35
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
WkB-Wakulla
0 to 6% slopes
FORM: LASC 06-16 Page 1

LAND APPLICATION SITE CERTIFICATION
R
NC-RO-20-06
Hammonds, Ronald G
4.37
Robeson
Row Crops
NoA-Norfolk
0 to 2% slopes
R
NC-RO-20-07
Hammonds, Ronald G
14.55
Robeson
Row Crops
GoA-Goldsboro
0 to 2% slopes
R
NC-RO-20-08
Hammonds, Ronald G
73.2
Robeson
Row Crops
GoA-Goldsboro
0 to 2% slopes
R
NC-RO-20-14
Taylco, Inc
Hammonds, R. G.
11.9
Robeson
Row Crops
GoA-Goldsboro
0 to 2% slopes
N
NC-RO-20-15
Hammonds, Ronald G
24.71
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
WkB-Wakulla
0 to 6% slopes
N
NC-RO-20-16
Hammonds, Ronald G
10.9
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
WkB-Wakulla
0 to 6% slopes
N
NC-RO-20-17
Hammonds, Ronald G
22.51
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
WkB-Wakulla
0 to 6% slopes
N
NC-RO-20-18
Hammonds, Ronald G
11
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
NoA-Norfolk
0 to 2% slopes
N
NC-RO-20-19
Hammonds, Ronald G
16.55
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
GoA-Goldsboro
0 to 2% slopes
N
NC-RO-20-20
Hammonds, Ronald G
43.27
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
GoA-Goldsboro
0 to 2% slopes
N
NC-RO-20-21
Hammonds, Ronald G
14.86
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
GoA-Goldsboro
0 to 2% slopes
R
NC-RO-28-01
Baskerville, Robert D., Jr.
Locklear, Camell
11.48
Robeson
Row Crops
Ra- Rains Sandy
0 to 2% slopes
R
NC-RO-28-02
Baskerville, Robert D., Jr
Locklear, Camell
58.01
Robeson
Row Crops
GoA-Goldsboro
0 to 2% slopes
R
NC-RO-28-03
Baskerville, Robert D., Jr
Locklear, Camell
10.47
Robeson
Row Crops
GoA-Goldsboro
0 to 2% slopes
R
NC-RO-39-OIA
Bullard, Lindbergh, Heirs
Bullard, Patrick
6.23
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
GoA-Goldsboro
0 to 2% slopes
R
NC-RO-39-OIB
Bullard, Lindbergh, Heirs
Bullard, Patrick
2.8
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
GoA-Goldsboro
0 to 2% slopes
R
NC-RO-39-02
Bullard, Lindbergh, Heirs
Bullard, Patrick
1.41
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
GoA-Goldsboro
0 to 2% slopes
R
NC-RO-39-03
Bullard, Quindale; Bullad, Luzette
Bullard, Patrick
6.46
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
Ra-Rains Sandy
0 to 2% slopes
R
NC-RO-39-04
Bullard, Quindale; Bullad, Luzette
Bullard, Patrick
14.8
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
Ly-Lynchburg
0 to 2% slopes
R
NC-RO-39-05
Bullard, Patrick
3.8
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
Ly-Lynchburg
0 to 2% slopes
R
NC-RO-39-06
Bullard, Patrick
2.9
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
WaB-Wagram
0 to 6% slopes
R
NC-RO-39-07
Bullard, Lyndon; Bullard, Anissa Emanuel
5.29
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
GoA-Goldsboro
0 to 2% slopes
R
NC-RO-39-08
Bullard, Lyndon
8.99
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
NoA-Norfolk
0 to 2% slopes
R
NC-RO-39-09
Bullard, Tracy Elizabeth
Bullard, Patrick
62.36
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
WaB-Wagram
0 to 6% slopes
N
NC-RO-40-1
Chavis, Ben
36.84
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
GoA-Goldsboro
0 to 2% slopes
N
NC-RO-40-2
Chavis, Ben
49.81
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
GoA-Goldsboro
0 to 2% slopes
N
NC-RO-40-3
Chavis, Ben
11
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
NoA-Norfolk
0 to 2% slopes
N
NC-RO-40-4
Chavis, Ben
17.22
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
NoA-Norfolk
0 to 2% slopes
N
NC-RO-40-5
Chavis, Ben
9.87
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
WaB-Eagram
0 to 6% slopes
FORM: LASC 06-16 Page 2

LAND APPLICATION SITE CERTIFICATION
N
NC-RO-40-6
Chavis, Ben
8.04
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
NoA-Norfolk
0 to 2% slopes
N
NC-RO-40-7
Chavis, Ben
13.87
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
NoA-Norfolk
0 to 2% slopes
N
NC-RO-40-8
Chavis, Ben
36.42
Robeson
Coastal Bermuda/Winter Rye
NoA-Norfolk
0 to 2% slopes
N
NC-RO-42-1
McGirt, James
Hardin Farms
34.67
Robeson
Row Crops
GoA-Goldsboro
0 to 2% slopes
N
NC-RO-42-2
McGirt, James
Hardin Farms
3.4
Robeson
Row Crops
GoA-Goldsboro
0 to 2% slopes
N
NC-RO-42-3
McGirt, James
Hardin Farms
57.18
Robeson
Row Crops
Ra-Rains Sandy
0 to 2% slopes
N
NC-RO-42-4
McGirt, James
Hardin Farms
4.64
Robeson
Row Crops
Me-Meggett Fine Sandy
0 to 2% slopes
N
NC-RO-42-5
McGirt, James
Hardin Farms
8.48
Robeson
Row Crops
Me-Meggett Fine Sandy
0 to 2% slopes
N
NC-RO-42-6
McGirt, James
Hardin Farms
9.54
Robeson
Row Crops
Me-Meggett Fine Sandy
0 to 2% slopes
N
NC-RO-42-7
McGirt, James
Hardin Farms
20.05
Robeson
Row Crops
Me-Meggett Fine Sandy
0 to 2% slopes
N
NC-RO-42-8
McGirt, James
Hardin Farms
1.19
Robeson
Row Crops
Ra-Rains Sandy
0 to 2% slopes
N
NC-RO-42-9
McGirt, James
Hardin Farms
28.4
Robeson
Row Crops
NoA-Norfolk
0 to 2% slopes
a Status Code for land application sites are: ♦ N (New) ♦ R (Renewed) ♦ M (Modified) ♦ T (Transferred) ♦ D (Deleted)
b Soil Series Name (i.e. Appling, Cecil, etc.)
Mapping Unit must be consistent with those used in the County Soil Survey (i.e. for a 2-8% slope Cecil in Anson County the mapping unit is CeB2)
FORM: LASC 06-16 Page 3

LAND APPLICATION SITE CERTIFICATION
II. WATERBODY AND CLASSIFICATIONS INFORMATION (See Instruction Q:
Site/Field ID
Latitude
Longitude
Location
Location
Location Accuracy
Waterbody Subbasin and
Current and Proposed
Datum
Method Code
Stream Index No.
Class
NC-RO-17-01
34.611136
-79.054205
Google Maps
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-17
C;Sw
NC-RO-17-02
34.599260
-79.074230
Google Maps
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-17
QSw
NC-RO-17-04
34.609154
-79.059053
Google Maps
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-17
QSw
NC-RO-17-04A
34.606287
-79.063723
Google Maps
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-17
QSw
NC-RO-17-05
34.617194
-79.05339
Google Maps
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-17
QSw
NC-RO-17-06
34.605947
-79.054299
Google Maps
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-17
QSw
NC-RO-17-07
34.610854
-79.063432
Google Maps
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-17
QSw
NC-RO-20-15
34.790247
-79.079081
Google Maps
ADD
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-10-4
C;Sw
NC-RO-20-16
34.790247
-79.079081
Google Maps
ADD
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-10-4
QSw
NC-RO-20-17
34.790247
-79.079081
Google Maps
ADD
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-10-4
QSw
NC-RO-20-18
34.722911
-79.071572
Google Maps
ADD
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-10-(5.5)
WS-IV;Sw
NC-RO-20-19
34.722830
-79.028887
Google Maps
ADD
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-12-3
C:Sw
NC-RO-20-20
34.725264
-79.025476
Google Maps
ADD
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-12-3
C:Sw
NC-RO-20-21
34.722268
-79.023093
Google Maps
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-12-3
C:Sw
NC-RO-40-1
34.736106
-79.012886
Google Maps
ADD
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-22-3
C;Sw
NC-RO-40-2
Google Maps
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-22-3
QSw
34.736072
-79.009727
NC-RO-40-3
Google Maps
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-22-3
QSw
34.739551
-79.004684
NC-RO-40-4
Google Maps
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-22-3
QSw
34.737437
-79.004360
NC-RO-40-5
Google Maps
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-22-3
QSw
34.7377870
-79.001929
NC-RO-40-6
Google Maps
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-22-3
QSw
34.735540
-79.004643
NC-RO-40-7
Google Maps
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-22-3
QSw
34.735823
-79.002922
NC-RO-40-8
Google Maps
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-22-3
QSw
34.732211
-79.003509
NC-RO-42-1
34.682377
-78.966435
Google Maps
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-22-3-4
C;Sw
NC-RO-42-2
Google Maps
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-22-3-4
QSw
34.684425
-78.964811
NC-RO-42-3
Google Maps
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-22-3-4
QSw
34.679899
-78.965605
FORM: LASC 06-16 Page 4

LAND APPLICATION SITE CERTIFICATION
NC-RO-42-5
Google Maps
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-22-3-4
QSw
34.675302
-78.963078
NC-RO-42-6
Google Maps
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-22-3-4
QSw
34.675109
-78.960408
NC-RO-42-7
34.672928
-78.960029
Google Maps
ADD
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-22-3-4
QSw
_
NC-RO-42-8
Google Maps
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-22-3-4
QSw
34.672942
-78.963529
NC-RO-42-9
Google Maps
39.7 meters RMSE
Lumber River Basin / 14-22-3-4
QSw
34.681116
-78.958910
Note: Please keep the site information (L) and waterbody information (II.) of the same field on the same page.
FORM: LASC 06-16 Page 5

VICINITY/SETBACK APPLICATION MAPS

Field 1:
Total Acres:
11.24 Application Area: 10.57
Field 2:
Total Acres:
5.77 Application Area: 3.05
Field 3:
Total Acres:
Application Area: 2.81
Field 4:
Total Acres:
3.67 Application Area: 3.67
Field 5:
Total Acres:
9.40 Application Area: 9.40
Field 6:
Total Acres:
28.29 Application Area: 20.32
Field 7:
Total Acres:
20.82 Application Area: 16.29
Field 8:
Total Acres:
6.96 Application Area: 6.72
O
Legend
x - Fence7�i-
0OApplication -- Private Road
o Pond Area
® Unsuitable Area t
1 0 270 540 1,080
s
' Y
d
O
O
O
O
The compliance boundary is established
f -` �. ♦ p Y
at either 250 feet from the residuals land
application area or 50 feet within the
property boundary, whichever is closest
to the residuals land application area.
Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthsta G ,o• hT , GI munity
NC-RO-16
Graphical Scale
1,620 2,160 Field 1-8
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
Ozzel Baker City of Lumberton Robeson

Field 1 6:
Total Acres: 5.11 Application Area: 5.11
Field 1 7:
Total Acres: 6.62 Application Area: 6.62
Field 1 8:
Total Acres: 12.32 Application Area: 12.32
Field 1 9:
Total Acres: 0.99 Application Area: 0.99
17
Leg-d
x - Fence
-- Private Road
o Pond #
®Application Area
® Unsuitable Area
Graphical Scale
701'6 5 330 660 990 1,320
Feet
The compliance boundary is established
» at either 250 feet from the residuals land
application area or 50 feet within the
property boundary, whichever is closest
to the residuals land application area.
. E M Earthstar Geographical GI mrr
NC-RO-16
Field 16-19
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
James T Campen City of Lumberton Robeson

Acres:r 10
Field 1:
Area: ' -
Total
Field . i
Acres:Total Application -
r ♦
r ♦ 2
r O ♦
i
W..w.cm
u
:A
Legend
—Ditch The compliance boundary is established
Parcel at either 250 feet from the residuals land
®Application_Area yam' application area or 50 feet within the
property boundary, whichever is closest
® Unsuitable Areaa H to the residuals land application area.
S I rce: E Maxar, Earth star Geo graphics,: Agraphics, and the GIS Comy unity
NC-RO-17
Graphical Scale
0 237.5 475 950 1,425 1,900 Field 1-6
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
City of Lumberton City of Lumberton Robeson

Application Area Map
y- r�
_ •
• Acres: Application 51.35
Field♦ s'
vTotal Acres: 44.89 Application Area: 89 ♦II
I �
` ;�. ;� � '= ~ �l `6io � ��. it � ♦I I I
1v YR. .r� _ ♦ ♦ I I ,,
"� r. l/ {�. *.c -wF* �. a +, -. +.�� ♦ I
tl d r,
1 d. � - w ♦ I I I ��
i k. l i
7
�, � � , ` � - r � .� t ` ��, �' � � ' � �, ��� ♦ III „i� i IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� �
� r
i
I �
appucation area or 5u teet witnin
property boundary, whichever is cic
to the residuals land application a

Application Area Map
Mtm08Lq�w

Legend
—Ditch
0
The compliance boundary is established
Parcel
at either 250 feet from the residuals land
®Application_Area
�° application area or 50 feet within the
property boundary, whichever is closest
® Unsuitable Areaa
to the residuals land application area.
Ea'?MM Geographic GIS User+Commiv�ffy
NC-RO-17
Graphical Scale
0 90 180 360
540 720
Field 5
Feet
Owner:
Permit Holder:
County:
City of Lumberton
City of Lumberton
Robeson

Field 7:
Total Acres: 30.76 Application Area: 30.76
' �y�• �f'.
Legend
—Ditch The compliance boundary is established
Parcel
at either 250 feet from the residuals land
®Application_Area application area or 50 feet within the
/.
® Unsuitable Areaa property boundary, whichever is closest
to the residuals land application area.
Source: Esri, Maxar, E Geographics, amd the GIS User Community
NC-RO-17
Graphical Scale
0 170 340 680 1,020 1,360 Field 7
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
City of Lumberton City of Lumberton Robeson

Field 6:
-
Total Acres:
4.37 Application Area: 4.37
-
Field 7:
Total Acres:
17.96 Application Area: 14.55
= _
Field 8:
Total Acres:
73.2 Application Area: 73.2
Field 1 4:
Total Acres:
11.90 Application Area: 11.90
1 g
r -
•'*14
� 14
tj
y1-
6'
6
f a it A.
i
19
The compliance boundary is established
Legend at either 250 feet from the residuals land
• Wells —steam Papce' Oapplication area or 50 feet within the
On -site House _Drain —Private R°atl � 1 Application Area
X _ Feace Pontl ® HnsaitableA— property boundary, whichever is closest
Off-site"°ase,. to the residuals land application area.
Sou . E ri, M t Earthstar Geogra • nd the GIS U Nr C Vim- ity
NC-RO-20
Graphical Scale
0 345 690 1,380 2,070 2,760 Field 6-8,14
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
Ronald Hammonds City of Lumberton Robeson

1-94 vow,
Field 3: 4
Total Acres: 48.21 Application Area: 29.56
Field 15:
Total Acres: 28.95 Application Area: 24.71 'ft •` ' ��
Field 1 6:
Total Acres: 14.42 Application Area: 10.90�`
Field 17:
Total Acres: 24.93 Application Area: 22.51
V.
•�
.-"".
r
+
167 +
;l
M
i�
?7
� � r
The compliance boundary is established
at either 250 feet from the residuals land
Legend application area or 50 feet within the
off-siteHense Well= —s„eam Drain Private Rood
property boundary, whichever is closest
— — —
x — Fenee Pend to the residuals land application area.
Application Area
E- , MM17d 139- h
NC-RO-20
Graphical Scale
0 260 520 1,040 1,560 2,080 Field 3, 15-17
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
Ronald Hammonds City of Lumberton Robeson

Field 1 9: 1'
Total Acres: 16.55 Application Area: 16.55 �
Field 20:
Total Acres: 43.27 Application Area: 43.27
Field 21:
Total Acres: 16.97 Application Area: 14.86 -_
1
�a
•� rr
y Legend
Wells Ed'— Parcel
Off -side House _Drain —Private Roatl Application Area
X— Fen,, O Pond
f '
0 275 550 1,100 1,650
Graphical Scale
2,200
� Feet
1
y
r r
M 21
lea
The compliance boundary is established
at either 250 feet from the residuals land
application area or 50 feet within the
property boundary, whichever is closest
to the residuals land application area.
rcb: Esri, ,Maxar, Earthstar G ographics, and the G'IS'lJser Com i
NC-RO-20
Field 19-21
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
Ronald Hammonds City of Lumberton Robeson
b

4
Legend
On -site House
Off -site House
• Wells
Drain
X — Fence
Stream . . . . . .
PIRIF
Private Road
The compliance boundary is established
Pond at either 250 feet from the residuals land
Parcel application area or 50 feet within the
®Application Area property boundary, whichever is closest
Unsuitable Area to the residuals land application area.
Esri, Maxar, Ear% I�tak�,-eographics, and the GIS User Community
NC-RO-28
Graphical Scale
0 300 600 1,200 1,800 2,400 Field 1-3
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
Carnell Locklear I City of Lumberton lRobeson
Field 1:
I
Total Acres: 11.48 Application Area: 11.48
Field 2:
Total Acres: 61.33 Application Area: 58.01
Field 3:
Total Acres: 15.33 Application Area: 10.47
Mo
O

- •
TotalTotal Acres: 6.23 Application Area: 6.23
Total Acres: 2.8 Application Area: 2.8
Field 2:
-Application Area: J Y
Field y _ ,�
Total Acres: 6.46 Application Area: 6.46
''�' + - 'fig ii'•.. ,�� ,� ♦ � ♦ , `� 116
i
r i . +� - _ - _ ♦ ♦tea i � �,
O F\
5
O O'
v
Legend t•'�
x - Fence.77
!�°a
-- Private Road �e
o Pond e The compliance boundary is established
Parcel at either 250 feet from the residuals land
®Application Area
application area or 50 feet within the
® Unsuitable Area.. property boundary, whichever is closest
to the residuals land application area.
' Source: E Max, , E ,aph 111 GI
NC-RO-39
Graphical Scale
0 195 390 780 1,170 1,560 Field 1 - 6
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
Patrick Bullard City of Lumberton Robeson

Field 7:
Total Acres: 6.64 Application Area: 5.29
Field 8:
Total Acres: 9.11 Application Area: 8.99
"`" 6, ; ,�, 1 •A ram, ''
�►' y Y;4 A
Legentl I `
x - Fence
-- Private Road
o Pond
Parcel
®Application Area
®Unsuitable Area •� :� "'• '�:: �
Graphical Scale
0 90 180 360 540 720
Feet
The compliance boundary is established
at either 250 feet from the residuals land
application area or 50 feet within the
property boundary, whichever is closest
to the residuals land application area.
MMEMO
NC-RO-39
Field 7 - 8
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
Lyndon Bullard Tty of Lumberton Robeson

AMMWR —7) rS ry r 4
Field 9:
Total Acres: 6.64 Application Area: 62.36
1_
0.
I � ' �� •ram✓ „+-_, .{ `' �. '. e.!
+
6
1
Legend
It
On -site House
i
—Drain
x - Fence
—Stream ...; __ b:..:._ ..�: •
-- Private Road The compliance boundary is established
o Pond at either 250 feet from the residuals land
application area or 50 feet within the
®Application Area �`'' property boundary, whichever is closest
®Unsuitable Area to the residuals land application area.
Esri, Maxar, EartM.RKINEVEi, I!, C
NC-RO-39
Graphical Scale
0 205 410 820 1,230 1,640 Field 9
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
Tracy Bullard City of Lumberton Robeson

x
Field 1: 1
Total Acres: 36.84 Application Area: 36.84 x
Field 2:
Total Acres: 53.83 Application Area: 49.81 x
I
e / x
X
x — x — XX-- x — x — XI X x --<
4
X
I \
x of
—X
1 O X�IX
� %< _x
I
�X
.L l
i
x --x—x—x —x —xoX
�I
x
X -
Y I 1 V
X_/_
1
Legend 4. _ x• . S.. ,t.. ` ��
Wells
On -site House
-- Private Road
Stream
x — Fence
—Drain
Parcels The compliance boundary is established
at either 250 feet from the residuals land
Ponds application area or 50 feet within the
®Application Area property boundary, whichever is closest
Pond to the residuals land application area.
GIS C m n`t
NC—RO-40
Graphical Scale
Field 1-2
0 200 400 800 1,200 1,600
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
Ben Chavis City of Lumberton Robeson

Field 3:
Total Acres: 15.55 Application Area: 11
r
U
L
U
a>
N
ry
Legend
*Wells
On -site House
-- Private Road
Stream
X - Fence
Parcels
® Unsuitable Area
®Application Area
O
Graphical Scale
0 80 160 320 480 640
Feet
The compliance boundary is established
at either 250 feet from the residuals land
application area or 50 feet within the
r
property boundary, whichever is closest
to the residuals land application area.
fir,. E y_ rGeoc , GI Fri
NC-RO-40
Field 3
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
Ben Chavis City of Lumberton Robeson
?T XI

Field 4:
.
Total Acres:
21.38 Application Area: 17.22
Field 5:
Total Acres:
9.87 Application Area: 9.87
Field 6:
Total Acres:
9.33 Application Area: 8.04
Field 7:
Total Acres:
13.87 Application Area: 13.87
I
i
I
A0
O
O
w
LAI
O
X R.
Legend i w
*Wells 1 `
On -site House
-- Private Road /
Stream / The compliance boundary is established
X - Fence / at either 250 feet from the residuals land
Parcels
application area or 50 feet within the
®Unsuitable Area property boundary, whichever is closest
®Application Area
to the residuals land application area.
.1 Source: Esri, Maxa , E ra GIS C
NC-RO-40
Graphical Scale
0 137.5 275 550 825 1,100 Field 4-7
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
Ben Chavis City of Lumberton Robeson

FField: 37.7 ApplicationArea: 34.67
: 3.40 Application Area: 3.40
1
Fes;
Legend
On -site House
—Stream
— Fence
o Ponds
®Application Area
Parcels
0 155 310
�k \'`
2K It
u
O
�r
erxtage Road
\nd\axj N
The compliance boundary is established
r� at either 250 feet from the residuals land
` application area or 50 feet within the
property boundary, whichever is closest
' k to the residuals land application area.
NC-RO-42
Graphical Scale
620 930 1,240 Field 1-2
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
James McGirt City of Lumberton Robeson

Field 3:
Total Acres: 62.27 Application Area: 57.18
Field 4:
Total Acres: 5.28 Application Area: 4.64
1n
dean Nef�kage R°ad
r,
3 a
�+ O
Legend ,
d On -site House
Off Site House
—Stream
—Fence V�fi ,. ' �The compliance boundary is established
o Ponds • •' at either 250 feet from the residuals land
.� application area or 50 feet within the
®Application Area : " ' property boundary, whichever is closest
ParcelsAWT%Y.' .
r„ : to the residuals land application area.
!�; } w• Esri, Max E GI
NC-RO-42
Graphical Scale
0 160 320 640 960 1,280 Field 3-4
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
James McGirt City of Lumberton Robeson

Field 5:
Total Acres:
13.55 Application Area: 8.48
Field 6:
Total Acres:
9.54 Application Area: 9.54
Field 7:
Total Acres:
22.91 Application Area: 20.05
Field 8:
Total Acres:
1.34 Application Area: 1.19
0
4. .
4
O
S
AO I
y.�4
.�( }• OCK}
Legend
On -site House
• Off -Site House
— Stream
Fence
Ponds
,.
®Application Area
Parcels
s;
O
Graphical Scale
0 160 320 640 960 1,280
Feet
{W:
O
a � ♦ e_.r1.
i
The compliance boundary is established
at either 250 feet from the residuals land
application area or 50 feet within the
property boundary, whichever is closest
to the residuals land application area.
NC-RO-42
Field 5-8
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
James McGirt City of Lumberton Robeson

SOILS MAPS

Legend -
Soil Boring Samples ` ,'t . The compliance boundary is established
Parcel `— at either 250 feet from the residuals land
®Application_Area application area or 50 feet within the
' _ property boundary, whichever is closest
® Unsuitable Areaa to the residuals land application area.
s
Source: Esri, Maxar, E87, peog ap 111=1511EMMommunity
NC-RO-17
Graphical Scale
0 220 440 880 1,320 1,760 Field 4A
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
City of Lumberton City of Lumberton Robeson

I
5-IC)
Jo
O
I
low
0� `.....
Legend
Soil Boring Samples - The compliance boundary is established
Parcel at either 250 feet from the residuals land
•'' application area or 50 feet within the
®Application_Area / property boundary, whichever is closest
® Unsuitable Areaa to the residuals land application area.
1 Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User -Community
NC-RO-17
Graphical Scale
0 125 250 500 750 1,000 Field 5
Feet
[— Owner: Permit Holder: County:
City of Lumberton City of Lumberton Robeson

J � � Jo
' CD
Jo
t
41
Legend
0 Soil Boring Samples � The compliance boundary is established
Parcel 1 �: , at either 250 feet from the residuals land
®Application_ Area \ application area or 50 feet within the
property boundary, whichever is closest
® Unsuitable Areaa to the residuals land application area.
Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community
NC-RO-17
Graphical Scale
0 125 250 500 750 1,000 Field 6
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
City of Lumberton City of Lumberton Robeson

Lu
Legend
C' Soil Boring Samples
Parcel
®Application_ Area
® Unsuitable Areaa
'•"
1 0 135 270 540
810
PoB
7-10
O
Lu
Jo
Lu
KaA
"—-
The compliance boundary is established
at either 250 feet from the residuals land
application area or 50 feet within the
property boundary, whichever is closest
to the residuals land application area.
E i„ Maxa , E ti GI �muni
NC-RO-17
Graphical Scale
1,080 Field 7
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
City of Lumberton City of Lumberton Robeson

Ra
t I
GoA Ra
GoA
NoA
� LY
r GoA-�
20-1 01
20
20-2
r� o GoA
i
► t GoA
20 3
�
� 0 Co
71%It7�
' 21-2 21-3
A , GoA
A
NoA
•
The compliance boundary is established
at either 250 feet from the residuals land
application area or 50 feet within the
Legend
Parcel property boundary, whichever is closest
• Soil Boring Sample Application Area to the residuals land application area.
����
Esri; ar, jf sty Geographics, GIS User Community
NC-RO-20
Graphical Scale
0 245 490 980 1,470 1,960 Field 19-21
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
Ronald Hammonds City of Lumberton Robeson

GoA
2-3
Ra
Co
2-1 2-2
1 O 1-2
O
2
1-1 11
W
Ra
Legeod _ The compliance boundary is established
Soil Boring samples at either 250 feet from the residuals land
Parcels application area or 50 feet within the
Unsuitable Area property boundary, whichever is closest
®application area to the residuals land application area.
EMMIE GI ity
NC-RO-40
Graphical Scale
0 170 340 680 1,020 1,360 Field 1-2
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
Ben Chavis City of Lumberton Robeson

Soils Map
orr LO � m coo am ww

I& Soils Map
H
EMWIRM�

L 1 1
Y
1-2 .1
�nd�an Her`tage R
pad Co
c
Co
GoA 4
3-1 —
p`
3-2
i
Co
r 4-1
GoA
3-3 NoA
Ly Ra
O
Ly
GoA 4-
g. GoA O
m
91
--� Co M
Legend ,:,-: The compliance boundary is established
Soil Boring Samples
at either 250 feet from the residuals land
®Application Area *' oA application area or 50 feet within the
Parcels property boundary, whichever is closest
to the residuals land application area.
Source: Esri, Ma fflE _, : GI -ty
NC-RO-42
Graphical Scale
0 155 310 620 930 1,240 Field 3
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
James McGirt City of Lumberton Robeson

Rlian H ritage Road
NoA
Co
o
9-1
s;
( GoA
0
GAA
� O C
fl,
4-1 III
NoA ,+
Ra J
F
.t Ra r,
+ j
4-2
Co - -
Legend The compliance boundary is established `
at either 250 feet from the residuals land
Soil Boring Samples
®Application Area application area or 50 feet within the
Parcels r property boundary, whichever is closest
to the residuals land application area.
Source: Esri, MaxaT, E � �� , GI • unity
NC-RO-42
Graphical Scale
0 130 260 520 780 1,040 Field 4-9
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
James McGirt City of Lumberton Robeson

GoA
5-2
0
Legend
Soil Boring Samples
®Application Area
Parcels
1 0 130 260 520
Me 5-1
O
6-1
7-2
O
t
GoA
Ly
The compliance boundary is established
at either 250 feet from the residuals land
application area or 50 feet within the
property boundary, whichever is closest
NoA h l d I
tote residuals an app Icatlon area.
in IfflUE
NC-RO-42
Graphical Scale
780 1,040 Field 5-8
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
James McGirt City of Lumberton Robeson

SOIL SCIENTIST REPORT FOR NEW APPLICATION SITES

willcox&mabe
SOI L SOLUTIONS
May 12, 2021
Enviro-Choice Recycling, LLC
Post Office Box 390
Lumberton, North Carolina 28359
Attention: Mr. Michael "Cody" Hunt
President
Transmitted by e-mail to: [e-mail]
Reference: Soil Scientist Services for Permit Application
City of Lumberton — Permit No. WQ0000672
Robeson County Sites
WMSS Project No. 21-02, Phase: 01
Dear Mr. Hunt:
Willcox & Mabe Soil Solutions, PLLC (WMSS) has conducted a Soil Scientist
Evaluation per WMSS Proposal No. 2020-P17 dated October 30, 2020. The evaluation
was performed to provide information for submitting a modification to a non -discharge
permit to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) — Division
of Water Resources (DWR), Non -Discharge Permitting Unit (NDPU) in accordance with
15A NCAC 2T .1104(c)(2)(A). The evaluation was conducted to assess the soil
properties of the proposed acreage and to determine suitability for land application
activities in the referenced permit application.
WMSS has included our findings in Appendix I and II in order for this information to be
incorporated into the permit modification package being prepared by Enviro-Choice
Recycling, LLC (Enviro-Choice). The Appendices summarize our evaluations, findings,
and recommendations. Should you have any questions or comments about this report
please feel free to contact us at [phone].
Sincerely,
Willcox & Mabe Soil Solutions, PLLC
1&-i -- /G�4
Martin Mabe
Partner / Agronomist
Rob Willcox, L.S.S.
Partner / Soil Scientist
Attachments: Appendix I — Summary Table
Appendix H — Maps, Soil Profile Description Sheets
Shared\WMSS Projects\2021\21-02 Enviro-Choice Recycling\Phase 01 Soil Scientist Report - City of Lumberton
(WQ0000672) - Robeson County.doc
Willcox & Mabe Soil Solutions, PLLC / 7231 B Summerfield Road / Summerfield, NC 27358 / Rob 336.339.9128 or
Martin 336.312.1396 / www.willcoxmabesoil.com

APPENDIX I - SUMMARY TABLE

On March 15 and 17, 2021, a Willcox & Mabe Soil Solutions, PLLC (WMSS) licensed soil
scientist performed hand auger borings (denoted on the attached maps) on the following sites and
determined that the noted predominant soil series was present for each of the following fields:
Project/Permit
County
Farm Name/
Site No.
Field
No.
Predominant Soil Series /
Mapping Unit
City of Lumberton /
WQ0000672
Robeson
17
4-ADD
Lumbee / Lu
5
Johns / Jo
6
Lumbee / Lu
7
Johns / Jo
20
19
Goldsboro / Go
20
Goldsboro / Go
21
Goldsboro / Go
40
1
Goldsboro / Go
2
Goldsboro /Go
3
Norfolk / No
4
Norfolk / No
5
W agram / W a
6
Norfolk / No
7
Norfolk / No
8
Norfolk / No
41
1
Rains / Ra
2
Goldsboro / Go
3
Goldsboro / Go
4
Goldsboro /Go
5
Norfolk / No
6
Goldsboro / Go
7
Norfolk / No
8
Goldsboro / Go
9
Goldsboro / Go
10
Goldsboro / Go
42
1
Goldsboro / Go
2
Goldsboro / Go
3
Rains / Ra
4
Meggett / Me
5
Meggett / Me
6
Meggett / Me
7
Meggett / Me
8
Rains / Ra
9
Goldsboro / Go
43
1
Norfolk / No
2
Norfolk / No

The hand auger borings were performed to determine if the proposed land application
sites were suitable for land application activities in accordance with 15A NCAC 2T
.1104(c)(2)(A) and to be incorporated into a permit modification package for the City of
Lumberton Land Application Permit No. WQ0000672. All fields evaluated were found
to be suitable for land application activities, based upon current farming activities. Please
reference the attached maps for hand auger boring locations and subsequent soil profile
descriptions.
SOIL
�y sC� Q w►<< `e,
�'
UWj f
in
d-
�� '1098 40�'
F NORsH C
Rob Willcox
NC Licensed Soil Scientist # 1098

APPENDIX II - MAPS, SOIL PROFILE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC Sly I q
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION 3
Project No. ?1 D 2 E i 6 Phone No. Date:
Location 6p f ,- t.rr,A I I Pin County: s tom` Property Size
Proposed Facility: S1TJr L4 Water Supply: On -Site Well ❑ Evaluation:
Community I--].
Described By: k�f3 �//f �Y Public ❑
Weather: �!i �a,;., %%p6 Antecedent Moisture Surface Water:
a 'n Ll -ADA
Auger Boring ❑
Pit ❑
Cut ❑
FACTORS
PROFILE
PROFILE
PROFILE T rN�
a .
PROFILE
Landscape Position %
Horizon Depth I�-
Color Munsell
Texture
51
Structure
r
Consistence
6
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
_ IT—
Color — Munsell
Texture
Mottles
Structure
_
Consistence
<<
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
Color — Munsell
-7 j
/r/ %Z 7 r
Texture
SC i
Mottles
Structure
Consistence
55
�c
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
3
r -
Color — Munsell
rI ;
Texture
d
Mottles
_
Structure
;;
e
Consistence
Boundary
Soil Wetness
Z
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
miNG �
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R Ridge Interfluve
S Shoulder
L Linear Slope
FS Foot Slope
N Nose Slope
H Head Slope
Cc Concave Slope
Cv Convex Slope
T Terrace
P Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s sand
Is loamy sand
sl sandy loam
I loam
si silt
A silt loam
sicl silty clay loam
cl clay loam
scl sandy clay loam
sc sandy clay
sic silty clay
c clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns non -sticky
Ss slightly sticky
S sticky
Vs very sticky
Vp non -plastic
Sp slightly plastic
plastic
Vp very plastic
HOIST
ifr Very friable
i friable
�i firm,
Ifi Very firm
;TRUCTURE
g single grain
n massive
a crumb
;r granular
bk subangular blocky
bk angular blocky
it platy
,r prismatic

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC S ITS 1
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION 2 01F 3
Project No. 2l -Q2,2l4' 6 ( Phone No. Date: 3f )-7
Location �r�y or' 'Z_q14A%7.3NPin County: 1> F 6p N Property Size
Proposed Facility: S/%E Water Supply: On -Site Well ❑ Evaluation: Auger Boring �.
Community ❑ Pit ❑
Described By: Zoe Njac p X Public ❑ Cut ❑
Weather: JWL. Antecedent Moisture /%;"_ _ Surface Water: N!�
FACTORS
PROFILE
PROFILE
PROFILE
PROFILE
Landscape Position %
�R T _ _ �%d
L= f-Z®1(-
Horizon Depth I
0 _
_
b _g
Color Munsell
loye f
12W 4
Texture
S
S
SJ
Structure
r
Consistence
/js V �,/
S ✓
S /1
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
/% - /S
96 - S 2 -I`
Color - Munsell
/) Ve '7/ 3
G /
/ 23
1,6qlz '73
Texture
Mottles
_
Structure
_
r
M
Consistence
/) S
✓ ^.
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
/s.- 25?
Color - Munsell
to ¢
G
7
Texture
SG 1
SC
Mottles
�!' �, S
-5L
/Q n S r
Structure
yl/ C
X
N/S hkr
Consistence
�s Y
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
$ _3
2 +
Color - Munsell
S
S
Texture
C
�i
Mottles
, /6 iz
G' - /Q 1
Structure
AdhZ
4415
Consistence
r
S , ,
Boundary
Soil Wetness
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R
Ridge Interfluve
S
Shoulder
L
Linear Slope
FS
Foot Slope
N
Nose Slope
H
Head Slope
Cc
Concave Slope
Cv
Convex Slope
T
Terrace
P
Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s
sand
Is
loamy sand
sl
sandy loam
1
loam
si
silt
sil
silt loam
Sid
silty clay loam
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
se
sandy clay
sic
silty clay
c
clay
Ns
non -sticky
Ss
slightly sticky
S
sticky
Vs
very sticky
Np
non -plastic
Sp
slightly plastic
P
plastic
Vp
very plastic
MOIST
vfr
Very friable
fr
friable
f,
firm
vfi
Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg
single grain
m
massive
cr
crumb
gr
granular
sbk
subangular blocky
abk
angular blocky
pl
platy
pr
prismatic

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC S I-7-E /-I
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION 3 6 f- 3
Project No. low'. ! Phone No. Date: %/ 2
Location ('t7Lj OF � � uJ_Pin County: / o�E_S�/J Property Size
Proposed Facility: st i i Water Supply: On -Site Well ❑ Evaluation:
�"� Community ❑
Described By: \C Public ❑
Weather: Lp ,O ' �'p G Antecedent Moisture /&/15 % Surface Water:
)5_1, n ( : , r, r i i .,
Auger Boring
Pit ❑
Cut ❑
FACTORS
PROFILE
PROFILE i
PROFILE
PROFILE
i-
Landscape Position %
G 270
L 2%O
Horizon Depth I
.19
Color Munsell
4 t
,¢ �
Texture
S
Structure
l^I r
Consistence
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
7 4.
.- 1
2 ,I.
Color - Munsell
2, S G/2
ve -71 f
?
-7 1
Texture
S/
Mottles
-
_
7
Structure
Consistence
4S 4,2 JeE
11 S
S S
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
Color - Munsell
l6 7
1
Texture
�' C1
SC
Mottles
Structure
( r
W
Consistence
s
12
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
36
3
Color - Munsell
-7
1-/
Texture
/ SC I
SC
Mottles
7
Structure
k
�.
Consistence
SS S
Boundary
Soil Wetness
L
J�
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
II N
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R Ridge Interfluve
S Shoulder
L Linear Slope
FS Foot Slope
N Nose Slope
H Head Slope
Cc Concave Slope
Cv Convex Slope
T Terrace
P Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s sand
Is loamy sand
sl sandy loam
1 loam
si silt
sil silt loam
Sid silty clay loam
cl clay loam
scl sandy clay loam
sc sandy clay
sic silty clay
c clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns non -sticky
Ss slightly sticky
S sticky
Vs very sticky
Np non -plastic
Sp slightly plastic
P plastic
Vp very plastic
MOIST
vfr Very friable
fr friable
fi firm
vfi Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg single grain
m massive
cr crumb
gr granular
sbk subangular blocky
abk angular blocky
pl platy
pr prismatic

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC S I T E 20
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION % or 4
Project No.
2/- D 2 , Pt9.' 0 / Phone No.
Date: 3 1 -� JZ
Location
61/n1 Qf �cMi3E01 NX in County: v
6f o J Property Size
Proposed Facility:
J I TE Water Supply:
On -Site Well
❑ Evaluation: Auger Boring.
Described By:
Community
❑ Pit ❑
1 UX 0 V
Public
❑ Cut ElWeather:
a Antsgedent Moisture
l� I,Ci/1 1 %
Ale, r-
Surface Water: )JIA
L.�i) lC)
.can 1q
FACTORS
PROFILE
PROFILE
PROFILE
PROFILE
Landscape Position %
Horizon Depth I
_
Color Munsell
S 2
S 2
Texture
Structure
�r
Consistence
V} r
ns
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
r]
)
Color — Munsell
h0ale L 3
6 r
ho ae G
6 we S,
Texture
5
SC
Mottles
—
_
Structure
Consistence
3
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
3
2
Color — Munsell
(o
I EIR S (�
Texture
G (
SG
Mottles
_
—
Structure
Consistence
S' Z2
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
2qT 5
- 3 0
Color — Munsell
qk(, 3
Texture
$C
Mottles
_ 1
6
Structure
wc Z
Consistence
r S
S S
Boundary
Soil Wetness
2(
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
SBaQ!/
p L3�d�ZD
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R Ridge Interfluve
S Shoulder
L Linear Slope
FS Foot Slope
N Nose Slope
H Head Slope
Cc Concave Slope
Cv Convex Slope
T Terrace
P Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s sand
Is loamy sand
sl sandy loam
1 loam
si silt
sil silt loam
Sid silty clay loam
cl clay loam
scl sandy clay loam
sc sandy clay
sic silty clay
c clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns non -sticky
Ss slightly sticky
S sticky
Vs very sticky
Np non -plastic
Sp slightly plastic
P plastic
Vp very plastic
MOIST
vfr Very friable
fr friable
fi firm
vfi Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg single grain
m massive
cr crumb
gr granular
sbk subangular blocky
abk angular blocky
pl platy
pr prismatic

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC S1TL 2�
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION 2 a'C
Project No.
0,4 ; D Phone No.
Date:
__ /qLe-
Location
Df /1//YIB()?T&kRin County: PoBESarV
Property Size
Proposed Facility: s/72� 20 Water Supply:
On -Site Well
❑
Evaluation: Auger Boring
-
Described By:
�6 Nwe-oV
Community
Public
❑
❑
Pit
Cut
❑
❑
Weather:
Caw!! • ' rool Antecedent Moisture
/Di S r
Surface Water: A)
FACTORS
PROFILE
,o— I
PROFILE
20-/ ConI
PROFILE -
D-2
PROFILE
&-2caf1
Landscape Position pro
L _ 0 _t b
/-- 0 _ J %u
Horizon Depth I
Color Munsell
Texture
S
Structure
W
Consistence
5
S �
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
- J 2
2- -L
- /3
2— S 2 k
Color - Munsell
C_ I
Texture
6a/
1
SG
Mottles
r
�. S L
—
w
Structure
wr r
ir k tjt
Consistence
/15 r'1 , v
St
S AlpV
SS S
C -
(43
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
/2
Color — Munsell
&)
Texture
SC
Mottles
_
Structure
Consistence
Sj S FY
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
8 _04—
Color — Munsell
6 3
e.
Texture
G
SG t
Mottles
/! /n _ AA&eG I
Structure
wf
Jyd
Consistence
fs S
SS
Boundary
Soil Wetness
11
04
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
_�
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R
Ridge Interfluve
S
Shoulder
L
Linear Slope
FS
Foot Slope
N
Nose Slope
H
Head Slope
Cc
Concave Slope
Cv
Convex Slope
T
Terrace
P
Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s
sand
Is
loamy sand
sl
sandy loam
1
loam
si
silt
sit
silt loam
Sid
silty clay loam
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
sc
sandy clay
sic
silty clay
c
clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns
non -sticky
Ss
slightly sticky
S
sticky
Vs
very sticky
Np
non -plastic
Sp
slightly plastic
P
plastic
Vp
very plastic
MOIST
vfr
Very friable
fr
friable
fi
firm
vfi
Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg
single grain
m
massive
cr
crumb
gr
granular
sbk
subangular blocky
abk
angular blocky
pl
platy
pr
prismatic

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC S ITiC 26
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION 9 oF 4-
Project No. 21-6Z" Df1 (D/ Phone No. Date: 311-) l Z
Location 1rjjl� Of- 2UMAFW7,) .Pin County: col �,p eJ Property Size
Proposed Facility: S/7 E 26 Water Supply: On -Site Well ❑ Evaluation: Auger Boring
Community ❑ Pit ❑
Described By: KaP W/U,-D Public ❑ Cut ❑
Weather: rlou COOL Antecedent Moisture 6I ST Surface Water: N �/
FACTORS
PROFILE
PROFILE
2 / '-- j
PROFILE
2 — Z
PROFILE
- cr,
Landscape Position %
D ` y1
L _ 0 — / Ig0
2 !%U
Horizon Depth I
_
_.
_
Color Munsell
/U cle 3 12
//7
3 2
Texture'51J
Structure
W
Consistence
S C ,
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
/7— 2D
Color - Munsell
10ae (v 2
(o
t7 (v 3
6-
Texture
.SGJ
I5
SC
Mottles
�'_ G ,
_ /
_
_ 6/3
Structure
IL
w
S
Consistence
S
S
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
2 p - Q
�1
1
Color - Munsell
1
hw G (
G
Texture
SG)
G I
C
Mottles
Structure
Consistence
SS S
SS 5
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
4p ,S .4-
5 f
-3a
Color - Munsell
(o,
(�
ak &0 2
Texture
G
SC
Mottles
p
G
Structure
*s VQ
Consistence
SS S 12
SS
5
S 6
Boundary
Soil Wetness
L f
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
AJ�.f
SIN
IM i
,C�►emI 4,
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R
Ridge Interfluve
S
Shoulder
L
Linear Slope
FS
Foot Slope
N
Nose Slope
H
Head Slope
Cc
Concave Slope
Cv
Convex Slope
T
Terrace
P
Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s
sand
Is
loamy sand
sl
sandy loam
I
loam
si
silt
A
silt loam
sicl
silty clay loam
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
sc
sandy clay
sic
silty clay
c
clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns
non -sticky
Ss
slightly sticky
S
sticky
Vs
very sticky
Np
non -plastic
Sp
slightly plastic
P
plastic
Vp
very plastic
MOIST
vff
Very friable
fr
friable
f,
firm
vfi
Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg
single grain
in
massive
cr
crumb
gr
granular
sbk
subangular blocky
abk
angular blocky
pl
platy
pr
prismatic

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC S rf 2-b
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION 4 of 1-
Project No. - /- d Z r p� '. f Phone No.
Location � ei-ji ► Pin County:
Date:
Property Size
Proposed Facility: S 1T_-F Water Supply:
On -Site Well
❑ Evaluation: Auger Boring
❑
Described By:
Community
Public
❑ Pit
❑ Cut
❑
❑
Weather: Ant dent Moisture
/1%Iy r ST
Surface Water:
FACTORS
PROFILE
21-I-
PROFILE
w)'
PROFILE
PROFILE
Landscape Position %
vG
Horizon Depth I
_
Color Munsell
.512
Texture
Structure
Consistence
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
_
- � 2 +
Color - Munsell
L,'?
U G
Texture
S
SG
Mottles
-
:. /f' 4 j
Structure
;V r
le
Consistence
} r % V ;/
S S
m 14 sL
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
C��2
Color - Munsell
Q S
Texture
�� )
Mottles
—
Structure
Consistence
SS
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
2g- ,j
Color - Munsell
Texture
Mottles`
Structure
Consistence
Boundary
Soil Wetness
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
J
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R Ridge Interfluve
S Shoulder
L Linear Slope
FS Foot Slope
N Nose Slope
H Head Slope
Cc Concave Slope
Cv Convex Slope
T Terrace
P Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s sand
Is loamy sand
sl sandy loam
I loam
si silt
sil silt loam
Sid silty clay loam
cl clay loam
scl sandy clay loam
sc sandy clay
sic silty clay
c clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns non -sticky
Ss slightly sticky
S sticky
Vs very sticky
Np non -plastic
Sp slightly plastic
P plastic
Vp very plastic
MOIST
vfr Very friable
fr friable
fi firm
vfi Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg single grain
m massive
cr crumb
gr granular
sbk subangular blocky
abk angular blocky
pl platy
pr prismatic

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION
Project No. 2 -DZ : O Phone No. Date:
Location n� 4, or wmetr1T-bNPin County: S cN Property Size
Proposed Facility: 51TE `tom Water Supply: On -Site Well ❑ Evaluation:
Community ❑
Described By: I LL OV Public ❑
Weather: Antecedent Moisture s T Surface Water:
f i Sri r-. J /`;r; r-, I
Auger Boring
Pit ❑
Cut N`4 ❑
FACTORS
PROFILE
PROFILE
PROFILE
PROFILE
Landscape Position %
L
Horizon Depth I
Color Munsell
Q 41
3�
Texture
Structure
r-
Consistence
y
A S t 1 ✓ 1
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
Color — Munsell
69/�
C .
Texture
C
S
Mottles
Structure
Consistence
'f 5
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
14- 3 2
Color - Munsell
;
lVeIzZ S
Texture
C
Mottles
_.
Structure
c'
Consistence
/-
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
✓1 _
Color — Munsell
h,
, , /
Texture
Mottles
Structure
;
Consistence
Boundary
Soil Wetness
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
6L.D Sd30 C v
L
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R
Ridge Interfluve
S
Shoulder
L
Linear Slope
FS
Foot Slope
N
Nose Slope
H
Head Slope
Cc
Concave Slope
Cv
Convex Slope
T
Terrace
P
Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s
sand
Is
loamy sand
sl
sandy loam
1
loam
si
silt
sil
silt loam
sicl
silty clay loam
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
sc
sandy clay
sic
silty clay
c
clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns
non -sticky
Ss
slightly sticky
S
sticky
Vs
very sticky
Np
non -plastic
Sp
slightly plastic
P
plastic
Vp
very plastic
MOIST
vfr
Very friable
fr
friable
f,
firm
vfi
Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg
single grain
m
massive
cr
crumb
gr
granular
sbk
subangular blocky
abk
angular blocky
pl
platy
pr
prismatic

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC S 17- 4 b
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION -2 F
Project No. 2/- DZ : µ () JPhone No. Date: 3J Is 1 Z
Location C'/Tta b r- LuirlL(QZl JPin County: D o i.J Property Size
Proposed Facility: Sl T-E 46 Water Supply: On -Site Well ❑ Evaluation: Auger Boring
� Community ❑ Pit ❑
Described By: Kam W c_t Co,� Public ❑ Cut ❑
Weather: up p L Antecedent Moisture /% _S_r- Surface Water: h/A
FACTORS
PROFILE
PROFILE
PROFILE
PROFILE
Landscape Position %
Horizon Depth I
_ (o
Color Munsell
/U 3 2love4,
Texture
Structure
e-
r
Consistence
S
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
(p — / 2-
4 Z
41)- S2 a
Color — Munsell
16 fde & I
Id 12 L,},
/D 6_ '
Texture
G
Sl
f c
Mottles
_ q, S
Structure
Consistence
:5.5-
:r
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
Color — Munsell
lovLZ ;
oxa
Texture
Sc i
SC
Mottles
_
C , 14G
Structure
_
S ky
Consistence
r
�r
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
2C� q�
ZS — 46
Color — Munsell
/d S ,
Texture
C (
Sr
Mottles
Structure
Wr6 [
Consistence
Boundary
Soil Wetness
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R Ridge Interfluve
S Shoulder
L Linear Slope
FS Foot Slope
N Nose Slope
H Head Slope
Cc Concave Slope
Cv Convex Slope
T Terrace
P Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s sand
Is loamy sand
sl sandy loam
1 loam
si silt
A silt loam
sicl silty clay loam
cl clay loam
scl sandy clay loam
se sandy clay
sic silty clay
c clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns non -sticky
Ss slightly sticky
S sticky
Vs very sticky
Np non -plastic
Sp slightly plastic
P plastic
Vp very plastic
MOIST
vfr Very friable
fr friable
fi firm
vfi Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg single grain
in massive
cr crumb
gr granular
sbk subangular blocky
abk angular blocky
pl platy
pr prismatic
✓FT E!✓VA< KrjXCrPr' f`

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC I Te
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION S of
Project No. 2 1 - DS ; 4�)W, O 1 Phone No. Date:
Location C)-r(l of- Lung Pin County: ,�F'EsD fv Property Size
Proposed Facility: &T 4-0 Water Supply: On -Site Well ❑ Evaluation: Auger Boring
Community ❑ Pit ❑
Described By: �P-0'3 w/gyp y Public ❑ Cut ❑
Weather: ahaoq ' 6vL_ Antecedent Moisture MDi; 7` Surface Water: N%A
C.c✓r) n -A
FACTORS
PROFILE
PROFILE
PROFILE`
—
PROFILE V
=' z'
Landscape Position %
L _ _ 76
Horizon Depth I
Color Munsell
? /
Q 12
Texture
Structure
W
Consistence
S
S
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
40 - Z -a
— !S
Color — Munsell
lU 'e L
Q G
S L-
Texture
Mottles
Structure
s/ OS ✓�%
b�
Consistence
//$
Sr
✓
S 5
- /
G 4
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
Color — Munsell
love
S A
Texture
Se/
Mottles
Structure
S (jIV
Consistence
; s 5 F -
S
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
22,40
4
Color — Munsell
/!o/
6 l S (o
Texture
SCE
C
Mottles
S
0
Structure
/
Consistence
SS S
<
Boundary
Soil Wetness
,� %2
) el
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
�)/ /U
PAiN
"/V6
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R Ridge Interfluve
S Shoulder
L Linear Slope
FS Foot Slope
N Nose Slope
H Head Slope
Cc Concave Slope
Cv Convex Slope
T Terrace
P Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s sand
Is loamy sand
sl sandy loam
I loam
si silt
sil silt loam
sicl silty clay loam
cl clay loam
scl sandy clay loam
sc sandy clay
sic silty clay
c clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns non -sticky
Ss slightly sticky
S sticky
Vs very sticky
Np non -plastic
Sp slightly plastic
P plastic
Vp very plastic
MOIST
vfr Very friable
fr friable
fi firm
vfi Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg single grain
m massive
cr crumb
gr granular
sbk subangular blocky
abk angular blocky
pl platy
pr prismatic
f►c/ f' &AC5 3K+fE(CCU

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC S rrf7 4D
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION 4 '4
Project No. H; D 1 Phone No. Date: 3) f S I2I
Location /i UrxBEMlTin County: -s Property Size
Proposed Facility: El 7E 40 Water Supply: On -Site Well ❑ Evaluation: Auger Boring
Community ❑ Pit ❑
Described By: g JYIL,L.,CO 'k-- Public ❑ Cut ❑
Weather: e7QWPq,'6QQL Antecedent Moisture % i%U! ST Surface Water:
FACTORS
PROFILE
PROFILE
PROFILE
PROFILE
Landscape Position %
a.
Horizon Depth I
Q
_
Color Munsell
Texture
5
Structure
�,/
ule-
Consistence
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
f 3
Q _ 2 -+
- m L
_ S' ' .
Color — Munsell
(' i I
ly
S
Texture
J
SC S
Mottles
_
yt _ !3k
Structure
Consistence
if, ) y PY
r
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
/ 3_ 20
r6
Color—Munsell
Texture
C l
Mottles
Structure
Consistence
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
P"
Color — Munsell
1,6 ale w 0
5/1,
Texture
5 l
Mottles
I
Structure
L
K
Consistence
S
Boundary
Soil Wetness
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
,G ln/NG
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R
Ridge Interfluve
S
Shoulder
L
Linear Slope
FS
Foot Slope
N
Nose Slope
H
Head Slope
Cc
Concave Slope
Cv
Convex Slope
T
Terrace
P
Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s
sand
Is
loamy sand
sl
sandy loam
I
loam
si
silt
sil
silt loam
sicl
silty clay loam
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
sc
sandy clay
sic
silty clay
c
clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns
non -sticky
Ss
slightly sticky
S
sticky
Vs
very sticky
Np
non -plastic
Sp
slightly plastic
P
plastic
Vp
very plastic
MOIST
vfr
Very friable
fr
friable
fi
firm
vfi
Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg
single grain
m
massive
cr
crumb
gr
granular
sbk
subangular blocky
abk
angular blocky
pl
platy
pr ,
prismatic

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC S 1 Tr— 46
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION 5 o F
Project No. 21- bZ ; P N' D 1 Phone No. Date: .3I 1 S 1 2 /
Location rrrq br LumufC1)1 Pin County: ,w1�. �JY'_J Property Size
Proposed Facility: J t fiic 40 Water Supply: On -Site Well ❑ Evaluation:
Community ❑
Described By: ) C3 } VI L (C D lC Public ❑
Weather: , '(�����/ ' %l�,p�, Antecedent Moisture /X41S7-Surface Water:
Auger Boring
Pit ❑
Cut ❑
FACTORS
PROFILE PROFILE
PROFILE
PROFILE
PROFILE
Ca n t
Landscape Position %
L
L Z
Horizon Depth I
p _0-9
Color Munsell
U 2 Q 2
Q14& 3-6
Texture
15
Structure
h/ /
`✓
Consistence
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
- 2
-
_ J3
Color — Munsell
&/te_el-57,
s
Texture
S
I
,-
c �
Mottles
_ -
In , L N
Structure
`y f
- f
k
Consistence
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
Color — Munsell
$ R
S �
Texture
Mottles
Structure
!n/S
t�✓S
Consistence
SS
y
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
_
Color — Munsell
fiA
0S G
Texture
C/
$'C /
Mottles
f^ S �! S
?i' , Aog r f.
Structure
Consistence
r
S
Boundary
Soil Wetness
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
KA (.L'Am
,1600LK_
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R
Ridge Interfluve
S
Shoulder
L
Linear Slope
FS
Foot Slope
N
Nose Slope
H
Head Slope
Cc
Concave Slope
Cv
Convex Slope
T
Terrace
P
Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s
sand
Is
loamy sand
sl
sandy loam
1
loam
si
silt
A
silt loam
sicl
silty clay loam
el
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
sc
sandy clay
sic
silty clay
c
clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns
non -sticky
Ss
slightly sticky
S
sticky
Vs
very sticky
Np
non -plastic
Sp
slightly plastic
P
plastic
Vp
very plastic
MOIST
vfr
Very friable
fr
friable
fi
firm
vfi
Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg
single grain
m
massive
cr
crumb
gr
granular
sbk
subangular blocky
abk
angular blocky
pl
platy
pr
prismatic

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION
SITE 4d
(� OF 4
Project No. 2/- 02' dH,' 0/ Phone No. Date:
Location _ pf L ,)ain County: J Property Size
Proposed Facility: slTF 4-c�) Water Supply: On -Site Well ❑ Evaluation: Auger Boring
Described By:
Weather:
�� Community I --] Pit-
E"�P6 /'1//uCO)C Public ❑ Cut
eloy ' t6z_ Antecedent Moisture /4i!� T Surface_ Water: tjip.
FACTORS
PROFILE
PROFILE
—2 CUn
PROFILE
PROFILE
GOr'
Landscape Position %
Horizon Depth I
Color Munsell
Texture
Structure
/
t'
Consistence
AS ei,2 y
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
_ 3
40 _S
..' ,+.
Color — Munsell
V woS :
SIL
Texture
SG
Mottles
Structure
wS
L4140-
Consistence
/
s f
1
r S' 12
�3
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
f Z U
Color — Munsell
/Q G /
SA.
Texture
`
C
Mottles
_.
Structure
y,� �,
k
Consistence
c <
r
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
26— .�
Color — Munsell
0 qw G (
r.
Texture
rC
r C
Mottles
Structure
S �'
Consistence
Boundary
Soil Wetness
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
i/\I 5
/1 DE�DL
ov4m ED A
%jI'✓t1
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R Ridge Interfluve
S Shoulder
L Linear Slope
FS Foot Slope
N Nose Slope
H Head Slope
Cc Concave Slope
Cv Convex Slope
T Terrace
P Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s sand
Is loamy sand
sl sandy loam
I loam
si silt
A silt loam
Sid silty clay loam
cl clay loam
scl sandy clay loam
sc sandy clay
sic silty clay
c clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns non -sticky
Ss slightly sticky
S sticky
Vs very sticky
Np non -plastic
Sp slightly plastic
P plastic
Vp very plastic
MOIST
vfr Very friable
fr friable
fi firm
vfi Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg single grain
m massive
cr crumb
gr granular
sbk subangular blocky
abk angular blocky
pl platy
pr prismatic
1 ))T/Yt A/7T PC

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC S 17 F_ 4J'S
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION / o r q
Project No.
- p2' ; 0(Phone No.
Date:
3 1 S J Z
Location
C'iTV a,x-- /��1� 6APin
County: hs�,< d N
Property Size
Proposed Facility: S/ 4-D Water Supply: On -Site Well ❑ Evaluation: Auger Boring n'
�,,� Community ❑ Pit ❑
Described By: �Flo 3 GCGd}c' Public ❑ Cut ❑
I
Weather: eukoy w e— Antecedent Moisture / 41 S T- Surface Water:
i _n rZ L :<. n r�7 / ci n r—<" n S?
FACTORS
PROFILEE
—
PRO,F-IyLE
PROFILE~ —
PROFILE _ l
Landscape Position %
Horizon Depth I
(p
Color Munsell
)r
�?
Texture
S
S
Structure
Consistence
r` S i V
qi2V
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
¢S --S Z 4
Color — Munsell
tv
i q
s
Texture
f
SGi
L
Mottles
Structure
purl
Consistence
VP,
�r
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
/s
/
Color — Munsell
2. fu s_
Q K S
Texture
L
Mottles
— a vr 4
—
Structure
Sy
,'
Consistence
SS 5
5 S S
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
)5 3D
Color — Munsell
2, 5 G 2
iQw1,7S 6
Texture
5 C
C
Mottles
e m,/6 S b
, d -'
Structure
r
IF S IJ
Consistence
S C
c
Boundary
Soil Wetness
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R Ridge Interfluve
S Shoulder
L Linear Slope
FS Foot Slope
N Nose Slope
H Head Slope
Cc Concave Slope
Cv Convex Slope
T Terrace
P Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s sand
Is loamy sand
sl sandy loam
1 loam
si silt
A silt loam
sicl silty clay loam
cl clay loam
scl sandy clay loam
sc sandy clay
sic silty clay
c clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns non -sticky
Ss slightly sticky
S sticky
Vs very sticky
Np non -plastic
Sp slightly plastic
P plastic
Vp very plastic
MOIST
vfr Very friable
fr friable
fi firm
vfi Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg single grain
m massive
cr crumb
gr granular
sbk subangular blocky
abk angular blocky
pl platy
pr prismatic

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC 41
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION of
Project No. el-'00 (44,.O ( Phone No. Date:
Location LudEMtjPin County: /�vBFSOV Property Size
Proposed Facility: ,s t i "E 4- 1 Water Supply: On -Site Well ❑ Evaluation: Auger Boring
Described By:
Weather:
Community ❑ Pit
'For3 W&L60V Public ❑ Cut
LDUD ' eADL- Antecedent Moisture %no" S -- Surface Water:
i e r ✓"n -2
FACTORS
PROFILE
PROFILE
PROFILE
PROFILE
-1 ce., 1r
Landscape Position %
L , � _ Z
/ 4 2 0..
Horizon Depth I
_ 1�7
-
Color Munsell
3
3�2
Texture
r�
S
Structure
Consistence
on /1 {y
S n V
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
11�3
.0 _ 2
Color - Munsell
(,12
16 wf (p
Texture
led
C
Mottles
—
(13
1&49S G
Structure
W r
S w ;
Consistence
/?S n
SS 5 'C %
-�-✓
/% ` 1614is LInS
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
G
Color - Munsell
- Z Z
/Q G
Texture
5 c l
G
Mottles
{ - S `
? oe S
Structure
5 b�Lkrbf
Consistence
f ,
SS
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
2Z
4
Color - Munsell
Texture
�)
C
Mottles
%)M- 4 3
StructureW
5,bk
W bL
Consistence
5
S S
-' M - / as'4
Ml S
Boundary
Soil Wetness
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
141A f
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R
Ridge Interfluve
S
Shoulder
L
Linear Slope
FS
Foot Slope
N
Nose Slope
H
Head Slope
Cc
Concave Slope
Cv
Convex Slope
T
Terrace
P
Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s
sand
Is
loamy sand
sl
sandy loam
I
loam
si
silt
sil
silt loam
sicl
silty clay loam
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
sc
sandy clay
sic
silty clay
c
clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns
non -sticky
Ss
slightly sticky
S
sticky
Vs
very sticky
Np
non -plastic
Sp
slightly plastic
P
plastic
Vp
very plastic
MOIST
vfr
Very friable
fr
friable
fi
firm
vfi
Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg
single grain
m
massive
cr
crumb
gr
granular
sbk
subangular blocky
abk
angular blocky
pl
platy
pr
prismatic

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC Srar 41
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION 6 2 69 '7
Project No. 21- 02,' 1f'� : Q P Phone No. Date:
Location County: 3ESo�i Property Size
Proposed Facility: .SITS 4 1 Water Supply: On -Site Well ❑ Evaluation: Auger Boring g
Community ❑ Pit ❑
Described By: Y ILt '_e o- Public ❑ Cut ❑
J
Weather: zoao �poL Antecedent Moisture /�/�iS-� Surface Water: /U/ Xq
FACTORS
PROFILE
- 2-2-
PROFILE l
2 eon -L
PROFILE
PROFILE ,
Landscape Position %
1 _ 2 !o
Horizon Depth I
Color Munsell
JQ/,
0 412
Texture
Structure
Consistence
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
/
j 't
_
2_
Color — Munsell
/6 G
Z .,
G
S G
Textures
/
Mottles
lbeie
Structure
Consistence
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
Color — Munsell
ZQ1
5
Texture
Mottles
6 all4
Structure
Consistence
—
S
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
Color — Munsell
< <
S G
Texture
G 1
C l
Mottles
. /Q /j /
i,
Structure
h/S
Consistence
S ,
Boundary
Soil Wetness
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R
Ridge Interfluve
S
Shoulder
L
Linear Slope
FS
Foot Slope
N
Nose Slope
H
Head Slope
Cc
Concave Slope
Cv
Convex Slope
T
Terrace
P
Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s
sand
Is
loamy sand
sl
sandy loam
I
loam
si
silt
sil
silt loam
sicl
silty clay loam
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
sc
sandy clay
sic
silty clay
c
clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns
non -sticky
Ss
slightly sticky
S
sticky
Vs
very sticky
Np
non -plastic
Sp
slightly plastic
P
plastic
Vp
very plastic
MOIST
vfr
Very friable
fr
friable
fi
firm
vfi
Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg
single grain
m
massive
cr
crumb
gr
granular
sbk
subangular blocky
abk
angular blocky
pl
platy
pr
prismatic

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC S rrF-. 4-t
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION
Project No. 21- 02 ' H ' p ( Phone No. Date: 3/15)?.
Location (f DF M8EP-7W Pin County: D6IGS UN Property Size
Proposed Facility: Si-rE 4-/ Water Supply: On -Site Well ❑ Evaluation:
Community ❑
Described By: 2oB VUILy0\Z PubUc ❑
Weather: up ` ApL Antecedent Moisture AiPlS T Surface Water:
-::k %n -R. C,c, n
Auger Boring
Pit _K
Cut ❑
N�A
FACTORS
PROFILE
-
PROFILE 1
3.2 Con J-)
PROFILE
PROFILE
3-.3 Cone
Landscape Position %
L — D - / fl�
[ /— 2 �O
Horizon Depth I
_
Color Munsell
4Q¢
dYZ 3
Texture
Structure
r
Consistence
f
r✓
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
-
' /4
3R_
Color — Munsell
_
7 (p
G
Texture
<
C
Mottles
—
—ag
S b
Structure
Consistence
h �� ti/
<;.
Ss S ✓
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
Color — Munsell
Texture
5�� S
Mottles
Structure
yJ b r
Consistence
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
2S —4- Q
Color — Munsell
Texture
/ SC
Mottles
Structure
S
Consistence
s
ih - G 17 (13
Boundary
Soil Wetness
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
p
f
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R Ridge Interfluve
S Shoulder
L Linear Slope
FS Foot Slope
N Nose Slope
H Head Slope
Cc Concave Slope
Cv Convex Slope
T Terrace
P Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s sand
Is loamy sand
sl sandy loam
I loam
si silt
sil silt loam
sicl silty clay loam
cl clay loam
scl sandy clay loam
sc sandy clay
sic silty clay
c clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns non -sticky
Ss slightly sticky
S sticky
Vs very sticky
Np non -plastic
Sp slightly plastic
P plastic
Vp very plastic
MOIST
vfr Very friable
fr friable
fi firm
vfi Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg single grain
m massive
cr crumb
gr granular
sbk subangular blocky
abk angular blocky
pl platy
pr prismatic

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC SfrE 44
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION P 4-0 r_�
Project No. 2/-D2; ,y'b/ Phone No. Date:
Location cia �c L-G.R&t enyurin County: Property Size
Proposed Facility: Si-rr Water Supply: On -Site Well ❑ Evaluation:
Community ❑
Described By: /O(3 /G.ZCO". Public ❑
Weather: l oNv DO4, Antecedent Moisture 1J%I.5 r Surface Water:
I-lifin 4a / r, c .i. 1 c
Auger Boring W
Pit ❑
Cut ❑
FACTORS
PROFILE
4 _ !
PROFILE
PROFILE
PROFILE
Landscape Position %
Horizon Depth I
Color Munsell
¢Ovg
s/2
Texture
Structure
Consistence
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
_ 7q-
3 _ S
Color — Munsell
lj wi 3
G
s
Texture
��
C
Mottles
Structure
!v
Consistence
S
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
/4_ 2,�
Color — Munsell
Q S l
Texture
Mottles
Structure
Consistence
f- c12
�.
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
Z
r <
Color — Munsell
rj /Z �,
S r
Texture
SC /
Mottles
Structure
yy'�
Consistence
Boundary
Soil Wetness
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
Gtp
or- L
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R
Ridge Interfluve
S
Shoulder
L
Linear Slope
FS
Foot Slope
N
Nose Slope
H
Head Slope
Cc
Concave Slope
Cv
Convex Slope
T
Terrace
P
Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s
sand
Is
loamy sand
sl
sandy loam
I
loam
si
silt
sil
silt loam
sicl
silty clay loam
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
sc
sandy clay
sic
silty clay
c
clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns
non -sticky
Ss
slightly sticky
S
sticky
Vs
very sticky
Np
non -plastic
Sp
slightly plastic
P
plastic
Vp
very plastic
MOIST
vfr
Very friable
fr
friable
fi
firm
vfi
Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg
single grain
m
massive
cr
crumb
gr
granular
sbk
subangular blocky
abk
angular blocky
pl
platy
pr
prismatic.

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC S fTr 4-1
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION 19A& 5 of
Project No. 21- b 2� pl:} : D t Phone No. Date: �1 2
Location C'rru Ar Lumac N Pin County: u � Property Size
Proposed Facility: Si TLF 4- ! Water Supply: On -Site Well ❑ Evaluation: Auger Boring [f
� Community ❑ Pit ❑
Described By: K`l3 kJI LL.e-mz Public ❑ Cut %j ❑
Weather: 1�14v' elvL Antecedent Moisture S' 7- Surface Water:
FACTORS
PROFILE
PROFILE
(P-/ con t-i
PROFILE
6 -2-
PROFILE I
-2 Gcn
Landscape Position %
Horizon Depth I
Color Munsell
¢ 2
/) V
Texture
S 1
Structure
(,v r
Consistence
/? n V f
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
24
e7, 1 2
Color — Munsell
U L 3
Co 3
(o )
Texture
C /
1
Mottles
Structure
1'✓
w rb
Consistence
1p
al?G
%. r L
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
Color — Munsell
S (�
S G
Texture
/
C
Mottles
r /U G �}
Structure
Consistence
c /
SC S
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
L
Color — Munsell
/6
Texture
G_
Mottles
lAwo /0 1
Structure
WS C
Consistence
SS S
M /!)
Boundary
Soil Wetness
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
lvon5bI-
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R
Ridge Interfluve
S
Shoulder
L
Linear Slope
FS
Foot Slope
N
Nose Slope
H
Head Slope
Cc
Concave Slope
Cv
Convex Slope
T
Terrace
P
Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s
sand
Is
loamy sand
sl
sandy loam
l
loam
si
silt
sil
silt loam
sicl
silty clay loam
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
sc
sandy clay
sic
silty clay
c
clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns
non -sticky
Ss
slightly sticky
S
sticky
Vs
very sticky
Np
non -plastic
Sp
slightly plastic
P
plastic
Vp
very plastic
MOIST
vfr
Very friable
fr
friable
fi
firm
vfi
Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg
single grain
m
massive
cr
crumb
gr
granular
sbk
subangular blocky
abk
angular blocky
pl
platy
pr
prismatic

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC E IT-F
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION j246,F
Project No. 2/ QZ� Phone No. Date: 3 is) Z
Location 7!�t QJCZ,% 9&e7bN Pin County: Property Size
Proposed Facility: Stir ¢ � Water Suppli
Described By: �g k'J/L Lf p 1 -
Weather: r!' D Deb q Antecedent Moisture
n
6or/--�
On -Site Well ❑ Evaluation: Auger Boring /Q
Community ❑ Pit ❑
Public ❑ Cut ❑
%G1T Surface Water: N/jA
FACTORS
PROFILE
PROFILE `
PROFILE-
-
PROFILE i
-1 Crn t'
Landscape Position %
L ` / _ 24%a
Horizon Depth I
—�
Color Munsell
¢ 2-
Texture
Structure
r
li►/
Consistence
-v'
1S n
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
,' '
g — 3
Z — Z 4
Color — Munsell
Texture
C
Mottles
le& t_
to ,
Structure
S
r
Consistence
y
,�
✓
- S
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
/T_ 3T
.— 32
Color — Munsell
/Z L
/Q e S .6
Texture
C/
Mottles
_-
Structure
Consistence
s
SS S
Boundary
Horizon Depth IVY
Color — MunsellM
41ffS;
Texture
Mottles
/yt , /Uc
X n
Structure
Consistence
Boundary
Soil Wetness
y
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
5
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R Ridge Interfluve
S Shoulder
L Linear Slope
FS Foot Slope
N Nose Slope
H Head Slope
Cc Concave Slope
Cv Convex Slope
T Terrace
P Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s sand
Is loamy sand
sl sandy loam
I loam
si silt
A silt loam
Sid silty clay loam
cl clay loam
scl sandy clay loam
sc sandy clay
sic silty clay
c clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns non -sticky
Ss slightly sticky
S sticky
Vs very sticky
Np non -plastic
Sp slightly plastic
P plastic
Vp very plastic
MOIST
vfr Very friable
fr friable
fi firm
vfi Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg single grain
m massive
cr crumb
gr granular
sbk subangular blocky
abk angular blocky
pl platy
pr prismatic

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC _5 i r�E 41
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION f"Gz!� I
Project No. - 02' ' D( Phone No. Date: l 5 2 f
Location C/County: Pe, )r5sn/ Property Size
Proposed Facility: Si7 r 4- / Water Supply:
Described By: K o8 wat e 6y
Weather: LOUDt ' CboL. Antecedent Moisture
n 47
On -Site Well ❑ Evaluation: Auger Boring 0
Community ❑ Pit ❑
Public ❑ Cut ) El
/AD/S T" Surface Water: N / P
,st`. n /n
FACTORS
PROFILE
PROFILE
PROFILE
PROFILE
Landscape Position %
Horizon Depth I
Color Munsell
IOU12 Vp
,32
Texture
S
S
Structure
bt-
Consistence
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
(,— '
a s
Color — Munsell
6 r
Texture
�+
Mottles�-
Structure
Consistence
S^
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
2_
17
Color — Munsell
/
Texture
Mottles
Structure
> ,
Consistence
S
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
,r Q
Color — Munsell
W2S
Texture
C
Mottles
i
Structure
y�f
Consistence
S
Boundary
Soil Wetness
32
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
L
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R
Ridge Interfluve
S
Shoulder
L
Linear Slope
FS
Foot Slope
N
Nose Slope
H
Head Slope
Cc
Concave Slope
Cv
Convex Slope
T
Terrace
P
Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s
sand
Is
loamy sand
sl
sandy loam
I
loam
Si
silt
A
silt loam
sicl
silty clay loam
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
Sc
sandy clay
sic
silty clay
c
clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns
non -sticky
Ss
slightly sticky
S
sticky
Vs
very sticky
Np
non -plastic
Sp
slightly plastic
P
plastic
Vp
very plastic
MOIST
vfr
Very friable
fr
friable
fi
firm
vfi
Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg
single grain
in
massive
cr
crumb
gr
granular
sbk
subangular blocky
abk
angular blocky
pl
platy
pr
prismatic

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC 5i7E 42-
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION PA6i 1 6� 0
Project No. 2l-!S2 ' pt4 1.0 ( Phone No. Date: 3)l77 2
Location of-LumefentvPin County: -&Jow Property Size
Proposed Facility: sl T-E 4Z. Water Supply: On -Site Well ❑ Evaluation:
/� � Community ❑
Described By: / 8 A l ue-oK Public ❑
Weather: eagp oaG Antecedent Moisture ,E`7" Surface Water:
JC-1 1r` tom, 1 c. i
Auger Boring 0
Pit ❑
Cut ❑
FACTORS
PROFILE
PROFILE
PROFILE
PROFILE
Landscape Position%
Horizon Depth I
Color Munsell
! ?
¢
Texture
S
Structure
�.
r
Consistence
Z25✓,
�S V
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
—
2 4
�- — /4
2-S 2 -1
Color — Munsell
Texture
15,1$
/
S
Mottles
_ (� 1
Structure
l
w jb
W t
tisS�✓P
Consistence
SS 5
- / 4
/YI • /d 2 � 3
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
2
Color — Munsell
Texture
$C C
Mottles
Structure
✓
Consistence
l S
S
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
2 . 42
Color — Munselllzn'meS
Texture
Mottles
V 4
Structure
yi/S
W K
Consistence
aS'S
5
Boundary
Soil Wetness
�2 n
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
i36leJ
0 1/1L F
� Fr1
A��WMIIV61
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R Ridge Interfluve
S Shoulder
L Linear Slope
FS Foot Slope
N Nose Slope
H Head Slope
Cc Concave Slope
Cv Convex Slope
T Terrace
P Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s sand
Is loamy sand
sl sandy loam
l loam
si silt
A silt loam
sicl silty clay loam
Cl clay loam
scl sandy clay loam
sc sandy clay
sic silty clay
c clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns non -sticky
Ss slightly sticky
S sticky
Vs very sticky
Np non -plastic
Sp slightly plastic
P plastic
Vp very plastic
MOIST
vfr Very friable
fr friable
fi firm
vfi Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg single grain
m massive
cr crumb
gr granular
sbk subangular blocky
abk angular blocky
pl plat'
pr prismatic

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC SrFF 42-
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION �0&F 2 of $
Project No. 0/ - 62; pay :yJ Phone No.
Location �'iTy of �aMB i �v Pin
Date: ;,11712 I
County:,ti Property Size
Proposed Facility: 5i7x-g 42 Water Supply: On -Site Well ❑ Evaluation: Auger Boring
Community ❑ Pit ❑
Described By: '�3 y1/«� D)C Public ❑ Cut ❑
Weather: p p,pL Antecedent Moisture j/V& Surface Water: �N f
FACTORS
PROFILE
PROFILE
PROFILEµ
PROFILI 1
Landscape Position pro
L_ 29jG
L — — 219/6
Horizon Depth I
Color Munsell
/Q
A0 wa 3 2.
Texture
S
S
Structure
r
Consistence
) S /
/7 6 V
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
4 7— S7-{
4-6 —57 4
Color — Munsell
zavwCo
() e G
ZQ
Texture
G
SG
Mottles
_
I/limS
�I,if
Structure
r
Consistence
V` f
SS S
/' , n
ss s
✓n - �v
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
Color — Munsell
Texture
G
G
Mottles
Structure
`ys
Consistence
: S
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
�r7 2—
J
Color — Munsell
<"
/J
Texture
Mottles
Structure
v✓r C
y
Consistence
SS
Boundary
Soil Wetness
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
,>
b
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R
Ridge Interfluve
S
Shoulder
L
Linear Slope
FS
Foot Slope
N
Nose Slope
H
Head Slope
Cc
Concave Slope
Cv
Convex Slope
T
Terrace
P
Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s
sand
Is
loamy sand
sl
sandy loam
I
loam
si
silt
sil
silt loam
sicl
silty clay loam
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
sc
sandy clay
sic
silty clay
c
clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns
non -sticky
Ss
slightly sticky
S
sticky
Vs
very sticky
Np
non -plastic
Sp
slightly plastic
P
plastic
Vp
very plastic
MOIST
vfr
Very friable
fr
friable
fi
firm
vf1
Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg
single grain
m
massive
cr
crumb
gr
granular
sbk
subangular blocky
abk
angular blocky
pl
platy
pr
prismatic

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC 51 42
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION PA L4C -3 :)F
Project No. 21- D2 t all Q i Phone No. Date: 3 l 7 2 i
Location LiTN of �!s/It13EGZTD /Pin County:?
� b,1E5o A., Property Size
Proposed Facility: SmE 42 Water Supply: On -Site Well ❑ Evaluation:
Community El
Described By: �(3 %j�Iaeov, Public ❑
Weather: Ctoar'! ooL- Antecedent Moisture
y]/T Surface Water:
Auger Boring
Pit ❑
Cut � 1p ❑
FACTORS
PROFILE
3--
PROFILE ?
3_2 Cor1 t-
PROFILE
- 5
PROFILE
Landscape Position %
L ` 0 — /
Horizon Depth I
Color Munsell
3
Texture
5
Structure
r
ConsistenceASy
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
4D -- 2- -)
�%� 13
Color — Munsell
$ !
I
Q (0 2
r
Texture
Mottles
_
100fx q3
_
r
Structure
/
!�/Sl� 4IY� !�(�
MYM r n 'to
Consistence
S -1 ♦
fis
0d
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
14_ 2
3, 2
Color — Munsell
Texture
-
C)
Mottles
(rj
Structure
Lv bk
Consistence
SS $
42
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
Color — Munsell
Texture
C
Mottles
tag
Structure
L_J IV
Consistence
' C 5,2
Boundary
Sou Wetness
G 2 11
L 1it
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
/L—C E
A/ s
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R
Ridge Interfluve
S
Shoulder
L
Linear Slope
FS
Foot Slope
N
Nose Slope
H
Head Slope
Cc
Concave Slope
Cv
Convex Slope
T
Terrace
P
Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s
sand
Is
loamy sand
sl
sandy loam
1
loam
si
silt
sil
silt loam
sicl
silty clay loam
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
sc
sandy clay
sic
silty clay
c
clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns
non -sticky
Ss
slightly sticky
S
sticky
Vs
very sticky
Np
non -plastic
Sp
slightly plastic
P
plastic
Vp
very plastic
MOIST
vfr
Very friable
fr
friable
fi
firm
vfi
Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg
single grain
m
massive
cr
crumb
gr
granular
sbk
subangular blocky
abk
angular blocky
pl
platy
pr
prismatic

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC S5 rTE 4-2.
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION PPG's 4- OF?
Project No. 2/. Q2 ;,P14', 0 1 Phone No. Date: 17 2 /
Location �'rry of 'J_I rA5F2Tpti.,,Pin County: 12 E ,1, Property Size
Proposed Facility: ,�� TE 4-2 Water Supply: On -Site Well ❑ Evaluation:
Community ❑
Described By: , e> �%l LLCo l " Public ❑
Weather: IIZAl i C�DOL Antje`cedent Moisture Akk/ Surface Water:
Auger Boring
Pit 8
Cut ❑
FACTORS
PROFILE
PROFILE
PROFILE 4
PROFILE`
Landscape Position %
_ Z %G
O>�
Horizon Depth I
IR_
Color Munsell
(Jq1L¢ 2-
,Ik4
Texture
Structure
Consistence
S
✓i i'
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
L _ S2 +
—
d-0
Color — Munsell
/,.� - '-
�d
16 Ilk? S
Q 2
Texture
G /
Mottles
--
_ f�
—
4? S (�
Structure
/
KWsht
Consistence
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
14 _ 3
l/
Color — Munsell
/Q V S (
U S
Texture
I (
Mottles
Structure
1tiS t-
k
Consistence
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
IF 4
, 4
Color — Munsell
Texture
G�
Mottles
Structure
S
Z
Consistence
SS S /
SS S
�d
Boundary
Soil Wetness
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
MeAeLZ
71 /t
mtJe
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R
Ridge Interfluve
S
Shoulder
L
Linear Slope
FS
Foot Slope
N
Nose Slope
H
Head Slope
Cc
Concave Slope
Cv
Convex Slope
T
Terrace
P
Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s
sand
Is
loamy sand
sl
sandy loam
I
loam
si
silt
sil
silt loam
sicl
silty clay loam
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
Sc
sandy clay
sic
silty clay
c
clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns
non -sticky
Ss
slightly sticky
S
sticky
Vs
very sticky
Np
non -plastic
Sp
slightly plastic
P
plastic
Vp
very plastic
MOIST
vfr
Very friable
fr
friable
fi
firm
vfi
Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg
single grain
in
massive
cr
crumb
gr
granular
sbk
subangular blocky
abk
angular blocky
pl
platy
pr
prismatic

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC S i Tf 42
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION k,4e*.e S aF ?-
Project No. 2)- 6Z, Phone No. Date:
Location 1�'1TN dF Lu JAt3m n twin County: g,!,J6 n, Property Size
Proposed Facility: Sj 7ZE 42 Water Supply: On -Site Well ❑ Evaluation:
��- Community ❑
Described By: wag4LC0 �L Public ❑
Weather: a p4 0Antecedent Moisture A14 r Surface Water:
Auger Boring
Pit ❑
Cut N/� ❑
FACTORS
PROFILE
s - 1
PROFILE /
S- 111�n1�-
PROFILE
5- 2-
PROFILE
Landscape Position %
Horizon Depth I
—>'o
Color Munsell
Texture
Structure
Consistence
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
Color — Munsell
(v t
cig
Texture
Mottles
i.
Structure
k
Consistence
S V
S s S
�SV
5
'm_lU11,12
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
_2 2
PS_ O
Color — Munsell
Q /I (o /
/6 S5
Texture
L
Sc r
Mottles
Structure
WS"
VUS
Consistence
SS
S S 12
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
_
3O
Color — Munsell
J- r
Texture
C
1
Mottles
'Ile - 11644PSeb
_
Structure
P,
Consistence
S
�S �-
Boundary
Soil Wetness
L c of
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
12266
C SC3te0
/7Z►9i/V� fZI2
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R
Ridge Interfluve
S
Shoulder
L
Linear Slope
FS
Foot Slope
N
Nose Slope
H
Head Slope
Cc
Concave Slope
Cv
Convex Slope
T
Terrace
P
Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s
sand
Is
loamy sand
sl
sandy loam
I
loam
si
silt
A
silt loam
sicl
silty clay loam
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
sc
sandy clay
sic
silty clay
c
clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns
non -sticky
Ss
slightly sticky
S
sticky
Vs
very sticky
Np
non -plastic
Sp
slightly plastic
P
plastic
Vp
very plastic
MOIST
vfr
Very friable
fr
friable
fi
firm
vfi
Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg
single grain
m
massive
cr
crumb
gr
granular
sbk
subangular blocky
abk
angular blocky
pl
platy
pr
prismatic.

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC S T 4 2-
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION ?,4ew- (b�
Project No. O f .- D 2. ; pN ' I Phone No. Date: 3I o / a l
Location Pin County: Property Size
Proposed Facility: SIT, 4 2. Water Supply: On -Site Well ❑ Evaluation: Auger Boring
Described By:
Weather:
Community ❑ Pit
Public ❑ Cut
I' mo 64PL Antecedent Moisture Neer Surface Water: NIA
FACTORS
PROFILE
PROFILE`
PROFILE
PROFILE ~
oe) �r
Landscape Position %
L d _ 1 020
[�
Horizon Depth I
Color Munsell
Q ?113
2
Texture
S
Structure
Consistence
i% S V
ns 4,,o
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
_ �j
_ .�-
—5 2 +
Color — Munsell
Texture
S
G
S
Mottles
Structure
Consistence
✓
S S
/0. &//�1
-
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
l
Color — Munsell
ZZ,Texture
L
Mottles
Structure
S
Consistence
S
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
Color — Munsell
G
(�
Texture
s /
Mottles
S
_ �j / /
Structure
K
Consistence
SS S
Boundary
Soil Wetness
C �/
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
l�r
qM
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R Ridge Interfluve
S Shoulder
L Linear Slope
FS Foot Slope
N Nose Slope
H Head Slope
Cc Concave Slope
Cv Convex Slope
T Terrace
P Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s sand
Is loamy sand
sl sandy loam
I loam
si silt
sil silt loam
sicl silty clay loam
cl clay loam
scl sandy clay loam
sc sandy clay
sic silty clay
c clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns non -sticky
Ss slightly sticky
S sticky
Vs very sticky
Np non -plastic
Sp slightly plastic
P plastic
Vp very plastic
MOIST
vfr Very friable
fr friable
fi firm
vfi Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg single grain
In massive
cr crumb
gr granular
sbk subangular blocky
abk angular blocky
Pl Platy
pr prismatic

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC s, 4,
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION r o r— g
Project No. 2/-00',PH : 0 f Phone No. Date: I 2 r
Location r�i� 'L4/ME,C'.l_D1Pin County: a Sons Property ize
Proposed Facility: Si j E 42 Water Supply: On -Site Well ❑ Evaluation: Auger Boring
Described By:
Weather:
�. Community ❑ Pit
08C�c[Du Public ❑ Cut
D i6i►L. Antecedent Moisture ET Surface Wate
n r7 n �L�% ,c,n 0-;c,hl�
FACTORS
PROFILE
r 2
PROFILE 1
" 2 trDn �-
PROFILE
- 1
PROFILE„
Landscape Position %
_
L _ D ,, �p
Horizon Depth I
Color Munsell
V2
/O ? 311
Texture
s
Structure
r
Consistence
V
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
D - Z f
-/2
' 4
Color — Munsell
/ve S' -
loqA 4(0//
(A 2
G
Texture
W
Mottles
U $'
/ lt S 4
Structure
t
t f
S
Consistence
y
ji
SS S
rn-Ida, Wf
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
If Z
1 Z
Color — Munsell
/Q S I
(o
Texture
C
Mottles
�-
S G
Structure
vs &Y
Consistence
S S
f
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
Z— 4b,
2D— 4 a
Color — Munsell
Texture
I SC
Mottles
S
Structure
Consistence
Sl60
SS S
. � a
Boundary
Soil Wetness
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
Tr
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R
Ridge Interfluve
S
Shoulder
L
Linear Slope
FS
Foot Slope
N
Nose Slope
H
Head Slope
Cc
Concave Slope
Cv
Convex Slope
T
Terrace
P
Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s
sand
Is
loamy sand
sl
sandy loam
I
loam
si
silt
sil
silt loam
sicl
silty clay loam
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
sc
sandy clay
sic
silty clay
c
clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns
non -sticky
Ss
slightly sticky
S
sticky
Vs
very sticky
Np
non -plastic
Sp
slightly plastic
P
plastic
Vp
very plastic
MOIST
vfr
Very friable
fr
friable
fi
firm
vfi
Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg
single grain
m
massive
cr
crumb
gr
granular
sbk
subangular blocky
abk
angular blocky
p1
platy
pr
prismatic

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC S/TE 4-2-
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION pl�Gf- 8 of g
Project No. Zl -02: Q�.'p� Phone No. Date:
Location !'�r-y a' ky y tJPin County: 40Ae_cA y\% Property Size
Proposed Facility: 7�F 12 Water Supply: On -Site Well ❑ Evaluation:
Community ❑
Described By: ;0t"6 ma eo x' Public ❑
Weather: ' �'pp Antecedent Moisture ,E T' Surface Water:
i in R .ci n ti1
Auger Boring Ell
Pit ❑
Cut ❑
FACTORS
PROF LE
PROFIL
lu�I
PROFILE
PROFILE
Landscape Position %
G _ D _ 'no
Z _ 0 ?
L
Horizon Depth I
—
Color Munsell
IQ � 3 L
#410
Texture
r
.5
Structure
tv 4-
Consistence
'09 S- d
n
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
Color — Munsell
6�Q S /
(,
G
Texture
ri
SC
Mottles
Structure
Consistence
A I/t
SS S
✓
L� M- Z-19
s` l✓
Boundary
Horizon Depth III
_ 2
6
Color — Munsell
14 OR ,f
16x S �,
Texture
Mottles
lVc_
_
Structure
wS
Consistence
S
Jr 1A
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
ZZ -46
Color — Munsell449S
/
Texture
SC-1-1SG
Mottles
_ /0 14,e lr 2
G /U l
Structure
S /(
Consistence
SS S
S �'✓
S G
Boundary
Soil Wetness
4:_
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
ZvV Vit-E
601?6
T N Fl k f
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R Ridge Interfluve
S Shoulder
L Linear Slope
FS Foot Slope
N Nose Slope
H Head Slope
Cc Concave Slope
Cv Convex Slope
T Terrace
P Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s sand
Is loamy sand
sl sandy loam
1 loam
si silt
A silt loam
sicl silty clay loam
cl clay loam
scl sandy clay loam
sc sandy clay
sic silty clay
c clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns non -sticky
Ss slightly sticky
S sticky
Vs very sticky
Np non -plastic
Sp slightly plastic
P plastic
Vp very plastic
MOIST
vfr Very friable
fr friable
fi firm
vfi Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg single grain
m massive
cr crumb
gr granular
sbk subangular blocky
abk angular blocky
pl platy
pr prismatic .

WILLCOX & MABE SOIL SOLUTIONS, PLLC S
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION
Project No. Phone No. Date:
Location County: �L&6 96 K/ Property Size
Proposed Facility: S17T 43 Water Supply: On -Site Well ❑ Evaluation: Auger Boring
� // Community ❑ Pit ElDescribed By: -96 AilaeO Public ❑ Cut ❑
Weather: Antecedent Moisture
� yNIi Surface Water:
, -, 12
FACTORS
PROFILE
PROFILE
PROFILE r _
PROFILE i
Landscape Position %
L
Horizon Depth I
/
Color Munsell
Aoave 4 2
Mtl& 41
Texture
1
Structure
Consistence
Boundary
Horizon Depth II
_. 45
!� —9 —S- 2
¢ Z +
Color — Munsell
&o
(�j 3
.7G
2
Texture
Mottles
Structure
k%4 I6.4.0de
Consistence
45
U
Boundary
Horizon Depth IH
Color — Munsell
0 s
tee S-L
Texture
Mottles
_
Structure
Consistence
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
2s _ �} Z
0
Color — Munsell
j' (�
S- (.
Texture
G
G
Mottles
Yale , 4
�� G
Structure
S
/&
Consistence
Boundary
Soil Wetness
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTAR
Classification
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSITION
R
Ridge Interfluve
S
Shoulder
L
Linear Slope
FS
Foot Slope
N
Nose Slope
H
Head Slope
Cc
Concave Slope
Cv
Convex Slope
T
Terrace
P
Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s
sand
Is
loamy sand
sl
sandy loam
I
loam
si
silt
A
silt loam
sic]
silty clay loam
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
sc
sandy clay
sic
silty clay
c
clay
CONSISTENCE WET
Ns
non -sticky
Ss
slightly sticky
S
sticky
Vs
very sticky
Np
non -plastic
Sp
slightly plastic
P
plastic
Vp
very plastic
MOIST
vfr
Very friable
fr
friable
fi
firm
vfi
Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg
single grain
in
massive
cr
crumb
gr
granular
sbk
subangular blocky
abk
angular blocky
pl
platy
pr
prismatic

TOPO MAPS: SURFACE WATERBODIES

Field 1: soap
Total Acres: 11.24 Application Area: 10.57
Field 2:
Total Acres: 5.77 Application Area: 3.05
Field 3: • w' '``_
Total Acres: Application Area: 2.81
Field 4:
Total Acres: 3.67 Application Area: 3.67 1
Field 5:
Total Acres: 9.40 Application Area: 9.40 0,
Field 6:
Total Acres: 28.29 Application Area: 20.32
Field 7:
Total Acres: 20.82 Application Area: 16.29 _ I
Field 8:
Total Acres: 6.96 Application Area: 6.72 1
w
O
. _ 6
2
`�' • ,:000 %
'/
l r .
_ qLegend
x - Fence rf
-- Private Road The compliance boundary is established
o Pond at either 250 feet from the residuals land
• application area or 50 feet within the
®Application Area • property boundary, whichever is closest
®Unsuitable Area to the residuals land application area.
' Copyright:© A 13 National Gerographic Society, i-cubed
NC-RO-16
Graphical Scale
0 270 540 1,080 1,620 2,160 Field 1-8
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
Ozzel Baker City of Lumberton Robeson

Field 1 6:
Total Acres:
5.11 Application Area: 5.11
Field 1 7:
Total Acres:
6.62 Application Area: 6.62
Field 1 8:
Total Acres:
12.32 Application Area: 12.32
Field 1 9:
Total Acres:
0.99 Application Area: 0.99
4W #-
son-,
.s►
Idols" 40
Legend
x - Fence
-- Private Road
o Pond
®Application Area
® Unsuitable Area
0 165 330
660 990
ft
Graphical Scale
1,320
� Feet
O
OQ
r
The compliance boundary is established
(' at either 250 feet from the residuals land
application area or 50 feet within the
property boundary, whichever is closest 401
to the residuals land application area. •0e
C•opyright:© 2013 National Geographic Socie , bed
NC-RO-16
Field 16-19
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
James T Campen City of Lumberton Robeson

Field 1:
Total Acres: 44.89 Application Area: 44.89
Field 6:
Total Acres: 26.72 Application Area: 26.72
1
IMF
Legend
— Ditch
Parcel
®Application_Area
® Unsuitable Areaa
0 237.5 475 950 1,425
WN
Graphical Scale
1,900
� Feet
�' -
%� The compliance boundary is established
at either 250 feet from the residuals land
application area or 50 feet within the
property boundary, whichever is closest
to the residuals land application area.
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
NC-RO-17
Field 1-6
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
City of Lumberton City of Lumberton Robeson

Field 2:
Total Acres: 51.35 Application Area: 51.35
Field 3:
Total Acres: 41.81 Application Area: 44.89
Legend
— Ditch
Parcel
®Application_ Area
® Unsuitable Areaa
0 230 460 920
0
1,380
nos
I
The compliance boundary is established
at either 250 feet from the residuals land
application area or 50 feet within the
property boundary, whichever is closest
to the residuals land application area.
Copyright:© 13 Na%gonal Geogr phic Society, i-cu
Graphical Scale NC-RO-17
1,840 Field 1-2
� Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
City of Lumberton City of Lumberton Robeson

Field 4:
Total Acres: 65.94 Application Area: 65.94 /
Field 4A:
Total Acres: 70.10 Application Area: 70.10
v
4
O
O -vv
-
Legend
— Ditch
Parcel
®Application_ Area
® Unsuitable Areaa
\ 2411
413
Graphical Scale
0 320 640 1,280
1,920 2,560
Feet
v
�2?
The compliance boundary is established
at either 250 feet from the residuals land
application area or 50 feet within the
property boundary, whichever is closest
to the residuals land application area.
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
NC-RO-17
Field 4 - 4A
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
City of Lumberton City of Lumberton Robeson

Field 5:
Total Acres: 33.51 Application Area: 33.51
Legend
— Ditch
Parcel
®Application_ Area
® Unsuitable Areaa
0 90 180
r
360 540
m
a
L
CD
`1
The compliance boundary is established
at either 250 feet from the residuals land
application area or 50 feet within the
property boundary, whichever is closest
to the residuals land application area.
Copyright:© 2013 NatMMICMS =
NC-RO-17
Graphical Scale
720 Field 5
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
City of Lumberton City of Lumberton Robeson

Field 7:
Total Acres: 30.76 Application Area: 30.76
.ijt*n Ch
•
i
4
14
I I
Ooxx /
Legend
/Z
—Ditch The compliance boundary is established
Parcel ' at either 250 feet from the residuals land
®Application_ Area application area or 50 feet within the
/ property boundary, whichever is closest
® Unsuitable Areaa to the residuals land application area.
Copyright:© 2013 N tional Geographic Society, i-cubed
NC-RO-17
Graphical Scale
0 170 340 680 1,020 1,360 Field 7
Feet
L-Owner: Permit Holder: County:
City of Lumberton City of Lumberton Robeson

Field 3:
Total Acres:
48.21 Application Area:
29.56
Field 1 5:
Total Acres:
28.95 Application Area:
24.71
Field 1 6:
Total Acres:
14.42 Application Area:
10.90
Field 1 7:
Total Acres:
24.93 Application Area:
22.51
•
-H- �
i +
f+ +
f+ +
+
I y % +
f / ♦
f/
/
+♦
1001
�� li M, 1 � � ♦ � i f
_ f
• f+
The compliance boundary is established
at either 250 feet from the residuals land
Legend application area or 50 feet within the
Off -sit, H,,se Well= —s„eam property boundary, whichever is closest
— Drain — —Private Roatl
x — Fenee Pend to the residuals land application area.
Application Area
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
NC-RO-20
Graphical Scale
0 260 520 1,040 1,560 2,080 Field 3, 15-17
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
F
nald Hammonds City of Lumberton Robeson

Field 4:
Total Acres: 31.08 Application Area: 30.35
•
Legend
Wells S�reem Percel
On -side House Drain — Private R-d 7 Application Area
M X Fence O Pond ® Unsuitable Area
I`LJIi Off side House
The compliance boundary is established
at either 250 feet from the residuals land
application area or 50 feet within the
property boundary, whichever is closest
to the residuals land application area.
ht:©
NC-RO-20
Graphical Scale
0 285 570 1,140 1,710 2,280 Field 4
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
Ronald Hammonds City of Lumberton Robeson
i-cubed

Field 6:
Total Acres: 4.37 Application Area: 4.37
Field 7:
Total Acres: 17.96 Application Area: 14.55
Field 8:
Total Acres: 73.2 Application Area: 73.2
Field 1 4:
Total Acres: 11.90 Application Area: 11.90
�i
E
( �t
up-
J 19
r reither
ce boundary is established
Legend eet from the residuals land
We" —S"enm Pz"e' , area or 50 feet within the
On -side House Drain — Private F°ad 1 Application Area
X _ Fence O P°nd Un—tableA.. ` ndary, whichever is closest
°" "e"°nse als land application area.
%.WOOF If1 copyright:© 201 National Geographic S, ciety, i-c bed
NC-RO-20
Graphical Scale
0 345 690 1,380 2,070 2,760 Field 6-8, 14
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
Ronald Hammonds City of Lumberton Robeson

Field 1 8:
Total Acres: 14 Application Area: 11
�so
y r
dek
•
Legend
• Wells — Ed'— Parcel
Off -side House _Drain --- Private Roatl 7— Application Area
X— Feace O Paatl
b
Graphical Scale
0 245 490 980 1,470 1,960
Feet
11
Oil
I]
ON The compliance boundary is established
at either 250 feet from the residuals land
application area or 50 feet within the
property boundary, whichever is closest
to the residuals land application area.
Copyright:© 2013 National Geogra hic Society, i-cubed
NC-RO-20
Field 18
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
Ronald Hammonds City of Lumberton Robeson

Field 1 9:
Total Acres:
16.55 Application Area: 16.55
Field 20:
Total Acres:
43.27 Application Area: 43.27
Field 21:
Total Acres:
16.97 Application Area: 14.86
W
O
• �-
• b-
J � �
The compliance boundary is established
at either 250 feet from the residuals land
Legend application area or 50 feet within the
off-=i�eHoa=e `"e"= —Into �� boundary, whichever is closest
— Drain — —Private Roatl � property Y�
X — F—, Pend to the residuals land application area.
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, iMoubed
NC-RO-20
Graphical Scale
0 255 510 1,020 1,530 2,040 Field 19-21
Feet 77
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
Ronald Hammonds City of Lumberton Robeson

Field 1:
Total Acres:
11.48 Application Area: 11.48
Field 2:
Total Acres:
61.33 Application Area: 58.01
Field 3:
Total Acres:
15.33 Application Area: 10.47
FJ
1
Legend
On -site House •_
Off -site House
• Wells ,.
— Drain
x — Fence j i •�-
- Stream f✓ 1
--- Private Road
Pond
Parcel
®Application Area
® Unsuitable Area
USA Topo Maps
Graphical Scale
0 300 600 1,200 1,800 2,400
Feet
•
N
I
The compliance boundary is established
at either 250 feet from the residuals land
application area or 50 feet within the
property boundary, whichever is closest
to the residuals land application area.
i
C«opyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
NC-RO-28
Field 1-3
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
;arnell Locklear City of Lumberton lRobeson

Field 1A:
Total Acres:
6.23 Application Area: 6.23
Field 1 B:
Total Acres:
2.8 Application Area: 2.8
Field 2:
Total Acres:
1.41 Application Area: 1.41
Field 3:
Total Acres:
6.46 Application Area: 6.46
Legend '` w �•
x - Fence
-- Private Road t • _
o Pond The compliance boundary is established
Parcel ' at either 250 feet from the residuals land
®Application Area +J application area or 50 feet within the
property boundary, whichever is closest
® Unsuitable Area • % to the residuals land application area.
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
NC-RO-39
Graphical Scale
0 195 390 780 1,170 1,560 Field 1 - 6
Feet F-
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
Patrick Bullard City of Lumberton Robeson

Field 7:
Total Acres: 6.64 Application Area: 5.29
Field 8:
Total Acres: 9.11 Application Area: 8.99
11111d
On -site House
Drain
x - Fence
—Stream
Private Road
Pond
®Application Area
® Unsuitable Area
0 85 170
(D
W
0
�0l
-0
M
0
ry
L
t�
a)
Cz
VJ
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 , ,
i
O
ME V ____IMI
The compliance boundary is established
at either 250 feet from the residuals land
application area or 50 feet within the
property boundary, whichever is closest
to the residuals land application area.
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
NC-RO-39
Graphical Scale
340 510 680 Field 7 - 8
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
Lyndon Bullard City of Lumberton Robeson

Field 9:
` Total Acres: 6.64 Application Area: 62.36
a
Legend
f
On -site House I �
—Drain
x - Fence
—Stream
-- Private Road
o Pond ` ~
®Application Area
® Unsuitable Area
0 205 410 820
Graphical Scale
1,230 1,640
Feet
LM
The compliance boundary is established
at either 250 feet from the residuals land
application area or 50 feet within the
property boundary, whichever is closest
to the residuals land application area.
Copyrigh c© 201 National Geographic - c , .` wbed
NC-RO-39
Field 9
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
Tracy Bullard City of Lumberton Robeson

x
Field 1: 1
Total Acres: 36.84 Application Area: 36.84 x
Field 2:
Total Acres: 53.83 Application Area: 49.81
I
x
I
k'
yy yy yy _ x—
.ii`��iL�ii�XR.�w `ax —_( X — X — x — Xx X X
' ---- ----
C I
I �
I �X
01
X
O 0
X
X——X—X—%�X
• X
�I
I I
X x
X
X X
1.
f
Legend N
Wells 000 lo,/
On -site House
-- Private Road
Stream f
X — Fence
— Drain —
Parcels _ �
Ponds — The compliance boundary is established
at either 250 feet from the residuals land
®Application Area _ application area or 50 feet within the
Pond — property boundary, whichever is closest
USA Topo Maps to the residuals land application area.
Copyright:© 1 Na ional Geogr phi, Society, i-c b -
NC—RO-40
Graphical Scale
Field 1-2
0 200 400 800 1,200 1,600
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
Ben Chavis City of Lumberton Robeson

Field 3:
Total Acres: 15.55 Application Area: 11
Legend
*Wells
On -site House
-- Private Road
Stream
X - Fence
Parcels
® Unsuitable Area
®Application Area
0 80 160
O
Graphical Scale
320 480 640
Feet
r-
X.-
o��
The compliance boundary is established
at either 250 feet from the residuals land
application area or 50 feet within the
property boundary, whichever is closest
to the residuals land application area.
• right:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-k, bed
NC-RO-40
Field 3
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
Ben Chavis City of Lumberton Robeson

Application Area Map
o

Application Area Map
T

Field 1:
Total Acres: 37.7 Application Area: 34.67
Field 2:
Total Acres: 3.40 Application Area: 3.40
O
PPE �WIMPW_I
_.asaa P.-I
-1i
r
C
Legend
On -site House
0
—Stream
—Fence
The compliance boundary is established
o Ponds
at either 250 feet from the residuals land
®Application Area
application area or 50 feet within the
property boundary, whichever is closest
Parcels
to the residuals land application area.
•
Copyright:© 2013 Nati nal Geographic Society, i-cubed
NC-RO-42
Graphical Scale
0 155 310 620
930 1,240
Field 1-2
Feet
Owner:
Permit Holder:
County:
James McGirt
City of Lumberton
Robeson

Field 3:
Total Acres: 62.27 Application Area: 57.18
Field 4:
Total Acres: 5.28 Application Area: 4.64
er�ta9e
•
r
:7
— ____j `�' , I
►3
Legend
11 On -site House
Off -Site House
—Stream
—Fence The compliance boundary is established
o Ponds at either 250 feet from the residuals land 41
®Application Area application area or 50 feet within the
Parcels property boundary, whichever is closest
to the residuals land application area.
Cop, ght:© 2013 National Geographic Socie , i-c be
NC-RO-42
Graphical Scale
0 160 320 640 960 1,280 Field 3-4
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
James McGirt City of Lumberton Robeson

Field 5:
Total Acres:
13.55 Application Area: 8.48
Field 6:
Total Acres:
9.54 Application Area: 9.54
Field 7:
Total Acres:
22.91 Application Area: 20.05
Field 8:
Total Acres:
1.34 Application Area: 1.19
0 160 320 640 960
Graphical Scale
1,280
� Feet
ed
nd
:st
3.
Copyright:© 2013 National Geography Society, i-cubed
NC-RO-42
Field 5-8
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
James McGirt City of Lumberton Robeson

Field 9:
Total Acres: 32 Application Area: 28.40
r 1
O
ae Road
Legend v
0 On -site House
Off -Site House
—Stream
—Fence The compliance boundary is established
o Ponds at either 250 feet from the residuals land
application area or 50 feet within the
jj ®Application Area \%,. 19W property boundary, whichever is closest
Parcels V,
'.000W to the residuals land application area.
6 Copyright:© 2013 National Geographi ciety, i-cubed
NC-RO-42
Graphical Scale
0 135 270 540 810 1,080 Field 9
Feet
Owner: Permit Holder: County:
James McGirt City of Lumberton Robeson

COUNTY BOARD NOTIFICATION

State of North Carolina
DWR
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Division of Water Resources COUNTY BOARD NOTIFICATION
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: CBN 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and
supporting documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
General — This notification is intended to provide the county board in which the land application site is proposed to be located with
general information on the size, location and type of residuals land application proposed to occur in their county, and to give them an
opportunity to comment on the pending permitting request as stipulated in Session Law 2013-340. Notification is not required for
fields deemed permitted to receive Class A residuals under 15A NCAC 02T .1100. Do not submit this document for review
without a corresponding residuals program application form (FORM: RLAP 11-15).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. County Board Notification (FORM: CBN 11-15):
❑ Submit the completed and appropriately executed County Board Notification (FORM: CBN 11-15). Please do not make any
unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to the form may
be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they refer.
❑ Prepare a separate County Board Notification (FORM: CBN 11-15) for each county in which the proposed land application
sites are located.
B. Critical Watershed Areas Information:
❑ Under 15A NCAC 02B .0212, no new permitted sites for land application of residuals are allowed within critical watershed
areas. It is the Applicant's responsibility to ensure that the proposed land application sites are not located within these areas.
❑ For more information regarding Water Supply Watershed Protection Program, please visit the Division website at:
httDs:Hdea. nc. gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-resources-rules/water-sullllly-watershed-Drotection-Dro gram
❑ If uncertain about whether the proposed sites are located within the critical areas, contact the Division or call [phone]
C. Notification Package Submission:
❑ Complete and mail the notification letter, source facility summary, land application site summary, and site location maps to
the appropriate County Board by certified mail with a return receipt requested. It is recommended that a copy of the
notification package also be sent to the County Manager.
❑ The most current publication of the Directory of State and County Officials may be downloaded at:
hlWs://www.sosnc.gov/gublications/direct.aspx
❑ A list of the Division's regional offices, their county coverage, and their contact information may be downloaded at:
hlW:Hdeg.nc.gov/contact/regional-offices.
❑ The source facility summary shall include: facility name; county where it is located; and the proposed annual dry tonnage
(i.e., a copy of "Residuals Source Facility Summary" is adequate but not required).
❑ The land application site summary shall include: field ID; acreage; county where it is located; latitude and longitude (i.e., a
copy of "Land Application Site Certification" is adequate but not required).
D. Proof of Submission:
❑ Attach an 8.5 by 11-inch copy of the return receipt to the back of this attachment prior to submission of the application to the
Division for review.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: CBN 06-16 Page 1 of 1

t
M
...i7
M
ru
ru
0
Q
Q
4
r-
117
ri
r�
ru
173
-
r Complete items 1,:2, and 3.
■ Print -your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the hack of the maifpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Mole Addressed to:
cOvvv--r�\ —60pt CA
5S D ),j
A. Sigilhatup
x ❑Agent
❑ Addressee
B. Received by (Panted Name) C. pate of Delivery
D. Is delivery address different from Item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
M prilaity Mal! Express
0 Adult Signature Restricted Delivery
El Registered Mal Restricted
NCertd,ed Mad®
Delivery
9590 94Q� 7155 1251 847 2$
Q Certified Mail Restricted Delivery
0Signature Canflrrnatlan'
Collect on Delivery
Q Signature Conflrnlal'
_ a o L. �• _ �_W_ . �_
rn rn¢wet an Delivery Restricted Delivery
Restricted DeUvery
7G21 1970 0002 2804 3673
�,d
9d Maal!l
fetRestricted Delivery
s $5W)
P5 Form 3811, July 2020 PSN 7530-02.000-9053
domestic '

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
Date:
To: Name of Chairman to the Board of County Commissioners:
Complete mailing address: 550 N Ches�t�tred
City: - State: �,(, Zip: 28358-_M
County where land application sites are located: _
From: Applicant's name:
in accordance with Session Law 2013-340)
Contact person and title: Krey Walters
Complete mailing address: O Box 1388
City: Lumbert
Telephone number: (PR) ll!!0"-79
State: NC
(on behalf of the Division of Water Resources
Zip: 28359-m
E-mail address: ciwalterskci.lumberton.nc.uss
Subject: Notification of residual land application site proposal
This is to notify you that the Applicant listed above will be submitting an application to the Division of Water
Resources for the land application of residual solids to site(s) located in your county. During this review, the Division
will ensure that all federal and state regulations are enforced. Attached to this form is information regarding residuals -
generating sources and locations of the proposed land application sites. Please forward this letter and its associated
attachments to the appropriate Department within your County (i.e., Health or Environmental Health Department and
Planning Department) if applicable.
More information of the land application sites included in this application will be available at the following
Division of Water Resources Regional Office:
Name of appropriate regional office: Fa, Neville Regional Office
Complete mailing address: 225 Green Street; Suite 714
City: State: Zip: 28301-5095
Telephone number: (E)
Expected date of application submission: -
Should you desire to comment on this application, please do so no later than 30 calendar days following the
expected application submission date. If you have any questions or comments about this notification, or if you would like
more information, please contact the appropriate regional office at the telephone number provided above. Thank you in
advance for your attention to this matter.
Enclosures: Source Facility Summary
Land Application Site Summary
Maps
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Phone: [phone] \ Internet: httyHPortal.ncdenr.org/web/wg
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer- Made in part with recycled paper FORM: CBN 06-16

DWR
Division of Water Resources
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
15A NCAC 02T .1100 — RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RLAP 06-16 & SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and
supporting documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
General — This application is for treatment, storage, transport, and/or land application of Class B residuals (may include residuals that
are generated from a water treatment plant or other type facilities) on the proposed or currently approved land application site(s) under
15A NCAC 02T .1100.
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Residuals Land Application Program (FORM: RLAP 06-16) Application: (All Application Packages):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Residuals Land Application Program (FORM: RLAP 06-16) form. Please
do not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to
the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
® The Applicant's Certification on Page 5 of this form shall be signed in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .0106(b). An alternate
person may be designated as the signing official if a delegation letter is provided from a person who meets the criteria in 15A
NCAC 02T .0106(b).
❑ If this project is for a modification of an existing permit, submit one copy of the existing permit.
❑ Please submit this application form at least 180 days prior to the expiration date on the existing permit, or 90 days prior to
operation of proposed facility(ies) for application packages involving new or changes to treatment and storage units.
B. Application Fee (New and Major Modification Application Packages)
❑ Submit a check, money order or electronic funds transfer made payable to: North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ).
Facility Classification
New Permit
Major Modification'
Major (land are permitted for > 300 acres)
F $1,310
F $395
Minor (land are permitted for < 300 acres)
F $810
$245
' - A major modification shall be defined as any permit modification that: increases the generating facility's residuals dry tonnage;
adds additional land application areas not previously approved for that particular program [including transferring of field(s) from
one program to another]; adds additional residuals sources; or includes the addition of new treatment or storage units/processes not
previously permitted. There is no fee for minor modifications to a permit.
C. Cover Letter (All Application Packages)
® List all items included in the application package, as well as a brief description of the requested permitting action.
D. Environmental Assessments (Maybe Required— See 15A NCAC 1C .0300)
❑ Sub-- - — of the Findings of No Significant Impact (FONSI) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Also, include
info NSA any mitigating factor(s) from the Environmental Assessment (EA) that impact the construction of the residuals
treat orage facilities. An EA may also be required for private systems if any public funds and/or lands are used for
the construction of the subject facilities.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 1 of 3

E. Operation and Maintenance Plan (New and Renewal Application Packages)
® For Modification Application, if there are any changes to the existing plan, submit an updated O&M plan.
® Submit the O&M Plan in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1110 and include at a minimum:
® Operational functions; describe the operation of the program to show what operations are necessary for the program to
function and by whom the functions are to be conducted.
® Maintenance schedules; may include equipment calibration, maintenance of signs, etc.
® Safety measures; may include safety training program, manuals, signs, etc.
® Spill response plan; including control, containment, remediation, emergency contact information, etc.
® Inspection plan including the following information;
® Names and titles of personnel responsible for conducting the inspections.
® Frequency and location of inspections, including those to be conducted by the ORC, and procedures to assure that the
selected location(s) and inspection frequency are representative of the residuals management program.
® Detailed description of inspection procedures including record keeping and actions to be taken by the inspector in the event
that noncompliance is observed.
® Sampling and monitoring plan including the following information;
® Names and titles of personnel responsible for conducting the sampling and monitoring.
® Detailed description of monitoring procedures including parameters to be monitored.
® Sampling frequency and procedures to assure that representative samples are being collected. Fluctuation in temperature,
flow, and other operating conditions can affect the quality of the residuals gathered during a particular sampling event. The
sampling plan shall account for any foreseen fluctuations in residuals quality and indicate the most limiting times for
residuals to meet pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements (e.g. facilities that land apply multiple times per
year but have an annual sampling frequency, may need to sample during winter months when pathogen reduction is most
likely to be negatively affected by cold temperatures.
THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL ITEMS (G to M) ARE REQUIRED FOR DEDICATED PROGRAM ONLY.
F. Program Determination
❑ Dedicated residuals land appli ims are ones in which land application sites meet the criteria in 15A NCAC 02T
.1102(12). Specifically, a resit N/A plication program is designated as dedicated if any of the following are applicable:
❑ Any land application site a ie residuals land application program that receives residuals at rates or frequencies
greater than agronomic rates.
❑ Any land application site certified for the residuals land application program that is used primarily for residuals disposal,
and agricultural crop production is of secondary importance.
❑ Any land application site certified for the residuals land application program that receives residuals through fixed irrigation
facilities or irrigation facilities fed through a fixed supply system.
❑ Please contact the Non -Discharge Permitting Unit if you need any assistance in determining whether your residuals program
falls under the dedicated program definitions.
G. Program Information
❑ Provide an explanation of why a do N/A ;m is required instead of a conventional non -dedicated system.
❑ Provide an explanation of the dedic _ _ and its operation.
H. Detailed Site Maps (All New or Modification Application Packages)
❑ Submit three (3) sets of standard size plans and two (2) sets of I V by 17" plans (electronic format is acceptable - Adobe PDF
only). For Modifications, submit plans specific to the modification(s) only.
❑ Plans must include the following minimum items:
❑ A general location map, a vicinity map and a topographic map with contours not exceeding 10 feet or 25% of the total site
relief and showing all facility rc' ' ' ' ' res and fences within the land application area.
❑ The location of all wells (incl N/A and construction details if available), streams (ephemeral, intermittent, and
perennial), springs, lakes, pond, urface drainage features within 500 feet of the land application site(s).
❑ Delineation of the review and compliance boundaries
❑ Setbacks as required by 15A NCAC 02T .1108
❑ Site property boundaries within 500 feet of all waste treatment, storage, and disposal site(s).
❑ A map showing the entire irrigation area with an overlay of the suitable irrigation area depicted by the soil scientist's
evaluation. The irrigation plans shall show each nozzle/emitter and wetted area (when applicable). Clearly label spray
irrigation zones as they will be operated.
❑ Plans must depict a completed design and not be labeled with preliminary phrases (e.g., FOR REVIEW ONLY, NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION, etc.) that indicate that they are anything other than final plans. However, the plans may be labeled with
the phrase: FINAL DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 2 of 3

L Project Evaluation and Receiver Site Management Plan (All T ion Packages or Modifications that include new sites)
❑ Submit a project evaluation and a receiver site management i N/A cable) with recommendations concerning cover crops
and their ability to accept the proposed application rates.
J. Hydrogeologic Report (All New Application Packages or Modifications involving increasing the total design capacity)
❑ Submit a detailed hydrogeologic e accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1104(d)(4) and current Division Policy
available at: http://www.ncwater.orN cies_and_Regulations/. The document shall be signed, sealed and dated by a
qualified professional.
K. Engineering Design Documents (All New or Modification Application Packages with fixed irrigation facilities or irrigation
facilities fed through fixed supply system)
❑ Submit engineering design documents that have been signed, sealed, and dated by a NC licensed Professional Engineer and/or
Professional Land Surveyor in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .I104(d)(2). For Modifications, submit an updated site map
specific to the modification(s) only
❑ The design documents the following minimum items:
El Engineering plans f N/A , and equipment except those previously permitted unless they are directly tied into the new
units or are critical u., --tanding of the complete process;
❑ Specifications describing materials to be used, method of construction, and means for ensuring quality and integrity of the
finished product including leaking testing; and
❑ Engineering calculations including hydraulic and pollutant loading, sizing criteria, hydraulic profile, total dynamic head
curve analysis for each pump, and irrigation design.
❑ Soil mapping units shown on all disposal sites.
L. Water Balance (All New Application Package nr nandifications that include new sites utilizing fixed irrigation facilities or
irrigation facilities fed through fixed supply sysb N/A
❑ Submit a completed and accurate water bale dance with 15A NCAC 02T .I104(d)(5) and current Division Policy
available at: hlW://www.ncwater.org/Rules_roncres_and_Regulations/.
M. Property Ownership Documentation (All New or Modification Application Packages involving new and/or relocated treatment
or irrigation components)
❑ Property ownership docuw ill consist of one of the following:
❑ Legal documentation i N/A (i.e., GIS, deed or article of incorporation), or
❑ Written notarized inte. e agreement signed by both parties with a plat or survey map, or
❑ An easement running with the land specifically indicating the intended use of the property and meeting the requirements of
15A NCAC 02L .0107(D, or
❑ A written notarized lease agreement signed by both parties, indicating the intended use of the property, as well as a plat or
survey map.
ONE ORIGINAL AND TWO COPIES OF THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL
SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS, SHALL BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
WATER QUALITY PERMITTING SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
By U.S. Postal Service:
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
By Courier/Special Delivery:
512 N. SALISBURY STREET
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27604
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 3 of 3

State of North Carolina
DWR
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Division of Water Resources 15A NCAC 02T .1100 — RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
FORM: RLAP 06-16
L APPLICANT INFORMATION:
1. Applicant's name: City of Lumberton
Applicant type: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporation ❑ General Partnership ❑ Privately -Owned Public Utility
❑ Federal ❑ State ® Municipal ❑ County
Signature authority's name per 15A NCAC 02T .0106: Corey Walters Title: Public Works Deputy Director
Applicant's mailing address: PO Box 1388
City: Lumberton State: NC Zip: 28359-
Telephone number: [phone] Email Address: ciwalters#,,ci.lumberton.nc.us
2. Consultant's name: Enviro-Choice Recycling, LLC License Number (for P.E.):
Affiliation: ❑ On Staff ® Retained (Firm: )
Consultant's mailing address: PO Box 390
City: Lumberton State: NC Zip: 28360-
Telephone number: [phone] Email Address: envirochoicenc #,gmail.com
3. Agronomist's name: License Number:
Affiliation: ❑ N/A ❑ On Staff ❑ Retained (Firm: )
Agronomist's mailing address:
City: State: Zip: -
Telephone number: O - Email Address:
4. Soil Scientist's name: Robert P. Willcox, Jr License Number: 1098
Affiliation: ❑ N/A ® On Staff ❑ Retained (Firm: )
Soil Scientist's mailing address: 7231B Summerfield Road
City: Summerfield State: NC Zip: 27358-
Telephone number: [phone] Email Address: robAwillcoxmabesoil.com
5. Fee submitted: $1,310 (See Instruction B)
IL PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Application is for (check all that apply): ❑ new, ❑ modified, ® renewed permit
2. If this application is being submitted to renew or modify an existing permit, provide the following:
Permit number: WO0000672
Date of most -recently issued permit: April 27, 2017
Date of most -recently certified Attachment A (if different than the permit): September 14, 2020
Date of most -recently certified Attachment B (if different than the permit):
FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 1 of 5

III. RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM INFORMATION:
1. Residuals Processing Facility's physical address: 700 Lafayette Street
City: Lumberton State: NC
Coordinates: Latitude: 34' 36' 20.1024"
Datum: WGS 84
Method of measurement: Google Earth
Zip: 28358-,
Longitude: 78. 59' 30.426"
Level of accuracy: —25 ft
2. County where residuals land application program is headquartered: Robeson
3. List the Operator In Responsible Charge (ORC) and all Back -Up ORCs for the residuals land application program, their
certification numbers, and their affiliations in the following table:
Designation
Name
Affiliation
Certification Number
ORC
Michael C Hunt
Subcontractor
1006180
Back -Up ORC
Eric T Locklear
Subcontractor
1004579
Additional Back -Up
ORCs
if applicable)
Henry B Harper Jr.
Chief Operator
1009036
If an ORC and at least one Back -Up ORC are not currently designated for this residuals land application program, provide the
candidates' names, affiliations, and an estimated time schedule for each candidate's completion of the required training school
and certification test:
4. Complete the following tables regarding management of the residuals land application program:
a. Plant Available Nitrogen Summary: Determine the maximum plant available nitrogen (PAN) generated by all residuals
source -generating facilities as currently certified and proposed for certification with this application and list the results in the
following table:
Maximum amount of residuals to be certified: 2000 dry tons per year.
PAN
Pounds of PAN per Dry Ton
(Weighted Average)
Pounds of PAN per Year
Surface
Incorporation
or Injection
Surface
Incorporation
or Injection
First -Year
34.82
47.82
69640
95640
Five -Year Maximum Adjusted
51.084
60.74
102168.1
121475
b. Land Application Site Use Summary: Summarize information regarding the land application sites as currently certified and
proposed for certification with this application:
Category
Use
Acres
Comments
Crops
Forest or Plantation
Row Crops
951.34
Hay
218
Pasture
360.23
Total:
1,671.86
Methods
Surface
578.23
Incorporation or Injection
951.34
Total:
1,529.57
FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 2 of 5

c. Residuals Land Application Summary: Determine the minimum acreage required to land apply the residuals as currently
certified and proposed for certification assuming the scenarios listed in the following table:
Assumed
Application Rate
(lbs PAN/ac yr)
Acres Required Using
First -Year PAN Concentrations
Acres Required Using
Five -Year Maximum Adjusted PAN
Concentrations
Surface
Incorporation or
Injection
Surface
Incorporation or
Injection
50
1392.8
1912.8
2043.361
2429.361
100
696.4
956.4
1021.681
1214.75
150
464.2667
637.6
681.1204
809.8336
200
348.2
478.2
510.8403
607.3752
6. If applicable, provide a plan and a schedule to resolve any known issues that would prevent land application of the proposed
residuals due to the violation of North Carolina Administrative Code (e.g. not enough storage, not enough land, vector reduction
practices not in place, etc.): Applicant will dewater residuals and haul solids to landfill and/or compost facility if needed.
7. Specify type of residuals program (See Instruction F): ® Non -dedicated ❑ Dedicated
If Dedicated, specify the following (check all that apply):
❑ Residuals program contains any land application site(s) that receives residuals at rates or frequencies greater than agronomic
rates, explain;
❑ Residuals program contains any land application site(s) that is used primarily for residuals disposal, and agricultural crop
production is of secondary importance, explain;
❑ Residuals program contains any land application site(s) that receives residuals through fixed irrigation facilities or irrigation
facilities fed through a fixed supply system, explain;
IV. RESIDUALS SOURCE INFORMATION: (Required for all new, renewed, or modified residuals source)
Complete and submit the following Residuals Source Certification and all associated documentation.
Residuals Source
Certification
V. LAND APPLICATION SITE INFORMATION: (Required for all new, renewed, or modified land application site)
Complete and submit the following Land Applications Site Certification and all associated documentation.
Land Application Siite
Certification. doc
FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 3 of 5

Note: Item VL Applicable to Dedicated Program with fixed irrigation system only.
VI. DESIGN INFORMATION FOR FIXED IRRIGATION SYSTEM
1. The inigat N/A ❑ Spray ❑ Drip
2. Disposal system is: LJ existing ❑ proposed.
3. Minimum depth to mean seasonal high water table (SHWT) within irrigation sites(s) per Soil Scientist's Evaluation: feet
below ground surface. Rules 15A NCAC 02T .0505(pl requires at least one -foot vertical separation between SHWT and ground
surface.
4. Are there any artificial drainage or water movement structures within 200 feet of any irrigation area?
❑ Yes or ❑ No If Yes, please explain if the soil scientist report addresses artificial structures and please indicate if
structures are to be maintained or modified:
5. Loading rates recommended by the Soil Scientist Evaluation:
Soil Series
Fields within Soil Area
Recommended
Loading Rate
in/hr
Recommended
Loading Rate
in/ r
6. Design loading rates are equal or less than the loading rates recommended by Soil Scientist?
❑ Yes or ❑ No If No, explain why 15A NCAC 02T .0505(n) is not met:
7. Non -dedicated System Design (fill in the appropriate information for either a spray or drip irrigation system):
Field / Zone
Design Area
(ft')
Number of
Nozzles
Maximum Application
Rate ( allons/hr)
Design Annual Loading
Rate (gallons/ r)
Total
Spray Irrigation Design Element
Plan Sheet
Number
Specification
Page Number
Wetted diameter of nozzles
It
Wetted area of nozzles
ftZ
Nozzle capacity
gpm
Nozzle manufacturer / model
/
Elevation of highest nozzle
It
FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 4 of 5

Applicant's Certification (signing authority must be in compliance with 15A NCAC 02T .0106):
The applicant or any aff Bate has not been convicted of an environmental crime, has not abandoned a wastewater facility without proper
closure, does not have an outstanding civil penalty where all appeals have been exhausted or abandoned, are compliant with any active
compliance schedule, and do not have any overdue annual fees under Rule 15A NCAC 02T .0105.
01 Yes ❑ No, Explain;
I. I rc V _ L)a I tiPy "i,,— Urv-S D1,"Erb
(Signature Authority's Name — PLEASEPRINT) (Title)
attest that this application for
CE`} � orr ��bcr�v.►
(Facility Name)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the Division of Water Resources
may not conduct a technical review of this program and approval does not constitute a variance to any rules or statutes unless specifically
granted in the permit. Further, any discharge of residuals to surface waters or the land will result in an immediate enforcement action,
which may include civil penalties, injunctive relief, and/or criminal prosecution. I will make no claim against the Division of Water
Resources should a condition of this permit be violated. I also understand that if all required parts of this application are not completed
and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package will be returned to me as
incomplete.
Note: In accordance with North Carolina General Statutes § 143-215.6A and § 143-215.613, any person who knowingly makes any false
statement, representation, or certification in any application shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor, which may include a fine not to
exceed $10,000 as well as civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation.
Signature:
Date:
FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 5 of 5

State of North Carolina
DWR
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Division of Water Resources LAND APPLICATION SITE CERTIFICATION
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted. the Applicant shall submit one original and two conies of the application and
supporting documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
General — This certification provides detailed information of receiving sites for land application of Class B residuals (may include
water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1100. Do not submit this certification for review
without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 06-16 or FORM: SDR 06-16).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16) form. Please
do not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments
to the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
® For new or renewed pennits, submit the requested information for all land application sites.
❑ For modified permits, submit the requested information for only those sites that are new, transferred or affected by the
proposed modification.
B. Land Application Site Information:
® The status of the land application site with respect to this residuals land application program must be provided in table I. The
status categories and th ' es onding codes are as follows:
♦ New (N) ♦ Renewed (R) ♦ Modified (M) ♦ Transferred (T) ♦ Deleted (D)
® Attach the following m ance with each status code:
Status Code
Required Item
N
R
T
M
71
County Board
Notification.doc
Land Owner
Agreement
(If applicable)
Setback Waiver
Agreement
An updated vicinity/setback map in accordance with the "Map Guidance
for Residuals Land Application Permits"
✓
✓
✓
A soils and agronomic evaluation in accordance with the "Soil Scientist
✓
Evaluation Policy"
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 06-16 Page 1 of 3

An updated accounting of the land application site's cumulative
pollutant loading rates (CPLRs)
Status Code
Required Item
N
R
T
M
For previously permitted sites without a soil series name indicated in the
Attachment B, submit County Soil Survey Map (or equivalent) clearly
indicate the location of the land application site and in accordance with
the soil map requirements in the "Soil Scientist Evaluation Policy"
Acknowledgement of field transfer from Land Owner (Fields may not
be permitted to multiple Permittees over the same timeperiod)
* This item may be required for land application site with a status code "M", please contact the Division if you need assistant in
determining attachment requirements.
® Crop Type should include the most likely crop types for the life of the permit (five years).
® Predominant Soils Series Name must be either the name of the soil indicated in Attachment "B" of the existing permit, or
name of the soil series as provided by the licensed soil scientist.
® Predominant Soil Mapping Unit or Representative Slope: Either the Soil Mapping Unit or the representative slope of each
site must be provided. The predominant soil -mapping unit must be consistent with the predominant soil series name. Please
note that the soil mapping units are variable between Counties, so care should be taken in properly identifying the correct
mapping unit. If a representative slope is provided, it must be determined accordingly:
❑ For sites previously permitted for use, but do not have an established soil mapping unit (the mapping unit provides
information on both the soil series name and the slope of the soil), the Applicant may determine the representative slope
by using the average slope provided in the County Soil Survey (or equivalent). A soil type with a slope range of 4 - 8%
would have a representative slope of 6%.
❑ New Sites to be permitted must have slopes determined as part of the soils report prepared by a licensed soil scientist.
❑ Acceptable methods for determining location coordinates (i.e., latitude and longitude) and their corresponding codes are as
follows:
• Address Matching (ADD) • Digital or Raw Photo Extraction (EXT)
• Aerial Photography with Ground Control (AER) • Geodetic Quality GPS Survey (GEO)
• Cadastral Survey (SUR) • LORAN-C Navigation Device (LOR)
• Conversion from Coordinate Plane (CP) • Navigation Quality GPS (GPS)
• Conversion from Township -Section -Range (TSR) • Remote Sensing (RS)
• Conversion from Universal Trans Mere (UTM) • Zip Code Centroid (ZIP)
• Map Interpretation by Digital or Manual Extraction (MAP)
C. Waterbody and Classifications Information: (new sites only)
® Use an 8.5 by 11-inch copy of the portion of a 7.5-minute USGS Topographic Map to identify the location where the
residuals program activities are planned to occur as well as the closest downslope surface waters as clearly as possible. Each
map portion must be labeled with the map name and number, the identified location, and be of clear and reproducible quality.
❑ Surface water body classifications information may be found at: http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-
re sources/planning/classification-standards/classifications
❑ Any questions concerning the waterbody and its classification, please contact the Division's regional offices.
❑ A list of the Division's regional offices, their county coverage, and their contact information may be downloaded at:
hU:Hdeq.nc.gov/contact/regional-offices
❑ General Instructions: There are 17 river basins in North Carolina. Each basin has associated waterbodies with assigned
subbasins, location descriptions, stream index numbers and established classifications.
1. Identify the project area on a 7.5 minute USGS topographical map (an 8.5 x 11-inch sheet showing the project area
should be submitted with the permit application regardless of whether a Stream classification was completed).
2. Determine the names of all the closest down slope surface waters from the project site. For unnamed tributaries, see
Table 1: Unnamed Tributaries Entering Other States or for Specific Basin Areas. Label any unnamed tributaries as
"UT to stream name" as the waterbody name.
3. Open the link hU:Hdeq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/planning/classification-standards/classifications.
❑ Stream Classification Process: One of the options below may be used depending on the known initial project information.
❑ KNOWN BASIN WHERE CLOSEST DOWN SLOPE SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED
1. Select proper basin from the List all Waterbodies in Basin sorted report. Sort hydrologically as this will provide
the proper location descriptions if multiple runs.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 06-16 Page 2 of 3

2. Locate the name of the identified waterbody (from General Directions) on the list.
3. For multiple listings of the same waterbody name in the report, select and verify the location description. The term
"source" in the description means the beginning of the waterbody segment (most upstream point).
4. Record all Basins, Stream Index Numbers and Classifications applicable to the project.
❑ KNOWN COUNTY WHERE CLOSEST DOWN SLOPE SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED
1. Select the proper county from the List all Waterbodies in county, hydrologically report.
2. Locate the name of the identified waterbody (from General Directions) on the list.
3. For multiple listings of the same waterbody name in the report, select and verify the location description. The term
"source" in the description means the beginning of the waterbody segment (most upstream point).
4. Record all Basins, Stream Index Numbers and Classifications applicable to the project.
❑ UNKNOWN BASIN WHERE CLOSEST DOWN SLOPE SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED
1. Use the Clickable basin map to hydrologically sorted list report.
2. Click on the approximate project location to bring up the hydrologically sorted list.
3. Locate the name of the identified waterbody (from General Directions) on the list.
4. For multiple listings of the same waterbody name in the report, select and verify the location description. The term
"source" in the description means the beginning of the waterbody segment (most upstream point).
5. Record all Basins, Stream Index Numbers and Classifications applicable to the project.
❑ Notes on index number and unnamed streams:
Unnamed Streams 15A NCAC 02B .0301(i).
❑ Any stream which is not named in the schedule of stream classifications carries the same classification as that assigned
to the stream segment to which it is tributary (at the point of entry) except:
(A) unnamed streams specifically described in the schedule of classifications;
(B) unnamed freshwaters tributary to tidal saltwaters will be classified "C"; or
(C) after November 1, 1986, any newly created areas of tidal saltwater which are connected to Class SA waters by
approved dredging projects will be classified "SC" unless case -by -case reclassification proceedings are conducted.
❑ The following river basins have different policies for unnamed streams entering other states or for specific areas of the
basin:
Unnamed Tributaries Entering Other States or for Specific Basin Areas
Hiwassee River Basin
Streams entering Georgia or Tennessee shall be classified "C Tr."
Little Tennesse River
Basin And Savannah
River Drainage Area
Streams entering Georgia or Tennessee shall be classified "C Tr." Such streams in the Savannah
River drainage area entering South Carolina shall be classified "B Tr."
French Broad River
Basin
Streams entering Tennessee will be classified "B."
Watauga River Basin
Streams entering the State of Tennessee are classified "C."
Broad River Basin
Streams entering South Carolina are classified "C."
New River Basin
Streams entering the State of Tennessee are classified "C."
Catawba River Basin
Streams entering South Carolina are classified "C."
Yadkin -Pee Dee River
Basin
Streams entering Virginia are classified "C," and such streams entering South Carolina are
classified "C."
Lumber River Basin
Streams entering South Carolina are classified "C Sw."
Roanoke River Basin
Streams entering Virginia are classified "C." Except that all backwaters of John H. Kerr
Reservoir and the North Carolina portion of streams tributary thereto not otherwise named or
described shall carry the classification "B," and all backwaters of Lake Gaston and the North
Carolina portion of streams tributary thereto not otherwise named or described shall carry the
classification "C and B."
Chowan River Basin
Streams entering Virginia are classified "C."
Tar -Pamlico River
Basin
All drainage canals not noted in the schedule are classified "C Sw." except the main drainage
canals to Pamlico Sound and its bays which shall be classified "SC."
Pas uotank River Basin
All drainage canals not noted in the schedule are classified "C."
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 06-16 Page 3 of 3

Is
�I
o
0
0
0
o
o
o
u�
P.
u�
P.
u�
P.
u�
P.
u�
P.
u�
P.
u�
P.
p
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a.
S."
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CC
'7j
C
C
cz
O
O
O
A
A
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
cz
Q
z
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
x
a
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
cz
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
C)
C)
C)
0
0
0
C)
�
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
'o
�
'o
�
00
'fl
'o
O
O
M
'o
O
l�
vi
o
'0
M
M
M
M
00
l�
i
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
-
Q
Q
N
N
N
N
c
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
cz
5�'
N
i".
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
¢¢¢¢¢
P
Q
c
cz
c
U
U
U
U
�O
l—
oc
C1
N
M
t
N
't
W)
r—
--�
y
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
-
-
0
-
0
-
0
-
0
-
0
-
0
-
0
-
0
-
0
-
-
0
-
0
-
0
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
p
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
7-i
z
z
7-i
z
x
cz

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
\
0
\
0
\
0
\
0
\
0
\
0
\
0
\
0
\
0
\
0
\
0
\
0
\
0
\
0
\
0
\
0
\
0
\
0
\
0
\
0
\
0
\
0
\
0
\
0
\
0
\
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
cz
0
0
0
0
o
o
0
0
0
0
>
C7
C7
C7
C7
�c
C7
�
C7
C7
C7
C7
C7
�
Z
Z
o
c�
0
c�
0
c�
Z
o
c�
Z
Z
o
c�
x
o
c�
0
c�
0
c�
0
c�
0
c�
x
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
n
L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
,1'
a
a
a
a
a
a
U
U
U
u
U
cz
cz
U
U
U
JU
U
U
U
U
U
bq
S"y iti y �
,.Ur
3-r
3-r
7-r
Vi
Vi
Vi
"a
"a
75
'-a
7a
"a
7a
'-a
'�
ra
ra
34
ra
-a
-a
ra
•a
ra
a
a
a
x a cz
a
cz u
Z w cz
cz
c
cz
cz
c
c
czcz
O
O
O
O
O
O
x
x
o � �
cz
t
O .Ur
00
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
I Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
I Z
I Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
x
P�
x
x
�
x
P�
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
x
x
x
x
P.
x
x
�
x
x
x
x
7

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
a
a
75
a
a
ll
ll
CC
��FO�
Q
CC
CC
r�FO�
^
yQ
yQ
�
^
yQ
yQ
r�FO�
r�FO�
bA
cz
bA
bA
bA
bA
W
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
cz
cz
r0`
V
rr0``
V
rr0``
V
rr0``
V
rr0``
V
rr0``
V
rr0``
V
rr0``
V
rr0``
V
rr0``
V
rr0``
V
rr0``
V
rr0``
V
rr0``
V
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
oc
M
Ol
N
M
l--
V1
oc
Vl
N
01
O1
01
'0
M
O
vl
oc
l�
M
Vl
Ol
t--
N
�--i
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
ct
ct
ct
75
Y
lV
W
O
CC
CC
c
�
O
I —I
Y
Q
. N
U
..fir
..fir
..fir
..fir
..fir
..fir
..fir
..fir
.
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
,"I
ct
,ii
,ii
ct
a
M�
W
v)
l—
oc
a,
M
M
M
M
M
M
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
x
x
x
P�
x
Z
z
Z
Z
z
Z
Z
Z
Z
z
Z
Z
z
Z
Z

i
00
Il�il
i
O
4
4
4
4
4
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
—
C
cz
Uj
pC�+
�C�+
�C�+
�C�+
pC�+
N
N
N
N
N
N
,r
,r
,r
,r
�CC
�CC
�CC
�
�CC
�CC
�CC
'n'n
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
55
55
55
55
55
cf�
cf�
cf�
cf�
cf�
cf�
cf�
cf�
cf�
cf�
cf�
cf�
cf�
cf�
cf�
cf�
cf�
�n
cf�
cf�
a
a
a
a
a
a
M
M
M
M
olC�
M
M
C�
M
C�
M
C�
M
C�
M
C�
M
C�
M
C�
M
C�
M
0,
M
0,
M
0,
M
a
M
0,
M
0,
M
M
M
M
M
M
O
O'
O �
.O
OA
a
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
T
T
T
T
T
kn
W�
T
R
l�
r
�
00
�
N
N
M
N
R
00
T
N
00
M
kn
a
�
en
en
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
--�
N
v')
v')
N
M
v')
v')
0
0
N
0
N
N
0
N
0
N
N
0
N
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
u
cz
u
0
w

�
}
}
}
}
6
6
J
6
3
3
3
3
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
)
)
)
)
2
2
2
2
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
/
«
�
�
�
�
\
\
\
\
3
§
A
m
\
\
\
\
R
R
R
R
@
m
g
a
§
§
�
\
%
%
%
%
9
&
f
9
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
/
a

SOILS AND AGRONOMY REPORT

FARM ID NC-RO-17
Airport Fields
SOIL AND AGRONOMY REPORT
For this farm, Fields 5, 6, and 7 have been added as new application sites. Fields 5, 6, and 7 are currently
in row crops and will likely remain that way until management dictates a change in crop. Fields 1, 2, and
4 have been expanded from clearing activities. All of these fields are owned by the City of Lumberton
and Lumberton Municipal Airport and are leased/farmed by Delois Allen. The farm is located around the
Lumberton Municipal Airport south of Interstate 95 along Starlight Drive and Contempora Drive. The
fields are nearly level and gently sloping and provide excellent receiver sites for the City of Lumberton
land application program.
Field investigations performed by a NC licensed soil scientist were in general agreement with the
mapping available from the Robeson County Geographic Information Services (GIS) website and the
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) soil maps for Fields 5, 6, and 7. However, Field 4
was found to consist predominately of Lumbee Sandy Loam during field inspection. Field observations
found Johns Sandy Loams mapped in Fields 5, and 7. Profile descriptions for these fields found Johns
Sandy Loams soils. Field observations found Lumbee Sandy Loams mapped in Field 6. Profile
descriptions for these fields found Lumbee Sandy Loams. Fields 1 and 2 previously had been evaluated
and the soil scientist remarked no changes in soils for these fields. Darker surface soils were found in
areas that were adjacent to surface ditching which drains any standing water.
Soil samples were submitted for analysis to the North Carolina Department of Agriculture NCDA for
analysis. The soil analyses are attached and are within normal range for crop production.
Attached is a table with the predominant soil series indicated and the corresponding realistic yield
estimation (RYE) as available from http://www.soil.ncsu.edu/nmp/ncnmwg/vields/. These fields should
receive nitrogen applications in accordance with the rates specified in this table or in the standard DWQ
permit shell.
Realistic Yield Estimates for nitrogen applications for these fields should be set as follows:
Field
Acres
Crop
Soil Map
Unit
Predominant Soil Series
RYE Rate
(lbs/acre)
1
44.89
Soybeans
Jo
Johns Sandy loam 0 to 2% slopes
147
2
51.35
Soybeans
Lu
Lumbee Sandy Loam 0 to 2% slopes
147
4
65.94
Soybeans
Lu
Lumbee Sandy Loam 0 to 2% slopes
147
4A
1 70.1
Soybeans
Lu
Lumbee Sandy Loam 0 to 2% slopes
147
5
65.94
Soybeans
Jo
Johns Sandy loam 0 to 2% slopes
147
6
70.10
Soybeans
Lu
Lumbee Sandy Loam 0 to 2% slopes
147
7
33.51
Soybeans
Jo
Johns Sandy loam 0 to 2% slopes
147

Crop Management guidelines that will be of importance for this site will be:
• Proper coordination with land applier to incorporate biosolids,
• Proper harvesting of cover crop,
• Matching of cover crops' growing season to application events,
• Overseeding if winter application is desired,
• Good communication with farmer, land applier, and WWTP ORC, and
• Proper coordination between application events and crop harvesting and planting.

FARM ID NC-RO-40
Chavis Farm
SOIL AND AGRONOMY REPORT
For this farm, Fields 1-8 have been added as new application sites, as this farm is new to the program.
Fields 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7 are currently in rotational pasture and will likely remain that way until
management dictates a change in crop. Fields 1, 3, and 8 are bermuda hay fields. All of these fields are
owned and operated by Ben Chavis. The farm is located at 1790 Rozier Church Road. The fields are
nearly level and gently sloping and provide excellent receiver sites for the City of Lumberton land
application program.
Field investigations performed by a NC licensed soil scientist were in agreement with the mapping
available from the Robeson County Geographic Information Services (GIS) website and the USDA Natural
Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) soil maps. Field observations found Goldsboro mapped in Fields
1 and 2. Profile descriptions for these fields found Goldsboro loamy sand (GoA) soils. Field observations
found Norfolk mapped in Fields 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8. Profile descriptions for these fields found Norfolk
loamy sand (NoA) soils. Field observations found Wagram mapped in Field 5. Profile descriptions for
these fields found Wagram loamy sand (WaB) soils. Darker surface soils were found in areas that were
adjacent to surface ditching which drains any standing water.
Soil samples were submitted for analysis to the North Carolina Department of Agriculture NCDA for
analysis. The soil analyses are attached, and lead (Pb) was elevated in multiple samples. However, Pb
was not believed to pose a concern for plant growth, therefore continued monitoring is recommended.
Attached is a table with the predominant soil series indicated and the corresponding realistic yield
estimation (RYE) as available from http://www.soil.ncsu.edu/nmp/ncnmwg/vields/. These fields should
receive nitrogen applications in accordance with the rates specified in this table or in the standard DWQ
permit shell.
Realistic Yield Estimates for nitrogen applications for these fields should be set as follows:
Field
Acres
Crop
Soil Map
Unit
Predominant Soil Series
RYE Rate
(lbs/acre)
1
35.8
Coastal Bermuda
GoA
Goldsboro loamy sand 0 to 2% slopes
230
2
49.4
Coastal Bermuda
GoA
Goldsboro loamy sand 0 to 2% slopes
230
3
11.4
Coastal Bermuda
NoA
Norfolk loamy sand 0 to 2% slopes
230
4
1 14.7
Coastal Bermuda
NoA
Norfolk loamy sand 0 to 2% slopes
230
5
9.9
Coastal Bermuda
WaB
Wagram loamy sand 0 to 6% slopes
192
6
8.0
Coastal Bermuda
NoA
Norfolk loamy sand 0 to 2% slopes
230
7
13.6
Coastal Bermuda
NoA
Norfolk loamy sand 0 to 2% slopes
230
8
36.1
Coastal Bermuda
NoA
Norfolk loamy sand 0 to 2% slopes
230

Crop Management guidelines that will be of importance for this site will be:
• Proper coordination with land applier to incorporate biosolids,
• Proper harvesting of cover crop,
• Matching of cover crops' growing season to application events,
• Overseeding if winter application is desired,
• Good communication with farmer, land applier, and WWTP ORC, and
• Proper coordination between application events and crop harvesting and planting.

FARM ID NC-RO-42
McGirt Farm
SOIL AND AGRONOMY REPORT
For this farm, Fields 1-9 have been added as new application sites, as this farm is new to the program.
All fields are in rotational row crops. All of these fields are owned by James McGirt and operated by
Hardin Farms. The farm is located at 1296 Indian Heritage Road. The fields are nearly level and gently
sloping and provide excellent receiver sites for the City of Lumberton land application program.
Field investigations performed by a NC licensed soil scientist were in agreement with the mapping
available from the Robeson County Geographic Information Services (GIS) website and the USDA Natural
Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) soil maps for Fields 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9. Field observations
found Goldsboro mapped in Fields 1 and 2. Profile descriptions for these fields found Goldsboro loamy
sand (GoA) soils. Field observations (using USDA Mapping) found Coxville mapped in Field 3. Profile
descriptions for these fields found Rains sandy loam (Ra) soils as conducted by the soil scientist. Field
observations found Meggett mapped in Fields 4, 5, 6, and 7. Profile descriptions for these fields found
Meggett fine sandy loam (Me) soils. Field observations found Rains mapped in Field 8. Profile
descriptions for these fields found Rains sandy loam (Ra) soils. Field observations found Norfolk mapped
in Field 9. Profile descriptions for these fields found found Goldsboro loamy sand (GoA) soils (contrary
to USDA mapper). Darker surface soils were found in areas that were adjacent to surface ditching which
drains any standing water.
Soil samples were submitted for analysis to the North Carolina Department of Agriculture NCDA for
analysis. The soil analyses are attached, and lead (Pb) was elevated in multiple samples. However, Pb
was not believed to pose a concern for plant growth, therefore continued monitoring is recommended.
Attached is a table with the predominant soil series indicated and the corresponding realistic yield
estimation (RYE) as available from http://www.soil.ncsu.edu/nmp/ncnmwg/vields/. These fields should
receive nitrogen applications in accordance with the rates specified in this table or in the standard DWQ
permit shell.
Realistic Yield Estimates for nitrogen applications for these fields should be set as follows:
Field
Acres
Crop
Soil
Map
Unit
Predominant Soil Series
RYE Rate
(lbs/acre)
1
34.7
Corn/Soybeans
GoA
Goldsboro loamy sand 0 to 2% slopes
147/149
2
3.4
Corn/Soybeans
GoA
Goldsboro loamy sand 0 to 2% slopes
147/149
3
57.2
Corn/Soybeans
Ra
Rains sandy loam 0 to 2% slopes
135/143
4
4.7
Corn/Soybeans
Me
Meggett fine sandy loam 0 to 2% slopes
108/124
5
6.6
Corn/Soybeans
Me
Meggett fine sandy loam 0 to 2% slopes
108/124
6
9.4
Corn/Soybeans
Me
Meggett fine sandy loam 0 to 2% slopes
108/124
7
20.9
Corn/Soybeans
Me
Meggett fine sandy loam 0 to 2% slopes
108/124
8
1.3
Corn/Soybeans
Ra
Rains sandy loam 0 to 2% slopes
135/143
9
28.5
Corn/Soybeans
GoA
Goldsboro loamy sand 0 to 2% slopes
147/149

Crop Management guidelines that will be of importance for this site will be:
• Proper coordination with land applier to incorporate biosolids,
• Proper harvesting of cover crop,
• Matching of cover crops' growing season to application events,
• Overseeding if winter application is desired,
• Good communication with farmer, land applier, and WWTP ORC, and
• Proper coordination between application events and crop harvesting and planting.

FARM ID NC-RO-20
Hammonds Farm
SOIL AND AGRONOMY REPORT
For this farm, Fields 15-21 have been added as new application sites, as this farm is existing to the
program. Fields 15, 16, 17, and 20 are all in rotational pasture. Field 18 is in hay. Fields 19 and 21 are in
rotational row crops. All of these fields are owned by Ronald Hammonds and are operated by RGH
Farms. The farm is located at 1218 Hammonds Rd. The fields are nearly level and gently sloping and
provide excellent receiver sites for the City of Lumberton land application program.
Field investigations have been previously conducted for Fields 15-18 via Fayetteville PWC's permit
WQ0000527 and subsequent soils observations were transferred. Field observations found Wakulla
sand mapped in Fields 15 and 16. Profile descriptions for these fields found Wakulla sand (WkB) soils.
Field observations found Wagram loamy sand mapped in Field 17. Profile descriptions for these fields
found Wakulla sand (WkB) soils. Field observations found Norfolk loamy sand mapped in Field 18.
Profile descriptions for these fields found Norfolk loamy sand (NoA) soils (per previous soils reports
found in PWC Permit WQ0000527).
Field investigations for 19 and 21 were performed by a NC licensed soil scientist were in agreement with
the mapping available from the Robeson County Geographic Information Services (GIS) website and the
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) soil maps. Field observations found Goldsboro
loamy sand mapped in Fields 19 and 21. Profile descriptions for these fields Goldsboro loamy sand
(GoA) soils. Field observations found Coxville mapped in Field 20. However, soil scientist profile
descriptions for these fields found Goldsboro loamy sand (GoA) soils. Darker surface soils were found in
areas that were adjacent to surface ditching which drains any standing water.
Soil samples were submitted for analysis to the North Carolina Department of Agriculture NCDA for
analysis. The soil analyses are attached, and the following was noted: Note elevated chromium(Cr) and
lead (Pb) in many samples plus elevated zinc(Zn) in samples 20-17 and 20-16. Although the above metals
here are not believed to pose a concern for plant growth, continue to monitor these and note where
elevated above background levels. Therefore, these fields will be closely monitored during application,
as well as metals adjustment mitigation measures will be made as needed.
Attached is a table with the predominant soil series indicated and the corresponding realistic yield
estimation (RYE) as available from http://www.soil.ncsu.edu/nmp/ncnmwg/vields/. These fields should
receive nitrogen applications in accordance with the rates specified in this table or in the standard DWQ
permit shell.

Realistic Yield Estimates for nitrogen applications for these fields should be set as follows:
Field
Acres
Crop
Soil Map
Predominant Soil Series
RYE Rate
Unit
(lbs/acre)
Coastal
15
24.7
WkB
Wakulla sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
147
Bermuda
Coastal
16
10.9
WkB
Wakulla sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
147
Bermuda
Coastal
17
23.1
WkB
Wakulla sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
147
Bermuda
Coastal
18
10.9
NoA
Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
242
Bermuda
Corn/
19
6.5
GoA
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
147/149
Soybeans
astal
GoA
20
43.3
omuda
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
230
Be
Corn/
21
14.9
GoA
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
147/149
Soybeans
Crop Management guidelines that will be of importance for this site will be:
• Proper coordination with land applier to incorporate biosolids,
• Proper harvesting of cover crop,
• Matching of cover crops' growing season to application events,
• Overseeding if winter application is desired,
• Good communication with farmer, land applier, and WWTP ORC, and
• Proper coordination between application events and crop harvesting and planting.

Soil Analysis Results

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. FY23-SL000920
Client: Ronald G. Hammonds
Advisor: Michael Hunt
r Heavy Metals
1218 Hammonds Rd.
Enviro-Choice Recycling
Lumberton, NC 28360
3330 Saddletree Rd
# Soil Report-3 Extraction
_
Sampled County : Robeson
Lumberton, NC28360
Links to Helpful Information
Client ID: 404031
Advisor ID: 486968
Sampled: 05/25/2022 Received: 07/18/2022 Completed: 07/21/2022 Farm: Nc-Ro-20
Agronomist's Comments:
This report contains both routine soil test information as well as heavy metals data in a section
labeled as Heavy Metals under soil test lab results.
Using Mehlich 3 as a
soil test extractant, background levels of these metals typically seen in NC soils when analyzed are as follows: arsenic (As)- 4.5 ppm, cadmium (Cd)- 0.1 ppm, chromium
(Cr)- 0.2 ppm, lead (Pb)- 4.2 ppm, nickel (Ni)- 0.8 ppm, & selenium (Se)- 0.2 ppm (FY2005-2007). Note elevated chromium(Cr) and lead (Pb) in many samples plus
elevated zinc(Zn) in samples 20-17 and 20-16. Although the above metals here are not believed to pose a concern for plant growth, continue to monitor these and note
where elevated above background levels. Note any lime and fertilizer recommendations. Tissue testing is advised where soil pH is elevated and where zinc levels are of
concern as in samples found here. Ja athi Kamalakanthan, Agronomist, 7/21/2022
Sample ID: 20-15
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O Mg S Mn Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Bermuda hay/past., M 1.6 180-220 0
40 25 0 0 0
0 0
Note: 12
2 - 0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class: Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.86 1.37 5.2 53 2.4 4.7 432 88 37 7
50 163 115 744 744
929 0.1 2
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.5 Cadmium, 0.1
Nickel, 0.8 Chromium, 0.7 Lead,
7.4 Selenium, 0.1
Sample ID: 20-16
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O Mg S Mn Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Bermuda hay/past., M 1.3 180-220 0
170 25 0 0 0
0 0
Note: 12
2 - 0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class: Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I Mn-All Mn-AI2 Zn-I Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.60 1.41 5.0 57 2.1 5.0 397 28 48 6
35 175 122 1178 1178
750 0.0
North Carolina
J
Tcbatcu (rusk f umi Cixnmisslan
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No.
FY23-SL000920
Ronald G. Hammonds
Page 2 of 4
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.2 Cadmium, 0.1
Nickel, 0.6
Chromium, 0.6
Lead,
4.0
Selenium, 0.1
Sample ID: 20-17
Lime History:
Recommendations: Lime
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1 -Bermuda hay/past., M 0.0 180-220 0
2- 0.0
K2O
0
Nutrients (lb/acre)
Mg S
0 0
Mn
pH$
Zn
0
Cu
0
B
0
More
Information
Note: 12 Note: $
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
0.36 1.14 14.8 95 0.7 6.9 655 234 64 24
S-1 Mn-I
290 98
Soil Class: Mineral
Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI
63 1095 1095
Cu-I
483
Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.3 2
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.7 Cadmium, 0.0
Nickel, 0.4
Chromium, 0.7
Lead,
0.6
Selenium, 0.1
Sample ID: 20-18
Lime History:
Recommendations: Lime
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1 -Corn, grain 1.5 120 - 160 0
2- 0.0
K2O
0
Nutrients (lb/acre)
Mg S
25 0
Mn
0
Zn
0
Cu
0
B
0
More
Information
Note: 3
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
0.60 1.39 4.7 54 2.2 4.7 486 84 39 6
S-1 Mn-I
72 137
Soil Class:
Mn-All Mn-AI2
99
Mineral
Zn-I Zn-AI
524 524
Cu-I
619
Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.1 2
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.5 Cadmium, 0.0
Nickel, 0.3
Chromium, 0.5
Lead,
9.4
Selenium, 0.2

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No.
FY23-SL000920
Ronald G. Hammonds
Page 3 of 4
Sample ID: 20-19
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean 0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2 - 0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
1.08 1.16 9.6 85 1.5 6.0 659 99 65 15
39 77
56
803
803
713
0.1
1
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.5 Cadmium, 0.0
Nickel, 0.5
Chromium, 0.3
Lead,
4.5
Selenium,
0.3
Sample ID: 20-20-
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1- Bermuda hay/past., M 0.0 180-220 0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 12
2 - 0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
1.14 1.16 13.3 91 1.2 6.5 601 220 64 19
39 57
44
820
820
686
0.1
1
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.7 Cadmium, 0.0
Nickel, 0.4
Chromium, 0.4
Lead,
6.7
Selenium,
0.2
Sample ID: 20-21
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain 0.0 120 - 160 0
20
0 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2 - 0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
2.22 1.09 8.6 82 1.5 5.9 52 67 57 21
42 24
31
143
143
142
0.1
1

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. FY23-SL000920
Ronald G. Hammonds
Page 4 of 4
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.2 Cadmium, 0.1 Nickel, 0.2 Chromium, 0.3
Lead,
6.0 Selenium, 0.1
Understanding the Soil Report: explanation of measurements, abbreviations and units
Recommendations
Report Abbreviations
Lime
Ac
exchangeable acidity
If testing finds that soil pH is too low for the crop(s) indicated, a lime recommendation will be given in units of either
B
boron
ton/acre or Ib/1000 sq ft. For best results, mix the lime into the top 6 to 8 inches of soil several months before planting.
BS%
% CEC occupied by basic cations
For no -till or established plantings where this is not possible, apply no more than 1 to 1.5 ton/acre (50 Ib/1000 sq ft) at onE
Ca%
% CEC occupied by calcium
time, even if the report recommends more. You can apply the rest in similar increments every six months until the full rate
CEC
cation exchange capacity
is applied. If MG is recommended and lime is needed, use dolomitric lime.
Cu-I
copper index
ESP
exchangeable sodium percent
Fertilizer
HM%
percent humic matter
Recommendations for field crops or other large areas are listed separately for each nutrient to be added (in units of
K-1
potassium index
lb/acre unless otherwise specified). Recommendations for N (and sometimes for B) are based on research/field studies
K20
potash
for the crop being grown, not on soil test results. K-1 and P-1 values are based on test results and should be > 50. If they
Mg%
% CEC occupied by magnesium
are not, follow the fertilizer recommendations given. If Mg is needed and no lime is recommended, 0-0-22 (11.5% Mg) is
MIN
mineral soil class
an excellent source; 175 to 250 lb per acre alone or in a fertilizer blend will usually satisfy crop needs, SS-1 levels appear
Mn
manganese
only on reports for greenhouse soil or problem samples.
Mn-All
Mn-availability index for crop 1
Mn-Al2
Mn-availability index for crop 2
Mn-I
manganese index
Farmers and other commercial producers should pay special attention to micronutrient levels. If $, pH$, $pH, C or Z
Mn-
mineral -organic soil class
notations appear on the soil report, refer to $Note: Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients_ In general, homeowners do not
N
nitrogen
need to be concerned about micronutrients. Various crop notes also address lime fertilizer needs; visit
Na
sodium
ncagr.gov/agronomi/pubs.htm.
NO3-N
nitrate nitrogen
ORG
organic soil class
Recommendations for small areas, such as home lawns/gardens, are listed in units of Ib/1000 sq ft. If you cannot find
pH
current soil pH
the exact fertilizer grade recommended on the report, visit www.ncagr.qov/agronomi/obpart4.htn*fsfind information that
P-1
phosphorus index
may help you choose a comparable alternate. For more information, read A Homeowner's Guide to Fertilizer.
P205
phosphate
S-1
sulfur index
Test Results
SS-1
soluble salt index
W/V
weight per volume
The first seven values [soil class, HW/V, CEC, BS%, Ac and pH] describe the soil and its degree of acidity. The
Zn-AI
zinc availability indexM%,
Zn-1
zinc index
remaining 16 [P-I, K-I, Ca%, Mg%, Mn-I, Mn-All, Mn-AI2, Zn-I, Zn-AI, Cu-I, S-I, SS -I, Na, ESP, SS -I, NO3-N (not routinel
available)] indicate levels of plant nutrients or other fertility measurement. Visit www.ncagr.qov/agronomi/uyrst.htm

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. FY22-SL033961
"4
Client: James McGirt
Advisor: Michael Hunt
r Heavy Metals
1296 Indian Heritage Rd / 1244 Indian
Enviro-Choice Recycling
Heritage Road
3330 Saddletree Rd
# Soil Report-3 Extraction
Lumberton, NC 28358
Sampled County : Robeson
Lumberton, NC 28360
Links to Helpful Information
Client ID: 470993
Advisor ID: 486968
Sampled: Received: 05/13/2022 Completed: 05/18/2022 Farm:
Agronomist's Comments:
This report contains both routine soil test information as well as heavy metals data in a section
labeled as Heavy Metals under soil test lab results.
Using Mehlich 3 as a
soil test extractant, background levels of these metals typically seen in NC soils when analyzed are as follows: arsenic (As)- 4.5 ppm, cadmium (Cd)- 0.1 ppm, chromium
(Cr)- 0.2 ppm, lead (Pb)- 4.2 ppm, nickel (Ni)- 0.8 ppm, & selenium (Se)- 0.2 ppm (FY2005-2007). Note elevated lead (Pb) in all the sample areas. Although the above
metals here are not believed to pose a concern for plant growth, continue to monitor these and note where elevated above background levels. Note any lime and fertilizer
recommendations. Where soil test phosphorus (P) is very high (P-1 > 100), crops will not respond to additional P applied. Tissue testing is advised where soil pH is
elevated as in samples found here. Ja athi Kamalakanthan, Agronomist, 5/18/2022
Sample ID: 42-01
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O Mg S Mn Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean 0.0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
Note: 3
2 - 0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class: Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.46 1.23 7.5 87 1.0 6.1 216 ill 61 18
47 57 42 187 187
154 0.1 1
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.5 Cadmium, 0.0
Nickel, 0.1 Chromium, 0.2 Lead,
8.7 Selenium, 0.0
Sample ID: 42-02
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O Mg S Mn Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean 0.0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
Note: 3
2 - 0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class: Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I Mn-All Mn-AI2 Zn-I Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.66 1.13 7.8 88 1.0 6.3 152 104 61 20
43 48 35 171 171
134 0.1 1
North Carolina
J
Tcbatcu (rusk f umi Cixnmisslan
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No.
FY22-SL033961
James McGirt
Page 2 of 5
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic,
0.6 Cadmium, 0.0
Nickel, 0.1
Chromium, 0.2
Lead,
8.2
Selenium, 0.0
Sample ID: 42-03
Lime History:
Recommendations:
Crop
1-Soybean
2-
Lime
(tons/acre) N P2O5
0.0 0 0
0.0
K2O
0
Nutrients (lb/acre)
Mg S
0 0
Mn
0
Zn
0
Cu
0
B
0
More
Information
Note: 3
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
0.92 1.12 9.1 87 1.2 6.1 90 122 60 21
S-1 Mn-I
63 56
Soil Class:
Mn-All Mn-Al2
41
Mineral
Zn-I Zn-AI
223 223
Cu-I
150
Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.2 2
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic,
0.1 Cadmium, 0.0
Nickel, 0.1
Chromium, 0.1
Lead,
5.7
Selenium, 0.0
Sample ID: 42-04
Lime History:
Recommendations:
Crop
1 -Corn, grain
2-
Lime
(tons/acre) N P2O5
0.0 120 - 160 0
0.0
K2O
0
Nutrients (lb/acre)
Mg S
0 0
Mn
0
Zn
0
Cu
0
B
0
More
Information
Note: 3
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
1.02 1.07 8.2 84 1.3 5.9 77 117 56 22
S-1 Mn-I
65 53
Soil Class:
Mn-All Mn-AI2
49
Mineral
Zn-I Zn-AI
247 247
Cu-I
143
Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.2 2
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic,
0.0 Cadmium, 0.0
Nickel, 0.2
Chromium, 0.1
Lead,
6.0
Selenium, 0.0

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No.
FY22-SL033961
James McGirt
Page 3 of 5
Sample ID: 42-05
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.4 120 - 160 0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.97 1.13 7.4 83 1.2 5.7
96 96 60 17
66 50
47
350
350
156
0.2
3
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic,
0.0 Cadmium, 0.0
Nickel, 0.1
Chromium, 0.0
Lead,
6.2
Selenium,
0.0
Sample ID: 42-06
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.7 120 - 160 0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
1.25 1.18 6.8 78 1.5 5.5
117 116 56 13
87 51
48
259
259
148
0.2
3
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic,
0.0 Cadmium, 0.0
Nickel, 0.1
Chromium, 0.0
Lead,
5.4
Selenium,
0.0
Sample ID: 42-07
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.0 120 - 160 0
30
0 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2 -
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.81 1.13 8.4 88 1.0 6.1
86 61 72 12
63 57
50
229
229
137
0.2
2

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No.
FY22-SL033961
James McGirt
Page 4 of 5
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic,
0.0 Cadmium, 0.0
Nickel, 0.1
Chromium, 0.0
Lead,
4.1
Selenium, 0.0
Sample ID: 42-08
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.9 120 - 160 0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2-
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
1.02 1.14 6.3 72 1.8 5.4
70 88 51 14
66 43
43
363
363
212
0.1
2
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic,
0.1 Cadmium, 0.0
Nickel, 0.2
Chromium, 0.1
Lead,
6.4
Selenium, 0.0
Sample ID: 42-09
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean
0.0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2-
0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.76 1.11 12.0 91 1.1 6.1
199 167 73 11
84 67
49
276
276
193
0.2
2
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic,
0.5 Cadmium, 0.0
Nickel, 0.1
Chromium, 0.2
Lead,
7.9
Selenium, 0.0

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. FY22-SLO33961
James McGirt
Page 5 of 5
Understanding the Soil Report: explanation of measurements, abbreviations and units
Recommendations
Report Abbreviations
Lime
Ac
exchangeable acidity
If testing finds that soil pH is too low for the crop(s) indicated, a lime recommendation will be given in units of either
B
boron
ton/acre or Ib/1000 sq ft. For best results, mix the lime into the top 6 to 8 inches of soil several months before planting.
BS%
% CEC occupied by basic cations
For no -till or established plantings where this is not possible, apply no more than 1 to 1.5 ton/acre (50 Ib/1000 sq ft) at onE
Ca%
% CEC occupied by calcium
time, even if the report recommends more. You can apply the rest in similar increments every six months until the full rate
CEC
cation exchange capacity
is applied. If MG is recommended and lime is needed, use dolomitric lime.
Cu-I
copper index
ESP
exchangeable sodium percent
Fertilizer
HM%
percent humic matter
Recommendations for field crops or other large areas are listed separately for each nutrient to be added (in units of
K-1
potassium index
lb/acre unless otherwise specified). Recommendations for N (and sometimes for B) are based on research/field studies
K20
potash
for the crop being grown, not on soil test results. K-1 and P-1 values are based on test results and should be > 50. If they
Mg%
% CEC occupied by magnesium
are not, follow the fertilizer recommendations given. If Mg is needed and no lime is recommended, 0-0-22 (11.5% Mg) is
MIN
mineral soil class
an excellent source; 175 to 250 lb per acre alone or in a fertilizer blend will usually satisfy crop needs, SS-1 levels appear
Mn
manganese
only on reports for greenhouse soil or problem samples.
Mn-All
Mn-availability index for crop 1
Mn-Al2
Mn-availability index for crop 2
Mn-I
manganese index
Farmers and other commercial producers should pay special attention to micronutrient levels. If $, pH$, $pH, C or Z
Mn-
mineral -organic soil class
notations appear on the soil report, refer to $Note: Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients_ In general, homeowners do not
N
nitrogen
need to be concerned about micronutrients. Various crop notes also address lime fertilizer needs; visit
Na
sodium
ncagr.gov/agronomi/pubs.htm.
NO3-N
nitrate nitrogen
ORG
organic soil class
Recommendations for small areas, such as home lawns/gardens, are listed in units of Ib/1000 sq ft. If you cannot find
pH
current soil pH
the exact fertilizer grade recommended on the report, visit www.ncagr.pov/apronomi/obpart4.htrntfsfind information that
P-1
phosphorus index
may help you choose a comparable alternate. For more information, read A Homeowner's Guide to Fertilizer.
P205
phosphate
S-1
sulfur index
Test Results
SS-1
soluble salt index
W/V
weight per volume
The first seven values [soil class, HM%, W/V, CEC, BS%, Ac and pH] describe the soil and its degree of acidity. The
Zn-AI
zinc availability index
Zn-1
zinc index
remaining 16 [P-I, K-I, Ca%, Mg%, Mn-I, Mn-All, Mn-AI2, Zn-I, Zn-AI, Cu-I, S-I, SS -I, Na, ESP, SS -I, NO3-N (not routinel
available)] indicate levels of plant nutrients or other fertility measurement. Visit www.ncagr.pov/agronomi/uyrst.htm

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/ Report No. FY22-SL034144
Client: City Of Lumberton Advisor:
r Heavy Metals P.O. Box 1388
ti:
Lumberton, NC 28359
`T Mehlich-3 Extraction
#� Soil Report
Sampled County : Robeson
Links to Helpful Information
Client ID: 530702 Advisor ID:
Sampled: Received: 05/17/2022 Completed: 05/20/2022 Farm: NC-RO-17
Agronomist's Comments:
This report contains both routine soil test information as well as heavy metals data in a section labeled as Heavy Metals under soil test lab results. Using Mehlich 3 as a
soil test extractant, background levels of these metals typically seen in NC soils when analyzed are as follows: arsenic (As)- 4.5 ppm, cadmium (Cd)- 0.1 ppm, chromium
(Cr)- 0.2 ppm, lead (Pb)- 4.2 ppm, nickel (Ni)- 0.8 ppm, & selenium (Se)- 0.2 ppm (FY2005-2007). Note elevated lead (Pb) in 17-02, 17-05 and 17-07; nickel(Ni) in 17-02,
17-06 and 17-07 samples. Although the above metals here are not believed to pose a concern for plant growth, continue to monitor these and note where elevated above
background levels. Note any lime and fertilizer recommendations. Where soil test phosphorus (P) is very high (P-1 > 100), crops will not respond to additional P
applied.Tissue test is advised where soil pH is elevated and is of concern as in samples found here. Ja athi Kamalakanthan, Agronomist, 5/20/2022
Sample ID: 17-02
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean 1.9 0 30 90 0 0 0 0 0 0
Note: 3
2 - 0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% S-1 Mn-I Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
1.43 1.03 6.4 53 3.0 4.9 40 25 44 8 44 26 26 45 45 29 0.1 2
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.2 Cadmium, 0.0 Nickel, 1.9 Chromium, 0.2 Lead, 6.0 Selenium,
0.1
Sample ID: 17-04
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean 0.0 0 0 100 25 0 $pH 0 0 0
Note: 3 Note:
2 - 0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% S-1 Mn-I Mn-All Mn-AI2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.97 1.23 8.5 92 0.6 6.7 107 21 88 4 27 13 8 70 70 171 0.0
North Carolina
J
Tcbatcu (rusk f umi Cixnmisslan
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No.
FY22-SL034144
Page 2 of 4
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic,
1.3 Cadmium, 0.0
Nickel, 0.8
Chromium, 0.4
Lead,
3.5
Selenium, 0.3
Sample ID: 17-05
Lime History:
Recommendations:
Crop
1-Soybean
2 -
Lime
(tons/acre) N P2O5
1.3 0 0
0.0
K2O
40
Nutrients (lb/acre)
Mg S
0 0
Mn
0
Zn
0
Cu
0
B
0
More
Information
Note: 3
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
2.15 1.18 7.0 64 2.5 5.3 145 50 49 11
S-1 Mn-I
32 31
Soil Class:
Mn-All Mn-Al2
29
Mineral
Zn-I Zn-AI
93 93
Cu-I
34
Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.0
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic,
0.5 Cadmium, 0.1
Nickel, 0.7
Chromium, 0.2
Lead,
8.1
Selenium, 0.1
Sample ID: 17-06
Lime History:
Recommendations:
Crop
1-Soybean
2 -
Lime
(tons/acre) N P2O5
1.9 0 0
0.0
K2O
100
Nutrients (lb/acre)
Mg S
25 0
Mn
0
Zn
0
Cu
0
B
0
More
Information
Note: 3
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
1.61 1.25 4.7 41 2.8 4.8 79 20 30 9
S-1 Mn-I
46 26
Soil Class:
Mn-All Mn-AI2
26
Mineral
Zn-I Zn-AI
68 68
Cu-I
80
Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.0
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic,
0.2 Cadmium, 0.0
Nickel, 1.0
Chromium, 0.3
Lead,
5.3
Selenium, 0.2

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. FY22-SL034144
Page 3 of 4
Sample ID: 17-07
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O
Mg S
Mn Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean 1.6 0 0 70
25 0
0 0
0 0
Note: 3
2 - 0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
1.61 1.19 5.2 50 2.6 5.0 82 33 41 6 52 35
31
44 44
35 0.1 2
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.4 Cadmium, 0.0 Nickel, 1.1
Chromium, 0.2
Lead,
8.7 Selenium, 0.1

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. FY22-SLO34144
Page 4 of 4
Understanding the Soil Report: explanation of measurements, abbreviations and units
Recommendations
Report Abbreviations
Lime
Ac
exchangeable acidity
If testing finds that soil pH is too low for the crop(s) indicated, a lime recommendation will be given in units of either
B
boron
ton/acre or Ib/1000 sq ft. For best results, mix the lime into the top 6 to 8 inches of soil several months before planting.
BS%
% CEC occupied by basic cations
For no -till or established plantings where this is not possible, apply no more than 1 to 1.5 ton/acre (50 Ib/1000 sq ft) at onE
Ca%
% CEC occupied by calcium
time, even if the report recommends more. You can apply the rest in similar increments every six months until the full rate
CEC
cation exchange capacity
is applied. If MG is recommended and lime is needed, use dolomitric lime.
Cu-I
copper index
ESP
exchangeable sodium percent
Fertilizer
HM%
percent humic matter
Recommendations for field crops or other large areas are listed separately for each nutrient to be added (in units of
K-1
potassium index
lb/acre unless otherwise specified). Recommendations for N (and sometimes for B) are based on research/field studies
K20
potash
for the crop being grown, not on soil test results. K-1 and P-1 values are based on test results and should be > 50. If they
Mg%
% CEC occupied by magnesium
are not, follow the fertilizer recommendations given. If Mg is needed and no lime is recommended, 0-0-22 (11.5% Mg) is
MIN
mineral soil class
an excellent source; 175 to 250 lb per acre alone or in a fertilizer blend will usually satisfy crop needs, SS-1 levels appear
Mn
manganese
only on reports for greenhouse soil or problem samples.
Mn-All
Mn-availability index for crop 1
Mn-Al2
Mn-availability index for crop 2
Mn-I
manganese index
Farmers and other commercial producers should pay special attention to micronutrient levels. If $, pH$, $pH, C or Z
Mn-
mineral -organic soil class
notations appear on the soil report, refer to $Note: Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients_ In general, homeowners do not
N
nitrogen
need to be concerned about micronutrients. Various crop notes also address lime fertilizer needs; visit
Na
sodium
ncagr.gov/agronomi/pubs.htm.
NO3-N
nitrate nitrogen
ORG
organic soil class
Recommendations for small areas, such as home lawns/gardens, are listed in units of Ib/1000 sq ft. If you cannot find
pH
current soil pH
the exact fertilizer grade recommended on the report, visit www.ncagr.pov/apronomi/obpart4.htrntfsfind information that
P-1
phosphorus index
may help you choose a comparable alternate. For more information, read A Homeowner's Guide to Fertilizer.
P205
phosphate
S-1
sulfur index
Test Results
SS-1
soluble salt index
W/V
weight per volume
The first seven values [soil class, HM%, W/V, CEC, BS%, Ac and pH] describe the soil and its degree of acidity. The
Zn-AI
zinc availability index
Zn-1
zinc index
remaining 16 [P-I, K-I, Ca%, Mg%, Mn-I, Mn-All, Mn-AI2, Zn-I, Zn-AI, Cu-I, S-I, SS -I, Na, ESP, SS -I, NO3-N (not routinel
available)] indicate levels of plant nutrients or other fertility measurement. Visit www.ncagr.pov/agronomi/uyrst.htm

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. FY22-SL034142
Client: Ben Chavis
Advisor: Michael Hunt
r Heavy Metals 1790 Rozier Church Rd
Enviro-Choice Recycling
Lumberton, NC 28360
3330 Saddletree Rd
# Soil Report-3 Extraction
_ Sampled County : Robeson
Lumberton, NC28360
Links to Helpful Information
Client ID: 437774
Advisor ID: 486968
Sampled: Received: 05/17/2022 Completed: 05/20/2022 Farm: NC-RO-40
Agronomist's Comments:
This report contains both routine soil test information as well as heavy metals data in a section labeled as Heavy Metals under soil test lab results.
Using Mehlich 3 as a
soil test extractant, background levels of these metals typically seen in NC soils when analyzed are as follows: arsenic (As)- 4.5 ppm, cadmium (Cd)- 0.1 ppm, chromium
(Cr)- 0.2 ppm, lead (Pb)- 4.2 ppm, nickel (Ni)- 0.8 ppm, & selenium (Se)- 0.2 ppm (FY2005-2007). Note elevated lead (Pb) in many samples. Although the above metals
here are not believed to pose a concern for plant growth, continue to monitor these and note where elevated above background levels. Note any lime
and fertilizer
recommendations. Where soil test phosphorus (P) is very high (P-1 > 100), crops will not respond to additional P applied. Tissue test is advised where
soil pH is elevated
as in samples found here. Ja athi Kamalakanthan, Agronomist, 5/20/2022
Sample ID: 4001
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1- Bermuda hay/past., M 0.0 180-220 0 30 0 0 0 0
0 0
Note: 12
2 - 0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% S-1 Mn-I Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
1.74 1.02 9.1 79 1.9 6.0 211 100 55 19 40 35 38 162 162
176 0.1 1
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.1 Cadmium, 0.0 Nickel, 0.2 Chromium, 0.2 Lead,
5.7 Selenium, 0.1
Sample ID: 4002
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Bermuda hay/past., M 0.0 180-220 0 0 0 0 pH$ 0
0 0
Note: 12 Note:
2 - 0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% S-1 Mn-I Mn-All Mn-AI2 Zn-I Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.92 1.11 10.7 92 0.9 6.8 318 142 66 19 30 64 44 414 414
280 0.1 1
North Carolina
J
Tcbatcu (rusk f umi Cixnmisslan
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No.
FY22-SL034142
Ben Chavis
Page 2 of 5
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.2 Cadmium, 0.1
Nickel, 0.3
Chromium, 0.3
Lead,
6.9
Selenium, 0.1
Sample ID: 4003
Lime History:
Recommendations: Lime
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1 -Bermuda hay/past., M 0.0 180-220 0
2- 0.0
K2O
0
Nutrients (lb/acre)
Mg S
0 0
Mn
pH$
Zn
0
Cu
0
B
0
More
Information
Note: 12 Note: $
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
0.36 1.15 9.7 93 0.6 6.9 505 177 69 15
S-1 Mn-I
33 142
Soil Class:
Mn-All Mn-Al2
89
Mineral
Zn-I Zn-AI
840 840
Cu-I
412
Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.2 2
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.4 Cadmium, 0.0
Nickel, 0.2
Chromium, 0.4
Lead,
7.9
Selenium, 0.1
Sample ID: 4004
Lime History:
Recommendations: Lime
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1 -Bermuda hay/past., M 0.0 180-220 0
2- 0.0
K2O
0
Nutrients (lb/acre)
Mg S
0 0
Mn
pH$
Zn
0
Cu
0
B
0
More
Information
Note: 12 Note: $
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
0.41 1.10 13.3 96 0.6 7.0 537 162 74 16
S-1 Mn-I
35 183
Soil Class: Mineral
Mn-All Mn-AI2 Zn-I Zn-AI
111 1335 1335
Cu-I
585
Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.1 1
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.3 Cadmium, 0.1
Nickel, 0.3
Chromium, 0.3
Lead,
4.5
Selenium, 0.1

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No.
FY22-SL034142
Ben Chavis
Page 3 of 5
Sample ID: 4005
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Bermuda hay/past., M 0.0 180-220 0
0
0 0
pH$
0
0
0
Note: 12 Note: $
2 - 0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.56 1.05 14.8 96 0.6 7.1 369 138 74 18
39 100
61
671
671
199
0.1
1
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.3 Cadmium, 0.1
Nickel, 0.2
Chromium, 0.3
Lead,
4.7
Selenium,
0.1
Sample ID: 4006
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Bermuda hay/past., M 0.0 180-220 0
0
0 0
pH$
0
0
0
Note: 12 Note: $
2 - 0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.56 1.07 14.5 97 0.5 7.1 463 191 74 16
40 137
82 1022
1022
436
0.1
1
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.3 Cadmium, 0.1
Nickel, 0.2
Chromium, 0.3
Lead,
6.1
Selenium,
0.2
Sample ID: 4007
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Bermuda hay/past., M 0.0 180-220 0
0
0 0
pH$
0
0
0
Note: 12 Note: $
2 - 0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.51 1.14 10.5 95 0.6 7.0 465 189 69 17
70 130
80
901
901
441
0.1
1

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No.
FY22-SL034142
Ben Chavis
Page 4 of 5
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.3 Cadmium, 0.1
Nickel, 0.4
Chromium, 0.4
Lead,
6.4 Selenium, 0.1
Sample ID: 4008
Lime History:
Recommendations: Lime
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1- Bermuda hay/past., M 0.0 180-220 0
2 - 0.0
K2O
70
Nutrients (lb/acre)
Mg S
0 0
Mn
0
Zn
0
Cu B
0 0
More
Information
Note: 12
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
1.37 1.11 7.4 77 1.7 6.0 184 73 52 20
S-1 Mn-I
38 28
Soil Class:
Mn-All Mn-Al2
34
Mineral
Zn-I Zn-AI
195 195
Cu-I Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
96 0.1 1
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.3 Cadmium, 0.0
Nickel, 0.8
Chromium, 0.4
Lead,
6.3 Selenium, 0.1

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. FY22-SLO34142
Ben Chavis
Page 5 of 5
Understanding the Soil Report: explanation of measurements, abbreviations and units
Recommendations
Report Abbreviations
Lime
Ac
exchangeable acidity
If testing finds that soil pH is too low for the crop(s) indicated, a lime recommendation will be given in units of either
B
boron
ton/acre or Ib/1000 sq ft. For best results, mix the lime into the top 6 to 8 inches of soil several months before planting.
BS%
% CEC occupied by basic cations
For no -till or established plantings where this is not possible, apply no more than 1 to 1.5 ton/acre (50 Ib/1000 sq ft) at onE
Ca%
% CEC occupied by calcium
time, even if the report recommends more. You can apply the rest in similar increments every six months until the full rate
CEC
cation exchange capacity
is applied. If MG is recommended and lime is needed, use dolomitric lime.
Cu-I
copper index
ESP
exchangeable sodium percent
Fertilizer
HM%
percent humic matter
Recommendations for field crops or other large areas are listed separately for each nutrient to be added (in units of
K-1
potassium index
lb/acre unless otherwise specified). Recommendations for N (and sometimes for B) are based on research/field studies
K20
potash
for the crop being grown, not on soil test results. K-1 and P-1 values are based on test results and should be > 50. If they
Mg%
% CEC occupied by magnesium
are not, follow the fertilizer recommendations given. If Mg is needed and no lime is recommended, 0-0-22 (11.5% Mg) is
MIN
mineral soil class
an excellent source; 175 to 250 lb per acre alone or in a fertilizer blend will usually satisfy crop needs, SS-1 levels appear
Mn
manganese
only on reports for greenhouse soil or problem samples.
Mn-All
Mn-availability index for crop 1
Mn-Al2
Mn-availability index for crop 2
Mn-I
manganese index
Farmers and other commercial producers should pay special attention to micronutrient levels. If $, pH$, $pH, C or Z
Mn-
mineral -organic soil class
notations appear on the soil report, refer to $Note: Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients_ In general, homeowners do not
N
nitrogen
need to be concerned about micronutrients. Various crop notes also address lime fertilizer needs; visit
Na
sodium
ncagr.gov/agronomi/pubs.htm.
NO3-N
nitrate nitrogen
ORG
organic soil class
Recommendations for small areas, such as home lawns/gardens, are listed in units of Ib/1000 sq ft. If you cannot find
pH
current soil pH
the exact fertilizer grade recommended on the report, visit www.ncagr.pov/apronomi/obpart4.htrntfsfind information that
P-1
phosphorus index
may help you choose a comparable alternate. For more information, read A Homeowner's Guide to Fertilizer.
P205
phosphate
S-1
sulfur index
Test Results
SS-1
soluble salt index
W/V
weight per volume
The first seven values [soil class, HM%, W/V, CEC, BS%, Ac and pH] describe the soil and its degree of acidity. The
Zn-AI
zinc availability index
Zn-1
zinc index
remaining 16 [P-I, K-I, Ca%, Mg%, Mn-I, Mn-All, Mn-AI2, Zn-I, Zn-AI, Cu-I, S-I, SS -I, Na, ESP, SS -I, NO3-N (not routinel
available)] indicate levels of plant nutrients or other fertility measurement. Visit www.ncagr.pov/agronomi/uyrst.htm

CUMULATIVE POLLUTANT LOADING RATES FOR
EXISTING SITES

Arsenic lCadmium lCopper I Lead IMercury Imolybdenj Nickel ISelenium IZinc
CPLR Ceiling Limit 361 341 13381 2671 15 1 n/a 1 3741 891 2498
Field Name
Ozzell Farm
NC-RO-16-01
NC-RO-16-2
NC-RO-16-3
NC-RO-16-4
NC-RO-16-5
NC-RO-16-6
NC-RO-16-7
NC-RO-16-8
0.113
0.034
11.931
0.568
0.009
0.197
1.033
0.124
19.162
0.113
0.039
10.745
0.631
0.008
0.122
0.625
0.116
21.352
0.092
0.038
5.764
0.312
0.005
0.109
0.537
0.102
9.092
0.097
0.037
8.79
0.509
0.006
0.1091
0.548
0.102
16.714
0.097
0.035
8.557
1.347
0.006
0.161
0.84
0.1
16.251
0.26
0.046
12.992
1.576
0.03
0.225
1.146
0.308
22.123
0.2
0.031
10.874
1.87
0.026
0.169
0.875
0.254
18.505
0.1161
0.04516.04410.3621
0.005
0.123
0.57810.1241
10.134
Baker Farms
NC-RO-16-16
NC-RO-16-17
NC-RO-16-18
NC-RO-16-19
0.278
0.127
39.385
3.861
0.044
0.738
3.283
0.25
32.459
0.196
0.118
37.845
3.94
0.169
0.751
3.02
0.16
32.775
0.282
0.127
44.954
4.36
0.047
0.777
3.11
0.257
41.931
0.153
0.12
39.428
4.905
0.236
0.388
2.401
0.612
24.46
Airport Fields
NC-RO-17-01
NC-RO-17-02
NC-RO-17-03
NC-RO-17-04
0.09
0.04
11.175
1.87
0.02
0.624
1.052
0.0178
8.745
0.16
0.087
20.128
1.667
0.035
0.419
1.969
0.193
20.616
0.1
0.06
9.674
0.494
0.012
0.192
0.963
0.14
15.755
0.157
0.073
28.421
1.75
0.017
0.461
1.6981
0.1081
16.43
Hammonds Farms
NC-RO-20-03
NC-RO-20-04
NC-RO-20-06
NC-RO-20-07
NC-RO-20-08
NC-RO-20-14
0.15
0.062
12.305
2.036
0.026
0.261
1.433
0.13
22.131
0.249
0.078
17.582
1.957
0.038
0.364
2.001
0.183
31.217
0.007
0.001
2.625
1.562
0
0.069
0.391
0.003
5.839
0.05
0.006
4.093
1.758
0.003
0.767
0.559
0.048
9.417
0.0741
0.0031
3.841
1.2081
0.011
0.0631
0.3271
0.0931
6.684
0.0011
01
10.0331
0.331
01
01
01
0
14.341
Carrell Farms
NC-RO-28-01
1 0.0151
0.011
1.7191
0.0771
0.0021
0.0261
0.1391
0.0261
1.972
NC-RO-28-02
0.0611
0.0121
3.5691
0.2361
0.0061
0.0661
0.5011
0.0621
4.955
NC-RO-28-03
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
0
Patrick Bullard Farms
NC-RO-39-OIA 0.001 0 0.026 0.001 0 0 0.002 0.001 0.111
NC-RO-39-01B
0.001
0
0.028
0.001
0
0
0.002
0.001
0.121
NC-RO-39-02
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NC-RO-39-03
0.001
0
0.02
0.001
0
0
0.001
0.001
0.085
NC-RO-39-04
0.001
0
0.023
0.001
0
0
0.002
0.001
0.1
NC-RO-39-05
0.001
0
0.024
0.001
0
0
0.002
0.001
0.102
NC-RO-39-06
0.001
0
0.031
0.001
0
0
0.002
0.001
0.134
NC-RO-39-07
0.046
0.005
1.313
0.094
0.003
0.0371
0.143
0.046
3.246
NC-RO-39-08
1 0.0011
01
0.0251
0.001
01
01
0.0021
0.001
3.078
NC-RO-39-09
1 0.031
0.0021
7.1961
0.692
0.0041
0.0821
0.4561
0.036
13.331