20230566 Ver 1_Deep River Kayak PJD Request_20230418

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID#: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Deep River Kayak Launch
2. Work Type: ❑Private ❑Institutional ✓❑Government ❑Commercial
3. Project Description/Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
Proposed kayak launch
4. Property Owner/Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A41: State of North Carolina
5. Agent/Consultant [PNC Form A5 —or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Walter Cole of S&ME, Inc.
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location—Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
35.63097, -79.11557 (7140 Moncure Pittsboro Road, Moncure, NC)
8. Project Location—Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B 1 a]: 370370011089
9. Project Location—County [PCN Form A2b]: Chatham County
10. Project Location—Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Moncure
11. Project Information—Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Deep River
12. Watershed/ 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]:03030003
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ✓❑ Section 10 and 404 ❑
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit ❑Pre-Application Request
Nationwide Permit# ❑Unauthorized Activity
Regional General Permit# ❑Compliance
Jurisdictional Determination Request ❑No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

- a
III E
August 12, 2022
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
U.S.Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Attention: Mr.James Lastinger
Reference: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request and Supporting Documentation
Deep River Kayak Launch
Moncure, Chatham County, North Carolina
S&ME Project 22050051
Dear Mr. Lastinger:
On behalf of our client, S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) hereby submits this Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination request. In
support of this request, please find enclosed the following:
Jurisdictional Determination Request Form
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form
Agent Authorization form completed by Property Owner
Figures—USDA- SCS Soil Survey Exhibit (Figure 1), USGS Topographic Exhibit (Figure 2), 2012 Color Aerial
Exhibit (Figure 3), Feature Exhibit (Figures 4), LIDAR Exhibit (Figure 5), National Wetlands Inventory Exhibit
(Figure 6), National Hydrography Dataset Exhibit (Figure 7), FEMA Flood Zone Exhibit (Figure 8)
USACE Routine Data Forms
NCDWR Stream Identification Forms
Site Photographs
Please let me know when you are available to review the jurisdictional features on-site. If you have questions or
need additional information, please contact me at 919.801.3798.
Sincerely,
S&ME, Inc.
Walter Cole, L.S.S., R.E.H.S. Ashley Bentz, P.W.S.
Senior Project Manager Project Scientist
S&ME, Inc.13201 Spring Forest Road I Raleigh, NC 27616 1 p 919.872.2660 1 www.smeinc.com

Jurisdictional Determination Request
FE11
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination(JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District(Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.LM.mil/Missions/Re ug latoiyPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE&CHARLOTTE REGULATORY WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
FIELD OFFICES US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers 2407 West Fifth Street
151 Patton Avenue,Room 208 Washington,North Carolina 27889
Asheville,North Carolina 28801-5006 General Number:[phone]
General Number:[phone] Fax Number:[phone]
Fax Number:[phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington Avenue
3331 Heritage Trade Drive,Suite 105 Wilmington,North Carolina 28403
Wake Forest,North Carolina 27587 General Number:910-251-4633
General Number:[phone] Fax Number:[phone]
Fax Number:[phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D—PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D -NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service,prior to starting work.
Version:May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 7140 Moncure Pittsboro Road
City, State: Moncure, NC
County: Chatham
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 370370011089
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Walter Cole of S&ME, Inc.
Mailing Address: 3201 Spring Forest Road
Raleigh, NC 27616
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
✓❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other,please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: State of North Carolina
Mailing Address: 1615 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1615
Telephone Number: 919-707-9302
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request(copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version:May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. 1,the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
See attached agent authorization
Print Name
Capacity: ✓❑ Owner ❑Authorized Agent'
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ 1 intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
✓❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols,skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties,please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version:May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION(JD)TYPE (Select One)
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination(PJD)provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States"or"navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed(33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary"in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination(AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States"or"navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner,permit applicant, or other"affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2)who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
'❑ Size of Property or Review Area 75.46 acres.
✓❑ The property boundary(or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version:May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 35.63097
Longitude: -79.11557
✓� A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than I Ix17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water,pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or"Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Wetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
❑ Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled"Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations"to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards.http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug latory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version:May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs,please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form'and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs,please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
❑ Vicinity Map
aAerial Photograph
❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan,previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
✓❑ Landscape Photos (if taken)
❑ NCWAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
❑ Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatoM/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App_A_Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
' Please see hqp://www.saw.usace.army.miIA4issions/Re ug latory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose:The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses:This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal,state,and local
government agencies,and the public,and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law.Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination(AJD),which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure:Submission of requested information is voluntary;however,if information is not provided,the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version:May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD)
FORM BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 8/12/2022
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Walter Cole of S&ME, Inc.
3201 Spring Forest Road, Raleigh, NC 27616
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Chatham City: Moncure
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.63097 Long.: -79.11557
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83
Name of nearest waterbody: Deep River
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALTHAT APPLY): Office (Desk)
❑ Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Latitude Longitude Estimated amount Type of aquatic Geographic authority
number (decimal (decimal of aquatic resource resource (i.e., to which the aquatic
degrees) degrees) in review area wetland vs. non- resource"may be"
(acreage and linear wetland waters) subject(i.e., Section
feet, if applicable) 404 or Section 10/404)
W1 35.64107 -79.11400 0.10 ac Wetland Section 404
W2 35.62968 -79.11573 4.74 ac Wetland Section 404
W3 35.63180 -79.11677 0.07 ac Wetland Section 404
W4 35.63258 -79.11632 0.28 ac Wetland Section 404
W5 35.62894 -79.11549 0.25 ac Wetland Section 404

W6 35.63347 -79.11434 0.11 ac Wetland Section 404
S1 35.63312 -79.11525 760 If Non-Wetland Section 404
S2 35.63096 -79.11765 1,445 If Non-Wetland Section 404
S3 35.62845 -79.11711 626 If Non-Wetland Section 404
S4 35.62888 -79.11650 600 If Non-Wetland Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources
in the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her
option to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's
acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing
a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of
Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic
resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or
judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any
Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD,
the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit
denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an
administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination
whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area,
the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This PJD finds that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic
features in the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on
the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked items should
be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
® U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
® USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: USGS National Topo Map Viewer.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:USDA-N RCS 2006 published
Soil Survey of Chatham County, North Carolina.
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS National Wetlands Inventory rest service.
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): 2022 NC One Map aerial orthoimagery.
or Other (Name & Date): Site photographs taken March 2022.
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the
Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
An
8/12/2022
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED) (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not
respond within the established time frame,the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up
is necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Proposal for Jurisdictional Delineation &Geotechnical Exploration Services
Deep River Kayak launch
. .:: Ij Moncure, Chatham County, North Carolina
S&ME Proposal No, 22050051
AGENT AUTHORIZATION AND RIGHT OF ENTRY FORM
Date: February 23,2022
Project Information
S&ME Project Name: Deep River Kayak Launch Site
Type of Project: Recreational
Location: Moncure Pittsboro Road, Moncure,Chatham County, North Carolina
Property Owner/Representative Information
Business Name: State of North Carolina, Department of Natural&Cultural Resources
Mailing Address: 1615 Mail Service Center
City,State,Zip Code: Raleigh, NC 27699-1615
Telephone No. 919-707-9302 =
Contact: Justin Williamson
Agent Information
Business Name: S&ME, inc.
Street Address: 3201 Spring Forest Road _
City,State,Zip Code: Raleigh, NC 27616
Telephone No. 919-872-2660
Contact: Mr.Walter Cole
Authorization; J ��•z%� on behalf of
! onta
, ct Signature)
Z�LC P 7_�'u:.�Anil.L�?`r(s•r ram. fxy
(Name of Landowner or Representative)
a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,hereby authorize S&ME to
act as agent with the USCAE in connection with the above-mentioned project.By signing above,I also
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District,U.S.Army Corps of Engineers(Corps)to enter upon f
the property herein described for the purposes of conducting on-site investigations,if necessary,and
issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of e
the River and Harbors Act of 1889.1,the above signed,am either a duly authorized owner of record of the
property identified herein,or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property. :
z

SOIL MAP UNIT: A ' •
ChA:Chewacla and Wehadkee soils,0 to 2 percent slopes,frequently flooded
CmB:Cid-Lignum complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes MdC
GaB:Georgeville silt loam,2 to 6 percent slopes CkC
MdC: Mayodan fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
MgD: Mayodan gravelly sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes
NaB: Nanford-Badin complex,2 to 6 percent slopes
NaC: Nanford-Badin complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes •
NaD: Nanford-Badin complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes MgD
1
W:Water =
- .'. MdC
BaE NaD CkC
Cm BaE i MdC
NaD •
2 \
_ G aR •,
• C cD
NaB 1
OdC
NaD NaC MdB
o NaD �90 Q •
s MdC
w NaC
Z �
0
MgD
v
c
BaE ;• MgD W BaE
3 - = NaC
MgD
Y WE MdC GkD CkC
T
Y
•
K
0
PeB UdC
a
BaE UK
MgD W CnA
ti
0
( BaE
N
R v �tl
O -
0 1,-00 2,000
v
REIET)
5
w REFERENCE: RvA•
GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE USDA-NRCS 2006 CHATHAM COUNTY SOIL
L
a SURVEY MERRY OAKS SHEET 11 OF 18. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES
m ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED.THEY ARE NOT BASED
ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION,UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. O Survey Limit
0 671
SCALE: FIGURE NO.
USDA-NRCS SOIL SURVEY EXHIBIT 1 " = 1,000 '
DATE:
DEEP RIVER KAYAK LAUNCH 8-4-22 1
MONCURE PITTSBORO ROAD PROJECT NUMBER
MONCURE, CHATHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 22050051

z
�W
W
f�
OZC&I
W
y 0
z
P. x
% 0
0
0
0
v
T
9
0
REU.WING LN
vi
vi
w
z
0
0
Y
K
Q
Q
S
U ti
0
0
0
N
N
N
N
O
0 1,000 2,000
v
(FEET)
S _
w REFERENCE:
GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE ESRI ONLINE USGS NATIONAL TOPOGRAPHIC
L
d BASEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS
DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED.THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, Deep River
3 UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. O Survey Limit
m
SCALE: FIGURE NO.
USGS TOPOGRPAHIC EXHIBIT 1 " = 1,000 '
DATE: r�
DEEP RIVER KAYAK LAUNCH 8-4-22 2
MONCURE PITTSBORO ROAD PROJECT NUMBER
MONCURE, CHATHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 22050051

/ W �
00
C
CCC � � lr� 0
`� `Z Q
seo�o�o
LU
o
GA-N�
�tE
\,JJ
Oa �
a
1
a
z
a
a 1
0
0 �`��OI\ 1,400
w REFERENCE: Survey Limit
GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE NCONEMAP.COM LATEST_ORTHOIMAGERY
a BASEMAP LAYER. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE Chatham County Parcels
m LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED.THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY Contour at 4 feet
INFORMATION,UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
0
SCALE: FIGURE NO.
COLOR AERIAL AND TOPOGRAPHIC EXHIBIT 1 " = 700 '
DATE:
I I DEEP RIVER KAYAK LAUNCH 8-4-22 3
MONCURE PITTSBORO ROAD PROJECT NUMBER
MONCURE, CHATHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 22050051

Potentially Jurisdictional Wetland Water of the US _
Wetland Feature W2;4.74 ac
' Represented by Flags W2.1-W2.82 v Y % III
, *� "' Potentially Jurisdictional Non-Wetland Water of the US
w ; �-. � Stream Feature S4;600 If
x Represented by Flags 54.1 54.25
Potentially Jurisdictional Wetland Water of the US
Wetland Feature W5;0.25 ac
` `-`:• i �ir Represented by Flags WA1 1-WA.12
� , = Q'
*�' - �►�.
of
DP1 Potentially Jurisdictional Wetland Water of the US .. �- Q
V
o Wetland Feature W6;0.11 ac
v pp2 Represented by Flags WA2.1 WA2.20 ty, (~ V Z O
� y MR a s-� •""l.o, ta.-.�. 1s..l. -� 'ti' � � �
71
Q CJ
w Potentially Jurisdictional Wetland Water of the US ++i p SF1 . , �^ w• ;� � DP3 W Q F
N ; Wetland Feature W1;0.10 ac V
5 Represented by Flags W1.1-W1.11 _ Potentially Jurisdictional Non-Wetland Water of the US �' u w w
Stream Feature S1;760 If (~ �— _
z } Represented b Flags S1.1-S1.40 V
r P Y 9 W w Z Q
- = w o U
' _ L
0
'y r Potentially Jurisdictional Wetland Water of the US
' 1
Wetland Feature W4;0.28 ac V
o I = h . r4 Represented by Flags W4.1-W4.9 z
r SF2
oz
Potentially Jurisdictional Wetland Water of the US Ag ,
Y - Wetland Feature W3;0.07 ac ;
> Represented by Flags W3.1-W3.22 *`
y _ v.� '+0�,; i FYI - _ tllO '•
Potentially Jurisdictional Non-Wetland Water of the US
�7� -- ` '� �:-' Potential) Jurisdictional Non-Wetland Water of t
a +a_ ��,• r`� �'_•:x.,. t '"� Stream Feature S2; 1,445 If y he US y,
Stream Feature S3;626 If
� � x 4 Represented by Flags S2.1-S2.30
Represented by Flags S3.1-S3.8 SCALE:
w 1 ' = 400
DATE:
8-9-22
'2 PROJECT NUMBER
s NCDWR Stream Form Location
Z 22050051
• USACE Data Form Location
FIGURE NO.
a REFERENCE: Stream
GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE 2021 NCONEMAP AERIAL ORTHOIMAGERY 0 400 800 Wetland
LAYER. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS
DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED.THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, (FEET) Survey Limit

_ N
W �
m �
2
22
_ REDW\NG�N
c
A
z
0
0
a
Y
2'
Q
Q Survey Limit
o Chatham County Parcels
Elevation
High : 461.863
N Low : 85.2022
0 700 1,40o
r
(FEET) i Hillshade
E :REFERENCE: High 254� ,�' g
GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE NCONEMAP.COM LATEST_ORTHOIMAGERY I
a BASEMAP LAYER. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE Low : 0
m LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED.THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY
INFORMATION,UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
0
SCALE: FIGURE NO.
LIDAR EXHIBIT 1 " = 700 '
DATE:
I I DEEP RIVER KAYAK LAUNCH 8-4-22 5
MONCURE PITTSBORO ROAD PROJECT NUMBER
MONCURE, CHATHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 22050051

ES PO�N��
W
..f.
Uj
02C`G �
F-
0
0
REDWING LN
o <
Q
E
Z
5
Z
z J
0
0
a
m
Y _
Q Survey Limit
0
Wetlands
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
o i Estuarine and Marine Wetland
0
Freshwater Emergent Wetland
0
7Ja•'` �. ;' Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
0 1,000 00.'i Freshwater Pond
v
(FEET) 0 Lake
5
w REFERENCE:
GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE NCONEMAP.COM LATEST_ORTHOIMAGERY Other
L
a BASEMAP LAYER. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE
m LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED.THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY Riverine
INFORMATION,UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
0
SCALE: FIGURE NO.
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY EXHIBIT 1 " = 1,000 '
DATE:
I I DEEP RIVER KAYAK LAUNCH 1-13-22 6
MONCURE PITTSBORO ROAD PROJECT NUMBER
MONCURE, CHATHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA I TBD

`ESTERS - - ���N r✓�
A �W
7O 0
F•-
y o
oc
�o 0
0
0
s
s
a REDWING LN
Q <
So
_ . . .
0
z
w
z
0
0
0
a
T
Y
K Jl`
a
of
QSurvey Limit
NHDWaterbody
o -
N FType
o �,000 , !' z,000: LakePond
(FEET) NHDFlowline
s fir•, ::,� . ..},< ! .�i.-,
E REFERENCE: '' �' �:: FType
GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE NCONEMAP.COM LATEST_ORTHOIMAGERY
a BASEMAP LAYER. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE #- ArtificialPath
m LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED.THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY Stream River
INFORMATION,UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
0
SCALE: FIGURE NO.
NATIONAL HYDROGRAPHY EXHIBIT 1 " = 1,000 '
DATE:
III S DEEP RIVER KAYAK LAUNCH 8-4-22 7
MONCURE PITTSBORO ROAD PROJECT NUMBER
MONCURE, CHATHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 22050051

!•ESTERS _ �`�N L�
4j,
el
y o
�a o
0
0
s
o -
REDWING LN .
OR
a
w
z
0
0
o
o
T
Y
W
a _ _
m
m
�� Zon AE
o Survey Limit
Flood Hazard Zones
Zone Type
1%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
�+ Regulatory Floodway
0 1,000 2,000 �. Special Floodway
(FEET) 0 Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard
z REFERENCE: 0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE NCONEMAP.COM LATEST_ORTHOIMAGERY € Future Conditions 1%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
L
a BASEMAP LAYER. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE Area with Reduced Risk Due to Levee
m LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED.THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY
INFORMATION,UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. Area with Risk Due to Levee
0
SCALE: FIGURE NO.
FEMA FLOODPLAIN EXHIBIT 1 " = 1,000 '
DATE:I I DEEP RIVER KAYAK LAUNCH 8-4-22 Q
MONCURE PITTSBORO ROAD PROJECT NUMBER
MONCURE, CHATHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 22050051

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-0024,Exp:1113012024
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.
See ERDC/EL TR-12-9; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Deep River Kayak Launch City/County: Moncure/Chatham Sampling Date: 3/15/22
Applicant/Owner: NCDCR State: NC Sampling Point: DP1
Investigator(s): W. Cole Section,Township, Range:
Landform (hillside,terrace,etc.): landscape depression Local relief(concave,convex, none): concave Slope(%): 2-5
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.64107 Long:-79.11400 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Cid-Lignum complex,2-6%slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Site has recently been logged
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
X Surface Water(All) _True Aquatic Plants(1314) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
—High Water Table(A2) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) —Drainage Patterns(B10)
_Saturation(A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(1316)
—Water Marks(131) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(62) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(133) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
X Algal Mat or Crust(134) —Other(Explain in Remarks) —Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(135) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
X Water-Stained Leaves(139) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(1313) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0.5
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP1
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 50*50 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1 Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 5 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 50*50 ) FACW species x 2=
1. Liquidambar styraciflua 15 Yes FAC FAC species x 3=
2. Acer rubrum 15 Yes FAC FACU species x 4=
3. UPL species x 5=
4. Column Totals: (A) (B)
5. Prevalence Index =B/A=
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
30 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 15 20%of total cover: 6 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10*10 ) -Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Juncus effusus 20 Yes FACW 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Ludwigia alternifolia 10 Yes FACW present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Carex lurida 10 Yes OBL Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Andropogon virginicus 5 No FACU Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines, 3 in.(7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH), regardless of
6 height.
7. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines, less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9 (1 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
45 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 23 20%of total cover: 9 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10*10 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 2/1 100 Loamy/Clayey
2-5 10YR 6/3 80 5YR 6/8 10 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
10YR 6/1 10 D M
5-18 10YR 7/1 80 10YR 6/3 10 C PL Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
7.5YR 6/8 10 C PL Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(Al) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147, 148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
—Black Histic(A3) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) X Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
—Stratified Layers(A5) —Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Red Parent Material(F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) —Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) X Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, —Other(Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix(S6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-0024,Exp:1113012024
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.
See ERDC/EL TR-12-9; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Deep River Kayak Launch City/County: Moncure/Chatham Sampling Date: 3/15/22
Applicant/Owner: NCDCR State: Sampling Point: DP2
Investigator(s): W. Cole Section,Township, Range:
Landform (hillside,terrace,etc.): hillslope Local relief(concave,convex, none): none Slope(%): 2-5
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.64118 Long:-79.11416 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Nanford-Badin complex,6-10%slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Site has been recently logged
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
_Surface Water(All) _True Aquatic Plants(1314) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
—High Water Table(A2) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) —Drainage Patterns(B10)
_Saturation(A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(1316)
—Water Marks(131) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(62) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(133) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust(134) —Other(Explain in Remarks) —Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(135) —Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves(139) Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(1313) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP2
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 50*50 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1 Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 3 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 75.0% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 50*50 ) FACW species x 2=
1. Liquidambar styraciflua 15 Yes FAC FAC species x 3=
2. Acer rubrum 15 Yes FAC FACU species x 4=
3. Pinus echinata 10 No UPL UPL species x 5=
4. Pinus taeda 10 No FAC Column Totals: (A) (B)
5. Ilex opaca 5 No FACU Prevalence Index =B/A=
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
55 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 28 20%of total cover: 11 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10*10 ) -Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines, 3 in.(7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH), regardless of
6 height.
7. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines, less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9 (1 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10*10 )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 5 Yes FAC
2. Lonicera japonica 5 Yes FACU
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
10 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover: 2 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/2 100 Loamy/Clayey
4-18 10YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(Al) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147, 148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
—Black Histic(A3) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
—Stratified Layers(A5) _Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Red Parent Material(F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) —Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) _Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, —Other(Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix(S6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-0024,Exp:1113012024
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.
See ERDC/EL TR-12-9; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Deep River Kayak Launch City/County: Moncure/Chatham Sampling Date: 3/15/2022
Applicant/Owner: NCDCR State: NC Sampling Point: DP3
Investigator(s): W. Cole Section,Township, Range:
Landform (hillside,terrace,etc.): floodplain Local relief(concave,convex, none): concave Slope(%): 2-5
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.62971 Long:-79.11527 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla and Wehadkee soils,0-2%slopes,frequently flooded NWI classification: PFO1Ch/PSS1Fh
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
X Surface Water(All) _True Aquatic Plants(1314) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
X High Water Table(A2) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) X Drainage Patterns(1310)
X Saturation(A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(1316)
—Water Marks(131) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(62) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(133) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust(134) —Other(Explain in Remarks) —Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(135) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
X Water-Stained Leaves(139) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(1313) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 3
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP3
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 50*50 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Acer rubrum 30 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 20 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 6 (A)
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 20 Yes FACW Total Number of Dominant
4. Platanus occidentalis 15 No FACW Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5. Ulmus americana 10 No FACW Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 85.7% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
95 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 48 20%of total cover: 19 OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 50*50 ) FACW species x 2=
1. Lindera benzoin 15 Yes FAC FAC species x 3=
2. Ilex opaca 10 Yes FACU FACU species x 4=
3. Arundinaria gigantea 5 No FACW UPL species x 5=
4. Column Totals: (A) (B)
5. Prevalence Index =B/A=
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
30 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 15 20%of total cover: 6 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10*10 ) -Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Carex lurida 20 Yes OBL 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Juncus effusus 10 Yes FACW present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines, 3 in.(7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH), regardless of
6 height.
7. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines, less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9 (1 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 15 20%of total cover: 6 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10*10 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-5 7.5YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
5-12 10YR 5/1 80 10YR 4/4 15 C PL Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
7.5YR 5/6 5 C PL Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(Al) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147, 148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
—Black Histic(A3) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
—Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Red Parent Material(F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) —Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) _Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, —Other(Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix(S6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-0024,Exp:1113012024
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.
See ERDC/EL TR-12-9; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Deep River Kayak Launch City/County: Moncure/Chatham Sampling Date: 3/15/22
Applicant/Owner: NCDCR State: NC Sampling Point: DP4
Investigator(s): W. Cole Section,Township, Range:
Landform (hillside,terrace,etc.): hillslope Local relief(concave,convex, none): none Slope(%): 5%
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.62988 Long:-79.11497 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Mayodan fine sandy loam,6-10%slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
_Surface Water(All) _True Aquatic Plants(1314) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
—High Water Table(A2) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) —Drainage Patterns(B10)
_Saturation(A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(1316)
—Water Marks(131) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(62) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(133) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust(134) —Other(Explain in Remarks) —Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(135) —Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves(139) Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(1313) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP4
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 50*50 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Fagus grandifolia 20 Yes FACU Number of Dominant Species
2. Acer rubrum 20 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 2 (A)
3. Carya glabra 10 No FACU Total Number of Dominant
4. Liquidambar styraciflua 10 No FAC Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 28.6% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
60 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 30 20%of total cover: 12 OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 50*50 ) FACW species x 2=
1. Ilex opaca 20 Yes FACU FAC species x 3=
2. Cornus florida 10 Yes FACU FACU species x 4=
3. UPL species x 5=
4. Column Totals: (A) (B)
5. Prevalence Index =B/A=
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
30 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 15 20%of total cover: 6 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10*10 ) -Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Polystichum acrostichoides 5 Yes FACU 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines, 3 in.(7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH), regardless of
6 height.
7. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines, less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9 (1 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
5 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 3 20%of total cover: 1 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10*10 )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 5 Yes FAC
2. Lonicera japonica 5 Yes FACU
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
10 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover: 2 Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 6/3 100 Loamy/Clayey
6-18 5YR 5/8 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(Al) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147, 148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
—Black Histic(A3) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
—Stratified Layers(A5) _Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Red Parent Material(F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) —Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) _Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, —Other(Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix(S6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

NC Division of Water Quality-Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: March 11 , 2022 Project/Site:Deep River Kayak Launch Latitude:35.6331 1
Evaluator:W. Cole County:Chatham Longitude:-79.1 1 525
Total Points: Stream Determination (circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent 28.5 SF1 @ Flag S1.10
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_30" Intermittent e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 15 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
,a,Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 ® 2 © 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 • 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 ® 1 ® 2 © 3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 ® 2 © 3
5.Active/relict floodplain 0 (F) 1 2 0 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 0 1 2 . 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 • 1 2 0 3
8. Headcuts 0 • 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 ® 0.5® 1 (F) 1.5®
10. Natural valley 0 0 1 0. 1 . 1.5®
11. Second or greater order channel No=0 • Yes=3
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0® 1 ® 2 ® 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 • 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.50 1 (F) 0.5® 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 ® 0.5 • 1 ® 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 e_1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0® Yes=3 0
C. Biology (Subtotal = 5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 • 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 30, 20 in 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 • in 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 0 • 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 • 0.50 10 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 • 0.5 10 1.5
24.Amphibians 00 0.5® 1® 1.5
25.Algae 0 • 0.50 1 10 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed ® FACW=0.7500BL= 1.500ther=0(E)
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality-Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: March 11 , 2022 Project/Site:Deep River Kayak Launch Latitude:35.631 05
Evaluator:W. Cole County:Chatham Longitude:-79.1 1 755
Total Points: Stream Determination (circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent 34.5 SF2 @ Flag S2.10
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_30" Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 19 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
,a,Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 ® 2 ® 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 • 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 ® 1 ® 2 ® 3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 ® 2 ® 3
5.Active/relict floodplain 0 ® 1 • 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 0 1 2 33
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 • 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 • 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 ® 0.5© 1 e) 1.5®
10. Natural valley 0 0 1 0. 1 • 1 1.5®
11. Second or greater order channel No=00 Yes=3 •
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9 )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0® 1 ® 2 ® 3 E)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 • 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1. • 1 ® 0.5® 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 ® 0.5 1 (D 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 • 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0® Yes=3 0
C. Biology (Subtotal = 6.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 • 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 • 20 in 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 • in 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 0 • 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 • 0.50 10 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 • 0.5 10 1.5
24.Amphibians 00 0.5® 1® 1.5
25.Algae 00 0.5 • 10 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed ® FACW=0.7500BL= 1.500ther=0(E)
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality-Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: March 11 , 2022 Project/Site:Deep River Kayak Launch Latitude:35.62864
Evaluator:W. Cole County:Chatham Longitude:-79.1 1 707
Total Points: Stream Determination (circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent 38.5 SF3 @ Flag S3.3
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_30" Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 19.5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
,a,Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 ® 2 ® 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 • 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 ® 1 ® 2 3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 ® 2 ® 3
5.Active/relict floodplain 0 ® 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 • 1 2 0 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 • 3
8. Headcuts 0 • 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 ® 0.5© 1 e) 1.5®
10. Natural valley 00 0. 1 0 1 1.5(•
11. Second or greater order channel No=00 Yes=3 •
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0® 10 2 ® 3 E)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 • 10 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1. • 1 ® 0.5® 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 ® 0.5 1 (D 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 e_1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0® Yes=3 0
C. Biology (Subtotal = 9.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 • 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 • 20 in 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 00 1 • 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 0 • 1 2 3
22. Fish on 0.50 1 • 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 • 0.5 10 1.5
24.Amphibians 00 0.5® 1(F) 1.5
25.Algae 00 0.5 • 10 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed ® FACW=0.7500BL= 1.500ther=0(E)
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality-Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: March 14, 2022 Project/Site:Deep River Kayak Launch Latitude:35.62888
Evaluator:W. Cole County:Chatham Longitude:-79.1 1 648
Total Points: Stream Determination (circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent 32 SF4 @ Flag S4.18
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_30" Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 16 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
,a,Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 ® 2 ® 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 • 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 ® 1 Q 2 ® 3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 (D 2 ® 3
5.Active/relict floodplain 0 ® 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 0 1 • 2 0 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 • 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 • 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 ® 0.5e) 1 ® 1.5®
10. Natural valley 00 0. 1 0 1.5(•
11. Second or greater order channel No=00 Yes=3 •
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9 )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0® 1 ® 2 ® 3 E)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 • 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1. • 1 ® 0.5® 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 ® 0.5 1 (D 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 • 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0® Yes=3 0
C. Biology (Subtotal = 7 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 • 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 • 20 in 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 • in 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 0 • 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 • 0.50 10 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 • 0.5 10 1.5
24.Amphibians 00 0.5(F) 1® 1.5
25.Algae 00 0.5 • 10 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed ® FACW=0.7500BL= 1.500ther=0(E)
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
41