20071780 Ver 1_401 Application_20071007

BRIY`GMAN COMPANY
1 N C O R P O R A T E D
i~~19f1~. 1 1 ~ ~ 1i7u 1721
October 12, 2007
Ms. Cindi Karoly
NC DENR
401 Oversight Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604-226
RE: Monogram Creek (Proposed SID)
Brunswick County, North Carolina
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Action ID SAW-2007-2236
Nationwide Permit #29 Authorization
Dear Ms. Karoly:
07-780
On behalf of our client, Stello Developers, LLC we are pleased to submit the
attached Pre-Construction Notification Application and supporting documentation
to secure 401 water quality certification for the unavoidable impacts to wetland
resources occurring onsite.
To facilitate your review/approval of this request, we have also enclosed the
$200 application fee and a copy of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 404 permit.
Should you have any questions or require additional information to facilitate this
request, please advise.
Sincerely,
dom. ~. ~~' -
Joseph C. Floyd
Project Manager
`~
~, ~~
~?~N~.W-+T~ ~aa Ea~~'~CH
M:WOBS\2007\00256-07101\Agency Corespond\Cindi Karoly.doc y,~t,AN4~~'~~S
WWW.T~7EbRIf~MANCOMPANy.COM
P.O. Box 7 532 CoNway, SC 29528 [phone] FAX [phone]

f~
Office Use Only' Fonn Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. ~ ~ 7 ~ 7 $ ~
(if any particular Item is not appncao,e w uii~ j~,v~c~~, yi~.uo~. ~.ii~.,. .......yt,..----,-
I. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
^ 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 29
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), ch ~~ ~~~ {~; r;'
~t
~ -~
II. Applicant Information
OAT i $ ZOOI
Owner/Applicant Information DENR - YVA7FR (~UALVIY"
yVETtAtd0.?:4~^!D StC!tP;~vR~R 9RMlCH
Name: Steno Develo ers LLC
Mailing Address: P O Box 7014 Wilmington NC 28406
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: X843) 280-5870
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Joe Flo d
Company Affiliation: The Bri~man Com~any
Mailing Address: P O Box 1532 Conway SC 29528
Telephone Number: (843248-9388 Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: Tfloyd cr thebrigmancompany-com -
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 12

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Mono ram Creek S/D
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 21400012 (13 15 16 20)
4. Location
County: Brunswick County Nearest Town: Shallotte
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Monogram Creek 201ots
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From the site you travel
southeast on Fletcher Hewett Road to reach Shell Point Road (S R 1132). Heading northeast
on Shell Point Road will take yo to HoldenBeachRoad.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 33.94213 °N 78.35841 °W
6. Property size (acres): 7.61
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Shallotte River
8. River Basin:
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o enr state.nc.us/adminlm~ps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Undeveloped Woodlands (See Attached Representative
Photo rahs
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 12

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
pioiect foal is to create a well desi¢ned economically viable safe residential community.
Excavators dum trucks and dozers will be used
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: To build a well designed economically viable,
safe residential community
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. None. Undevelo ed Woodlands.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future ro~ect Tans
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and peremzial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Proposed impacts include 2
road crossings The first is less than 1/100 of an acre and the second road crossing is 0.079
Acres. Road Crossin 2 will utilize culverts.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 12

2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
-,-- u..4 : ,.+,. ,7,,,, +,. 1.,.+1, mot,-,,.,+,,,•n •anrl flnnrlina

Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)

Type of Impact T e of Wetland
Yp
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
1 Road crossing/Fill PFolc 921 .008
2 Road crossing/Fill PFolc 1000 .079

Total Wetland Impact (acres) •087
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.64
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
~,_ _ _,__a_a T~ „t,.,,i,.+„ „ ,,,,,1+;,,1.T 1P„Rth X .x~;rlth then divide by 43.560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact Peremlial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before fin act Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage)
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
r-n .7..,..7 ._:... ,. ~41 .....7;, .-1,• ,ten rtn hnllrh PAf1C PtC
1111, lJn~
Open Water Impact

Site Nwnber
(indicate on ma) uvca~ivaa, uavubaa.t„ i... ..

Name of Waterbody
if a hcable
( pp ) »..-D, ~'-___--~_, - ---_-

T e of Im act
Yp p
Type of Waterbody
lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
(
ocean, etc.)
Area of
Impact
acres
( )

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 12

6
List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres):
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.087
Open Water Impact (acres):
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond:
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant inay attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts Impacts have been desi ng ated
onlywhere necessary for a road Since the wetland crosses the full length of the property it is
unavoidable to ii~act it with less than one road crossin¢ Aside from the one mam road crossm~
the only other impact which is also a road is less than one hundredth of an acre.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 12

USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Pe>7nits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina (see DWQ website for most current
version.).
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A -Proposed wetland impacts < 10 Acres
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at htt~: ~~~~~~~~~~~.1.cce~l~~t'h~l~c.~'inli~~ucLlllec.lltm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed,
please check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 10 of 12

IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an envirommental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
2
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No ^
If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.

Zone*
Impact
Multiplier Re wired
Mitq ation
(s ware feet)
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet fi•om the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 11 of 12

XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No ^
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http:;/h2o.el~r.state.nc.uslnc~~~etlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
l: ~ ~J
pplicant/Agent's S' ature Date
(Age is signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 12 of 12

Rest Bug"
17
~~
~rf~~erg ~d ~~t
'S~-
~~ _ 5~.
~,
~ 17B
~7 Shallotte
~'`' -.
u~ _ -
y~ ~ ,
`fi .~ ~_~titude: 33.94213 ~!
~~ f P1 ~~ n 7 7 1,
~_ongitude; .. ; ~ ya ..~~ .
~ Y' ~
17 9 ~~ ~, '.~~
:. ~' _' --
~ \~
.~
~ ~ _
--
': II _. ~, ~ ~_
r i
- -_ ~ ~ ~,
~ 1 ~ ~ ~~
._
i
;; . T
,;
~•. _ __. , ~ ~ ~ r i
-- - - -
, ~~ r
~ ,~d ~ ~~
,~
-: ,~-~_ugcyriu:• ~~9h ~~Monogr~m _ ~~~
~ ?tn~t _r~~ 7t4~ Q
9 ar ~,
~~~ f p
T ,;
,.. ,..
,,
.__
FC' i_trr - _ _
~_CtTir_trr•~, Sf~-1 t4$ ~•
+n _ ~
n b
~ Q
~ ~ ~::
- _~
~ ,.i s..-
~' ~
~7 ~'l
Souse: ESI~ 2005 ~~
Monogram Creels S/D PROPOSED ACTIVITY: Residential
Neighborhood and Regional
BRUNSWICK COUNTY ~ Roadway
Date:5-18-07
APPLICANT:Stello Developers, LLC
Date Revised: FicuRE
SCALE IN FEET
Application No. ~ 300°~ °~ 3°°°•

... _
- !ti; ,_
_Iti h~} _~ J...
1. L
L ~Y- •. L ~! d
i•i 1 ••~ e
_ .t' f r~ s. - '' ~ r+.r ~.! _~ ti- _ 5t+iy+3r'.'~-+~-~~h_".y~ ~r"`"T ~"T4..+r..~
1 -I ~
I I ~ ~. * ~•. ~ `. 1~7 ti~~r~:C-. - ~. 1~ : _ n" ~~ • `r 14 LT~p n f ~+•.
~` ~L~. ~ •_ I yltiky~ it t~ti •`^A ..,~.•'.t,~t "3. _ ~ ~
_ f ~~'~'~ ~ ~ ~ I ,jai ~. ~, '~, :~
•, ~~~I •f' 1 1 ",~' ~ "~1 -'w ~ ~1 1'y.a_~ 1 '"`'y, Mrp ~.~ 'Lr_ ~.
~~,~ ~ ~ I
- - r¢,~.~'l P ~ ~ • it _ i ~ .~,"F•~` 1`M'' .~ L~~r+'1'~'
~ ~ •:r `f'ir ~~-~ •~ • t ~ -k ~ i
it ~ :~ .n ~~,..''~r.
• , -4
. ~ - ~~ Yi is '
Y ~' ~1..~~~71~ri ~1iA' y~'J~~ • ~,j. _ ~ -,~.-n,,,rr• ~ -~......1~ ~Ir ...,.r 1
M _-i---..- I r
r ~ ~
~souce: Brunswick County Soil Suryw~p I~X''-~ ' - ~ - I ;fi^~._ ~'`~'~`
Monogram Creelc S/D
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
Date:5-18-07
Date Revised:
Application No.
PROPOSED ACTIVITY: Residential
Neighborhood and Regional
~ Roadway
APPLICANT:Stello Developers, LLC
FIGURE SCALE IN FEET
2 660' 0' 660'

s Wit.
XIL
I '.v
Lo
Souce: USGS Quadrangle (Holden Beac
Monogram Creek S/D
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
Date:5-18-07
Date Revised:
Application No.
14,
K f -B
Fo Monogram
Ln
irm
Ma
PROPOSED ACTIVITY: Residential
Neighborhood and Regional
Roadway
APPLICANT: Stello Developers, LLC
FIGURE SCALE IN FEET
3 660' 0 660'

C
t
C
C
0
a
Z
TYPICAL ROAD CROSS-SECTION
N.T.S.
TYPICAL ROAD CROSS-SECTION
N.T.S.
Total Wetlands:
Total Wetland Impacts:
Wetlands to be Preserved:
Total Site Acreage:
e~~~
Monogram Creek S/D -_- hROhosE~ ACTIVITY: Residential
Neighborhood and Regional
BRUNSWICK COUNTY lv Roadway
Date:5-18-07 APPLICANT:Stello Developers, LLC
Date Revised: FicuRE SCALE IN FEET
Application No. q- 200' °~ z°°~

Job Number: 256-07101
Town/Village/City: Shell Point
Data Form Wetland Data Point: U-1
Routine Wetland Determination
Project/Site: Monogram Creek Subdivision (Prop.] Date:
Applicant/Owner: Stello Developers, LLC County: Brunswick
State: North Carolina
Investigator: JCF
----------------------....-.__----...-._. ~ --------
[True] Do normal circumstances exist on the site. ____...._..._.._.._._.-._.._..___---
----- -_----._-..------------._.___---
Community ID: Upland ....___.__.....
[False] Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situat ion)? Station ID: U
[False) Is the area a potential problem area?
Plot ID: 1
Vegetation
Common Name / CofC__
_.._______..._._....__.....__._._._.._____.%,Cover_-.
.Indicator ___-
_ _.
Dominant Species._____.___.._-.___...__
Herbaceous
X Pteridium aquilinum Fern, Bracken FACU
Shrub
X Cornus florida Dogwood, Flowering FACU
FAC
X Ilex vomitoria Yaupon
~
X Pinus taeda Pine,Loblolly FAC
FACU
X Quercus alba Oak,White FAC
X Quercus nigra Oak,Water
Red
Turtlehead OBL
X Chelone obliqua ,
Sweet Pignut
Hickory FACU
X Carya glabra ,
Vine
X Vitis rotundifolia.._._..._._...._ __._._.__.._-------....__.._._..
_______-_.-- _
._......_Grape_,_Muscadine .---..
.........._.__..__----_._.____....____......._---.....----.._.__.._
Cowardin Classification: Upland
FA _--._._.-
._-__-._.._.._
Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (except FAG) : 56
Remarks
Hydrology Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators

[ ]Recorded Data (describe in remarks)
G Inundated
( l
[ ]Saturated in upper 12 inches [ ]Oxidized root channels
Water-stained leaves
[ l
age
[ ]Stream, Lake, or Tide Water marks
( ] [ )Local soil survey data
[ ]Aerial Photograph
[ ]Other (describe in remarks)
[ ]Drift lines FAC-Neutral test
( ]
[ ]Other (explain in remarks)
[ ]Sediment deposits
Field Observations: ( ]Drainage patterns in wetlands
Depth of Surface Water(in.): NIA
Depth to Free Water in Pit(in.): 24
Depth to Saturated Soils(in.): 24
Remarks
No Evidence of past/present hydrology.
$OIIS
Depth Hor. Matrix Mottle / 2nd Mottle
ontras
e Texture,
_.-----_------.._.___...___.
etc_
Structure
..._.
___
(in.)__.._-._ Color ____._-___-- o or __ un_ anc __
..----...._...__
___
Fine Sand
0-4 A 10YR 4/1 Sand
4-9 E 10YR 7/1 Sand _
9-20 E B/H10YR 7/3
Hydric Soils Indicators
[ ] Histosol
[ ] Histic Epipedon
[ ] SulfidicOdor
[ ]Probable Aquatic Moist Regime
[ ]Reducing Conditions
[ ] Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Unit Name: Baymead (BaB)
Drainage Class: Well Drained
Remarks
Soil is non-hydric.
Wetland Determination
[False] Hydrophytic Vegetation Present
[False] Hydric Soils Present
[False] Wetland Hydrology Present
Remarks
Minimun wetland criteria is not satisfied.
[ ]Concretions
[ ]High Organic % in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
[ ]Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
[ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
[ ]Listed on National Hydric Soils List
[ ]Other (explain in remarks)
Taxonomy: Arenic Hapludults
[ ]Field Observations match map
[False] This Data Point is a Wetland

Job Number: 256-07101
Data Form Town/Village/City: Shell Point
o,...+:.,e ~AIn+I~nrll flsa4arminatic~n Wetland Data Point: W-1
ProjecUSite: Monogram Creek Subdivision (Prop.] Date: May 09, 2007
ApplicanUOwner: Stello Developers, LLC County: Brunswick
North Carolina
State:
Investigator: JCF
• ~
[True] Do normal circumstances exist on the site. ___ __ ___ ,
.
-
Community ID: PFO _ __ _
~
[False] Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation). Station ID: W
[False] Is the area a potential problem area? Plot ID: 1
Vegetation
Name / CofC
Common
_.....___._.._.____..___._.._....__..__~~ Cover ....
.Indicator __,_.._
Dominant _S ecies
p -- --_ _- - ----- ...._..__ _.. ._..____
_
.----__ - - ___
Herbaceous
X Woodwardia virginica
Chainfern,Virginia OBL

FACW-
X Arisaema triphyllum Jack-In-The-Pulpit,Swamp
r r
X Lyonia lucida
Fetter-Bush FACW
FACW
X Ilex glabra Ink-Berry
Lr~g
X Nyssa sylvatica
Tupelo,Swamp OBL
FAC
X Acerrubrum
i
i Maple,Red
Sweetbay
Magnolia FACW+
ana
n
X Magnolia virg ,
Red
Ba FACW
X Persea 6orbonia y,
Vine
__ X _________.Berchemia scandens_____...._______.__..._._...._.....____ Supple-Jack Alabama _______.__
Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (except FAG): 100 Cowa
Remarks
Hydrology
[ ]Recorded Data (describe in remarks)
[ ]Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
[ ]Aerial Photograph
[ ]Other (describe in remarks)
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water(in.): 0
Depth to Free Water in Pit(in.): 4
Depth to Saturated Soils(in.): 2
Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators
[ ]Inundated
[X] Saturated in upper 12 inches
[X] Water marks
[X] Drift lines
[X] Sediment deposits
[ ]Drainage patterns in wetlands
PFO1c
Secondary Hydrology Indicators
[ ]Oxidized root channels
[ ]Water-stained leaves
[ ]Local soil survey data
[ ] FAGNeutral test
[ ]Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks
No visual evidence of pasUpresent hydrology.
$OIIS
Depth Hor. Matrix Mottle / 2nd Mottle Texture,
_.
------------
(in) ____ Color ____._...._______. o or _ un _ance ontras __ Structure_.etc.
0-6 A 10YR 2/1 loam
0-10 A 10YR 4/1 Loamy Sand
Hydric Soils Indicators
[ ] Histosol
[X] Histic Epipedon
[X] Sulfidic Odor
[ ]Probable Aquatic Moist Regime
[X] Reducing Conditions
[X] Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Unit Name: Bohicket (Bo)
Drainage Class:
Remarks
Wetland Determination
[True] Hydrophytic Vegetation Present
[True] Hydric Soils Present
[True] Wetland Hydrology Present
Remarks
[ ]Concretions
[X] High Organic % in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
[X] Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
[X] Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
[X] Listed on National Hydric Soils List
[ ]Other (explain in remarks)
Taxonomy: Typic Sulfaquents
[ ]Field Observations match map
[True] This Data Point is a Wetland

Typical view of non-hydric soli proriie aL u~iaiiu ua~a Nviii~.

,~ .: .~ „ ~

/
~
}
~
,J
''~ s ! i+
~~
*~'r~~~
~~+ s~~ '~f~`~ ,
~ ` ~
~t
'
wl
~,.,~r h1
,,fir ~'
:
r,,,
t~
jjr~ q~ ~ ~ `,
~ ~
f
r :
~
~~ _.a
;
h t

'
~ -
~ ::
~
,
~ K ~' Y~ 1 ,., y~ ~ •.5 ~ '7;
`
"
"
"(
~
~ ~ , •
'
'
~fi ~~ ~. ~~
` rt ~~ +
w ~ f r
- `
0
,
.
~ {
yy~
'V'. ,.C il. ~ .,~r~Yk ~,b vi' }YY~~
~y. +T ~, \
P' ti.`~,~wr 3;. 1~.. v~'
'mw.y ~
~ .t ,~ 1 11
~ ,
1t4 ~ 71 ~,r `~'~
P~1~~'1.~,~~
i q 'd ~ i ~i ~ ,
Y t ~t ~
M,. y ~ V
'~ ~ ~ ~ .:
~~' ~
:~~ gy
` ,
~ ~,xs ~ ( c~.
y~
p
a
~
t
'~ f
3
~T~ _ ~ oho
~.~ ~ ~
a ,..
Y l ~.~
``}'LY ~ j n"

w^ _~,.

r ! T .~ ~ ~

y, /. l• ~ r F~

~ F Y l~''Ae, 'f Fy'~fjj',, rin i'S Y` ` ~ ..n.,y' \'`. .. I ..i t 4 ^ tip:

1
~
h
~ ij ~ j.
~~
~`Y
~
~ 1y
~~ !A'a ~' ~.7 I~T i ~~ y 5 ~
r
} J J.L.-. .~~
Typical view of hydric soli pronie aL weuai.u Ua~a N~~~ ~~•
Upper limits of wetland community occur r ~~ iy ~~ ~ ~~~~•