20081473 Ver 4_As Built Report_20150504

BANK PARCEL
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER &
NUTRIENT OFFSET
MITIGATION SITE
WAYNE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PHASE I &
PHASE I EXPANSION
AS -BUILT REPORT
DWQ Projecl # 2008- 1473 ,t .4
EBX -13020
April 27, 2015 O F�� D
MAY 042015;

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
To Ms Katie Merritt
11
MCADANIS
Date May 1, 2015
NCDENR -DWR
512 N Salisbury Street, Archdale Building
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 '' FEDERAL EXPRESS
Re Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel
Phase I & Phase I Expansion
I am sending you the following item(s)
Job No EBX -13020
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
1
Phase I & Phase I Expansion Report
These are transmitted as checked below
® As requested
❑ For approval
❑ For review and comment
Remarks
Copy to
® For your use
Signed
George Buchholz, REM,,,PWS
Environmental Scientist, Project
Manager, Water Resources and
Infrastructure
Raleigh- Durham Charlotte
2905 Meridian Parkway 11301 Carmel Commons Blvd, Suite 111
Durham, North Carolina 27713 Charlotte, North Carolina
(919) 361 -5000 (704) 527 -0800
Designing Tomorrow's Infrastructure & Communities
McAdamsCoxom

Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction .............. .............. ............................... .. . ....... .
11P tL t dD t
... .............. .. 1
roJec oca ion an escnp ion ......... . ..... .. .... ... ............. I ........................ ...
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives ....................... ............................... ........ ......
2.0 Project Area — Pre - Construction Condition Summary .................. ...................
3 0 As Built Site Conditions ................. .................................. ...............................
3.1 Restoration Plan ........... ... ............................... .................... ............. ...
3.2 Vegetation Monitoring Plots ..................................... ...............................
3 3 Photo Stations ............................................................ ...............................
4 0 Monitoring, Maintenance Plan, and Reporting ........................ ...............................
5.0 Neuse Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation .............................. . . .
.................1
...................2
............ .. 2
.................3
. . ............3
...................4
............... ..5
...................5
.................5
Appendix A: Site Maps
Figure l: Site Location Map
Figure 2.1: Conservation Easement Area — Phase I
Figure 2.2: Conservation Easement Area — Phase 1 Expansion
Figure 2.3: Proposed Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Restoration Area — Phase I
BPDP
Figure 2.3A: Ncusc Buffer & Nutrient Offset Restoration Areas — Phase I
Figure 2.313: Neusc Buffer & Nutrient Offset Restoration Areas — Phase I Expansion
Figure 3.1: As -Built Exhibit —Phase I
Figure 3.2: As -Built Exhibit — Phase I Expansion
Appendix B: Existing Conditions Photographs
Appendix C: Vegetation Assessment Data
Table l • Plant Species Summary
Table 2A: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table — Phase I
Table 2B. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table — Phase I Expansion
Table 3A: Stcm Count Total and Planted by Plot Species — Phase l
Table 313: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species — Phase I Expansion
ADDendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos — Phase 1
Appendix E: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos — Phase I Expansion
Appendix F: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets — Phase I
Appendix G: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets — Phase I Expansion
Appendix H: Photo Stations — Phase I
Appendix 1: Photo Stations — Phase I Expansion
Appendix J: Correspondence
DWR Memo dated August 9, 2013
Email from EBX Requesting use of DWR Memo
Email October 17, 2014 from DWR Authorizing use of DWR Memo
{`I
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

1.0 Introduction
1.1 Project Location and Description
Located off of Arrington Bridge Road, at its intersection with John Street in Goldsboro,
North Carolina (Figure 1, Appendix A) is the Neuse buffer and nutrient offset restoration
area previously referred to as the Wayne County Development Alliance Bank Parcel and
currently known as the Amngton Bridge Bank Parcel (hereafter referred to as the Bank Site).
The Bank Site was proposed to be developed in two (2) phases- Phase I and Phase H.
According to the Wayne County Development Alliance Bank Parcel Development Package
(BPDP, EcoEngineering, April 2012), Phase I consisted of Parcel Numbers 2598449002 and
is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Arrington Bridge Road and John
Street. Phase II consisted of Parcel Numbers 2598632250 (located at the northeast corner of
the intersection of Arrington Bridge road and John Street) and 2598543857 (located north of
Parcel Number 2598449002, along the west side of John Street, and is separated from Parcel
Number 2598449002 by a railroad easement and utility line casement). Since approval of the
BPDP, only a portion of Parcel Number 2598632250 was developed and dedicated to Phase
II. The Arrington Bndge Bank Parcel Neuse Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation
Site Phase II As Built Report (June, 2013) describes that portion of land developed for Phase
IL Based on the Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel Neuse Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset
Mitigation Site Phase Il As -Built Report (June, 2013), Parcel Number 2598543857 was not
developed as part of Phase II. Because the approved BPDP allowed development to occur on
Parcel Number 2598543857, it was decided that development on Parcel Number 2598543857
would be dedicated to Phase I. Figure 2.1 (Appendix A) is the signed and sealed
Conservation Easement (CE) platted for Phase 1. Figure 2.3 (Appendix A) is provided to
illustrate the Phase I CE as approved in the BPDP.
Since approval of the BPDP, a portion of Parcel Number 2598427606 has also been added to
Phase I, this portion of Phase I will hereafter be rcferied to as Phase I Expansion. Parcel
Number 2598427606 (Phase 1 Expansion) is located south of Parcel Number 2598449002,
along the south side of Arrington Bridge Road. On October 15 ' 2014, staff from the Division
of Water Resources (DWR) authorized approval to this additional area to Phase I, and is
referred to as Phase 1 Expansion. Email correspondence authorizing approval is provided in
Appendix G. Figure 2.2 (Appendix A) is the signed and sealed CE platted for Phase I
Expansion.
The total signed and scaled CE for both Phase I and Phase 1 Expansion of the Bank Site
consists of + 43.512 acres (Figures 2.1 and 2.2, Appendix A). Figures 23A and 2.313
(Appendix A) are provided to illustrate the constructed Phase I and Phase I Expansion
Conservation Easements with aerials.
The purpose of this Bank Site is to improve water quality within the Neuse River watershed
by providing off-site mitigation for development (both existing and proposed) requinng
stream buffer mitigation and nutrient offset credits.
As shown on the easement plat (Figure 3.1, Appendix A), the CE for Phase I of the Bank
Site is 38.886 acres (1,693,874.16 sf) Within the Phase I CE, 0.99 acres (43,124.4 sf) is
dedicated to 0' to 50' of the Neusc Riparian Buffer and 0.981 acres (42,732 36 sf) is
dedicated to 50' to 100' of the Neuse Riparian Buffer. Therefore, a total of 1.971 acres
(85,856.76 so is dedicated to Neuse Riparian Buffer. A total of 31.558 acres (1,374,666 48
sf) is dedicated to Nutrient Offset Credits for nitrogen. Therefore, there is 5.357 acres
(233,350.92 sf) of the Phase I Expansion CE that is not dedicated to either Neuse Riparian
Buffer Credits or Nutrient Offset Credits.
Pat A-
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

As shown on the easement plat (Figure 3.2, Appendix A), the CE for the Phase I Expansion
of the Bank Site is 4.626 acres (201,508 56 sf). Within the Phase I Expansion CE, 1.63 acres
(71,002.8 sf) is dedicated to 0' to 50' of the Neuse Riparian Buffer and 1.402 acres
(61,071.12 sf) is dedicated to 50' to 100' of the Neuse Riparian Buffer. Therefore, a total of
3.032 acres (132,073.92 sf) is dedicated to Neuse Riparian Buffer. A total of 0.947 acres
(41,251.32 sf) is dedicated to Nutrient Offset Credits for nitrogen. Therefore, there is 0.647
acres (28,183.32 sf) of the Phase I Expansion CE that is not dedicated to either Neuse
Riparian Buffer Credits or Nutrient Offset Credits.
The Bank Site Service Area is contained within 8 -digit USGS HUC 03020201. Stormwater
runoff from the Bank Site drains into an unnamed tributary of the Ncuse River (Stream Index
#27- (56)). According to the N.C. Division of Water Resources Basinwide Information
Management System (BIMS), the Neuse River is classified as Class C and NSW (Nutrient
Sensitive Waters) in this location. The "C'" classification is for "waters protected for uses
such as secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish consumption, aquatic life including
propagation, survival and maintenance of biological integrity, and agriculture" while the
NSW designation is for "Nutrient Sensitive Waters ".
This Bank Site shall be established under the terms and conditions of the EBX Neuse
Riparian Buffer Umbrella Nfitigation Bank (Bank) made and entered into by EBX Neuse 1,
LLC (EBX), acting as the Bank Sponsor, and the North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources - Division of Water Quality (DWQ), and was entered into by the
parties on November 10, 2008. The Division of Water Quality is now hereby referred to as
Division of Water Resources (DWR).
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The goals of this nutncnt offset mitigation project are to:
To improve the overall water quality and aquatic habitat in and around the unnamed
tnbutary of the Ncusc River by reducing nutrient and sediment loads into the streams
caused by agricultural influences.
To improve the richness and diversity of the plant species within the conservation
casement.
To provide perpetual protection for the unnamed tributary to the Neuse River and
associated riparian and upland buffers
These goals will be met through the following objectives:
- By establishing a native plant community to match the endemic plant species at the
Bank Site.
- By reducing the quantities of exotic invasive species at the Bank Parcel through
chemical methods.
- By establishing a conservation easement to provide long -term protection for the Bank
Site.
- By donation of the conservation easement and all of its interests, in perpetuity, to an
accredited or approved land trust or stewardship program
2.0 Project Area — Pre - Construction Condition Summary
Land adjacent to the Bank Site is comprised of active agricultural fields which have
historically cultivated corn and soybean. Prior to construction, the 33.529 acre Phase 1 CE of
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

the Bank Site was within agricultural activities and contained corn fields which were
harvested and pastureland Prior to construction, the 4.626 acre Phase I Expansion CE of the
Bank Site was in active pastureland.
There are areas along the unnamed tributaries and along Arrington Bridge Road that contain
relic forest /shrub communities. These fringe forest/shrub areas have been impacted by
historical agricultural activities. Species such as sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), red
maple (Ater rubrum), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), giant cane (Arundinaria
gigantea), willow oak (Quercus phellos), and water oak (Quercus nigra) were observed
Small significant populations of non - native, invasive species including privet (Ligustrum
sinense) and multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora) were also observed, which are indicative of a
disturbed forest community. Since these fringe forest/shrub areas have been disturbed, a
reference forested community was examined to gain insight as to the type of forested
community which would have been on the Bank Site if agricultural activities had not
occurred. One such reference forested community located approximately 0.7 miles west of
the Bank Parcel was examined. The reference forested community is generally characterized
as a Basic Meste Forest (Coastal Plain Subtype), according to the North Carolina Natural
Heritage Program (NHP) classification system (Schafale and Weakley, 1990). The canopy
and undcrstory is dominated by southern red oak (Quercus pagodcfolia), willow oak, water
oak, white oak (Quercus alba), sweetgum, red maple, tulip poplar, red cedar (Juniperus
virginiana), beech (Fagus grandifolia), American holly (Ilex opaca), dogwood (Cornus
florida), American elm (Ulmus Americana), paw -paw (Asimina triloba), swamp bay (Persea
palustris), giant cane, and highbush blueberry (Yaccinium corymbosum). Photographs
showing existing conditions prior to construction are located in Appendix B.
3.0 As Built Site Conditions
3.1 Restoration Plan
Construction of Phase I and Phase I Expansion of the Bank Site occurred on December 17
and 18, 2014. Construction activities included planting the conservation area followed by
staking of photo stations and vegetation plots. In addition, base line vegetation sampling was
conducted. All photographs and data are attached in`the appendices.
Grassed fields within the conservation easement were scarified prior to vegetation planting
activities. The established microtopography on level surfaces will promote diffuse flow and
surface water storage In addition, subsurface hardpans were eliminated to promote
vegetation growth and survival and to increase groundwater recharge rates. Grasses will be
treated with herbicide to reduce competition with planted species. Where necessary, invasive
species will be treated with herbicide to ensure they do not become dominant within the
Bank Site, or hinder the establishment, growth and survival of planted vegetation.
The Bank Site was planted with bare root seedlings consisting of species previously observed
on the Bank Site and selected species known to inhabit Basic Mesic Forests (Coastal Plain
Subtype) community type as described in Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina (Schafale and Weakley, 1990) Table 1 (Appendix C) provides a listing of planted
species and a summary of total stems planted within Phase i and Phase I Expansion of the
Bank Site, A total of 24,900 individual stems, or 695 stems per acre, were planted within the
Bank Site, which is slightly above the desired range of 436 to 681 stems per acre according
to the Wayne County Development Alliance Bank Parcel Development Package
(EcoEngineering, April 2012)
Po I
101" Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

The list provided in Wayne County Development Alliance Bank Parcel Development
Package was used as a guide in species selection. Due to stock unavailability from local
nurseries, changes were made on -site The planted species were a mixture of hardwood tree
species consistent with those found within a Basic Mesic Forest in the Coastal Plain. Plant
composition consisted of nine (9) tree species. No shrub species were selected as part of plant
composition. The following is the only substitution: bald cypress (Taxodtuna distichium,
Tree). The Bank Sponsor will conduct Monitoring Year 1 field exercises during the fall of
2015, as further described in Sections 3.2 and 3.3 At the conclusion of Monitoring Year 1, a
deterinination will be made regarding the need for supplemental plantings, at which time,
input from DWR will be sought prior to developing a supplemental planting plan. If
supplemental plantings are required, it will take place between the months of January and
April, 2016, and at which time, a minimum of three (3) additional tree species listed in the
Waync County Development Alliance Bank Parcel Development Package (EcoEngineering,
April 2012) will be planted.
Temporary and permanent native herbaceous seed will be applied simultaneously to the
nutrient offset restoration areas within the Bank Site area. Temporary seed will provide cover
until the permanent seed applied becomes established. Temporary cover consisted of millet
(E'chtnochloa crusgalh), annual rye grain (Secale cereale), and crimson clover (Trtfohum
incarnatum). Permanent ground cover consisted of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum),
decrtongue (Panicum clandesimman), black -eyed susan (Rudbeckta htrta), and riverbank
wildryc (Elymus riparius).
3.2 Vegetation Monitoring Plots
McAdams permanently installed six (6) vegetation plots for future monitoring purposes on
December 18, 2014; five (5) plots were installed in Phase I and one (1) plot was installed in
Phase I Expansion. It was subsequently determined that five (5) additional plots would be
needed for monitoring purposes, for a total of eleven (11) vegetation monitoring plots located
at both Phase I and Phase I Expansion. The five (5) additional plots were established on
March 18, 2015; three (3) additional plots were established in Phase 1, and two (2) additional
plots were established in Phase I Expansion. Therefore, there are a total of eight (8)
vegetation plots located at Phase I and a total of three (3) vegetation plots located at Phase I
Expansion The locations of the plots are depleted on the As -Built Exhibits (Figures 3.1 and
3.2, Appendix A). The plots were installed randomly throughout the Bank Site and each are
100 square meters in size (10 meter by 10 meter square plots) Baseline vegetation
monitoring was conducted in general accordance to CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording
Ve etg ation (CVS -EEP, v4.2). Table 2 (Appendix C) provides a success summary for each
vegetation monitoring plot.
Based on the baseline vegetation monitoring, all eleven (11) vegetation monitoring plots
were within the desired range of 436 to 681 stems per acre (Table 2, Appendix C) Table 3
(Appendix C) provides a more detailed summary of stem counts and the type of planted
species within each vegetation monitoring plot. The number of planted stems per acre for the
monitoring plots ranges from 769 stems to 971 stems.
Photographs of the vegetation monitoring plots are located in Appendix D. Vegetation
Monitoring Plot Data Sheets are provided in Appendix E. Each Vegetation Monitoring Plot
Data Sheet provides the measurements, location, and vigor of each planted tree within the
vegetation monitoring plots.
4
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

3.3 Photo Stations
Photo documentation is essential to monitoring the success the Bank Site. Photos provide a
visual assessment of the vegetation conditions. McAdams permanently installed seven (7)
photo stations for future monitoring purposes. The location of the photo stations and their
direction are depicted on Figures 3.1 and 3.2 (Appendix A) Photographs for the photo
stations arc located in Appendix F.
4.0 Monitoring, Maintenance Plan, and Reporting
The Bank Site will be monitored for five (5) consecutive years or until the required success
criteria has been met as determined by DWR. Monitoring Year 1 field exercises will begin
during fall of 2015. Supplemental planting and additional site modifications will be
implemented, if necessary, after a determination has been made regarding the success of the
project following each monitoring year. Monitoring activities will follow the terms and
conditions of the EBX Neuse Riparian Buffer Umbrella Mitigation Bank (Bank) made and
entered into by EBX Neuse I, LLC (EBX), acting as the Bank Sponsor, and thc North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Resources
(DWR).
The eleven (11) vegetative monitoring plots will be monitored in general accordance with the
CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation. A monitoring report will be submitted
annually to DWR no later than December 31 of each monitoring year describing the
conditions of the Bank Site and relating those conditions to the success criteria.
The target density for the riparian buffer is a minimurn of 320 planted trees per acre at the
end of the five (5) year monitoring period. Vegetation monitoring will occur between August
and October of each monitoring year. A determination will be made regarding the success of
the project following the collection and evaluation of ecological and physical monitoring
data, photographs, and site observations.
5.0 Neuse Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation
The Bank Site will provide Neuse Riparian Buffer Mitigation Credits for development
impacts within the Neuse River Basin. Additionally, it will provide Nutrient Offset
Mitigation Credits for development unpacts within the Ncuse River Basin USGS HUC
03020201 outside of the Falls Watershed. On October 17, 2014, EBX requested to use the
DWR Memorandum dated August 9, 2013 to request to receive Neuse Buffer mitigation
credits from 51 — 100 feet adjacent to the streams onsite. On October 17, 2014, DWR
authorized their approval for this request All correspondence between EBX and DWR are
provided in Appendix G. Of the total + 38.155 -acre conservation casement area for Phase 1
and Phase I Expansion, + 37.508 acres will be dedicated to Neuse Riparian Buffer restoration
and Nutrient Offset restoration (Figures 2.1 and 2.2, Appendix A). A total Neuse Riparian
Buffer restoration area of 5.002 acres (217,887 12 sf) will be used to generate 5 002 acres
(217,887.12 so of Neuse Riparian Buffer credits. The remaining 32.506 acres (1,415,961.36
sf) of riparian restoration -area within the Site (i.e areas outside of the Neuse Buffcr) will
provide Nutrient Offset Credits for nitrogen (currently based on 2,273.02 lbs of nitrogen/ac
of riparian restoration). The Site will provide 73,886.788 pounds of Nitrogen Nutrient Offset
Credit.
si
0 �' -L' I
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

Table l provides a summary of mitigation credit for the Site.
Table 1: MitiLyation Credit Summary
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER
RESTORATION /ENHANCEMENT CREDITS
Conservation Area
Neuse River Buffer
acres / s
Restoration
Enhancement
Phase 1
1.971 acres 85,856 76 sf)
0.00
Phase 1 Expansion
3.032 acres 132,073.92 sf)
0.00
TOTAL ACREAGE
5.003 acres 217 930.68 s
0.00
RATIO
1:1
3:1
TOTAL CREDITS
5.003 acres 217 930.68 s
0.00
NUTRIENT
OFFSET RESTORATION
CREDITS
Conservation Area
Nutrient Offset
Restoration acres )
Nitrogen Credit
(2,273.02 lbs/ac
Phase I
31.558
71,731.965
Phase I Expansion
0.947
2,152 550
TOTAL CREDITS
32.505
73,884.515
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

6.0 References
EcoEngineering — A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. April 2012. Wayne
County Development Alliance Bank Parcel — Bank Parcel Development Package.
EcoEngincering — A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. June 2013. Arrington
Bridge Bank Parcel Neuse Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation — Phase II — As
Built Report.
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R, 2008. CVS -BBP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) 2004. Guidelines for Riparian
Buffer Restoration. Available at internet site:
http: / /www.nceep .net/news /reportsibuffers.pdf Accessed August 2009.
Schafale MP and AS Wcaklcy. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina: Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of
Parks and Recreation, Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh,
North Carolina.
I OW
�r
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

APPENDIX A
Site Maps
s
i Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

-`� ph ' . '_ ;� . • ' �`� 6:9 sew
iii .:..'CMDRBORO we. "March'.; i , - - - - --
-- va, Nat .rJ - I
rGof
Cuurse �w1
lu •, South
C r � r r c Goldsboro
BANK SITE
PHASE
Cam, r 1 •- �•_ ' 'tea � -
'` �! .i[.!•� .jam U,
Tp
R PHASE I �.
V
JOA
f 4Vndi 1` '
Legend 35'21'0.33 "N
78' 0'38.64 "W
LL Q Bank Site Phase I Phase I Expansion ` N
~ 7.5 MINUTE USGS "SW GOLDSBORO- QUAD; 1974 (PHOTO INSPECTED 1988)
F a, 7.5 MINUTE USGS "SE GOLDSBORO" QUAD; 1982 (PHOTO INSPECTED 1988) F , } `. of ll �'• , • ,
FIGURE 1. USGS QUAD
SW/SE GOLDSBORO
0 1,000 2,000 4,000
Feet
I inch = 2,000 feet M c A D A M S

ng 0/4
/
i-
i `
J u 0 Ul
Pit
y
rl
I
MERE
�g
ng 0/4
/
i-
i `
J u 0 Ul
Pit
y
rl
I
MERE
ti
`IL

tj
MHHN
Dot
!
2
��Y
Z
srtrts
s'
W m
LL
i ti Si
�g
�j
O
ffi
i ILI
Y.
Jill I
ti
y 1p
n
jw'
MHHN
Jill
ISjl
2
Z
W_
s'
W m
LL
i ti Si
; !
/0)4)
k
Y al
pq � nil
my
I =
3 .,►� si
iw
? L _' fee ^•�I I :ai DUE
a lit•
MA
Y2
a+�
far
2
Z
W_
s'
W m
LL
i ti Si
Q
O

FIGURE 2.3 - PROPOSED RIPARIAN BUFFER & NUTRIENT !!j
OFFSET RESTORATION AREA - PHASE I BPDP
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
1 inch — 500 feet M C A DA M S

FIGURE 2.3A - PROPOSED NEUSE BUFFER &
NUTRIENT OFFSET RESTORATION AREAS - PHASE I
0 250 500 1,000
Feet A M
I inch — 500 feet c A U A M S,

FIGURE 2.313 - PROPOSED NEUSE BUFFER &
NUTRIENT OFFSET RESTORATION AREAS -
PHASE I EXPANSION
0 250 500 1,000
Feel
1 inch 500 feet

"PRELIMINARY PLAT'
NOT FOR SALES; CONVEYANCES,
OR RCCOROA TION. GRAPHIC SCALE
it
EBX -NEUSE I, LLC.
ARRINGTON BRIDGE I
YIELD MAP
MATRIX EAST, PLLC
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS
906 N. QUEEN ST., SURE A KINSTON, NC 28501
TEL: [phone] FAX- 252 -522 -4747
FIGURE 3.1
"I NNW Y.l7 "o. EBX -13020
BE
ARRINGTON BRIDGE �� UM J( MR YeAGAMS
�¢ " "NFEX1302X.DWG °°W"� °�
a BANK PARCEL aeos xmamo
P,.t,Y.y
s
SCALE: ShuhAm. Nw .: C-o 97713
y SAT¢: ' " =zoo• AS -BUILT REPORT "`°"` N° c-o�s
04-27 -15 WAYNE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
MCADAMS `�' T�.e�.M��.�

Zee
CL
�� � � $ 5a y$y y[^ R $� �•�ici �` p9 "F., a_ �� 3�k_-r � � '7 a 4 �
xM�k��
,., . • as
� Alw
lip
z Oar
f
/ ee
U �
42i V W ri
/ �VC, N x 3'
� nrl ro
co
ILN

APPENDIX B
Existing Conditions Photographs
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel
As Built Report
Wayne County, North Carolina
EBX -13020
December 18, 2014
Existing Conditions (Photos taken October 4, 2011):
Existing Condition Photo 1: View from Arrington Bridge Road.
Existing Condition Photo 2: View from Arrington Bridge Road at ditch.

Existing Condition Photo 3: View from South John Street. The stream is located to the
left and the agricultural fteld is located to the right.
Existing Condition Photo 4: View from South John Street.

APPENDIX C
Vegetation Assessment Data
j Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

Table 1. Plant Species Summary
Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel
Neusc Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site
Phase I & Phase I Expansion
Wayne County, NC
AS BUILT: December 19, 2014 & March 18, 2015
EcoEngineering Project #: EBX -13020
Tet.11 Nenue Rinarian and Nntrient Offset Restoration Area =35 828 acres
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type*
Total Bare Root Species Planted
Betula ntgra
river birch
T
1,200
Ltnodendron lultpr%ra
tulip poplar
T
1,000
Platanus occtdentalty
sycamore
T
3,400
Quercuv alha
white oak
T
2,300
Quercus mtchauxit
swamp chestnut oak
T
3,200
Quercus ntgra
water oak
T
3,800
Quercas pagodafoho
cherry bark oak
T
4,600
uerr -u3 phellov
willow oak
T
4,600
Taxodium drsttchium
bald cypress
T
800
TOTAL NUMBER OF STEMS
24900
NUMBER OF STEMS PER ACRE
695
Notes*
T = denotes medium to large tree
Table 2A. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table - Phase I
Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel
Neuse Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site
Wayne County, NC
AS BUILT: December 19, 2014 & March 18, 2015
EcoEneineering Project #: EBX -13020
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation
Threshold
Met ?*
Tract Mean
1
Yes
100%
2
Yes
3
Yes
4
Yes
5
Yes
9
Yes
10
Yes
11
Yes
* Within Range of 436 to 691 ic(.oTding to the "Wayne county Development Alliance Bank Park - Bank Parcel Development
Package ", April 27, 2012

Table 2. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table - Phase I Expansion
Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel
Neuse Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site
Wayne County, NC
AS BUILT: December 19, 2014 & March 18, 2015
EcoEngineering Project #: EBX -13020
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation
Threshold
Met ?*
Tract Mean
6
Ye-
100%
7
Yes
8
Yes
* Within Range of 436 to 681 ac,u>rdtng to the "Wayne wunty Development Alliance bank Dark - bank Parcel Development
Package ", April 27, 2012

I able 3A. Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegatlon Plot - Phase I
Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel
Neuse Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site
Wayne County, NC
AS BUILT: December 19, 2014 & March 18, 2015
EcoEnguicerulg Project #. EBX -13020
Total \Luse. Riparian and Nutrient 0tket Restoration Aria = 33 519 aces
Table 3B. Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegation Plot - Phase I Expansion
Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel
Neuse Riparian Butler & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site
Wayne County, NC
AS BUILT December 19, 2014 & March 18, 2015
EcoEngmccring Protect # EBX -13020
Scicalific Name I Common Nami I Species I ypel VP -6 1 VP -7 f vP -8 J�JMJMJMJMWJ AS RUII T SLl11SfARY (Dec 2014 & Mar 2015)1
Quercus alha H hits oak I fee 4 1 4
Quer urs michauxu swamp a hi.sinut oak I ree 2 5 7
Quercris ni +ra water oak 1 roe 1 3 6 10
Quercus agodl faha ihery bark oak riee 1 4 5
Ourrruc Plrellm willow oak Tiee 17 6 6 -79
I otal Noose Repinan and Nntncmt 011xA Restoration Aeei - 3 979 acres
AS RL I LT ANN UAL MLANS
Scientific Name Common Name 19pmie, T) p.1
VI' -1 I VP -2 I VP -1 I NP-4 VP -5 VI' -9 P-01 NIP it AS RUIL r SUMMARY (Dec 2014 &Mar 2015)
Planted Stuns
Beudanigra
river birch
Tree
3
!
6
4
1
6
2
8
31
Lurudcnrlrunlydrpijera
tult poplar
Tru
2
1
3
1
2
1
2
12
Platanm uccrdentalts
s camori.
Ini
2
1
2
5
Quercus albri
white oak
rre,
'-
1
3
Quercits naehaum
swamp Lhixtnut oak
Im
3
J
3
5
16
Quercus ni •ra
wales oak
free
2
3
1
1
3
10
Quercus a od✓folia
c hirry bark oak
Iles
16
3
3
1
I I
3
4
3
44
hterC145 pliellov
willow Oak
Tree
Ill
11
7
5
1
2
4
40
laxodrumdrstrcluum
bald a press
Tree
3
5
8
Shin Coum lolal
14
21
21
21
24
20
19
19
169
Sue ul Vigetstion Not (Acres)
U 02
0 02
0 02
002
002
002
002
0 02
020
N tonbir ul lh frerenl Species
4
5
4
6
6
6
6
5
42
Stems Per Acre
971
850
850
850
971
1 809
769
761)
5
Total \Luse. Riparian and Nutrient 0tket Restoration Aria = 33 519 aces
Table 3B. Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegation Plot - Phase I Expansion
Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel
Neuse Riparian Butler & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site
Wayne County, NC
AS BUILT December 19, 2014 & March 18, 2015
EcoEngmccring Protect # EBX -13020
Scicalific Name I Common Nami I Species I ypel VP -6 1 VP -7 f vP -8 J�JMJMJMJMWJ AS RUII T SLl11SfARY (Dec 2014 & Mar 2015)1
Quercus alha H hits oak I fee 4 1 4
Quer urs michauxu swamp a hi.sinut oak I ree 2 5 7
Quercris ni +ra water oak 1 roe 1 3 6 10
Quercus agodl faha ihery bark oak riee 1 4 5
Ourrruc Plrellm willow oak Tiee 17 6 6 -79
I otal Noose Repinan and Nntncmt 011xA Restoration Aeei - 3 979 acres

APPENDIX D
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos — Phase l
ffim
L'AiJ,I
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel — Phase I
As Built Report
Wayne County, North Carolina
EBX -13020
December 18, 2014 & March 18, 2015
Vegetation Plot Photos:
Vegetation Plot 1: View facing 134 °SE, showing the Neuse River Riparian Buffer to the
left and Nutrient Offset Restoration area to the right.
Vegetation Plot 2: View facing 202 °S

Vegetation Plot 3: View facing 300 °NW
Vegetation Plot 4: View facing 44 °NE

Vegetation Plot 5: View facing 144 °SE
Vegetation Plot 9: View facing 334 °NW
Vegetation Plot 10: View facing 150 °SE

Vegetation Plot 11: View facing 220 °SW

APPENDIX E
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos -- Phase I Expansion
um
10 Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel — Phase I Expansion
As Built Report
Wayne County, North Carolina
EBX -13020
December 18, 2014 & March 18, 2015
Vegetation Plot Photos:
Vegetation Plot 6: View facing 212 °S
.i
Vegetation Plot 7: View facing 310 °NW

Vegetation Plot 8: View facing 30 °N

APPENDIX F
Vegetation Momtonng Data Sheets — Phasc I
I Lnvironmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

Site Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel - Phase 1
Page 1
Monitoring Year AS BUILT
Date 12/1812014
Area
Veg Plot No 1
X -axis
200°S
Plot Location
see sketch below
AS BUILT DATA
X
meter
Y
meter
ddh
millimeter
Height
centimeter
DBN
cm
V1 or
Notes
Map ID
Screnbfic Name
Common Name
Source
1
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
03
01
0 539
39
3
2
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
07
1 9
0 708
31
3
3
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
12
35
0 514
27
3
4
Betula ni ra
river birch
B 1
02
53
0 548
67
3
5
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
1 8
5 31
0 701
341
3
6
1 Betula ni ra
river birch
B
07
74
0 331
261
3
7
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
1 2
96
0 362
471
3
8
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
25
69
0 665
24
3
9
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
3
1 5
0 682
30
3
10
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
35
29
0 659
31
3
11
Quecus michauxn
swamp chestnut oak
B
1 43
45
0 705
37
3
12
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
5
61
0 474
28
3
13
Linodendron tuli ifera
tulip poplar
B
57
761
1 476
44
3
14
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
83
86
0 692
27
3
15
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
73
67
0 496
32
3
16
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
69
52
0 375
30
3
17
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
65
45
0 522
24
3
18
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
59
31
0 515
45
3
19
Quercu michauxu
swamp chestnut oak
B
54
1 7
0 374
24
3
20
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
83
1 5
0 496
261
3
21
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
88
26
0 349
34
3
22
Betula ni ra
river birch
B
92
46
0 856
48
1 3
23
Linodendron tuli ifera
tulip poplar
B
97
7
0 988
53
3
24
Quercu michauxn
swarrip chestnut oak
B
98
89
0 644
34
3
B = bare root
Note 1 Plot is located partially within the 50' Neuse River Buffer
xY y
ddch
x S John Road

Site Arrington Bndge Bank Parcel - Phase I
Page 2
Monitoring Year AS BUILT
Date 12/18/2014
Area
Veg Plot No I
X-axis 200*S
10
E
mmmmmmmmmm_
160
men
0
11
05
00 05
1345
X-AXIS

Site
Page
Monitoring Year
Date
Area
Veg Plot No
X -axis
Plot Location
Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel - Phase 1
1
AS BUILT
12/18/2014
2470y
see sketch below
AS BUILT DATA
X
meter
Y
meter
ddh
millimeter
I Height
centimeter
DSH
cm
Vigor
Notes
Map ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Source
1
Quecus michauxu
swamp chestnut oak
B
02
03
0 222
32
3
2
Quecus michauxu
swamp chestnut oak
B
02
22
023
28
3
3
Quecus michauxn
swamp chestnut oak
B
02
41
0 545
61
3
4
Quecus michauxn
swamp chestnut oak
B
02
62
0 522
54
3
5
Quecus michauxn
swamp chestnut oak
B
02
82
0 799
601
3
6
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
32
02
0 422
491
3
7
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
32
32
067
59
3
8
Quercus Phellos
willow oak
B
32
45
0 352
37
3
9
Quercus ni ra
water oak
B
32
67
0 364
43
3
10
Quercus rn ra
water oak
B
32
89
0 226
44
3
11
Betula nicira
river birch
B
6
03
0 507
66
3
12
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
6
16,
0 526
59
3
13
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
6
361
0 528
58
3
14
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
6
571
0 358
56
3
15
Quercus phellos
willow oak
8
6
78
0 344
53
3
16
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
6
97
0 357
59
3
17
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
87
18
0 481
58
3
18
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
87
37
048
49
3
19
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
87
64
0 488
56
3
20
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
8 7
1 7
0 36
1 64
3
211
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
871
91
03521
571
1 3
B = bare root
ditch
S John Road
x
Y
xy
ddch ,

Site Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel - Phase 1
Page 2
Monitoring Year AS BUILT
Date 12/1812014
Area
Veg Plot No 2
X-axis 2471W
10
05
00
mm
m
m-
=MID=
mr0q.=
NO
m
m
mmmmmm
mmmmmmOmm
�am
IfimmmmmmmemmIme
mmmmmmmm
=�
mmmmmEmEm
�01
me-m—mmmmmmmmm
mmmmmmlommmm
mmmlemmmommmm
05
5
X-AXIS

Site Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel - Phase 1
Page 1
Monitoring Year AS BUILT
Date 12/18/2014
Area
Vag Plot No 3
X -axis
345 °N
Plot Location
see sketch below
AS BUILT DATA
X
meter
Y
meter
ddh
millimeter
Height
centimeter
DBH
cm
Vigor
Notes
Map ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Source
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
05
03
0 305
47
3
2
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
25
03
0 579
53
3
3
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
45
03
0 619
54
3
4
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
1 66
03
0 411
33
3
5
Linodendron tuli ifera
tulip poplar
B
85
031
0 629
44
3
6
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
1 5
28
0 425
51
3
7
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
36
28
0 567
56
3
8
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
56
28
0 501
45
3
9
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
75
28
0 419
36
3
10
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
93
28
0 574
58
3
11
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
1 06
44
0 396
49
3
12
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
52,
44
0 423
62
3
13
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
26
57
0 415
57
3
14
Quercus phallos
willow oak
B
41
65
0 542
56
3
15
Betula ni ra
river birch
B
7
57
0 431
57
3
16
Betula ni ra
river birch
B
87
63
0 395
58
3
17
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
94
86
0 418
51
3
18
Betula ni ra
Inver birch
B
78
77
1 75
40
3
19
Betula ni ra
Inver birch
B
1 5
99
0 741
58
3
20
Betula ni ra
Inver birch
B
3 4
0 375
45
3
21
Betula ni ra
I nver birch
B
0 81
_23
8
0,557
50
3
B = bare root
— — — — .• — _. — — — Z- - --
oad
xy
S John Road

Site Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel - Phase 1
Page 2
Monitoring Year AS BUILT
Date 12/1812014
Area
Veg Plot No 3
X-axis 3450N
05
0,0
05
5
X-AXIS
lu
IDMmmmm
m
m
MO.
— —0
VA
mmMmmmmmm
no=
no===
no=
05
5
X-AXIS
lu

Site Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel - Phase 1
Page 1
Monitoring Year AS BUILT
Date 12/18/2014
Area
Veg Plot No 4
X -axis
890E
Plot Location
see sketch below
AS BUILT DATA
X
meter
Y
meter
ddh
millimeter
Height
centimeter
DBH
cm
Vi or
Notes
Map ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Source
1
Quercus ni ra
water oak
B
06
04
0 897
60
3
2
Quercus n3 ra
water oak
B
27
04
0 571
44
3
3
Quercus ni ra
water oak
B
47
04
0 575
38
3
4
Quercus hellos
willow oak
B 1
66
04
0 435
37
3
5
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
87
041
0 385
26
3
6
Lirodendron tuli ifera
tulip poplar
B
54
27
0 767
44
3
7
Betula rn ra
river birch
B
35
27
0 512
50
3
8
Betula rn ra
river birch
B
12
27
0 439
57
3
9
Betula nl ra
river birch
B
72
27
031
37
3
10
Lirodendron full ifera
tulip poplar
B
91
27
0 615
43
3
11
Quercus michauxu
swamp chestnut oak
B
83,
55
0 388
28
3
12
Betula ni ra
river birch
B
6
55
0 577
54
3
13
Quercus michauxu
swamp chestnut oak
B
1 42
55
0 319
30
3
14
Quercus michauxu
swamp chestnut oak
B
23
55
0 625
31
3
15
brodendron tub fera
tulip poplar
B
04
55
1 245
62
3
16
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
85
84
057
441
3
17
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
81
84
0 579
491
3
18
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
71
84
0 439
40
3
19
lQuercus phellos
willow oak
B
48
84
0265.
21
3
20
Quercus phellos
I willow oak
B
1 241
84
0 385
43
3
21
jQuercus phellos
1willow oak
B
1 011
84
0 445
33
1 3
B = bare root
Ddch
Y
xY x
S John Road
RadRo'd
-- — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- — ^ — — — — —

Site Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel Phase
nxwe »
Monitoring Year AS BUILT
oum 12/18m014
Area
mw Plot wv 4
. X-axis 891E
m
0
0.0
��D
mmmmmmmmmm
#
wou:16
"0
mmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmmmm
MMMMMMOMMMIM
mmmmmmmmmmi
mmmmmmm
mm
MMMMMMM'
mm
mmmmmmmmmm
mmalemalemme
mmm
on
x

Site Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel - Phase 1
Page 1
Montonng Year AS BUILT
Date 12/18/2014
Area
Vag Plot No 5
X -axis
182 °S
Plot Location
see sketch below
AS BUILT DATA
X
I Y
ddh
Height
DBH
Map ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Source
meter
meter
millimeter
centimeter
cm
Vi or
Notes
1
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
03
03
0 808
65
3
2
Quercu michauxu
swamp chestnut oak
B
24
03
0 765
57
3
3
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
44
03
0 615
56
3
4
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
1 63
03
0 376
37
3
5
Quercus Phellos
willow oak
B
85
0 31
0 596
63
3
6
Quercu michauxu
swamp chestnut oak
B
97
2
0 625
58
3
7
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
82
22
0 323
37
3
8
Lmodendron tuli ifera
tulip poplar
B
64
24
059
55
3
9
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
43
28
069
50
3
10
Quecus michauxu
swamp chestnut oak
B
22
27
0 618
53
3
11
Quecus michaux i
I
swamp chestnut oak
B
05,
33
0 642
66
3
12
Quecus michaux i
swamp chestnut oak
B
03
63,
0 258
281
3
13
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
8
16
59
0 395
31
3
14
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
29
53
0 288
28
3
15
Betula m ra
river birch
B
45
57
0 288
59
3
16
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
61
47
0146
23
3
17
Quercus ni ra
water oak
B
78
38
0 302
29
3
18
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
94
27
0 468
63
3
19
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
99
66
0 321
44
3
20
Quercus hellos
willow oak
B
81
69
0 477
58
3
21
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
66
75
0 596
59
3
22
Quercus pagodifblia
cherry bark oak
8
39
8
0 478
58
3
23
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
29
86
059
59
3
24
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
1 51
9
05961
31
1 3
B = bare root
Note 1 Plot is located partially within the 50' Neuse River Buffer
y
ditc
xy
x
`1

Site Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel - Phase I
Page 2
Monitoring Year AS BUILT
Date 12/18/2014
Area
Veg Plot No 5
X-axis 182*S
ILI
05
0,0 05
144SE
4
X-AXIS
0
�
0.
05
0,0 05
144SE
4
X-AXIS

Site Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel - Phase 1
Page 1
Monitoring Year AS BUILT
Date 3/18/2015
Area
Veg Plot No 9
X -axis
28oN
Plot Location
see sketch below
AS BUILT DATA
X
meter
Y
meter
ddh
millimeter
Height
centimeter
DBH
cm
Vi or
Notes
Map ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Source
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
06
06
778
60
3
2
Quercus alba
white oak
B
25
06
56
47
3
3
Taxodwm distichum
bald cypress
B
45
05
582
60
3
4
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
8
1 66
05
938
62
3
5
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
86
041
578
651
3
6
Betula ni ra
river birch
B
84
24
384
46
3
7
Betula m ra
river birch
B
66
2 3
405
49
3
8
Betula ni ra
river birch
B
49
2 5
579
62
3
9
Platanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
26
30
1266
45
3
10
Quercus paclodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
1 0
36
428
23
3
11
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
B
19,
66
588,
56
3
12
Quercus albs
white oak
B
36
55
551
62
3
13
Linodendron tul fera
tulip poplar
B
52
53
302
23
3
14
Betula ni ra
river birch
B
69
46
288
37
3
15
Quercus m ra
water oak
B
96
99
895
59
3
16
Platanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
72
99
626
47
3
17
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
1 55
991
618
46
3
18
Linodendron tul fera
Itulip poplar
B
4 31
991
5 911
49
-01
3
19
Betula rn ra
Inver birch
B
241
991
4 39
3
20
Betula m ra
I river birch
B
1 091
1001
3951
581
3
B = bare root
i
r
i
i
r
Ditc !

Site Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel Phase 1
Page x
Monitoring Year AoBUILT
Date 3118/2015
Area
Vag Plot wv o
X-axis 281N
mv
vo
| «o
'
m
/ e
|
i�
� m
*»
�o
m
19
18
/ m
�
/ uo �_—_�-----
| oo zo
m 30 40 m 60 m oo ou mo

Site Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel - Phase 1
Page 1
Monitoring Year AS BUILT
Date 3/18/2015
Area
Veg Plot No
X -axis
Plot Location
In
19405
see sketch below
AS BUILT DATA
X
mater
Y
meter
ddh
millimeter
Height
centimeter
DBH
cm
Vigor
Notes
Map ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Source
1
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
B
05
04
505
53
3
2
Quercus Phellos
willow oak
B
22
06
425
53
3
3
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
B
45
04
560
60
3
4
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
B
1 70
06
752
59
3
5
Quercus ni ra
water oak
B
93
061
585
481
3
6
Betula ni ra
river birch
B
91
31
582
42
3
7
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
70
30
423
36
3
8
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
B
49
30
958
60
3
9
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
B
26
29
418
55
3
10
Quercus nl ra
water oak
B
07
26
598
54
3
11
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
08
51
442
60
3
12
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
1 30
521
613
59
3
13
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
49
561
115
23
3
14
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
67
58
750
60
3
15
Quercus ni ra
water oak
B
89
61
305
58
3
16
Betula ni ra
river birch
B
97
81
889
60
3
17
Linodendron tul ifera
tulip poplar
B
77
81
438
27
3
18
Quercus phellos
willow oak
IB
60
81
61
65
3
19
Platanus occidentalis
s camore
16
1 451
81
16921
47
3
20
Quercus albs
1white oak
1B
1 181
80
7811
54
3
Conserv;
B = bare root
r
1
1
t
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
r
1
Ditch

Site Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel - Phase 1
Page 2
Monitoring Year AS BUILT
Date 3/18/2015
Area
Veg Plot No 10
X-axis 194'S
F---10 _0
90
so
70
60
SO
40
30
20
10
00
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
X-AXIS
19 18 r 17 T 16
15
T
8
7
00
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
X-AXIS

Site Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel - Phase 1
Page 1
Monitoring Year AS BUILT
Date 3/18/2015
Area
Veg Plot No
X -axis
Plot Location
III
Y80'yy
see sketch below
AS BUILT DATA
X
Y
ddh
Height
DBH
Map ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Source
meter
meter
millimeter
centimeter
cm
Vigor
Notes
1
Linodendron tul ifera
tulip poplar
B
06
04
1055
55
3
2
Betula m ra
river birch
B
27
02
591
62
3
3
Betula m ra
river birch
B
46
02
782
60
3
4
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
67
02
585
59
3
5
Betula m ra
river birch
B
86
02
561
61
3
6
Quercus phallos
willow oak
B
14
33
261
31
3
7
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
32
30
440
47
3
8
Quercus pagodiibla
cherry bark oak
B
50
27
582
52
3
9
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
67
26
257
32
3
10
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
86
18
252
26
3
11
Betula ni ra
river birch
B
89
51
401
50
3
12
Betula ni ra
river birch
8
69
51
266
51
3
13
Platanus occrdentalis
sycamore
B
54
56
613
52
3
14
Betula ni ra
river birch
B
31
57
395
53
3
15
Platanus occrdentalis
sycamore
B
14
59
885
47
3
16
Lmodeadron tulpfera
tulip poplar
8
12
88
275
25
3
17
Betula ni ra
river birch
B
31
87
273
58
3
18
Betula ni ra
river birch
B
43
8 6
6 35
61
3
19
Quercus a odifoha
cher bark oak
B
64
85
4321
33
3
20
B
97
83
608
70
3
B = bare root
x �C.n.e,.t,,n
X, y
y
Ditch
--- --- ---r°----------------------------------------------------------------------
r
Ditch

Site Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel - Phase 1
Page 2
Monitoring Year AS BUILT
Date 3/18/2015
Area
Veg Plot No 11
X-axis 2801W
100
90
80
70
60
LA
so
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
X-AXIS
6_ 17 18
0
is
U4
6 7
8
@3
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
X-AXIS

APPENDIX G
Vegetation Monitoring Data Sheets — Phase I Expansion
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

Site Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel - Phase 1 Expansion
Page 1
Monitoring Year AS BUILT
Date 12/18/2014
Area
Veg Plot No 6
X -axis
258 °S
Plot Location
see sketch below
AS BUILT DATA
X
meter
Y
meter
ddh
millimeter
I Height
centimeter
DBH
cm
Vi or
Notes
Map ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Source
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
04
04
0 294
32
3
2
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
B
08
38
0 505
34
3
3
Quercus michauxn
swamp chestnut oak
B
1
66
0 406
36
3
4
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
1 07
92
032
42
3
5
Quercus Phellos
willow oak
B
21
75
0 446
61
3
6
Quercus rn ra
water oak
B
23
49
064,
35
3
7
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
2
1 8
0 445
47
3
8
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
38
29
0 469
59
3
9
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
4
56
0 477
30
3
10
Quercus hellos
willow oak
B
4
82
0 317
41
3
11
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
55
99
0 585
54
3
12
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
54
66
0 622
36
3
13
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
56
46,
0 459
59
3
14
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
53
07
062
30
3
15
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
69
21
0 614
41
1 3
16
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
77
55
0.274
28
3
17
Quercus Phellos
willow oak
B
71
79
047
29
3
18
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
92
7
0 327
49
3
19
Quercus phellos
1willow oak
B
99,
45
0 592
34
3
20
Quercus phellos
1willow oak
B
1 851
32
061
33
3
is = bare root
Note 1 Plot is located partially within the 50' Neuse River Buffer
– -----
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – ` – –
� Tree hne
y
Dttc I —
xy
� Fence
I
x
Conservation Easement

Site Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel - Phase I Expansion
Page 2
Monitonng Year AS BUILT
Date 12118Y2014
Area
Veg Plot No 6
X-axis 2581S
01
0,0
212So
05
5
X-AXIS
="-D-'
mmmm
mme-mmmm
j
mm-mallmmmemimmm
mwm-Mm
M-Mmmm
mmmmmmmmmm
05
5
X-AXIS

Site Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel - Phase 1 Expansion
Page 1
Monitoring Year AS BUILT
Date 3/18t2015
Area
Veg Plot No
X -axis
Plot Location
2 °N
see sketch below
AS BUILT DATA
X I
meter
Y
meter
ddh I
millimeter
Hei ht
centimeter
DBH
cm
Vi or
Notes
Map ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Source
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
05
06
751
51
3
2
Quercus Phellos
willow oak
B
34
1 2
451
48
3
3
Quercus Phellos
willow oak
B
48
03
583
56
3
4
Quercus Phellos
willow oak
B
65
1 3
430
53
3
5
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
B
81
021
456
511
3
6
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
B
96
1 8
306
481
3
7
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
50
27
312
471
3
8
Quercus Phellos
willow oak
B
20
20
446
46
3
9
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
02
38
421
60
3
10
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
B
25
55
748
30
3
11
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
B
67
49
585
47
3
12
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
B
99
46
746
47
3
13
Quercus alba
white oak
B
881
64
457,
29
3
14
Quercus aiba
white oak
B
551
63
430
321
3
15
Quercus aiba
white oak
B
39
78
433
31
3
16
Quercus aiba
white oak
a
07
68
811
42
3
17
Quercus m ra
water oak
B
27
93
622
33
3
18
Quercus m re
water oak
B
57
99
771
36
3
19
Quercus ni ra
Iwateroak
B
73
81
750
34
3
B = bare root
I
I �
Conservation Easement 1
I I 1
� 1
I
i
Y, ` 1
i `
i
I Zone
Zone g__ Channel
�' Zone C

Site Amogtvonuoaoa"parco Phase IExpansion
Page u
Monitoring Year AS BUILT
oum 3/18m015
Area
wm Plot wn r
xaxm x^w
! u/o
|
i
�
oo
oo
| m
'
|
! oo
/
| � so
�
/
|
. m
m
/ m
|
'
/
� m
�
!
| ""
�
— '
10
2 m m so oo m xn on 10
i 18
— '
10
2 m m so oo m xn on 10

Site Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel - Phase 1 Expansion
Page 1
Monitoring Year AS BUILT
Date 3/18/2015
Area
Veg Plot No 8
X -axis
76 °NE
Plot Location
see sketch below
AS BUILT DATA
X
I Y
ddh
Height
DBH
Map ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Source
meterl
meter
millimeter
centimeter
cm
Vi or
Notes
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
07
05
586
61
3
2
Quercus ni ra
water oak
B
07
26
443
49
3
3
Quercus ni ra
water oak
B
07
44
434
21
3
4
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
1 07
64
605
45
3
5
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
07
83,
594
70
3
6
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
33
95
305
19
3
7
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
30
71
313
59
3
8
Quercus ni ra
water oak
B
30
51
318
52
3
9
Quercus alba
white oak
B
30
31
467
50
3
10
Quercus alba
white oak
B
33
1 0
448
50
3
11
Quercus alba
white oak
B
63
1 5
434
49
3
12
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
63
31
431
41
3
13
Quercus ni ra
water oak
B
63
50
768
61
3
14
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
58
68
455
29
3
15
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
61
88
469
57
3
16
Quercus pagodifolia
cherry bark oak
B
89
92
446
59
3
17
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
87
74
563
46
3
18
Quercus ni ra
water oak
B
90
61
46
45
3
19
Quercus ni ra
Iwater oak
1B
1 95
48
464
391
3
20
Quercus alba
white oak
B
1 99
241
606
551
3
B = bare root
t
1
L
1
t
l
Channel ,
t
� x
1
1
Tree line
Easement

Site Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel Phase 1Expansion
pno* x
Monitoring Year AS BUILT
Date 3118/2015
Area
voo Plot wo o
X-axis 761ws
loo
70 7
x 50 13
30 9
10 10
zz
��D

APPENDIX H
Photo Stations — Phase I
A— I
Environmental Banc, & Exchange, LLC

Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel — Phase I
As Built Report
Wayne County, North Carolina
EBX -1 3020
December 18, 2014
Photo Station Photos:
Photo Station l: View facing 260 °W, showing the Neuse River Riparian Buffer to the
right and Nutrient Offset Restoration area to the left.
Photo Station 2: View facing 234 °SW

Photo Station 2: View facing 300 °NW
Photo Station 3: View [acing 301 °NW

Photo Station 4: View facing 288 °W
Photo Station 4: View facing 94 °E

Photo Station 5: View facing 88 °E
Photo Station b: View facing 178 °S

Photo Station 6: View facing 10 °N

APPENDIX [
Photo Stations — Phase I Expansion
RM
I# Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel — Phase i Expansion
As Built Report
Wayne County, North Carolina
EBX -13020
December 18, 2014
Photo Station Photos:
Photo Station 7: View facing 50 °NE, showing the Neuse River Riparian Buffer to the
right and Nutrient Offset Restoration area to the left.
Photo Station 7: View facing 152 °SE, showing the Neuse River Riparian Buffer to the
left and Nutrient Offset Restoration area to the right.

Photo Station 7: View facing 216 °SW, showing the Nutrient Offset Restoration area.

APPENDIX J
Correspondence
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Programs
Pat McCrory Thomas A Reeder John E Skvarla, III
Governor Director Secretary
August 9, 2013
MEMORANDUM
To- N C. Ecosystem Enhancement Program
prom. Tom Reeder
Subject DWR responses to the EEP document "Refoi ins needed nnniedhately to the regulation
of i iparian huffer mitigation"
On August 2, 2013, the Division of Water Resources (DWR) received a document from the N C
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) titled "Reforms needed imniedtatelr in the regulation of
riparian buffer mitigation" Below is a short summary of each point raised in the document and
DWR's response to those points
1. Riparian Buffer Mitigation Widths — the Ironclad 50' Standard
There are two issues raised under this section (a) provide mitigation credit for buffers wider than
50 feet and (b) provide mitigation credit for buffers narrower than 50 feet
Response:
(a) DWR will approve mitigation credit for butler widths in excess of 50 feet on a prorated
basis, up to a maximum of 200 feet, including on pre - existing mitigation sites
Buffer wid£h (#t)
Percentage.of full Credit' `
50 -100
300%
101 -200
25% for area > 100 feet
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 1617
Location 512 N Salisbury St Ralegh North Carolina 27604
Phone [phone] t FAX [phone]
Internet wwwnmaterquairtyorg
M Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

Example for restoration of a 1,000 linear foot stream segmcnt:
50' m WM-Arn
required 100
FULL CREDIT FOR
Stroam A So' JWMR
1.000 LF
A, ra - 50,000 f1
C, - 50.000 "I
100'
F-I!, c 8,011 FOR
A I,In @UFFfR
25 " FULL CREDIT FOR
AODITIONAL BUFFER
BEYOND 100
Area - 100.00011
[rrdil = lS�OVl1 W FO ScAej
*vId / reaY� 1!S o0f1I1=
(b) DWR agrees that mitigation credit should be granted for restored buffer widths less than
50 feet, however this would require a rule change. The draft consolidated buffer
mitigation rule (15A NCAC 02B .0295) already has provisions for narrower buffers in
urban areas and DWR supports expanding this to non -urban areas.
11. Riparian Buffer Jurisdiction — Man Jurisdiction.
There are two issues raised under this section: (a) the ability to conduct restoration or
enhancement on unmapped streams and (b) the ability to conduct restoration or enhancement on
all watercourses, including ditches.
Response for the Neuse, Tar - Pamlico, Catawba and Jordan:
Under the current buffer mitigation rules, applicants may "restore or enhance a non - forested
riparian buffer..." A riparian buffer is defined within each of the buffer rules. Each rule has
an applicability paragraph that defines where the rule shall apply (e.g. in the Neuse "This
Rule shall apply to SO foot wide riparian buffers directly adjacent to surface waters in the
Neuse River Basin (intermittent streams, perennial streams, lakes, ponds, and estuaries),
excluding wetlands.") The rule goes on further to clarify that a subject feature must be
depicted on either the USGS topo map or the NRCS soil survey and defines the Zones of the
riparian buffer.

To allow buffer mitigation to occur on non - subject features requires a rule change DWR
does support buffer mitigation on unmapped streams, and the draft consolidated buffer
mitigation rule (15A NCAC 02B 0295) aheady has language to allow for this
Response for Randleman:
Under the current Randleman buffer mitigation rules, applicants may "restore or enhance a
non - forested riparian buffet " A rtpaltan buffer is defined within the Randleman rules to
include unmapped features, as well as ditches or manmade conveyances that "delrvet
untreated stormwater runoff from an adjacent source directly to an intermittent or perennial
stream are subject to the Rule "
DWR will continue to allow buffer mitigation to occur an the Randleman watershed on
unmapped features as well as ditches or manmade conveyances that meet the rule
Response for Goose Creek:
Under the current Goose Creek buffer mitigation rules, unmapped streams may be used to
provide buffer mitigation, as well as first order ephemeral streams that discharge /outlet into
intermittent or perennial streams
111. Riparian Buffer Jurisdiction — Stream Calls on Mapped Streams
The issues raised under this section focus on the requirement to have a stream determination
made by DWR staff More specifically, there is a concern that the stream method is not
appropriate for modified natural streams that may be severely degraded and that these streams
are not eligible for mitigation
Response:
• DWR will allow all subject streams to be eligible for riparian buffer mitigation
IV. Restoration Success Criteria — Native Hardwood Trees
The issues raised under this section focus on the requirement to plant a minimum of at least two
native hardwood tree species and the current DWR practice of not allowing Sweet Gum or Red
Maple to be counted towards meeting this requirement
Response:
• DWR agrees that as written, the use of Sweet Gum and Red Maple counts towards
meeting the minimum requirement of the rule Mitigation providers wall be expected to
meet planting criteria established by the IRT an butter areas that are part of a stream
mitigation site

V. Restoration Success Criteria — Planted Stems
The issues raised under this section focus on the requirement to plant 320 trees per acre and the
statement that DWR does not count trees derived from existing seed sources, planted seeds,
stump sprouts or other volunteer species towards meeting that 320 requirement
Response:
• DWR agrees that using 260 stems per acre at the end of the monitoring period would
provide more consistency with the federal performance standards for stream and wetland
projects, however this would require a rule change The draft consolidated buffer
mitigation rule (15A NCAC 02B 0295) has already incorporated this change
DWR staff will continue to consider the presence of woody volunteers during closeout of
buffer sites
VI. Restoration and Enhancement Criteria — Measuring Density
The issues raised under this section focus on tree density for determining restoration or
enhancement More specifically, the issues include the inconsistency among rules, the lack of
clarity on how to measure density which has resulted in inconsistent calls among DWR staff, and
the use of a tree's dnphne.
Response:
• DWR agrees that the inconsistency among rules has created confusion and inconsistency
in implementation, however this would require a rule change to be consistent among all
six rules The draft consolidated buffer mitigation rule (15A NCAC 02B 0295) has
definitions for restoration, enhancement and preservation, which were written to provide
clarity and predictability while still allowing DWR staff to use best professional
judgment in evaluating potential mitigation saes based on their many years of experience
In the Jordan and Randleman watersheds, the rules allow for restoration on sites with
fewer than 100 trees /acre and enhancement on sites with between 100 and 200 trees In
these two watersheds, DWR will accept established forestry protocols (e g fixed radius
plot sampling) to be used to determine existing tree densities in any non - forested buffer
area Sufficient numbers of plots should be used to accurately assess stem densities and
delineate areas of the site with varying densities Plot data should not be averaged to
determine an overall stem density unless the site is fairly homogeneous in terms of
vegetative coverage Existing forested areas should be delineated out and not included in
stem density calculations DWR has not considered the drip line to represent the outer
edge of a wooded area for several years and will not consider it in the future Existing
wooded areas should be delineated at the trunks of the outer edge of the areas

Buchholz, George
From: Merritt, Katie <katie merritt@ncdenr gov>
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 3 34 PM
To: Buchholz, George
Subject: FW Arrington Bridge I Credit Release
Please attach to AsBuilt
From: Merritt, Katie
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 11.18 AM
To: 'Cara Conder'
Cc: Norton Webster, Ely Perry - Forward Record, Matt Fisher
Subject: RE- Arrington Bridge I Credit Release
Hi Cara,
All sounds good I will work on the revised credit release letter today. And yes, it is okay to comply with the DWR memo
dated August 9, 2013 to extend the buffer widths out to 100 feet for this project Any changes to the project from what
was approved in the BPDP, can be provided in the As -Built report and survey
Thanks
Katie
From: Cara Conder [madto [e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 11 14 AM
To: Merritt, Katie
Cc: Norton Webster; Ely Perry - Forward Record, Matt Fisher
Subject: Arrington Bridge I Credit Release
Kate,
On September 2, 2014 we requested the first credit release for Arrington Bridge Phase I and I also emailed a preliminary
plat with 100 foot buffers The release we received on September 4, 2014 was based on the plat that has 100 ft buffer
After our discussion today, instead of sending in a formal request for those buffer credits we received, we would prefer
to have the credit release revised based on the BPDP amounts as you said it should have been The BPDP amounts were
102 acres of buffer and 3157 acres of nutrient vs the preliminary plat with the 100 ft buffer that had credit calculations
of 197 acres of buffer and 31 559 acres of nutrient
We would like to use the DWR memorandum dated August 9, 2013 to request the buffer credits from 50 -100ft when the
as -built survey is complete Please let us know if this will be ok
Thanks,
Ca ra
Cara Conder
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
909 Capability Dnve, Suite 3100
Raleigh, NC 27606
dir 919 -829 -9909 x 21
cell 919- 608 -5876
fax 919 - 829 -9913

www ebxusa com

Buchholz, George
From: Merritt, Katie <katie merritt @ncdenr gov>
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 3 35 PM
To: Buchholz, George
Subject: FW Arrington Bridge Phase I - addt'I areas proposed
Attachments: Nutrient Offset Restoration Area pdf, SKM_C224e14101514430 pdf
Please attach to the AsBuiit
From: Merritt, Katie
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 2 51 PM
To: Norton Webster
Subject: Arrington Bridge Phase I - addt`I areas proposed
Norton,
You have notified me that EBX would like to add an additional 5 acres (approx 4) of mitigation (buffer and nutrient) to
the existing Phase I site of Arrington Bridge The BPDP for Phase I was approved on July 19, 2012, which also included a
mitigation plan for Phase II During the site visit we performed on October 14, 2014, it was determined that the feature
being proposed for buffer restoration and nutrient offset on this additional area, is a downstream segment of the
intermittent stream located on the Arrington Bridge Phase I site Stormwater runoff from the upstream segment flows
towards this downstream segment through a culvert under Arrington Bridge Road Since the stream being proposed is
the same stream that has already been approved for buffer mitigation on Phase I, DWR is okay with allowing this 5
additional acres to be added as an "Addendum" to the existing Phase I bank However, a survey will be required to
determine the exact area of the mitigation
Additionally, after seeing the site yesterday, it is determined that the proposed nutrient offset area tin yellow on the
attached figure) is not land currently in agriculture It is actually a grassed yard /open space Therefore, this side of the
stream cannot be used to generate nutrient offset mitigation, only buffer mitigation Nutrient offset is generated from
converting a nutrient loading activity into nutrient reduction, such as converting agricultural land into a forested buffer
The approved BPDP does not include /allow buffer mitigation beyond 50 feet Please make sure that the figures and
accounting of credits complies with the rules in place at the time the Phase I BPDP was approved in July 2012
Please provide the following in an "Addendum to Arrington Bridge Phase I BPDP (previously known as Wayne County
Development Alliance)" for review and approval into the existing Arrington Bridge Phase I Mitigation Bank
• General Description of the additional area, location, existing use, etc
• A revised aerial showing the separate mitigation assets & new easement boundaries of Phase I (similar to the
figure_ attached to this email titled Nutrient Offset Restoration Area, which was submitted with the original
BPDP )
- - - -- - • A new topo map showing the entire Phase I site
• Planting Plan (if different than the one approved in the BPDP, or if the same, note that the same plan will be
used for this area as approved in the BPDP on July 19, 2012)
• Signed Survey
• Conservation Easement
• Construction Bond (if needed)
Please let me know if there are any other questions
Thanks,

Katie
Katie Merritt
Nutrient Offset & Buffer Banking Coordinator
NCDENR- Division of Water Resources
Work 919- 807 -6371
Website http / /portal ncdenr org /web /wq /401bufferpermittine
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation.
APlease consider the environment before printing this email

FIGURE 1 - PROPOSED RIPARIAN BUFFER
8 NUTRIENT OFFSET RESTORATION AREA EcoEnglneering
0 250 500 1,000 DEJ Feet
A division of "The John R McAdam, Company, Inc.
i inch -- 500 feet

Legend Arrington Bridge I Extension
9 _f:J-f t0oft Buffer 0 175 350 700 1,050 1,400
Nutrient Buffer 1 Feet